Himachal Pradesh field visit Report

1. Details of Proposed Road

District Hamirpur Traffic Category T6

Block Existing Carriageway

Biihri 3.05
width (m)
Name of the Road Barsar to Chambeh Proposed Carriageway width [m) 3.75
Package No HP-03-164 Average Cost (lakh/km) 1.05.79
Proposed Length (km) 8.00 CBR value 6.2

Existing Surface at RD 0/000 KM

Existing Surface at RD 0/900 KM

Existing Surface at RD 1/800 KM

Existing Surface at RD 2/700 KM

Existing Surface at RD 3/600 KM

Existing Surface at RD 4/500 KM

ffi
w
Y

Existing Surface at RD 5/400 KM

Existing Surface at RD 6/400 KM

Existing Surface at RD 7 /200 KM

 Existing Surface at RD 8/000 KM

2. Existing Crust Details

Chainage GSB wBM/WMM Bituminous Layer
0/000 to B/000 160 30

3. Proposed Pavement Composition

3.1. BituminousPavement
Initial Proposal Revised Proposal
Chainage
CT CT
GSB BC GSB MSS
Ease Base
0 to 2860 BT pavement 50 2L0 40 50 270 25
2900 to 3270 BT Pavement 50 270 40 50 270 25
3530 to 4800 BT Pavemenr 50 2L0 40 50 21,0 25
4900 to 5600 BT Pavement 50 210 40 50 2L0 25
-l
STooroSoooBf,Pavement I sO I zto I 40 I 50 | 2lo 125
3.2,. Cement Concrete Pavement
Initial Proposal Revised Proposal
Chainage
GSB CT Base CC M3O GSB CT Base CC M3O

2850 to 2900 CC Pavement 50 100 160 50 100 160

3.3. Paver Block Pavement

Initial Proposal Revised Proposal
Chainage PV PV Remarks
GSB WMM GSB WMM
Block Block
3270 to 3530 Paver 150 75
150 75 BO BO
Block Pavement

4800 to 4900 Paver

150 75 BO 150 75 BO
Block Pavement

5600 to 5700 Paver 75

150 75 BO 150 BO
Block Pavement

4. Observations on CD structures chainage wise

Initial Proposal Revised Proposal

Chainage Type ofCulvert Span/Dia Chainage Type ofCulvert Span/Dia

910 HPC 0.9m 910 HPC 0.9m

5. Protection works
5.1. Observations on Retaining Wall
Initial Proposal Revised Proposal
Start f,nd Start End
Height
Length Height Length
Chainage Chainage Side Chainage Chainage Side
(Km) Im) Im) (Km) Im] {m}
{Km) tKm)
0+520 0+527 LHS 7.00 2 0+520 0+527 LHS 7.00 2

1+440 l+460 LHS 20.00 3.5 7+440 l+460 LHS 20.00 3.5

I
 Initial Proposal Revised Proposal
Start End Start End
Length Height Length Height
Chainage , Chainage Side Chainage Chainage Side
(m) (m) (m) (m)
(Km) : (Km) (Km) tKm)
2+19o I Z+Zoo ll,Hsl10.00 4 2+790 2+200 LHS 10.00 4

2+360 I Z+ggO LHS 20.00 3.5 2+360 2+380 LHS 20.00 3.5

3+270 I 3+277 LHS 7.00 2 3+270 3+277 LHS 7.00 2

3+700 3+720 LHS 20.00 3 3+700 3+720 LHS 20.00 3

3+750 3+755 RHS 5.00 4 3+750 3+755 RHS 5.00 4

5+420 5+440 RHS 20.00 3.5 5+420 5+440 RHS 20.00 3,5

6+290 6+295 RHS 5.00 3 6+290 6+295 RHS 5.00 3

6+800 6+820 RHS 20.00 4 6+800 6+820 RHS 20.00 4

6+900 7+020 RHS 120.00 2 6+900 7+020 RHS 120.00 2

Total Length (m) 254.O Total Length (m) 254.O

5.2. Observations on Breast Wall

Initial Proposal Revised Proposal
Start f,nd $tart End
tength Height tength Height
Chainage Chainage Side Chainage Chainage Side
(m) (m) {m) (m)
tKm) (Km) {I(m) tKm)
1+260 1+310 LHS 50.00 3 L+260 1+3 10 LHS 50.00 3

7+800 7+BB0 LHS 80.00 4 7+800 7+BB0 LHS 80.00 4

Total Length (m) 130.0 Total Length (m) 130.0

5.3. Observations on Toe Wall

Initial Proposal Revised Proposal
Start End Start End
Length Height tength Height
Chainage Chainage Side Chainage Chainage Side
(m) Im) (m) {m}
{Km) (I(m) {I(m) tKm)

Total Length (m) 00.0 Total tength (m) 00.0

5.4. Observations on Other protection works (Crash Barrier)

Initial Proposal Revised Proposal
Crash Barrier from Ch. 5220to 5860 Length Crash Barrier from Ch. 5220 to 5800 Length
640 m on RHS 580 m on RHS
Crash Barier fuom Ch. 5960 to 7310 kngtr I Crash Barrier from Ch. 5960 to 6200 Length
1350monRHS I Z+OmonRHS
Crash Barrier from Ch. 6800 to 6990 Length Crash Barrier from Ch. 6800 to 6950 Length
190 m on RHS 150 m on RHS
Crash Barrier from Ch. 7050 to 7470 Length Crash Barrier from Ch. 7050 to 7230 Length
410 m on RHS 180 m on RHS
Crash Barrier from Ch. 7480 to 8000 Length Crash Barrier from Ch.74B0to 7730 Length
1120 m on RHS 250 m on RHS
Total Length (m) | 3710.0 Total Length [m) I 1400.0
Note: Provide a boundary stone where the crash barrier length hqs been
reduced.

6. Observations on Pucca Drain

Initial Proposal Revised Proposal

Start End Length $t*rt End Length

Side Shape
Side Shape
ch Ch Im) Ch Ch (m)
V V
"t260 t3 10 50 LHS 7260 13 10 50 LHS
Shape Shape

U U
3900 3950 100 Both 3900 3950 100 Both
Shape Shape

V V
7800 TBBO BO LHS 7800 TBBO BO LHS
Shape Shape

Total [m) 230 Total (m) 230

7. General Observations

The existing width of the road is 3.05 m [avg) throughout the

length and is getting widened to 3.75 m cfw.
CTB is proposed for 210 mm, but in rate analysis new/virgin
materials are taken in full quantity
 of 150
It was verified on site that there is a considerable thickness
mm available which State was advised to take credit for in
rate
analysis, accordingly the rates are revised for CTB'
State has revised the provision of 40 mm BC with 25
mm MSS as
the Traffic is <2 MSA.
a Existing surface of the road is damaged BT'
Protection work R/W, B /W,Toe Wall are proposed with both
PCC
a

and Gabion type in stretches where roadway of 6.0 m is

not
available. These provision has been revised as per the side
condition after the in section.

Tentative revision in cost

h0
b!
ta 0)
9^
(.,
, ELtr otr
Ui ta 'o' UE
-Y, oi4 o\ 9E vX
U,r!
Erl o\ o. tA ,) o-l
9G P€ -tr Pe otr
6!s E-P
.36 bE sg
o
{' o
i3 F
G
o 6)
o
U 0)

t05.79t 67 t.B7 4 L7 4.456

Signature'f d;#'fffifi' orn.". Signature of InsPecting Officer

1. Details of Proposed Road
District Hamirpur Traffic Category T6

Existing Carriageway
Block Bijhri 3.05
width (m)
Barsar to Gujrera
Name of the Road Proposed Carriageway width (m) 3.75
via Neri
Package No HP-03-163 Average Cost (lakh/km) 105.79

Proposed Length (km) 11.00 CBRvalue 6.2

ri#a'',ffi
%ry
;

Existing Surface at RD 0/000 KM

Existing Surface at RD 0/900 KM

'i:mj
WY.{M:@

Existing Surface at RD 1/700 KM

I

Wffi

Existing Surface at RD 2/600 KM

ti r,
lil

--

w1
iffi4;

Existing Surface at RD 3/700 KM

Existing Surface at RD 4/400 KM

ru
ffi

Existing Surface at RD 5/500 KM

Existing Surface at RD 6/500 KM

H
ffif

Existing Surface at RD 7 /700 KM

I

W
ffi'
7

WA
ffif
**u q

Existing Surface at RD 9/000 KM

Existing Surface at RD 11/000 KM

l
2. Existing Crust Details
Chainage WBM/WMM

0/000 to 111000 160 30

3. Proposed Pavement Composition

3.5. BituminousPavement
Initial Proposal Revised Proposal
Chainage CT CT
GSB BC GSB \i:>
Base Base

0 to 3200 BT Pavement 50 210 40 50

3300 to 4750 BT Pavement 50 270 40 50 21.0

4800 to 7450 BT Pavement

7550 to 7550 BT Pavemenr

7680 to 9650 BT Pavement

9680 to 9750 BT Pavement

9800 to 11000 BT Pavement

3.6. Cement Concrete Pavement

Initial Proposal Revised Proposal
Chainage
GSB CT Base CC M3O GSB CT Base CC M3O

3.7. Paver Block Pavement

Initial Proposal Revised Proposal
Chainage PV PV Remarks
GSB WMM GSB WMM
Block Block
3200 to 3300 Paver
150 75 BO 150 75 BO
Block Pavement

4750 to 4800 Paver

150 75 BO 150 75 BO
Block Pavement

7450 to 7550 Paver

150 75 BO 150 75 BO
Block Pavement

7650to 7680 Paver

150 75 BO 150 75 BO
Block Pavement
9650 to 9680 Paver
150 75 BO 150 75 80
Block Pavement

4. Observations on CD structures chainage wise

Initial Proposal Revised Proposal

Chainage Type ofCulvert Span/Dia Chainage Type of Culvert Span/Dia

910 HPC 0.9m 910 HPC 0.9m

5. Protection works
5.1. Observations on Retaining Wall
Initial Proposal Revised Proposal
Start End Start End
Length Height Length Height
Chainage Chainage Side Chainage Chainage Side
Im] [m] (m) (m)
(Km) (Km) {Km} {Km)
0+176 0+207 LHS 31.00 3 0+176 0+207 LHS 31.00 3

0+422 0+429 LHS 7.00 4 0+422 0+429 LHS 7.00 4

0+470 0+477 LHS 7.00 3 0+470 0+477 LHS 7.00 J

1+160 t+770 LHS 10.00 2 1+160 !+770 LHS 10.00 2

1+160 t+770 RHS 10.00 2 1+160 I+170 RHS 10.00 2

7+2L0 7+277 LHS 7.00 3 L+210 1+277 LHS 7.00 3

1+250 7+255 LHS 5.00 4 l+250 1+255 LHS 5.00 4

1+640 1+550 LHS 10.00 3 1+640 1+650 LHS 10.00 3

2+230 2+237 RHS 7.00 4 2+230 2+237 RHS 7.00 4

2+550 2+560 RHS 10.00 3 2+550 2+560 RHS 10.00 3

2+790 2+800 RHS 10.00 3 2+790 2+800 RHS 10,00 3

3+740 3+745 LHS 5.00 3 3+740 3+745 LHS 5.00 3

4+080 4+090 LHS 10.00 3 4+080 4+090 LHS 10.00 3

5+010 5+020 RHS 10.00 3 5+0L0 5+020 RHS 10.00 3

5+010 5+040 RHS 30.00 4 5+010 5+040 RHS 30.00 3

5+460 5+470 LHS 10.00 3 5+460 5+470 LHS 10.00 3

6+740 6+800 RHS 60.00 3 6+740 6+800 RHS 60.00 3

6+840 6+860 RHS 20.00 4 6+840 6+860 RHS 20.00 3

7+020 7+050 RHS 30.00 2 7+020 7+050 RHS 30.00 2

8+160 8+190 LHS 30.00 4 B+160 B+190 LHS 30.00 3

 lnitial Proposal Revised Proposal
Start End Start End
Length Height Length Height
Chainage i Chainage Side
(m)
Chainage Chainage Side
(m)
(Km) i tx*l Im) (Km) {m)
tKm)
8+390 I 8+410 LHS 20.00 3 B+390 B+4 10 LHS 20.00 3

B+450 B+470 LHS 20.00 3 B+450 B+470 LHS 20.00 3

B+550 B+560 LHS 10.00 4 B+550 B+560 LHS 10.00 2.5

B+990 9+000 RHS 10.00 4 B+990 9+000 RHS 10.00 2.5

9+640 9+650 RHS 10.00 4 9+644 9r650 RHS 10.00 2.5

9+660 9+67O RHS 10.00 3 9+660 9+670 RHS 10.00 3

9+740 9+770 RHS 30.00 3 9+740 9+770 RHS 30.00 3

10+130 L0+L37 RHS 7.00 4 10+130 10+137 RHS 7.00 3

10+340 10+360 RHS 20.00 3 10+340 10+360 RHS 20.00 3

10+700 10+710 LHS 10.00 3 10+700 1,0+710 LHS 10.00 3

10+700 70+710 RHS 10.00 3 10+700 10+710 RHS 10.00 3

Total Length (m 476.0 Total Length (m 476.0

5.2. Observations on Breast Wall

Initial Proposal Revised Proposal
Start End Start End
Length Height Length Height
Chainage Chainage Side Chainage Chainage Side
(m) (n) (Km) (Km)
(m) (m)
{Km) IKm]
0+128 0+752 RHS 24.00 2.5 0+LZB 0+152 RHS 24.00 2.5

3+970 3+980 LHS 10.001 2 l3+970 I g+ggo LHS I 10.00 2

5+400 5+41 0 LHS 10.001 2 I 5+4001 5+410 LHS 10,00 2

7+330 7+350 RHS 20.00 I 2.5 I 7+330 I 7+350 IRHS 20.00 2.5

10+570 10+600 LHS 30.00 I 2.5 lto+Szo I to+6oo luts 30.00 2.5

10+570 10+600 RHS 30.00 I 2.5 110+570 110+600 RHS 30.00 2.5

Total Length (m) L24.O Total Length (m) 124.O

5.3. Observations on Toe Wall

Start
Chainage
{Km)

Total Length (m) Total Length (m)

5.4. Observations on Other protection works (Crash Barrier)

Initial Proposal Revised Proposal

Crash Barrierfrom Ch.5220to 5850 Length Crash Barrier from Ch. 5220 to 5450 Length
630 m on RHS 230 m on RHS

Crash Barrier from Ch.5960 to 6310 Length Crash Barrier from Ch. 5960 to 6110 Length
350 m on RHS 150 m on RHS

Crash Barrier from Ch.6800 to 6950 Length Crash Barrier from Ch. 6800 to 6950 Length
150 m on RHS 150 m on RHS

Crash Barrier from Ch. 7050 to 7430 Length Crash Barrier from Ch. 7050 to 7130 Length B0
380 m on RHS m on RHS

Crash Barrier from Ch. 7480 to.8500 Length Crash Barrier from Ch. 7480 to 7730 Length
lL20 m on RHS 250 m on RHS

Crash Barrier from Ch.8690 to 8790 Length Crash Barrier from Ch. 8690 to 8790 Length
100 m on RHS 100 m on RHS

Crash Barrier from Ch. BB70 to 9150 Length Crash Barrier from Ch. BB70 to 9150 Length
280 m on RHS 280 m on RHS

Crash Barrier from Ch.9870 to 10030 Crash Barrier from Ch. 9870 to 10030 Length
Length 160 m on RHS 160 m on RHS

Total Length (m) | 3710.0 Total Length (m) | r+Oo.O

Note: Provide a boundary stone where the crash barrier length has been
reduced.
6. Obserwations on Pucca Drain
Initial Proposal Revised Proposal

Start End Length Start End Length

Side Shape Side Shape
ch ch (m) Ch Ch Im]
U U
0 530 1060.0 Both 0 530 1060.0 Both
Shape Shape
V V
1100 1,224 124 LHS 1100 L224 724 LHS
Shape Shape
U U
7750 1,960 420.00 Both 1750 1960 420.00 Both
Shape Shape
U U
5040 5070 60.00 Both 5040 5070 60.00 Both
Shape Shape

Total (m) 1664.O Total (m) 1664.0

7. Other Observations
 o The existing width of the road is 3.05 m (avg) throughout
the length and is getting widened to 3.75 m cf w.
o CTB is proposed for 210 mm, but in rate analysis
new/virgin materials are taken in full quantity.
. It was verified on site that there is a considerable thickness
of 150 mm available which State was advised to take credit
for in rate analysis, accordingly the rates are revised for
CTB.
. state has revised the provision of 40 mm BC with 25 mm
MSS as the Traffic is <2 MSA.
o Existing surface of the road is damaged BT.
o Protection work R/w, B /w, Toe wall are proposed with
both PCC and Gabion type in stretches where roadway of
6.0 m is not available. These provision has been revised as
per the side condition after the in section.

Tentative revision in cost:

Initial Proposal Revised Proposal Cost Reduction

o o EO o
q) o0
o
(J a0 U
?^ 's 'S^ I
o) U= P.Y o.tr
o 3a 32
.9
i.j -tr
Etr ort 2G ,:(
ort er, ,ii
9rg
,r4
oJt P€ Erl f-c E0 a- o= oj
(! otr
3o 6q L)s !i E0
oJ r!
3E OE
o
o
L'
o
O.
is o .''i .ed
o)
{- (!
o
F
Pg o
q) & o)
/ o\

1096.09 11.00 99.645 857.77 11.00 77.98 238.32 27.665 21,.74

l
 I

Signature of State's Field Officer Signature of Inspecting Officer