2016-2-JOH-BATU PAHAT GERAK GEMPUR PRA

No Solution/Annwer Mark
1 (a)
mx + 3x 2 m + 3x
lim = lim M1
x →0 4 x − 8 x 2 x →0 4 − 8 x

m
=
4

m
=3 M1
4
m = 12 A1

(b)
 3 − x − 3  3 − x + 3  M1
3− x − 3
lim = lim   
 3 − x + 3 
x →0 x x →0 x
  
1 M1
= lim −
x →0
3− x + 3
1
=− A1
2 3
2 (a)
1 r
V = r 2 h tan 45  = r = h
3 h
1 M1
= h 3
3
dV
= h 2
dh
dh dV dh M1
= .
dt dt dV
 1 
= 36 . 2  M1
 h 
36
= 2
h

h=3
dh 36
= = 4 cms -1
dt 9 A1

For More Info: Dr. Math (Shopee) #All the HARDWORK, SACRIFICES, SLEEPLESS NIGHT, DOWNFALLS definitely PAYS OFF!
No Solution/Annwer Mark

2 (b)
M1
V =  (18)
1 3

3
 (18)3
1 M1
t=3
36
= 54 s A1

3 𝑥2 𝑦2
(a) From + 𝑏2 = 1,
𝑎2
𝑏2 𝑥 2
𝑦 2 = 𝑏2 − 𝑎2

𝑎 𝑏2 𝑥 2
∴ 𝐴 = 4 ∫0 √𝑏2 − 𝑑𝑥
𝑎2
M1
𝑎 𝑏2
𝐴 = 4 ∫0 √𝑎2 (𝑎2 − 𝑥 2 )𝑑𝑥
4𝑏 𝑎
𝐴= 𝑎
∫0 √(𝑎2 − 𝑥 2 )𝑑𝑥
A1
𝜋 𝜋
(b) given 𝐶 = ∫0 𝑒 −2𝑥 𝑐𝑜𝑠𝑥 𝑑𝑥 given 𝑆 = ∫0 𝑒 −2𝑥 𝑠𝑖𝑛𝑥 𝑑𝑥
𝑑𝑣 𝑑𝑣
Let 𝑢 = 𝑒 −2𝑥 and = 𝑐𝑜𝑠𝑥 OR Let 𝑢 = 𝑒 −2𝑥 and = 𝑠𝑖𝑛𝑥
𝑑𝑥 𝑑𝑥
𝑑𝑢 𝑑𝑢
= −2𝑒 −2𝑥 𝑣 = 𝑠𝑖𝑛𝑥 = −2𝑒 −2𝑥 𝑣 = −𝑐𝑜𝑠𝑥
𝑑𝑥 𝑑𝑥 M1
𝜋 𝜋
𝐶 = ∫0 𝑒 −2𝑥 𝑐𝑜𝑠𝑥 𝑑𝑥 OR 𝑆 = ∫0 𝑒 −2𝑥 𝑠𝑖𝑛𝑥 𝑑𝑥
𝜋 𝜋 𝜋 𝜋
= [𝑒 −2𝑥 𝑠𝑖𝑛𝑥] − ∫0 −2𝑒 −2𝑥 𝑠𝑖𝑛𝑥 𝑑𝑥 = [−𝑒 −2𝑥 𝑐𝑜𝑠𝑥] 0 − ∫0 −2𝑒 −2𝑥 . −𝑐𝑜𝑠𝑥 𝑑𝑥
0
M1

= 0 + 2𝑆 = (𝑒 −2𝜋 + 1) − 2𝐶 M1

= 2𝑆 = −2𝐶 + 1 + 𝑒 −2𝜋 A1A1

substitute 𝐶 = 2𝑆 into 𝑆 = −2𝐶 + 1 + 𝑒 −2𝜋

∴ 𝐶 = 2(−2𝐶 + 1 + 𝑒 −2𝜋 ) M1
5𝐶 = 2 + 2𝑒 −2𝜋
𝐶 = 0.4007 A1

0.4007 A1
∴𝑆= = 0.2004
2

For More Info: Dr. Math (Shopee) #All the HARDWORK, SACRIFICES, SLEEPLESS NIGHT, DOWNFALLS definitely PAYS OFF!
No Solution/Annwer Mark
4 1 1
𝑧= → 𝑦2 =
𝑦2 𝑧
𝑑𝑧 2 𝑑𝑦 𝑑𝑦 𝑦 3 𝑑𝑧
= − 𝑦 3 𝑑𝑥 → =− M1
𝑑𝑥 𝑑𝑥 2 𝑑𝑥

𝑑𝑦
Given 𝑥 2 𝑑𝑥 + 𝑥𝑦 = 𝑦 3

𝑦 3 𝑑𝑧
𝑥 2 (− ) + 𝑥𝑦 = 𝑦 3
2 𝑑𝑥
𝑦 2 𝑑𝑧
÷ 𝑦, 𝑥 2 (− ) + 𝑥 = 𝑦2
2 𝑑𝑥

𝑥 2 𝑑𝑧 1 1 M1
− 2𝑧 𝑑𝑥 + 𝑥 = 𝑧 (substitute 𝑦 2 = 𝑧 )
𝑑𝑧 2𝑧 2 A1
− = − 𝑥 2 (proven)
𝑑𝑥 𝑥
2
Integrating factor = 𝑒 ∫ −𝑥𝑑𝑥 =
1 M1
𝑥2

𝑑𝑧 1 2𝑧 1 2 1 M1
∴ (𝑥 2 ) − (𝑥 2 ) = − 𝑥 2 ( 𝑥 2 )
𝑑𝑥 𝑥

𝑑 𝑧 2
( ) = − 𝑥4
𝑑𝑥 𝑥 2

𝑧 1 M1
= −2 ∫ 𝑥 4 𝑑𝑥
𝑥2
2
= 3𝑥 3 + 𝐶
2
𝑧 = 3𝑥 + 𝐶𝑥 2
1 2 M1
= 3𝑥 + 𝐶𝑥 2
𝑦2

1 M1
When 𝑦 = 1, 𝑥 = 1, 𝐶=3

1 2 𝑥2 A1
∴ = 3𝑥 +
𝑦2 3
1 1 5
5 sin 𝑥 = 𝑥 − 𝑥 3 + 𝑥 −⋯ B1
6 120
(Implied)
1 1 5 1 1 5
𝑠𝑖𝑛2 𝑥 = ( 𝑥 − 𝑥3 + 𝑥 −⋯)( 𝑥 − 𝑥3 + 𝑥 − ⋯)
6 120 6 120 M1
1 1 6 1 4 1 6 1 6
= 𝑥2 − 𝑥4 + 𝑥 − 𝑥 + 𝑥 + 𝑥 −⋯
6 120 6 36 120
1 2
= 𝑥2 − 𝑥4 + 𝑥6 − ⋯ M1
3 25
𝑠𝑖𝑛 2 𝑥 1 2
= 𝑥 − 3 𝑥 3 + 25 𝑥 5 − ⋯
𝑥

For More Info: Dr. Math (Shopee) #All the HARDWORK, SACRIFICES, SLEEPLESS NIGHT, DOWNFALLS definitely PAYS OFF!
 A1

No Solution/Annwer Mark
6  
3 3
sin x B1
 tan xdx = 
0 0
cos x
dx

= − ln cos x 3
0 M1

= − ln cos + ln cox0
3
1
= − ln +ln 1
2
= ln 2 = 0.69 (2 sf) A1

By the trapezium rule



d= 3 = B1
4 12

1  
0
3 tan xdx   [0 + 2(0.2679 + 0.5773 + 1) + 1.732]
2  12  M1

 0.71 (2sf)
A1

D1

x
0


Since the graph of y = tan x is concave upwards over the range [0, ],, therefore the
3
trapezium rule gives an approximate value which is greater than the exact value. A1

For More Info: Dr. Math (Shopee) #All the HARDWORK, SACRIFICES, SLEEPLESS NIGHT, DOWNFALLS definitely PAYS OFF!
No Solution/Annwer Mark

7
a) y = f ( x ) = x
B1
f ( x +  x) = x +  x
dy  x + x − x  M1
= lim  
dx  x→0  x 

= lim 
(  x + x − x )(x + x + x 

)
 x →0 
 ( )
x + x + x  x 

M1

 
 x + x − x 
= lim
(
 x →0 
 )
x + x + x  x

 1 
= lim  
 x →0
 x + x + x 
M1
1
= A1
2 x

7
ln x
b) y=
x
1
x   − ln x
=  2
dy x M1
dx x
1 − ln x
=
x2
 1
2 x 2  −  − (1 − ln x ) 2 x
= 
d y x
2
dx x4
− x − 2 x + 2 x ln x
=
x4
2ln x − 3
=
x3
dy
For turning points, =0 M1
dx
1 − ln x = 0
x=e
1 d2y 1
When x = e , y = and 2
=− 3 0 M1
e dx e
 1
 e,  is a maximum point A1
 e

For More Info: Dr. Math (Shopee) #All the HARDWORK, SACRIFICES, SLEEPLESS NIGHT, DOWNFALLS definitely PAYS OFF!
No Solution/Annwer Mark
2
7b For point of inflexion, d y = 0 M1
dx 2
2ln x − 3 = 0
3
ln x =
2
3
x = e2

3
d 3x 2
When x = e 2 , = 3 −3  0
dy 3 M1
e2

3
3
ln e 2
When x = e , y =
2
3
e2
3
= 3
2e 2
 3 3 
  e2 , 3  is a point of inflexion
  A1
 2e 2 

Asymptotes: x = 0 and y = 0 D1
By inspection,
as x →  , y → 0+
1
as x → 0 , →  and ln x → −  y → −
x
Intersection at x-axis:
When y = 0 , x = 1
D1
Concave
downward
before
x = e1.5
and
Concave
upward
after
x = e1.5

D1
All
correct
For More Info: Dr. Math (Shopee) #All the HARDWORK, SACRIFICES, SLEEPLESS NIGHT, DOWNFALLS definitely PAYS OFF!
No Solution/Annwer Mark
1
8a y=
1− x2
y 1− x2 = 1
y 2 (1 − x 2 ) = 1
Differentiating with respect to x,
 dy 
y 2 (−2 x) + (1 − x 2 ) 2 y  = 0 OR equivalent first derivative
 dx 
 dy 
 2y, − xy + (1 − x 2 )  = 0
 dx 
 dy 
(1 − x 2 )  = xy (shown) (1)
A1
 
dx
Differentiating with respect to x,
2  d y   dy   dy 
2
(1 − x ) 2  +  (−2 x) = x  + y(1)
 M1
 dx   dx   dx 
 d2y  dy
(1 − x 2 ) 2  − 3x = y (2)
 dx  dx
Differentiating with respect to x,
2 d y d y
3 2
  d 2 y   dy   dy
(1 − x ) 3  +  2 (−2 x) − 3( x) 2  +  (1) = M1
 dx   dx    dx   dx   dx
 d3y  d2y dy
(1 − x ) 3  − 5 x 2  − 4 = 0
2
  (3)
 dx   dx  dx
1
When x = 0, y = =1
1 − ( 0) 2
dy
From (1), =0
dx

For More Info: Dr. Math (Shopee) #All the HARDWORK, SACRIFICES, SLEEPLESS NIGHT, DOWNFALLS definitely PAYS OFF!
 d2y
From (2), =1
dx 2
d3y
From (3) , =0
dx3
d3y
Therefore, = 0 when x = 0. (shown) A1
dx3
0 1 0 1
y = 1 + x + x 2 + x3 + ... = 1 + x 2 + ... A1
1! 2! 3! 2
Integrating with respect to x,
1 1 x3
sin −1 x =  dx =  1 + x 2 + ... dx  x + + c B1
1 − x2 2 6
When x = 0, sin −1 x = 0 , c = 0
x3
 sin −1 x  x + A1
6
No Solution/Annwer Mark
8b y

D1
y = ex

1
x
0 2
−1.5 D1
3
y=
𝑥−2

Since the graphs intersect each other at only one point at first quadrant, therefore
the intersection point show that the equation e x ( x − 2) − 3 = 0 has only one positive A1
real root.
M1
f ' ( x) = (e x )(1) + ( x − 2)(e x )
= e x ( x − 1)

Let x0 = 2 ,
e 2 (2 − 2) − 3 M1
x1 = 2 − = 2.406
e 2 (2 − 1)

e 2.406 (2.406 − 2) − 3
x2 = 2.406 − = 2.310 M1
e 2.406 (2.406 − 1)
For More Info: Dr. Math (Shopee) #All the HARDWORK, SACRIFICES, SLEEPLESS NIGHT, DOWNFALLS definitely PAYS OFF!
 Similarly ,

x3 = 2.301  2.3

x4 = 2.301  2.3
A1
Since x3 = x4 = 2.301  2.3 , the real root correct to two significant figures is 2.3

A situation in which the Newton-Raphson method fails is

(a) The first approximation, x0 is too far from the root . OR
(b) The first approximation, x0 or subsequent approximation cause the function
f(x) to become undefined. OR A1
(c) The gradient of function very small or zero, f ' ( x)  0 near an estimate. This
f ( xn )
situation cause the ratio is undefined.
f ' ( xn )
The End

For More Info: Dr. Math (Shopee) #All the HARDWORK, SACRIFICES, SLEEPLESS NIGHT, DOWNFALLS definitely PAYS OFF!