Professional Documents
Culture Documents
665.4 − 725.8
% change in current assets = x 100
665.4
= 9.1 %
Note: For Accounts with zero balance in the earlier or initial year, the formula
for the percentage of change will not apply.
Fidas Merchandising
Statement of Financial Position
As of December 31
(in millions)
Fidas Merchandising
Statement of Financial Position
As of December 31
(in millions)
Fidas Merchandising
Income Statement
As of December 31
(in millions)
Analysis
1. Current assets increased by 9.1%. The increase is a
result of 64.1% increase in accounts receivable and a
57.7% increase in inventory. The increase in accounts
receivable entails management to check their credit
and collection policy for prompt collection of
accounts especially that increase in net sales was only
27.3% and cash decreased by 32.5%. Likewise, the
increase in merchandise inventory necessitates
management to check their inventory stocks for
obsolescence or slow moving items comparing their
increase in sales and the increase in inventory.
Analysis
2. Property, Plant, And Equipment showed a 235.6%
increase. This may be due to purchase made by the
company to invest in plant assets. It is possible for
the owner to invest property and equipment in the
business. However, in the case of Fidas
Merchandising, owner’s equity showed a decrease
of 2.9%. This might not be possible unless the
owner invested non-current asset then afterwards
made large amounts of withdrawals during the
year.
Analysis
3. Current Liabilities and owner’s equity decreased
despite increase in total liabilities and owner’s equity.
This can be explained by the 383.9% increase in the
company’s non-current liabilities which means that the
company made heavy borrowings during the year.
Sources of business funds are generated either from the
investment of the owner or loans from banks or financial
institutions. In the case of Fidas Merchandising, the
company obtained additional funds through loan. With
the significant increase in non-current assets, it can be
inferred that the loan obtained by the company was used
to finance the acquisition of the property, plant, and
equipment.
Analysis
4. Net Sales increased by 27.3% during the year. However,
despite the increase in sales, net income decreased by 7.3%.
Looking at the other components of the income statement,
cost of goods sold increased by 24.1%. Even with this increase
in goods sold, gross margin registered a 30.2% increase.
Selling and administrative expenses showed a 34.8% increase.
Despite this, income from operations recorded an 18%
increase. The company’s increase in interest expense of 98%
resulted in a decrease in income before taxes despite the
increase in net sales. Analyzing the components of the income
statement, we were able to explain the decrease in net
income despite increase in net sales. Hence, management can
now understand that the magnanimous increase in interest
expense caused the decrease in overall net income.
On the Dot Trading
Statement of Financial Position
As of December 31
On the Dot Trading
Income Statement
For the Years Ended December 31
(in millions)
Vertical Analysis
₱1,822.4
% of non − current liabilities = x 100% = 70.3%
₱2,592.2
4. For the comparative income statement, express each account as a percentage of net
sales. Net sales is automatically 100%.
Example:
₱1,032
% of cost of goods sold = x 100% = 46.6%
₱2,213
Fidas Merchandising
Statement of Financial Position
As of December 31
(in millions)
Fidas Merchandising
Income Statement
For the Years Ended December 31
(in millions)
Interpretation of Data (Analysis)
• 1) Current asset was 54.5% of total assets in
2016. However, this percentage decreased to
28% in 2017. This was due to the significant
increase n property, plant, and equipment.
Hence, the dramatic change in total assets
composition.
Interpretation of Data (Analysis)
2. Non-current assets represented by property,
plant, and equipment was 45.5% of total assets
in 2016 and 72% in 2017. This may be due to
purchases made by the company during the year
to invest in plant assets.
Interpretation of Data (Analysis)
3. Current liabilities was 50.8% of total liabilities and
owner’s equity in 2016 but significantly decreased to 21%
in 2017. This is opposite to non-current liabilities which
was 30.8% of total liabilities and owner’s equity in 2016
but increased to 70.3% in 2017. The company made a
loan during the year and might have paid its current
liabilities. Hence, the opposite change in the two
liabilities. Percentage of owner’s equity to total liabilities
and owner’s equity was 18.4% in 2016 and 8.4 in 2017.
This means that the equity financed by creditors
represented by total liabilities was 81.6 in 2016 and 91.6
in 2017. This is not a good sign as the company’s business
funds are heavily provided by creditors.
Interpretation of Data (Analysis)
4. From the income statement, the percentage of net
income to sales decreased from 8.7% to 6.4%. This
decrease has been explained by the onerous interest
expense in the horizontal analysis discussed in the
previous lesson. The percentage of cost of goods sold in
relation to net sales indicated a minimal decrease from
47.8% to 46.6% while selling and administrative expenses
indicated a minimal increase from 38% to 40.2%. The
relation of interest expense to net sales during the year
increased more than double from 1.8% to 4.1%. Finally,
net income in relation to net sales decreased from 8.7%
to 6.4% despite the company’s acquisition of property,
plant, and equipment.
Trend Analysis
Steps in Performing a trend analysis
1. Prepare a comparative financial statements for three, four or five
consecutive years.
2. Choose a base year. Usually the first year is the base year.
3. Calculate the trend percentage for each item by dividing the
amount of each item by the base year. The base year is
automatically 100%.
𝐶ℎ𝑜𝑠𝑒𝑛 𝑌𝑒𝑎𝑟
𝑇𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑑% = x 100 %
𝐵𝑎𝑠𝑒 𝑌𝑒𝑎𝑟
Example:
₱665.40
Current Assets Trend % 2016 = x 100% = 111.3%
₱597.60
Fidas Merchandising
Statement of Financial Position
As of December 31
(in millions)
Fidas Merchandising
Income Statement
As of December 31
(in millions)
(30%)
Fidas Merchandising
Statement of Financial Position
As of December 31
(in millions)
Fidas Merchandising
Income Statement
As of December 31
(in millions)
Interpretation of Data (Analysis)
1. Cash increased in 2016 but significantly
decreased in 2017. Accounts receivable and
inventory continued its upward trend for three
years. Although net sales has an upward trend,
its increase is not on a par with the increase in
accounts receivable, inventory should be
checked for obsolete and slow moving items.
Interpretation of Data (Analysis)
2. Property, plant and equipment decreased in
2016 but drastically increased in 2017 due to
acquisition made by the company. Likewise,
Non-current liabilities significantly increased in
2017 which means that the company used the
loan to acquire the property, plant and
equipment.
Interpretation of Data (Analysis)
3. Total liabilities has an upward trend while owners
equity has a downward trend indicating the
company heavily relied on outside funds from
creditors.
4. Net sales had an upward trend in 3 years while
property plant and equipment decreased in 2016
but significantly increased n 2017. This may indicate
that the company is benefitting from the use of the
newly acquired non-current assets as evidence by
the increase in sales.
Interpretation of Data (Analysis)
5. Cost of sales has an upward trend but despite
this, gross profit managed to follow with an upward
trend. Selling and administrative expenses has an
upward trend, income from operations decreased
in 2016 but increased in 2017.
6. Interest expense has the most significant
increasing trend in three years culminating to more
than 300 percent increase in 2017. With cost of
sales and all expenses going up, income went
understandably went on a downward trend despite
an upward trend in net sales.