Professional Documents
Culture Documents
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-019-3860-x 1059-9495/$19.00
This article presents the structural, mechanical, and electrical behavior of ceramic-reinforced copper metal
matrix hybrid composites developed by stir-casting technique. Commercial copper was used as matrix, and
different weight percentages of boron carbide (B4C), with constant weight percentage of tungsten carbide,
boron nitride, and chromium, were used as reinforcements. Copper hybrid composites were characterized
by high-resolution x-ray diffraction, optical microscope, scanning electron microscope, energy-dispersive
analysis of x-ray, high-resolution scanning electron microscope, and Fourier transform infrared spec-
troscopy. Density, hardness, tensile strength, compressive strength, and electrical conductivity were also
analyzed. These hybrid composites show improved mechanical properties such as hardness, tensile
strength, and compressive strength, while relatively lower density and electrical conductivity were ob-
served.
Fig. 1 SEM morphology of reinforcing particles (a) B4C, (b) BN, (c) WC, (d) Cr, and their particle size frequency plot (aÕ)-(dÕ), respectively
Table 1 Compositional detail of the CC, HC-1, HC-2, HC-3, and HC-4
S. no. Types of materials Compositions Purity (%) Wt.% Wt. in (g) Wt. after assay correction (g)
Fig. 3 (a) HRXRD pattern of CC, HC-1, HC-2, HC-3, and HC-4, (b) HRXRD peak broadening (at 2h = 95.097 degree)
Table 2 Detail of the FWHM of CC, HC-1, HC-2, HC-3, and HC-4 with their respective peak positions
S. Peak position Diffraction FWHM (b-deg.) FWHM (b-deg.) FWHM (b-deg.) FWHM (b-deg.) FWHM (b-deg.)
no. (2h-deg.) planes of CC of HC-1 of HC-2 of HC-3 of HC-4
W–H analysis shows that the crystallite size decreases by about straight line for all the B4C additions; this suggests that the
48.5% on increasing the B4C from 0.0 to 1.0 wt.%, whereas strain is anisotropic for all compositions (Ref 34).
strain increases by 96.40%. This implies that the anomalous
broadening of the peak as shown in Fig. 3(b) is not only due to 3.2 Fourier Transform Infrared Analysis
crystallite size, but also due to a significant increase in strain.
Figure 6 shows the Fourier transform infrared (FTIR)
From Fig. 5, it was observed that all the points do not lie on
spectra of the CC, HC-1, HC-2, HC-3, and HC-4. FTIR spectra
ceramic particles has played a significant role in the copper transition when the original surface or grain boundaries
matrix. It is also observed that the grain refinement takes place dissociate into flat segments whose energy is less than that of
in the microstructures of HC-1, HC-2, and HC-3, as shown in the original surface or grain boundary. Grain boundary faceting
Fig. 10(b), (c), and (d), respectively, which also plays a vital proceeds only close to the so-called coincidence misorientation
role in the improvement in strength of the HC-1, HC-2, and (Ref 39). The R9 grain boundary is unstable against the
HC-3. It is due to the reinforcing particles, which restrain the dissociation reaction: R9 fi R3 + R3. Therefore, elongated
degree of freedom of grain boundaries and further stop the twins with well-developed R3 grain boundaries appear during
grain growth so that it is limiting the average grain size of the the growth of crystal, instead of planes or facets. Faceting is a
microstructures (Ref 1). The microstructure of the CC shows temperature- and composition-dependent phenomenon of the
twins, and these twins (R3) grain boundaries contain various copper alloys where we expect that at high temperature only the
facets with different crystallography that is clearly depicted in facets with highest density of coincidence sites appear, and with
Fig. 10(a) and 11. It may be possible in copper hybrid decreasing temperature, the number of existing facets will
composites also. However, faceting is a well-documented gradually increase, including the facets with less and less
phenomenon known for both surfaces and interfaces, particu- dense-packed coincidence sites and shallower energetic minima
larly, grain boundaries. Faceting can be considered as a phase (Ref 40).
Element CK NK OK Peak1 Peak2 Peak3 Peak1 Peak2 Peak3 Peak1 Peak2 Peak3 Peak4
Spectrum 0.284 0.409 0.543 0.574 5.403 5.989 0.952 8.083 8.979 1.387 2.054 8.403 8.743
energy
(KeV)
Standard 0.284 0.409 0.543 0.574 … 5.989 0.952 … 8.979 1.809 2.281 10.207 11.544
energy
(KeV)
Principal K 1s K 1s K 1s L3 2P3/2 … K 1s L2 2P1/2 … K 1s M5 3d5/2 M4 3d3/2 L3 2p3/2 L2 2p1/2
emission
line
Fig. 8 EDAX spectrum of HC-3 for qualitative and quantitative analysis at 300 counts
Table 5 Detail of the K-ratio value for the element in the EDAX spectrum of HC-3
S. no. Elements Wt.% in spectrum K-ratio Difference, %
The microstructure of CC and sections of R3 CSL boundaries present in the samples could strongly influence their
perpendicular to the {110} tilt axis with position of various properties.
facets and micrograph of intersections of (100)CSL with other
facets are shown in Fig. 11. Thus, micrographs in Fig. 10 and 3.5 Relative Density and Porosity of Materials
11 show that the alloys have different amounts of twins as well
Table 6 shows the variation of relative density and porosity
as differences in their facets. In turn, the character of grain
of CC, HC-1, HC-2, HC-3, and HC-4. The relative density of
Fig. 10 Microstructure of (a) CC, (b) HC-1, (c) HC-2, (d) HC-3, and (e) HC-4
the hybrid composites decreases, and porosity increases with compared with other hybrid composites but not more than its
the increasing wt.% of B4C reinforcement with constant wt.% copper matrix. This may be attributed to the lowering in
of WC and BN into the copper matrix. It is attributed to the porosity due to proper orientation and well-occupied space by
addition of low density (g/cm3), irregular shape, and size of reinforcing materials into the copper matrix. Relative density of
B4C and BN reinforcements (Ref 41). As shown in Table 6, hybrid composites such as HC-1, HC-2, and HC-4 is decreasing
there is some enhancement in relative density of HC-3 as with the increase in reinforcement. It is due to the increase in
Table 6 Variation of relative density, porosity, hardness, compressive strength, ultimate tensile strength, and electrical
conductivity of CC, HC-1, HC-2, HC-3, and HC-4
S. Types of Relative Porosity, Vickers hardness, Compressive strength, UTS, Electrical conductivity, %
no. materials density, % % HV MPa MPa IACS
the porosity in the hybrid composites as shown in Table 6. An Orowan strengthening mechanisms in addition to the interface
increase in porosity is due to the addition of the irregular shape between the matrix and reinforcements (Ref 47).
and different size of reinforcing particles into the matrix with An increase in ultimate tensile strength (UTS) is observed
their different crystal geometry, such as rhombohedral, hexag- with the increase in the B4C content from 0 to 1.0 wt.% as
onal, and bcc. Agglomeration of reinforcing particles in the given in Table 6. An improvement of 16.2, 27.6, 50.4, and
matrix may also initiate the enhancement of porosity in the 39.0% in ultimate tensile strength is observed for HC-1, HC-2,
materials as observed in Fig. 9(a). HC-3, and HC-4, respectively. It may be attributed to the
combined effect of improved hardness of the hybrid composites
3.6 Mechanical Properties (Ref 48) and increased wettability of copper matrix by the
addition of Cr. Wettability is an influencing factor to ensure
Table 6 shows the variation of the Vickers hardness of CC,
good bonding between the reinforcement and matrix; good
HC-1, HC-2, HC-3, and HC-4. It is observed that there is a
bonding is always required for the improvement in ultimate
significant increase in the Vickers hardness of hybrid compos-
tensile strength of materials (Ref 42). In addition, the lowering
ites (from 88 to 175 HV) with the increase in B4C content from
in crystallite size and grain refinement of the hybrid composite
0.0 to 1.0 wt.%. The presence of hard B4C with other
materials may also play a vital role in the improvement in
reinforcements increases the Vickers hardness of hybrid
ultimate tensile strength of the materials. HC-3 has the highest
composites with increasing their content (Ref 42). Similar
ultimate tensile strength among all, as shown in Table 6. It is
trend was also reported for reinforcements of SiC, B4C, and
also noticed that HC-4 has higher ultimate tensile strength than
AlB2 particles to enhance the hardness of the composites (Ref
other hybrid composite materials and matrix but lower than
43, 44). Such enhancement in hardness may be attributed to the
HC-3, because of its lower density and hardness compared with
variation in the plastic deformation of hybrid composites due to
HC-3. Ultimate tensile strength of hybrid composites may also
the reinforcement of hard ceramic particles in softer matrix (Ref
be enhanced by the incorporation of ceramic particles in copper
45). The hardness of the hybrid composites is also influenced
matrix that increase the work hardening in the materials. The
by other reasons, such as their low crystallite size, which was
work hardening in the hybrid composites is due to the
calculated by W–H plot as discussed above, by grain refine-
geometric constraints imposed by the presence of the ceramic
ment that is observed in microstructures (Ref 24), and elastic
reinforcements. When the matrix is significantly work hard-
modulus and thermal mismatch between reinforcing particles
ened, the matrix is placed under great constraint with an
and matrix (Ref 46). The hardness of the hybrid composites
inability of the strain relaxation to take place (Ref 49).
also increases due to the involvement of Hall–Petch and