Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ORG
International Journal
of
Learning, Teaching
And
Educational Research
p-ISSN: 1694-2493
e-ISSN: 1694-2116
Vol.22 No.4
International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research
(IJLTER)
Vol. 22, No. 4 (April 2023)
Print version: 1694-2493
Online version: 1694-2116
IJLTER
International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research (IJLTER)
Vol. 22, No. 4
This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part
of the material is concerned, specifically those of translation, reprinting, re-use of illustrations,
broadcasting, reproduction by photocopying machines or similar means, and storage in data banks.
Table of Contents
The Reconstruction of Blended Learning Teaching Model for Full Online Learning System: A Study on English
Education Department in Islamic Universities in Indonesia ............................................................................................ 1
M. Arif Rahman Hakim, Reko Serasi, Yashori Revola, Nur Ilianis Adnan, Ade Riska Nur Astari
The Impact of Online Self-Assessment on Learning Outcomes and Self-Assessment Skills Among Grade 11
Students in Vietnam ............................................................................................................................................................. 21
Tran Thi Ngoc Anh, Nhi Thi Nguyen, An Thi Tan Nguyen
Developing Skill of Using Feedback in Learning-outcome Assessment for Future Teachers .................................... 36
Khuu Thuan Vu, Nguyen Thi Viet Nga
Examining the Relationships between Academic Adaptation and Life-Domain Issues among Working University
Students in Estonia ............................................................................................................................................................... 58
Mohammad Abu Sayed Toyon
Effectiveness of Teacher and Peer Feedback in EFL Writing: A Case of High School Students ................................ 73
Paul Gonzalez-Torres, Cristhian Sarango
Influence of Organizational Innovation Climate on Creativity and the Mediating Role of Feedback-Seeking
Behavior—A Case Study of University Teachers in Hebei, China ................................................................................. 87
Tao Du, Yuan-Cheng Chang
A Mediation Model of the Effect of Visionary Leadership on Teachers’ Organizational Citizenship Behavior .... 104
Widodo Widodo, Irvandi Gustari, Rahayu Permana
Perception of Religious Lecturers of Higher Order Thinking Skills and Students’ Academic Performance in
Online Learning .................................................................................................................................................................. 124
Indah Wigati, Mardeli ., Mardiah Astuti, Yuniar ., Zulmi Ramdani
Developing Early Graders' Collaborative Skills through Group-Work, Play-Based Pedagogy ............................... 160
Martin Chukwudi Ekeh
Challenges of First-Year Extended Curriculum Programme Students at a University in South Africa .................. 178
Funmilola Kemi Megbowon, Makhetha-Kosi Palesa, Kavi Bongi, Mayekiso Siphokazi
ESL Pre-university Learners’ Needs Analysis for Web-based English Academic Vocabulary Learning Resource
............................................................................................................................................................................................... 195
Farah Amirah Mohd Fisal, Nur Ehsan Mohd Said
‘One day I will make it to university’: Students from Refugee Backgrounds in University Pathway Programs .. 217
Snjezana Bilic, Teresa Thai
Matthew Effect and Achievement Gap in Rwandan Basic Education ......................................................................... 242
Jean de Dieu Habyarimana, Abdou Mugabonake, Emmanuel Ntakirutimana, Theogene Hashakimana, Emmanuel
Ngendahayo, Faustin Mugiraneza, Ke Zhou
Being a Teacher in China: A Systematic Review of Teacher Identity in Education Reform ..................................... 267
Xiaoyi Liu, John Trent
Sociolinguistic Pedagogical Implications of EFL Issues: A Case Study of Saudi Universities ................................. 264
Omer Elsheikh Hago Elmahidi, Mohammed AbdAlgane, Ibtesam AbdulAziz Bajri
Formation and Consolidation of Research Seedbeds: A Systematic Literature Review ............................................ 286
Beatrice Avolio, Luz María Paucar-Menacho, Pretell Carolina
School-Based Positive Behavior Support for Students with Emotional and Behavioral Problems: Implementation
and Teachers’ Experiences ................................................................................................................................................. 326
Aini Mahabbati, Edi Purwanta, Budi Astuti
Teacher Strategies for Providing Access to Learning for Students with Special Needs in Elementary Schools .... 345
Hermanto Hermanto, Bayu Pamungkas
Evaluation of Psychosomatic Symptoms Associated with Stress in Teachers after Returning to Face-to-Face
Classes .................................................................................................................................................................................. 362
Edwin Gustavo Estrada Araoz, Judith Annie Bautista Quispe, Benjamín Velazco Reyes, Wilber Cesar Calsina Ponce,
Duverly Joao Incacutipa Limachi, Victor Soto Aquino, Yolanda Paredes Valverde, Rosel Quispe Herrera
Implementing an Internal Quality Assurance System to Enhance Elementary School Education Quality ............ 414
Nan Rahminawati, Tedi Supriyadi
Professional Development Needs and Challenges Faced by K-12 Teachers in Delivering Effective Online
Education in the United Arab Emirates ........................................................................................................................... 434
Hamdy A. Abdelaziz, Ahmed Ankit, Abdurrahman G. Almekhlafi, Semiyu Aderibigbe, Athra Alawani, Apollos Bitrus
Goyol
Patterns of Character Education for Vocational School Students through Non-Academic Programs: Paradigm and
Implementation ................................................................................................................................................................... 459
Amilda ., Dian Andesta Bujuri, Muhammad Uyun, Dindin Nasrudin, Junaidah .
A Gender-Based Comparison of the Effects of Face-to-Face and Online Learning on Student Performance in
Introductory Computer Science Courses ......................................................................................................................... 478
Ali Alshammari
Assessment of Math Teachers’ Dispositions to Improve Urban Teacher-Leaders’ Growth and Effectiveness ...... 494
L. L. Moore, W. Steve Lang
Barriers Towards the Implementation of E-portfolio in Education Based on the Diffusion of Innovation Theory
............................................................................................................................................................................................... 512
Sameh Said Ismail
Social Media Influenced Lexicons: A Child’s Vocabulary Production in Talk-In Interactions ................................ 541
Jollibee Angchangco Aharul
Knots and Bolts of Online Teaching Internship amid the COVID-19 Pandemic ........................................................ 557
Feleeh De Leon Enanoza, Maria Nancy Quinco Cadosales, Ethel De Leon Abao
1
Reko Serasi
Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Fatmawati Sukarno Bengkulu
Bengkulu, Indonesia
Yashori Revola
Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Fatmawati Sukarno Bengkulu
Bengkulu, Indonesia
Abstract. The aim of this research was to construct a teaching model that
was intended as a standardization and benchmark for lecturers in the
online class teaching and learning process during the COVID-19
pandemic in the English Education Department of Islamic religious
universities in Indonesia. This problem was identified from the results
of pre-observation research which indicated that in Indonesian Islamic
religious university institutions, especially in the English Language
Education study program, there was not yet clear standardization for
conducting full online learning. The product of this research study is in
the form of a teaching model developed using the ASSURE method that
consists of analyzing the participants’ needs, stating the objectives,
selecting appropriate strategies, utilizing a technological approach,
requiring learners' participation, and evaluating the final product of this
study. In developing this research product, the researchers also
©Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0
International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
2
1. Introduction
In early 2020, the world was interrupted by the COVID-19 pandemic which
impacted on all sectors, including the economic and government, as well as the
educational sector. Specifically in the world of education, the COVID-19
pandemic affected policies, educational practices and strategies, among others
(Contreras et al., 2021). This forced the educational practices at academic
institutions in Indonesia, including in universities, to transform completely into
a virtual learning-focussed system. The benefit was that although education had
been moving towards technological transformation, the pandemic escalated its
immediate adoption. Nonetheless, this does not mean the process was seamless
or without complications because not all the universities in Indonesia were
prepared for or capable of accommodating these changes (Firmansyah et al.,
2021).
On May 2nd, 2020, on National Teacher's Day, the Minister of Education and
Culture emphasized the need for innovation in education during the pandemic
COVID-19 to ensure the quality of education in Indonesia (Ministry of Education
and Culture, 2020). This included the importance of English language
proficiency among students, especially in the context of online learning.
Proficiency in English is crucial for students at all levels, particularly in higher
education and for those studying English as a foreign language (EFL), as it is
essential for understanding English as a medium of education and
communication in the era of the fourth industrial revolution in the field of
educational technology. This, in turn, would contribute to the development of a
technological advancements in education and enable Indonesia to compete more
effectively in various global fields. Therefore, to improve the English
communication ability of EFL students during and after the COVID-19
pandemic, a research study was conducted to develop online teaching models.
Several courses in the English education study program were selected as
subjects for which the teaching models would be developed. Some of the courses
developed were selected based on the needs analyses conducted by the
researchers.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
3
2. Literature Review
The phrase ‘blended learning’ refers to learning methodologies that incorporate
elements of integration or the amalgamation of one learning methodology with
other learning methodologies. Blended learning is a contemporary educational
topic that has emerged owing to the advancements in globalization and
technology. Numerous institutions or professionals have formulated and
presented definitions in their respective languages based on the classification of
blended learning practices. There are currently four generally accepted
definitions of blended learning (Bruggeman et al., 2020): (a) Blended learning is
a process of learning that utilizes a mix of diverse Internet-based technologies to
attain academic objectives; (b) Blended learning is a fusion of multiple learning
methodologies (e.g. constructivism, behaviorism, and cognitivism) designed to
achieve maximum knowledge acquisition, whether through technology-based
education or not; (d) Blended learning is also a combination of varied learning
technology formats, such as videos, online training, and films, with in-person
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
4
In line with some of the explanations above, Graham (2013) and Heilporn et al.
(2021) mention other definitions of blended learning that are often suggested as
those that combine several kinds of teaching and learning media modalities;
those that integrate several kinds of teaching and learning methods, learning
theories, and elements of pedagogical dimensions; or those that integrate the
online teaching and learning process with the face-to-face learning process.
Based on these definitions, the blended learning method (BLM) can be
considered as a combination of the characteristics of traditional learning and
electronic learning (e-learning) (Hrastinski, 2019; Smith & Hill, 2019).
Furthermore, the BLM is a learning activity that combines face-to-face learning
processes with e-learning activities through aspects of learning theory, learning
approaches, and learning models to achieve the desired learning objectives.
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia in early 2020 had an effect
on many sectors, such as the world of education where the central government
issued policies to local governments to suspend classes at all educational
institutions and replace them with online learning (Yunus et al., 2023). This was
done as an effort to prevent the transmission of the Coronavirus in Indonesia.
It was hoped that, since no Indonesian educational institutions were carrying
out face-to-face activities, the spread of the COVID-19 virus in Indonesia would
be minimized. Since various countries globally were also exposed to the
COVID-19 virus disease, the lockdown or quarantine policy was one of the
efforts to reduce the interaction of crowds in order to curb the spread of this
virus (Subarao & Kadali, 2022).
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
5
withdrawing the computer-based test for the Joint Entrance Test for State
Universities (UTBK SBMPTN) and reviewing the National Selection for State
Universities (SNPTN) application (Hasniati, 2022).
Regarding the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the education sector, it was
necessary for teaching and learning activities during the pandemic era to be
conducted online and independently since teachers and students had to remain
at home. Some of the direct effects related to this situation were that teachers
were forced to adapt to and participate in redesigning the existing learning
media as innovations by adjusting to online systems and the use of media. This
was also in accordance with the decision of the Minister of Education and
Culture of the Republic of Indonesia regarding the Letter Number 4 of 2020
concerning the Implementation of Education Policies in the Emergency Period
during the Spread of the COVID-19 Pandemic (Restian, 2020). The pandemic
had resulted in extraordinary changes to the world of education, as every
educational institution at all levels was forced to transform at very short notice
so that students could adapt to learning from home using online media.
This was certainly not easy, considering that in general the technological
preparedness of educational institutions in Indonesia was still limited.
According to Munastiwi and Puryono (2021), one of the main problems in
Indonesian education related to this was the lack of uniform learning processes
and models, both in terms of standardization and the quality of the desired
learning targets. This problem was a challenge for both the teachers and
students, but especially for educators who are always required to be creative in
their teaching and learning process and who now had to adjust the delivery of
the teaching material to online learning media. For most of these teachers this
was a new experience.
3. Methodology
This study used a research and development (R&D) design in the field of
education which aimed to develop an online-based teaching model for the
English Education Department of the Islamic Religious University in Indonesia.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
6
The participants in this study were 100 students of the English Education
Department from five Indonesian Islamic religious universities who, until the
time of the research implementation process, were still participating in online
learning methods, and 10 lecturers who oversaw 10 different courses in the
English Education Department. The participant requirements for inclusion in
this research were students and lecturers who had experience in the
implementation of the face-to-face teaching and learning process (before the
COVID-19 outbreak) and who were also currently either teaching or learning
online courses.
In this study, participants were involved in the observation stage and initial
needs analysis, for which the results of this process were used as the main basis
for designing and developing the research products, as suggested by Zubaedi
et al. (2018). Furthermore, participants were also involved in the product trial
phase to gather input from the field trial process.
For the interview process in the needs analysis and observation stage of this
study, the researchers used the semi-structured interview method with 10
lecturers and 10 students as representatives of the research population. This
approach allowed for more open and flexible data collection, as semi-structured
interviews consist of both pre-designed questions and additional questions
based on the context, as mentioned in studies by Kallio et al. (2016), Adnan et al.
(2020), and Hakim et al. (2021). This type of interview is considered easier to use
as it can be adapted to the respondents' needs.
In terms of data processing for this study, the researchers utilized technical
triangulation and source triangulation. Technical triangulation involves using
multiple data collection techniques, such as observation, interviews, and
documentation, to obtain data from the same source, as referenced in studies by
Walsh and Mann (2019), Sileyew (2019), and Natow (2020). The research
instrument used for the interviews was a question list, while field notes were
taken during the observation and documentation processes.
In this study, a thematic analysis approach was used to analyze the data,
drawing on the works of Flick (2014) and Daghigh and Rahim (2021). The
analysis process started with the researchers familiarizing themselves with the
data by transcribing the interviews, which had been conducted in English as all
the participants were English lecturers with ELT qualifications. However, some
participants occasionally used Bahasa Indonesia when they were unable to find
suitable words in English to convey their ideas. Transcribing the interviews
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
7
provided the researchers with their initial understanding of the data. They then
read through the entire dataset and assigned notes or codes to each statement,
representing the content or meaning of the participants' statements. This process
was recursive and involved constant back-and-forth movement among the entire
datasets. The same procedure was followed for all twenty interview transcripts.
Subsequently, the researchers created a 'codebook' that contained the coding list
from the interviews, which was categorized and classified into themes. To
maintain ethical considerations, codes were used throughout the discussion to
refer to each participant, as suggested by Hidayat et al. (2023), in reporting on
this research.
Analyzing learners
The initial stage of the ASSURE model is the evaluation stage. This stage
involves an evaluation of students, environment, and instructional resource
requirements.. Moreover, it entails establishing the desired educational
outcomes that need to be met to cater to the specific needs of the students. The
needs analysis stage is carried out by first analyzing the circumstances and
conditions of learning as the main source of information in the learning process.
It relates to the implementation of learning, especially during the COVID-19
pandemic. At this stage, researchers made suggestions related to ongoing
teaching and learning activities for one semester at the English Education
Departments in Islamic universities. The use of observation and field note
instruments enabled researchers to analyze the data and describe the actual
conditions.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
8
every week by using the Zoom or Google Meet applications. On the other hand,
some only used WhatsApp as a teaching and learning tool without any face-to-
face meetings at all, while yet others combined the two methods, by using both
a virtual face-to-face process and a chat application. Thus, students often felt
confused by the differences in the learning processes and suggested their
lecturers and universities establish a clear standardization of the teaching and
learning process.
This was in line with the results of the analysis conducted by the researchers
with lecturers at the English Education Departments of Islamic religious
universities. From the results of interviews with five lecturers who teach in the
English Language Study Program at five different Islamic universities, it was
established that they did have different ways of teaching during the COVID-19
pandemic era. Furthermore, there was no official standardization laid down by
their universities or the Ministry of Religious Affairs. According to them, despite
their willingness to undertake the fully online teaching process at the beginning
of the COVID-19 pandemic, they felt they were not fully prepared for it, both in
terms of human resources (HR) and in terms of supporting facilities. Therefore,
what they had done for two semesters was more about survival since they were
determined that the teaching and learning process should continue. Therefore,
the lecturers also hoped that there would be an official learning model and
standard that they could apply as their guide for teaching and learning in
situations such as the COVID-19 pandemic.
At this stage the researchers also developed an instrument that would be used to
assess the learning model that had been developed. This concept is also
supported by the connectivist learning theory that focuses on expanding the
connection and networking activities (Chang et al., 2022). The instrument was
prepared by considering aspects of the model assessment, namely the feasibility
of using it in learning, the feasibility of the technology used, the feasibility of
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
9
Table 1:The construction of teaching model of blended learning for full online
learning
Meeting Activity Teaching-Learning
Media
1 Introduction of the course with face-to-face Zoom/Google Meet
virtual meeting
2 Delivery a lecture & giving some contextual YouTube/Instagram
examples related to the learning topic
3 Group discussion about specific topic and WhatsApp group/
giving individual project Telegram
4 Continuing the group discussion and project WhatsApp group/
reflection Telegram/online
academic campus
portal
5 Face-to-face virtual meeting and project review Zoom/Google Meet
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
10
Utilizing technology
The fourth stage of the research process relates to the use of technology in the
research development process. Based on the needs analysis, the objective of this
research was to develop a product in the form of a teaching model that could be
applied during learning in the COVID-19 pandemic. From first-hand
experience it has been established that technology is the main supporting
element on which online teaching and learning are based (Mariano-Dolesh et
al., 2022). The use of technology in the research process of developing this
product was thus imperative. In developing this teaching model, the technology
used included Zoom, WhatsApp, Google Classroom, the YouTube channel and
the academic system (SIAKAD). These applications were the most suitable
options for the online teaching and learning process during the COVID-19
pandemic.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
11
Regarding the instructional steps and learning variations in the teaching model,
the lecturers indicated that the activities and organization of the model were
well-designed, with logical and coherent sequencing of steps, and the utilization
of various platforms and applications to support the learning process. Similarly,
none of the students reported any dissatisfaction with the steps or organization
of the teaching model. This indicates that the researchers were successful in
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
12
meeting the needs and expectations of both lecturers and students, as identified
through the needs analysis conducted.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
13
5 4 3 2 1
1 The reasonableness between instructing Acceptable
substance and standard as well
as fundamental capability.
2 The reasonableness between the Incredible
instructing demonstrates substance and
the study goals that will be accomplished.
3 The reasonableness between the title and Acceptable
the fabric talked about.
4 Potential definition of the substantial ?
5 Chronological and efficient course of Incredible
activity of the teaching appear ?
6 The instructing show can encourage Acceptable
students' comprehension of education.
7 Precision in utilizing terms. Neutral
Percentage 81, 54 %
(Adapted from Asiyah, 2019)
Based on the results of the development that was carried out, the validation
result of the blended learning teaching model during the COVID-19 pandemic
was 81.54%. Therefore, from the results of the validation, it can be concluded
that the teaching model developed during this research is feasible to use and try
out on students during the teaching and learning process (Sartono et al., 2022).
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
14
The second expert validation process is related to the design of the teaching
model that has been developed. The detailed results of the validation carried out
by expert validators can be seen in Table 4:
Table 4: Result of the teaching model design validation design validation process by
expert validator
No Standard Assessment Remarks
5 4 3 2 1
Percentage 91, 43 %
(Adapted from Asiyah, 2019)
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
15
The second characteristic that was evaluated and validated was the teaching
model design (Dwijayani, 2019). The percentage of validation results carried out
by design expert validators for blended learning teaching models during the
COVID-19 pandemic was 91.43%. Thus, based on the results, it can be concluded
that the developed model is feasible to use for experimentation on learners
during their educational journey.
5 4 3 2 1
Percentage 78, 33 %
(Adapted from Asiyah, 2019)
The final stage in the validation process comprised evaluating the suitability of
the context of the teaching model resulting from the development research.
Based on the data above, the percentage of suitability context validation from
expert validators was 78.33%. In this case, an expert validator stated that the
suitability of the context offered in the teaching model resulting from the
development research was generally good. Therefore, it was believed that there
was no suggestion that was over-emphasized in this section. Based on the
results of validation, evaluation, and input from three expert validators, it was
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
16
necessary to make revisions based on corrections and suggestions from the three
experts so that the final product of this research would be much improved.
Furthermore, all suggestions from the experts such as revising the context,
exercises and level of difficulty of the final product were very useful in
improving the learning model to develop a better quality product. After passing
all these stages, the teaching model was ready to be tested by lecturers in the
actual learning process of the students of the English Education Departments of
the Indonesian Islamic religious universities.
Final Product
The last stage in this study was to revise the blended learning teaching model
over the pandemic or full online learning period as a result of development
research. This was compiled based on some comments and inputs given by
lecturers and students’ representatives during the trial process to produce
teaching material products in the form of teaching models. This was considered
to be a good solution for the full online learning system during the pandemic.
This was also conveyed by three expert validators who recommended the
process of improving this teaching model after trials had been carried out so that
this teaching model would be excellent in terms of content. Hence, the authors
are optimistic that the instructional model resulting from this advancement
investigation would be beneficial not only to students in the English Education
Departments at Indonesian Islamic religious universities, but also to a wider
range of students enrolled in all universities throughout Indonesia.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
17
Figure 2: Stages of the blended learning teaching model for the full online learning
system during the pandemic in the English Tadris Study Program
5. Conclusion
This research activity was focussed on lecturers and students of the English
Education Departments of five Islamic religious universities in Indonesia. The
output of this study is in the form of a teaching model that is intended as a
standardization and benchmark for lecturers in the teaching and learning
process in fully online classes during the pandemic. The product of development
research in the form of a teaching model was developed using the ASSURE
method. In addition, the study suggests that the fully online learning process in
the English language study program in the Islamic religious universities in
Indonesia during a pandemic needs to be re-constructed. Clear learning models
and guidelines would facilitate the teaching and learning process for lecturers
and students, respectively.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
18
6. References
Adnan, N. I., Abidin, M. J. Z., & Hakim, M. A. R. (2020). Improving Malaysian working
adults’ confidence concerning willingness to communicate (WTC) in English
using OCS module. TEST Engineering and Management, 82, 10190-10200.
Aktaş, İ., & Özmen, H. (2020). Investigating the impact of TPACK development course
on pre-service science teachers’ performances. Asia Pacific Education
Review, 21(4), 667-682. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-020-09653-x
Affandi, M., Dalimunthe, A., & Suryanto, E. (2022, May). Microprocessor practicum
module development using ASSURE model. In Proceedings of the 3rd International
Conference of Science Education in Industrial Revolution 4.0, ICONSEIR 2021,
December 21st, 2021, Medan, North Sumatra, Indonesia.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4108/eai.21-12-2021.2317341
Asiyah, A., Syafri, F., & Hakim, M. A. R. (2018). PengembanganMateri Ajar Animasi
Bahasa InggrisBagiUsia Dini di Kota Bengkulu [Development of English
animation teaching materials for early ages in Bengkulu City]. AWLADY: Jurnal
Pendidikan Anak, 4(1), 30-49. https://doi.org.10.24235/awlady.v4i1.2063
Asiyah, A. (2019). Pengembangan Modul PembelajaranMatakuliahIlmuAlamiah Dasar
Terintegrasi Nilai-Nilai Islam Di FakultasTarbiyah dan TadrisInstitut Agama Islam
Negeri Bengkulu [Development of learning modules for integrated basic natural sciences
course of Islamic values at the Faculty of Tarbiyah and Tadris State Islamic Institute of
Bengkulu] [Doctoral dissertation, IAIN Bengkulu].
Bruggeman, B., Tondeur, J., Struyven, K., Pynoo, B., Garone, A., & Vanslambrouck, S.
(2021). Experts speaking: Crucial teacher attributes for implementing blended
learning in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 48, 100772.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2020.100772
Cancino, M., & Capredoni, R. (2020). Assessing pre-service EFL teachers' perceptions
regarding an online student response system. Taiwan Journal of TESOL, 17(2), 91-
118. https://doi.org/10.30397/TJTESOL.202010_17(2).0004
Chang, M., Walimuni, A. C., Kim, M. C., & Lim, H. S. (2022). Acceptance of tourism
blockchain based on UTAUT and connectivism theory. Technology in Society, 71,
102027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102027
Contreras, C. P., Picazo, D., Cordero-Hidalgo, A., & Chaparro-Medina, P. M. (2021).
Challenges of virtual education during the COVID-19 pandemic: Experiences of
Mexican university professors and students. International Journal of Learning,
Teaching and Educational Research, 20(3), 188-204.doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.20.3.12
Daghigh, J., & Rahim, A. (2021). Neoliberalism in ELT textbooks: An analysis of locally
developed and imported textbooks used in Malaysia. Pedagogy, Culture &
Society, 29(3), 493-512. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2020.1755888
Dwijayani, N. M. (2019, October). Development of circle learning media to improve
student learning outcomes. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1321 (2) 022099.
IOP Publishing.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2020.1755888doi.org/10.1088/1742-
6596/1321/2/022099
Fauzi, R. A., & Asri, Y. (2021, March). Barriers and solutions in online learning during
the COVID-19 pandemic, Indonesian language education students at the Riau
Islamic University. In Ninth International Conference on Language and Arts (ICLA
2020) (pp. 14-18). Atlantis Press.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
19
https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2020.1755888doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.21032
5.003
Flick, U. (2014). An introduction to qualitative research (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Firmansyah, R., Putri, D., Wicaksono, M., Putri, S., Widianto, A., & Palil, M. (2021).
Educational transformation: An evaluation of online learning due to COVID-
19. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 16(7), 61-76.
https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v16i07.21201
Graham, C. R. (2013). Emerging practice and research in blended learning. In Handbook of
distance education (pp. 351-368). Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203803738.ch21
Hakim, M. A. R., Abidin, M. J. Z., & Adnan, N. I. (2020). Using the ASSURE model in
developing an English instructional module for Indonesian migrant workers in
Penang, Malaysia. In Charting a Sustainable Future of ASEAN in Business and Social
Sciences (pp. 383-390). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-3859-9_32
Hakim, M. A. R., Serasi, R., Efrizal, D., & Kurniawan, D. (2021, June). An online English
teaching module for CCU subject: A solution on the pandemic COVID-19
situations. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1933(1), 012082. IOP
Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1933/1/012082
Hakim, M.A.R. (2021). Developing English speaking module by using Indonesian local culture
content: A quasi-experimental study for EFL students in Indonesia (Doctoral
dissertation, Universiti Sains Malaysia).
Hasniati, H. (2022). Discretion in education services: Explaining teaching-learning
models of learning from home during COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia. Journal
of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, 6(2), 1495.
https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v6i2.1495
Heilporn, G., Lakhal, S., & Bélisle, M. (2021). An examination of teachers’ strategies to
foster student engagement in blended learning in higher education. International
Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 1-25.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00260-3
Hidayat, A. T., Sudarman, S., Alfurqan, A., & Doni, S. (2021, February). Understanding
level of UIN Imam Bonjol Padang’s lecturers towards the privacy policy
application used in academic activities during the COVID-19 pandemic period.
Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1779(1), 012028. IOP Publishing.
https://doi.og/10.1088/1742-6596/1779/1/012028
Hidayat, D. N., Fitriah, F., Mahlil, M., & Mason, J. (2023). Factors impacting English
teachers’ creativity in teaching English as a foreign language in
Indonesia. Studies in English Language and Education, 10(1), 155-173.
https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v10i1.26145
Hrastinski, S. (2019). What do we mean by blended learning? Tech Trends, 63(5), 564-569.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00375-5
Kallio, H., Pietilä, A. M., Johnson, M., & Kangasniemi, M. (2016). Systematic
methodological review: Developing a framework for a qualitative
semi‐structured interview guide. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 72(12), 2954-2965.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13031
Ministry of Education and Cultural Affairs. (2019). Speech of Minister of Education &
Cultural Affairs of the Republic of Indonesia on Indonesian National Education Day
2019.
https://setjen.kemdikbud.go.id/setjen/files/PIDATO%20MENDIKBUD%20H
ARDIKNAS%202019.pdf
Mariano-Dolesh, M. L., Collantes, L. M., Ibanez, E. D., & Pentang, J. (2022). Mindset and
levels of conceptual understanding in the problem-solving of preservice
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
20
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
21
*
Corresponding author: Tran Thi Ngoc Anh, tranthingocanh@dhsphue.edu.vn &
tranthingocanh@hueuni.edu.vn
©Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives
4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
22
1. Introduction
Self-assessment plays a crucial role in self-regulated learning (Andrade, 2019;
Garrido Astray et al., 2019; Yan, 2020). While not a new concept, self-
assessment has been identified in numerous previous studies as the learners’
ability to plan, monitor, and control their thoughts, feelings, and actions
(Hadwin et al., 2015; Karmaker, 2020; Punhagui & De Souza, 2013; Schumacher
et al., 2013; Steuber et al., 2017; Wolters & Benzon, 2013). In education, self-
assessment refers to learners’ capacity to evaluate and monitor their
understanding of a specific subject area (Boud et al., 2015). Alternatively, self-
assessment is defined as a cyclical process that enhances learners’ skills by
detecting the gap between present ability and desired ability (Yew et al., 2016).
A critical aspect of the learning journey is the process of self-assessment, in
which individuals engage in a reflective evaluation of their learning, abilities,
and skills to determine their areas of proficiency, as well as limitations, and
establish objectives for personal growth and improvement. It not only
promotes better self-awareness in learners but also enables them to take charge
of their academic advancement. As a result, self-assessment is extremely
important as an integral element of the learning process since it allows students
to get a full awareness of their cognitive capacities and take responsibility for
their growth and development.
Several studies have found that self-assessment empowers students to become
owners of their learning (Azar & Tanggaraju, 2020; Luo et al., 2021; Mäenpää
et al., 2020; Oh et al., 2021; Rini et al., 2020; Rizk, 2016; Wiliam & Leahy, 2020);
other studies describe it as making learners co-owners of the learning process
by having them critically reflect on their learning while addressing the needs
of the learning task (Fletcher, 2016; Muñoz-Escalona et al., 2018). This process
allows learners to review previous course content, assess their knowledge, and
identify their weak points (Elkhatat et al., 2021), motivating them to learn
actively (Styers et al., 2018) and influencing their self-regulated learning
(Papanthymou & Darra, 2018).
Whether the student is a “owner” or a “co-owner”, self-assessment requires
that learners be aware of the goals of a task and monitor their own progress
toward them. The act of self-assessment, that is, engaging in a self-reflective
process that enables individuals to discern their own unique learning styles,
preferences and needs, is a crucial aspect of the pedagogical journey.
Through self-reflection, learners can gain a more profound comprehension of
their own cognitive faculties, enabling them to identify the modalities and
approaches that are most efficacious for their learning. Consequently, the
process of self-assessment becomes an invaluable tool for learners, providing
them with the ability to optimize their academic output and achieve their goals
in a more expeditious manner. Additionally, by engaging in self-assessment,
students are better equipped to identify their areas of difficulty, enabling them
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
23
to seek out the necessary assistance from their instructors or peers, and
ultimately overcoming any obstacles that may hinder their academic success.
Therefore, self-assessment is an indispensable component of the learning
process, contributing to the growth and development of learners, and
promoting a culture of self-directed and autonomous learning. As a result,
learners must develop the ability to analyze task requirements, set learning
goals, and track their understanding, as they actively participate in the learning
process (Meusen-Beekman et al., 2016; Ratminingsih et al., 2018; Tur et al., 2019;
Wallin & Adawi, 2018; Wanner & Palmer, 2018). Self-assessment can also help
students develop critical thinking skills, as they learn to evaluate their own
work and identify areas for improvement. By setting goals and tracking their
progress, students can become more motivated and engaged in the learning
process.
The role of self-assessment in the learning process is to provide students with
a tool to evaluate their own learning and identify areas where they need to
improve. Self-assessment can also help teachers identify areas where students
may be struggling, and provide targeted support to help them overcome those
challenges (Alseddiqi et al., 2012; Childress et al., 2020; Ishikawa et al., 2021;
Rick & Phlypo, 2019). In order to be effective, self-assessment should be an
ongoing process that is integrated into the learning environment. Students
should be taught how to self-assess and given opportunities to practice and
refine their skills. Teachers can also provide feedback and support to help
students develop their self-assessment skills. Overall, self-assessment is a
valuable tool for students to take control of their own learning, identify areas
where they need to improve, and set goals for future growth and success.
With the trend of incorporating information technology into teaching, self-
assessment is not insusceptible to this influence (Borg & Edmett, 2019; Chang
& Wu, 2018; Christensen & Knezek, 2017). The transition from traditional
paper-based self-assessments to online self-assessments on mobile devices is
taking place (Ching-Ter et al., 2017; Scherer et al., 2015; Valtins et al., 2020).
Online self-assessment has been shown to be an effective self-regulated
learning method in a variety of subjects (Fan et al., 2021; Koehler & Meech,
2022; Lawson et al., 2012).
Online self-assessments can be accessed anytime and anywhere, making it
easier for students to complete them. Students can complete assessments on
their own devices, reducing the need for paper-based assessments and making
it easier to keep track of their progress. Automatic scoring of online self-
assessments reduces the time and resources required to grade assessments
manually. This can also provide students with immediate feedback, allowing
them to address areas of weakness more quickly. Many studies show that
online self-assessment has a positive impact on student learning and
motivation (Nikou & Economides, 2016).
Additionally, online self-assessments can be more engaging than traditional
paper-based assessments. Multimedia elements, such as videos, images, and
interactive activities, for example, can be incorporated into online assessments
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
24
to make them more visually appealing and interactive. Therefore, students are
less stressed as a result of taking online self-assessments (Stančić, 2021). When
students feel at ease taking an assessment, their participation in the assessment
process increases, which promotes self-efficacy (Seifert & Feliks, 2019).
Furthermore, it is used to increase student motivation in a variety of learning
contexts, such as flipped classroom courses or online courses (Broadbent et al.,
2021; Cacciamani et al., 2021; Lock et al., 2021). Learners can easily
communicate with classmates and teachers through social networks and
communities at any time and from any location in order to assess their
knowledge and receive immediate feedback using the online assessment
system (Lesage et al., 2015; Y. N. Lin et al., 2019).
Online self-assessments can provide valuable data for teachers to analyze.
Teachers can use this data to identify trends and patterns in student
performance, and to adjust their teaching strategies accordingly. As a result,
teachers can focus more on activities that require students to interact physically
while teaching in the classroom. Academic performance, student motivation,
and engagement in blended learning and online learning have piqued the
interest of researchers in recent years (Azizan et al., 2014; X. Chen et al., 2020;
Lo et al., 2020; Paniagua & Simpson, 2018; Tsai et al., 2020).
Students in Vietnam have had little experience with online self-assessment,
even though, previous to the COVID-19 pandemic, the use of information
technology in teaching and assessment was widespread across many schools
and subjects (Anh et al., 2021). However, it was not until the post-COVID-19,
normal period that synchronous and widespread digital transformation in
teaching activities was implemented. The current literature on the impact of
online self-assessment on academic performance and self-assessment skills
lacks research conducted in Vietnam. Existing findings may not be applicable,
as the country’s educational system and cultural values differ from those of
other countries where similar studies have been conducted. As a result, the goal
of this study was to create an online self-assessment tool for grade 11 physics
students and to investigate the impact of online self-assessment outside of
classroom hours.
Given the potential benefits of online self-assessment, it is important to
investigate whether it can improve students’ learning outcomes and self-
assessment skills in the Vietnamese context.
Therefore, this study aims to address the following research questions:
1. What is the relationship between online self-assessment and learning
outcomes among grade 11 students in Vietnam?
2. Can online interactive exercises with immediate feedback improve
learning outcomes compared to traditional self-assessment methods?
3. Does regular online self-assessment enhance students’ self-assessment
skills?
Liveworksheets is a platform designed to assist teachers in creating interactive
worksheets that can be completed by students online (Bārdule, 2021). These
worksheets incorporate various question types commonly used in self-
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
25
assessments, such as multiple choice, drag and drop, pairing, fill in the gaps,
and others. The platform is a tool for producing interactive worksheets that
present material in different formats and question styles (Rudenko et al., 2021).
Liveworksheets provides various customization options, including the
integration of multimedia elements, such as audio, videos, and images, that can
enhance the engagement of students during self-assessments. Additionally, the
platform allows teachers to effortlessly share the worksheets with their
students via email, messaging apps, or a learning management system.
By using Liveworksheets, teachers can create interactive exercises that offer a
more dynamic and engaging self-assessment experience for students. The
ability to personalize the worksheets with multimedia elements and the ease of
sharing them make Liveworksheets a valuable tool for educators seeking to
facilitate student learning and self-assessment.
With Liveworksheets, teachers can input conventional exercises in the form of
PDF or Word files and transform them into interactive online exercises in
several formats. This application simplifies the process of creating engaging
and interactive exercises that can aid in student learning and self-assessment.
The use of Liveworksheets is an innovative approach to online learning. It
allows for real-time feedback and interaction between the students and the
teacher, which can improve the effectiveness of the learning process.
In this study, we used Liveworksheets, an online platform that provides
interactive activities and immediate feedback to students. Liveworksheets is
effective in promoting student engagement, motivation, and learning
outcomes in previous studies (Daher et al., 2022). The use of Liveworksheets in
this study represents a novel approach to online self-assessment in Vietnam.
This study’s focus on grade 11 students and their self-assessment skills adds to
the existing literature by examining a specific age group that has received
limited attention in the literature. Furthermore, the study’s use of the quasi-
experimental method, with a control group, helps address the limitations of
previous studies in this area. Finally, this study’s findings can provide valuable
insights for educators and policymakers on the potential benefits of online self-
assessment in promoting student learning outcomes and self-assessment skills
in Vietnam and other similar contexts.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
26
The two groups were then randomly assigned to either the intervention or
control group. After each lesson, both the control and intervention groups
completed self-assessment exercises related to the week’s content outside of
class time. The intervention group received interactive online exercises that
delivered instant feedback on Liveworksheets based on the links or QR codes
provided by the teacher, while the control group engaged in traditional self-
assessment. During the online self-assessment, students carried out different
assignments as required and obtained instant feedback on their responses
upon completing each task. At the same time, the teacher received email
notification of the outcomes. We explicitly stated that students’ performance
on the online self-assessments would not impact their final test scores to
discourage any attempts to cheat or seek answers from study materials during
the assessment. At the end of the six weeks, both groups completed a post-test
to assess their learning outcomes and self-assessment skills.
To measure students’ learning outcomes, a pre-test, and a post-test were
administered to both groups. The test comprised of multiple-choice questions
that assessed the students’ understanding of the topics covered in the self-
assessment. The test was scored out of 10, and the student’s scores were
recorded for analysis.
To measure the students’ self-assessment skills, a self-assessment rubric was
developed. The self-assessment skills of students in the intervention group
were compared before and after participating in the intervention. The self-
assessment skills’ scale consisted of eight criteria, which were as follows:
1. Recognizing assessment and self-assessing learning outcomes.
2. Collecting and processing information on learning outcomes.
3. Establishing learning objectives and tasks.
4. Comparing learning outcomes with established objectives and tasks.
5. Creating and revising study plans.
6. Implementing the proposed study plan.
7. Reflecting on personal strengths and weaknesses.
8. Developing a plan for personal capacity enhancement.
Each criterion was scored on a scale of 1 to 3, with 1 representing the lowest
and 3 representing the highest level of attainment.
The data collected were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics.
Descriptive statistics, such as means and standard deviations, were used to
summarize the data. Inferential statistics, such as independent samples t-test
was used to compare the final test scores between the intervention and control
groups, and ANOVA was used to compare the pre- and post-intervention self-
assessment skills of the intervention group. The p-value was set at 0.05, and all
statistical tests were two-tailed.
Overall, the study’s quasi-experimental design was robust and allowed for a
thorough investigation of the relationship between online self-assessment and
learning outcomes and self-assessment skills among grade 11 students in
Vietnam. The selection of participants, the random assignment of participants
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
27
to groups, and the use of pre- and post-tests and a self-assessment rubric all
contributed to the validity and reliability of the study’s findings.
3. Results
The study aimed to confirm the relationship between online self-assessment
and learning outcomes and self-assessment skills among grade 11 students in
Vietnam. The study involved 160 students and was conducted over six weeks.
The intervention group employed interactive online exercises that delivered
immediate feedback on Liveworksheets for online self-assessment. The control
group, in contrast, engaged in traditional self-assessment.
The statistical analysis conducted to support these findings included the use of
the t-test and ANOVA. SPSS software was used to analyze and compare the
learning outcomes of the control and intervention group. Table 1 shows the
results of the statistical test of the difference between the intervention and
control groups’ final test scores.
Table 1: A summary of the test’s average statistical parameters
The results of Levene’s test for Sig = 0.161 > 0.05 show that the variance of the
test mean between the intervention and control groups is not different. The test
results on the difference between the two mean values of the tests between the
intervention group and the control group had Sig = 0.005 < 0.05. As a result,
there is a difference in the mean score of the test between the intervention and
control groups. The intervention group’s mean test score was 7.7 points higher
than the control group’s mean score of 6.3. This demonstrates that there is a
difference in learning outcomes between the intervention and control groups
after the impact of online self-assessment via Liveworksheets. It also shows a
positive relationship between online self-assessment and learning outcomes.
The intervention group’s self-assessment skills were analyzed and compared
using pre- and post-test data. The average scores of the criteria of self-
assessment skills of students in the intervention group are shown in Table 2
based on statistics of points according to the level of each criterion:
Table 2: Student self-assessment skills in the intervention group
Pre-test Post-test
Criteria
M SD M SD
1 1.48 0.64 2.49 0.68
2 1.44 0.59 2.35 0.73
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
28
Table 2 displays the average scores and standard deviations for each criterion
of self-assessment skills for students in the intervention group in two
evaluations, prior to and after the pedagogical experiment. The findings show
that after six weeks of impact, students’ self-assessment skills improved in all
criteria, more or less.
As a whole, the study confirmed the positive relationship between online self-
assessment and learning outcomes and self-assessment skills among grade 11
students in Vietnam. The findings suggest that interactive online exercises with
immediate feedback can improve learning outcomes, and regular online self-
assessment can enhance students’ self-assessment skills.
4. Discussion
One novel finding in this study is the effectiveness of interactive online
exercises with immediate feedback on Liveworksheets in improving learning
outcomes and self-assessment skills among grade 11 students in Vietnam.
This study builds upon previous research that has found a positive relationship
between online self-assessment and learning outcomes (Prisacari & Danielson,
2017) but goes a step further by demonstrating the specific benefits of
interactive online exercises with immediate feedback. This finding is
particularly relevant in the current educational landscape, where many schools
are turning to online and blended learning models due to the COVID-19
pandemic. The use of interactive online tasks with immediate feedback can
help educators facilitate self-assessment and improve student learning
outcomes, even in virtual environments. This finding is consistent with
previous research that has shown the effectiveness of online self-assessment
tools in promoting self-regulated learning and improving academic
performance (Alanzi, 2021; Hsu et al., 2022; Pinto-Llorente et al., 2017).
Online self-assessment allows students assess themselves whenever and
wherever they want, which helps to alleviate the anxiety and pressure that
some students feel when using traditional assessment methods (Tay, 2015;
Yang et al., 2022). Furthermore, technology-based self-assessment tools
frequently include features that encourage learners to interact with the system
and motivate them to learn (Rodríguez et al., 2019). Motivation is a critical
factor in student learning (Azar & Tanggaraju, 2020; Lin et al., 2017; Luo et al.,
2021; Mäenpää et al., 2020; Oh et al., 2021; Rini et al., 2020; Tokan & Imakulata,
2019). Furthermore, the features of assessment tools via interactive online
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
29
5. Conclusion
The online self-assessment on Liveworksheets is not only appropriate for
improving learning efficiency but also for objectively assessing learners’ self-
assessment skills. These findings are useful for learning analytics researchers
and practitioners interested in using online self-assessment for learning. Using
multimedia resources in conjunction with immediate feedback is an
appropriate solution for creating an online self-assessment environment for
learners, contributing to digital transformation in educational activities, and
meeting the current trend of globalization.
Despite several limitations, this study adds to the growing body of research on
the effectiveness of online self-assessment tools and provides a foundation for
future research in this area. It is hoped that the findings of this study will
encourage educators to explore the potential benefits of using Liveworksheets
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
30
Acknowledgment
This research is funded by the University of Education, Hue University under
grant number NCM.T.23-03.
6. References
Alanzi, T. (2021). A review of mobile applications available in the app and google play
stores used during the COVID-19 outbreak. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare,
14(1), 45-57. https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S285014
Alseddiqi, M., Mishra, R., & Pislaru, C. (2012). The new school-based learning (SBL) to
work-based learning (WBL) transition module: A practical implementation in the
Technical and Vocational Education (TVE) system in Bahrain. Journal of Physics:
Conference Series, 364(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/364/1/012117
Andrade, H. L. (2019). A Critical Review of Research on Student Self-Assessment.
Frontiers in Education, 4(87), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00087
Anh, T. T. N., Duy, N. N., & Nguyen, N. T. (2021). Effectiveness of Kahoot on Exam
Scores in Physics of High-School Students: a Case Study in Vietnam. Journal of
Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues, 24(Special Issue 1), 1–12.
Azar, A. S., & Tanggaraju, D. (2020). Motivation in second language acquisition among
learners in malaysia. Studies in English Language and Education, 7(2), 323-333.
https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v7i2.16506
Azizan, A., Shayesteh, H., Shaffe, M. D., Ahmad Fauzi, M. A., & Jasmin, A. S. (2014).
Factors Affecting Students’ Self Regulated Learning Using Learning Management
System. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 19(1), 119-124.
Bārdule, K. (2021). E-learning Tools for the Flipped Learning in Elementary School.
Baltic Journal of Modern Computing, 9(4), 453-465.
https://doi.org/10.22364/bjmc.2021.9.4.05
Borg, S., & Edmett, A. (2019). Developing a self-assessment tool for English language
teachers. Language Teaching Research, 23(5), 655-679.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168817752543
Boud, D., Lawson, R., & Thompson, D. G. (2015). The calibration of student judgement
through self-assessment: disruptive effects of assessment patterns. Higher
Education Research and Development, 34(1), 45-59.
https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2014.934328
Broadbent, J., Sharman, S., Panadero, E., & Fuller-Tyszkiewicz, M. (2021). How does
self-regulated learning influence formative assessment and summative grade?
Comparing online and blended learners. Internet and Higher Education, 50(1), 1-8.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2021.100805
Cacciamani, S., Perrucci, V., & Fujita, N. (2021). Promoting Students’ Collective
Cognitive Responsibility through Concurrent, Embedded and Transformative
Assessment in Blended Higher Education Courses. Technology, Knowledge and
Learning, 26(4), 1169-1194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-021-09535-0
Chang, C. H., & Wu, B. S. (2018). Teaching geography with technology-A critical
commentary. In C-H. Chang, ,B. S. Wu, T. Seow, K. Irvine (Eds.), Learning
Geography Beyond the Traditional Classroom: Examples from Peninsular Southeast Asia.
Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8705-9_3
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
31
Chen, C. H. (2010). The implementation and evaluation of a mobile self- and peer-
assessment system. Computers and Education, 55(1), 229-236.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.01.008
Chen, X., Zou, D., Cheng, G., & Xie, H. (2020). Detecting latent topics and trends in
educational technologies over four decades using structural topic modeling: A
retrospective of all volumes of computers & education. Computers and Education,
151(1), 103855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103855
Childress, J., Backman, A. C., & Lipson, M. Y. (2020). Reframing Literacy Assessment:
Using Scales and Micro-Progressions to Provide Equitable Assessments for All
Learners. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 63(4), 371-377.
https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.1016
Ching-Ter, C., Hajiyev, J., & Su, C. R. (2017). Examining the students’ behavioral
intention to use e-learning in Azerbaijan? The General Extended Technology
Acceptance Model for E-learning approach. Computers and Education, 111(1), 128-
143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.04.010
Christensen, R., & Knezek, G. (2017). Validating the Technology Proficiency Self-
Assessment Questionnaire for 21st Century Learning (TPSA C-21). Journal of
Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 33(1), 20-31.
https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2016.1242391
Daher, W., Anabousy, A., & Alfahel, E. (2022). Elementary Teachers’ Development in
Using Technological Tools to Engage Students in Online Learning. European
Journal of Educational Research, 11(2), 1183-1195. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-
jer.11.2.1183
Elkhatat, A. M., Elsaid, K., & Almeer, S. (2021). Some students plagiarism tricks, and
tips for effective check. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 17(1), 1-12.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-021-00082-w
Fan, Y., Matcha, W., Uzir, N. A., Wang, Q., & Gašević, D. (2021). Learning Analytics to
Reveal Links Between Learning Design and Self-Regulated Learning. International
Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 31(4), 980-1021.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-021-00249-z
Fletcher, A. K. (2016). Exceeding expectations: scaffolding agentic engagement through
assessment as learning. Educational Research, 58(4), 400-419.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2016.1235909
Garrido Astray, M. C., Santiago Gómez, G., Márquez, M. G., Poggio Lagares, L., &
Gómez Garrido, S. (2019). The impact of digital resources in the learning and the
development of the competence Analysis and Synthesis. Educacion Medica, 20(2),
74–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edumed.2018.02.011
Hadwin, A. F., Järvelä, S., & Miller, M. (2015). Self-Regulated, Co-Regulated, and
Socially Shared Regulation of Learning. In D. H. Schunk & J. A. Greene (Eds.),
Handbook of Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance. Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203839010.ch5
Hsu, P. J., Wu, C. Y., Kuo, L. C., Chen, M. Y., Chen, Y. L., Huang, S. F., Chuang, P. Y.,
Jerng, J. S., & Chen, S. Y. (2022). Improving the Process of Shared Decision-
Making by Integrating Online Structured Information and Self-Assessment Tools.
Journal of Personalized Medicine, 12(2), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12020256
Ishikawa, Y., Umemoto, T., Tsubota, Y., Fujiwara, S., Suto, A., & Nishiyama, K. (2021).
Achieving Student Engagement in Learning: Utilizing a Rubric-Based
Assessment System for Visualizing Learners’ Self-, Peer, and Teacher
Assessments. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in
Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 292–+-300.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
32
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77889-7_20
Karmaker, P. R. (2020). Implementing Assessment literacy in ESL/EFL at
Undergraduate Level in Bangladeshi Universities: Imperativeness and
Challenges. Journal of English Education and Teaching, 4(3), 348-367.
https://doi.org/10.33369/jeet.4.3.348-367
Katsarou, E., & Chatzipanagiotou, P. (2021). A critical review of selected literature on
learner-centered interactions in online learning. Electronic Journal of E-Learning,
19(5), 349-362. https://doi.org/10.34190/ejel.19.5.2469
Koehler, A. A., & Meech, S. (2022). Ungrading Learner Participation in a Student-
Centered Learning Experience. TechTrends, 66(1), 78-89.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-021-00682-w
Lawson, R. J., Taylor, T. L., Thompson, D. G., Simpson, L., Freeman, M., Treleaven, L.,
& Rohde, F. (2012). Engaging with graduate attributes through encouraging
accurate student self-assessment. Asian Social Science, 8(4), 3-12.
https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v8n4p3
Lesage, M., Raiche, G., Riopel, M., Fortin, F., & Sebkhi, D. (2015). The Internet
Implementation of the Hierarchical Aggregate Assessment Process with the
“Cluster” Wi-Fi E-Learning and EAssessment Application — A Particular Case
of Teamwork Assessment. E-Learning - Instructional Design, Organizational
Strategy and Management, 83-125. https://doi.org/10.5772/60850
Lin, M. H., Chen, H. C., & Liu, K. S. (2017). A study of the effects of digital learning on
learning motivation and learning outcome. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science
and Technology Education, 13(7), 3553-3564.
https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00744a
Lin, Y. N., Hsia, L. H., Sung, M. Y., & Hwang, G. H. (2019). Effects of integrating mobile
technology-assisted peer assessment into flipped learning on students’ dance
skills and self-efficacy. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(8), 995-1010.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1461115
Lo, C. M., Han, J., Wong, E. S. W., & Tang, C. C. (2020). Flexible learning with
multicomponent blended learning mode for undergraduate chemistry courses in
the pandemic of COVID-19. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 18(2), 175-
188. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-05-2020-0061
Lock, J., Lakhal, S., Cleveland-Innes, M., Arancibia, P., Dell, D., & De Silva, N. (2021).
Creating technology-enabled lifelong learning: A heutagogical approach. British
Journal of Educational Technology, 52(4), 1646-1662.
https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13122
Luo, Y., Lin, J., & Yang, Y. (2021). Students’ motivation and continued intention with
online self-regulated learning: A self-determination theory perspective. Zeitschrift
Fur Erziehungswissenschaft, 24(6), 1379-1399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11618-
021-01042-3
Mäenpää, K., Järvenoja, H., Peltonen, J., & Pyhältö, K. (2020). Nursing students’
motivation regulation strategies in blended learning: A qualitative study. Nursing
and Health Sciences, 22(3), 602-611. https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12702
Meusen-Beekman, K. D., Joosten-ten Brinke, D., & Boshuizen, H. P. A. (2016). Effects
of formative assessments to develop self-regulation among sixth grade students:
Results from a randomized controlled intervention. Studies in Educational
Evaluation, 51(1), 126-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2016.10.008
Muñoz-Escalona, P., Savage, K., Conway, F., & McLaren, A. (2018). Promoting
undergraduate student engagement through self-generated exam activity.
International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education, 46(3), 252-273.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
33
https://doi.org/10.1177/0306419017743215
Nikou, S. A., & Economides, A. A. (2016). The impact of paper-based, computer-based
and mobile-based self-assessment on students’ science motivation and
achievement. Computers in Human Behavior, 55(1), 1241-1248.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.09.025
Oh, H., Cho, H., & Yim, S. Y. (2021). Influence of perceived helicopter parenting, critical
thinking disposition, cognitive ability, and learning motivation on learning
behavior among nursing students. International Journal of Environmental Research
and Public Health, 18(3), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18031362
Paniagua, A. S. E., & Simpson, O. (2018). Developing student support for open and
distance learning: The EMPOWER project. Journal of Interactive Media in Education,
2018(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.470
Papanthymou, A., & Darra, M. (2018). Student Self-Assessment in Higher Education:
The International Experience and the Greek Example. World Journal of Education,
8(6), 130-146. https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v8n6p130
Pinto-Llorente, A. M., Sánchez-Gómez, M. C., García-Peñalvo, F. J., & Casillas-Martín,
S. (2017). Students’ perceptions and attitudes towards asynchronous
technological tools in blended-learning training to improve grammatical
competence in English as a second language. Computers in Human Behavior, 72(1),
632-643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.071
Prisacari, A. A., & Danielson, J. (2017). Computer-based versus paper-based testing:
Investigating testing mode with cognitive load and scratch paper use. Computers
in Human Behavior, 77(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.07.044
Punhagui, G. C., & De Souza, N. A. (2013). Self-regulation in the learning process:
Actions through self-assessment activities with brazilian students. International
Education Studies, 6(10), 47-62. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v6n10p47
Ratminingsih, N. M., Marhaeni, A. A. I. N., & Vigayanti, L. P. D. (2018). Self-
Assessment: The effect on students’ independence and writing competence.
International Journal of Instruction, 11(3), 277-290.
https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11320a
Rick, H., & Phlypo, K. (2019). Choose your own adventure: Self-directed adult learning
and assessment. Proceedings of the European Conference on E-Learning, 680-XVI.
https://doi.org/10.34190/EEL.19.006
Rini, D. S., Adisyahputra, & Sigit, D. V. (2020). Boosting student critical thinking ability
through project based learning, motivation and visual, auditory, kinesthetic
learning style: A study on Ecosystem Topic. Universal Journal of Educational
Research, 8(4), 37-44. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.081806
Rizk, N. (2016). Real-Time Skill Assessment Data Mining Model to enhance students’
performance. International Journal of Education and Information Technologies, 10(1),
218-222.
Rodríguez, M. C., Ramírez, L. J., & Camargo, J. M. (2019). TBL, Self-assessment, and
Use of ICT: A Methodological Option to Benefit the English Learning Process in
a Colombian University. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 10(6), 1162-
1172. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1006.04
Rudenko, N., Palamar, S., Nezhyva, L., Bondarenko, G., & Shyrokov, D. (2021). The
Use of ICT Tools to Organize Distance Learning of Mathematics for Primary
School Students under COVID-19 Pandemic Conditions. CEUR Workshop
Proceedings, 371-380.
Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Teo, T. (2015). Becoming more specific: Measuring and
modeling teachers’ perceived usefulness of ICT in the context of teaching and
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
34
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
35
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
36
*
Corresponding author: Nguyen Thi Viet Nga, nguyenthivietnga@hpu2.edu.vn
©Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0
International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
37
1. Introduction
Assessment of learning outcomes is the process of assessing a student's
proficiency in the skills, knowledge, and competencies required to complete
academic tasks. (Mrunal and Manvinder, 2017) confirmed LO assessment is
critical in education because it allows teachers, students, and parents to know a
student's strengths and weaknesses as well as provides the information needed
to improve their learning. However, teachers’ feedback on students’ LOs is a
critical factor for those involved in the assessment to receive these values.
(Hardavella & et all., 2017) have proposed, when giving feedback, teachers must
keep a few essential points in mind. First of all, feedback should be provided
positively and encouragingly. If students feel that the teacher is uninterested in
their progress, they may lose interest and motivation to continue their efforts.
Second, the feedback needs to provide detailed and authentic opinions about the
students’ LOs. This helps students better understand what they did well and
where to focus on improving. Feedback should also provide suggestions and
advice to assist the student in improving their academic performance. Finally,
feedback needs to be provided in a complete and timely manner. If students
have to wait too long to get a response, they can lose motivation and forget
about their strengths and weaknesses. Therefore, teachers should provide
prompt feedback so that students can use it to develop their skills further and
improve their LOs. As such, feedback on students’ LO assessment is critical to
helping them better understand their achievement and improve on their
weaknesses. By providing positive, detailed, and timely feedback, teachers can
help students make great progress in their learning.
Training professional-pedagogical skills for future teachers in pedagogical
universities is undoubtedly influential in the career development process. Many
universities have conducted training for future teachers in assessment skills.
However, in Vietnam, in the context of educational innovation, teachers and
future teachers must have the skills of giving feedback to stakeholders about
student learning outcomes. This study has the following research questions:
1. What factors affect the effectiveness of future teachers in developing feedback
skills? What is the level of influence?
2. What measures will improve the effectiveness of developing future teachers'
feedback skills? How to do that?
2. Literature Review
2.1. Theory of feedback in learning-outcome (LO) assessment
Since the 1970s of the 20th century, there have been many researchs interested in
the relationship assessment and education, emphasizing the function of
assessment in supporting, regulating and improving the quality of education
(assessment for learning). That has led to many studies focusing on feedback in
assessment.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
38
regulate learning activities (Shute & Kim, 2014) (Dolin & et al., 2018) (Winstone
& Boud, 2022), thereby improving students’ learning (Black & Wiliam, 2018).
Discussing the content of feedback, Many authors confirmed that the feedback is
most complete and effective in learning orientation when it shows students both
correct results and their errors or limitations, explains the reasons for those and
gives specific instructions to help students adjust and improve their learning
(Lee, 2011), (Havnes & et al., 2012), (Ní Chróinín D. & Cosgrave C., 2013), (Shute
& Kim, 2014), (Dawson & et al., 2019)... confirmed. In addition, feedback should
focus on student tasks, especially criteria related to learning objectives
(Henderson & Phillips, 2015); (Diefes-Dux, 2019); (Brooks & et al., 2019); and,
more importantly, guide students to direct their learning activities in the future
(Boud & Molloy, 2013); (Merry & et al., 2013); (Gamlem & Smith, 2013);
(Dawson & et al., 2019). In terms of forms, feedback should be expressed as
constructive dialogues or discussions, especially when assessing complex
objectives at high cognitive levels (Brookhart, 2017); (Tekian & et al., 2017);
(Winstone & et al., 2017); (Carless & Boud, 2018), feedback should be informative,
specific, easy to understand, but not overly detailed, lengthy, unfocused or
commanding, which make students overwhelmed or annoyed (Hargreaves,
2013); (Brookhart, 2017)
Hattie and Timberly have proposed a fairly complete model of feedback in
teaching, in which feedback is information generalized from students' current
learning outcomes and accompanied by suggestions and guidance to improve
those learning outcomes (Hattie & Timperley, 2007). The purpose of feedback is
to bridge the gap between the student's recent learning outcomes and the set
learning objectives. By providing feedback, students have a clearer
understanding of their learning outcomes, form motivation, and develop more
effective learning strategies to enhance their learning outcomes under the
direction and supervision of the teacher. To promote effective teaching, feedback
needs to answer three main questions:
1. Where am I going? (What learning objectives are expected of students?):
Teachers need to clarify and repeat the learning objectives that students need to
achieve according to the requirements of the program or the subject.
2. How am I going? (What progress is being made towards the goal?): Teachers
need to determine the student’s current positions and levels of achievement of
their learning objectives.
3. Where to next? (What are the activities that need to be undertaken to make
better progress?); Teachers give directions for students to improve their learning
outcomes to achieve expected objectives, including teachers' suggestions and
instructions or specific tasks and requirements that guide students to self-
regulate their learning activities to achieve objectives.
The model also identifies four types (levels) of feedback:
1. Feedback about the Task (FT): Feedback focuses on correctness and limitations
in task results, accompanied by instructions for students to supplement and
adjust information and knowledge, indicating the correct results.
2. Feedback about the Processing of the task (FP): Feedback focuses on the
progress and strategies (methods) to process the task (such as metacognitive
strategies, learning process, problem research,…), accompanied by instructions
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
39
on how to correct mistakes, adjust skills, way to implement the task and choose
strategies or techniques when implementing the task.
3. Feedback about self-Regulation (FR): Feedback does not focus on process or
task results instead, it requires students to self-assess strategies, processes, and
results of the tasks, so that they can make adjustments while implementing the
task.
4. Feedback about Self as a person (FS): Feedback focuses on praise or criticism,
general blame with no or very little specific information about the process or the
results of the task.
Generally, while FS has low effectiveness in supporting learning, FT is suitable
for guiding students to supplement their knowledge and improve cognitive
competency; FP and FR are quite suitable for directing students to practice
competencies in science inquiry, knowledge-skills application and the other
(self-study, problem-solving,...). Furthermore, FR also helps to practice self-
assessment and self-regulation and strengthen students' confidence in their
competencies.
From the perspective of many researchers, it is possible to systematize the basic
requirements to ensure effective feedback in improving learning as follows (
(Nitko & Brookhart, 2013); (Henderson & Phillips, 2015); (McMillan, 2021),
(Cambridge Assessment International Education, 2018), (Voelkel & et al., 2020);
(Heritage, 2021) : Content of feedback focuses on students' expressions related to
learning objectives, contains specific, easy-to-understand, and clear information
for students to adjust even defines a detailed roadmap to direct students to
achieve small objectives towards the big goals; Feedback is suitable for the
students that receive (feedback for fairly good students does not need to be too
detailed like low-level students, feedback for student groups needs to focus on
the group's results instead of individual errors); Avoid praise, criticism in
general, judgment, and blame students, not only focus on mistakes and
limitations but also emphasize specific expressions of students’ effort and
progress; Ensure fairness, while ensuring individuality and differentiation,
avoiding comparison of achievements between students; At the right time, in
time for students to self-regulate (right when students have taken formative
assessment and as soon as possible when they have taken summative or
summative-based formative assessment).
Through the analysis of roles, purposes, content, method to give feedback, etc., it
is necessary to make teachers aware that feedback in teaching activities is an
application of system control model theory, in which the feedback is the
"rudder/vector" that drives the teaching activities to the correct goals. To avoid
the harmful effects of the "trial-error-redo" method, which is still encountered in
education, it is necessary to control the teaching activities with adequate and
timely feedback through the assessment activy
2.2. Skill of using feedback in LO assessment to support teaching and learning
After conducting an assessment, teachers must use the results of these
assessments to make decisions toward one or both purposes: confirming student
learning outcomes and supporting and improving teaching and learning
activities. Scott A. Schartel stated “Feedback is an integral part of the educational
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
40
Description: When giving and using feedback, teachers need to make flexible and
reasonable application of the following factors:
1. Knowledge: teachers need to develop a correct and sufficient awareness of the
theoretical basis of feedback, the roles of feedback, and the uses of feedback in
supporting teaching and learning activities, besides their basic understanding of
the rules of using assessment results to grade students.
2. Skills: teachers need to acquire skills in giving feedback and using them to
support teaching and learning activities (based on the instructions in documents
(Hattie & Timperley, 2007), (Heritage, 2021), (Walvoord & Anderson, 2010),
(Mertler, 2014). Specifically:
a) From the current assessment results (cause analysis has been done), combined
with the analysis of lesson objectives – teaching contents in the next period
b) Identifying the basic and central problems that exist in students' learning
outcomes which can be potentially improved in the next period (including
expressions of qualities and competences that have not yet been well achieved)
c) Setting specific objectives of improvement to be attained (which are fit to
students’ current levels of qualities and competences and feasible regarding the
teaching content that follows)
d) Proposing supportive solutions:
3. Attitudes: teachers are fostered and trained to have a positive and delicate sense
of giving feedback, making sure that the assessment is educational and
developmental; demonstrating an objective, responsible and cautious attitude
when making decisions related to students and the regulation of teaching
activities.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
41
3. Methodology
3.1. Subjects, context, and time of research
The subjects of the survey and experimental study of the measure are 110 FTs
who have trained for bachelor's degrees in Biology Education at Quynhon
University, Vietnam. The FTs participating in the study were all in the 4th year
of their training course; they had been trained with modules of Theory and
Methodology in Biology teaching and had been equipped with basic knowledge
of Psychology, Pedagogy, and specialized knowledge in Life Sciences.
Experimental contents and measures to develop the skill of using feedback in the
learning-outcome assessment are conducted when FTs participate in the module
"Assessment in teaching Biology." Experimental time in the years 2019, 2020, and
2021.
Table 1: Subjects, background, and time of the study
Experiment
Time of
round Class of FTs Number of FTs
experiment
Biology Future Teacher K38, 2015-
1 53 2019
2019
Biology Future Teacher K39, 2016-
2 33 2020
2020
Biology Future Teacher K40, 2017-
3 24 2021
2021
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
42
3.3. How to collect data on the effectiveness of feedback skills training in the
assessment of learning outcomes
Research layout plan: the study uses the impact method and evaluates the future
teachers’ change in the expression of feedback skills before, during, and after the
training process.
Method of conducting the study: The study was carried out three rounds, each
round including the following stages:
1. Pre-impact phase: During the first week of study, the lecturer receives the
class, introduces the subject and the training program to the future teachers, and
conducts the first assessment (input assessment). the pre-impact test.
2. Stage in impact (During-impact phase): Carrying out training feedback skills
in learning-outcome assessment when teaching the module "Assessment in
teaching Biology". At the same time, evaluate the training process two times at
two points:
Second assessment: through the results of the experential skill exercise/task
(when the future teacher is in step 3 of the procedure).
Third assessment: through the results of practical skill exercise/task (when
future teachers are in step 5 of the procedure).
3. Post-impact phase: evaluate the results of feedback skills training in learning-
outcome assessment to future teachers after having finished the lessons in the
course program (output assessment) by the post-impact test.
After each impact and assessment of the future teachers’ skills, from the
assessment results, the research team will edit the training measures and the
evaluation criteria for feedback skills. However, the research team edited the
sentences to make them easier for learners to understand.
How to assess experimental results:
At all times, the future teachers’ training demonstrations are evaluated based on
the system of assessment criteria (Table 3). Scores of all future teachers are
processed by descriptive statistical parameters and tested for the difference in
mean values by the Paired-Sample T-test tool to verify the progress in the
expression level of skills between assessment times (2nd time – 1st time, 3rd time –
2nd time, 4th time – 3rd time, and 4th time – 1st time). The test was conducted with
two hypotheses:
H0: there is no difference between the assessment (the expression level of the
skill does not change).
H1: there is a difference between the assessment (the expression level of the skill
changes).
Where: If the value Sig. (2-tailed) < .050: reject hypothesis H0, vice versa: accept
hypothesis H0 (with = .050).
Simultaneously, the study also conducted qualitative observation and analysis
of the future teachers’ performance during the experiment to draw some
conclusions confirming the effect and meaning of the measure to practice
feedback skills for future teachers.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
43
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
44
respectively. The last, the Cronbach’s alpha values for the 4th and 5th variables,
mentorship and confidence, are .789 and .759, respectively.
The survey shows the factors that must be affected to develop feedback skills in
learning-outcome assessment. From there, the research is oriented to the
experimental arrangement of the feedback skills training process based on
experiential learning experience and content to practice skills training for future
teachers.
4.2. The procedure of training feedback skills based on experiential learning
Skills are only developed and demonstrated through the subject's activities in
specific situations and real-world tasks by applying knowledge and skills
flexibly following the problem context. Therefore, to develop the skill of user
feedback, it is necessary to create conditions for FTs to experience situations and
contexts that reflect actual assessment activities. When FTs are placed in specific
cases, actively implementing teachers' feedback activities in real-life simulations
will stimulate them to apply their knowledge and skills differently, depending
on their cognitive abilities and social experiences.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
45
FTs receive the task and join group discussions to complete it. The lecturer
should suggest FTs connect the content of learned background knowledge in
step 1 to implement the tasks in the above situation: For the time and form of
feedback, please use past experiences to predict the teacher's conduct in this
situation (Note: explain the basis for making those predictions); For the feedback
content, apply the theory of Hattie – Timberly and answer three questions
yourself: Where are students going? How are students going? Where to next?;
For the proposal to improve teaching and learning activities, analyses should be
noted: After those assessment activities, what content will students continue to
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
46
learn on the topic? Are there any opportunities for improvement when learning
the following content? How to improve (what should students do, must teachers
do...)?
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
47
100
90
80
70
60 Level 1
50 Level 2
40 Level 3
30 Level 4
20
10
0
1st 2nd 3rd 4th
Figure 1: The graph shows the variation in the percentage of students meeting
the criteria levels D1 – Feedback and guide students to adjust learning activities
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
48
50 Level 2
40 Level 3
30 Level 4
20
10
0
1st 2nd 3rd 4th
Figure 2: The graph shows the variation in the percentage of students meeting
the criteria levels D2 – Developing measures to adjust teaching activities
However, to verify the true development level of future teachers during 3 years
of experiment, we conduct a year-by-year analysis and use the Paired-Sample T-
tool to analyze the difference in mean values.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
49
Table 7: Results of future teachers' feedback skills assessment in round 1 (53 4th-
year future teachers, 2019)
Number and percentage (%) of FTs that reached levels of
Assess
criteria
Criteria ment
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4
time
No % No % No % No %
1. Providing 1st 43 81.132 10 18.868 0 .000 0 .000
feedback and
conducting 2nd 14 26.415 39 73.585 0 .000 0 .000
students to 3rd 12 22.642 26 49.057 14 26.415 1 1.887
improve
learning 4th 9 16.981 28 52.830 15 28.302 1 1.887
activities
1st 41 77.358 12 22.642 0 .000 0 .000
2. Constructing
solutions to .000
2nd 13 24.528 40 75.472 0 .000 0
improve
teaching 3rd 9 16.981 24 45.283 18 33.962 2 3.774
activities
4th 8 15.094 21 39.623 21 39.623 3 5.660
Intuitively, the data in Table 7 is plotted on the graph of the percentage of future
teachers achieving the levels in each criterion across four times of assessments as
follows:
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
Level 4
50%
Level 3
40%
Level 2
30%
Level 1
20%
10%
0%
1st 2nd 3rd 4th 1st 2nd 3rd 4th
Criterion D1 Criterion D2
Table 7 and figure 3 show that the skill training results of future teachers have
changed positively through the assessments before, during and after the
experimental process. In the pre-impact test, 100% of future teachers only
achieved levels 1 and 2 in all criteria. However, later on, the percentage of future
teachers achieving levels 3 and 4 increased and accounted for a high rate.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
50
To check the actual development level of future teachers in each criterion, the
research performed a statistical hypothesis test to compare the average value of
the scores achieved through the assessments using the Paired Sample T-test. The
test results are summarized in the following table (here only two indicators are
presented, the mean difference – Mean and the tested coefficient Sig. (2-tailed)):
Table 8: Results of testing the difference in the average value of skill training
scores across assessments of 53 future teachers in 2019
Criteria Comparison Comparison Comparison Comparison
2nd time – 1st 3rd time – 2nd 4th time – 3rd 4th time – 1st
time time time time
Sig.(2- Sig.(2- Sig.(2- Sig.(2-
Mean Mean Mean Mean
tailed) tailed) tailed) tailed)
D1 .547 .000 .340 .000 .075 .376 .962 .000
D2 .528 .000 .491 .000 .113 .277 1.132 .000
Table 9: Results of future teachers' feedback skills assessment in round 2 (33 4th-
year future teachers, 2020)
Asse Number and percentage (%) of FTs that reached levels of
ssme criteria
Criteria
nt Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4
time No % No % No % No %
.000 .000
1. Providing 1st 28 84.848 5 15.152 0 0
feedback and
2nd 13 39.394 20 60.606 0 .000 0 .000
conducting
students to
improve 3rd 8 24.242 16 48.485 8 24.242 1 3.030
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
51
learning
4th 7 21.212 13 39.394 11 33.333 2 6.061
activities
1st 28 84.848 5 15.152 0 .000 0 .000
2. Constructing
solutions to .000 .000
2nd 10 30.303 23 69.697 0 0
improve
teaching 3rd 7 21.212 16 48.485 9 27.273 1 3.030
activities
4th 4 12.121 16 48.485 11 33.333 2 6.061
The data in Table 9 is also shown visually on the graph of the percentage of
students achieving the levels in each criterion through 4 times assessment as
follows:
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
Level 4
50%
Level 3
40%
Level 2
30%
Level 1
20%
10%
0%
1st 2nd 3rd 4th 1st 2nd 3rd 4th
Criterion D1 Criterion D2
Figure 4: Chart about results of future teachers' feedback skills assessment in the
second test (33 4th-year future teachers, 2020)
The results from table 9 and figure 4 also show the trend of progressive change
in the training results of future teachers through this training process, reflected
in the percentages of future teachers achieving levels 1 and 2 in criteria are
decreasing, even then, the percentages of future teachers achieving levels 3 and 4
are increasing and accounts for a high rate through the experimental
assessments.
To check the actual development level of future teachers in each criterion, the
research performed a statistical hypothesis test to compare the average value of
the scores achieved through the assessments using the Paired Sample T-test. The
test results are summarized in the following table:
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
52
Table 10: Results of testing the difference in the average value of competency
training scores across the assessment times of 33 students in 2020
Criteria Comparison Comparison Comparison Comparison
2nd time – 1st 3rd time – 2nd 4th time – 3rd 4th time – 1st
time time time time
Sig.(2- Sig.(2- Sig.(2- Sig.(2-
Mean Mean Mean Mean
tailed) tailed) tailed) tailed)
D1 .455 .000 .455 .000 .182 .136 .091 .000
D2 .545 .000 .424 .000 .212 .090 .182 .000
Table 11: Results of future teachers' feedback skills assessment in round 3 (24 4 th-
year future teachers, in 2021)
Number and percentage (%) of FTs that reached levels of
Asse
criteria
Criteria ssmen
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4
t time
No % No % No % No %
.000 .000
1. Providing 1st 21 87.500 3 12.500 0 0
feedback and
.000 .000
conducting
2nd 6 25.000 18 75.000 0 0
students to
improve .000
learning 3rd 3 12.500 12 50.000 9 37.500 0
activities
4th 3 12.500 8 33.333 10 41.667 3 12.500
2.
1st 18 75.000 6 25.000 0 .000 0 .000
Constructing
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
53
solutions to
improve 2nd 6 25.000 18 75.000 0 .000 0 .000
teaching
3rd 4 16.667 12 50.000 7 29.167 1 4.167
activities
4th 4 16.667 9 37.500 7 29.167 4 16.667
The data from table 11 and chart 3.5 above also show the trend of improvement
in future teachers' training results through round 3; when the percentages of
future teachers achieving levels 1 and 2 in the criteria gradually decrease, while
percentages of future teachers achieving levels 3 and 4 is increasing and
accounts for a high percentage through 4 assessment times. To check future
teachers' actual development in each criterion, the research continues to test
with the Paired Sample T-test. The test results are summarized in the following
table:
Table 12: Results of testing the difference in the average value of competency
training scores across assessments of 24 students in 2021
Criteria Comparison Comparison Comparison Comparison
2nd time – 1st 3rd time – 2nd 4th time – 3rd time 4th time – 1st time
time time
Sig.(2- Sig.(2- Sig.(2- Sig.(2-
Mean Mean Mean Mean
tailed) tailed) tailed) tailed)
D1 .625 .000 .500 .000 .292 .030 1.417 .000
D2 .500 .000 .458 .001 .250 .036 1.208 .000
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
54
5. Conclusion
In conclusion, this research describes the factors affecting feedback skills in the
learning-outcome assessment of future teachers, which are analyzed based on
the answers to the questionnaires of the future teachers in the pedagogical
university. The results show that the classroom experience is the most influential
factor (of the factors: classroom experience; feedback culture; pedagogical
training; mentorship; confidence) in developing future teachers' feedback skills.
Since then, the research has proposed and tested measure to develop this skills
for future teachers, which is geared towards skill training based on experiential
learning. Specifically, future teachers go through a process that includes the
following steps: Researching background knowledge; Experiencing skills;
Reflecting on the results of skill implementation; Generalizing the
implementation procedure of the skill; Practicing training the skill; Assessing the
results of skill training. The experiment was quantitatively analyzed through the
statistical indicators of the future teachers’ training results before, during, and
after the experiment, proving that the method used by the research was
compelling. Changes in measures to train pedagogical skills, especially feedback
skills in assessment based on experiential learning, need to be implemented
effectively to suit learning in the 21st-century environment. The findings of this
study can be implemented and applied in future teacher training programs.
6. References
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2018). Classroom assessment and pedagogy. Assessment in
education: Principles, policy & practice, 25(6), 551-575.
https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2018.1441807
Boud, D., & Molloy, E. (2013). Rethinking models of feedback for learning: the challenge
of design. Assessment & Evaluation in higher education, 38(6), 698-712.
http://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2012.691462
Brookhart, S. (2017). How to give effective feedback to your students. Ascd. Alexandria:
ASCD.
https://files.ascd.org/staticfiles/ascd/pdf/siteASCD/publications/books/Ho
w-to-Give-Effective-Feedback-to-Your-Students-2nd-Edition-sample-
chapters.pdf
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
55
Brooks, C., & et al. (2019). A matrix of feedback for learning. Australian Journal of Teacher
Education, 44(4), 14-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2018v44n4.2
Cambridge Assessment International Education. (2018). Developing your school with
Cambridge – A guide for school leaders.
https://www.cambridgeinternational.org/Images/271302-developing-your-
school-with-cambridge.pdf
Carless, D., & Boud, D. (2018). The development of student feedback literacy: enabling
uptake of feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 48(3), 1315-1325.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354
Dawson, P., & et al. (2019). What makes for effective feedback: Staff and student
perspectives. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(1), 25-36.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2
Diefes-Dux, H. (2019). Student self-reported use of standards-based grading resources
and feedback. European Journal of Engineering Education, 44(6), 838-849.
https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2018.1483896
Dolin, J., & et al. (2018). Exploring relations between formative and summative assessment.
Transforming assessment: Through an interplay between practice, research and policy.
Cham, Switzerland: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63248-3_3
Gamlem, S., & Smith, K. (2013). Student perceptions of classroom feedback. Assessment in
Education: Principles, policy & practice, 20(2), 150-169.
https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2012.749212
Hardavella, G., & et all. (2017). How to give and receive feedback effectively.; :. Breathe,
13(04), 327–333. http://doi.org/10.1183/20734735.009917
Hargreaves, E. (2013). Inquiring into children’s experiences of teacher feedback:
Reconceptualising assessment for learning. Oxford Review of Education, 39(2), 229-
246. http://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2013.787922
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of educational research,
77(1), 81-112. http://www.columbia.edu/~mvp19/ETF/Feedback.pdf
Havnes, A., & et al. (2012). Formative assessment and feedback: Making learning visible.
Studies in educational evaluation, 38(1), 21-27.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2012.04.001
Henderson, M., & Phillips, M. (2015). Video-based feedback on student assessment:
Scarily personal. , 31(1). Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 51-66.
https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1878
Heritage, M. (2021). Formative assessment: Making it happen in the classroom. Corwin Press.
https:// doi. org/10.4135/9781071813706
Joughin. (2009). Assessment, learning and judgement in higher education: A critical review,.
Springer. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8905-3_2
Kolb, D. (2015). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development.
Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education. Retrieved from
https://ptgmedia.pearsoncmg.com/images/9780133892406/samplepages/9780
133892406.pdf
Lee, I. (2011). Bringing innovation to EFL writing through a focus on assessment for
learning. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 5(1), 19-33.
doi:10.1080/17501229.2010.502232
McMillan, J. (2021). Classroom assessment: Principles and practice that enhance student
learning and motivation. Pearson. Retrieved from https://www.pearson.com/en-
us/subject-catalog/p/classroom-assessment-principles-and-practice-that-
enhance-student-learning-and-m
Merry, S., & et al. (2013). Reconceptualising Feedback in Higher Education: Developing
Dialogue with Students. London: Routledge. Retrieved from
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
56
https://www.routledge.com/Reconceptualising-Feedback-in-Higher-
Education-Developing-dialogue-with/
Mertler, C. (2014). The Data-Driven Classroom: How do I use student data to improve my
instruction? ASCD Arias. Retrieved from https://www.amazon.com/Data-
Driven-Classroom-Student-Improve-Instruction/dp/1416619755
Mrunal and Manvinder. (2017). Importance and Benefits of Learning Outcomes. Journal
Of Humanities And Social Science, 22(3), 65-67. Retrieved from
http://doi.org/10.9790/0837-2203056567
Ní Chróinín D. & Cosgrave C. (2013). Implementing formative assessment in primary
physical education: teacher perspectives and experiences. Physical Education and
Sport Pedagogy, 18(2), 219-233. doi:10.1080/17408989.2012.666787
Nitko , A., & Brookhart, S. (2013). Educational assessment of students (6th ed). Inc, Upper
Saddle River, New Jersey, Merrill Prentice Hall: Pearson Education. Retrieved
from https://www.pearson.com/en-gb/subject-catalog/p/educational-
assessment-of-students-pearson-ne
Scott , A. (2012). Giving feedback – An integral part of education. Best Practice & Research
Clinical Anaesthesiology, 26(1), 77-78. doi:10.1016/j.bpa.2012.02.003
Shute & Kim. (2014). Formative and stealth assessment. In e. a. Spector, Handbook of
research on educational communications and technology (pp. 311-321). New York:
Springer. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_25
Tekian, A., & et al. (2017). Qualitative and quantitative feedback in the context of
competency-based education. Medical teacher, 39(12), 1245-1249.
doi:10.1080/0142159X.2017.1372564
Voelkel, S., & et al. (2020). Students tell us what good written feedback looks like. FEBS
Open bio, 10(5), 692-706. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1002/2211-
5463.12841
Walvoord , B., & Anderson, V. (2010). Effective grading: A tool for learning and assessment in
college. John Wiley & Sons. Retrieved from https://www.wiley.com/en-
us/Effective+Grading:+A+Tool+for+Learning+and+Assessment+in+College,+2
nd+Edition-p-9780470502150
Winstone, N. E., & Boud, D. (2022). The need to disentangle assessment and feedback in
higher education. Studies in higher education, 47(3), 656-667. Retrieved from
https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1779687
Winstone, N., & et al. (2017). Supporting learners' agentic engagement with feedback: A
systematic review and a taxonomy of recipience processes. Educational
psychologist, 52(1), 17-37. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.20
Appendix 1
Factors that affect the effectiveness of feedback in teaching
Instrucstions: Mark (x) in the column provided for each item based on the score
chart in the table below
Level Score
‘’Strongly Disagree” (FTS) 1
“Do not agree’’ (TS) 2
“Not sure’’ (TP) 3
‘’Agrees’’ (S) 4
‘’Strongly agree’’ (SS) 5
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
57
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
58
1. Introduction
The issue of working students struggling to balance employment, personal
responsibilities, and academic obligations has become increasingly prevalent due
to the rise in the cost of living and the introduction of fee-based education
(Kroupova et al., 2021). As a result, investigating the relationships between life-
domain difficulties and academic adaptation among working, students have
become an important topic of research (Applegate & Daly, 2016). Job-related stress
and weariness can make it challenging for working students to maintain a healthy
*
Corresponding author: Mohammad Abu Sayed Toyon, mohammad.toyon@ebs.ee
©Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0
International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
59
Estonia has undergone significant changes in its higher education system since
gaining independence in 1991, resulting in a more diverse student population and
an increase in working students (Beerkens et al., 2011; Vinter, 2021). With over
60% of adults aged 25-64 having completed some form of higher education (Aug,
2022), it is important to examine those factors that may affect academic
adaptation, particularly for working students. Understanding academic
adaptation among Estonian university students could inform policies and
interventions aimed at supporting working students academically.
To address this issue, this study uses Eurostudent-VII data and several measures
of association metrics to examine the interplay between work, personal, and
university obligations and academic adaptation among Estonian working
students. The study extends previous research in this area and sheds light on the
difficulties experienced by working students; and on how they saw difficulties
could affect academic adaptation. The rest of the work is structured into four
parts: the literature review, the method, a discussion, and finally, the conclusion.
Study work integration, also known as juggling study and work, is the
combination of work and education for university students; this might include
working either part-time or full-time, while attending university (Kroupova et al.,
2021; Mitola et al., 2018). As the definition of working students can vary from
country to country and from law to law, and as it would be impossible to include
all aspects in the context of this study, working students are defined for the
purposes of this study as university students who work, while pursuing their
higher education.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
60
Life domains refer to various aspects of an individual’s life that can include
personal factors, such as physical and mental health, relationships, financial
stability, family and living conditions, as well as societal and cultural factors, such
as employment, social support, and access to resources (Gonta & Bulgac, 2019;
VanderWeele, 2017). In the context of this research, life domains relate to those
various personal and societal factors that can affect Estonian university students’
ability to adapt to the academic demands of their studies. To be more precise, this
study examines the life domain from three vantage points, including work,
personal, and academic contexts. Through the perspective of work difficulties,
such as weekly working hours and job obligations, it is feasible to comprehend
the time and energy demands placed on students outside the classroom.
However, personal difficulties, such as financial responsibilities, childcare, and
pregnancy can cause significant stress and hinder students’ ability to fully engage
in their academic activities. Lastly, university concerns. such as scheduling
conflicts, mandatory attendance requirements, and demanding academic
programs, with rigorous exams and papers, can impede students’ ability to
properly adapt to academic life. By considering these three perspectives, this
study can provide a more thorough picture of the academic adaptation issues
faced by such working students.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
61
Personal factors, such as work-family conflict and family obligations, have been
theorised by researchers to have a negative impact on academic life (Roy et al.,
2018). For working students, the additional responsibilities associated with family
obligations, such as childcare or managing a pregnancy, can make it even more
challenging to balance academic and personal obligations. In addition,
researchers (Broer et al., 2019) have discovered a link between students’ socio-
economic status and their adaptability to new environments, suggesting that
financially struggling students may find it harder to learn new material.
Additionally, research by Robotham (2009) suggests that students who work
while studying may have lower academic success. These arguments indicate that
personal factors of working students, such as childcare or managing pregnancy,
financial pressures, and limited access to resources, may be related to their
academic adaptation. Therefore, the following hypotheses have been proposed:
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
62
3. The Method
3.1. The Source of the Data
This study utilises Estonian data from the Eurostudent-VII survey (Cuppen et al.,
2021). The survey received a total of 2760 responses from students in Estonia, of
which 1902 were working university students. The Eurostudent survey is a valid
and reliable source of data regarding the social and economic circumstances of
higher education students in Europe, including Estonia (Cuppen et al., 2021;
Hauschildt et al., 2021). It is a large-scale survey that has been regularly
conducted, and it gives useful information on numerous aspects of student life,
such as academic performance, socio-economic background, living conditions,
and student mobility.
Table 1 presents the characteristics of the working student sample used in this
research. For example, in terms of age, the majority of working students are over
30 years old (35.9%), followed by those aged 22 to under 25 years (24.3%), those
aged 25 to under 30 years (21.3%), and those up to 21 years old (18.5%). In terms
of gender, the majority of working students are female (76.9%) and male working
students that account for 23.1% of the total. In terms of education level, more than
half of the working students have a Bachelor’s degree (57.7%), followed by those
with a Master’s degree (36.6%), and those with a lengthy national degree (5.6%).
In terms of academic disciplines, the most common are in the social sciences,
journalism and information (13.3%), business, administration and law (19.3%),
and health and welfare (15.4%). Other academic disciplines include education,
arts and humanities, natural sciences, mathematics and statistics, ICTs,
engineering, manufacturing and construction, agriculture, forestry, fisheries and
veterinary services.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
63
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
64
3.3. Operationalisation
In order to operationalise the role of life domain (e.g., work, personal, and
university program) issues on academic adaptation among university students, it
is necessary to define a number of variables from the Eurostudent-VII survey. For
the sake of simplicity in describing the variables, they were coded as Y and X (see
Table 2), where Y represents academic adaptation and X represents different life-
domain challenges. All of the variables provided in Table 2 are categorical
variables, with their respective categories listed in Tables 3 and 4. The
computations were conducted by using a Statistical Program for the Social
Sciences (SPSS) version 23.
4. The Results
4.1. Life-domain issues faced by working students.
Figure 1 displays the percentage distribution of responses to survey questions
identifying problems in working students’ current study programmes, as a result
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
65
of several life-domain issues. The difficulties are grouped into five distinct types:
difficulties related to paid job obligations, financial difficulties, child-care
obligations, organisational issues at the higher education institution, and the
standard of work in the study program. The responses are divided into two
categories, ‘‘No’’ and ‘‘Yes’’, indicating the presence or absence of student
challenges in each category.
Figure 1 reveals that the highest percentage of ‘‘Yes’’ responses were for
difficulties related to paid job obligations (48.1%), followed by organisational
issues at higher education institutions (37.0%), difficulties related to the quality of
work in the study program (36.4%), financial difficulties (23%), and child-care
obligations/pregnancy (7.6%).
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
66
Y
Don’t
X Strongly Total Measures of
- - - agree
agree association
at all
1- 47 124 126 224 152 673 χ2 = 5.057, df = 4,
20h 7.0 18.4 18.7 33.3 22.6 100% p = 0.282;
X1 Somers’s = -0.049,
>20 90 226 261 371 231 1179
p = 0.074;
h 7.6 19.2 22.1 31.5 19.6 100% Kendall’s tau-b =
Total 137 350 387 595 383 1852 -0.045, p = 0.074
In support of the second hypothesis, the metric (see Table 3) shows a statistically
significant difference between the groups of working students experiencing and
not experiencing work-related issues (Chi-square = 13.442 with 4 degrees of
freedom and a p-value of 0.009). Somers’s and Kendall’s table c indicates a
negative correlation (-0.087) between work challenges and academic adaptation.
This implies that as problems at work intensify, students’ adaptability to the
curriculum may decrease. The p-value of 0.001 for the two statistics supports the
claim, indicating that there is a significant association. Thus, the findings provide
sufficient support for the hypothesis that there is an association between work
responsibilities and academic adaptation, such that increased difficulties due to
the obligation of a paid job are associated with decreased academic adaptation
among working students.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
67
Regarding the third hypothesis, the results (see Table 3) show that there is no
significant difference between the groups of working students with and without
child-care obligations (Chi-square = 5.638 with 4 degrees of freedom and a p-value
of 0.228). The result does not lend support to the hypothesis that the presence of
difficulties derived from the obligation to provide child-care work would reduce
academic adaptation, and the p-value is large (p > 0.05), suggesting that the
difference is likely to have occurred by chance. Both the Somers’s and Kendall’s
table-c statistics show a weak negative correlation between child-care obligations
and academic adaptation (-0.066 and -0.047, respectively). Consequently, the
findings do not give sufficient evidence to accept the hypothesis that there is an
association between the difficulties of child-care obligations and academic
adaptation, such that the presence of difficulties stemming from the need to
provide child-care assistance would reduce the need for academic adaptation.
With regard to the fourth hypothesis, the results (see Table 3) show that there is
no significant difference between the groups of working students experiencing
varying degrees of financial difficulty (Chi-square = 2.980 with 4 degrees of
freedom and a p-value of 0.561). The findings do not support the hypothesis that
working students with financial challenges would show less academic
adaptability (p > 0.05). Both the Somers’s and Kendall’s tau-c statistics have values
close to zero, suggesting there is little to no correlation between socio-economic
status and academic adaptation. Both measures’ p-values of 0.746 suggest that the
correlation is not significant.
For the fifth hypothesis, the results (see Table 4) show that there is a statistically
significant difference between the groups of working students experiencing
varying degrees of difficulty with schedule of organisation, space restrictions in
classes, and mandatory attendance (Chi-square = 109.789 with 4 degrees of
freedom and a p-value of 0.000). Working students who struggle with scheduling,
class size, and mandatory attendance are predicted to show a poorer level of
academic adaptation; and this finding is supported by a p-value (less than 0.05),
indicating that the difference is highly unlikely to have occurred by coincidence.
In the same manner as the previous four hypotheses, the Somers’s and Kendall’s
tble-c were both calculated. The results of -0.278 and -0.259 show a moderate to
significant negative correlation between an inadequate academic program and
academic adaptation, respectively. The p-values less than 0.05 for both statistics
suggest that the association is statistically significant. Therefore, based on the
results, there is sufficient evidence to accept the hypothesis that there is an
association between academic adaptation and an inadequate academic
programme, such that increased difficulties due to the organisation of the
schedule, space restrictions in classes, and mandatory attendance are correlated
with decreased academic adaptation.
The results (see Table 4) for the sixth hypothesis show that there is a statistically
significant difference between the groups of working students experiencing
varying levels of difficulty as a result of the standard of work in their study
program (Chi-square = 68.621, 4 degrees of freedom, p < = 0.001). The two
measures of association (Somers’s = -0.211 and Kendall’s table-c = -0.196) between
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
68
5. Discussion
This study aimed to examine the relationship between life-domain issues (e.g.,
work, personal, and academic) obstacles and academic adaption among working
Estonian university students. In order to attain this objective, six relevant
hypotheses were examined. The pertinent explanation regarding the relationship
between these factors and their academic adaptation follows.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
69
work environments that are accommodating to the needs of these students, as well
as providing support and resources to help working students to balance work and
university.
6. Conclusion
This study has uncovered the association between life-domain concerns and
academic adaptation among Estonian university students. The findings
emphasise the significance of giving support and resources to working students,
in order to assist them in achieving academic success and their academic goals.
This research makes an important contribution; since it calls attention to the fact
that working university students in Estonia need academic-adaptation support.
The research sheds light on the difficulties encountered by working students and
the manner in which these difficulties can affect academic experiences by
illuminating the relationship between life domain concerns and academic
adaptability. Such knowledge can be utilised to improve policies and practises;
and it can also help direct the creation of initiatives geared towards helping
students who are also working while attending university.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
70
However, this study has a few limitations. As a case study, Estonia was chosen
for this research, which may provide insight into the cultural setting in which the
findings were gathered. Given that the institutional and labour market conditions
in other European nations may be more favourable than those in Estonia, it may
be useful to draw upon the experiences of working university students in those
countries in future studies. One more limitation is that the research is based on
self-reported information, which can be interpreted as subjective perceptions. The
exploratory nature of the study and the use of correlational analysis indicates that
different analysis techniques could be employed in future research, controlling for
variables including age, gender, field of study, and other academic adaptation,
factors.
7. References
Applegate, C., & Daly, A. (2016). The impact of paid work on the academic performance
of students: A case study from the University of Canberra. Australian Journal of
Education, 50(2), 155-166. https://doi.org/10.1177/000494410605000205
Aug, T. (2022, August 3). Estonian women still among the most highly educated in Europe.
Statistics Estonia. http://bit.ly/3GcNlVg
Beatson, N. J., Lange, P. d., & Oosthuizen, H. (2021). A question of balance: Study-work-
life, perspectives from accounting students. Pacific Accounting Review, 33(3), 257-
273. https://doi.org/10.1108/PAR-09-2020-0137
Beerkens, M., Mägi, E., & Lill, L. (2011). University studies as a side job: Causes and
consequences of massive student employment in Estonia. Higher Education, 61,
679-692. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-010-9356-0
Bhui, K., Dinos, S., Galant-Miecznikowska, M., Jongh, B. d., & Stansfeld, S. (2016).
Perceptions of work stress causes and effective interventions in employees
working in public, private and non-governmental organisations: A qualitative
study. BJPsych Bulletin, 40(6), 318-325. https://doi.org/10.1192/pb.bp.115.050823
Broer, M., Bai, Y., & Fonseca, F. (2019). A Review of the literature on socioeconomic status
and educational achievement. Socioeconomic Inequality and Educational Outcomes, 5,
7-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11991-1_2
Cuppen, J., Muja, A., Hauschildt, K., Buck, D., & Daniel, A. (2021). Eurostudent VII micro
data: Data and methods report. Research Ned.
https://doi.org/10.21249/DZHW:es7:2.0.0
Dahm, G., & Lauterbach, O. (2016). Measuring students' social and academic integra tion-
assessment of the operationalization in the national educational panel study. In
H.-P. Blossfeld, J. V. Maurice, M. Bayer, & J. Skopek (Eds.), Methodological Issues of
Longitudinal Surveys (pp. 313-329). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-
11994-2_18
Gonta, I., & Bulgac, A. (2019). The adaptation of students to the academic environment in
university. Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 11(3), 34-44.
https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/137
Hauschildt, K., Gwosć, C., Schirmer, H., & Wittenberg-Cras, F. (2021). Social and economic
conditions of student life in Europe. WBV Media GmbH & Co. KG.
https://bit.ly/40zzi4x
Knoster, K. C., & Goodboy, A. K. (2020). A conditional process model of academic
demands and student learning. Communication Education, 69(3), 335-355.
https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2020.1713387
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
71
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
72
Yerken, A., & Luu, L. A. (2022). A stepping-stone to the ‘‘West’’: Academic adaptation of
international students from post-Soviet countries in Hungary. International Journal
of Intercultural Relations, 89, 183-194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2022.06.005
Zhang, G., Shao, C. Y., & Johnston, C. R. (2019). Working students and their academic
performance: A decision tree analysis. Journal of Higher Education Theory and
Practice, 19(7), 123-136. https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v19i7.2538
Zhang, X., & Yang, L. (2020). The effects of employment on undergraduate student academic
performance. American Society for Engineering Education. http://bit.ly/40Qgs9v
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
73
Cristhian Sarango
Universidad Técnica Particular de Loja, Loja, Ecuador
Abstract. The aim of this study is to assess and compare the effectiveness
of three types of EFL writing feedback: teacher direct, teacher indirect,
and peer feedback, while also exploring student perceptions of the
feedback they receive. For this purpose, a mixed-method approach was
used, combining a quasi-experimental and a survey design. Eighty-two
EFL learners (aged 17-18 years old) were divided into four groups (three
intervention groups who received feedback and one control group who
did not) and practised EFL writing skills for a two-month period. After
the intervention, the students from the intervention groups (62) answered
a questionnaire related to their perceptions about the feedback received.
The results of pre- and post-tests showed an improvement in EFL writing
skills in all the groups. Likewise, there was a statistically significant
difference in the results of the post-test between the groups who received
feedback and those who did not, which means that feedback was
effective. However, when comparing the three types of feedback, there
were no statistically significant differences among the intervention
groups. As for the perceptions of the feedback received during their EFL
writing practice, students believed that feedback was a positive aspect of
writing instruction. They thought that feedback was important for their
learning, and they would like to receive a combination of teacher and peer
feedback. This study contributes to the ongoing discussion around the
effectiveness of different types of feedback on EFL writing skills.
1. Introduction
English as a Foreign Language (EFL) is part of the curriculum in Ecuadorian high
schools. However, students face difficulties in reaching the required English
proficiency level set by the Ecuadorian Ministry of Education upon completing
high school (El Comercio, 2017). Teaching EFL is a challenging task for teachers
who often lack the necessary resources and training, particularly in public high
©Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0
International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
74
schools (Gonzalez et al., 2015). This problem is also evident in the teaching and
learning of EFL writing skills, which are difficult for students, even in their mother
tongue.
Previous studies have shown the efficacy of different forms of feedback (e.g.,
Mirzaii & Aliabadi, 2013; Saukah et al., 2017; Deng et al., 2022; Tan &
Manochphinyo, 2017; Yang et al., 2006). Other studies, however, have questioned
the effects of feedback over time (e.g., Truscott & Hsu, 2008; Karim & Nassaji,
2019). This controversy has captured the attention of numerous researchers in the
field of Second Language Acquisition (SLA) because of some diversity in the
results of the studies conducted. For these reasons, the present study focuses on
studying the effectiveness of teacher and peer feedback on L2 writing in an
Ecuadorian context; thus contributing to the debate regarding the effectiveness of
different types of feedback in EFL teaching, specifically writing skills.
2. Literature Review
2.1 Relevance of EFL writing skills
Writing is a complex process in language that requires time and effort to learn and
teach. Language programmes must acknowledge the multi-dimensional nature of
writing, given its importance as a core component of language (Harmer, 2004). In
other words, writing is a fundamental but challenging skill in language
production.
Writing is a basic building block for life, leisure, and employment. Basically, it is
a crucial skill in academic and professional success (National Commission on
Writing, 2004), which becomes even more challenging when it comes to writing
in a second or foreign language (Li, 2013). The cognitive process of writing skills
involves memory, thinking ability and verbal skills, so proficiency in writing is an
indicator of effective learning in a second language (Hyland, 2019).
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
75
unity, and mechanics are also essential in writing. In addition, the purposes of
EFL writing programmes include tasks such as writing letters, stories, or reports
(Harmer, 2007).
The relevance of EFL/ESL writing has led to an increase in current research in this
field (Bui et al., 2023; Algburi & Razali, 2022). This research benefits from various
approaches that have been employed for writing (e.g., psychological, pedagogical,
linguistic, psycholinguistic) (Nation & Macalister, 2020).
Extensive research has been conducted on the use of peer feedback in L2, which
requires learners' training before its implementation. Peer feedback offers several
benefits, such as enhancing students' awareness of their writing strengths and
weaknesses, promoting critical thinking, and fostering learners' autonomy.
However, some drawbacks include the limited L2 proficiency of learners and the
size of the class.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
76
Previous work on peer feedback for L2 writing has demonstrated that this type of
feedback is an aid to improve learners’ written production, provided that they
receive appropriate training in providing feedback and the strategies are
appropriate (e.g., Levi Altstaedter, 2018; Yu & Lee, 2016).
On the other hand, research on teacher feedback for L2 writing has found that
certain forms of teacher feedback can be more effective than others. For instance,
indirect feedback has been shown to be more effective than direct feedback (e.g.,
Ghandi & Maghsoudi, 2014; Tan & Manochphinyo, 2017). This may be because
amending is a more active process (Westmacott, 2017). However, some studies
suggest that direct feedback is more effective than indirect feedback (e.g., Mirzaii
& Aliabadi, 2013), while others that have found no significant difference between
these two types of feedback (e.g., Elola et al., 2017). It is worth noting that direct
feedback can yield better results than indirect feedback when students have lower
L2 proficiency levels (Ferris & Hedgcock, 2014).
With respect to indirect feedback, we can have two subtypes: coded and un-coded
feedback. Research regarding this topic has demonstrated that indirect coded
feedback could be more effective than indirect un-coded feedback (e.g., Salimi &
Valizadeh, 2015; Saukah et al., 2017).
When it comes to the comparison of teacher and peer feedback, which is the focus
of our study, we address some related research in the following section.
Yang et al. (2006) compared peer and teacher feedback in an EFL writing class to
address the small amount of feedback provided in large classes at a university in
China. The participants included 79 Chinese students from an EFL writing class,
who were divided into two groups. Both groups worked on three rounds of multi-
draft compositions for the same writing tasks. The data for the analysis was
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
77
collected from three sources: textual and questionnaire data from both groups, as
well as video recordings and interviews with 12 students. The results revealed
that teacher feedback had a greater impact on student’s writing skills and was
more likely to be considered. Conversely, peer feedback was associated with
increased student autonomy.
Zhao (2012) conducted case study research to analyse how learners utilised and
comprehended teacher and peer feedback in an English as a Foreign Language
(EFL) writing course at a university in China. The participants involved were 18
second-year English majors who participated for 16 weeks. To investigate the use
of feedback, the researcher applied content analysis of the first and revised drafts
of 26 writing assignments (e.g., letters, poems, arguments). Recall interviews were
used to examine the learners' understanding of feedback. The findings indicated
that teacher feedback resulted in more changes in learners' subsequent drafts than
peer feedback. However, the recall interviews revealed that the students
internalised peer feedback more effectively.
Sun and Wang (2022) investigated the impact of teacher intervention on students'
utilisation of various forms of peer feedback and self-revision skills. They
employed a quasi-experimental design, in which two groups were exposed to
direct correction from the teacher for incorrect peer feedback or symbols denoting
inaccurate feedback, whereas the control group received no teacher intervention.
The sample consisted of 110 graduate students who were not majoring in English
and who participated for one and a half months. During the study, the students
produced two essays, conducted peer feedback, and revised their drafts based on
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
78
the received feedback. The results showed that the groups that received teacher
intervention made more accurate revisions in their subsequent essays than the
control group did.
2) What are the students’ perceptions of the feedback provided on their written
work?
3. Method
3.1 Setting and participants
A total of 82 senior high-school students from a public school in Ecuador
participated in the present study. Their ages ranged from 17 to 18 years old and
their English proficiency levels varied (A1, A2, and B1), based on the Common
European Framework of Reference (CEFR) (Council of Europe, 2020). These
students were enrolled in the Second Year of the Diploma Programme and were
divided into four classes, each with a similar number of students. Three of these
classes were intervention groups (62 students in total) for the three types of
feedback applied (direct feedback: 21 students; indirect feedback: 21 students;
peer feedback: 20 students). One group (20 students) was the control group that
did not receive any teacher or peer feedback.
3.2 Instruments
Students were administered a writing pre-test and post-test that consisted of short
descriptive essays (minimum 120 words and maximum 150 words) in which they
had to write about their favourite vacation (pre-test) and their favourite movie
(post-test).
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
79
prevent any confusion among students with lower English proficiency, the
questions were translated into Spanish.
3.3 Procedure
The present study employed a mixed-method approach that integrated a quasi-
experimental design (based on pre-test and post-test) and results of questionnaire
responses. A quasi-experimental design study involves non-random sampling to
evaluate the impact of an idea, practice, or procedure on a particular outcome
(Creswell, 2015). In this instance, the students were chosen according to the class
in which they were enrolled. This means that we used purposeful sampling in the
selection of the groups of students since these students had the characteristics
required for the study.
Before starting the writing practices, students took a writing pre-test to evaluate
their writing skills at the beginning of the intervention. The pre-tests were graded
jointly by two teachers and were based on a rubric developed for the pre-test and
post-test. The score assigned was out of 10 points.
The students from the four groups, who usually took five hours of General
English a week, worked on a weekly writing activity for eight weeks. Two of those
five hours per week were devoted to practising writing informal e-mails, blog
entries and short essays (with a minimum of 120 words and a maximum of 150
words). The students from the control group did not receive any teacher or peer
feedback on their tasks; however, learners from all of the four groups participated
in short weekly sessions with the whole class in which common writing errors
were pointed out and addressed.
Owing to the relevance of grammar and vocabulary in EFL writing (Cabrera et al.,
2021; Mart, 2013; Cook, 2013) and the effectiveness of focused feedback in
comparison to unfocused feedback (Deng et al., 2022), the students from the
intervention groups received feedback on grammar and vocabulary that they
were either already familiar with or were studying in class. As focused feedback
was provided, it did not address content, mechanics, or style. In the teacher direct
feedback group, the teacher underlined the errors and indicated the correct form
using arrows and comments. In the teacher indirect feedback group, the teacher
used codes that had been previously indicated in class. These codes were related
to grammar (verbs, wrong order, prepositions, etc.) and vocabulary errors (false
cognates, misspelling, calques, incorrect meaning, etc.).
With respect to peer feedback, students received two hours of training before
providing feedback. They worked in pairs and used oral communication and a
peer feedback rubric to implement this type of feedback. The feedback was
provided in the form of indirect feedback in which students had to circle the errors
related to grammar and vocabulary. If the students who received feedback were
unsure about the error, they asked their classmate to clarify their doubts.
The intervention groups revised their drafts based on the feedback provided (by
their teacher or peer) and submitted their final products. After receiving feedback
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
80
on their drafts and revising them, students were given a qualitative grade (very
good, good, needs improvement) for each revised task.
At the end of the intervention, the students took a writing post-test, which was
used to obtain data about their progress after the writing lessons. Like the pre-
test, the post-test was graded jointly by two teachers (out of 10 points) based on a
rubric. The students in the intervention groups also answered a questionnaire
about their perceptions of the feedback received in their writing sessions after the
intervention period.
The statistical analysis of the scores obtained in the pre- and post-tests in each
group was performed by using the paired t-test, as the data came from the same
group of students. This was done to determine whether there were statistically
significant differences in the results of the pre- and post-tests in each of the four
groups.
To compare the results of the pre-tests and post-tests of the four groups, we used
one-way ANOVA and the Tukey post-hoc tests in order to determine if there were
significant differences in the scores. First, we ran the one-way ANOVA with the
results of the pre-tests to compare the scores of the writing tests among the four
groups. Then, ANOVA was used to find significant differences in the scores of the
writing post-test after receiving the different types of feedback.
4. Results
4.1 Effectiveness of the different types of feedback used
Below (Table 1) we present the mean scores (out of 10 points) obtained by the
students in the pre-test for each group. There is no statistically significant
difference in the results of the writing pre-tests among the four groups (p-value >
0.05).
Table 2 displays the mean scores (out of 10 points) obtained by the students in the
post-test. The p-value obtained after running the ANOVA test indicates
statistically significant differences among the four groups. However, the Tukey
post-hoc test shows statistically non-significant differences, except for Groups 2
and 4, so there is a statistically significant difference in the scores obtained by the
direct teacher feedback group and the no feedback group.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
81
In both Tables 1 and 2, it is evident that there was an improvement in mean scores
for all groups at the end of the intervention (Group 1 mean score improvement =
1.7857; Group 2 mean score improvement = 2.1667; Group 3 mean score
improvement = 1.2; Group 4 mean score improvement = 0.875). Application of the
paired t-test to compare the pre-test and post-test scores in each group showed
that the improvements from the pre-test to the post-test were statistically
significant in all four groups (p-value < 0.0001). Moreover, groups that received
teacher feedback showed higher improvements in mean scores than those who
received peer feedback or no feedback at all. However, there was no statistically
significant difference when comparing teacher and peer feedback.
As presented in Table 3, the majority of students in the three groups believed that
the feedback they received helped them improve their written production (Agree
= 42 students; Strongly agree = 12 students). They also felt comfortable with the
feedback provided on their work (Agree = 29 students; Strongly agree = 33
students) and thought that feedback had helped them identify errors they had not
noticed before in their writing (Agree = 25 students; Strongly agree = 37 students).
The students also felt motivated after realising that their work improved owing
to the corrections (Agree = 45 students; Strongly agree = 9 students), and
considered that the corrections were related to the grammar and vocabulary
studied in class (Agree = 43 students; Strongly agree = 14 students). Finally, the
students expressed a preference for combined feedback from both the teacher and
their classmates (Agree = 36 students; Strongly agree = 29 students). They
regarded this feedback as crucial to their learning process (Agree = 26 students;
Strongly agree = 36 students).
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
82
5. Discussion
First of all, the EFL writing skills in the four groups under study are similar, as
demonstrated by the mean scores and p-value (>0.05) obtained in the writing pre-
test. This is an important basis for the comparability of the groups.
Once the instruction period finished, all the groups obtained higher mean scores
after the eight weeks of training, which means that the four groups improved their
use of grammar and vocabulary in EFL writing. This is reflected in the results of
the post-test. However, the intervention groups showed greater improvement in
their mean scores when the results are compared with those obtained in the pre-
test. There are statistically significant differences between the teacher direct
feedback group and the control group, which means that the direct feedback was
much more effective in this sample of students, perhaps because their English
proficiency level was low. This finding is consistent with the research conducted
by Ferris and Hedgcock (2014), which suggests that direct feedback on writing can
be more effective than other types of feedback, especially for students who
struggle with L2 proficiency. Based on these results, it is evident that teacher
direct feedback is a more effective approach for teaching students with lower
levels of English proficiency. This finding underscores the importance of tailoring
teaching approaches to the specific needs of individual students to maximize their
learning outcomes.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
83
either. These results seem to be different from other, similar studies that compare
types of feedback in which indirect feedback is more effective than direct feedback
(e.g., Ghandi & Maghsoudi, 2014; Tan & Manochphinyo, 2017), and more in line
with literature that has not found significant differences between these two types
of feedback (e.g., Elola et al., 2017). In other words, the results indicate that
indirect teacher feedback and peer feedback may not be the best alternative for
teaching students with a low English proficiency level. This has important
implications for determining the circumstances under which direct or indirect
feedback should be provided.
When it comes to comparing teacher and peer feedback, the results of the present
study are not completely aligned to studies that have found that teacher feedback
is more effective than peer feedback (e.g., Yang et al., 2006; Zhao, 2012) or studies
that favour peer feedback (Cui et ak.,2022). The results of the present study are
more in line with literature that shows no statistically significant difference
between teacher and peer feedback (e.g., Demirel & Engínarlar, 2016).
Regarding the students’ perceptions, students from the intervention groups seem
to have a positive attitude towards the feedback received on their written
production. In fact, feedback is considered helpful in improving learners’ writing
skills (Kim & Emeliyanova, 2021). Furthermore, the students would like to receive
a combination of teacher and peer feedback in L2 writing, which would be an
ideal scenario in teaching EFL writing.
Overall, this study offers valuable insights into the effectiveness of different
feedback types in improving the writing skills of students with low English
proficiency levels. The findings can assist teachers and educators in designing
effective feedback strategies for their students. However, it is important to note
that further research is needed to fully test the effectiveness of these types of
teacher and peer feedback with larger samples of high-school students across
different English proficiency levels.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
84
the teacher, especially in the case of indirect coded feedback. In terms of students’
perceptions, they hold positive opinions about written corrective feedback. They
favour receiving both teacher and peer feedback, as well as a combination of both
types of feedback. They feel that feedback is a helpful strategy that helps them
identify errors that they usually do not notice, and improves their writing skills.
Students also feel comfortable and motivated when receiving feedback related to
the content studied in the EFL classroom.
To sum up, the findings of the present study indicate that providing written
corrective feedback does help students to improve their written production in a
foreign language. Nevertheless, some factors must be taken into account when
providing this type of feedback, including class size, L2 proficiency level,
frequency, and strategies. It is also crucial to know how students feel about the
feedback received in order to determine if the teacher can continue implementing
the feedback strategies in the EFL classroom. Finally, it should be noted that the
sample size for this study was not large enough, and therefore, studies with larger
groups and a fully experimental approach would be recommended in future
studies.
7. References
Algburi, E. A., & Razali, A. B. (2022). Role of Feedback on English Academic Writing Skills
of Tertiary Level Iraqi English as a Foreign Language (EFL) Students: A Review
of Literature. Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development,
11(1), 689–702. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v11-i1/12168
Alvira, R. (2016). The impact of oral and written feedback on EFL writers with the use of
screencasts. PROFILE Issues in Teachers' Professional Development, 18(2), 79–
92. https://doi.org/10.15446/profile.v18n2.53397
Bitchener, J., & Ferris, D. R. (2012). Written corrective feedback in second language acquisition
and writing. Routledge.
Borup, J., West, R. E., & Thomas, R. (2015). The impact of text versus video communication
on instructor feedback in blended courses. Educational Technology Research and
Development, 63(2), 161–184. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11423-015-9367-8
Bui, H. P., Nguyen, L. T., & Nguyen, T. V. (2023). An investigation into EFL pre-service
teachers’ academic writing strategies. Heliyon, 9(3), 1–11.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13743
Cabrera-Solano, P., Gonzalez-Torres, P., & Ochoa-Cueva, C. (2021). Using Pixton for
teaching EFL writing in higher education during the covid-19 pandemic.
International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 20(9), 102–115.
https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.20.9.7
Cook, V. (2013). Second language learning and language teaching. Routledge.
Council of Europe (2020). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages:
Learning, teaching, assessment – Companion volume. Council of Europe
Publishing.
Creswell, J. (2015). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and
qualitative research (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc.
Cui, Y., Schunn, C. D., & Gai, X. (2022). Peer feedback and teacher feedback: a comparative
study of revision effectiveness in writing instruction for EFL learners. Higher
Education Research & Development, 41(6), 1838–1854.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2021.1969541
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
85
Demirel, E., & Enginarlar, H. (2016). Effects of combined peer-teacher feedback on second
language writing development. H. U. Journal of Education, 31(4), 657–675.
http://dx.doi.org/10.16986/HUJE.2016015701
Deng, C., Wang, X., Lin S., Xuan, W., & Xie, Q. (2022). The effect of coded focused and
unfocused corrective feedback on ESL student writing accuracy. Journal of
Language and Education, 8(4), 36–57. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2022.16039
Ecuadorian Ministry of Education. (2023, February 24). Lengua Extranjera [Foreign
Language]. http://educacion.gob.ec/curriculo-lengua-extranjera/
El Comercio (2017). El nivel de inglés en el Ecuador todavía es bajo [English proficiency
level in Ecuador is still low]. Retrieved from
http://www.elcomercio.com/tendencias/ecuador-nivel-ingles-adultos-
educacion.html
Elola, I., Mikulski, A. M., & Buckner, T. E. (2017). The impact of direct and indirect
feedback on the development of Spanish aspect. Journal of Spanish Language
Teaching, 4(1), 61–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/23247797.2017.1315267
Ferris, D. R., & Hedgcock, J. (2014). Teaching ESL composition: Purpose, process, and practice.
New York: Routledge.
Frear, D., & Chiu, Y. H. (2015). The effect of focused and unfocused indirect written
corrective feedback on EFL learners’ accuracy in new pieces of writing. System, 53,
24–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.06.006
Ghandi, M., & Maghsoudi, M. (2014). The effect of direct and indirect corrective feedback
on Iranian EFL learners’ spelling errors. English Language Teaching, 7(8), 53–61.
http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v7n8p53
Gonzalez, P. F., Ochoa, C. A., Cabrera, P. A., Castillo, L. M., Quinonez, A. L., Solano, L.
M., Espinoza, F., Ulehlova, E. & Arias, M. O. (2015). EFL teaching in the Amazon
Region of Ecuador: A focus on activities and resources for teaching listening and
speaking skills. English Language Teaching, 8(8), 94–103.
http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v8n8p94
Harmer, J. (2004). How to Teach Writing. UK: Pearson Education.
Harmer, J. (2007). The practice of English language teaching. New York: Longman.
Hyland, K. (2019). Second language writing. Cambridge University Press.
Karim, K., & Nassaji, H. (2019). The effects of written corrective feedback: A critical
synthesis of past and present research. Instructed Second Language Acquisition, 3(1),
28–52. https://doi.org/10.1558/isla.37949
Kim, Y., & Emeliyanova, L. (2021). The effects of written corrective feedback on the
accuracy of L2 writing: Comparing collaborative and individual revision behavior.
Language Teaching Research, 25(2), 234–255.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168819831406
Lee, I. (2017). Classroom writing assessment and feedback in L2 school contexts. Singapore:
Springer.
Levi Altstaedter, L. (2018). Investigating the impact of peer feedback in foreign language
writing. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 12(2), 137–151.
https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2015.1115052
Li, X. (2013). The application of "three dimensional" model in the teaching design of EFL
writing. English Language Teaching, 6(2), 32–44.
http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v6n2p32
Mart, C. (2013). Teaching grammar in context: Why and How? Theory and Practice in
Language Studies, 3(1), 124–129. http://dx.doi.org/10.4304/tpls.3.1.124–129
McKinley, J. (2022). An argument for globalized L2 writing methodological innovation.
Journal of Second Language Writing, 58, 100945.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2022.100945
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
86
Mirzaii, M., & Aliabadi, R. B. (2013). Direct and indirect written corrective feedback in the
context of genre-based instruction on job application letter writing. Journal of
Writing Research, 5(2), 191–213. http://dx.doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2013.05.02.2
Nation, I.S.P., & Macalister, J. (2020). Teaching ESL/EFL Reading and Writing (2nd ed.).
Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003002765
National Commission on Writing. (2004). Writing: A ticket to work…or a ticket out. New
York: The College Entrance Examination Board.
Salimi, A., & Valizadeh, M. (2015). The effect of coded and uncoded written corrective
feedback on the accuracy of learners writing in pre-intermediate level. International
Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 4(3), 116–122.
http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.4n.3p.116
Saukah, A., Dewanti, D. M. I., & Laksmi, E. D. (2017). The effect of coded and non-coded
correction feedback on the quality of Indonesian EFL students’ Writing. Indonesian
Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(2), 247–252.
http://dx.doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v7i2.8127
Sheen, Y. (2011). Corrective feedback, individual differences and second language learning.
Dordrecht: Springer.
Shen, R., & Chong, S. W. (2022). Learner engagement with written corrective feedback in
ESL and EFL contexts: a qualitative research synthesis using a perception-based
framework. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1–15.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2022.2072468
Sun, H., & Wang, M. (2022). Effects of teacher intervention and type of peer feedback on
student writing revision. Language Teaching Research.
https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688221080507
Westmacott, A. (2017). Direct vs. indirect written corrective feedback: Student perceptions.
Íkala, Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura, 22(1), 17–32.
http://dx.doi.org/10.17533/udea.ikala.v22n01a02.
Tan, K. E., & Manochphinyo, A. (2017). Improving Grammatical Accuracy in Thai
Learners' Writing: Comparing Direct and Indirect Written Corrective Feedback. The
Journal of Asia TEFL, 14(3), 430–442.
http://dx.doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2017.14.3.4.430
Truscott, J., & Hsu, A. Y. P. (2008). Error correction, revision, and learning. Journal of Second
Language Writing, 17(4), 292–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2008.05.003
Yang, M., Badger, R., & Yu, Z. (2006). A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback
in a Chinese EFL writing class. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15(3), 179–200.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2006.09.004
Yu, S., & Lee, I. (2016). Exploring Chinese students' strategy use in a cooperative peer
feedback writing group. System, 58, 1–11.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.02.005
Zhao, H. (2012). Who takes the floor? Peer feedback or teacher feedback: An investigation
of Chinese university English learners’ use and understanding of peer and teacher
feedback on writing. In Innovating EFL teaching in Asia (pp. 245–252). London:
Macmillan. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230347823_19
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
87
Yuan-Cheng Chang
Department of Education Management, Chinese International College
Dhurakij Pundit University, Thailand
1. Introduction
The context of this study is the higher education system in Hebei, China. In recent
years, the Chinese government has emphasized the importance of innovation in
©Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0
International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
88
driving economic and social development (xiu, 2022). As part of this, the Hebei
province has implemented innovation-driven development strategies where the
development of "double first-class" colleges and universities has become a major
priority (Lian et al., 2021). However, to achieve this goal, the presence of creative
teachers who can effectively promote innovation in teaching and research are
required (Deng et al., 2020). Furthermore, in the context of higher education,
creativity is not only important to drive innovation and development but also to
promote the quality of education (Lian et al., 2021). Creativity is rooted in a
complex interaction between environmental factors and personal characteristics
(Thatrak, 2021). Compared to a creative personality and mindset, environmental
factors such as management practices produce perceptible effects in a short period
of time. Through this, they considerably impact the generation and development
of innovative behaviors (Corradini et al., 2022). Therefore, university
administrators should create an environment that promotes organizational
innovation and strive to improve teachers’ creative teaching and research
capabilities.
The lack of a favorable environment that inspires creativity limits the creative
behavior of individuals (Zhang et al., 2011). This highlights the significance of
creating an organizational innovation climate in the context of increasingly fierce
competition in higher education (Muftahu & Jamil, 2021; Sharma et al., 2021). A
friendly (Stinkeste et al., 2021), tolerant (Y. Wang et al., 2021), cooperative
(Thomas & Khalil, 2022), and safe organizational climate (Whlert, 2020) can
enhance knowledge sharing and generate a stronger sense of psychological
security (Whlert, 2020), help realize the objectives of workplace excellence and
exceptionality, and encourage teachers to pursue innovation in education and
research (Dean et al., 2021).
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
89
2. Literature Review
A supportive organizational innovation climate that is agile, open, and innovative
can facilitate individuals' proactive responses to creativity requirements, leading
to idea generation for innovation (Lv et al., 2021). Therefore, sustained and
focused efforts should be made towards fostering creative development within
the organization.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
90
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
91
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
92
communication and trust, meet their psychological needs, and create a sense of
belonging. Therefore, feedback-seeking behavior serves as a crucial factor linking
organizational innovation climate and creativity.
3. Methodology
3.1 Research Objective
The aim of this study is to assess the current state of creativity among university
teachers in Hebei and to identify effective development strategies to improve their
competitiveness. The study intends to promote innovation and reform in teacher
management to meet the challenges of changing times. The research participants
were selected using convenience sampling from three universities in Hebei, and a
total of 356 university teachers took part. The findings of this study will aid in
cultivating teachers’ creativity, integrating their skills, abilities, and mindsets into
teaching reform, and promoting innovation-driven development in Hebei's
universities. Ultimately, this study aims to cultivate more talented individuals
with creative mindsets to address the evolving needs of the education sector.
To establish the validity and reliability of the scale, Cronbach's alpha coefficient
was calculated, and indicated good internal consistency at 0.867. The deletion of
any item did not significantly improve the Cronbach's alpha coefficient,
suggesting that 10 items contributed to the scale's reliability. A confirmatory
factor analysis was conducted to assess the construct validity of the scale. The
results showed satisfactory fitting indices, with χ2/df = 3.654, which is below the
threshold of 5. Other fitting indicators, including RMSEA = 0.086 (below the
standard value of 0.1), SRMR = 0.053 (below the standard value of 0.8), and CFI =
0.962, NFI = 0.936, GFI = 0.944, TLI = 0.955, all exceeded the recommended
threshold of 0.8 (Watkins, 2018).
Overall, the results indicate that the Organizational Innovation Climate Scale has
good validity and reliability and is a suitable tool for measuring teachers'
perceptions of organizational innovation climate.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
93
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
94
4. Results
A total of 400 questionnaires were distributed and 384 were collected, of which
356 were valid, resulting in an effective response rate of 89%. Data collation and
analysis were carried out on the collected research samples. The sample
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
95
comprised 227 men (63.76%) and 129 women (36.24%); 143 had a bachelor’s
degree (40.17%), 177 had a master’s degree (49.72%), and 36 had a PhD (10.11%).
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
96
OAI1
0.545***
SFB
0.545*** 0.453***
OAI2 0.316***
0.505*** 0.302***
OAI
OAI CA
OAI3
Referring to the study by Xie (2021) , the Bootstrap sampling method was used for
repeated sampling (5,000 times) to test the mediating effect of feedback-seeking
behavior. As shown in Table 6, the 95% confidence interval (0.200, 0.308) of the
indirect effect of organizational innovation climate on creativity did not include
0, which indicated that the mediating effect was significant. The total effect was
0.645 and the mediating effect accounted for 44.01%, thus verifying the partial
mediating effect of feedback-seeking behavior to imply that the organizational
innovation climate of university teachers in Hebei significantly and positively
affects creativity and can indirectly affect teachers’ creativity through feedback-
seeking behavior.
5. Discussion
The results of our study showed that the organizational innovation climate of
universities has a significant positive impact on teachers' creativity, which is
consistent with previous research results (Aldabbas et al., 2021; Daniel et al., 2021).
Further, Zelenski and Desrochers (2021) opined that a dynamic and interactive
relationship exists between behavior and the environment, and that synergistic
extrinsic motivation can enhance creativity (Daikoku et al., 2021). Innovation
involves continuous attempts to bring about change and break monotony, and
these actions carry risks by increasing unpredictability for an organization
(Michael et al., 2012). Organizations should allow individuals to make mistakes
and encourage them to engage in risky creative activities; this can improve their
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
97
willingness to take risks and engage more in creative activities (Peng et al., 2021).
An organizational innovation climate encourages the diversity of opinions
through the flow of information, which may lead to a higher probability of
conflicts in terms of beliefs, assumptions, possibilities, and new facts (Chaubey et
al., 2021). Through feedback-seeking behavior, increased interactions are more
likely to generate more creative ideas and solve practical problems at work
(Thatrak, 2021). Therefore, organizations’ focus on job autonomy, teamwork, and
organizational motivation can strengthen the sense of psychological security of
their members to break away from convention and creatively solve problems,
which is conducive to innovation.
6. Conclusions
This study investigated the impact of innovation culture on the development of
creativity among university teachers in Hebei. The survey research revealed that
a strong innovation culture is critical to developing creativity among Hebei
university teachers, as it positively affects feedback-seeking behavior and has a
significant positive impact on creativity development. Specifically, feedback-
seeking behavior has a large and statistically significant effect on the development
of creativity among Hebei university teachers and partially mediates the
relationship between innovation culture and creativity. Moreover, our findings
suggest that organizational motivation is a more important factor than job
autonomy and teamwork in inspiring teachers to be creative, explore new
avenues and methods, and enhance their confidence in innovation within the
organizational innovation climate of Hebei universities. These results highlight
the need for specific institutions to emphasize the importance of organizational
motivation and create a positive work environment that encourages innovation to
inspire feedback-seeking behaviors among teachers, which can facilitate the
generation and development of creativity. Overall, this study contributes to a
better understanding of the factors that promote creativity among university
teachers and provides insights that help develop effective strategies to cultivate
creativity in higher education institutions.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
98
7. Limitations
This study selected university teachers in Hebei as the research object. The
geographical location and questionnaire distribution method limited the
universality of the research result. To improve external validity, future research
can expand the sample scope to different regions. Moreover, the research results
may be biased as the research is based on cross-sectional data, lacks regular
follow-up with the participants, and does not involve periodic follow-ups. Future
studies may consider using periodic and phased long-term follow-up research to
collect sample data. Qualitative research and experiments can also be used to
explore the mediating role of other variables between organizational innovation
climate and creativity.
8. Recommendations
8.1 Practical Recommendations:
Managers of Hebei universities should establish an innovation platform that
allows teachers to share their ideas, learn from each other, and cultivate their
creativity. This platform can serve as a resource for teachers to access innovation
models, tools, and techniques.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
99
9. References
Adewoye, K. B., Rafiu, A. B., Aminu, T. F., & Onikola, I. O. (2021). Investigating the Impact
of Multicollinearity on Linear Regression Estimates. Malaysian Journal of
Computing, 6(1), 698–708. https://doi.org/10.24191/mjoc.v6i1.10540
Aldabbas, H., Pinnington, A., & Lahrech, A. (2021). The influence of perceived
organizational support on employee creativity: The mediating role of work
engagement. Current Psychology, 1–15. Advance online publication.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01992-1
Atatsi, E. A., Stoffers, J., Kil, A., & Li, M. S. (2022). Learn in Order to Innovate: An
Exploration of Individual and Team Learning as Antecedents of Innovative Work
Behaviours in Ghanaian Technical Universities. Sustainability, 14(7), Article 4012.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su14074012
Baker, W. E., Mukherjee, D., Perin, M. G., & Woodside, A. G. (2022). Learning orientation
and competitive advantage: A critical synthesis and future directions. Journal of
Business Research, 144, 863–873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.02.003
Bledow, R., Rosing, K., & Frese, M. (2013). A dynamic perspective on affect and creativity.
Academy of Management Journal, 56(2), 432–450.
https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0894
Brycz, H. (2021). The role of metacognition, type of feedback, and kind of incentives for
motivation to learn. Current Issues in Personality Psychology, 9(4), 429–440.
https://doi.org/10.5114/CIPP.2021.107070
Carmeli, A., Dutton, J. E., & Hardin, A. E. (2015). Respect as an engine for new ideas:
Linking respectful engagement, relational information processing and creativity
among employees and teams. Human Relations, 68(6), 1021–1047.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726714550256
Cerasoli, C. P., Nicklin, J. M., & Ford, M. T. (2014). Intrinsic motivation and extrinsic
incentives jointly predict performance: A 40-year meta-analysis. Psychological
Bulletin, 140(4), 980–1008. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035661
Chaubey, A., Sahoo, C. K., & Das, K. C. (2021). Examining the effect of training and
employee creativity on organizational innovation: A moderated mediation
analysis. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 29(1), 47–65.
https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-06-2020-2271
Chen, C. M., & Li, Y. X. (2010). Research on the relationship between organizational
innovation atmosphere and organizational performance. International Journal of
Business and Social Science, 1(1), 217–224.
https://doi.org/10.1109/icmse.2010.5719842
Cho, H. C., & Seo, J. P. (2021). Relationship between learning motivation and learning
attitude of middle school students according to the type of feedback. Korean
Journal of Sports Science, 30(1), 689-701.
https://doi.org/10.35159/kjss.2021.2.30.1.689
Corradini, C., Folmer, E., & Rebmann, A. (2022). Listening to the buzz: Exploring the link
between firm creation and regional innovative atmosphere as reflected by social
media. Environment Planning A, 54(3), 592-611.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X211056653
Daikoku, T., Fang, Q., Hamada, T., Handa, Y., & Nagai, Y. (2021). Temporal Dynamics of
Cognitive processing Influence Creativity: Importance of Environmental Setting.
Thinking Skills and creativity, 4, 11-40. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/dhwam
Daniel, E., Corinna, H., Daniela, K., & Kathrin, D. (2021). The peer teachers' perception of
intrinsic motivation and rewards. Advances in physiology education, 45(4), 758-768.
https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00023.2021
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
100
Dean, H. D., Myles, R. L., Porch, T., Parris, S., & Spears-Jones, C. (2021). Changing
Leadership Behaviors in a Public Health Agency Through Coaching and
Multirater Feedback. Journal of Public Health Management Practice, 27(1), E1-E8.
https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000001044
Deng, Q., Zheng, B., & Chen, J. (2020). The Relationship Between Personality Traits,
Resilience, School Support, and Creative Teaching in Higher School Physical
Education Teachers. Frontiers in Psychology, 11(3), 1-12.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.568906
Déprez, G., Bazine, N., Fréour, L., Pea-Jimenez, M., & Battistelli, A. (2021). From feedback
seeking to psychological attachment, the mediating role of adaptive performance
in perceived obstruction context. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 24, e1.
https://doi.org/10.1017/SJP.2021.33
Dygert, S., & Jarosz, A. F. (2020). Individual differences in creative cognition. Journal of
experimental psychology: General, 149(3), 1249-1274.
https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000713
Emery, N., Maher, J. M., & Ebert-May, D. (2021). Environmental influences and individual
characteristics that affect learner-centered teaching practices. PLOS ONE, 16(1), 1-
16. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0250760
Garivani, F., Devin, H. F., & Farbod, D. (2016). Investigating the Relationship Between
Group Emotional Intelligence with Collective Self-Efficacy and Team Work
Effectiveness. Human & Social Studies, 2, 133-144. https://doi.org/10.1515/hssr-
2016-0018
Hayes, A. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis.
Journal of Educational Measurement, 51(3), 335-337.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jedm.12050
Kozbelt, A. (2020). Review of The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity (2nd ed.), by J. C.
Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg. Evolutionary Studies in Imaginative Culture, 4(1), 131–
136. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.26613/esic.4.1.179
Kime, S. A. (2015). Creative motivation theory: An integrative review. Frontiers in
Psychology, 6, 902. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00902
Kozbelt, A., C, J., Kaufman, J, R., & Sternberg, R. J. (2020). The Cambridge Handbook of
Creativity. Evolutionary Studies in Imaginative Culture, 4(1), 131-136.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100763
Krasman, J. (2010). The feedback-seeking personality: Big Five and feedback-seeking
behavior. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 17(1), 18-32.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051809350895
Kumar, R., & Shukla, S. (2022). Creativity, proactive personality and entrepreneurial
intentions: Examining the mediating role of entrepreneurial self-efficacy. Global
Business Review, 23(1), 101-118. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150919844395
Lian, L., Guo, S., Wang, Q., Hu, L., Yang, X., & Li, X. (2021). Calling, character strengths,
career identity, and job burnout in young Chinese university teachers: A chain-
mediating model. Children and Youth Services Review, 120.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105776
Lin, Y. J., & Wang, H. C. (2021). Using virtual reality to facilitate learners' creative self-
efficacy and intrinsic motivation in an EFL classroom. Educational Information
Technologies, 26(4), 4487-4505. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10472-9
Lv, M., Yang, S., Lv, X. Y., Zhang, L., & Zhang, S. X. (2021). Organizational innovation
climate and innovation behavior among nurses in China: A mediation model of
psychological empowerment. Journal of Nursing Management, 29(7), 2225-2233.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.13381
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
101
Marín, V., Zawacki-Richter, O., Aydin, C. H., Bedenlier, S., Bond, M., Bozkurt, A., Conrad,
D., Jung, I., Kondakci, Y., & Prinsloo, P. (2022). Faculty perceptions, awareness
and use of open educational resources for teaching and learning in higher
education: A cross-comparative analysis. Research and Practice in Technology
Enhanced Learning, 17(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-022-00185-z
Mavri, A., Ioannou, A., & Loizides, F. (2021). Design students meet industry players:
feedback and creativity in communities of practice. The Internet Higher Education,
49(4), 100792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100684
Minnikin, A., Beck, J. W., & Shen, W. (2021). Why Do You Ask? The Effects of Perceived
Motives on the Effort that Managers Allocate Toward Delivering Feedback.
Journal of Business Psychology, 37(4), 813–830. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-
021-09776-x
Muftahu, M., & Jamil, H. (2021). Sustainable knowledge flow and innovation in higher
education: the implementation of change management in universities.
International Journal of Innovation Sustainable Development, 15(2), 159-168.
https://doi.org/10.1504/IJISD.2021.10035474
Nwangwu, N. I., Etodike, C. E., Okeke, H. C., Nnaebue, C. I., & Economics. (2021).
Organizational Climate Factors in Job Creativity among Public University
Librarians in Anambra State. South Asian Journal of Social Studies, 10(1), 34-44.
https://doi.org/10.9734/SAJSSE/2021/v10i130254
Peng, R. D., Chen, A., Bridgeford, E., Leek, J. T., & Hicks, S. C. (2021). Diagnosing Data
Analytic Problems in the Classroom. Journal of Statistics and Data Science Education,
29(3), 267-276. https://doi.org/10.1080/26939169.2021.1971586
Phankhong, T., Bakar, L. J. A., & Poespowidjojo, D. A. L. (2020). Examining the mediating
role of innovativeness on the relationship between innovation strategy,
atmosphere, culture and performance of hotel industry in Thailand: A pilot study.
Annals of Contemporary Developments in Management, 2(2), 29-39.
https://doi.org/10.33166/ACDMHR.2020.02.004
Prilop, C. N., Weber, K. E., & Kleinknecht, M. (2021). The role of expert feedback in the
development of pre-service teachers' professional vision of classroom
management in an online blended learning environment. Teaching Teacher
Education, 99(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103276
Rdulescu, C. (2013). A reflective model to stimulate knowledge and creativity in teacher
education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 76, 695-699.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.04.189
Mumford, M. D., Hester, K. S., & Robledo, I. C. (2012). Creativity in organizations:
Importance and approaches. In Handbook of organizational creativity (pp. 3-16).
Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-374714-3.00001-X
Roger, P., Athena C., Bridgeford, T. E., Leek, J., & Hicks, S. C. (2021). Diagnosing Data
Analytic Problems in the Classroom. Journal of Statistics and Data Science Education,
29(3), 267-276. https://doi.org/10.1080/26939169.2021.1971586
Saraf, N., Dasgupta, S., & Blettner, D. (2021). How do managerial perceptions of
performance feedback affect innovation? Strategic Organization, 20(3), 451-480.
https://doi.org/10.1177/14761270211019484
Schindler, M., & Lilienthal, A. J. (2022). Students' collaborative creative process and its
phases in mathematics: an explorative study using dual eye tracking and
stimulated recall interviews. Mathematics Education, 54(1), 163-178.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-022-01327-9
Sharma, S., Sharma, E., & Mirosnik, K. (2021). Factorial structure and internal consistency
of the Russian version of Teachers Creativity Nurturing Behavior Scale.
Assessment, 28(1), 57-70. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-433255/v1
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
102
Shen, L., Qin, C., Ali, M., Freeman, S., & Zheng, S. J. (2021). The impact of authentic
leadership on individual and team creativity: A multilevel perspective. Leadership
& Organization Development Journal, 42(4), 644-662.
https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-12-2019-0519
Son, S. J., & Kim, D. Y. (2016). The role of perceived feedback sources' learning-goal
orientation on feedback acceptance and employees' creativity. Creativity Research
Journal, 23(1), 82-95. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051815613732
Sternberg, R. J. (2020). Creativity from start to finish: A “Straight‐A” model of creative
process and its relation to intelligence. Journal of Creative Behavior, 54(2), 229-241.
https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.223
Stinkeste, C., Napala, A., & Romero, M. (2021). Impact of Team Climate on Co-Creativity
in STEAM Education in Primary Education. Education Sciences, 12(8), 1977-1994.
http://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2021.128151
Stobbeleir, K. D., Ashford, S. J., & Buyens, D. (2011). Self-Regulation of Creativity at Work:
The Role of Feedback-Seeking Behavior in Creative Performance. Academy of
Management Journal, 54(4), 811-831. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.64870144
Sun, S., & Tao, Q. Y. (2020). The Relationship Between Technological Innovation Ability,
Atmosphere and Innovation Performance. International Journal of Information
Systems and Supply Chain Management, 13(2), 47-58.
https://doi.org/10.4018/IJISSCM.2020040103
Thatrak, D. (2021). Human Capital Orientation, Employee Creativity Development,
Organizational Innovation Capabilities, and Outstanding Performance of SMEs
Businesses in Thailand. International Journal of Economics and Business
Administration, 9(2), 126-142. https://doi.org/10.35808/ijeba/693
Thomas, B. J., & Khalil, T. (2022, April). Innovation and Creativity Among Individuals in
Work Environments: The Effect of Personality, Motivation, Psychological, and
Task-Oriented Factors. In Eurasian Business and Economics Perspectives: Proceedings
of the 35th Eurasia Business and Economics Society Conference (pp. 37-50). Springer
International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94672-2_3
Thomas, B. J. K., Tarek. (2022). Innovation and Creativity Among Individuals in Work
Environments: The Effect of Personality, Motivation, Psychological, and Task-
Oriented Factors. Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics, 5(3), 1-20.
https://doi.org/10.3389/eusb.2022.5.3.1
Trudeau, S., Boudrias, J. S., & Cournoyer, A. (2021). Behavioral Integration of Individual
Psychological Assessment Feedback: Assessor and Social Support. The Spanish
Journal of Psychology, 24, e37. https://doi.org/10.1017/SJP.2021.34
VandeWalle, D., Challagalla, G. N., Ganesan, S., & Brown, S. P. (2000). An integrated
model of feedback-seeking behavior: Disposition, context, and cognition. Journal
of Applied Psychology, 85(6), 996-1003. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-
9010.85.6.996
Wang, S., Chen, H., & Carmeli, A. (2021). CEO environmentally responsible leadership
and firm environmental innovation: A socio-psychological perspective. Journal of
Business Research, 126, 327-340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.01.004
Wang, H., & Chang, Y. (2017). The influence of organizational innovation atmosphere and
work motivation on employees' innovation behavior. Management Science, 30(3),
51-62. http://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-0334.2017.03.005
Watkins, M. W. (2018). Exploratory Factor Analysis: A Guide to Best Practice. Journal of
Black Psychology, 44(3), 219–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095798418771807
Whitaker, B. G., & Levy, P. (2012). Linking feedback quality and goal orientation to
feedback seeking and job performance. Human Performance, 25(2), 159-178.
https://doi.org/10.1080/08959285.2012.658927
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
103
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
104
Irvandi Gustari
Lecturer in Doctoral Program in Economics, Postgraduate School,
Pancasila University, Jakarta, Indonesia
Rahayu Permana
Social Science Education Department, Postgraduate Faculty,
Universitas Indraprasta PGRI, Jakarta, Indonesia
*
Corresponding author: W. Widodo, widmag@gmail.com
©Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0
International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
105
1. Introduction
Organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) makes a vital contribution to personal
and organizational life and as such garners interest from researchers as a topic of
research from time to time. In a personal context, OCB determines job
performance (Hermanto & Srimulyani, 2022; Suswati, 2022), including contextual
performance (Widodo & Yusuf, 2021) and task performance (Bastian & Widodo,
2022; Yang & Chae, 2022). Meanwhile, in an organizational context, OCB
positively impacts on organizational performance (Huynh & Nguyen, 2022).
OCB comprises five indicators. The first, altruism, relates to helping others, for
example colleagues who are facing obstacles in completing work or who are
having trouble solving personal problems. Second, conscientiousness is related to
the awareness of doing good or making extra efforts beyond organizational
expectations. Third, sportsmanship reflects a tolerant attitude towards inadequate
organizational conditions. Fourth, courtesy reflects the willingness to foster social
relations with others as best as possible to minimize interpersonal conflict. The
fifth and last indicator, civic virtue, refers to acting responsibly towards
organizational survival (Organ et al., 2006).
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
106
The inconsistency of these research results creates a research gap that requires
scientific clarification. The relevant research question relates to the problem of
how QWL and organizational commitment mediate the effect of visionary
leadership on teachers’ OCB. Based on this urgent matter, this research explores
how visionary leadership affects teachers’ OCB through QWL and organizational
commitment, and develops a new empirical model of the mediation mechanism.
2. Literature Review
2.1 Visionary Leadership and Organizational Citizenship Behavior
Visionary leadership is becoming increasingly popular and not without reason.
Prior studies have demonstrated that visionary leadership affects different
domains, such as creativity (Chen & Yuan, 2021; Makhrus et al., 2022), and
stimulates followers to pursue the same vision (Kehr et al., 2022). It also increases
adherents’ ability to take charge (Liu et al., 2022) and to engage in citizenship
behavior (Ismail, Irani, & Kertechian, 2022; Luo et al., 2021). In addition, it
improves followers’ job outcomes (AlKayid et al., 2022; Zhou et al., 2018) and job
performance (Esfarjani et al., 2020; Kurniadi et al., 2020). Finally, visionary
leadership determines enterprise development (van der Voet & Steijn, 2021) and
enhances the capacity of the organization (Khoiri, 2020).
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
107
Teacher OCB can be stimulated where schools provide a safe and healthy social
environment and opportunities for personal growth as well as become learning
organizations responsible for all stakeholders. This shows that teachers’ OCB will
likely increase if they are supported with good QWL, such as a safe, healthy, and
conducive work environment; clear and transparent work roles; tolerance for
differences of opinion; and opportunities for the development of employee
potential. The second research hypothesis has been developed accordingly:
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
108
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
109
As an illustration, school principals with high work standards will try to condition
QWL in good schools so that all school members can work comfortably and
enthusiastically to realize the set work standards. This means that school QWL
requires the visionary leadership of school principals. An example is how school
principals clarify school environmental health and safety standards so that school
members can follow these standards so that the school environment is always
healthy and safe. Form the above, the fourth hypothesis has been formulated:
H4: Visionary leadership positively affects QWL
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
110
3. Methodology
3.1 Respondents
The research respondents were 387 social studies teachers in Indonesia spread
across three provinces, namely Jakarta, West Java, and Banten. As presented in
Table 1, the majority of the respondents were female (66.7%), had a bachelor’s
degree (92.3%), and were married (79.8%). Regarding age, 32.3% of respondents
were 36-45 years old, 26.1% were 26–35 years, and 25.8% were 46–55 years.
Concerning work experience as a teacher, 30.8% of respondents had more than 16
years, 25.6% had 11–15 years, 24.3% had less than five years, and 19.4% had 6–10
years.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
111
The indicator of visionary leadership comprises high standards and ideas (HSI);
clarifying direction and goals (CGD); inspiring spirit and commitment (ISC);
having effective communication (HEC); reflecting competencies and
organizational uniqueness (RCOU); and having a strong desire to pursue goals
(SDPG) (Anshar, 2017; Joseph, 2007). QWL indicators are a healthy and safe work
environment (HSWE); jobs that provide opportunities for the development of
employee potential (JPDE); the availability of opportunities for personal growth
and security (APGS); conducive social environment (CSE); the existence of
constitutionalism that guarantees the right to privacy, reciprocity, and differences
of opinion (EC); clear work roles (CWR); and the existence of organizational social
responsibility (EOSR) (Bateman et al., 2018). Furthermore, organizational
commitment indicators consist of affective commitment (AC), normative
commitment (NC), and continuance commitment (CC) (Meyer & Allen, 1991).
Finally, indicators of OCB include altruism (Altr), conscientiousness (Cons),
sportsmanship (Spor), courtesy (Cour), and civic virtue (CV) (Organ et al., 2006).
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
112
The correlation test results show that all correlation coefficients between variables
were less than .90 (Tehseen et al., 2017). Furthermore, Harman’s single-factor test
obtained a total variance extracted score of 38.282%, which is below the tolerance
threshold of 50% (Kock, 2020). Therefore, this indicates that there is no CMV
(CMB) in the data of this study. The findings generated from this research data
should therefore not be disputed.
4. Results
4.1 Descriptive and Correlation Analyses
The results of the descriptive and correlation analyses processed using SPSS are
presented in Table 2. In general, the mean values range from 7.96 to 17.86, which
are greater than the standard deviation values (SD), which range from 1.004 to
2.136. This reflects a good overall representation of the data and deserves further
analysis. Meanwhile, the results of the correlation analysis between indicators for
all constructs (variables) as a whole are significant at p < .01, with a correlation
coefficient value range of .13–.79. This shows that all indicators have a reciprocal
relationship with other indicators. However, this relationship does not indicate
symptoms of multicollinearity, because the value of the correlation coefficient
obtained is not more than .8.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
113
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
114
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
115
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
116
5. Discussion
Generally, this study found that visionary leadership, QWL, and organizational
commitment positively affect OCB; visionary leadership positively influences
QWL and organizational commitment; and visionary leadership positively
impacts OCB through QWL and organizational commitment. In particular,
visionary leadership affects OCB, indicating that visionary leadership is a crucial
predictor of OCB. This shows that school principals who intensely apply visionary
leadership can ultimately encourage an increase in teacher OCB. For example, a
school principal with high standards and ideas, who clarifies direction and goals,
inspires spirit and commitment, and also communicates effectively will
encourage teachers to be aware of doing good or making extra efforts beyond
school expectations and having responsibility towards school survival. This
evidence is similar to previous studies by Nikookar-Gohari et al. (2021) and
Widodo and Yusuf (2021) that visionary leadership affects OCB.
This study also revealed that QWL influences OCB. It indicated that QWL is an
essential determinant for OCB. Therefore, if the QWL conditions in schools are
improved, it can have implications for increasing teachers’ OCB. As an
illustration, schools that guarantee and make teacher work an instrument for
developing teachers’ capabilities and providing the widest possible opportunities
for teacher self-development will increase teachers’ awareness of making extra
efforts beyond school expectations. It will also increase teachers’ awareness of
being tolerant towards inadequate school conditions and being responsible
towards school survival. These empirical findings align with scholars’ claim that
QWL significantly affects OCB (Ojo et al., 2020; Purwani & Sukestiningsih, 2022;
Ulfa et al., 2021).
This study also demonstrated that organizational commitment impacts OCB. This
proves the empirical fact that organizational commitment is a vital predisposition
for OCB. Thus, teachers’ OCB can be increased through the improvement of
organizational commitment. For example, teachers with solid cohesion and active
involvement in various school activities will be aware of doing good or making
extra efforts beyond school expectations as a manifestation of their sense of
responsibility to the school. The finding is consistent with the research results of
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
117
Soesanto and Nasikh (2022) and Azmy (2021) that organizational commitment
significantly impacts OCB.
Another finding of this study is that visionary leadership positively impacts QWL
and organizational commitment. This indicates that visionary leadership is a
substantial antecedent for QWL and organizational commitment. This means that
improving visionary leadership practice can increase QWL, such as a healthy and
safe work environment, jobs that provide opportunities for the development of
employee potential, and the availability of opportunities for personal growth.
Besides this, it can enhance teachers’ organizational commitment, for example,
through their active participation in various school activities and obedience to the
norms that apply at school. This empirical evidence aligns with prior studies by
Yulius (2022), Basri et al. (2021), and Kesumayani et al. (2020) that visionary
leadership influences QWL and organizational commitment.
Finally, this study found that visionary leadership positively affects teachers’
OCB through QWL and organizational commitment. This indicates the crucial
mediating role of QWL and organizational commitment on linked visionary
leadership with teachers’ OCB. Hence, increasing teacher OCB through the
principal’s visionary leadership will be more effective if supported by QWL in the
school and teachers’ organizational commitment.
This finding promotes a new empirical model regarding the effect of visionary
leadership on teachers’ OCB mediated by QWL and organizational commitment.
It thus provides a theoretical contribution to leadership and organizational
behavior studies in various contexts, such as educational management and
organizational psychology. In addition, it contributes to leadership practice in
school organizations, especially regarding improving QWL in the school and
enhancing teachers’ organizational commitment and OCB.
7. Conclusion
Teachers’ OCB is needed primarily to deal with learning problems in abnormal
conditions, for example as experienced both during and after the Covid-19
pandemic. Accordingly, this research explored how visionary leadership affects
teachers’ OCB through QWL and organizational commitment. The results show
that visionary leadership significantly affects OCB, directly and indirectly, via
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
118
The research not only confirms several previous studies as the basis for the
development of this research hypothesis but also refutes and becomes an
antithesis for previous research claims that leadership does not significantly affect
organizational commitment and OCB, QWL does not significantly affect OCB,
and organizational commitment does not significantly affect OCB. With such
conditions, the new empirical model provides a theoretical and practical
contribution that requires in-depth discussion before it is adapted or adopted as
a model for improving teacher OCB via visionary leadership supported by QWL
and organizational commitment.
Practically, this research finding will inspire school management to apply the
visionary leadership style more because it potentially increases QWL in schools
and improves the quality of teachers’ organizational commitment and OCB.
Furthermore, the massive application of the visionary leadership style will enable
schools to have a visionary culture that is much needed by school members in
Indonesia, especially to face future challenges whose direction is increasingly
difficult to predict. However, applying visionary leadership requires adequate
soft skills support, such as psychological capital, cultural intelligence, and social
skills (intelligence). In addition, theoretically, the findings of this study will
inspire and motivate researchers to be more passionate about conducting
research, especially to respond to some of the weaknesses of the study findings.
8. References
Al Difa, S. I., & Claudia, M. (2022). The effect of organizational commitment and quality
of work life on organizational citizenship behavior during pandemic in
Wastewater Management Company PD Pal Banjarmasin. Journal of Wetlands
Environmental Management, 10(2), 1–10.
http://dx.doi.org/10.20527/jwem.v10i2.283
AlAntali. A. O., & Zuraida, Z. (2023). Modelling organizational commitment and
employee performance: A mediating role of employee motivation. International
Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management, 11(1), 40–64.
AlKayid, K., Selem, K. M., Shehata, A. E., & Tan, C. C. (2022). Leader vision, organizational
inertia and service hotel employee creativity: Role of knowledge-donating.
Current Psychology, 1–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-02743-6
Anshar, M. (2017). The impact of visionary leadership, learning organization, and
innovative behavior to performance of customs and excise functional. International
Journal of Human Capital Management, 1(2), 52–60.
https://doi.org/10.21009/IJHCM.01.02.07
Arief, N. R., Purwana, D., & Saptono, A. (2021). Effect of quality work of life (QWL) and
work-life balance on job satisfaction through employee engagement as
intervening variables. The International Journal of Social Sciences World, 3(1),
259−269.
Ates, N. Y., Tarakci, M., Porck, J. P., van Knippenberg, D., & Groenen, P. J. (2020). The
dark side of visionary leadership in strategy implementation: Strategic alignment,
strategic consensus, and commitment. Journal of Management, 46(5), 637–665.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206318811567
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
119
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
120
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
121
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
122
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
123
Widodo, W., & Gunawan, R. M. B. (2021). Effect of grit on the teaching creativity of
Indonesian teachers: The mediating role of organizational commitment and
knowledge management. Cogent Education, 8(1), 2006111.
https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2021.2006111
Widodo, W., & Yusuf, F. A. (2021). The effect of organizational citizenship and visionary
leadership on contextual performance: A case study in Indonesia. Journal of Asian
Finance, Economics and Business, 8(6), 0377–0386.
https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no6.0377
Yang, T., Jiang, X., & Cheng, H. (2022). Employee recognition, task performance, and OCB:
Mediated and moderated by pride. Sustainability, 14(3), 1631.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031631
Yang, Y., & Chae, H. (2022). The effect of the OCB gap on task performance with the
moderating role of task interdependence. Sustainability, 14(1), 61.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010061
Yao, T., Qiu, Q., & Wei, Y. (2019). Retaining hotel employees as internal customers: Effect
of organizational commitment on attitudinal and behavioral loyalty of employees.
International Journal of Hospitality Management, 76(Part A), 1–8.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2018.03.018
Yulius, Y. (2022). The effect of Islamic visionary leadership on organisational commitment
and its impact on employee performance. HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological
Studies, 78(1), a7722. https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v78i1.7722
Zhou, L., Zhao, S., Tian, F., Zhang, X., & Chen S. (2018). Visionary leadership and follower
creativity in China. International Journal of Manpower, 39(1), 93–105.
https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-04-2016-0092
Zhu, K., Wang, X., & Jiang, M. (2022). The impact of organizational commitment on
turnover intention of substitute teachers in public primary schools: Taking
psychological capital as a mediator. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1008142.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1008142
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
124
Zulmi Ramdani
UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, Bandung, Indonesia
©Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0
International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
125
1. Introduction
The skill of applying Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) in learning is very
important in the 21st century but there has been confusion among religious
lecturers about implementing HOTS in online learning in College (Zhaffar et al.,
2021). As stated by Mispani et al. (2021), that the questions in learning in tertiary
institutions are not yet HOTS-based so this is a challenge for a lecturer to
analyze this situation. Therefore, it becomes a challenge for lecturers to analyze
such a situation (Mokhtar et al., 2020; Sekwena, 2023). Purwasih (2020) and
Ibrahim et al. (2020) also explained that they have weaknesses in preparing
HOTS questions, one of which is the lack of knowledge and low universities'
expectations of religious learning materials. Meanwhile, they improve lives and
address social, political, and religious issues. Lubis (2018) stated that religious
education learning materials are the basis for building good, honest, virtuous,
responsible, trustworthy, and disciplined individual characters.
Lecturers should develop HOTS in online learning to make it more exciting and
easily understood (Sutarto et al., 2020). The success of online education affects
the ability to think, brings up independence, and provides new experiences in
ease and flexibility (Alchamdani et al., 2020; Singh & Thurman, 2019). Therefore,
students need to be familiarized with HOTS-based learning for more complex
life in the future (Sofyatiningrum et al., 2018). Improving HOTS capabilities
requires different teaching methods and strategies to transfer information and
knowledge easily and quickly (Chun & Abdullah 2019). Several positive impacts
of online learning are strongly influenced by the lecturer's HOTS in teaching
(Setena et al., 2021; Shah & Udgaonkar, 2018).
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
126
Study by Zhaffar et al. (2021) that HOTS is not taught directly in the learning
process at Islamic tertiary institutions. The use of learning methods in Islamic
tertiary institutions has not been able to build students' critical thinking skills
(Abdulbaki et al., 2018; Alghamdi, 2018; Saira et al., 2021). Therefore, this study
focuses on the analysis of the suitability of the HOTS skills of religious lecturers
and their implications for student learning outcomes. HOTS is a thinking ability
that demands creative thinking, being able to express opinions, make analyzes,
and convey conclusions. This contrasts with studies conducted by Tamuri (2016)
and Hashim et al. (2017) that HOTS learning is proven to be able to improve
students' critical thinking skills. Therefore, HOTS abilities are very important for
lecturers to be able to develop various concepts and methods in solving learning
and assessment problems in Islamic tertiary institutions (Saputra, 2016). For this
reason, this study aims to look at the perceptions of religious lecturers about
HOTS and their relevance to student academic performance in online learning in
tertiary institutions.
2. Literature Review
2.1. The Implementation of HOTS in Higher Education
HOTS includes logic, reasoning, analysis, evaluation, creation, problem-solving,
and judgment (Brookhart, 2010). In addition, it requires thinking skills that are
not merely recalling, restating, or referring (Widana, 2017). Students are
expected to possess these skills in the 21st century, and improving HOTS can be
accomplished by educators through creating appropriate assessment
instruments (Hanifah, 2019). Gong et al. (2020) stated that students' learning
motivation directly impacts their computational thinking skills in the classroom.
These include creativity, algorithmic thinking, cooperation, critical thinking, and
problem-solving. In contrast, Di et al. (2019) reported that students' motivation
does not affect HOTS in an intelligent classroom environment.
The cognitive process dimensions are divided into six levels based on Revised
Bloom's Taxonomy, namely remembering, understanding, applying, analyzing,
evaluating, and creating (Anderson & Krathwohl, 2001). Brookhart (2010)
categorized the process of analyzing as breaking down information or objects
into several parts and making connections between each piece and the overall
structure. Evaluating is defined as making judgments based on criteria and
standards, namely quality, effectiveness, efficiency, and consistency. The final
level of cognitive process dimensions is creating, which entails assembling
pieces to make a cohesive or functional whole. The details can be seen Figure 1.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
127
The teacher's perception affects the learning process and student motivation. In
capturing information and events, it is influenced by factors of objects and
events (Qiong, 2017). Perception in learning affects the memory system and is
influenced by beliefs that are believed (Afandi et al., 2018). Additionally, it arises
because everyone has the sense to penetrate surrounding objects and events.
Perception can influence people's way of thinking, working, and attitudes
because they have to adjust attitudes, thoughts, or behaviors in acquiring
information from their environment. The teaching and learning process is
undoubtedly the same age as humans on earth.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
128
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
129
3. Methods
3.1. Research Design
The current study design was quantitative, incorporating a descriptive method
to describe, explain, predict, or control the investigated phenomenon associated
with statistical or numerical data (Airasian, 2012; Behforouz et al., 2023). The
object was the application of HOTS in the religious education study program
through the perspectives of lecturers and students. This research has been
approved by the research ethics commission at the research and community
service institute at UIN Raden Fatah Palembang with a registration number B-
400/Un.09/PP.06/11/2022.
3.2. Participants
The subjects were lecturers with the following characteristics: (1) actively
teaching in the religious education study program, (2) possessing the status as
the Permanent Lecturer, and (3) comprehending HOTS-based learning.
Meanwhile, students involved as study participants actively participated in
lectures in the religious education study program. They also attended the
courses taught by the lecturers engaged as participants. Accordingly, they were
selected using a purposive sampling technique, namely a deliberate choice
considering the participants' qualities. It was a non-random sampling technique
without requiring a theory underlying the number of participants. In other
words, studies could decide what they needed to know and then started looking
for people who could and were willing to provide information based on their
knowledge or experience (Etikan, 2016). This sampling method does not require
researchers to get a definite number of subjects at the beginning of the research
data, so that the number of subjects selected according to the characteristics is
justified as a representative sample. The subjects involved in this study totaled
96 people consisting of 33 lecturers and 63 students.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
130
4. Results
The findings of this present study showed that the subjects involved were 96
respondents, 33 lecturers and 63 students. For more details, see the
demographics of lecturers in Table 1 and students in Table 2.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
131
5
Question Items
4 C1
3 C2
2 C3
1 C4
C5
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233 C6
Respondents
The percentage of cognitive level of mid-term exam question items, from highest
to lowest, was C1 (remembering), C2 (understanding), C3 (applying), C4
(analyzing), C5 (evaluating), and C6 (creating). The average items were
categorized as LOTS, precisely at levels C1 to C3, up to 31 subjects. Meanwhile,
those included in the HOTS category, at levels C4, C5, and C6, were only 2
subjects. The cognitive level of question items only focused on the bottom three
aspects of Bloom's Taxonomy, namely C1 (remembering), C2 (understanding),
and C3 (applying). Therefore, it was concluded that the cognitive level of critical
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
132
thinking skills was still in the LOTS category. The findings on the cognitive level
category of final-term exam question items on the learning process can be seen
in Graph 3.
4
Question Items
C1
3 C2
2 C3
C4
1
C5
0 C6
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233
Respondents
Based on Graph 3, the average final-term exam question items were categorized
as LOTS, precisely at the levels of C1 (remembering), C2 (understanding), and
C3 (applying), with a total of 32 subjects. Meanwhile, those classified into HOTS,
at the level of C4 (analyzing), were only 1 subject. It indicated that the lecturers'
critical thinking skills were classified into LOTS.
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 51 53 55 57 59 61 63
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
133
5. Discussion
The results of lecturer perceptions in learning were found to have implemented
HOTS as much as 65.3% with indicators C4 and C5. As Hwang et al. (2018)
identified three HOTS abilities, namely problem solving, critical thinking, and
creativity. However, the findings on the mid-term and final-term exam question
items' documentation showed different and contradictory reports. Students'
academic performance also indicated that their learning outcomes were
classified as LOTS.
The demands of the 21st century require lecturers to have various skills.
According to Ariyana et al. (2018), lecturers should have 4C skills, namely
critical thinking, communication, collaboration, and creativity, to improve their
HOTS abilities. The higher education level requires solving more complex
problems, requiring the application of learning to engage HOTS. Therefore,
lecturers are vital in making various forms of HOTS-based evaluation. They
should be able to carry out their obligations and responsibilities and master all
the materials provided to students (Winarno et al., 2017). In addition, they
should have particular skills related to the assessments based on HOTS.
Lecturers had low abilities to prepare question items because they were not
creative in developing their skills and were not very independent in exploring
knowledge. The other factors were low motivation in reading and a lack of
understanding of the HOTS concept. To increase the knowledge categorized as
LOTS, they should be accustomed to compiling HOTS-based exercises and
assignments. The management of HOTS should be trained and improved to
organize learning materials and conduct the process optimally and consistently
(Ramdiah et al., 2019).
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
134
Students' academic performance was classified into the low category, more than
50%, due to various factors. Lecturers should facilitate students to become better
thinkers and problem solvers by providing particular circumstances or issues to
apply HOTS (Wahid & Karimah, 2018). Haroun et al. (2016) discovered that a
lecturer's beliefs and experiences affected learning design and implementation
(Belo et al., 2014; Muhtarom et al., 2019). The level of students' thinking
competence was reflected in their abilities to understand concepts, generate
knowledge, and solve problems (Yoke et al., 2021). Furthermore, the different
abilities in cognitive aspects were considered logical and reasonable due to the
influence of reasoning, environment, teachers' learning media, learning models,
and learning facilities (Arifullah et al., 2020).
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
135
This present study confirmed that it was important for lecturers to improve
HOTS abilities in online learning, including the presented materials, the
implementation of learning, and the quality of exam questions. Meanwhile,
good HOTS abilities could improve students' critical thinking skills in higher
education. The limitation lies in the data collection, which only focused on two
universities as study samples. The practical recommendation for future studies
was to engage more subjects with a broader scope and involve learning
strategies that might improve the output quality of religious education students.
Estimation of the number of respondents is also a serious concern in the future
so that it can make research results more representative.
7. References
Abdulbaki, K., Suhaimi, M., Alsaqqaf, A., & Jawad, W. (2018). The use of the discussion
method at university: Enhancement of teaching and learning. International Journal of
Higher Education, 7(6), 118–128. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v7n6p118
Abdullah, A. H., Abidin, N. L. Z., & Ali, M. (2015). Analysis of students’ errors in solving
higher order thinking skills (HOTS) problems for the topic of fraction. Asian Social
Science, 11(21), 133–142. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v11n21p133
Abosalem, Y. (2015). Assessment techniques and students’ higher-order thinking skills.
ICSIT 2018 - 9th International Conference on Society and Information Technologies,
Proceedings, March, 61–66. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsedu.20160401.11
Abrori, M. S., & Nurkholis, M. (2019). Islamisasi ilmu pengetahuan menurut pandangan
Syed Muhammad Naquib Al-Attas dan implikasinya terhadap pengembangan PAI
di Perguruan Tinggi Umum [the Islamization of science according to the viewes of
Syed Muhammad Naquib Al-Attas and its implications for the development of PAI
in public universities]. Al-I’tibar : Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 6(1), 09–18.
https://doi.org/10.30599/jpia.v6i1.419
Afandi, A., Hidayat, S., & Syahri, I. (2019). Developing interactive questions to measure
the higher-order thinking skills of senior high schools’ students. Jurnal Pendidikan
Biologi Indonesia, 5(2), 313–324. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v5i2.7747
Afandi, A., Sajidan, S., Akhyar, M., & Suryani, N. (2018). Pre-service science teachers’
perception about high order thinking skills (hots) in the 21st century. International
Journal of Pedagogy and Teacher Education, 2(1), 107.
https://doi.org/10.20961/ijpte.v2i1.18254
Affouneh, S., Salha, S., & Khlaif, Z. N. (2020). Designing quality e-learning environments
for emergency remote teaching in coronavirus crisis. Interdisciplinary Journal of
Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences, 11(2), 135–137.
https://doi.org/10.30476/ijvlms.2020.86120.1033
Ahmad, I. F., Putro, N. H. P. S., Thontowi, Z. S., Syafii, A., & Subakti, M. A. (2020).
Trends in the implementation of higher-order thinking skills in islamic religious
education in madrasahs and schools: A Systematic Literature Review. Jurnal
Pendidikan Islam, 9(2), 195–216. https://doi.org/10.14421/jpi.2020.92.195-216
Airasian, Gay, M. (2012). Educational research. Person Education.
Alchamdani, A., Fatmasari, F., Rahmadani Anugrah, E., Putri Sari, N., Putri, F., & Astina,
A. (2020). The impact of covid19 pandemic on online learning process in the college
at Southeast Sulawesi. Jurnal Kesehatan Lingkungan, 12(1si), 129.
https://doi.org/10.20473/jkl.v12i1si.2020.129-136
Alghamdi, A. K. H. (2018). Faculty professional development and its impact on teaching
strategies in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Teaching and Teacher Education, 6(2), 77–93.
https://doi.org/10.12785/jtte/060202
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
136
Al-Naim, A., Abunaser, F., & Al-Naim, A. (2023). The role of teachers and coordinators of
gifted students’ in developing their students’ leadership abilities in high schools.
International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 22(3), 1–18.
https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.3.1
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. E. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and
assessing: A revision of bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.
Arifullah, Halim, A., Syukri, M., & Nurfadilla, E. (2020). The development of student
worksheets with PhET assisted to improve student science process skill. Journal of
Physics: Conference Series, 1460(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-
6596/1460/1/012144
Ariyana, Y., Bestary, R., Yogyakarta, U. N., &, & Mohandas. (2018). Buku pegangan
pembelajaran berorientasi pada keterampilan berpikir tingkat tinggi [Guide book of
learning by orientation in higher order thinking skills]. Direktorat Jenderal Guru
dan Tenaga Kependidikan.
Armiati, A. (2018). Mengembangkan higher order of thinking skill melalui pembelajaran
matematika pada siswa sekolah menengah kejuruan [Developing of higher order
thinking skills through mathematical learning in vocational students]. Jurnal
LEMMA, 4(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.22202/jl.2017.v4i2.2729
Assaree, I. G. A., & Al–Khalidi, I. K. S. (2021). Teacher perspectives on the impact of the
cyber press on the development of religious knowledge among hearing-impaired
students. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 20(11),
78–95. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.20.11.5
Basilaia, G. (2020). Replacing the classic learning form at universities as an immediate
response to the covid-19 virus infection in Georgia. International Journal for Research
in Applied Science and Engineering Technology, 8(3), 101–108.
https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2020.3021
Behforouz, B., Al Ghaithi, A., & Al Weshahi, S. (2023). Lecturers’ perceptions of action
research and current challenges. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and
Educational Research, 22(3), 141–159. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.3.9
Belo, N. A. H., van Driel, J. H., van Veen, K., & Verloop, N. (2014). Beyond the dichotomy
of teacher- versus student-focused education: A survey study on physics teachers’
beliefs about the goals and pedagogy of physics education. Teaching and Teacher
Education, 39, 89–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.12.008
Brookhart, S. M. (2010). How to assess higher order thinking skills in your classroom. ASCD
Member Book.
Carey, K. (2020). Is everybody ready for the big migration to online college? Actually, no. The
New York Times.
Chun, T. C., & Abdullah, M. N. L. Y. B. (2019). The teaching of higher order thinking
skills (HOTS) in Malaysian schools: Policy and practices. Malaysian Online Journal of
Educational Management, 7(3), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.22452/mojem.vol7no3.1
Dahmayati, D., Sanusi, S., & Kartini. K. (2021). Online learning strategy for islamic
education studies during the covid-19 pandemic in elementary schools. Journal of
Indonesian Islamic Studies, 1(1), 52–61.
Di, W., Danxia, X., & Chun, L. (2019). The effects of learner factors on higher-order
thinking in the smart classroom environment. Journal of Computers in Education, 6(4),
483–498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-019-00146-4
Elfeky, A. I. M. (2019). The effect of personal learning environments on participants’
higher order thinking skills and satisfaction. Innovations in Education and Teaching
International, 56(4), 505–516. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2018.1534601
Etikan, I. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling.
American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
137
https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
Favale, T., Soro, F., Trevisan, M., Drago, I., & Mellia, M. (2020). Campus traffic and e-
Learning during COVID-19 pandemic. Computer Networks, 176(May).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2020.107290
Gafur, A., Nurhasan, N., Switri, E., & Apriyanti, A. (2021). Dynamics of islamic learning
during pandemic times at Sriwijaya University. Conciencia, 21(2), 85–94.
https://doi.org/10.19109/conciencia.v21i2.9771
Gong, D., Yang, H. H., & Cai, J. (2020). Exploring the key influencing factors on college
students’ computational thinking skills through flipped-classroom instruction.
International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1).
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00196-0
Hakiman, H., Sumardjoko, B., & Waston, W. (2021). Religious instruction for students
with autism in an inclusive primary school. International Journal of Learning, Teaching
and Educational Research, 20(12), 139–158. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.20.12.9
Halim, A., Mastura, I., Soewarno, Elisa, Mahzum, E., Farhan, A., & Irwandi, I. (2021).
Analysis of students’ ability in completing HOTS-based Basic Physics questions.
Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1882(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-
6596/1882/1/012024
Hambali, D. S., & Asyafah, A. (2020). Implementasi pembelajaran pendidikan agama
islam di pendidikan tinggi vokasi [Implementation of islamic educational teaching
in vocational higher education]. Sosio Religi : Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Umum, 18(2),
8–19.
Hamidon, M., Sihes, A. J., & Nor, H. M. (2021). View of experts on knowledge
competency of higher order thinking skills in the teaching of quranic verses
comprehension. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social
Sciences, 11(8). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v11-i8/10911
Hamzah, M. I., Zhaffar, N. M., & Razak, K. A. (2018). Barriers in teaching critical thinking
in islamic education. Creative Education, 09(14), 2350–2356.
https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2018.914175
Hanifah, N. (2019). Pengembangan instrumen penilaian higher order thinking skill (hots)
di sekolah dasar [Development of higher order thinking skills instruments in
elementary school]. Current Research in Education: Conference Series Journal, 1(1), 1–8.
Haroun, R. F., Ng, D., Abdelfattah, F. A., & AlSalouli, M. S. (2016). Gender difference in
teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching in the context of single-sex
classrooms. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(2), 383–396.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9631-8
Hashim, H., Ali, M. N., & Shamsudin, M. A. (2017). Infusing high order thinking skills
(hots) through thinking based learning (tbl) during eca to enhance students interest
in STEM. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences,
7(11). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v7-i11/3557
Hwang, G. J., Lai, C. L., Liang, J. C., Chu, H. C., & Tsai, C. C. (2018). A long-term
experiment to investigate the relationships between high school students’
perceptions of mobile learning and peer interaction and higher-order thinking
tendencies. Educational Technology Research and Development, 66(1), 75–93.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-017-9540-3
Ibrahim, N. N., Ayub, A. F. M., & Yunus, A. S. Md. (2020). Impact of higher order
thinking skills (hots) module based on the cognitive apprenticeship model (CAM)
on student’s performance. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational
Research, 19(7), 246–262. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.19.7.14
Indrawati, B. (2020). Tantangan dan peluang pendidikan tinggi dalam masa dan pasca
pandemi covid-19 [Challenges and oppurtunities of higher eduaction in post
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
138
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
139
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
140
Wahid, A. H., & Karimah, R. A. (2018). Integrasi high order thinking skill (hots) dengan
model creative problem solving [Intgeration of higher order thinking skills and
creative problem solving model]. MODELING: Jurnal Program Studi PGMI, 5(1), 82–
98. http://jurnal.stitnualhikmah.ac.id/index.php/modeling/article/view/161
Widana, I. W. (2017). Higher order thinking skills assessment (hots). JISAE: Journal of
Indonesian Student Assessment and Evaluation, 3(1), 32–44.
https://doi.org/10.21009/jisae.v3i1.4859
Widoyoko, E. P. (2014). Teknik penyusunan instrumen penelitian [Guide to make research
instruments]. Pustaka Pelajar.
Widyaningrum, D. (2020). Pengembangan model pembelajaran saintifik berbasis higher order
thinking skill (hots) untuk meningkatkan penguasaan konsep dan ketrampilan sains ipa
pada siswa kelas 5 di sekolah dasar [Development of saintific learning model based on
higher order thinking skills for improving conceptual mastery and science skills in
students of 5 classs in elementary schools]. Tesis.
Wilson, D. M., & Narasuman, S. (2020). Investigating teachers’ implementation and
strategies on higher order thinking skills in school based assessment instruments.
Asian Journal of University Education, 16(1), 70–84.
https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v16i1.8991
Winarno, S., Muthu, K. S., & Ling, L. S. (2017). Direct problem-based learning (DPBL): A
framework for integrating direct instruction and problem-based learning approach.
International Education Studies, 11(1), 119. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v11n1p119
Yoke, S. K., Hasan, N. H., Ahmad, T. S. A. S., Ismail, N., Zainon, S., & bin Abdullah, M.
(2021). Exploring the design of online content for e-learning. E-Proceedings of
International Conference on Language, Education, Humanities & Social Sciences, 421–429.
www.shiftelearning.com
Zhaffar, N. M., Wan Abdullah, W. A. A., Nor, N., Musa, N. A., & Othman, M. S. (2021).
Issues and challenges of the implementation of hots in religious teaching in
Malaysia. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and
Development, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarped/v10-i2/9789
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
141
1. Introduction
Research is a crucial component of the academic curriculum in both
undergraduate and graduate programmes. Understanding the writing process is
critical for all researchers, particularly junior graduate students. Throughout their
degree programmes, they are assigned several writing projects (De Faoite et al.,
2013; Holzmueller & Pronovost, 2013). At graduate level, research is a
requirement for theses in the master’s programmes and dissertations for doctorate
programmes as well as various subjects, and students are expected not only to
possess vast knowledge but also to generate new ideas and explore the link
between theory and practice through research. The new policy set by the
Commission on Higher Education (CHED) requires of graduate students to
©Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0
International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
142
publish at least one research article before receiving their degree (CHED Memo,
No. 15, Series 2019). This memorandum aims to strengthen innovation, research
and development. With this directive, graduate students are expected to conduct
research during their academic courses, not only when they write theses or
dissertations. This puts pressure on graduate students to perform well in research.
The demands of research in graduate school highlight the need to evaluate the
student's readiness to conduct research. They may need to familiarize themselves
with the necessary skills, such as using information technology, conducting
literature reviews, and analysing and interpreting data. Upon enrolment in
graduate school, students are expected to gain expertise in their chosen field of
study and to participate in creating new knowledge through research. With these
expectations, several challenges and problems are faced by graduate students at
the Mountain Province State Polytechnic College (MPSPC), a state college in the
northern Philippines. Some students complete their academic requirements on
time but experience problems with writing their theses or dissertations, while
others lack skills to write coherent and cohesive research proposals. These issues
are evident in classes that require students to produce research proposals or
complete research papers. Given these persistent problems, it is imperative to
assess the research readiness of students and provide appropriate interventions
to address these concerns.
This study explored the research readiness of the MPSPC graduate students in the
hope of creating a basis for the Graduate School to design a development
programme to be implemented in every academic year, for improving graduate
students’ research skills. In the study we considered the research profile of the
students to establish whether they ever had attended any seminars or training,
either provided by the institution or from outside, or if they ever had conducted
research during their residency in the Graduate School. Another criterion for
determining the research readiness of students, is the results of their
comprehensive examination since three areas are evaluated: the foundational or
major courses, research knowledge, and presentation. Some academic courses in
the Graduate School require of students to submit a research proposal or
completed research report as a final paper in their courses. Hence, this is also
included. When students are ready to conduct research, the success rate in
finishing theses or dissertations is high, and they complete their research on time.
With the recurring problems MPSPC graduate students face regarding research
report writing, this study was aimed at exploring the research readiness of
graduate students, especially when they embark on thesis writing. Hence, this
study endeavoured to answer the following questions:
1. How do graduate students perform in the comprehensive exams?
2. What is the graduate students' level of research writing skills?
3. What are the challenges that graduate students encounter in conducting
research?
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
143
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
144
Students also were not confident about the quantitative research skills, that is,
their statistical analysis ability required in the research process. They felt anxious
dealing with statistics. On a more positive note, Meerah (2010) found that
graduate students were fairly satisfied with their ability to write their reports but
had difficulty reading in English. The study of Casanova (2021), on the other hand,
showed the high performance of master's students in the various stages of writing
up research, from formulating a research title to formulating the conclusions and
recommendations. Though the author noted that the students had done well in
formulating the significance of the study, the hypotheses of the study, the
definition of terms, and the statement of the problem, the students still needed
improvement in developing research tools and instruments and analysing the
data. Meanwhile, in the study by Manchishi et al. (2015), it is noted that master's
students committed mistakes in writing their thesis. These include broad and
unclear topics, failure to state the problem, failure to identify the gap in the
literature, using the wrong methodology, misunderstanding research
terminologies, wrong citation style, and plagiarism.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
145
were consistent with the findings of previous studies. Specifically, students hold
that the absence of scientific laboratories, the non-provision of scientific materials
for experimentation, and the dearth of equipment essential for completing the
thesis, were critical challenges under infrastructure. Although in the setting of
undergraduate students, Altikriti (2022) found similar challenges that students
face in writing their research papers as a prerequisite for graduation. The study
findings revealed that the most important problems were a lack of academic
prerequisites, namely teaching the techniques of how to write a research paper, a
lack of knowledge of the research writing process, a lack of resources, and a lack
of methodology.
These frameworks are essential to this study because they provide a clear
perspective on the complicated nature of research readiness and the numerous
aspects that contribute to it. It presents a comprehensive approach to measuring
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
146
3. Method
This research used qualitative and quantitative methods. A quantitative method
was used to identify the research skills of the respondents using a survey
questionnaire. The qualitative method (interview) was used to look into the
performance of the graduate students during their comprehensive examination
and the challenges faced by the students in research writing.
3.3 Instrumentation
Document analysis was used to examine the comprehensive exam results of the
students enrolled in Thesis Writing 1. This study also used a self-survey
questionnaire (Appendix 1) that included questions about students’ research
experience during their residency in the institution, the seminars related to
research writing they attended, and their perceived levels of confidence about
their skills for thesis-based research. For the perceived levels of their research
writing skills, a 4-point Likert-type scale was used, ranging from Not able (1),
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
147
Slightly Able (2), Able (3), and Very much Able (4). The content of the questionnaire
was validated by two research experts from the institution. Based on the
validators' corrections and suggestions, the questionnaire indicators were revised.
The interview was used to inquire about the challenges encountered by
respondents in reporting on research. The interview with the participants was
conducted during the students' consultations with their course professor in Thesis
Writing. Consent to access their comprehensive exam result was also acquired
from the participants before the interview proceeded.
To answer the third research question, the data gathered from the interview was
analysed qualitatively, employing thematic analysis. The data from the interviews
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
148
were transcribed. The researchers created a set of initial codes. The initial codes
were then collated and the codes were
grouped into themes. Similar themes were merged during the review of themes.
4. Results
At the peak of their academic journey, graduate students are mandated to take the
comprehensive exam before a panel. When they pass such an exam, they are
allowed to take thesis writing or dissertation writing. However, these culminating
requirements prove to be more gruelling for the graduate students than they
expected.
Students must be able to demonstrate the relationship between theories and their
field of specialization. Another important area of the comprehensive exam is
Research and Statistics, where students are evaluated on their understanding of
research processes, statistical tools, and data analysis and interpretation. This
section also assesses the student's readiness to undertake research. Lastly,
students are graded on Delivery, including clear articulation, vocabulary,
grammar, and appearance in a formal academic setting.
Findings reveal that students often find the area of Research and Statistics
problematic. Based on the panels' comments and recommendations, students are
advised to improve their knowledge of research processes and statistical tools.
Some students lack familiarity with the components of the research process and
are unable to explain their intended study or the appropriate tools for data
gathering and analysis. In such cases, the panel provides hypothetical problems
and asks students to identify the research problem, design, and statistical tools.
This approach works for some students, but those who cannot understand the
concepts still struggle. Interviews with participants showed that this is due to
them having forgotten the key points from the Research Methods and Statistics
courses, which they typically take in their first year of graduate school.
Students who fail in the Foundation and Major Courses often cannot articulate
their ideas clearly and/or cannot establish links with their field of specialization.
In such cases, the written examination focuses on the specific subjects that caused
them problems. Lastly, students who lack confidence in expressing their ideas
clearly are impacted in the delivery area and the other two areas. In most cases,
these students are asked to take the written examination.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
149
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
150
2.41 SA
Report Writing
Prepare a publishable article based on the results of the
27
study 2.00 SA
Presentation
28 Prepare ICT-based material to present the results. 2.53 A
29 Present results of the study to an audience 2.29 SA
2.41 SA
Grand Mean 2.30 SA
Another area of research skills students struggle with is Writing a review of related
literature, as evidenced by their self-assessment, rendering a mean score of 2.32.
Participants agreed that accessing information was not an issue due to the
availability of the internet, but the challenge lay in sorting, evaluating, and
synthesizing research reports. This was also reflected in their proposal defence
manuscripts, as the panel often commented on the section on the review of the
literature. Eight of the 18 participants were unable to propose a thesis in the first
semester of the academic year 2021-2022. This is a recurring problem in the
MPSPC Graduate School. Formulating a research problem and writing a literature
review are the first stages of a research proposal, but many students drop the
subject due to problems they experience when attempting to write the rest of the
paper.
The results of Writing the research methodology showed that graduate students
could choose and describe the location of their study, identify the population,
choose appropriate sampling techniques, select data gathering methods, and
explain procedures to be used. However, students experience problems with
computing the sample size. The second lowest mean was choosing the
appropriate design for the study, regardless of whether the tools used were
quantitative or qualitative. The participants also admitted confusion when having
to select the appropriate data-gathering tool, such as a questionnaire, interview,
or documents, due to their inability to see the relationship between their research
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
151
questions and the research design and instruments. During the proposal defence,
panel members often asked for clarification on the data to be collected, and
students often could not provide satisfactory answers. It is worth mentioning the
consistently low means across various indicators in research skills, such as not
being able to differentiate between a descriptive and an inferential problem,
computing sample size, and identifying the appropriate statistical tool to be used.
This consistency confirms the students' low mastery of statistics, as evidenced by
their incompetence during comprehensive exams.
Concerning interpretation of data, the results show that the participants had a
slightly above-average ability to make statements in this category. However, the
data indicate that the lowest mean is found in the participants’ ability to identify
the appropriate statistical tool for their study. Participants reported that this task
was difficult, especially for those who chose a quantitative design. They also
stated that they depended on their statisticians heavily. When it comes to
interpreting and analysing data, the participants indicated that they could
interpret the data, but their ability to analyse data was only slightly above
average. During the interview, the participants maintained that data analysis was
easier for them than interpretation, as the latter involved explaining and giving
meaning to the analysed data. In their interpretation of the data collected, the
participants found it difficult to integrate the data collected with the literature
they previously had reviewed. They often only gave tabular presentations of data,
without explaining what the figures or statements in the tables represented.
Regarding referencing and citations, the results indicated that the participants had
a ‘slight ability’. MPSPC uses the APA 7th edition format for referencing and
citations, but the participants admitted that they were confused or lacked
knowledge about this format. Proper referencing and citation are important in the
evaluation of student research manuscripts, and many students' scores are
negatively affected because they do not properly cite their sources, and some
sources are missing from the reference section of the manuscript. The results show
that citation has a lower mean compared to referencing. This is also evident in the
research manuscripts, where most sources were not properly cited or, in some
cases, not cited at all. Some sources were copied, rephrased, or summarized
without proper citation. Participants admitted that when reading other sources,
they copied and included the exact statements in their papers. In the reference
section, panel members asked the graduate students to revise their reference list
based on their citations in the manuscript.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
152
Regarding report writing, the results indicated that the participants were "slightly
able", with a mean score of two (2). When asked if they could prepare a
publishable article from their study results, the participants admitted that they
still required guidance in this area. Despite guidelines being available to them as
a requirement in the MPSPC Graduate School in addition to their thesis, they still
experienced a need for further guidance in writing a research article. They
explained that they found it difficult to condense the 100 or more pages of a thesis
into just 10-15 pages for a publishable article. The problems they face when
attempting to write a publishable article is one of the reasons why students face
delays in submitting their final papers, as they need to revise their research paper
and prepare a publishable article simultaneously.
In light of the above-mentioned findings, the conclusion has been reached that the
new Policy, Standards, and Guidelines of CHED that requires of students to
conduct and publish research poses great pressure to the students. Yet this
expectation of CHED will not be realized if the graduate students continuously
fare poorly in their research endeavours. The CMO emphasizes its goal to
contribute to knowledge acquisition through generation, sharing, and exchange
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
153
processes. To do this, means honing the graduate students’ research skills so that
they can conduct research to complete their thesis or dissertation confidently. The
CMO and the results of this study on the readiness of graduate students to
conduct research show a discrepancy between the expectations of the
Commission and the realities of the students’ research skills. Although a
limitation of this study is that it does not propose measures that may rectify the
situation, but it does emphasize what may be done for the students in light of
these findings.
5. Discussion
5.1 Performance of Graduate Students in Comprehensive Exam
The results of this study indicate that many students face difficulties in studying
Research and Statistics. As suggested by the panel's feedback and advice, students
should enhance their understanding of research methods and statistical
instruments. Some students lack knowledge of the key elements of research and
find it difficult to articulate their study objectives or select suitable techniques for
collecting and analysing data. The lack of prior knowledge or expertise in research
methodology and statistical analysis is a significant challenge graduate students
face. These findings corroborate with those of Onwuegbuzie and Leech (2005),
who found that many graduate students lacked awareness of fundamental
research principles and procedures, which is only one study that has brought this
issue to light. Relative to these findings is the study of Bakkalbasi et al. (2006).
They found that many graduate students had problems comprehending the
assumptions behind various statistical tests and in using statistical software.
Choosing acceptable study ideas and methodologies can be difficult for some
graduate students. These difficulties include challenges in formulating research
questions and hypotheses, adopting suitable sampling techniques, and selecting
the proper statistical tests for data analysis. This is similar to the findings of Karsli
and Ucar (2014) and Akyürek and Afacan (2018), namely that many graduate
students found it difficult to choose suitable research designs and methodologies;
and had limited knowledge of research methodology, which also affected their
research process negatively.
Students who fail in the Foundation and Major Courses often struggle with
articulating their ideas and showing clear connections to their field of
specialization. Students who lack confidence in expressing their ideas clearly are
impacted not just in the delivery area but also in other areas. Graduate students
frequently struggle with a lack of confidence in properly explaining their views.
Relative to this finding, Hadi and Muhammad (2019) found that students' self-
efficacy, learning motivation, and study environment have a significant influence
on their academic performance. Additionally, the study found that self-efficacy
had the strongest direct effect on academic performance. Comprehensive exams
carrying such high stakes pose
still another difficulty. Graduate students could experience pressure to succeed
in these tests, which can heighten anxiety and make it harder for them to express
their views clearly.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
154
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
155
6. Conclusion
The results of this study indicate that graduate students find it difficult to master
the skills required to write up (report) research. These difficulties, along with the
challenges usually faced in the research reporting process, make it challenging to
complete theses successfully. The findings have significant implications for
institutions, highlighting the importance of providing support and resources to
graduate students to help them develop the necessary research skills. The findings
also imply the need to consider incorporating research as a required component
of their courses, with close monitoring and guidance provided by academic staff
members. Additionally, the results emphasise the need for the Graduate School
to offer seminars to graduate students over the duration of a semester, during
which time mentoring groups can be established. In these groups, faculty
members can guide and support students as they navigate the research process,
whether it is aimed at a thesis or at satisfying an academic requirement. It is
important to note that these mentoring groups would serve as additional support,
but cannot replace the student advisor in completing research reports (theses).
7. References
Akyürek, E. & Afacan, Ö. (2018). Problems Encountered during the Scientific Research
Process in Graduate Education: The Institute of Educational Sciences. Higher
Education Studies, 8, 47-57.
Altikriti, S. (2022). Challenges facing Jordanian undergraduates in writing graduation
research paper. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 18(1), 58-67.
https://doi.org/10.52462/jlls.166
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
156
Arrazola, J., Polster, M., Etkind, P., Moran, J. V. & Vogt, R. C. (2020). Lessons learned from
an intensive writing training course for Applied Epidemiologists. Public Health
Reports, 135(4), 428-434. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033354920932659
Bakkalbasi, N., Bauer, K., Glover, J. & Wang, L. (2006). Three options for citation tracking:
Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science. Biomedical Digital Libraries, 3(1), 7.
https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-5581-3-7
Bayona-Oré, S. & Bazan, C. (2020). Why students find it difficult to finish their theses?
Journal of Turkish Science Education, 17(4), 591-602.
https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2020.47
Bittner, E. (2019). Reasons to fail a Ph.D. student during the comprehensive exam [Weblog
comment]. https://www.quora.com/For-professors-what-are-the-reasons-you-
failed-a-Ph-D-student-during-the-comprehensive-exam
Burke, S. & Snead, J. (2014). Faculty opinions on the use of master's degree end of
programme assessments. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science,
55(1), 26-39.
Casanova, V. (2021). Predictors of graduate students' research performance in the
Philippine state-run higher education institution. Journal of Education and Learning,
10(5), 170-176. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v10n5p170
CHED Memo (Commission on Higher Education Memorandum) (2019). Order No 15,
Series 2019. Policies, standards, and guidelines for graduate programs.
https://ched.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/CMO-No.-15-Series-of-2019-
%E2%80%93-Policies-Standards-and-Guidelines-for-Graduate-Programs-
Updated.pdf
De Faoite, D., Bakota, B., Staresinic, M., Kopljar, M., Cvjetko, I. & Dobric, I. (2013).
Awareness, attitudes, and perceptions of Croatian-based orthopedic and trauma
surgeons toward scientific manuscripts, publishing internationally and medical
writing. Results of an online questionnaire. Collegium Anthropologicum, 37(1), 165-
168.
El-Freihat S. M. (2021). Challenges facing students in writing theses at the Jordanian
universities. Cypriot Journal of Educational Science. 16(6), 3266-3277.
https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v16i6.6321
Hadi, N.U. & Muhammad, B. (2019). Factors Influencing Postgraduate Students'
Performance: A high order top-down structural equation modelling
approach. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice.
Holzmueller, C. G. & Pronovost, P. J. (2013). Organizing a manuscript reporting quality
improvement or patient safety research. BMJ Quality & Safety, 22(9), 777-785.
Hussain, M., Rehman, R. & Baig, M. (2020). Manuscript writing and publication
workshop: An invoking pilot study on enhancing cognitive research capabilities
in health sciences institutes of Pakistan. Cureus, 12(6), e8802.
Ivanitskaya, L.V., Laus, R. & Casey, A.M. (2004). Research Readiness Self-
Assessment. Journal of Library Administration, 41, 167 - 183.
https://doi.org/10.1300/J111v41n01_13
Kakupa, P. (2019). Students' attitudes towards research: A study of graduate education
students at a Chinese normal university. Educational Process: International Journal,
8(2), 97-110.
Karsli, E. & Ucar, M. (2014). Difficulties encountered by graduate students in their
research. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 3103-3107.
Komba, S. (2016). Challenges of writing theses and dissertations among postgraduate
students in Tanzanian higher learning institutions. International Journal of Research
Studies in Education, 5(3), 71-80. https://doi.org/10.5861/ijrse.2015.1280.
Kuther, T. (2019, March 24). A note about Master’s and Doctoral Comprehensive Exams
[Blog post]. https://www.thoughtco.com/masters-and-doctoral-students-
comprehensive-examinations-1686465
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
157
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
158
Appendix 1
Survey Questionnaire
Dear Respondent:
In an effort to determine how the Graduate School of Mt. Province State Polytechnic
College will be able to help its students enrolled in Thesis writing and Dissertation Writing
courses in conducting research studies, the Graduate School would like to survey the
research skills of its students. In this regard, we would like to request that you fill up the
following questionnaire. Rest assured that the data gathered will be solely used for
research. Thank you for your time.
Research Experience (Write any research studies, individual or collaborative, that you
have conducted before or during your residency in MPSPC)
_____________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
159
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
160
1. Introduction
Collaboration skill is among the indispensable skills needed for effective
functionality in the twenty-first century. In present-day living, many people
continue to depart from communal and collaborative living that characterised the
past of a more individualistic and virtual society (Ogihara, 2023; Castells, 2014).
*
Corresponding author: Martin Chukwudi Ekeh; mekeh@uj.ac.za
©Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0
International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
161
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
162
In this study, group work play-based pedagogy was considered ideal for
developing learners' collaborative skills; because it affords learners interpersonal,
engaging, and social experiences, leading to deep learning. Group-work play-
based pedagogy is among the teaching and learning strategies that enhance
learners' collaborative skills and develop their leadership and critical thinking
skills; hence, the researcher's choice for this study. Nonetheless, teachers who
facilitate learning by using this pedagogy must be equipped to achieve an optimal
performance level. Therefore, the researcher opted for professional development
to capacitate teachers in using - work play-based pedagogy, in order to facilitate
collaboration among young learners. Specifically, the researcher aims to
determine what group work play-based pedagogy teachers use to facilitate
collaborative skills, and how the professional development of teachers in group
work play-based pedagogy fosters collaborative skills among young learners.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
163
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
164
instructions, the learning objectives, the purpose or goals and to acknowledge the
strengths and the weaknesses of each learner (Kaendler, Wiedmann, Rummel, &
Spada, 2015; University of Waterloo, 2018).
Thet teacher must provide adequate learning resources, promote openness and a
culture of communicjation, in order to celebrate achievement and to utilise the
mistakes, as a resource for learning opportunities (Kaendler, Wiedmann,
Rummel, & Spada, 2015). Undoubtedly, some teachers still struggle to facilitate
learning when using the most appropriate learning pedagogies (Walton, Nel,
Muller & Lebeloane, 2014). However, competent teachers with twenty-first-
century pedagogical prowess are central in facilitating collaborative skills
(Ramsaroop & Petersen, 2020). This is because collaborative skills are among the
core skills of the twenty-first century; hence, teachers' pedagogical approach plays
a crucial role in their realisation (Kaendler, Wiedmann, Rummel, & Spada, 2015;
Ramsaroop & Petersen, 2020). Play-based pedagogy is a well-appreciated twenty-
first century teaching and learning pedagogy for early-grade learners (Ekeh,
Venketsamy, Thuketana, & Joubert, 2022; Pistorova & Slutsky, 2018). Hence,
early-grade teachers are encouraged to use it to facilitate collaborative learning
among early-grade learners.
Although some educators may consider play among learners to be a waste of time
in school while emphasising academic rigour with a focus on cognitive
development, many educators consider play to be an essential role in early-grade
learning and development (Pistorova & Slutsky, 2018; Pyle & Danniels, 2017).
Play-based pedagogies are teaching and learning strategies that use fun and
activity-based learning to capture and sustain early- rade learners' attention and
interest in learning (Pyle & Danniels, 2017; Wood, 2013). According to Danniels
and Pyle (2018) and Pyle et al. (2017), play-based pedagogies are divided into
child-directed play activities (free play), mutually directed play activities (teacher-
and learner-designed play), and teacher-directed play (mostly play during the
game period). However, this study focuses on group work play-based pedagogies
that harness collaborative skills among early-grade learners. This implies that
both mutually directed and teacher-directed play are essential in this study
(Lynch, 2015).
Group-work play-based pedagogy is among the primary components of co-
operative learning, as it involves two or more learners learning from each other
through play (Brame, Director & Biel, 2016; University of Waterloo, 2018).
Through group work play-based pedagogy, learners engage in dialogue
constructively, thereby understanding complex concepts; and they reach a
consensus on the tasks they are working on (Brame, Director & Biel, 2016;
University of Waterloo, 2018). In contrast to the regular classroom setting, the
group-work play-based pedagogy classroom environment is inclusive, as the
learners are all involved (Hedges & Cooper, 2018; Lynch, 2015). There are
numerous flexible group work play-based activities that teachers can adapt to
their classroom practices (University of Waterloo, 2018). Among these, fishbowl,
think-pair-share, rotating trios, circle of voices, jigsaw, learning teams, and
snowball groups; however, most teachers are unaware of these play activities and
how they are to use them (University of Waterloo, 2018; Walton, Nel, Muller &
Lebeloane, 2014). Due to teachers' inability to utilise most of the twenty-first-
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
165
The proper assessment of each learner's performance within the group is another
challenge that teachers encounter when facilitating collaborative learning (Le,
Janssen & Wubbels, 2018; Ruys, Van Keer, & Aelterman, 2014). Some scholars
believe that teachers are challenged by the ambiguous nature of assessing or
measuring the learning performance of each learner because of a lack of
transparency and concreteness (Forsell, Forslund Frykedal & Hammar Chiriac,
2020; Ruys, Van Keer, & Aelterman, 2014). It is uncertain how teachers will
determine each learner's level of work, or the input required to assign, measure,
or grade it, nor is there any concrete template for measuring each learner's
commitment to the group. However, this study used a learner's performance-
rating scale to determine each learner's level of performance and commitment in
group-work play-based pedagogy.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
166
3. The Methods
The participatory
action research (PAR) Discussion of findings
procedure
Figure 1: Flow chart on research methods (created by author)
The research site for this study was located in the Owerri Education Zone of Imo
State, Nigeria. The state has three (3) major education zones: Owerri, Orlu, and
Okigwe. The Owerri Education Zone was more appropriate for the study because
the researcher needed an educated elite city as the baseline. The implication is
that, as the Owerri zone underperforms in the research, other education zones
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
167
may be behind concerning the research in focus, because the Owerri zone is
considered more advantaged because of the state capital that is in the zone.
The data for this study were analysed by using a thematic data-analysis
procedure. In doing so, the researcher acquainted himself with the data,
transcribed the data, and generated initial codes that were translated into themes.
The themes were further modified until they were coherent and repeated the
patterns that were reported. In particular, semi-structured interviews were
conducted. After the teacher participants were capacitated at different workshops,
they returned to implementing the pedagogical strategies learned in their classes.
After three (3) weeks of implementation, they reconvened to appraise and analyse
the implemented pedagogical strategies. Their appraisal and analysis formed part
of the analysis used in this study, as the results were built into the findings.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
168
Figure 2 describes the actions taken in each phase of the professional development
program for the teacher participants.
Appraisal of the
status quo
Phase 1
Evaluation of Development of
implemented solutions workable solutions
Phase 5 Phase 3
Implementation of
solutions
Phase 4
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
169
participants and the learners were able to handle the two-week learning content
in a single class session; and the learners comprehended the content because they
were involved in the learning process. How does it work?
4.1.1 Introduce the home groups: The teacher-participants were divided into three
learning groups called the "home groups". Each home-group member became a
representative of the expert group. They became responsible for discussing and
noting any new knowledge gained by the expert group. For example, a home
group had three (3) teacher-participants, and these three (3) teacher participants
were given numbers 1, 2, and 3. Breaking into the expert group, all the teacher-
participants number 1 were regrouped into expert group 1; while those with
number 2 were grouped into expert group 2. The same procedure applies to the
teacher- participants 3.
4.1.2 Breaking into expert groups: At this point, the teacher-participants settled for
group learning in expert groups 1, 2, and 3. Different mathematical puzzles were
given to the teacher- participants in their expert groups to solve them within a
given time-frame. Teacher participants were asked to return to their home groups
when the allocated time was over.
4.1.3 Regrouping at the home group: regrouping in their home groups, group-
members were allowed to share and learn from one another how they had solved
the mathematical puzzles presented to them in their different expert groups. The
implication was that each representative of the home-group became a teacher to
other group members in their home groups; as they shared their learning
experiences with the home group. For instance, Group Member one (1) shared
and taught other members what she had learnt in the expert group. Home group
member number two (2) also shared and taught other members in the sub-topic
that she had learnt in her expert group; the same applies to group member number
three (3).
For example, to facilitate word generation in the English language, the teachers
were presented with the word "GENERATION" and they were asked to generate
30 words within 25 minutes. Examples of words generated include GENERATE,
IT, ON, NATION, NO, NET, TEN, RAT, NEAR, RATION, and GEAR. Individual
teacher participants had to "think" and generate words within 25 minutes.
Afterwards, they "paired' themselves and "shared" the answers they had
generated with their peers. After the first pairing, they changed and paired with
another learner to crosscheck the answers the participants had received. In this
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
170
process, they increased their vocabulary by adding new words that they had
obtained from their peers' answers to that which they already had after having
compared notes with their peers.
Group work
play-based
pedagogies
5. The Findings
Overall, group-work play-based pedagogy developed early grade collaborative
skills. The teachers were not well-informed about the twenty-first century
pedagogies that enhanced collaboration skills among the early-grade learners.
The researcher believed that this was a significant gap in teachers' pedagogical
practice in developing collaborative skills in the early grades. The two main
themes that emerged from the study were teachers' perspectives on facilitating
group work play-based pedagogy and fostering collaborative skills among early-
grade learners.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
171
In their interview responses, T1, T3, T4, and T6 indicated that they "use storytelling,
singing, dance and drama" as group work play-based pedagogy. However, T3
explained that she prefers story-telling because "Children like stories and they like
playing. So, if you start teaching them with playing and storytelling, you will find out
they will be reacting to them, answering the question you asked them, and bringing their
idea because all of them come from a home. So, when you're talking to them: playing and
telling the story, they will grab it quickly". According to T6, "I use singing and dancing
to expose teaching materials, pointing out those drawings on the diagrams, and allowing
the children to pronounce them in their own words".
T2, T5, T7, and T8 mentioned using the "playway method.” T2 indicated that she
uses the playway method because "it woull enable the children to remember what they
have been taught". Similarly, T7 mentioned that she used it because "the children
learn more and faster through the playway method. Yes, because they play, they will play
with the teacher and their classmates, using all those teaching materials. Eeh, you will see
them holding play materials. They will be saying things in their language, and you will
see them smiling with happiness. They put more interest in their work while I stand aside,
looking at them".
In the words of T8, "the children love playing, and as they are playing, you are to use
the play-method to teach them, which will help them. They will not forget that lesson
because they will recollect their role and what they did then and be able to do I againt. T9,
in her description, said, "anyway, I use class discussion, grouping the pupil then
engaging them in discussion. Why do I like this? Iit is because the idea had come from
them. Likewise,the answer will come from them also. That's why I like the discussion".
According to the University of Waterloo (2018) and Brame et al. (2016), group-
work play-based pedagogies are among the co-operative learning strategies that
involve learning in groups of two or more through play. Teacher participants,
while responding to the group work play-based pedagogies that they used,
showed a reasonable understanding of having used dance, drama, and story-
telling; consequently, they were not completely in the dark regarding play-based
pedagogy. Although some teacher-participants mentioned using the play-way, as
a pedagogical strategy, they were not specifically referring to the group-work
play-based pedagogy that they had used. Walton, Nel, Muller & Lebeloane (2014)
and the University of Waterloo (2018) mentioned that most teachers are not
knowledgeable about twenty-first century group-work play-based pedagogies.
Pedagogies include fishbowl, think-pair-share, rotating trios, circle of voices,
jigsaw, learning teams, and snowball. Apart from T9, who mentioned grouping
the pupils and engaging them in discussions, it is understandable from Phase 1
that teacher participants' knowledge of group-work play-based pedagogy was
inadequate.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
172
This interview formed a baseline assessment for the researcher to identify the gap
in teachers' pedagogical practice and to proceed with planned professional
development for teacher participants, as indicated in Figure 2, which was done
according to Figure 2. The following section discusses the theme of developing
early-grade collaboration skills.
Very poor
Excellent
Good
Good
Very
Poor
1. Jigsaw
2. Think-pair-share
i. Early grade learners integrated into the group successfully. 1 3 3
ii. Early grade learners enjoyed interacting with group members. 2 5
iii. Early-grade learners shared working materials appropriately. 4 3
iv. Early-grade learners worked together in a group as friends. 3 4
v. Ear-y-grade learners negotiated during group work. 1 4 2
vi. Groups of early-grade learners learnt from their mistakes. 4 3
vii. Groups of early-grade learners achieved the common goal set 3 4
out for them.
3. Buzz-groups
i. Early-grade learners integrated into the group successfully. 3 4
ii. Early-grade learners enjoyed interacting with group members. 3 4
iii. Early-grade learners shared working materials appropriately. 2 3 2
iv. Early-grade learners worked together in a group as friends. 4 3
v. Early grade learners negotiated during their group-work. 1 1 3 3
vi. Groups of early-grade learners learnt from their mistakes. 1 2 2 2
vii. Groups of early-grade learners achieved the common goal-set 1 3 3
out for them.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
173
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
174
6. The Results
The study aimed to determine which group-work play-based pedagogy teachers
could use to facilitate collaborative skills, and how the professional development
of teachers on group work play-based pedagogy fostered collaborative skills
among young learners.
The findings from the study showed that think-pair-share, jigsaw and buzz-group
pedagogies facilitated collaborative skills among young learners. It was also
discovered that teachers had inadequate knowledge of these group work play-
based pedagogies, which aided the development of collaborative skills in the early
grades. Next, teachers' professional development workshops are necessary, in
order to upskill in-service teachers in various group-work play-based pedagogies.
Professional development workshops are indicators that the teachers' community
of practice is a viable means for cross-breeding various ideas among teachers. The
findings also showed that early-grade learners’ collaborative skills were enhanced
after teachers were capacitated on the use of group-work play-based pedagogy in
teaching early graders. The study also showed that early-grade learners are
flexible in learning; and they can adapt to any teaching strategy. Early-grade
learners' collaborative skills were adequately enhanced when using various
group-work play-based pedagogies as mentioned earlier.
7. Conclusion
There were pockets of research evidence that reflected early-grade classroom
pedagogical practice as being teacher-centred, in addition to the researcher's first-
hand evidence. Such pedagogical practices hampered the development of
collaborative skills among early-grade learners. This was the pivot among the
motivations leading to the research "developing early- grade collaborative skills
through group work play-based pedagogy.” In determining the group work
play-based pedagogy teachers use to facilitate collaborative skills among learners,
the researcher adopted a participatory action-research approach as a professional
development strategy.
It was discovered that most teachers were not knowledgeable about using twenty-
first century group-work play-based pedagogies to facilitate collaborative skills
among early-grade learners. The contribution of the study was eminent in that,
learners’collaborative skills were significantly improved after teachers had been
capacitated in their various training workshops. Teachers who received the
training formed a community of practictitioners to assist in educating their
colleagues on using group-work play-based pedagogy to facilitate learning.
The implication of the study is that, many teachers who continue to use the
teacher-centred teaching approach are doing so because they are not
knowledgeable on how to facilitate learning by using the twenty-first century
learning strategies. Learners who are taught by such teachers are disadvantaged
because they are not exposed to the twenty-first century survival skills.
Additionally, this implies that the government needs to organise professional
workshops, in order for teachers to upskill their knowledge on twenty-first
century skills
.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
175
This study is limited to a few early-grade teachers who were selected in the
Owerri Education zone. It was further limited to early-grade teachers who teach
the nursery/kindergarten up to primary/grade 2. There is a need to conduct
studies to include other grades and levels of education on the use of these
strategies within the educational zone.
8. Recommendations
From the findings of this study, the researchers recommend continuous
professional development training for early-grade in-service teachers in group-
work play-based pedagogies. Trained teachers may organise a community of
practice among teachers of proximity to assist in capacitating them in learning
pedagogies. Teachers should be encouraged to participate in research, in order to
improve their classroom teaching pedagogies. Teachers must play down the use
of teacher-centred pedagogies and concentrate on the use of pedagogies that
encourage active learning among learners. Teachers must have adequate
preparation to facilitate collaborative skills in the early grades.
9. References
Ahmad, H. A. (2016). Learner–centred approach to instructions: A strategy for
repositioning education in Nigeria. The Online Journal of New Horizons in
Education, 6(1), 78.
Ahonen, A. K., & Kinnunen, P. (2015). How do students value the importance of twenty-
first century skills? Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 59(4), 395-412.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2014.904423
Amadi, M. N. (2013). In-service training and professional development of teachers in
Nigeria: Through open and distance education. Bulgarian Comparative Education
Society.
Balslev, T., Rasmussen, A. B., Skajaa, T., Nielsen, J. P., Muijtjens, A., De Grave, W., & Van
Merriënboer, J. (2015). Combining bimodal presentation schemes and buzz
groups improves clinical reasoning and learning at morning reports. Medical
teacher, 37(8), 759-766. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159x.2014.986445
Brame, C. J., Director, C. A., & Biel, R. (2016). Group work: Using cooperative learning groups
effectively. https://cft.vanderbilt.edu/guides-sub-pages/setting-up-and-
facilitating-group-work-using-cooperative-learning-groups-effectively/
Castells, M. (2014). The impact of the internet on society: a global perspective. Change, 19,
127-148.
Ciampa, K. (2014). Learning in a mobile age: an investigation of student
motivation. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 30(1), 82-96.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12036
Clarence, S. (2018). Towards inclusive, participatory peer tutor development in Higher
Education. Critical Studies in Teaching and Learning (CriSTaL), 6(1), 58-74.
https://doi.org/10.14426/cristal.v6i1.141
Creswell, J. W. (2020). Mixed method research. SAGE Research Method Foundation
Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526421036932545
Danniels, E., & Pyle, A. (2018). Defining play-based learning. Encyclopaedia on early
childhood development, 1-5. http://ceril.net/index.php/articulo s?id=594
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
176
Ekeh, M. C. (2020). Strengthening group work play-based pedagogy to enhance core skills in
young learners. Doctoral dissertation, University of Pretoria.
https://repository.up.ac.za/handle/2263/80436
Ekeh, M. C., Venketsamy, R., Thuketana, N. S., & Joubert, I. (2022). Play-based pedagogy
for oral communication in early grade and preschool classrooms. South African
Journal of Childhood Education, 12(1), 981. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajce.v12i1.981
Forsell, J., Forslund Frykedal, K., & Hammar Chiriac, E. (2020). Group work assessment:
Assessing social skills at the group level. Small Group Research, 51(1), 87-124.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496419878269
Hedges, H., & Cooper, M. (2018). Relational play-based pedagogy: Theorising a core
practice in early childhood education. Teachers and Teaching, 24(4), 369-
383. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2018.1430564
Hutchings, M., & Quinney, A. (2015). The flipped classroom, disruptive pedagogies,
enabling technologies and wicked problems: Responding to "the bomb in the
basement". Electronic Journal of e-learning, 13(2), 106-119.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2013). Cooperation and the use of technology.
In Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 777-803).
https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781410609519-
41/coopera tion -use-technology-david-johnson-roger-johnson
Kaendler, C., Wiedmann, M., Rummel, N., & Spada, H. (2015). Teacher competencies for
the implementation of collaborative learning in the classroom: A framework and
research review. Educational Psychology Review, 27(3), 505-536.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-014-9288-9
Le, H., Janssen, J., & Wubbels, T. (2018). Collaborative learning practices: teacher and
student perceived obstacles to effective student collaboration. Cambridge Journal of
Education, 48(1), 103-122. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764x.2016.1259389
Lynch, M. (2015). More play, please: The perspective of kindergarten teachers on play in
the classroom. American Journal of Play, 7(3), 347-370.
MacDonald, C. (2012). Understanding participatory action research: A qualitative research
methodology option. The Canadian Journal of Action Research, 13(2), 34-50.
https://doi.org/10.33524/cjar.v13i2.37
Mahmoudi, F., & Özkan, Y. (2015). Exploring experienced and novice teachers'
perceptions about professional development activities. Procedia-Social and
Behavioral Sciences, 199, 57-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.487
Morales, M. P. (2019). Participatory action research (PAR) in education. The Wiley handbook
of action research in education, 317-341.
https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119399490.ch15
Osamwonyi, E. F. (2016). In-service education of teachers: Overview, problems and the
way forward. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(26), 83-87.
Ogihara, Y. (2023). Chinese culture became more individualistic: Evidence from family
structure, 1953-2017. F1000Research, 12(10),
10. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.128448.1
Pistorova, S., & Slutsky, R. (2018). There is still nothing better than quality play
experiences for young children's learning and development: building the
foundation for inquiry in our educational practices. Early Child Development and
Care, 188(5), 495-507. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2017.1403432
Pyle, A., & Danniels, E. (2017). A continuum of play-based learning: The role of the teacher
in play-based pedagogy and the fear of hijacking play. Early Education and
Development, 28(3), 274-289. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2016.1220771
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
177
Pyle, A., DeLuca, C., & Danniels, E. (2017). A scoping review of research on play‐based
pedagogies in kindergarten education. Review of Education, 5(3), 311-351.
https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3097
Ramsaroop, S., & Petersen, N. (2020). Building professional competencies through a
service learning 'gallery walk'in primary school teacher education. Journal of
University Teaching & Learning Practice, 17(4), 3.
https://doi.org/10.53761/1.17.4.3
Ruys, I., Van Keer, H., & Aelterman, A. (2014). Student and novice teachers' stories about
collaborative learning implementation. Teachers and Teaching, 20(6), 688-703.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2014.885705
Scoular, C., Duckworth, D., Heard, J., & Ramalingam, D. (2020). Collaboration: Skill
Development Framework. Australian Council for Educational Research.
https://research.acer.edu.au/armisc/42
Sellami, A., Ammar, M., & Ahmad, Z. (2022). Exploring teachers' perceptions of the
barriers to teaching STEM in high schools in Qatar. Sustainability, 14(22), 15192.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su142215192
Strang, K. (2013). Cooperative learning in graduate student projects: Comparing
synchronous versus asynchronous collaboration. Journal of Interactive Learning
Research, 24(4), 447-464. Waynesville, NC: Association for the Advancement of
Computing in Education
(AACE). https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/33168/
Tuncel, Z. A., & Çobanoğlu, F. (2018). In-service teacher training: problems of the teachers
as learners. International Journal of Instruction, 11(4), 159-174.
https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11411a
University of Waterloo (2018). Implementing group work in the classroom: Centre for
teaching excellence. https://uwaterloo.ca/centre-for-teaching-
excellence/teaching-resources/teaching-tips/alternatives-lecturing/group-
work/implementing-group-work-lassroom
Valtonen, T., Sointu, E. T., Kukkonen, J., Häkkinen, P., Järvelä, S., Ahonen, A., & Mäkitalo-
Siegl, K. (2017). Insights into Finnish first-year pre-service teachers' twenty-first
century skills. Education and Information Technologies, 22(5), 2055-
2069. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-016-9529-2
Victor-Akinyemi, H. B., Uyanne, E. O., Udoji, J. N., & Oladele, J. I. (2021). Teaching
strategy preferences in upper basic schools in Ilorin west local government area,
Kwara state, Nigeria. Journal of Educational Research in Developing Areas, 2(1), 1-12.
https://doi.org/10.47434/jereda.2.1.2021.1
Walton, E., Nel, N. M., Muller, H., & Lebeloane, O. (2014). 'You can train us until we are
blue in our faces, we are still going to struggle': Teacher professional learning in a
full-service school. Education as change, 18(2), 319-333.
https://doi.org/10.1080/16823206.2014.926827
Wood, E. A. (2013). Play, learning and the early childhood curriculum: SAGE
Publications. 1-208. https://www.torrossa.com/en/resources/an/5019586
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
178
1. Introduction
Education, which is one of the human capital development components
alongside health, is an important factor that promotes socio-economic
©Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0
International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
179
The two main contemporary challenges in the South African higher education
are access and throughput rates. Access to higher education is an aspiration of
every youth in the country who views this as a pathway to a brighter future
(Jappie, 2020). In South Africa, the students from lower socio-economic
backgrounds find it challenging to gain access to higher education for various
reasons, such as poor schooling, and many students are unable to meet the
minimum requirements for admissions and funding (Jappie, 2020).
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
180
2. Literature Review
Higher education as a tool to level opportunities has necessitated the
government’s investment in education. Massification of programmes and
broadening access to and participation in higher education has increased the
dynamics of characteristics of students in higher education environments. These
characteristics include first-generation students, students from low socio-
economic status households, rural and disadvantaged environments, under-
prepared students, as well as those entering higher education with low previous
academic performance. Consequently, this has brought a new dimension to
higher education challenges. As a result, governments and institutions
specifically invest in first-year experience to promote persistence, and for future
academic performance and achievement (Schreiner et al., 2020; Sterling, 2018).
Several studies (Edjah et al., 2019; Baik et al., 2019; Ganss, 2016; Cheung et al.,
2020; Uleanya & Rugbeer, 2020) provide detailed insight into the experiences
and challenges (positive or negative) of first-year student groups in different
national and institutional contexts. A study conducted in Ghana established that
registration for courses, separation from family, movement on campus,
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
181
3. Methodology
3.1 Research Design and Data Gathering
The research approach used in this study is a qualitative research method to
understand the perceptions and challenges of ECP students. Qualitative research
is a technique that is adopted to make sense of feelings, experiences, social
situations or phenomena as they occur in the real world (Blanche et al., 2006).
Data was gathered through focus group interviews, with a total of 12 focus
groups of five participants in each group. Focus groups were used to provide a
platform for cross-checking individual and social construction and multiple
realities associated with notions that have tendencies to create controversy
(Vicsek, 2010). The focus group discussion was conducted and recorded through
Microsoft Teams and the recorded interview transcribed. In addition, content
analysis was used as a tool for making sense of the data (Hsieh & Shannon, 2005;
Neuendorf, 2011). This study adopts a summative content analysis method
(Silverman, 2001) which enables researchers to prudently scrutinize data in
order to discover the rate of recurrence of views, themes and contextual
reflection of these views and to observe emerging forms. Researchers were keen
to discover the strength of the participants’ views and opinions and considered
it useful to use the summative approach because of the benefits it brings to the
analysis.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
182
Ethical consideration
Ethical clearance was obtained from the University’s Research Ethics Committee
(UREC, 2022), and a written informed consent form was obtained. These
students gave their consent after being informed about the study. Participants
were well-informed that their involvement in the study was non-compulsory.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
183
show up during the programme. This theme is deduced in the responses of the
students in this regard:
“Actually, no one told me about the foundation programme, this was how I got into the
programme; I was initially admitted for business management for mainstream, but when
I got to the university, I could not register for it because it was already full. So, I was
given the alternative to register for information systems, the foundation programme.”
“I heard about the programme as a walk-in student, so when I arrive, they said because
of my point I have to be a part of the foundation and that's when I heard about
foundation programmes. (I did not qualify for mainstream and was told that there are
spaces in commerce and management foundation programme).”
“I don’t know anything about the programme, I was just told to apply for it.”
“A friend from home told me about the programme and encouraged me to apply. Right
now, I didn’t quite know anything at the moment about the programme.”
“Basically, I know a little bit about the programme. I am not fully informed about the
programme.”
“I have never heard about the programme. I saw it on the board that I can apply for the
programme.”
“My background is different from what I am currently doing. What I did in high school
is actually different from what I'm doing now, because the subjects that I did in high
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
184
school are not equivalent to what I'm doing now, and it is challenging for me. I am a
social science student.”
“…most of the modules have been challenging while others have been manageable.
Learning courses I have never done in high school has been quite stressful.”
“Since I registered as a student in the programme, it was not easy for me to understand
the courses because I was a science student in high school. I had no idea of business-
related subjects.”
“As a person who did social science subjects in high school, I was shocked to find out
that AMB is basically pure Mathematics. It has been difficult and stressful; it has taken a
toll on my mental health because I sometimes feel stupid in comparison to others, and
with Economics module as well also being new to me, it has been extremely hard for me
to cope.”
“Since from the first time I registered as a foundation programme student, it was not
easy for me to understand because I was doing sciences in high school.”
“It was hard for me to adapt in commerce during the first semester, because, in high
school doing science, so I had challenges because I had no clues in business.”
It can be inferred from these responses that misalignment is present between the
high school subjects and the university courses of the ECP. A student’s
knowledge of his/her career path and desire for the career path determines
what course he or she will take at the university. This implies that a student who
is knowledgeable about what he/she wants to become will choose subjects at
high school that align with his/her university’s courses and career choice.
According to Coles (2021), desire defines the reason someone acts or behaves in
a certain way, thus a strong desire for a specific career path determines what
courses a student will take in college. In addition, students who have a strong
desire in their career can choose a better pathway in college as they will have
chosen strands that align with their current college courses. This is important
because the interest of students plays an essential role in strands and courses;
students become involved in a curriculum which they are interested in; they
tend to study and work better when they are not excluded. The existence of this
mismatch underscores the importance of career guidance in high school. Studies
(Upoalkpajor, 2020; Savickas, 2015) have shown that career guidance enables
students to align what they learn with their aspirations, interests, and capacities,
and test these with existing opportunities. Career guidance also helps an
individual to know about the available training and educational opportunities
and the requirements for admission, as well as the choice of a suitable field of
study.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
185
et al. 2021; Krause and Coates 2008). Equally, it has been acknowledged in the
literature (Hassel & Ridout, 2018; Lekana & Bayaga, 2018) that such a transition
is a concern for students as some transition experiences could lead to dropping-
out or poor academic performance if not properly managed. Lekana and Bayaga
(2018) noted that limited or poor preparation for change, and overwhelming
new responsibilities and challenges make the move from high school to
university a difficult one. The experience of transitioning from high school to
university is often difficult to process because transition itself is difficult and
needs time and effort for emotional and social adjustment to minimise the
impact of the problems encountered during the process. Leaving high school for
university can be a time of increased vulnerability because the youths entering
university have to take on a new academic part, navigate adult roles, economic
responsibilities, and build new social networks (Laursen & Collins, 2009;
Aquilino, 2006). Transition challenges are revealed in the form of academic
expectations, technology adoption, and socialization. Quoted excerpts below are
the experiences of the first-year ECP students who were interviewed in this
study:
“I have experienced difficulties trying to adapt to the university system. When I started
the programme, I got overwhelmed because I didn't know what to expect in the course
that I'm doing and don’t know anything about the programme. Everything was difficult
for me.”
Studies by Turner and Brown (2010) and Thomas and Whitten (2012) identified
social support as an important source of social integration and well-being during
the transitional period. In addition, the supposed social support in the first year
of university is linked with other sides of emotional welfare such as motivation,
less insecurity, lower expectancies of dropping out, and a greater sense of
belonging (Rosenthal et al., 2011). It is necessary for these students to learn the
coping mechanisms for transitioning from high school to a higher institution of
learning, such as personality traits, perceived support, environmental and
individual resources (Wood, et al., 2008; Turner & Brown, 2010). Students in the
transitioning phase need the support of lecturers to feel comfortable and
motivated. Many said that:
“Maths is a difficult module and most of us don't get it because we've done maths
literacy in high school, and now that we are trying to adapt to pure maths, it's quite
difficult.”
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
186
“I didn’t have experience in using laptop. At first, I could not keep up with the use of
Blackboard, I couldn’t login to join classes, it was a struggle using the computer.”
“We are first-year student and not exposed to the use of technology.”
“Everything was difficult, I didn’t know about Blackboard. It was very hard completing
my assignment since I am not familiar with Blackboard.”
Stigmatization
Stigma is a perceived or actual violation of another person’s identity (Maringe
and Jenkins, 2015). It is also an extreme discontent or disapproval of a person for
reasons of attributes that differentiate them from other members of a society.
Maringe and Jenkins (2015) opine that stigma is not only derived from other
people’s disapproval, it also comes from how the disapproved feel about their
state. Studies (Zhang et al., 2021; Goffman 1963) have acknowledged sources of
stigmatization in the society include race, disability status, colour, gender, age,
language, sexual orientation, nationality, legitimacy, ethnicity, and health
condition, among many others. Specifically, there are three categories for
examining sources of social stigma: personal traits sources, tribal stigmas which
relate to real or imagined traits, and visible external sources (Goffman,1963).
These identified sources can be continuous or discontinuous sources of social
stigma. When they are continuous, it implies that these sources will possibly
include various forms of the same phenomenon. According to Sartorius (2007),
stigmatization may affect people’s feelings of loss of identity, feelings of being
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
187
“The senior students told me I am still in high school and that I will only start my first
year at the beginning of the next year.”
“I have seen posts on social media where people wrote on social media that people who
are doing foundation programme are still in their high school, and some others make
negative comments on social media about us. They do not know how I found myself in
that situation.”
“I have met some students who look down on me when I tell them what I am doing in the
university and that makes me feel like I am not really doing a productive course since I
am not in the mainstream.”
“I always ask myself; so, there are people who are doing mainstream and I'm here doing
something else. I think it's been me who is feeling weird about it. But at the end of the
day I told myself it is okay.”
“Some of the students I have met make me feel like an external person, an outcast, there
is no sense of belonginess, someone who doesn’t belong in the university.”
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
188
“We don’t have much support because they always have that mentality, that this is
university and by now we should know.”
“We don’t have much support structure as foundation students. We need support
groups around us both mentally and academically.”
“Umm. For example, accounting students mainstream, they get extra classes on
Saturdays. So that means that will boost their performance and they also get extra things
like free voucher for airtime, they also get book allowance from another bursary. They get
more support. They prioritize them, more especially their mental health.”
“And I'm pretty sure that if one of the students from accounting mainstream has the
problem, I'm sure they have that one person they can call or make an appointment with.”
Some students might feel that the degree or the university was not their first
choice, but although they were not accepted elsewhere, with proper student
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
189
support they can feel at ease with the transformation process. It is the
responsibility of the institution to ensure that students receive the necessary
support, and are provided agencies that will respond to their unique situations
and implement ideas that afford the individual’s uniqueness necessary to scale
the rigours of academic life (O’Shea, 2016; Gyamera, 2018). It is therefore
imperative for the management of the institution to reflect continuously on the
curriculum development and design of the programme which provides the
essential learning tools for these students as a managerial strategy. The amount
of support provided to these students in their first year and the sustainability of
the process of their learning depend on the interventions designed during
continuous reflection (Slabbert & Friedrich-Nel, 2015). These challenges are
essentially academic and social-related challenges, in accordance with a number
of studies (Wangeri et al., 2012; Prelow et al., 2006; Sanoff, 2006; Jemal, 2012).
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
190
6. References
Amani, J. (2016). Do Tanzanian undergraduate students choose or hunt for their degree
programmes? International Journal of Higher Education, 5(2), 74–81.
http://dx.doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v5n2p74
Ammigan, R., & Drexler, M. (2022). Exploring the relationship between academic performance
and the international student experience: Implications for university support offices and
academic unit. STAR Scholar Book Series: Routledge.
https://www.ojed.org/index.php/gsm/article/view/2804
Aquilino W. (2006). Family relationships and support systems in emerging adulthood. In
Arnett J. J., Tanner J. L., (Eds.), Emerging adults in America: Coming of age in
the 21st century Washington, DC. American Psychological Association, 193–217.
https://doi.org/10.1037/11381-008
Baik, C., Naylor, R., Arkoudis, S., & Dabrowski, A. (2019). Examining the experiences of
first-year students with low tertiary admission scores in Australian universities.
Studies in Higher Education, 44(3), 526–538.
https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2017.1383376
Balfanz, R., McPartland, J., & Shaw, A. (2002). Re-conceptualizing extra help for high
school students in a high standards era. Journal of Vocational Special Needs
Education, 25(1), 24-41. http://www.ed.gov/offices/OVAE/HS/balfanz.doc.
Blanche, M. T., Blanche, M. J. T., Durrheim, K., & Painter, D. (Eds.). (2006). Research in
practice: Applied methods for the social sciences. Juta and Company Ltd: Cape Town
South Africa.
Brophy, J. (1998). Motivating students to learn. Boston, MA: McGraw Hill.
Cheung, K., Tam, K. Y., Tsang, M. H., Zhang, L. W., & Lit, S. W. (2020). Depression,
anxiety and stress in different subgroups of first-year university students from 4-
year cohort data. Journal of Affective Disorders, 274, 30–-314.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.05.041
Coles, J. A. (2021). Black desire: Black-centric youthtopias as critical race educational
praxis. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 1–22.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2021.1888163
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
191
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
192
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
193
Prelow, H. M., Mosher, C. E., & Bowman, M. A. (2006). Perceived racial discrimination,
social support, and psychological adjustment among African American college
students. Journal of Black Psychology, 32(4), 442–454.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0095798406292677
Rosenthal, L., London, B., Levy, S. R., & Lobel, M. (2011). The roles of perceived identity
compatibility and social support for women in a single-sex STEM program at a
co-educational university. Sex roles, 65(9), 725–736.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-9945-0
Sanoff, A. P. (2006). A perception gap over students’ preparation. Chronicle of Higher
Education, 52(27), 9–14. http://chronicle.com/free/v52/i27/27b00901.htm
Sartorius, N. (2007). Stigma and mental health. The Lancet, 370(9590), 810–811.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61245-8
Savickas M. L., Porfeli E. J. (2012). Career Adapt-Abilities Scale: Construction, reliability,
and measurement equivalence across 13 countries. Journal of Vocational Behaviour,
80, 661–673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2012.01.011
Schreiner, L. A., Louis, M. C., & Nelson, D. D. (2020). Thriving in transitions: A research-
based approach to college student success. The National Resource Centre for the
First-Year Experience.
Sharf, R. S. (1992). Applying career development theory to counselling. Brooks: Cole
Publishing Company.
Silverman, D. (2001). Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for Analysing Talk, Text and
Interaction. London: Sage.
Slabbert, R., & Friedrich-Nel, H. (2015). Extended curriculum programme evolution: a
road map to academic success? South African Journal of Higher Education, 29(1),
45–59. http://hdl.handle.net/11462/1568
Sterling, A. J. (2018). Student experiences in the second year: Advancing strategies for
success beyond the first year of college. Strategic Enrolment Management
Quarterly, 5(4), 136–149. https://doi.org/10.1002/sem3.20113
Thomas, G., & Whitten, J. (2012). Learning support for students with learning difficulties
in India and Australia: Similarities and differences. International Education
Journal: Comparative Perspectives, 11(1), 3–21. https://www.iejcomparative.org
Turner, R. J., & Brown, R. L. (2010). Social support and mental health. A handbook for
the study of mental health: Social contexts, theories, and systems. Social Support
and Mental Health 2(10), 200–212.
Thompson, M., Pawson, C., & Evans, B. (2021). Navigating entry into higher education:
the transition to independent learning and living. Journal of Further and Higher
Education, 45(10), 1398–1410. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2021.1933400
Uleanya, C., & Rugbeer, Y. (2020). Investigation of First-year Learning Experiences in a
Rural University in South Africa. Journal of Student Affairs in Africa, 8(1), 29–46.
https://doi.org/ 10.24085/jsaa.v8i1.4180
Upoalkpajor, J. L. N. (2020). Career guidance and its implications for students’ career
choices: The case of public senior high schools in Ghana. Journal of Education
Society and Behavioural Science, 33(8), 62–69.
htpps://doi.org/10.9734/JESBS/2020/v33i830251
Vicsek, L. (2010). Issues in the Analysis of Focus Groups: Generalisability,
Quantifiability, Treatment of Context and Quotations. Qualitative Report, 15(1),
122–141. http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR15-1/vicsek.pdf
Wangeri, T., Kimani, E., & Mutweleli, S. M. (2012). Transitional challenges facing
university first year students in Kenyan public universities: A Case of Kenyatta
University. Interdisciplinary Review of Economics and Management, 1(2), 43–50.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
194
https://www.ku.ac.ke/schools/humanities/images/stories/docs/Research/tr
annsitional-challenges-facing-first-year-students
Watson, M., McMahon, M., Foxcroft, C., & Els, C. (2010). Occupational aspirations of low
socio-economic Black South African children. Journal of Career Development, 37(4),
717–734. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845309359351
Wood, A. M., Maltby, J., Gillett, R., Linley, P. A., & Joseph, S. (2008). The role of gratitude
in the development of social support, stress, and depression: Two longitudinal
studies. Journal of Research in Personality, 42(4), 854–871.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2007.11.003
Young, E., Thompson, R., Sharp, J., & Bosmans, D. (2020). Emotional transitions?
Exploring the student experience of entering higher education in a widening-
participation HE-in-FE setting. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 44(10),
1349-1363. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2019.1688264
Zhang, R., Wang, M. S., Toubiana, M., & Greenwood, R. (2021). Stigma beyond levels:
Advancing research on stigmatization. Academy of Management Annals, 15(1), 18–
-222. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2019.003
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
195
1. Introduction
Malaysian postsecondary institutions demand a greater emphasis on academic
language due to its usage in the classroom as part of instructions, reading,
discussions and assignments. Academic vocabulary is the key component of said
language (Truckenmiller et al., 2019). According to Charles and Pecorari (2016),
academic vocabulary refers to commonly used words in academic discourses,
©Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0
International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
196
but less frequently used in general English. Thus, its mastery would necessitate
learners' ability to accurately comprehend and produce academic discourses
(Nation, 2013), especially for those pursuing university-level programs in
English-medium settings (Coxhead, 2021). Over the years, numerous studies
have shown the role of academic vocabulary knowledge in improving learners’
academic reading comprehension (Lawrence et al., 2022), academic writing
(Csomay & Prades, 2018; Therova, 2021), listening comprehension (Dang, 2022;
Ha, 2021), speaking assessments, such as presentations or debates (Smith et al.,
2020; Yunus et al., 2016) as well as overall academic accomplishments (Skjelde &
Coxhead, 2020).
In this regard, it is necessary to adopt a more direct, explicit and purposeful and
systematic approach to academic vocabulary learning among ESL post-
secondary learners (Aldawsari, 2017; Coxhead, 2021; Yunus et al., 2016). Taking
into consideration the Malaysian Education Blueprint's 7th shift regarding the
use of Information Communication Technology (ICT) (MOE, 2015), it is apt for
explicit academic vocabulary instructions to integrate technology. In this sense,
developing online supplementary materials would allow learners to practise
vocabulary independently, whilst increasing their motivation for continued
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
197
learning (Krishan et al., 2020; Wu, 2015). Therefore, technology has increasingly
become more appealing to the current Gen Z post-secondary learners, who are
familiar with the use of digital technology and the internet.
Thus, this research is preliminary research with the intention of designing and
developing a supplementary academic vocabulary WBLR for ESL pre-university
learners. It seeks to investigate the needs of ESL pre-university learners in
learning English academic vocabulary, as the initial focal step before developing
the resource. The data acquired through needs analysis would provide a solid
foundation for the design of the resource. Since this study is only the first stage
of a larger developmental research project, the design and development stages
of the instructional product to address the underlined learning difficulties are
outside the scope of this article.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
198
barriers when they have sufficient knowledge on how to carry out a thorough
needs analysis.
According to Diana and Mansur (2018), there are four models of needs analysis
recognised by scholars, namely: Target-Situation Analysis, Present Situation
Analysis, the Hutchinson and Waters Model, and Dudley-Evans and St John’s
Model of Needs Analysis. Target-Situation Analysis (TSA) focuses on students’
needs at the end of the language course (Robinson, 1991). Present-Situation
Analysis (PSA) identifies the gap between the present and the target situation by
determining the students’ language proficiency and strengths and weaknesses at
the start of the language course (Robinson, 1991). Meanwhile, Dudley-Evans and
St John's (1998) Model of Needs Analysis provides personal information on the
learners, language information of the target situation, professional information
about learners, learners’ lack, learners’ needs from the course, language-
learning needs, and how to communicate in the target needs.
Finally, Hutchinson and Waters' (1987) Model defines needs analysis by two
main aspects: (i) Target Needs and (ii) Learning Needs. The former refers to
what learners are required to do in the target situation; while the latter refers to
what the learner needs to do in order to learn. Target Needs consist of
necessities, lacks and wants. 'Necessities' are what learners must know to
function effectively in the target situation. 'Lacks’ refers to the gaps between the
learners' target proficiency and their existing proficiency. 'Wants' fit into the
subjective needs of what the learners want to learn.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
199
Sulaiman et al., 2018; Yunus et al., 2016). As a result, learners cannot effectively
learn the academic vocabulary; and they lose awareness of the significance
thereof. Learning vocabulary is frequently tricky due to the vast number of
words, but it is even more complicated when learners do not meet a specific
vocabulary size. Malaysian ESL tertiary learners typically acquire only 3500-6000
word families (e.g., Ibrahim et al., 2016; Lim & Rashid, 2021; Tan & Goh, 2017),
which is significantly lower than what is required for university-level academic
success, as noted by Laufer and Ravenhorst-Kalovski (2010). As a result, learners
may struggle to acquire academic words, especially considering that academic
words are impossible to be gained through everyday language (Townsend et al.,
2012).
Furthermore, according to Gallagher et al. (2019), ESL learners are less likely to
benefit from the incidental instruction of academic words. Hence, it is
imperative for ESL pre-university learners to learn academic words explicitly by
direct instructions, practices, and feedback.
Mundir et al. (2022) found that integrating online instruction is more effective
than traditional instruction. Similarly, using online tools was found to be more
enjoyable for students than traditional teaching methods; and it helps learners to
retain words better (Poláková & Klímová, 2019). Hence, there are many reasons
why ESL learners perceive the integration of web-based learning in a traditional
classroom for vocabulary learning positively. For instance, multi-media
materials are noted to increase the effectiveness of learning new words by
assisting learners in developing self-learning methods for active and deeper
learning (Fayaz & Ameri-Golestan, 2016), leading thereby to higher vocabulary
gains (Knežević et al., 2020).
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
200
3. Methodology
3.1 The Research Design
This paper is part of a larger developmental research project that aims to design,
develop and evaluate a web-based academic vocabulary learning resource for
ESL pre-university learners. The overall research project follows a mixed-
method research approach (Creswell & Guetterman, 2021), with Design and
Development Research (DDR) Type 1 (product and tool) (Richey & Klein, 2007)
as the research design. DDR is the systematic study of design, development and
evaluation processes to establish an empirical basis for creating instructional and
non-instructional products (Richey & Klein, 2007). The ADDIE (Analysis,
Design, Develop, Implement, Evaluate) instructional design (Branch, 2010) is
utilised as the research framework to guide the development of the overall
research project. ADDIE is integrated into the three main phases of DDR, which
comprise the Analysis Phase (Phase 1), the Design and Development Phase
(Phase 2), and the Implementation and Evaluation Phase (Phase 3).
This paper only reports on Phase 1, the Analysis (A) Phase, which involves
gathering information, such as learning problems or an environment that can aid
the development of materials that meet the learning requirements of a particular
group of learners. In order to identify the ESL learners’ academic vocabulary
learning needs, this study adopts Hutchinson and Waters’ (1987) model of needs
analysis, which emphasises learners’ target needs (necessities, lacks, wants) and
learning needs. The model is adopted as it is specific, with clear target goals; and
it is workable for identifying the needs of adult learners at the tertiary-level
(Intan Baizura, 2014). A cross-sectional survey design was deemed appropriate
for the current study. Therefore, a quantitative data collection method is utilised
via a survey questionnaire. The data gathered serve as a basis for subsequent
phases of the research project.
3.3 Participant
117 Life Sciences ESL Foundation learners from one Centre of Foundation
Studies in Kuala Lumpur were deliberately selected for this study (Gay et al.,
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
201
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
202
Cronbach's alpha value is obtained for the four constructs during pilot testing; it
is above 0.7 (0.845, 0.711, 0.851, 0.935), which is an acceptable reliability
coefficient. The questionnaire was revised accordingly; and then it was
administered to the actual respondents. The reliability testing yielded a
Cronbach's alpha value of above 0.7 (0.716, 0.779, 0.829, 0.844) for all the
constructs, demonstrating thereby the high level of consistency between the
respondents' answers.
4. The Findings
4.1 Demographic Information
The distribution of a Google Form link to the needs analysis questionnaire
among the Life Sciences ESL Foundation students yielded 117 responses for
analysis. Part A required respondents to fill in their background information.
The analysis of their background information showed that most of the
respondents (67.5%, n=79) are female, while 32.5% (n=38) are male. Since they
belong to the same academic cohort, almost all the respondents (98.3%, 115) are
18 years old. Only 0.9% (n=1) of the respondents are 17 and 19 years old,
respectively (M=18). Regarding their educational background, all the
respondents had taken the SPM English Language paper, with 42.7% (n=50)
scoring an A+ score, 53.8% (n=63) scoring an A, and the remaining 3.4% (n=4)
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
203
scoring an A-. The scores show that the respondents have a similar upper-
intermediate proficiency in English.
In Part B, the ESL learners displayed a high attitude towards learning academic
vocabulary (M=4.52, SD=.361). They considered academic vocabulary important
and knew its crucial role in learning various academic English skills, especially
in academic writing (M=4.80, SD=.420). They also expressed a positive attitude
towards having moderate to extensive practice with academic words (M=4.15,
SD=.478). This indicates the 'necessity' of learning the academic vocabulary in
their context.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
204
technology access (M=4.57, SD=.486) and the online skills (M=4.41, SD=o.618)
required to access and utilise WBLRs with ease and efficiency. They also
expressed a willingness to use WBLR for future academic vocabulary learning
(M=4.48, SD=.583). These findings indicate an alignment in the learners'
preferences, access and skills, which points to the suitability of using web-based
learning to fulfil their 'wants' in learning academic vocabulary. Subsequently,
this method would enable learners to learn the academic vocabulary
independently and ubiquitously.
Building on their preferences and skills, the learners identified their 'learning
needs' for the proposed WBLR in Part E. They showed high agreement on the
favourable content for the WBLR (M=4.21, SD=.456). Regarding vocabulary
learning input, the learners favoured various word aspects, such as sample
sentences, word definition, pronunciation and spelling (M=4.38, SD=.573).
Regarding vocabulary learning exercises, the learners favoured various exercise
types, such as synonyms, multiple choices, matching words to definitions,
games and quizzes (M=4.25, SD=.584). Regarding media types, the learners
favoured multimedia, such as images, videos, audio and texts (M=4.01, SD-
0.616). These findings indicate that learners require these types of content in
order for them to learn academic vocabulary. Hence, the resource should include
these elements, in order to capture and retain learners' interest and motivation.
In summary, these findings showed that the Life Sciences ESL Foundation
students perceived their academic vocabulary learning needs are high (M=3.98,
SD=0.267). Therefore, researchers have to ensure that the ESL learners’ needs are
met to ensure adequate and successful academic vocabulary learning.
5. Discussion
5.1 Necessities
ESL pre-university learners' attitude towards learning academic vocabulary is
positive, as they consider it essential in all aspects of academic English, albeit to
varying degrees. This finding concurs with Choo et al.'s (2017) study, where ESL
tertiary students deemed AWL knowledge necessary in academic reading,
writing, speaking and listening. Nonetheless, the learners in this study especially
pointed out academic vocabulary knowledge’s usefulness for improving
academic writing. Thus, most learners communicated their expectations towards
a moderate to extensive academic vocabulary practice. This supports Choo et
al.'s (2017) claim that the AWL should be emphasised in Malaysian tertiary
English language education, given the lack of prior exposure during schooling
(Manan et al., 2013; Noorizan et al., 2017). Hence, it is ‘necessary’ for ESL pre-
university learners to learn academic vocabulary to improve their academic
English.
5.2 Lacks
However, learners' experience in learning academic English is not fruitful; since
they face difficulties in academic speaking and academic writing, stemming
from their limited academic word knowledge. This supports Karnine et al.'s
(2022) study indicating that ESL tertiary learners struggle with MUET because of
their limited vocabulary knowledge. According to Laufer and Ravenhorst-
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
205
5.3 Wants
To address the earlier shortcomings, the learners conveyed their opinions about
using web-based learning for academic vocabulary. They showed a positive
inclination towards this approach, stating that it is motivating and convenient
compared to traditional methods. This corroborates previous studies, which
posit that while learning vocabulary through traditional classroom instruction
can be restrictive, online resources provide more accessible and engaging
practices that can boost learner motivation for continued learning (Ali, 2018;
Krishan et al., 2020; Tan & Goh, 2020). Learners’ preference for web-based
learning rather than traditional methods aligns with numerous past studies (e.g.,
Alhujaylan, 2021; Altiner, 2019; Bashori et al., 2021; Mundir et al., 2022).
Moreover, the learners in this study possessed sufficient technological access,
online skills, and interest in ubiquitous resources that should enable them to use
and navigate a self-instructed WBLR efficiently, anywhere, at any time. This is
significant, when given the emerging need for tertiary learners to extend their
vocabulary learning independently beyond the classroom settings (Kaur, 2020;
Sulaiman et al., 2018). Indeed, the learners 'want' to use web-based learning as a
means to acquire academic vocabulary.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
206
synonyms like general English words and within comprehensible contexts like
sample sentences. This finding backs up Nguyen's (2020) assertion that although
students could simply utilise contextual clues to infer meaning when reading
academic textbooks, doing so is very challenging, especially when many other
unfamiliar terms surround an unfamiliar word. Furthermore, the learners in this
study preferred various vocabulary exercises. Past studies have shown that
repetitive exposure to target words through different exercises can result in
meaningful learning and better retention (Hashemzadeh, 2012; Mohd Tahir &
Mohtar, 2016). Lastly, the learners expressed a preference for multimedia
elements, particularly visuals. This is aligned with the findings of Bashori et al.
(2021), who found that learners value coloured-backgrounds, images and
visually-engaging user-interface, in order to enhance their vocabulary results. In
sum, incorporating these preferred elements into the WBLR would help learners
learn the academic vocabulary better.
These findings imply that to aid and improve learners' experience in learning
academic vocabulary, developers of web-based academic vocabulary learning
resources should emphasise the inclusion of these preferred elements. In
addition, the study's focus on the necessity of independent academic vocabulary
learning outside of the classroom highlights the significance of developing
resources that permit ubiquitous access and self-navigability. By considering the
learners' needs and preferences, developers can develop a more efficient and
exciting web-based academic vocabulary learning resource to help ESL pre-
university learners attain their academic English goals.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
207
In order to overcome the limitations of this study, future research would benefit
from using a broader and more varied sample of Foundation-level students from
various institutions. Future research could also consider how well the preferred
learning approaches identified in this study help students learn and retain their
academic vocabulary. Besides, the effect of linguistic and cultural diversity on
students' preferences for WBLRs should be explored in further studies. Next, to
meet the needs and preferences of different students, the incorporation of
artificial intelligence or personalised learning strategies into web-based
academic vocabulary learning resources could also be investigated. Finally,
using different data collection methods, such as interviews and classroom
observation, is also advised in order to obtain more productive data.
8. Conclusion
The study has revealed some significant points for consideration when
designing a WBLR to meet ESL pre-university learners' academic vocabulary
learning needs. Firstly, acknowledging the usefulness of academic word-
knowledge; learners expect frequent practices in their program. Secondly, they
believe their academic writing and speaking skills are impacted by their lack of
academic words. Thirdly, they are dissatisfied with the classroom's current
academic vocabulary learning approaches, which involve implicit vocabulary
acquisition through reading textbooks and other sources. Shortcomings include
a lack of engagement in their current approaches and a lack of opportunity to
develop their academic vocabulary using the textbook. Thus, learners require
web-based academic vocabulary learning; as they prefer this explicit non-
traditional method; and they have sufficient technology access and online skills.
Finally, the learners prefer content that includes multiple facets of a word,
various vocabulary-learning exercises and multimedia. Among the key details
are to present academic words in contexts through sample sentences and to use
basic English words as synonyms, in order to aid learners' word comprehension.
The study's findings provide instructional developers with valuable insights and
raise the awareness of the significance of learners' needs analysis to enhance
their learning. It is a tool that provides instructors with a clear grasp of the
learners' target and learning needs. In conclusion, acknowledging learners'
needs allows material designers to comprehend their needs and shortcomings to
bridge the gap between their current and the target proficiency.
9. References
Abmanan, A., Azizan, N., Wahida, F., & Nasir, M. (2017). Receptive and Productive
Vocabulary Level of Diploma Students from a Public University in Malaysia. J.
Appl. Environ. Biol. Sci, 7(1S), 53–59.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/315696194_Receptive_and_Productive
_Vocabulary_Level_of_Diploma_Students_from_a_Public_University_in_Malaysia
Al-Johali, K. Y. E. (2019). Teaching Vocabulary Through Wiki to First Secondary Graders.
English Language Teaching, 12(5). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v12n5p42
Aldawsari, H. (2017). The challenges of learning academic vocabulary among postgraduate
Saudi students at New Zealand universities [Auckland University of Technology].
https://openrepository.aut.ac.nz/bitstream/handle/10292/10754/AldawsariH.pd
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
208
f?sequence=4&isAllowed=y
Alhujaylan, H. (2021). Academic Vocabulary Acquisition in Web-based Learning
Environment. The Asian ESP Journal, 17(3.1), 32–57.
https://www.elejournals.com/asian-esp-journal/esp-march-2020-17-3-1/
Ali, Z. (2018). Evaluating the Use of Hot Potatoes in Learning Academic Word List.
International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(3.25), 253–257.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.25.17557
Altiner, C. (2019). Integrating a Computer-Based Flashcard Program into Academic
Vocabulary Learning. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology,
18(1). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1201649.pdf
Bashori, M., van Hout, R., Strik, H., & Cucchiarini, C. (2021). Effects of ASR-based
websites on EFL learners’ vocabulary, speaking anxiety, and language enjoyment.
System, 99(102496). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SYSTEM.2021.102496
Branch, R. M. (2010). Instructional Design: The ADDIE Approach. Springer US.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09506-6
Brown, J. (1995). The Elements of Language Curriculum: A Systematic Approach to Program
Development. Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
Charles, M., & Pecorari, D. (2016). Introducing English for academic purposes. Routledge.
Choo, L. B., Lin, D. T. A., Singh, M. K. M., & Ganapathy, M. (2017). The Significance of
the Academic Word List among ESL Tertiary Students in a Malaysian Public
University. 3L The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 23(4), 56–65.
https://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2017-2304-05
Coxhead, A. (2021). Vocabulary in English in Tertiary Contexts: Connecting Research
and Learning. Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 14(1).
https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/LEARN/article/view/248672/168985
Creswell, J. W., & Guetterman, T. C. (2021). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting,
and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Pearson Education.
Csomay, E., & Prades, A. (2018). Academic vocabulary in ESL student papers: A corpus-
based study. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 33, 100–118.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2018.02.003
Dang, T. N. Y. (2022). Vocabulary in academic lectures. Journal of English for Academic
Purposes, 58(3), 101–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2022.101123
Destianingsih, A., & Satria, A. (2017). A Study on Students’ Need Analysis on Web-
based English Learning Materials. Inovish Journal, 2(1), 48–57.
https://doi.org/https://dx.doi.org/10.35314/inovish.v2i1.184
Diana, S., & Mansur, M. (2018). Need Analysis on English Teaching Materials for Ict
Students. ETERNAL (English, Teaching, Learning, and Research Journal), 4(2), 209.
https://doi.org/10.24252/eternal.v42.2018.a6
Dudley-Evans, T., & St John, M. J. (1998). Developments in English for Specific Purposes.
Cambridge University Press.
Fayaz, S., & Ameri-golestan, A. (2016). Impact of Blended Learning, Web-based learning
and Traditional Classroom Learning on Vocabulary Acquisition on Iranian EFL
Learners. Modern Journal of Language Teaching Methods ( MJLTM ), 6(1), 244–255.
Gallagher, M. A., Barber, A. T., Beck, J. S., & Buehl, M. M. (2019). Academic Vocabulary:
Explicit and Incidental Instruction for Students of Diverse Language Backgrounds.
Reading and Writing Quarterly, 35(2), 84–102.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2018.1510796
Garreta-Domingo, M., Sloep, P. B., & Hernández-Leo, D. (2018). Human-centred design
to empower “teachers as designers.” British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(6),
1113–1130. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12682
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
209
Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. W. (2012). Educational Research Competencies for
Analysis and Applications (10th (ed.)). Pearson.
George, D., & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and
reference. 11.0 update (4th ed,). Allyn & Bacon.
Goodwin, A., Lipsky, M., & Ahn, S. (2012). Word Detectives: Using Units of Meaning to
Support Literacy. The Reading Teacher, 65(7), 461–470.
https://doi.org/10.1002/TRTR.01069
Ha, H. T. (2021). Exploring the relationships between various dimensions of receptive
vocabulary knowledge and L2 listening and reading comprehension. Language
Testing in Asia, 11(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1186/S40468-021-00131-
8/TABLES/8
Hajebi, M., Taheri, S., Fahandezh, F., & Salari, H. (2018). The Role of Web-based
Language Teaching on Vocabulary Retention of Adult Pre-intermediate EFL
Learners. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 9(2), 372.
https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0902.20
Hariyadi, A., & Yanti, D. R. (2019). The Importance Of Needs Analysis In Materials
Development. Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan (JIPP), 4(2), 94–99.
http://jipp.unram.ac.id/index.php/jipp/article/view/88
Harji, M. B., Balakrishnan, K., Bhar, S. K., & Letchumanan, K. (2015). Vocabulary Levels
and Size of Malaysian Undergraduates. English Language Teaching, 8(9).
https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v8n9p119
Hashemzadeh, M. (2012). The Effect of Exercise Types on EFL Learners’ Vocabulary
Retention. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(8), 1716–1727.
https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.2.8.1716-1727
Hiew, W. (2012). English Language Teaching and Learning Issues in Malaysia: Learners’
Perceptions Via Facebook Dialogue Journal. Journal of Arts, Science & Commerce,
3(1), 11–19. http://surl.li/gijcp
Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A. (1987). English for Specific Purposes. Cambridge University
Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511733031
Ibrahim, E. H. E., Sarudin, I., & Muhamad, A. J. (2016). The relationship between
vocabulary size and reading comprehension of ESL learners. English Language
Teaching. English Language Teaching, 9(2), 116–123.
https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n2p116
Ibrahim, H. H. (2020). Needs Analysis as a Prerequisite for Designing an ESP Course for
Medical Students. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 10, 83–103.
https://doi.org/10.4236/ojml.2020.102006
Kakerissa, W. M., & Lengkanawati, N. S. (2022). Students’ Needs Analysis in Learning
General English. A Case at A German Education Study Program. Sixth International
Conference on Language, Literature, Culture, and Education (ICOLLITE 2022), 631–636.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-494069-91-6_97
Karnine, S. M. B. B. V. K. S. V., Preece, A. S. D., Ahmad, I. B. S., & Muhammad, S. S. B.
(2022). A Study on Difficulties Encountered and Perception by English as Second
Language (ESL) Learners in Malaysian University Examination Test (MUET).
Proceedings, 82, 53. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2022082053
Kaur, N. (2013). A Case Study Of Tertiary Learners’ Capability In Lexical Knowledge.
GEMA OnlineTM Journal of Language Studies, 113(1).
https://ejournal.ukm.my/gema/article/view/2227
Kaur, N. (2020). Metacognitive Awareness In Lexical Learning Among Malaysian
Students. International Journal of English Language and Literature Studies, 9(3), 161–
171. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.23.2020.93.161.171
Knežević, L., Županec, V., & Radulović, B. (2020). Flipping the Classroom to Enhance
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
210
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
211
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
212
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
213
Appendix 1
I am Farah Amirah Fisal, a PhD student (TESL) from the Faculty of Education, UKM. I
am conducting a study to design, develop and evaluate a web-based learning resource
(WBLR) for English academic vocabulary learning among ESL pre-university learners.
Your participation is anonymous and voluntary. It is hoped that you will be able to
respond with sincere answers. This survey may take at most 10 minutes to complete.
Thank you.
1. Gender:
Male
Female
2. Age:
18 years old
19 years old
20 years old
Others: _____________
A+
A-
B+
C+
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
214
1 2 3 4 5
Strong Disagree (D) Neutral (N) Agree (A) Strongly
Disagree (SD) Agree (SA)
SD D N A SA
1. English academic vocabulary is useful for me to 1 2 3 4 5
understand academic texts.
2. English academic vocabulary is useful for me to 1 2 3 4 5
improve the quality of my academic writing.
3. English academic vocabulary is useful for me to 1 2 3 4 5
listen to class instructions better.
4. English academic vocabulary is useful for me to 1 2 3 4 5
participate in formal class debates and
presentations.
5. English academic vocabulary is useful for me to 1 2 3 4 5
help me get good grades.
6. English academic vocabulary is useful for me to 1 2 3 4 5
improve my English language proficiency for
future job purposes.
7. How much practice in the academic vocabulary do you expect to get? Please circle
your answer.
1 2 3 4 5
None Very minimum Minimum Moderate Extensive
SECTION 1: This section focuses on your language learning experience in the classroom
about academic vocabulary knowledge. Please circle your level of frequency towards the
statements based on the scale:
1 2 3 4 5
Never (N) Rarely (R) Sometimes (S) Often (O) Very Often
(VO)
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
215
1 2 3 4 5
Strong Disagree (D) Neutral (N) Agree (A) Strongly
Disagree (SD) Agree (SA)
1 2 3 4 5
Strongly Disagree (D) Neutral (N) Agree (A) Strongly
Disagree (SD) Agree (SA)
SD D N A SA
Preference
1. I prefer studying academic vocabulary on a web 1 2 3 4 5
platform than from books.
2. I prefer doing web-based exercises than on paper 1 2 3 4 5
exercises.
3. I prefer to carry smartphones and laptops rather 1 2 3 4 5
than books to the classroom.
4. I feel more motivated to learn academic 1 2 3 4 5
vocabulary on a web platform than from books.
Technology Access
5. I have access to electronic devices (e.g. computer, 1 2 3 4 5
laptop, netbook, tablet, smartphone, home PC,
etc.).
6. I have internet access on my electronic devices. 1 2 3 4 5
7. I am allowed to carry electronic devices to the 1 2 3 4 5
classroom.
8. My learning institution has Wi-Fi accessible to 1 2 3 4 5
students.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
216
Online Skills
9. I have the basic skills to operate a computer. 1 2 3 4 5
10. I have the knowledge to look for information on 1 2 3 4 5
the internet.
11. I am comfortable when using a computer several 1 2 3 4 5
times a week to participate in a learning activity.
12. I have experience in using electronic devices with 1 2 3 4 5
internet for language-learning purposes.
Future Use
13. If there is a web-based learning resource to learn 1 2 3 4 5
academic vocabulary, I will use it.
14. I want to be able to learn the academic vocabulary 1 2 3 4 5
at any time and anywhere.
1 2 3 4 5
Least Preferable Slightly Moderately Prefer (P) Most
(LP) Preferable (SP) Prefer (Mp) Preferable
(MP)
LP SP MP P MP
Vocabulary Learning Input
1. Academic word list 1 2 3 4 5
2. Definition of word 1 2 3 4 5
3. Spelling 1 2 3 4 5
4. Pronunciation 1 2 3 4 5
5. Sample sentences
Types of Vocabulary Learning Exercises
6. Multiple choice 1 2 3 4 5
7. Matching words to definitions 1 2 3 4 5
8. Word building 1 2 3 4 5
9. Synonym & antonym 1 2 3 4 5
10. Fill-in-the-blanks 1 2 3 4 5
11. Crossword puzzle 1 2 3 4 5
12. Vocabulary memorisation games 1 2 3 4 5
13. Quiz 1 2 3 4 5
Type of Media
14. Text 1 2 3 4 5
15. Image 1 2 3 4 5
16. Audio 1 2 3 4 5
17. Video 1 2 3 4 5
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
217
Teresa Thai
University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
1. Introduction
Australian classrooms have become increasingly diversified with the arrival of
students from Middle Eastern and African refugee backgrounds over the past
couple of decades (Hattam, 2018; Earnest et al., 2010). The education system is one
of the first institutions they encounter upon settlement and yet universities have
been slow in developing support for the specific needs of students from refugee
backgrounds (SfRBs) (Joyce et al., 2010; Lenette, 2016; Ramsey & Baker 2019) or to
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
218
improve their retention and transition to higher education studies (Kong et al.,
2016; Molla, 2022).
Research on SfRBs in higher education is relatively scarce (Baker and Irwin, 2021),
revealing significant gaps in knowledge about the experiences of this cohort of
students at university and even less is known about SfRBs in university pathway
programs. The emerging studies about SfRBs’ experiences at university find that
- despite aspiring to obtain university qualifications (Lenette, Brough, & Cox,
2013; Clark and Lenette, 2020; Naidoo, 2021) - many SfRBs face considerable
challenges in higher education. Given the significant gaps in knowledge about
this cohort of students in enabling pathway programs, it will be paramount to
investigate student experiences at university by focusing on the following:
• Factors that influence SfRBs to enrol and attend university pathways
programs?
• What are the challenges that SfRBs experience at university?
• How SfRBs experience UniSA College in academic and social terms?
• SfRBs’ perspectives on culturally competent social and academic support
activities that UniSA College can provide to enrich their university
experience?
Resonant with previous research, the data in this paper highlight students’
experiences that reflect ‘institutional, pedagogical, linguistic and cultural
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
219
2. Method
This project was carried out in the form of a pilot study aiming to better support
transition and success of SfRBs at universities. The study was conducted in UniSA
College. Permission to conduct the research was obtained from the University
Ethics Committee prior to starting this project.
The approach adopted was mixed method whereby the quantitative approach
incorporated a student survey while the qualitative approach included focus
group and individual interviews with PSOs. The quantitative part of the project
involved a consultative approach by surveying 59 Humanitarian Visa students
studying at the UniSA College. The purpose of the survey was to identify
concerns and issues this cohort of students experiences as well as matters
pertaining to their engagement, academic integration and learning needs. This
student-led approach then informed the specific project focus and helped to
identify discrepancies in support services for students from refugees
backgrounds. Student voices were consulted in an attempt to involve students as
participants as well as stakeholders. As Halilovich (2013) argues, research with
refugees must ‘take a more pro-active role in speaking along with, not on behalf
of, those they research’ (p. 132).
After the survey, students were invited to be part of the focus group. The informal
focus group was attended by 10 SfRBs. These students were recruited from an
email call-out for participants and through staff networks with students. In the
focus group the participants discussed the following themes: the moments they
were most proud of; the challenges they face; the careers and goals they were
aspiring to have; and their own recommendations for the university on how to
best support SfRBs.
Thematic analysis of all the data was undertaken using the process promoted by
Braun and Clarke (2006; 2021). This process enables the researchers to identify the
themes that emerge from such research. In order to analyse the data, we
transcribed the data from the survey1, the focus group as well as from the
1
While the survey was grounded in quantitative research methods, some questions about student motivations,
caring commitments, challenges and study supports they require at university, included open-ended questions.
Subsequently, the students’ responses to these were thematically analysed.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
220
individual interviews with PSOs. Given that ‘researcher subjectivity is bias’ and
therefore a ‘potential threat to coding reliability’ (Braun & Clarke, 2021, p. 39),
each researcher read the transcripts and ascribed codes for central meaning-based
concepts, which were then combined into categories revealing the final themes.
We also reconvened with the PSOs to discuss our reading of the data from the
interviews for them to validate and cross-reference. The participants in the focus
group and in the survey were offered to have the findings sent to them for cross-
referencing, but none opted for this suggestion. The last stage of data analysis was
defining and interpreting themes (Braun & Clarke, 2006), using the links between
research objectives and key themes in order to provide explanations. These
themes are presented in the ‘Findings and Discussion’ section.
2.1 Participants
The students participating in the survey included 59 Permanent Humanitarian
Visa students enrolled in 2019 at UniSA College’s pathway programs. The student
data is included in the table below. A total of 16 students participated in the
survey. Their responses were anonymous. The data was also collected from an
informal focus group attended by 10 students. The participants were from
Afghanistan, Pakistan, Somalia, Iran and Iraq. Additional participants were the
two PSOs working with SfRBs at the College. PSOs are previous College students
aged 19-25 who were eligible for the position. One is a female student from
Afghanistan, and the other is a male from Liberia.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
221
traditional pathways (Hattam & Weiler, 2021). Enabling programs are different to
credit-bearing undergraduate programs in two ways: (1) there are minimal entry
requirements; and (2) they are Commonwealth supported so there is no tuition
fees requirement.
Given the nature of the open-access programs, the student cohorts entering
university via enabling programs are very diverse. This includes a large
percentage of students from equity groups, many who are first-in-family at
university and with no prior knowledge or experience of tertiary education. Over
1000 students now study at the College and students from low socio-economic-
status (SES) backgrounds constitute half of the College student population
(Hattam and Weiler, 2021). Similarly, English as an Additional Language or
Dialect (EALD) students comprise one fifth of the College enrolments (Stokes,
2014), and anecdotally most are SfRBs. 2
The results from the student survey resonate with the above discussions. With
regards to main motivations and aspirations to study at university, most
participants commented that one of the main reasons they are at university is ‘to
improve English’. As Figure 1 below indicates, the participants also specified that
they choose to study at university because they ‘want to get a job in their chosen
career’ as well as ‘to create more opportunities’ for themselves. The majority also
responded that additional motivating factors to study are to ‘build social
2 Self-identification of the refugee status is compounded with stigma. Given this and the perceived lack of
services for SfRBs at the University, many students choose to not identify with the ‘refugee label’. Some of the
reasons for this include stigma associated with the ‘refugee’ label as well as the perceived lack of services for
SfRBs at the University (Fagan et al., 2018). Furthermore, by coming to university, the displaced youth also
associate with a new sense of belonging: unlike the identity of ‘refugee’, which is ‘heavy with loss’, the identity
of ‘student’ is positive, it is ‘hopeful with possibility’ (Ferede, 2018, p. 8; as cited in Molla, 2022, p. 482).
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
222
networks and meet new people’. Some have added that they are also at university
‘for their family’ and ‘to give back to the community’.
Many participants have also commented that they study because they want to
develop their talent and creativity, but they are also enrolled to study out of
‘interest’. Education pathways offer opportunities for SfRBs to rebuild their lives
in a new society. As Baker et al. (2020) highlight, a significant challenge is the need
to ‘make up’ for lost time. In their research, participants were eager to make good
use of their time, and they communicated being hopeful that their participation in
higher education (HE) would lead to significant improvements in their lives
(Baker et al. 2020). Furthermore, as highlighted in Figure 2, ‘status’ and ‘respect’
are considered key features of achievement for SfRBs and their families, with
education and career prospects as the process required to achieve this (Walker et
al., 2005; King and Owens, 2018). SfRBs’ resettlement journey is strongly founded
in this sense of purpose and determination.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
223
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
224
Question 17
Other. Please specify
5% Limited English
I have trouble asking language skills
for help 18%
11%
Limited social
networks e.g. I fear I
may struggle making
I don’t know much new friends in a new
about university environment and
support services e.g. culture
what they are or 5%
where to find them
11%
Navigating university
and academic culture
10%
Meeting family
expectations to
succeed at university Learning about
5% Australian culture
5%
Lack of material and
financial resources Managing my
and pressure to timetable e.g. feeling
financially support overwhelmed with
family members study, family, work
11% and other
My motivation levels e.g. I’m unsure
about whether I want to be at commitments
11%
3
At UniSA College we have created Peer Assisted Study Support (PASS) sessions which students utilise regularly and
receive peer assisted support with their academic writing and referencing.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
225
know meeting new people, social gathering, you know, to start off the
conversation with different people is difficult.
Peer Support Officer 1: Yes, and also they fear that, you know, others
may not understand what they say and that's probably based on their
previous experiences
Yeah, it’s like that too in places like (where they have a) major
responsibility (examples of these places included state-based
institutions like hospitals or courts).
In particular, PSOs highlighted that students expressed fearing that ‘others may
not understand what they are saying’ and this, in turn, may undermine their
confidence when writing assignments or speaking in class. Furthermore, the
survey participants expressed that despite arriving in Australia 5 or 6 years ago
and completing some secondary education in Australia, they would still list
‘limited English language skills’ as one of the main challenges they face. For
example, one male participant arrived in 2014 from Burundi and another female
participant who arrived from Afghanistan in 2013, despite completing some
secondary education in Australia, they still listed having ‘limited English
language skills’ as one of the main challenges they deal with. This is, in part,
because many SfRBs are not familiar with Western concepts of schooling and
discipline, and due to their frequent clustering together as a homogenous group,
this results in creating stress for themselves and the specific schools and areas
(Fagan et al., 2018).4 Furthermore, for SfRBs who are new to the Australian
education system, this is compounded with the effort needed to decipher the
hidden curriculum of academia.
In the survey, students also outlined that they struggle with ‘managing the
timetable, feeling overwhelmed with study, family and work’. These themes will
be addressed separately. This, together with ‘navigating university and academic
culture’ and ‘not knowing much about university support services’ were
identified as some of the most pressing challenges.
4
Fagan et al. (2018) outline the language and literacy needs of SfRBs are lacking adequate support systems in schools. This
is because standard English as an Additional Language/ Dialect (EAL/D) approaches do not address former disrupted
schooling and the literacy instruction necessary for meaningful participation.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
226
In terms of the challenges of navigating university, the PSOs also commented that
some students did not know how to navigate university in that they: ‘weren’t really
aware of the structure (of the university) and I think it links back to not knowing which
services were available’ (PSO A, 2019). They also mentioned the students reported
‘not understanding the assignments properly’ and that they would complain
about ‘receiving late submission penalty due to other commitments they had’.
5
Orientation and Starting Strong are introductory orientation events that are run at the start of every Study Period at UniSA.
While Orientation is a UniSA-wide event for students, the Starting Strong program is an orientation session specifically for
UniSA College students. In the Starting Strong session we provide preparatory information about university, introduce the
students to the teaching staff. We also include segments on academic conventions like paraphrasing, summarising and
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
227
they see somebody that is from a similar background and they go and sit
next to them and try and get involved.
This is echoed in the findings from the focus group discussions. One participant
asserted that she struggled because this was the ‘first time she attended Uni’ and
she felt ‘nobody wanted to talk to her’ (Student focus group, 2019). Similarly,
respondents from the Curtin University study reported that the lack of
socialisation and stigma impacts on SfRBs feeling socially isolated at university
(Fagan et al., 2018). As Fagan et al. (2018, p. 8) highlight, SfRBs have ‘a unique
habitus (ways of being and doing) that are shaped by the shame and
embarrassment they feel as a result of their refugee status, and by the negative
public and policy discourses around refugee and asylum seekers’. Another
significant challenge that compounds the experience of social exclusion is racism.
Many SfRBs report the ongoing incidents of racism (Watkins, Noble and Wong,
2018) and racism hugely affects their capacity to ‘fit in’ (Yak, 2016). In the
education environment, being treated as the 'other' when starting university is
often conveyed by African and Muslim students (Lawson, 2014). Similar
circumstances were reported by Onsando and Billett (2009) in their examination
of African refugee students' experiences of learning at Australian Technical and
Further Education (TAFE) institutions. Their findings highlight that, despite being
in a safe environment, the students still encounter racism and social exclusion.
Racism was also identified by PSOs in our research:
Another challenge is racism. Yes it is not, explicit, like for example, one of
the students, she was in the tutorial, you know, everyone is speaking but
when it was her turn to speak, she was cut short. Or maybe it was time
for her to contribute yet she didn't say what she wanted to say and they
just moved on (PSO A, 2019).
This was echoed in the focus group discussions too. One of the participants in the
focus group outlined that she finished the first semester ‘with no new friends’,
and she felt people were actively avoiding her and felt that the ‘Muslims are
terrorists-stereotypes’ which affected her social life (Focus group discussions,
2019). These testimonials attest that once they arrive, SfRBs do not slot neatly into
the multicultural diversity of the Australian landscape. Rather the figure of the
‘refugee’ is delivered into ‘pre-existing racialised discourse, and contemporary
power/knowledge regimes that circulate and establish disparaging and
contradictory representations’ (Matthews, 2008., p. 42). As McWilliams and Bonet
(2016, p. 167) argue, this is particularly cruel for people from refugee backgrounds
who have often escaped conflicts that are ‘painfully visible’, as they are also
entering economic/ideological conflicts that are ‘actually more pernicious as
refugee youth and families come to understand that [educational institutions] that
allegedly promise hope, are not what they seem’.
referencing as well as demonstrating academic integrity. In these events students are also introduced to university-wide
services including counselling, the learning advisors and the career services.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
228
Family responsibilities also feature strongly in other literature (Fagan et al., 2018;
King and Owens, 2018; Baker et al., 2020). In Fagan et al.’s (2018) report they
outlined that family responsibilities are often tied to cultural expectations. This
may include an expectation to financially support the family overseas, and to care
for children without relying on formal child-care, which all impacts on study time
– a similar situation is reported in our study, as well.
Although many university students work while studying, for SfRBs, having a job
is vital as the income is then used to support their immediate family. In our
survey, some reported the ‘lack of material and financial resources’ and they
highlighted feeling ‘pressured to financially support family members’. Similarly,
all three projects in Fagan et al.’s (2018, p. 22) report also highlighted the
responsibility to financially support family in Australia and family back home can
constrain student engagement and participation at university (see also Harris &
Marlowe, 2011; Lawson, 2014). As one of the PSOs in our study explained:
The challenge I think is the work and study balance. Some of them are
working very hard. Yes, then coming to school, you know the next day
and they are tired. Some of them have siblings and they have to balance it
all. And they look for jobs to provide support for their studies and also for
their families as well. Some of them are trying to get a job in the
disabilities and aged care (PSO A, 2020).
PSOs also commented that some of the students have also asked about ‘help with
paying their fees’ and others have opened up about ‘commitments between work,
university and family’:
Some of them were able to open up about family situations, you know,
avoiding having to face back home and in uni. Yes, some of them were
having to do with work and study and some of them didn't have a job and
needed to work, (they were wondering) where to get support, some of them
you know, they had the issue of how to interpret the documents to parents
when they go home, or whatever they learned at Uni, they had to interpret
that to their parents (PSO A, 2020).
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
229
For SfRBs the difficulties of navigating complex university terrain are deepened
with challenges of balancing work, study and attending to family responsibilities
and settlement obligations.
Workshops for
developing
grammatical
knowledge, sentence
structure, vocabulary,
punctuation etc.
Math and numeracy 10%
support workshops
5%
Workshops focusing
on academic literacy
Interpreting and skills: Paraphrasing,
understanding how to Summarising, Reading
write short answer Strategies,
questions for science Referencing etc.
courses Peer Assisted Study Sessions 21%
12%
Figure 4. The study support services students feel they need at University
Source: UniSA College
These student selections are in line with findings from existing research (Fagan et
al., 2018; Naidoo et al., 2015; Earnest et al., 2010). For instance, the data from Curtin
University (Fagan et al., 2018) highlight that, for some students, academic
literacies like referencing and essay writing were new concepts for them.
Furthermore, participants in the Curtin University and Macquarie University
studies also reported a preference for additional assistance with checking and
correcting their assignments. Similarly, in our research PSOs reported that a
common challenge students experience is not knowing where to access university
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
230
resources like the enrolment help, counselling services, as well as online resources
such as Studiosity, or Study Help-Pals. The only online resources students knew
how to access was the library site.6
The PSOs also outlined that most students are not aware of the student learning
support services that are available through Uni-Mentors and PASS programs at
UniSA College.7 Instead, PSOs found that students get most of their learning
support through drafting work and meeting the lecturers during consultation
hours. Apart from needing help with ‘navigating the university’, participants also
reported needing assistance with ‘seeking employment and resumé writing’, ‘help
with Centrelink’ and ‘help with visa and citizenship protocols’. This highlights
that for SfRBs navigating complex university terrain is exacerbated with
challenges of seeking employment or government assistance as well as needing
assistance with the complex process embedded in seeking visa renewal or
citizenship (see Figure 5).
6
Library and research skills are taught at one of our core courses called University Studies. In this course students are taught
academic literacies as well as how to reference and conduct a literature review.
7
At UniSA College we also have Uni-Mentor program where previous College students mentor new students
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
231
students (see Figure 6). This warranted an employment of the two PSOs. The role
of the PSOs, in their words is, ‘to have a face-to-face interaction with new students
from refugee backgrounds, direct them to different services and just be there, you
know, as their …as someone that they can talk to and someone they can trust that
whatever they say…(they) can be an advocate on (their) behalf’ (PSO A, 2020).
Since the establishment of their roles at UniSA College, PSOs report that they see
about five or six students per week during the Study Period and that some of them
need ‘mainly a direction to learning support sentences. They might be working on an
assignment, yet don’t know where to go for help. Because most of the time the only place
they know is the consultation hours for the lecturers but they don’t know about PASS
(peer assisted study support) (PSO A).
During the interviews PSOs outlined how significant these peer-led approaches
were for the students:
Peer Support Officer A: Yes some of them, they feel happy, when they
go to the common room with an assignment and they look right and look
left and see the lecturer and they see they are busy and then they see us
come to them and we start a conversation and they feel happy, especially
those that are refugee backgrounds, similar to see they feel more like they
can relate.
Interviewer: Did the students ask you about your own experiences
at university?
Peer Support Officer A: Yes, they want, they ask you like ‘how did you
go with this assignment, what did you do? That’s how I start to direct
them to the different services. So I tell them if you go to the Uni mentors
they will help you with this.
And one of them, at another consultation time one of them came back and
he was like, thank you for directing me to like the PASS, all along I’ve
going to the Study help Pals or Uni Mentors but not really getting the
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
232
extra help. After receiving the PASS (advice) they were really happy that
yes, he helped him with that.
Addressing emotional needs was also highlighted by the other PSO when she
outlined a recommendation for ‘working with different areas of the College to
embed different strategies and support for the emotional needs of SfRBs’.
The help-seeking behaviours of SfRBs are shaped by the cultural norms and
attitudes (Pastoor, 2015) and this makes it challenging for participants to disclose
mental health issues or try to find treatment for these (Jack et al., 2019). Student-
participants in Fagan et al.’s (2018) study highlighted their availability to talk
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
233
about mental health is hindered by the stigma associated with mental health in
their cultural groups. Yet trauma and traumatic personal histories (death of family
members, loss of home and personal property, displacement, physical violence
(King & Owens, 2018) can significantly affect one’s ability to adjust, concentrate
and achieve academically (Grant & Francis, 2011). Overcoming trauma
accompanied with the competing settlement-related priorities and acculturation
make it very difficult for SfRBs to focus entirely on their studies.
When PSOs were asked about how to best support SfRBs, their recommendation
is to form a social platform which includes the student voice:
Peer Support Officer B: It is important to continue creating a social
platform where students can express their views on different aspects of
learning, challenges they are facing and how it is affecting the emotions
and well-being. Setting a safe and vulnerable environment for these
students to express their emotional needs will be essential to the
institution in providing services to cater for those needs (PSO B).
Addressing the emotional needs of SfRBs was also outlined by the PSOs:
Peer Support Officer B: For example: The counselling service, tutors
and other learning support services can run workshops, focus group and
different events with students from refugee backgrounds. All these
emotional needs that will be mentioned during the social gathering events
can be discussed with people in different roles of support services. This
discussion can be focused on how to cater for these emotional needs of
students (PSO B).
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
234
and as ‘funds of knowledge’ (Moll et al., 1992) and being culturally responsive in
multicultural schools (Nieto, 2013; Phillippo, 2012; Toldson & Lemmons, 2013). In
the Australian context, culturally responsive pedagogies (CRPs) ‘refer to those
pedagogies that actively value, and mobilise as resources, the cultural repertoires
and intelligences that students bring to the learning relationship’ (Morrison et al.,
2019, p. v). Particularly relevant is Rigney and Hattam’s (2018) thesis: toward an
Australian culturally responsive pedagogy which they utilise for improving
education outcomes for Indigenous students. In their more recent work, Morrison
et al. (2019, p. v) argue that given ‘the current conditions of super-diversity in
Australian classrooms, culturally responsive pedagogy offers a hopeful approach
to improving the educational experiences of all students’. Together, the existing
work on Culturally Responsive Practices (CRP) illuminate that in order to
promote student engagement and learning, we must endorse students’ cultural
differences as an asset to be encouraged by schools, rather than as a challenge that
needs to be managed (Bottiani et al., 2018).
With regard to the staff support and training needs, the project has resulted in
some incentives which enhance staff knowledge (both academic and professional
staff) of SfRBs’ requirements. This culturally responsive approach is reflected in
the tutor training sessions which include modules educating the staff about SfRBs
at UniSA College. These modules consist of professional development workshops
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
235
for staff to deconstruct the tacit presumptions and stereotypes about SfRBs, and
to highlight the aspirations and assets that SfRBs convey in the classroom.
Since this research was a pilot study, its scope was limited. Nevertheless, this
article contributes to the much-needed body of knowledge on the experiences of
SfRBs in university pathway programs. As noted previously, research on this
cohort of students is still emerging. This study resonates with the findings
highlighted in current literature on SfRBs and reiterates that universities need to
go ‘beyond literacy supports and involve changing the campus ethos to one of
inter-culturality and socioeconomic inclusivity’ (Naidoo, 2021, p. 193). Future
research addressing in more detail how and where CRPs are applied to create
more inclusive university environments for SfRBs, as well as investigating how
CRPs are experienced by SfRBs would be of both benefit to SfRBs and universities
in Australia.
6. Conclusion
This paper reported on the UniSA College project which aimed to build the
capacities of SfRBs which they will need in order to succeed in higher education.
This paper explored the aspirations as well as challenges that SfRBs experience in
order to assist with their needs, aspirations and education dreams. The data from
the focus group, the survey and the PSOs interviews highlight that higher
education plays a central role in the lives of SfRBs. Universities are uniquely
placed to provide SfRBs with transformative education prospects that help with
the realisation of their individual hopes and ambitions. For successful
engagement of SfRBs, education institutions need an all-encompassing approach
consisting of culturally responsive efforts, and peer-led supports for students.
7. References
Ager, A., & Strang, A. (2008). Understanding integration: A conceptual framework. Journal
of Refugee Studies, 21(2), 166–191. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/fen016
Baker, S. and Irwin, E. (2021). Disrupting the dominance of ‘linear pathways’: how
institutional assumptions create ‘stuck places’ for refugee students’ transitions
into higher education. Research Papers in Education, 36(1), 75-95.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2019.1633561
Baker, S., Irwin E., & Freeman H. (2020). Wasted, manipulated and compressed time: adult
refugee students’ experiences of transitioning into Australian higher education.
Journal of Further and Higher Education, 44(4), 528-541.
https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2019.1586849
Baker, S., Irwin, E., Freeman, H., Nance, S. & Coleman, J. (2018). Building cultural and
linguistic bridges: Reflections on a program designed to support adult students
from refugee backgrounds’ transitions into university. Journal of Academic
Language and Learning, 12(1), A64-A80.
https://journal.aall.org.au/index.php/jall/article/view/521
Ben Moshe, D., Bertone, S. & Grossman, M. (2008). Refugee Access and participation in
Tertiary Education and Training. Melbourne, Institute for Community, Ethnicity
and Policy. Victoria University. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/30687021.pdf
Bottiani, J.H., Larson, K.E., Debnam, K.J., Bischoff, C.M. and Bradshaw, C.P. (2018).
Promoting educators’ use of culturally responsive practices: A systematic review
of inservice interventions. Journal of Teacher Education, 69(4), 367-385.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487117722553
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
236
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Can I use TA? Should I use TA? Should I not use TA?
Comparing reflexive thematic analysis and other pattern‐based qualitative
analytic approaches. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 21(1), 37-47.
https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.12360
Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research
in Psychology, 3, 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Clark, C., & Lenette, C. (2020). Enabling pathways for students from refugee and asylum-
seeker backgrounds in higher education: Aspirations about progression to
postgraduate studies. Refugee survey quarterly, 39(2), 244-271.
https://doi.org/10.1093/rsq/hdaa001
Earnest, J., Joyce, A., de Mori, G., & Silvagni, G. (2010). Are universities responding to the
needs of students from refugee backgrounds? Australian Journal of Education, 54(2),
155–174. https://doi.org/10.1177/000494411005400204
Fagan, S., Baker, E., Irwin, J., Dantas, S., Gower, S. Singh, S. & Taiwo, M. (2018).
(Re)Claiming Social Capital: Improving Language and Cultural Pathways for Students
from Refugee Backgrounds into Australian Higher Education, University of Newcastle.
https://ltr.edu.au/resources/ID15-4758_Fagan_FinalReport_2018.pdf
Grant, J., & Francis, S. (2011). School’s in for refugees: A whole-school approach to
supporting students of refugee background (2nd ed.). Brunswick, Australia:
Victorian Foundation for Survivors of Torture Inc.
http://www.foundationhouse.org.au/wp-
content/uploads/2016/11/Schools_In_for_Refugees_2nd_Edn_Update_Chap1-
11_2016.pdf
Halilovich, H. (2013). Ethical approaches in research with refugees and asylum seekers
using participatory action research. In K. Block, E. Riggs & N. Haslam (eds.),
Values and vulnerabilities: The ethics of research with refugees and asylum seekers (pp.
127 -150). Toowong: Australian Academic Press.
Harris, V. & Marlowe, J. (2011). Hard yards and high hopes: The educational challenges
of African refugee university students in Australia. International Journal of Teaching
and Learning in Higher Education, 239(3), 186–196.
https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ946144.pdf
Hattam, R. (2018). Diversity, global citizenship and the culturally responsive school. In I.
Davies, L-C. Ho, D. Kiwan, C.L. Peck, A. Peterson, E. Sant & Y. Waghid (eds.), The
Palgrave handbook of global citizenship and education (pp. 257-275). London: Palgrave
Macmillan.
Hattam, S.K. & Weiler, T. (2021). ‘Every single student counts’: leadership of professional
development underpinned by social justice for sessional staff in a South
Australian university. Professional Development in Education, 47(1), 128-140.
https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2020.1814388
Jack, O., Chase, E. & Warwick, I. (2019). Higher education as a space for promoting the
psychosocial well-being of refugee students. Health Education Journal, 78(1), 51-66.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0017896918792588
Joyce, A., Earnest, J., de Mori, G., & Silvagni, G. (2010). The experiences of students from
refugee backgrounds at universities in Australia: Reflections on the social,
emotional, and practical challenges. Journal of Refugee Studies, 23(1), 82–97.
https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/feq001
King, S.M. & Owens, L. (2018). Great Expectations: African Youth from Refugee
Backgrounds and the Transition to University. In C.I. Agosti & E. Bernat (eds.),
University Pathway Programs: Local Responses within a Growing Global Trend (pp. 67-
84). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-
319-72505-5
Kong, E., Harmsworth, S., Rajaeian, M.M., Parkes, G., Bishop, S., AlMansouri, B. and
Lawrence, J. (2016). University Transition Challenges for First Year Domestic
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
237
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
238
https://www.academia.edu/575912/African_students_from_refugee_backgrou
nds_in_Australian_TAFE_institutes_A_case_for_transformative_learning_goals_
and_processes
Pastoor L.D.W. (2015). The mediational role of schools in supporting psychosocial
transitions among unaccompanied young refugees upon resettlement in Norway.
International Journal of Educational Development, 41, 245–254.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2014.10.009
Phillippo, K. (2012). “You’re trying to know me”: Students from nondominant groups
respond to teacher personalism. The Urban Review, 44, 441-467.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-011-0195-9
Ramsey, G. and Baker, S. (2019). Higher education and students from refugee
backgrounds: A meta-scoping study. Refugee Survey Quarterly, 38(1), 55-82.
https://doi.org/10.1093/rsq/hdy018
Rigney, L., & Hattam, R. (2018). Toward a decolonizing Australian culturally responsive
pedagogy. In American Education Research Association Annual Meeting. New York.
https://www.unisa.edu.au/siteassets/episerver-6-
files/global/eass/cite/keynote-address-1-rigney_hattam.pdf
Silburn, J., Earnest, J., Butcher, L., & de Mori, G. (2010). Learning interactively for
engagement (LiFE)— Meeting the pedagogical needs of students from refugee
backgrounds. Refereed report prepared for the Australian Teaching and Learning
Council, Canberra, Australia. https://ltr.edu.au/resources/CG7-
496_Murdoch_Silburn_Final_Report_2010_0.pdf
Stokes, J. (2014). New Students and Enabling Pedagogies: Supporting Students from
Diverse Backgrounds through a University Enabling Program. The International
Journal of Diversity in Education, 13(2), 115-124. https://doi.org/10.18848/2327-
0020/CGP/v13i02/40096
Toldson, I. A., & Lemmons, B. P. (2013). Social demographics, the school environment,
and parenting practices associated with parents’ participation in schools and
academic success among Black, Hispanic, and White students. Journal of Human
Behavior in the Social Environment, 23, 237-255.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10911359.2013.747407
Vickers, M. McCarthy, F. & Zammit, K. (2017). ‘Peer mentoring and intercultural
understanding: Support for refugee-background and immigrant students
beginning university study’, International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 60, 198–
209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2017.04.015
Walker, I., Tilbury, F., Volet, S., Tungaraza, C., & Hastie, B. (2005). Pathways to
apprenticeships and traineeships for people from culturally and linguistically
diverse backgrounds. Perth: Western Australian Department of Education and
Training. https://researchrepository.murdoch.edu.au/id/eprint/8393/
Watkins, M., Noble, G. and Wong, A. (2019). It's Complex! Working with students of
refugee backgrounds and their families in New South Wales Public Schools.
Report.
https://researchdirect.westernsydney.edu.au/islandora/object/uws:50609
Yak, G. (2016). Educational barriers facing South Sudanese Refugees in Australia, Refugee
Communities Advocacy Network Conference, Melbourne, 28 May 2016.
https://www.refugeecouncil.org.au/educational-barriers-facing-south-
sudanese-refugees-australia/
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
239
Appendix A
9. a) Do you work?
9. b) If yes, how many hours per week do you work?
- 0-4 hours
- 4-8 hours
- 8-12 hours
- 12-20 hours
- 20+ hours
10. Do you receive Centrelink assistance?
11. Do you pay for your accommodation?
12. Do you care for people, i.e. children, parents, siblings, other family
members?
13. Do you have any other commitments not including work e.g. sporting clubs,
cultural/religious commitments, other hobbies or volunteering roles? If yes,
please specify.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
240
13. a) On average, how many hours per week do you spend caring for family or
other commitments such as sport, hobbies, etc.)
0-1 hour
1-2 hours
2-5 hours
5 + hours
14. What are some challenges that face while studying at the College? Mark
those that are most applicable to you.
Limited English language skills
Limited social networks, e.g. I fear I may struggle making new friends in
a new environment and culture
Navigating university and academic culture
Learning about Australian culture
Managing my timetable, e.g. feeling overwhelmed with study, family,
work and other commitments
My motivation levels, e.g. I’m unsure about whether I want to be at
university.
Lack of material and financial resources and pressure to financially
support family members
Meeting family expectations to succeed at university
I don’t know much about university support services, e.g. what they are
or where to find them
I have trouble asking for help
14. b) Are there any other challenges that worry you? Please specify.
15. What study support services do you feel you need at the College?
Workshops for developing conversational English language skills
Workshops for developing grammatical knowledge, sentence
structure, vocabulary, punctuation, etc.
Workshops focusing on academic literacy skills: Paraphrasing,
Summarising, Reading Strategies, Referencing, etc.
Peer Assisted Study Sessions
Interpreting and understanding how to write short answer
questions for science courses
Math and numeracy support workshops
Research skill workshops
Essay writing workshops
I don’t know what services I need
16. What other support services do you feel you need at the College?
Help with seeking employment and resumé writing
Help with seeking accommodation
Help with Centrelink
Help and Guidance with Visa and citizenship protocols
Help with navigating university and studying
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
241
16. b) Are there any other services you require? Please specify.
17. Who do you see for support with navigating university and your studies?
Friends
Family
Fellow students
College teachers
18. Do you know where to seek help if you need it? Please mark the services you
are aware of:
Learning advisors: helping with assignments
Student Engagement Unit: student counselling
Student Engagement Unit: helping with accommodation
Student Engagement Unit: helping with employment
19. Do you feel comfortable seeking help when you need it?
If yes, what have sought help with previously?
If not, why not? Please elaborate
Appendix B
Questions for individual interviews with peer support officers (PSO)
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
242
Abdou Mugabonake
Mount Kenya University, Kigali, Rwanda
Emmanuel Ntakirutimana
University of Technology and Arts of Byumba, Gicumbi, Rwanda
Theogene Hashakimana
Catholic University of Rwanda, Huye, Rwanda
Emmanuel Ngendahayo
Shanxi Normal University, Xian, China
Faustin Mugiraneza
Mount Kenya University, Kigali, Rwanda
Ke Zhou*
Henan University, Henan, China
*
Corresponding author: Ke Zhou, 10180055@vip.henu.edu.cn
©Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0
International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
243
used to select 350 participants, including 51.4% males and 48.6% females,
mostly aged 30 to 40 years. Quantitative and qualitative data were
collected through questionnaire and interviews. The collected data were
descriptively analysed using IBM-SPSS 21. The study established that
socio-economically disadvantaged students mostly enrol in under-
resourced and low-performing schools i.e. public and government-aided
schools. Furthermore, the study identified that private and international
school students outperform their counterparts enrolled in public or
government-aided schools. Moreover, a significant (p-value .011) low
degree of positive correlation (r= .159) was established between the
students’ academic achievement and their parents’ socio-economic
category. In conclusion, the Rwandan aim of ensuring access to quality,
equitable and effective education for all is facing a bleak foreseeable
future due to the existing academic achievement gap influenced by the
Matthew effect. Recommendations were therefore formulated with a
view to eradicating the Matthew effect in the basic education schools of
Rwanda.
1. Introduction
The Matthew effect refers to a popularised gospel verse from the bible (see
Matthew 25:29 and Matthew 13:12 in the King James version), which states that
those who are richer than others will get richer and the poor will get poorer. The
paraphrased verse says: “to everyone who has, much will be given to him and he
will be given abundantly. However, for the one who has less, it will be taken from
him.” This was adopted by Robert Merton in his 1968 publication titled The
Matthew effect in Science, in which he discusses the concept through a scientific
lens. For example, he observed that a scientific contribution is paid more attention
when it is introduced by a renowned scientist, whereas it would be given less
value or attention if it was introduced by a junior scientist, despite the fact that
the contribution might be more worthy than the one introduced by a renowned
scientist. In the scientific reward system, much more awards and accolades are
given to famous scientists compared to up-and-coming scientists, regardless of
the particular value of their contribution to science or research (Merton ,1968).
Similarly, it has been noted that parents’ financial ability to get their children
enrolled in advantageous schools corresponds to their children’s high academic
achievement, leading to the added value of entering white-collar jobs in a global
economy, a fact that is conversely applied to their counterparts from poor
households.
Moreover, the term ‘Matthew effect’ was adopted for use in education by an
American psychologist, Keith Stanovich, who confirmed that children who easily
acquire basic early reading skills more easily acquire advanced reading skills in
the future. He found that children who perform well in reading at a young age
also perform well in reading as adults. Differences in children’s reading ability at
an early age signal negative consequences for slow learners, since both teachers
and parents tend to give more opportunities to quick learners, thereby enhancing
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
244
their phonological awareness (Stanovich, 1986). This argument has lately been
discussed by various researchers (Walberg and Tsai, 1983; Romeo et al., 2018;
Huang et al., 2014; Rigney, 2010; Van, 2021; Ergül et al., 2022), who found that the
Matthew effect may exist in any educational system, school and classroom if it is
not well understood and controlled during the education process. As a case in
point, Herbert Walberg and Shiow-Ling Tsai, in their publication titled Matthew
Effects in Education, found that certain factors may influence academic
performance in science or mathematics; those factors include ethnic and
socioeconomic groups, environment, prior education and motivation. Perhaps
surprisingly, one who is advantaged in one specific factor may be advantaged in
another one, with those having a high quality prior education performing well in
their current educational activities (Walberg & Tsai, 1983). In the current study,
the achievement gap, influenced by the Matthew effect, was not only examined in
students’ reading skills but across the entire subjects of literacy, numeracy and all
learning attainment expected from school leavers in the national examinations
undertaken at the end of elementary and secondary schools.
An in-depth analysis of the above quoted gospel shows that the Matthew effect is
a cross-sectional applied concept in people’s lives around the globe, which
promotes inequalities between countries, communities and individuals living
apart or together. One example might be seen in the education systems of different
countries, whereby policy makers introduce policies and programmes that benefit
already advantaged schools and communities instead of uplifting the
disadvantaged. A similar analysis may be taken on the most harnessed 21st
century ICT skills that have been translated into education policy across the globe
while less consideration and emphasis have been given rural-remote
disadvantaged schools with untrained teachers, without access to electricity or the
basic skills to operate the computers and other ICT tools that are dumped in their
schools (Hashakimana et al., 2022). Such education policies have been identified
as exemplifying the Matthew effect as less is being done to advance the overall
teaching and learning conditions in disadvantaged schools, particularly in rural
areas, reflecting a serious gap in education policy implementation.
According to Bush (2013), access to technology in education is causing a digital
divide in some parts of the world, including Asia and Africa, where policy makers
refer to the best schools that are already advantaged with trained teachers,
students from wealthy, educated families and other beneficial resources instead
of emphasizing measures that could improve the potential of schools in remote
areas. To implement the policies, Bush quoted a biblical passage which says that
all things are possible, but – he added – for education, they are possible when the
elephant’s ability is not tested in competing with a monkey to climb a tree. This
means that policy makers should not expect the magic to happen in schools or in
any education system when computers are dumped in schools without
considering their connectivity to electricity, internet, teacher training and other
factors that may boost technology inclusion in education. The Matthew effect in
this study will therefore be characterised by parents’ socio-economic category
(UBUDEHE categories) and the types of schools enrolling their students. Bush
(2013) advises policy makers to think of the Matthew effect that may come with
the implementation of each policy during the policy design stage to ensure that
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
245
the policy does not advantage the advantaged and disadvantage the
disadvantaged.
Relevant to the above research topic, the terminology referred to as achievement
is students’ attainment against pre-set ultimate goals of education at a specific
educational level and this is scientifically proven through a course of systematic
assessments and/or examinations (Education Evolving, 2016). Thus, an
achievement gap in education is confirmed when a specific group of students
outperforms another group during their levelled systematic assessment intending
to weigh the two groups’ performance against that assessment (Steinmayr et al.,
2014).
The ultimate goal of education is to equip all people, regardless of gender, age or
circumstances, with the knowledge, skills and values necessary to develop their
talents and for them to participate fully in the life and work of their society
(Power, 2015). Thus, the most obvious and important consideration is the
overarching goal of post-2015 education agenda, which aims at achieving
equitable and inclusive quality education and lifelong learning for all by 2030
(UN, 2015). Similarly, Rwandan education aims at ensuring access to quality,
equitable and effective education for all Rwandans (Ministry of Education
[MINEDUC], 2010).
Unfortunately, the citizens’ ability to pay tuition fees and other related costs of
education in a given school determines the extent of achievement available to their
students. In this regard, Mbabazi (2020) and Nzabihimana (2015) reported that
students enrolled in private schools perform better than their counterparts in
public schools. In this specific instance, it was also noted that almost all of the top
10 excellent primary schools in terms of national examination attainment, as
recognised by the national board in charge of national examinations, were private
schools (Nzabihimana, 2015).
Consequently, this pushes a big number of citizens into extreme poverty and
insecurity. In essence, Power (2015) ascertains that viewing education and
knowledge as a private good weakens the foundations of democracy and
international solidarity. With that, the hopes and expectations of the millions of
people who cannot afford to pay for an empowering education of good quality
vanish, along with any pretence that human rights or the common good matter.
Therefore, there is an urgent need to conduct the current study to explore the
contribution of the Matthew effect to students’ achievement gap in Rwandan basic
education schools.
There was little existing data regarding student’s achievement gap in the region
or in Rwanda, where the research was being conducted, but the world Bank
group confirmed a Matthew effect in education and the economy that remains the
main cause of social inequality. Indeed, 90% of children from the top 10% poorest
families attend primary school compared to 99% of children from the top 10%
richest families, whereas attendance in secondary school remains low and is
highly influenced by family living conditions, with only 11% of children from the
10% top poorest families attending secondary school compared to 78% children
from the 10% top richest families (World Bank, 2015). The achievement gap in this
study was characterised by high achievers (students who had passed the national
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
246
examination with the highest aggregate i.e. 5-30 classified under Division 1&2)
and low achievers (students who had passed or failed the national examination
with a low aggregate i.e. 31-45 classified under division 3&4 or Unclassified).
The theoretical basis of this study was derived from Maslow’s theory of
motivation, which emerged as an important descriptor of factors influencing
success at school. Its founder, Abraham Harold Maslow (1954), an American
psychologist, introduced the idea of a strong correlation between effort and
motivation while discussing human behaviour. Maslow’s theory of motivation
was adopted in this study due to its significant applicability in addressing the
contribution of parents’ socioeconomic categories determining the provision of
required needs (physiological needs, cost of education, safety needs, etc.) to their
children and the level of the students’ attention/effort in the classroom, which in
turn determines academic achievement. In essence, the immediate needs
determine the immediate action of the students. To clarify, when students become
worried about their basic needs, such as food, sleep, health and clothing, their
focus/attention is directed to such distractions and studying and accomplishment
lose their importance. In the context of this study, the theory is therefore that
parents’ ability to pay school fees and other related hidden costs in a given type
of school determines the degree of achievement of their children, a contention that
correlates to the Matthew effect and its contribution to students’ educational
achievement gap.
As far as Ubudehe is concerned in Rwanda, Ubudehe refers to the economic-based
culture of categorising Rwandan citizens into different categories according to
their current economic standards. It has largely modernised and introduced social
protection policies and programs in Rwanda since 2002 (Local Administrative
Entities Development Agency [LODA], 2016). According to LODA (2016), there
are four categories expressed in terms of the numbers 1, 2, 3 and 4, which remain
valid to date.
Thus, category 1 represents those citizens without a residential house or who have
proved unable to rent a home. The ability of such citizens to find food and satisfy
other basic needs remains quite perplexing (LODA, 2016). Following this is the
second category, representing those citizens who seldom eat twice a day and often
depend on temporary wages. More advantaged is the third category, representing
those who are employed or employers, and businessmen, while the fourth
category includes the highest earners from big companies, industries, and those
in high public and private positions. To clarify the close link that exists between
students’ academic achievement and the economic level of their parents,
UNESCO (2002) substantiates that academic performance is strongly correlated
with the occupations and economic status/category of the students’ parents,
irrespective of differences in the extent of such a relationship between countries.
However, 16%, 29.8%, 53.7% and 0.5% of Rwandans are still categorised under
Ubudehe categories 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively (LODA, 2016). Thus, there is a need
to explore the academic achievement of students from all these categories.
In terms of types of schools (basic education schools), there are four types of
schools in Rwanda: public schools, government-aided schools, private schools
and international schools. In this study, these four types were summarised into
two main groups: public and government-aided schools, which are mainly public,
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
247
free and compulsory; as well as private and international schools, which are
mainly private and fee-paying. Generally, public schools aim at increasing
academic achievement for public benefits; particularly, preparing youth for active
citizenship in a democratic society. Conversely, private schools emphasise
individual or private economic benefits, such as preparing youth for good jobs in
a global economy (Centre on Education Policy [CEP], 2007). At the same time, it
is important to note that when the government of a given country loosens its
efforts in maintaining public education, this favours the emergence of many types
of private schools. This situation leads to great inequities and the exclusion of
disadvantaged families from education (CEP, 2007). There is a claim that students
enrolled in private and international schools outperform their counterparts in
public and government-aided schools (Damien, 2015; Joan, 2020). Given that
there are 3931 public and government-aided basic education schools, compared
to 706 private and international basic education schools in Rwanda (NISR, 2019),
there is a rationale for this current study to explore the degree of achievement
provided by each type of Rwandan basic education school.
The existing literature related to variables of the Matthew effect and students’
achievement has been reviewed. The arguments of various scholars and
researchers’ findings report a significant relationship that exists between the two
variables (Islan & Khan, 2017; Chandra & Azimuddin, 2013) but, to the best of our
knowledge, no study has yet established the level of such a correlation. Despite
such a relationship existing between the two variables of this current study, the
previous studies have revealed socio-economic category (UBUDEHE) as being a
main factor contributing to the decision of parents regarding the type of basic
education school in which to enrol their children. The evidence suggests that
socio-economically disadvantaged students are mostly enrolled in low
performing schools (OECD, 2017; World Bank, 2011; Boyd and Macneill, 2020,
Weber, 2018), which are also under-resourced, a fact indicating the presence of the
Matthew effect in education. Due to the paucity of literature on the variables of
this current study in Rwanda, a conclusion that the Matthew effect exists in
Rwandan basic education schools should not be drawn. Therefore, this current
study ascertained the relevant information on the impact of the Matthew effect on
educational attainment in Rwanda.
Based on a review of the existing related literature, the degree of correlation
between parents’ socio-economic category (UBUDEHE) and students’
achievement in Rwandan basic education schools remains unstudied.
Furthermore, no research has yet been conducted to determine students’
educational attainment compared to their parents’ socio-economic category
(UBUDEHE) and their related basic education schools. Rather, only the claims of
parents and the wider community in Rwanda suggest that there are privileged
basic education schools enrolling students from privileged families whose
performance in national examinations outshines economically those
disadvantaged students who end up graduating from under-resourced schools
with low achievement. Moreover, this problematic situation has been identified
as perpetuating inequality through the allocation of individuals into various
positions within the social stratification structure, thereby decelerating fairer
socio-economic development across the country. The aim of this study was
therefore to shine a new light on these debates through an examination of existing
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
248
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
249
Additionally, it is important to note that the class of 2018 was selected due to its
normal teaching and learning process before the COVID-19 pandemic led to
education processes becoming significantly hampered. To complement the
quantitative data collected from the class of 2018, qualitative data was recently
(from 16th -20th Jan. 2023) collected from five District Directors of Education
purposively selected from the selected districts.
A questionnaire for parents and an interview for the District Directors of
Education were used to collect quantitative and qualitative data concerning the
participants’ socio-economic categories, the types of schools in which their
children were enrolled for the 2018 national examinations in primary and
secondary schools, and their academic achievement (national examinations
results). Descriptive and correlational analysis through IBM-SPSS 21 was
performed to analyse the collected data.
In view of establishing the validity of the parents’ questionnaire used for data
collection in this study, the expert-judgement technique was used. The
questionnaire was given to two experts in the field of education to evaluate the
relevance of each item and rate each item on a 4-point Likert scale of very relevant
(4), quite relevant (3), somewhat relevant (2), and not relevant (1) (Wynd et al.,
2003). Validity was established using the Content Valid Index (C.V.I.)(C.V.I. =
Item rated 3 or 4 by both judges divided by the total number of items in the
questionnaire (n/N)) (Zamanzadeh et al., 2015). Therefore, since the C.V.I. was
0.81, the validity of questionnaire was assured provided that C.V.I. > 0.79
(Zamanzadeh et al., 2015).
To establish the reliability of the research instrument, the test-retest technique
(Weir, 2015) was used, whereby the research questionnaire used in this study was
twice used for 30 subjects purposively selected from a district that was not
included in the study sample. In the first instance, the research instrument was
used for these subjects and their answers were recorded. After a period of six
weeks, the research instrument was also used with the same respondents and
their answers were again recorded. Having collected this data, the Spearman rank
order correlation coefficient was computed to measure the correlation of results
from the data collected in two different time intervals. The formula of the
Spearman rank order correlation coefficient used to calculate the coefficient is
R=16Σd2/ (n (n2-1)), where R: Spearman’s correlation coefficient; n: size of the
sample; Σd: the sum of the difference between ranks. Thus, based on the reliability
of the questionnaire for parents being 0.78, the research instrument was deemed
to be reliable provided that the Spearman rank order correlational coefficient was
not less than 0.75 (Orodho, 2009).
3. Results
This research study sought to ascertain the Matthew effect and its influence on the
students’ achievement gap in Rwandan basic education. To answer the three main
questions of the study, both quantitative and qualitative data were collected. The
results are therefore presented in tables, indicating the responses to the questions
asking participants’ social economic categories, the type of schools in which their
children were enrolled and their corresponding academic attainment.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
250
3.1 The Matthew effect and the achievement gap in the basic education of Rwanda
3.1.1 The type of schools and the students with their corresponding socio-economic category
The first objective of this study was to determine the schools’ enrolled students
from each socio-economic category (Ubudehe) in Rwanda. To achieve this
objective, quantitative data were collected from 257 respondents (parents of the
elementary and secondary school students completing these levels). A research
questionnaire was used to collect data, presented in Table 1. This shows that the
majority of the students were enrolled in public schools (206/257) at either the
elementary (118) or secondary (88) level.
Table 1. Schools’ enrolled students from each socio-economic category in Rwanda
Socio-economic category Total
Category 1 Category 2 Category 3 Category 4
Primary public school 8 48 54 8 118
Primary government -
0 3 5 0 8
aided school
Schools' enrolled Primary private school 0 2 27 11 40
candidates in the Secondary public school 2 28 46 12 88
school year 2018 Secondary government -
0 0 0 2 2
aided school
International secondary
0 0 0 1 1
school
Total 10 81 132 34 257
With respect to the type of basic education schools and students enrolled therein
with their corresponding socio-economic category, the results shown in Table 1
establish that the majority of students (candidates entered for national
examinations i.e. primary leaving examinations and senior six national
examinations) were from the third category (132/257). A particular concern was
the fact that 126 elementary school candidates were enrolled in either public
schools or government-aided schools, with 59 i.e. 46.8% from the first and second
categories while 67 i.e. 53.2% came from the third and fourth categories.
Furthermore, of the 90 candidates sitting secondary examinations enrolled in
public and government-aided schools, 30 i.e. 33.3% came from the first two
categories compared to 60 i.e. 66.7% from the last two categories. The results of
Table 1 also show only two i.e. 5% primary leaving examination candidates from
the first two categories compared to 38 i.e. 95% from the last two categories who
were enrolled from primary private schools and only one candidate from fourth
category enrolled from a secondary international school. In a similar vein, of the
results collected from DDEs through interview, all five i.e. 100% confirmed that
the parents’ socio-economic category determines the schools enrolling their
children. For example, one interviewee said:
“There is no basis of UBUDEHE category while enrolling students but what is
practically observed is those from rich families attend private schools and those
from poor families attend government and government-aided schools from pre-
primary to primary schools and the children from poor families attend day schools
(9-12YBE) and the rich attend boarding (school of excellence) in secondary
schools as observed…”
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
251
In terms of identifying the level of academic achievement from the basic education
schools of Rwanda, the results shown in Table 2 illustrate that of the 126
candidates from primary public and government-aided schools, 72 i.e. 57.1%
candidates passed with excellence (classified in divisions I and II), whereas among
40 candidates from primary private schools, 34 i.e. 85% passed with excellence
(classified in divisions I and II). As far as secondary schools are concerned, the
results in Table 2 show that 90 candidates were enrolled from secondary public
and government-aided schools, with 40 i.e. 44.4% scoring high marks and
classified in divisions I and II. Furthermore, the results in Table 2 show that one
candidate i.e. 100% from an international secondary school scored high marks i.e.
classified in division I. Further analysis showed that all five DDEs participating in
the interviews validated that private schools outperform public and government-
aided schools. Talking about this issue, an interviewee said:
“The public and government-aided schools perform less than private primary
schools according to the previous national examinations results, [and] the private
and government-aided (day schools) perform less than boarding schools (schools
of excellence). The achievement in private primary schools is higher than the rest,
while the achievement in boarding schools (government or government-aided
boarding schools) achieve higher than the rest...”
A recurrent theme in the interviews was a sense amongst interviewees that
primary private schools outperform the public and government-aided schools but
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
252
the most striking result to emerge from the interview data was that public or
government-aided boarding schools (schools of excellence) outperform the
private and public day secondary schools. One possible reason behind this finding
is that the majority of the best performers come from private primary schools who
are financially able to afford the high cost of education from those boarding
schools.
3.1.3 Relationship between parents’ socio-economic categories and students’ academic
achievement
In order to establish the relationship between the parents’ socio-economic
category and their children’s academic achievement, as outlined in the third
objective of this study, the Pearson correlation coefficient was computed. The
results obtained are summarised in Table 3.
Table 3. Relationship between parents' socio-economic category and their children's
academic achievement
Correlations
The results in Table 3 show that the Pearson correlation coefficient (r) between
parents’ socio-economic category and their children’s academic achievement from
basic education schools is r = 0.159, with a significant level p-value of 0.011; this
remains < 0.05 level (2-tailed). This reveals that a significant weak degree of
positive relationship exists between the parents’ socio-economic category and
their children’s academic performance in the basic education schools of Rwanda.
Increasing evidence for this correlation was found from the DDEs interviewed,
who confirmed that such a relationship exists. One interviewee, when asked about
this relationship, said:
“There is a significant relationship between parents’ socio-economic relationship
and their [children’s] achievement because the schools that require much fees and
materials (expensive) are the ones performing well at all levels of education in
our district and they are only joined by students from families that are financially
able.”
A common view amongst the interviewees was that the schools that are fee-
paying with a high tuition cost are those using adequate teaching and learning
materials, infrastructure, well-paid competent teachers and therefore these
schools perform better than the public ones providing free and compulsory
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
253
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
254
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
255
achievement gap of 23% in Mathematics between white and black students due to
various factors, including parents’ literacy level, income, and the poverty level of
such households. These findings also support the report of World Bank (2015),
based on EICV 2015, which reveals a 9% and 67% difference in school attendance
between the top 10 poorest families and the top 10 richest families in primary and
secondary education, respectively. However, the current finding is in contrast
with the previous report published by UNESCO (2002), which declared a strong
relationship between students’ academic achievement and their parents’
economic status, irrespective of the different levels of such a correlation among
countries. This last exception could therefore be applied to the current situation
of Rwanda. The government of Rwanda is therefore recommended to exert a full
effort in all projects purporting to increase citizens’ socio-economic status in order
to provide students with the necessary basic needs that influence students’
attention and effort in learning, thereby ultimately determining their academic
achievement, as Maslow (1954) suggested that immediate need determines the
immediate action of the students.
5. Conclusion
This study ascertained the Matthew effect and its contribution to students’
academic achievement gap in the basic education schools of Rwanda. The findings
established that the majority of students who enter public and government-aided
schools, which afford them little opportunity to access enhanced educational and
economic/job opportunities or attendant life chances, are those from
disadvantaged socio-economic families, while private and international schools
enroll students from socio-economically advantaged backgrounds. The findings
revealed at the same time that students enrolled in private and international
schools achieve higher scores in national examinations than their counterparts
from public and government-aided schools. Finally, the study established that a
significant weak positive relationship exists when assessing students’ academic
achievement compared to their parents’ socio-economic status, a fact indicating a
low positive contribution of the Matthew effect on students’ academic
achievement in Rwandan basic education schools. In view of these findings, a
conclusion was therefore drawn that the Rwandan aim of ensuring access to
quality, equitable and effective education for all Rwandans is facing a noticeably
bleak foreseeable future due to the existing academic achievement gap, influenced
by the Matthew effect. Thus, recommendations were suggested with the aim of
eradicating the Matthew effect from the basic education schools of Rwanda.
Nevertheless, the study experienced four major limitations within data collection
which could affect its results: a) some respondents were not prepared to indicate
their socio-economic category (UBUDEHE); b) a small number of private or
international schools were found from rural areas (provinces) whereby some
children from advantageous families are displaced to find those schools in Kigali
City, a challenge therefore to find data related to these schools considering zoning
factor; c) some respondents opted not to offer information about their schools,
particularly those in private and international schools; d) some respondents were
not prepared to offer responses for data collection unless they were paid for so
doing. Further studies on this topic should therefore find another research method
that can help in collecting data on socio-economic categories, which seems to be
matter of secrecy for Rwandans, as well as a method that can help in increasing
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
256
6. References
Aleksandar, C.V., Jorge, M., Alonso, S., Jaime, L.V., & Lucky, E.C.L. (2021). Cross-sectional
studies. Rev. Fac. Med. Hum. 21(1), 164-170.
http://doi.org/10.25176/RFMH.v21i1.3069.
Boyd, R., & Macneill, N. (2020). The Matthew effect: School boundaries, school funding and
resources, and school staff. https://www.educationtoday.com.au/news-
detail/The-Matthew-Effect-4936
Bush, M. D. (2013). What MOOCs, Flipped Classrooms, and OLPC Teach Us About
Individualization of Learning. Educational Technology, 53(6), 60–63.
http://www.jstor.org/stable/44430224
CEP. (2007). Why We Still Need Public Schools: Public Education for the Common Good.
Washington: Centre on Education Policy.
https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED503799.pdf
Chandra, R. & Azimuddin, S. (2013). Influence of socio economic status on academic
achievement of secondary school students of Lucknow city. International journal of
scientific & engineering research, 4(12) 1952-1960.
https://www.ijser.org/researchpaper/Influence-of-Socio-Economic-Status-On-
Academic-Achievement.pdf.
Education Evolving (2016). Our Working Definition of Student Achievement and School
Quality. https://www.educationevolving.org/files/Definition-Achievement-
School-Quality.pdf
Ergül, C., Kılıç - Tülü, B., Aydin, B. Ökcün-Akçamuşa, C. M., Akoğluc, g. Bahap-Kudreta,
Z. (2022). Does the Matthew effect have an impact on the reading skills of Turkish-
Speaking children? International journal of primary, Elementary and Early Years
Education, education 3-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2022.2049336
Habyarimana, J.D, Hashakimana, T., Ntwawiha, P., Zhou, K. (2022). Quality education in
Rwanda: A critical analysis of quality indicators. IOSR Journal of humanities and
social sciences (IOSR-JHSS), 27(2), 52-70. DOI: 10.9790/0837-2702065270.
Hashakimana, T., Habyarimana, J. D., Nshimyumuremyi, E., & Ngendahayo, E. (2022).
School data management system and school management in Rwanda. IOSR
Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences (IOSR-JHSS), 27(9), 1-11. DOI:
10.9790/0837-2709040111.
Huang, F.L., Moon, T.R., & Boren, R. (2014). Are the reading rich getting richer? Testing
for the presence of the Matthew Effect. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 30(2), 95-
115. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2013.789784
Islam, R. & Khan, Z. (2017). Impact of socioeconomic status on academic achievement
among the senior secondary school students. Educational Quest: An International
Journal of Education and Applied Social Sciences, 8(3), 1-7.
https://doi.org/10.5958/2230-7311.2017.00117.9
Kerckhoff, A. C. & Glennie, E. (1999). The Matthew effect in American education in: Aron, M.
P. (1999). Research in sociology of education and socialization Vol 12. Stamford: JAI
Press.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
257
Khidhir, R.J. (2021). A correlation study of the effectiveness of teaching practice between
taught programs and personal in-built performance talents. Journal of English
language and applied linguistics. 3(3), 41-50.
https://doi.org/10.32996/jeltal.2021.3.3.6
LODA. (2016). Press briefed on effective use of revised Ubudehe categories. Kigali: LODA.
Maslow, A. H. (1954). Motivation and personality, (3rd. Ed.)New York: Longman.
Mbabazi, J. (2020). Teamwork: Bridging the learning gap between private and public schools. The
New Times. https://www.newtimes.co.rw/lifestyle/teamwork-bridging-
learning-gap-between-private-and-public-schools
Merton, R. (1968), The Matthew effect in education, Science, 159(3810): 56-63. DOI:
10.1126/science.159.3810.5.
Miech, R., Essex, M. J., & Goldsmith, H. H. (2001). Socioeconomic status and the
adjustment to school: The role of self-regulation during early childhood. Sociology
of Education, 74 (2), 102–120. https://doi.org/10.2307/2673165
MINEDUC (2018a). Education statistical year book, Kigali.
https://statistics.gov.rw/file/7367/download?token=X0yWkMCC
MINEDUC (2019). Education statistical year book, Kigali.
https://www.statistics.gov.rw/publication/statistical-yearbook-2019
MINEDUC. (2010). Education sector strategic plan 2010-2015. Kigali.
https://reb.rw/fileadmin/Policies/education_sector_strategic_plan.pdf
MINEDUC. (2018b). MINEDUC releases p6 and s3 examinations results for the school year 2018.
https://www.mineduc.gov.rw/news-detail/mineduc-releases-p6-and-s3-
examinations-results-for-the-school-year-2018
NISR. (2019). The Rwanda statistical year 2019. Kigali: NISR.
https://www.statistics.gov.rw/publication/statistical-yearbook-2019
Nzabihimana, D. (2015). Education: Performance of primary school students in Rwanda, case of
Gasabo district, Kigali City. (A masters’ dissertation in Kampala international
university).
http://www.nationalexamination.com/news_index.php?news_id=303.
OECD. (2017). PISA in focus: do students today read for pleasure? Paris, France: OECD
Publishing.
https://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/pisainfocus/48624701.pdf
Orodho, J.A. (2009). Elements of Education and Social Science Research Methods. Maseno,
Kenya: Kenezja Publishers.
Power, C. (2015). The power of education: Education for all, Development, Globalisation and
UNESCO. Berlin/Germany: Springer.
Rigney, D. (2010). The Matthew Effect: How advantage begets further advantage. New York:
Columbia University Press.
Romeo, R.R., Leonard, J.A., Robinson, S.T., West, R. M., Mackey, P. A., Lowe, L. M.,
Gabrieli, D. E. J. (2018). Beyond the 30 million word gap: Children’s
conversational exposure is associated with language-related brain function.
Psychological Science, 29(5), 700-710. DOI: 10.1177/0956797617742725.
Stanovich, K.E., (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual
differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading research quarterly, 21(4), 360-407.
Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/747612
Steinmayr, R., Meißner, A., Weidinger, A., F. et al. (2014). Academic achievement. UK:
Oxford-Bibliographies.
UN. (2015). Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. USA.
https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
258
UNESCO. (2002). Teaching and learning for a sustainable future: A multimedia teacher education
programme. Paris: UNESCO.
https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000125238
Van Lancker, W. (2021). The Matthew Effect in early childhood education and care: How
family policies may amplify inequalities in: M., Daly, N., Gilbert, B., Pfau-
Effinger, D. Besharov (eds.) International Handbook of Family Policy: A Life-course
Perspective. Oxford University Press.
Vanneman, A., Hamilton, L., Baldwin Anderson, J., and Rahman, T. (2009). Achievement
Gaps: How Black and White Students in Public Schools Perform in Mathematics and
Reading on the National Assessment of Educational Progress, (NCES 2009-455).
National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S.
Department of Education. Washington, DC.
https://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2009455
Walberg, H. J. & Tsai, S., L. (1983), Matthew Effects in Education. American educational
research Journal, 20(3), 359-373. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312020003359
Wang, X. and Cheng, Z. (2020). Cross-sectional studies: Strengths, Weaknesses, and
Recommendations. Chest journal, 158(1), 65-71.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2020.03.012
Weber, M. (2018). Socioeconomic Gaps in Academic Achievement within Schools. Are
They Consistent Across Subject Area? Educational research and evaluation.
Weir, J. P. (2005). Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation
coefficient and the SEM. J Strength Cond Res. 19(1):231–40.
https://doi.org/10.1519/00124278-200502000-00038
World Bank (2011). Rwanda: Education Country Status Report. Toward Quality
Enhancement and Achievement of Universal Nine Basic Education, and
Education System in Transition, a nation in transition. Washington, DC: The
World Bank.
World Bank Group. (2015). Rwanda Poverty Assessment: Poverty global practice Africa region.
Washington D.C. The World Bank.
Wynd, C. A, Schmidt, B., Schaefer, M. A. (2003). Two quantitative approaches for
estimating content validity. West J Nurs Res. 25(5):508-18.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0193945903252998. PMID: 12955968.
Zamanzadeh, V., Ghahramanian, A., Rassouli, M., Abbaszadeh, A., Alavi-Majd, H.,
Nikanfar, A. (2015). Design and implementation content validity study:
Development of an instrument for measuring patient-centered communication. J
Caring Sci. 4(5):165–78. https://doi.org/10.15171/jcs.2015.017
Zangirolami-Raimundo, J., Echeimberg, J. O., Leone, C. (2018). Research methodology
topics: Cross-sectional studies. Journal of Human Growth and Development. 28(3),
356-360. http://dx.doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.152198
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
259
Appendix
APPENDIX I: Questionnaire for parents
SECTION 1: Background information
1. Gender of respondents (Tick with √)
Male
Female
2. Your age group
20-30years old
30-40years old
40-50years old
Above 50yers old
3. Your status
Parent by blood
Parent as your adopted child
Guardian
4. Your living province
North
South
West
East
Kigali City
Section II: Indicate your socio-economic category and the school which has
been enrolling your child, his/her examination grade, and his/her results
obtained in school year 2018 (Tick with √)
5. What is your category of UBUDEHE?
Category 1
Category 2
Category 3
Category 4
6. Which kind of school was enrolling your child in the school year 2018?
Primary public school
Primary government aided school
Primary Private School
International Primary School
Secondary Public school
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
260
Maximum aggregate: 73
Minimum aggregate: 0
Please indicate his/her aggregate in the box provided
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
261
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
262
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
263
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
264
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
265
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
266
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
267
John Trent
The Education University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
*
Corresponding author: Xiaoyi Liu, s1142495@s.eduhk.hk
©Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0
International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
268
1. Introduction
Education reform has become a global phenomenon. Sahlberg (2016) uses the
term Global Education Reform Movement (GERM) to describe the spreading
education reform orthodoxy. Neoliberal market principles of decentralization,
competition, performativity, and accountability are manifest in GERM (ibid.). As
GERM spreads and evolves, it exhibits contextually specific nuances created by
different jurisdictions and reform drivers. In China, since the market-oriented
economic reform launched in the late 1970s, the government has introduced a
series of education reform policies designed to foster socioeconomic
transformation and enhance the nation’s international competitiveness. For
example, the 1980s witnessed the decentralization of educational governance,
with greater autonomy given to provincial educational authorities and stronger
accountability for education institutions and teachers (Committee of the
Communist Party of China [CCCPC], 1985). In the 1990s, education reform
aimed to shift from exam-oriented to quality-oriented education (CCCCP and
the State Council, 2022). From the 2000s onward, training “socialist builders and
successors” with “all-round development” and “strengthen(ing) moral
education for cultivating people” have been persistently prioritized in education
policies (Xue & Li, 2021, p. 135). Focusing on higher education, in 2016, China
initiated a plan for building “world-class universities” and “disciplines” to boost
its core competitiveness (The State Council, 2015). This strategic decision is
“reform-based performance-related” (Peters & Besley, 2018, p. 1075), as the plan
writes, “using performance as a lever ... (to) encourage fair competition,
strengthen target management ... perfect evaluation system for world-class
universities and disciplines”. Overall, Chinese education reform is a fusion of
GERM features and Chinese characteristics, propelled by the state’s need to
compete globally and support socialist modernization domestically.
Education reform changes teacher identity (TI) which affects how reform
policies “are received, adopted, adapted and sustained or not sustained” (Ball,
2003; Day, 2017, p. 26). Against the ongoing education reforms, considerable
attention has been given to how teachers in China, at both K-12 and
post-secondary levels, construct, sustain, and enhance their identity over the
past decade (e.g., Jiang & Zhang, 2021; Lee et al., 2013; Trent & Liu, 2023).
Beauchamp and Thomas’ (2009) examined the definitions of TI and the factors
shaping it. Over a decade, TI reviews have become increasingly specific in their
reviewed aspects (e.g., focusing on approaches to TI inquiry) and teacher groups
(e.g., TIs of student teachers) (Liu & Yin, 2022; Rodrigues & Mogarro, 2019),
reflecting the growing TI research with sophisticated research paradigm and
nuanced understanding of TIs. Yet, no TI review closely related to education
reform, a site of TI struggle and tension. Beauchamp and Thomas (2009) point
out that education reforms “particularly affect” TI “because of the high level of
emotion involved” (P180). Moreover, none of the previous TI reviews focus on
the Chinese context. Filling these gaps, we attempt to situate the current TI
review against the backdrop of education reform in China, providing insights
into how teachers construct TIs and what mediating factors are involved. By
doing so, this review can contribute to a deeper understanding of the intricate
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
269
2. Teacher identity
TI is “dynamic, multifaceted, negotiated, and co-constructed” in social milieux
(Edwards & Burns, 2016, p. 735). TI negotiation and construction occur when
external forces (e.g., education policies) assign desired TIs to teachers whose
claimed, practiced, or imagined TIs may or may not align with those imposed or
ascribed by others (Reeves, 2018). Wenger (1998) recognizes identity “as a pivot
between the social and the individual” (p. 145) and proposes three sources of
identification: engagement, imagination, and alignment. Through engagement,
teachers involve in the “mutual processes of negotiation of meaning” (p. 192).
Employing imagination, they create unconstrained images of themselves and
their teaching trajectories through time and space by extrapolating from their
experience. Alignment coordinates teachers’ energy and activities to “fit within”
and “contribute to broader enterprises,” such as promoting quality education (p.
174). According to Wenger (1998), policies (e.g., education reform policies) are
reifications that require people’s “intense and specific participation to remain
meaningful” (p. 67). Within changing education reform discourses, TI “provides
a framework for teachers to construct their own ideas of ‘how to be’, ‘how to act’
and ‘how to understand’ their work and their place in society” (Sachs, 2005, p.
15). Therefore, whether and how teachers engage in and align with education
reform agenda are shaped by TIs (e.g., Yang et al., 2021b; Ye & Zhao, 2019). As
“one of the most powerful theories of identity formation” (Tsui, 2007, p. 659),
Wenger’s (1998) theory illuminates the TI construction analysis for the current
review.
3. Method
3.1 Literature search and screen
We aim to understand TI construction within education reform in China. The
following inclusion criteria were used to select studies to review: (1) published
in English, (2) published in peer-reviewed journals, (3) focusing on in-service
teachers, (4) focusing on TI construction, (5) located in Chinese mainland; (6)
empirical studies; (7) covering the reform period from 2010 to the present.
Confining source type to academic journals or articles, we entered search terms
(TI = (teacher identity OR professional identity OR identity) AND Topic (i.e.,
title, abstract, and keywords) = (China OR Chinese) AND AB = (teacher AND
identity)) into three databases in May 2022: Web of Science, Scopus, and ERIC,
yielding 316 hits. 186 articles remained for screening after removing duplicates.
The first phase screening excluded 154 articles with reasons listed in Figure 1. 32
studies remained for full-text screening to further appraise their rigor and fitness
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
270
for our review. In the second phase, six studies were eliminated. To maximize
exhaustiveness, we opted to use Google Scholar to search broadly in the same
timeframe, entering the terms “teacher,” “identity,” “reform,” and the like. Only
two eligible articles were captured, indicating the comprehensiveness of the
current data pool. 28 articles were retained for review. Figure 1 shows the search
and screening process, excluded article numbers in each phase, and the reasons
for exclusion.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
271
factors.
Table 1: Codebook for analyzing TI construction in reviewed studies
Code name Definition Examples
engagement “active involvement in mutual “Ping started to learn new
processes of negotiation of meaning” pedagogical concepts, like
(Wenger, 1998, p. 173) constructivism, collaborative
learning, and inquiry-based learning,
etc. Meanwhile, Ping actively
employed new pedagogical methods
in her teaching ...” (Wei, 2021, p. 7)
alignment “coordinating our energy and “...these policies further increased
activities in order to fit within her enthusiasm for STEM
broader structures and contribute to education... Sunjie diligently and
broader enterprises” (Wenger, 1998, enthusiastically explored how to
p. 173) implement integrated STEM
teaching ...” (Jiang et al., 2021, p. 12)
imagination “creating images of the world and “... I get depressed wondering if I can
seeing connections through time and really fit back into this school in the
space” (Wenger, 1998, p. 174) long term ... I see myself as
displaced...” (Trent, 2020, p. 325)
4. Findings
Table 2 and Table 3 synthesize TI categories teachers had formed at the time of
research and their imagined TIs. They fall into three categories: TIs as thriving,
TIs as survival, and TIs as exclusion. TIs as thriving are agentive, integrated, and
committed, embodying negotiation-oriented TI development. TIs as survival are
contradictory, compliant, and expedient, following utilitarianism-orientated TI
building. TIs as exclusion are unable, invisible, and silent, orienting towards
alienation. How the three types of TIs are constructed is reviewed and analyzed
in detail in the discussion section.
Studies TI categories
TIs as thriving
Lee et al. ⚫ a “reform leader”
(2013) ⚫ “active explorers”
Xu (2013) ⚫ “a learning facilitator” (pre-service imagined TI)1
⚫ “a responsible educator” (in-service imagined TI)
Yuan and ⚫ a “fishing coach”
Burns (2017) ⚫ a “teacher researcher”
⚫ a “collaborator”
⚫ a “change agent”
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
272
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
273
⚫ a “role model”
TIs as survival
Lee and Yin ⚫ “the losing heart accommodators”
(2011) ⚫ “the drifting followers”
⚫ “accessories of the reform machine”
⚫ “spare part(s) of the reform engine”
⚫ “cynical performers”
⚫ “an actor”
Xu (2013) ⚫ a teacher valuing “consolidation of the learnt” (pre-service
imagined TI)
⚫ student’s “spiritual guide” (pre-service imagined TI)
⚫ a “teacher busy catching up with the schedule”
⚫ a “routine performer”
⚫ “a worker working on a machine”
Lee et al. ⚫ “contradictory performers”
(2013) ⚫ “novice strugglers”
⚫ a “manual worker”
Huang (2019) ⚫ an “opponent” to the exam-oriented education model
⚫ a “conformist” to the exam-oriented education model
⚫ a “pragmatist” toward exams
Wei et al. ⚫ a teacher who “follow(s) the crowd”
(2020) ⚫ an exam-oriented teacher who “highlight the testing points”
⚫ a teacher “long(ing) for change and innovation” (in-service
imagined TI)
⚫ an influential teacher “making a difference in the practical work”
(in-service imagined TI)
⚫ a teacher “constrained by textbooks”
⚫ a teacher with “weakened determination” in innovation
Trent (2020) ⚫ a “transformative” teacher (pre-service imagined TI)
⚫ a teacher who is “conforming”
Xu and Huang ⚫ “a common follower”
(2021) ⚫ “passive listeners”
⚫ “routine players”
⚫ “flexible accommodators”
⚫ “test-score pursuers”
⚫ “lonely wanderers”
TIs as exclusion
Xu (2013) ⚫ a “language expert” (pre-service imagined TI)
⚫ a “language attrition sufferer”
Trent (2020) ⚫ a teachers sharing “knowledge and skills with colleagues”
(pre-service imagined TI)
⚫ “a silent teacher”
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
274
⚫ a “rejected” teacher
⚫ an “integrative” teacher (pre-service imagined TI)
⚫ an “excluded” teacher
⚫ a “displaced” teacher (in-service imagined TI)
Xu and Huang ⚫ an “invisible middleman without functions”
(2021)
Studies TI categories
TIs as thriving
Liu and Xu ⚫ a “self-motivated” teacher
(2011) ⚫ a “free thinker”
⚫ an “innovative researcher”
Xu (2014) ⚫ “a self-contented established researcher”
⚫ “a productive associate professor”
Huang and ⚫ a “capable college English teacher-as-researcher”
Guo (2019) ⚫ “an educator who cultivates the ‘whole person’”
⚫ “a researcher who conducts ‘real’ research”
Yang et al. ⚫ a teacher who “keeps innovating”
(2021a) ⚫ “a real expert teacher” (in-service imagined TI)
⚫ a teacher who is “constantly changing”
⚫ “a conscientious life coach”
Gao and Cui ⚫ a “boundary explorer” and “connector”
(2021) ⚫ “a pioneer fearlessly jumping across hurdles and ditches”
⚫ “a giver with an empty container or a big bucket”
⚫ “a learner”
⚫ “a self-trainer who engaged in agentive self-cultivation”
Jiang and ⚫ “a boundary-crosser”
Zhang (2021) ⚫ “collaborator”
Yang et al. ⚫ “the strenuous accommodator”
(2021b) ⚫ “the fulfilled integrator”
Bao and Feng ⚫ “a prolific ‘academic’” (in-service imagined TI)
(2022) ⚫ “a famous scholar” (in-service imagined TI)
⚫ “fulfilled research practitioner”
⚫ “agentic researcher-teacher”
⚫ “confident teacher-researcher”
Jiang (2022) ⚫ “an expert ESP teacher” (in-service imagined TI)
⚫ “a learner and a cross-boundary collaborator”
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
275
TIs as survival
Xu (2014) ⚫ “a struggling periphery research practitioner”
⚫ “a passive would-be researcher”
⚫ a teacher who is “forced to do research”
⚫ “a researcher” (in-service imagined TI)
Long and ⚫ teachers who “struggle with whether to do research or not”
Huang (2017) ⚫ conformist to “the university’s promotion benchmarks”
Tao and Gao ⚫ a teacher who “make more contribution to the society” (in-service
(2018) imagined TI)
⚫ teachers ““caught in the middle” between ESP teaching and
mainstream language research”
Wang (2020) ⚫ “a mechanical clock”
⚫ a “teaching robot”
⚫ “marginalized teachers”
Yang et al. ⚫ “the miserable follower”
(2021b)
Zeng and ⚫ “inferior CE teachers”
Fickel (2021) ⚫ “marginal pedagogic researchers”
⚫ “illegitimate, second-class researchers”
Yip et al., ⚫ “an independent teacher” (in-service imagined TI)
(2022) ⚫ a teacher who “have more freedom” (in-service imagined TI)
⚫ “a follower of the leaders’ wish”
⚫ “lower-level factory worker”
⚫ “a technical worker”
⚫ “a score monitor”
TIs as exclusion
Liu and Xu ⚫ an “overwhelmed teacher”
(2013) ⚫ a “torn” teacher self-excluding from the community
Xu (2014) ⚫ “a disheartened non-researcher”
Huang and ⚫ a teacher “being excluded in the field”
Guo (2019) ⚫ a teacher “being thrown out of the right track”
⚫ a member of “the most invisible group in the department”
Yang et al. ⚫ “the disheartened performer”
(2021b)
5. Discussion
5.1 TI construction
Consistent with three types of TIs, three patterned TI trajectories emerge:
contrive to thrive, adjust to survive, and alienate to wither. Three different
trajectories manifest three distinct TI construction process: teachers contriving to
thrive engage in meaningful negotiation, aligning their actions with broader
communities or enterprises; teachers adjusting to survive engage in restricted or
wavering actions regulated by the dominant discourses in situated contexts;
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
276
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
277
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
278
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
279
communities, and learning how to do research through doing it (Bao & Feng,
2022, p. 8; Huang & Guo, 2019, p. 6).
All the mentioned engagement reflects and supports some alignment. Three
kinds of alignment were identified: aligning with teachers’ “telos” (i.e., “ultimate
goal” “of teachers’ teaching selves”), such as self-growth (Jiang, 2022, pp. 8-9; Li
& Craig, 2019); aligning with the values of broader teacher or teaching
communities, such as “improving language teaching and learning” (Yuan &
Burns, 2017, p. 740); aligning with the ideals of reform policies, such as quality
education (e.g., Ye & Zhao, 2019; Wei, 2021). These alignments direct teachers’
engagement in a larger spatiotemporal context, fostering and sustaining
integrated and committed TIs (Wenger, 1998).
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
280
Seven studies documented that teachers’ determination, passion, and action for
innovation or desired TI construction were frustrated by different institutional
constraints, including stipulated daily routines, assigned heavy workload, fixed
teaching arrangements, standardized textbooks, rigid evaluation system, and
obeying school culture (Trent, 2020; Wang, 2021; Wei et al., 2020; Xu, 2013; Xu &
Huang, 2021; Yang et al., 2021b; Yip et al., 2022). Particularly depressing were
teachers’ innovative actions or ideas incurring leaders’ criticism and denial, such
as “disrupting the normal teaching order” (Wei et al., 2020, p. 694) and “teachers
are irresponsible for discussing teaching issues related to the reform” (Xu &
Huang, 2021, p. 105). “With coercion being the dominant mode of alignment”
(Tsui, 2007, p. 673), this cohort of studies found that for “utilitarian purposes”
(e.g., “academic rank,” securing the job), teachers had to make adjustment, such
as abandoned their valued beliefs and practice, minimized “communications
with leaders,” stifled their idealistic imagined TIs, and performed new roles to
“follow the crowd,” the rule, and the told (Wei et al., 2020, p. 691; Yang et al.,
2021b, p.245). Being compelled to engage in restricted actions “based on
compliance rather than participation in meaning” (Wenger, 1998, p. 187), they,
consequently, formed passive TIs such as “routine performer” and “miserable
follower” to get by (Xu, 2013, p. 83; Yang et al., 2021b, p. 235).
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
281
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
282
reform made teachers feel fulfilled by virtue of their firm belief in the usefulness
of ESP. Yet, their ESP TI negotiation was undermined due to the peripheral
status of ESP discipline in the institution and mainstream language research,
cutting off their sense of belonging. Under the pressure of publication and
promotion, they chose to engage in ESP teaching while disengaging in ESP
research, a “subtle mix of participation and non-participation” (Wenger, 1998, p.
196).
In a nutshell, alignment with dominant discourses can be coerced, ostensible, or
optional, mediated by asymmetrical power relations, entrenched exam culture,
teachers’ beliefs, experiences, and multiple utilitarian purposes. Restricted
actions based on compliance, rather than meaning negotiation, led to passive TIs.
Wavering actions reflecting teachers’ confusion and predicaments in education
practices and professional development resulted in simulated or fragmented TIs.
Imagined TIs can be crushed by stiff reifications, but dominant discourses can
also yield imagined TIs subscribing to those discourses, such as TIs as
researchers.
Xu (2013) and Liu and Xu (2013) noted that unfair experiences regarding
granting awards and opportunities—reifications of recognition, demoralized
and disillusioned teachers. A teacher in Xu’s (2013) study felt “indignant”
because awards and opportunities to participate in competitions were based on
seniority rather than competence and performance (p. 83). She was unwilling to
align with such organizational culture, which completely contradicted her belief
and imagination in the teaching profession, so she quit. Similarly, teacher Feng,
who engaged in and chaired the pedagogic reform, was rejected in the
nomination of the best teacher award and the opportunity to study abroad due
to the lack of publications and age bias, making her feel “betrayed” and
disappointed (Liu & Xu, 2013, p. 187). Such experiences dissolved her
“designated alignment” with reforms (p. 184), replaced by her “self-selected
exclusion” from the reform community and “non-participation” in reforms (p.
190). These studies corroborate the significance of fair recognition, the absence of
which might frustrate engagement and put teachers on “an outbound
trajectory,” such as quitting or retreating from the reform stage (Wenger, 1998, p.
154). Besides emotional needs, Chinese teachers’ care for external recognition
resides in its associated resources and opportunities for moving upward
professionally and personally, as shown in the thriving TI cases. Another form
of unfairness leading to feeble TIs was revealed in Xu’s (2014) study, where a
contracted teacher was treated unfairly compared with tenured ones. Not
allowed to apply for the associate professor as a contracted teacher, he
“alienated himself from research,” becoming “a disheartened non-researcher” (p.
253). Shared among these cases are teachers’ experiences of rejection
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
283
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
284
Categories Sub-categories
personal factors agency, belief, competence, career phases, disposition, emotion,
experiences, imagination, morality, motivation, qualification, role,
employment status (i.e., contracted teacher or bianzhi teacher1)
interpersonal factors teacher-students, teacher-parents, teacher-colleagues,
teacher-models, teacher-mentors, teacher-experts, teacher-leaders,
community members’ relationships (e.g., supporting, indifferent)
disciplinary factors status of the teaching discipline, cross-disciplinary collaboration
institutional factors institutional discourses (e.g., policies, regulations), institutional
management, institutional leadership
community factors existence/absence of communities, support/recognition/rejection
from communities
cultural factors exam culture, institutional culture, publication culture, Confucian
culture, cultural artifacts
sociopolitical factors national education policies, power relations, life pressure
1. bianzhi refers to the number of established posts in all state-financed schools, colleges,
or universities.
Power relations
Reviewed literature reveals that coercive power relations discourage self-desired
and coherent TI construction by imposing rigid rules on teaching, research, and
promotion; nevertheless, teacher engagement as a “dimension of power”
potentially enables TI negotiation and reconstructs power relations (Wenger,
1998, p. 175). Cases of TIs as survival and exclusion display suppressive power
relations in which decision-making and ownership of meaning are largely or
totally at the hands of institutions, squelching teacher agency, triggering
negative emotions, and blocking robust TI construction (e.g., Trent, 2020; Wang,
2021; Xu & Huang, 2021). Whereas, in cases of TIs as thriving and some cases of
TIs as survival (e.g., Tao & Gao, 2017), despite constraints in institutional power
hierarchy, teachers’ agentive actions were clearly observed to defend and align
with their values, ideals, or enterprises within the structure (e.g., Bao & Feng,
2022; Jiang et al., 2021). Particularly, agency was activated when national
education policies added “new discourses and power dynamics” to teachers’
situated contexts and became an external power they could effectively harness
for professional development (Jiang, 2022, p. 3). Some flourishing teachers
received support and recognition from leaders and experts for their agentive
reification endorsed and advocated by policies, accessing, or constructing
communities of practices and altering the power relations by accumulating and
gaining “competent interpretation” and “ownership of meaning” in terms of
reforms (e.g., Jiang et al., 2021; Wenger, 1998, p. 201; Wei, 2021; Ye & Zhao, 2019).
Yet, if institution leadership adopts policies superficially and uses power to force
unified policy implementation for more political resources, it frustrates TI
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
285
Agency
Agency anchors in teachers’ engagement, alignment, and imagination. Ye and
Zhao (2019) remarked that Chinese teachers’ agency “is fully embedded in the
institutional structure of the state” (p. 48). Indeed, institutional discourses
shaped by and aligning with national education policies have proven to
influence the direction of teacher agency, orientation of TI construction, and
development of TI trajectories in a significant and distinctive way (e.g., Bao &
Feng, 2022; Jiang, 2022; Wei, 2021). When teachers’ beliefs and value aligned
with policies or when teachers strived for self-development within the system,
they exerted agency to construct a “self-institutionalized self” (Ye & Zhao, 2019,
p. 46) by doing what the institutions and policies desired and required them to
do. Notable examples include university teachers’ engagement in research and
imagination to be researchers to align with institutional discourses regarding
research shaped by the national initiative of building “world-class universities
and disciplines” (e.g., Long & Huang, 2017; Yang et al., 2021b). Whatever
institutional system, scope, and opportunities for exercising agency are
indispensable for robust TI construction. As immediate contextual influences,
suppressive and obedience-oriented institutional discourses and practices that
lacked negotiability are observed as the most direct factor in eroding potential
thriving TIs by constraining teachers’ agentive actions (e.g., Trent, 2020; Xu &
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
286
Huang, 2021).
Emotion
Emotion has been increasingly recognized as central to TI construction,
supported by the reviewed literature. Teachers wrapped in the changing
educational environment and competing discourses experienced mixed
emotions in flux, informing TI construction (e.g., Lee et al., 2011). Strong
emotions that transform TIs were triggered by critical events in teachers’
professional lives, such as the enactment of relevant education policies (e.g., Wei,
2021); and they could also be stirred by daily experiences and pervasive
discourses in the workplace, such as heavy workload and stringent
performativity evaluation (e.g., Long & Huang, 2017; Wang, 2021). Teacher
emotions touch off and bridge teachers’ judgment, thoughts, imagination, and
actions toward their situation and teaching lives, reframing TIs. For instance, CE
teachers’ experiences within neoliberal institutional discourses engendered
heterogeneous emotions (e.g., anger, shame) that prompted their reposition,
revaluation, imagination, and actions regarding their TIs, forming a
non-participation TI or striving for an organizational-desired TI as a
teacher-researcher (e.g., Huang & Guo, 2019; Yang et al., 2021b). Congruence
between external requirements and teachers’ beliefs, competence, and agentive
actions brought positive emotions, facilitating integrated and confident TIs
thriving (Ye & Zhao, 2019); whereas dissonance between external and internal
forces evoked negative emotions that discouraged engagement, contributing to
weak TIs with tensions (e.g., Yip et al., 2022). It is noteworthy that growing
research demonstrates that negative emotions induced by demanding
socio-institutional environments could be conducive to teachers’ agentive
actions for survival, self-growth, and success, enhancing TIs (e.g., Jiang et al.,
2021; Yang et al., 2021a).
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
287
endeavors and strengthen solid TIs (e.g., Yuan & Burns, 2017). In contrast,
interpersonal relationships that stirred negative emotions are characterized by
estrangement, competition, surveillance, denial, and distrust, frustrating actions,
and eroding TIs (Huang & Guo, 2019; Li & Craig, 2019; Trent, 2020; Wang, 2021).
Particularly, the pervasive neoliberal discourses are observed to have
complicated and jeopardized interpersonal relationships in which teachers and
leaders “live an existence of calculation” (Ball, 2003, p. 215). It is reported that
some teachers experienced negative feelings (e.g., anger, fear, anxiety), seeing
colleagues’ (academic) achievements, being judged by students’ test
performance, or being forced to implement certain practices, which triggered
actions such as compliance, compromise, and struggle (Huang, 2019; Li & Craig,
2019; Wang, 2021; Yang et al., 2021b). This finding resonates with Ball’s (2003)
view that institutions’ neoliberal demands affect relations and engender
individuals’ negative feelings.
Taken together, power relations, agency, and emotion stand out from the
reviewed studies as central mediators in TI construction, which can be combined
as a triangular prism to understand the complexity of TIs in reform contexts.
6. Implication
In this review, we made a crucial observation that teachers’ agentive, strenuous,
and fruitful participation aligning with policies and dominant education
discourses is implicit in thriving TIs with more positive emotional experiences.
Underneath is the power of the state and institutions, embedding alignment
with system’s regulations and enterprises in teacher evaluation and promotion,
profoundly shaping the direction of teacher agency and orientation of TI
development. Not exclusive to Chinese teachers, teachers around the world
“face unprecedented national pressures to comply with policy agendas through
increasingly interventionist systems of surveillance” of the orientation, quality,
and impact of their professional work (Day, 2017, p. 2). A more dialectical view
of education reforms is perhaps desired, as thriving TI cases have verified that
teachers’ actions initially driven externally brought a sense of fulfillment when
they developed competence, gained ownership of meaning, and received
recognition (e.g., Bao & Feng, 2022; Jiang, 2022; Wei, 2021). It was the process of
exerting agency and reifying certain TIs, albeit externally motivated, that
brought fresh perspectives and meaningful experiences to teachers,
reinvigorating their passions, inspiring their imagination, and promoting their
TIs. However, greater sensitivity should be given to the affordance of teacher
agency that is largely contingent upon their situated environments and internal
competence and beliefs. Several studies reveal that institutional environment
forbidding space for negotiability and agency deprofessionalized teachers with
fragile TIs (e.g., Wang, 2021); while the clash between external requirements and
internal forces tormented teachers by feelings of insecurity, vulnerability,
inferiority, and indignation, damaging their TIs (Huang & Guo, 2019; Yang et al.,
2021b; Zeng & Fickel, 2021). Therefore, we argue for teacher empowerment that
enhances strong TIs in such a turbulent era when teachers are wrapped in
ever-changing reform discourses and socio-institutional environments.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
288
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
289
7. Conclusion
Drawing from Wenger’s (1998) identity theory, our systematic review has taken
stock of empirical studies focusing on Chinese teachers’ TIs in times of reforms
since 2010. This review has shown that education reforms could result in both
challenges and opportunities for teachers, constraining, enabling, or orienting
their TIs. Under the three scenarios of TIs are teachers’ unique professional
stories, the development of which are constantly mediated by myriad factors,
such as emotions, beliefs, agency, moral stance, institutional environment,
culture, and power relations. How these interrelated factors interact to shape TI
construction and reconstruction under education reform policies warrants
further investigation from multiple perspectives. Particularly, TI conflicts and
crises caused by neoliberal reform discourses call for more research. Suggestions
for enhancing strong and positive TIs are put forward, which point to the
necessity of teacher empowerment from the broader socio-institutional context,
teacher themselves, and teacher education. We hope to see more contextualized
TI reviews and enlightening TI research against the global education reform
trend in the future since different sociopolitical, economic, and cultural
environments influence countries’ education policies and teachers’ responses to
them.
8. References
Ball, S. J. (2003). The teacher's soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education
Policy, 18(2), 215-228. https://doi.org/10.1080/0268093022000043065
Bao, J., & Feng, D. W. (2022). “Doing research is not beyond my reach”: The
reconstruction of College English teachers' professional identities through a
domestic visiting program. Teaching and Teacher Education, 112, 103648.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103648
Beauchamp, C., & Thomas, L. (2009). Understanding teacher identity: An overview of
issues in the literature and implications for teacher education. Cambridge Journal
of Education, 39(2), 175-189. https://doi.org/10.1080/030576409029022
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in
(reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328-352.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238
Carl, A. E. (2009). Teacher empowerment through curriculum development: Theory into
practice. Juta and Company Ltd.
Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2017). Thematic analysis. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(3),
297-298. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1262613
Day, C. (2017). Teachers’ worlds and work: Understanding complexity, building quality (1st
ed.). Taylor & Francis.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
290
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
291
Long, N. N., & Huang, J. (2017). Exploring researcher identity construction of university
EFL teachers in China. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 40(4), 371-391.
https://doi.org/10.1515/cjal-2017-0022
Meihami, H., & Husseini, F. (2020). EFL teacher educators and EFL teachers’
perspectives on identity-oriented teacher education programs. Journal of Applied
Linguistics and Applied Literature: Dynamics and Advances, 8(2), 101-117.
https://doi.org/10.22049/JALDA.2020.26839.1179
Myrick Short, P., Greer, J. T., & Melvin, W. M. (1994). Creating empowered schools:
Lessons in change. Journal of Educational Administration, 32(4), 38-52.
https://doi.org/10.1108/09578239410069106
Peters, M. A., & Besley, T. (2018). China’s double first-class university strategy: 双一流.
Educational Philosophy and Theory, 50(12), 1075-1079.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2018.1438822
Reeves, J. (2018). Teacher identity. In J. Liontas (Ed.), The TESOL encyclopedia of English
language teaching (1st ed., pp. 1-7). Wiley-Blackwell.
Rodrigues, F., & Mogarro, M. J. (2019). Student teachers’ professional identity: A review
of research contributions. Educational Research Review, 28, 100286.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.100286
Sachs, J. (2005). Teacher education and the development of professional identity:
Learning to be a teacher. In M. Kompf & P. Denicolo (Eds.), Connecting policy and
practice (1st ed., pp. 5-21). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203012529
Sahlberg, P. (2016). The global educational reform movement and its impact on
schooling. In K. Mundy, A. Green, B. Lingard, & A. Verger (Eds.), The handbook of
global education policy (pp. 128-144). Wiley-Blackwell.
https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118468005.ch7
Tao, J., & Gao, X. S. (2017). Teacher agency and identity commitment in curricular
reform. Teaching and Teacher Education, 63, 346-355.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.01.010
The Central Committee of the Chinese Communist Party [CCCCP]. (1985). The CPC
central committee’s decision on reform for the educational system reform. The Central
Committee of the Chinese Communist Party [CCCCP],. Retrieved July 15, 2022,
from http://gov.hnedu.cn/c/2005-06-21/784062.shtml
The Central Committee of the Chinese Communist Party and the State Council
[CCCCP]. (2022, March 32). Decision of the central committee of the Chinese
Communist Party and the State Council on deepening the educational reform and fully
advancing quality education. The Central Committee of the Chinese Communist
Party and the State Council [CCCCP]. Retrieved July 15, 2022, from
https://ganxun.hue.edu.cn/2022/0331/c19774a137966/page.psp
The State Council. (2015, October 24). Overall plan for the coordinated promotion of the
construction of world-class universities and first-class disciplines. Ministry of
Education of the People's Republic of China. Retrieved July 15, 2022, from
http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xxgk/moe_1777/moe_1778/201511/t20151105_2
17823.html
Trent, J. (2020). Wither teacher professional development? The challenges of learning
teaching and constructing identities across boundaries in China. Asia Pacific
Journal of Education, 40(3), 315-329.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2020.1717438
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
292
Trent, J., & Liu, X. (2023). A ‘useful’ vocational education English language teacher by
any other name. Short stories of teacher identity construction and reconstruction
in vocational education in China. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 1–19.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2023.2169840
Tsui, A. B. M. (2007). Complexities of identity formation: A narrative inquiry of an EFL
teacher. TESOL Quarterly, 41(4), 657-680.
https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2007.tb00098.x
Vesely, A. K., Saklofske, D. H., & Nordstokke, D. W. (2014). EI training and pre-service
teacher wellbeing. Personality and Individual Differences, 65, 81-85.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.01.052
Wang, P. (2021). Too many constraints: Five first-year EFL teachers’ professional identity
construction. European Journal of Teacher Education, 44(2), 180-199.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1758662
Wei, B., Chen, N., & Chen, B. (2020). Teaching with laboratory work: the presentation of
beginning science teachers’ identity in school settings. Research Papers in
Education, 35(6), 681-705. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2019.1615117
Wei, G. (2021). Imagined professional identity: A narrative inquiry into a Chinese
teacher’s perezhivaniya in life. Teaching and Teacher Education, 102, 103337.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103337
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity (1st ed.).
Cambridge University Press.
Xu, H. (2013). From the imagined to the practiced: A case study on novice EFL teachers'
professional identity change in China. Teaching and Teacher Education, 31, 79-86.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.01.006
Xu, J., & Huang, Y. T. (2021). Identity transformation of Chinese secondary school
teachers during educational reform. Asian Journal of Social Science, 49(2), 101-108.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajss.2021.01.001
Xu, Y. T. (2014). Becoming researchers: A narrative study of Chinese university EFL
teachers’ research practice and their professional identity construction. Language
Teaching Research, 18(2), 242-259. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168813505943
Xue, E. Y., & Li, J. (2021). What is the ultimate education task in China? Exploring
“strengthen moral education for cultivating people”(“Li De Shu Ren”).
Educational Philosophy and Theory, 53(2), 128-139.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2020.1754539
Yang, S. S., Shu, D. F., & Yin, H. B. (2021a). ‘Frustration drives me to grow’: Unraveling
efl teachers' emotional trajectory interacting with identity development. Teaching
and Teacher Education, 105, 103420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103420
Yang, S. S., Shu, D. F., & Yin, H. B. (2021b). “Teaching, my passion; publishing, my
pain”: Unpacking academics’ professional identity tensions through the lens of
emotional resilience. Higher Education, 84(2), 235-254.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-021-00765-w
Yazan, B. (2019). Toward identity‐oriented teacher education: Critical autoethnographic
narrative. TESOL Journal, 10(1), e00388. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.388
Ye, J. Y., & Zhao, D. (2019). Developing different identity trajectories: Lessons from the
Chinese teachers. Teachers and Teaching, 25(1), 34-53.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2018.1532408
Yip, J. W. C., Huang, J., & Teng, M. F. (2022). Identity and emotion of university English
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
293
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
264
Mohammed AbdAlgane*
Associate Professor of Applied Linguistics
Department of English & Translation, College of Science and Arts,
Ar Rass, Qassim University, Saudi Arabia
*
Corresponding author: Mohammed AbdAlgane; Mo.mohammed@qu.edu.sa
©Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0
International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
265
teach the language and that universities provide teachers and students
with adequate resources to help them understand the language.
1. Introduction
This study dealt with the topic of sociolinguistic pedagogical implications of
English as a Foreign Language (EFL) issues by applying a case study conducted
at Saudi universities. Exploring various factors and the effect of the social context
on EFL learners' English aptitude at the tertiary level reflect that social
competence helps learners gain more than academic competence. Non-native
speakers frequently encounter misunderstandings in the cross-cultural
implementation of communicative acts, which are typically caused by their
improper use of pragma-linguistic and socio-pragmatic skills. Not making an
effort to recognize and understand the aspects of the language-use situations that
influence the rules of language usage cross-cultural differences may lead to
misconceptions and major communication breakdowns between the speech
participants. The rules of speaking can be learned gradually by the language
learners as they become more and more ingrained in the culture of the target
language; however, this process takes time, and many rules may go years without
being noticed or, worse yet, never be learned at all. Communication is a significant
area of challenge for EFL learners.
English is a global language with the right to global ownership since it is widely
learned and used by people of all ethnicities with different mother tongues and
cultures. As a communication solution for multilingual and multicultural
situations, it is unsurprising that distinct variants originate and exist across
geographic regions according to Jenkins (2015) and Galloway and Rose (2018).
Akkakoson (2019), and Ambele (2021) stated that the existence of this trend
should be acknowledged and understood by educators working in the English
language teaching (ELT) sector. Their objectives need to be reprioritized, and their
ELT frameworks need to be rethought. The major educational emphasis should
no longer be on adhering to Standard English, such as British English or American
English. Priority should be given to strategies that address communication
success in cross-cultural contexts and the new linguistic landscape (Jenkins 2015;
Galloway and Rose, 2015). English's sociolinguistic landscape has changed and
become more diverse, causing the language to be less tied to particular English
varieties or ethnic groupings like British and American, according to Jenkins
(2015) and Galloway and Rose (2018). As a result, the uses and applications of the
language quickly transcend racial, social, and geographic borders.
The main challenge of this study was to find the sociolinguistic pedagogical
consequences of EFL difficulties. The eventual goal of language education is to
develop social-linguistic competence, therefore teachers' crucial involvement in
this change is still a huge concern. Education that considers linguistic, socio-
historical, cultural, and pedagogical issues is necessary for future EFL instructors.
At the same time, this was considered taking cognisance of the impact of variables
and the social setting on tertiary-level English proficiency in EFL learners that was
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
266
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
267
from parts of sociolinguistics and cultural research. Accordingly, this study aimed
at attaining the following objectives:
1. Determining the sociolinguistic pedagogical implications of EFL.
2. Explaining instructors’ vital role in changing language education.
3. Proving that future EFL instructors require education that considers linguistic,
socio-historical, cultural, and pedagogical aspects.
4. Investigating the significant influence of sociolinguistic characteristics on the
educational context and the growth and use of EFL.
5. Describing the close relationship between social and educational settings and
the classroom environment as suitable factors for fostering sociolinguistic
competence in EFL learners and attaining the desired outcomes.
2. Literature Review
2.1. Sociolinguistic Pedagogical Implications of EFL Issues
The study of language in its social context is known as sociolinguistics. It looks at
the way language is used in different social settings and the different ways in
which language can be used to communicate. The term ‘socio-pedagogy’ refers to
the use of sociolinguistic approaches to teaching and learning. Socio-pedagogical
teaching focuses on teaching language in its natural context so that students are
able to understand and use the language correctly. Sociolinguistic pedagogy has
implications for the teaching and learning of EFL in Saudi universities. Various
sociolinguistic issues need to be addressed to ensure effective teaching and
learning of a language. These include the use of the native language, the use of
dialects, the use of non-standard language, the use of slang, and the use of code-
switching.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
268
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
269
to social considerations, as noted by Muftah (2022). Shenk (2014) has found that
the social and discursive context in which instructional intervention is offered
significantly affects the success of second/foreign language students in school.
The social setting determines not just the status of the target language within a
given speech community, but also the kind of linguistic resources available to
language students. The sociolinguistic characteristics of English language
acquisition and its use in India, West Germany, and Japan, as illustrated by Nunan
(2003), show how these countries have significantly different influences on the
growth and use of English as a second or foreign language.
Tollefson and Tsui (2014) claim that the educational context is crucial in
determining both the nature and the goals of language learning programmes for
English language learning (ELL). For instance, the educational setting affects the
connection between the native tongue and the language of instruction, as well as
the development of ‘standard’ and ‘nonstandard’ linguistic norms. Official
decisions in the field of education will allow students learning a second language
to choose between additive and subtractive forms of bilingualism. Additive
bilingualism allows second-language learners to develop functional proficiency
in a second language without abandoning their first language. Subtractive
bilingualism describes the phenomenon in which second language learners lose
their native language as their ability and confidence in the target language
improves. Norton and Toohey (2011) state that “[e]ducation can affect how non-
native speaker status, race, gender, class, age, and social standing mediate access
to linguistic and interactional resources, and how discourses appropriated by
second language learners are linked to power and authority" (cited in Pavlenko,
2002:291).
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
270
other names under which the study of language has been known before World
War II. Learners' unique traits have a major bearing on how quickly and well they
acquire a language, thus teachers should not ignore them.
2.4.3. One's Age
It is generally agreed that one's future linguistic ability is impacted by the age at
which one first begins learning a foreign language. Lenneberg and Lenneberg
(1967) argue that learning a second language before reaching puberty is optimal
since after this age, linguistic growth slows down. Younger is better, according to
Krashen (1981), but he also proposed that children and adults may use different
processes when learning a second language, with children relying on the same
innate properties of language acquisition as with first language acquisition and
adults relying on general problem-solving skills. For others, however, ‘older is
better’ because of the benefits for second-language acquisition of increased
cognitive and reading abilities that come with age (McLaughlin, 1987; Snow,
1983). These data demonstrate that maturation influences L2 (second language)
learning.
There are three main reasons why sociolinguistic competence is not generally
recognized as a separate issue and an integral part of language instruction, as
outlined by Omaggio (2001):
a) Due to time limits imposed by the curriculum, many language teachers feel
they cannot adequately provide students with sociocultural training.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
271
Yu (2006) agrees that there are not enough communicative contexts in which
students use language, and she argues that it is unrealistic to expect students to
use authentic and natural language in the classroom, where most second-
language learning takes place. Yu draws attention to the challenges associated
with teaching and learning sociolinguistic competence. Due to a lack of L2
sociolinguistic competence, transmission from L1 includes the transfer of L1
sociocultural patterns into L2 sociolinguistic rules of language usage. According
to Holmes and Brown (1987), it seems simpler to explicitly teach grammatical
rules, segmental level pronunciation, and lexical items, while the sociocultural
components of communicative competence are viewed as incidentally learned.
This is a false premise since familiarity with linguistic conventions and the correct
method to pronounce and interpret individual words do not necessarily translate
into familiarity with the contexts in which those words are used.
Social context and cultural milieu shape how linguistic forms are understood by
speakers of a given language. In actual communication, forms have roles and
socio-pragmatic meanings that are intertwined with one another. Classroom
interaction with native speakers is essential for teachers to help their pupils
develop their communicative skills. Teachers need to be well-versed in the topic
of sociolinguistic competence if they are to aid their pupils in developing this skill.
Most teachers either do not cover the material which they do not know much
about or do a poor job of covering it since they have inadequate training in
sociolinguistics during their own education. An effective response is needed to
the problem of teachers lacking sociolinguistic abilities. To accomplish this, it is
necessary to either provide instructors with a well-structured educational
programme designed specifically for them, or to provide them with ample
opportunities to interact with native English speakers so that they may acquire a
more nuanced understanding of English culture and proper language usage.
Altering curricula and syllabi to make room for instruction in this area can also
help in resolving the aforementioned problems. Learners' purported inability to
overcome pre-existing linguistic and cultural hurdles will also be addressed in the
final results of the analysis of the qualitative data.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
272
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
273
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
274
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
275
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
276
4.2. Future EFL instructors require education that considers linguistic, socio-
historical, cultural, and pedagogical aspects
Future EFL instructors require education that considers linguistic, socio-
historical, cultural, and pedagogical aspects, indicating that EFL instructors
should be aware of their own background, culture, and identity.
Chart 2. Future EFL instructors require education that considers linguistic, socio-
historical, cultural, and pedagogical aspects
16
14
14 13 13 13 13
12 11
10 9 9 9 9
4 3 3
2 1 1 1
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
EFL instructors should EFL instructors should EFL instructors need to EFL instructors should be EFL instructors need to
consider and understand have an understanding of consider the cultural aware of his/her own cultivate the relationship
the relevance of the the socio-cultural differences of the background culture and between belief and
learning environment in background of the learner. students in implementing identity. practice to ensure better
the teaching/learning activities in the classroom. language learning
process. Strongly agree Agree Uncertain Disagree Strongly diagree outcomes
According to Figure 2, which shows that future EFL instructors require education
that considers linguistic, socio-historical, cultural, and pedagogical aspects, 13%
of the participants ‘strongly agree’ that ‘EFL instructors should consider and
understand the relevance of the learning environment in the teaching/learning
process’, 9% ‘agree’, while only 1% of the respondents were ‘uncertain’.
Regarding ‘EFL instructors having an understanding of the socio-cultural
background of the learner’, 13% of the participants ‘strongly agree’, 9% ‘agree’,
and only 1% were ‘uncertain’. For the statement ‘EFL instructors need to consider
the cultural differences of the students in implementing activities in the
classroom’, 13% of the participants ‘strongly agree’, 9% ‘agree’, and only 1%
indicated ‘uncertain’. Furthermore, 14% of the participants ‘strongly agree’ that
‘EFL instructors should be aware of their own background culture and identity’,
11% ‘agree’, and 3% indicated ‘uncertain’. Lastly, 13% of the participants ‘strongly
agree’ that ‘EFL instructors need to cultivate the relationship between belief and
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
277
10
4
2 2
2 1 1
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
Social situations are shaped Social competence helps Context can support The way a teacher chooses
by contextual factors and learners gain more than students appreciate the to manage the daily
contextual cues are academic competence. relevance of disciplinary concerns of teaching that
important for interpreting knowledge and skills, indirectly shapes the
social situations increasing their motivation perceptions of learners
and engagement
Figure 3: Exploring the effect of factors and social context on EFL learners' English
aptitude at the tertiary level
Shown in Figure 3 are responses about the effect of factors and social context on
EFL learners' English aptitude at the tertiary level. 13% of the participants
‘strongly agree’ that ‘social situations are shaped by contextual factors and
contextual cues are important for interpreting social situations’; 13% ‘agree’, and
2% are ‘uncertain’. It was found that 15% of the participants ‘strongly agree’ that
‘social competence helps learners gain more than academic competence’, while
12% ‘agree’ and only 1% indicated ‘uncertain’. Moreover, 15% of the participants
‘strongly agree’ that ‘context can help students appreciate the relevance of
disciplinary knowledge and skills, increasing their motivation and engagement’;
12% indicated ‘agree’; and only 1% selected ‘uncertain’. Additionally, 14% of the
participants ‘strongly agree’ that ‘the way a teacher chooses to manage the daily
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
278
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
279
By describing the close relationship between social and educational settings and
the classroom environment as factors suitable for fostering sociolinguistic
competence in EFL learners and the desired outcomes, we explored whether
culture and education are two inseparable parameters although they are
interdependent and whether EFL learners need to master the cultural rules of use
and rules of discourse.
12 11 11
10
10
8
8
4
2 2 2
2 1 1 1 1 1
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
Culture and education Social interaction plays Social interaction plays EFL learners need to The emphasis is on the
are two inseparable an important role in an important role EFL in master the cultural rules appropriateness of
parameters and they learning. learning by performing of use and rules of communicative acts and
are interdependent. learning tasks. discourse. the naturalness of
speech within given
Strongly agree Agree Uncertain Disagree Strongly diagree socio-cultural contexts.
Figure 5: Describing the close relationship between social and educational settings and
the classroom environment factors suitable for fostering sociolinguistic competence in
EFL learners and the desired outcomes
Figure 5 describes the close relationship between social and educational settings
and the classroom environment factors suitable for fostering sociolinguistic
competence in EFL learners and the desired outcomes. It is shown that ‘culture
and education are two inseparable parameters and they are interdependent’, with
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
280
which 16% of the participants ‘strongly agree’, 11% ‘agree’, and only 1% was
‘uncertain’; ‘social interaction plays an important role in learning’, with which
11% of the participants ‘strongly agree’, 15% ‘agree’, and 2% of the participants
were ‘uncertain’; ‘social interaction plays an important role in EFL learning by
performing learning tasks’, with which 13% of the participants ‘strongly agree’,
14% ‘agree’, and only 1% of the participants were ‘uncertain’; ‘EFL learners need
to master the cultural rules of use and rules of discourse’, to which 8% of the
participants responded ‘strongly agree’, 16% ‘agree’, 2% ‘uncertain’, 1%
‘disagree’, and 1% of the participants reacted with ‘strongly disagree’. Lastly, for
‘the emphasis is on the appropriateness of communicative acts and the
naturalness of speech within given socio-cultural contexts’, 10% of the
participants responded with ‘strongly agree’, 15% with ‘agree’, 2% were
‘uncertain’, and only 1% indicated ‘strongly disagree.’
5. Conclusion
The research shows that the use of a socio-pedagogical approach to teaching EFL
in Saudi universities can have a positive impact on the EFL issues in the country.
It is recommended that EFL instructors in Saudi universities take a socio-
pedagogical approach to teaching the language and that universities provide
teachers and students with adequate resources to help them understand the
language. By taking these steps, universities can ensure that their students are able
to effectively use the language and avoid confusion and misunderstanding. The
research results demonstrate that the instructors have a positive view of the EFL
issues in their universities and that their teaching has a positive impact on EFL
issues. The instructors believe that teaching the language in its natural context is
the most effective approach to teaching the language, and the students report that
the instructors’ teaching has a positive impact on their understanding of the
language. This indicates that these sociolinguistic issues should be addressed in
the teaching of EFL in Saudi universities.
6. References
Akkakoson, S. (2019). Thai Language Learners' Sense of English Ownership. PASAA:
Journal of Language Teaching and Learning in Thailand, 58, 235-262.
Ambele, E. A. (2021). Voices of learners in Thai ELT classrooms: A wake-up call towards
teaching English as a lingua franca. Asian Englishes, 23(2), 201-
217. https://doi.org/10.1080/13488678.2020.1759248
Beebe, L. M. & Takahashi, T. (1989). Sociolinguistic Variation in Face-Threatening Speech
Acts. Springer EBooks, 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0900-8_13
Blommaert, J. (2014). From Mobility to Complexity in Sociolinguistic Theory and Method.
In N. Coupland (ed.). Sociolinguistics: Theoretical Debates. London: Cambridge
University Press.
Bloome, D. & Green, J. (2015). The Social and Linguistic Turns in Studying Language and
Literacy. In The Routledge Handbook of Literacy Studies (pp. 19-34). London:
Routledge.
Canale, M. & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical Bases of Communicative Approaches to
Second Language Teaching and Testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1-47.
https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/I.1.1
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
281
Ellis, R. (1991). Communicative Competence and the Japanese Learner. JALT Journal, 13(2),
103-129.
Faizin, Ahmad 'apin' (2015). Sociolinguistics in language teaching. MABASAN, 9(2), 66-77.
Galloway, N. & Rose, H. (2015). Introducing Global Englishes. London: Routledge.
Galloway, N. & Rose, H. (2018). Incorporating Global Englishes into the ELT classroom.
ELT Journal, 72(1), 3-14. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccx010
Hall, J. K. & Walsh, M. (2002). Teacher-Student Interaction and Language
Learning. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 22: 186.
Heath, S. B. (1983). Ways with Words: Language, Life and Work in Communities and Classrooms.
London: Cambridge University Press.
Holmes, J. & Brown, D. F. (1987). Teachers and Students Learning about Compliments.
TESOL Quarterly, 21(3), 523-546.
Izumi, K. (1996). Teaching Sociolinguistic Knowledge in Japanese High Schools. JALT
Journal, 18(2), 327-340.
Jenkins, J. (2015). Repositioning English and Multilingualism in English as a Lingua
Franca. Englishes in Practice, 2(3), 49-85. https://doi.org/10.1515/eip-2015-0003
Krashen, S. (1981). Second Language Acquisition. Second Language Learning, 3(7), 19-39.
Kumaravadivelu, B. (2006). Understanding Language Teaching: From Method to Postmethod.
London: Routledge.
Lenneberg, E. H. & Lenneberg, E. (1967). Foundations of Language Development. New York:
Routledge.
Lesaux, N. K. & Siegel, L. S. (2003). The Development of Reading in Children Who Speak
English as a Second Language. Developmental Psychology, 39(6), 1005.
Li, G. (2020). Principles for Developing Learner Agency in Language Learning in a New
Eduscape with COVID-19. Language Learning, 5, 30-40.
Littlewood, W. (2013). Developing a Context-Sensitive Pedagogy for Communication-
Oriented Language Teaching. English Teaching, 68(3), 3-25.
http://dx.doi.org/10.15858/engtea.68.3.201309.3.
McGregor, Sarah. (2019). The Role of Environment in Second Language Pragmatic
Comprehension: A Case Study of Intensive English Program Students in
Homestays. DEd, University of San Francisco.
McLaughlin, M. W. (1987). Learning from Experience: Lessons from Policy
Implementation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 9(2), 171-178.
Muftah, M. (2022). Impact of social media on learning English language during the
COVID-19 pandemic. PSU Research Review. https://doi.org/10.1108/prr-10-
2021-0060
Munandar, M. I. & Newton, J. (2021) Indonesian EFL Teachers’ Pedagogic Beliefs and
Classroom Practices Regarding Culture and Interculturality. Language and
Intercultural Communication, 21(2), 158-173.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2020.1867155
Nunan, D. (2003). The Impact of English as a Global Language on Educational Policies and
Practices in the Asia-Pacific Region. TESOL Quarterly, 37(4),
589. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588214
Norton, B. & Toohey, K. (2011). Identity, Language Learning, and Social Change. Language
Teaching, 44(4), 412-446.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
282
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
283
Zhang, H. & Wang. N. (2016). Sociolinguistics and English Teaching in China. Theory and
Practice in Language Studies, 6(4), 830-834.
https://doi.org/10.17507/TPLS.0604.21.
Appendix
The Questionnaire:
Areas of improvement in explaining instructors’ vital role in changing language
education
Language proficiency
Promoting student
participation
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
284
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
285
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
286
Carolina Pretell
CENTRUM Católica Graduate Business School, Lima, Peru
Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, Lima, Peru
*
Corresponding author: Beatrice Avolio, bavolio@pucp.pe
©Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0
International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
287
1. Introduction
Science, technology and innovation are necessary elements for the social and
economic progress of the world (Organization of Ibero-American States for
Education, Science and Culture, 2012). In this context, research, as a social process
that aims to discover new knowledge from evidence, forms the basis of progress.
In many countries, research is developed, disseminated and used through various
organizations and institutions that make up national innovation systems. A
national innovation system can be defined as “the set of organizations and
institutions of a country that influence the development, dissemination and use
of different types of knowledge and innovations” (Colciencias, 2016, p. 5).
According to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development
(OECD) (1997), the performance of a system of science, technology and innovation
is the result of complex relationships among its stakeholders, whereby the flows
of knowledge and technology among people, companies, higher educational
institutions and research institutes are essential for innovation and technological
development processes. Thus, the governing institutions of science, technology
and innovation systems are not only expected to guarantee the quality and socio-
economic relevance of research, but also to be able to create opportunities to
improve interactions among the stakeholders at national and international levels
and promote competitiveness by building capacities in strategic areas (Science
and Technology Options Assessment, 2014). One of the fundamental stakeholders
in the system of science, technology and innovation is the higher educational
institutions, which play a fundamental role in the creation of new knowledge
through scientific, technological, humanistic and social research. To meet this
goal, higher educational institutions must develop the research skills of their
professors and students, through the incorporation of research as a differentiating
element of learning within the curriculum and the institution (Lopez et al., 2022).
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
288
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
289
RQ2. What are the key factors for the formation and consolidation of research
seedbeds? A literature review can be described as a way to collect and synthesize
previous research (Knopf, 2006), which is especially useful for integrating
perspectives and facilitating theory development (Onwuegbuzie et al., 2012). The
literature review is not only a report that summarizes articles from a specific line
of research; it also provides a description and critical evaluation of a line of
research (Parajuli, 2020). Furthermore, they can help to identify knowledge gaps
and provide recommendations for future research.
To the best of our knowledge, this article is the first literature review applied to
the study of research seedbeds. This article is expected to serve as an input for the
development of strategies of formative research based on scientific seedbeds, as
well as providing recommendations for future research on this topic. The rest of
the article is structured as follows. Section two presents the definition of research
seedbeds. Section three explains the methodology applied to the literature review
and section four presents the results of the literature review. Finally, the
conclusions and recommendations for future research are discussed.
2. Theoretical Foundation
Research seedbeds are defined in different ways in educational institutions. Some
also refer to them as scientific seedbeds or research circles. According to García (2010),
the research seedbed “is an alternative training space to the curriculum…that uses
the professor-book-student triad methodology” (p. 265). Research seedbeds
involve activities based on reading, speaking, writing, attendance at conferences
and academic and cultural events, the organization of events, the construction of
joint projects and other proposals for reflective intervention. For Molineros (2010),
they are “groups that acquire instruments for the development of research, in a
space that promotes conversation and dialogue and where new knowledge and
learning methods are discovered” (p. 212). Giraldo (2002) explains that the
seedbeds are interdisciplinary learning communities that converge in the
formation of a research culture and the promotion of the scientific spirit in the
educational field.
In terms of their formation, research seedbeds usually have the same structural
and functional form. They are comprised of (i) a research tutor (in charge of
supervising and guiding students in research activities); (ii) a coordinator-student
(who supports the research tutor and maintains close coordination with the
students of the seedbed, consistently supporting them in the fulfillment of the
duties assigned during the research project); and (iii) members (students who
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
290
carry out projects or other research activities within the seedbed and who are the
main stakeholders seeking to develop their potential for scientific contribution).
Moreover, research seedbeds aim to identify talents among students and train
new researchers, so that students and professors “learn research by doing
research”. Seedbeds are organized as academic communities for the research
systems of the higher educational institutions, through their link with the research
groups, making them the training cells of the generational change of researchers.
Similarly, they are linked to students, since their work areas are derived from the
interests that arise in students in the formal development of their studies, always
framed in the institutional lines of research. Appendix 2 provides three examples
of the characteristics of scientific seedbeds in Latin America (Colombia and Peru).
3. Methodology
In this study, we conducted a systematic literature review to identify, synthesize
and analyze previous studies using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic
Reviews and the Meta-Analyses methodology (PRISMA, 2020). According to
Pahlevan-Sharif et al. (2019), the PRISMA checklist represents one of the most
comprehensive checklists to assess current and future trends in any field. It sets
out the necessary steps to conduct a literature review that is replicable for other
researchers and that generates reliable data. In addition, the application of the
PRISMA checklist contributes to a clearer picture of the execution, quality and
rigor of systematic literature reviews. The PRISMA methodology has four stages.
In the first stage, the researcher determines the objectives of the review and
formulates research questions. In the second, the researcher establishes the
literature review protocol, which includes the definition of databases, search
terms, and literature selection criteria. In the third stage, the researcher performs
the search in the databases, and the search results are filtered according to the
selected criteria. In the fourth stage, the results are analyzed to collect relevant
information, and prepare summary tables and a map of the literature and
references. Finally, the researcher carries out the thematic analysis methodology,
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
291
which is “a form of pattern recognition within the data, where emerging themes
become the categories for analysis” (Fereday & Muir-Cochrane, 2006, p. 82).
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
292
Identification
Studies identified through databases (n=52
in Scopus / n= 8 in Web of Science)
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
293
As for academic journals, the 17 articles were published in 16 journals. The only
journal that includes two publications is the Estudios Pedagógicos Journal, which
aims to contribute to the understanding of pedagogical phenomena. In the case of
the Estudios Pedagógicos Journal, both publications had 14 citations. The rest of
the journals account for 15 publications with 11 citations. The most cited article
was that by Arenas et al. (2021) (12 citations in Scopus). These authors described
the characteristics of the formative research process among students, professors
and coordinators of industrial engineering. They showed that the formative
research process has improved the perception of the quality of academic
programs, for the specific case of industrial engineering. In addition, they
demonstrated a significant increase in scientific production. Martinez-Daza et al.
(2021), who studied the perceptions represented in the attitudes, knowledge and
uses of ICTs in students ascribed to the research seedbed in a virtual business
administration program, and Garza et al. (2021), who studied the processes of
knowledge management in research seedbeds based on an analysis of the
experience of the leaders of the research seedbeds, had three citations each.
Finally, Vega-Monsalve (2019) had two citations. This author analyzed the
formation and consolidation strategies used by two undergraduate research
seedbeds and found that the success of the process lies in the execution of four
moments. These moments are motivation, work dynamics, the performance of the
leader-professor, and institutional support. Finally, the author proposed some
strategies for other scenarios. In terms of the number of publications, only
Martínez-Daza (2022, 2021) participated in the publication of two articles among
the articles included in the analysis.
As for the study population, we identified articles that focused on analyzing the
experience of people linked to the social structure and evolution of the seedbeds,
including students, coordinators, professors and, in some cases, entrepreneurs. In
some papers, the study only focused on students, while in other cases, multiple
units of analysis were considered in the same study.
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
2002 2010 2016 2019 2020 2021 2022
4. Findings
4.1 Research Seedbeds as a Formative Strategy
The first studies on research seedbeds were essays about the dynamics of a
specific seedbed in a particular educational institution (Corpas-Iguarán, 2010;
García, 2010; Giraldo, 2002; Villa et al., 2020). Later, new qualitative research
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
294
studies appeared. One study was based on the case study and ethnography
strategy on the research seedbed in Public Health and Epidemiology of the
Universidad de Antioquia. The authors analyzed the identity (history of the
seedbed, evolution and strategic direction), significant learning (experiences,
motivations, fears and research culture, work methodology and academic
progress of the managers of the seedbeds) and challenges (reflection of the work
and perspectives of the seedbeds) (López-Ríos et al., 2016). Another focused on
the characteristics of the training research process in a seedbed in the field of
industrial engineering in the I.U. Pascual Bravo (Colombia) (Arenas et al., 2020).
A further study analyzed the formation and consolidation strategies used by two
research seedbeds at the Universidad de Manizales (Colombia) (Vega-Monsalve,
2019). Furthermore, one study described an experimental laboratory model that
linked the students and researchers of the university with public and private
organizations, NGOs, communities and people who required technologies to
solve their problems (Chang & Alvarez, 2019). More recently, Valerio (2022)
described how research seedbeds are a tool used to generate research culture in
the Universidad Hispanoamericana de Costa Rica. They found that, as the hotbed
transformed over time, the students developed investigative skills and made
improvements in terms of “cooperative learning, leadership, responsibility,
computer skills, and even conflict resolution” (para. 19).
The previous literature includes only three quantitative studies. The first of these,
with a clearly descriptive scope, identified the perception of nursing students
regarding formative research at the Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
in Peru (Rivas-Díaz et al., 2020). The second, based on the hierarchical clustering
technique, analyzed the perceptions represented in the attitudes, knowledge and
uses of ICTs in students ascribed to the research seedbed in a virtual business
administration program (Martinez-Daza et al., 2021). The third one studied a
purposive sample of 102 students in Perú to analyze the effectiveness of formative
research in strengthening their enquiry competences, using a pre- and post-test
approach (Campos-Ugaz et al., 2022).
More recently, the literature has evolved from descriptive studies to studies that
seek to conceptualize the work developed in the seedbeds, as is the case with
Garza et al. (2021). These authors analyzed the processes of knowledge
management in the research seedbeds based on an analysis of the experience of
the leaders of research seedbeds in different academic programs of the
Corporación Universitaria Minuto de Dios (Colombia) (Garza et al., 2021). The
authors proposed a knowledge management model for research seedbeds that
facilitate their implementation in higher educational institutions that develop this
teaching-learning strategy. In addition, Gallardo-Cerón and Duque-Castaño
(2022) analyzed research seedbeds focused on creating a space for the recognition
of people with outstanding abilities (with high potential for creative and
productive practices oriented to the common good). Finally, Martinez-Daza (2022)
systematized the pedagogical strategy and evaluation of a virtual research
seedbed through five stages: planning, design, implementation, tutoring and
evaluative monitoring.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
295
4.2 Critical Factors for the Formation and Consolidation of Research Seedbeds
While there are diverse experiences of scientific seedbeds, no scientific research
has yet systematized all of the knowledge. According to Garza et al. (2021),
“…seedbeds are a permanent and interdisciplinary space that changes over time
and self-manages based on the continuous learning of the cohorts of students that
are part of it” (p. 161); thus, it is necessary to know the knowledge management
process in the research seedbeds. For this reason, based on the systematic
literature review, the present study aims to identify the critical factors related to
the formation and consolidation of the research seedbeds, enabling them to
generate the expected results, based on the experience of different cases presented
in the literature. It is also important to consider that the optimal results of the
research seedbeds depend on the commitment and “coordinated gearing” of the
leading professor, the students and the institutional support of the university
(Vega-Monsalve, 2019). These factors have been grouped into the following
dimensions:
(i) factors related to the formation of research seedbeds; (ii) factors related to the
organization of research seedbeds; (iii) factors related to the dynamics of the
management of research seedbeds; and (iii) factors related to the stakeholders of
research seedbeds (institution, research tutor and students). Figure 3 summarizes
the factors identified, which are explained below.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
296
Figure 3: Critical factors for the formation and consolidation of research seedbeds
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
297
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
298
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
299
The results showed that research is scarce on this topic and the existing studies
identified have mainly been developed in higher educational institutions in
Colombia. The review allowed us to conclude that, although there are various
experiences of scientific seedbeds in higher educational institutions in the Latin
American region, no scientific research has systematized all the knowledge. The
studies available in the literature show qualitative case studies and ethnography
regarding the experience and significant learning of certain research seedbeds. We
identified only three quantitative studies. Two of these had a clearly descriptive
scope and the third was based on the hierarchical clustering technique to identify
the perceptions represented in the attitudes, knowledge and use of ICTs in
students ascribed to a research seedbed in a virtual business administration
program. Recent qualitative studies have analyzed the processes of knowledge
management in the research seedbeds and the systematization of the pedagogical
strategy of the seedbeds.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
300
Based on the literature review, the study identified the factors that are most critical
for the implementation of research seedbeds, which have been grouped into the
following dimensions: (i) factors related to the formation of research seedbeds; (ii)
factors related to the organization of research seedbeds; (iii) factors related to the
dynamics of the management of research seedbeds; and (iii) factors related to the
stakeholders of research seedbeds (institution, research tutor and students).
Funding
This work was not supported by any specific grant from funding agencies in the
public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no potential conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
The data source for this paper is secondary data and no human experiments
were conducted.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
301
6. References
Ajzen, I. (2002). Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory
of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(4), 665-683.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb00236.x
Arango Montes, R., & Gómez-Giraldo, J. S. (2021). Experiencias de los semilleros de
investigación de la Universidad de Antioquia Seccional Oriente: aprendizajes y
perspectivas [Experiences of the research seedbed of the Universidad de
Antioquía Seccional Oriente: learning and perspectives]. Uni-Pluriversidad, 21(1),
1–17. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.unipluri.21.1.05
Arenas, I., Marín, J., & Vera, J. (2020). Formative research as a pedagogical strategy:
Industrial engineering case study of the I.U Pascual Bravo. Estudios Pedagógicos,
46(1), 319-338. http://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-07052020000100319
Berrouet, F. (2010). Orígenes y dinámicas de los semilleros de investigación en Colombia:
La visión de los fundadores [Origins and dynamics of research seedbed in
Colombia: The vision of the founders]. In L. Molineros (Ed.), La riqueza que hay en
la voz del silencio. Aportes para una discusión sobre la naturaleza de los semilleros de
investigación [The richness in the voice of silence. Contributions to a discussion on the
nature of research seedbeds] (pp. 44-57). Universidad del Cauca. bit.ly/3ZJMr9Y
Bolívar, R., López, L., González, P., & Cardona, J. (2015). Trayectoria e impacto de la estrategia
semilleros de investigación de la Universidad de Antioquía [Trajectory and impact of the
research seedbed strategy of the University of Antioquia]. Universidad de Antioquía.
bit.ly/3jJX6SK
Calderón, Y. (2015). Investigación formativa en el aula para la formación de actitud
científica [Formative research in the classroom for the formation of a scientific
attitude]. Revista Amazonia Investiga, 4(6), 18-26.
Campos, P. (2020). La importancia de la investigación formativa como estrategia de
aprendizaje [The importance of formative research as a learning strategy]. Educare
et Comunicare, 8(1), 88-94. https://doi.org/10.35383/educare.v8i1.397
Campos-Ugaz, O., Campos-Ugaz, W.A., Ronald M. Hernández, Doig, S.G.A., Ortíz, J.B.F.,
Saavedra-López, M.A., Garay-Argandoña, R. (2022). Formative research to
strengthen enquiry competence in university students. International Journal of
Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 21(11), pp. 443-464.
https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.11.25
Chang, I., & Alvarez, H. (2019). Hotbed of research: A practical approach to learning and
research - Faculty of Electrical Engineering. In R. Bilof (Ed.), 2019 7th International
Engineering, Sciences and Technology Conference (IESTEC) (pp. 296-299). IEEE.
https://doi.org/10.1109/IESTEC46403.2019.00061
Colciencias. (2016). Actores del sistema nacional de ciencia, tecnología e innovación [Actors of the
national system of science, technology and innovation]. Ministerio de Ciencia,
Tecnología e Innovación. bit.ly/3Gd5YHN
Corpas-Iguarán, E. (2010). Virtualización de los semilleros de investigación: Acaso un
modelo de continuidad [Virtualization of research seedbeds: Perhaps a model of
continuity]. Revista Ciencias de la Salud, 8(2), 77-87. bit.ly/3WSjp76
Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A
hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development.
International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 1-11.
https://sites.ualberta.ca/~iiqm/backissues/5_1/PDF/FEREDAY.PDF
Gallardo-Cerón, B., & Duque-Castaño, D. (2022). Semilleros de investigación como espacio
de reconocimiento de personas con altas capacidades [Research seedbed as a
space for the recognition of people with high abilities]. Revista Latinoamericana de
Ciencias Sociales, Niñez y Juventud, 20(2), 1-22.
https://doi.org/10.11600/rlcsnj.20.1.4962
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
302
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
303
Onwuegbuzie, A., Leech, N., & Collins, K. (2012). Qualitative analysis techniques for the
review of the literature. The Quantitative Report, 17(56), 1-28.
http://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2012.1754
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (1997). National systems of
innovation. OECD. bit.ly/3WHdgdV
Organization of Ibero-American States. (2012). Ciencia, tecnología e innovación para el
desarrollo y la cohesión social [Science, technology and innovation for development and
social cohesion]. OEI. bit.ly/3Gvfbf5
Pahlevan-Sharif, S., Mura, P., & Wijesinghe, S. (2019). A systematic review of systematic
reviews in tourism. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 39, 158-165.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2019.04.001
Parajuli, J. (2020). Significance of literature review in the research of social sciences. Journal
of Population and Development, 1(1), 96–102.
https://doi.org/10.3126/jpd.v1i1.33108
Pavón, C., Naranjo, M., & Carrillo, G. (2018). Development of formative research in
teaching processes to enhance the professional profile of undergraduate students.
Proceedings of the 16th LACCEI International Multi-Conference for Engineering,
Education and Technology. http://doi.org/10.18687/LACCEI2018.1.1.50
Peláez, L., & Montoya, J. (2019). Investigación formativa e investigación en sentido
estricto: Una reflexión para diferenciar su aplicación en instituciones de educación
superior [Formative research and research in the strict sense: A reflection to
differentiate its application in higher education institutions]. Entre Ciencia e
Ingeniería, 7(13), 20-25. bit.ly/3Z4cSYy
Pepper-Loza, K., & Terán-Vega, J. (2019). El semillero de investigación estudiantil, como
estrategia para la formación de investigadores [The student research seedbed, as
a strategy for the training of researchers]. Polo del Conocimiento, 4(11), 4-20.
bit.ly/3vQTzox
PRISMA. (2020). PRISMA 2020 Statement. PRISMA. bit.ly/3UVuovb
Restrepo-Gómez, B. (2007). Conceptos y aplicaciones de la investigación formativa, y criterios
para evaluar la investigación científica en sentido estricto [Concepts and applications of
formative research, and criteria for evaluating scientific research in the strict sense].
Escuela Politécnica Nacional. bit.ly/3i6t6Qm
Rivas-Díaz, L., Loli, R., & Quiroz, M. (2020). Percepción de estudiantes de enfermería sobre
la investigación formativa en pregrado [Perception of nursing students on
formative research in undergraduate]. Revista Cubana de Enfermería, 36(3), 1-15.
bit.ly/3WFhtPz
Rodrigo, F., Molines, S., & Gómez, C. (2019). Proyectos educativos integrados para el
aprendizaje competencial de los maestros, en los grados superiores de educación.
Análisis de una experiencia y primeros resultados de aprendizaje
[Multidisciplinary educational projects for the improvement of teachers’ skills, in
the degrees of education. Analysis of an experience and first learning results].
Publicaciones, 49(1), 63-78. https://doi.org/10.30827/publicaciones.v49i1.9853
Rubio, M., Vila, R., & Berlanga, V. (2015). La investigación formativa como metodología
de aprendizaje en la mejora de competencias transversales [Formative research as
a learning methodology to improve transversal skills]. Procedia - Social and
Behavioral Sciences, 196, 177–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.037
Sánchez, M., Tisalema, S., & Sotomayor, M. (2018). Sistema de inclusión estudiantil en la
investigación formativa de la Facultad de Arquitectura de la Universidad de
Guayaquil [System of student inclusion in the formative research of the
Architecture Faculty of the University of Guayaquil]. Revista Conrado, 14(63), 43-
48. bit.ly/3ZTxQsE
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
304
Science and Technology Options Assessment. (2014). Measuring scientific performance for
improved policy making: Summary of a study. European Parliamentary Research
Service. bit.ly/3GANenl
Silva, A., Torres, M., González, P., & Sarmiento, J. (2008). Dinámicas de los semilleros de
investigación en la UMNG [Dynamics of research seedbeds at UMNG]. Revista
Facultad de Ciencias Económicas, 16(1), 131-149. bit.ly/3GxbEhq
Universidad de Antioquía. (2019). Semilleros de investigación: Rutas y experiencias de la
Universidad de Antioquía [Research seedbeds: Routes and experiences of the University
of Antioquia]. Editorial Aula de Humanidades. bit.ly/3i4f1mH
Universidad EAFIT. (2022). Investigación/Semilleros [Research/Seedbeds]. EAFIT.
bit.ly/3ChTY6S
Universidad Nacional del Santa. (2019). Reglamento de semillero de investigación (estudiantes
pregrado) [Research seedbed regulations (undergraduate students)]. UNS.
bit.ly/3Qhg6UH
Valerio, C. L. (2022). Research hotbeds for teachers using active learning methodologies
educational tool, to generate research culture at the Universidad
Hispanoamericana of Costa Rica. Proceedings - JICV 2022: 12th International
Conference on Virtual Campus. https://doi.org/10.1109/JICV56113.2022.9934317
Vega-Monsalve, N. (2019). Estrategias de conformación y consolidación de semilleros de
investigación en pregrado. Estudio de caso en una institución de educación
superior en Colombia [Strategies for the formation and consolidation of
undergraduate research seedbeds. Case study in a higher education institution in
Colombia]. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación Superior, 10(27), 216-229.
https://doi.org/10.22201/iisue.20072872e.2019.27.347
Villa, C., Gómez-Giraldo, J., & Montes, R. (2020). Becoming language teacher-researchers
in a research seedbed. Profile: Issues in Teacher's Professional Development, 22(1), 159-
173. https://doi.org/10.15446/profile.v22n1.78806
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
305
Arenas et al. Characteristics of the training research process in a seedbed in the Institución Educativa
9 Colombia Case study
(2020) area of industrial engineering Pascual Bravo
Universidad de
Arago & Gómez-
10 Experience in a research seedbed Antioquía Seccional Colombia Qualitative
Giraldo (2021)
Oriente
©Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
306
Carry out research on important issues for regional and national development, promoting formative research at
Objectives
the Universidad Nacional del Santa.
Required formation One responsible professor, one student coordinator and a maximum of four students.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
307
Activities Work meetings, updates, research projects, dissemination of results and activities, academic interaction.
Incentives Funding in internships, papers and highly specialized events, publication of scientific.
The university considers within its budget the funds for the projects, which include undergraduate or thesis
Financing
work, as well as the expenses demanded by the research and the incentives of the professors and students.
EAFIT
EAFIT university community and the people outside of it, as long as they are connected to the seedbed from an
Scope
inter-institutional agreement.
They must have at least one adviser-professor, one coordinator-student and three students who are listed as
Required formation
members and who must be active.
Working meetings, study groups, research projects, dissemination of results and activities, academic interaction,
Activities
research days, research forums, seedbed meetings, participation in events.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
308
a) Support the dissemination of research results derived from the work of the seedbeds
b) Research excellence scholarship
c) Certificate of attendance
Financing d) Mention in the annual seedbed
e) Training
f) Use of laboratories
g) Finance research proposals with annual validity
Universidad de Antioquía (Colombia)
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
309
Research projects, supervision of the training of students, networking, search for funding sources, meetings
and events, exchange of experiences, feedback on the work done, open chairs, meetings with seedbed
Activities
coordinators, journal articles, presentations, exhibitions, cultural exchanges, strengthening of reading and
writing skills
The information related to funding and financial support for the projects is presented in each call promoted by
Financing
the university.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
310
Norazilawati Abdullah
National Child Development Research Centre
Faculty of Human Development, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Malaysia
Saniah Sembak
Ministry of Education, Malaysia
©Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0
International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
311
1. Introduction
Classroom-based assessment (CBA) has been used for a long time in education
systems all over the world, in most countries, to assess and evaluate students
holistically (Arumugham, 2020). Scriven (1967) was the first to introduce
formative and summative assessment. CBA is driven by the fundamental factors
and principles and goals of an education system and has undergone several
phases of evolution in terms of the form in which it is implemented. These changes
have been brought about by shifts in education policy (Lewkowicz & Leung,
2021). To guarantee effective CBA implementation, which benefits students, a
variety of initiatives and frameworks have been developed (Brandmo et al., 2020),
of which some are assessment literacy frameworks, assessment for learning
frameworks, formative assessment frameworks, and CBA frameworks. These
frameworks provide guidance and structure for educators to effectively design,
implement, and evaluate CBA practices in the classroom, and to, ultimately,
enhance student learning and achievement. Different countries have modified the
application of CBA to accommodate their particular policy requirements. For
instance, in the year 1980, the United Kingdom established the Task Group on
Assessment and Testing (TGAT) to resolve issues that had arisen concerning
student assessment through public examinations based on statutory curriculum
specifications and education-oriented assessment. Therefore, government ought
to provide guidance for making decisions about the learning needs of students,
which should emphasize formative assessment, as recommended by TGAT
(1987).
In a broader sense, CBA can be understood as an assessment that is split into two
distinct parts: academic and non-academic. The purpose of a test is to evaluate a
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
312
Assessment practices in the classroom have been a subject of ongoing debate and
research in the field of education. Nichols and Gianopulos (2021) argue that
assessment plays a critical role in evaluating student learning outcomes and
informing instructional practices, and further research and debate on the topic of
classroom assessment are needed as contributions to ongoing discourse in the
field of mathematics education. Classroom assessment of English language
learners (ELLs) is the topic of investigation of Clark-Gareca (2016), who conducted
a study on teachers' implementation of accommodations for ELLs during routine
maths and science tests. Clark-Gareca found that teachers' implementation of
accommodations was influenced by various factors, including their beliefs about
ELLs' abilities and language proficiency, their understanding of accommodations,
and contextual factors in the classroom.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
313
diverse education settings and the need for ongoing research and development in
the field of classroom assessment. Alloway et al. (2009) discuss the development
and application of the Working Memory Rating Scale and provide insights into
potential uses of this assessment tool in education settings. They consider it to be
relevant for measuring and the supporting working memory skills of students.
3. Research Methodology
Metasynthesis is a qualitative research method that involves systematically
reviewing and synthesizing findings from multiple qualitative studies to generate
new insights or understandings. It includes stages such as defining the research
question, identifying relevant studies, extracting data, synthesizing findings, and
interpreting the results to generate new insights or theoretical frameworks (Walsh
& Downe, 2005). In the context of this metasynthesis study, the findings of other
studies were analyzed qualitatively. According to Hass and Springer (1998),
metasynthesis studies have the potential to increase the benefits of research by
providing in-depth narrative descriptions, and allow extensive exploration.
Scopus, Science Direct, and Springer were some search agents used for data
collection. The data that were obtained were subjected to a screening based on
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
314
two keywords: assessment and CBA. Other criteria for inclusion were that articles
had to have been published between 2018 and 2022 and had to report on
evaluations carried out in schools.
4. Findings
Based on the article search screening, seven articles were selected for analyis in
this metasynthesis study, as summarized in Table 1.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
315
Classroom Exploration
Increased Student Self-
Achievement
Self-Implementation
Various Forms of
Assessment
Teacher Assessment
Practices
Teacher Productivity in
Assessing
Teacher Productivity in
Delivery Methods
Teacher Pedagogy
Practice
Positive Impact
Different Teaching
Approaches
Results
Improve Student
Achievement
Students Achieve
Learning Goals
Comprehensive
Holistic Learning
Learning
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
316
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
317
addition to using elements of reward, Yan et al. (2021) used their research to
motivate students to achieve positive results.
The final positive impact that the implementation of CBA has, and one that is
highly effective in the education system, is to increase students' academic
achievement levels. Teachers will gain a better understanding of their role of
managing learning sessions to assist students to achieve the learning goals that
have been targeted through CBA. In addition, teachers will assess students' levels
of comprehension, in order to ensure that every student benefits from the learning
experience (Vlachou, 2018). Consequently, students are incentivized to improve
their academic performance at school, which could narrow the gap between
students with high, medium, and low levels of achievement (Vlachou, 2018).
According to Puad and Ashton (2021), students' behavior and attitudes can be
improved by implementing CBA, and by emphasizing resiliency and seriousness.
In addition, CBA generates excitement among students about the potential for
their academic performance to improve during the learning session.
Confusion in
Implementation
Skills in CBA
Ambigous CBA
Issues Implementation
Implementation of
Various Complex
CBA Approaches
Peer Assessment
Issues
Implementation of
CBA
Infrastructure
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
318
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
319
(Lewkowicz & Leung, 2021). In addition, the problem of peer evaluation was also
addressed by other research. According to Puad and Ashton (2021), students may
not fully understand the material being taught. As a result, they have difficulty
evaluating the work of either themselves or their peers. In addition, Puad and
Ashton (2021) found that one of the reasons teachers give students homework in
the classroom is to observe students' responsibilities in their effort to complete
their work this was found to be one of the reasons teachers give students
assignments. However, there are concerns regarding responsibility when putting
CBA into practice.
The issue of CBA implementation is also mentioned by Yan et al. (2021), who
discuss the difficulty of implementing CBA sessions due to infrastructure factors.
The typical number of students enrolled in a single classroom in some countries
with a high population density, such as China, is very high, averaging between 40
and 50 individuals. As teachers found it difficult to put together a variety of
strategies and tasks, CBA could only be used on an ad hoc basis. The large number
of students made it difficult for teachers to provide students with detailed
feedback and prevented teachers from consistently observing large numbers of
students on an individual basis. In fact, according to Yan et al. (2021), researchers
consider the implementation of CBA to be unimportant, because examinations
have been commonly practiced, and summative marks do not play an essential
role in students’ lives. In other words, CBA is deemed to be irrelevant. Most
teachers used a grading system that involved assigning points to students' work,
to prepare them for high-stakes exams. In addition, in the context of the education
system in Chinese schools, the culture of focusing on examinations has affected
the CBA practices of teachers. The schools put a significant amount of weight on
the summative grades. The examination structure was divided into two parts: the
first was continuous assessment, which included aspects such as student
performance and in-class assignments; the second was the final examination.
These two sections of the assignment were used to determine students' overall
performance, based on the summative marks they received. Even though teachers
participated in formative CBA activities with their students, such as self and peer
assessment and descriptive feedback, teachers remained committed to the
examination system. It was a significant hurdle for the process of putting the CBA
into effect.
5. Discussion
According to the findings of the metasynthesis study, CBA is regarded as a
valuable assessment that has beneficial effects on both students and teachers. In
spite of the inherent problems that were brought to light by this research, CBA is
still capable of producing a variety of beneficial effects overall. In this discussion
section, the inherent problems are broken down into minute details of their
components.
The primary issue that was discovered by this research pertains to the knowledge
component. Due to its significant impact on the actual implementation of CBA
and its intended purpose, the role of knowledge must not be taken lightly. Failure
to implement CBA due to a lack of knowledge will result in failure. Fullan (2005)
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
320
The topic of expertise also emerged in this investigation. Expertise has a close
connection to knowledge foundation, which is the primary pillar. Nevertheless,
this problem can be solved, by providing persistent training to educators on
implementing CBA in their classrooms (Randel et al., 2016). Selecting trainers to
guide educators will ensure that skills can be improved and that confusion in the
implementation of CBA can be overcome (Christoforidou & Kyriakides, 2021).
Even though CBA has some problems, it has a number of positive effects on the
education system as a whole, especially on the students and the teachers. CBA can
help students achieve more in their own lives. Participating in CBA will teach
students how to achieve their education goals through healthy competition. As is
well known, the concept of CBA calls for an ongoing and thorough evaluation,
which may be verbal, written, or observational feedback. Students can improve
their achievement levels using these three assessment strategies. This self-
accomplishment can be evaluated using observational assessment. It may include
skills in areas such as attitudes and behavior, practical, manipulation, social,
kinesthetic, computer literacy, and creative abilities (Curriculum Development
Division, Ministry of Education Malaysia, 2019). In general, the seven facets
mentioned above refer to the efforts that students make on their own to improve
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
321
Self-assessment, shaped by beliefs about its nature, has the potential to influence
students' attitudes and behaviors. Proficient students can act as mentors, and can
foster social skills and interactions. By applying prior knowledge and engaging in
creative problem-solving, students produce unique outcomes. Self-assessment
promotes holistic development and enhanced learning outcomes by developing
processing skills and creativity. Self-achievement also has the potential to mold
each student's attitudes and behavior. A student who possesses a particular skill
or a good level of mastery could act as a guide and mentor to a student who lacks
these qualities. It helps the student's social skills and interaction with others in a
roundabout way. There is room for development in the students' processing and
creative abilities. Students apply the prior knowledge they have gained through
teaching and learning to a process of generating and refining ideas, ultimately
working towards producing something superior to and distinct from what their
classmates have produced. CBA affects not only students, but also benefits
teachers, particularly the way they approach pedagogical practices. The skills of
a teacher to select and employ pedagogy appropriate for the student group can be
trained and improved through the use of CBA. In their role as educators, teachers
are required to recognize the proper pedagogy to be applied during the teaching
and learning process. This is necessary, because each student comes equipped
with unique knowledge, skills, and areas of weakness. Educators are encouraged
to vary the pedagogy they implement for teaching and learning. It is essential that
they choose an appropriate pedagogy to ensure that each student masters the
material. Differentiated pedagogy refers to selecting a learning strategy
appropriate for each student to meet learning goals and objectives.
Integrating assessment perspectives in teachers' practices can greatly improve the
overall quality of education. Traditional methods of evaluation that are based
solely on academic performance may not fully capture the diverse needs and
abilities of students. However, with the help of CBA, teachers can adopt a more
comprehensive approach to assessment, which takes into consideration students'
attitudes and behaviors, in addition to their academic performance.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
322
The adoption of CBA in teachers' practices also aligns with the recommendations
of education experts such as Fullan (2005), who emphasize the importance of
educators, including teachers, for generating ideas and insights related to
assessment. It empowers teachers to take an active role in shaping the assessment
practices in their classrooms, based on their professional judgement and expertise.
This promotes a culture of continuous improvement in education, where teachers
are encouraged to reflect on their practices and adapt them to meet the needs of
their students better. In addition, using CBA in teacher practices promotes a
holistic approach to assessment, which goes beyond academic performance and
considers students' attitudes, behaviors, and abilities. Doing so helps foster a more
well-rounded and comprehensive evaluation of students' progress, and provides
valuable insights into their overall development and growth.
6. Conclusion
CBA is a crucial process that evaluates students' knowledge, skills, and abilities
in the classroom through various methods, such as tests, quizzes, projects, and
observations. Its purposes include providing feedback to students, guiding
instructional planning for teachers, monitoring student progress, evaluating
teaching strategies, and informing parents about their children’s academic
performance. Effective CBA requires educators to possess the necessary skills and
knowledge related to content standards, learning levels, and teaching syllabus
performance standards. CBA plays a significant role in facilitating student self-
assessment, guiding instructional planning, monitoring progress, and evaluating
teaching effectiveness. It provides valuable feedback to students, helps teachers
enhance instructional strategies, allows monitoring of student progress, and
evaluates teaching effectiveness. CBA also informs parents about their child's
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
323
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to extend their gratitude to the Research Management and
Innovation Centre (RMIC), Sultan Idris Education University (UPSI), for the
University Special Interest Group Research Grants (code: 2022-0034-106-01) that
helped fund the research.
7. References
Acar, A. S. (2023). Genre pedagogy: A writing pedagogy to help L2 writing instructors
enact their classroom writing assessment literacy and feedback literacy. Assessing
Writing, 56, 100717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2023.100717
Alloway, T. P., Gathercole, S. E., Kirkwood, H., & Elliott, J. (2009). The working memory
rating scale: A classroom-based behavioral assessment of working memory.
Learning and Individual Differences, 19(2), 242–245.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2008.10.003
Andrade, H. L., & Brookhart, S. M. (2020). Classroom assessment as the co-regulation of
learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 27(4), 350–372.
https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2019.1571992
Arumugham, K. S. (2020). Kurikulum, pengajaran dan pentaksiran dari perspektif
pelaksanaan pentaksiran bilik darjah [Curriculum, teaching and assessment from
the perspective of classroom assessment implementation]. Asian People Journal
(APJ), 3(1), 152–161. https://doi.org/10.37231/apj.2020.3.1.175
Barnes, N., Fives, H., Mabrouk-Hattab, S., & SaizdeLaMora, K. (2020). Teachers' epistemic
cognition in situ: Evidence from classroom assessment. Contemporary Educational
Psychology, 60, 101837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101837
Brandmo, C., Panadero, E., & Hopfenbeck, T. N. (2020). Bridging classroom assessment
and self-regulated learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice,
27(4), 319–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2020.1803589
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
324
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
325
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
326
©Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0
International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
327
1. Introduction
Emotional and behavioral issues are persistent issues that make it hard for an
individual to live a normal life (Ogundele, 2018; Vaughn & Bos, 2014). Research
has shown that Indonesia has cases of students with emotional and behavioral
problems (Kumara et al., 2017; Saputra et al., 2017; Umami & Turnip, 2019).
Emotional problems present as anxiety, feelings of sadness and hopelessness, high
levels of fear, low self-esteem, and difficulty controlling emotions. Observed
behavioral issues include hyperactivity, conflict, theft, rule-breaking, and lying.
Social problems include being lonely, not having friends, having difficulty being
accepted in a friendship, and other serious interaction issues.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
328
The purpose of this study was to obtain comprehensive information about how
behavior support is used in inclusive elementary schools in Yogyakarta, Indonesia,
and what teachers’ experiences are of providing the service. This research
explores several aspects. These include the characteristics of behavioral and
emotional problems in students that can be identified by teachers, the
implementation of school-based PBS regarding students’ needs, teachers’
experiences and challenges in providing daily behavior support to students with
emotional and behavioral problems, as well as teachers’ needs in implementing
behavior support.
The study’s findings can be used as a reference for future research and practice in
developing behavioral support services, especially for schools with students who
have behavioral and emotional problems. This is particularly relevant when
considering the requirements for services that are in accordance with the
characteristics and severity of the students’ behavioral and emotional problems,
improvement of procedures and strategies, teacher competencies, school support
capabilities, and collaborative efforts.
2. Literature Review
2.1 Emotional and Behavioral Problems
Emotional and behavioral problems persist in children with excessive intensity,
frequency, and/or duration for at least six months (Ogundele, 2018). This disorder
is characterized by a pattern of severe emotional and behavioral problems that
interfere with intrapersonal, interpersonal, and social interactions (Ogundele,
2018) and can impair the academic and personal performance of children
(Mitchell et al., 2019).
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
329
3. Methodology
3.1 Research Design
This qualitative study used an exploratory case study to investigate the research
phenomenon (Creswell & Creswell, 2018), and facts were explored to determine
fascinating dynamics that answered the “how” question (Yin, 2018). As a dynamic
phenomenon, the implementation of inclusive school-based PBS for students with
emotional and behavioral problems and teachers’ experiences thereof is an
interesting topic to explore. This research describes the occurrence and cannot be
generalized (Crowe et al., 2011).
3.2 Participants
This research took place in five inclusive schools (one public school and four
private schools). The five schools were selected based on previous research and
initial interviews with the school principals, who confirmed that the schools have
students with emotional and behavioral problems and that they provide behavior
support for them.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
330
To ensure anonymity, the names of participating schools and teachers were coded
as part of the informed consent for the research. The school codes are School A,
School B, School C, School D, and School E. Participants’ names were coded based
on their position and their school’s name (e.g., CA is the classroom teacher from
School A, SA is the support teacher from School A etc.). The demographic details
of the participants are shown in Table 1.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
331
Table 2 shows an example of the Microsoft Word tabulation as used for the data
coding.
4. Findings
This study explored how teachers implement school-based behavior support for
students with emotional and behavioral problems. Table 3 presents the themes
and subthemes yielded from data coding and analysis.
Table 3: Themes and subthemes resulting from data coding and analysis
No Theme Subthemes
Characteristics of students’ Behavioral problems
1. emotional and behavioral Emotional problems
problems Learning behavior problems
School-based PBS Identification and assessment of students’
implementation emotional and behavioral problems
2.
Multi-tiered system of school-based PBS
Program monitoring and evaluation
Teachers’ experiences in Direct support from teachers provided to
implementing school-based students
3.
PBS Teachers’ challenges
Teachers’ needs
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
332
2. Destructive behavior: “Even at the library, the kid disobeyed the rules by
scribbling on tables, messing around on the teacher’s computer, throwing books
into the trash, failing to return books that had been taken, and spilling markers”
(SB); “When he doesn’t receive what he wants, he may easily erupt, screaming
and throwing things at those nearby” (SC).
3. Disruptive behavior: “Child with initials A has behavior disorders such as being
ignorant to their friends” (CC); “The child also liked to go to other classes during
class time” (SB); “The child showed curiosity about the other sex, which made
some friends—particularly male friends—uncomfortable. The child enjoys
peering out the window during some lessons to visit her classmates in other
classes” (CE).
4. Forcing others to do what they want: “If he wants to see a friend’s toy, he
snatches it, which damages the toy” (SD); “The child would ask the teacher for
permission, and then shout after a friend was given permission to drink or use the
restroom. If she were denied, she would scream until her request was
granted” (SE).
2. Feeling of anxiety: “Student K had a severe fear of failing. The kid always adds,
‘I lived in pain,’ when he doesn’t complete the homework precisely” (SD).
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
333
2. Off-task behavior: “Child often ignores teacher directions and instead does what
he wants, including playing by himself, painting, writing on surfaces, disturbing
other students during sports and other class activities, and playing in the library”
(SB); “The kid walked around the study room for two to five minutes while
learning ...” (SA).
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
334
The anti-bullying, kid-friendly, and culturally based activities are among the
school-based programs offered by School A. SA said: “Child-friendly schools
promote acceptance of individual diversity in order to foster a friendly atmosphere free of
bullying. Smiles, hellos, civility, and manners [are school attributes]. Students are
instructed in good behavior and mutual respect.” Self-protection education is taught
in School C as a school-based curriculum combining moral and ethical learning
(CC, SC). Teachers from School E also mentioned that School E promotes self-
protection education, literacy day, living values, and multicultural events
programs.
Regular school events such as morning meetings and weekly assemblies serve to
remind all students about the school-based program (Schools A, C, and E).
Concerning this, participants stated: “Principal and teachers are promoting many
topics, such as anti-bullying behavior, in the classroom and during morning assemblies”
(SA); “[The program is reminded on] the morning carpet and day carpet by discussing
class dynamics related to rules and positive attitudes” (CC); “[The program is
reminded by] focusing children’s attention on the morning and day carpets” (SE); “[The
program is reminded during] assembly, which include instruction on a particular
contextual subject” (SC).
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
335
behavior (School D), peer tutoring and developing cooperative learning activities
in the classroom (Schools B and C), as well as student-led conferences (School E).
All participants said their schools use secondary or tertiary PBS without a system
to differentiate. All schools provide tailored interventions for serious behavioral
and emotional problems, but few identify tertiary or secondary intervention
processes. Secondary/tertiary PBS begins with identification and assessment
(Schools C and E). School C supports teachers assessing students through initial
observation, document analysis, and discussions with classroom teachers, the
vice-principal for student affairs, and the principal. Assessing and identifying
students’ problem behavior were stressed by School E’s classroom teacher and
support teacher.
All participating schools offer PBS individually for moderate and severe problems.
Special class services are provided to students who need intensive behavior and
emotional support (SA, CC, SC, SD). SD explained: “[School] provides clear
boundaries of things that [students] are allowed and not allowed to do.” “Any violations
relating to bullying will be immediately followed up by the vice-principal for student
affairs in the counseling room” (SA). According to the participating teachers from
School E, serious cases are handled individually.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
336
School B teachers let students choose activities and accompanied them when they
are down. School C teachers encouraged students to express their ideas or needs,
take initiative, be aware of their emotional state, focus and develop life skills based
on their interests and talents (SC); assisted them in social activities (CC); and
instilled social values in learning and social interaction (SC).
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
337
supervision duties and cannot focus on that child.” CE stated that getting all teachers
to support and agree with the behavior intervention was difficult. “Parents are
tough to work with, so the behavior program only works at school,” said SC. The School
D teacher struggled with parent collaboration. The school teachers said parents
were less forthcoming about their child’s condition.
The FGD results also revealed psychological issues. The School B teacher said
managing students, especially those with emotional and behavioral problems,
was exhausting.
In addition, Schools A, C, and E teachers said that they needed more training on
behavioral and emotional problems and effective interventions. In this regard, SA
said: “We need teacher training to understand students with emotional disorders.”
Furthermore, SC said: “Training is needed for classroom teachers and support teachers
regarding children with special needs and how to handle them.”
5. Discussion
The participants’ explanations of student behavior and emotional problems
demonstrate their understanding. Teachers must identify students with emotional
and behavioral problems because they work with students the most and influence
their growth and behavior (Farmer et al., 2011). Although the accuracy of
identification and behavior assessment has not been thoroughly researched,
elementary schools must provide intensive assistance based on these techniques
(Maggin et al., 2016). Identification and assessment teams must also be considered
(Horner & Sugai, 2018). Teachers, especially at Tiers 2 and 3, need identification
and assessment training and mentoring (Lewis et al., 2017).
The study found that at all five participating schools had students with behavioral,
emotional, and learning behavior issues. Internalizing-problem behavior, which
depends on the student’s emotional state, is harder to recognize (Mitchell et al.,
2019; Ogundele, 2018). Problem behavior can impair students’ learning and their
personal and functional abilities (Mitchell et al., 2019). Emotional and behavioral
problems need to be identified using the appropriate instruments. This
determines whether a student needs secondary (moderate) or tertiary (severe)
treatment (Lane et al., 2014).
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
338
meets students’ needs for services, program continuity, resources, and quality
execution (Lindstrom Johnson et al., 2020).
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
339
consider school support, problem behaviors, and their own issues, such as anxiety
and stress, when choosing treatments (Egan et al., 2019). The competences of
teachers, along with interventions, students’ needs and issues, classroom
suitability, and school support, would affect PBS performance (Cho Blair et al.,
2021).
Collaboration with the school team was also a challenge for the teachers in this
study and a big issue in the PBS framework. Disagreements among teachers on
behavior management could impede PBS (Mitchell et al., 2019). Schools often
prioritize setting up services inside the school over working with outsiders (Nelen
et al., 2020). In addition, parent cooperation is crucial to PBS success. Schools and
parents must communicate about student-behavior expectations at home and at
school (Strickland-Cohen et al., 2021). The interactive collaboration between
school ecological stakeholders affects how well PBS is implemented for all
students (Opartkiattikul et al., 2014). Conversely, the lack of support from these
stakeholders is an obstacle to the success of PBS (Mitchell et al., 2019).
6. Limitations
The study had limitations regarding the small sample of participants, which
consisted of only eight teachers from five schools in Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
Participant status might not sufficiently represent the variety of schools and
situations for teachers in other settings. As a result, it is not appropriate to
generalize the findings of this study to other settings. It would be preferable to
explore in depth other ways of collecting data, such as in-depth interviews and
observations, to gain more authentic data. In addition, another study limitation
was the data gathering method employed, where data were collected using FGDs
only. Further research with a broader setting coverage that reflects the variety of
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
340
7. Conclusion
All the participating schools in this study used behavior support to respond to the
emotional and behavioral problems of their students. The various types of
problems that were identified by participants include behavioral problems,
emotional problems, and learning behavior problems. The participants’
experiences show that they support students who exhibit emotional and
behavioral problems with their behavior, either in accordance with school policy
or, if necessary, though improvisation. The implementation of school-based
behavior support programs includes identifying and assessing the emotional
and/or behavioral problem, setting strategies and procedures into practice within
a multi-tiered system of support with less structure, and monitoring and
evaluating how students progress over the period of the intervention. Teachers
struggle to manage severe behavioral problems, assess students precisely,
collaborate with other teachers, and work with parents. PBS must be used as an
intervention framework by all stakeholders. However, this study indicated that
managing school-based PBS requires a system that is adapted for all school
conditions and needs. Every school should develop the consistency of PBS as a
systematic and procedural framework for behavior intervention. They should also
develop the standard of the school system’s policies focusing on behavior support
plans; and the quality of cooperation between the school, the parents, and other
experts such as psychologists, psychiatrists, and special education professionals.
8. Acknowledgements
We are grateful to the Resource Center and Disability Service Unit of the
Department of Youth Education and Sport in Yogyakarta for their support with
this research. The Indonesian Ministry of Education, Culture, Research, and
Technology is also acknowledged for providing funding through a national
doctoral research grant.
9. References
Allen, K. A., Jamshidi, N., Berger, E., Reupert, A., Wurf, G., & May, F. (2021). Impact of
school-based interventions for building school belonging in adolescence: A
systematic review. Educational Psychology Review, 34, 229–257.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09621-w
Anafiah, S., & Andini, D. W. (2018). Pelaksanaan pendidikan inklusi di SD Tumbuh 2
Yogyakarta [Inclusive education implementation in Tumbuh 2 Elementary School
in Yogyakarta]. Wacana Akademika: Majalah Ilmiah Kependidikan, 2(1), 73.
https://doi.org/10.30738/wa.v2i1.2479
Apriani, A.-N., & Ariyani, Y. D. (2017). Implementasi pendidikan nilai nasionalisme
dalam pembelajaran living values [The implementation of national value
education in living values learning]. LITERASI (Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan), 8(1),
60−74.
Arora, P. G., Collins, T. A., Dart, E. H., Hernández, S., Fetterman, H., & Doll, B. (2019).
Multi-tiered systems of support for school-based mental health: A systematic
review of depression interventions. School Mental Health, 11(2), 240–264.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
341
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12310-019-09314-4
Blair, E. (2015). A reflexive exploration of two qualitative data coding techniques. Journal
of Methods and Measurement in the Social Sciences, 6(1), 14–29.
https://doi.org/10.2458/jmm.v6i1.18772
Breeman, L. D., Wubbels, T., van Lier, P. A. C., Verhulst, F. C., Ende, J. van der, Maras, A.,
Hopman, J. A. B., & Tick, N. T. (2014). Teacher characteristics, social classroom
relationships, and children’s social, emotional, and behavioral classroom
adjustment in special education. Journal of School Psychology, 53(1), 87–103.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2014.11.005
Cho Blair, K. S., Park, E. Y., & Kim, W. H. (2021). A meta-analysis of tier 2 interventions
implemented within school-wide positive behavioral interventions and supports.
Psychology in the Schools, 58(1), 141–161. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22443
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed
methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage.
Crowe, S., Cresswell, K., Robertson, A., Huby, G., Avery, A., & Sheikh, A. (2011). The case
study approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 11, 100.
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-11-100
Egan, T. E., Wymbs, F. A., Owens, J. S., Evans, S. W., Hustus, C., & Allan, D. M. (2019).
Elementary school teachers’ preferences for school-based interventions for
students with emotional and behavioral problems. Psychology in the Schools, 56(10),
1633–1653. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22294
Farmer, T. W., McAuliffe Lines, M., & Hamm, J. V. (2011). Revealing the invisible hand:
The role of teachers in children’s peer experiences. Journal of Applied Developmental
Psychology, 32(5), 247–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2011.04.006
Finning, K., Ford, T., Moore, D. A., & Ukoumunne, O. C. (2020). Emotional disorder and
absence from school: Findings from the 2004 British Child and Adolescent Mental
Health Survey. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 29, 187–198.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-019-01342-4
Gage, N. A., Whitford, D. K., & Katsiyannis, A. (2018). A review of schoolwide positive
behavior interventions and supports as a framework for reducing disciplinary
exclusions. Journal of Special Education, 52(3), 1–10.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466918767847
George, M. P., George, N. L., Kern, L., & Fogt, J. B. (2013). Three-tiered support for students
with E/BD: Highlights of the universal tier. Education and Treatment of Children,
36(3), 47–62. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42900211
Hapsari, I. I., Iskandarsyah, A., Joefiani, P., & Siregar, J. R. (2020). Teacher and problem in
student with ADHD in Indonesia: A case study. The Qualitative Report, 25(11),
4104–4126. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2020.4381
Horner, R. H., & Sugai, G. (2018). Future directions for positive behavior support: A
commentary. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 20(1), 19–22.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300717733977
Kartikawati, D., Radjagukguk, D. L., & Sriwartini, Y. (2018). Communication strategies for
inculcating multicultural values in inclusive elementary school in Yogyakarta and
Bandung. Journal of Education and Social Sciences, 10(3), 22–29.
Kumara, A., Wimbarti, S., Fajar Susetyo, Y., & Kisriyani, A. (2017). The epidemiology of
Indonesian children and adolescent school-based mental health: Validation of
school-based mental health information system. Universal Journal of Psychology,
5(3), 114–121. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujp.2017.050303
Lane, K. L., Oakes, W. P., Ennis, R. P., & Hirsch, S. E. (2014). Identifying students for
secondary and tertiary prevention efforts: How do we determine which students
have tier 2 and tier 3 needs? Preventing School Failure, 58(3), 171–182.
https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2014.895573
Lee, A., & Gage, N. A. (2019). Updating and expanding systematic reviews and meta-
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
342
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
343
and familial factors with mental health problems in school-aged children in Aceh
province, Indonesia. Asian Journal of Psychiatry, 25, 207–212.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajp.2016.10.025
Sartono, E. K. E. (2018). Values of social care values through school culture
(Phenomenology study at SD Tumbuh I Yogyakarta). Jurnal Pendidikan Sekolah
Dasar, 1, 43–50. https://doi.org/10.21831/didaktika.v1i2.28087
Sholikhah, A. M., & Purwanta, E. (2020). Transformational leadership of inclusion principals
in SD Negeri Giwangan, Yogyakarta [Conference session]. 3rd International
Conference on Learning Innovation and Quality Education (ICLIQE 2019)
(pp. 129−137). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200129.017
Sink, C. A. (2016). Incorporating a multi-tiered system of supports into school counselor
preparation. The Professional Counsellor, 6(3), 203–219.
https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/chs_pubs/9
Strickland–Cohen, M. K., Kyzar, K. B., & Garza–Fraire, F. M. (2021). School–family
partnerships to support positive behavior: Assessing social validity and
intervention fidelity. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and
Youth, 65(4), 362–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2021.1913084
Sugai, G., & Horner, R. H. (2020). Sustaining and scaling positive behavioral interventions
and supports: Implementation drivers, outcomes, and considerations. Exceptional
Children, 86(2), 120–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402919855331
Swoszowski, N. C., Jolivette, K., & Fredrick, L. D. (2013). Addressing the social and
academic behavior of a student with emotional and behavioral disorders in an
alternative setting. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 48(1), 28–36.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/43858885
Umami, R., & Turnip, S. S. (2019). Emotional and behavioral problems among left-behind
children in Indonesia. Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine, 41(3), 240–245.
https://doi.org/10.4103/IJPSYM.IJPSYM_370_18
Vaughn, S. R., & Bos, C. S. (2014). Strategies for teaching students with learning and behavior
problems (9th ed.). Pearson.
Weist, M. D., Eber, L., Horner, R., Splett, J., Putnam, R., Barrett, S., Perales, K.,
Fairchild, A. J., & Hoover, S. (2018). Improving multitiered systems of support for
students with “internalizing” emotional/behavioral problems. Journal of Positive
Behavior Interventions, 20(3), 172–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300717753832
Yang, C., Chan, M. K., & Ma, T. L. (2020). School-wide social emotional learning (SEL) and
bullying victimization: Moderating role of school climate in elementary, middle,
and high schools. Journal of School Psychology, 82, 49–69.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2020.08.002
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage.
Zaheer, I., Maggin, D., McDaniel, S., McIntosh, K., Rodriguez, B. J., & Fogt, J. B. (2019).
Implementation of promising practices that support students with emotional and
behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 44(2), 117–128.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0198742918821331
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
344
Appendix
1. What kind of emotional and behavioral problems have students ever faced,
or are facing in class, or among the students you support? Please identify
one or more of the students that most impressed you in terms of emotional
and behavioral issues.
2. In what ways do emotional problems and student behavior appear in detail?
3. Is there a school policy on behavioral support for students in your school?
4. How does the behavioral support policy address and deal with students'
emotional and behavioral issues?
5. Do you have your own way, outside of the school's behavioral support
policies, to address and respond to students' emotional and behavioral
issues? Please elaborate.
6. How is the implementation of behavioral support aimed at all students?
7. How can school behavioral support practices be tailored to the level of
student emotional and behavioral problems?
8. How are the results of behavioral support practices in your school
monitored and evaluated?
9. What are the challenges you face in implementing behavioral support
practices for students with emotional and behavioral problems?
10. What do you need for your tasks as a teacher to provide behavioral support
programs for students with emotional and behavioral problems in school?
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
345
Bayu Pamungkas*
Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
1. Introduction
The acceptance of new students is part of the process of acquiring students in
schools, both at the kindergarten and high school levels. Since 2017, the process
of accepting students in Indonesia has implemented a zoning system, as
*
Corresponding author: Bayu Pamungkas; bayu.pamungkas@uny.ac.id
©Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0
International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
346
Inclusive education is a service model for children with special needs. Inclusive
means that children with special needs can follow the learning and participate in
regular schools in the nearest environment. Children with special needs can
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
347
Inclusive education certainly does not only involve the learning process and the
potential of children with special needs. It also relates to the diversity of students
in the classroom and at school. Based on the diverse abilities of students,
differentiated learning is needed. Differentiated learning is a learning practice in
which the teacher conveys learning with adjustments to meet the students’
abilities, as well as the students’ readiness, interests, and learning styles. Teachers
can modify their teaching strategies based on the content, processes, and learning
products. Evertson and Weinstein (2011) discussed four aspects of inclusive
education. First, the implementation of inclusive education guarantees presence,
as every student can be present simultaneously in every activity carried out by
the school/teacher. Second, acceptance (acknowledgment) is where every student
has the right to be accepted without discrimination. Third, participation is where
every student can participate in every activity carried out in the class or school.
Lastly, achievement relates to each student achieving according to their abilities.
The teacher plays an important role in the learning component, their role not
being limited to teaching only. They are also a guide, developer, and manager of
learning activities to facilitate student learning activities as part of achieving the
goals set. Teachers must be prepared for various challenges and demands as well
as being at the forefront. The teacher must continue to innovate to develop the
potential of diverse students. The current diversity of students started with the
new student acceptance process which facilitated the diversity of students,
including the presence of children with special needs in regular schools. There is
a demand for teachers to have the ability to plan and implement a quality learning
process. By understanding the various demands and challenges faced by teachers
today, and the presence of diversity of students as required in Regulation of the
Minister of National Education of the Republic of Indonesia number 16 of 2007,
this has now become a reality (Republic of Indonesia, 2007).
This research will answer questions on how teachers employ strategies to fulfill
access to learning for students with special needs in elementary schools. To
answer this question, we employed a descriptive research design to describe the
teacher strategies used when providing access to learning involving 100 teachers
from 25 elementary schools that provide inclusive education in the city of
Yogyakarta, Indonesia. A qualitative approach was used with a descriptive
research design to comprehensively describe teacher strategies in each school
providing access to learning for students with special needs in their class. It is
hoped that the results of this study can provide an overview of the strategies that
can be implemented by teachers in inclusive schools who have been confused
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
348
about providing access to learning for students with special needs in the
classroom.
2. Literature Review
2.1 Inclusive Education
Inclusive education has the goal of providing equal opportunities for all children
to learn and develop in an inclusive environment. However, several challenges
and obstacles must be faced in its implementation. According to de Beco (2017),
the problem is that even though the right to create inclusive education is fully
given, there are limitations when it comes to taking the steps needed to create an
inclusive education system. In short, there is a gap between the concept and
practice of inclusive education. On the other hand, there is still uncertainty about
whether inclusive education should be the standard in every situation. The United
Nations (2006) in the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities
recognized that if the general school system fails to meet the needs of all
individuals with disabilities, special education may be an option, but there should
be a focus on preparing students for education within the general school system.
Although special education is linked to the goals of inclusive education, there are
still opportunities for temporary exclusion from the general environment.
UNESCO (2017a) listed and discussed the challenges and obstacles encountered
in inclusive education. The first is limited resources: Inclusive education requires
adequate resources to support all students, including students who need special
attention. However, not all schools or education systems have sufficient resources
to support these programs. Second, there is lack of training and knowledge: Many
teachers and education staff have not received adequate training or knowledge
about inclusive education and how to support students with special needs. This
can be a barrier to supporting students who need special support. The third
challenge is stigma and discrimination: Students with special needs often
experience discrimination and stigma from society and even from their peers at
school. This can make them feel unappreciated and neglected and interfere with
their ability to learn and develop. The fourth is lack of parental support: Parents
of students with special needs often feel that they are not heard or understood by
education staff and the public. This can discourage them from engaging in
inclusive programs and a lack of support from parents can hinder the students’
progress. Fifth, there is lack of supportive policies and regulations: Lack of
support from the government and a lack of oversight can make inclusive
programs ineffective. To overcome these challenges and obstacles, it is necessary
to carry out sustainable efforts. These include increasing the support and
availability of resources, increasing the training and knowledge of education staff,
promoting equality, reducing stigma and discrimination, and developing policies
and regulations that support inclusive programs.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
349
progress regularly, and identify students who need additional support. The duties
and roles of teachers in inclusive schools by UNESCO (2017b) are further
elaborated as follows. First, teachers in inclusive schools must provide differential
teaching so that all students can access the curriculum and learn in a way that
suits their needs. Second, teachers must form collaborations between students and
encourage students to support and learn from each other. Finally, teachers must
also build positive relationships with the parents of their students and involve
them in their children’s education. Therefore, teachers in inclusive schools have a
very important role to play in creating an inclusive learning environment and
providing support to all students.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
350
Children with hearing impairments have the same adaptive abilities as children
who can hear, as long as the communication modalities they use at home and
school are appropriate (Fisher et al., 2021). These capable cognitive abilities help
children with hearing impairments to undergo the education process with some
modifications, such as the simplification of language and the use of sign language
in the communication system.
3. Methodology
A qualitative approach with a descriptive research design was used in this
research to describe strategies teachers use in providing access to learning in
elementary schools that provide inclusive education. This method was chosen so
that the data obtained in this study could fully and comprehensively explain how
access to learning is provided for children with special needs as the research focus.
The stages carried out in this study included determining the research informants,
collecting the data, and analyzing the data collected. The informants in this study
consisted of 100 teachers from 25 elementary schools with students with special
needs who were selected through purposive random sampling from a total pool
of 625 teachers. The data collection in this study was carried out using
participatory observation techniques and semi-structured interviews, as well as a
documentation search related to providing access to learning for children with
special needs across the 25 elementary schools.
The successfully collected data were then tested to determine its credibility using
a member check. Sugiyono (2013) explained that member checks are used to
determine the credibility of the data provided by the research informants. To
analyze the data collected, we used analytical induction techniques, namely
reducing the data, displaying the data, and drawing conclusions and verifying the
data (Creswell, 2008). For data analysis in this study, we used techniques from
Miles et al. (2014), which consisted of four activity flows for analyzing the data,
namely data collection, data compaction, data presentation, and drawing
conclusions.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
351
collected data sets. All the data from the interviews, observations, and
documentation obtained were analyzed to determine if there were patterns of
similarities and differences in the strategies for fulfilling learning access for
students with special needs. We eliminated any residual data pieces that appeared
as though it was not related to the research focus. Furthermore, the data from the
analysis were presented to describe the various teacher strategies used for
providing access to learning for students with special needs.
4. Results
Analysis of the research data shows that there are various teacher strategies for
providing access to learning for students with special needs in elementary schools
that provide inclusive education, which is the focus of this study. Table 1 presents
a description of teacher strategies categorized according to the provision of access
to physical and non-physical learning in schools.
The data in this study also show that various teacher efforts are made when
providing access to learning according to the students’ learning needs. Table 2
contains a description of the teacher assistance efforts based on the type of
specificity and the constraints of the students with special needs when learning.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
352
Based on the data in Tables 1 and 2, teachers who provide access to learning for
students in elementary schools providing inclusive education employ various
strategies for providing physical and non-physical access tailored to the special
needs of students.
In providing various strategies for fulfilling learning access for students with
special needs, the teacher must go through many stages that require time and
energy to work. By involving many parties, including the school principal who
supervises through to experts in other disciplines who become referrals when
they need a more complete analysis, informants admitted that they feel very
helped and that they are not struggling alone when providing these services.
According to informants, the implementation of these strategies has shown
significant results, although in practice some of the aspects of service delivery still
need to be improved. These include clinical diagnostic services that teachers
cannot obtain free of charge, up to the fulfillment of physical accessibility
developments that must wait for funding from the government through the
Education Office.
5. Discussion
The results of the study show that the management of physical and non-physical
accessibility is an important factor in the successful implementation of inclusive
education. In terms of managing physical accessibility, the provision of
infrastructure and media as well as various other accessible learning resources is
very much needed. According to the United Nations (2006) in the Convention on
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
353
the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, it is argued that all persons with disabilities
should have the same access as other people to the physical environment,
transportation, information, and communication, as well as other public services
and facilities. An accessible environment is one that enables everyone, including
those with disabilities, to access public places and services in the same way as
people without disabilities (World Health Organization, 2011).
The provision of media and learning resources that are in accordance with the
abilities and needs of the students is one of the teacher’s strategies to fulfill
physical accessibility in the implementation of inclusive education in schools,
especially in the learning process. Students with disabilities need media
differentiation and learning resources to facilitate more effective and efficient
learning. Media and learning resources are two different concepts in education
(Ertmer & Newby, 2013). Learning media include the various technologies and
physical objects used to help the students learn the material, such as textbooks,
audio, video, and the internet. Learning resources include all the information that
the students use to study the material, including textbooks, journals, and other
sources. The differentiation of media and learning resources in education is
related to the level of readiness and the abilities, interests, and learning styles of
the students. These conditions affect their approach to learning activities. Some
students excel in terms of their visual, auditory, or mixed skills. To adjust for these
differences, educators must expand their delivery methods and allow students to
access material using their preferred method. Various learning strategies, such as
learning centers, graphic organizing, graded reading and writing, and graded
assignments, can be implemented to achieve this goal (Mahoney & Hall, 2017).
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
354
Analysis of the research data collected show that in general, there are three aspects
of learning that are adjustable, namely learning objectives, material adjustments,
and evaluation as an implementation of differentiated learning that is carried out.
Tomlinson and Imbeau (2023) explained that in differentiated learning, the
aspects that are adjusted are the content, process, and product components. The
efforts made by the teacher reflect the application of the teacher’s pedagogic
competence in managing the inclusive classroom. Rudiyati et al. (2021) explained
that the efforts to meet the needs of students, especially those with special needs
in inclusive schools, can be carried out by teachers as a form of implementing their
pedagogical competencies. This includes the mastery of student characteristics for
identification and assessment, mastery of the theories about learning methods,
and the strategies for determining the learning methods and approaches used in
the learning process.
The findings of this study also show that teachers are trying to provide special
services according to the conditions of students with special needs through
differentiated learning. This has previously been explained through the
implementation of an assessment program. Assessments are the main key for
teachers as part of providing appropriate educational service programs for
students with special needs. The information obtained from the assessment is
used to determine the educational services needed by students with special needs.
This is so that the scope of the assessment does not only include the student’s
constraints but also the modalities (potential) that the student has and what is
needed by these students in the future (Nurfadhilah et al., 2022). In terms of
carrying out student assessments, the role of experts from other disciplines,
including psychologists, also has a significant influence when it comes to
obtaining complete and in-depth assessment data. Teachers and school
psychologists need to assess and help the students assess their potential using an
alternative/dynamic approach. A thorough psychological evaluation can provide
information about the different educational plans that provide appropriate
support for a student’s area of competence, with additional support or
accommodation for areas of weakness (Al-Hroub & Whitebread, 2019; Maddocks,
2020).
The results of the assessment of students with special needs will determine the
teacher’s next strategy. Hanks (2011) explained that the strategy for fulfilling
student learning access in schools providing inclusive education is based on two
key assumptions. The first is that the ability of students in schools is the result of
the interactions between the students and their learning environment. Second,
teachers can properly accommodate students in the classroom by analyzing the
factors that become their learning needs and the specific demands of the
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
355
classroom environment. Friend and Bursuck (2018) explained that the results of
the assessment can help teachers implement the INCLUDE strategy. That is:
identify (identify the classroom demands), note (note the advantages and learning
needs of students), check (check areas for potential student success), look (look for
areas of potential problems), use (utilize information to find ideas for learning
diversity), differentiate (good practices of differentiating learning), and evaluate
(evaluate the student learning progress).
Inclusive education programs are not only implemented for students who have
special needs but for all students, because every student has different
characteristics. For students with intellectual disabilities, it was found that the
teacher often lowers the depth level of the material. The complexity of the material
for students with intellectual disabilities is simplified and emphasized through
more functional material if possible. Yunaini (2021) explained that the learning
materials for students with special needs are not found in the academic field only.
Teachers also need to provide functional knowledge. Anjarsari (2018) explained
that the material, curriculum, and legal learning media must be modified. This is
done with the aim that students with special needs can follow along with the
existing material according to their abilities and characteristics.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
356
well as personal approaches for students who have low learning motivation. The
implementation of inclusive learning in each school has its own provisions
depending on the determined needs (Hartadi et al., 2019).
In this regard, the findings of this study indicate that character education is also
an urgent matter in the implementation of inclusive education policies.
Pamungkas (2016) explained that the success of the education process for students
with special needs in inclusive schools cannot be separated from the acceptance
of other students who do not have special needs. Through character education,
general students who attend inclusive schools are expected to have high tolerance
and concern so that they can accept their friends who have special needs and can
assist the teachers in providing optimal educational services.
Character education, such as respecting diversity and empathy, can help reduce
discrimination and strengthen diversity in an inclusive school environment. This
is in line with UNESCO (2015), who compiled the educational concept of
“learning to live together”. This is an approach that focuses on developing
individual abilities to help people live together with others in culturally,
ethnically, and religiously diverse societies. This concept prioritizes the values of
unity, harmony, and cooperation between individuals and groups. Education
“learning to live together” was developed by UNESCO as a response to world
developments that are increasingly complex and global. This approach to
education aims to develop a better understanding of cultural diversity, respect for
human rights, and promotion of social justice. UNESCO (2016) explained the
concept of education in the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, saying that
education is seen as an important human right and the key to achieving
sustainable development goals. The concept emphasizes the importance of
inclusive and just education as well as education that promotes peace, gender
equality, and tolerance. Education is considered to improve the quality of life of
individuals and communities, as well as helping to tackle global problems such
as poverty, inequality, and climate change.
The results of this study also show that collaboration between teachers and the
parents of students with special needs is an important factor. Hermanto and
Pamungkas (2023) explained that collaboration between teachers and parents to
meet the special needs of students can start from the learning planning stage
through to the evaluation stage at the end of the learning process. Besides that,
coordination and communication with various related parties also need to be
carried out. Qomarudin et al. (2019) explained that schools that run inclusive
education programs must be able to involve both parents and the community
throughout the planning, implementation, and evaluation stages. Building
collaboration between schools and the community is a challenge for inclusive
school managers. Kurniawan and Aiman (2020) explained that collaborative
relationships between the government, schools, parents, and the community are
the main capital for the formation of a professional inclusive education paradigm
so that students with special needs can participate in realizing the national
education goals in Indonesia.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
357
6. Conclusion
As part of the teacher’s strategy in providing access to learning in the
implementation of inclusive education in elementary schools and at other levels,
differentiated learning by adjusting the content, process, and product components
has become integral. The differentiation made must be based on the results of
previous student identification and assessments. While still paying attention to
the needs of other students who do not have special needs, special services and
individualized learning programs need to be implemented as curriculum
modifications and adjustments to other learning components. The role and
involvement of parents and related disciplines can optimize the implementation
of ideal inclusive education. Equally important is the inculcation of character
values in the students to accept diversity in school, including the special needs of
other students. The provision of access to learning will be complete if it is
supported by an environment with accessible facilities and infrastructure as well
as appropriate media and learning resources. The involvement of related parties
is highly expected in the implementation of inclusive education programs.
Training in the context of increasing teacher competence is an important facet to
carry out to equip the teachers in schools that provide inclusive education. In
addition to the role of parents, experts from various related disciplines are
expected to be able to support the implementation of inclusive education starting
from the assessment stage through to the fulfillment of services related to the
special needs of students, including fulfilling the accessibility of physical
supports. The Education Office is expected to be able to facilitate teacher
competency improvement training in inclusive schools, including the provision
of assistance for the parents of children with special needs in inclusive schools.
This research is limited to describing teacher strategies when providing learning
access for students with special needs in inclusive schools. It is hoped that further
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
358
research can be initiated, and efforts made to optimize each strategy described in
this study.
7. References
Ackah-Jnr, F. R., & Danso, J. B. (2018). Examining the physical environment of Ghanaian
inclusive schools: How accessible, suitable, and appropriate is such environment
for inclusive education? International Journal of Inclusive Education, 23(2), 188–208.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2018.1427808
Al-Hroub, A., & Whitebread, D. (2019). Dynamic assessment for identification of twice
exceptional learners exhibiting mathematical giftedness and specific learning
disabilities. Roeper Review, 41(2), 129–142.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2019.1585396
Anaby, D. R., Campbell, W. N., Missiuna, C., Shaw, S. R., Bennett, S., Khan, S.,
Tremblay, S., Kalubi‐Lukusa, J., & Camden, C. (2018). Recommended practices to
organize and deliver school‐based services for children with disabilities: A
scoping review. Child: Care, Health, and Development, 45(1), 15–27.
https://doi.org/10.1111/cch.12621
Anjarsari, A. D. (2018). Penyelenggaraan pendidikan inklusi pada jenjang sd, smp, dan
sma di Kabupaten Sidoarjo [Implementation of inclusive education at elementary,
middle and high school levels in Sidoarjo Regency]. Jurnal Pendidikan Inklusi, 1(2),
91. https://doi.org/10.26740/inklusi.v1n2.p91-104
Asep, S., Uswatun, H., & Ahmad, J. (2020). Inclusive education services for children with
mild intellectual disabilities in pandemic period: The dilemma of general
elementary schools in Indonesia. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengembarngan Pendidikan
Luar Blasa, 7(2), 22–30. http://journal2.um.ac.id/index.php/jppplb/ar
ticle/view/16747/pdf
Billingsley, B., & Banks, A. (2019). Leadership for inclusive schools 1995–2015. In
J. Crockett, B. Billingsley, & M. Boscardin. (Eds.), Handbook of leadership and
administration for special education (2nd ed.; pp. 196–220). Routledge.
Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative
and qualitative research (3rd ed.). Pearson Education.
de Beco, G. (2017). The right to inclusive education: Why is there so much opposition to
its implementation? International Journal of Law in Context, 14(3), 396–415.
https://doi.org/10.1017/s1744552317000532
Efendi, M. (2018). The implementation of inclusive education in Indonesia for children
with special needs: Expectation and reality. Journal of ICSAR, 2(2), 142–147.
https://doi.org/10.17977/um005v2i22018p142
Ertmer, P. A., & Newby, T. J. (2013). Behaviorism, cognitivism, constructivism: Comparing
critical features from an instructional design perspective. Performance Improvement
Quarterly, 26(2), 43–71. https://doi.org/10.1002/piq.21143
Evertson, C. M., & Weinstein, C. S. (2011). Handbook of classroom management, research,
practice, and contemporary issues. Routledge.
Fajar, M. (2020). Peran dukungan sosial dan harga diri terhadap kesejahteraan subjektif
penyandang disabilitas fisik [The role of social support and self-esteem on the
subjective welfare of persons with physical disabilities]. E Print UMS.
http://eprints.ums.ac.id/id/eprint/85583
Fisher, E. L., Thibodaux, L. K., Previ, D., & Reesman, J. (2021). Impact of communication
modality on caregiver ratings for deaf and hard of hearing children. Applied
Neuropsychology: Child, 11(4), 598–609.
https://doi.org/10.1080/21622965.2021.1916495
Friend, M., & Bursuck, W. D. (2018). Including students with special needs, a practical guide
for classroom teachers. Pearson
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
359
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
360
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
361
Siam, K., & Al-Natour, M. (2016). Teacher’s differentiated instruction practices and
implementation challenges for learning disabilities in Jordan. International
Education Studies, 9(12), 167. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v9n12p167
Sugiyono, S. (2013). Metode penelitian pendidikan pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D
[Educational research methods: Quantitative, qualitative, and R&D approaches].
Alfabeta.
Tomlinson, C. A., & Imbeau, M. B. (2023). Leading and managing a differentiated classroom.
ASCD.
Topping, K., & Maloney, S. (2005). The RoutledgeFalmer reader in inclusive education.
RoutledgeFalmer.
UNESCO. (2015). Learning to live together: Education for intercultural and interfaith
understanding. UNESCO Publishing.
UNESCO. (2016). Education 2030: Incheon Declaration Framework for Action for the
implementation of Sustainable Development Goal 4: Ensure inclusive and equitable
quality education and promote lifelong learning opportunities for all.
https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000245656
UNESCO. (2017a). Guidelines for inclusion: Ensuring access to education for all.
https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000140224
UNESCO. (2017b). A guide for ensuring inclusion and equity in education.
https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000248254
United Nations. (2006). Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.
https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-
mechanisms/instruments/convention-rights-persons-disabilities
World Health Organization. (2011). World report on disability. World Health Organization.
Yunaini, N. (2021). Model pembelajaran anak berkebutuhan khusus dalam setting
pendidikan inklusi [Learning models for children with special needs in inclusive
education settings]. Journal of Elementary School Education, 1(1), 18–25.
https://doi.org/10.52657/jouese.v1i1.1326
Yunita, E. I., Suneki, S., & Wakhyudin, H. (2019). Manajemen pendidikan inklusi dalam
proses pembelajaran dan penanganan guru terhadap anak berkebutuhan khusus
[Management of inclusive education in the learning process and teacher handling
of children with special needs]. International Journal of Elementary Education, 3(3),
267. https://doi.org/10.23887/ijee.v3i3.19407
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
362
*
Corresponding author: Edwin Gustavo Estrada-Araoz, gestrada@unamad.edu.pe
©Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0
International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
363
1. Introduction
The health emergency caused by COVID-19 has marked a turning point in the
history of humanity. After the announcement made by authorities in Wuhan
(China) regarding the existence of a new type of Coronavirus (COVID-19), the
situation became complex, since the virus subsequently spread quickly across
China and throughout most of the countries around the world (Osman et al.,
2022). This scenario understandably engendered high levels of concern among
society, as people felt anxious about their health and did not want to become
infected, due to the impact on the respiratory system increasing the potential
risk of death (Lin et al., 2020).
Thus, in order to deal with this context, the World Health Organization (WHO)
characterized this disease as a pandemic (Estrada, 2022), a decision that caused
health, social, economic, cultural and, of course, educational repercussions
throughout the world (Estrada et al., 2023). Particularly, in the educational field,
the virtuality of lessons was established with the purpose of avoiding crowds
and reducing the spread of the virus, while giving continuity to the educational
service. However, the limitations of connectivity and accessibility of the
educational community, that had already been perceived several decades ago,
became more critical and made this transition more difficult (Huanca-
Arohuanca et al., 2020).
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
364
From the first quarter of 2022, the rate of infections and deaths caused by
COVID-19 decreased significantly worldwide, mainly due to vaccination
campaigns (Taborda et al., 2022). As a result, many activities that had been
previously carried out virtually were able to take place in person once more.
Thus, in Peru, the Ministry of Education (MINEDU) instructed that classes
would also return to face-to-face lessons from March 2022, after following
certain biosafety protocols.
However, the work of teachers became significantly more complex after the
return to face-to-face classes. This is because the academic performance levels of
the students were no longer in line with those established in the National
Curriculum for Basic Education. In other words, the learning achieved through
virtual classes had been insufficient. For this reason, since March 2022, teachers
have been making tremendous efforts, including providing a greater focus and
increased support, in an attempt to bring the students up to the standard level.
This necessitates an increase in their workload, and much of it must take place
outside their working hours. Similarly, the anxiety, discouragement, and
frustration of returning to face-to-face work is draining their emotional
resources while increasing their levels of mental and emotional tension. In other
words, an already recurrent phenomenon among teachers has been growing
more acute: stress.
It is well known that teaching is one of the main professions in which employees
can develop stress-related symptoms. The job requires a significant amount of
time and effort, both inside and outside the classroom, which can lead to neglect
of other personal areas due to work overload (El-Sahili, 2011). Additionally, it is
a profession that faces constant stressors, as environmental factors such as noise,
high numbers of students, behavioral issues, constant friction from educational
authorities and parents, among others, generate more complex situations that
can significantly affect the quality of life of those who perform this work
(Peralta, 2018).
The word “stress” derives from the word “anguish”, meaning “pain or
affliction”. Stress is now considered the disease of the 21st century (Rojas et al.,
2021) and is a behavioral response of the body to various internal and external
pressures. This is because it is an adaptive and emergency process and therefore
crucial for survival (Whiting et al., 2021), as well as being a result of the
relationship between the individual and his environment (Casimiro et al., 2020).
From the same perspective, it is often argued that stress is the automatic
response of an organism to any event that is imposed on it and which feels
threatening (Uribe et al., 2015). This response causes the nervous system to be
stimulated and the individual reacts involuntarily, producing both
psychological (mental) and physiological (physical) changes; this occurs in a
particular way between the person and the situation (Alvites, 2019).
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
365
Given the cognitive, psychological, and emotional demands required for the
development and fulfillment of various activities, psychosocial risk factors can
be developed, which considerably diminish one’s state of health (Vieco &
Abello, 2014). Although it was initially believed that stress was something
exclusive to work organizations, the World Health Organization has recognized
that other environmental factors can lead to the breakdown of associated
pathologies (Peralta, 2018). Regarding this, Uribe (2010) distinguishes seven
psychosomatic factors directly related to stress development: pain, anxiety,
depression, sleep disorders, gastric disturbance, neurotic and psychosexual
issues; these can significantly affect the physical and mental health of those who
suffer from any of them.
Stress negatively impacts teachers’ lives, which can reduce life satisfaction and
therefore cause a potential reduction in work commitment and job satisfaction,
which also negatively affects students (Ahmed, 2019; Ozamiz et al., 2021;
Minihan et al., 2022). In addition, the stress has a negative impact on the
person’s mental health, as it increases the risk of psychological and behavioral
disorders (Cladellas et al., 2018).
Conversely, Lazarus & Folkman (1984) devised the transactional theory of stress,
which explains the associated symptoms using a frame of reference. This theory
considers Sandín's (1999) process model, which states that people can become
stressed depending on their self-perception, perceived social support, and an
assessment of the situation. Similarly, other symptoms can occur when suffering
from stress, including emotional, behavioral, and physiological responses
(psychosomatic symptoms such as pain in the stomach, back, arms, legs, head,
or chest; dizziness, shortness of breath, constipation, and indigestion) (González
& Landero, 2008).
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
366
In the current context of returning to face-to-face classes, very few studies have
been carried out to evaluate the psychosomatic symptoms associated with stress
in teachers, which increases the need to investigate this topic and gives it greater
relevance. The described finding is aligned with the report by Estrada et al.
(2022), who determined that teachers were presenting with psychosomatic
symptoms related to stress upon returning to face-to-face classes. The main
symptoms were feelings of extreme exhaustion, the feeling of not wanting to get
up in the morning, some nervous tics or blinks, and headaches. Similarly, this
corresponds to research carried out in Japan, where researchers analyzed the
mental health of teachers who were working in person after the reopening of
educational institutions; they found that the teachers were suffering from
moderate levels of stress and anxiety due to the fear of becoming infected and
due to the educational lagging (Wakui et al., 2021). Similarly, in Mexico, an
investigation was conducted to evaluate the mental health and psychological
impact on teachers and students of the return to face-to-face classes; it was found
that there were moderate levels of psychological distress, stress and anxiety due
to possible infections and readaptation to this form of teaching (Armenta et al.,
2023). On the other hand, some investigations have determined that the presence
of psychosomatic symptoms associated with stress is greater in women
(Guayasamín & Ramos, 2020; García, 2020) and in those with temporary
employment contracts (Estrada & Gallegos, 2020; Alvites, 2019).
Therefore, the research problem is: How do teachers in Primary and Secondary
education evaluate the psychosomatic symptoms associated with stress after
returning to face-to-face classes? Thus, the objective of this research is to
evaluate the psychosomatic symptoms associated with stress in Primary and
Secondary Education teachers after returning to face-to-face classes.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
367
2. Methodology
2.1 Research Design
The research has a quantitative approach because the data collection was carried
out in order to answer the research question and because statistics was applied.
A non-experimental design was employed, as the study variable was not
intentionally manipulated, but rather observed as it occurred in its natural
environment, for later analysis. With respect to the type of research, it was
descriptive - cross-sectional, since the properties and characteristics of the study
variable were described and because the data collection process was carried out
in a single moment (Hernández & Mendoza, 2018).
2.3 Instruments
The technique used was the survey and the instrument of data collection was the
Psychosomatic Problems Questionnaire, which was originally designed by Hock
(1988) and adapted to the Peruvian context by Mogollón and Muñoz (2018). Its
purpose is to evaluate the most recurrent psychosomatic symptoms associated
with stress, for which participants must indicate how frequently they have
manifested in the last three months. This questionnaire is a single factor and
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
368
2.4 Procedure
The data collection process was carried out between the months of April and
July in the year 2022, when all of the educational institutions of regular basic
education were providing in-person educational. For this purpose, the
respective authorization was requested from the Local Educational Management
Unit of Cusco. After that, the permission of the management staff of each
educational institution was requested and a coordination meeting with the
teachers was arranged to define the days to apply the in-person data collection
instruments.
3. Results
As Figure 1 shows, 45.2% of the teachers perceived that the presence of
psychosomatic symptoms associated with stress was moderate, 33.9% perceived
that it was low, while 20.9% perceived that it was high. The described finding
indicates that the teachers were experiencing certain emotional, cognitive, and
physiological reactions that affected their health and were likely caused by the
high workload and other demands that were placed upon them following the
return to face-to-face classes.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
369
Table 3 shows that the arithmetic mean of the general scores among females was
higher than those of the males. Similarly, it can be seen that the p-value of the
Student's t-test was below the level of significance (p<0.05), which indicates that
the differences found were statistically significant. For instance, women
presented with more psychosomatic symptoms associated with stress compared
to men.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
370
It can be seen from Table 4 that the arithmetic means of the general scores of
teachers who were between 21 and 40 years old was slightly higher than those of
participants between 41 and 64 years old. However, it is observed that the p-
value of the Student's t-test was higher than the significance level (p>0.05),
which indicates that the differences found were not statistically significant.
As can be seen in Table 6, the arithmetic means of the general scores of the
temporarily employed teachers was higher than those of the permanently
employed teachers. Similarly, it can be seen that the p-value of the Student's t-
test was below the level of significance (p<0.05), which indicates that the
differences found were statistically significant. Therefore, the teachers who have
temporary employment contracts showed more psychosomatic symptoms
associated with stress than those with permanent employment contracts.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
371
Table 7, below, shows that the arithmetic means of the general scores of those
teachers who worked in the afternoon was higher than the scores of the teachers
who worked in the morning. However, it can be seen that the Student's t-test p-
value was higher than the significance level (p>0.05), which indicates that the
differences found were not statistically significant.
4. Discussion
In recent years, research focused on the mental health of teachers has increased
significantly, since psychosocial variables, such as stress, are determinants of
emotional state and psychological well-being, which are necessary factors for
adequate performance. However, the return to face-to-face attendance since the
health emergency caused by COVID-19 is causing work overload for many
teachers. Therefore, the present investigation sought to evaluate the
psychosomatic symptoms associated with stress in Primary and Secondary
Education teachers after returning to face-to-face classes.
This study’s finding aligns with that of Estrada et al. (2022), who determined
that teachers were experiencing psychosomatic symptoms related to stress upon
returning to face-to-face classes. The main symptoms were feelings of extreme
exhaustion, a reluctance to get up in the morning, some nervous tics or blinks,
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
372
and headaches. Similarly, research carried out in Japan analyzed the mental
health of teachers who were working face-to-face after the reopening of
educational institutions and found that they were suffering from moderate
levels of stress and anxiety due to the fear of being infected as well as the
educational lagging (Wakui et al., 2021). Furthermore, in Mexico, an
investigation was carried out to evaluate the mental health and psychological
impact on teachers and students of returning to face-to-face classes and reported
that there were moderate levels of psychological distress, stress and anxiety due
to possible infections and readaptation to this form of teaching (Armenta et al.,
2023).
It was also found in the present investigation that the symptoms teachers
reported most frequently were those of extreme tiredness, headaches and a
feeling of not wanting to get up in the morning. This resulted in a moderate
presence of psychosomatic symptoms associated with stress, which affects
pedagogical practice and, consequently, educational quality. The result
described partially agrees with the report of an investigation carried out in
Ecuador, where they determined that the main psychosomatic reactions
presented by teachers were irritability, restlessness, headaches, neck pain, back
pain, sweating, sleep disorders and gastrointestinal problems (Basurto et al.,
2020).
Another finding of this study is that teachers who have temporary employment
contracts presented greater manifestations of psychosomatic symptoms than
those with permanent ones. This can be explained by the fact that teachers with
permanent employment contracts enjoy job security, which provides them with
peace of mind. In contrast, teachers with temporary contracts are often worried
about retaining their jobs and finding new employment once their contract
period expires. Furthermore, additional undesirable responsibilities may be
allotted to temporary employees, which some of the teachers with permanent
contracts may refuse to assume. The described finding concurs with that of some
investigations carried out in Peru (Estrada & Gallegos, 2020; Alvites, 2019).
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
373
Despite the fact that the present investigation addressed a topic associated with
mental health, which is very relevant and resulted in important findings, it is
necessary to specify some limitations. First, the data obtained from the teachers,
who detailed the psychosomatic symptoms associated with stress, were based
on a self-reported instrument; therefore, the results could be overestimated or
underestimated. Second, the sample size is relatively small and is also
homogeneous, which implies that caution must be taken when interpreting the
findings. Consequently, it is recommended that future research should use data
collection instruments that complement the questionnaire to give greater
objectivity to the entire process. Similarly, the size of the sample should be
increased, including teachers from rural contexts and diverse sociocultural
characteristics.
5. Conclusion
The psychosomatic symptoms associated with stress are considered to be risks
for the health, well-being and quality of life of those people who suffer from it.
In the present investigation, it was concluded that basic education teachers rated
their psychosomatic symptoms associated with stress at a moderate level when
they returned to face-to-face classes. The most frequently reported symptoms
were feeling extremely tired, headaches, and not wanting to get up in the
morning. Furthermore, it was determined that there were statistically significant
differences regarding the presence of psychosomatic symptoms associated with
stress related to the gender and employment status of the teachers.
To reduce stress levels in teachers, it is crucial that the relevant educational
authorities establish national, regional and local policies to improve the working
conditions under which teachers must operate. On the other hand, the
management teams of educational institutions must develop preventive and
corrective programs to promote teacher well-being and consequently protect
teachers’ quality of life.
6. References
Ahmed, I. (2019). Causes of teacher stress: Its effects on teacher performance and health
problems. International Journal of Management and Business Sciences, 1(1), 1-13.
https://doi.org/10.63105/IJMBS.2019.1.1.6
Alvites, C. (2019). Estrés docente y factores psicosociales en docentes de Latinoamérica,
Norteamérica y Europa. Propósitos y Representaciones, 7(3), 141-178.
http://dx.doi.org/10.20511/pyr2019.v7n3.393
Armenta, C., Blanco, H., & Castillo, A. (2023). Regreso a clases, el impacto psicológico
ante el confinamiento por COVID 19, la importancia de la salud mental en el
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
374
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
375
Lin, C., Broström, A., Griffiths, M., & Pakpour, A. (2020). Investigating mediated effects
of fear of COVID-19 and COVID-19 misunderstanding in the association
between problematic social media use, psychological distress, and insomnia.
Internet Interventions, 21, 100345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.invent.2020.100345
Minihan, E., Adamis, D., Dunleavy, M., Martin, A., Gavin, B., & McNicholas, F. (2022).
COVID-19 related occupational stress in teachers in Ireland. International Journal
of Educational Research Open, 3, 100114.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2021.100114
Mogollón, A., & Muñoz, A. (2018). Estudio de los factores internos y externos que generan
estrés en los trabajadores de la Zona Norte-Lima en la red de oficinas del BANBIF y su
influencia en las metas comerciales-2017. (Tesis de pregrado). Universidad San
Ignacio de Loyola, Perú. http://200.37.102.150/handle/USIL/3483
Osman, D., Khalaf, F., Ahmed, G., Abdelbadee, A., Abbas, A., & Mohammed H. (2022).
Worry from contracting COVID-19 infection and its stigma among Egyptian
health care providers. The Journal of the Egyptian Public Health Association, 97(1), 2.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s42506-021-00099-6
Ozamiz, N., Berasategi, N., Idoiaga, N., & Dosil, M. (2021). The psychological state of
teachers during the COVID-19 crisis: The challenge of returning to face-to-face
teaching. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 620718.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.620718
Peralta, J. (2018). Estrés y factores psicosomáticos en docentes de una escuela normal
particular: una comparación de grupos de sexos. Kinesis Revista Veracruzana de
Investigación Docente, 3(3), 45-53.
https://www.revistakinesis.com/index.php/journal/article/view/27
Peralta, J., & Villalba, W. (2019). Estrés laboral y desarrollo de trastornos psicosomáticos
en estudiantes de posgrado. Psicología y Salud, 29(2), 177-186.
https://doi.org/10.25009/pys.v29i2.2584
Rodríguez, J., Benavides, E., Ornelas, M., Jurado, P. (2019). El burnout académico
percibido en universitarios; comparaciones por género. Formación Universitaria,
12(5), 23-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-50062019000500023
Rojas, J., Flores, G., & Cuaya, I. (2021). Principales aspectos metodológicos en el estudio
del estrés laboral en personal universitario: Una revisión sistemática. Revista
Digital de Investigación en Docencia Universitaria, 15(1), e1248.
https://doi.org/10.19083/ridu.2021.1248
Sandín, B. (1999). Estrés psicosocial. Klinik.
Taborda, A., Murillo, D., Moreno, C., Taborda, P., Fuquen, M., Díaz, P., & Londoño, D.
(2022). Análisis de impacto presupuestal de la vacunación contra COVID-19 en
América Latina. Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública, 46, e5.
https://doi.org/10.26633/RPSP.2022.5
Uribe, J. (2010). EDO: Escala de Desgaste Ocupacional (Burnout). El Manual Moderno S.A.
Uribe, J., Patlán, J., & García, A. (2015). Manifestaciones psicosomáticas, compromiso y
burnout como consecuentes del clima y la cultura organizacional: un análisis de
ruta (path analysis). Contaduría y Administración, 60(2), 447-467.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0186-1042(15)30009-7
Vargas, N., & Oros, L. (2021). Stress and burnout in teachers during times of pandemic.
Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 756007. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.756007
Vidal, J., Muntaner, A., Palou, P. (2018). Diferencias de estrés y afrontamiento del mismo
según el género y cómo afecta al rendimiento académico en estudiantes
universitarios. Contextos Educativos, 0(22), 181-195.
https://doi.org/10.18172/con.3369
Vieco, G., & Abello, R. (2014). Factores psicosociales de origen laboral, estrés y
morbilidad en el mundo. Psicología desde el Caribe, 31(2), 354-385.
http://dx.doi.org/10.14482/psdc.31.2.5544
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
376
Wakui, N., Abe, S., Shirozu, S., Yamamoto, Y., Yamamura, M., Abe, Y., Murata, S.,
Ozawa, M., Igarashi, T., Yanagiya, T., Machida, Y., & Kikuchi, M. (2021). Causes
of anxiety among teachers giving face-to-face lessons after the reopening of
schools during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public
Health, 21(1), 1050. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11130-y
Whiting, S., Wass, S., Green, S., & Thomas, M. (2021). Stress and learning in pupils:
Neuroscience evidence and its relevance for teachers. Mind, Brain and Education:
The Official Journal of the International Mind, Brain, and Education Society, 15(2),
177-188. https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12282
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
377
*
Corresponding Author: Chris-Valentine Ogar Eneji; vcogareneji@gmail.com,
vcogareneji@unical.edu.ng
©Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0
International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
378
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
379
However, it is sometimes used more broadly to include all effort and processes
to educate the public, individuals and other audience including print materials,
websites, media campaigns etc to explore environmental issues, engage in
problem solving, and takes responsible actions to improve the environment.
Moreover, Freire, (1996 in Pirrie et al., 2006) observed that the effectiveness of
environmental education is dependent on multidimensional perspective of
information dissemination acquired through education as a whole, thereby,
involving shared knowledge between indigenous education systems already
possessed by the rural communities and the social realities on ground. Based on
these perspectives, individuals who have acquired environmental education
should have the thorough and effective understanding of our environmental
challenges, while also possessing the requisite skills, capacities and knowledge
to address these environmental issues accordingly. This will guide them to make
informed decisions concerning the extent of participation to address these issues
so identified.
Gruenwald, (2004 in Eneji, 2017a) and Ford Foundation, (2005 in Eneji, 2017a)
defined Environmental Education as the process of learning that improves
human knowledge and awareness concerning the environment, with its
numerous problems, developing people’s attitude, and that gives them the
motivation and commitments to make valid and reliable decisions to take
sustainable actions in tackling these environmental issues so identified. The
Tbilisi conference of 1972 defined Environmental Education as a learning
process that help the students develop positive attitudes, skills, belief,
knowledge, capacities and the commitment to work as a learner or as a
community to address current environmental issues and avoiding new
environmental issues.
Most often than not, people make the mistake of using Environmental Education
and Environmental Science interchangeably, while both focus on environmental
problems, they have a thin line of differentiation. The duty of the environmental
scientist is to bring out facts concerning the environment, while that of the
Environmental Educator is to pass the message through education and
awareness creation to the public.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
380
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
381
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
382
Studies have shown that in curriculum development, there are four major
approaches to the theory and practice; these approaches include:
a) Curriculum is a body of knowledge to be transmitted from one person to
another or from one generation to another.
b) Curriculum is an attempt of helping learners to achieve educational goals.
c) Curriculum is a process which is systematic and outlined activities by the
school for the wilful and guided learning of students.
d) Curriculum is praxis (Murray et al., 2015; Bilbao et al., 2008; Maria del
Carmen & Sanchez, 2010; Hancock et al., 2012).
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
383
Gooder and Cantwell, (2017); Harrison, (2020); Yuxuan et al, (2022) respectively
posited that the evaluation of curriculum is an attempt to measure and give
judgement on the extent to which a curriculum has met the objective of the
school. It is used to measure and judge the curriculum in terms of the courses
planned, the program to be assessed, the activities presented to the learners and
their participation in the learning process including the opportunities used in
the formal school curriculum., to make an objective decision in the school
process, the curriculum evaluation helps to guide the school in the
implementation of such curriculum. Not only does the curriculum helps to
guide program implementation, it also help the schools and the managers of the
process to evaluate whether the goals and schedule of responsibilities of those
assigned to implement the process were actually carried out as laid down in the
curriculum process and have the goals set out in the curriculum been achieved.
It is an activity which looks at the process to identify any potential defects or
challenges in the implementation process of the curriculum, while it also tries to
make a comparative analysis of the outcomes with the stated objectives and the
entire curriculum implementation process. This also helps look at the
effectiveness of the worth of the curriculum implemented (Gooder and
Cantwell, 2017; Harrison, 2020; Yuxuan et al, 2022). The major concern of this
paper is to evaluate the Environmental Education curriculum implemented and
the products there from in the University of Calabar, Nigeria. Therefore, our
concern is primarily centered on the evaluation of the curriculum implemented,
the process, and the products of the program from its inception at the University
of Calabar, Nigeria.
Petegem et al., (2007 in Mbilinyi and Msuya, 2018) posited in their study that to
evaluate the implementation of Environmental Education from two Flemish
(Belgian) teacher education college, two curriculum design approaches were
studied, one with a long history of cross curricular education and another with a
straight curriculum. The authors reported that at some points, the two
curriculum models stagnated because of organizational and personal
interference or obstructions. The authors then reported that after incorporating
Environmental Education into the curriculum for pre-service teachers’ education
and in the job description of the participating teachers, the implementation goals
improved considerably. Based on this finding and discovery, the authors took
the initiatives and made progress through the institutionalization of
Environmental Education. The implication of this result is that like in most
schools, the implementation of EE is not yet made a standalone subject, but EE
topics are rather infused into other subjects like Integrated Sciences, Biology,
Agriculture, Geography, Economics etc. This has also made the
institutionalization of Environmental Education to be slow and given a second
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
384
fiddle priority (Harder et al., 2014; Lewis et al., 2014; Eneji et al, 2017b; Thomas
et al., 2018; Astutik & Widiaty, 2018; Stevenson et al., 2019).
Ardoin et al., (2013) posited that several factors have played against the proper
implementation of EE in most schools, some of these factors include: funding,
facilities, EE inclusion in conventional school curriculum, teacher apathy and
attrition, absence of proper regulatory bodies, variations and differences in
curriculum content and practices among others. Others include poor career
prospect, poor teacher’s pedagogic knowledge of the subject Environmental
Education among others (Ana et al., 2009; Gonzaga, 2016; Marpa & Juele, 2016;
Raman, 2016; Astutik & Widiaty, 2018; Sotiriadou et al., 2019).
These authors further opined that very few institutions of higher learning have
actually begun the implementation of Environmental Education programs. They
further stated that in most schools, Environmental Education is domiciled in
Faculties of Education, in some under faculties of Social Sciences, while in others
in Development Studies (Yusof et al. 2011 in Kelani & Khourey-Bowers, 2012;
Godin et al., 2015). These faculties where the programs are domiciled are not the
problem, but the course content of what Environmental Education should be is
hampered by the thinking and specializations within where the program is
domiciled (Ardoin & Heimlich, 2013; Ardoin et al., 2015; McKinley et al. 2017;
Seo et al., 2020). The University of Calabar is one such university where the EE
program has adequately been implemented, and their curriculum content has
been adjudged by the Nigerian Universities Commission (NUC) accreditation
team as one of the best in the country, being in operation for well over thirty (30)
years now.
The positions of Wang et al, (2010) as cited by Carleton and Hug, (2010) was
further affirmed by Knight et al., (2017) whose study on challenges and
opportunities for evaluating Environmental Education programs listed poor
funding and facilities for the implementation of the program, student’s apathy
and attitude to lecture attendance and doing of assignments, their commitments
to studies, institutional based prejudice and administrative bottle necks, poor or
near absence of Environmental Education regulatory agencies, absence of the
program in primary, secondary and final qualifying examination bodies like
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
385
Other scholars also posited that Environmental Education like other new courses
like Business Education, Integrated Science, Introductory Technology, and many
others are left halfway because these are not written in the final qualifying
examinations by these examining bodies (Amirshokoohi, 2010; Kelani &
Khourey-Bowers, 2012; Kelani, 2015). Kelani and Khourey-Bowers, (2012)
further posited that there is the need for serious professional development for
the teachers of this new program (McDonald and Dominquez, 2010; Krasny et
al., 2010; Kuhar et al., 2010; Bull, 2013;Lemos et al., 2018). Most of those teaching
this new course have disjointed certificates, some read science related courses,
and others studied pure education (Curriculum and Teaching, Biology
Education, Guidance and Counselling, Physical and Health Education, Sport
Psychology, Agricultural Education, Forestry and Wildlife, Chemistry, Physics,
Biological Sciences, Geology, Medicine and Nursing Sciences amongst others).
These according to some authors could only teach borrowed courses, but not
core courses (Amirshokohi, 2010; Okhakhu and Evawoma-Enuku, 2011; Kelani
& Khourey-Bowers, 2012; Kelani, 2015; Monroe and Krasny, 2016; Monroe et al.,
2017; Yoni and Dasining, 2018; Mellish et al., 2019).
While adding credence to this study, Blatt (2013), writing on the roles
Environmental Education specialists and graduates should play and where they
should work to solve environmental problems, posited that the essence of
introducing the course Environmental Education is to work to forestall the
creation of new environmental issues, while mitigating the already existing
problems. In Blatt’s (2013) work on exploring environmental identity and
behavioral change in an environmental science course, the author said those
who become committed to the course should be trained in values, skills, attitude
and belief to have the necessary commitment to work towards solving
environmental problems. This is a challenge that is in line with the goals and
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
386
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
387
4.1 Study area: The study was carried out in the Department of Environmental
Education University of Calabar. University of Calabar is located in the Calabar
Municipality between latitudes 40 15ꞌ and 50 00 North and longitude 80 15ꞌ and 80
23ꞌ East. The students who graduated from the department between 1997-2021
are our research subjects. The reason for choosing these sets of graduates is
because that was when the department began graduating students with first
degree and for the 2021 session, this was the last sets of students who graduated
before this study was carried out. According to the list of graduates found in the
department’s archive, the department had produced about one thousand, nine
hundred and thirty-eight (1938) graduates, (1,455 Bachelor’s degree graduates
and 483 Master’s degree graduates). This population excludes ordinary diploma
and post graduate diploma in graduates of environmental education. The
collection of data took the researchers well over eight months for the
administration of the instrument.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
388
Since the location and residents of most of these graduates are not known, the
graduates from the department have an alumna WhatsApp’s platform where
issues concerning the department are discussed. Incidentally, some of the
researchers carrying out this research are graduates of the department and are
also members of the alumna platform. A sample of 50% of the research subjects
(969) were purposefully selected for the study. A researcher design closed and
open-ended questionnaire was used for data collection. The instrument was
validated by three lecturers in the department of test, measurement, and
evaluation and three lecturers from the Department of Environmental
Education. The instrument was administered through the online platform,
where the instrument was posted on the WhatsApp platform. Some respondents
filled directly while others who could not fill them online, printed a copy, filled
them and mailed them back to the researchers. Others, are located within
Calabar, filled the hard copies and returned them to the researchers in the
department.
Those filled online were printed out, where the hard copies were all coded,
analyzed and result interpreted. Simple percentage was used for data analysis.
Results are presented on tables.
Further, summary shows that a total of five hundred and sixty-six respondents,
representing 58.41%, strongly agreed that the curriculum content is not
adequate, while four hundred and three, representing 41.59%strongly disagreed
that the curriculum content is adequate. Based on the percentage and response
options obtained from this analysis, the curriculum content as in force today is
not adequate and therefore needs urgent overhauling and review.
The results show that, three hundred and fifty-four respondents, representing
36.53% strongly agreed that the knowledge they got from studying
environmental education cannot afford them the ability to solve environmental
problems in their communities, two hundred and one respondents representing
20.74%agreed that the knowledge they obtained has not helped them much in
solving community environmental problems.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
389
While, two hundred and two respondents, representing 20.85%, agreed that the
knowledge they received has helped them to solve some community
environmental problems, two hundred and twelve respondents, (21.88%)
strongly support the position that the knowledge has help them so much in
solving some environmental problems in their communities. A further
summary shows that five hundred and fifty-five respondents representing
57.3% strongly opposed the fact that the knowledge they acquired could not
help them to solve environmental problems, while four hundred and fourteen
respondents agreed that the knowledge they received helped them solve some
environmental issues in their communities.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
390
Based on the opinion of respondents, the knowledge they acquired when they
studied Environmental Education did not help them enough to solve their
community environmental problems. The result of simple percentage analysis
on table 3 shows that two hundred and twenty-three respondents (23.03%)
strongly agreed that the environmental awareness level created during their
studies was enough to enable them to solve environmental problems in their
society or community, two hundred and thirty three respondents, representing
23.99%, agreed that the environmental awareness created in them as students of
environmental education gave them the leeway to help in solving
environmental problems within their communities and where they work,
whereas, two hundred and seventy seven respondents (28.64%) disagreed that
the quality of environmental awareness created in them was not sufficient
enough to give them all it takes to help in solving community environmental
problems, while, two hundred and thirty six respondents (24.34%) strongly
disagree that the environmental awareness they got as students in the
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
391
Summarizing further, it was discovered that four hundred and fifty six
respondents, representing 47.02%, strongly agreed that during their period of
studies in the department of Environmental Education, the awareness they got
was enough to help them solve community environmental problems,
individually and collectively, while, five hundred and thirteen respondents
strongly disagreed that the awareness during their studies in the department
was not sufficient to help them solve community environmental problem,
whether at home or in their places of work.
Even though the numbers of those who ticked against having higher level of
environmental awareness than those who ticked for, the margin is slim,
implying that some said they got awareness enough to help in solving their
community environmental problems, other said they did not get enough
environmental awareness to help solve community problem. Even at this, most
of the graduates’ attitudes are influenced by the course they studied.
From the result of the simple percentage analysis shown on table 4, three
hundred and six respondents representing 31.5% strongly agreed that the
course which they studied had brought about a change of attitude towards
environmental problems in their community and work place, two hundred and
twenty eight, 23.5% of the respondents, also agreed that the environmental
education they studied had brought a reasonable change of their attitude
towards environmental problems in their community and their work place. Two
hundred and forty eight respondents (25.7%) disagreed that the course they
studied did not have any positive influence on their attitude towards
environmental problems in their work place or community, while one hundred
and eighty seven (19.3%) respondents, strongly disagreed that the course
environmental education as studied did not change their attitude towards
environmental prevention or creation.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
392
A further summary of the result indicates that five hundred and thirty four
respondents representing 55% agreed that the education they studied
contributed so much in changing their attitude positively towards finding
solution to the existing environmental issues, while avoiding the fermenting of
new environmental issues, while four hundred and thirty five respondents
(45%) disagreed that the environmental education they studied did not have any
positive influence on their attitude towards providing dependable solution to
the existing environmental issues, while avoiding the fermenting of new ones.
By inference therefore, the course as taught to these graduates has contributed
positively to influence their attitude towards providing dependable solution to
the existing environmental issues while avoiding the fermenting of new
environmental challenges. This therefore means this objective of Environmental
Education is being achieved, though gradually.
Two hundred and thirty three respondents (24.1%) agreed that their studying
environmental education has built their skills to actively participate in working
to provide solution to the existing environmental concerns. Two hundred and
seventy nine respondents again ticked that they agreed that the course improved
their skills to actively participate in finding solutions to our environmental
issues. On the other hand, two hundred and fifty respondents (250, 25.8%) and
two hundred and seven (207; 21.3%) disagreed and strongly disagreed
respectively that the environmental education they studied did not contribute to
build their environmental skills to participate in finding solutions to the
environmental challenges currently being felt by humans. A further summary of
the simple percentage analysis on table 5 shows an aggregate score of five
hundred and twelve respondents representing 52.9% who strongly agreed that
the course which they studied built their environmental skill positively to
empower them to actively participate in providing solutions to the existing
environmental issues, this will help them to avoid creating new environmental
concerns. Four hundred and fifty seven respondents representing 47.1% strongly
disagreed to the postulation that the environmental education they studied did
not improve or develop their skills to provide feasible solution to the current
existing environmental challenges, not to talk of avoiding the production of of
new environmental issues.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
393
From the results on table 5, enough evidence abounds to show that the
introduction of environmental education as studied by these sets of graduates
shows that the course built their skills and prepared them well to actively
participate in solving current environmental problems, while preventing the
creation of new ones. Therefore, Environmental Education as introduced in
University of Calabar, has met this objective too.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
394
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
395
The result of the simple percentage analysis on table 6 revealed that two
hundred and thirty six respondents (24.4%) strongly agreed that the lecturers
that taught them as undergraduate students have the pedagogic knowledge of
the subject matter, two hundred and fifty eight respondents (26.6%), also greed
that most of the lecturers that taught them have the pedagogic knowledge of the
subject matter. Two hundred and twenty five respondents (23.2%) disagreed
that most of the lecturers who taught them do not have the pedagogic
knowledge of the subject matter, while two hundred and fifty respondents (250,
25.8%) strongly disagreed that most of the lecturers who taught them do not
have the requisite knowledge to teach.
Further summation of respondents opinion posits that four hundred and ninety
four respondents (51.0%) shows that most of the lecturers who taught them
during their undergraduate days have the requisites pedagogic knowledge of
the subject matter, while four hundred and seventy five respondents (475;
49.0%) strongly disagreed that most of the lecturers who taught them do not
have sufficient pedagogic knowledge of the subject matter. Deducing from the
result on table 6, it therefore stands to reason that some of the lecturers who
taught these respondents at undergraduate levels have the requisite pedagogic
knowledge.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
396
The result of the simple percentage analysis shown on table 7 indicates that 214
respondents (22.1%) strongly agreed that the job they are current doing is as a
result of the course environmental education which they studied, 172
respondents, agreed that the course they studied help them to get the current job
they are doing, while 338 respondents representing 34.8% disagreed that the job
they are doing is not because they studied environmental education, but because
they are graduates, the remaining 249 respondents (25.3%) strongly disagreed
that the job they are doing now is not because they studied environmental
education, but because they have somebody somewhere who assisted them to
get the job. The implication of this result is that most of the graduates got the job
they are doing not because they studied environmental education, but because
they have somebody who assisted them to get the job just because the job was
meant for graduates. A further look at the result again shows that 386
respondents, representing 39.9% agreed that the current job they are doing is
because they studied environmental education, while 583 respondents,
representing 60.1% vehemently disagreed that the job they are doing is not
because they studied environmental education. The implication of this result is
that most of the graduates of environmental education are not employed
because they studied environmental education, but because they are just
graduates. This therefore means that even the government who are signatory to
the implementation of environmental education are not even serious about
engaging these graduates where they actually should be or belong.
Looking at the result on table 8, it was discovered that three hundred and eighty
six respondents (39.8%) strongly agreed that the seven factors listed above are
militating factors working against the effective implementation of
environmental education in the University of Calabar, three hundred and thirty
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
397
six respondents (34.8%) agreed that the seven factors listed militates against the
effective implementation of environmental education as a course. While, one
hundred and sixty six respondents, representing 17.0%, disagreed that these
factors listed do not in any way militate against the implementation of
environmental education, whereas, eighty one respondents (8.4%) strongly
disagreed that these seven factors do not act as militating factors against the
implementation of environmental education. A further analysis found that seven
hundred and twenty two (74.6%) agreed that the seven factors listed are some of
the militating factors working against the effective implementation of
environmental education, while two hundred and forty seven respondents, (247:
25.4%) disagreed that the factors listed here may not be responsible for the poor
implementation of environmental education curriculum. From the result of
simple percentage analysis on table 8, it is clear that the factors listed above are
militating against the implementation of environmental education curriculum.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
398
On the way forward, the open-ended questionnaire which involves the listing of
feasible solutions by the respondents were summed up and the scores are listed
on table 9. Thirteen suggestions were made from the respondents as feasible
solutions to the problems of implementation of environmental education
curriculum in the University of Calabar: funding from both federal and state
government and other relevant agencies, retraining of teachers of environmental
education, curriculum overhauling in line with modern realities, formation of
statutory regulatory body and including environmental education in the
primary and secondary school curriculum. Others include writing
environmental education in final secondary school certificate examination like
West African Senior School Certificate Examination, National Examination
Council and National Board for Technical Education and the Basic Certificate
Examination (BCCE).
The simple percentage analysis on table 9 shows that thirteen feasible solutions
were filtered from the list of suggested solutions to the problem of
implementation of environmental education curriculum and the products in the
University of Calabar. Three hundred and fifty seven respondents (36.8%
strongly agreed that the solutions suggested can correct the issues of the
curriculum implementation, two hundred and ninety seven (30.7%) agreed that
the feasible solutions identified by the respondents are capable of solving the
problems militating against the implementation of environmental education
curriculum.
Table 9. Captured some feasible solutions to the problem militating against the
effective implementation of Environmental Education curriculum in the University of
Calabar from the respondents.
S/N Suggested solutions SA A D SD Total
1 Both the federal government and the 452 255 42 220 969
relevant authorities should make
adequate provision of funding to run
the program
2 Training and retraining of 512 311 21 125 969
Environmental Education lecturers
within and outside the country
should be encourage through
sponsorship from TETFUND and the
federal government
3 Redesigning the curriculum in line 344 352 180 93 969
with current realities is a sure way to
go
4 Formation of standard regulatory 488 211 255 15 969
body for EE must be done as a matter
of urgency
5 Collaboration with authorities to 433 343 120 73 969
include EE in final examination board
curriculum like WASSCE, NECO,
NABTEC, etc
6 Creating more awareness on the job 235 322 388 24 969
prospect of EE Graduates can go a
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
399
One hundred and eighty seven respondents, representing 19.3%, disagreed that
these solutions suggested cannot solve these problems, while another one
hundred and twenty eight (13.2%) strongly disagreed that these list of possible
solutions as identified by the respondents cannot solve environmental education
curriculum implementation as identified by the same respondents. Others
include reinvigorating the awareness on the job prospects of graduates of
environmental education, provision of functional school facilities like well-
furnished lecture theater, libraries, laboratories, weather station among others,
and teaching practice for environmental education students should be replaced
with a full session’s industrial attachment in environmentally related
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
400
A further observation of the result of the analysis on table 9 further revealed that
six hundred and fifty four respondents representing 67.49% agreed completely
that these feasible solutions suggested has the magic wand to solve the problems
militating against the effective implementation of environmental education
curriculum, while three hundred and fifteen respondents (32.14%) disagreed
that these solutions proffered here cannot solve the problems of the
environmental education curriculum implementation in the University of
Calabar. From this analysis therefore, these thirteen suggested solutions are
feasible.
6. Discussion of findings
Judging from respondents’ opinion from the result of the simple percentage
analysis on table1, it is submitted that five hundred and sixty six (58.41%)
respondents strongly agreed that the curriculum contents of environmental
education as it is presently in force is not adequate, while four hundred and
three (41.59%) strongly disagreed that the curriculum contents as is used in the
department of environmental education is adequate. The simple percentage
analysis points that the environmental education curriculum content is not
adequate, these respondents in their response posited that there are more of
education courses in the curriculum contents than core environmental education
courses. Reasons adduced by the respondent’s shows that most of the lecturers
teaching the courses were not very grounded in the pedagogic content of
environmental education; rather they were in some other courses, which they
insist on including making them relevant and staying in the department.
Some said because of the few hands in the department, most lecturers are
borrowed from other departments, so they design the curriculum to suit their
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
401
needs and qualifications. This result is in agreement with those of Ana et al.,
(2009) and Ardoin et al., (2013) whose work found that the introduction of
environmental education into many schools is still being impeded by the
shortages of manpower. These authors in their respective positions stated that
there are disjointed curriculum contents based on the design brought by those
who are not very grounded, but because they have participated or taken short
courses in the subject, want to teach these courses. In situations like this, facts
presented are at times distorted, teaching methods used are wrongly applied
and teaching and learning becomes boring and redundant. When situations like
this occurs, especially if schools float such programs without adequate qualified
teachers with the basic pedagogic knowledge of teaching and subject matter, the
course at best will be minimally beneficial to the students. Practical are skipped
or are haphazardly done, these practical’s including fieldwork (trips) carries a
larger chunk of the knowledge these students would have learnt, and this will in
turn destroy rather than make the course a lucrative and an enjoyable one.
The result of this analysis has come to confirm the earlier finding of Ballard
and Belsky, (2010); Ardoin and Heimlich, (2013); Ardoin et al., (2015) who in
their respective works found that the curriculum contents of every course
introduced in any school setting must meet the Basic Minimum Academic
Standard (B-MAS). Basic minimum academic standard in terms of content,
coverage, practice and delivery systems including facilities and staff to
implement such course content. From data gathered from the field, it is
unfortunate that respondent’s opinion suggested otherwise about the
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
402
This result again confirmed the earlier works of Bull, (2013) and Ballard et al.
(2017) whose researches concluded that the content of any curriculum must
address the course objectives, thereby striving to meet the current challenges
and realities in the profession. It is on this premise that it was revealed that
many courses produce half-cooked, half-baked and poorly trained graduates,
because most of the core courses that make such course what it should be are
either ignored completely or are played down because there are no core
specialties in that area to teach such courses. To address these imbalances in
curriculum content delivery, we suggest that grants should be provided for
further training outside the university where they are employed to teach such
courses. We recommend that foreign staff or qualified experts could be brought
from outside the university (either from other universities or ministries) with
qualified staff to handle such professional areas.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
403
The implication of this result therefore is that most of the respondents were not
satisfied with the knowledge they acquired from studying environmental
education in the University of Calabar. This result is in line with the results of
Bilbao et al., (2008) and Maria del Carmen & Sanchez, (2010) who found a
correlation between deficiency in curriculum and graduate knowledge level. In
their respective researches, they observed that when curriculum contents are
either staggering or disjointedly implemented or handled by non-experts
without the basic knowledge of subject matter and poor pedagogic knowledge,
the course is poorly implemented and haphazardly carried out, at this point,
students who passed through such deficient process will themselves be deficient
in knowledge, skills and values and may hardly have the required capacities to
replicate, practice or participate in solving community problems.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
404
This result partly may be blamed on both students and the school system
including the lecturers who either out of laziness did not do enough for the
students or the students who refused to work extra to acquire enough of this
knowledge. An analysis of the result shows that about 47.02% of the students
said they acquired enough environmental awareness when they were students.
Could this be blamed on these groups of students who claimed not to have
acquired enough environmental awareness? This reasoning is buttressed out of
the fact that they were taught by the same group of lecturers, while others are
claiming to have adequate knowledge. Hancock et al., (2012) in their study had
earlier said despite all efforts put by the school system to make reasonable
learning possible for the students, the students must give excuses for failure.
These were blamed on the poor facilities, near absence of practical experience
from industrial attachments, field trips, excursion, and field work. These
practical exercises are introduced to give the students firsthand information in
the real world on how to identify, manage and solved most environmental
problems in the real practical situation and not in theory as is the case.
In a related research by Carleton-Hug and Hug (2010) and Camp and Fraser,
(2012), we assessed the environmental awareness level of college students after
been exposed to some piece of instruction and their reaction to a physical
environmental situation. Their result shows a positive correlation between the
student’s exposure to practical awareness on environmental issues and their
demonstrated skills based on the awareness they were exposed to during the
instructional process. These results are a confirmation of these studies, where
student’s level of awareness were lower towards understanding environmental
issues and how to proffer feasible solutions to these problems in their local
communities.
The result on table 4 shows that five hundred and thirty four respondents
representing 55% agreed that the course they studied contributed so much in
changing their attitude positively towards providing solutions to the
environmental issues already in existence, while helping them t avoid causing
more environmental problems, while four hundred and thirty five respondents
(45%) disagreed that the environmental education they studied did not have any
positive influence on their attitude towards providing tangible solution to the
existing environmental issues, talk less of helping them to avoid causing new
ones in their homes or work place. This implies that the course as taught to these
graduates has contributed positively to influence their attitude towards solving
current environmental problems, while preventing the creation of new ones.
This therefore means this objective of environmental education is being
achieved, though, gradually but steadily.
This result is similar to the result of Barnosky and Hadly (2016) whose result
shows a positive perfect correlation between environmental education
knowledge and people’s attitude toward environmental issues. This result has
also confirmed the result of an earlier research by Eneji et al., (2017) on people’s
attitude towards waste management and disposal methods. The authors found a
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
405
The results found by Mbilinyi and Msuya, (2018) on knowledge and strategies
for controlling plagiarism in universities, Eneji, et. al., (2019) gave credence to
this current study based on their work on lecturer’s strike actions and the
performance of students of environmental education in terms of their academic
achievements. They found that teaching students under an acceptable learning
environment, while considering the necessary factors which influence human
learning imbues in the learners the needed skills, knowledge, strategies, and
methods to transfer such knowledge into practical situations. If this is done by
universities, students would always transfer theories in classrooms into practical
solutions to society’s problems. Eneji et al., (2019) cited schools in Finland,
Norway, etc where the authorities believe more in practical than theoretical
knowledge in their dispositions. Schools, especially universities and the
management authorities should provide all enabling environment, including
functional classrooms, facilities, and teachers to teach these courses that are the
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
406
basic needs of the society. It therefore stands to reason that with this knowledge
so acquired from practical experiences, they can solve community problems.
The result on table 6 revealed that four hundred and ninety four respondents
(51.0%) shows that most of the lecturers who taught courses in environmental
education have the requisites pedagogic knowledge of the subject matter of
environmental education, while four hundred and seventy five respondents
(49.0%) strongly disagreed that most of the lecturers who taught courses in
environmental education at their undergraduate level do not have sufficient
pedagogic knowledge of the subject matter of environmental education. The
conclusion here is that most of the teachers who taught these students do have
the requisite pedagogic knowledge while some too do not have the requisite
knowledge to teach these courses they picked to teach.
Following these figures, it appears some of the lecturers are really harsh to their
students. This could be one of the major reasons for graduate’s poor quality of
the knowledge, skills, and awareness about environmental issues. One major
characteristics of a good subject teacher is to be accommodating, homely and
friendly, and giving student’s access to approach him/her anytime they have
issues, especially concerning the course(s) they teach these students. Access to
the teacher, accommodation, and warm reception of students by the lecturer is
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
407
Eneji et al., (2017) and Toomey et al., (2017) found that research in most
universities, especially in the third world countries where anything goes to
satisfy political leaders has had significant impact on the quality of graduates we
produce from our tertiary institutions, especially in countries where the will
power to fund education is grossly lacking. Countries like this hardly engage in
teacher education funding to produce the best hands for the job. This boils down
to Bab Fafunwa’s popular quote’’ the quality of any nation’s educational system
cannot grow above the efficiency, competence and established pedagogic
foundations of her teachers’’. The result obtained in this study is a true reflection
of this dictum and the earlier assertion of Eneji et al., (2017). This is a true
reflection of the quality of teachers that were used at that initial stage to teach
these courses, when it was newly introduced. However, in recent times, it
appears much improvement has been recorded as there is an astronomical rise in
the number of qualified lecturers in the department now.
Result on table 8 shows that seven issues were raised as factors militating
against the effective implementation of the environmental education curriculum
in the University of Calabar, these issues are:
A. Environmental education is not a subject written in the final secondary
school certificate examination,
B. Poor funding to implement environmental education curriculum,
C. No uniform environmental education curriculum implemented across
universities offering the course,
D. Poor or shortage of qualified lecturers to teach the course
E. No regulatory body (ies) to regulate the implementation and practice of
environmental education curriculum in tertiary institutions,
F.Poor job prospect/poor employment of professional graduates of
environmental education
G. The delay in the computation and graduation of students in the department
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
408
This study used Tyler’s and Enukoha’ curriculum evaluation models for
evaluating the environmental education curriculum implementation in the
University of Calabar. The resources used (the input), the processes of
curriculum implementation, the output and the impact which the environmental
education curriculum implementation has produced reasonable success as
indicated in the study. Despite this success recorded by these models and its
applicability in this study, there are some works which the result of this study
has come to nullify, works like those of Kelani, 2015; Marpa & Juele, 2016;
McKinley et al., 2017; Kuhar et al., 2019). While their studies found that the
implementation of environmental education in their various levels of schools
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
409
7. Conclusion
The study identified six objectives of environmental education as envisaged by
the curriculum designers and planners for which it set out to achieve, career
prospect, problems working against the effective implementation of
environmental education curriculum and the feasible solutions to these
problems were listed as the purpose of this sturdy. The study discovered that
the basic objectives were being achieved, but there are still some aspects lagging
behind for which it was discovered that the issues listed to include no uniform
curriculum, poor funding, delay in result computation and compilation,
shortage of qualified lecturers, poor facilities and weather station, forcing
students to go on compulsory teaching practice instead of one year industrial
attachment among others were responsible for the lagging behind. It was also
discovered that most of the teachers brought to compliment the core
environmental education teachers actually lack the basic pedagogic knowledge
of the subject matter of environmental education, while some students who
could not get admission into the university, saw environmental education as
introduced as an avenue to get into the system.
Having enumerated all these, the curriculum as implemented has achieved some
encouraging degree of success (62%), but more needed to be done to effectively
implement the curriculum. This must be followed by a commensurate awareness
of the job prospects including convincing and liaising with final examination
bodies to make the course an external examination subject. This will improve the
employment of environmental education graduates to be teachers of the course
in the lower educational rungs.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
410
9. References
Amirshokoohi, A. (2010). Elementary preservice teachers’ environmental literacy and
views toward science, technology, and society (STS) issues. Science Educator,
19(1), 56–63.
Ana, G. R. E. E., Oloruntoba, E. O., & Sridhar, M. K. C. (2009). Contributions of
environmental clubs toward improved environmental programs in selected
secondary schools in Ibadan, Nigeria,Appl. Environ. Educ. Commun., 8, 94-104.
https://doi.org/10.1080/15330150903133611
Ardoin, N. M., Bowers, A. W., & Gaillard, E., (2020). Environmental Education outcomes
for conservation: A systematic review. Biological Conservation, 241, 108-224.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108224.
Ardoin, N. M., Clark, C., & Kelsey, E. (2013a). An exploration of future trends in
environmental Education research, Environ. Educ. Res., 19(2013), 499-
520. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2012.709823
Ardoin, N. M, Bowers, A. W., Roth, N. W., & Holthuis, N. (2018). Environmental
Education and K-12 student outcomes: a review and analysis of research, J.
Environ. Educ., 49, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2017.1366155
Ardoin, N. M., & Heimlich, J. E. (2013b). Views from the field: conservation educators
and practitioners perceptions of education as a strategy for achieving
conservation outcomes. J. Environ. Educ., 44 (2013), 97-115.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2012.700963
Ardoin, N. M. Biedenweg, K., & O’Connor, K. (2015). Evaluation in residential
Environmental Education: an applied literature review of intermediary
outcomes. Appl. Environ. Educ. Commun., 14 (2015), 43-56.
https://doi.org/10.1080/1533015X.2015.1013225
Astutik, I. R. I., & Widiaty, I., (2018). Integrated Management Information System for
Curriculum in University; IOP Conf. Ser.: IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 384.
http://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/384/1/012077
Ballard, H. L., & Belsky, J. M. (2010). Participatory action research and environmental
learning: implications for resilient forests and communities, Environ. Educ.
Res., 16, 611-627. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2010.505440
Ballard, H. L., Robinson, L. D., Young, A. N., Pauly, G. B., Higgins, L. M., Johnson, R. F.,
& Tweddle, J. C. (2017). Contributions to conservation outcomes by natural
history museum-led citizen science: examining evidence and next steps. Biol.
Conserv., 208, 87-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.08.040
Barnosky, A. D., & Hadly, E. A. (2016). Tipping Point for Planet Earth: How Close Are We to
the Edge? Thomas Dunne Books, New York.
Bilbao, Purita P., Lucido, Paz I., Iringan, Tomasa C. & Javier, Rodrigo B. (2008).
Development. Quezon City: Lorimar Publishing, Inc.
Blatt, E. N. (2013). Exploring environmental identity and behavioral change in an
environmental science course. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 8, 467-488.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-012-9459-2
Bull, M. (2013). Transformative sustainability learning: cultivating a tree-planting ethos
in Western Kenya,J. Educ. Sustain. Dev., 7, 5-21.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0973408213495599
Camp, E., & Fraser, D. (2012). Influence of conservation education dive briefings as a
management tool on the timing and nature of recreational SCUBA diving
impacts on coral reefs, Ocean Coast. Manag., 6, 30-37.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2012.02.002
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
411
Carleton-Hug, A. & Hug, J.W. (2010). Challenges and opportunities for evaluating
environmental education programs, Eval. Program Plann., 33, 159-164.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2009.07.005
Catalano, A.S., Redford, K, Margoluis, R. & Knight, A.T. (2018). Black swans, cognition,
and the power of learning from failure. Conserv. Biol., 32, 584-596.
https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13045
Crohn,K. & Birnbaum, M. (2010). Environmental Education evaluation: Time to reflect,
time for change, Evaluation and Program Planning, 33(2), 155-158.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2009.07.004
Eneji, C. V. O., Onnoghen, N. U., Agiande, D., & Okon, G. M. (2019). Lecturer’s
industrial actions and Environmental Education student’s academic
performance in the University of Calabar, Nigeria. Civil and Environmental
Research, 11(7), 45-55. https://doi.org/10.7176/CER
Eneji, C.V.O. (2017a). Introduction to Environmental Education: Historical Groundwork and
Foundation of Environmental Education. Calabar, Ushie Printers
Eneji, C.V.O., (2017b). A Handbook on Environmental Impact Assessment, Monitoring and
Evaluation, Ushie Printers, Calabar, Nigeria.
Eneji, C.V.O., Eneji, J. E. O., Ngoka, V. N., & Abang, M. (2017c). Attitude towards Waste
Management and Disposal Methods and the Health Status of Cross River State,
Nigeria. SCIREA Journal of Agriculture, 1(2), 231-247.
http://www.scirea.org/journal/Agriculture
Godin, K., Stapleton, J., Kirkpatrick, S. I., Hanning, R. M., & Leatherdale, S. T. (2015).
Applying systematic review search methods to the grey literature: a case study
examining guidelines for school-based breakfast programs in Canada. Syst.
Rev., 4, 122-134. http://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-015-0125-0
Gonzaga, M. L. (2016). Awareness and Practices in Green Technology of College
Students. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 848, 223-227.
https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.848.223
Gooder, G and Cantwell, S., (2017). Student Experiences with a newly developed
concept-based curriculum. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 12(2), 142-147.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2016.11.002
Hancock, D., Dyk, P. H., & Jones, K. (2012). Adolescent Involvement in Extracurricular
Activities. Journal of Leadership Education, 11(1), 84–101.
Harder, M.K., Velasco, I., Burford, G., Podger, D., Janoušková, S., Piggot, G & Hoover, E.
(2014). Reconceptualizing “effectiveness” in environmental projects: can we
measure values-related achievements? J. Environ. Manage., 139 (2014), 120-134.
http:// doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.02.022
Harrison, C. V. (2020). Concept-based curriculum: design and implementation
strategies. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 17(1), 20190066.
https://doi.org/10.1515/ijnes-2019-0066
Kelani, R. R. & Khourey-Bowers, C. (2012). Professional development in sub-Saharan
Africa: what have we learned in Benin? Professional Development in Education,
38(5), 705-723. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2012.670128
Kelani, R. R. (2015). Integration of Environmental Education in science curricula in
secondary schools in Benin, West Africa: Teachers’ perceptions and challenges.
Electronic Journal of Science Education 19(3), 1-24. http://ejse.southwestern.edu
Knight, A. T., Cook, C. N., Redford, K. H., Biggs, D., Romero, Ortega-Argueta, A.,
Norman, C. D., Parsons, B., Reynolds, M., Eoyang, G., & Keene,M. (2019).
Improving conservation practice with principles and tools from systems
thinking and evaluation. Sustain. Sci. 5, 221-223. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-
019-00676-x
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
412
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
413
Onnoghen, U. N., Eneji, C.V.O., Petters, J. S., & Peters, C. B. (2020). School Environment
and Environmental Education Lecturer’s Job Performance in the University of
Calabar, Nigeria. GIS Business, 15(2), 160-186.
Petegem, P. V., Blieck, A., & Pauw, J. B. (2007). Evaluating the Implementation Process of
Environmental Education in Preservice Teacher Education: Two Case Studies.
The Journal of Environmental Education, 38(2), 47-54.
https://doi.org/10.3200/JOEE.38.1.47-54
Pirrie, A., Elliot, D., McConnell, F, & Wilkinson, J. E. (2006). Evaluation of Eco Schools
Scotland. Glasgow: University of Glasgow.
Punzalan, C. H. (2020). Evaluating the Environmental Awareness and Practices of Senior
High School Students: Basis for Environmental Education Program. Aquademia,
4(1), ep20012. https://doi.org/10.29333/aquademia/8219
Seo, E., Ryu, J., & Hwang, Y. (2020). Building key competencies into an Environmental
Education curriculum using a modified Delphi approach in South
Korea, Environmental Education Research, 26(6), 890-914.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2020.1733493
Sotiriadou, P., Logan, D., Daly, A. & Guest, R. (2019). The role of authentic assessment to
preserve academic integrity and promote skill development and employability.
Studies in Higher Education, 45(11), 2132-2148.
https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1582015
Stevenson, K. T., Peterson, M. N., Carrier, S. J., Strnad, R. L., Olson, R. A. & Szczytko, R.
E., (2019). Making the case for a null effects framework in Environmental
Education and K-12 academic outcomes: when “just as good” is a great thing.
Front. Commun. 3, Article 59. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2018.00059
Thomas, R. E. W., Teel, T., Bruyere, B., & Laurence, S. (2018). Metrics and outcomes of
conservation education: a quarter century of lessons learned. Environ. Educ.
Res., 25, 172-192. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2018.1450849
Toomey, A.H., Knight, A.T. & Barlow, J. (2017). Navigating the space between research
and implementation in conservation. Conserv. Lett., 10, 619-
625. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12315
United Nation Educational and Scientific Organization/ United Nation Environmental
Program (UNESCO/ UNEP) (1977). Intergovernmental Conference on
Environmental Education, October 14-26, 1977. https://www.gdrc.org
United Nation Conference On Human Environment (UNCHE) (1975). UNESCO- UNEP
International Workshop On Environmental Education 91975) 13th- 22nd October,
1975. International Environmental Workshop In Belgrade, Yugoslavia.
Yoni, N., & Dasining, Y. (2018). Curriculum Development Based On INQF and Business
/Industries Sector for Improvement Competency of Basic Pattern Making
Students at Vocational High School. IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 336, 012029.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/336/1/012029
Yuxuan, Z., Xianbo, P. & Xiaoli, C., (2022). Faculty's experience in developing and
implementing concept-based teaching of baccalaureate nursing education in the
Chinese context: A descriptive qualitative research study, Nurse Education Today,
108, 105126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105126
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
414
Tedi Supriyadi
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, Indonesia
*
Corresponding author: Nan Rahminawati, nan@unisba.ac.id
©Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0
International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
415
1. Introduction
In the past decade, one of the strategic efforts of countries to enhance education
quality at the elementary, middle and higher levels has been to implement quality
assurance systems (Kadhila & Iipumbu, 2019; Podgornik & Vogrinc, 2017).
Policies on quality assurance for education in Indonesia at the levels of primary
and secondary education are regulated by the Minister of Education Regulation
No. 28 of 2016, which aims to ensure that the entire process of education provision
is in line with national education quality standards (Pannen, 2021; Sampul et al.,
2020; Susilana & Asra, 2018). However, many Indonesian elementary schools have
not fully implemented policies for quality assessment and assurance through self
and external evaluation.
Noda et al. (2021) applied Elken and Stensaker's (2018) theoretical framework to
internal quality assurance (IQA) in Japanese and Taiwanese universities,
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
416
Rahmania et al. (2020) explored the implementation of the IQA system (SPMI,
Sistem Penjaminan Mutu Internal) at SMP Negeri 21 Malang, Indonesia, to
improve the education quality carried out during the 2016–2019 period. They
identified five stages for implementing a quality assurance system in schools: (1)
quality mapping, (2) quality fulfillment planning, (3) implementation of quality
fulfillment, (4) evaluation, and (5) standard setting, which lead to improved
learning outcomes and contributed to the school's culture and character. This
implementation resulted in the school being ranked fourth in the 2019 Computer-
Based National Examination, which positively impacted the quality of graduates.
This research aimed to formulate action steps for implementing an IQA system
in elementary schools – a topic that has not been explored in previous studies.
The research question focuses on the steps necessary to enhance education
quality through this system. We propose nine steps, based on the 14 Steps of
Quality Improvement Program initiated by Philip Crosby (1979). This research
contributes to the formulation of effective efforts and strategic steps for
improving an IQA system. These steps can be replicated by institutions, both in
Indonesia and in other countries with similar problems.
2. Literature Review
2.1. Quality Assurance as Culture
Quality assurance is an activity that consists of quality monitoring, evaluation,
or review (Gambescia & Early, 2017). Quality assurance activities concentrate on
processes that foster trust by ensuring that minimum requirements or standards
are met, whether input, processes, or results as expected by stakeholders
(Ingvarson & Rowley, 2017; Sumsion et al., 2018). In the education field,
assurance is a way of managing all educational activities and resources with the
aim of achieving customer satisfaction (Anwar, 2018; Ijah et al., 2021; Mahmud,
2012; Widodo et al., 2020).
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
417
sustainable manner (Harvey, 2006; Legemaate et al., 2021; Rahnuma, 2020). In the
context of education, QC involves values, beliefs, and practices, and aims to
improve the quality of education provided, which can be done by focusing on
student learning outcomes, encouraging active involvement of staff in lifelong
learning, and having a strong evaluation system.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
418
3. Method
3.1. Research Design and Collaboration
To attain the research objectives, and considering the nature of the study, that is,
a self-reflection question aiming to investigate practical problems and to develop
solutions, action research was chosen as the design for this research (Creswell,
2012). This research design is in line with the research aims, namely to find
solutions for improving education quality in elementary schools through quality
assurance implementation. In addition, this design has been widely used to solve
problems in the education context (Abdussalam et al., 2021; Jefferson, 2014; Kaye
et al., 2021; Netcoh et al., 2017; Supriadi et al., 2022), which is also characterized
by collaboration (Bleicher, 2014; O’Siochru et al., 2021; Somekh, 2010).
To establish collaboration, Heil’s (2005) method was used: We asked what was
needed and who had interest in this project. The research was conducted from
February 2020 to December 2022 through both physical visits and virtual
methods (e-mail, WhatsApp and phone calls), which gave ample time to collect
data from various sources and analyze it for publication.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
419
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
420
National
STANDARD INDICATORS
Score
5. Integrated learning.
6. Learning with answers whose truth is
multi-dimensional.
7. Learning towards acquiring applied skills.
8. Improvement and balance between physical
skills (hard skills) and mental skills (soft
skills).
9. Learning that prioritizes cultivating and
empowering students as lifelong learners.
10. Learning that takes place at home, in
schools, and in the community.
11. Learning that applies the principle that
anyone is an educator, anyone is a student,
and anywhere is a class.
12. Utilization of information and
communication technology to increase the
efficiency and effectiveness of learning.
13. Recognition of individual differences and
cultural background of learners.
14. Learning plans are prepared in accordance
with the KTSP
4. Assessment 1. Valid, objective, open, authentic, systematic,
Standard accountable and educative assessment
(Regulation of process.
Ministry of 5.8 2. The education unit applies authentic
Education and assessment.
Culture No. 66 of 3. The form of the assessment document is in
2013) accordance with the applicable regulations.
5. Teacher and Staff 1. Number and qualifications of educators
Standard according to standards.
(Regulation of 2. Qualification of the head of the education
Ministry of unit according to the Standards.
Education and 3. Availability of the head of administrative
Culture No. 13, 16 staff.
of 2007, 24–26 of 4. Availability of administrative affairs.
2008) 5. Availability of library heads.
6. Availability of library implementing staff.
7. Availability of the laboratory head.
8. Availability of laboratory implementing
4.0
technicians.
9. Availability of laboratory assistants.
10. Competence of the head of education unit
according to Standards
11. Competence of the head of administrative
personnel according to Standards.
12. Competence for implementing
administrative affairs according to
Standards.
13. Competence of the head of the school
library according to the Standards.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
421
National
STANDARD INDICATORS
Score
14. Competence of school library staff
according to Standards
15. Laboratory technician competencies
according to standards
16. Laboratory competence according to
Standards.
6. Facilities and 1. The capacity of the education unit is in
Infrastructure accordance with the Standards.
Standard 2. Number and condition of educational
(Regulation of facilities and infrastructure according to the
4.0
Ministry of Standards.
Education and
Culture No. 24 of
2007)
7. Management 1. Program planning is carried out in
Standard accordance with Standards and involves
(Regulation of stakeholders.
Ministry of 2. The implementation of the program is
Education and carried out in accordance with Standards
Culture No. 19 of and involves stakeholders.
5.2
2007) 3. The education unit carries out supervision
and evaluation of the implementation of the
program regularly.
4. Head of educational unit performs well.
5. Education unit that manages information
systems.
8. Financing 1. Minimum non-personnel operational costs
Standard according to standards (total education unit
(Regulation of budget minus investment costs and salaries
Ministry of of educators and education personnel
5.4
Education and divided by the total number of students).
Culture No. 69 of 2. Management of funds for education units is
2009) carried out in a transparent and accountable
manner (reports, accessible and auditable).
Mean 5.14
In Table 1, the national score is the minimum average score each standard must
achieve for each education unit. The instrument used in this research to assess
each indicator was validated through focus group discussions with two
education management experts and one education administrator. The
assessment used a scale of 1–7, with the standard score indicating how well
schools meet SNP.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
422
interviews to investigate the survey results. The data were analyzed thematically,
coded, evaluated, categorized, and analyzed using NVivo 12 Plus software. The
findings of the analysis were discussed and crosschecked by experts.
4. Findings
4.1. Pre-Action Analysis
At this stage, we conducted a survey of 34 participants (one school principal, 31
teachers, and two staff of school foundations). Participant responses involved
their assessment of the eight standards on a Likert scale, based on their
perceptions. These eight standards were used to measure school performance of
each school in every education unit. Table 2 presents the survey results.
Table 2 above reports that 32 (94.12%) participants stated that the graduate
competency standards met national standards, while 2 (5.88%) said that the
school involved in this study exceeded the standards. UN results, final exam
reports and teacher assessment were used to assess the graduate competency
standard. A total of 30 (88.23%) participants stated that the content standards met
national standards and 4 (11.76%) participants stated that the result exceeded the
standards. Regarding the process standard, 34 (100%) participants stated that
they met the national standard. Regarding assessment, 6 (17.64%) participants
stated that they doubted whether they met the standards and 28 (82.35%)
participants stated that they met the standards. For the teacher and staff
standard, 5 participants said they doubted that they met the standards and 29
participants said they met the standards. Regarding the facilities and
infrastructure standard, 19 (55.9%) participants said they doubted they met the
standard and 15 participants said they met the standard. In terms of management
standards, 12 participants said they doubted that they met national standards
and 22 participants said they met national standards, and for financing
standards, 15 participants said they doubted they met standards and 19
participants said they met standards. After the answers had been analyzed, three
standards that were believed to meet SNP had been identified, as were five
standards that participants believed they met or were doubtful about.
To follow up, we interviewed a school principal and two school personnel who
served as the quality assurance team in a semi-structured manner at a separate
time and different space. We asked them, “What makes you sure that Standards
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
423
1 to 3 meet national standards?” Participant 1 answered “This can be seen from the
average national standard final exam results where every year students got scores above
the average national standard exam scores.” Participant 2 answered, “The results of
our analysis of student national exam results increased every year and the scores were
above average.” Participant 3 answered, “This is evidenced by our school’s national
final exam score that reached 100% graduation rate and the scores obtained by students
were above the national average score.”
From the pre-action analysis, four mapping documents were obtained. The first
document is the average scores of the national exam, which tended to fluctuate.
The national exam score in 2015 was 8.59, in 2016 it was 8.7, in 2017 it was 8.52,
in 2018 it was 8.2, and in 2019 it was 8.3. To compare, the two accreditation
assessment data in 2003, 2011 and 2013 achieved good results, even though not
every teacher in the school was fully certified. Of the 31 teachers, only 14 (45%)
had obtained certification.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
424
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
425
reference to literature. Doing so makes the mapping process easier and ensures
all involved components have a clear understanding, to direct decision-making.
6.3
5.9
5.7
5.6
5.6
5.5
5.3
5.3
4.6
4.5
4.2
4.2
3.5
3.1
1.5
1.1
1.1
1.1
0.7
0.7
1
0.6
Figure 3 shows that there was an increase in the achievement of all standards.
Assessment of compliance to each standard after implementing the nine action
steps showed that the school involved in this study achieved the SNP.
5. Discussion
The nine quality improvement steps proposed proved to be an effective strategy
for enhancing the education quality assurance in a selected school in Kalimantan
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
426
Island, Indonesia. The proposed nine steps were a simplification of the 14 steps of
a quality improvement program initiated by Philip Crosby (1979). Three school
commitments, namely (1) establishing a school foundation trustee policy; (2)
school reorganization; and (3) signing a joint commitment pact, were followed up
rigorously through regular management meetings, where this commitment was
renewed and refreshed, to keep it up to date. These commitments are closely
related to the concept of total quality management (TQM) (Jasti et al., 2022;
Nogueiro et al., 2022; Olaguer & Bertillo, 2023). TQM requires long-term
commitment by senior management, but it can also be a potential obstacle to its
implementation (Sallis, 2014). Commitment is crucial for implementing TQM, as
it involves all members of the organization in a continuous improvement process.
In schools, all members must commit to improving service and learning quality,
and collaborate to achieve common goals (Oakland et al., 2020). Periodic
evaluations of teacher and student performance can identify potential problems
and provide appropriate solutions for TQM implementation in schools.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
427
The mapping instrument prepared by the school in this study was indicated as
complete and in accordance with the Guidelines for Implementing Quality Assurance
of the Education Unit issued by Dikdasmen Kemendikbud (2016a, p. 41–54) and
the Toolkit of Mapping Quality of Elementary and Secondary Education issued by
Dikdasmen Kemendikbud (2016b). The success of these guidelines is based on
three indicators: outcome (the ability of the education unit to carry out the entire
quality assurance cycle and the existence of an education quality assurance
organization in the education unit), result indicators (whether the learning
process and the management of the education unit are running according to
standards), and impact indicators (the establishment of a culture of quality in the
education unit, as well as an increase in the quality of learning outcomes)
(Raharjo et al., 2019).
Lastly, the data processing of school self-evaluation (EDS, Evaluasi Diri Sekolah)
was carried out through an application system accessed on the website
pmp.dikdasmen.kemendikbud.go.id using the DAPODIK access account. The
analysis of education quality mapping data was carried out on the output of EDS
results that were extracted from the system, which resulted in the following
documents: (a) National examination results, (b) Accreditation results, (c)
Certification results, and (d) School self-evaluation results. These documents
indicate that there was improvement, except for the certification results, as more
than half the teachers are yet to be certified. This shortcoming was the result of a
waiting list to join the certification program managed by the government.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
428
The findings of this study indicate that school quality standards are improving
every year, as demonstrated by the EDS results, which show an increase of 8
points compared to the SNP. There was an increase in the average value of
Standard 1, by 1.1, Standard 2 by 0.6, Standard 3 by 1.1, Standard 5 by 1.5,
Standard 6 by 0.7, Standard 7 by 1.1, and Standard 8 by 1. Additionally, national
examination (UN) scores improved, surpassing the average score at the
provincial level. As a result, schools have been able to obtain superior
accreditation ratings. In other words, the nine steps had an impact on obtaining
school accreditation with a superior rating.
This research resulted in nine action steps that can be applied to enhance the
quality of elementary school education, as a real effort to realize and appreciate
government policies to achieve SNP. Therefore, it is recommended that these
nine actions steps are implemented and developed by policymakers and
education actors to enhance the quality of elementary school education.
Specifically, the applied and research department of the Indonesian education
system can adopt these action steps to enhance the quality of elementary
education in Indonesia.
Acknowledgment
Thanks go to the Institute for Research and Community Service at the Islamic
University of Bandung for providing funding for this research project (No.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
429
7. References
Abdussalam, A., Supriyadi, T., Saepudin, U. S. A., & Pamungkas, M. I. (2021). Exegetical
translation of the Qur’an: An action research on prospective Islamic teachers in
Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 254–268.
https://doi.org/://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v11i2.34691
Alauddin, N., & Yamada, S. (2019). Overview of Deming criteria for total quality
management conceptual framework design in education services. Journal of
Engineering and Science Research, 3(5), 12–20.
Anastasiadou, S. D. (2015). The roadmaps of total quality management in the Greek
education system according to Deming, Juran, and Crosby in light of the EFQM
model. Procedia Economics and Finance, 33, 562–572.
https://dhttps://doi.org//https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01738-4
Anwar, K. (2018). Peran sistem penjaminan mutu pendidikan dalam meningkatkan mutu
pendidikan di madrasah [The role of the education quality assurance system in
improving the quality of education in madrasas]. TA’DIBUNA: Jurnal Pendidikan
Agama Islam, 1(1), 41–56.
Banji, F. J. (2011). External quality assurance in higher education: The need for a paradigm
shift. COREVIP 2011: Conference of Rectors, Vice Chancellors & Presidents of African
Universities: Strengthening the Space of Higher Education in Africa.
Bastas, A., & Liyanage, K. (2018). Sustainable supply chain quality management: A
systematic review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 181, 726–744.
Batool, Z., & Qureshi, R. H. (2007). Quality assurance manual for higher education in Pakistan.
Higher Education Commission, Pakistan.
Biggs, J. (2001). The reflective institution: Assuring and enhancing the quality of teaching
and learning. Higher Education, 41 (3): 221–238.
Bleicher, R. E. (2014). A collaborative action research approach to professional learning.
Professional Development in Education, 40(5), 802–821.
https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2013.842183
Buzdar, M. A., & Jalal, H. (2019). Quality enhancement, teaching quality, and students
perceived satisfaction: challenges and perspectives in higher education. Research
Journal of PNQAHE, 2(1), 161–172.
Cardoso, S., Rosa, M. J., & Santos, C. S. (2013). Different academics’ characteristics,
different perceptions on quality assessment? Quality Assurance in Education, 21(1).
https://doi.org/10.1108/09684881311293089
Cardoso, S., Rosa, M. J., Videira, P., & Amaral, A. (2019). Internal quality assurance: A new
culture or added bureaucracy? Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(2),
249–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1494818
Cartwright, M. J. (2007). The rhetoric and reality of ‘quality’ in higher education: An
investigation into staff perceptions of quality in post 1992 universities.” Quality
Assurance in Education,15(3), 287–301.
Chakraborty, A., & Tan, K. C. (2012). Qualitative and quantitative analysis of six sigma in
service organizations. In T. Aized (Ed.), Total Quality Management and Six Sigma (pp.
247–248). Intech. https://doi.org/10.5772/46104
Chukwulozie, O. P., Nnaemeka, O. E., & Chigoziri, N. I. (2018). Quality and productivity
management. Proceeding of the World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science, 2.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Education research: Planning, conducting, evaluating, quantitafive and
qualitative research. Pearson.
Crosby, P. B. (1979). Quality is free. New American Library.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
430
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
431
Jalal, H., Buzdar, M. A., & Mohsin, M. N. (2017). Accreditation and quality enhancement
dynamics in higher education. Journal of Educational Research, 20(2), 127–145.
Jasti, N. V. K., Venkateswaran, V., Kota, S., & Sangwan, K. S. (2022). A literature review
on total quality management (models, frameworks, and tools and techniques) in
higher education. TQM Journal, 34(5), 1298–1319. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-04-
2021-0113
Jawad, S., Jamshaid, I., & Wahab, F. (2015). Quality culture in higher education institutes:
perspective of different stakeholders. VFAST Transactions on Education and Social
Sciences, 6(2).
Jefferson, R. N. (2014). Action research: Theory and applications. New Review of Academic
Librarianship, 20(2), 91–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2014.921536
Jensen, H. T., Aspelin, M., Devinsky, F., Gerlach, J., Heerens, N., Jungwith, W., Kamsek,
K., Kladis, D., Modica, L., & Mudry, M. (2006). Quality culture in European universities:
A bottom-up approach: Report on the three rounds of the Quality Culture Project 2002-2006.
EUA Publications.
Julia, J., Subarjah, H., Maulana, M., Sujana, A., Isrokatun, I., Nugraha, D., & Rachmatin,
D. (2020). Readiness and competence of new teachers for career as professional
teachers in primary schools. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(2), 655–673.
Kadhila, N., & Iipumbu, N. (2019). Strengthening internal quality assurance as a lever for
enhancing student learning experiences and academic success: lessons from
Namibia. Quality in Higher Education, 25(1), 4–20.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2019.1597424
Karkoszka, T. (2009). Quality assurance in the European higher education area. Journal of
Achievements in Materials and Manufacturing Engineering, 37(2), 759–766.
Kaye, C., Dorjotov, N., Batmunkh, L., & Badrakh, J. (2021). Strategies for democratic
reform in education: developing an action research community in Mongolia.
Educational Action Research, 29(4), 656–673.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2021.1969975
Legemaate, M., Grol, R., Huisman, J., Oolbekkink–Marchand, H., & Nieuwenhuis, L.
(2021). Enhancing a quality culture in higher education from a socio-technical
systems design perspective. Quality in Higher Education, 28(3), 1–14.
Liu, Y., & Watson, S. (2020). Whose leadership role is more substantial for teacher
professional collaboration, job satisfaction and organizational commitment: a lens of
distributed leadership. International Journal of Leadership in Education.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2020.1820580
Mahmud, M. (2012). Manajemen mutu perguruan tinggi [Higher education quality
management]. PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Mahmudi, A. (2018). The use of G-form as an assessment instrument in Arabic language
teaching based on HOTS. At-Tarbawi: Jurnal Kajian Kependidikan Islam, 3(2).
Matsebatlela, E. M. (2015). The effect of the Higher Education Quality Committee’s institutional
audits on public higher education institutions [Doctoral dissertation, University of
Pretoria].
Menteri Pendidikan. (2016). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia
Nomor 28 Tahun 2016 Tentang Sistem Penjaminan Mutu Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah
[Regulation of the minister of Education and Culture of the Republic of Indonesia Number
28 of 2016 concerning the quality assurance system for elementary and secondary education].
Kementerian Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan.
Mohamedbhai, G. (2006). Quality assurance mechanisms in higher education. ASCI
Journal of Management, 36(1), 53–56.
Mukhopadhyay, M. (2020). Total quality management in education. SAGE Publications.
Netcoh, S., Olofson, M. W., Downes, J. M., & Bishop, P. A. (2017). Professional learning
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
432
with action research in innovative middle schools. Middle School Journal, 48(3), 25–33.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00940771.2017.1297665
Newton, J. (2000). Feeding the beast or improving quality? Academics’ perceptions of
quality assurance and quality monitoring. Quality in Higher Education, 6(2), 153–163.
Newton, J. (2002). Views from below: Academics coping with quality. Quality in Higher
Education, 8(1), 39–61.
Nguyen, T. L. H. (2018). Quality assurance in higher education: Implications for
Vietnamese universities. VNU Journal of Foreign Studies, 34(5).
Nitza, D., & Roman, Y. (2016). WhatsApp messaging: Achievements and success in
academia. International Journal of Higher Education, 5(4), 255–261.
Noda, A., Kim, S., Yung Chi Hou, A., Lu, I.-J. G., & Chou, H. C. (2021). The relationships
between internal quality assurance and learning outcome assessments: challenges
confronting universities in Japan and Taiwan. Quality in Higher Education, 27(1), 59–
76. https://doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2020.1838406
Nogueiro, T., Saraiva, M., & Jorge, F. (2022). Total quality management and social
responsibility an approach through their synergies in higher education institutions.
Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, 256, 311–321.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5063-5_26
O’Siochru, C., Norton, L., Pilkington, R., Parr, E., Anderson, B., & Maslen, J. (2021). Action
learning: how can it contribute to a collaborative process of pedagogical action
research? Educational Action Research, 29(2), 191–205.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2020.1850495
Oakland, J. S., Oakland, R. J., & Turner, M. A. (2020). Total quality management and
operational excellence: text with cases. Routledge.
Olaguer, M. B., & Bertillo, J. B. (2023). Total quality management of public elementary
school principals in relation to school performance. Available at SSRN 4320498.
Pannen, P. (2021). Quality assurance in online learning at scale at the Indonesia Cyber
Education Institute. In S. Ra, S. Jagannathan, & R. Maclean (Eds.), Powering a learning
society during an age of disruption (pp. 121–134). Springer,.
Podgornik, V., & Vogrinc, J. (2017). The role of headteachers, teachers, and school
counselors in the system of quality assessment and assurance of school work. SAGE
Open, 7(2), 2158244017713239. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244017713239
Raharjo, S. B., Handayani, M., Jauhari, M. R., Juanita, F., & Waspodo, R. M. (2019). Sistem
penjaminan mutu pendidikan [Education quality assurance system]. Pusat Penelitian
Kebijakan Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan [Center for Educational and Cutluryal
Policy Research].
Rahmania, I., Budiono, B., Soenaryo, S. F., Syakur, A., & Tinus, A. (2020). Implementation
of internal quality guarantee system to increase the quality of education in Junior
High School 21 Malang. Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and
Education (BirLE) Journal, 3(1), 421–432.
Rahnuma, N. (2020). Evolution of quality culture in an HEI: critical insights from
university staff in Bangladesh. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability,
32(1), 53–81.
Sallis, E. (2014). Total quality management in education. Routledge.
Sampul, D., Binilang, B. B., Senduk, J. F., & Oentoe, F. J. A. (2020). Implementation of the
internal quality assurance process: Quality mapping analysis at State Senior High
School in Tomohon City, North Sulawesi, Indonesia. IJORER: International Journal of
Recent Educational Research, 1(2), 124–133.
Seyfried, M., & Pohlenz, P. (2018). Assessing quality assurance in higher education:
quality managers’ perceptions of effectiveness. European Journal of Higher Education,
8(3), 258–271.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
433
Silaeva, V. V., & Semenov, V. P. (2018). Internal education quality assurance through
standardization of educational organization management system. 2018 IEEE
International Conference: Quality Management, Transport and Information Security,
Information Technologies, pp. 70–73.
Simanjuntak, B., & Limbong, T. (2018). Using Google form for student worksheet as
learning media. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(3.4), 321–324.
Skidmore, S. T., Hsu, H.-Y., & Fuller, M. (2018). A person-centred approach to
understanding cultures of assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education,
43(8), 1241–1257.
Smith, J. (2011). The lasting legacy of the modern quality giants. Quality, 50(10), 40.
Somekh, B. (2010). The Collaborative Action Research Network: 30 years of agency in
developing educational action research. Educational Action Research, 18(1), 103–121.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09650790903484566
Stalmeijer, R., Whittingham, J., de Grave, W., & Dolmans, D. (2016). Strengthening internal
quality assurance processes: facilitating student evaluation committees to contribute.
Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(1), 53–66.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2014.976760
Stensaker, B., Langfeldt, L., Harvey, L., Huisman, J., & Westerheijden, D. (2011). An in‐
depth study on the impact of external quality assurance. Assessment & Evaluation in
Higher Education, 36(4), 465–478.
Sumsion, J., Harrison, L., Letsch, K., Bradley, B. S., & Stapleton, M. (2018). ‘Belonging’ in
Australian early childhood education and care curriculum and quality assurance:
Opportunities and risks. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 19(4), 340–355.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1463949118796239
Supriadi, U., Supriyadi, T., & Abdussalam, A. (2022). Al-Qur’an literacy: A strategy and
learning steps in improving Al-Qur’an reading skills through action research.
International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 21(1).
Susilana, R., & Asra, A. (2018). Development of quality assurance system in culture and
nation character education in primary education in Indonesia. MOJES: Malaysian
Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 1(2), 17–24.
Tavares, O., Sin, C., Videira, P., & Amaral, A. (2017). Academics’ perceptions of the impact
of internal quality assurance on teaching and learning. Assessment and Evaluation in
Higher Education, 42(8), 1293–1305. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2016.1262326
Watty, K. (2006). Want to know about quality in higher education? Ask an academic.
Quality in Higher Education, 12(3), 291–301.
Westerheijden, D. F., Hulpiau, V., & Waeytens, K. (2007). From design and
implementation to impact of quality assurance: an overview of some studies into
what impacts improvement. Tertiary Education and Management, 13(4), 295–312.
Widodo, A., Riyanto, Y., & Roesminingsih, E. (2020). Implementation of Islamic senior
hight school academic quality assurance (multi-site study at Islamic Senior High
School of Surabaya and Islamic Senior High School of 2 Malang). IJORER:
International Journal of Recent Educational Research, 1(3), 233–245.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
434
Ahmed Ankit
Hamdan Bin Mohammed Smart University, United Arab Emirates
Abdurrahman G. Almekhlafi
Hamdan Bin Mohammed Smart University, United Arab Emirates
Semiyu Aderibigbe
University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates
Athra Alawani
Emirates Schools Establishment, United Arab Emirates
*
Corresponding author: Hamdy A. Abdelaziz; H.Abdelaziz@hbmsu.ac.ae
©Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0
International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
435
1. Introduction
One of the pillars of the National Agenda in accordance with the UAE Vision 2021,
is providing world class and state of the art educational systems. The UAE
strategic vision l is to enable their students rank among the best in the world in
reading, mathematics, science, and Arabic language proficiency. The role of a
teacher, whether it is in a face-to-face or online teaching environment, is
undoubtedly to create an immense impact on the learners. Several studies during
the pandemic revealed the role of a teacher as acting as a motivator in creating a
positive impact on students’ learning abilities (Aderibigbe, Dias, & Abraham,
2021; UNESCO, 2020). The creativity and innovativeness toward adopting
innovative teaching and learning methods for coping in different educational
landscapes demand that the teachers remain lifelong learners open to the concept
of their professional development (PD).
In the COVID-19 era, online education seems to be the only viable option to cope
with such unforeseen events. However, the transition to online teaching requires
specialized skills, which need to be learned and practiced, thereby strengthening
the proficiency of the teachers to be able to incorporate the new educational
technologies. As the literature indicates, successful online education requires
special skills such as creating creative and innovative e-content, timely and
appropriate planning, and the capability to use the technology (Adnan, 2017;
Nachimuthu, 2012). The transition to online education in schools and higher
education institutions due to COVID-19 posed several challenges for teachers and
students worldwide. Philippakos et al. (2022) discusses challenges related to
online instruction, including student participation, engagement, and motivation,
lack of resources, and limited access to professional development. The article
highlights the importance of teacher preparation programs to adequately prepare
teachers to effectively deliver instruction online and select appropriate tools for
their learners. The impact of prior training and experience with online instruction
on teachers' efficacy and readiness to provide remote instruction is also discussed.
These challenges and the need for teachers' PD skills during and after the
pandemic have been noted in the literature, including in studies conducted in the
UAE (Kamble et al., 2021). Therefore, it is crucial for educational planners and
stakeholders in the UAE to develop strategies that address these challenges and
enhance teachers' PD skills in online education.
The literature review had shown evidences that the effort for a smooth transition
to online teaching and learning modes have been noticeable in the UAE. To cite a
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
436
few examples, the Mohammed Bin Rashid Smart Learning Program (MBRSLP)
focused on providing the latest technology for creating smart learning
environments in the UAE schools. It also provides resources, including smart
interactive whiteboards, tablets for students, and access to high-speed 4G
networks (Gokulan, 2014). Buckner et al. (2016) also found that teachers in the
UAE have high participation rates in their PD activities. Enhancing teachers’ PD
skills and reducing challenges in online education during pandemics require
research-driven and evidence-based practices.
Against this juncture it is imperative to mention that this research explored the K-
12 teachers’ PD needs and the challenges faced while delivering online classes
during COVID-19 in the UAE context. The authors contend that this study
provides insights for developing a framework to address teachers’ PD needs and
challenges that have the possibility to hinder their effective online teaching in
emergencies. The study also complements the existing body of literature and
knowledge globally on issues surrounding online education and teachers’ PD
needs during a pandemic.
3. Research Questions
With the evolution of innovative teaching techniques, and platforms due to the
COVID-19 pandemic, the concept of PD needs special attention. Efforts should be
exerted to train teachers in acquiring the required technological skills, as the
COVID 19 has exacerbated the gaps in the teaching and learning methods and
that of PD needs of teachers. This study was conducted to answers to the
following questions:
1. What are teachers’ professional needs required to deliver effective online
education in the UAE’s K–12 contexts?
2. To what extent are the teachers in the UAE’s K–12 settings familiar with
the contemporary trends in online education?
3. What challenges hinder the effective adoption of online education by the
K-12 teachers in the UAE?
4. Are there any significant differences between teachers’ perceptions of their
PD needs based on their educational level (grade level)?
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
437
4. Significance
Although teachers in the UAE are generally exposed to PD workshops organized
by schools, educational zones, and sometimes by the Ministry of Education, these
workshops need to be regularly revised in line with the changing needs and
contexts of teachers and their students. Thus, efforts need to be intensified in
unravelling the different needs of teachers and providing a variety of training
opportunities for teachers in line with their needs and teaching contexts. For the
programs to be effective, program planners ought to contextualize the
information clarifying the specific needs of the teachers. This study provides
information on which training conducted by the program planners can customize
development initiatives for public school teachers in the UAE.
5. Literature Review
Online education refers to teaching and learning using the internet, enabling that
all teaching materials are provided to students online (Kisanjara, 2020; Yusuf &
Jihan, 2020). The shift from traditional teaching to online learning is challenging
for teachers and curriculum designers alike; however, it could even result in an
opportunity that teachers may benefit from (Ortiz, 2020). Needless to say, it is also
recognized as a teaching model that promotes dynamic learning approaches
(Yusuf & Jihan, 2020) and has gained the attention of many institutions due to its
numerous advantages (Dwiyogo & Radjah, 2020; Limperos et al., 2015). As a
pedagogical approach, online education is growing at a fast rate at the K–12 levels
(Barbour & Harrison, 2016; LaFrance & Beck, 2014). Despite such rapid growth
the success of the online mode of teaching depends on the teachers’ skills to use
this approach efficiently and effectively (Yusuf & Jihan, 2020).
Teachers are thus required to master their skills through PD activities, including
workshops and independent learning (Sulisworo et al., 2016; Zhou et al., 2020).
There are numerous PD programs that are helping teachers to prepare for their
jobs. Successful components of PD programs may additionally enhance teachers’
competencies since they have become imperative for online learning (Candice,
2019). Online learning can only be achieved when the teacher can: ‘(a) convey
knowledge with limited face-to-face contact, (b) design and develop course
content in a technology-based environment, (c) deliver content in a way that will
engage students, and (d) use assessment measures to ensure that students are
enable to master the content’ (Archambault & Kennedy, 2018, p.221).
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
438
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
439
6. Methods
Research Design
The study employed a descriptive research design as it helped in exploring an
existing condition and situation of individuals within a specific context (Creswell,
2014). Specifically, this research design assisted in exploring K-12 teachers' shared
and subjective understanding of the issues related to their professional
development needs and the challenges experienced by them during COVID-19.
Research Instruments
The research team adopted a multi-rating scale questionnaire to collect
information for addressing the research questions in the study. The questionnaire
consisted of four parts, with the first section devoted to the demographic data of
the participants and consisted of five main items. In the second section of the
survey (Professional Needs Assessment), a four-point Likert scale was used to
assess the felt need of the participants. Response choices were: 1= No need at all,
2= Low level of need, 3= Moderate level of need, 4= Highly needed, 5= Extremely
high need. In the third section of the survey, participants were given a list of
challenges that may or may not apply to them. They were asked to select the
challenges that apply to them. This section was followed by an open-ended
question to give the participants to add other challenges, if any. In the fourth
section of the survey (Emerged Digital Learning Trends), a four-point Likert scale
was sued to assess the awareness level of the participants. Response choices were:
1= Not familiar, 2= Familiar but I have not tried it, 3= Familiar but I need support
to Adopt it, and 4= Familiar and Adopt it. The distributed survey has been
showcased in Appendix A.
Population and Sample
The study targeted all schools that had migrated to an online mode of education
due to the spread of COVID-19. According to the UAE Ministry of Education
(MoE), the total number of public school teachers in 2020 was 21,153, representing
619 schools (MoE, 2020). The study targeted a sample of 1400 teachers. Purposive
and random sampling techniques were used to reach out to teachers with relevant
experience. All teachers were offered the chance to participate and share their
thoughts on the issues under exploration. A total of 1,110 public school teachers
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
440
As can be seen from Table 1, most participants were female (62%). The number of
participants from secondary education was higher than that of participants from
other grade levels. Science education teachers represented approximately 20% of
the sample. It is evident in the table, that participants were from all streams.
Similarly, participants had varied years of teaching experience extending from 5
to 20 years. Regarding the education qualification of participants, 36% had BA
degrees, while 2% had doctoral degrees.
Data Collection
An electronic version of the questionnaire was sent to all the public-school
teachers in the UAE through the MoE using its teachers’ management information
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
441
system platform. The MoE portal was used due to its potential to help reach out
and collect data from as many teachers as possible. However, teachers were not
mandated or forced to participate in the study and other ethical factors were
considered, as clarified below.
Reliability and Ethical Considerations
The research instrument (questionnaire) was validated through an iterative and
collaborative process of reviewing and revising the questionnaire’s contents
among the researchers. In doing this, the first author crafted the initial draft and
then shared it with the other authors, who read and provided feedback to validate
the questionnaire items. To establish the content reliability, the survey was
distributed to a random sample consisting of 141 public school teachers. The
Cronbach’s Alpha was 0.929, which indicates that the survey is reliable and has
the required consistency to accurately collect data.
All procedures involved in this study were conducted following scientific
organizations’ ethical practices and approved by both the MoE and the
Institutional Research Ethics Committee of Hamdan Bin Mohammed Smart
University (Ethical Clearance Code). The participants’ consent to participate and
confidentiality in the data collection process were recorded.
Data Analysis
As mentioned earlier, 1,110 K-12 teachers responded to the survey. Partial
responses were included for only the questions answered, with no further
treatment of missing values. Of the two possible open-response questions,
question one was answered by 860 respondents, yielding 573 responses after
initial data cleaning. The data cleaning criteria were: exclude the survey with
missing response to a survey item in the dataset, and through review of any data
entry errors. The second open-response question was answered by 685
respondents, generating 351 responses after the initial cleaning.
After cleaning and sorting responses by question, the researchers conducted a
range of descriptive and inferential statistical analyses using the SPSS. Tables of
frequencies and percentages were used to present categorical variables; means,
independent sample t-test, One-way ANOVA were used to test for the differences
between pairs of categorical variables. Qualitative coding of themes was
conducted based on the responses to the two open-ended questions, following an
inductive process (Corbin & Strauss, 1990; Saldana, 2015). The following stages
were followed: open coding, axial coding and selective coding to ground the
major patterns and themes addressing other PD needs felt and perceived by the
public-school teachers to deliver and assess effective online education in the UAE
K–12 educational contexts.
7. Findings
Findings related to question 1
To answer question 1 ‘What are the teachers’ PD needs to deliver effective online
education in the UAE K–12 contexts?’, the researchers computed the frequencies,
percentages, means and weighted means for each item included in section two in
the survey. As shown in Table 2, the respondents indicated a range of PD needs
for public school teachers to deliver and assess effective online education in the
UAE’s K–12 educational contexts.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
442
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
443
To effectively identify the critical PD needs for the K-12 school teachers in the
UAE, and to deliver effective online education and transfer to a distance learning
model, the researchers suggested a hypothesized cut-off point of 60% for the
weighted means. If the weighted mean for each item in Table 2 is equal to or
greater than 60%, then the PD need is critical. More than 50% of the surveyed
participants feel they need to be trained in how to master this competency.
According to the weighted mean values for each item shown in Table 2, 12 critical
PD needs are considered essential by the public-school teachers in this study.
To complete the answer to research question 1, the researchers performed
qualitative coding of themes based on the responses to the first open-ended
question attached to section 2 in the survey. This open-ended question states
‘Please use this space to tell us about any other PD needs you feel are important
for you, that we did not mention in the above list’. This question was answered
by 860 respondents (77% of the sample size), yielding 573 responses. The
subthemes (patterns) and major themes yielded from this analysis are presented
in Table 3.
Table 3. The Patterns and Major Themes of the Open-Ended Question #1 (Other
Professional Development Needs)
Patterns, How to… Major themes Professional
development
tracks
Use differentiated online learning strategies Differentiated Effective e-
Develop responsive learning objects that address learning styles and learning
Personalize the online learning experience personalised e- pedagogy
Use online learning platforms for learners with special needs learning design
and strategy
Manage online learning classroom and online learners’ behaviour Managing
Manage online collaborative and distributed problem-solving online
Motivate and encourage parents’ involvement in online learning classroom and
collaboration
Develop educational gamification and animation in specific subject Utilization and Effective e-
areas integration of content design
Use online instructional tools and resources such as Nearpod or interactive and learning
Wordwall, Edushare technology technologies
Use AI educational applications application in
Use Blender software for creating animations teaching and
Use augmented reality in content-specific areas/subjects learning
Design experiential learning for content-specific online pedagogy Design
Integrate online field trips and virtual labs in the daily lessons interactive and
Create a step-by-step video bank (objects) on guided instruction experiential e-
Develop agile e-content/lesson content/lesson
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
444
Collect and analyze online assessment evidence Design and Effective online
Use learning analytics to track and improve students’ discussion effective online assessment
quality and quantity assessment strategies
Design online test- and assessment-based standards
Use/implement online students’ progress tracker
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
445
For effective analysis based on the available data and responses collected for
question 2, the researchers did the following:
1. Combined the first three points in the scale: Not familiar, Familiar, but I
have not tried it, and Familiar, but I still need support and training to
adopt it to address the trends that are not adopted (non-adoption) by the
public-school teachers in the UAE.
2. Compute participants’ response frequencies and percentages on each
item.
3. Suggest a hypothesized cut-off point of 60%.
4. Compare the percentage of familiarity and adoption with the combined
percentages of non-adoption. If the total percentage of non-adoption is
equal to or greater than 60%, then the contemporary trends of online and
digital learning are critical since more than 50% of the surveyed
participants infer that they need to be trained in it.
5. Identify and prioritize the trends that the majority of public-school
teachers in the UAE are not adopting.
According to the data presented in Table 4, one can conclude that out of the 18
critical trends of online and digital learning; there are 11 trends that the UAE
public schools’ teachers are neither familiar with nor adopting into teaching and
learning. Thus, they feel that they need to be trained in how to master them. These
11 trends are: Learning by Making/Design (78%), Machine Learning (74.6%),
Infographic Presentation Design Software (72.8%), Creating an e-Learning Profile
and Aptitude Inventories (71.7%), Crowd Learning (67.5%), Automated
Pedagogical Agents (APA) (66.7%), Avatar-based Coaching (65.9%), Learning
Analytics (64.9%), Seamless Learning (63.3%), Augmented Reality (AR) (61.9%)
and Agile Design for e-Lessons (60.3%).
Findings related to question 3
To answer question 3, ‘What challenges hinder the effective adoption of online
Education by public sector teachers in the UAE?’, the researchers computed the
frequencies and percentages for each item included in section three in the survey.
The frequencies and percentages of the challenges of adopting online and digital
learning perceived by the UAE public school teachers are shown in Table 5.
Table 5. Frequencies and Percentages of Challenges That Hinder the Effective
Adoption of Online Education
Challenges Yes, Applies to Me No, It Does Not Apply
to Me
N % N %
1 Getting students to complete 752 68% 358 32%
assignments
2 Getting students to complete 742 67% 368 33%
the online activities on time
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
446
To effectively identify the critical challenges that hinder the effective adoption of
online education perceived by the public school teachers in the UAE, the
researchers suggested a hypothesized cut-off point of 60% of the participants. If
the challenge is seen by at least 60% of participants, it addresses a critical issue.
According to the data presented in Table 5, one can conclude that eight major
challenges were perceived by the majority of the public-school teachers in the
UAE that inhibited them from the effective adoption of online education.
To complete the answer to research question #3, the researchers performed
qualitative coding of themes based on the responses to the second open-ended
question attached to section 3 in the survey. This open-ended question states
‘Please use this space to tell us about any other challenges you think you are
facing, that we did not mention in the above list’, was answered by 685
respondents (62% of the sample size), yielding 351 responses after initial data
cleaning. The subthemes (patterns) and major themes yielded by this analysis are
presented in Table 6.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
447
Table 6. The Subthemes and Major Themes of the Open-Ended Question #2 (Other
Challenges and Barriers)
Subthemes (Patterns), How to… Major Themes/Challenges
Increase students’ engagement in online Students’ and Parents’ Motivation and
sessions Engagement
Increase students’ parents’ interaction
Motivate learners to complete activities and
assignments on time
Promote Parents/Teachers/Learners’ presence
Manage time of online sessions Time and Online Classroom
Use behaviour management strategies during Management
the online lesson
Strike a balance between work and life for well-
being
Monitor the learning of individual learners
during the lesson
Apply micro teamwork and collaboration
during the time frame of a session
Deal with learners’ individual needs
Support online learners when they face Online Learning Support
interaction problem
Promote self-paced learning skills among
online learners
Overcome isolation and student attendance
issues
Interact with special needs learners (with
learning disabilities)
Reduce learning load
Ensure authentication of exam and work done Online Learning Assessment and
remotely Authenticity
Collect evidence about students’ performance
Measure online learning effectiveness
Give individual constructive feedback to
students whose parents are doing the work for
them
Apply student self and peer assessment
Prepare interactive lesson e-Content Pedagogical Design
Redesign and align the curriculum for effective
online learning
Use specific strategies for effective online
learning
Search for and integrate professional and
subject-specific open educational resources that
support teachers and learners
Overcome language barriers in online learning Technical and Language Challenges
environments and Barriers
Solve technical and platform access limitations
and problems
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
448
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
449
8. Discussion
The analysis of quantitative data related to question 1 revealed that 12 critical PD
needs were considered vital by the K–12 public school teachers in this study. The
highly ranked PD needs identified by 65% of the public-school teachers for
effective delivery of online education are: 1) design and manage interactive
learning environments to support learners’ online engagement; 2) use next-
generation online pedagogy; 3) design and manage online collaborative learning;
4) use online assessment tools and 5) use cloud computing and open learning
spaces to manage learners’ files and projects. This finding is in line with the
generated themes from the first open-ended question. Most of the surveyed
teachers who answered this question felt they need professional and practical
training on the following: Managing the online classroom and collaboration;
Designing and managing effective online assessment; Designing interactive and
experiential e-content/lessons and utilizing personalized e-learning design and
strategy. These findings reinforce the need for PD endeavours for teachers in
technology-enabled teaching and learning contexts (El Fadil, 2015; Ferdig &
Kennedy, 2014; Somera, 2018). For effective and customized PD activities, one can
conclude that over two-thirds of respondents in this study identified ‘promoting
learners’ engagement through interactive online learning space, smart and
personalized pedagogy, online assessment techniques, and online collaborative
learning strategies’ as areas in which they want PD. These results were consistent
with other studies emphasizing that online teachers in the context of K–12 schools
must be able to design and develop content in a technology-enabled learning
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
450
environment (Archambault & Kennedy, 2018; Awasthi, 2020; Somera, 2018; and
Sulisworo et al., 2016). Beyond this, they must also be able to deliver content
through dynamic pedagogies and approaches that promote students’
engagement, use assessment measures to ensure that students master content,
while utilizing more than one online channel to communicate with students and
their parents (Archambault & Kennedy, 2018; Awasthi, 2020; Somera, 2018; and
Sulisworo et al., 2016). Thus, stakeholders like MoE who are leading the
workshops, and other agencies need to consider designing training programs
capable of assisting teachers to develop the skills identified in this research. As
situations change, PD facilitators will need to regularly explore teachers’ needs to
ensure adequate and contextually relevant training and that the required support
are provided to them.
The quantitative data analysis related to question 2 revealed that more than 60%
of the surveyed teachers are not adopting some of the new trends in online
learning. They identified the following as critical and challenging trends:
Making/Design (78%), Machine Learning (74.6%), Infographic Presentation
Design Software (72.8%), Creating an e-Learning Profile and Aptitudes Inventory
(71.7%), Crowd Learning (67.5%), Automated Pedagogical Agents (APA) (66.7%),
Avatar-based Coaching (65.9%), Learning Analytics (64.9%), Seamless Learning
(63.3%), Augmented Reality (AR) (61.9%) and Agile Design for e-Lessons (60.3%).
This result was found to be surprising since most of the trends mentioned above
needs extra infrastructure and smart technology solutions such as advanced
virtual labs, and big data analysis software. At the same time K-12 teachers who
are not pursuing postgraduate degrees and collaborative research with university
researchers may not be familiar with the trends or consider them relevant to their
context. These are new areas for further training as critical competencies for online
teachers regardless of contexts. These results were consistent with other studies
(Barbour et al., 2017; Hertz, 2020; Husain et al., 2019; Nachimuthu, 2012). They
emphasised that the quality of online teaching needs more research to understand
evidence-based practices that require the use of an entirely different set of tools
and an innovative medium of online instruction and tutoring so that students
achieve the experiences they deserve. These new trends are causing huge
disruptions in learning design and technology. They are also creating a new line
of competencies and PD learning opportunities for the teachers and faculty
members (Farmer & West, 2019).
The analysis of the quantitative data related to question 3 revealed that over 60%
of public school teachers in the UAE are facing critical challenges in adopting
online and distance learning strategies, especially in the following areas: Getting
students to complete assignments (68%); Getting students to complete the online
activities on time (67%); Ensuring that students understand what it takes to
succeed online (64%); Structuring learning activities that foster student–student
interaction (63%); Keeping students engaged throughout the online course (63%);
Identifying and supporting struggling students (62%); Gathering feedback from
students to improve the learning experience (61%) and using specific strategies to
create an instructor presence in the course (60%). This finding is in line with the
themes generated from the second open-ended question. Most of the surveyed
teachers who answered this question felt they are facing challenges in promoting
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
451
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
452
mentorship training programs based on the personalized training and at the same
time measure its impact on improving the practices in the field.
Since the data collected were limited to public school teachers in the UAE, the
results may not be the same in the private school context. The survey could,
therefore, be administered to the private school sector to determine whether
different contexts lead to different results, given that the findings in this study
rely on self-reported data. Respondents may have forgotten some of the rigorous
training they received earlier. Future research may investigate the alignment
between teachers’ reported challenges and those observed by the school principal,
their line manager or independent observers. Future studies could also focus on
how to plan, design, develop, implement and evaluate technological trend-
oriented PD programs for public school teachers in the UAE context.
10. References
Abdelaziz, H. A. (2019). The impact of AI on curriculum systems: towards an orbit-shifting
dialogue. UNESCO International Bureau of Education. BE/2019/WP/CD/32.
https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000371258
Abdelaziz, H. A., & Al Zehmi, O. (2020). E-cognitive Scaffolding: Does it Have an Impact
on the English Grammar Competencies of Middle School Underachieving
Students? Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 36(1), 5–
28. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2020.1774356
Aderibigbe, S.A., Dias, J.M., & Abraham, M.S. (2021). Understanding issues affecting
students’ commitment to online discussion forum in undergraduate courses.
International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 15(1), 4–23.
https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v15i01.17939
Adnan, M. (2017), “Professional development in the transition to online teaching: The
voice of the voice of entrant online instructors. ReCALL, 30(01),1–24.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344017000106
Alawani, A. (2019). Designing and Developing a Smart Mobile Learning System for Teacher
Professional Development in the United Arab Emirates. PhD Dissertation, Hamdan
Bin Mohammed Smart University.
Almekhlafi, A., & Almeqdadi, F. (2010). Teachers’ Perceptions of Technology Integration
in the United Arab Emirates School Classrooms. Educational Technology & Society,
13(1), 165–175. http://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.13.1.165
Archambault, L., & Kennedy, K. (2018). Teacher Preparation for K–12 Online and
Blended Learning. In Handbook of Research on K–12 Online and Blended
Learning (2nd ed., pp. 221–245). Pittsburgh: Carnegie Mellon University: ETC
Press.
Aubusson, P., Schuck, S., & Burden, K. (2009). Mobile learning for teacher professional
learning: Benefits, obstacles, and issues. Research in Learning Technology, 17(3),
233–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687760903247641
Awasthi, A. (April 2020). Tips on teaching online in the age of Covid-19. The Hindustan
Times; New Delhi. https://www.hindustantimes.com/education/tips-on-
teaching-online-in-the-age-of-covid-19/story-Iato5HIjTCx2JixxiUmFTL.html
Barbour, M. K., Miron, G., & Huerta, L. (2017). Virtual schools in the U.S.: Case studies of
policy, performance, and research evidence. Lansing, MI: Michigan Virtual
University. http://media.mivu.org/institute/pdf/
Barbour, M.K., & Harrison, K.U. (2016). Teachers’ perceptions of K–12 online: impacting
the design of a graduate course curriculum. Journal of Educational Technology
Systems. 45(1), 74–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239516637072
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
453
Borup, J., Graham, C.R., & Drysdale, J.S. (2014). The nature of teacher engagement at an
online high school. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(5), 793–806.
Buckner, E., Chedda, S., & Kindreich, J. (2016). Teacher Professional Development in the
UAE: What Do Teachers Actually Want? Policy Paper No.16. RAK: Sheikh Saud
Bin Daqr Al Qasimi Foundation for Policy Research.
Candice, A. (2019). What is the importance of professional Development for a Teacher?
https://resumes-for-teachers.com/blog/professional-development/what-is-
the-importance-of-teacher-professional-development/
Compton, L.K.L. (2009). Preparing language teachers to teach language online: a look at
skills, roles, and responsibilities, Computer Assisted Language Learning, 22(1),73–
99. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588220802613831
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and
evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13, 3–21.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00988593
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods
Approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Dwiyogo, W. D., & Radjah, C. L. (2020). Effectiveness, Efficiency, and Instruction Appeal
of Blended Learning Model. International Journal of Online and Biomedical
Engineering, 16(4), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijoe.v16i04.13389
El Fadil, B. (2015). High school technology design process–goals and challenges. International
Journal of Arts & Sciences, 8(6), 109–116. https://search-proquest-
com.contentproxy.phoenix.edu/docview/1764688920?accountid=35812
Farmer, T., & West, R. (2019). Exploring the Concerns of Online K–12 Teachers. Journal of
Online Learning Research, 5(1), 9–118.
https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1208818.pdf
Ferdig, R., & Kennedy, K. (2014). Handbook of Research on K–12 Online and Blended
Learning. Library of Congress, ETC Press, Pittsburgh, PA.
Ghavifekr, S., Abd Razak, A., Faizal, M., Ghani, A., & Yan, N. (2013). ICT Integration in
Education: Incorporation for Teaching & Learning Improvement. The Malaysian
Online Journal of Educational Technology, 2(2), 24–45.
https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1086419.pdf
Gokulan, D. (2014). Smart learning: Aiming for the stars.
https://www.khaleejtimes.com/nation/education/smart-learning-aiming-for-
the-stars
Gu, L., Xiaodong, J., Qin, D., & Lindberg, J. (2012). Case Studies on the Use of Technology
in TPD (Teacher Professional Development). US-China Education Review, A 3, 278–
290.
Hertz, O. (2020). Teaching and learning in the age of covid-19. (Accessed 3/6/2021).
https://orenhertz.academia.edu/research
Husain, B., Natasya, Y.I., & Basri, M. (2019). Teachers’ perceptions on adopting e-
learning during covid-19 outbreaks; advantages, disadvantages, suggestions.
Journal Tarbiyah. 27(2), 41–57. http://doi.org/10.30829/tar.v27i2.738
Kamble, A., Gauba, R., Desai, S., & Golhar, D. (2021). Learners’ Perception of the
Transition to Instructor-Led Online Learning Environments: Facilitators and
Barriers During the COVID-19 Pandemic. International Review of Research in Open
and Distributed Learning, 22(1), 199–215.
https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v22i1.4971
Kisanjara, S. (2020). Factors Influencing E-Learning Implementation in Tanzanian
Universities. The Online Journal of Distance Education and E-Learning, 8(1), 37–54.
https://doi.org/10.4236/jcc.2022.109008
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
454
LaFrance, J.A., & Beck, D. (2014). Mapping the terrain: educational leadership field
experiences in K–12 virtual schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 50(1),
160–189. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X13484037
Limperos, A. M., Buckner, M. M., Kaufmann, R., & Frisby, B. N. (2015). Online teaching
and technological affordances: An experimental investigation into the impact of
modality and clarity on perceived and actual learning. Computers & Education,
83, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.12.015
MoE, United Arab Emirates (2020). Open Data.
https://www.moe.gov.ae/Ar/OpenData/Pages/Home.aspx
Nachimuthu, K, (2012). Need of E-Content Development in Education, Education Today.
An International Journal of Education & Humanities, 3(2), 72–80.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/258206638_Need_of_e-
content_development_in_Education
Ortiz, P. A. (2020). Teaching in the time of COVID-19. Wiley Online Library All Journal. 48,
201.
Philippakos, Z. A. T., Rocconi, L., Blake, K., & Summers, J. (2022). Teachers’ practices
during COVID-19: Practices and perspectives in elementary and secondary
settings. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 6(1), 100324.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S259029112200078X
Saldana, J. (2015). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers (3rd Edition). Thousand
Oaks, California: Sage.
Somera, S.L. (2018), ‘Educator experiences transitioning to blended learning environment in K-
6 public schools’, Order No. 10746266, No. 2019657254, ProQuest Dissertations &
Theses Global, Ann Arbor, MI. https://search-proquest-
com.contentproxy.phoenix.edu/docview/2019657254?accountid=134061
Sulisworo, D., Nasir, R., & Maryani, I. (2016). Identification of Teachers’ Problems in
Indonesia on Facing Global Community. International Journal of Research Studies
in Education, 6(2), 81–90. https://doi.org/10.5861/ijrse.2016.1519
Sulisworo, D., Ishafit, F., & Firdausy, K. (2016). The Development of Mobile Learning
Application Using Jigsaw Technique. International Journal of Interactive Mobile
Technologies, 10(3), 11–16. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v10i3.5268
UNESCO (2002). Information and Communication Technologies in Teacher Education: a
planning guide. UNESCO, program and meeting document.
https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000373338
UNESCO (2020). Supporting teachers and education personnel during times of crisis.
https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000373338
Vercellotti, M.L. (2018). Do interactive learning spaces increase student achievement? A
comparison of classroom context. Active Learning in Higher Education, 19(3), 197–
210. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787417735606
Yusuf, B. N., & Jihan, A. (2020). Are We Prepared Enough? a Case Study of Challenges in
Online Learning in a Private Higher Learning Institution During the Covid-19
Outbreaks. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 7(5), 205–212.
https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.75.8211
Zhou, L., Wu, S., Zhou, M., & Li, F. (2020). 'School’s Out, But Class’ on’, The Largest
Online Education in the World Today: Taking China’s Practical Exploration
During the COVID-19 Epidemic Prevention and Control as an Example. SSRN
Electronic Journal, 4(2), 501–519. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3555520
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
455
Appendix 1
Professional Development Needs of the UAE Teachers for the Transition to
Online and Distance Education
https://forms.gle/sokRqDmVNfHDupdQ6
Dear Participant,
At Hamdan Bin Mohammed Smart University, as part of our research-driven
culture, a team of dedicated researchers has come together to conduct institutional
research. The objective of this research is to explore the professional development
needs of the UAE teachers in order to effectively implement the shift to online and
distance education. In order to achieve this objective, we would need to collect
information focusing on your professional development needs to help you with a
smooth transition to online teaching and learning.
The results of this survey will be confidentially used for research purposes only.
If you would like to have a copy of this research results, please let us know and
communicate with the research principal investigator
Section one
Please select from the following what applies on you:
Gender:
- Male
- Female
Educational Level:
- Pre-school (kindergarten)
- Elementary Education
- Primary Education
- Secondary education
Major (Field of Specialization):
- Math
- Science
- Art
- Drama
- Arabic
- Islamic Studies
- Social studies
- English
- Modern Languages
- Business studies
- Other (Please specify :……………………………………….….)
Years of experience:
- Less than 5 years
- Between 6 and 10 years
- Between 11 and 15 years
- Between 16 and 20 years
- More than 20 years
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
456
Qualifications
- Bachelor
- Bachelor in education
- Post Graduate Diploma in Education/Teaching
- Master Degree in education
- Master degree in other fields
- PhD or Ed.D in Education
- Other Degree (Please specify…)
Section Two
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
457
Open ended
Please use this space and tell us about any other professional development needs
you feel as important for you and we did not mention in the above list……
Section 3
Challenges
The following are a list of challenges that may or may not apply on you, please
select the challenges you are facing.
Challenges
▪ Getting students to complete the course online activities
▪ Getting students to complete assignments
▪ Keeping students engaged throughout the online course
▪ Identify and support struggling students
▪ Familiarity with effective pedagogy for online teaching
▪ Inadequate time to learn about online teaching and assessment
▪ Developing an online lesson or course can be complicated
▪ Structuring my course for best online experience
▪ Structuring learning activities that foster student-student interaction
▪ Giving students constructive feedback in a timely manner
▪ Gathering feedback from students to improve the learning experience
▪ Using specific strategies to create an instructor presence in the course
▪ Ensuring that students understand what it takes to succeed online
Open ended
Please use this space and tell us about any other challenges you think that you
are facing we did not mention in the above list……
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
458
Section 4
Topological Trend, techniques, and tools Not Familiar Familiar but I Famili
familiar but have need support ar and
not tried to Adopt it Adopt
it
Hybrid (Blended) Courses (with over 50% delivered
online and in-person)
Augmented Reality (AR)
Virtual Reality (VR)
Experiential e-Learning
eAvatar-based Coaching
Agile Design of e-courses
Adaptive Electronic Testing and Assessment
Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS)
Automated/Animated Pedagogical Agents (APA)
Learning Analytics
Seamless Learning
Crowd Learning
Learning by Making/Design
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
459
Dindin Nasrudin
UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, West Java, Indonesia
Junaidah
Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan, Lampung, Indonesia
*
Corresponding author: Amilda, amilda_tarbiyah_uin@radenfatah.ac.id
©Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0
International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
460
1. Introduction
The vocational high school (Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan) is one of the levels of
formal education in Indonesia. The purpose of education at this level is to prepare
students, and especially to prepare them to work in certain fields (Pambudi &
Harjanto, 2020). Therefore, at this type of school, students can choose various
majors or fields of study that are suitable to their interests and the skills they want
to develop.
A vocational high school is more unique than other Indonesian high school types.
The number of male students is greater than female students. For example, the
number of students in South Sumatra in the academic year of 2020-2021 is 125,183
with 72,661 (58.04%) males and 52,522 (41.96%) females (Kemendikbud, 2021). In
the same year, SMK Negeri 2 Palembang consists of 85% male students and 15%
female students. This condition becomes a challenge for the school in educating
students, especially in the aspect of good character.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
461
2. Literature Review
Schools have a prominent role in the development of character education
(Mahmud & Manda, 2016). The proactive role of schools in shaping the character
of students is very much needed in addition to the role of parents and the social
environment (Sugiarti et al., 2022; Pala, 2011). In addition, character education is
one of the goals of education (Shields, 2011). Therefore, the character of students
can be formed through programmed activities in schools (Smith, 2013). At their
schools, students receive education through academic activities (learning
activities) and non-academic activities (extracurricular and routine activities).
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
462
character values. The last is the habituation method, that is, continuous and
routine practice of character values in daily activities (Asnawan, 2020; Rijal et al.,
2023; Roseth, 2015).
Previous research shows that there are several patterns of character education
through academic and non-academic programs such as through the
implementation of local wisdom-based learning models (Anggraini & Kusniarti,
2017), contextual learning (Rahmawati et al., 2019), the provision of role models,
interventions, consistent habituation, and reinforcement (Zurqoni et al., 2018),
and through traditional games (Hafina et al., 2022). This research reveal another
approach to implementing character education in SMK.
3. Methodology
This study uses a qualitative approach with an explanatory case study method
that aims to explain the phenomenon in depth (Zainal, 2017). This study is
conducted to describe the facts regarding the patterns of character education
through non-academic activities at SMK Negeri 2 Palembang, South Sumatra,
Indonesia. To test the validity of the data, the researcher conducts repeated
interviews, does intensive observations in the field, and confirms the data from
the interviews, the observation data, and research documents as well.
Participants
The researcher directly selects representative informants who are considered to
know much about the research problem. This is intended to obtain accurate and
informative data. Eleven people become the informants. They are the vice
principal of student affairs (informant 1), the coordinator of the counseling
guidance unit (informant 2), supervisor of extracurricular activities (informant 3),
head of administration (informant 4), spiritual advisor (informant 5), teachers
(informant 6), and five students (informants 7, 8, 9, 10, 11).
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
463
4. Findings
The research findings reveal that there are two patterns of character education
implemented by the school; a habituation program involving extrinsic motivation
and is initiated by the school, and an extracurricular program involving intrinsic
motivation and is based on students’ hobbies and interests. Both approaches can
be categorized into non-academic programs.
Program Planning
The character education program at SMK Negeri 2 Palembang is under the
supervision of the vice principal of student affairs who supervises several fields,
as shown in Figure 1.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
464
Both the habituation program and the extracurricular program have been
carefully designed and well prepared. The researcher found the concept and
design of the systematic program in school documents. According to the vice
principal of student affairs, who is the person in charge of the program, these two
activities are considered to have a positive impact on student's mental
development.
"In addition to cognitive abilities, character building becomes one of the
main goals in the educational process in schools. Character education
cannot be successfully done only through learning activities, but also
must be carried out in non-academic activities through special disciplined
development activities and by optimizing extracurricular activities
(informant 1).
Each unit is obliged to make a program for one academic year in consultation with
the vice principal of student affairs and make a report to the principal. The
program for each unit is shown in table 1.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
465
Program Implementation
1. Habituation Activities and Mental Discipline Building
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
466
Mental building activity for the students of SMK Negeri 2 Palembang is carried
out through daily programs such as the smiling day program and reading Al-
Qur'an, weekly programs such as the flag-raising ceremony on Mondays, and the
annual program such as short-term Islamic boarding school as stated by
informant 2, the head of the discipline of the counseling Guidance Unit.
"Human character likes to change, including the students' and ours.
Schools are responsible for creating programs that facilitate teachers and
students to maintain their faith in God. In the daily program, we create
the smiling day program. It aims to help students and teachers to be
accustomed to smiling to everyone they meet. The program starts earlier
before classes begin around 06.30 in the morning. All students must be at
the school at that time and do "saluting, smiling, and greetings". In the
program, all students who pass the school gate must greet all the teachers,
especially the counseling guidance teachers, who are ready to welcome
students in front of the gate. After that, students automatically carry out
the "ant operation movement". In the program, students do the cleaning
in the school environment or in their workshops. After that, students
enter the class at 07.00. After the class captain leads the prayer, the
students read Al Qur'an (tadarus). In the weekly program, we do mental
discipline training by performing a flag-raising ceremony every Monday
morning. All students must gather at the schoolyard before 07.00. In the
annual program, we have prepared a short-term Islamic boarding school
program that is in the month of Ramadan." (Informant 2)
The counseling guidance unit assisted by several counselors and Islamic religious
advisors leads the implementation of the habituation program. Counselors and
religious coaches are selected from teachers who have an educational background
and expertise in counseling and religion. They work on a scheduled basis and in
their respective task areas, as stated by the vice head of student affairs. In
implementing students' discipline effectively and efficiently, the school divides
tasks among several people. Those who are in charge of doing their tasks have the
responsibility of conducting scheduled coaching based on certain classes.
"We fully support school policies in disciplining students. All related
needs will be facilitated. In the habituation and discipline section, six
people serve as counselors. They are given scheduled assignments to carry
out coaching in classes. Consulting services can be carried out in
classrooms, offices, or spaces outside classrooms. The counseling services
provided are very flexible. It means students can consult whenever they
want. We are always ready to serve.” (Informant 4)
The school always involves the students' parents in every process of the program
and has discussions with them to ensure that the program runs smoothly. At the
beginning of the learning activities, the school invites the students' parents to
discuss the program design and sign an agreement regarding the program
implementation. The students and their parents are asked to sign a letter of
agreement regarding the rules and regulations that must be obeyed by the
students. This is done so that the guardians of the students know and agree on the
coaching programs implemented in the school. This agreement is also a
collaborative effort between the school and the guardians in educating students.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
467
The school gives sanctions for any violations of the rules as a form of student
discipline control. Sanctions are given based on the level of the violation. At this
level, schools are committed to upholding discipline that adheres to the principle
of "being forced and accustomed". There are three types of violations committed
by students. They are serious violations, moderate violations, and minor
violations. The explanation of the violation points can be seen in table 2.
Regarding the supervision of student discipline, the school makes a schedule for
teachers to carry out supervision effectively, especially during activities outside
the classroom and during school breaks. This supervision aims to ensure that no
students commit violations such as fighting, skipping classes, smoking, and so on.
Students who commit violations will get punishment to prevent them from
repeating the same violations in the future.
“We apply the principle of ‘being forced and accustomed to doing good
behavior’. This is actually to train and increase the students’ awareness
to be able to control their behavior.” (Informant 1)
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
468
MODERATE VIOLATIONS
a. Signature forgery 20
b. Entering and exiting the school through illegal exits or 20
entrance doors
c. Stealing class-owned finance or financial abuse 20
d. Being outside school/classroom during study hours without 15
permission
e. Instigating friends to perform negative behaviors 15
f. Playing basketball or volleyball during other lesson time 20
g. Coming late for classes 20
h. Being absent without any notice or with no permissions 25
2 i. Having long hair of more than 3 cm or having untidy hair for 20
male students
j. Having a tattoo or tattoos 30
k. Using nail polish for male students 20
l. Wearing earrings/piercing for male students 30
m. Damaging school property such as school supplies, chairs, 30
tables, benches, blackboards etc.
n. Forcibly asking other students for money 30
o. Wearing more than a pair of earrings for female students 30
MINOR VIOLATIONS
a. Giving no greetings when meeting teachers 3
b. Disobeying flag-raising ceremony regulations 5
c. Skipping flag-raising ceremony 10
d. Doing other activities instead of focusing on teaching- 10
learning activities during classes.
e. Buying food or drink during classes 10
f. Wearing no student council badge, chest name tags, and 5
school badge.
g. Wearing no standard school uniform, socks, or belts 5
h. Wearing no standard shoes and shoe laces 5
i. Wearing school uniform improperly 8
3 j. Wearing no school uniform 8
k. Wearing non-standard skirts for female students 8
l. Wearing no chest name tags or wearing other students’ chest 5
name tags
m. Wearing shoes improperly 5
n. Dying hair 5
o. Wearing accessories improperly 5
p. Wearing colorful contact lenses 5
q. Being against classroom regulations 5
r. Littering 5
s. Spitting improperly 5
t. Using toilets or bathrooms improperly 5
u. Making noise during teaching and learning activity 8
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
469
Although most of the students are males, the school has never carried out physical
sanctions on them. The school gives punishment in the form of social sanctions
that are more educational, as stated by the following informant:
"If students violate unwritten rules, we never do physical punishment.
We just give a reprimand with the principle of 'extended discussion and
a sense of love. Besides, teachers should not get bored reminding students
not to break the rules, especially during the flag-raising ceremony every
Monday. We always remind the students of the rules and regulations
every Monday. In addition, in controlling students' discipline, sometimes
I can be very angry even though I can be very gentle more often. By doing
those things, students' behavior can change quickly." (Informant 2)
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
470
problem. After that, the coordinator counseling guidance unit will do the rest:
identifying the problem, providing counseling services, and conducting an
evaluation.
If the coaching carried out does not produce results (or the student repeats a
similar violation), the case will be handled by the vice principal of student affairs
to be discussed in the case trial. The results of the trial will provide
recommendations for the subsequent actions: giving students another
opportunity to improve or asking the students to resign voluntarily.
2. Extracurricular Activities
In addition to disciplinary training activities, the school also conducts character
education programmatically by strengthening extracurricular activities. The
students are free to choose the type of activity they want to take based on their
interests and preferences. The researcher discovered that the vocational school has
15 types of different extracurricular activities.
“There are 15 kinds of extracurricular activities at this school. Students
are free to join whichever activities they like. I handle religious activities.
I accompany students who become members of the Islamic spiritual club.”
(Informant 5)
Field data shows that of the 15 extracurricular activities at the vocational school,
scouting has the most activities such as learning how to do rigging, learning
emergency first aid skills, learning pioneering dexterity, practicing Morse and
semaphore skills, learning how to read scouting codes, exploring nature with
certain signs and directions, learning how to do useful wander, learning how to
march, and directional skills. This activity is carried out to build the character of
discipline, tolerance, responsibility, discipline, hard work, creative,
friendly/communicative, and social care.
There are various responses given by the students regarding the implementation
of the character education program. Some of the interview excerpts are as follows.
“The school has strict rules. I have to hurry to arrive at the school on time,
especially in the morning or on Mondays.” (Informant 7)
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
471
“I have been studying at this school for 2 years. There are many ups and
downs. However, I also get many positive things. I get used to cleaning
the environment, both at school and at home” (informant 10)
"I agree with the school on this program and it should be continued, but
the teachers should not be grumpy. (smiling) (informant 11)
Program Evaluation
The implementation of character education programs is evaluated regularly. It is
done either weekly, monthly, or yearly. All reports from each field are well
recorded and documented. This includes the types of violations committed by
students and their approach to solving the problems.
5. Discussions
The school has a paradigm stating that character education will not be sufficient
to be taught only through learning and academic activities. Schools must also
carry out character education through non-academic activities in the form of
disciplinary development activities and extracurricular activities. This paradigm
makes the concept of character education comprehensively implemented.
Character education with this paradigm is complete and comprehensive character
education. This paradigm is relevant to the goal of national education which is
not only a place for knowledge transfer, but also a place for the formation of
attitudes, behavior, and character (Rokhman et al., 2014). With this paradigm,
character education becomes a priority program and is one of the main goals of
the education process in schools.
The facts show that the implemented extracurricular activities have a positive
impact on the character-building of students. It means that extracurricular
activities are quite effective in shaping the character of students. In their research,
Covay & Carbonaro (2010) states that extracurricular activities have a positive
effect on behavior. Marini (2017) concludes that extracurricular activities are quite
effective in shaping students' character. Another study indicates that
extracurricular activities have a positive effect on the formation of student
character (Saleh, 2021). This fact shows that the strength of the concept determines
the success of character education programs in schools.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
472
Negeri 2 Palembang students are males, most of them have good character. The
visible evidence is that the students can dress neatly, salute others politely, smile,
and greet teachers and other people when they meet. They are also accustomed to
reading the Qur’an, participating in flag-raising ceremonies as a form of love for
the homeland, and being responsible for the mandate and tasks either from their
teachers or from extra-curricular activities. The success of this program is strongly
influenced by the role of the vice head of student affairs who represents the
principal as well as the person in charge of the program. Therefore, leadership is
another factor that supports the success of this character education program
(Fackler & Malmberg, 2016).
The field data also shows that the results of the recapitulation of violations
committed by students are minimal, especially in 2021. Of the total students, only
three students committed serious violations, twenty-three students committed
moderate violations, and twelve students committed minor violations. This fact
explains that the violations that occur in this school are minor compared to the
total number of students, that is, 2830 students in the 2020-2021 academic year.
The number of students who violated the school regulations is only four. It is
1.45% of the total number of students. The success of this program is, of course,
supported by the synergy of all school members and organizations such as the
school counselors and spiritual coaches in the counseling guidance unit. Besides,
trainers and teachers who handle the extracurricular units also give their great
contribution. This shows that the strength of the organization as a system runs
well and properly.
Finally, the practice and habituation methods that are applied through
disciplinary and extracurricular activities in schools enable students to apply
character values directly and continuously in their daily activities, especially in
the school environment. The habituation method is the right method for shaping
students’ character. The habit of practicing values of good character regularly
becomes a habit for students. Finally, the character values that are practiced are
internalized in students and become their permanent characters (Hidayat &
Bujuri, 2020). This success, of course, is also influenced by the support of the
students’ parents. It is proven by their readiness to fill in the agreement and
support the school programs.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
473
6. Conclusion
This research proves that the patterns of student character education through non-
academic programs in vocational high schools have a positive impact on shaping
the students’ character. The applied principle of "being forced and get accustomed
to" turns out to be successful in making students accustomed to practicing positive
characters. Through disciplinary development and extracurricular activities,
students are trained to directly practice character values, including religious,
honest, tolerant, disciplined, hard-working, creative, independent, democratic,
curious, homeland loving, friendly/communicative, peace-loving,
environmentally caring, socially caring, and responsible consistently and
continuously. The success of the character education program at SMKN 2
Palembang can be seen in several ways, such as the program strength factor
(concept), leadership factor, system factor, competency factor, and support factor
of students’ parents and other stakeholders. This study has limitations in
describing other factors that cause the formation of the students’ character. In
addition, further research needs to be done on the causal factors for students who
still commit violations that reflect negative characters at school.
7. References
Amin, M. S. (2018). Perbedaan struktur otak dan perilaku belajar antara pria dan wanita;
Eksplanasi dalam sudut pandang neuro sains dan filsafat [Differences in brain
structure and learning behavior between men and women; Explanation in the
viewpoint of neuro science and philosophy]. Jurnal Filsafat Indonesia, 1(1), 38–43.
https://doi.org/10.23887/jfi.v1i1.13973
Anggraini, P., & Kusniarti, T. (2017). Character and Local Wisdom-Based Instructional
Model of Bahasa Indonesia in Vocational High Schools. Journal of Education and
Practice, 8(5), 23–29.
https://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JEP/article/view/35461
Aquami, A., Astuti, M., & Sunardi, S. (2020). Strengthening Discipline Character
Education and Social Caring in Class I (One) Thematic Learning in State
Elementary School 03 Pagaralam City. JIP (Jurnal Ilmiah PGMI), 6 (2), 236-251.
https://doi.org/10.19109/jip.v6i2.6540
Asnawan, A. (2020). Exploring Education Character Thought of Ki Hajar Dewantara and
Thomas Lickona. International Journal on Advanced Science, Education, and Religion,
3(4), 164-174. https://doi.org/10.33648/ijoaser.v3i3.83
Birhan, W., Shiferaw, G., Amsalu, A., Tamiru, M., & Tiruye, H. (2021). Exploring the
context of teaching character education to children in preprimary and primary
schools. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 4(1), 100171.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2021.100171
Carolan, B. V. (2018). Extracurricular activities and achievement growth in kindergarten
through first grade: The mediating role of non-cognitive skills. Early Childhood
Research Quarterly, 45, 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2018.06.004
Castleberry, A., & Nolen, A. (2018). Thematic analysis of qualitative research data: Is it as
easy as it sounds? Currents in pharmacy teaching and learning, 10(6), 807-815.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2018.03.019
Chu, H., & Ke, Q. (2017). Research methods: What's in the name? Library & Information
Science Research, 39(4), 284-294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2017.11.001
Covay, E., & Carbonaro, W. (2010). After the bell: Participation in extracurricular activities,
classroom behavior, and academic achievement. Sociology of Education, 83(1), 20-
45. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040709356565
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
474
Evren, C., Evren, B., & Bozkurt, M. (2014). Tobacco use among 10th grade students in
Istanbul and related variables. Asian journal of psychiatry, 8, 69-75.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajp.2013.11.016
Fackler, S., & Malmberg, L. E. (2016). Teachers' self-efficacy in 14 OECD countries:
Teacher, student group, school and leadership effects. Teaching and Teacher
Education, 56, 185-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.03.002
Farb, A. F., & Matjasko, J. L. (2012). Recent advances in research on school-based
extracurricular activities and adolescent development. Developmental Review,
32(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2011.10.001
Fadhilah, M. N., & Nurahman, M. (2021). Collaboration of Parents and Teachers in
Establishing Students'praise Character in the Covid-19 Pandemic. JIP (Jurnal
Ilmiah PGMI), 7(2), 117-124. https://doi.org/10.19109/jip.v7i2.7999
Frasandy, R. N., Awida, A., & Dorisno, D. (2022). Integration of Religion and
Minangkabau Culture: Implementation of Sumbang Duo Baleh in Culture Art
and Craft Learning in the Character Strengthening Effort of Students in the State
Islamic Elementary School. JIP (Jurnal Ilmiah PGMI), 8(1), 1-14.
https://doi.org/10.19109/jip.v8i1.11653
Goodell, L. S., Stage, V. C., & Cooke, N. K. (2016). Practical qualitative research strategies:
Training interviewers and coders. Journal of nutrition education and behavior, 48(8),
578-585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2016.06.001
Güvendir, E. (2015). Why are males inclined to use strong swear words more than
females? An evolutionary explanation based on male intergroup aggressiveness.
Language Sciences, 50, 133-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2015.02.003
Hafina, A., Nur, L., & Malik, A. A. (2022). The development and validation of a character
education model through traditional games based on the Socratic method in an
elementary school. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 41(2).
http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/cp.v41i2.46125
Hastasari, C., Setiawan, B., & Aw, S. (2022). Students' communication patterns of Islamic
boarding schools: the case of Students in Muallimin Muhammadiyah
Yogyakarta. Heliyon, 8(1), e08824.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e08824
Hidayat, N., & Bujuri, D. A. (2020). The Implementation of Character Education in Islamic
Boarding School. Lentera Pendidikan: Jurnal Ilmu Tarbiyah Dan Keguruan, 23(1),
127–140. https://doi.org/10.24252/lp.2020v23n1i11
Hutomo, M. R., & Ariati, J. (2017). Kecenderungan agresivitas remaja ditinjau dari jenis
kelamin pada siswa SMP Di semarang [The tendency of aggression in
adolescents as viewed from the perspective of gender among junior high school
students in Semarang]. Jurnal Empati, 5(4), 776–779.
https://doi.org/10.14710/empati.2016.15425
Kemendikbud. (2021). Statistik SMK Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan 2020/2021 (Vocational
High School Vocational School Statistics 2020/2021).
Kim, D. (2015). A study on the class of education that builds students’ character through
films–classes at the university of liberal arts. Procedia-Social and Behavioral
Sciences, 174, 1529–1533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.784
Lee, L. S., Lee, Y. F., Altschuld, J. W., & Pan, Y. J. (2015). Energy literacy: Evaluating
knowledge, affect, and behavior of students in Taiwan. Energy Policy, 76, 98-106.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.11.012
Lidyasari, A. T. (2014). Developing PGSD students' character through experience learning
theory. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 123, 189–195.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1414
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
475
Mahmud, A., & Manda, D. (2016). The Implementation of Character Education through
Scout Activities. International Education Studies, 9(6), 130–138.
http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ies.v9n6p130
Marini, A. (2017). Building Students' Characters Through Extracurricular Activities. In 1st
Yogyakarta International Conference on Educational Management/Administration and
Pedagogy (YICEMAP 2017) 266-268). Atlantis Press.
https://doi.org/10.2991/yicemap-17.2017.45
Miles, H., & Huberman, A. M. (2018). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook
Moen, K., & Middelthon, A. L. (2015). Qualitative research methods. In Research in
medical and biological sciences (pp. 321-378). Academic Press.
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-799943-2.00010-0
Moon, M. D. (2019). Triangulation: A method to increase validity, reliability, and
legitimation in clinical research. Journal of emergency nursing, 45(1), 103-105.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jen.2018.11.004
Nitu, L. (2011). The Design Club-an extracurricular activity for art students and a master-
disciple learning partnership. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 11, 27–31.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.01.027
Pala, A. (2011). The need for character education. International Journal of Social Sciences
and Humanity Studies, 3(2), 23–32.
https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ijsshs/issue/26222/276136
Pambudi, N. A., & Harjanto, B. (2020). Vocational education in Indonesia: History,
development, opportunities, and challenges. Children and Youth Services Review,
115, 105092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105092
Pane, M. M., & Patriana, R. (2016). The significance of environmental contents in character
education for quality of life. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 222, 244-252.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.153
Pradana, D. A., Mahfud, M., Hermawan, C., & Susanti, H. D. (2020). Nasionalisme:
Character Education Orientation in Learning Development. Budapest
International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal), 3, 4026–4034.
https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v3i4.1501
Putro, A. A. Y., & Suryono, Y. (2019). New tradition of pesantren in character education.
In Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1254 (1), 012002). IOP Publishing.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1254/1/012002
Rahmawati, L., Supardi, K. I., & Sulistyaningsih, T. (2019). Contextual Teaching and
Learning Integrated with Character Education to Improve Studentâ€TM s
Motivation and Character in Concentration of Solutions Topic at Pharmacy
Vocational School. Journal of Innovative Science Education, 8(3), 239–247.
https://doi.org/10.15294/jise.v0i0.27910
Reyes, H. L. M., Foshee, V. A., Bauer, D. J., & Ennett, S. T. (2014). Proximal and time-
varying effects of cigarette, alcohol, marijuana and other hard drug use on
adolescent dating aggression. Journal of adolescence, 37(3), 281-289.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2014.02.002
Rijal, A., Kosasih, A., & Nurdin, E. S. (2022, November). Thomas Lickona and Yusuf
Qardhawi: Creating Value for Character Education Through Narrative. In
International Conference on Language, Education, and Social Science (ICLESS 2022)
(pp. 15-24). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-494069-15-2_3
Rokhman, F., Hum, M., & Syaifudin, A. (2014). Character education for golden generation
2045 (national character building for Indonesian golden years). Procedia-Social
and Behavioral Sciences, 141, 1161–1165.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.197
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
476
Rosenthal, M. (2016). Qualitative research methods: Why, when, and how to conduct
interviews and focus groups in pharmacy research. Currents in pharmacy teaching
and learning, 8(4), 509-516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2016.03.021
Roseth, C. J. (2015). Character education, moral education, and moral-character education.
In Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 227-240). Routledge.
Saleh, S. (2021). The Influence of Extracurricular Activities on Character Building of
Students of SMPN 22 Makassar. Jurnal Office: Jurnal Pemikiran Ilmiah dan
Pendidikan Administrasi Perkantoran, 7(1), 1-10.
Saputro, J. D., & Murdiono, M. (2020). Implementation of Character Education through a
Holistic Approach to Senior High School Students. International Journal of
Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 7(11), 460–470.
http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v7i11.2146
Shields, D. L. (2011). Character as the aim of education. Phi Delta Kappan, 92(8), 48–53.
https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171109200810
Siregar, S. F., Mardianto, M., & Ahkas, A. W. (2020). Extracurricular Implementation of
Islamic Education in Character Building Students in MTs EX PGA UNIVA
Medan. Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education
(BirLE) Journal, 3(2), 965–973. https://doi.org/10.33258/birle.v3i2.1013
Smith, M. R. (2013). Character education: Introduction, evolution, and current trends.
Peabody Journal of Education, 88(2), 139–141.
https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2013.775861
Sugiarti, R., Erlangga, E., Suhariadi, F., Winta, M. V. I., & Pribadi, A. S. (2022). The
influence of parenting on building character in adolescents. Heliyon, 8(5), e09349.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09349
Tadege, A., Seifu, A., & Melese, S. (2022). Teachers’ views on values-education: The case
of secondary schools in East Gojjam, Ethiopia. Social Sciences & Humanities Open,
6(1), 100284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2022.100284
Tahira, Z. M., Hassana, N. A., & Othmana, N. (2013). Performance measurement for
extracurricular management at secondary school level. Procedia-Social and
Behavioral Sciences, 81, 438–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.456
Ucus, S. (2015). Elementary school teachers’ views on game-based learning as a teaching
method. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 186, 401–409.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.216
Wahid, S., & Pamungkas, A. H. (2019). The Development of Character through Extra-
Curricular Programs. 1st International Conference on Education Social Sciences and
Humanities (ICESSHum 2019), 918–926. https://doi.org/10.2991/icesshum-
19.2019.143
Wardhani, R. H., Sunarti, E., & Muflikhati, I. (2017). Ancaman, faktor protektif, aktivitas,
dan resiliensi remaja: Analisis berdasarkan tipologi sosiodemografi [Threats,
protective factor, activity, and adolescent resilience: Analysis based on
sociodemographic typology]. Jurnal Ilmu Keluarga & Konsumen, 10(1), 47–58.
https://doi.org/10.24156/jikk.2017.10.1.47
Yani, A. L., & Retnowuni, A. (2019). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi perilaku agresif
pada remaja yang tinggal di Pesantren [Factors influencing aggressive behavior
in adolescents living in Islamic boarding schools]. Journal of Holistic Nursing
Science, 6(1), 36–43. https://doi.org/10.31603/nursing.v6i1.2406
Zainal, Z. (2017). Case study as a research method Zaidah. Jurnal Kemanusiaan, 15(1-S), 75–
80.
https://jurnalkemanusiaan.utm.my/index.php/kemanusiaan/article/view/16
5
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
477
Zurqoni, Retnawati, H., Arlinwibowo, J., & Apino, E. (2018). Strategy and implementation
of character education in senior high schools and vocational high schools. Journal
of Social Studies Education Research, 9(3), 370–397.
https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/jsser/issue/43625/534243
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
478
©Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0
International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
479
1. Introduction
1.1 Purpose of the Study
Computing is for everyone, not just for those who major in computer science (CS).
In an age characterized by a high-tech economy, many jobs, regardless of whether
they are computer-related occupations, require basic to advanced computer skills.
According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (2021), the workforce engaged in
computer-based occupations is expected to grow rapidly between 2020 and 2030
due to the strong demand for computer-related skills. Currently, computing is
deeply linked to other STEM disciplines (Pereira et al., 2018); as a result, new
computing subfields, such as bioinformatics, computational statistics,
computational chemistry, and computational biology, have been created (Pappas
et al., 2017). Therefore, computer science education is important for a 21st-century
workforce.
Due to the increasing importance of online learning in higher education, and its
several advantages and benefits, many universities offer introductory computer
science courses online. This mode of course delivery has become increasingly
popular as it provides a flexible way for college students to learn the essential
concepts and skills of computer science from anywhere and at any time.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
480
2. Literature Review
2.1 Computer Science Education
Computer science education is a field of study that focuses on the pedagogical
practices involved in teaching computing. The field has emerged from other
disciplines, such as education, psychology, engineering, and computing
(including computer science, information technology, information science, and
computer engineering) (Lunn et al., 2021). The importance of computer science
education extends beyond the field of computing as it enhances students’ abilities
to solve problems and be creative; it also supports project management,
supervision and communication, and interpersonal interactions (Pappas et al.,
2017). It is currently unclear which topics should be the focus in computer science
classes, but such classes usually cover programming and computational thinking
skills (Burbaitė et al., 2018). Regardless of the different topics covered in computer
science classes, course content is usually taught using individual-centric
pedagogy.
There are some organizations that have set standards for computing education
and digital literacy, such as The Global Digital Literacy Council, The Computing
Technology Industry Association (CompTIA), the International Society for
Technology in Education (ISTE), and the National Coalition of Certification
Centers (NC3). Moreover, SkillsUSA has set the neutral vendor standard called
the IC3 Digital Literacy Certification (IC3) (Daungtod, 2019). Such standards can
be used as key performance indicators (KPIs) for student performance levels.
Many instructional methods can be used to teach computer science which have
been identified in the previous literature, such as Computer Science Unplugged
(Sendurur, 2019), direct instruction, project and free work. Learning forms for
computer science instruction can also vary and include subject-related,
interdisciplinary, and self-directed learning approaches (Zendler & Reile, 2018),
and the Mastery Learning Model (McCane et al., 2017). In their research, Hao et
al. (2018) found that the implementation of active learning methods, such as team-
based learning or problem-based learning, had significantly positive effects on
students’ learning outcomes. Other emerging methodologies in computer science
education include parallel and distributed computing (PDC) (Ghafoor et al., 2019),
creative computation (Xu et al., 2018), computational creativity exercises
(Peteranetz et al., 2019), and the use of blended learning, which has been shown
to be important for reducing the number of students who drop out of courses
(Förster et al., 2021).
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
481
Introductory computer science courses are known to have high drop-out rates
across many different institutions and countries (Long & Harrington, 2019). There
is a dearth of literature about effective and ineffective behaviors of students in
introductory computer science courses (Robins, 2019). Bennedsen and Caspersen
(2019) conducted a study in 2007 on failure rates in introductory computer science
courses and repeated the same study in 2017. The findings revealed that the failure
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
482
rates had reduced slightly from (33%) in 2007 to (28%) in 2017. However, the
difficulty of such courses and the drop-out rates still need to be addressed. It is
reasonable to assume that students drop out of introductory courses due to poor
performance in the courses, but this assumption ought to lead to a better
understanding of the assessment strategies used in such courses. Adkins and
Linville (2017) conducted a study on the relationship between the number of
exams and students’ grades in the courses. The study found no significant
differences in students’ performance, even though students wanted more exams
to reduce exam anxiety.
Other challenges facing students taking introductory courses include the typical
teaching–learning process utilized in the delivery of such courses, which makes
the course content difficult to learn (Narasareddygari et al., 2018). An examination
of the evolution of introductory computer science courses indicates significant
changes in the topics from 1970 to 2018. Some topics have disappeared as they are
no longer relevant, while new topics such as gender and diversity in
programming have become a new trend (Becker & Quille, 2019).
There are many different designs for introductory courses, such as massive open
online courses (MOOCs) (Duran et al., 2020), microcontroller unit (MCU)-based
courses (Brown et al., 2018), online courses (Shirai et al., 2021), and traditional
(face-to-face) courses. Regardless of the delivery mode, however, interaction
among peers is an essential component of many active learning strategies (Hao et
al., 2018). Moreover, it is necessary to identify which factors play a significant role
in student performance in introductory computer science courses.
Many studies have listed factors related to student success in introductory
courses, such as student motivation, attitudes, domain identification,
(Alshammari, 2018) and self-efficacy (Lishinski & Yadav, 2021). Another factor
that can help to determine student success is student–instructor interaction
(Blaney & Stout, 2017).
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
483
In Saudi Arabia, for example, many universities offer fully online introductory
computer science courses. There are many examples of such courses being
delivered in blended formats, or in traditional formats supported by online
instruction materials (Mason et al., 2019; Kortsarts et al., 2020; Förster et al., 2021;
Bigman et al., 2021). Zeuch et al. (2019) investigated the impact of supporting
traditional face-to-face introductory computer science courses with online
learning resources and they demonstrated a positive impact on students’
performance. Moreover, Kanika et al. (2020) recommended that computer science
students should access massive open online courses (MOOCs). Although students
may perceive online learning to be helpful (Marasco et al., 2018), a recent study
found no differences in student performance and perceptions between students
in a fully online introductory computer science course when compared with a
traditional face-to-face version of the same course (He, 2020). Both delivery modes
have advantages for students’ learning. While students benefit from face-to-face
interaction and feedback, students in online introductory courses benefit from the
flexibility offered by online learning (Srivatanakul, 2022). Despite this, teaching
introductory computer science courses fully online can be difficult, with more
attendant challenges than are encountered when teaching traditional face-to-face
courses.
3. Research Questions
RQ1: Are there any statistically significant differences in student performance in
introductory computer science courses between face-to-face and online delivery
modes?
RQ2: Are there any statistically significant gender-based differences in student
performance in introductory computer science courses based on course delivery
mode?
4. Methods
In this quantitative study, the sample size included 600 first-year students in an
introductory computer science course at a public university in Saudi Arabia. The
participants were selected randomly from different sections. All sections were
taught the same course content, either online or via traditional face-to-face
delivery mode. It was a requirement for all students, across different colleges and
majors, to take the introductory computer science course for a total of 15 weeks.
The course focuses on a variety of topics, such as Microsoft Office, essentials of
information technology, and fundamentals of operating systems. The students
who were enrolled in online sections participated in synchronous learning during
each lecture. Although there were two different delivery modes, all students took
their mid-term examinations and final examinations face-to-face regardless of the
way in which they had been taught.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
484
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
485
The qq plot and the density plot (Figure 4) support the validity of the normality
assumption for these data. Homogeneity was assessed using the Bartlett test of
homogeneity of variances to ascertain whether the variances were equal, and the
null hypothesis was tested against the alternative hypothesis that the variances
were not equal. Based on the results in Table 2, we accept the null hypothesis; it
was, therefore, assumed that the populations were homoscedastic.
From Table (3), the results reveal statistically significant differences between the
groups (t = -3.7023, p value = 0.0002364). Therefore, the null hypothesis was
rejected. From the means of the groups and the boxplot (Figure 5), there were
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
486
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
487
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
488
6. Discussion
There has been exceptional growth in online learning globally in recent years, and
it has become the learning mode of choice for many students since it can allow
some of the limitations of traditional face-to-face courses to be overcome. While
there is evidence that there are no differences between students’ perceptions of
online introductory computer science courses and traditional face-to-face courses
(He, 2020), the current enhances the existing body of research by analyzing the
academic performance of students in an introductory computer science course.
The analysis involved comparing the grades of students from both online and
traditional face-to-face course sections. Moreover, the study adds to the literature
by investigating gender-based differences in student performance between the
two delivery modes when the assessment methods were the same.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
489
delivery mode. Such findings suggest the need for an important shift towards
leveraging the powerful features of online learning for both male and female
students in introductory computer science courses.
7. Conclusion
In conclusion, online learning has become the norm for many of today's students
taking introductory computer science courses. Many universities offer
introductory computer science courses online, which raises the question of
whether online learning has a significant impact on students’ academic
performance. The current study provided empirical evidence to support the effect
of online learning on students’ academic performance in introductory computer
science courses. Moreover, the study analyzed the gender-based differences in
student performance based on course delivery mode. The findings from this study
provide insights into the effectiveness of online learning in introductory computer
science courses and inform educators on the gender-based differences in students’
performance across the delivery modes.
8. Future Work
The role that introductory computer science courses play in introducing students
to the field is critical, although these courses are commonly perceived to be
difficult. The current study yielded interesting findings about the differences in
student performance between the two modes of delivery for the same course (i.e.,
face-to-face and online). A follow-up study is needed to analyze the factors that
play a significant role in the effectiveness of online learning in introductory
computer science courses and that can be used as predictors of student
performance. Moreover, it is important to perform a qualitative study to identify
which elements of introductory computer science courses result in them being
perceived as difficult and therefore negatively affect male students’ performance.
9. References
Adkins, J. K., & Linville, D. (2017). Testing frequency in an introductory computer
programming course. Information Systems Education Journal, 15(3), 22-28.
Alshammari, A. N. (2018). She Is a Computer Scientist: A Quantitative Comparison between
the Effectiveness of Game Design Studios and Robotics at Enhancing Women's
Learning of, Self-Efficacy in, Attitudes toward, and Domain Identification with
Computer Science (Doctoral dissertation, Purdue University).
Alvarado, C., Umbelino, G., & Minnes, M. (2018, February). The persistent effect of pre-
college computing experience on college CS course grades. In Proceedings of the
49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 876-881).
https://doi.org/10.1145/3159450.3159508
Becker, B. A., & Quille, K. (2019, February). 50 years of cs1 at sigcse: A review of the
evolution of introductory programming education research. In Proceedings of the
50th acm technical symposium on computer science education (pp. 338-344).
https://doi.org/10.1145/3287324.3287432
Bennedsen, J., & Caspersen, M. E. (2019). Failure rates in introductory programming: 12
years later. ACM inroads, 10(2), 30-36. https://doi.org/10.1145/3324888
Bigman, M., Roy, E., Garcia, J., Suzara, M., Wang, K., & Piech, C. (2021, March).
PearProgram: A More Fruitful Approach to Pair Programming. In Proceedings of
the 52nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 900-906).
https://doi.org/10.1145/3408877.3432517
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
490
Blaney, J. M., & Stout, J. G. (2017, March). Examining the relationship between
introductory computing course experiences, self-efficacy, and belonging among
first-generation college women. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE Technical
Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 69-74).
https://doi.org/10.1145/3017680.3017751
Bresnihan, N., Bray, A., Fisher, L., Strong, G., Millwood, R., & Tangney, B. (2021).
Parental Involvement in Computer Science Education and Computing Attitudes
and Behaviours in the Home: Model and Scale Development. ACM Transactions
on Computing Education, 21(3), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1145/3440890
Brown, D. W., Ghafoor, S. K., & Canfield, S. (2018, July). Instruction of introductory
programming course using multiple contexts. In Proceedings of the 23rd Annual
ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (pp.
147-152). https://doi.org/10.1145/3197091.3197105
Burbaitė, R., Drąsutė, V., & Štuikys, V. (2018, April). Integration of computational
thinking skills in STEM-driven computer science education. In 2018 IEEE Global
Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON) (pp. 1824-1832). IEEE.
https://doi.org/10.1109/educon.2018.8363456
Coffman-Wolph, S., & Gray, K. (2019). Fun and Interactive Activities for an Introductory
Computer Science Course of 200 Students. In ASEE Gulf-Southwest Section
Annual Meeting 2018 Papers. American Society for Engineering Education.
Daungtod, S. (2019, January). A study of digital literacy of 1st year computer education
students faculty of education Nakhon Phanom University. In Proceedings of the
10th International Conference on E-Education, E-Business, E-Management and E-
Learning (pp. 241-244). https://doi.org/10.1145/3306500.3306541
Dawson, J. Q., Allen, M., Campbell, A., & Valair, A. (2018, February). Designing an
introductory programming course to improve non-majors' experiences.
In Proceedings of the 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science
Education (pp. 26-31). https://doi.org/10.1145/3159450.3159548
Dengel, A. (2019, October). Computer Science Replugged: What Is the Use of Virtual
Reality in Computer Science Education? In Proceedings of the 14th Workshop in
Primary and Secondary Computing Education (pp. 1-3).
https://doi.org/10.1145/3361721.3362113
Drabowicz, T. (2014). Gender and digital usage inequality among adolescents: a
comparative study of 39 countries. Computers & Education, 74 (1), 98-111.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.01.016
Duran, R., Haaranen, L., & Hellas, A. (2020, February). Gender differences in
introductory programming: comparing MOOCs and local courses. In Proceedings
of the 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 692-698).
https://doi.org/10.1145/3328778.3366852
Finlayson, I. (2020). The effect of gender on student self-assessment in introductory
computer science classes. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 36(3), 102-110.
Förster, A., Dede, J., Udugama, A., Förster, A., Helms, D., Kniefs, L., ... & Kulmann, J.
(2021). A Blended Learning Approach for an Introductory Computer Science
Course. Education Sciences, 11(8), 372. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11080372
Ghafoor, S. K., Brown, D. W., Rogers, M., & Hines, T. (2019, July). Unplugged activities
to introduce parallel computing in introductory programming classes: An
experience report. In Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Conference on Innovation and
Technology in Computer Science Education (pp. 309-309).
https://doi.org/10.1145/3304221.3325573
Gülbahar, Y., & Kalelioğlu, F. (2017). Competencies of High School Teachers and
Training Needs for Computer Science Education. In Proceedings of the 6th
Computer Science Education Research Conference (pp. 26-31).
https://doi.org/10.1145/3162087.3162092
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
491
Hao, Q., Barnes, B., Wright, E., & Kim, E. (2018, February). Effects of active learning
environments and instructional methods in computer science education.
In Proceedings of the 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science
Education (pp. 934-939). https://doi.org/10.1145/3159450.3159451
He, X. (2020, September). Teaching Introductory Programming Online: Lessons Learned.
In Proceedings of the Southern Association for Information Systems Conference (p. 1).
Jayathirtha, G., & Kafai, Y. B. (2019, February). Electronic textiles in computer science
education: a synthesis of efforts to broaden participation, increase interest, and
deepen learning. In Proceedings of the 50th ACM technical symposium on computer
science education (pp. 713-719). https://doi.org/10.1145/3287324.3287343
Jiang, X., Liu, W., & Liu, J. (2019, November). Learning Analytics in a Blended Computer
Education Course. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Artificial
Intelligence and Education (pp. 6-12). https://doi.org/10.1145/3397453.3397456
Kanika, Chakraverty, S., & Chakraborty, P. (2020). Tools and techniques for teaching
computer programming: A review. Journal of Educational Technology
Systems, 49(2), 170-198. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239520926971
Khan, I. A., Iftikhar, M., Hussain, S. S., Rehman, A., Gul, N., Jadoon, W., & Nazir, B.
(2020). Redesign and validation of a computer programming course using
Inductive Teaching Method. PloS one, 15(6).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233716
Kortsarts, Y., Akhuseyinoglu, K., Barria-Pineda, J., & Brusilovsky, P. (2020). Integrating
personalized online practice into an introductory programming course. Journal of
Computing Sciences in Colleges, 35(8), 264-266.
Lishinski, A., & Yadav, A. (2021). Self-evaluation Interventions: Impact on Self-efficacy
and Performance in Introductory Programming. ACM Transactions on Computing
Education (TOCE), 21(3), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1145/3447378
Long, J., & Harrington, B. (2019, May). A Statistical Analysis of Drop Rates in
Introductory Computer Science by Gender and Partial Grade. In Proceedings of
the Western Canadian Conference on Computing Education (pp. 1-2).
https://doi.org/10.1145/3314994.3325081
Lunn, S., Marques Samary, M., & Peterfreund, A. (2021, March). Where is Computer
Science Education Research Happening?. In Proceedings of the 52nd ACM
Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 288-294).
https://doi.org/10.1145/3408877.3432375
Malik, K. M., & Zhu, M. (2023). Do project-based learning, hands-on activities, and
flipped teaching enhance student’s learning of introductory theoretical
computing classes?. Education and Information Technologies, 28(3), 3581-3604.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11350-8
Marasco, E. A., Moshirpour, M., Moussavi, M., Behjat, L., & Amannejad, Y. (2018, June).
Evidence-based best practices for first-year blended learning implementation.
In 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--
30457
Mason, T., Gavrilovska, A., & Joyner, D. A. (2019, February). Collaboration versus
cheating: Reducing code plagiarism in an online MS computer science program.
In Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science
Education (pp. 1004-1010). https://doi.org/10.1145/3287324.3287443
McBroom, J., Koprinska, I., & Yacef, K. (2020, February). Understanding gender
differences to improve equity in computer programming education.
In Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Australasian Computing Education
Conference (pp. 185-194). https://doi.org/10.1145/3373165.3373186
McCane, B., Ott, C., Meek, N., & Robins, A. (2017, January). Mastery learning in
introductory programming. In Proceedings of the Nineteenth Australasian
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
492
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
493
implications for what comes next. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM conference on
international computing education research (pp. 142-150).
https://doi.org/10.1145/3230977.3230988
Wilcox, C., & Lionelle, A. (2018, February). Quantifying the benefits of prior
programming experience in an introductory computer science course.
In Proceedings of the 49th acm technical symposium on computer science education (pp.
80-85). https://doi.org/10.1145/3159450.3159480
Xu, D., Wolz, U., Kumar, D., & Greenburg, I. (2018, February). Updating introductory
computer science with creative computation. In Proceedings of the 49th ACM
Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 167-172).
https://doi.org/10.1145/3159450.3159539
Zendler, A., & Reile, S. (2018). The effect of reciprocal teaching and programmed
instruction on learning outcome in computer science education. Studies in
Educational Evaluation, 58(1), 132–144.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.05.008
Zeuch, K., Kaven, S., & Skwarek, V. (2019, September). Evaluation of a re-designed
introductory course “Programming in C” with video support. In 2019 18th
International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and
Training (ITHET) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
494
W. Steve Lang*
University of South Florida, St. Petersburg, Florida
1. Introduction
For national accreditation purposes in the United States, educator preparation
programs (EPPs) are required to demonstrate that their graduates are competent
in the Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (InTASC)
Standards developed by the Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO, 2013).
These standards establish the knowledge, skills, and dispositions found to be
important across the 50 states, and include a set of critical dispositions. The
*
Corresponding author: William Lang, lang@usf.edu
©Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0
International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
495
Educators that are not part of a specific culture tend to face obstacles in navigating
responses and treatment to students that are diversely different from the
experiences of the educator themself. For instance, if a White educator is
imagining themself in the position of one of their students of color, the educator
may rely on their experiences and simply attribute the blame for poor
performance or behavior on the student rather than taking into consideration the
unique experiences of the student. Evidence points to success when educators
affirm racial diversity viewpoints, take the time to educate themselves on the
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
496
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
497
support student’ mathematical thinking and learning as well as their home culture”
(p. 18).
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
498
Teacher-leaders that are unclear of how their personal dispositions, beliefs, and
attitudes affect student learning may see the use of a calculator as a crutch or
cheating mechanism (PCS Teaching, 2018). They may believe that students need
to know the computations without the use of a calculator. Most importantly for
students with dyscalculia, it is important to break down the computations into
smaller steps and provide individual feedback, helping the students and guiding
them exactly where they went wrong. For students in urban schools, this process
may take more time and effort from the teacher-leader. Teacher-leaders who
understand their students’ beliefs and values also understand that giving partial
credit is more beneficial than no credit for equations that were partially correct
but failed to reach the end number. This explains that success comes in steps and
with practice.
Students in urban schools often become frustrated with teachers that do not
understand or attempt to understand their cultural beliefs, values, and attitudes
towards math (National Center for Learning Disabilities, 2020). Students with
dyscalculia may get frustrated after trying for some time and give up, so it is
important for math teachers to model each step exactly as well as each step where
the student went wrong. All these practices benefit not only individuals with
dyscalculia but also those with other learning exceptionalities and mathematical
anxieties. Therefore, math teacher dispositions are crucial in instructing students
with exceptionalities.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
499
Index (Singh & Stoloff, 2008) and the Clinical Experience Rubric (Flowers, 2006).
These efforts suffered psychometrically.
The CAEP Standards validation of the use of multiple measures combined into a
single calibrated ruler for assessing teacher candidates has been demonstrated
(Wilkerson, 2012). Brindle (2012) also recommended the use of different
assessment devices to measure dispositions, such as giving students feedback,
using self-reflection, and prescriptive remediation. The Disposition Assessment
Aligned with Teacher Standards (DAATS) battery has always included multiple
measures (Lang et al., 2016; Lang, Moore et al., 2018; Lang, Wilkerson, Gilbert et
al., 2018; Lang, Wilkerson, Moore, & Fields, 2018; Wilkerson & Lang, 2006), noting
that in a parallel to knowledge and skills, one should not depend on a single
moment in time or score.
The current effort pilots a new edition of disposition assessments originally called
DAATS. The DAATS battery measures the consistency of teachers and teacher
candidates to the InTASC-based dispositions of teaching and was originally
proposed in a book by Wilkerson and Lang (2007). The original version of DAATS
was built on an earlier edition of the InTASC Standards but without the emphasis
on a taxonomy. The earlier DAATS battery had well-established construct and
predictive validity and excellent reliability (Wilkerson & Lang, 2006) but only one
form of each instrument. Later studies included rater accuracy when judges
(scorers) use the Rasch model (Rasch, 1960/1980) of item response theory (IRT)
(Lang et al., 2014) to estimate judge error.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
500
The two forms allow multiple measurements without repeating the same items.
All items were developed from the InTASC critical dispositions statements. Each
item was aligned with both Krathwohl levels and critical dispositions. For
example, Standard 2, Learning Differences, includes: “The teacher respects learners
as individuals with differing personal and family backgrounds and various skills, abilities,
perspectives, talents, and interests.” The BATS2 items ask a student to agree/disagree
with statements such as:
• I usually think about children’s home life and environment so that I
can tell if something is wrong. (Taxonomy level: valuing)
• I have a rule in my classroom: “We all speak proper English and
ignore gestures, slang, or foreign languages.” (Taxonomy level:
unaware)
Every item is coded for analysis by InTASC Standards (10), Core Area (4), and
Krathwohl Taxonomy (6). A modification of the taxonomy (Wilkerson & Lang,
2011) classifies student affect into six levels: unaware, receiving, responding,
valuing, organizing, and characterizing, since the original taxonomy was
designed for instruction and not assessment, omitting the possibility that
respondents might have no commitment. Examples of the levels are presented in
Table 1.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
501
The ETQ2 takes more time to score than BATS2 or the CDC2, but, as a constructed
response assessment it provides assessment of dispositions that is hard to fake,
and a view of what the teachers really believe. Individual questions can be used
to finetune the evaluation of a teacher on an individual InTASC standard
(Wilkerson & Lang, 2012). In this case, we used a short form of ETQ2B with four
reflective items with one item representing each of the four InTASC categories.
For example, an InTASC critical disposition is: “1(h) The teacher respects
learners’ differing strengths and needs and is committed to using this information
to further each learner’s development.” The associated ETQ2 reflective question
would be “Think about a lesson that did not work as you had hoped it would. Did
the students perform lower than you expected as a group or just several? Did you
deal with some students individually? If it happens again, would you do
something differently?” Typical scores for responses to this item are shown in
Table 2.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
502
Taxonomic
Paraphrased sample response from teacher-leaders
level
I did not set goals or expectations for the class at the beginning of the
Receiving
lesson, so that’s something that I should do differently for next time
4. Math Teacher-Leaders
The teacher-leader project described in this paper was developed as a strategic
partnership between an institution of higher education and a southern urban
school district. Thirty-two passionate educators in one large urban school district
applied and were to participate in a new district-wide initiative based on
readiness to fully dedicate their energy to the program. Administrators applied
and were expected to fully participate in every school. Three teachers were
selected from each school by the principal based on the given criteria. Our target
population was all elementary schools that do not receive regular mathematics
coaching. MTLI members are expected to act as on-site math support from the
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
503
classroom for schools that typically do not receive much coaching support.
Schools were selected based on their request to participate each year and on
administrator enthusiasm and school readiness. Teacher-leaders were selected by
principals based on these criteria: respected by peers, demonstration of high-
quality teaching practices, use of data to inform instruction, and interest in
participation.
The MTLI (PCS Teaching, 2018) was developed to support and replicate strategies
of current school-based reformers. These educational reformers act from a set of
values that guide their professional decision-making. As passionate individuals
who persist, they place high professional development expectations on
themselves, often finding ways, outside the school district, to get what they need.
The teacher-leaders in the MTLI provide mentoring to others, while staying
focused on students and their learning. The MTLI focuses on teachers who
demonstrate resilience, are able to take charge, solve problems, and find
opportunities which may positively add to the school in important ways that
support student achievement, increase teacher leadership, and strengthen the
school’s overall success.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
504
This analysis using Winsteps software was completed in a single calibration for
both people and items. This is described by Linacre (2003, p. 18) as:
Log { Pnij / Pni(j-1) } = Bn – Dig - Fgj
Where
Pnij is the probability that person n encountering item I is observed in category j,
Bn in the “ability” measure of peron n,
Di is the “difficulty” measure of item i,
Fj is the “calibration” measure of category J relative to category j-1.
In this study, the analysis followed the guidelines provided in Smith and Wind
(2018). The raw data were calibrated using the Rasch model rating scale and
incorporating Winsteps software. IRT differs from classical test theory, which is
sample dependent, while the Rasch model is not.
5.2 Sample
Two hundred and eighty-one (N = 281) math teacher-leaders were administered
the BATS2 Form B and the ETQ2 short form simultaneously. All the participants
were in-service teachers or administrators in a large urban school district in the
southeastern United States. The sample was selected through convenience
sampling, with the participants representing a wide span of experience, prior
education, and demographics. The participants agreed to participate, and the
research met all relevant human subject considerations.
6. Findings
6.1 Quantitative Results
All analyses were generated using Winsteps software (Linacre, 2023) (see Tables
3 and 4). In the initial calibration of a modest sample size (N = 281), the real item
separation = .98, which suggests that the scale discriminates between the persons
adequately. The real person separation = .69 (Cronbach alpha = .71), indicating a
reasonably defined variable. The outfit MNSQ = .99 (expected value = 1.0) and
outfit ZSTD = -.11 (expected value = 0.0), indicating that the data variability fit the
Rasch model.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
505
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
506
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
507
“I message and meet with families as needed. Every year, I have one or two
families that need a lot of interaction, which I always do. Struggled a little
with one student whose mother didn’t speak English this year.” (Rating
1, receiving)
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
508
7. Conclusions
7.1 Disposition Instruments
One purpose of this research effort was to pilot a new forms of the BATS2 self-
report scale (Thurstone items) and a short form of the ETQ2 (reflection). The
Rasch item analysis estimated separation reliability and fit statistics within
expected parameters, and no items in this sample appeared misfitting. This
supports the scale use for consistency with the InTASC Standards as measures.
In addition, the item estimates ranged in difficulty, while the person scores
appeared normally distributed. This reinforced use of the BATS2 with samples
of in-service teachers as DAATS was intended. As such, there is a strong
conclusion of support for the instrument’s psychometric qualities for similar
samples.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
509
the content specialty (math), the sample of teachers from an urban setting, or some
other variable. The results offered an immediate target for discussion in the MTLI
as the results were revealed to participants.
7.3 Implications
The assessment of teacher dispositions is still relatively new in teacher
preparation. It remains to be seen if university programs, accreditation, or
certification will emphasize such measures in the future, but any proposals will
clearly require valid and reliable instruments. That is one of the primary reasons
that creating and piloting such devices is a precursor to training changes or
research on effective teaching regarding dispositions. Even in this one pilot with
a homogeneous sample, there were findings that could alter the planned training
and served as eye-opener to participants.
8. References
Annamma, S., Ferri, B., & Connor, D. (2018). Disability critical race theory: Exploring the
intersectional lineage, emergence, and potential futures of DisCrit in education.
Review of Research in Education, 42(1), 46–71.
https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X18759041
Barone, C. (2006). Cultural capital, ambition and the explanation of inequalities in learning
outcomes: A comparative analysis. Sociology, 40(6), 1039–1058.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038506069843
Bond, T., & Fox, C. (2007). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human
sciences (2nd ed.). LEA.
Brindle, S. (2012). An exploratory study on the assessment of pre-service teacher dispositions by
teacher education programs in Iowa [Doctoral dissertation, Drake University, Iowa].
Carlson, D. (2017). Teachers and crisis: Urban school reform and teachers’ work culture.
Routledge.
Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation (CAEP). (2022). The CAEP
Standards. Washington, DC. https://caepnet.org/standards/2022-
itp/introduction
Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO). (2013). InTASC model core teaching
standards and learning progressions for teachers 1.0. https://ccsso.org/resource-
library/intasc-model-core-teaching-standards-and-learning-progressions-
teachers-10
Englehart, D. S, Batchelder, H. L., Jennings, K. L. Wilkerson, J. R., Lang, W. S., & Quinn,
D. (2012). Teacher dispositions: Moving from assessment to improvement. The
International Journal of Educational and Psychological Assessment, 9(2), 26–44.
http://tijepa.books.officelive.com/Documents/V9.2_TIJEPA.pdf
Flowers, C. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis of scores on the Clinical Experience
Rubric: A measure of dispositions of preservice teachers. Educational and
Psychological Measurement, v66, n3, p 478-488.
Krathwohl, D. R., Bloom, B. S., & Masia, B. B. (1973). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The
classification of educational goals. Affective domain (handbook II, vol. 1). David
McKay Co., Inc.
Lang, W. S., Moore, L., Wilkerson, J. R., Parfitt, C. M., Greene, J., Kratt, D., Martelli, C. D.,
LaPaglia, K., Johnston, V., Gilbert, S., & Zhang, J. (2018). Beliefs About Teaching
(BATS2): Construction and validation of an instrument based on InTASC critical
dispositions. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research,
17(8), 56-77. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.17.8.4
Lang, W. S., Wilkerson, J. W., Rea, D. C., Quinn, D., Batchelder, H. L., Englehart, D. S., &
Jennings, K. J. (2014). Measuring teacher dispositions using the DAATS battery:
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
510
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
511
Wadlington, E., & Wadlington, P. (2011) Teacher dispositions: Implications for teacher
education. Childhood Education, 87(5), 323–326.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00094056.2011.10523206
Warren, C. (2017). Empathy, teacher dispositions, and preparation for culturally
responsive pedagogy. Journal of Teacher Education, 69(2), 169–183.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487117712487
Wilkerson, J. R. (2012). Measurement and evaluation perspectives on scaling teacher affect
with multiple measures. The International Journal of Educational and Psychological
Assessment 9(2), 165–191.
http://tijepa.books.officelive.com/Documents/V9.2_TIJEPA.pdf
Wilkerson, J. R., & Lang, W. S. (2006). Measuring teaching ability with the Rasch model
by scaling a series of product and performance tasks. Journal of Applied
Measurement, 7(3), 239–259.
Wilkerson, J. R., & Lang, W. S. (2007). Assessing teacher dispositions: Five standards-based steps
to valid measurement using the DAATS model. Corwin Press.
Wilkerson, J. R., & Lang, W. S. (2011). Standards-based teacher dispositions as a necessary
and measurable construct. The International Journal of Educational and Psychological
Assessment, 7, 34–54.
Williams, D. L., Edwards, B., Kuhel, K. A., & Lim, W. (2016). Culturally responsive
dispositions in prospective mathematics teachers. Discourse and Communication for
Sustainable Education, 7(2), 17–33. https://doi.org/10.1515/dcse-2016-0013
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
512
Abstract. The current research aims to identify the barriers faced by the
candidates during the implementation of the e- portfolio in an
educational environment. How to implement the e-portfolio at the
College of Education, Sultan Qaboos University in light of the theory of
diffusion of innovation. The research sample consisted of 122 out of 233
field-training candidates from undergraduate students in all disciplines
at the College of Education, Sultan Qaboos University. The research
applied the descriptive approach, and the research tool is a questionnaire
consisted of 39 items entitled "Barriers of Application of the e-portfolio".
Statistical treatments were performed as the mean, standard deviation, T-
test, and ANOVA by using SPSS. The results indicated that there are
barriers during the implementation of the e-portfolio related to
candidates and other related to educational environment. The results also
indicated that there are statistically significant differences at the level of
significance (0.05) attributable to each of the two variables of
specialization, and technological skills in identifying barriers related to
candidates and the educational environment. According to the results, the
research recommends integrating the e-portfolio into all courses, using
special platform for applying the e-portfolio uniformly.
1. Introduction
The College of Education at Sultan Qaboos University (SQU) obtained
institutional academic accreditation in 2016, and is now preparing to renew
accreditation in its second cycle 2023 from the Council for the Accreditation of
Educator Preparation (CAEP). It is a foundation where applicants are subject to
an evaluation aimed at verifying that they met five criteria. The E-portfolio is
considered evidence of the first standard, Content and Pedagogical Knowledge of
CAEP standards. In light of this, the College of Education sought to integrate the
©Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0
International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
513
It is worth mentioning that the student teaching course is the last station in the
student’s journey at the College of Education. Candidates of genders male and
female apply all the experiences gained during their studies and includes them in
the e-portfolio. In addition, the candidates also collect some evidences that
confirm his readiness to be a teacher during the previous academic years.
However, when the candidates applied the e-portfolio, we noticed that the
candidates faced many barriers. These barriers prevent them from applying the e-
portfolio, which leads to poor assessment, lack of integration of knowledge,
inability to identify previous learning and link it to new learning, inability to
identify strengths and weaknesses in their learning, and loss of many professional
documents. The barriers that could be classified as barriers related to candidates
and barriers related to the instructional environment.
The research focused on the e-portfolio, where it aimed to monitor and analyse
the barriers faced by candidates when applying the e-portfolio effectively, and to
examine the possibility of applying the e-portfolio. It is known that when
implementing any new idea, 50% of users (laggards & late majority) have a
negative impact on adoptions for various reasons (Kaminski, 2011). We
encountered this in the College of Education when trying to incorporate e-
portfolio as a new practice. Therefore, the current research suggested using the
stages diffusion of innovation theory to support the adoption of integrating e-
portfolio into the teacher preparation program at the College of Education, SQU.
The first section of this research deals with the literature review to what is the e-
portfolio, its advantages, its components, the barriers that prevent its smooth
implementation. The second section of this paper describes the methodology used
and an analysis of the difficulties from the candidates’ point of view. The final
section of the research deals with the findings, conclusions, and recommendations
on how to face the barriers of applying the e-portfolio in the College of Education.
Specifically, this paper addressed the following research questions:
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
514
- What are the barriers that candidates of the College of Education face when
applying the e-portfolio?
- Are there statistically significant differences facing candidates while
applying the e-portfolio and are attributable to the following variables:
(gender, disciplines, level of technological skills)?
2. Literature review
Many previous studies addressed the issues of the e-portfolio extensively during
the previous years (Tosun & Baris (2011); Jenson & Treuer (2014); Beckers et al.
(2016); Alajmi (2019); Mahasneh (2020)). Generally, the published research focuses
on investigating the following questions:
- What is the e-portfolio?
- What is the importance of the e-portfolio?
- How to implement the e-portfolio?
- What are the barriers to its implementation?
- Is the e-portfolio a learning tool, or education tool?
- Is it an assessment tool or one for evaluation?
In this part of the research, we will shed light on the e-portfolio by summarizing
a set of selected literature that the researcher monitored in three dimensions,
namely:
- What is e-portfolio and what is the importance of e-portfolio in teacher
education programs?
- Barriers to e-portfolio implementation.
- Diffusion of the e-portfolio application culture.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
515
necessary to build it. They require candidates to organize their learning process
and define their educational goals in different stages of its construction. It helps
candidates have a deeper understanding of the topics they have studied and to
reveal their talents and creativity. It also reflects the candidates' learning style, the
way they approach various educational topics and ideas, and their ability to
organize, arrange and create (Chang et al., 2013).
The importance of the e-portfolio lies in identifying the acquired and interrelated
experiences that the candidates have accumulated. It can be used as a tool for
assessment and evaluation, documenting learning, determining the level of
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
516
In light of the above, the goal of the e-portfolio is to use it as a learning tool as it
relies on candidates to build their learning and experience. In addition, it is an
evaluation tool as one of the alternative evaluation methods for candidates’
activities, and a tool in which candidates document their works and experiences.
It allows them to access their works anytime and anywhere (Yastibas & Yastibas,
2015); (Buyarski & Landis, 2014).
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
517
In spite of the many barriers mentioned, studies confirm that there are vigorous
efforts to use and integrate it into learning, presentation, evaluation, and
employment (Alajmi, 2019); (Nasseif, 2021); (Händel et al., 2020). Some of these
barriers are due to the inability to adopt a new idea or technology. Many studies
Blevins (2013); (Nasseif, 2021) have sought to rely on the diffusion of innovations
theory, which seeks to understand the social process that community members
engage in to adopt or reject an innovation, which contains a number of stages
explaining how to integrate the e-portfolio into the College of Education, SQU.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
518
The next section shows this theory and explains how to apply it in producing the
e-portfolio.
The Knowledge Stage: In this step, the individual knows about innovation and
seeks information by trying to answer the following questions: "What is the
innovation?" "How does it work?" and "Why does it work?'' These are the main
concerns of an individual once he is aware that innovation exists, Rogers
identified three types of knowledge on innovation.
1. Awareness-knowledge is the information that an innovation exists.
2. How-to-knowledge consists of the information necessary to use an
innovation properly?
3. Principles-knowledge consists of information dealing with the functioning
principles underlying how the innovation works (Rogers, 2010).
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
519
The persuasion stage: This follows the knowledge stage in the innovation-
decision process. The knowledge stage is centered on cognition (or knowing),
while the persuasion stage is more focused on the affective (or feeling). The degree
of uncertainty about the innovation performance and social reinforcement from
others (colleagues and peers) affects the individual's views and beliefs about the
innovation. The self-assessments done by close colleagues on the innovation
usually reduces the uncertainty about the innovation outcomes and are more
credible for an individual.
The decision stage: Individuals choose to adopt or reject the innovation. Rogers
(2010) defined the adoption process as the mental process through which an
individual pass from first hearing about an innovation to final adoption. An
individual may choose to adopt “full use of an innovation as the best course of
action available,” (Rogers, 2010, p. 21) or rejection that means, “Not to adopt an
innovation” (Rogers, 2010, p. 21). Sahin (2006) referred that if there were previous
attempts to innovate, then it would be quickly adopted and vice versa. Rogers
(2010) indicated two types of rejection: active rejection, which means that the
individual thinks about adopting the innovation, but decides not to adopt it; and
passive rejection means not adopting the innovation at all.
The implementation stage: When an innovation is put into practice, there is still
uncertainty about the innovation outcomes (Lin, 2008). According to Rogers
(2010), the implementer needs help to reduce uncertainty about innovation
outcomes, and the innovation decision process may end negatively. Re-
innovation is an important part of the implementation stage and it means “the
degree to which an innovation is changed or modified by a user in the process of
its adoption and implementation” (p. 35).
The confirmation stage: A decision is made to innovate. The individual may seek
support for his decision and move away from destructive views of adopting
innovation. Rogers (2010) indicated that an individual might reflect upon his
decision about adopting innovation in two cases: the first refusing innovation to
adopt another better innovation, and the second, refusing innovation due to an
unsatisfactory performance, as it does not meet needs.
Many studies have addressed the barriers that face the application of the e-
portfolio. Although some of the barriers were shared among several studies, but
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
520
there are other barriers differed according to the educational institution in which
the e-portfolio is applied. This situation applies to the College of Education, SQU,
where the candidates are facing other barriers in implementing the e-portfolio due
to the way of the application as well as the mechanism of preparing candidates
and academics for the application of the e-portfolio.
This situation stimulated the researcher to identify the barriers facing the
candidates in the College of Education at SQU. The research suggests ways to
overcome by following the diffusion of innovation theory stages, which concerns
with spreading modern innovations, as a basis for applying the e-portfolio in the
College of Education.
3. Methodology
3.1 Research Design
The research utilized a descriptive analytical method. This approach was selected
as it is the most appropriate to answer the questions of this research. It depends
on designing a questionnaire aimed at identifying the barriers facing the
candidates during the application of the e-portfolio. The barriers have been
classified into two dimensions, barriers related with the candidates and those
related to the instructional environment. The diffusion of innovation theory has
been followed in the research methodology. The diffusion of innovation theory
consists of five stages: (1) The Knowledge Stage, (2) The persuasion stage, (3) The
decision stage, (4) The implementation stage, and (5) The confirmation stage. The
researcher adopted the use of the theory of innovation diffusion when there is a
need to spread a new idea, practice or technology such as the e-portfolio. The “A
proposal for Implementation of the e-portfolio” section explains in detail the
application of the diffusion of innovation theory at the College of Education, SQU.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
521
Technologies
and Learning
Instructional
Education
Education
Education
Education
Education
Language
Language
Physical
English
Science
Islamic
Arabic
Math
(ILT)
(ME)
(AL)
(AE)
(EL)
(SE)
(PE)
(IE)
Art
22 21 17 11 11 14 10 16
3.3 Instrument
In light of the literature reviewed, in particular e.g. (Butler, 2006); (Paulson &
Campbell, 2018); (Alonso et al., 2019); (Payne et al., 2020); a research instrument
was self-developed by the author of this study as questionnaire entitled “Barriers
of Application of the e-portfolio”. The instrument was designed using Google
Forms and it was based on a five-point Likert scale measurement (coded as
‘strongly disagree=1’, disagree=2’, to some extent=3’, agree=4’, strongly
Agree=5’). The instrument consisted of two sections. The first section consisted of
two dimensions, dimension of “the barriers related to candidate” has 31 items
(self-developed), and dimension of “the barriers related to the instructional
environment” has 8 items (self-developed). The total items in the instrument is 39
items (see appendix 1 for instrument’s items). In addition to participants’
demographic variables, the first variable is gender (1=‘male’ and 2=‘female’). The
second variable was related to the discipline (1=‘Islamic education’, 2=‘Arabic
Language’, 3=‘English Language’, 4=‘Science education’, 5=‘Math Education’,
6=‘Physical Education’, 7=‘Art Education’, 8=‘Teaching and learning
Technology’). Moreover, the third variable is technological skills level (1= ‘Weak’,
2= ‘Medium’, and 3= ‘Good’) These variables were included in the instrument to
identify the barriers that candidates face while applying the e-portfolio. The
second section consisted of two open-ended questions, and was devoted to provide
more freedom to the candidates in expressing their perspectives and thoughts regarding
the implementation of the e-portfolio. The first question was about the barriers related
to candidates and the second one was about the barriers related to the
instructional environment (see appendix 1).
The content and criterion validity was judged by five experts specialized in
teaching methods and educational technology with several years of teaching
experience. All experts were asked to check the correctness of the dimensions and
the items, the relations between the items and dimensions, and the
appropriateness of the questionnaire items to the Omani context. The experts'
notes included reformulating some words and phrases, deleting repeated phrases,
deleting phrases related to the supervisor, and transferring some phrases from the
dimensions of barriers related to the instructional environment to the dimensions
of barriers related to the candidate. Then the instrument was modified
accordingly. The agreement between the experts was measured and it was 90%.
The instrument was tested in a pilot study and the reliability was calculated using
the coefficient of Cronbach alpha (α). The value of α= 0.82 was acceptable,
meaning the instrument is reliable.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
522
4. Analysis
The researcher distributed the instrument to all candidates in the College of
Education in the 2020. The data were collected using electronic means and
analysed using SPSS to provide answers for research questions. The following
briefly shows the statistical methods used in the research methodology:
1. To determine whether there are barriers facing the candidates when
applying the e-portfolio, the mean, standard deviation of the barriers, the
mean scores of the questionnaire as a whole and each dimension of the
questionnaire were calculated. Then, the means were compared to the mean
values for each scale by increasing 0.5 to the starting value for each rank to
rank (1.5, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5).
2. To determine whether there are barriers facing students when applying the
e-portfolio that are attributable to the gender variable, the T-test was applied
for two independent groups of different numbers.
3. To determine whether there are barriers facing students when applying the
e-portfolio that are attributable to the variables of Discipline and the level of
technological skills, the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test was
applied.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
523
5. Results
The initiative of current research dealt with the barriers that candidates faced in
the College of Education at SQU during the implementation of the e-portfolio.
These barriers prevent candidates from applying the e-portfolio, which leads to
poor assessment, lack of integration of knowledge, inability to identify previous
learning and link it to new learning, and loss of many professional documents.
The barriers identified in the research could be classified as barriers related to
candidates, and others related to the instructional environment.
The first question: What are the barriers that candidates of the College of
Education face when applying the e-portfolio?
The questionnaire was applied to the research sample and the mean scores of the
students' responses were calculated for the questionnaire as a whole as well as for
the first and second dimensions of the questionnaire. The value corresponding to
the value of each mean score was determined consequently. Table (3) shows the
mean scores of the students' responses and the corresponding values
Table 3. Shows the descriptive statistics for the barriers that candidates face during
the applying of the e-portfolio that related candidates.
(2.A) Barriers related to candidate
Barrier’s N. Mean Std. Deviation Barrier’s N. Mean Std. Deviation
1 2.8689 1.19192 18 2.7951 1.30440
2 3.1230 1.17535 19 3.2623 1.22510
3 3.0902 1.33611 20 3.5738 1.27867
4 3.3033 1.08246 21 3.6148 1.25604
5 2.6721 1.30126 22 3.8770 1.16830
6 2.6885 1.17186 23 4.2705 1.01262
7 3.4590 1.09957 24 3.7213 1.24158
8 3.2623 1.36547 25 3.2951 1.19702
9 3.4180 1.32266 26 3.8525 1.11097
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
524
The results confirm that there are a number of barriers candidates face when
implementing an e-portfolio. This might be derived from the results of 16 barriers
of the first dimension that have obtained means equal or greater than 3.0. These
barriers are 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 19, 25 and 27 from the first dimension
and barrier 35 from the second dimension. The barriers 1, 5, 6, 16, 17, 18, that
obtained means above 2.5 which refers to an “average” score, also supported the
fact that there are barriers facing candidates when implementing the e-portfolio.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
525
Table 4. Descriptive statistics and (T) values for the sample according to the gender
variable
Mean Std. Deviation
Dimension T Sig.
Male Female Male Female
Barriers related to candidate 110.357 111.383 26.387 23.54 0.197 0.844
Barriers related to the
28.535 30.351 7.12 5.758 1.384 0.169
instructional environment
Total 138.892 141.734 32.896 28.118 0.451 0.653
The results shown in Table 4 indicate that the means of the responses on the first
dimension were 110.357 and 111.383 for males and females respectively. As for
the second dimension, the means of the responses were 28.535 and 30.351 males
and females respectively. It also shows the (T) value of the difference between the
average responses of males and females were 0.197 on the first dimension, 1.384
on the second dimension, and 0.451 to the questionnaire as a whole.
This result confirms that the difference between the mean of the males’ responses
and the mean of the females’ responses on the first and second barriers
dimensions, and the total of the responses on all the questionnaire barriers are not
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
526
statistically significant. The value of (T) in both the first and second dimensions,
and the total of the questionnaire barriers, are not statistically significant at the
level of (0.05), and this means that there are no differences attributable to the
gender variable when determining the barriers of applying the e-portfolio of the
candidate or the instructional environment.
Table 6. Scheffe test for post comparisons according to the disciplines variable of first
dimension
(I) (J) Mean Difference 95% Confidence Interval
Std. Error Sig.
Discipline Discipline (I-J) Lower Bound Upper Bound
IE -29.98864-* 7.03365 .016 -56.8976- -3.0797-
AL -28.88690-* 7.10382 .027 -56.0643- -1.7095-
EL -37.94853-* 7.45646 .001 -66.4751- -9.4220-
ILT SE -30.57955- 8.38467 .076 -62.6572- 1.4981
ME -8.03409- 8.38467 .996 -40.1117- 24.0435
PE -31.33929-* 7.83424 .032 -61.3111- -1.3675-
AE -30.82500- 8.62953 .089 -63.8394- 2.1894
*. The mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level.
The results shown in Table 6 indicate that there are statistically significant
differences in the barriers facing candidates when producing the e-portfolio
according to the variable of disciplines. The directions of differences were
between groups ILT and IE in favour of IE, between ILT and AL in favour of AL,
between ILT and EL in favour of EL, and between ILT and PE in favour of EL. PE.
It be concluded that the barriers identified by IE, AL, EL and PE disciplines were
of greater statistical value and significance than the barriers identified by ILT. As
for the other disciplines, there are no statistically significant differences.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
527
As in Table 7, indicate that the value of (F) for the second dimension of the
questionnaire is 5.350, which is statistically significant (0.00). To reveal the reasons
for the significance (F) among disciplines, the Scheffe test was used for the post
comparisons, and the results of the test are shown in Table 8.
Table 8. Scheffe test for post comparisons according to the disciplines variable of
second dimension
95% Confidence Interval
(I) (J)
Mean Difference (I-J) Std. Error Sig. Lower Upper
Discipline Discipline
Bound Bound
IE -7.23295-* 1.79566 .030 -14.1027- -.3632-
AL -4.68750- 1.81357 .468 -11.6258- 2.2508
EL -10.04044-* 1.90360 .001 -17.3231- -2.7577-
ILT SE -8.14205- 2.14057 .053 -16.3313- .0472
ME -2.50568- 2.14057 .986 -10.6950- 5.6836
PE -6.75893- 2.00005 .134 -14.4106- .8927
AE -4.58750- 2.20308 .739 -13.0159- 3.8409
*. The mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level.
The results shown in Table 8 indicate that there are statistically significant
differences in the barriers facing candidates when producing the e-portfolio
according to the variable of disciplines. The directions of differences were
between ILT and IE in favour of IE, and between ILT and EL in favour of EL. It be
concluded that the barriers identified by the IE and EL disciplines were of greater
value and statistical significance than those identified by the ILT. As for the other
disciplines, there are no statistically significant differences.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
528
Table 9. Results of ANOVA test for the technological skills level variable for the first
dimension of the questionnaire.
Technological skills level N Mean Std. Deviation F Sig
Weak 62 122.8387 20.92390
Medium 20 109.0000 17.54393
23.947 0.00
High 40 94.1000 21.25161
Total 122 111.1475 24.11394
As in Table 9, indicate that the value of (F) for the first dimension of the
questionnaire according to the technological skills variable is 23.947, which is
statistically significant (0.00). To reveal the reasons for the significance (F), the
Scheffe test was used for the post comparisons, and the results of the test are
shown in Table 10.
Table 10. Scheffe test for post comparisons according to the technological skills
variable of first dimension
(I) (J) 95% Confidence Interval
Mean Std.
Technologica Technological Sig. Lower Upper
Difference (I-J) Error
l skills level skills level Bound Bound
Medium 13.83871* 5.28002 .035 .7501 26.9273
Weak
High 28.73871* 4.16403 .000 18.4166 39.0609
Medium High 14.90000* 5.62303 .033 .9612 28.8388
*. The mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level.
Table 11. Results of ANOVA test for the technological skills level variable for the
second dimension of the questionnaire.
Technological skills level N Mean Std. Deviation F Sig
Weak 62 32.4839 5.45546
Medium 20 28.9000 4.51780
14.70 0.00
High 40 26.5000 6.04258
Total 122 29.9344 6.11425
Table 11 indicates that the value of (F) for the second dimension of the
questionnaire according to the technological skills variable is 14.70, which is
statistically significant (0.00). To reveal the reasons for the significance (F), the
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
529
Scheffe test was used for the post comparisons, and the results of the test are
shown in Table 12.
Table 12. Scheffe test for post comparisons according to the technological skills
variable of second dimension
95% Confidence Interval
(I) Tech (J) Tech Mean Difference (I-J) Std. Error Sig. Lower Upper
Bound Bound
Medium 3.58387* 1.41975 .045 .0645 7.1033
Weak
High 5.98387* 1.11967 .000 3.2083 8.7594
*. The mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level.
Finally, it was confirmed that candidates decided to apply the e-portfolio in light
of the positive experiences presented to them, and that it is a mandatory
requirement. Therefore, they avoided destructive opinions that indicate the
existence of barriers that hinder their implementation of the e-portfolio. However,
some candidates refused to apply the e-portfolio according to the ideas presented
to them in previous experiences and adopted a new method for applying it based
on the dimensions of the conceptual framework.
6. Discussions
This research explored the perceived barriers that face candidates of the College
of Education during the implementation of the e-portfolio. In addition, it explored
if these barriers are related to variables gender, disciplines, level of technological
skills. The researcher discussed the results according to the study questions, as
follows.
The first question: “What are the barriers that candidates of the College of
Education face when applying the e-portfolio?”
The results in Table (3) showed that the research sample agreed on all the barriers
included in the questionnaire are 41 barriers (as shown in Appendix 1). The
number of barriers that got a mean of more than 3.00 were 35 barriers, while the
number of barriers that got a mean of more than 2.5 were 6 barriers, which
confirms that the candidates agreed upon all the barriers included in the
questionnaire on the e-portfolio. The candidates indicated that the e-portfolio is a
good idea and it has many positives, but they agreed that there were some barriers
to the implementation process; this was confirmed by Aldhafeeri (2017).
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
530
From the candidates' responses to the questionnaire, there are barriers related to:
At the knowledge stage, in their responses, the candidates emphasized in
statements 1, 9-14 in the questionnaire the limited knowledge provided to them
about the e- portfolio and how to build it in light of the conceptual framework of
the College of Education, INTASC standards, specialization standards, and the
outputs of the teacher preparation program. They also emphasized in the open
part lack of knowledge of how to write reflective specialized and general papers
and how to select evidences related to the college's conceptual framework, and
the inadequate score assigned to e-portfolio evaluation. This result could be
explained by the need for introducing the e-portfolio concept, its content, and how
to build and link it the standards to the candidates through including these
subjects in some courses that related the e-portfolio before producing it. This is
consistent with the e-portfolio application success criteria indicated by Steele
(2009) such as familiarizing candidates with the concept and rationale for creating
an e-portfolio as well as briefing them with the types of evidence selected and how
to evaluate this evidence. Aldhafeeri (2017) confirmed that the e-portfolio was
imposed on the students without introducing them to it or providing any training
on its use.
In light of the above, it is important to overcome the numerous barriers that the
candidates face related to the knowledge stage due to its important role in
educating the candidates with the knowledge necessary to apply the e-portfolio.
This was confirmed by Fong et al. (2014) in that prior knowledge of the e-portfolio
plays an effective role in shaping perceptions of usability and effectiveness. This
research suggests defining a special course for the e-portfolio in which knowledge
is presented. Another option would be to specify a number of courses in the
student’s plan to provide knowledge, and to implement the application of the e-
portfolio gradually so its application is not delayed until the final semester and
work accumulates on the candidates.
As for the barriers related to the persuasion stage, the candidates confirmed in
the open part of the questionnaire that they were affected by the opinions of the
graduates. This extent of influence is revealed through the candidates’ desire to
reduce the work included in the e-portfolio even before starting any
implementation steps, and this may be due to the effort made by graduates during
the implementation of the e-portfolio. Additionally, statement #17 indicated that
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
531
they lack cooperation and exchange of knowledge and skills related to building
an e-portfolio. In this regard, Syzdykova et al. (2021) emphasized that candidates
should improve their collaborative skills as their cooperation with graduates may
contribute to giving them positive attitudes towards the e-portfolio. The
difference in the e-portfolio components among candidates of same discipline,
and other disciplines, is one of the barriers identified by the candidates, which is
expected to prevent them from being persuaded to implement the e-portfolio.
This could be justified by inconsistency of the evidence produced in the academic
curricula because of the differences of the faculty members who teach them, as
stated in statement 38. Aldhafeeri (2017) indicated that some instructor interested
to apply the e-portfolio while others not interested, and this difference between
instructors is one of the reasons for the resistance of students the e-portfolio.
At the decision stage, candidates are expected to make the decision to start
implementing the e-portfolio and are positively influenced by the models
presented to them by graduates about the e-portfolio. This is matched to Abrami
& Barrett (2005) conclusion who confirmed the possibility of accepting candidates
to implement e-portfolio by providing examples of previous e-portfolio and
demonstrating their effectiveness in achieving learning. However, candidates also
revealed there are not enough e-portfolio forms to guide them because the
graduates usually cancel sharing their e-portfolio with their supervisor after
completing their studies. Based on that, the need for a special platform to produce
the e-portfolio and preserve the graduates’ work could be confirmed. The
candidates agreed in statement 37 of the questionnaire that “the college does not
have an electronic platform in which the e-portfolio is produced” is one of the
barriers to producing the e-portfolio. Several studies have concluded the
importance of using a special platform for e-portfolio implementation such as
Chang et al. (2013); Galvin Fernandez et al. (2017); Taylor (2021). In addition, the
decision to apply for an e-portfolio is a mandatory requirement for all candidates
to achieve the requirements for academic accreditation. This explains why some
candidates are not convinced of the e-portfolio as stated in the open part of the
questionnaire. Fong (2014), Aldhafeeri (2017) have confirmed the candidates’
resistance to applying the e-portfolio increases if they are forced to implement it.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
532
supervisors along with their weak feedback provided on the candidates’ work are
the reasons behind the candidates’ feeling of uncertainty about their ability to
implement the e-portfolio as statement 16, 26, 32, 36, 40 of the
questionnaire. Other reasons confirmed by statements 24 and 28 of the
questionnaire are the preoccupation of some candidates with studying other
courses accompanying the student teaching and also the low grade allocated to
the e-portfolio compared to the amount of work required to complete it. The
opinions of the students in the Aldhafeeri (2017) are similar to the opinions of the
candidates in the current research, as they confirmed the lack of interest and
guidance of some supervisors in the e-portfolio. Moreover, some supervisors
demand hard and soft copy of the e-portfolio, which increases the burden on
candidates. It could be concluded that the barriers facing candidates in the
implementation phase are due to the delay in providing knowledge, the delay in
applying the e-portfolio until the final semester, and the lack of support and
encouragement for candidates by some academic supervisors. The researcher
believes that having a special course for the e-portfolio will solve many of the
barriers that the candidates faced during their application.
During confirmation stage, candidates are expected to put a lot of efforts into
implementing the e-portfolio and to stay away from the destructive opinions that
hinder their implementation of the e-portfolio. The candidates indicated in
statements 16 and 18 of the questionnaire that the weak feedback of some
supervisors and the candidates’ unacceptance of their feedback may remain
among the barriers that hinder the e-portfolio. This is consistent with what Steele
(2009) emphasized on the need for supervisors to encourage and support their
students while implementing the e-portfolio as a new experiment.
Some candidates indicated in their responses to the open part of the questionnaire
that the e-portfolio is not needed (no need to innovate) because it conflicts with
their needs and interests. Statement 28 of the questionnaire indicated that some
candidates were preoccupied with studying other courses accompanying the
student teaching course, which reduces the effort expended in implementing the
e-portfolio. This agrees with Aldhafeeri (2017), who confirmed that the
preoccupation of students with studying other courses is the reason behind
refusing the e-portfolio. Therefore, candidates should be urged to avoid studying
other courses simultaneously with the student teaching course that the e-portfolio
is applied in.
Individuals usually tend not to expose themselves to thoughts that conflict with
their interests, needs, or attitudes. According to his research findings, the
Individuals rarely expose themselves to innovation-related ideas unless they
initially feel the need to innovate. Moreover, if individuals were exposed to
innovative ideas, the exposure would have little effect unless they perceive that
innovation is closely related to their needs and corresponds to their current
attitudes and beliefs (Rogers, 2010; Ozen, & Koc, 2021). The statements 1, 19, and
35 confirmed that the research findings agreed with Rogers' theory that the
ambiguity of the purpose for applying the e-portfolio and its insignificance led
the candidates to not feel the need for it.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
533
The researcher believes that having a course on the e-portfolio will solve many of
the barriers that the candidates will face during the implementation of the e-
portfolio as the course includes teaching practical skills required to build the e-
portfolio. The supervisor is fully responsible for the course and independent of
the partner departments and colleges in regard to the correcting reflective papers.
The process begins with introducing different types of knowledge about the e-
portfolio (innovation) to answer the first question what is innovation? Students
learn about the nature, importance and types of the e-portfolio, and emphasizing
the need to include the most important works they produced in it. Then
introduces the candidates to another level of knowledge related to the second
question: How does innovation work? Where it trains candidates on the sites
necessary to produce the e-portfolio, and introduce them with the standards on
which it is built, which are the dimensions of the conceptual framework of the
College of Education, the InTasc standards, and the outputs of the teacher
preparation program. Finally, another level of knowledge is introduced related to
the answer to the third question, why we make an innovation? At this level,
candidates are introduced to the importance of the e-portfolio, and how they can
collect and reflect on their best work. Which proves that they have acquired many
experiences.
Candidates’ application of the e-portfolio is influenced by the opinions of their
colleagues who have previously applied it in terms of: (1) Its feasibility, (2) Its
usefulness, (3) Ease and difficulty of its application, (4) Adequacy of the
knowledge provided to them and necessary for their application, (5) The time
available to them to apply it, and (6) The amount of effort expended in its
production, and its suitability to the grade assigned to it.
In the previous light, it is necessary to work on providing positive opinions from
colleagues who have implemented the comprehensive e-portfolio, as the decision
of candidates to adopt the e-portfolio application is influenced by the self-
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
534
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
535
Disciplines variable: The results of multiple comparisons for the first dimension
of the questionnaire shown in Table 6 indicated that there were statistically
significant differences between the mean response scores for ILT discipline and
the responses of candidates from other disciplines except for SE and ME and AE.
In addition, that multiple comparisons for the first dimension of the questionnaire
shown in Table 7 indicated that barriers identified by the disciplines of IE and EL
were of greater value and statistical significance than the barriers identified by the
ILT. As for the other disciplines, there are no statistically significant differences.
This result could be explained by that the ILT and EL disciplines have previously
implemented the e-portfolio before other disciplines, which means that they have
been exposed to the barriers that candidates face while implementing the e-
portfolio before other disciplines. On the other hand, disciplines ILT, SE, ME and
AE have technological skills due to the nature of the major that deals with many
technological applications. Candidates in the ELT and ME disciplines have the
technological skills needed to apply the e-portfolio as they previously designed
educational websites on WIX. In addition, the mathematics discipline uses
technology to teach subjects. Cahyono & Ludwing (2018) emphasized the use of
digital technology to support mathematics teaching and learning.
Technological skills level variable: The results of multiple comparisons for the
first dimension of the questionnaire shown in Table 10 indicated that the barriers
related by candidates with low technology skills were of greater statistical value
and significance than the other barriers. In addition, the barriers related by
candidates with medium technology skills were of greater statistical value and
significance than the barriers related by candidates with high technology skills.
Moreover, the multiple comparisons for the second dimension of the
questionnaire shown in Table 12 indicated that barriers related by candidates with
low technology skills were of greater statistical value and significance than the
barriers related by candidates with medium and high technology skills. This
result can be explained by the necessity of training candidates on technological
skills in general, and the skills necessary to implement the e-portfolio in
particular. In this regard, Barrett (2007) emphasized that the use of an e-portfolio
requires a high level of technological skills and a support system.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
536
7. Conclusion
Many barriers that could hinder the application of e-portfolios in the institutions
of higher education have been identified in the literature. Obviously, the existence
of barriers affects the candidates’ construction of the e-portfolio, causes a lack of
integration of knowledge among them, and perhaps lead to loss of many
professional documents. This research aimed to identify and analyse such barriers
in College of Education, SQU, and to implement the e-portfolio in light of the
diffusion of innovation theory. To achieve the research goals, the research
explained the concept, importance, and characteristics of the e-portfolio. The
research designed an electronically distributed questionnaire to identify barriers
during the implementation of the e-portfolio related to the candidates and the
instructional environment. After applying the questionnaire, it was confirmed
that there are two classes of barriers during the implementation of the e-portfolio,
barriers related to the candidates such as the specialization and technological
skills and barriers related to the instructional environment, such poor supervision
and the consequent delay in providing knowledge, skills and feedback related
with the e-portfolio.
The contribution of this research is identification of barriers faced by the
candidates of candidates of College of Education, SQU during the implementation
of their e-portfolio. In addition, the research proposes an approach to implement
the e-portfolio and confront the barriers based on the diffusion of innovation
theory.
The research recommends integrating the e-portfolio into all courses. However,
this requires spreading continuously the knowledge and skills necessary among
the candidates to create their e-portfolio. Moreover, following up the creation of
e-portfolio, assessing its content, and providing proper feedback to the candidates
are very crucial. The research also recommends integrating the e-portfolio into
other courses during other semesters rather than making it limited to courses in
the final semester. Finally, based on some comments from the candidates, the
research recommends the importance of having an e-portfolio and a special
platform for its production uniformly.
8. References
Abrami, P., & Barrett, H. (2005). Directions for research and development on electronic
portfolios. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology/La revue canadienne de
l’apprentissage et de la technologie, 31(3).
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21432/T2RK5K
Alajmi, M. M. (2019). The impact of e-portfolio use on the development of professional
standards and life skills of students: a case study. Entrepreneurship and
Sustainability Issues, 6(4), 1714. https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2019.6.4(12)
Aldhafeeri, F. M. (2017). Effectiveness and Obstacles of Female Students’ Usage of
eportfolio in Learning Skills Development in the College of Education at Kuwait
University. Journal of Educational & Psychological Sciences, 18(02), 47-73.
http://dx.doi.org/10.12785/JEPS/180202
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
537
Alonso, R. R., Plaza, I. R., & Orfali, C. H. (2019). Barriers in teacher perception about the
use of technology for evaluation in Higher Education. Digital Education
Review(35), 170-185.
Alzouebi, K. (2020). Electronic portfolio development and narrative reflections in higher
education: Part and parcel of the culture? Education and Information Technologies,
25(2), 997-1011.
Ardito, C., & Costabile, M. F. (2021). Electronic portfolios in higher education: A
systematic literature review on benefits and challenges. Education Sciences, 11(4),
178.
Barrett, H. (2004). Differentiating electronic portfolios and online assessment management
systems. Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International
Conference, Atlanta, GA, USA.
http://www.electronicportfolios.org/portfolios/SITE2004paper.pdf
Barrett, H. C. (2007). Researching electronic portfolios and learner engagement: The
REFLECT initiative. Journal of adolescent & adult literacy, 50(6), 436-449.
https://doi.org/10.1598/JAAL.50.6.2
Basu, R. (2015). Use of E-Portfolios in Higher Education: Application of Constructivist
Theory for Effective Learning. Advances in Computer Science and Information
Technology (ACSIT), 2(3), 186-190.
https://www.academia.edu/11684369/Advances_In_computer_science_and_In
formation_technology
Batson, T. (2011). Situated learning: A theoretical frame to guide transformational change
using electronic portfolio technology. International Journal of ePortfolio, 1(1), 107-
114. http://www.theijep.com/pdf/IJEP34.pdf
Beckers, J., Dolmans, D., & Van Merriënboer, J. (2016). e-Portfolios enhancing students’
self-directed learning: A systematic review of influencing factors. Australasian
Journal of Educational Technology, 32(2). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.2528
Blevins, S. J. (2013). Electronic Portfolio Adoption: Developing a Framework by Exploring
Faculty Perspectives Through the Lens of Diffusion of Innovation Theory Virginia
Tech].
Butler, P. (2006). A review of the literature on portfolios and electronic portfolios. eCDF
ePortfolio Project, Massey University College of Education, Palmerston North, New
Zealand.
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.11.11.175.4678&rep=re
p4671&type=pdf
Buyarski, C. A., & Landis, C. M. (2014). Using an ePortfolio to assess the outcomes of a
first-year seminar: Student narrative and authentic assessment. International
Journal of ePortfolio, 4(1), 49-60. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1107859.pdf
Cahyono, A. N., & Ludwig, M. (2018). Teaching and learning mathematics around the city
supported by the use of digital technology. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics,
Science and Technology Education, 15(1), em1654.
https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/99514
Chang, C.-C., Tseng, K.-H., Liang, C., & Chen, T.-Y. (2013). Using e-portfolios to facilitate
university students' knowledge management performance: E-portfolio vs. non-
portfolio. Computers & Education, 69, 216-224.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.07.017
Chen, B., & Crook, A. D. (2020). Using e-portfolios to foster self-regulated learning in
higher education: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 145, 103755.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
538
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
539
Matra, S. D., & Rukmini, D. (2017). Issues and Challenges of E-Portfolio in Micro Teaching
Class: Students’ Perspectives. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Volume, 8.
https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol8no2.17
Muñoz-Carril, P. C., & Fernández-Martínez, A. (2020). Electronic portfolios as a tool for
authentic assessment: A literature review. Educational Technology Research and
Development, 68(2), 659-687.
Nasseif, H. (2021). Exploring E-Portfolio as a new technology tool in Saudi Arabian higher
education: A case study. Studies in Technology Enhanced Learning, 1(2).
https://doi.org/10.21428/8c225f6e.0e590f93
Ngui, W., Pang, V., & Hiew, W. (2020). Designing and Developing an e-Portfolio for
Second Language Learners in Higher Education. International Journal of
Information and Education Technology, 10(5).
https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2020.10.5.1390
Oakley, G., Pegrum, M., & Johnston, S. (2014). Introducing e-portfolios to pre-service
teachers as tools for reflection and growth: lessons learnt. Asia-Pacific Journal of
Teacher Education, 42(1), 36-50. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2013.854860
Ochola, J. E., Achrazoglou, J., & Anthony, R. (2015). ePortfolio Using the Power of
Nonlinear Space to Create and Interlink a Repertoire of Skills Essential for
Teaching. Electronic Journal for Inclusive Education, 3(4), 4.
https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1178&cont
ext=ejie
Ozen, E., & Koc, M. (2021). The impact of innovativeness, subjective norms, perceived
usefulness, perceived ease of use, and perceived credibility on the adoption of
mobile payment services: An empirical study on Turkish consumers. International
Journal of Bank Marketing, 39(5), 1116-1134.
Paulson, E. N., & Campbell, N. (2018). Collective Approaches to ePortfolio Adoption:
Barriers and Opportunities in a Large Canadian University. Canadian Journal for
the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 9(3), n3. https://doi.org/10.5206/cjsotl-
rcacea.2018.3.4
Payne, B., Paredes, T., & Cross, B. (2020). Student perceptions about the production of
electronic portfolios: Technology, process, and showcase insights. Education,
141(2), 67-78.
Pennington, R. (2011). Reflective thinking in elementary preservice teacher portfolios: Can
it be measured and taught? Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 1(1), 2.
http://10.5590/JERAP.2011.01.1.03
Picciano, A. G., & Steiner, E. D. (2021). Leveraging e-portfolios for authentic assessment in
higher education: An integrative review. Internet and Higher Education, 50, 100810.
Poole, P., Brown, M., McNamara, G., O'Hara, J., O'Brien, S., & Burns, D. (2018). Challenges
and supports towards the integration of ePortfolios in education. Lessons to be
learned from Ireland. Heliyon, 4(11), e00899.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00899
Preedy, V. R., & Watson, R. R. (2010). Handbook of disease burdens and quality of life
measures (Vol. 4). Springer.
https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007/978-0-387-78665-
0_5140. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-78665-0_5140
Robles, A. C. M. O. (2012). Cyber Portfolio: The Innovative Menu for 21st Century
Technology. Online Submission, 2(3), 143-150. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED535739
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
540
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
541
1. Introduction
A child's capacity to communicate and develop requires language abilities.
Children who possess these abilities can interact with others, learn from their
surroundings, and succeed in society. For children to develop language abilities,
they must learn the rules for stringing words together in a way that will allow
them to convey their thoughts and feelings, as well as the significance of both
spoken and written language. And language learning, whether natured or
nurtured has already been long debunked by language experts' several theories
©Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0
International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
542
But in recent years, with the thriving technology innovations in the digital world,
communication with and access to any services through any systems and devices
have already encompassed human connections. In this regard, social media
becomes a prominent medium of communication and has been used by all
generations, including the youngest members of society. It has emerged as a
powerful communication medium, allowing conversations to become quick, easy,
and reasonable. It has taken over business, education, government, health care,
religion, and all other spheres of society. Its massive use over the last few years is
constantly reshaping today's human interactions. And the trends in digital
exchanges have a profound impact on children's development.
Currently, there are extensive studies about how social media and various
networking sites affect the health conditions and behavior of children. Other
research focused on enhancing the existing methods on how to develop children's
skills in communication and language and exploring how the emerging social
factors affect their biological foundations on their language capacity. But
investigations regarding the influence of social media on children's literacy
development, particularly on language aspects are very limited. Specifically, there
is a diminutive amount of works of literature that provides comprehensive lists
and descriptions of specific languages that children acquire at a specific period of
their life while exposed to virtual interactions.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
543
Youngsters use social media to have fun, form and maintain connections, share
and discover hobbies, explore identities, and grow familial ties. It is a continuation
of their in-person and offline encounters. Children enjoy the easy access and the
various convenience brought about by the numerous social media contents be it
educational, personal, or entertainment. During the onset of the COVID-19
pandemic and community lockdowns, media use became a coping strategy for
many, including children. Youngsters turn to social networking sites and engaged
with media sharing networks to remain socially connected with peers, to discover
new hobbies and interests, and even to pursue learning educational contents.
There was a considerable increase of about 50–70% in internet use during the
COVID-19 pandemic, and this includes a massive portion from children aged 13
and below (Pandya & Lodha, n.d.). Thus, there is no doubt that media use has
completely taken the human interaction scenes. This is the new world where
almost all individuals all over the world are involved, and children are no
exception. And with their exposure to social media, there is no doubt that there is
a profound impact on young people's interaction in the digital world.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
544
Likewise, the critical drawbacks of social media use, particularly for children, is
something that should also be taken noticed of. Overuse of digital media may
cause children to have irregular sleep patterns, an obesity tendency, delays in
learning and social skills, poor school performance, problematic behaviors, media
addiction, exposure to violence and sexual content, and cyberbullying
experiences (Healthy Children's Org, n.d.). A significant number of case studies
have been conducted to investigate the detrimental long effects of social media on
children. Kids under the age of 11 who use Instagram and Snapchat are more
likely to engage in hazardous digital behaviors including making online-only
friends and viewing websites that their parents would find objectionable. They
are also more likely to experience online harassment (Charmaraman et al, 2022).
Another study conducted by Heyman et al (2021), indicated youngsters who use
TikTok are more likely to experience tic-like attacks and to develop tics. They have
a movement problem brought on by stress and worry, which is probably being
exacerbated by the epidemic and youngsters' increased use of social media.
Children's daily conduct at home may change in addition to their harmful internet
practices such as increased irritability, elevated anxiety, and inadequate self-
esteem.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
545
have an impact on their manner of speaking and writing. Many of the posts are
informal and vary from one another—different from the academic writing the
students use in language learning setting. (Derakshan & Hasanabbasi, 2015).
The impact of social media and the related issues on gadget and internet use are
expected to increase as human beings continue to become compliant with the
nature of interactions in the digital world. Thus, along with the continuous
evolution of social interactions and human nature, whether real or virtual, there
should be a progressive quest to provide children with the accurate ways and
means for sustainable learning development.
3. Methodology
This study utilizes a qualitative-descriptive research design. The research subject
is an eight-year old Filipino girl who was born in Cebu, Philippines, but whose
first and primary language is English. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, where
learning mode was only delivered online, the child has had open access to
different social media platforms. The child’s screen time and digital media
exposure is about 8-10 hours a day since the beginning of the community
lockdowns.
The data gathering procedure, which was conducted for two weeks, involved the
audio recording of the one-on-one daily turn-taking conversations with random
topics, facilitated by her mother at home. The course of action was done for two
weeks, twice a day for about 30 minutes per session. The utterances were
transcribed manually. The use of online transcription software was deliberately
avoided to ensure the accurate records of the child’s natural speaking occurrences
in conversations. After transcribing, data was checked, and some parts of the
conversation were selected based on the child’s emergent vocabulary and put
them as the data of this research. To identify and examine the social-media
influenced lexicons in the child’s talk-in interactions, the frameworks of
Conversation and Content Analyses were utilized.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
546
As part of speech, another interesting thing to note is that, most of the child’s
words and phrases function as adjectives or adverbs to modify or describe what
the child wants to express. In her conversations with her mother, the child often
describes a situation or a person and repeatedly uses the words to attribute to
what is being talked about such as “sus person”, “uwu girl”, “sosyal girl”, “istetik
chair”, “slimey tummy”, “you’re berrylicious”, and “that was cringey”.
Some of the items may sound familiar but are used differently by the child based
on the topic being shared in the conversation. Words like “emotional damage”,
“material gworl”, and “aesthetic” may have been meant as what they commonly
known are, but the word function in a statement (‘emotional damage’ instead
of emotionally damaged to mean the person being affected); and pronunciation or
spelling (“istetik” instead of [iːsˈθɛtɪk] and “gworl” instead of [ɡɜːl] for material
girl) are also modified.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
547
It can also be noticed that child is able to present the different variants of lexicons
such as “sus / sussy”, “uwu/ewew/uwu girl," “bebs/bebe," and "sosyal/sossy."
These variants in the child’s oral communication may indicate the frequency of
the child’s exposure to those words, and the child may have heard or learned them
in different ways from various online utterances.
a) Slang
Internet slang has greatly infiltrated different languages, including those in the
digital world. Slang is a kind of language that is characterized by words and
expressions that are highly informal, more frequently used in speech than in
writing, and usually specific to a certain setting or group of people. It has brought
numerous changes to the way digital nomads communicate. From the analysis,
the following items are identified as internet slang: “emotional damage,"
“sus/sussy baka”, “uwu/ uwu girl”, “preppy”, “luh”, “poser”, and “lolz”. Slang
is used by individuals who are close friends as well as those who are in the same
social group, that is why many slang words may sound offensive or too direct
when heard by others who do not belong to a certain setting or the same speech
community.
b) Colloquialism
Colloquial language is the informal language used by people in everyday speech.
Common parlance or vernacular language are all examples of colloquial
language. It is more formal than slang because it does not sound as vulgar. It is
more appropriate in speech or conversation. In most of her talk-in interactions,
the child always starts her greetings with “Hey, mom!” or “You know, mom?”.
She also often uses “wanna” instead of "want to" or “gonna” instead of "going to,
to mean specific information. These are some examples of colloquialism that are
dominant in the child’s speech. Colloquialism becomes prevalent in social media
due to the widespread use of informal languages popularized by various speakers
who are evident with language variations from different sides of the world.
c) Alphabetism
Alphabetism or also known as abbreviation also dominantly takes the scene in
social media interactions both in writing and speaking. Computer-mediated
communications are designed to provide fast and easy access to users. Texting
acronyms and abbreviations are frequently used and are intended to speed up
discussions by shortening them so that the user doesn't have to spell out words,
expressions, or sentences, even if many of them appear to be misspelled,
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
548
d) Neologism
The term "neologism" describes a relatively recent or isolated term, word, or
phrase that may undergo the process of entering common usage but that has not
yet been fully accepted into language. It refers to a freshly produced word that
accommodates the usage of a language at a specific moment (Plauc & Čilić, n.d.).
“Material gworl”, “slimey/slimy”, “berrylicious”, “hashtag”, “selfie”, “lol”, and
“cringey” are examples of neologisms. Neologisms can take many forms, and may
be entirely new, or formed of existing words. are generally drawn on word
formation processes like affixation, compounding, conversion, reduplication,
clipping, and blending.
e) Loan Words
Loanwords are words that speakers of one language borrow from speakers of
another language (the source language). Loanwords can be modified to fit the
morphology, spelling, phonology, and phonotactics of the destination language.
A loanword can only be recognized from native terms of the target language when
it has fully assimilated to its new rules. Majority of the loan words produced by
the child are Japanese such as “yamete kudasai”, “kawaii”, and “konichiwa”. The
popularity of Japanese anime shown in television and online entertainment sites
allow younsters to be introduced with Japanese words and expressions that are
not translated. While it is true that there are words that are normally
untranslatable due to its association with experiences unique to a given culture or
society, others believe that introducing the native terms to foreigners is one way
of penetrating the identity to global recognition.
f) Pseudowords
A pseudoword – a kind of non-lexical vocable – is piece of text or speech that looks
to be a real word in a language but actually has no definition. These words may
be the product of (the interpretation of) a completely random signal, with no
meaning in any given language or occurrence in any text corpus or dictionary, but
there is frequently an underlying predictable cause. “Sussy baka” and “chupapi
munyayo” are examples of a pseudoword. Although the phrase“sussy baka”
became a viral trend and has been known to many as “suspicious”, “sussy baka
isn’t actually a real word; it is just “rather a combination of video game slang “sus”
and Japanese lingo “baka”” (Raschella, 2022). The same as true for the absurd
phrase “chupapi munyayo”. Although some references online may
commonly provide definitions like “suck my d**ck papa!”, The origin of this gibberish
language itself remains a bit of a mystery (Soumya, 2022); which includes the item
to the pseudoword category.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
549
Social media is equipped with multifaceted words and phrases that may harm
youngsters when not guided. And children always have the tendency to absorb
learning without conscious effort, naturally, and spontaneously, as they
experience a period of intense mental activity (Access, 2018). Findings show that
some of the social media-influenced lexicons used by the child have suggestive
meanings. Table 2 shows the extracted social media-influenced vocabulary items
with critical definitions.
Table 2. Child’s words and phrases with critical meanings
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
550
higher ability level in the use of language. They pass on their language to the child
through their social media contents, and as expected, the child absorbs the
lexicons naturally and without conscious effort through her constant online
engagements, and applies her learned languages from social media in her
communication. She converses with ease and transmits the information
spontaneously, as if she has a total grasp of the full meanings of the social media
words and phrases.
According to the Stages of Reading Development (Chall, 1983), by the age of 7–8
years old, children’s decoding skills become advanced and their wide reading
reaches an independent level, which enable them develop language, vocabulary
and concepts. The said competencies are clearly exhibited by the research subject.
Her fluency in speaking using the social-media inflicted words and phrases imply
her sufficient exposure to such lexicons in a long period of time. Vygotsky posits
that language was a “psychological tool” (Ehrich, 2006) and that this tool when
used, resulted in a number of internal or mental changes, such as the growth of
higher cognition and conceptual understanding. Hence, the child has the ability
to repeat or rephrased her statements and use the lexicons according to her
understanding.
When children do not receive the proper assistance in language learning while
they are on their critical period of literacy development, there is a tendency that
the acquired language will be established and will be part of his or her natural
speech. Moreover, failure to acquire proper “scaffolding” or the absence of MKO
while children are on their ZPD, will lead to breakdowns of the suitable
understanding of knowledge domains or development of complex skills. The
negative outcomes will eventually be evident in child’s poor behavior and
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
551
performance, decreased motivation, and low self-esteem, and rippling effects can
manifest in children’s social interactions. No one wants to see our children become
vulgar, obtrusive, sexist, racist, and the like in society.
Social media platforms have been the “home inside a home” for most children.
This where they get refuge and comfort especially when they feel alone and need
companies. Children use these digital platforms to to have fun, make and keep
friends, share and find hobbies, explore identities, and strengthen family ties. It is
an extension of their face-to-face and offline interactions. Children appreciate the
simple accessibility and multiple conveniences provided by the numerous social
media contents, whether they are instructional, individualized, or entertaining.
Many people, especially children, used media as a coping mechanism during the
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
552
The time spent on social media platforms implies the interest and enthusiasm the
children dedicate to consuming the contents of such websites. The more
interactions the children establish with the internet community, the more they
will utilize its language in their daily interactions. In this study, the child learns
the social media language through online interactions, where there is an exchange
of messages for instant messaging apps such as Snapchat or Facebook Messenger;
the reading and writing of comments for social networking sites like Facebook,
Instagram, or Twitter; and watching the online entertainment contents from TikTok
and YouTube. Other children who are habituated with video game streaming sites
are enticed with synchronous communications with players.
To put it simply, a child’s lexical development can take place by using different
social media apps in messaging and calling friends and family, watching random
online videos, playing synchronous online games, reading photo captions such as
in memes, conversing with people and including the social-media influenced
lexicons in their productive communication skills. Any online content with
linguistic features can contribute to children’s lexical development. The various
social media lexicons are absorbed and used by children to communicate their
ideas, their needs, and even their desire.
And while the study provides insights into the vocabulary production of a single
eight-year-old Filipino girl whose first language is English, the limited sample size
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
553
and specific participant characteristics may limit the generalizability and external
validity of the findings to a broader population. Future research with larger and
more diverse samples would help to overcome these limitations and provide a
more comprehensive understanding of the influence of social media on lexicons
in children's vocabulary production.
6. Conclusion
Social media language is prominent in the eight-year-old child's talk-in
interactions. Various lexicons are acquired from her social media interactions on
social networking sites, video sharing and streaming platforms, instant messaging
apps, etc. Interaction online with friends and family as well as engaging with
various digital activities contribute a great deal to the acquisition and production
of a new language. Digital media social interactions can also be a good avenue for
language production and development, wherein children can learn a wide range
of vocabularies, terminologies, and expressions. However, the evident use of
lexicons with suggestive meanings may also hamper a child’s ability to produce
quality language and literacy in due time. This lexical acquisition problem may
cause a later ripple effect on children’s personality and attitudes toward others.
Thus, this study emphasizes Vygotsky’s assertion that language is an extremely
potent psychological instrument that builds the groundwork for fundamental
thinking structures later in a person's development, and that frequent joint social
media engagement by a child and his or her MKO is strongly recommended.
7. References
Access. (2018, October 22). The Absorbent Mind - Step By Step Montessori Schools and Child
Care Centers - MN. Step by Step Montessori Schools and Child Care Centers.
https://www.stepbystepmontessori.com/2018/10/22/the-absorbent-mind
Aharul, J. A., & Tanoc, D. I. L. (2019). Use Of Social Media Platforms In Classrooms To
Enhance News Writing Competence Of College Students. Journal Of International
Academic Research For Multidisciplinary, 7(5), 40-50.
Barnett, M. A., Gustafsson, H. C., Deng, M., Mills-Koonce, W. R., & Cox, M. J. (2012).
Bidirectional Associations Among Sensitive Parenting, Language Development,
and Social Competence. Infant and Child Development, 21(4), 374–393.
https://doi.org/10.1002/icd.1750
Chaffey, D. (2023, January 30). Global social media statistics research summary 2022 [June
2022]. Smart Insights. https://www.smartinsights.com/social-media-
marketing/social-media-strategy/new-global-social-media-research/
Chall, J. S. (1983). Stages of Reading Development.
Charmaraman, L., Lynch, A. D., Richer, A. M., & Grossman, J. M. (2022a). Associations
of early social media initiation on digital behaviors and the moderating role of
limiting use. Computers in Human Behavior, 127, 107053.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.107053
Charmaraman, L., Lynch, A. D., Richer, A. M., & Grossman, J. M. (2022b). Associations
of early social media initiation on digital behaviors and the moderating role of
limiting use. Computers in Human Behavior, 127, 107053.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.107053
Child care and mother-child interaction in the first 3 years of life. NICHD Early Child
Care Research Network. (1999). Developmental Psychology, 35(6), 1399–1413.
Children and parents: media use and attitudes report 2022. (2023, March 16). Ofcom.
https://www.ofcom.org.uk/research-and-data/media-literacy-
research/childrens/children-and-parents-media-use-and-attitudes-report-2022
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
554
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
555
Legner, L. (2022, April 22). Kids’ screen time: How much is too much? | OSF HealthCare.
OSF HealthCare Blog. https://www.osfhealthcare.org/blog/kids-screen-time-
how-much-is-too-much/
Linebarger, D. L., & Vaala, S. E. (2010). Screen media and language development in
infants and toddlers: An ecological perspective. Developmental Review, 30(2), 176–
202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2010.03.006
Mares, M., & Pan, Z. (2013). Effects of Sesame Street: A meta-analysis of children’s
learning in 15 countries. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 34(3), 140–
151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2013.01.001
Mohsin, M. (2022, October 13). 10 Social Media Statistics You Need to Know in 2022. 10
SOCIAL MEDIA STATISTICS YOU NEED TO KNOW IN 2022 [INFOGRAPHIC].
Retrieved January 8, 2023, from https://www.oberlo.com/blog/social-media-
marketing-statistics
Morin, A. (2012). Inner Speech. In Elsevier eBooks (pp. 436–443). Elsevier BV.
https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-375000-6.00206-8
Most 5-Year-Olds Spend Too Much Time Online, Survey Shows. (2022, February 14).
Bloomberg.com. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-02-14/most-
5-year-olds-spend-too-much-time-online-survey-shows
Mostafavi, B. (2021, October 18). A third of children ages 7-9 use social media apps.
https://healthblog.uofmhealth.org/childrens-health/a-third-of-children-ages-7-
9-use-social-media-apps
Number of worldwide social network users 2027 | Statista. (2023, February 13). Statista.
https://www.statista.com/statistics/278414/number-of-worldwide-social-
network-users/
Nwala, M. A., & Tamunobelema, I. (2019). The Social Media and Language Use: The
Case of Facebook. Advances in Language and Literary Studies.
https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.10n.4p.9
Pandya, A., & Lodha, P. (2021). Social Connectedness, Excessive Screen Time During
COVID-19 and Mental Health: A Review of Current Evidence. Frontiers in
Human Dynamics, 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/fhumd.2021.684137
Pebworth, K. (2019). Understanding the language of social media. www.linkedin.com.
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/understanding-language-social-media-
katharine-pebworth
Penuel, W. R., Bates, L. C., Gallagher, L. P., Pasnik, S., Llorente, C., Townsend, E.,
Hupert, N., Dominguez, X., & VanderBorght, M. (2012). Supplementing literacy
instruction with a media-rich intervention: Results of a randomized controlled
trial. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 27(1), 115–127.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2011.07.002
Raschella, C. (2022, May 6). What Does “Sussy Baka” Mean? Definition and Where It
Shows up in Anime. We Got This Covered. https://wegotthiscovered.com/social-
media/what-does-sussy-baka-mean-and-where-did-it-originate/
Rodriguez, A. (2016, November 11). 8 Reasons Why Parents Should Allow Their Kids to Use
Social Media Sites. Social Media Today.
https://www.socialmediatoday.com/social-networks/8-reasons-why-parents-
should-allow-their-kids-use-social-media-sites
Rucchin, G. (2021). Children’s screen time surged during pandemic: study. Western
News. https://news.westernu.ca/2021/10/children-spend-more-screen-time-
during-pandemic-study/
Soumya. (2022, October 7). Chupapi Munyayo Meaning- What’s Behind this Absurd
Phrase? The Teal Mango. https://www.thetealmango.com/featured/chupapi-
munyayo-meaning-whats-behind-this-absurd-phrase/
Swan, K. (2017). Gaining Perspective: Social Media’s Impact on Adolescent Literacy
Development. Education and Human Development Master’s Theses, 1–41.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
556
West, C. (2023). 12 Ways to use social media for education. Sprout Social.
https://sproutsocial.com/insights/social-media-for-education/
Zone of Proximal Development - The Decision Lab. (n.d.). The Decision Lab.
https://thedecisionlab.com/reference-guide/neuroscience/zone-of-proximal-
development
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
557
1. Introduction
Teaching internship is a leadoff stage towards a profession for a lifetime. It is an
important component towards becoming a teacher as it provides experience to
*
Corresponding authors: Feleeh L. Enanoza, enanozaf@cnu.edu.ph
©Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0
International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
558
In similar vein, Kumar and Ratnalikar (2005) asserted that because of the current
changing and challenging world, teachers should be provided with a range of
skills, knowledge, attitudes, and relevant educational experience that enables
them to cope with these challenges.
Therefore, Young (2022) contends that the COVID-19 pandemic has had a
significant impact on the lives of the entire global population. Its immense
impact, especially in the field of education, has been increasingly felt. Meeting
the educational needs of students, especially the young children, during a global
crisis during which instructional delivery was done online, presented
remarkable challenges. Hence, early childhood educators recognized their
critical role in ensuring that every child’s development remained a priority
despite their distance from the physical classroom. Teachers of young children
were trained to be engaging, culturally competent, and to recognize the
importance of teaching young children.
Similarly, the COVID-19 pandemic had an impact, not only on how the young
learners were taught remotely, but also on how preservice teachers (student
interns) were trained to became relevant and competent future teachers as well.
To this end, the professors collaborated among themselves on the transition
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
559
This mode of teaching, which is still conducted in a virtual class has noticeably
challenged the teaching interns in the preparation as well as the implementation
of their teaching activities among the early childhood learners. It is therefore in
this context that this study aimed to find out the “knots and bolts” (motivating
and demotivating factors) of online teaching internship in the identified areas in
the framework and how their personal convictions, family support and school
input have influenced their online teaching internship.
2. Research Objectives
The study aimed to ascertain the “knots and bolts” of online teaching internship
during the COVID-19 pandemic. Specifically, this examined how the teaching
interns’ personal, family, and academic backgrounds influenced their teaching
experiences as regards lesson planning, online modalities, classroom
management and communication skills during online teaching. Individual
accounts were likewise noted to validate the findings. Determining their
personal and academic backgrounds together with their teaching proficiency
would help validate their individual accounts.
3. Research Methodology
This study employed both quantitative and qualitative methods of research. As
Creswell (2014) mentioned, quantitative methods may use a survey design to
provide a numeric description of trends, attitudes, or opinions of a sample of a
population. In this study, the survey method was used to determine the profile
of the participants in terms of personal, family, and social background. The
qualitative research method was further employed by conducting an
unstructured interview to validate individual accounts. The thematic analysis of
Braun and Clarke (2006) was used to treat the qualitative responses.
The participants of the study were the 18 teaching interns enrolled in the
Bachelor in Early Childhood Education course of the Integrated Laboratory
School, in a State University in Region 7, Philippines during the first semester of
the academic year 2020-2021. The teaching interns were teaching various
subjects at the preschool level.
Data was obtained on the degree of influence of the factors that have affected
their teaching internship experiences as regards lesson planning, teaching
strategies, classroom management and communication skills, For this a test
questionnaire compiled by the researcher was utilized. Further, to validate the
individual accounts of these teaching interns, an unstructured interview was
conducted.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
560
It was necessary that ethical issues be discussed and understood in the context of
the research process. The ethical considerations required for this research
undertaking included honesty, quality, legality, integrity, informed consent,
voluntary participation, beneficence, confidentiality, anonymity, incentives, and
compensation, among others.
Age
21 1 5.56
22 10 55.56
23 7 38.89
Civil Status
Single 18 100
Gender
Male 2 11.11
Female 16 88.89
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
561
As presented in Table 1, the age of the teaching interns ranges between 21 and 23
years old and were all single. This denoted that they were on schedule as
regards their scholastic engagements. This was a manifestation that their
significant others, family, school and community, have positively influenced
them regarding their education, deferring their plans for marriage. The data
relating to these participants in the Bachelor in Early Childhood Education
program revealed that the number of females (16) outweighed the male teaching
interns (2). This is an apparent indication that females loved teaching young
learners, pointing to their roles as “nurturing mothers” of the future. As
generally noted, their parents are employed and are therefore able to support
the needs of their children since they considered their children’s education a
priority. This was manifested in their having instructional materials at home:
cellular phones, laptops or even desktops. This was an indication of their
parents’ care and concern for them. According to Crocker (1997), the professions
have traditionally underestimated the magnitude of parental contributions to
the success of a child’s studies. The love of parents for their children is
immeasurable.
The subsequent data present the factors influencing the teaching performance of
teaching interns in a virtual instructional engagement in terms of lesson
designing, online teaching modality or pedagogy, classroom management and
communication skills. In each component, these teaching interns identified their
sources of knowledge, ”knots” (motivating experiences) as well as the “bolts”
(demotivating experiences).
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
562
It could therefore be deduced that lesson planning was an essential aspect in the
lives of the teaching interns. For them to keep going, the positive influence of the
aforementioned factors, especially of the family, needs to be afforded careful
consideration. According to Liu and Chiang (2019), parents influence children’s
educational outcomes by adopting class-based patterns of parental involvement
and providing cultural resources that impart educational benefits to their
children (Calarco, 2011; DiMaggio, 1982; Lareau, 2011).
The factors that motivated the learners to engage proactively in online teaching
were primarily related to their eagerness to learn as well as their animated
responses (77%). Their obvious enjoyment motivated the TIs to continue despite
their numerous challenges. Moreover, their professors’ and mentors’ guidance
inspired them as well (11%). Real-life application of knowledge (11%) and
personal growth (5%) gave them the assurance that these challenges could be
overcome if everyone was conscientious in carrying out their responsibilities.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
563
Marzano and Marzano (2003) posit that research has shown that teachers'
actions in their classrooms have twice the impact on student achievement as do
school policies regarding curriculum, assessment, staff collegiality, and
community. Moreover, it is common knowledge that one of the classroom
teacher's most important jobs is managing the classroom effectively. In support
of this finding, Liu, and Chiang (2019) stated that by using research-based
strategies combining appropriate levels of authority, cooperation and an
awareness of student needs, teachers can build positive classroom dynamics.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
564
On the other hand, there were “bolts” or demotivating factors in the practice of
the target language, especially in the delivery of instruction. As noted, these
participants expressed that their limited vocabulary and grammatical errors
(77%) somehow prevented them from freely expressing their thoughts and ideas.
This was supported by their statement that anxiety (11%) crept in along the
way, thus making them self-conscious and awkward in their communication.
Their successful imparting of ideas to the learners depended on their own levels
of fluency. In certain cases, they also felt somewhat demotivated if the learners
could not answer their questions. For them, this was confirmation that learners
did not clearly understand their instructions or input.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
565
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
566
These comments revealed that the TIs were obviously disturbed by the Internet
connectivity problems. Apart from these, another concern regarding low or no
electrical power supply also surfaced:
“I almost cried when there was a sudden brown out in the middle of my activities. The
children enjoyed it a lot but due to no power, everything stopped.”
The use of instructional materials should also be varied in the teaching and
learning. It can be defined as a collection of tools that enables teachers to educate
successfully, making the learning process easier for the learners (Savery, 2015).
In the process, teachers utilized several resources apart from the traditional ones
to meet needs of the present.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
567
The first one was having to encounter a child who was spoiled and threw tantrums so
easily. As I was starting my class, I like to begin with a prayer and then with an
energizer just so the learners would not feel sleepy. Now what happened was when I
asked them if they felt energized, this kid answered me that it was boring for him and
instead of making him energized and ready for class, he said it made him even more
tired.”
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
568
tasks. Tantrums can become less frequent and even be prevented by not giving
the performer an audience and by not giving into their demands. Furthermore,
Eguico et al. (2022) concluded that parents as co-teachers contributed to the
success of their children during their homeschooling with the onset of the
COVID–19 pandemic and were highly engaged in attending to the learning
needs of their children (Hinggo et al., 2022).
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
569
“I remained calm and patient in dealing with learners with attention problems”.
Along these lines, Russell et al. (2022) revealed the circumstances that enable
teachers to promote student self-regulated learning considering the difficulties
they encounter. Vijaya et al. (2022) also concluded that learners should be
scaffolded to concentrate on their strengths rather than on their weaknesses,
educated in time management skills, and given strategies for dealing with
stress.
The strengths of the teaching interns were rooted in their faith in God. As
teaching interns, their faith gave them the strength to confront life's challenges.
Teaching interns indicated that:
“I asked help from the Lord that He would help me continue the class I was teaching (TI
1). God always listens and provides the answers and guidance (TI 8). Prayer is my main
key in overcoming all the challenges. It gave me the strength to continue (TI 15).
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
570
The online instruction gave teaching interns the chance to improve their
interaction with students. Teaching intern (TI 3) said that:
“I practice interacting with pupils while I hone my teaching abilities. When I see the
pupils learn and progress, I get inspired to teach and enhance my passion to teach”.
The study of Kristianto and Gandajaya (2022), found that students' participation
in offline and online problem-based learning (PBL) results in scores that are
similar but not significantly different. This is made feasible by the PBL structure,
which calls for students to participate actively in learning, work cooperatively in
teams, and interact with lecturers and other students. In the same vein, Gamage
et al. (2022) asserted that engaged students are more likely to achieve their
academic goals. Additionally, during COVID-19, Fabian et al. (2022) examined
the elements affecting online learners' participation and engagement in study
skills. They found that study skill engagement is influenced by e-learning capital
and transactional distance between students and teachers as well as between
students themselves.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
571
The study of Rodriquez et al. (2022) emphasized how preservice teachers' skills
develop gradually during teaching practice in teacher education according to
the viewpoint of school mentors. The findings indicate that the preservice
teachers' personal skills have been evaluated more favorably by the school
mentors than their professional competences. On the other hand, Michos et al.
(2022) concluded that the scaffolding provided by mentors helped student
teachers build their motivational orientations.
The mentors' assessments of the knowledge and abilities that mentees bring to
school were generally favorable, according to the research. The mentors also
acknowledged their high level of satisfaction with their own understanding of
their mentoring position and competencies. The researchers concluded that the
effectiveness of mentor-teachers influenced teacher-trainees' teaching practices
in a positive way (Radulović et al., 2022). In the same vein, Cadosales et al.
(2021) conducted a meta-synthesis on the potential effectiveness of a teaching
internship program. They found that the mentor played an important role in the
success of the teaching interns through coaching and feedback.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
572
6. References
Ali, W. (2020). Online and remote learning in higher education institutes: A necessity in
light of COVID-19 pandemic. Higher Education Studies, 10(3).
https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v10n3p16
Al-Mahdy, Y. F. H., Emam, M, & Hassan, T. (2022). Workplace spirituality and
organizational citizenship behavior among teachers in Bahrain: Commitmnt as a
mediator. Journal of Beliefs & Values, 43(3).
https://doi.org/10.1080/13617672.2021.1957601
Anjum, S. (2020). Impact of internship programs on professional and personal
development of business students: A case study from Pakistan. Future Business
Journal, 6, 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-019-0007-3
Asemah, E., Idialu, J. U., Ajagun, S. O., Osemeke, M., Ekwe, O., Oaikhena, M.,
Ohiokha, F., & Ola, K. (2021). Pandemic in the 21st century: Multidimensional
approaches. Proceedings of the 2nd College of Management and Social Sciences 2021
Conference.
Asio, J. (2021). Internet connection and learning device availability of college students:
Basis for institutionalizing flexible learning in the new normal. Studies in
Humanities and Education, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.48185/she.v2i1.224
Bao, W. (2020). COVID-19 and online teaching in higher education: A case study in
Peking University. Wiley Online Library. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.191
Baruani, T. H., Li, X., & Binghai, S. (2021). Teachers’ resilience against stress: A review on
ways and its impacts towards teaching profession. Asian Journal of Education and
Social Studies, 20(4). https://doi.org/10.9734/AJESS/2021/v20i430492
Bradley, N. A., Fogelsong, D., & Tech, V. (2021). Building community in a pre-service
teacher cohort during a pandemic. Teacher Educators' Journal, 14, 43-60. ERIC –
EJ1296274.
Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research
in Psychology, 3, 77-101.
Cadosales, M.N.Q., Cabanilla, A. B., Elcullada, R. O., Lacea, R. L., & Beltran, N. Y. (2021).
A meta-synthesis on the potential effectiveness of a teaching internship
program. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry (TOJQI), 12(6), 8955-8964.
Commission on Higher Education Memorandum Order 104, s. (2017). Revised guidelines
for student internship programs in the Philippines for all programs.
https://ofa.upd.edu.ph/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/CMO-No.104-
S.2017.pdf
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed- methods
approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publishing.
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
573
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
574
Lee, J., Cheah, W.,, Anchang, G. N. J., Hafizah Y. N., Abim, M., Ruzifa, A.T., Koh, D.,
Reeves, S., Summerbell, C., Essau, C., Poh, B., & Gibson, E.L. (2022). Teachers’
and parents’ perspectives on the feasibility of a preschool-based behavioral
intervention to prevent obesity: An embedded qualitative study within ToyBox
study Malaysia. Early Childhood Education Journal.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-021-01290-2
Liu, R. & Chiang, Y. (2019). Who is more motivated to learn? The roles of family
background and teacher-student interaction in motivating student learning. The
Journal of Chinese Sociology, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40711-019-0095-z
Lorena, E. (2015). Parental demographic factors affecting the application of common
methods towards tantrum management in toddlers: Implications in designing a
parenting skills program. International Journal of Child and Development and
Mental Health, 3(1).
Low, E., Chong, S. & Ellis, M. (2014). Teachers' English communication skills: Using
IELTS to measure competence of graduates from a Singaporean teacher
education program. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 39(10).
https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2014v39n10.5
Martin, F., & Parker, M.A. (2014). Use of synchronous virtual classrooms: Why, who, and
how? MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10(2).
https://jolt.merlot.org.martin_0614.
Marzano, R. & Marzano, J. (2003). Building classroom relationships. Educational
Leadership, 61.
Michos, K., Cantieni, A., Schmid, R., Müller, L., & Petko, D. (2022). Examining the
relationship between internship experiences, teaching enthusiasm, and teacher
self-efficacy when using a mobile portfolio app. Teaching and Teacher Education,
109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103570
Misbah, N. H., Mohammad, M., Yunus, M. M., & Ya’acob, A. (2017). Identifying the
factors contributing to students’ difficulties in the English language learning.
Creative Education, 8(13). https:/doi.org/10.4236/ce.2017.813136
Morris, D. B., Usher, E. L., & Chen, J. A. (2017). Reconceptualizing the sources of
teaching self-efficacy: A critical review of emerging literature. Educational
Psychology Review, 29(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-016-9378-y
Msangya, B.W., Mkoma, S. L., & Yihuan, W. (2016). Teaching practice experience for
undergraduate student teachers: A case study of the Department of Education at
Sokoine University of Agriculture, Tanzania. Journal of Education and Practice,
7(14).
National Center on Safe Supportive Learning Environments (2016). School climate.
Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
https://safesupportivelearning.ed.gov/school-climate.
Nonis, S. A., & Hudson, G. I. (2006). Academic performance of college students:
Influence of time spent studying and working. Journal for Education and Business,
81(3). https://doi.org/10.3200/JOEB.81.3.151-159
Perry, A. (2022) Student engagement, no learning without it. Creative Education, 13.
https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2022.134079
Radulović, B., Jovanović, T., Gadušová, Z., Hašková, A., & Pavera, L. (2022). Mentor’s
perception of the future science teacher’s teaching practice. Journal of Education
Culture and Society, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs2022.1.145.155
Rolando, L.G.R., Salvador, D.F., & Luz, M.R.M. (2013). The use of internet tools for
teaching and learning by in-service biology teachers: A survey in Brazil. Teaching
and Teacher Education, 34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.03.007
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
575
Rupp, D., & Becker, E. S. (2021). Situational fluctuations in student teachers’ self-efficacy
and its relation to perceived teaching experiences and cooperating teachers’
discourse elements during the teaching practicum. Teaching and Teacher
Education, 99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103252
Russell, J. M., Baik, C., Ryan, A. T., & Molloy, E. (2022). Fostering self-regulated learning
in higher education: Making self-regulation visible. Active Learning in Higher
Education, 23(2), 97–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787420982378
Salas-Pilco, S. Z., Yang, Y., & Zhang, Z. (2022). Student engagement in online learning in
Latin America higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic
review. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(3).
https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13190
Sapta, I. K. S., Rustiarini, N. W., Kusuma, I. G. A. E. T., & Astakoni, I. M. P. (2021).
Spiritual leadership and organizational commitment: The mediation role of
workplace spirituality. Cogent Business & Management, 8(1).
https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2021.1966865
Siripol, P., & Wilang, J. (2021). Demotivation and coping strategies in synchronous
online teaching. Asian EFL Journal Research Articles, 28(2).
Stajkovic, A.D. (2006). Development of a core confidence-higher order construct. Journal
of Applied Psychology, 91. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1208
Starko, A. J. (2021). Creativity in the classroom: Schools of curious delight (7th ed.).
Routledge.
Tang, C., Mao, S., Naumann, S. E., & Xing, Z. (2022). Improving student creativity
through digital technology products: A literature review. Thinking Skills and
Creativity, 44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101032
Van, V. F., Maier, M. F., Epstein, J. L., & Lloyd, C. M. (2013). The impact of family
involvement on the education of children ages 3 to 8: A focus on literacy and
Math achievement outcomes and social-emotional skills. Building Knowledge to
Improve Social Policy.
Wang, A.I. (2015). The wear-out effect of a game-based student response system.
Computers & Education, 82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.11.004
Young, N., Jordahl, R., & Stepter, R. (2022). COVID and the early childhood classroom:
The importance of PLAY - persistently learning and adapting for youth. In A.
Courtney-Dattloa (Ed.), Handbook of research on adapting remote learning practices
for early childhood and elementary school classrooms. http://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-
7998-8405-7.ch005
Zlatovic, A. (2018). Benefits of communication on the learning process.
https://nobelexplorers.com/benefits-communication-learning-process/
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
Knots and Bolts of Online Teaching Internship Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic
Age : __________
Gender: _______________
Lesson Designing
(online)
Online Teaching
Modality / Pedagogy
Classroom
Management
Communication
Skills
C. INTERVIEW GUIDE FOR THE TEACHING INTERNS’ EXPERIENCES
(freely narrate your answers)
1. Cite the most unforgettable experience/s you have encountered as a teaching intern (both
the challenges and opportunities)
Challenges Opportunities
3. Identify your strength/s as a teaching intern. How will you apply them to your actual
teaching experiences in the future?