Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Submitted by:
Vincent Lloyd I. Baquillos
Jamie Jane D. Trinidad
Jonhil S. Andrade
Lady Mae Mares Chio
II. Rationale
i. The Philippines has slipped four notches to 22nd out of 111 countries in
the 2022 edition of the English Proficiency Index (EPI) by Education First
(EF), an international education company. With a score of 578, the country's
EPI score is categorized as "high proficiency," which is considered sufficient
for tasks such as making work presentations, understanding TV shows, and
reading newspapers. The EPI is the world's largest ranking of
countries/regions by adult English skills and serves as an international
benchmark for English proficiency.
In recent years, the country's ranking has been declining. It was 13th in
2016, 15th in 2017, 14th in 2018, and 20th in 2019. Subsequently, it fell to
27th in 2020, improved to 18th in 2021, and settled at 22nd in 2022. This
trend raises questions about the country's education system, of which we, as
teachers, are a part. While the EPI primarily assesses adult English
proficiency, it prompts us to consider the competence of teachers in their
roles.
When examining the data, studies reveal that the performance of most
teacher applicants in English proficiency tests is satisfactory but falls short of
receiving very satisfactory and excellent remarks. In light of this, the
Department of Education should implement Teacher Development Programs
to further enhance the English communication competencies of teachers at all
levels in both public and private schools. As educators, excellent English
proficiency is expected of us, and teachers should meet a considerable
English proficiency standard.
ii. English proficiency plays a vital role in the education system, particularly in
countries where English is not the first language. In such contexts, the quality
of English language instruction provided by teachers significantly influences
students' language learning outcomes.
IV. Objectives
V. Clientele/Target Participants
b. Lectures/Presentations/Discussions
c. Brainstorming
d. Group work/Practice set or simulation exercises (technical writing
activity, active listening activity, reading activity, public speaking,
etc.)
e. Questions and Answers Session
f. Evaluations/Feedback Mechanism
iii. Venue
20,000 x 2 = 40,000.00
Total budget
300,000.00
320,000.00
150,000.00
+ 40,000.00
------------------
TRAINING MATRIX
June 24, 2023 (Day 1) Saturday
TIME ACTIVITIES FACILITATORS
7:00 AM- 9:00 AM Arrival, Registration, and Jonhil S. Andrade and
Settling in Training Staff
9:00 AM – 10:00 AM Opening Program Jamie Jane D. Trinidad
10:00 AM – 12:00 NN Breakout Session:
Significance of the English Lady Mae M. Chio
Communication Skills
Training
12:00 PM – 1:00 PM LUNCH
1:00 PM - 5:00 PM Breakout Session: Writing
and Reading Skills Training Invited Speaker
5:00 PM – 6:00 PM DINNER
6:00 PM – 8:00 PM Socialization Night Training Committee
Officers of the Day: Jonhil S. Andrade and Lady Mae M. Chio
June 25, 2023 (Day 2) Sunday
6:00 AM – 7:00 AM BREAKFAST
8:00 AM – 11:00 AM Breakout Session: Public
Speaking and Listening Skills Invited Speakers
Training
11:00 AM – 12:00 NN LUNCH
12:00 PM - 4:00 PM Practicum of all the learned
skills Invited Speakers
4:00 PM – 5:00 PM
Closing Program and Training Committee
Awarding of Certificates
HOME SWEET HOME
Officers of the Day: Jamie Jane D. Trinidad and Vincent Lloyd I. Baquillos
Sample of ‘Evaluation Form’
Evaluation Form
Not
Criteria Acceptable Very Good Excellent
Acceptable
Did the participants acquire
the knowledge and skill that
the trainer was supposed to
provide?
1
Training for Non-Trainers by Carolyn Nilson
2
Ibid.
3
Ibid.