You are on page 1of 2

SCHOOL OF DESIGN ASSESSMENT FORM

Module Name: Professional Practice and Portfolio Module Code: DESI1221 Hand in date: 13/05/20
Assessment Task: Design Portfolio Assessment Weighting: 100%

Assignment Brief:

‘Nothing is yours. Things are only yours when no one else cares about what you are doing. Once people
start to care, you start to share what you are – your art, your words – you lose sole possession of it’
– Tariq Goddard, author / publisher

As Final Year students of Graphic Design, you will soon be entering the exciting, chaotic, inspiring, daunting,
[ add descriptor of choice ] world of commercial / professional design practice . . . or you may not! You
may choose to pursue a career as a writer, researcher, illustrator, photographer, business developer,
academic . . . But now is the time for some deep reflection and consideration of your options and to make
some immediate short-term and long-term plans. The PPP module is designed to support you through
this – identifying potential directions; making contact with the right people and organisations; and of course
creating the appropriate communication materials to showcase your ideas, abilities and interests.

This module follows on from the Creative Professional Practice module in year 2. At this stage you should
have some idea of who you are as a designer, what type of work you might like to be doing, and an
understanding of some of the skills you need to achieve your ambitions. Now we are going to drill down
a little deeper in order to establish who / where your skill set and ambitions are perfect for and if you are
the type of candidate they might be interested in.

This brief invites you to explore personal and professional links in order to develop a body of materials
– cv, cover letter / personal statement, online presence and portfolio – with which to engage the creative
industries. The studios / individuals / work you see, collect and follow provide inspiration and an
understanding of the field, but equally it is how you present yourself and your work that help to establish
the important connections and opportunities for future success. Who are you speaking to? What events
are you attending? Where are you showcasing your work?

Guided by a combination of lectures, seminars, reviews, visits and through your research activity, you will
produce a design portfolio and supporting materials, to assist you in applying for roles that you will go on
to following your studies.

KEY DATES:
Week 6: Feb 19 – Formative Assessment: presentations [walk through of Portfolio]
Week 11: March 25 – Portfolio surgery with industry specialists
Week 2 (T3): May 13 – SUMMATIVE HAND-IN Design Portfolio, research + supporting materials

AIMS:
1 Develop a deeper understanding of the Creative industry and the role of the designer
2 Explore and engage in the creation of a professional and thoughtful Design Portfolio
3 Pursue links with potential design employers with whom you would like to work
4 Develop a creative Design Portfolio to support your applications to acquire a internships /
work within a professional design context

Course Learning Outcomes to be met through this Brief:


At the end of this assignment you will be able to:
1. Identify and understand your position as a designer within a professional context.
2. Develop an holistic approach to design practice, developing criticality, exploring issues that are important
to you via professional enquiry and design.
3. Consolidate and expand professional networks and social media presence in preparation for employment
or further study.
4. Develop a portfolio / show reel of creative work that is confident in both design and positioning
to enable employability.

SUBMISSION:
Sketchbook (physical / digital) documentation of portfolio design and efforts to secure links and work
within design context. Key items to be included: cover letter / statement, cv, correspondence with potential
employers.

A complete Design Portfolio [print / screen / online] which positions you as a Graphic and Digital Designer
ready to engage in professional working. Give careful consideration to selection of work, media, format, tone
and method of delivery.

Final work must be uploaded to the ‘Design Portfolio’ moodle assignment / physically handed in
by 10am on 13/05/20. Remember to include a printed ‘header sheet’ for this assignment: ‘243767’.
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA Date posted: 07/01/20

CATEGORIES

Research and Analysis Planning and Technical Skill Presentation and


Identification and Development Competence in production Outcome
interrogation of primary and Management of time, and making in the realisation Communication of ideas and
secondary sources through resources and self-direction; of ideas results; clarity of purpose and
evaluation and interpretation engagement with learning ability to edit; appropriate to
and personal development defined audience

1ST: 80–100%

Exceptional body of research Exceptional investment Exceptional standard of Compelling and persuasive
supported by accurate and in own learning and technical and conceptual arguments communicated
insightful critical evaluation to development through approach; operating clearly and effectively;
inform own work purposeful and effective at the highest level of resulting product unifies
planning; prioritises own time understanding, judgement concept and technique; clear
and resources through well- and ability purpose and design intent
structured process

1ST: 70–79%

Substantial body of research Engages fully and actively Technique and conceptual Significant and persuasive
supported by accurate and in own learning and approach are unified; arguments communicated
insightful critical evaluation to development through operating at high level of clearly and effectively;
inform own work purposeful and effective understanding, judgement resulting product combines
planning; prioritises own time and ability concept and technique; clear
and resources through well- purpose and design intent
structured process

2.1: 60–69%

Strong level of research Manages own time and Ability to control technique Information and ideas
with sound judgements resources effectively, and production in direct delivered clearly and with
and interpretation of links supported by evidence of communication of ideas; purposeful outcome;
between sources based on documentation and self- strong understanding and appropriate information
material gathered reflection; able to build on demonstration of making and materials have been
own strengths and address skills presented skilfully to a high
weaknesses standard of design and finish

2.2: 50–59%

Range of information Evidence of own time and Consistent approach to Communication is


gathered from multiple resource management, technical communication; accurate and well-
sources with appropriate supported by some evidence evidence of quality and informed; demonstrates
documentation; evidence of and self-reflection; able to testing; awareness of sound judgements and
analysis identify own strengths and appropriate standards editing; resulting product
weaknesses communicates ideas and
design appropriate to
audience
3RD: 40–49%

Information has been Demonstrates understanding Adequate skills for Ideas and thinking have
gathered from some available of time / resource communicating ideas; been delivered to
sources and attempts made management with some application of some conventional standards;
to interpret material evidence; some level of appropriate procedures end results are adequate
planning and conventions with some relevance to
intended audience

FAIL: 30–39%

Some information has been Inconsistent approach Some technical proficiency Ideas and outcome are
gathered but with little to planning and time- evident in approaching task; unclear; presentation is
relevance or suitability to the management; unable to little skill or critical judgement ill-informed / unorganised;
brief; some evidence of basic identify areas of personal shows lack of awareness
evaluation development which require of audience
attention

SERIOUS FAIL: –29%

Little or no evidence of Lack of engagement with Poor ability in judgment and Failure to use communication
information gathered and no evidence of planning execution; sub-standard skills in presenting ideas and
and self-development technique design outcome; very poor
presentation

You might also like