Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Black Belt Training Booklet 2
Black Belt Training Booklet 2
Development program
Week 3 booklet for trainees
Devenir Green Belt
Executive
Research/ Sales /
Operations HR Finance /
developmen marketing admin
t
Companies are normally structured hierarchically, with each area having its
own functional responsibilities.
Delivered
service
(Q, C, D)
Operations /
Flow Chart Process Sheet
SUMMARY GRAPH
COMMENTS
The parts is stored for 86.4% of the throughput time - this is the delay at the stores both incoming and outgoing.
In the process the part is delayed for 9.6% of the time due to working in batches of 30
The part is transported for 1300 metres around the plant.
Hold
interview
Process Make
Yes Want
to offer
offer
Flow Offer/decline
?
made No
Decline
HR Department Production
Interview Requested
1. Create the ‘swim
Require lanes’ for the involved
“preinterview”
chat ? functional areas
2. Draw a ‘start’ box at
the top
3. Agree the first
activity.
4. Draw an ‘end’
terminator box at the
bottom.
Offer/decline
made
HR Department Production
Interview Requested
Require
No
“preinterview”
chat ? Continue adding
Yes process steps
Arrange
Hold «pre-
« pre-interviews»
interview» cat
chat
Yes
Make Want
offer to offer ?
Offer/decline
made No
Decline
SUMMARY GRAPH
COMMENTS
The parts is stored for 86.4% of the throughput time - this is the delay at the stores both incoming and outgoing.
In the process the part is delayed for 9.6% of the time due to working in batches of 30
The part is transported for 1300 metres around the plant.
11 Mill 900
Totals for time and
12 Wait for batch of 30 27000 distance
Graph of activity 13
14
Transport to paint
Paint operation
250
1200
50
17
Transport to Stores
604800
250
Totals for each
added and waste Total Time 47700 6900 135000 1209600 1399200 1300 activity type
Grand Total Time 1399200
SUMMARY GRAPH
0.5%
Delay
Storage
Percentage of each
Transport
The parts is stored for 86.4% of the throughput time - this is the delay at the stores both incoming and outgoing.
focus areas of In the process the part is delayed for 9.6% of the time due to working in batches of 30
The part is transported for 1300 metres around the plant.
waste
Focus should be kept on the product / document / service flow and not the
people
Watch just one part! When the part is waiting and not being worked on, it is a
delay
If you can’t get a unique time measurement for an activity use min & max time
Operation mode
• Groups of 3-4
• Make the sheet of the operations of the
process 'make the morning coffee.
• Review = 5’ per group
Utensils / Ingredients
You need to know the “real As Is” to guide your data collection and
subsequent analysis
Do not leap to solutions too quickly in your process mapping. You may
begin to ‘fix’ the wrong things
Flow Diagrams
understand the basics of a process.
Show inputs & outputs (required information to create value)
Allow visibility of customers and suppliers
Flow Charts
Detailed levels to communicate procedures and show tasks
Easily understood at all levels of the organisation
Mapping sheets
Well-adapted for industrial process
Enable to decompose into standard task
Show order and hierarchy from task to task
Allow analyse of time cycles with a “Lean” light
Include
Enough details to understand where problems occur
But not too much detail to be able to see problems clearly.
Operating mode
• 2 groups read the available instructions
• and map out the processes
• Time = 15' by group
This document and the information it contains belong to
Safran. They must not be copied or communicated to any
Black Belt development program - Week 3
other person without prior written authorisation from Safran. 25
BUILD A TARGET
Site 1 30 8 8 weeks
Site 2 15 6 6 weeks
- 50%
Site 3 18 10 5 weeks
Target 7 3 3 weeks
Use the process map to identify value added activities and metrics
Eliminate or reduce dramatically any activity that does not add value. This
is the “war” on wastes
Avoid over-production, Eliminate waiting time, balance the work stations and
level the demand, eradicate multiple transportation, no pointless operation,
reduce WIP & movements (persons or files), Rework requires to do the same
things twice!
xx x x
Low value added process
VA VA
Product line
This document and the information it contains belong to
Safran. They must not be copied or communicated to any
Black Belt development program - Week 3
other person without prior written authorisation from Safran. 30
ELABORATE SOLUTIONS
Manufacturing process
Value added is defined by the customer. We cannot add value to the product
more than the specification
Office / Engineering
You can always create some added value when customer demand is not
really explicit
If you already satisfy customer basic requirements, how can you delight him
with a new service?
Ex: offer helpdesk service 24/7, discounts on products, do better and quicker, …
Standard
Specific cases
? doesn’t affect
standard flow
Specific
We recommend that you schedule a daily review at then end of each day
in order to
Reorient the project if necessary
Prepare the sponsor and the Steering Committee to proposed
developments.
Operation Mode
• 2 groups
• Read the instructions available and look for
solutions to your main service problems
• Time = 15’ per group
CONCLUSION
Process Steps
Start with a macro process
Detail what seems important to you
Add actual data to reinforce your point of
view
Operation Mode
• Groups of 3-4
• Analyze the results and indicate your own
conclusions
• Time = 5’ per group
CASE STUDY: PERCENTAGE OF AIRCRAFT WHICH TOOK OFF WITH MORE
THAN 15 MINUTES LATE - SAMPLES OF 30 DEPARTURES
50 45
45
40
40
35 50 43
35
43 40 40
30
30
27 27 30
0 0
Air France Aeromexico American Lufthansa Air France Aeromexico American Lufthansa
40
Les 30 échantillons ont été tirés
30
parmi 4 groupes de 3000 données
20
33 33 33 33 RIGOUREUSEMENT identiques dans
10 lesquels 33% des vols étaient en
retard / annulés
0
Air France Aeromexico American Lufthansa
Lessons apprises?
A PERSON
THIS CLASS
Variable
Characteristic of the individuals/items.
Ex: Salaries of employees, diameter of a part, age of a model
Item/Individual
A single observation of the population under study.
Ex: An employee, a part, a model.
Sample
A collection of observations / individuals
Ex: 100 employees, 1000 parts models, 10 models.
Population
The totality of items/individuals under consideration and from which a sample
has been taken.
Ex: All employees, all parts built, all models sold.
Statistics (or sample statistics) are terms used to describe the key
characteristics of a sample.
We usually measure Sample Statistics in order to learn something about Population Parameters.
Inferential Statistics is the field of statistics that draws conclusions about a population based upon our
analysis of the sample data.
Rule : The letter n is used to describe the number of values in a sample (the sample size).
The symbol x (xbar) and the letter s represent respectively the mean and the standard
deviation of the sample.
n, x , s
Population
N, m, s
Sample
Average: m
Standard dev.: s
Size: N
SAMPLE
Average: X
Standard dev.: s
Size: n
Benefits
Saves time & money
Allows for more meaningful data
Simplifies measurement over time
Drawbacks
Accept a degree of uncertainty as the cost of not measuring the whole
population
Measurement
results J Customer without
written complaint
L Letter of complaint sent
106
107
106.7
106.8
106.75 Traffic lights
106.753
Errors in an invoice?
Oven temperature
# of employees absent
# of IT tickets
On time delivery
Why is it important ?
Discrete data is generally faster and easier to capture
If you have a choice and you can afford the time and resources, you will
want to collect continuous data whenever possible e.g.: lateness of a
delivery
if you measure how late the delivery is, this is continuous data
if you only measure the deliveries that exceeded the due date, this is discrete data
Average X [m ]
Standard dev. S [s ]
Proportion p̂ [p]
SE mean = s n
Confidence interval on the mean
SE mean
X
For a given S, the higher the
number of data is, the lower
the error on the mean will X tn 1;(1 ) / 2 .( s n) X t n 1;(1 ) / 2 .( s n)
be
The confidence interval on the
mean calculation decreases as n
Low n = Large n = increases and s decreases
n
big error small error
Other exercise:
BB_Exercises_Eng.xls / Baguettes
M ean 317,92
S tDev 10,54
V ariance 111,13
S kew ness 0,153662
Kurtosis -0,132055
N 30
M inimum 297,92
1st Q uartile 308,41
M edian
3rd Q uartile
318,07
325,63
CI on mean
300 310 320 330 340
M aximum 343,97
95% C onfidence Interv al for M ean
313,98 321,85
95% C onfidence Interv al for M edian CI on median
313,67 322,49
95% C onfidence Interv al for S tDev
95% Confidence Intervals
8,40 14,17
Mean
CI on standard
Median
Operational Mode
• Groups of 2-3
• Use Minitab to calculate the
confidence intervals of the
percentages given by John
• Review = 15’ each
4 CASE STUDY: PERCENTAGE OF AIRCRAFT WHICH TOOK OFF MORE
THAN 15 MINUTES LATE - SAMPLES OF 30 DEPARTURES
50
Air Aero Ameri- Lufthan-
45 France Mexico can sa
40
# late 13 8 8 15
35
30
n 30 30 30 30
25 50
43
20
15
% of late 43% 27% 27% 50%
27 27
10
5 Terminal l:
interv. … … … …
0
Air France Aeromexico American Lufthansa
conf
Each month, the Purchasing Department emits, on average, 5000 orders. Some vendors
highlight the too many errors in order to justify their delays in delivery. I want to estimate
the percentage of incorrect orders.
Out of 10 orders, 2 of them have at least one error. What is the actual percentage of
erroneous orders?
Out of 100 orders, 20 of them have at least one error. What is the actual percentage of
erroneous orders?
Out of 1000 orders, 200 of them have at least one error. What is the actual percentage of
erroneous orders?
2
s 2
2
n 2 n p(1 p)
d d
n = sample Size
p = proportion
s = standard deviation
d = precision
95% Confident
How confident do you want to be ( the formulas on the previous page give
you the 95% confident intervals.)
n
nadjusted
n
1
N
Formulas only valid when sampling from a population
Example
We have a box with coloured beads, and we are interested to know the
proportion of white beads in this box.
Questions ?
Which one is more accurate: Henri (8%) or John (20% of white beads) ?
Can sample size formula help us to draw better conclusions?
If n = 50 and p = 50 % d = 14 %
The confidence interval on the proportion is + or - 14%
If n = 100 and p = 50 % d = 10 %
The confidence interval on the proportion is + or - 14%
Now, we sample the 100 beads and found 13 white
dmax is 10% (cf previous page)
But we have a better estimate for p (13%) using the formula with the observed value
for p
p(1 p) 0,13(1 0,13) 0,113
d2 2 2 0,067 7%
n 100 100
So we can say that we are 95% sure the real proportion of white beads is between
6% and 20%.
Case 1 : Description
You want to know the average length for the last production of wiper blades.
This last production run contained 3500 units.
The standard deviation in the length is about 13 mm.
Question ?
How many units should be sampled?
This is not a destructive test, the only cost involved is the extra operator.
Case 2 - Description
You want to know the proportion of wiper blades that will fail the end
inspection.
You guess about 2% of the wiper blades will fail this test.
There is an average of 3500 units produced per shift.
Question ?
How many units should be sampled?
What is the difference if you want to sample some water in a standing pond & a running
stream ?
Population:
Static situation: you can make a photograph
The boundaries are defined
Sampling done to either quantify a characteristic
or to compare two (or more) groups
e.g.: Is there a change in the active ingredients
in a drug after 1 year? Record the age of all goods in stock.
Process:
There is a time element
Important to show the dynamics
Characteristics might change from one moment
to the other
Sampling done to understand the process and track improvements
E.g.: record call volume every 15 min for a help desk.
Random sampling
all elements have an equal chance of being selected
Systematic sampling
shows time element in a process
Judgment sampling
based on prior knowledge of the population
Description
Your company wants to know invoice payment lead time
Your database contains 1 345 customers
You cannot measure lead time for all your customers. You need to choose a
set of 200.
P P P
I
PPP P P P
I I I
P P P P P P P
I I
P P P P P P
I
P P
When random sampling is used, values of X that are often observed, will
occur more in the sampling.
The low and high values (that are rather rare) tend not to show up in the
sample.
The preferred sampling method for regression analysis (or scatter plots)
Ensures that you have low values and high values of X
(= wide range) so that you can investigate relations
45
What tools can I use to
40 know if:
35
43
50
American and Aero
30 Mexico are actually more
0
27 27 punctual thanLufthansa
Air France Aero Mexico American Lufthansa
and Air France ?
20 12 12 30
4 27 27
0 0 0
• ANOVA deviation
• Variance test
Graphics
Continuous
Statistics Statistics
• Correlation Test • Logic regression
• Regression Analysis
This document and the information it contains belong to
Safran. They must not be copied or communicated to any
Black Belt development program - Week 3
other person without prior written authorisation from Safran. 91
DEMONSTRATE AN IMPROVEMENT
41
38 38
36 35
33 33
31
29
22
Before
After
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct
Test to be used
• 2-Sample t test (before / after)
• Test for equal variances / standard deviation
Risks decision
Case Study
Y continuous
• Influence on the average
• Influence on variability
• Test for 2 and + standard deviation / variance
Y discrete
• Influence on the proportions
• Khi² Test
To better understand the risk in Hypothesis Testing, let’s look to a trial where a person is
judged for a murder. In this case, the hypothesis to be tested are :
H0 : Defendant is Innocent vs H1 : Defendant is Guilty
What ever the jury’s conclusion, there is a risk to make the wrong decision…
Concluding « H0 » does not mean that the defendant is for sure innocent.
Concluding « H1 » does not prove that he is guilty…
The verdict has a probability of error and we can define 2 types of error :
1st type of error : the jury conclude “he is guilty” but in fact “he is innocent”.
2nd type of error : the jury conclude “he is innocent” but in fact “he is guilty”.
CORRECTNESS OF HYPOTHESIS
Hypothesis Hypothesis
is true is false
b Risk
DECISION ON
HYPOTHESIS
Accept Correct
Error of the
Hypothesis Judgment
Second kind
Risk
Reject Correct
Error of the
Hypothesis Judgment
first kind
27
0 How:
American Lufthansa
• Groups of 2
• Read the proposals and connect
those who seem match
• Review: 10 minutes
Exercise
Hypothesis H0:
"No difference between companies.
1- b
Y of your project
Continuous Discrete / Attributes
Graphic = Box plot Graphics
Discrete /Attributes
• Pareto Proportions
50
50 100 50
43
40 80 45
40
30 60
35 50
20 40 43
12 12 30
10 20
X (Factors / Causes to test)
4
27 27
0 0 0
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct
Does my cause • Suppliers 2 (X) vs diameter (Y) No influence of X on the The X is important at least 1
X (discrete) • 2 Guest (X) vs Sustainability parts variability of Y standard X levels has a different
have an impact (Y) variability in the time of deviation variability of others
on the variability • 3 machines (X) vs Dimension (Y) deliveries is identical test (or test
of the Y • 5 days of the week (X) vs parts between Monday, of variance)
delivery time Tuesday,...
X AND Y DISCRETE
Does my cause • Team (X) vs Quality Parts (Y) No influence of X on Y Khi2 Test X is important. Y is
X (discrete) • Machines (X) vs type defects (Y) X and Y are dependent on X. One of
have an impact • Weekday (X) vs Part type produced independent the the teams has a higher
on the Y (Y) proportions of defects proportion of defects.
(discrete)? • Brand IT equipment (X) vs are the same in both
Categories soco-professional (Y) teams
Case 2: using units, parts, different components for the 2 measurement series
• Quantities of parts produced per day No influence between 2-Sample t Improvement is confirmed
BEFORE and AFTER improvement BEFORE and AFTER Test The average of all units
• Flow time BEFORE and AFTER The average flow produced is different from
improvement time is identical BEFORE BEFORE AFTER
• Physical Size raised on parts and AFTER
BEFORE and AFTER retrofit of the
machine
50
45
40
50
35
43
30
4
27 27
0
Air France Aero Mexico American Lufthansa
Risks decision
Case study
Y continuous
• Influence on average
• 2 samples t test
• ANOVA
• Influence on variability
• Test 2 and + standard deviation / variance
• Correlation between two continuous variables
• linear regression
Y discrete
• Influence on the proportions
• Chi² Test
Operation mode
• Groups of 2
• Take notice of the 6-pack and the list
of project factors
• Prepare a list of tests to be carried
out (15 ')
• Review = 5 each
REDUCING THE FLOW TIME REQUIRED DURING SHOPS
DELIVERIES BY TRUCK
Planning Team
Start: March Sponsor : Chuck OLAT
End Analysis: May Project manager Black Belt : You
Implementation: August Team members: Logistics driver, drivers of
End of the project: September trucks, part shipping operator
Project Context
The project is in phase ANALYSER you have already identified a series of
potentially influential factors
And have launched the collection of data associated with
Summary table
Risks decision
Case study
Y continuous
• Influence on average
• 2 samples t test
• ANOVA
• Influence on variability
• Test 2 and + standard deviation / variance
• Correlation between two continuous variables
• linear regression
Y discrete
• Influence on the proportions
• Chi² Test
Question ?
Is the difference (245cm versus 250cm) significant or is it just due to the
chance during sampling?
Capabilité.mtw
Compare the height of side X 213 produced by 4 different machines
compare the average of parts produced on machines (2-2)
Operation Mode
• Groups of 2
• Identify the analysis or the test
sample t 2 is applicable
• Perform the tests and complete your
study report
• Review = 5’ each
NOTES AND ADDITIONAL EXPLANATIONS
Risks decision
Case study
Y continuous
• Influence on average
• 2 samples t test
o ANOVA
• Influence on variability
• Test 2 and + standard deviation / variance
• Correlation between two continuous variables
• linear regression
Y discrete
• Influence on the proportions
• Chi² Test
Case Study
In a paint shop, the concentration of chemical elements in the paint must
remain constant. An important chemical component must be distributed
evenly in this painting to ensure a good resistance to corrosion of parts.
Capabilité.mtw
Compare the height of side X 213 produced by 4 different machines
compare the standard deviation of the X 213 coast on 4 machines in a single
analysis. Is there a machine more or less dispersed than the others?
Operation Mode
• Groups of 2
• Identify where the ANOVA analysis is
applicable
• Perform the tests and complete your
study report
• Review = 5 ‘ each
NOTES AND ADDITIONAL EXPLANATIONS
Risks decision
Case study
Y continuous
• Influence on average
• 2 samples t test
• ANOVA
• Influence on variability
• Test 2 and + standard deviation / variance
Case study (identical to that of the ANOVA test but for variances)
In a paint shop, the concentration of chemical elements in the paint must
remain constant. An important chemical component must be distributed
evenly in this painting to ensure a good resistance to corrosion of parts.
Questions
We want to know if the variability of the concentration is identical in all the
storage tank.
Apply the test of the deviation and conclude...
Operation Mode
• Groups of 2
• Identify testing where the test of the
deviation is applicable
• Perform tests and complete your
study report
• Review = 5’ each
NOTES AND ADDITIONAL EXPLANATIONS
Risks decision
Case study
Y continuous
• Influence on average
• 2 samples t test
• ANOVA
• Influence on variability
• Test 2 and + standard deviation / variance
Y discrete
• Influence on the proportions
• Chi² Test
3 Distance
2
4
1
3
2
Angle
1
5 4 3 2
6 1
Consider our Catapult: the more we draw to the rear the Catapult, the farther
the golf ball will go. A slight increase in the angle of Kickback will increase
slightly the shooting distance.
In this case we can control X, and so we can influence the output response Y.
The Scatter plot shows a linear relationship between the angle and the
distance.
3600
3400
3200
Distancetir
3000
Distance
2800
2600
2400
2200
2000
30 35 40 45 50 55 60
Angle recul
Angle
Y: Answer
X: Input
Y aX b a: for each single variation of X, Y
will increase by a
b: the value of Y when X=0
Nuage de points
Scatter PlotdeDistance
Distance tirvs
et Angle
Angle recul
3800
3600
3400 Y aX b
3200
tir
3000
Distance
Distance
2800
2600
2400
For a given value of X,
2200 we can predict the
2000 value of Y
30 35 40 45 50 55 60
Angle recul
Angle
Benefit
Check the output of our process response using the correct value of the
input parameter X.
Vocabulary
X is called the controllable input to this process (variable adjustment).
X is called the Predictor for this process.
Let’s imagine that the equation between the angle and the distance is
Y = 50*X + 445
What will be the increase in the distance if the angle increases by 1°?
Y= 50*1 = 50mm. Per each degree, the distance should increase by 50mm.
Y 50 X 445
4000
The model is linear
only within the
evaluation zone
3000
Shooting_Dis
Distance
2000
1000
Evaluation zone
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Drawback_Ang
Angle recul
Angle
Operation Mode
• Groups of 2
• Open the Regression catapult Fr file in
Minitab
• Follow the instructions in the following
pages step by step
• Review = 15’ each
LINEAR REGRESSION STEP BY STEP
66. Do we have a good model? Watch the p-value for the regression.
30 30
20 20
Y2
Y1
10 10
0 0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
X X
15
14
15
13
12
11
Y
Y
10 10
7
5
6
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
X X
r = 100% r = 63%
20 10
10
Y
Y
5
0 0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
X X
r = 28% r = 0%
Operation Mode
• Groups of 2
• Identify the analyses where the
linear regression is applicable
• Perform tests and complete your
study report
• Review = 5’ each
NOTES AND ADDITIONAL EXPLANATIONS
Risks decision
Case study
Y continuous
• Influence on average
• 2 samples t test
• ANOVA
• Influence on variability
• Test 2 and + standard deviation / variance
Y discrete
• Influence on the proportions
• Chi² Test
Let’s throw a coin : What is the probability to get a TAIL ? … 50%, isn’t it ?
When the observed frequency is too far away from the expected frequency,
we can reject the fact that the observed situation is just due to the hazard.
Let’s suppose we collect the volume produced by 2 shifts, but also the
number of good and bad parts
At this stage, we don’t know the exact quantities but only the overall sums
If both teams work at the same quality level, what should be the expected
value a, b, c, d?
Now, let’s look at the actual production per shift which are slightly
different than the expected quantities
If the difference is small enough, we can conclude that the two populations
are independent otherwise we will conclude that the there is a significant
difference between the two populations with respect to the factor studied.
In this specific example, the question is: given the total production achieved
on each shift, does one shift have a significantly higher defect rate than the
other.
=S
2
2 (fo - fe) fo: observed frequency
fe fe: expected frequency
Khi² follows a distribution (looks similar to the F distribution) with a degree of
freedom of (R-1)x(C-1) R being the number of rows and C the number of
columns.
Given the degree of freedom, if 2 is big enough, the probability will be low
(<5%) and we will conclude that there is a statistical difference.
Chi-Square DF P-Value
Pearson 10.774 1 0.001
Likelihood Ratio 10.508 1 0.001
Accurate data have been collected across all sites and the manager
would like to know –before investigating root causes- if there are some
differences between locations.
Invoicing
X = Country Y = Type of defect
Process
This document and the information it contains belong to
Safran. They must not be copied or communicated to any
other person without prior written authorisation from Safran.
KHI² TEST- SESSION WINDOW
Khi square test: Spain; Brazil; Vietnam; Australia; South Africa
counts expected are printed below those observed two Khi contributions are printed under expected counts
2 15 19 13 19 11 77
14,13 17,23 14,83 16,15 14,67
0,054 0,181 0,225 0,505 0,918
3 45 50 46 49 32 222
40,73 49,68 42,74 46,55 42,30
0,448 0,002 0,248 0,129 2,506
6 17 22 21 17 12 89
16,33 19,92 17,14 18,66 16,96
0,028 0,218 0,871 0,148 1,449
Compagnies aériennes.mtw
Can we consider that the 4 people who have collected the information have
comparable results on delays on takeoff?
If so, what collector / company is different?
Khi 2 tireur.mtw
Following sled tests, the file contains the number of times each shooter hit
the target (in) or missed the target (off)
What is your best shot? Why?
What is your least good shooter? Why?
ACCURACY OF HYPOTHESIS
Hypothesis Hypothesis
Ho is true Ho is false
Risk b
DECISION TAKEN
Accept Judgement
Correct: (error
Hypothesis Ho
2nd type)
1-
Example on the timeliness of the airlines. We find a value p > 0.05. This
may mean either
Companies have the same punctuality
Or
The companies do not have the same punctuality (risk = b)
What are the chances / risks of detecting a difference taking random "n"
flights of each companies?
Resultss
For 30 flights by companies,
only 13 sample over 100 will
Sample size (n) Chance of detecting a difference by lead to the rejection of H0
doing the statistical test1
30 13% It will take more than 300
flights by companies to
100 32% probably detect this gap of 10
300 73% pts
1000 99.7%
(1) : puissance du test
This document and the information it contains belong to
Safran. They must not be copied or communicated to any
Black Belt development program - Week 3
other person without prior written authorisation from Safran. 190
POWER TEST
We will not use the b error, but the notion of power of test
99.7%
73%
32%
The graph shows the power if
Lufthansa is 40% but you can directly
13%
see the power for other cases (10%,
20%,...)
With the old method, 14% of reports show the errors. The management
controller expects a reduction of 10 points (14% to 4% passage) errors
with the new method.
Write 0.14
Sample Target
Comparison p Size Power Actual Power
The accountant needs 128 reports produced 0.04 101 0.7 0.702420
according to the two ways to have a 80% 0.04 128 0.8 0.801925
chance of detecting a decrease of 14 to 4% 0.04 171 0.9 0.901635
error rate
The sample size is for each group.
Prior research suggests that approximately 25% of the fish were infected.
What is the recommended (for each of the two lakes) the sample size?
50 25 0.410100
50 50 0.696893
50 100 0.940427
1. We can only afford a sample with a size of 10. What is the difference the
smallest that we can observe with a power of 80%?
T-test catapulte.mtw
Pied à coulisse.mtw
Minitab can calculate the power, the size of the sample or the minimum
difference can be detected between the largest and the smallest average
group (Minitab calls this the maximum difference).
STAT > POWER AND SAMPLE SIZE > ONE WAY ANOVA
Suppose we have 4 normal populations with averages of 50, 60, 50, 60.
1. How many observations should take of each of these populations so that
the probability of rejecting Ho (reject it the hypothesis that the population
means are equal, even though they are actually different) is at least 90%?
Set a = 0,05.
A reasonable estimate of the standard deviation is s = 5.
We need a sample
size of 9
We need a size of 12
samples
Anova concentrations.mtw
We assume that the sampling does not influence the measurement result.
Calculate the power of the test. The conclusions are valid or should we
increase the size of the sample?
Operation Mode
• Groups of 2
• Available data: average time before = 10
h, standard deviation = 1.5 h before
• You expect an improvement of 2 hours
from the average, when sample size take
to confirm the results?
• Review = 10’ each
NOTES AND ADDITIONAL EXPLANATIONS
Operation Mode
• Groups of 2
• Learn about the process on the
following page and associated data
• Open the file« BB exercises Eng.xlsx »
and select data in the tab « complete
exercise »
• Identify the most important factors on
travel time and submit some additional
studies and suggestions
• Review = 10’ each
HOMEWORK - COMMUTING TIME REDUCTION
Planning Team
Start: March Sponsor : V. Low
End Analysis: May Project Manager / Black Belt : You
Implementation: August Team Members: 5 employees, Resp. HR
End of the project: September
Project Context
The project is in the ANALYZE phase
You have already identified a number of factors that are potentially influential
and have started collecting the needed data
Summary table
• day
• week • Travel time(Y)
• names
• itinerary Deliver
• climate packages of
• Type of transport n-n’s
• Jams?
• temperature
• humidity
This document and the information it contains belong to
Safran. They must not be copied or communicated to any
Black Belt development program - Week 3
other person without prior written authorisation from Safran. 223
NOTES AND ADDITIONAL EXPLANATIONS