Professional Documents
Culture Documents
INTRODUCTION
The testing technique and initial results obtained from seismic tests
performed in the ISMES calibration chamber on dry specimens of Ticino Sand
are presented in this paper. The experimental program was designed to
investigate the anisotropy of the small strain elastic moduli in pluvially
deposited, uniform sand specimens. Stress level effects on the small strain
stiffness also come into consideration.
Many authors (e.g. [9]) have shown that the strains associated wiC-
typical working loads are relatively small, less than 0.05% to 0.1%.
Consequently, adequate geotechnical analysis of deformations for situations
far from failure require knowledge of stiffnesses characteristic of the soil
at strains ranging from very small (less than 0.001%) up to approximately
1%. The dependence of sand stiffness on stress and strain levels over this
strain interval is relatively well documented in the literature. The
anisotropy of stress-strain behavior at small strains, on the other hand,
has received far less attention notwithstanding the generally recognized
anisotropic nature of sands.
Each dry sand specimen was pluviated through air using the travelling
sand spreader which deposits one layer of sand at a time through a thin
rectangular aperature at the bottom of a hopper oriented perpendicular to
the travel direction. This device produces homogeneous specimens of relative
density, Dr, varying between approximately 20% and 100% depending on the
aperture width. The height of drop between the aperture and the soil surface
is maintained at a constant 160 cm.
To effect the seismic velocity determination, miniature cylindrical
geophones employed as both sources and receivers were positioned within the
sand specimen during the deposition process. These velocity transducers
(model no. LAO A-1, natural frequency - 60 Hz, of Mark Products, Houston,
Texas) are 3.5 cm in length with a diameter equal to 3.1 cm. S wave
velocities were studied by considering an array of geophones oriented side-
by-side such that their cylindrical axes were perpendicular to the
propagation direction while for P waves the geophones were oriented end-to-
end with the geophone axis parallel to the direction of propagation.
A function generator and a power amplifier were used to control the
character of the 50 V peak-to-peak signal sent to the source geophone. The
frequency of the source wave (3000 Hz and 2000 Hz for P and S waves,
respectively) was chosen such that the wavelength of the propagating
vibration was greater than three times the size of any obstruction (e.g.,
geophone) in its path, and less than half the travel distance so as to avoid
near field effects [151. Received signals were conditioned by operational
amplifiers and bandpass filters, one of each devoted to each receptor, and
then observed on a two-channel digital oscilloscope. Filters, often avoided
due to the distortion suffered by the conditioned signal, were necessary
since the calibration chamber is not isolated from ambient vibrations. The
equipment configuration is as indicated in Fig. 1.
CALIBRATION CHAMBER
SAND SPECIMEN
RECErNER2
RECEIVERI
SOURCEi, DIFFERENTtAL
S0URC ~ AMPLIFIERS
60 dB
500 H, to 10000 H,
POWER OSCILLOSCOPE
AMPLIFIER
FUNCTION C2 to 4 ) Ioe~
GENERATORI
P- :~ SPREADER DIRECTION
SEISMIC
WAVE
TYPE
2 x COV(velocity) ()
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
PVX ' Ab,'D'''' ' ' ' '
Pvy * + +
Phx o
M, 4
Phy 01D O4* * +
Sxy .in
SYMBOL TEST
Syx *0Uj No.
Svx 4- 00 + 310
* 308
Svy X a 0 306
4 307
S45 * 309
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
Figure 3. Coefficient of variation associated with the evaluation of seismic
wave velocity in the calibration chamber.
The error associated with this seismic technique has been interpreted
in terms of repeatability of the measurement. Data presented in Fig. 3
represent the evaluation of six separate readings of the interval travel
time using the same geophones at a given stress level. P and S wave travel
time measurements from five different tests indicate standard deviations
equal to +/-0.025 msec and 0.020 msec, respectively, resulting in 95%
confidence level (two times the coefficient of variation) velocities equal
to +/-6% and +/-3%, respectively. The larger scatter associated with the
P waves is largely due to their lower travel time.
TEST PROGRAM
The cohesionless soil investigated was medium to coarse Ticino sand, a
soil of fluvial origin obtained from the Po river valley in northern Italy.
The characteristics of Ticino sand are presented in Fig. 4. Over the past
decade, this sand has received intensive attention in the laboratory,
including numerous cone penetration, dilatometer and pressuremeter tests in
the calibration chamber [3] [8], as well as exhaustive triaxial and resonant
column test series [1] (2] [5] [17]. The seismic measurement test program
comprised a total of 18 tests performed on 18 different dry sand,
calibration chamber specimens. Two densities were considered: low medium
35
(Dr- -45%) and very dense (Dr-85-90%).
d
e
t
217
I ISANDI SLT
NEIGHT
PERCENTR --.- ,--
PASSING
$
1391 kal e 0.93 cu. 1.6
G - p Vs 2 (2)
2
M p Vp (3)
218
V s - C2 aanaa'bnba'cnc (5)
where:
Vp - compression wave velocity
V - shear wave velocity
o'a - principal effective stress parallel to wave propagation direction
O'b - principal effective stress parallel to wave polarization direction
o'c - principal effective stress parallel to the out-of-plane direction
and Cl, C2 na, nb and nc are experimentally determined parameters.
1000
700
\Pxnc--0.045
[SThAE TES
200 I EFFECT
TicinoSand
OP - 40 X
TESTNo.331
100
TEST RESULTS
500
tiv : 3 different
400 geophone groups
na - 0. 102 / mo
VELOCITY
(a/sec)
300 Aa0.4
OF (a
EFFECT M
"ICINO
SA t/effective
s n 332
% stresspath
200
EFFECTIVE
HORIZONTAL STRESS (kPa)
500
1000
INHIENT ANISOTROPY
Ticino Sand
700 Or - 40 % Ph .._
Test No.305
VELOCITY na-nb
(m/sed .2S)~,A U
0.11 O
0.11 RESONANTCOLUMN
esp. formula
(LoPresti. 1987. Armand. .1991)
iO0...............................................I
1000
INHERENTANISOTRfOPY
Ticilno
Sand
700 Or -B5
Test No. 330
na - nb SM
400
VELOCITY 0.123 5l A A
(a/see) 0.134 A
200 0.112
COLUMN
RSONANT
es. formula
(Lopresti,1967:Amandi.1991)
100
tO0 1000 1O000 100000 1000000
of Ticino sand [1] [17]. The seismic wave monitored in the RC device is a
vertically propagating, horizontally vibrating S wave (Svh). The correlation
with the measurements in the calibration chamber is notably good.
CONCLUSIONS
The seismic method presented wherein both S and P wave velocities are
measured in large, dry sand specimens in the calibration chamber is well
adapted to the investigation of small strain modulus anisotropy. Employing
the visual true interval method using two receivers, the 95% confidence
level scatter associated with the technique is equal to approximately +/-3%
and +/-6% for S and P wave velocities, respectively. Appropriate disposition
of approximately 25 to 30 geophones at three elevations within the sand
specimen permits measurement of Svh, Shv Shh, Pv and Ph velocities.
Implanting a minimum of six geophones at a tilt allows the evaluation of
obliquely propagating S and P waves.
500
400
VELOCITY 3Sft
(m/seci
200 51
K, 1± Sh±I
0.3 A A
IDUCEDANISOTRPY ~ 0.5 #
Shear' WaveVelocity fl0.7 10 a
Ticinlo Sand fl1.0 -
O 401.5 0 0-
100
too 1000 MsOO 100000 ±000000
sigma' a x sigma' b (kPa'21
Figure 10. Shear wave velocity measured on specimens aubjected to different
consolidation stress ratioa, Kc.
l00
Ph
00
400 0> S
*0m
VELOCITY c -A-"
(u/sec)0
3D. Ps Ph
0.3 A 4
INDCE AISTRPY0.5
Compression Wave fl0.7 a
Velocit f 1.0 - - - -
Ticinos Sand U1.5 0
200 1 1 ..
100 1000 10000 100000 1000000
sigma* a x sigma* b (kPa^2)
Figure 11. Compression wave velocities measured on specimens subjected to
different consolidation stress rstios, jKc*
224
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
REFERENCES