1. This document appears to be transcripts from a pre-trial hearing involving multiple parties: the Heirs of Rabiato and Josephine Baluya et al.
2. The attorneys are presenting their witnesses for trial and reserving the right to present additional evidence. They are also requesting trial dates from the court.
3. Issues discussed include the assessed value for computing filing fees, whether documents and witnesses not included in the pleadings can be presented, and the number of trial dates needed. Objections are raised and noted.
1. This document appears to be transcripts from a pre-trial hearing involving multiple parties: the Heirs of Rabiato and Josephine Baluya et al.
2. The attorneys are presenting their witnesses for trial and reserving the right to present additional evidence. They are also requesting trial dates from the court.
3. Issues discussed include the assessed value for computing filing fees, whether documents and witnesses not included in the pleadings can be presented, and the number of trial dates needed. Objections are raised and noted.
1. This document appears to be transcripts from a pre-trial hearing involving multiple parties: the Heirs of Rabiato and Josephine Baluya et al.
2. The attorneys are presenting their witnesses for trial and reserving the right to present additional evidence. They are also requesting trial dates from the court.
3. Issues discussed include the assessed value for computing filing fees, whether documents and witnesses not included in the pleadings can be presented, and the number of trial dates needed. Objections are raised and noted.
SANTOS Assalamu alaykum. 29. ROJEAN F. VENDER 30. APOLINARIO A. Good morning your honor. MONSERATE
I am Atty. Bai Pangandongan G.
Dilangalen of the FLD Law office, -------- Roll # 83952, Cotabato Chapter, Permission to speak , your Honor
RESpectfully entering my Point of clarification. I would like to
appearance as counsel for clarify to the plaintiff’s counsel the defendant- Heirs of Rabiato purpose of presenting the (NAMELY: municipal Assessor ______. DOLORES RABIATO JANILO R The notice I have received for JAROLYN R-OCAMPO today’s hearing is a pretrial. EDSEL R-BIBAY HAMILCAR R If the assessor is being presented (AS REPRESENTED BY ROSELLA as a witness, it is still premature at DIMACUTAC) this stage.
For the defendant Josephine Baluya the purpose of the pre-trial is
ET AL, limited to what is enumerated under the law and the presentation NAMELY: of a witness is not among those 1. HEIRS OF EDILBERTO included. BALUYA 2. CLAUDIA BARNIDO IF MENTIONED, ASSESSED 3. HEIRS OF PABLO BASADRE VALUE IN DET. DOCKET FEES--- 4. ESTERLITA M. BARBANTE 5. MARIETTA R. BOGLOSA OBJECTION , YOUR HONOR. 6. PACITA B. CASTRO 7. CHERRY D. CRUZ UNDER A.M. NO. 35-2004, FOR 8. JACKYLOU B. DE DIOS FILING FEES, THE BASIS FOR 9. ANASTACIO T. FABRO COMPUTING IT IS THE FMV OF 10. CATHERINE POSADA- THE REAL PROPERTY IN BISNAR LITIGATION STATED IN THE 11. ENCARNACION C. CURRENT TAX DECLARATION OR VICENTE THE CURRENT ZONAL 12. JOSEPHINE D. BALUYA VALUATION OF THE BIR, 13. RODOLFO B. BOSQUE WHICHEVER IS HIGHER. 14. DOREEN JARABELO 15. ELIZABETH IF TCT 39241 IS MENTIONED, IT MAGSALANG SHOULD BE THE TAX 16. MICHAEL A. RIVERA DECLARATION OF THE ENTIRE 17. PERCIVAL ORACION TITLE. 18. CERILA MUÑOZ 19. REYNALDO D. FUENTES ----IF NAG-OKAY PADIN SI 20. FLAVIO PARREÑO, JR. JUDGE: YOUR HONER, MAY WE BE 21. ROSITA L. BORLAZA ALLOWED TO REGISTER OUR 22. SEGUNDINA B. DENOY CONTINUING OBJECTION TO THE 23. JANJIE M. PALACIO RULING OF THIS COURT. 24. DELIA D. LIBOON 25. ELIZABTEH B. THANK YOU. BASADRE 26. CERILA CUAJOTOR ADD’L PROPOSED ISSUE: 27. EDGAR D. ROJAS RABIATO 2
SHALL BE HEARD OR ADMITTED BY
THE DEFENDANT – HEIRS OF THE COURT. RUBIATO VALIDLY AND LEGALLY ACQUIRED THRU A VALID SALE (CHECK IF THE DOCUMENTS OF THEIR RESPECTIVE PROPERTIES THE OTHER COUNSEL ARE SUBJECT MATTER OF THIS CASE. ORIGINAL)
JOSEPHINE BALUYA et al, WITNESSES: YOUR HONOR WE
WOULD LIKE TO PRESENT THE 3. THE DEFENDANT – HEIRS OF FOLLOWING WITNESSES. RUBIATO VALIDLY AND LEGALLY ACQUIRED THRU A VALID SALE FOR THE DEFENDANT THEIR RESPECTIVE PROPERTIES HEIRS OF RABIATO, WE SUBJECT MATTER OF THIS SUIT. WOULD LIKE TO PRESENT AS WITNESS: STIPULATIONS: WE WOULD LIKE TO STIULATE THAT: DOLORES RABIATO
Baluya : FOR THE DEFENDANT
BALUYA et al, WE WOULD 4. xxx. Mr. Ibrahim’s LEGAL AND LIKE TO PRESENT THE FACTUAL BASIS XXX FOLLOWING WITNESSES:
Rabiato: 1. ESTERLITA M. BARBANTE
JUST READ THE PTB 2. MARIETTA R. BOGLOSA 3. PACITA B. CASTRO 4. CHERRY D. CRUZ MARKINGS: FOR THE 5. JACKYLOU B. DE DIOS DEFENDANTS HEIRS OF RABIATO 6. ANASTACIO T. FABRO AND BALUYA ET. AL,CONSIDERING 7. CATHERINE POSADA-BISNAR THE VOLUMINOUS DOCUMENTS 8. ENCARNACION C. VICENTE AND EXHIBITS THAT WE HAVE, SO 9. JOSEPHINE D. BALUYA AS NOT TO UNDULY DEPRIVE THE 10. RODOLFO B. BOSQUE OTHER LITIGANTS’ HEARINGS, 11. DOREEN JARABELO MAY WE BE ALLOWED 12. ELIZABETH MAGSALANG YOUR HONOR WE WOULD LIKE TO 13. MICHAEL A. RIVERA RESERVE THE PRESENTATION OF 14. PERCIVAL ORACION ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE DURING 15. CERILA MUÑOZ THE COURSE OF THE 16. REYNALDO D. FUENTES PROCEEDINGS 17. FLAVIO PARREÑO, JR. 18. ROSITA L. BORLAZA IF DEAN PAHM MARKS A 19. SEGUNDINA B. DENOY JUDAFF— 20. JANJIE M. PALACIO 21. DELIA D. LIBOON OBJECTION HONOR. 22. ELIZABTEH B. BASADRE UNDER THE RULES OF COURT, 23. CERILA CUAJOTOR ONLY WITNESSES WHOSE 24. EDGAR D. ROJAS JUDICIAL AFFIDAVITS ARE 25. ANTONIO S. DELOS ATTACHED TO THE PLEADING SANTOS SHALL BE PRESENTED BY THE 26. ROJEAN F. VENDER PARTIES DURING THE TRIAL. 27. APOLINARIO A. MONSERATE EXCEPT IF A PARTY PRESENTS MERITORIOUS REASONS AS BASIS FOR THE ADMISSION OF WE WOULD LIKE TO RESERVE THE ADDITIONAL WINESSES, NO PRESENTATION OF MA. JEANNIE L. OTHER WITNESS OR AFFIDAVIT OCTAVIO AS THE DEFENDANT’S 3
ADDITIONAL WITNESS TO TESTIFY
ON THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF HER FATHER’S PURCHASE OF LOT 53- M.
TRIAL DATES:
FOR THE DEFENDANT HEIRS OF
RABIATO, WE WOULD LIKE TO ASK FOR JUST ONE TRIAL DATE
FOR THE DEFENDANT BALUYA ET
AL, MAY WE BE ALLOWED TO PRESENT 2-WITNESSES A DAY. SO THAT WOULD BE 14-TRIAL DATES.