Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction
Both the cardiac and the skeletal muscles belong to the striated group of muscular cells. De-
spite of this, the activating action potential (AP) is rather different between them. While
skeletal myocytes present a brief spiking-like AP of a few milliseconds, the cardiomyocytes
have an AP that lasts for some tens of a second, usually in the order of 200 ms in human
beings (Fig.1). This contrasting divergence between the action potentials of these cells is due
to the long phase-2 in the cardiac cells, i.e., these cells stay in a positive membrane potential,
a depolarization plateau, for a much longer time than the skeletal ones.
Academia Letters, September 2021 ©2021 by the authors — Open Access — Distributed under CC BY 4.0
Such a notorious difference did not pass unnoticed and two lines of non-excluding finalist
explanations came out during the 20th century: (a) the phase-2 plateau would be a safe-guard
against a tetanic contraction of the heart (e.g., [1,2]); and (b) the phase-2 plateau would be a
safe-guard against AP reentry (e.g., [3]).
The problem with these explanations is that both rely on cardiac frequency. The higher the
frequency in relation to the AP duration, the higher the probability of a tetanic contraction of
a muscle; and, in the heart, the higher the probability of a reentry [3]. Therefore, contrary to
what a long phase-2 could represent, a safe-guard mechanism would rely on a short phase-2.
From now on, we shall refer the phase-2 time as T2.
The QT interval of the electrocardiogram is a proxy of the time T2. By this proxy, one
can see that what is empirically observed is in line with the short T2 prediction made above,
not only on an individual basis [3] but also along the phylogeny of mammals [4]. That is, the
increase in heartrate is accompanied by a decrease in T2. These observations leave us with
the dilemma of the relevance in the T2 duration.
Force in skeletal muscles depends on two types of summations: spatial and temporal.
Both of these processes are related to the activation of motor units. The cardiac muscle does
not possess any of these mechanisms and pressure, to be effective, must rely on a degree of
Academia Letters, September 2021 ©2021 by the authors — Open Access — Distributed under CC BY 4.0
Model
The model comprises three distinct types of cells: (1) pacemaker - defined to send out an
electric signal at a predefined rate; (2) electrical conducting system - cells which do not gen-
erate force and have high transmission velocity; and (3) cardiac muscle. The latter have three
electrical states that simulate the AP, as well as six contracting states related to the electrical
phases as shown in Fig.2.
Academia Letters, September 2021 ©2021 by the authors — Open Access — Distributed under CC BY 4.0
The rules for electrical state transitions for muscle cells are as follows (illustrated in Fig.3):
• Depolarization. A cell in the resting state-0, is stimulated to state-2 if four or more of
its neighbors are depolarized, or if in direct contact with a depolarized conducting cell.
• The resting state. A hyperpolarized state-1 cell will return to the resting state-0 after a
determined amount of time, if most of its neighbors are not in state-2.
Repolarization time is also dependent on the electrotonic propagation of electrical poten-
tial, i.e., a repolarizing cell creates a repolarizing wave [5–7]. This electrotonic propagation
was simulated through a probabilistic transition from state-2 to state-1 depending on the recent
repolarizations in the vicinity of a cell.
An algorithm to record the macroscopic flow of the electric signal was implemented, sim-
ulating an electrocardiogram (ECG). This information is obtained by computing the change of
Academia Letters, September 2021 ©2021 by the authors — Open Access — Distributed under CC BY 4.0
Figure 3. Left panel: initial grid with conducting cells (white), muscle cells (grey) and the
ventricular chamber (red). Notice the three branches of the conducting system that travel
through the chamber emulating the 3D structure of this system. Middle and right panels:
snapshots during a depolarization wave (white). Model built in Python, simulations ran in
google cloud machines.
Results
Fig.4 shows the result of increasing T2 from 80 ms to 240 ms. It can be seen that while the
QT time is related to T2, the QRS amplitude is quite the same irrespective to this time, as
expected from real data. Therefore, the model seems to reproduce essential features of the
cardiac electrical signal. As it is clear, the increase in T2 leads to an increase in ventricular
pressure due to the increase in the concomitant force exerted by the distant parts of the grid.
Academia Letters, September 2021 ©2021 by the authors — Open Access — Distributed under CC BY 4.0
Academia Letters, September 2021 ©2021 by the authors — Open Access — Distributed under CC BY 4.0
Figure 5. Partial tetanic contraction of the ventricular wall in simulations with high cardiac
frequency and 2 close to the heart cycle period. Notice the irregular force peak and the
absence of a completely relaxed state between systolic events.
Figure 6. (A) Relationship of pressure developed by the ventricular wall as a function of 2.
(B) Empirical data showing amplitude of contraction as a function of duration of the AP for
single ventricular cells [8].
Academia Letters, September 2021 ©2021 by the authors — Open Access — Distributed under CC BY 4.0
References
1. Antoni H. Functional Properties of the Heart. In: Greger R, Windhorst U, editors. Com-
prehensive Human Physiology. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 1996.
pp. 1801–1823. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-60946-6
2. Pinnell J, Turner S, Howell S. Cardiac muscle physiology. Contin Educ Anaesthesia, Crit
Care Pain. 2007;7: 85–88. doi:10.1093/bjaceaccp/mkm013
3. Eisner DA, Dibb KM, Trafford AW. The mechanism and significance of the slow changes
of ventricular action potential duration following a change of heart rate. Exp Physiol.
2009;94: 520–528. doi:10.1113/expphysiol.2008.044008
4. Günther B, Morgado E. Allometry of ECG waves in mammals. Biol Res. 1997;30: 167–
170.
5. Campos RS, Silva JGR, Barbosa HJC, Santos RW dos. Electrotonic Effect on Action Po-
tential Dispersion with Cellular Automata. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including
Academia Letters, September 2021 ©2021 by the authors — Open Access — Distributed under CC BY 4.0
8. Morad M, Trautwein W. The effect of the duration of the action potential on contraction in
the mammalian heart muscle. Pflugers Arch Gesamte Physiol Menschen Tiere. 1968;299:
66–82. doi:10.1007/BF00362542
12. Binah O. Tetanus in the mammalian heart: Studies in the shrew myocardium. J Mol Cell
Cardiol. 1987;19: 1247–1252. doi:10.1016/S0022-2828(87)80534-5.
Academia Letters, September 2021 ©2021 by the authors — Open Access — Distributed under CC BY 4.0