LNG to BALI by FSRU

Why LNG?

Solution on Fuel Oil Shortage

Utilization of cheaper and environmentally friendly

energy source

Reduce long term life cycle cost

Main requirement for LNG to Bali

Sustainable LNG Supply

Buyer’s commitment

Infrastructure at receiving terminal and end user

Local Govt. permit

LNG req for Power Plant in Bali

1. Jimbaran Power Plant 162 MW

2. Gilimanuk Power Plant 130 MW
3. Pemaron Power Plant 80 MW

TOTAL : 372 MW

CORRESPONDENTS TO:

1. Jimbaran Power Plant  32.4 MMSCFD

2. Gilimanuk Power Plant  26 MMSCFD
3. Pemaron Power Plant  16 MMSCFD

TOTAL: 74.4 MMSCFD

CORRESPONDENTS TO:

0.5 MTPA  10~13 SHIPMENT ANNUALLY

CONVENTIONAL LNG SUPPLY CHAIN

Gas platform LNG Plant Loading Terminal LNG Carrier ReceivingTerminal End User
WEAKNESS

Huge infrastructure
Land acquisition
Risk centered at the land terminal

Fixed facilities  inflexible

Labor concentrated onshore  local community
potential risk
FSRU

A semi permanent LNG terminal to receive LNG

at a floating vessel located a distance from
shore area
FSRU’s ADVANTEGOUS

No need of shore receiving terminal

No need of land regasification unit

Risk centered offshore (away from people act.)

Labor concentrated offshore  only skill labor are involved

Flexible  high mobility

 FSRU

SUPPLY SIDE RECEIVER SIDE

Gas Field Liquefaction Transportation Receiving Terminal End User

POWER PLANT
FSRU

Regasification unit
FSRU (general)

• LNG storage capacity: more than 125,000m3

• Accommodation as today
• Design life: Permanently moored and in operation for 20 years
• Nominal gas send-out pressure: 85 bar
• Water depth: 50-150m
• Terminal location: Benign environmental conditions
• Maximum gas send-out flow: 240 tonnes/h
• Gas send-out temperature (min): 0°C
• Maximum boil-off from the storage tanks is 0.25%, as per original
design requirements off the existing LNG carrier.
• The boil-off gas is collected and used as fuel for steam
generation in the FSRU boilers.
• A metering station shall be arranged on the forward deck.
• Time for berthing, loading & unberthing is 24 hours
FSRU (power generation)

• LNG storage capacity: 125,000m3

• The existing equipment shall be used for onboard power generation.
• Usually two steam driven turbo generators onboard, and in addition one
larger steam driven turbo generator of about 6MW need to be installed.
• Usually a diesel driven generator as well as a diesel driven emergency
generator are available.
• The boilers will run on natural gas only, supplied by suction of BOG
from the vapour header, and partly by additional fuel supplied by the
LNG vaporizers.
FSRU (cargo containment)
• LNG storage capacity: 125,000m3
• Number of tanks 5
• Internal diameter Tank 35-40m (common design)
• Tank volume 129,000m3
• Material Aluminium 5083-0
• Max. cargo density 500 kg/m3
• Max. filling ratio 99.5% at reference temp.
• Insulation material Polystyrene
 FSRU (cargo handling)

• In-tank cargo pumps 1,100m3/hr- 5 sets, 140m3/hr- 5 sets

• Spray pumps 50m3/hr, 50mth - 2 sets
• HD Compressors 27,000m3/h - 2 sets
• LD Compressors 6,700m3/h - 1 set
• LNG vapour heater 2,200 MJ/h (7,000 kg/h vapour) - 2 sets
• LNG vaporiser 7,500 MJ/h (8,800 kg/h LNG) - 1 set
• LNG loading arms 16 inch - 2 sets on starboard side
• Vapour loading arm 16 inch - 1 set on starboard side
• Inert gas plant 5,000 m3/h
• Nitrogen plant 60 Nm3/h - 2 sets
• LNG booster pumps 267m3/h, 1,980 mlc, - 3 sets
• LNG Export vaporisers 80,000 - 150,000 kg/h - 4 sets
 FSRU (send out pipeline)
• Pipe inlet pressure 85 bar
• Pipeline inner diameter 380 mm
• Volume flow rate 2,750 m3/h
• Pressure drop per km 0.60 bar/km
• Pipeline nominal diameter 400 mm
Power Plants in Bali
Gilimanuk Pemaron

Benoa
Pesanggaran Power Plant

PESANGGARAN
BENOA

PESANGGARAN
BENOA

PESANGGARAN
BENOA

PESANGGARAN POWER PLANT OF 162 MW

Pesanggaran Power Plant

BENOA COASTAL AREA

NARROW CHANNEL  ONLY 150 M  DIFFICULT MANEOUVERABILITY

(SHUTLE TANKER’S LOA +/- sekitar 270 M).

WATER DEPTH ONLY 10 M  SHUTTLE TANKER’S DRAFT 11.9 M

SHOULD DREDGING IS CARRIED OUT  HIGH INVESTATION  HIGH

SEDIMENTATION RATE DUE TO RECLAMATION PROJECT

WITHIN 1-2 KM RADIUS  FISHING VESSEL PORT AND TOURISM

INDUSTRIES  HIGHLY PETENTIAL OF REJECTION
Pemaron Power Plant
PLTG
Pemaron

SHALLOW
WATER

PEMARON POWER PLANT OF 80 MW

Pemaron Power Plant

PEMARON COASTAL AREA

NO RESTRICTED SHIPPING CHANNEL

SHALLOW WATER  BERTHING FACILITIES FAR FROM SHORE SIDE

(BATHYMETRI CHART)

VERY CLOSE TO LOCAL PEOPLE RESIDENCE  POTENTIAL

REJECTION FROM LOCAL PEOPLE AND GOVERNMENT (TAKING
CONSIDERATION PEMARON POWER PLANT PROJECT IN EARLY YEAR
OF 2000)

3 KM FROM LOVINA TOURIST RESORT  POTENTIAL REJECTION FROM

LOCAL PEOPLE AND GOVERNMENT (TAKING CONSIDERATION
PEMARON POWER PLANT PROJECT IN EARLY YEAR OF 2000)
Gilimanuk Power Plant

Port of Ketapang

GILIMANUK POWER PLANT OF 120 MW

Port of Gilimanuk
Gilimanuk Power Plant

Gilimanuk Power Plant

Gilimanuk Power Plant

Route Alternative 1

Pump House
Existing DO Pipeline

DO Barge from
Tanjungwangi DEPO
Gilimanuk Power Plant

Route Alternative 2

Jembatan
timbang

State owned
land
Gilimanuk Power Plant
Gilimanuk Power Plant

GILIMANUK COASTAL AREA

ADEQUATE SHIPPING CHANNEL  TAKING ROUTE FROM SOUTH

ADEQUATE WATER DEPTH  25-40 M AT 100 m DISTANCE FROM

SHORE SIDE (BATHYMETRI CHART)

RELATIVELY HIGH CURRENT SPEED  ACCEPTABLE WITH STRONGER

BERTHING FACILITIES

STATE OWNED LAND  AT RADIUS OF 1-2 KM FROM POWER PLANT 

EASIER PERMIT FROM LOCAL GOVERNMENT

BUT…

HEAVILY MARINE TRAFFIC IN THE VICINITY

OTHER BEST ALTERNATIVE
FSRU LOCATION SELECTION

MULTIPLE CRIETRIA DECISION MAKING

Attribute

Quantitative Qualitative

Distance Community Environment

Current speed Housing Noise

Water depth Industry Emission

Tide Sea traffic Waste water

Wave height Explosive loc.

Wind speed
FSRU LOCATION SELECTION

MULTIPLE CRIETRIA DECISION MAKING

Ranking Total
Alternatif BENOA G.MANUK PEMARON

Entropy 0.087 0.701 0.469

THE HIGHEST THE ENTROPY  THE BETTER
LNG Distribution Model to Bali
 Delivery model of LNG will used port – to – port calling
system, hence no transhipment is made possible.

 The shuttle LNG vessel speed is assumed to be constant at

the speed of 19 knots.

 No waiting time of the LNG vessel. It means that loaded and

unloaded cargo is assumed to be the same.

 Roundtrip day’s is calculated only based upon seatime at

constant speed and time required for LNG for
loading/unloading cargo.

 Only one size of LNG shuttle vessel is set, which is having

the size of 145.000 M3.

 Commission days within a year are 330 days.

LNG Distribution Model to Bali

 Supply Capacity. The supply capacity of Tangguh Field for

the first phase is 0.5 MTPA, equivalent to +/- 75 MMSCFD.

 Demand Capacity. Total demand capacity of three power

plants in Bali is 74.4 MMSCFD (0.5 MTPA). It consists of 26
MMSCFD for Gilimanuk power plant, 32.4 MMSCFD for Benoa
power plant, and 16 MMSCFD for Pemaron power plant.

 Distance of those three power plant from Tangguh Field is

assumed to be the same of 1186 miles.

 Model will be considered optimum if FSRU location would be

as close as possible to the power plant.
BERTHING FACILITIES

L-TYPE BERTHING SYSTEM T-TYPE BERTHING SYSTEM

MOORING SYSTEM

L-TYPE MOORING SYSTEM T-TYPE MOORING SYSTEM

LOADING ARMS
FIXED TYPE LOADING ARM (L-TYPE BERTHING SYSTEM)
LOADING ARMS
FIXED TYPE LOADING ARM (T TYPE BERTHING SYSTEM)
LOADING ARMS
FIXED TYPE LOADING ARM
LOADING ARMS
FLEXIBLE TYPE LOADING ARM
REGASIFICATION UNIT

MOSS TYPE REGAS-UNIT HAMWORTHY TYPE REGAS-UNIT

REGASIFICATION UNIT
REGASIFICATION UNIT
GOLAR SPIRIT
GOLAR SPIRIT
GOLAR SPIRIT
ASSESSMENT PHASE

 PROJECT LOCATION

 LAND REQUIREMENTS

 CONSTRUCTION PROCEDURES
Mobilization and Site Preparation
Construction
Demobilization

 ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE INSPECTION AND

MITIGATION MONITORING OPERATION, MAINTENANCE, AND
SAFETY CONTROLS

 FUTURE PLANS AND ABANDONMENT

 PERMITS, APPROVALS, AND REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS

GAS SUPPLY MAIN COMPONENT

i) FSRU
ii) Berthing facilities
iii) Anchors – High Holding Power (HHP) Fluke-type
iv) Pipeline End Termination (PLET) / Gravity Base
v) Pipeline End Manifold (PLEM) – Gravity base
vi) Offshore Pipelines (24”) with their own PLET
vii) Shore Approach Tie-In (pipeline/HDD tie-in)
viii) Shore Approach (HDD beach crossing)
ix) Ground Installation (AGI)
x) Onshore Component
MAIN COMPONENT (DED)

 FSRU
LNG Receiving Facilities (FSRU  SHIPYARD)
LNG Regasification Facilities (FSRU  SHIPYARD)
Natural Gas Metering-ship side (FSRU  SHIPYARD)

 BERTHING FACILITIES
Mooring System
Pipeline End Terminations
Pipeline End Manifold

 UTILITIES SYSTEMS AND WASTE MANAGEMENT

Power Generation
Hazardous Materials and Lubricants Management
MAIN COMPONENT (DED)

 SAFETY SYSTEMS
Hazard Detection and Emergency Shutdown Systems
Emergency Shutdown (ESD)
Emergency Depressurizing and Venting System
Gas Detection Systems
Fire Protection Systems
Spill Containment System
Natural Gas Purging with Inert Gas

 OTHER OPERATIONS
Equipment/Supplies/Personnel Transfer Area
Safety Zone and Precautionary Area
MAIN COMPONENT (DED)

 ONSHORE PIPELINES AND ABOVEGROUND FACILITIES

Center Road Pipeline
Center Road Valve Station Expansion
Main Line Block Valves
Pipeline Loop
Valve Station Expansion
MAIN COMPONENT (DED)

 OFSHORE PIPELINE AND ASSOCIATED FACILITIES

Pre-Lay Survey
Offshore Pipeline Preparation, Welding, and Testing
Transport of Materials to the Site
Pipeline Laying
Post-Lay Testing
Other Right-of-Way Crossings

 SHORE CROSSING

 ONSHORE PIPELINES AND ASSOCIATED FACILITIES

Pre-Construction Activities
Ditching
Hauling, Stringing, and Bending
Lowering In, Line-up, and Welding
Backfilling
Hydrostatic Testing
Right-of-Way Cleanup, Paving, and Restoration
PIPE LAYING PROCESS
PIPE LAYING PROCESS
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT

Biological Resources: specifically, the loss of surf grass habitat

offshore of North Beach due to sand deposition.

Hydrology and Water Quality: specifically, the potential for

decreased beach width resulting from the deflection of
bypassed sand away from these local beaches.

Aesthetics/Visual Resources: specifically, the potential impacts

related to decreased beach width

Recreation: specifically, the impacts to use in the vicinity of the

proposed Project resulting from changes in the bottom
topography and waves, and the potential impacts to beach
recreation opportunities and use
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
(QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT  SUBJECT TO DETAIL ASSESSMENT)

 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES  MODERATE

 AGRICULTURE RESOURCES  LOW
 GEOLOGY AND SOILS  LOW
 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY  LOW
 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS  MODERATE
 AIR QUALITY  LOW
 TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC  MODERATE
 NOISE  LOW
 CULTURAL RESOURCES  LOW
 AESTHETICS/VISUAL RESOURCES  MODERATE
 LAND USE AND PLANNING  LOW
 SOCIOECONOMIC  MODERATE
(POPULATION/HOUSING/PUBLIC SERVICES)
 RECREATION  LOW
 MINERAL RESOURCES  LOW
 ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE  MODERATE / HIGH
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
MITIGATION

 MONITORING AUTHORITY
 working guide to facilitate not only the implementation of
mitigation measures by the Project proponent, but also the
monitoring, compliance, and reporting
 delegate duties and responsibilities for monitoring to other
environmental monitors or consultants

 ENFORCEMENT RESPONSIBILITY

 MITIGATION COMPLIANCE RESPONSIBILITY

 GENERAL MONITORING PROCEDURES

 Environmental Monitors
 Construction Personnel
 General Reporting Procedures
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
MITIGATION

 MITIGATION MONITORING TABLE

 Impact (impact number, title, and impact class);
 Mitigation Measure
 Location (where the impact occurs and the mitigation measure
should be applied)
 Monitoring/reporting action (the action to be taken by the
monitor or Lead Agency)
 Effectiveness criteria (how the agency can know if the measure
is effective)
 Responsible agency
 Timing (before, during, or after construction; during operation,
etc.).