Jaroslaw “Jerry” Waszczuk, Petitioner

2216 Katzakian Way

Lodi, CA 95242
Phone: 209-663-2977
Email: jjw1980@live.com

October 10, 2019

Via Electronic Mail

Karen Kidd, Reporter

Northern California Record

Subject: Your January 7, 2019 Article in Northern California Record titled “Polish
immigrant fired from UC - Davis for misconduct not entitled to unemployment benefits,
appeals court affirms.”

Re: The Court of Appeals, Third Appellate District (3DCA) Unpublished Opinion
in Case No. C079254, Trial Case No. 34-2013-80001699, Jaroslaw Waszczuk v.
California Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board (CUIAB) and Real Party of
Interest (RPI) –The Regents of the University of California (UC Regents);
California Supreme Court Case Nos. S253713 & S245879

Dear Ms. Kidd:

A few days ago as I was working on my wrongful termination lawsuit, which I

filed against the University of California Regents and which is pending in the
Sacramento County Superior Court since December 4, 2013, Case No. 34-2013-
00155479, Jaroslaw Waszczuk v. The Regents of the University of California, I
came across your article titled “Polish immigrant fired from UC - Davis for
misconduct not entitled to unemployment benefits, appeals court affirms.”

1
Polish immigrant fired from UC - Davis
https://norcalrecord.com/stories/511716336-polish-immigrant-fired-from-uc-
davis-for-misconduct-not-entitled-to-unemployment-benefits-appeals-court-
affirms
It is my understanding that the Northern California Record is owned by the U.S.
Chamber Institute for Legal Reform whose mission is to reduce excessive and
frivolous litigation while restoring fairness and balance to the nation’s civil
justice system.

The above captioned court case, which is the subject of the article in the Northern
California Record, is a classic example of excessive and frivolous litigation in
the California Superior Court and California Appellate Courts, including the
California Supreme Court on two occasions. The litigation for stolen
unemployment benefits has been permitted to continue by judges and justices for
the past six years without resolution. Because they stole my unemployment
benefits from me, which were restored by the California Employment
Development Department in May 2014, the litigation was unnecessary.

I am not quite sure why you and your prestigious legal blog, Northern California
Record, granted me the honor of an article about the December 27, 2018 3DCA
unpublished opinion that denied my unemployment insurance benefits. My
unemployment benefits, which were denied by the California Employment
Development Department (EDD) in January 2013 and were then restored in May
2014 by the same EDD, were possibly intercepted by my crooked attorney or
vanished for reasons unknown to me. I am still searching for a reason as to who
would steal my unemployment benefits. (Attachment #1)

I am assuming that you know a lot more about the Case No. 34-2013-80001699,
Jaroslaw Waszczuk v. California Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board

2
Polish immigrant fired from UC - Davis
(CUIAB) and Real Party of Interest (RPI) – The Regents of the University of
California (UC Regents), as I and my attempts to recover my stolen
unemployment benefits have become the subject of your special writing and
investigative skills at the Northern California Record.

Your January 7, 2019 article about the unpublished opinion in the above-
mentioned case is not the end of the story. Following the December 12, 2018 oral
argument and December 27, 2018 unpublished opinion delivered to me by 3DCA
Justice Elena Duarte, Duarte awarded legal fees for this proceeding to the
Defendants, the CUIAB, represented by legal counsel Ashante Norton from the
California Attorney General’s Office and to the Real Party of Interest, the UC
Regents, represented by David Burkett from Porter Scott Law Firm. Norton never
showed up for oral arguments on December 27, 2018. A remittitur was issued by
3DCA on March 25, 2019, but no one wanted to claim the legal fees awarded by
the Court for this case. I wonder why? I was considering filing a Motion to Recall
Remittitur with 3DCA. However, I’m afraid that it would be a waste of my time,
and my Motion to Recall would be denied as usual by the 3DCA’s rubber stamp
by the presiding judge or his substitute

Consequently, I submitted a Petition for Rehearing to 3DCA on January 11,

2019, four days after you wrote your article about the Petition for Rehearing
being denied by 3DCA acting Justice Blease on January17, , 2019.

On January 23, 2019, I submitted a Petition for Review to the California Supreme
Court. (Attachment #2) On March 20, 2019, a Supreme Court of California en
banc session denied my petition for review filed on January 29, 2019
(Attachment #3). The Supreme Court Justices denied my unemployment
insurance benefits that the EDD had restored on May 14, 2014, but then the

3
Polish immigrant fired from UC - Davis
benefits vanished, just like my short-term disability benefits of 2011. These
benefits resurfaced after eight years on March 20, 2019 in the State of California
Controller’s Office. I claimed them right away in March 2019. However, I am
still awaiting a response to my inquiry under the California Public Records Act
Provision that I sent to the State Controller’s Office concerning to whom and
when they sent my short-term disability benefits. The puzzle is not yet solved.
(Attachment #4)

The Supreme Court’s decision to deny my Petition for Review is very bizarre
considering that Superior Court Judge Shelleyanne Chang, 3DCA justices, the
Supreme Court, and the State Bar were all informed that my unemployment
insurance benefits were restored by EDD in May 2014 and then the benefits
disappeared or were intercepted by my crooked attorney, Douglas Stein, who
stole my $20,000 retainer and misrepresenting me in my wrongful termination
case. The Supreme Court decision denying my Petition for Review stated that
Justice Hon. Joshua Groban was recused and did not participate. Justice Groban
was appointed to the Supreme Court in November 2018 by Governor Jerry
Brown and was sworn into office on January 3, 2019.

The Petition for Review filed in California Supreme Court on January 29, 2019
and the most recent filing and U.S. Tax Court Orders in my Whistleblower Case
No. 23105-18W, JAROSLAW JANUSZ WASZCZUK, Petitioner v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent will give some
insight into this whole matter and help you understand that my unemployment
benefits case was a tiny but important part of a broader matter related to the
enormous and sophisticated scheme of fraud and organized crime known as the
“California Energy Crisis.” This has nothing to do with any alleged Polish
Immigrant Misconduct, which never occurred.
4
Polish immigrant fired from UC - Davis
If you take the time to read the attached “PETITIONER’S REPLY TO U.S. TAX
COURT ORDER SERVED ON JULY 9, 2019 SIGNED BY SPECIAL TRIAL
JUDGE HON. ROBERT N. ARMEN”; RE: PROTECTIVE ORDER—TAX
COURT RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE SECTION 6103(B)(L),
(2), AND (3), you will understand that I am only one person in Lodi, California,
who has gotten hit by the organized crime scheme associated with the University
of California Office of the President (UCOP) mafia led by UC President Janet
Napolitano, who announced her resignation as UC President one month after my
IRS whistleblower case was set for trial in San Francisco. (Attachment #5)

https://www.scribd.com/document/426636466/The-Case-is-Set-for-Trial-Docket-
No-23105-18W-Napolitano-resigned

I am quite convinced that if I had agreed on July 29, 2019 to withdraw my

opposition to the Respondent Motion for Protective Order (U.S. Tax Court
Whistleblower Case), then District Judge Burrell would not have signed the
Order on July 29, 2019 to overturn conviction of Lodi, California, resident
Hamid Hayat, who was wrongly accused of affiliation with the Al-Qaeda terror
group. Hayat never should have been locked up. His only fault was that he was a
member of the Pakistani community in Lodi where I have lived since 1989. If
you read the attached U.S. Tax Special Trial Judge Order dated July 9, 2019, then
you will learn how this judge tried to convince me to withdraw my opposition to
the Motion for Protective Order. My long Reply to the Order, of which part was
used in the Hamid Hayat case, stated:

It was not a coincidence that a new FBI Director, Robert Mueller,

appointed in September 2001, gave his okay to find a guy in Lodi and
5
Polish immigrant fired from UC - Davis
 make him a dangerous terrorist and to make the terror case in Lodi, CA.
Instead of opening a probe and conducting an investigation to find out
who was directly and personally responsible for the ruthless attack on the
California Power Grid that almost collapsed in September 2001, the FBI
Director, instead, ordered the creation of a terrorist sleeper cell in Lodi to
serve as a scapegoat and scarecrowand sent 19-year-old cherry picker
Hamid Hayat to Federal prison for 24 years and kept him hostage for 14
years.

Also, on July 29, 2019, I received the final decision from the State Bar of
California Client Security Fund that I will receive a reimbursement check in
amount of $14,500. (Attachment #6)

In addition to the above, I would like to mention that I came across another of
your more interesting articles in the Legal Newsline dated September 24, 2019,
titled “LAWYERS REPRESENTING KAVANAUGH ACCUSER SHOULD
FACE ETHICS INVESTIGATION, TRUMP ADVOCATE SAYS.”

I addressed the witch hunt aimed at Justice Kavanaugh in my September 18, 2018
letter addressed to Charles E. Grassley, Chairman of the Committee on the
Judiciary in the U.S. Senate. The findings presented in my letter are partially
related to the previously mentioned fraud known as the “California Energy
Crisis.” (Attachment #7)

In conclusion, I would like to quote my statement from the PETITIONER’S

REPLY TO U.S. TAX COURT ORDER SERVED ON JULY 9, 2019 SIGNED
BY SPECIAL TRIAL JUDGE HON. ROBERT N. ARMEN; RE: PROTECTIVE
ORDER—TAX COURT RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
SECTION 6103(B)(L), (2), AND (3):

6
Polish immigrant fired from UC - Davis
 There has been a 14-year-long desperate effort by the University of
California Office of the President (UCOP) mafia to frame and to deport
Petitioner [Jaroslaw Waszczuk] to his native country of Poland. In 1982,
the Polish government deported Petitioner to the United States because of
my participation in political activities in the anti-communist movement
called “Solidarity” to liberate Poland from Soviet domination and
communist rulers who had been enslaving the Polish people for 50 years.
The UCOP mob also orchestrated an ill-crafted and unsuccessful attempt
to provoke and kill me on May 31, 2012 along with portraying me as a
Most Wanted Terrorist on September 26, 2012. These acts of terror
involved Janet Napolitano’s friend from Arizona and former FBI Agent
and UCOP Director of Investigation John Lohse, who was recruited by
the UCOP mob in January 2004 and other criminally minded UCOP, UC
Davis, and UC Davis Medical Center thugs.

Regards,

Jaroslaw “Jerry” Waszczuk

Polish Immigrant

CC:
U.S. Chamber Institute for Legal Reform

7
Polish immigrant fired from UC - Davis