Professional Documents
Culture Documents
meaningful insights on how the interplay of their University of Southeastern Philippines (USeP), Saint
personality aspects internally drove their act of Mary's College (SMC), Tagum Doctors College,
academic procrastination. Especially now that learning ACES Tagum College, and STI Tagum College. The
is situated outside the classroom, students will most study uses Slovin's formula N/(1+Ne2 ) to determine
probably be confronted with the urge towards the sample size. Slovin's procedure is properly used in
academic procrastination. Also, though the researchers the Philippines to determine the research sample size,
recognized that studies were conducted nationally, especially in an undergraduate thesis (Castillo, 2016).
globally, and locally, the researchers have not come
across studies exploring the influence of personality The respondents were 373 students of the selected
aspects on college students' academic procrastination colleges in Tagum City, according to Slovin's formula.
in Tagum City. Therefore, it is also proposed that the In Table 1, the distribution of respondents of the study
current research make a specific contribution and who are enrolled students of the mentioned colleges
generate new insights that may suggest possible action chosen in Tagum City for the Academic year
to the different offices of the selected colleges to 2020-2021. The selection of the respondents used
remedy academic procrastination. stratified random sampling as suggested by the
statistician, that is appropriate for academic research.
Stratified random sampling involves dividing the
Methodology population into different strata or groups and getting
some samples per stratum according to the percentage
they contribute to the whole population (Cozby and
This chapter presents the research design, locale, Bates, 2015)
population and sample, research instrument, data
collection, and statistical tools. Table 1. Distribution of Respondents
Research Design
The high level could be attributed to the high score entertaining tasks. For these reasons, students engage
given by the respondents in all indicators. It means that in a delay of studying for an upcoming exam.
the respondents' response to academic procrastination
was mostly positive in items of Doing requirements Regarding Doing requirements and assignments,
and assignments, Studying for exams, Attending school academic procrastination behavior is also positive in
activities, and Interest in changing procrastination. the selected colleges of Tagum City, the respondents
agreed that they delay doing their essays, term papers,
The overall mean score was the result gathered from or final requirements. They either dislike the task or
the following computed mean scores from highest to find it a long time to finish. Another factor they
lowest: 3.95 or high for Interest in changing procrastinate in doing their needs is because they have
seen it of little importance than exams. And with less
procrastination, with a standard deviation of 0.77;
supervision from the teacher, they tend to be lazy in
3.64 or high for Doing requirements and assignments
attending to such tasks.
with a standard deviation of 0.71; 3.42 for high for
Studying for exams with a standard deviation of 0.71; Finally, the positive academic procrastination behavior
and 3.34 or moderate for Attending school activities among the selected colleges in Tagum is Attending
with a standard deviation of 0.75. school activities being the indicator with the lowest
score, which pertains to the delay in participating in
Table 3. Level of Academic Procrastination school-related events like Intramurals, Inter-branch
contests, etc. Contrary to improving students'
socialization process, the activities encourage
procrastination, especially if it does not steer the
students' interest. It is more likely to become a burden.
Table 4. Significance of the Relationship between Table 5. Regression Analysis on the Influence of
Levels of Aspects of Personality and Academic Aspects of Personality on Academic Procrastination
Procrastination
It means that the aspects of personality significantly The respondents' level on the aspect of personality is
influence academic procrastination since the high. These results are consistent with the study results
probability value is less than 0.05. The R2 value of by Kutlu Abu and Saral (2016), which shows that the
0.642 indicates that 64.2% of the academic reasons for delaying academic tasks attribute to
procrastination of the selected colleges in Tagum City internal factors like not finding an academic task
is influenced by aspects of the personality of the enjoyable or fear of failure. Any of these factors link
selected colleges in Tagum City. In comparison, other to irrational thoughts, negative affect, and predisposed
factors influenced the remaining 35.8%. behavioral tendencies. The results also showcase the
four propositions about the role of aspects of
The indicator Cognitive functions have a beta of personality in academic procrastination defined by the
0.268* and a corresponding p-value of <0.001, which research of Graf (2016). It states that specific
means that cognitive functions significantly influence executive function processes have a role in one's
the academic procrastination of the selected colleges in efforts at intellectual task engagement, completion,
Tagum City since the probability level is <0.001 less and resisting the tendency to procrastinate on these
than 0.05. Also, Affective states have a beta of 0.233* tasks. It also states that total concentration and
and a p-value of <0.001, which means that Affective absorption is a motivator that enables someone to
states significantly influence the academic remain on an academic task, thus negatively impacting
procrastination of the selected colleges in Tagum City academic procrastination. It believes that general self-
since the probability level is <0.001, which is less than efficacy will predict the frequency with which one
0.05. Lastly, the Behavioral aspects have a beta of experiences negative or positive effects and leads to
0.404 and a p-value of <0.001, which means that the entering flow states. Lastly, it defined that the
Behavioral aspects have a significant influence on the frequency with which one experiences flow in learning
academic procrastination of the selected colleges in will interact with the relationship of executive function
Tagum City since the probability level is <0.001, processes to academic procrastination, shielding one's
which is less than 0.05 efforts at task completion from the influence of
executive function deficits.
The three indicators, cognitive functions, affective
states, and behavioral aspects, significantly influence In terms of Affective states, the level of aspect of
the academic procrastination of the selected colleges in personality of the selected colleges in Tagum City is
Tagum. high. It indicates that students engage in negative
emotions and moods that influence the conscious delay
in finishing an academic task. According to the theory
of Personality Systems Interaction of Kuhl and Kazen respondents felt lazy in some way while writing. They
(1999), positive affect influenced the interest towards also disliked writing paper works in the first place.
making a task; a student engages in doing a task when When studying for exams, the respondents, during the
they feel good about it. Also, according to Estrito & approach of exam time, got busy with other things and
Victor (2018), a student will also tend to delay doing a tried to find excuses to justify delay review. The first
task if they are unmotivated to do so. The lack of indicator to have the highest mean is Interest in
motivation could be rooted in a lack of enjoyment or changing procrastination, which has to do with
interest in doing a task. Results for affective states motivation and willingness of students to improve
follow the findings given by Zarrin, Paixao, & Garcia procrastination habits. Together with the acceptance of
(2020) about negative emotions. These findings show the presence of academic procrastination, respondents
that fear of failure is positively related to academic are interested in changing them. The results of this
procrastination. Fear of failure is associated with low study present the same idea as the study of Morse
self-esteem. Those with low self-esteem consider (2016), which states that students interested in
themselves defeated in entirety when they fail, so it overcoming their procrastination also express an
would be better not to engage in academic tasks. interest in joining intervention programs, such as
acceptance and commitment training (ACT).The
Regarding cognitive functions, the level of aspect of therapy helps students overcome stress related to
personality in the selected colleges in Tagum City is academic procrastination and improves well-being.
high. It connotes that the thought processes among the The treatment may also work for the respondents in
students influence their delay in doing a task. In line this study. Another indicator described with a high
with this, according to the results of the study of Marc mean next to the highest is Studying for exams. It is
Graf (2016), academic procrastination is a tendency concerned with starting a review session and its
towards "dysregulated behavior" due to a decline in completion. At some point, they did start studying but
self-motivation due to negative thoughts that fill the start doing enjoyable things. Respondents may have
mind of a student. Added to this is the study by been thinking that they always have enough time later,
Hailikari et al. (2020) that if one's self-belief towards this pattern goes on and on, and they do not feel that it
self-regulation is low, the person is more likely to is necessary to start studying. In connection with this
procrastinate. thought or idea of the respondents, a study conducted
by Pychyl, Morin, and Salmon (2015) states that a
A high level of aspects of personality in terms of the common practice among students studying for exams
behavioral aspect of personality was also evident is estimating days of learning. Its results show that
among the respondents. The behavioral aspect of the scoring high on procrastination indicates that a student
personality of the selected colleges in Tagum was also is studying later for an exam. In connection to this, a
positive. It means that the students possessed a certain survey conducted by Greenfield (2019) to 101
behavioral predisposition that causes them to delay university students, states that the primary cause why
academic tasks. Students want to challenge themselves students study at the last minute before an exam or
in beating the deadline, even without negative thoughts quiz is due to more and more distractions caused by
or affect, and they frequently wait to do a task other people, cell phones, and open windows. The
regularly. The high standard deviation distributes the results conform to the prevalence of students being
data. Lantern Education (2015) states that students busy with unimportant things while an exam is
likely delayed doing a job because it proves that they approaching.
were likely to perform well. Under the behavioral
aspect, the result conforms to the idea of the In terms of d oing requirements and assignments,
psychology research of Sederlund, A. P., Burns, L. R., respondents have paid little to no attention to
and Rogers, W. (2020), which conveys that academic requirements and duties because they disliked them.
procrastination is an unreasonable delay of behavior. It According to Yilmaz (2017), this may stem from little
also refers to postponing behavior in completing a task regard to assignments as they see it as less important
in an educational setting or including academic duties. than other academic tasks to complete, like exams.
With the respondents' admission of this study of being
Level of Academic Procrastination of the Selected lazy to write papers works, Hayat, Kojuri, & Mitra
Colleges in Tagum Amini (2020) explained that this is because students
put less effort mostly into making assignments due to
The respondents' responses on their level of academic the easily accessible internet gives them more
procrastination in the selected colleges in Tagum City opportunities to plagiarize. Assignments are
appear on a high level. The results indicate that the intrinsically unpleasant or less enjoyable, contributing
even more to a person's laziness in finishing the task. grounded theory of Schraw and colleagues (2007). It
An American study in 2004 cited in an article by communicates that delay in doing an academic task is
Victor Agboa (2021) stated that 70% of college not necessarily maladaptive. It may manifest in doing
students are chronic procrastinators. Some requirements and assignments, studying for exams,
procrastinate through trivialization or think that doing doing school activities, and being interested in
something else like cleaning the house is more changing procrastination.
important than the avoided task. Further, students' lack
of metacognitive skills in learning could also explain In connection, a study by Jenifer Joseph (2016) among
why they procrastinate more often on assignments Chinese General Hospital College Students revealed a
because it has less teacher supervision. Concerning significant relationship between academic
this, Price (2018) spelled out that a student may spend procrastination and self-efficacy (ASE). Thus,
long hours looking at the screen, feeling so stressed improving academic self-efficacy can be an effective
about the task's demands, to the point of deciding to intervention in improving academic procrastination.
engage in a more relaxing activity. Higher self-efficacy will lead students to have better
academic performance and less procrastination.
The only indicator to have a moderate descriptive level
and lowest mean is Attending school activities. Results Regression Analysis on the Influence of Aspects of
have shown that respondents somehow put off school Personality to the Academic Procrastination of the
activities, and if they were to attend, they will most Selected Colleges in Tagum
likely be late and delay the appointment. As stated by
Muntada et al. (2014) in their study, it suggests that the The regression coefficient tests the significant
reason why students procrastinate in joining this influence of the personality and academic
activity depends on how the activities spark the procrastination aspects of the selected colleges in
interests of the students. The participation delay may Tagum City. Using the Linear Regression Analysis,
be due to their interest in the activities provided. the data reveal that the impact of the aspect of the
Contrary to improving students' academic grades and personality on academic procrastination of the selected
socialization process, school activities which colleges in Tagum City has a significant influence.
encourage students to procrastinate. Furthermore, The overall results of the aspect of personality predict
according to Trevino-Maack, S. I., Kamps, D., and academic procrastination in the selected colleges in
Wills, H. (2015), consistently doing self-regulation Tagum City. Therefore, the significance level in the
skills in a collaborative school context has proven hypothesis of aspects of personality and academic
effective in developing academic engagement and procrastination of the selected colleges in Tagum is
significantly decreasing the effects of numerous risks rejected.
factors for most students.
As the previous study mentioned, the resulting
Correlation Between Measures significant influence conformed with the theory from
which this study is anchored. It repeatedly notes in this
There is a significant relationship between the two section that the considerable effect of the independent
variables, which are aspects of personality and variable on the dependent variable accentuates the
academic procrastination. An implication of this is that theory's integrity. It aligns with the Multidimensional
aspects of personality influence the academic View of Academic Procrastination of Solowoska
procrastination of college students. The gathered data (2009), which views academic procrastination as
proves this. It supports the Multidimensional View to contributed by three interacting factors: cognitive
academic procrastination of Sokolowska (2009). functions, affective states, and behavioral aspects.
Aspects of personality and academic procrastination's They were interrelated factors in that how we think
correlation with each other are significant. It means influences how we feel and predicts the particular way
that academic procrastination correlates to the aspects we behave. This pattern of interaction between these
of college students' personalities. Solowoska's views three facto rs in creases the likelih ood of
(2009) affirms the significance in connection to this. It procrastination. Also, the study by Custer (2016)
showcases that cognitive function affects the capacity supports the connection of affective states with
to self-regulate and leads to the act of doing the academic procrastination, stating that the higher test
academic task later, affective states associated the task anxiety an individual feels, the higher the tendency to
that may lead to academic procrastination. A procrastinate. Further, according to Zarrin, Oaixao,
behavioral aspect may contribute to putting off a job and Garcia (2020), negative emotions, and fear of
and doing it a last time. It also conforms with the failure, affect self-esteem, thus doubting one's ability
to finish a task with the desired outcome causes to cognitive functions, affective states, and behavioral
engage in academic procrastination. Further, consistent aspects all have a significant influence on academic
with the adaptive of academic procrastination. Schraw procrastination.
and colleagues (2007) argued that academic
procrastination is not necessarily maladaptive because
References
when the student experiences stress and pressure at the
peak of a deadline, it enhances performance,
Affective vs. Effective: What’s the Difference? (2020). Retrieved:
explaining why some students don't engage on a task November 2, 2020 Retrieved from
unless it's one day before the deadline. https://www.grammarly.com/blog/affective-vs- effective/,
LanternaEducat ion. (2015). The Lie of Working Better under Oxford Learning. (2017). Why do Students Procrastinate?. Retrieved
Pressure. Retrieved October 23, 2020. Retrieved from: October 22, 2020. Retrieved from:
https://www.lanternaeducation.com/ib-blog/lie-working-better-press https://www.oxfordlearning.com/why-do-kids- procrastinate/.
ure/. Retrieved October 23, 2020.
Parker, E. A. (2017). Adults' experience of procrastinating: A
Ljubin-Golub, T., Petričević, E., &Rovan, D. (2019). The role of grounded theory study (Order No. 10634016). Available from
personality in motivational regulation and academic procrastination. ProQuest Central. (1964262481 ). Ret ri eved from
Educational Psychology, 39(4), 550-568. https://search.proquest.com/docview/1964262481?accountid=31259
M P Sederlund, A., R Burns, L., & Rogers, W. (2020). Prajapati, S. (2018).A Curriculum-Based Psychological Flexibility
Multidimensional Models of Perfectionism and Procrastination: Intervention for Procrastination in First-Year Undergraduate
Seeking Determinants of Both. International Journal of Students. Kean University, ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(14), 5099. 10844082.
Mellor, D. (2019). Why do we procrastinate when it’s time to work Price, D. (2018). Laziness Does not Exist. Human Parts. Retrieved
and study? Retrieved November 13, 2020. Retrieved from: October 22, 2020 Retrieved from: https://humanparts.medium.
https://this.deakin.edu.au/study/how-online-learning-is-enhancing- com/laziness- does-not-exist-3af27e312d01.
Qaisar, S., Akhter, N., Masood, A., & Rashid, S. (2017). Trevino-Maack, S. I., Kamps, D., & Wills, H. (2015). A Group
Problematic mobile phone use, academic procrastination and Contingency plus Self-Management Intervention Targeting At-Risk
academic performance of college students. Journal of Educational Secondary Students’ Class-Work and Active Engagement. Remedial
Research, 20(2), 201-214. Retrieved from and Special Education, 36(6), 347–360.
https://search.proquest.com/docview/2036982991?accountid=31259 https://doi.org/10.1177/07419 32514561865
Ren, Y. (2018). Destigmatization or Restigmatization: How Media University of Arkansas. (2020). Understanding and Overcoming
Frame and Perceived Threat to Selfesteem Affect Procrastinators' Procrastination. Retrieved November 21, 2020 Retrieved from:
Behavioral Intention through Labeling Effect. The Chinese https://academics.uafs.edu/sites/academics.uafs.edu/files/Departmen
University of Hong Kong (Hong Kong), ProQuest ts
Dissertations Publishing.11012114. /Academic%20Success/overcoming_and_understanding_procrastin
atio n.pdf.
Rosetti, Lauren, "Procrastination behaviors in college students"
(2011). Theses and Dissertations. 412. Urbiztondo, E. (2018). Impact of Procrastination and it’s
h t t p s : / / rd w . ro w a n . e d u / e t d / 4 1 2 Contributing Factors on Busiiness Administration Students in
Surigao del Sur State University. Retrieved November 19, 2020.
Sarirah, T. H. O. Y. Y. I. B. A. T. U. S., &Chaq, S. A. (2019). Retrieved from:
Academic self-efficacy as a predictor toward decisional http://www.sci-int.com/pdf/636596877274581174.pdf.
procrastination among college students preparing a thesis in
Indonesia. Journal of Advanced Research in Social Sciences and What is Behavioural Aspects (2020). Retrieved Nove,ber 2, 2020
Humanities, 4(1), 23-28. Retrieved from: https://www.igi -
global.com/dictionary/behaviouralaspects/43249#:~:text=1.,when%
Scent, C. L., & Boes, S. R. (2014). Acceptance and commitment 20H olistically%20Approaching%20Project%20Management,
training: A brief intervention to reduce procrastination among
college students. Journal of College Student Psychotherapy, 28(2), Watson, D., Clark, L. & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and
144– 156. https://doi.org/10.1080/87568225.2014.883887 validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The
PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54,
Sederlund, A. P., Burns, L. R., & Rogers, W. (2020). 1063-1070.
Multidimensional models of perfectionism and procrastination:
Seeking determinants of both. International Journal of Woltman, A. (2020). Academic Procrastination in College Students:
Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(14), 5099. Physical-Mental Fatigue,“Fear of Failure”, Perfectionism, Trait
Procrastination, and Aversive Behavior.
Shams, D. (2016). The use of stories in promoting morality among
junior high school students. Journal of Advances in Humanities and Zarrin, S. A., Gracia, E., & Paixão, M. P. (2020). Prediction of
Social Sciences, 2(3), 168-181. academic procrastination by fear of failure and self-
regulation. Kuram Ve Uygulamada Egitim Bilimleri, 20(3), 34-43.
Solomon, L. J., & Rothblum, E. D. (1984). Academic doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.12738/jestp.2020.3.003
procrastination: Frequency and cognitive-behavioral correlates.
Journal of Counseling Psychology, 31(4), 503-509. doi: Zusya, A. R., & Akmal, S. Z. (2016). The relationship of academic
10.1037/0022-0167.31.4.503 self-efficacy with academic procrastination on students who are
completing their thesis. Psympathic: JurnalIlmiahPsikologi, 3(2),
Solving Procrastination, 2020. Procrastinator: A Guide to 191-200.
Understanding the People Who Procrastinate. Retrieved October,
22, 2020. Retrieved from:
h t t p s : / / s o l v i n g p ro c r a s t i n a t i o n . c o m / p ro c ra s t i n a t o r/ . Affiliations and Corresponding Information
Suharti, L., &Pramono, A. (2016). Cultural intelligence among
indonesian students: Role of international experiences and their
Rae Ann G. Feguracion
impact on the development of social network and adaptive
performance. Journal of Advances in Humanities and Social UM Tagum College - Philippines
Science, 2(3), 182-194.
Jibriel Mapuro
Susman, D. (2020, May 30). What Is Procrastination? VeryWell UM Tagum College – Philippines
Mind.
https://www.verywellmind.com/the-psychology-of-procrastination-2 Miles Grace Bautista
795944 UM Tagum College – Philippines
Steel P, Klingsieck KB (2016). Academic Procrastination: Edlyn Joy P. Espiritu
Psychological Antecedents Revisited. Austr. Psychol. 51:36-46.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ap.12173
UM Tagum College – Philippines