Professional Documents
Culture Documents
argued that its applicability could fail when the final 3 ANALYSIS
collapse is determined by creep phenomena or matrix
yielding. These failure modes are typically experienced In this section, the features of the model proposed in
when thermoplastic matrices are used. Ref. 4 relevant to the present work are recalled. The
Compared to thermosets, thermoplastics offer the model is then developed according to a statistical
advantages of faster processability, easier storage, and approach.
recycling, resulting in lower environmental impact. On
the other hand, the effect of their substitution for ther- 3.1 Fatigue model
mosets on the fatigue life of reinforced plastics must be The starting point for the model proposed in Ref. 4 was
better evaluated. the hypothesis that, during cycling, the material
Finally, one of the problems usually encountered in strength undergoes a continuous decay, following a
design for long-term exposure is the high scatter gen- power law:
erally affecting fatigue tests. This calls for a better
understanding of the causes of variability in fatigue life, da, -b
-= -a.n (1)
as well as for design methods based on statistical dn
approaches.
a=ao.Aa (2)
(4 to assess the model presented in Ref. 4 for the
case of RGFRP with a thermoplastic resin;
@I to verify the effect of the resin type on the fatigue
where ao, like b, is a constant for given material and
response of a RGFRP;
load conditions, and AC-Iis defined as:
cc> to study the fatigue behaviour from a statistical
point of view, in order to obtain a tool for prob- Aa = amax - amin (3)
abilistic design methodologies.
To achieve these goals, static and fatigue tests in four- In eqn (3) urnax and omin represent the maximum and
point bending were carried out on a random con- minimum stress during fatigue cycling, respectively.
tinuous-fibre-reinforced polypropylene resin. Three dif- Substituting eqn (2) into eqn (1) the latter was inte-
ferent R ratios were adopted in fatigue. The results were grated, and the constant of integration was obtained by
handled according to the model discussed in Ref. 4. the boundary condition n = 1 --+ a,, = aa, where cro is
Despite the anticipation, a good correlation was found the static strength of virgin material. Introducing the
between theoretical predictions and experimental data. stress ratio R, given by:
A possible reason for the negligible effect of matrix
amin
yielding on the fatigue behaviour was given by the R=p (4)
microscopic observation of fracture surfaces, revealing Cr,ax
happens when the residual material strength matches and, recalling eqn (9):
the maximum applied stress, the critical number of
cycles to failure, N, is calculated by putting a,, = amax in c$,,,;[l +cr.(N*B-l)(l -R#
eqn (5): YS
Equation (7) is then rearranged in the form: from which the statistical distribution of fatigue lives
can be calculated.
It is interesting to note that eqn (12) meets the
&=,.(N@- 1) (8)
boundary conditions for monotonic tests. In fact, put-
ting N* = 1, eqn (12) becomes:
According to eqn (8), all the fatigue data should con- Fdl) = 1 - ev[-(~maxlr)s] (13)
verge to a single master curve, irrespective of the stress
ratio adopted, when the quantity on the left-hand side is
plotted against N. Moreover, plotting the term on the Comparing eqn (13) and eqn (9), it is concluded that, as
left-hand side against (Nfl - 1) should result in a expected, the probability of a specimen failing in fatigue
straight line of slope 01passing through the origin. The within the first cycle coincides with the monotonic
latter observation was used to evaluate LXand B by sui- strength distribution.
tably adjusting the fi value until the best-fit straight line Solving eqn (12) for N*, it is obtained:
through the experimental data actually passed through
the origin.
&. 1ln[ 1 - FN(N*)] I Iis - 1
3.2 Statistical implementation
To resort to a statistical analysis of the fatigue data, a (14)
method conceptually similar to that presented in Ref. 11
is followed.
It is assumed that the scatter in the monotonic mate- Equation (14) is particularly useful in design, because
rial strength, ao, is well represented by a two-parameter it allows the direct calculation of the classical S-N curve
Weibull distribution. Therefore, the probability of find- for a fixed probability of failure F,v(N*), when the stress
ing a 00 value 5 x is given by: ratio R is given.
where y is the scale parameter or the characteristic The specimens for monotonic and fatigue tests were cut
strength, and 6 is the shape parameter. from rectangular plates, about 400mm in length,
It is also hypothesised that the parameters (Yand /3 are 300mm in width, and 4mm in thickness, made of ran-
not statistical variables, and that the scatter in fatigue dom continuous-glass-fibre-reinforced polypropylene.
life is uniquely due to the variability in static strength, in The dimensions of the samples were 80x20 mm. The
such a way that a lower fatigue life is associated with a measured fibre content by volume was Vr = 0.2.
lower ultimate strength. Under these assumptions, the Both the monotonic and fatigue tests were carried out
probability of finding an N value 5 N* is obtained from in four-point bending at room temperature, adopting an
eqn (7): outer span I= 66 mm, an inner span a = 22 mm, and a
sinusoidal waveform. The testing machine was an
FN(N*) = Instron 8501 servo-hydraulic system in load control.
The frequencies used during the fatigue tests were in the
’ . (z- l)]“‘j N*) range f = 0.8-2 Hz, to avoid significant heating of the
cr.(l - R) material. The actual frequency was chosen so that the
same initial stress rate could be applied on all samples.
Higher frequencies were therefore used for lower max-
Rearranging eqn (10) results in: imum stress levels. The stress ratio was varied in the
range R =0.1&O-5, and the criterion of complete failure
was conventionally assumed to determine fatigue life.
FdN*) = P{uo5 umax. [l+~.(N*B-l)(l-~)]} The load levels during fatigue were selected in the range
(11) O+O-9 of the mean monotonic failure load. The latter
960 G. Caprino, A. D’Amore
was measured in crosshead control, at a crosshead speed Looking at the data in Fig. 1, it is seen that eqn (15)
of 100 mm min-‘, to provide an initial stress rate similar can be approximately applied also for the material con-
to that attained in fatigue. In all, 15 monotonic and 35 sidered in this work. To measure the fatigue sensitivity,
fatigue tests were performed. each data set in Fig. 1 was fitted by a best-fit straight
After tests, the external surfaces of all the specimens line (not shown in the figure) conditioned to pass
were observed for the detection of eventual visible through the point (Log N = 0, amax/~s = l), and the c
damage. Some fracture surfaces were also analysed by values shown in Table 1 were obtained. For R = 0.1, c
scanning electron microscopy (SEM), in order to deter- was quoted by Mandell’ in the range -0.09 to -0.135
mine failure modes. for short-glass-fibre-reinforced thermoplastics. The
value c =0+124 calculated here is in good agreement
with the findings of Mandell,’ and demonstrates that
5 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION the presence of continuous fibres, as compared to short
fibres, does not sensibly improve the fatigue behaviour
From the 15 monotonic flexural tests, the mean flexural of a composite system. From Table 1, c appears to
strength of the material under investigation was calcu- depend on R, decreasing as the latter increases. This
lated through the well-known strength-of-materials for- only indicates that the fatigue life, as previously shown,
mulae, providing a0 = 185 Nmm-*. The fatigue data increases with increasing R for a given maximum stress.
were then normal&d with respect to 00, and reported Some interesting considerations can be made, if the
on a classical semi-logarithmic S-N plot (Fig. 1). experimental results in Fig. 1 are fitted by a straight line
The general behaviour of the material follows the of equation:
trend described in Ref. 4 for a thermoset-based
RGFRP, with higher fatigue durations pertaining to a,,,/ao= d-f. Log N (16)
higher stress ratios.
The fatigue lifetime of many composite systems is
often described by the simple equation: so that the straight line is not forced to fulfil the
boundary condition amax/uo = 1 + LogN = 0. The cal-
amaX/aO= 1 - c. Log N (15) culated values of the constants d and fin eqn (16) are
reported in the third and fourth column in Table 1.
Despite the scatter of data, a clear trend is observed
According to eqn (15) the experimental points of the from these values. The intercept of the straight lines is
S-N curve should fall on a straight line passing through always higher than unity, and tends to increase with
the point (Log N = 0, 0in~Ja0 = 1), when reported on a increasing stress ratio, whereas the slope f progressively
semi-log scale. One of the advantages of using eqn (15) decreases under the same circumstances. Therefore, the
is in the fact that the fatigue sensitivity can be evaluated effect of R cannot be accounted for by a simple shift of
by a single coefficient, c, i.e. the absolute value of the the experimental points along the x axis.
slope of the straight line fitting the experimental data. Other researchers,’ working on thermoplastic-matrix
This method was utilised by Mandelli to rank a variety composites, have shown that their fatigue lifetime at
of composite systems on the basis of their fatigue beha- sufficiently high cycles follows a nearly linear trend,
viour. provided the S-N data are presented on a log-log plot.
Therefore, the fatigue life could be described by the law:
I
umax/uo
= N-(““‘) (17)
0.75
In Fig. 2, the same data shown in Fig. 1 are replotted
on a log-log diagram. The continuous straight lines
reported in the figure were drawn by the best-fit
method, and approximate with sufficient accuracy the
experimental points. From their slope, the m values in
0.25 eqn (17) were calculated for each R, and are reported in
A R = 0.5
Table 1. Values of the coefficients appearing in eqns (15)-(17)
I I I I
0 for the material tested
0 2 4 6 8
R C d f m
LopN
0.1 0.124 I .09 0.147 8.40
Fig. 1. Semi-log plot of the normalised maximum stress, 0.3 0.108 I.11 0.134 9.17
a,,,/~, against number of cycles to failure, N, for different 0.5 0.096 1.15 0.128 9.71
values of the stress ratio, R.
Flexural fatigue behaviour of random continuous-jibre-reinforced thermoplastic composites 961
the last column in Table 1. Limiting the attention to The K value was calculated for each experimental
R = 0.1, m is 8.4, in very good agreement with the data point, and reported against N on a semi-log scale
reported elsewhere’ for injection-moulded, short-fibre (Fig. 3). As anticipated, all the data fall sensibly on a
composites, for which m = 7-9 was found. However, single line, irrespective of R. This indicates that the
from Table 1, m seems to depend on R, increasing as R effect of the stress ratio is efficiently modelled. Never-
increases. theless, Fig. 3 does not yield direct evidence of the
From the straight lines in Fig. 2, it is apparent that validity of eqn (7) in describing the S-N curve. To
their intercept is far from coincident with the origin. demonstrate this, it is necessary to show that eqn (7) is
This trend has been interpreted’ as a transition in failure satisfactorily able to fit the actual trend of K as a func-
modes from matrix shear yielding at low cycles (high tion of N.
stress levels) to a single crack growth at high cycles. In Ref. 4, it was noted that, according to eqn (8)
Only the latter behaviour should be described by eqn plotting K against (NB - 1) should result in a straight
(17) which can be theoretically derived’ from the Paris line passing through the origin, provided the correct
law, modelling a single crack growth under fatigue con- value is used for fi. This observation was utilised to cal-
ditions. Therefore, the fatigue lifetime at low cycles culate both /? and CY.The latter value should be given by
should follow a different law. the slope of the straight line.
The previous considerations highlight two needs to be The previous procedure was also followed in this
accomplished, in order to obtain reliable design proce- work, and the results reported in Fig. 4 were obtained,
dures based on fatigue lifetime: putting /?=0.194. In the figure, no distinction is made
between points referring to different R values.
(a) models must be built, capable to describe the
It can be seen that, although there is some scatter, all
fatigue behaviour at low, as well as at high cycles;
the points actually follow a linear trend. From the slope
(b) the effect of the stress ratio must be accounted for
of the best-fit straight line, shown in the figure, the value
in the models.
CY = 0.224 was calculated.
Both of these features are present in the model pre- The continuous lines in Figs 1 and 3 represent the
sented in Ref. 4, which was assessed for a random-fibre- fatigue predictions based on eqns (7) and (8), respec-
reinforced thermosetting resin. In Ref. 4, it was noticed tively, in which the values of the constants a, /? specified
that the applicability of the proposed formula could fail above where adopted. The agreement with experimental
if different failure mechanisms determined lifetime at data is satisfying.
low and high cycles. From this aspect, it is then parti- The results available do not permit us to draw any
cularly useful to assess the proposed model for a ther- conclusion as to the validity of eqn (7) in the field of
moplastic-based composite whose fatigue behaviour, as high stresses, i.e. low fatigue cycles. It will be shown
previously shown, substantially agrees with similar later in this work that, as also noted by other research-
materials treated in the literature. ers,’ this is a very difficult task from an experimental
To test the model, eqn (8) was utilised. According to viewpoint, especially when composites characterised by
this equation, all the fatigue data obtained for different highly scattered monotonic properties are concerned.
R values should converge to a single curve, provided the In Ref. 4, the same methodologies followed in this
term on the left-hand side, indicated by the symbol K in work were used to test the fatigue behaviour of a con-
the following, is reported against N. tinuous random glass-fibre-reinforced thermosetting
0
4
0 R=O.l
0 R = 0.3
3
- -0.2
g= A R = 0.5
1
d z 2
zi
s -0.4 OR
OR 1
A R=0.5
-0.6
0 2 4 6 0
0 2 4 6 8
h0
hi9
Fig. 2. Log-log plot of the normalised maximum stress,
o,,,,,/ao, against number of cycles to failure, N, for different Fig. 3. Semi-log plot of the tcrrn on the left-hand side of eqn
values of the stress ratio, R. (8), K,against number of cycles to failure, N.
962 G. Caprino, A. D’Amore
0.8
0.4 ~ Present
----- [51
0.2
0 4 8 12 16 0 2 4 6
ND -1 LogN
Fig. 4. Plot for the evaluation of the constants (Y,/3appearing Fig. 5. Semi-log plot of the predicted fatigue lifetimes for the
in eqn (7). material tested in Ref. 4 and the present material. R=stress
ratio.
resin. It is important to recall that, in addition to the In Figs 6 and 7, two microphotographs of the fracture
different matrix type, also the fibre content was higher surfaces are shown of specimens tested at high and low
(Vr = 0.35) than the present (0.20) whereas the reinfor- load levels, at R=O.l. Some broken fibres are clearly
cement type was the same. The difference in fibre con- visible, and from their surfaces quite a poor fibre/matrix
tent can explain the static flexural strength measured in interface is inferred. Looking at the matrix, some loca-
Ref. 4 (290Nmm-*), much higher than the one char- lised zones of matrix yielding, more diffuse in the case of
acterising the present material (185 Nmmm2). The a! and high load, are observed. However, in general the intrin-
fi values calculated in Ref. 4 were 0.184 and 0.200, sic ductility of the resin appears to have been strongly
respectively. Unfortunately, the presence of two con- hindered by the constraint action of the reinforcement.
stants in eqn (7) renders difficult a direct comparison of This remark could explain the insensitivity of the fati-
different materials in terms of fatigue sensitivity. There- gued composite to the matrix ductility, previously
fore, a judgement can be given only on the basis of the noticed.
overall S-N curves. The basic hypothesis in developing the statistical
In Fig. 5, the predicted lifetimes for the two compo- model was the distribution of the monotonic flexural
sites under investigation are shown. Two stress ratios, strength according to a two-parameter Weibull dis-
R=O-1 and R=0.5, have been considered. It is seen tribution (eqn (9)). To assess this assumption, the results
that, despite of the difference in matrix type and fibre of the 15 monotonic tests were used to evaluate, by the
content, the materials exhibit approximately the same best-fit method, the characteristic strength, y, and the
fatigue behaviour. The present composite seems to offer shape parameter, 6. The values y = 193-3 Nmmp2 and
a slightly poorer response, but it is hard to accept this 6 = 11.80 were obtained, by which the distribution func-
statement on a sound basis, owing to the scatter of the tion was calculated and plotted in Fig. 8. The symbols
experimental data.
It may be wondered why an inherently ductile resin
like polypropylene results in a fatigue response similar
to that of a more brittle polymer, when adopted as
matrix in a composite. A possible answer can be given
by the observation of the fracture surfaces after fatigue
failure.
By contrast with the composite treated in Ref. 4, the
present material did not show extensive microcracking
before catastrophic failure. The final collapse was pro-
voked by a single crack, which apparently nucleated on
the surface subjected to tension, and propagated rapidly
during the last fatigue cycles, running approximately
perpendicular to the specimen length. Sometimes, some
buckling failures were revealed on the surface subjected
to compression, but there was no evidence of any inter-
action between them and the main crack in precipitating Fig. 6.Fracture surface after fatigue failure. Normalised
final failure. maximum stress (T,,-Jcro = 0.8; stress ratio R = 0.1.
Flexural fatigue behaviour of random continuous-fibre-reinforced thermoplastic composites 963
0.8
0.6
0
100 150 200 250
2
%(N/m )
Fig. 7.Fracture surface after fatigue failure. Normalised
maximum stress u,,Jao = 0.4. Stress ratio R =O.1. Fig. 8. Statistical distribution of the measured static strength,
CO.
represent the experimental data. In spite of some fluc- parameters (Y,p appearing in eqn (7). To reduce overall
tuation in the data points, resulting from the small testing time, low values of the stress ratio R can be
sample size, the correlation between theory and experi- adopted in fatigue characterisation.
ments is sufficiently good, as witnessed also by the From eqn (14), the S-N bands having as a lower and
coefficient of correlation, r =0.955. In order to assess upper bound the 5% probability of survival and 95%
the statistical model, it is useful to solve eqn (7) for ~0, probability of survival curves, respectively, were calcu-
obtaining: lated for the material under study. Two of these bands,
concerning R = 0.1 and R = O-5, are shown in Fig. 10.
00 = CON = %x3x . [1 + (Y. (1 - R)(NB - 1)] (18) From Fig. 10, it is seen that the fatigue behaviour at
high stresses is strongly influenced by the static strength.
Since the scatter in static strength is quite high, as often
From a physical viewpoint, eqn (18) indicates that the happens for random-fibre-reinforced plastics, this
ultimate strength of the virgin material can be calcu- results in large variability in fatigue lifetime. For
lated from the fatigue life, N. The symbol oe~ has been instance, for an applied maximum stress
used in eqn (10) just to distinguish the calculated u max- 150 N mmP2, cycles to failure in the range N = 1
strength from that, a~, directly measured in a static (static failure) to N - lo3 are expected, if R=O.l. If the
characterisation test. stress ratio is higher (R=0*5), the maximum number of
Of course, if the assumptions are valid, the calculated cycles at 95% probability level under the same loading
values of flexural strength should exhibit the same sta-
tistical distribution found for co. By eqn (18), aslv was 1
evaluated for all the 35 specimens subjected to fatigue,
and the distribution function shown in Fig. 9 was
0.8
obtained. The solid line in the same figure represents the
Weibull distribution of 15 monotonic strength data,
already drawn in Fig. 8. It is observed that the correla-
0.6
tion between the measured and calculated monotonic
strength distribution is excellent.
It is important to note that not only the hypotheses
made in the statistical analysis, but also the assumptions
on which the fatigue model relies are involved in eqn
(18). Therefore, the results in Fig. 9 give further evi-
dence of the effectiveness of eqn (7).
The significance of the previous findings is in the fact
that, when an assigned probability of failure is required 100 1.50 200 250
in the design of a component subjected to fatigue, the
0,~ (N/mm’)
shape parameter and characteristic strength can be
evaluated by simple, quick static tests. Of course, a Fig. 9. Statistical distribution of the calculated static strength,
minimum of fatigue tests will be necessary to obtain the CON.
964 G. Caprino, A. D’Amore
10. El Kady, H. and Ellyin, F., Effect of stress ratio on the Il. Yang, J. N. and Liu, M. D., Residual strength degradation
fatigue of unidirectional glass fibre/epoxy composite model and theory of periodic proof tests for graphite/
laminae. Composites, 1994, 25, 91 l-924. epoxy laminates. J. Compos. Mater., 1977, 11, 176203.