Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Diffraction
Diffraction
NVIS Technologies 2
NV2000
Fig. 23
If a plane wave is considered, as in above the question that arises immediately is why
the wavefront continues as a plane, instead of spreading out in all directions. The
answer is that an infinite plane wave has been considered, and mathematics shows
that cancellation of the secondary wavelets will occur in all directions other than the
original direction of the wavefront; thus the wavefront does continue as a plane.
Francesco Grimaldi discovered that no mailer how small a slit was made in an opaque
plane. Light on tile side opposite the source would spread out in all directions.
Similarly, No matter how small a light source was constructed. A sharp shadow could
not be obtained at the edge of a sharp opaque obstacle. The Dutch astronomer
Christian Huygens. The founder of the wave theory of light. gave an explanation for
these phenomena that was published in 1690 and is still accepted and-used.
When a finite plane wave is considered, the cancellation in spurious directions is no
longer complete, so that some divergence or scattering will take place. For this to be
noticeable, however, the wavefront must be small, such as that obtained with the aid
of the slot in a conducting plane, as in It is seen that instead of being "squeezed
NVIS Technologies 3
NV2000
through" as a single ray, the wave spreads out past the slot, which now acts as
Huygens' point source on a wavefront and radiates in all directions. The radiation is
maximum (but not a sharp maximum if the slot is small) in front of the slot and
diminishes gradually away from it.
Below figure shows what happens when a plane wave meets the edge of an obstacle.
Although a sharp shadow might have been expected, diffraction takes place once
again for precisely the same reasons as before. If two near by points on the wavefront,
P and Q, are again considered. As sources of wavelets, it is seen that radiation at
angles away from the main direction of propagation is obtained. Thus the shadow
zone receives some radiation. If the obstacle edge had not been there, this side
radiation would have been canceled by other point sources on the wavefront.
Radiation once again dies down away from the edge, but not so gradually as with a
single slot because some interference takes place; this is the reason why two point
sources on the wavefront were shown. Given a certain wavelength and point
separation, it may well be that rays a and a', coming from P and Q, respectively, have
a path difference of a half-wavelength, so that their radiations cancel. Similarly, the
path difference between rays b and b' may be a whole wavelength, in which case
reinforcement takes place in that direction. When all the other point sources on the
wavefront are taken into account, the process becomes less sharp. However, the
overall result is still a succession of interference fringes (each fringe less bright than
the previous) as one move away from the edge of the obstacle.
This type of diffraction is of importance in two practical situations. First, signals
propagated by means of the space wave may be received behind tall buildings,
mountains and other similar obstacles as a result of diffraction. Second, in the design
of microwave antennas, diffraction plays a major part in preventing narrow pencil of
radiation which is often desired, by generating unwanted side lobes
Fig. 24
Diffraction around the edge of an obstacle
NVIS Technologies 4