Professional Documents
Culture Documents
(4.11.2022)
1. History of Civil Air Transport 4. Commercial Aircraft Operators (18.11.2022)
What are the main differences between Full-Service Network Carrier (FSNC)
and Low-Cost Carrier (LCC)?
What are the key cost advantages of a LCC vs. FSNC?
What are the main differences between Hub & Spoke, what are the
advantages and disadvantages?
What are operating cost elements of a typical airline? Can you differentiate
between TOC, DOC, COO, COC ADOC?
What is the differences between fleet, route and schedule planning?
Can you explain a payload-range diagram?
What are criteria for airlines influencing aircraft buying decision?
I 173 I © Bauhaus Luftfahrt e. V. I WS2022/23 I Air Transport & Airport Design / Luftverkehr
Lessons Learned of Chapter 4 (1/2)
Can you explain the differences between “Macro” and “Micro” approach to
fleet planning
Name the four steps of schedule development planning?
What are criteria for airlines to evaluate a “new” route?
I 174 I © Bauhaus Luftfahrt e. V. I WS2022/23 I Air Transport & Airport Design / Luftverkehr
Part 4: Commercial Aircraft
Operators
4.1 Business Models and Networks
4.2 Operating Costs
4.3 Airline Planning and Strategy
Airline Business Models
I 176 I © Bauhaus Luftfahrt e. V. I WS2022/23 I Air Transport & Airport Design / Luftverkehr
Air Operations Models
Capacity Provisioning Action Space
Full-Service Carrier
projected
Hybrid Carrier
- Low Cost Carrier
Private trip
Charter Carrier
Regional Carrier Charter
Target Group
Low Cost
On Demand
Business Transport
“Airtaxi”
Charter Airplane
Business trip
Hybrid
Regional
I 177 I © Bauhaus Luftfahrt e. V. I WS2022/23 I Air Transport & Airport Design / Luftverkehr
Development of Airline Operating Models
• Clear separation of the segments • Convergence of costs, network and • Efficient differentiation and focus in unique
• only minor concept overlaps passenger segments selling points
• Partly same offer to PAX • Innovation of concessions in order to secure
Three different airline operating models a competitive advantage
Blurry airline operating models
Added value for passengers
FSC
FSC Charter
Charter Charter FSC
LCC LCC
Extreme
LCC
I 178 I © Bauhaus Luftfahrt e. V. I WS2022/23 I Air Transport & Airport Design / Luftverkehr
Airline Business Models Changing
I 179 I © Bauhaus Luftfahrt e. V. I WS2022/23 I Air Transport & Airport Design / Luftverkehr
Airline Business Models: Market Shares in Europe
I 180 I © Bauhaus Luftfahrt e. V. I WS2022/23 I Air Transport & Airport Design / Luftverkehr
Saving Potentials of Low-Cost Carriers
Cost advantage of low-cost carriers vs. full-service carriers in € cents / ASK
9.1 2.2
1.6
0.7
0.7
0.5
3.4
I 181 I © Bauhaus Luftfahrt e. V. I WS2022/23 I Air Transport & Airport Design / Luftverkehr
Hub-&-Spoke vs. Point-to-Point
787 A380
15.200 km 15.700 km
250 Pax 525 Pax
15.12.2009 27.04.2005
747-8I A350XWB
14.800 km 15.300 km
467 Pax 276 Pax
20.03.2011 14.06.2013
I 182 I © Bauhaus Luftfahrt e. V. I WS2022/23 I Air Transport & Airport Design / Luftverkehr
Hub-&-Spoke Networks Example: United Airlines (Domestic USA)
Example: Emirates
I 183 I © Bauhaus Luftfahrt e. V. I WS2022/23 I Air Transport & Airport Design / Luftverkehr
Point-to-Point Networks: Ryanair Example
Mesh Network of Ryanair
on May 14
06:00 07:00 08:00 09:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00
I 185 I © Bauhaus Luftfahrt e. V. I WS2022/23 I Air Transport & Airport Design / Luftverkehr
Part 4: Commercial Aircraft
Operators
4.1 Business Models and Networks
4.2 Operating Costs
4.3 Airline Planning and Strategy
Life-Cycle Costs (LCC)
LCC distribution for a typical short-to-medium-haul transport aircraft*
Additional Direct Operating Costs
* Underlying Assumptions:
Cost 616 NM stage length, operation: 20years, 35%
of Cash Operating Cost share of IOC, fuel price 3.0 US$/gal, program
Ownership costs covered by A/C market price, disposal cost
equal to residual value (20 years)
For civil transport aircraft, LCC are dominated by the Operating Costs
Direct operating cost (DOC) have the highest share on Operating Costs
Share depending on operator and external factors i.e. fuel price
Decrease of Indirect Operating Costs (IOC) share can be observed (for AEA1996: 50%, 2006:40%)
I 187 I © Bauhaus Luftfahrt e. V. I WS2022/23 I Air Transport & Airport Design / Luftverkehr
Operating Costs - Overview
Total Operating Costs (TOC)
I 188 I © Bauhaus Luftfahrt e. V. I WS2022/23 I Air Transport & Airport Design / Luftverkehr
Operating Costs - Overview
Total Operating Costs (TOC)
I 189 I © Bauhaus Luftfahrt e. V. I WS2022/23 I Air Transport & Airport Design / Luftverkehr
Airbus A320 Cost Shares in 2008
Averaged values for 20 years operations, 3 US$/gal
Local Emission
Local Noise Charges EU-Emission
Charges 0.02% Trading Scheme
0.08%
1.47%
Insurance Cost
Average Aircraft Average Aircraft
0.13%
Direct Operating Costs Cash Operating Costs
Interest Cost
9.63% Cabin Crew
Cost
10.91%
Flight Crew
Depreciation Fuel Cost Cost
Cost 33.36% 9.41%
11.53%
Engine DMC Fuel Cost
3.15% 43.25%
Navigation
Flight Crew Cost Charges
7.26% 6.29%
Airport Charges
Service
Engine DMC Groundhandling Charges Passenger
Navigation 1.34% Terminal Lightning
2.43% Charges Charges Navaid Charges Charges
Airframe DMC Charges Charges
0.65% 2.41% 3.97%
6.18% 4.85% 3.45% 0.19%
I 190 I © Bauhaus Luftfahrt e. V. I WS2022/23 I Air Transport & Airport Design / Luftverkehr
Airport Charges
Landing Charge
Lighting Charge
Terminal User Charge
Ground Handling Charge
Inspection Charge
Service Charge
Passenger Related Charge
Additional Charge Cargo Charge
Noise Charge
Terminal Navaid Charge
Emission Charge
I 191 I © Bauhaus Luftfahrt e. V. I WS2022/23 I Air Transport & Airport Design / Luftverkehr
Noise Charges at Airports
I 192 I © Bauhaus Luftfahrt e. V. I WS2022/23 I Air Transport & Airport Design / Luftverkehr
Crew Costs (Flight Deck & Cabin)
I 193 I © Bauhaus Luftfahrt e. V. I WS2022/23 I Air Transport & Airport Design / Luftverkehr
Crew Costs: International Comparison
I 194 I © Bauhaus Luftfahrt e. V. I WS2022/23 I Air Transport & Airport Design / Luftverkehr
Crew Costs: International Comparison
I 195 I © Bauhaus Luftfahrt e. V. I WS2022/23 I Air Transport & Airport Design / Luftverkehr
Maintenance Costs
Expenditures for maintenance and overhaul
Direct Maintenance Cost (DMC): labor and material cost associated with airframe and
engine
Indirect Maintenance Cost (IMC): Overhead, administration, tooling, testing equipment,
quality controls
Aircraft Down-time (associated costs not included)
I 196 I © Bauhaus Luftfahrt e. V. I WS2022/23 I Air Transport & Airport Design / Luftverkehr
DMC Cost Share: Airframe / Engine
100%
Percentage on Total Maintenance Costs [%]
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
Maintenance Burden %
20%
Direct Maint. - Engines %
10% Direct Maint. - Airframe %
0%
1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
I 197 I © Bauhaus Luftfahrt e. V. I WS2022/23 I Air Transport & Airport Design / Luftverkehr
Direct Maintenance Cost Share
DMC breakdown for airframe systems of narrowbody aircraft (Boeing 1990)
Windows 56 AC 21 Auto Pilot 22
Stabilizers 55 3.4% Wings 57 4.2% 2.5%
1.1% 3.4% Communication 23
Nacelles/Pylons 54 1.8%
0.7%
Fuselage 53 Electrical Power 24
Doors 52 3.8% 3.8%
2.5%
APU 49 Equipment/Interior 25
8.6% 11.8%
Water/Waste 38
Fire Protection 26
0.7%
0.6%
Pneumatics 36
Flight Controls 27
1.9%
4.8%
Fuel System 28
Oxygen 35 1.0%
Hydraulic Power 29
1.2% 3.2%
Ice & Rain Protection 30
1.0%
Lights 33 Instruments 31
Navigation 34 2.1% 1.4%
9.0%
Landing Gear 32
25.3%
I 198 I © Bauhaus Luftfahrt e. V. I WS2022/23 I Air Transport & Airport Design / Luftverkehr
Engine Maintenance Costs
Labor Cost
25%
32%
Repair Cost
10% Material Cost
65%
18%
11% 11%
9% 8% 9%
3%
I 199 I © Bauhaus Luftfahrt e. V. I WS2022/23 I Air Transport & Airport Design / Luftverkehr
ADOC: Emission Trading Scheme
I 200 I © Bauhaus Luftfahrt e. V. I WS2022/23 I Air Transport & Airport Design / Luftverkehr
Part 4: Commercial Aircraft
Operators
4.1 Business Models and Networks
4.2 Operating Costs
4.3 Airline Planning and Strategy
Airline Planning Tasks
Airline Planning is made on long term. It starts with long-term decisions of strategic
nature and continues with planning and steering activities of the airline management.
At the start of the airline planning process, detailed knowledge about the airline’s fleet
composition as well as the network to be served and the flight schedule to be offered is
available.
Strategic Decisions Planning Decisions Tactical Decisions
• Market planning • Flight schedule development • Capacity management and capacity
• Market strategies • Basic price structures (fares, adjustment
• Aircraft ordering / conditions) • Pricing
fleet planning • Fundamental decisions in
revenue management
Steering
Planning
Development
• Aircraft / Fleet
• Frequencies
• Departure Time
• Hub Structure
I 204 I © Bauhaus Luftfahrt e. V. I WS2022/23 I Air Transport & Airport Design / Luftverkehr
Part 4: Commercial Aircraft
Operators
4.1 Business Models and Networks
4.2 Operating Costs
4.3 Airline Planning and Strategy
Fleet Planning
Route Planning
Schedule Development
Questions in Airline Fleet Planning
Please buy one or more aircraft units with a budget of 145 Mio. US$!
Would you buy one of this type? Or would you buy several ones of this type?
I 206 I © Bauhaus Luftfahrt e. V. I WS2022/23 I Air Transport & Airport Design / Luftverkehr
Key Questions
I 207 I © Bauhaus Luftfahrt e. V. I WS2022/23 I Air Transport & Airport Design / Luftverkehr
Cost Factors of an Aircraft Fleet
Operating Costs • Fuel, crew, maintenance, airport charges, take-off and landing fees, etc.
I 208 I © Bauhaus Luftfahrt e. V. I WS2022/23 I Air Transport & Airport Design / Luftverkehr
Top-Level Goals of Fleet Development…
I 209 I © Bauhaus Luftfahrt e. V. I WS2022/23 I Air Transport & Airport Design / Luftverkehr
Aircraft Selection Criteria (1)
• Sales Price
• Residual Value
• Maintenance Costs
Financial Criteria
• Manufacturer Guarantees
• Product Support
• Fleet Commonality
• Passenger Comfort
• Crew Requirements
Other Criteria
• Required Infrastructure at Airports
• Delivery Flexibility (Production Slots)
I 210 I © Bauhaus Luftfahrt e. V. I WS2022/23 I Air Transport & Airport Design / Luftverkehr
Aircraft Selection Criteria (2)
max. Fuel
Payload-Range Diagram Fuel
MZFM
Mass
Maximum Zero Fuel
Mass
max. Payload
Payload
OME
Operating Mass
Aircraft Structure Empty
Range
I 211 I © Bauhaus Luftfahrt e. V. I WS2022/23 I Air Transport & Airport Design / Luftverkehr
The Payload-Range Diagram: Examples 787
Source: Boeing, Airplane Characteristics for Airport Planning
I 212 I © Bauhaus Luftfahrt e. V. I WS2022/23 I Air Transport & Airport Design / Luftverkehr
Aircraft Selection Criteria (3)
Higher Lower
Ownership Costs Operating Costs
I 213 I © Bauhaus Luftfahrt e. V. I WS2022/23 I Air Transport & Airport Design / Luftverkehr
Aircraft Selection Criteria (4)
I 215 I © Bauhaus Luftfahrt e. V. I WS2022/23 I Air Transport & Airport Design / Luftverkehr
Critical Inputs required for Fleet Planning
I 216 I © Bauhaus Luftfahrt e. V. I WS2022/23 I Air Transport & Airport Design / Luftverkehr
Two fundamental Approaches to Fleet Planning
I 217 I © Bauhaus Luftfahrt e. V. I WS2022/23 I Air Transport & Airport Design / Luftverkehr
The Macro Approach to Fleet Planning
The main input data required for this approach consist of the traffic forecast
and a target average load factor. In addition, the retirement of older aircraft
must be considered. Airline Transport
RPK = lf ∙ ASK = lf ∙ (Seats ∙ Dist ∙ Freq)
Performance:
lf a/c
2
ASK2
Market Growth
lf Gap Capacity Gap:
RPK2
1 New Aircraft required
ASK1 Retirement Gap
RPK1
ASK’2
Remaining ASK
I 218 I © Bauhaus Luftfahrt e. V. I WS2022/23 I Air Transport & Airport Design / Luftverkehr
The Micro Approach to Fleet Planning
Forecasts of demand and revenues for each O-D market are then allocated
to each future flight in the airline’s schedule using a traffic allocation model.
The Micro Approach requires highly detailed input data featuring high
uncertainty about the future. The Macro Approach is therefore more
commonly used.
I 220 I © Bauhaus Luftfahrt e. V. I WS2022/23 I Air Transport & Airport Design / Luftverkehr
Part 4: Commercial Aircraft
Operators
4.1 Business Models and Networks
4.2 Operating Costs
4.3 Airline Planning and Strategy
Fleet Planning
Route Planning
Schedule Development
Route Planning
Performance
Requirements
Route planning is made both on long-term (strategic planning, time horizon: several
years) and short-term (tactical planning, time horizon: weeks to months) basis.
I 222 I © Bauhaus Luftfahrt e. V. I WS2022/23 I Air Transport & Airport Design / Luftverkehr
Route Evaluation (1)
Economic considerations dominate route evaluation
Does the route own the potential of being profitable when served?
Important input data required for route evaluation:
Passenger and cargo demand forecasts
Expected market share
Expected revenues
Competitor’s behavior
It is important not to consider the O-D passengers only, but also the
connecting passengers (hub-&-spoke network).
There might be routes that are not profitable by themselves (considering
only O-D passengers), but that make an important contribution as “feeder
operations” to other routes within the airline network
I 223 I © Bauhaus Luftfahrt e. V. I WS2022/23 I Air Transport & Airport Design / Luftverkehr
Route Evaluation (2)
Criteria for route evaluation:
Incremental profitability (on short term): estimating the opportunity cost of taking
aircraft from one route to another.
Technical capability and availability of aircraft: adequate range and payload
capacity.
Operating cost characteristics of aircraft: estimating the operating costs when
operating the aircraft on a specific route.
New route? Consider additional costs of establishing airport facilities, sales offices, and
staff relocation.
Political and legal restrictions, bilateral agreements, limited airport slots, etc.
Strategic considerations: evaluate competitor’s behavior and decide how to (re)act
I 224 I © Bauhaus Luftfahrt e. V. I WS2022/23 I Air Transport & Airport Design / Luftverkehr
Route Profitability Model
Demand and fare estimates for year Annual demand Average revenue (one way) TOTAL REVENUE
Additional Traffic
Connections North American cities behind YUL to/from
FCO 24,000 $425 $10,200,000
Connections to/from YUL beyond FCO 12,000 $400 $4,800,000
Connections behind YUL to/from destinations beyond FCO 4,500 $375 $1,687,500
I 226 I © Bauhaus Luftfahrt e. V. I WS2022/23 I Air Transport & Airport Design / Luftverkehr
YUL – FCO: Operating Cost and Profit Calculations
Inputs and assumptions Calculated measures (per annum)
I 227 I © Bauhaus Luftfahrt e. V. I WS2022/23 I Air Transport & Airport Design / Luftverkehr
Part 4: Commercial Aircraft
Operators
4.1 Business Models and Networks
4.2 Operating Costs
4.3 Airline Planning and Strategy
Fleet Planning
Route Planning
Schedule Development
Schedule Development
Fleet assignment: what type of aircraft should be used for each departure time?
Aircraft rotation planning: how should each aircraft type be flown over the airline’s
network in order to ensure an overall balance of aircraft arrivals and departures et each
airport?
I 229 I © Bauhaus Luftfahrt e. V. I WS2022/23 I Air Transport & Airport Design / Luftverkehr
Schedule Development: Chronological Overview
Fleet planning
decisions
Aircraft availability
Route evaluations
Unexpected
operational
Timetables of departure times
constraints
Final revisions
I 230 I © Bauhaus Luftfahrt e. V. I WS2022/23 I Air Transport & Airport Design / Luftverkehr
Task 1: Frequency Planning
Based on the outputs of the route evaluation process, the airline should already have
estimates of the total “local” demand between the origin and destination served by the
route under consideration.
The airline’s supply decision consists of two choices: number of departures per day
and number of seats to be offered on each departure
Higher frequency / lower seat capacity Lower frequency / higher seat capacity
= =
Increasing Pax convenience Decreasing Pax convenience
& &
Source: Belobaba (2009) Increasing operating costs Decreasing operating costs
I 231 I © Bauhaus Luftfahrt e. V. I WS2022/23 I Air Transport & Airport Design / Luftverkehr
Task 2: Timetable Development
Source: Belobaba (2009)
Initial goal of the airline: provide departures at peak periods (usually at around 09:00 am
and 5:00 pm), especially for business travelers
This is not always possible: slot restrictions, limited amount of aircraft in fleet, etc.
Trade-off required:
Maximization of
Pax convenience
Important issues to consider: aircraft utilization
Long
Overnight
23:30
I 233 I © Bauhaus Luftfahrt e. V. I WS2022/23 I Air Transport & Airport Design / Luftverkehr
Task 3 & 4: Fleet Assignment and Aircraft Rotations
Fleet Assignment Problem (FAP): determines the type of aircraft to be flown on each
flight leg departure, given a planned network of routes and specified timetable of
flights.
Objective of FAP: Minimize the combined costs of “spill” (= rejected payload demand)
and aircraft operating costs over the entire airline fleet and network.
TH = Time needed to de-/board the aircraft and make it ready for the next flight mission
TH = f (no. of passengers, type of aircraft cabin, airport infrastructure, etc.)
I 235 I © Bauhaus Luftfahrt e. V. I WS2022/23 I Air Transport & Airport Design / Luftverkehr
Aircraft Availability
I 237 I © Bauhaus Luftfahrt e. V. I WS2022/23 I Air Transport & Airport Design / Luftverkehr
How a 737NG spends a Day with major US Airline
I 238 I © Bauhaus Luftfahrt e. V. I WS2022/23 I Air Transport & Airport Design / Luftverkehr
Airline, MRO, & Manufacturer Partnership
I 239 I © Bauhaus Luftfahrt e. V. I WS2022/23 I Air Transport & Airport Design / Luftverkehr
Air Transport & Airport
Part 5: Airport Operations
Design / Luftverkehr
Winter Term 2022/2023
Dr. Kay Plötner Munich, October 2022
I 240 I © Bauhaus Luftfahrt e. V. I I
Part 5: Airport Operations
5.1 Airport Elements and Operations
5.2 Airport Planning
5.3 Airport Capacity
Lessons Learned Chapter 5
I 242 I © Bauhaus Luftfahrt e. V. I WS2022/23 I Air Transport & Airport Design / Luftverkehr
Part 5: Airport Operations
5.1 Airport Elements and Operations
5.2 Airport Planning
5.3 Airport Capacity
The Airport System
Landing Take-Off
Runway Runway
Taxiway Taxiway
Airside Airside
Aircraft
Apron Apron
Ground-based Means
Car Parking Streets Streets Car Parking
of Transport
City Connections
I 244 I © Bauhaus Luftfahrt e. V. I WS2022/23 I Air Transport & Airport Design / Luftverkehr
Airport Elements
Duty free
Läden, etc
shops
Ramp
Gate 1
Landside
Parken Flughafe
n
Gate 2
Flughafe
n
Apron
Terminal
Flughafe
GA
n
Tower
Flughafe
n
Vorfeld
Flughafe
n
n
hafe
Flug
Flughafe
n
Hangar
Fracht
facilities for passenger
handling and assistance: Airside with technical & operational facilities for
focus on the passenger Hand-out - 17.06. 2009 - 2
handling the air traffic: focus on the airplane
I 245 I © Bauhaus Luftfahrt e. V. I WS2022/23 I Air Transport & Airport Design / Luftverkehr
Major Airport Facility Components
Runway Maintenance Hangars
Taxiway Car Parking Areas
Air Traffic Control Facilities: Street Connections
Tower Public Transport Connections
Apron / Ground Control Airport Maintenance and Winter Services
Nav Aids Electric Energy Supply
Lighting Waste Water Facilities
Fuel Tanks Security Fences and Gates
Pax Terminals and Apron Hotels
Cargo Terminals and Apron Industry Facilities
General Aviation Area Safety Facilities (fire department, medical
Catering Services services, etc.)
I 246 I © Bauhaus Luftfahrt e. V. I WS2022/23 I Air Transport & Airport Design / Luftverkehr
Airport Layout (Munich Airport)
Source: Jeppesen
I 247 I © Bauhaus Luftfahrt e. V. I WS2022/23 I Air Transport & Airport Design / Luftverkehr
Example 1: New York La Guardia
I 250 I © Bauhaus Luftfahrt e. V. I WS2022/23 I Air Transport & Airport Design / Luftverkehr
Airside Elements of the Airport (1): Runway
Runway
made of concrete or bituminous construction
dimensioning in compliance with ICAO guidelines
and mean sea level
Navigation lighting
Border lighting
Middle line lighting
Edge lighting
Approach lighting
Signage
I 251 I © Bauhaus Luftfahrt e. V. I WS2022/23 I Air Transport & Airport Design / Luftverkehr
Airside Elements of the Airport (2): Taxiways
Taxiway
made of concrete or bituminous construction
dimensioning in compliance with ICAO guidelines
Navigation lighting
Border lighting
Middle line lighting
Stop Bar lighting
Signage
I 252 I © Bauhaus Luftfahrt e. V. I WS2022/23 I Air Transport & Airport Design / Luftverkehr
Airside Elements of the Airport (3): Apron
Apron
mostly made of concrete
rarely bituminous construction
Navigation lighting ,Taxi guidance
systems
Docking systems, Boarding bridges,
Parking positions
Areas for parking operational devices
Optional:
Electric power supply
Fuel supply (hydrants)
Pre-Conditioned Air Units (PCA)
Air Starter Units (ASU)
I 253 I © Bauhaus Luftfahrt e. V. I WS2022/23 I Air Transport & Airport Design / Luftverkehr
Airside Elements of the Airport (4): PAX Handling (Terminal)
Primary Elements Secondary Elements
Check-In Counters Lost & Found
Ticket Counters Restaurants
Security Control Travel Agencies
Waiting Areas Spiritual Welfare
Baggage Systems Travel Requisites and other
Customs Control commercial facilities
Immigration Control Lounges (Business / First
Class)
Border Control
Tourist Information Center
Baggage Claim
Medical Services
I 254 I © Bauhaus Luftfahrt e. V. I WS2022/23 I Air Transport & Airport Design / Luftverkehr
Airside Elements of the Airport (4): Passenger Terminal Layouts
I 255 I © Bauhaus Luftfahrt e. V. I WS2022/23 I Air Transport & Airport Design / Luftverkehr
Part 5: Airport Operations
5.1 Airport Elements and Operations
5.2 Airport Planning
5.3 Airport Capacity
General Airport Requirements and Planning Factors
I 257 I © Bauhaus Luftfahrt e. V. I WS2022/23 I Air Transport & Airport Design / Luftverkehr
Airside Planning Fundamentals
ICAO Regulations
Convention on International Civil Aviation of 7 December 1944 (Chicago) and their
annexes (Annex 1 - 18) and the Manuals
ICAO, acting on the basis of convention specifications for the design,
construction, and operation of airports and their facilities. Goal: the
establishment of international quality and safety standards.
The ICAO fundamentally distinguishes between “Standards" and
"Recommended Practices.“
Standards are compulsory: minimum planning requirements for all airports
of the member states.
Recommended Practices are non-compulsory recommended
implementation guidelines.
I 258 I © Bauhaus Luftfahrt e. V. I WS2022/23 I Air Transport & Airport Design / Luftverkehr
ICAO Guidelines for Airport Planning (1)
Source: ICAO
I 259 I © Bauhaus Luftfahrt e. V. I WS2022/23 I Air Transport & Airport Design / Luftverkehr
ICAO Guidelines for Airport Planning (1)
Source: ICAO
I 261 I © Bauhaus Luftfahrt e. V. I WS2022/23 I Air Transport & Airport Design / Luftverkehr
Aircraft Dimensions and References
6 Airports Codes
(Definition of geometric minimum
requirements)
Airplane
parameters
I 262 I © Bauhaus Luftfahrt e. V. I WS2022/23 I Air Transport & Airport Design / Luftverkehr
ICAO Guidelines for Airport Planning (1)
Source: ICAO
Curve radii
I 264 I © Bauhaus Luftfahrt e. V. I WS2022/23 I Air Transport & Airport Design / Luftverkehr
ICAO Guidelines for Airport Planning (1)
Source: ICAO
I 265 I © Bauhaus Luftfahrt e. V. I WS2022/23 I Air Transport & Airport Design / Luftverkehr
ICAO Guidelines for Airport Planning (1)
Source: ICAO
I 266 I © Bauhaus Luftfahrt e. V. I WS2022/23 I Air Transport & Airport Design / Luftverkehr
ICAO Guidelines for Airport Planning (1)
Source: ICAO
I 267 I © Bauhaus Luftfahrt e. V. I WS2022/23 I Air Transport & Airport Design / Luftverkehr
The Airport Master Plan
Source: Gaffal (2014)
The airport master plan is a development plan for the airport facilities that is
supposed to ensure a well-coordinated and demand-oriented expansion of
the airport.
The master plan is supposed to describe
where the future development and expansion projects will take place and
what maximum potential they may reach and to consider a certain time horizon.
The major goal of the master plan is to define the balance of capacity, i.e.,
an economically well-balanced equilibrium among the primary traffic
handling facilities
Further goals of the master plan are to show future perspectives to provide
internal and external information, and to direct the general planning of the
airport infrastructure and its financing
I 268 I © Bauhaus Luftfahrt e. V. I WS2022/23 I Air Transport & Airport Design / Luftverkehr
Balance of Capacity
Source: Gaffal (2014)
Regional Connections
City Connections
Car Access
Car Parking
Terminals
(public, non-public)
Apron
Runway
Airspace
The capacity of the entire airport system is determined by the element with the smallest capacity.
I 269 I © Bauhaus Luftfahrt e. V. I WS2022/23 I Air Transport & Airport Design / Luftverkehr
Airport Master Plan: Toronto Pearson Intl. Airport
I 270 I © Bauhaus Luftfahrt e. V. I WS2022/23 I Air Transport & Airport Design / Luftverkehr
Airport Master Plan: Memphis Intl. Airport
I 271 I © Bauhaus Luftfahrt e. V. I WS2022/23 I Air Transport & Airport Design / Luftverkehr
Part 5: Airport Operations
5.1 Airport Elements and Operations
5.2 Airport Planning
5.3 Airport Capacity
Airport Capacity: Airside Capacity (1) - Runways
The most important airport elements determining the airport airside capacity
are the runways, the taxiways, and the aprons.
Runway Capacity (“Maximum throughput capacity”): “…defined as the
expected (“average”) number of movements (landings and takeoffs) that can
be performed per unit of time, typically 1 hour, in the presence of
continuous demand and without violating air traffic control separation
requirements.”
The runway systems of the world’s busiest airports belong to the principal
“bottlenecks” (limiting factors) in many regions of the world.
I 273 I © Bauhaus Luftfahrt e. V. I WS2022/23 I Air Transport & Airport Design / Luftverkehr
Airport Capacity: Airside Capacity (1) - Taxiways
Taxiway Capacity:
At major airports, the taxiway capacity almost always exceeds the runway capacity by
considerable margin.
Some exceptions may exist at older airports with limited land area or inadequate
taxiway systems.
Taxiway capacity problems are airport-specific and must be resolved in the context of
local conditions.
I 274 I © Bauhaus Luftfahrt e. V. I WS2022/23 I Air Transport & Airport Design / Luftverkehr
Airport Capacity: Airside Capacity (3) - Apron
Static Capacity:
refers to the number of aircraft stands available at the airport, i.e., the maximum number
of aircraft that can be stationed on the apron simultaneously.
stands may be designed for specific aircraft types only.
Dynamic Capacity:
indicates the number of aircraft that can be served at the apron per unit of time, typically
per hour, and is the more important measure for operating and planning purposes.
takes into account the stand occupancy times: for a given static capacity, short stand
occupancies result in a high dynamic capacity and vice versa.
The most critical question is whether the dynamic capacity is consistently greater than
the capacity of the runway system, so that the apron does not constrain runway
operations.
I 275 I © Bauhaus Luftfahrt e. V. I WS2022/23 I Air Transport & Airport Design / Luftverkehr
Airport Capacity: Airside Capacity (1) - Runways
determined by the minimum separation Heavy (H) MTOW > 136 tons
Medium (M) 7 tons <= MTOW <= 136 tons
requirements between consecutive aircraft for Light (L) MTOW < 7 tons
same-runway operations.
FAA Aircraft Classification
(Wake Turbulences Categories)
The minimum separation requirements are Heavy (H) MTOW > 116 tons
specified for every possible pair of aircraft Boeing 757 MTOW at the borderline btw. L and
H Classes: 757 constitutes an
classes (e.g., Heavy-Class Aircraft followed by aircraft class by itself due to its
severe wake vortices.
Light-Class Aircraft) and for every possible Large (L) 19 tons <= MTOW <= 116 tons
sequence of movements (e.g., departure Small (S) MTOW < 19 tons
followed by arrival).
I 276 I © Bauhaus Luftfahrt e. V. I WS2022/23 I Air Transport & Airport Design / Luftverkehr
Excursion: Wake Turbulence Videos
I 277 I © Bauhaus Luftfahrt e. V. I WS2022/23 I Air Transport & Airport Design / Luftverkehr
Excursion: Wake Turbulence
Source: Airbus
I 278 I © Bauhaus Luftfahrt e. V. I WS2022/23 I Air Transport & Airport Design / Luftverkehr
Aircraft Separation Requirements (ICAO)
Leading aircraft …followed by…
A380
Super
Heavy
> 136 t
Medium
≥ 7 - 136 t
I 279 I © Bauhaus Luftfahrt e. V. I WS2022/23 I Air Transport & Airport Design / Luftverkehr
Airport Capacity: Airside Capacity (1) - Runways
I 280 I © Bauhaus Luftfahrt e. V. I WS2022/23 I Air Transport & Airport Design / Luftverkehr
Airport Capacity: Airside Capacity (1) - Runways
> 1,035 m
> 210 m
Closed Parallel Runway System: Open Parallel Runway System: Crossing Runway System Complex Runway System
A/C OPS mutually dependent A/C OPS mutually independent Example: Hamburg Example: Amsterdam
Example: Frankfurt Example: Munich