See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/324687573

Book Review: House Form and Culture - Amos Rapoport (1969) - by J.A. Adedeji
and S.A. (2010)

Research · April 2018

DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.11116.87687

CITATIONS READS
3 24,396

1 author:

Adedeji Adeniran
Federal University of Technology, Akure
14 PUBLICATIONS   69 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

Book Review: House Form and Culture -Amos Rapoport. 1969 - Reviewed by J.A. Adedeji, Department of Architecture, Ladoke Akintola University of Technology (Nigeria) and
S.A. Amole, Department of Architecture, Obafemi Awolowo University (Nigeria) (2010) View project

The Concept of Healing Places; Landscape as a Sustainable tool to enhance Healing. View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Adedeji Adeniran on 22 April 2018.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

SPACE AND CULTURE - SAGE
WELCOME TO SPACE AND CULTURE – THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL AND WEBLOG
DEDICATED TO SOCIAL SPACES OF ALL KINDS

Home About the journal Meet the bloggers Book review guidelines

Book Review: House Form and Culture

Amos Rapoport. 1969. House Form and Culture (Foundations of Cultural Geography Series).
Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall. 150 pp. ISBN: 978-0133956733.

Reviewed by J.A. Adedeji, Department of Architecture, Ladoke Akintola University of

Technology (Nigeria) and S.A. Amole, Department of Architecture, Obafemi Awolowo
University (Nigeria)

The book “House Form and Culture” was originally written in 1969 by Amos Rapoport and published
as one of seven books in the “Foundations of Cultural Geography Series” edited by Philip Wagner.
This series considered the underlying theoretical constructs that have shaped, and continue to shape,
the built environment, including religion, beliefs, customs and socio-cultural forces at large. Rapoport
presented neatly distilled correlates of culture and house form with a large volume of cultural
illustrations from across the globe. The book is also a presentation of cross-disciplinary studies of
dwellings, buildings and settlements from architecture, planning and cultural geography.

http://www.spaceandculture.org/2010/07/15/book-review-house-form-and-culture/
An interesting aspect of Rapoport’s book is its balanced view. After giving substantial evidence
against factors other than culture as house form determinants, he went on to present his basic
hypothesis that “house form is not simply the result of physical forces or any single causal factors, but
is the consequence of a whole range of socio-cultural factors seen in their broadest terms.” In view of
the logical arrangement of Rapoport’s argument, the book naturally divides into two parts: chapters 1-
3 are for the defence of the primacy of culture, and chapters 4-6 explain the modifying influence of
other factors. As expected, the later part is relatively thin compared to the former, which is the real
bone of the argument that Rapoport grinds into powder.

Rapoport’s book is the direct opposite of traditional patterns of study in architectural theory and
history where efforts have always been on monuments and “high style” buildings of various
civilizations. The foundation of the book was laid on the intellectual debate of the meaning and
characteristics of folk, primitive, and vernacular buildings on one side, and modern buildings on the
other–possibly even forming a continuum. Relying on the work of Gould and Kolb (1964), Redfield
(1965) and Mumford (1961), among others, Rapoport argued that “primitive” buildings were
produced by “primitive” societies which had a “diffuse knowledge of everything by all” with
elementary technology.

The book linked behaviour and form, and theorized that built form has influence on behaviour, not in
a causal manner but in the way of “coincidences.” Despite the firm grip of the book on the
comparison between the vernacular and modern societies and their buildings, its loose grip on the
varied meanings of culture leads to a conspicuously missing extraction of which set of meanings is
crucial to the understanding of the study. Such deep and wide meanings of culture as later presented
by Oyeneye et al (1985), Norberg-Schulz (1988), among many others, are denied the reader leaving a
large vacuum of knowledge and intellectual dreariness that dates the book. Unfortunately, readers of
the book are also left to find their own path through the contexts in which “form” has been used.

Nonetheless, Rapoport debunked the many “alternative theories of house form” by refuting the rather
extreme explanation and weak foundation of architecture that “climate and the need for shelter”
determine the form of dwellings. His balanced view on the impact of climate on house form is
commendable; after giving enough evidence on the supremacy of culture over climate in determining
house form, he submitted that “it is a characteristic of primitive and vernacular buildings that they
typically respond to climate very well.”

Rapoport concluded the book with what he called “a look at the present.” In this way, the book
presented the relationship between house form and culture from the “primitive” to the vernacular and
1960s modern period. He noted that in the past there were hierarchies in society which were legible
on built forms but at the time of writing there was “the general loss of hierarchies within society,”

http://www.spaceandculture.org/2010/07/15/book-review-house-form-and-culture/
resulting in the reality that “all buildings tend to have equal prominence.” According to Rapoport,
“modern man has lost the mythological and cosmological orientation which was so important to
primitive man, or has substituted new mythologies in place of the old.” Crowe (2000) had a similar
view when he noted that the symbolic values of the built environment are being lost today and that is
why “man was born in a hospital, lived in a building that might as well look as an hospital judging
from its outlook and died in an hospital.” In this concluding chapter, Rapoport again demonstrated his
balanced sense of judgment when he maintained that both “primitive” and “modern” times have
myths that may be different but are commonly motivated by being “primarily socio-cultural”–
however still claiming that the “neglect of traditional cultural patterns may have serious results.”

Despite its shortcomings, Rapoport’s book remains convincing in its argument pattern, detailed in its
presentation, and unparalleled in its academic ingenuity. The book should continue to be a great
companion for all those who are advocates of a livable built environment.

Works Cited

Crowe, N. 2000. Nature and the Idea of a Man–made World: An Investigation into the Evolutionary
Roots of Form and Order in the Built Environment. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Gould, J, and Kolb, W.L. (Eds.) 1964. A Dictionary of the Social Sciences. New York: The Free
Press.

Munfora, L. 1961. The City in History. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.

Norberg-Schulz, C. 1988. Architecture: Meaning and Place: Selected Essays. New York : Rizzoli.

Oyeneye, O. T. and Shoremi, M. O. 1995. Nigeria Life and Culture. Publication Committee,
Department of Sociology. Ogun State University Press.

Redfield, R. 1965. Peasant Society and Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

This was written by Anne Galloway. Posted on Thursday, July 15, 2010, at 16:05. Filed under
Architecture, Book reviews, Cities & urbanism. Bookmark the permalink. Follow comments here
with the RSS feed. Post a comment or leave a trackback.

http://www.spaceandculture.org/2010/07/15/book-review-house-form-and-culture/
Post a Comment
Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *
Name *

Email *

Website

Comment

Submit comment

‹ Book Review: Essays on Boredom and Modernity

Book Review: Strange Spaces: Explorations into Mediated Obscurity ›

• Pages
o About the journal
o Book review guidelines
o Meet the bloggers
•

Search
Search for:

• Categories
oAnnouncements
Architecture
o
o Arctic
o Art & design
o Asia
o Australia & South Pacific
o Book reviews
o CFPs
o Cities & urbanism
o Citizenship & publics
o Climate & environment
o Conferences
o Economics
o Embodiment & performance
o Europe
o Everyday life
o Gender & sexuality
o Geography & environment
o Geopolitics

http://www.spaceandculture.org/2010/07/15/book-review-house-form-and-culture/
 oGlobalisation
oHealth
o Interviews
o Latin America
o Management & anticipation
o Mapping
o Material culture
o Media & communications
o Mobilities
o Music
o North America
o Postcolonialism
o Power & resistance
o Production & consumption
o Race & ethnicity
o Religion & mythologies
o Risk
o Rural & regional spaces
o Spatiality & temporality
o Techno-science
o Tourism
o Uncategorized
• Archives
o July 2010
o May 2010
o April 2010
o March 2010
o February 2010
o January 2010
o December 2009
o November 2009
o October 2009
o September 2009
o August 2009
o June 2009
o May 2009
o April 2009
o March 2009
o February 2009
o January 2009
o December 2008
o November 2008
o October 2008
o September 2008
o August 2008
o July 2008
o June 2008
o May 2008
o April 2008
o March 2008
o February 2008
o January 2008
o December 2007
o November 2007

http://www.spaceandculture.org/2010/07/15/book-review-house-form-and-culture/
 o October 2007
o September 2007
o August 2007
o July 2007
o June 2007
o May 2007
o April 2007
o March 2007
o February 2007
o January 2007
o December 2006
o November 2006
o October 2006
o September 2006
o August 2006
o July 2006
o June 2006
o May 2006
o April 2006
o March 2006
o February 2006
o January 2006
o December 2005
o November 2005
o October 2005
o September 2005
o August 2005
o July 2005
o June 2005
o May 2005
o April 2005
o March 2005
o February 2005
o January 2005
o December 2004
o November 2004
o October 2004
o September 2004
o August 2004
o July 2004
o June 2004
o May 2004
o April 2004
o March 2004
o February 2004
o January 2004

© 2010 Anne Galloway ¶ Thanks, WordPress. ¶ veryplaintxt theme by Scott Allan Wallick. ¶ It's nice
XHTML & CSS.

http://www.spaceandculture.org/2010/07/15/book-review-house-form-and-culture/

View publication stats