ADMINISTRATIVE LAW

Outline Part 3
SLSU | CABHA – BPA
Atty. Mark Christian B. Apordo

A. Quasi-judicial or Adjudicatory Power

i. Nature
1. Sec. 5(5), Art VIII, Constitution
ii. Administrative due process
1. Ang Tibay v. CIR, G.R. No. L-46496, February 27, 1940
2. Ute Paterok v. Bureau of Customs, 193 SCRA 132
3. Civil Service Commission v. Lucas, G.R. No. 127838, January
21, 1999
4. Napolcom v. Bemabe, G.R. No. 129943, May 12, 2000
5. Arboleda v. NLRC, G.R. No. 119509, February 11, 1999
6. Calma v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 122787, February 9, 1999
7. Philippine Merchant Marine School v. Court of Appeals, 244
SCRA 770
8. Lumiqued v. Exenea, G.R. No. 117565, November 18, 1997
a. Gonzales v. NLRC and Ateneo de Davao University,
G.R. No. 125735, August 26, 1999
9. Secretary of Justice v. Lantion, G.R. No. 139465, January 18,
2000
10. Ocampo v. Office of the Ombudsman, G.R. No. 114683,
January 18, 2000
11. De la Cruz v. Abille, G.R. No. 130196, February 26, 2001
12. Pilipinas Loan Company v. Securities and Exchange
Commission, G.R. No. 104720, April 4, 2001
13. Busuego v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 95326, March 11, 1999
14. Globe Telecom v. National Telecommunications
Commission, G.R. No. 143964, July 26, 2004
15. MIAA v. Airspan Corporation, G.R. No. 157581, December 1,
2004
16. Nicolas v. Desierto, G.R. No. 154668, December 16, 2004
17. Casimiro v. Tandog, G.R. No. 146137, June 8, 2005
18. Civil Service Commission v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No.
161086, November 24, 2006
iii. Administrative determinations where notice and hearing are not
necessary for due process
1. RCPI v. National Telecommunications Commission, 184
SCRA 517
2. Suntay v. People, 101 Phil 770
3. Art. 704, Civil Code of the Philippines
4. Sec. 51, Book V, Title I, Subtitle A, Administrative Code of
1987
iv. Right against self-incrimination
 1. Cabal v. Kapunan, 6 SCRA 1064
2. Pascual v. Board of Medical Examiners, 28 SCRA 345
v. Power to punish contempt
1. Guevara v. Comelec, 104 Phil 269
2. Dumarpa v. Dimaporo, 177 SCRA 478
vi. Administrative decisions not part of the legal system
1. Art. 8 of the Civil Code
2. Philippine Bank of Communications v. Commissioner of
Internal Revenue, G.R. No. 112024, January 28, 1999
vii. Administrative Appeal and Review
1. Araneta v. Gatmaitan, 101 Phil 328
2. Reyes v. Zamora 90 SCRA 92
viii. Doctrine of res judicata
1. Ysmael v. Deputy Executive Secretary, 190 SCRA 673
2. United Pepsi Cola Supervisory Union v. Laguesma, 288 SCRA
15
3. Fortich v. Corona, 289 SCRA 624
a. Board of Commissioners, CID v. Judge de la Rosa, 197
SCRA 853
i. Zita Ngo Burca v. Republic, 19 SCRA 186
4. B.F. Goodrich Philippines v. Workmen’s Compensation
Commission, 1988
ix. Some relevant decisions
1. LLDA V. Court of Appeals, 251 SCRA 42
2. Regional Director, DECS Region VII v. Court of Appeals, G.R.
No. 110193, January 17, 1995
3. Realty Exchange Venture Corporation v. Sendino, G.R. No.
109703, July 5, 1995
4. Calma v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 122787, February 9, 199
5. Energy Regulatory Board and lligan Light & Power, Inc. v.
Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 127373, March 25, 1999
6. Unilongo v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 123910, April 5, 1999