INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, NIRMA UNIVERSITY

Informal Feedback, B. Tech. (A Div) Sem. II (January-May 2021)

Date: 7.4.2021

An Informal feedback Session for B. Tech. Sem. II (Div. A) Students was conducted on 7 th April, 2021
during the time slot of 1:15 pm to 1:40 pm
Following points were extracted and discussed during the feedback session as per the information shared by
the students. The subsequent action taken is also mentioned in the Table.
Members Present:
Two Student representatives from each batch of respective division (6 students per division)
Faculty Advisor: Dr. Pavan Khetrapal
Feedback Co-ordinator: Prof. Neha Patni and Prof. Darshit Upadhyay
Group-I Co-ordinator (FY): Dr.Akhilesh Nimje 

Subject (Faculty) Feedback Action taken

Physics (Theory) Students are satisfied with delivery in theory, Not required
Faculty: Dr. Chetna Chauhan LPW and tutorial.
Physics (LPW)
Faculty: Dr. Chetna Chauhan,
Dr. Ankur Pandya
Physics (TU)
Faculty: Dr. Chetna Chauhan, Dr.
Ankur Pandya, Dr. Tanuj Gupta
CDE (Theory) Students expressed that explanation part of the Respective HOD is
Faculty: Visiting Faculty (Prof. faculty is required to be improved rather than informed.
Pratik Rawal) simply reading from the book (shared in PDF
CDE (TU) form).
Faculty: KP, MP, Visiting faculty
CP (Theory) Students are satisfied with delivery in theory
Faculty: AN and tutorial.
CP (LPW) The faculty members taking the LPW of A2 Respective HOD is
Faculty: SD, TATR, TATR and A3 batch are conducting their class on informed.
CP (TU) Google Meet. Rather, all the classes are now
Faculty: SD, TKV required to be conducted on CISCO WEBEX.
EEE (Theory) Students are satisfied with delivery in theory Not required
Faculty: PAK and LPW.
EEE (LPW)
Faculty: AAN, JT
ES (Theory) Students expressed that the concerned faculty Respective HOD is
Faculty: VRS explained a lot of discussion in the class but the informed.
ES (TU) students are not cleared that either the
Faculty: VRS, RK, PAB discussion is related to course contents or
simply it’s a general discussion related to real
life or practical issues. Anyhow, the students
informed that faculty is good in explanation.
Summarizing, the students couldn’t be able to
 correlate the class discussion with course
contents.
EWP (LPW) Students are satisfied with delivery in LPW. Not required
Faculty: SSS, HZA, SS
DT (Tutorial) Students are satisfied with tutorial session. Not required
Faculty: VV, RM
Cyber Security (Theory) Students are satisfied with delivery in theory. Respective HOD is
Faculty: PPS However more hands on activity/ies can be informed.
added or included for more practice.
Intr. To Chemical Engg. Students are satisfied with delivery in LPW. Not required
Faculty: Dr. Sandip Sharma
General Remark Overall satisfied with academic activities. ------

Faculty Advisor Feedback Coordinator Group-I Co-ordinator Head FY Engg. Prog.

Copy To: Director (IT) / Concerned Faculty, HoDs of all concerned Dept.