Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Shattuck (#9345)
TYCKSEN & SHATTUCK, L.C.
12401 South 450 East, Suite E-1
Draper, Utah 84020
Telephone: (801) 748-4081
Fax: (801) 748-4087
Email: chad@tyshlaw.com
vs.
Case No.:
DEIDRE HENDERSON Lieutenant Governor
of Utah and Celeste Maloy, an individual, Judge:
Respondents.
COMES NOW Petitioner Richard Quin Denning, through his undersigned counsel,
and pursuant to Utah Code §20A-1-404 hereby petitions this Court regarding the candidacy
of Respondent Celeste Maloy (“Maloy”) and require the Lieutenant Governor of Utah and
her office (“The Lieutenant Governor’s Office” or “LGO”) to remove Maloy as a candidate
in the race for the seat in the United States House of Representatives for the Second
This lawsuit seeks to compel the “LGO” and Maloy to comply with Utah law. Maloy was
not a member of the Utah Republican Party (“Utah GOP”) when she declared her candidacy for
the seat in the United States House of Representatives that is soon to be vacated by Chris
Stewart. Maloy also had not legally established her residency in Utah at the time she declared her
candidacy. Being a member of her declared political party and being a resident are both
requirements under Utah law to qualify a person to run as a candidate for the congressional seat
at issue. Since Maloy did not meet the statutory requirements to run for this office when she
declared her candidacy, and did not meet those requirements as of the June 14, 2023 deadline,
The LGO is aware of the legal requirements under Utah law for a person to qualify to
declare her candidacy for congressional office. The LGO became aware that Maloy was not a
registered member of the Republican Party when Maloy declared her candidacy for Utah’s
Second Congressional District seat in the United States House of Representatives in the
upcoming special election, and was not a member when the filing deadline passed, and failed to
disqualify her from running. the LGO failed to follow Utah law and disqualify Maloy as a
candidate, and waited until after the Special Republican Convention to reveal the information
after Maloy won the nomination at convention. Under Utah law Maloy is not eligible to be a
candidate and Henderson should be ordered to not put Maloy on the ballot or consider Maloy as
Washington County, Utah. Denning was a candidate for Utah’s Second Congressional
2
District for the United States House of Representatives.
Arlington Virginia the last four years. 1 She claims to now reside in Iron County, Utah. Maloy
is a candidate for Utah’s Second Congressional District for the United States House of
Representatives.
4. This court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to Utah Code §78A-5-102.
6. This case is classified as Tier 2 for discovery purposes under Rule 26 of the
Utah Rules of Civil Procedure. Utah R. Civ. P. 26(c)(3). Petitioner reserves the right to amend
by Governor Cox on June 7, 2023 (a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto as
Exhibit 1), the following deadlines are important to this election controversy:
1
The address Maloy has listed with the Utah Bar Association is 166 Cannon House Office Building, Washington
DC 20515 (services.utahbar.org) – this is apparently a work address.
3
8. Pursuant to Utah Code §20A-5-405(1)(f): “no later than 45 days before the day
of the election, make sample ballots available for inspection, in the same form as official
ballots and that contain the same information as official ballots…” Thus the ballot deadline
9. Pursuant to Utah Code §20A-3a-202(2) the LGO must mail out ballots to
voters “no sooner than 21 days before election day and no later than seven days before election
day….” Thus the earliest such can be mailed for the special election is August 15, 2023, and
10. The Court should rule on this election controversy as soon as possible to enable
GENERAL ALLEGATIONS
11. As did other legal candidates, Denning invested tens of thousands of dollars
and countless hours in pursuing his campaign for election as the Representative of Utah’s
12. Petitioner’s campaign was impacted by the participation of each and every
other candidate for the Party nomination for the same congressional seat.
13. Petitioner relied on the LGO as the Election Official to not allow any illegal
candidate into the race so that the voting at the Special Convention would result in the
14. Unbeknownst to Petitioner until after the Special Republican Convention, held
in Delta, Utah on June 24, 2023, another candidate, Celeste Maloy did not meet the statutory
qualifications to become a candidate for Second Congressional District in the U.S. House of
Representatives.
4
15. Having an illegal candidate in the congressional race impacted the voting at the
Special Convention. Voters who would otherwise have not considered Maloy undertook to
vote for candidates, including Maloy on the assumption that the candidates were properly
16. In February 2016, Maloy submitted a voter registration form to the Washington
County Clerk. On the form she was affiliated as a member of the Utah GOP.
17. In 2019 Maloy moved to Virginia, after being hired by Congressman Chris
Stewart.
18. Upon information and belief, from 2019 through 2023 Maloy resided exclusively
in Virginia.
19. Maloy has confirmed that she has lived in Virginia working for Congressman Chris
Stewart for the last four years. See the interview Maloy had with Eric Mousos at 8:57-9:49,
https://rumble.com/v2yk3nc-celeste-maloy-friend-or-foe-to-utah-with-eric-moutsos.html .
20. Maloy filed income tax returns for for the last four years in the state of Virginia while
21. Upon information and belief Maloy was a resident of Virginia on May 31, 2023
22. Upon information and belief, thirteen days later Maloy used the address of a
residence belonging to Lucia Maloy as her own when declaring her candidacy.
23. The Republican Party Constitution requires that a party member be a resident of
Utah. See the Utah GOP Constitution, Article 1(c). A true and correct copy of the Republican
24. Pursuant to the Republican Party Constitution, Maloy was not eligible to be a
member of the Utah GOP while not a resident of Utah from 2019 forward.
5
25. In April 2019, the Washington County Clerk designated Maloy’s voter
Address Processing, that she no longer lived at the address listed on her voter registration and
mailed notice informing her of this, as required under Utah Code §20A-2-505.
26. In January 2023, Maloy was removed from the current voter registration as required
by Utah Code §20A-2-504(iv) because she did not respond to the notice and did not vote
between the time the notice was mailed and the date of the second regular general election
following the mailing of the notice, and under such circumstances the “county clerk shall
27. On June 12, 2023, Maloy filed with the Office of the Lieutenant Governor a
Maloy indicated that she was, at the time filing, a member of the Republican Party. Attached
28. Maloy was not a member of the Utah GOP at the time she filed her
declaration of candidacy on June 12, 2023 because she was at the time not registered with
29. As of June 14, 2023, Maloy was not a registered member of the Utah Republican
Party.
30. Utah Code §20A-9-201(2)(a)(iii) reads in part that “an individual may not file a
declaration of candidacy for a registered political party of which the individual is not a member.”
31. On or before June 15, 2023, the LGO was aware of Maloy’s ineligibility to run
for the position as a Representative in the Second Congressional District of Utah due to not being a
32. Article I, Section 2 of the United States Constitution requires that a candidate for
6
the office of U.S. House of Representatives be: (1) a U.S. Citizen, (2) at least 25 years old, and (3) an
33. “The term “ inhabitant” implies a more fixed and permanent abode than the term “
resident,” and frequently imports many privileges and duties, which a mere resident could not claim
34. Consistent with the authority preserved to the states by the 10th Amendment to the
U.S. Constitution, states elect their representatives pursuant to state law and can impose additional
35. Utah’s The Election Code expressly requires that BEFORE declaring candidacy
37. Instead of enforcing compliance with Utah’s election laws as required by Utah
Code §20A-2-101(1)(b), and §20A-1-501, the LGO ignored Maloy’s statutory deficiencies and
2
Board of Supervisors v. Davenport, 40 Ill 197, at HN1 and 206 (Illinois S. Ct.,1866).
7
undertook efforts to reach out to Maloy to remedy the fact that Maloy was not a member of the Utah
38. On or about June 15, 2023, the LGO informed Maloy that she was not a statutory
resident or on the voter registration records for the Utah GOP, and therefore not a member of the
Republican party at that time, and that she needed to be on the registration records to be determined
39. On June 15, 2023, Maloy submitted an online voter registration form and
40. On June 16, 2023 the Iron County Clerk updated Maloy’s voter registration
41. The LGO did not reveal to the Republican Party of Utah that Maloy did not meet
the qualifications of Utah Code §20A-9-201 to be a candidate at any time prior to the GOP
special convention.
42. Maloy did not reveal to the Republican Party of Utah that she did not meet the
43. On June 24, 2023, the Republican Party held a special convention to nominate a
replacement candidate for the upcoming vacant seat in Utah’s Second Congressional District.
44. On June 24, 2023, Maloy became the presumptive Republican Party nominee to
replace Congressman Chris Stewart as the Utah House of Representative in Utah’s Second
Congressional District.
45. Upon information and belief, the address on Maloy’s Declaration of Candidacy is
the residence belonging to a family member. See Exhibit 4 – a true and correct copy of
County record for the property where Maloy purports to reside in Iron County.
8
46. Utah Code §20A-2-105(1) “A person shall be considered a resident of the state of
a particular voting precinct if, on the date of registering to vote, the person’s principal place
47. Upon information and belief, the address on Maloy’s Declaration of Candidacy
48. The Utah legislature undertook the effort to review public election and party
summarizing the factual findings regarding Maloy’s eligibility (as set forth in ¶¶17, 18, 23-
49. Respondents knew that Maloy did not meet the statutory requirements to legally
and lawfully declare her candidacy approximately ten days prior to the Republican
Convention and knowingly failed to disclose that information to the Utah GOP until the day
50. On or about June 25, 2023, the LGO called the Utah GOP Chairman
Robert Axson and informed him that Maloy did not meet the requirements to be considered
as a candidate before the June 14, 2023 deadline, but that such was “corrected” after the
deadline.
declaration for elections within 10 days of the first Wednesday after the fourth Saturday in
52. However, there was no possibility of raising an objection months before the
3
Attached hereto as Exhibit 5 is a true and correct copy of the legislative report. The report can
also be found at: https://house.utleg.gov/cd2-timeline-and-facts/ .
9
declaration of candidacy was actually made in the special election, and no replacement
deadline was authorized for the special election when Governor Cox Issued his Writ of
Election authorizing a special election and setting forth deadlines for such on June 7, 2023.
See Exhibit 1.
that all candidates met the requirements to be on the ballot by the June 14 deadline.
54. Respondent’s lack of action to prevent an illegal candidate from running for office
55. The fact that Maloy was legally authorized at the time of declaring her candidacy
56. Including Maloy while she was an illegal candidate changed the outcome of the
Special Convention.
57. Due to Maloy’s illegal status as the Convention nominee, members of the GOP
will be compelled to consider an illegal candidate for the special primary election set for
58. Petitioner incorporates the foregoing allegations of this Complaint as though fully
59. Maloy did not meet the statutory requirements to declare her candidacy on June
12, 2023 when she filed her Declaration on June 12, 2023.
60. The Election Code expressly requires that BEFORE declaring candidacy for a
10
a. be a United States citizen;
b. meet the legal requirements of that office; and
c. if seeking the nomination of a registered political party, state the
registered political party of which the individual is a member or state
that the individual is not a member of a registered political party.
61. Maloy did not meet the requirements for candidacy for the congressional seat by
62. This deficiency was known by Maloy and the LGO at least 9 days before the
special Convention held on June 24, 2023, whereat Maloy won the nomination.
63. Disqualifying Maloy for failing to meet the requirements of candidacy will serve
64. Upon doing so, Utah Code provides the mechanism by which the Utah GOP shall
In the event that a Party candidate resigns, dies or becomes incapacitated after
nomination at the state convention or at the primary election, the candidate shall be
replaced by the following method: … A candidate for any statewide, U.S. Senate or U.S.
Representative office shall be replaced by the State Central Committee.
GOP Constitution Article XII §8(B)(2); see also Utah Code 20A-1-501.
65. Candidates in Utah have been disqualified for failing to comply with election laws
and deadlines. 4 Some examples can be found where even filing candidacy documents one
minute late has been sufficient to be disqualified. 5 It would be appropriate here to uphold
66. Disqualifying Maloy for being an illegal candidate will afford the GOP to provide
4
https://kslnewsradio.com/1977692/candidate-disqualified-in-davis-county-house-race/ ,
https://www.deseret.com/utah/2019/8/7/20797627/salt-lake-city-council-candidate-disqualified-for-finance-
reporting-issue
5
https://www.fox13now.com/2019/08/13/draper-city-council-candidate-disqualified-for-filing-documents-one-
minute-late.
11
a lawful nominee for consideration in the Utah GOP Primary Election.
67. Petitioner incorporates the foregoing allegations of this Complaint as though fully
68. Utah Code § 20A-1-404 authorizes a candidate for office to challenge an election
officer’s or other election-related person’s performance of any duty or action taken under
Whenever any controversy occurs between any election officer or other person or entity
charged with any duty or function under this title and any candidate, or the officers or
representatives of any political party, or persons who have made nominations, either
party to the controversy may file a verified petition with the district court.
69. After reviewing the petition, a Court shall “summarily hear and dispose of any
issues raised by the petition to obtain . . . substantial compliance with all other provisions of
[the Election Code] by the parties to the controversy” and “make and enter orders and
judgments, and issue the process of the court to enforce all of those orders and judgments”
70. The Election Code expressly requires that BEFORE declaring candidacy for a
71. The Election Code mandates that “an individual may not … file a declaration of
12
candidacy for a registered political party of which the individual is not a member, except to
the extent that the registered political party permits otherwise in the registered political
72. On June 12, 2023, Maloy was not a member of the Utah GOP.
73. The Utah GOP Bylaws has no provision allowing a person who is not
74. On June 12, 2023, Maloy knew that she was not a registered as member of the
Utah GOP.
77. As of June 14, 2023, the deadline for declaring her candidacy, Maloy was a tax-
78. As of June 14, 2023, Maloy was not yet a resident of Utah
79. On June 12, 2023, when she declared her candidacy Maloy knew that she was not
80. Maloy did not meet the qualifications for candidacy as of June 14, 2023,
and there is no provision in the Election Code to retroactively change her illegal status upon
making her declaration, the Court should order that Maloy is disqualified from running in
the special election and restrain her from having her name on any ballot.
81. Petitioner incorporates the foregoing allegations of this Complaint as though fully
13
set forth herein.
82. The LGO knowingly allowed Maloy who did not meet all of the requirements for
declaring her candidacy before the filing deadline to become a candidate for the GOP
nomination for the special election for the Second Congressional District seat.
83. The LGO “shall enforce compliance by election officers with all legal
requirements relating to elections, including… state law relating to elections.” Utah Code
84. The Election Code expressly requires that BEFORE accepting a United States
Congressional candidate’s declaration of candidacy, the LGO must read the requirements for
that office and have the prospective candidate declare she is qualified.
(3)(a) Except for a candidate for president or vice president of the United States, before
the filing officer may accept any declaration of candidacy, the filing officer shall:
(i) read to the individual the constitutional and statutory qualification
requirements for the office that the individual is seeking;
(ii) require the individual to state whether the individual meets the
requirements described in Subsection (3)(a)(i).
85. The LGO purports to have complied with the Election Code when receiving
Maloy’s stated compliance with the statutory requirements for her candidacy.
86. However, the LGO was aware that Maloy was not qualified under Utah law when
she declared her candidacy on June 12, 2023, and was still not qualified as of June 14, 2023,
87. Instead of enforcing the Election Code and deeming Maloy ineligible to run for
14
the congressional seat, the LGO sought after the fact to correct the eligibility deficiency after
88. The LGO should have notified the Utah GOP of Maloy’s lack of qualification for
the office Maloy sought. The LGO failed to do so, thus removing the Utah GOP’s ability to have
89. The LGO has failed to administer the Election Code in a fair and equal manner,
90. Because of the LGO’s failure to perform her statutorily mandated duties, and
since Maloy did not meet the qualifications for candidacy as of June 14, 2023, the Court
should order that the LGO as Election Official not include Maloy as a candidate for Utah’s
91. Since Maloy did not meet the qualifications for candidacy as of June 14, 2023,
and there is no provision in the Election Code to retroactively change her illegal status, the
Court should order that the LGO not print or mail out any election ballots bearing Maloy’s
name.
92. Since Maloy did not meet the qualifications for candidacy as of June 14, 2023,
and the LGO knowingly withheld that information from the GOP and GOP delegates until
after the special convention, the Court should compel the LGO to request a new nominee
from the Utah GOP due to Maloy’s disqualification, and to include the name of such
15
PRAYER FOR RELIEF
1. That Maloy be disqualified from running for the United States Congressional
Seat for Utah’s Second Congressional District due to her ineligibility as of the candidacy
declaration date and her knowingly withholding such information from the GOP and the
2. That LGO be restrained from including Maloy in any further election for the
United States Congressional Seat for Utah’s Second Congressional District due to her
ineligibility as of the candidacy declaration date and the LGO knowingly withholding such
information from the GOP and the GOP delegates at the Special Convention.
3. That the LGO be compelled to request a new nominee from the Utah GOP, as
authorized buy Utah Code 20A-1-501, due to Maloy’s disqualification, and to include the name
4. For such other relief as the Court deems just and appropriate under the
circumstances.
16
VERIFICATION
I, R. Quin Denning verify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing factual statements
in the Verified Petition Regarding the Candidacy of Celeste Maloy are true and correct to the
best of my knowledge and understanding.
/s/Chad C Shattuck
Chad C Shattuck, Attorney for Petitioner
17