You are on page 1of 6

Addictive Behaviors

Volume 39, Issue 1, January 2014, Pages 3-6

Mini Review

An overview of problematic Internet use


Marcantonio M. Spada

Show more

Share Cite

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2013.09.007 ↗
Get rights and content ↗

Abstract

Problematic Internet use (PIU), which has become a global social issue, can be broadly conceptualized as an
inability to control one's use of the Internet which leads to negative consequences in daily life. The aim of
this paper is to give a brief overview of the gradually evolving body of literature on PIU. This shows that the
definitions and diagnostic criteria that have been proposed, and the assessment tools that have been
developed, stress similarities between PIU, addictive behaviours and impulse-control disorders.
Disagreements regarding diagnostic criteria and the lack of large epidemiological studies have resulted in
difficulties in establishing the prevalence of PIU in the general population. Studies suggest high comorbidity
rates between PIU and numerous psychiatric disorders highlighting the importance of focusing on
comorbidity in treatment. There is growing evidence that genetic, personality and individual differences in
automatic and controlled aspects of self-regulation may promote the development of PIU. Pharmacological
and psychotherapeutic treatments specific to PIU have received limited testing in large, rigorous studies
however preliminary evidence suggests that both psychotropic medications (Escitalopram, Naltrexone and
Methylphenidate) and cognitive behaviour therapy may have some utility in the treatment of PIU. More
research is needed on areas which remain unclear and contribute to the prognosis of PIU, in particular the
temporal relationships between psychiatric disorder and PIU, mechanisms of comorbidity and the more
subtle psychological changes that occur through Internet use.

Introduction

Over the last twenty years global Internet users have grown to almost two and half billion (Internet World
Stats, 2013). In the UK and USA over 80% of the population has access to the Internet (International
Telecommunications Union, ITC, 2013). Similar access rates have been observed in Asia (particularly Japan,
South Korea and Taiwan) and lower rates, in the range from 45.0 to 55.0%, in South America (ITC, 2013).
Internet use is comparatively lower in Africa and the Middle East but respectively grew by more than 3600%
and 2600% between 2000 and 2012 (Internet World Stats, 2013).

The growth in Internet use has been paralleled by emerging concerns about problematic Internet use (PIU),
also variously termed Internet addiction (Brenner, 1997, Young, 1998), pathological Internet use (Davis,
2001) and Internet dependence (Scherer, 1997). PIU can be defined as “use of the Internet that creates
psychological, social, school and/or work difficulties in a person's life” (Beard & Wolf, 2001, p.378). Scientific
understanding of PIU has lagged behind media attention mainly because of inconsistencies in defining PIU,
disagreement about its very existence, and the variable methodological approaches used in studying it
(Aboujaoude, 2010). In spite of this, a global body of data unequivocally highlights the Internet's potential to
bring about considerable psychological harm (Aboujaoude, 2010).

Section snippets

Definition and diagnosis

The diagnosis of PIU does not appear in any official diagnostic system, including DSM-V, and there are no
widely accepted diagnostic criteria. Researchers investigating PIU still need to distinguish between
dependence on the Internet, and dependence to the Internet, according to Griffiths (2000) who argues that a
majority of individuals presenting with PIU are simply using it as a medium to fuel other addictive
behaviours. Griffiths (2000) also argues that some behaviours engaged on the…

Prevalence

Disagreements regarding diagnostic criteria and the lack of large epidemiological studies have resulted in
difficulties establishing the prevalence of PIU in the general population. Only two large epidemiological
studies examining the prevalence of PIU in the general population have been conducted in Norway (Bakken,
Wenzel, Götestam, Johansson, & Oren, 2009) and the US (Aboujaoude, Koran, Gamel, Large, & Serpe, 2006)
yielding, respectively, prevalence rates of 0.7% and 1.0%. Prevalence rates in …

Comorbidity

PIU has been found to frequently be comorbid with other psychiatric disorders (Ko, Yen, Yen, Chen, & Chen,
2012). Research has shown that adolescents who display problem drinking are more likely to have PIU (Ko,
Yen, Chen, Chen, & Yen, 2008). Some have argued that individuals presenting with difficulties in
disengagement from Internet use may be at greater risk of gambling-related problems (Phillips, Ogeil, &
Blaszczynski, 2012). Yoo et al. (2004) have also observed the association between…

Development

There is growing evidence that genetic factors may influence the development of PIU. A Korean study by Lee
et al. (2008) comparing adolescents diagnosed with PIU with healthy control participants found that those
diagnosed with PIU anomalies in serotonin transporter genes have greater harm avoidance and higher levels
of depression. The results of this study suggest that PIU patients may have genetic and personality traits
similar to depressed patients.

In two South Korean studies, personality…


Treatment

The associations between psychiatric disorders and PIU clearly indicate that the clinical evaluation of the
patient presenting with PIU should include a careful assessment of comorbid psychiatric disorders as
treating these disorders could improve outcomes. Furthermore, since comorbid psychiatric disorders might
predispose to PIU, appropriate screening and treatment for these disorders might prevent the emergence of
PIU. Pharmacological and psychotherapeutic treatments specific to PIU have…

Conclusions

PIU remains an ill-defined and heterogeneous construct, however two features appear fundamental to its
conceptualisation. The first pertains to the aspects of Internet use, described as excessive or compulsive,
along with preoccupation with and loss of control over the Internet use. The second refers to various
adverse consequences of spending too much time on the Internet, such as neglecting social activities,
relationships, health and work or school duties, and altering sleep and eating…

Role of funding sources

The study was completely self-funded.…

Contributors

Marcantonio Spada wrote the entire manuscript.…

Conflict of interests

There are no conflicts of interest to declare.…

References (64)

J.Y. Yen et al.


The comorbid psychiatric symptoms of Internet addiction: attention deficit and hyperactivity
disorder (ADHD), depression, social phobia, and hostility
Journal of Adolescent Health (2007)

M.M. Spada et al.


The role of metacognitions in problematic internet use
Computers in Human Behavior (2008)

N.A. Shapira et al.


Psychiatric features of individuals with problematic Internet use
Journal of Affective Disorder (2000)

Y.S. Lee et al.


Depression like characteristics of 5HTTLPR polymorphism and temperament in excessive
Internet users
Journal of Affective Disorders (2008)

C.H. Ko et al.
The association between Internet addiction and psychiatric disorder: A review of the literature
European Psychiatry (2012)

C.H. Ko et al.
Proposed diagnostic criteria and the screening and diagnosing tool of Internet addiction in
college students
Comprehensive Psychiatry (2009)

D.H. Han et al.


The effect of methyphenidate on Internet video game play in children with attention-
deficit/hyperactivity
Comprehensive Psychiatry (2009)

R.A. Davis
A cognitive–behavioral model of pathological Internet use
Computers in Human Behavior (2001)

J.M. Bostwick et al.


Internet sex addiction treated with naltrexone
Mayo Clinical Proceedings (2008)

S. Bernardi et al.
Internet addiction: A descriptive clinical study focusing on comorbidities and dissociative
symptoms
Comprehensive Psychiatry (2009)

View more references

Cited by (436)

Network analysis of internet addiction and sleep disturbance symptoms


2023, Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry

Show abstract

Dynamics and moderating factors of esport participation and loneliness: A daily diary study
2023, Psychology of Sport and Exercise
Show abstract

A cross-national validation of the Internet Severity and Activities Addiction Questionnaire


(ISAAQ)
2023, Comprehensive Psychiatry

Show abstract

Cognitive inflexibility and repetitive habitual actions are associated with problematic use of the
internet
2023, Addictive Behaviors
Show abstract

A latent profile transition analysis and influencing factors of internet addiction for adolescents:
A short-term longitudinal study
2023, Heliyon
Show abstract

Problematic Internet use in adolescent psychosocial and physiological development


2023, Encyclopedia of Child and Adolescent Health, First Edition
Show abstract

View all citing articles on Scopus

Recommended articles (6)

Research article

Adolescent Internet use and its relationship to cigarette smoking and alcohol use: A prospective
cohort study
Addictive Behaviors, Volume 39, Issue 1, 2014, pp. 7-12

Show abstract

Research article

Screening for Adolescent Problematic Internet Use: Validation of the Problematic and Risky
Internet Use Screening Scale (PRIUSS)
Academic Pediatrics, Volume 15, Issue 6, 2015, pp. 658-665
Show abstract

Research article

Relationships between problematic Internet use and problem-gambling severity: Findings from
a high-school survey
Addictive Behaviors, Volume 39, Issue 1, 2014, pp. 13-21
Show abstract

Research article

The measurement of Internet addiction: A critical review of existing scales and their
psychometric properties
Computers in Human Behavior, Volume 41, 2014, pp. 190-202

Show abstract

Research article

Problematic internet use, psychopathology, personality, defense and coping


Computers in Human Behavior, Volume 73, 2017, pp. 47-54

Show abstract
Research article

Problematic Internet use and problematic alcohol use from the cognitive–behavioral model: A
longitudinal study among adolescents
Addictive Behaviors, Volume 40, 2015, pp. 109-114

Show abstract

View full text

Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. or its licensors or contributors.


ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.

You might also like