POLICY BRIEF

INTERNATIONAL
COOPERATION
IN DISASTER RISK
REDUCTION IN
INDONESIA
Dialog in Celebrating the International Day on Disaster
Reduction International, National Disaster Risk Reduction
Month, and The Tsunami International Day 2021

Organized by:

DEPUTY FOR SYSTEMS & STRATEGIES AND PLANNING BUREAU

NATIONAL DISASTER MANAGEMENT AGENCY (BNPB)
WITH THE SUPPORT USAID INVEST DM 2.0 PROGRAM.
Jakarta, 3 November 2021

KERJASAMA INTERNASIONAL BIDANG PENGURANGAN RISIKO BENCANA DI INDONESIA

 Writer:

Puji Pujiono

Reviewer:

Djoni Ferdiwijaya

Nanang Suharto

Rini Nasution

Graphic Design:

Diberu Karina

INVEST DM 2.0

INVEST DM 2.0, a USAID-funded program, is a continuation of INVEST DM

program. The program applies a holistic approach to support BNPB’s own
‘people-centered approach, with comprehensive inputs in the technical
capacity in preparedness-response-recovery; policy and planning; governance;
and organizational development. These areas are grounded in human capital,
serving to capacitate and reinforce the people resources that contribute to
disaster management

Disclaimer - This document is made possible by the generous support of

the American people through The United States Agency for International
Development (USAID). The contents are the responsibility of Mercy Corps
Indonesia- INVEST DM 2.0 program and do not necessarily reflect the views of
USAID or The United States Government.

2
 POLICY
BRIEF
International Cooperation in Disaster Risk Reduction
is one of the targets of the Sendai Framework for
Disaster Risk Reduction 2015-2030. These international
commitments contained in the target (F) on international
cooperation, namely: to “substantially enhance
international cooperation to developing countries
through adequate and sustainable support in order
to complement their national actions to implement the
Sendai Framework by 2030”.

The above target underlines the three principles of

international cooperation, namely adequate in the sense
that it is balanced with, and sufficient for investment
needed for, effective disaster risk management1,
sustainable where the targeted goals and the means
used to achieve them do not harm the parties involved,
and are resistant to external shocks2, and complementary
in the sense that developing countries establish their own
disaster risk management strategies while international
partners provide support in line with these strategies
in a coordinated manner, streamlined procedures and
information exchange to avoid overlapping3.
1 UNDRR (2021) “International Cooperation in Disaster Risk Reduction”, United Nations Office for
Disaster Risk Reduction
2 Sustainable Society (2020) Sustainable cooperation, University of Groningen https://www.rug.nl/
gmw/research/sustainable-society-bss/?lang=en
3 OECD- DAC (2005) The Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness; Five Principles for Smart Aid?

KERJASAMA INTERNASIONAL BIDANG PENGURANGAN RISIKO BENCANA DI INDONESIA

International cooperation in the field of DRR, in the Indonesian context, is part of the Pentahelix
approach, which consist of the government and local governments, the community including
national and international NGOs and CSOs, experts and academics, the media, and the private
sector4. This kind of collaboration has been going on for a long time and has been intensive in
various forms such as community-based DRR strengthening programs, strengthening safe schools,
strengthening BPBD capacities, strengthening BNPB institutions, developing infrastructure for disaster
impact mitigation, building early warning
systems, and others. Cooperation can be
ABOUT THE DIALOG 2021 established between people (people-to-
people), government and NGOs, government
On November 3, 2021, in conjunction with the to government, government to business,
Commemoration of the Disaster Risk Reduction and others. These, however, have not been
Month (DRR), as well as the International DRR recorded and documented in a systematic
Day in 2021, Deputy for Systems and Strategy and comprehensive manner.
and Planning Bureau, National Disaster
Management Agency (BNPB), with the support Experience shows that international
of the USAID INVEST DM 2.0 program, organize cooperation yielded positive results. This
a Web dialogue to strengthen international Dialogue was held to explore more space
cooperation in the field of disaster risk and opportunities to continue to improve
management. this international cooperation, including
through the reporting of the Sendai Target
More than 130 people from BNPB, BPBD, Framework (F) on International Cooperation,
National and Local Governments, civil society the implementation of the 2022 Global
organizations, multilateral and bilateral Platform, as well as improving coordination
cooperation institutions, the Red Cross mechanisms and effectiveness and
Movement, international non-governmental accountability in general.
organizations and others, together discussed
strategies towards more adequate , Indonesia as an Archipelagic State lives with
empowering and sustainable international the risk related to climate, topographical and
cooperation in response to the latest major geological characteristics as well as socio-
changes. economic and political dynamics that interact
in ways that become chains of disasters.
More specifically, this dialogue was a vehicle Along with the paradigm shift of disaster
for building a common understanding for the management from reactive mode to the more
preparation of the Midterm Review of the proactive and predictive and multi-hazard
Sendai Framework Target F on international risk management, there have been reforms
cooperation, developing initial ideas about that have gradually shifted Indonesia’s image
international actors scope for contribution to from being a Disaster “Supermarket” to a
the 2022 Global Platform, and envisioning the Disaster “Laboratory”.
strengthened future international cooperation.
The disaster management system in Indonesia
is gradually strengthening. BAPPENAS in this
dialogue emphasized that DRR has explicitly
become one of Indonesia’s medium-term development priorities. Innovative policies that increasingly
prioritize the role of local communities, accumulation of good practices and increasing use of
science and technology, to some extent, reduce the impact of disasters, while strengthening inclusive
risk management has been seen as development investment towards a prosperous and resilient
Indonesian society.

The role of BNPB and other stakeholders in the context of reporting on international cooperation
Target (F) is that the government to be the party authorized and responsible for monitoring and
4 TEMPO (2019) Kepala BNPB Perkenalkan Pendekatan Pentahelix Penanganan Bencana, 12 Mei 2019 , https://nasional.tempo.co/read/1206278/kepala-bnpb-perkenalkan-
pendekatan-pentahelix-penanganan-bencana/full&view=ok

4
reporting on the implementation of the Sendai Framework in their respective countries; while the
parties and partners are involved and actively participate in accordance with their respective fields
of work and authorities5.

International Cooperation or Target (F) Sendai Framework is a weak and the least reported indicator,
where in 2019 only 16 countries have reported while 158 others have not started6. So far there
has been no clear indication of the causes of the weakness in reporting Target (F) globally. The
participants of the dialogue discussed that gathering information regarding Target (F) in Indonesia
requires clearer and broader guidelines, structures and mechanisms from BNPB beyond recording
bilateral and multilateral cooperation at BAPPENAS and BNPB itself. This is important considering the
number of collaborations carried out by international actors whose activities are not included in the
category of ODA cooperation.

Given the limited global information on monitoring and reporting of Target (F), Indonesia, which
has a lot of experience in international cooperation both as a recipient and as a provider, can take
the opportunity to report on the Sendai Framework Target (F) as an example and model for the
international community.

5 UNDRR (2020). Monitoring the Implementation of Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015-2030: A Snapshot of Reporting for 2018. Bonn, Germany. United Nations
Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNDRR)
6 Poljanšek K., Marin-Ferrer M., Vernaccini L., Marzi S., Messina L., Review of the Sendai Framework Monitor and Sustainable Development Goals indicators for inclusion in the
INFORM Global Risk Index

KERJASAMA INTERNASIONAL BIDANG PENGURANGAN RISIKO BENCANA DI INDONESIA

OVERVIEW
These years are a strategic window
for strengthening international
cooperation .
BNPB considers that international cooperation
in the field of Disaster Risk Management
(DRR) has produced positive results and is
getting stronger with frequent interactions
at the policy, managerial and operational
levels. Furthermore, there is a lot of room
and opportunity to continue to improve it,
including reporting on the SFDRR Target (F)
and the 2022 GPDRR.
The Sendai Target (F) reporting as a
vehicle for consolidating international
cooperation.
BNPB invites development partners and
international partners to contribute to
the preparation of the Target (F) report
by gathering among themselves the
quantitative and qualitative information.
Given that there is no standard format and
procedure for preparing this report, the
completion of this report will not only be
advantageous in terms of consolidating
international cooperation in Indonesia
but is also expected to be an example
for other countries. This opportunity,
however, requires BNPB to establish a
mechanism and a focal point for and
regarding international cooperation.
GPDRR 2022 is a strategic stage to
showcase international cooperation in
DRR.
GPDRR 2022 as a global stage for
disaster management provides, for
actors in international cooperation in
Indonesia, a platform to show exemplary
initiatives and achievements. They
showed an interest in contributing in the
form of documentation, special events,
or publications, of various initiatives,
good practices, and implementation
of DRR strategies through technical
6
assistance, science and research
partnerships, capacity building
and technology transfer
International cooperation
plays a catalytic and
facilitative role in Indonesia.
International cooperation
in the field of DRR, along
with Indonesia’s experience,
especially since the Indian Ocean
Tsunami to the Central Sulawesi
earthquake and tsunami, plays
an important role in achieving
national goals and priorities as
well as the SDGs. International
cooperation in the field of DRR
in Indonesia has various models
of partnerships and program
activities at all stages of disaster
management at the national and
local and sectoral levels.
The dynamic context
of pandemics and risks
demands a new cooperation
framework.
Response to and recovery from
the impact of pandemics coupled
with conventional disaster
risks requires strengthening
international cooperation. This
reform should be based on
the principles of international
cooperation and humanitarian
reform processes including
the Grand Bargain 2.0, which
encourages the international
cooperation practice that is
principled, integrated and
consistent, as well as empowering,
equal and accountable.
 RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Momentum from the reporting of Sendai Target (F) and GPDRR is a good opportunity
for international actors and BNPB to gather information to support the Mid-Term Review of Sendai
Framework7 Target (F) and to play an active role in the 2022 GPDRR. The

a. Bureau of Legal, Organization and Cooperation of BNPB may appoint an International

Cooperation “Desk” to accommodate, organize, and facilitate relevant cooperation Sendai
reporting Target (F) and GPDRR 2022. in coordination with the National Development
Planning Agency, the Ministry of Finance, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and the secretariat
of the SDGs, and documenting the achievements of the amount as existing commitments.
Concurrently, monitoring the DRR funding allocation in the prevention and risk reduction in
comparison to the allocation to emergency response. As a first step can be a briefing on the
Technical Guidance Reporting SFDRR Target (F) as the basis of the work plan and roadmap
Mid-Term Review of the 2023, which interim version will be presented at the 2022 GPDRR

b. International actors can follow through the Dialogue to form a committee tasked to
collect between themselves, quantitative and qualitative information on the framework of
international cooperation programs both in terms of ODA and non-ODA.

c. The 2022 GPDRR Implementing Committee can follow up on the direction of the Deputy
for Systems and Strategy of BNPB to explore, together with UNDRR, a space for exemplary
international cooperation in the field of Indonesian DRR. Utilize the output of this Dialogue
as a starting point for coordinating with the nodes of the international network of actors
including the UN Country Team, South-South Cooperation, INGOs consortium, and so on,
to prepare a short-term work plan towards the 2022 GPDRR.

2. Consolidate a coordination platform for international actors. BNPB should consider

permanently establishing a coordination platform for international DRR cooperation. This
platform coordinates the implementation, monitoring and reporting of DRR aspects in documents
that customarily compile international cooperation information. For example, the World Bank
Indonesia Country Partnership Framework and the United Nations Sustainable Development
Cooperation Framework. Theconcept National Reference Group8 as discussed in the Grand
Bargain 2.0 Scheme, can also be considered as another multisectoral platform.

3. Towards International Cooperation based on principles of equality, sustainability ,

and accountability. BNPB together with international partners need to develop an international
cooperation framework in the field of DRR that accommodates and harmonizes various strategic
and accountability frameworks such as Good Humanitarian Donorship, ParisDeclaration and
Grand Bargain 2.0, and applies them to the Indonesian context in a coordinated, complementary
and accountable manner such as contained in the Jakarta Commitment9, which stipulates that
international aid including ODA is to aim at strengthening national capacities and resources
towards promoting development effectiveness.

7 Resolusi 75/216 tahun 2020, Majelis Umum PBB memutuskan untuk mengadakan “Mid-Term Review of the Implementation of the Sendai Framework” pada tahun 2023
8 Grand Bargain 2.0. Mengusulkan pembentukan National reference Group sebagai suatu kelompok kecil yang terdiri dari perwakilan konstituensi Pemerintah, lembaga-lembaga
PBB, donor dan LSM Internasional, dunia usaha, akademisi, dan LSM-Organisasi Masyarakat Sipil nasional dan Lokal. Kelompok ini bersifat konsultatif dan sukarela, dan selain
menguatkan kerjasama dalam suatu negara juga dapat menjadi titik hubung negara yang bersangkutan dengan Grand Bargain pada tataran global.
9 The Jakarta Commitment represents a shared recognition between the Government and development partners to enhance the effectiveness of external financing in Indonesia. It
entalis strengthening country ownership over development through strengthening capacities and using stronger government systems, and improving the international governance of aid
and strengthening south-south cooperation. Building more effective and inclusive partnerships for development by developing a new partnership paradigm; strengthening existing aid
instruments and shaping new ones; and expanding dialogue to include new actors. Delivering and accounting development results by way of strengthening a focus on, and capacity to
manage by, development results; and working together to review progress across development partnerships http://mdtf.undp.org/document/download/9714

KERJASAMA INTERNASIONAL BIDANG PENGURANGAN RISIKO BENCANA DI INDONESIA

 SUBSTANTIVE
DELIBERATIONS
The 2004 Indian Ocean Tsunami demonstrates the importance of international cooperation at the
global, regional, national and local levels. International cooperation in the field of DRR provides a
vehicle for managing and utilizing the nexus between development and humanity to address social and
economic problems. The 2004 tsunami also prompted legislative reforms and resulted in the Disaster
Management Law no. 24 of 2007, which covers all stages of disaster management, integrates disaster
risk reduction into development, and strengthens the authority of national and local institutions. The
participants of the Dialogue, who came from the regions, emphasized the importance of international
cooperation to reach and to benefit localities and the grassroots.

International cooperation is inseparable from disaster risk manage-

ment in Indonesia The
The tsunami also marked a turning point in the humanitarian response relationship between the
Government of Indonesia and the international community during an emergency. The long-term
impact of these reforms is seen in the context of the earthquake response in Lombok and Central
Sulawesi. The government’s decision to take operational leadership and limit the entry of international
aid dramatically changed the configuration of international cooperation in the context of disaster
emergency response:

“
‘The timetable for the transfer of power is no longer determined by
the international system in the region. The main implication is that the

“
international system needs to change more quickly to fit the new norm or
it risks becoming redundant and marginalized.10’

On the one hand, Indonesia is increasingly playing a role through a number of initiatives including
the South-South cooperation framework and Triangular Cooperation11, regional initiatives and
schemes, and leadership and hosting global and regional discussions including the Post-Tsunami
Summit in 2005 and the Asian Ministerial Meeting on Disaster Risk Reduction in 2015. When
Indonesia takes over the G20 Presidency next year, Indonesia will also become the Co-Chair and
host of the Seventh Global Platform for Disaster Risk Reduction 2022 (GPDRR 2022)12 with the topic
“From Risk to Resilience: Towards Sustainable Development for All in the context of a Changing
World with COVID-19”. This leadership will go on with Indonesia’s ASEAN chairmanship in 2023.

Indonesia has emerged as a new donor in the Global South. In 2019 formed Indonesian AID to
expand technical assistance, capacity building, and humanitarian assistance to developing countries
in need in accordance with the SDGs13. During the 2015 Typhoon Pam, Indonesia sent US$2 million
10 https://humanitarianadvisorygroup.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/HH_Sulawesi-Practice-Paper-4_FINAL_electronic_200319_v1.pdf
11 Statement of H.E. Jusuf Kalla, GPDRR Jenewa, 2019
12 https://www.undrr.org/event/seventh-session-global-platform-disaster-risk-reduction-gp2022
13 https://www.liputan6.com/global/read/4092047/mengenal-indonesian-aid-lembaga-dana-bantuan-internasional-perdana-dari-ri

8
in humanitarian aid to Vanuatu14 to share experiences such as the post-tsunami reconstruction and
rehabilitation process, and to actualize commitments to international cooperation in DRR. Non-
government parties also cooperate with the government to provide humanitarian assistance to
several countries15 including the Indonesian Humanitarian Alliance (IHA) and an alliance of NGOs
and zakat organizations responding to the Rohingya crisis in Myanmar and Bangladesh.

BAPPENAS representatives illustrated that Indonesia has benefited from various international
cooperation programs, assistance and projects. Among other things, a loan World Bank of US$160
million as the Indonesia Disaster Resilience Initiative Project (IDRIP) to support the development of a
comprehensive approach including priority investments to improve national and local government
preparedness, and to strengthen geophysical early warning services16.

The Asian Development Bank (ADB) provided a policy-based loan of US$500 million17 to strengthen
government policies and action plans including social protection; improve the resilience of public
infrastructure; and increase the financing through insurance, better health care, and targeted social
spending.

Investment in Human Resources for Disaster Management – ​​INVEST DM 2.0 18, is another example.
As a collaborative program between the United States government and the Government of Indonesia,
this program is a multi-year scheme designed to provide a holistic approach that could support
BNPB in carrying out its roles and duties to fill system and skill gaps in priority areas, including
increasing technical capacity for preparedness, emergency response, and recovery; development
policy and planning; institutional governance; and organizational development. This is achieved
through strengthening the capacity of Indonesia’s disaster management agencies and resources at
various administrative levels so that they are able to fulfill their mandate in providing effective and
life-saving disaster management services.

The Sendai Framework provides context, goals and targets for Interna-
tional Cooperation.
The Sendai Declaration of the United Nations Third World Conference on Disaster Risk Reduction
201519 confirms the increasing complexity and impact of disasters, and calls for action and
cooperation of all stakeholders for the substantial reduction of disaster risks and losses to lives and
economic assets , physical, social, cultural and environmental by 2030.

Target (F) on international cooperation contains provisions that international actors need to integrate
disaster risk reduction measures into multilateral and bilateral development assistance programs
within and across all sectors. This includes links to poverty reduction, sustainable development,
natural resource management, the environment, urban development and adaptation to climate
change. The “Target (F)” sets out the following objectives:

“ “…to substantially enhance international cooperation to developing

countries through adequate and sustainable support to complement their
national actions for the implementation of this Framework by 2030”.

14 Thejakartapost.com dengan judul “Indonesia mengirimkan bantuan ke Vanuatu”. https://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2015/04/04/indonesia-sends-aid-vanuatu.html.

15 Fauzia, A. (2017). Filantropi Islam di Indonesia: Modernisasi, Islamisasi, dan Keadilan Sosial. Jurnal Studi Asia Tenggara Austria, 10(2), 223– 236.
“
16 https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2019/11/27/preparing-indonesia-for-future-natural-hazards
17 https://www.adb.org/news/500-million -adb-loan-help-boost-indonesia-s-disaster-resilience
18 https://www.mercycorps.or.id/tags/invest-dm?page=1
19 Konferensi Dunia Ketiga PBB tentang Pengurangan Risiko Bencana di Sendai, Jepang, pada 18 Maret 2015

KERJASAMA INTERNASIONAL BIDANG PENGURANGAN RISIKO BENCANA DI INDONESIA

 The mapping conducted in this Dialogue shows that international cooperation has not yet targeted
many aspects of risk understanding and that there is still much room for the development of national
mapping of disaster sources and hazards. More comprehensive reporting, including on Target
(F), is expected to help international partners to work with governments to build frameworks and
policies based on risk, collaboration to achieve targets and, ultimately, resilience. For example,
through collaboration with the business sector as developed substantively by the Indonesian Disaster
Management Agency Forum (Forlubi), the Business Continuity Management (BCM) Forum Indonesia,
and the Indonesian Chamber of Commerce

BNPB invites international actors to engage in dialogue, mapping activities, inventorying achievements,
and identifying gaps and challenges. This report is also an opportunity for international actors to
report on achievements related to ODA commitments, review the proportion of aid that supports risk
prevention and reduction, and other non-ODA collaborations. In this Dialogue, MPBI proposes four
classifications of reporting according to SFDRR, namely action, transfer of knowledge and technology,
capacity building, and contribution to the development of disaster statistics. Given that there is no
standard format and procedure for preparing this report, the completion of this report will not only
consolidate international cooperation in Indonesia but is also expected to be an example for other
countries.

The momentum for strengthening international DRR cooperation in the

context of a pandemic
The Pandemic has shown how the roots of vulnerability to disaster risk are also the determinants of risk
for a pandemic20. IFRC illustrates in this Dialogue how they support PMI’s comprehensive approach
that accommodates DRR and pandemics while still being guided by SFDRR’s priority actions.

Indonesia’s priorities regarding international cooperation in the context of a pandemic include

equitable access to treatment and vaccines, health technology and other resources21. The challenge
is how to integrate this with general toughness improvements. OXFAM Indonesia illustrates its
partnership approach at various levels including in terms of local leadership, active involvement of
women; nexus of development and humanity; toughness development; including advocacy on fair
vaccine issues; and support humanitarian networks.

Meanwhile, for reasons of visibility or other motivations, donors, governments and aid agencies
still prefer to invest in response rather than prevention and preparedness22. This is still the case
despite the overwhelming evidence that disaster risk management is more cost-effective, and more
beneficial.

There is a need to improve the governance of international cooperation towards one that is more
comprehensive and complementary to all sectors and levels of government, civil society and society.
A review of much of the risk analysis underlying international cooperation and programs is needed
to ensure the integration of considerations about pandemics and disaster risk.

OCHA representatives on this Dialogue proposed better and more formal coordination to respond to
complex challenges, more relevant capacity building, and fulfillment of basic needs and protection
of basic rights of affected communities. Such improvement can only be achieved when international
actors have a platform to explicitly and periodically coordinate with each other, with governments,
and with other stakeholders to ensure coherence and added value of international cooperation in the
20 Lavell & Lavell (2021), Covid-19: Relationship with Disaster Risk, its concept and Management, Regional Assessment Report RAR-2020, UNDRR Panama
21 Statemen Menteri Luar Negeri RI, pada Pertemuan Tingkat Menteri NAM “Bandung+65: More Relevant, United, and Effective NAM against Emerging Global Challenges, including
COVID-19”, 9 Oktober 2020
22 UNDRR (2021) Only Together, Te Sendai Seven Campaign, International Day for Disaster Risk Reduction

10
changing landscape of disaster risk management that is integrated with management of response
and recovery to the pandemic in Indonesia.

Towards principled and accountable international DRR cooperation

This Dialogue highlighted the relevance of the SFDRR Target (F) with the characteristics of the desired
international partnership in Indonesia. USAID illustrated this relevance as follows: a) appropriate
and appropriate cooperation is formulated through a multi-stakeholder consultative process in
Indonesia; b) equality where all parties bringing in different resources have the same opportunity to
provide input, generate ideas, and be part of the agreed consensus; and c) sustainable by investing
in institutions and systems that have a long-term impact, building capacity for capacity building,
ensuring competent cadres to manage risks and to respond to crises when necessary.

BAPPENAS representatives in this Dialogue emphasized international cooperation under SFDRR23

which also aims to address economic disparities and gaps in technological innovation and research
capacity between countries, through the flow of knowledge, ideas, knowledge and technology transfer
from developed countries to developing countries.

The Dialogue also explored the approach to international cooperation by referring to the Paris
Declaration on Aid Effectiveness24, where the quality of international cooperation and its impact
on development can be improved through the application of the following principles: a sense of
ownership on the part of the state or community being assisted where they can develop and define
their own strategy, improve their institutions and tackle corruption; compatibility of international aid
with local strategies and systems; alignment of actions and procedures as well as avoiding duplication
of information; oriented to measurable results; and two-way accountability between partners who
share responsibility for development outcomes.

Meanwhile, the Good Humanitarian Donorship25 encourages general principles which include,
among others: Allocating funds according to needs and based on needs assessments; ensure as far
as possible adequate involvement of beneficiaries; strengthen the capacity of affected communities
and countries to better fulfill their responsibilities and coordinate effectively with humanitarian
partners; and support long-term recovery and development.

One example from the humanitarian sector is the Grand Bargain which that was published26ahead
of the 2016 World Humanitarian Summit. In the June 2021 version, the Grand Bargain 2.0 includes
two enabling priorities, namely a) securing quality funding that ensures visibility and accountability,
and b) greater support for local leadership and participation of affected communities.

In short, each international actor has good and noble values ​​and principles as determined by their
respective headquarters. International actors also need a recognition that they have or are currently
implementing principled and accountable international cooperation.

The study shows how the practice of international cooperation that has an accountability gap can have
potential negative consequences.27 For example, intentionally or international actors might get local
partners to deliver humanitarian assistance in high-risk areas while also holding them to bear most
of the financial risk; coordination gaps among international actors themselves can prolong activity
delays, conflicting messages and multi-interpretational programmatic and financial requirements;
and the complex and unwieldy reporting formats and requirements cause local partners to waste
time and effort on non-value added activities.
23 UNDRR (2015) Kerangka Sendai untuk Pengurangan Risiko Bencana, Paragraf 40.
24 Deklarasi Paris Tentang Efektivitas Bantuan: Lima Prinsip Untuk Bantuan Cerdas (2015) https://www.oecd.org/dac/effectiveness/45827300.pdf
25 https://www.ghdinitiative.org/ghd/gns/home-page.html
26 https://interagencystandingcommittee.org/grand-bargain#:~:text=The%20Grand%20Bargain%2C%20diluncurkan%20selama,efficiency%20of%20the%20humanitarian%20
action
27 Persyaratan donor kelembagaan Laporan Tantangan Sektoral (2016) https://www.nrc.no/globalassets/office/whs/institutional-donor-requirements-report-on-sectoral-
challenges-21.05.pdf

KERJASAMA INTERNASIONAL BIDANG PENGURANGAN RISIKO BENCANA DI INDONESIA

In this regard, the Indonesian Development Alliance - Humanity / Indonesian Development -
Humanitarian Alliance (AP-KI) proposed a National Reference Group as a small, multi-sectoral
constituency-based consultative group that is in line with the Pentahelix approach. This idea also
reflects the circle of stakeholders described by UNOCHA, where affected communities at the center
of the circle interact and are supported by national, government, regional and international actors.
This vehicle is intended as a “safe room” for international actors, governments, and civil society to
discuss issues, and explore solutions including questioning one another’s actions and responsibilities.
HFI representatives emphasized the need for such a vehicle to better manage it, including publishing
authoritative guidelines on various partnership models such as G-to-G , G-to-P, and P-to-P. It is
hoped that a culture of accountability related to international cooperation in the field of disaster risk
management will also grow.

12
 APPENDIX 1: MESSAGES AND
PRESENTATIONS
INTERNATIONAL
INTRODUCTION
COOPERATION
Yusak Oppusunggu (USAID/Indonesia Disaster Program
FOR DISASTER Specialist)
RISK REDUCTION »» The Dialogue activity is a good initiative designed
together with BNPB. This activity is increasingly important
INCLUDES A considering that Indonesia is a country that is familiar
with disasters, especially related to hydrometeorological
VARIETY OF
threats, and is now increasingly complex with the
SOURCES AND IS A occurrence of thePandemic
»» HFAand SFDRR help frame international cooperation in
CRITICAL ELEMENT the field of disaster risk management and, in this regard,
this Dialogue can increase mutual understanding and
IN SUPPORTING
shared learning towards more effective disaster risk
THE EFFORTS management.

OF DEVELOPING OPENING AND KEY PRESENTATIONS

COUNTRIES TO Dr. Raditya Jati, S.Si., M.Si, Deputy for Systems and Strategy,
BNPB
REDUCE DISASTER
RISK.
To support the
implementation of the
present Framework,
the United Nations and
other international and
regional organizations,
international and
regional financial
institutions and donor
agencies engaged in
disaster risk reduction
are requested,
as appropriate,
to enhance the
coordination of their
strategies in this regard
SFDRR (2015) Para 39
»» Dialogue on Global DRR Day and World Tsunami Day,
is needed to improve coordination for better results The
»» A shift in the DRR paradigm has become a development
consideration in Indonesia and globally, enthusiasm
which needs to be disseminated - and translated into
field activities.
»» Only together - togetherness, collaboration, synergy,
inclusivism, integration. , Appreciate international
cooperation, as stated in THE dm lAW, in DRR starting
from HFA to SFDRR,
»» Compilation of Sendai report, Target (F) related to
international cooperation, including improvements that
have been achieved since 2015 is beneficial in promoting
sustainable joint development
»» Various means of cooperation, bilaterally , multilateral,
South-to-South or other schemes.
»» Inviting dialogue, mapping all activities, recognize
achievements and identify gaps that need to be
addressed, and the challenges of disaster risk especially
in the context of a pandemic that is closely connected
with DRR
»» Policy direction for international cooperation is inseparable
from the dynamics of the global level that will determine
the direction such as the Grand Bargain 2.0 .

KERJASAMA INTERNASIONAL BIDANG PENGURANGAN RISIKO BENCANA DI INDONESIA

 »» Hosting GPDRR on May 23-28 OF 2022,
preparations are ongoing, it is a matter of
pride that Indonesia is worthy to host global Call for action on
events, which are usually held in Geneva. International Cooperation for
This is an opportunity for international Disaster Risk Reduction
partners to be actively involved in activities
that lead to specific agendas such as Bali »» Fulfilling ODA
Declarations. International partners can commitments
provide important notes and plan special »» Balancing aid
composition
activities such as side events highlighting
how partnerships address Indonesia’s »» Increase and maintain
funding for prevention
unique challenges as an archipelagic
»» Increase understanding
state with higher and diverse risks due of national financing for
to archipelagic characteristics, cultural PB
variations, and resource inequality. »» Contextualize
»» International support and cooperation international cooperation
is needed, and reported to SFDRR, »» Give focus on Target (F)
regarding Indonesia which continues to
show enthusiasm by integrating national
International Cooperation
commitments and commitments of heads in Disaster Risk Reduction, UNDRR (2021)
of state in various development plans of
the Master Plan, further into the RPJMN,
and annual budget plans.

PARTNERS’ PRESENTATIONS

1
“
»» Indonesia officially submitted various reports on
SFDRR achievements, including baselines, progress,
Pratomo Cahyo dashboards, and implementation reports on certain
Nugroho, Head of targets. Furthermore, future reports will be carried out
Sub-Directorate of in the form of Dashboard monitoring which will be
Governance, BNPB carried out annually and mid-term reports in 2023.

“
»»
Quantitative reports are required on Dashboard
monitoring for certain targets (A & G). Qualitative report
including other targets to be covered by government
and non-government 2015-2020 in mid-term 2023
which will be presented at GPDRR 2022 The
»» Output, approach and methodology reporting of Indonesia is expected to be a good practice
for other countries, and it is projected that Indonesia will have a role global leadership
related to SFDRR
»» Preparation is carried out in coordination with the core team by involving government sectors
and/Agencies including BAPPENAS, Ministry of Home Affairs, Coordinating Ministry for
Human Development and BNPB has also requested published official data from ministries/
agencies as well as non-government partners such as MPBI, Planas and Siap Siaga. This is
done through various approaches to data collection and validation according to the targeted
time frame.
»» Target (F), international cooperation still requires a lot of data. It is necessary to collect data
on how international cooperation supports Indonesia’s DRR targets in various frameworks
and plans for both development and PB. The indicators in Target (F) are intended to measure

14
 international resources to Indonesia, both loans and grants, the flow of funds and the
exchange and transfer of technology, knowledge and innovation, the trends of DRR
capacity development programs including disaster statistics.
»» Challenges in preparing the report include limited and delayed data between government
agencies, difficulties in measuring cooperation in the exchange and transfer of technology
and innovation, the need for detailed descriptions of partner actors, and the inadequacy
of data on foreign cooperation for disaster management.
»» BNPB invites international partners to cooperate in compiling the Target (F) report,
including programs and activities that are not included in the ODA category.

2 “
»» Experience has shown that NGO and government
partnerships produce positive results. As disaster risk
Harlan Hale increases worldwide, there is a growing need for
Regional Advisor meaningful, equitable and sustainable partnerships
- Bureau for
»» USAID core values
Humanitarian
»» Passion for mission: a workforce committed to

“
Affairs at USAID
making a just, more equitable, and just world.
Solidarity of connectedness between nations
exemplified by the response to the pandemic
(the why)
»» Excellence and commitment to learning: making the best of the resources entrusted by
the community to help partner countries overcome challenges and respond to shocks
through continuous learning in a changing world (the what)
»» Integrity, respect, empowerment and inclusion: internally, with countries and the
international community. committed to providing support, not imposing assistance,
seeking to empower partners to lead their own development, inclusive and whole
society approach which generally leads to better outcomes (the how)
»» Specifically for DRR in Indonesia
»» Needs based: works with partners to identify and reach a common understanding of
the problem, to develop the most appropriate solution
»» Requests are encouraged to work together on identity issues, meet shared priority needs
»» Strict technical review to ensure that supported programs have solid outputs and
outcomes towards the desired positive impact
»» Partnerships with various Actors, governments, international bilateral and multilateral
partners, and NGO grantees and partners
»» Partnership according to SFDRR
»» Appropriate: a multi-stakeholder consultative process to ensure it’s right for the
Indonesian people
»» Equal: all parties bringing different resources have equal opportunities to provide
input, generate ideas, and be part of agreed consensus
»» Sustainability: to vest in institutions and systems that have lasting impact, build capacity
for capacity building, ensure a competent cadre to manage risk and to respond to
crises when needed .

Characteristics of a good partnership in DRM. Supporting BNPB’s own goals and objectives, in a
mutually beneficial way, is an investment that seeks to address the common challenges of today,
which, if not addressed today, will perpetuate greater future risk. Such a partnership should be based
on mutual respect, open communication, honesty, shared vision, focus on people, fair sharing, trust.

KERJASAMA INTERNASIONAL BIDANG PENGURANGAN RISIKO BENCANA DI INDONESIA

3 “
»» increasing risk of disasters around the world causing
Victoria Saiz- impact and destruction. In this regard, Indonesia faces
Omenaca, a large variety of risks, while new types of crises are
Head of OCHA emerging. Not a single area is included in the category
Indonesia Office, of low disaster risk.
primary liaison »» The traditional representation of local, national and

“
point with ASEAN international cooperation is increasing due to frequent
interactions in disaster risk management. At the
center are the affected people and in addition local
government and civil society and communities. The
private sector, and national governments are next in the circle along with the humanitarian
country team organized by the Inter-Agency Standing Committee (IASC) and its embodiment
at the national level under the leadership of the UNRC. In the outer circle there are bilateral,
multilateral and regional organizations.
»» The HCT report in 2016 demonstrated the existence of existing risk monitoring systems and
tools such as InaSAFE and proved their relevance. Thus, independent risk analysis and HCT
monitoring are not required. However, this is the need for a more formal analysis sharing
process in a broader and ongoing capacity building work with BNPB and HCT agencies.
Indonesia has available resources with back up military capabilities with civil society, private
sector, and religious groups heavily involved.
»» Some of these issues are language and cultural challenges, the gap between theory and
actual preparedness, and in this regard, the importance of led contingency planning. BNPB
which brings the development and humanitarian sectors closer together, and raises the need
to identify new sources. funding, Actors to work together.

4 “
Support to Sendai Target (F): make PMI a better leader and
stronger government auxiliary
Ruth Lane, »» Understanding risk: supporting PMI’s digital
Program transformation and assessment capacity including
Coordinator, participatory vulnerability assessment and planning,
IFRC Indonesia an online instrument and camera-enabled tools to

“
improve risk mapping and analysis in rural and urban
areas.
»» Support for the COVID-19 response: expanding

support both to the task force, namely in community engagement with UNICEF, as well as
in strengthening response and awareness and preparedness for pandemics and zoonoses
including through community-based detection and through cluster mechanisms.
»» Strengthening disaster risk governance: improving PMI laws to better define roles and
responsibilities in disaster response; launched the Red Ready program that enhances
PMI’s framework for managing disasters at multiple levels; support sub-Cluster Shelters
in a nationalized cluster approach that resulted in the first standard of shelter and shelter
recovery policies, as well as shelter guidelines
»» Strengthening local preparedness in various aspects integrating preparedness and response
based forecasts.

16
5 “
Oxfam develops programs based on multi-stakeholder
consultations including affected communities, global
Panjitresna
context, RPJMN and humanitarian networks.
Prawiradiputra,
Program »»
Oxfam’s approach is multi-level partnership;
Manager at support local humanitarian leadership, active
Oxfam in involvement of women; development and

“
Indonesia. humanitarian nexus, especially related to shifting
configurations of funding, inclusion and protection
and gender; integration of adaptation and
preparedness as part of resilience development;
multi hazard preparedness; advocating for a fair vaccine issue; and advocacy for
regional and global humanitarian reforms including in Grand Bargain 2.0. In this
regard, support the establishment and implementation of SEJAJAR and AP-KI.
»» Covid-19 is forcing international organizations to be more creative in combining
disaster preparedness with pandemics related to reducing international funding and
the business sector. It is necessary to approach more viable to the Donor
»» Is is projected that the disaster in the future and the pandemic will have an impact that
is very much challenging that requires integrating the use of technology and the efforts
of risk management including insurance

OVERVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF

DISASTER RISK
»» Funding for disaster risk reduction is a small part of the overall investment in
development assistance;
»» US$ 133 billion of disaster-related ODA was made available between 2010-
2019: this is 11% of the total aid (US$1.17 Trillion).
»» Of this, US$ 5.5 billion was devoted to risk reduction actions prior to a
disaster, compared to US$ 119.8 billion spent on emergency/disaster
response and US$ 7.7 billion for reconstruction, relief and rehabilitation.
»» Of all disaster-related ODA between 2010-2019, the US$5.5 billion spent
on DRR accounts for only 0.5% of the total amount spent on disaster-related
assistance

International Cooperation In Disaster Risk Reduction, UNDRR (2021)

KERJASAMA INTERNASIONAL BIDANG PENGURANGAN RISIKO BENCANA DI INDONESIA

DISCUSSANTS

1 “
»» Principle of adequacy: international cooperation is expected
Dr. Rd Siliwanti, to allocate funding resources, planning and capacity
MPIA. Director building to increase government effectiveness in disaster
of Development management ; The principle of coherence of harmonized
Funding for and complementary measures, synergies and agendas at the
Development, national level, programs and activities; and the Sustainability

“
BAPPENAS Principle, namely that international cooperation activities
Sufficient encourage sustainable efforts and can be more widely
replicated in other places.
»»
DRR has become the 6th priority of the 2020-2024 RPJMN,
with a target of reducing potential economic losses from the
impacts of climate change and disasters by up to 1.15% GDP, as the implementation of
SDGs, Paris Agreement, and SFDRR.
»» Partners need to participate in identifying, monitoring, and seeking solution strategies to
issues and evaluations. Preparation of the Target (F) report, it is necessary to take into account
the availability of data, consensus among Ministries/Agencies regarding activities that are in
accordance with the SFDR indicator reference.
»» Development partners and international actors constitute an international collective working
unit. One of the enabling environments is PP 10/2011 which regulates opportunities for
utilizing international cooperation assistance related to social economic infrastructure,
technology transfer and the use of international good practices for knowledge.
»» DRR through international, national and local partnerships can be achieved through foreign
grants, technical assistance and foreign loans. For example, the IDRIB Project with the World
Bank, ADB projects for disaster impact recovery and system strengthening, policy-based
loans targeting contingency strengthening, infrastructure and pandemics, inter-agency
reform and coordination and expansion of social protection for vulnerable communities.
disasters and pandemics.
»» Indonesia’s international role and leadership regionally and globally is expected to provide
opportunities for soft diplomacy in the fields of humanitarian and DRR, Indonesia as a
center of knowledge on disaster management, showcasing, increased commitment, public
awareness, and capacity opportunities for Indonesian actors

2 “
»» The key question is what is the role and contribution of
Dicky C. international actors in DRR, within the action domain of:
Pelupessy, Ph.D, science technology & innovation; capacity building; and
Chairperson, statistical capacities. It is necessary to identify mechanisms
Indonesian and performance metrics for international cooperation in
Disaster each domain.
Management
»»
Indonesian civil society gathers and celebrates CBDRM

“
Society (MPBI)
during the national DRR month, where they document good
practices, reflect on lessons learned, and formulate them into
declarations containing recommendations. The question is
how does international cooperation encourage, support, and amplify, and biomagnify such
initiatives.
»» International cooperation also needs to be faced with accountability aspects related to the
localization agenda which, in fact, is also the internationalization agenda. This needs to be
managed sensitively with a range from principles, guidelines to implementation.

18
3 “
»» International cooperation has many channels such as G to G,
Surya Rahman, G to People, and people-to-people. Some of them have relied
Executive on a standard approach and some have just been formed.
Director, When these channels are not regulated by a general policy,
Humanitarian what happens is a confusion of policy and implementation.
Forum A multi-sector consultative platform is needed to facilitate the
division of roles between government, NGOs, international

“
Indonesia (HFI)
actors and other stakeholders.
»» While G-to-G international cooperation financing is
administered in the state treasury by government agencies,
P-to-P financing outside of ODA cannot be recognized and included in SFDRR reporting.
Therefore, coordination and consolidation are needed, especially among international
actors themselves, including an inclusive and transparent data collection and dissemination
mechanism.
»» Coordination in the management of international cooperation requires a guide that
accommodates all interests, for example the issue of localization in the Grand Bargain.
Without clear guidance from the government and international actors, what happens is that
there is a cooperative relationship between international actors and local actors who are not
or have no experience in humanitarian response. In the guide it should be emphasized that
localization is not merely the use of local manpower or funding a project but also absolutely
requires the development of local capacities related to humanitarian and DRR.

4“
»» Indonesian civil society actors are
Muhammad Ali Yusuf, Chairman
adopting humanitarian reform following
of the Institute for Disaster
the global momentum. In the process,
Management and Climate
Covid 19 changed perspectives, ways of
Change, Nahdlatul Ulama
thinking, and ways of working where when
Executive Board (LPBI PBNU),
international actors “left” Indonesia, the role
Convenor of the Indonesian
of civil society is required to be increased,
Development and Humanitarian

“
including through consolidation between
Alliance (AP-KI).
development-oriented and humanitarian
organizations so that they can complement
each other, stand on their own feet, and view international actors as partners.
»» AP-KI was established in April 2021 and consists of 7 main networks with hundreds of
member organizations throughout Indonesia with the aim of moving and working strategically
to complement the government’s response to disasters and pandemics, to ensure that
vulnerable and marginalized groups are met and their rights are protected. Civil society
seeks pragmatic solutions at a time when the results of complex and protracted humanitarian
reforms are yet to be seen. Findings from a multi-year review of the Pujiono Centre and the
Humanitarian Advisory Group, with support from DFAT, show that stakeholders recognize
gaps that require humanitarian reform in aspects of coordination, funding, accountability
and capacity building.
»» APKI draws on these findings, as well as taking advantage of interactions with the global
humanitarian reform process, conducting a national workshop earlier this month.
The workshop resulted in recommendations to review and reformulate an Indonesian
Humanitarian Framework based on Indonesian philosophy, identity and personality but in
line with global humanitarian principles. Workshops also form the pillars of work in the
Alliance.
»» National Reference Group: optimizing existing humanitarian structures and mechanisms

KERJASAMA INTERNASIONAL BIDANG PENGURANGAN RISIKO BENCANA DI INDONESIA

 in the form of a small cross-sectoral consultative group Pentahelix consisting of, and
linking, the Government, the United Nations and international actors, the business,
academic and civil society sectors, as well as providing a vehicle for substantive
interaction with the process global reform.
»» Pooled funding: creatively raise local funds, prompting some organizations to be the
intermediary organization / intermediary with the donor community, and strengthen
the capacity of local NGOs to be able to manage better and accountability in the use
of humanitarian funds
»» Capacity building, to make efforts in the dissemination of humanitarian response as
part of the common basic skills of all local NGOs without having to convert them into
humanitarian organizations but, based on these skills can respond to local crises in the
vicinity and, where necessary in the case of major crises, interact more meaningfully
with national and international systems.
»» Accountability: drive 360-degree accountability insights to affected communities and
peers without leaving accountability to government and donors.
»» Vaccine Justice Advocacy: ensuring the acquisition, implementation and ensuring
equitable and sustainable vaccination considering the importance of vaccination in the
context of response and recovery from the pandemic

APKI invites international actors to dialogue, strengthen humanitarian reform, and build resilience
and an effective, equitable, dignified, and resilient humanitarian system that is equitable, dignifying,
and sustainable.

DIALOGUE
»» Local actors call on international actors to seek cooperation schemes at the national and
subnational levels that can reach the region and the grassroots, and apply a comprehensive
perspective from risk prevention to recovery from disaster impacts.
»» The landscape of international cooperation: International cooperation has not yet focused
on the risk understanding aspect and needs to continue to develop activities such as the
development of a national map of sources and hazards that underlies the review of the
building code, the rehabilitation and reconstruction process, the activities of the Indonesian
tsunami research consortium, etc.
»» Interest in GPDRR: Many international collaborations are interested in contributing to GPDRR
2022 in various forms including publications on good practices, special events and also
in drafting the Sendai Monitoring Target (F) report. For this, a mechanism is needed both
from BNPB as the host and among international actors themselves. It is recommended to
collect more complete data to capture the interest of international actors to participate in the
GPDRR.
»» Desired international cooperation: related to the GB 2.0. there is a sense of shared ownership
of DRR among governments, CSOs, and international actors; ideally there is harmony
between international cooperation with the national agenda of development and DRR;
involving partnerships in various fields, both in terms of information sharing and in a more
structured and substantial manner; there is also a desire for monitoring and harmonizing
reporting, and the importance of an accountability framework related to international
cooperation using both global indicators such as the SFDRR and the Grand Bargain, as well
as the SDGs.
»» The mapping conducted in this Dialogue shows the interest of international actors to be

20
 recognized for their work, including through the Sendai Target (F) reporting. This requires
a data collection mechanism and focal point persons or institutions, especially on the part
of BNPB and among international actors themselves. Such a mechanism could compile
narrative reports including non-ODA activities, information on Indonesia’s aid to other
countries, and collaborations that are scientific partnerships, capacity building, student
exchanges, and technology exchanges such as the U-INSPIRE Alliance. This related data
needs to be grouped according to the division in the SFDRR Target (F) report, namely a)
Action, b) Science technology, innovation; c) capacity building; and d) Statistics
»» International cooperation through South-South cooperation platforms, for example between
the practice of Disaster Preparedness Villages between Indonesia and Bangladesh which has
the potential to be linked with South-South initiatives at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs
»» International cooperation supports DRR targeting the business sector such as the Connecting
Business Initiative (CBI) ) which also involves several UN agencies. This includes, among
others, efforts to strengthen MSMEs in building resilience, including readiness and ability
to respond to disaster risk. A data collection shows the circulation of money of around
3 trillion among business sectors since the pandemic. Cooperation with various forums
and business sector associations in business resilience such as the Indonesian Disaster
Management Agency Forum (Forlubi) such as a series of discussions on Road to GPDRR, the
Business Continuity Management (BCM) Forum Indonesia, and the Indonesian Chamber of
Commerce and Industry (KADIN) has a Deputy Chair for Disaster.

KERJASAMA INTERNASIONAL BIDANG PENGURANGAN RISIKO BENCANA DI INDONESIA

APPENDIX-2: INTERACTIVE DISCUSSION
OUTPUTS
LANDSCAPE OF INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION IN THE FIELD OF DRR

PREVENTION & RISK REDUCTION

Human resource development BNPB

Indonesia Disaster Resilience Initiative Project (World Bank)

Central Sulawesi Rehabilitation and Reconstruction Project (World Bank)

Disaster Resilience Improvement Program (ADB)

Disaster Resistant Villages in West Sumatra, Banten, NTB, NTT, Central Sulawesi, Maluku)-Caritas Germany

Safe school initiative

Support capacity building for risk mapping at community level through eVCA (IFRC/PMI)

UNDP-OCHA Linking Business initiatives (CBi) & KADIN

Business Engagement DRM

BUILD CHANGE: Develop free mobile apps for resilient homes; Conducted school building assessments and produced
guides & training modules for strengthening

Emergency and Recovery Program

(CRS)

LPBI NU (Community-Based DRR Project)

USAID

DM Law Review

Integrating risk mapping into village development plans

Support procurement of medical equipment for the future wave of COVID-19 - capacity building of PMI staff and vol-
unteers in Epidemic control and equipment use (IFRC/PMI)

OXFAM:

ICDRC

ACT

WVI DRR

WFP: 1. Establishment of a Regional Hub, 2. CBDRM, 3. EWS, 4. ASP

BPBD SUKABUMI CITY

Homes and Communities program - scaling and influence on the Standard and Dignity Shelter

(CRS)

International Research Collaboration, universities, Student-Research Exchange/visits

National Hazard and Seismic Map Development- PuSGeN Ministry of Public Works and Housing in collaboration with
ANU - DFAT - GA, USGS, PERMATA

22
PREPAREDNESS
Capacity building for CVA, Emergency Response guidelines, mainstreaming of PGI

Forecast based Action (PMI/IFRC) anticipatory funding for ap emergency

Emergency Assistance for Rehabilitation and Reconstruction (ADB)

WFP: Capacity Building, Logistics Contingency Planning, CVA

UNDP-OCHA Connecting Business Initiative (CBi) & KADIN

Data Preparedness

(IFRC.PMI) Digital transformation including capacity building in information management and data preparedness

CRS: Flores DRR Enhancement for Sustainable Livelihoods

Support for warehouse management and stock pre-deployment for emergency response (IFRC/PMI)

Red Ready Project

Private Sector

Mainstreaming And Webinar on MCR 2030 Registration (collaboration with BNPB, UNDRR, IFRC, APEKSI)

UCLG ASPAC

Pandemic, endemic preparedness (IFRC/PMI)

HFI (capacity building on ER and recovery)

USAID: workforce development and system strengthening

Capacity building in German ER-caritas

U-INSPIRE Alliance: Youth Platform to harness Science, Technology, Innovation for DRR in Asia-Pacific, which was initi-
ated from Indonesia
(currently 12 country chapters in Asia)

1. Connect & Networking

2. Capacity and Dialogue: (a) Regional / International Workshop on mobilizing Youth and Young Professionals in SETI
DRR, (b) Future Thinking about DRR
Advocacy, Innovation: Sharing regularly - Coffee PB

LPBI NU (strengthening on community-based preparedness)

RESPONDING TO EMERGENCY
Health Assistance-Caritas Germany

LPBI NU (emergency response)

Red Ready DRM strengthening at subnational level (IFRC/PMI)

Emergency response HFI

CRS: Flores DRR Enhancement for Sustainable Livelihood

IFRC - Access to global finance requires a response Dref EA

CRS: ICERP , ERRF

KERJASAMA INTERNASIONAL BIDANG PENGURANGAN RISIKO BENCANA DI INDONESIA

RECOVERY
Palu Disaster Reconstruction and Rehabilitation (in collaboration with CUF, APEKSI)
UCLG ASPAC
Capacity and Resilience Training (in collaboration with UCLG World, BNPB, UNDRR, APEKSI)
UCLG ASPAC
Emergency Assistance for Rehabilitation and Reconstruction ( ADB)
WVI
HFI (recovery)
UNDP-OCHA Connecting Business Initiative (CBi)Breaks
Advocacy - Missing MSMEs and
CRS: Homes and Communities
Thrive Digital Marketplace as Space Public Hub for Local Farmers during the Covid Pandemic (Cooperation with CUF,
APEKSI)
UCLG ASPAC
Caritas Germany (Emergency Response, Early Recovery
Model for implementing minimum service standards for
LPBI NU (post-disaster recovery)

CONTRIBUTION IDEAS TO 2022 GPDRR

PUBLICATION
UCLG Resilience Module: https: //www.uclg.org/sites/default/files/resilience_learning_module_i_eng.pdf
UCLG ASPAC
USAID
DM Law Review
CRS: publication type TBD
Ternate PRB Forum: Geo-Tourism Gamalama Volcano
INVEST DM
U-INSPIRE - UNESCO - UNDRR - UNDP Acc Lab:
Future Thinking on DRR (The Future of DRR Governance, The Future of DRR Knowledge, The Future of Human Behav-
ior and Hazards)
U-INSPIRE: Youth and Young Professionals Innovation in DRR in Asia - Pacific
Building Change: Linked Guidelines to resilient housing for practitioners

SPECIAL EVENT
Ternate PRB Forum: From Disaster to Sustainable Ecotourism
Caritas Germany-Disaster Resilient Villages and Participation of Persons with Disabilities in DRR
OXFAM : Sphere Training
UCLG ASPAC: ToT on Resilience Module on Apr 2021 (in collaboration with BNPB, OGI Bappenas, UNDRR, and UCLG
World)
U-INSPIRE - UNESCO - UNDRR - UNDP - BRIN: 3rd Regional Workshop in Science, Technology, Innovation in DRR
Launches Indonesian Network for Women in DRR - linked to WIN-DRR UNDRR
PMI/IFRC: Community-based Action
BUILDING CHANGE: 1) Regarding resilient housing - financing model for house strengthening & mobile app based for
safe house and construction information 2) linked to schools
CRS, : KSBD - DRR - Fund Allocation for DRR

24
SFDRR REPORT Target (F)
U-INSPIRE: International Collaboration on Strengthening Youth and Young Professionals in DRR

INVEST DM

IFRC / PMI

BRIN: International Collaboration on Strengthening Research and Innovation in DRR

International Collaboration on Strengthening the Role of Women in DRR - connected with WIN-DRR UNDRR

OTHERs
University: Center for Excellence in DRR Management Development

Community Based Disaster Risk Learning

BRI N: Research Center for (1) Geological Disasters (2) Disaster Technology

CSOs: BalancingLocalization and Internationalization

Tsunami-Ready in Indonesia

PARIS DECLARATION ON ASSISTANCE EFFECTIVENESS: FIVE PRINCIPLES

FORSMART ASSISTANCE

SFDRR REPORT Target (F)

U-INSPIRE: International Collaboration on Strengthening Youth and Young Professionals in DRR

INVEST DM

IFRC / PMI

BRIN: International Collaboration on Strengthening Research and Innovation in DRR

International Collaboration on Strengthening the Role of Women in DRR - connected with WIN-DRR UNDRR

ALIGNMENT
Project support is in line with the national disaster strategy and tailored with local systems

PB cooperation with due regard to national priorities

-Integrating DRR programs into the RPJMDes

by ensuring the availability of derivative regulations and the ability of local institutions to translate them

Ensure program sustainability by identifying the teaching for replication and extending programs based on existing les-
sons learned / good practice

Tsunami Ready:

- UNDRR Target 100% coastal village tsunami ready by 2030

- United Nations Decade 2030

- Disaster-Resilient Villages

KERJASAMA INTERNASIONAL BIDANG PENGURANGAN RISIKO BENCANA DI INDONESIA

HARMONISED
Project and government/CSO partners co-coordinate their actions, simplifying procedures and sharing information to
avoid duplication.
Strengthening accessible knowledge management reporting

Better and systematic coordination

Utilizing Planas PB (?) - as a center for harmonization

Partnerships and new programs may consider the possibility of continuing to develop or improve existing public pro-
grams
With active involvement of all stakeholders in planning, implementation and processes monitoring

MANAGEMENT FOR EFFICIENCY

Projects and government/CSO partners focus on measuring performance.

Centralized platform for reporting results - and regularly

standard indicators for DRR indicators

made practical for varieties of reporting

common platforms for displaying / knowledge management

MUTUAL ACCOUNTABILITY
Projects and government partners / CSOs responsible for DRR results.

By maintaining close collaboration and support from project design to monitoring and evaluation

International organizations responsible for contributing to the achievement of the Grand Bargain

Government, NGOs and CSOs are accountable to the communities they support

Facilitate Stakeholder reporting mechanisms to BNPB

Agreed mechanism: accountable to beneficiaries and stakeholders including joint monitoring and evaluation

OTHER
Other characteristics of effective international cooperation;

Equal Partnership

Shared values

By opening up new sources of financing to supportDRM efforts

Inclusive

Addressing local, cultural and geographic needs

26
ANNEX - 3: REPORTING FRAMEWORK
SFDRR TARGET (F)
International Cooperation in Disaster Risk Reduction”,UNDRR (2021)
Sendai Framework: Target (F)
»» The Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction
»» nternational financial commitments are still far
from the desired target — ODA disbursements
have averaged about 0.39 percent of Gross
National Income since 2010, compared to the
committed target of 0.7 percent.
»» For every US$100 spent on disaster-related
ODA, only 50 cents is invested in protecting
development from the effects of disasters.
»» While ODA correlates well with disaster response
and reconstruction needs, existing investments
are insufficient to prevent future disasters in
areas where mortality rates may be high. ODA
should be better targeted to address the multi-
dimensional vulnerability of the population.
»» Disasters and extreme events encourage
increased funding and international cooperation
for prevention and preparedness. However, this
funding is inconsistent across most countries,
making it more difficult to build long-term
resilience.
»» Better and systematic tracking of financing for
disaster risk reduction is needed at national
and international levels, including development
budgets and investments focused on risk
management.
»» Target (F) of the Sendai Framework for Disaster
Risk Reduction highlights the role of international
cooperation in accelerating its implementation,
and measures this cooperation through
advances in financing, technology transfer and
capacity building. Target (F) is the least reported
among the Sendai Framework targets. Better
tracking of international cooperation is critical to
accelerating the implementation of the Sendai
Framework. • Despite limited reporting, 1,113
examples of technology transfer and 2,203
examples of capacity building demonstrate a
significant level of international cooperation
between countries.
KERJASAMA INTERNASIONAL BIDANG PENGURANGAN RISIKO BENCANA DI INDONESIA
2015-2030 has seven strategic objectives and 38
indicators to measure progress in reducing disaster risk
and losses. These indicators align the implementation
of the Sendai Framework with the implementation
of the SDGs and the Paris Agreement on climate
change. Target (F) of the Sendai Framework aims
to: Substantially increase international cooperation
to developing countries through adequate and
sustainable support to complement their national
actions for the implementation of this Framework by
2030. United Nations Member States agree on the
following indicators in measuring Target (F ):
F-1 Total official international support, (official
development assistance (ODA) plus other official
flows), for national action in disaster risk reduction.
F-2 Total official international support (ODA plus
other official flows) for national action on disaster risk
reduction provided by multilateral agencies.
F-3 Total official international support (ODA plus
other official flows) for national action in disaster risk
reduction provided on a bilateral basis.
F-4 Total official international support (ODA plus other
official flows) for technology transfer and exchange
related to disaster risk reduction.
F-5 Number of international, regional and bilateral
programs and initiatives for the transfer and exchange
of knowledge, technology and innovation in disaster
risk reduction for developing countries.
F-6 Total official international support (ODA plus other
official flows) to build capacity in disaster risk reduction.
F-7 Number of international, regional and bilateral
programs and initiatives to build disaster risk reduction
capacity in developing countries.
F-8 Number of developing countries supported by
international, regional and bilateral initiatives to
strengthen their statistical capacity on disaster risk
reduction
 APPENDIX -4: DETAILS OF ACTIVITIES
No Kegiatan
09.00-09.05 Introduction by theCommittee
Opening
»» Listening to the Indonesia
Raya Anthem
»» Speech by USAID
Representative (USAID
09.05-09.30 Program Specialist, Yusak
Oppusunggu, )
»» Opening and Keynote Speech
(Deputy for Systems and
Strategy, BNPB, Dr. Raditya
Jati, S.Si., M.Sc.,
09:30 - 09:35 Introduction by Facilitator (FC)
Trigger presentations (10 minutes
each)
1. Strategy Development
Director, BNPB: Dr. Ir. Agus
Wibowo, M.Sc. represented
by Mr. Pratomo Cahyo
Nugroho, ST. MT
2. Regional Advisor, USAID/BHA
09:35-10:30 (bilateral): Harlan Hale
3. Program Coordinator IFRC
Indonesia: Ruth Lane
4. Program Manager OXFAM
Panjitresna Prawiradiputra
5. Head of the UN OCHA
Indonesia: Victoria Saiz-
Omenaca
Responses (7 minutes each)
1. Director of Multilateral
Financing Cooperation
of Bappenas: Mrs. Dr. Rd
Siliwanti, MPIA
2. Chair of MPBI (disaster risk
10:30-11:00 reduction): Dicky Pelupessy,
Ph.D
3. Executive Director HFI
(humanity): Surya Rahman
4. Convenor APKI
(humanitarian-development
convergence): M. Ali Yusuf
Presentation from OCHA: Victoria
11:00-11:10
Saiz-Omenaca
28
Pelaksanaan
MC opening the event, Administrative announcements
1. MC gave an introduction
2. MC played the song Indonesia Raya
3. MC invited USAID representatives USAID
4. representatives delivered remarks
5. MC invited BNPB Deputy for Strategy System
6. Deputy SS BNPB delivered remarks
7. Closing the opening ceremony
Photo session
MC introducing Facilitator
MC handing Screen to Facilitator
Technical announcement
FC opens lighter presentation segment
1. FC invites representatives of BNPB
1. Strategy Director BNPB Strategy Director to deliver
remarks welcomes
2. FC invites USAID representatives USAID
3. representatives give presentations
4. FCIFRC representative IFRC
5. representative delivered presentation
6. FC invited OXFAM representative OXFAM
7. representative to present presentation
8. FC said that the UN representative (OCHA) would
deliver his presentation after 11.
9. FC closed the segment with several conclusions
OCHA will deliver presentation at 11:00 (see below)
1. FC gave an introduction.
1. FC invited the Director of Multilateral Cooperation
and Funding , Bappenas
2. Director of Multilateral Cooperation and Funding,
Bappenas, conveys his response
3. FC invites MPBI representatives MPBI
4. representatives to submit their comments
5. FC invites HFI representatives HFI
6. representatives convey their responses
7. FC invites APKI representatives APKI
8. representatives convey their responses
9. FC closes the segment with several conclusions
FC invites OCHA representative OCHA
representative to present presentation
FC closing segment
11:10 - 12:15 Interactive segment

FC introduces interactive segment: an initial

activity towards consolidation of international DRR
cooperation in Indonesia (refers to keynote BNPB and
the speech of the Deputy Director of Strategy)

Introduction test drive

11:10-11:20
FC introduce Mural, and test drive
Committee provides (or screen the Mural)
https://app.mural.co/t/targetf9095/m/targetf9095/16
35835507887/17874dacf3237fa1df2f2f1c53c1ca0f0
caaf2f5?sender=ufbb7f50c7952030719651771

FC provides an introduction: This activity is not

permanent and conclusive, but is an illustration of the
Landscape of international DRR realm of international cooperation. Later can be fitted
cooperation at a later
Guide:
11:20 - 11:40
Introduction (5 minutes) Putting a Post-it note with the name of the institution
Input (10 minutes) and project activities in the quadrant concerned

Review by participants (5 minutes) https://app.mural.co/t/targetf9095/m/targetf9095/16

34204233405/76b3cbc825ea6a349dcd4976249c0d
facd1cb81a?sender=ufbb7f50c7952030719651771

FC provides introduction: If the international

Showcasing di GPDRR
11:40-12:00 Pengantar (5 menit)
Input (10 menit)
Review oleh peserta (5 menit)
community together with BNPB will present a
“showcase”, what will be done?
Guide:
For those who agree to Showcase, can put a post-it
note on the boxes that have been provided
https://app.mural.co/t/targetf9095/m/
targetf9095/1635850620834/d8b1f77ff0da1d
513eeb2ab3b1e39abfbf5138ff?sender=ufbb7f5
0c7952030719651771

FC provides an introduction: This activity is a Co-

Towards a New International
Cooperation
Introduction (5 minutes)
12:00-12:20
Input (10 minutes)
Review by participants (5 minutes)
creation, an imagining of the optimal posture of
international DRR cooperation in Indonesia
Guidance:
Laying Post-it note describing activities or actions to
apply the principles of international cooperation (paris
Declaration for Effective Aid)
https://app.mural.co/t/targetf9095/m/targetf9
095/1635817773241/4b568f35bb22a20247
a1731401792fcb5431dd11?sender=ufbb7f5
0c79520307196517710719651771030719651771

FC offers some conclusions

12:20- 12:25 Closing of segment FC asks who is willing to become a WG member to
follow up

Closing
FC reading notes on dialogue results
1. Reading of notes and
12:25-12:30 FC returning screen to committee
Dialogue results
MC closing activities
2. Closing

KERJASAMA INTERNASIONAL BIDANG PENGURANGAN RISIKO BENCANA DI INDONESIA

 APPENDIX-5: TERMS OF REFERENCE

1. Background The
Theme of this year’s International Day for Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR) is #OnlyTogether, with a
focus on Target (F)28 on the Sendai Framework for DRR: enhancing international cooperation for
developing countries to reduce disaster risks and losses29, with the motto “Only together…can we
save the planet.”. In this regard, Indonesia as the host of the 2022 GPDRR has a good opportunity
to show an example in terms of international cooperation in the field of DRR while building a path
towards the Mid-Term Review of the Sendai Framework for 2023.

Indonesia, since 2013, has adopted the International Day for Risk Reduction. Disasters are declared
by UNDRR every third week of October, as “DRR Month, an annual national agenda. The anniversary
commemoration was held in Jakarta and Ambon with the theme “Nation’s Resilience in Facing
Disasters.”

This theme is appropriate considering the significant changes related to international cooperation
in the field of DRR, especially due to the global pandemic and, on the other hand, the approval of
the Grand Bargain 2.0. This month is a great opportunity for international DRR partners to celebrate
progress-and successes, reflect on the principles of empowerment, focus on risk reduction, and
coherence towards complementarity, and take note of the challenges ahead.

Based on the above thinking, BNPB through the support of USAID INVEST-DM 2.0 will hold an activity
Dialogue REFLECTION OF INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION IN THE FIELD OF DRR IN INDONESIA,
in commemoration of International DRR Day / DRR Month 2021.

2. Purpose and Objectives of

This Dialogue is intended as a vehicle to strengthen common understanding and contribute thoughts
towards the preparation of the Mid-Term Review Target (F) of the Sendai Framework, the interim version
of which will be published in the 2022 GPDRR. It is also an opportunity to jointly develop strategies
in responding to recent major changes in relation to efforts towards more equal international DRR
cooperation and build independence.

Purpose of this Dialogue is to substantially support the commemoration of DRR Month 2021 with the
following specific objectives:
1. Building alignment of views on Target (F) of the SFDRR
2. Conduct initial mapping of the landscape of international DRR cooperation
3. Develop an indicative roadmap towards reporting Target (F) on GPDRR 2022
4. Identifying strategic direction towards more equal cooperation between BNPB and international
partners in the field of DRR in the context of the latest major changes

28 https://iddrr.undrr.org/
29 Full quote The target (F) of the Sendai Framework is “Substantially enhance international cooperation with countries develop through adequate and ongoing support to complement
the follow-up their national government for the implementation of the Sendai Framework until 2030”

30
3. Expected Outputs
This Dialogue is expected to produce:
»» List of data and indicative roadmaps related to response to Target (F) of SFDRR
»» Landscape of international cooperation DRR
»» Strategic framework towards a more equal partnership between BNPB and international
partners in the field of DRR

4. Time and place

Day/Date : Wednesday/3 November 2021

Time : 09.00 – 12.00 WIB

Venue : Zoom Meeting (online)

Pre-registration : https:// bit.ly/DialogKerjasama InternasionalPRB

5. Form of activity and language

»» This activity is registered as participation in the DRR Awareness Month 2021.
»» To be held virtually using the Zoom Meeting platform.
»» Indonesian – English translator and sign language are provided.

6. Organizer
This activity is organized by BNPB with the support of the USAID INVEST DM 2.0 program.

7. Participants
This activity is open to the public but in order to support the achievement of goals and results, several
categories of participants will be determined and invited (as attached).

8. Resource persons and Discussants

Resource persons for this Dialogue consist of:
1. BNPB Deputy for Systems and Strategy
1. Director for PB Strategy Development, BNPB
2. ODA/bilateral agency representatives: USAID Indonesia
3. International Red Cross Movement Family: IFRC
4. UN System Indonesia: Resident Coordinator/UN OCHA Indonesia
5. NGO Community Representative International: OXFAM

Responder:
1. Bappenas
2. Development Alliance – Indonesian Humanity
3. MPBI
4. HFI

KERJASAMA INTERNASIONAL BIDANG PENGURANGAN RISIKO BENCANA DI INDONESIA

9. Financing
This activity will be carried out using a cost-sharing mechanism between BNPB and USAID. BNPB will
provide ASN resource persons fees in accordance with applicable regulations. Meanwhile, the INVEST
DM 2.0 program will provide moderators, note takers, sign language interpreters, interpreters and Zoom
facilities.

10. Agenda

No. Agenda Time (WIB) PIC

1. Introduction by the Committee 09.00-09.05 Committee
Opening MC
»» Remarks by USAID Representative
“Expectations for International
2. »» Foreword and opening of the 09.05-09.30
Deputy for System and Strategy Support in Supporting PB
Development of BNPB Priorities and Achievement of
Targets “f” SFDRR in Indonesia”
Panel Presentation – (10 minutes each)
»» Director of BNPB Strategy
Development
DRR international partnership
3 »» USAID Indonesia (bi-lateral) 09:30-10:20 landscape and information
»» UNRC / UNOCHA (multilateral) needs for Target “F” SFDRR
»» IFRC (auxiliary)
»» OXFAM (partnership)
Responses (7 minutes each)
»» Directorate of Multilateral Funding
Cooperation, BAPPENAS
4 »» MPBI (disaster risk reduction)) 10:20- 10:45
»» HFI (humanitarian)
»» APKI (humanitarian development
convergence)
5 Q&A (15 minutes) 10:45-11:00

Interactive session: Roadmap of the

6 international DRR partnership towards 11:00-11:45
GPDRR 2022 (45 minutes)

Closing
Moderator
1. Reading of notes on the results of
7 11.45-12.00
the Dialogue
Committee
2. Closing

32
11. Logistics Support
implementation of this activity requires logistical support as follows:
1. Invitation letter from participants, moderators and resource persons by BNPB
2. Note taker by INVEST DM 2.0
3. Interpreter by INVEST DM 2.0
4. Virtual meeting facilities (zoom link) by INVEST DM 2.0
5. Signal interpreter by INVEST DM 2.0
6. Activity flyer by PRB Month Committee, BNPB
7. Youtube streaming by Pusdatin KK, BNPB

12. Contact Person

For confirmation and further information, please contact Mr. Nanang Suharto (HP/WA:
081363035622, email: nsuharto@id.mercycorps.org)

13. Closing
Thus this TOR is prepared to serve as a guide in the implementation of this activity later for all
parties involved.

DIMENSIONS OF RESOURCE PERSONS PRESENTATIONS

No Speakers Presentation grid

1. The role of international cooperation in DRR

Deputy for Systems and 2. The importance of international cooperation aspects in
1. GPDRR
Strategy of BNPB
3. Strategic issues related to international DRR cooperation

1. Purpose and content of the Target (F) of SFDRR

Director of PB Strategy
2. 2. The importance of international cooperation in the GPDRR
Development, BNPB
3. Initial draft of the report Target (F)

USAID 1. Perspectives, strategies and programs in international

UNOCHA cooperation
3. 2. Information participation in responding to the Target (F)
IFRC
OXFAM 3. Tips for responding to the latest major changes

1. Meaning of the principle of “adequate, coherent, and

BAPPENAS sustainable”
MPBI 2. Partnership and empowerment between local and
4. international
HFI
APKI 3. Input related to the preparation of the Target (F) report
from SFDRR

KERJASAMA INTERNASIONAL BIDANG PENGURANGAN RISIKO BENCANA DI INDONESIA

 ANNEX-6 : TARGET PARTICIPANTS

1. Ministry of Foreign Affairs 34. MFAT

2. Ministry of Public Works and Public 35. IFRC
Housing
36. Save The Children
3. Ministry of Health
37. Plan
4. Ministry of Women’s Empowerment
and Child Protection 38. UNICEF

5. Ke Ministry of Home Affairs 39. UNESCO

6. Ministry of Social Affairs 40. Mercy Corps Indonesia

7. Ministry of EnergyMineral Resources 41. OXFAM

8. andNational Search and Rescue 42. UCLG

9. Agency Geospatial Information 43. Caritas Germany Indonesia

10. Agency Meteorology Climatology and 44. Child Fund

Geophysics 45. Church World Service Indonesia
11. Agency Indonesian Institute of Sciences 46. MPBI
12. Steering Committee BNPB 47. HFI
13. BNPB 48. ASB
14. PMI 49. Build Change
15. UN OCHA 50. Karina
16. UNDP 51. ADRA Indonesia
17. FAO 52. CARE Indonesia
18. WFP 53. Wetlands International Indonesia
19. UNFPA 54. UN INSPIRE
20. UN Women 55. Catholic Relief Services (CRS)
21. World Vision Indonesia The Unspoken Ministry (TUM) ASB

22. MPBI 56. Humanity & Inclusion (HI)

23. USAID 57. Miyamoto International

24. USFS 58. UN Environment

25. Disaster Map
26. ADPC
27. The University of Hawaii’ i at Manoa
28. CFE DM
29. World Bank
30. DFAT
31. GIZ
32. JICA
33. KOICA

34
KERJASAMA INTERNASIONAL BIDANG PENGURANGAN RISIKO BENCANA DI INDONESIA
Mercy Corps Indonesia
AD PREMIER building, 3RD Floor suite 02 & 03
Jl. TB. Simatupang No. 5, Ragunan
Pasar Minggu, Jakarta Selatan 12550
Phone : +62.21.22708939
Fax : +62.21.22708940
Email: info@id.mercycorps.org
www.mercycorps.or.id
@mercycorpsindonesia
Mercy Corps Indonesia
Mercy Corps Indonesia