New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel by REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION As Hyper Decoration On Super Density

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.
net/publication/372825427
New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph With

Star and Wheel By REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION As Hyper Decoration
On Super Density
Preprint · August 2023

DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.8206877
CITATIONS
1 author:
Henry Garrett
541 PUBLICATIONS 27,882 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Featured Articles View project
On Fuzzy Logic View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Henry Garrett on 02 August 2023.
The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 2
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By REVERSE 3
CONNECTIVE DOMINATION As Hyper Decoration On 4
Super Density 5
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · 7
DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA 8
1 ABSTRACT 9
In this scientific research, (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic 10
SuperHyperREVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 11
(NSHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet 12
V 0 = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then V 0 is called Neutrosophic SuperHyperREVERSE CONNECTIVE 13
DOMINATION if the following expressions, terms and statements is called Neutrosophic 14
SuperHyperREVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION criteria holds. 15
X X X
|( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 Vi ∈V 0 Vi ∈V 0
X X X
= max
00 ⊆V
|{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) | ∀Vi ∈ VN SHG , ∃Vj ∈ V 00 :
V N SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
0 0 0
TV (Vi , Vj ∈ Ei ) ≤ min[TV (Vi ), TV (Vj )]Vi ,Vj0 ∈P :Vi ,...,Vj ,
0 0
IV0 (Vi , Vj ∈ Ei0 ) ≤ min[IV (Vi0 ), IV (Vj0 )]Vi ,Vj ∈Ei0 Vi0 ,Vj0 ∈P :Vi ,...,Vj ,
and FV0 (Ei0 )(Vi , Vj ∈ Ei0 ) ≤ min[FV (Vi0 ), FV (Vj0 )]Vi ,Vj ∈Ei0 Vi0 ,Vj0 ∈P :Vi ,...,Vj
}
In this scientific research, new configurations are introduced for the new 16
SuperHyperNotions, namely a REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION and a 17
Neutrosophic REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION. Two different 18
SuperHyperDefinitions were started for them, but research has progressed and 19
SuperHyperNotion, SuperHyperUniform, and SuperHyperClass are well-defined and 20
well-reviewed based on them. Literature review is implemented throughout this research. 21
To shine the light and importance of this research, a comparison between this 22
SuperHyperNotion with other SuperHyperNotions and basic SuperHyperNumbers is 23
presented. Definitions are followed by examples and examples, so clarifications are 24
guided by various tools. Applications are designed to understand the theoretical aspect 25
of this ongoing research. “Cancer diagnosis” are the things that are being researched to 26
explore the challenges that make sense in ongoing research and future research. It is a 27
special case. Cells are viewed in the intended manner. There are different types of them. 28
Some are individual and some are well modeled by groups of cells. All these types are 29
officially called “SuperHyperVertex”, but the relationships between them all are 30
officially called “SuperHyperEdge”. “SuperHyperGraph” and “Neutrosophic 31
SuperHyperGraph” frameworks are selected and selected for research on “Cancer 32
Diagnosis”. Thus, these complex and dense super-hypermodels open avenues for 33
research on theoretical aspects and “cancer diagnosis”. Ways to pursue this scientific 34
research have been considered. It has also been formally collected in the form of several 35
questions and problems. It is useful to define a “neutrosophic” version of REVERSE 36
CONNECTIVE DOMINATION. Since there are more ways to get type results a 37
REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION becomes more understandable. In order to 38
master the Neutrosophic REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION, there is a need to 39
“re-define” the concept of “REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION mastery”. 40
SuperHyperVertices and SuperHyperEdges are assigned by alphabetical labels. In this 41
method, the position of tags is used to assign values. Suppose a REVERSE 42
CONNECTIVE DOMINATION. If the specified table contains “values of vertices, 43
supervertices, edges, hyperedges, and hyperedges belonging to Neutrosophic 44
SuperHyperGraph” with key points, it is redefined. ”values of vertices & number of 45
positions in alphabet”, ”Values of SuperVertices&maximum values of its vertices”, 46
”values of edges&maximum values of its vertices”, ”super edge values&max values of its 47
vertices”, “super edge values” and maximum values of its endpoints”. To get examples 48
and structural examples, I would like to introduce the next SuperHyperClass 49
SuperHyperGraph based on REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION. This is the 50
original. Having the foundation of the previous definition in the SuperHyperClass type 51
would be disciplined. If there is a need to have all REVERSE CONNECTIVE 52
DOMINATION until REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION, then it is officially 53
called “REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION”, but otherwise, it is not REVERSE 54
CONNECTIVE DOMINATION. There is some explanation for the original definition 55
titled “REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION”. These two examples are further 56
explored and distinguished because they are characterized in the SuperHyperClass 57
disciplinary methods based on a dominant REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION. 58
Because of having REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION, there is a need to 59
“re-define” the concept of “neutrosophic REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION” 60
and “neutrosophic REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION”. SuperHyperVertices 61
and SuperHyperEdges are assigned by alphabetical labels. In this method, the position 62
of tags is used to assign values. Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. 63
“Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” is redefined if the desired table exists. And if the 64
desired table exists, a REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION is redefined to a 65
“Neutrosophic REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION”. It is useful to define a 66
“Neutrosophic” version of SuperHyperClasses. Since there are more ways to obtain 67
Neutrosophic type results, a SuperHyper- Neutrosophic REVERSE CONNECTIVE 68
DOMINATION becomes more understandable. Consider a Neutrosophic 69
SuperHyperGraph. If the desired table exists, there are a number of Neutrosophic 70
SuperHyperClasses. So are SuperHyperPath, SuperHyperCycle, SuperHyperStar, 71
SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultiPartite and SuperHyperWheel. ”Neutrosophic 72
SuperHyperPath”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar”, 73
“Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultiPartite” and 74
“Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel”. A graph is SuperHyperUniform if it is a 75
SuperHyperGraph and the number of SuperHyperEdges elements is the same. Consider 76
a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. There are a number of SuperHyperClasses as follows. 77
It is a SuperHyperPath if there is only one SuperVertex as an intersection between two 78
given SuperHyperEdges with two exceptions. If only one SuperVertex is given as an 79
intersection between two SuperHyperEdges, it is SuperHyperCycle. It is 80
SuperHyperStar and only one SuperVertex as intersection among all SuperHyperEdges. 81
It is SuperHyperBipartite, and only one SuperVertex is given as the intersection between 82
two SuperHyperEdges, and these SuperVertices, which form two distinct sets, have no 83
SuperHyperEdge in common. This is SuperHyperMultiPartite. Only one SuperVertex is 84
given as an intersection between two SuperHyperEdges, and these SuperVertices, which 85
form separate multisets, have no SuperHyperEdge in common. If only one 86
SuperHyperEdge among the given two SuperHyperEdges is a SuperHyperWheel and a 87
SuperVertex has a SuperHyperEdge with any regular SuperVertex. SuperHyperModel 88
suggests specific designs and specific architectures. SuperHyperModel is officially called 89
“SuperHyperGraph” and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”. In this SuperHyperModel, 90
the “special” cells and the “special group” of cells are SuperHyperModeled as 91
“SuperHyperVertices” and the common and desired properties between the “special” 92
cells and the “special group” of cells. SuperHyperModeled as “SuperHyperEdges”. 93
Sometimes, to have a more accurate SuperHyperModel, it is useful to have some degree 94
of determinism, uncertainty, and neutrality, in this case the SuperHyperModel is called 95
“Neutrosophic”. In future scientific research, the foundation will be based on “diagnosis 96
of cancer” and the results and definitions will be introduced in redeemed methods. 97
Cancer diagnosis in long-term practice. The specific region is assigned by the model 98
(called SuperHyperGraph) and the long cycle of movement of the cancer is determined 99
by this scientific research. Sometimes the movement of cancer is not easy to detect, 100
because there is certainty, uncertainty and neutrality about the movements and effects 101
of cancer on that area. This event leads us to choose another model [which is said to be 102
the Neutrosophic superhypergraph] in order to have a proper understanding of what 103
happened and was done. There are some specific models, which are well known and 104
have names, and some SuperHyperGeneral SuperHyperModels. The movements and 105
effects of cancer in complex pathways and between complex groups of cells can be 106
visualized with a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (-/SuperHyperCycle, SuperHyperStar, 107
SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, SuperHyperWheel). The goal is to find 108
the longest REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION or the strongest REVERSE 109
CONNECTIVE DOMINATION in those Neutrosophic SuperHyperModels. Some 110
general results are presented for the longest REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION 111
called REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION and the strongest REVERSE 112
CONNECTIVE DOMINATION called Neutrosophic REVERSE CONNECTIVE 113
DOMINATION. Beyond that in SuperHyperStar, all possible SuperHyperPaths have 114
only two SuperHyperEdges, but it is not enough as having at least three 115
SuperHyperEdges is necessary to form any style of cycle. There is no form of any cycle, 116
but literally, it is the transformation of any cycle. It literally transforms and does not 117
form. A basic introduction to the theory of REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION 118
Neutrosophic, SuperHyperGraphs and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs is suggested. 119
Keywords: Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, SuperHyperREVERSE CONNECTIVE 120
, Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition

DOMINATION 121
AMS Subject Classification: 05C17, 05C22, 05E45 122
2 Applied Notions Under The Scrutiny Of The 123
Motivation Of This Scientific Research 124
In this scientific research, there are ideas in the prominent frameworks of motivations. I 125
try to bring motivations in narrative ways. Some Cells have faced attacks from the 126
established situation with cancer attacks in this case, there is some analysis embedded 127
in the case current situations where cells can be labeled as some groups and some 128
groups or individuals are overlabeled, all from behaviors to overcome cancer attacks. In 129
embedded situations, cell individuals and cell groups can be considered as “new groups”. 130
So it encourages us to find suitable SuperHyperModels for more appropriate analysis 131
about this dirty story. I found SuperHyperModels, officially called “SuperHyperGraphs” 132
and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. In this SuperHyperModel, cells and groups of 133
cells are defined as “SuperHyperVertices” and relationships between individual cells and 134
groups of cells are defined as “SuperHyperEdges”. So this is another motivation for us 135
to do research on this SuperHyperModel based on “cancer diagnosis”. Sometimes, 136
things get worse. The situation has passed certainty and precise style. So it is beyond 137
them. There are three descriptions, i.e., degrees of determination, uncertainty, and 138
neutrality, for any object based on ambiguous forms, i.e., incomplete data, imprecise 139
data, and uncertain analysis. The second model can be considered in the previous 140
SuperHyperModel. This is SuperHyperModel. This is SuperHyperGraph but officially 141
called “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. Cancer is a disease, but the model is 142
supposed to understand what happens in this phenomenon. The special case of this 143
disease is considered and some parameters are used as consequences of the model. Cells 144
are attacked by the disease, but the movement of cancer is in a specific area. Knowing 145
the mind of cancer can help to find some cures for this disease. SuperHyperGraph and 146
Neutrosophic Super-HyperGraph are super-hypermodels used in “cancer diagnosis” and 147
both are the foundation of the background of this scientific research. Sometimes cancer 148
has occurred in an area full of cells, cell groups, and embedded styles. In this section, 149
SuperHyperModel proposes based on the links of cancer movements in the form of unity 150
styles with the formation of design and architecture officially called “REVERSE 151
CONNECTIVE DOMINATION”, in the themes of specialized terms and common 152
words. Particle for direct object. Applied concepts under the investigation of the 153
motivation of this scientific research. The “SuperHyper” prefix refers to the theme of 154
embedded styles for background discovery for SuperHyperNotions. Cancer diagnosis in 155
long-term practice. The specific region is assigned by the model (called 156
SuperHyperGraph) and the long cycle of movement of the cancer is determined by this 157
scientific research. Sometimes the movement of Cancer is not easy to identify because 158
there is certainty, uncertainty and neutrality about the movements and effects of Cancer 159
in that region. This event leads us to choose another model [said to be Neutrosophic 160
SuperHyperGraph]. Easy understanding of what happened and what was done. There 161
are some specific models that are well known and named and some general models. The 162
movements and effects of cancer in complex pathways and between complex groups of 163
cells can be visualized by a neurosophic superhyperpath (-/SuperHyperCycle, 164
SuperHyperStar, SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, SuperHyperWheel). 165
The goal is to find REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION or Neutrosophic 166
REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION for SuperHyperModels in it. Some general 167
results are presented. Beyond that in SuperHyperStar, all possible Neutrosophic 168
SuperHyperPaths have only two SuperHyperEdges, but it is not enough as having at 169
least three SuperHyperEdges is necessary to form any style of cycle. There is no form of 170
cycle, but it is literally a form of any cycle. It literally transforms and does not form. 171
Question 2.1. How to define “SuperHyperNotions and to do research” to find the 172
“REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION Rate” of any cell or groups of cells based on 173
fixed cell or fixed group of cells broadly, “REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION 174
Rate” based on fixed groups or fixed cells. Groups of groups of cells? 175
Question 2.2. What are the best descriptions for “diagnosing cancer” in terms of 176
these chaotic and dense super-hypermodels in which embedded concepts are depicted? 177
This motivation to find concepts to use in this dense model is called 178
“SuperHyperGraphs”. So it motivates us to define different types of “REVERSE 179
CONNECTIVE DOMINATION” and “neutrosophic REVERSE CONNECTIVE 180
DOMINATION” over “superhypergraph” and “neutrosophic superhypergraph”. Then 181
this scientific research has taken more motivations to define SuperHyperClasses and find 182
some connections among this SuperHyperNotion with other SuperHyperNotions. It 183
motivates us to obtain examples and examples to clarify the framework of this scientific 184
research. The general results and some of the results about some of the connections are 185
the ways that the key point of this scientific research, “diagnosis of cancer” is more 186
understandable and clear. 187
The framework of this research is as follows. First, I will introduce the basic 188
definitions to clarify the basics. In the “Introductions” subsection, basic definitions 189
about SuperHyperGraphs and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph are introduced and 190
discussed in depth. Basic concepts are thoroughly explained and illustrated, and 191
sometimes a literature review is used to make sense of what is to come in the coming 192
sections. The main definitions and their explanations, along with some results on the 193
new concepts, REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION and Neutrosophic 194
REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION, are specified in the sections “REVERSE 195
CONNECTIVE DOMINATION” and “Neutrosophic REVERSE CONNECTIVE 196
DOMINATION”. In the concept of dealing with results and in REVERSE 197
CONNECTIVE DOMINATION to create logic about the continuation of the scientific 198
research, the ideas of SuperHyperUniform and Neutrosophic SuperHyperUniform are 199
introduced and as their consequences, the corresponding SuperHyperClasses are 200
specified to summarize the work done in this section, as “Results on SuperHyperClasses” 201
and “Results on Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”. Going back to the core concepts, 202
clever steps towards common concepts to extend new concepts in new frameworks, 203
SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, in “Results on 204
SuperHyperClasses” and “Results on Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses” sections. There 205
is the initial scientific research on supergeneral relations and as the final and final part 206
of the theoretical scientific research is available in the section “General results”. Some 207
general SuperHyperRelations are fundamental and are known as fundamental 208
SuperHyperNotions, as in “General results” were extracted and discussed. “REVERSE 209
CONNECTIVE DOMINATION”, “Neutrosophic REVERSE CONNECTIVE 210
DOMINATION”, “Results on SuperHyperClasses” and “Results on Neutrosophic 211
SuperHyperClasses”. There are curious questions about what has been done about 212
SuperHyperNotions to make sense of the superiority of this scientific research and to 213
discover the word “best” as a description and adjective of this scientific research as 214
presented in the “REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION” section. The keyword of 215
this scientific research was presented in the section “Applications in cancer diagnosis” 216
with two cases and sub-sections “Case 1: Initial steps towards SuperHyperBipartite as 217
SuperHyperModel” and “Case 2: Incremental steps towards SuperHyperMultiperdel as 218
SuperHyper. In the “open issues” section, there is a detailed examination and 219
recognition of what was done in this scientific research and what happened in this 220
scientific research in the form of “questions” and “issues” in order to understand this 221
scientific research in an outstanding style, the advantages and limitations of this 222
scientific research in addition to What has been done in this scientific research is stated 223
in the “conclusion and final remarks” section. 224
3 Neutrosophic Preliminaries Of This Scientific 225
Research On the Redeemed Ways 226
In this section, the basic material in this scientific research, is referred to [Single Valued 227
Neutrosophic Set](Ref. [1],Definition 2.2,p.2), [Neutrosophic Set](Ref. [1],Definition 228
2.1,p.1), [Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)](Ref. [1],Definition 2.5,p.2), 229
[Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)](Ref. [1],Definition 230
2.7,p.3), [t-norm](Ref. [1], Definition 2.7, p.3), and [Characterization of the 231
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)](Ref. [1],Definition 2.7,p.3), [Neutrosophic 232
Strength of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPaths] (Ref. [1],Definition 5.3,p.7), and 233
[Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)] 234
(Ref. [1],Definition 5.4,p.7). Also, the new ideas and their clarifications are addressed 235
to Ref. [1]. 236
In this subsection, the basic material which is used in this scientific research, is 237
presented. Also, the new ideas and their clarifications are elicited. 238
Definition 3.1 (Neutrosophic Set). (Ref. [1],Definition 2.1,p.1). 239
Let X be a Eulerian-Path-Cut of points (objects) with generic elements in X denoted by

x; then the Neutrosophic set A (NS A) is an object having the form
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}

+
where the functions T, I, F : X →]− 0, 1 [ define respectively the a
truth-membership function, an indeterminacy-membership function, and a
falsity-membership function of the element x ∈ X to the set A with the condition
−
0 ≤ TA (x) + IA (x) + FA (x) ≤ 3+ .
The functions TA (x), IA (x) and FA (x) are real standard or nonstandard subsets of 240
+
]− 0, 1 [. 241
Definition 3.2 (Single Valued Neutrosophic Set). (Ref. [1],Definition 2.2,p.2). 242
Let X be a Eulerian-Path-Cut of points (objects) with generic elements in X denoted by

x. A single valued Neutrosophic set A (SVNS A) is characterized by
truth-membership function TA (x), an indeterminacy-membership function IA (x), and a
falsity-membership function FA (x). For each point x in X, TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) ∈ [0, 1].
A SVNS A can be written as
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}.
Definition 3.3. The degree of truth-membership,

indeterminacy-membership and falsity-membership of the subset X ⊂ A of
the single valued Neutrosophic set A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}:
TA (X) = min[TA (vi ), TA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,
IA (X) = min[IA (vi ), IA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,

and FA (X) = min[FA (vi ), FA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X .
Definition 3.4. The support of X ⊂ A of the single valued Neutrosophic set
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}:
supp(X) = {x ∈ X : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) > 0}.
Definition 3.5 (Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). (Ref. [1],Definition 243
2.5,p.2). 244
Assume V 0 is a given set. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a 245
pair S = (V, E), where 246
(i) V = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vn } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of V 0 ; 247
(ii) V = {(Vi , TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi )) : TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi ) ≥ 0}, (i = 248
1, 2, . . . , n); 249
(iii) E = {E1 , E2 , . . . , En0 } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of 250
V; 251
(iv) E = {(Ei0 , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )) : TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 ) ≥ 0}, (i0 = 252
1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 253
(v) Vi 6= ∅, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 254
(vi) Ei0 6= ∅, (i0 = 1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 255
Figure 1. The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a illustrated SuperHyperModeling

on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
P
(vii) i supp(Vi ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 256
supp(Ei0 ) = V, (i0 = 1, 2, . . . , n0 );
P
(viii) i0 257
(ix) and the following conditions hold:
TV0 (Ei0 ) ≤ min[TV 0 (Vi ), TV 0 (Vj )]Vi ,Vj ∈Ei0 ,
IV0 (Ei0 ) ≤ min[IV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vj )]Vi ,Vj ∈Ei0 ,

and FV0 (Ei0 ) ≤ min[FV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vj )]Vi ,Vj ∈Ei0
where i0 = 1, 2, . . . , n0 . 258
Here the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ej 0 and the Neutrosophic 259
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) Vj are single valued Neutrosophic sets. TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), 260
and FV 0 (Vi ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 261
indeterminacy-membership and the degree of falsity-membership the Neutrosophic 262
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) V. 263
TV0 (Ei0 ), TV0 (Ei0 ), and TV0 (Ei0 ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 264
indeterminacy-membership and the degree of falsity-membership of the Neutrosophic 265
SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) Ei0 to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) E. Thus, 266
the ii0 th element of the incidence matrix of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) 267
are of the form (Vi , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )), the sets V and E are crisp sets. 268
Example 3.6. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair 269
S = (V, E) in the mentioned Neutrosophic Figures in every Neutrosophic items. 270
• On the Figure (1), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 271
notion, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. E1 272
and E3 are some empty Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges but E2 is a loop 273
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge and E4 is a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. Thus 274
in the terms of Neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only one Neutrosophic 275
SuperHyperEdge, namely, E4 . The Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 is 276
Neutrosophic isolated means that there’s no Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge has it 277
as a Neutrosophic endpoint. 278
Figure 2. TThe Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a illustrated SuperHyperModel-

ing on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
notion, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 280
E1 , E2 and E3 are some empty Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges but E4 is a 281
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. Thus in the terms of Neutrosophic 282
SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only one Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge, namely, 283
E4 . The Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 is Neutrosophic isolated means that 284
there’s no Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge has it as a Neutrosophic endpoint. 285
• On the Figure (3), the SuperHyperNotion, namely, SuperHyperGirth, is up. 286
E1 , E2 and E3 are some empty SuperHyperEdges but E4 is a SuperHyperEdge. 287
Thus in the terms of SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only one SuperHyperEdge, 288
namely, E4 . 289
• On the Figure (4), there’s no empty SuperHyperEdge but E3 are a loop 290
SuperHyperEdge on {F } and there are some SuperHyperEdges, namely, E1 on 291
{H, V1 , V3 }, alongside E2 on {O, H, V4 , V3 } and E4 , E5 on {N, V1 , V2 , V3 , F }. 292
• On the Figure (5),there’s neither empty SuperHyperEdge nor loop 293
SuperHyperEdge. 294
• On the Figure (6), there’s neither empty SuperHyperEdge nor loop 295
SuperHyperEdge. 296
SuperHyperEdge. 298
SuperHyperEdge. 300
SuperHyperEdge. 302
SuperHyperEdge. 304
Figure 3. The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a illustrated SuperHyperModeling

on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 4. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a illustrated Super-

HyperModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 5. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs mentioned as the SuperHy-

perModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 6. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a illustrated Super-

HyperModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 7. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs depicted SuperHyperMod-

eling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 8. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with dense SuperHyper-

Modeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 9. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a messy SuperHyper-

Modeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 10. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with highly-embedding-

connected SuperHyperModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example
(3.6)
Figure 11. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a SuperHyperModel-

SuperHyperEdge. 306
SuperHyperEdge. 308
SuperHyperEdge. 310
SuperHyperEdge. 312
SuperHyperEdge. 314
SuperHyperEdge. 316
SuperHyperEdge. 318
SuperHyperEdge. 320
SuperHyperEdge. 322
SuperHyperEdge. 324
SuperHyperEdge. 326
SuperHyperEdge. 328
Figure 12. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with highly-multiple-

connected-style SuperHyperModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic
Example (3.6)


Figure 15. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with Linearly-Connected

SuperHyperModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)

Figure 17. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a Linearly-over-

packed SuperHyperModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example
(3.6)





Definition 3.7 (Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). 329
(Ref. [1],Definition 2.7,p.3). 330
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). The 331
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ei0 and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 332
(NSHV) Vi of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S = (V, E) could be 333
characterized as follow-up items. 334
(i) If |Vi | = 1, then Vi is called vertex; 335
(ii) if |Vi | ≥ 1, then Vi is called SuperVertex; 336
(iii) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called edge; 337
(iv) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 338
HyperEdge; 339
(v) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called 340
SuperEdge; 341
(vi) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 342
SuperHyperEdge. 343
If we choose different types of binary operations, then we could get hugely diverse 344
types of general forms of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG). 345
Definition 3.8 (t-norm). (Ref. [1], Definition 2.7, p.3). 346
A binary operation ⊗ : [0, 1] × [0, 1] → [0, 1] is a t-norm if it satisfies the following 347
for x, y, z, w ∈ [0, 1]: 348
(i) 1 ⊗ x = x; 349
(ii) x ⊗ y = y ⊗ x; 350
(iii) x ⊗ (y ⊗ z) = (x ⊗ y) ⊗ z; 351
(iv) If w ≤ x and y ≤ z then w ⊗ y ≤ x ⊗ z. 352
Definition 3.9. The degree of truth-membership, indeterminacy-membership

and falsity-membership of the subset X ⊂ A of the single valued Neutrosophic set
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X} (with respect to t-norm Tnorm ):
TA (X) = Tnorm [TA (vi ), TA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,
IA (X) = Tnorm [IA (vi ), IA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,

and FA (X) = Tnorm [FA (vi ), FA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X .
Definition 3.10. The support of X ⊂ A of the single valued Neutrosophic set
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}:
supp(X) = {x ∈ X : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) > 0}.
Definition 3.11. (General Forms of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). 353
Assume V 0 is a given set. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a 354
pair S = (V, E), where 355
(i) V = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vn } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of V 0 ; 356
(ii) V = {(Vi , TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi )) : TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi ) ≥ 0}, (i = 357
1, 2, . . . , n); 358
(iii) E = {E1 , E2 , . . . , En0 } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of 359
V; 360
(iv) E = {(Ei0 , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )) : TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 ) ≥ 0}, (i0 = 361
1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 362
(v) Vi 6= ∅, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 363
(vi) Ei0 6= ∅, (i0 = 1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 364
P
(vii) i supp(Vi ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 365
0 0
P
(viii) i0 supp(Ei ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n ).
0 366
Here the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ej 0 and the Neutrosophic 367
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) Vj are single valued Neutrosophic sets. TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), 368
and FV 0 (Vi ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 369
indeterminacy-membership and the degree of falsity-membership the Neutrosophic 370
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) V. 371
TV0 (Ei0 ), TV0 (Ei0 ), and TV0 (Ei0 ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 372
indeterminacy-membership and the degree of falsity-membership of the Neutrosophic 373
SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) Ei0 to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) E. Thus, 374
the ii0 th element of the incidence matrix of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) 375
are of the form (Vi , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )), the sets V and E are crisp sets. 376
Definition 3.12 (Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). 377
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). The 379
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ei0 and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 380
(NSHV) Vi of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S = (V, E) could be 381
characterized as follow-up items. 382
(i) If |Vi | = 1, then Vi is called vertex; 383
(ii) if |Vi | ≥ 1, then Vi is called SuperVertex; 384
(iii) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called edge; 385
(iv) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 386
HyperEdge; 387
(v) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called 388
SuperEdge; 389
(vi) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 390
SuperHyperEdge. 391
This SuperHyperModel is too messy and too dense. Thus there’s a need to have 392
some restrictions and conditions on SuperHyperGraph. The special case of this 393
SuperHyperGraph makes the patterns and regularities. 394
Definition 3.13. A graph is SuperHyperUniform if it’s SuperHyperGraph and the 395
number of elements of SuperHyperEdges are the same. 396
To get more visions on SuperHyperUniform, the some SuperHyperClasses are 397
introduced. It makes to have SuperHyperUniform more understandable. 398
Definition 3.14. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. There are some 399
SuperHyperClasses as follows. 400
(i). It’s Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath if it’s only one SuperVertex as 401
intersection amid two given SuperHyperEdges with two exceptions; 402
(ii). it’s SuperHyperCycle if it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two 403
given SuperHyperEdges; 404
(iii). it’s SuperHyperStar it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid all 405
SuperHyperEdges; 406
(iv). it’s SuperHyperBipartite it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two 407
given SuperHyperEdges and these SuperVertices, forming two separate sets, has 408
no SuperHyperEdge in common; 409
(v). it’s SuperHyperMultiPartite it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid 410
two given SuperHyperEdges and these SuperVertices, forming multi separate sets, 411
has no SuperHyperEdge in common; 412
(vi). it’s SuperHyperWheel if it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two 413
given SuperHyperEdges and one SuperVertex has one SuperHyperEdge with any 414
common SuperVertex. 415
Example 3.15. In the Figure (23), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath 416
ESHP : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, in the 417
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (23), is the notion. 418
Example 3.16. In the Figure (24), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle 419
N SHC : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Neutrosophic 420
SuperHyperSet, in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (24), is up. 421
Example 3.17. In the Figure (25), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar 422
ESHS : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, 423
by the Algorithm in previous Neutrosophic result, of the Neutrosophic 424
SuperHyperVertices of the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E), in 425
the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (25), is up. 426
Figure 23. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath Associated to the Notions in the Example

(3.15)
Figure 24. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions

in the Neutrosophic Example (3.16)
Figure 25. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions in

the Neutrosophic Example (3.17)
Example 3.18. In the Neutrosophic Figure (26), the connected Neutrosophic 427
SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), is Neutrosophic highlighted and Neutrosophic 428
featured. The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Neutrosophic Algorithm in 429
previous Neutrosophic result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected 430
Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic 431
SuperHyperModel (26), is up. 432
Example 3.19. In the Figure (27), the connected Neutrosophic 433
SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E), is highlighted and Neutrosophic featured. 434
The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Algorithm in previous Neutrosophic 435
result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected Neutrosophic 436
SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (27), 437
is up. 438
Example 3.20. In the Neutrosophic Figure (28), the connected Neutrosophic 439
SuperHyperWheel N SHW : (V, E), is Neutrosophic highlighted and featured. The 440
obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Algorithm in previous result, of the 441
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel 442
ESHW : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (28), is up. 443
Definition 3.21. Let a pair S = (V, E) be a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)

S. Then a sequence of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) and Neutrosophic
SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)
V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs
is called a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic 444
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) V1 to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vs if either 445
of following conditions hold: 446
(i) Vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 447
Figure 26. Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite Neutrosophic Associated to the Neutro-

sophic Notions in the Example (3.18)
Figure 27. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite Associated to the Notions in the

Example (3.19)
Figure 28. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel Neutrosophic Associated to the Neutro-

sophic Notions in the Neutrosophic Example (3.20)
(ii) there’s a vertex vi ∈ Vi such that vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 448
(iii) there’s a SuperVertex Vi0 ∈ Vi such that Vi0 , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 449
(iv) there’s a vertex vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that Vi , vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 450
0 0
(v) there’s a SuperVertex Vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that Vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 451
(vi) there are a vertex vi ∈ Vi and a vertex vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that vi , vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 452
0 0
(vii) there are a vertex vi ∈ Vi and a SuperVertex Vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 453
(viii) there are a SuperVertex Vi0 ∈ Vi and a vertex vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that Vi0 , vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 454
(ix) there are a SuperVertex Vi0 ∈ Vi and a SuperVertex Vi+1

0
∈ Vi+1 such that 455
Vi0 , Vi+1
0
∈ Ei0 . 456
Definition 3.22. (Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPaths). 457
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). a

Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV)
V1 to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vs is sequence of Neutrosophic
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) and Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)
V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs ,
could be characterized as follow-up items. 458
(i) If for all Vi , Ej 0 , |Vi | = 1, |Ej 0 | = 2, then NSHP is called path; 459
(ii) if for all Ej 0 , |Ej 0 | = 2, and there’s Vi , |Vi | ≥ 1, then NSHP is called SuperPath; 460
(iii) if for all Vi , Ej 0 , |Vi | = 1, |Ej 0 | ≥ 2, then NSHP is called HyperPath; 461
(iv) if there are Vi , Ej 0 , |Vi | ≥ 1, |Ej 0 | ≥ 2, then NSHP is called Neutrosophic 462
SuperHyperPath . 463
Definition 3.23 (Neutrosophic Strength of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPaths). 464
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). A

Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV)
Table 1. The Values of Vertices, SuperVertices, Edges, HyperEdges, and SuperHy-

perEdges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph Mentioned in the Definition
(3.27)
The Values of The Vertices The Number of Position in Alphabet
The Values of The SuperVertices The maximum Values of Its Vertices
The Values of The Edges The maximum Values of Its Vertices
The Values of The HyperEdges The maximum Values of Its Vertices
The Values of The SuperHyperEdges The maximum Values of Its Endpoints
V1 to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vs is sequence of Neutrosophic

SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) and Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)
V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs ,
have 466
(i) Neutrosophic t-strength (min{T (Vi )}, m, n)si=1 ; 467
(ii) Neutrosophic i-strength (m, min{I(Vi )}, n)si=1 ; 468
(iii) Neutrosophic f-strength (m, n, min{F (Vi )})si=1 ; 469
(iv) Neutrosophic strength (min{T (Vi )}, min{I(Vi )}, min{F (Vi )})si=1 . 470
Definition 3.24 (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges 471
(NSHE)). (Ref. [1],Definition 5.4,p.7). 472
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). Consider 473
a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) E = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then E is called 474
(ix) Neutrosophic t-connective if T (E) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic 475
t-strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 476
(NSHV) Vi to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vj where 1 ≤ i, j ≤ s; 477
(x) Neutrosophic i-connective if I(E) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic 478
i-strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 479
(xi) Neutrosophic f-connective if F (E) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic 481
f-strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 482
(xii) Neutrosophic connective if (T (E), I(E), F (E)) ≥ maximum number of 484
Neutrosophic strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic 485
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vj 486
where 1 ≤ i, j ≤ s. 487
For the sake of having a Neutrosophic notion, there’s a need to “redefine” the 488
notion of “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”. The SuperHyperVertices and the 489
SuperHyperEdges are assigned by the labels from the letters of the alphabets. In this 490
procedure, there’s the usage of the position of labels to assign to the values. 491
Definition 3.25. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (SHG) S is a pair 492
S = (V, E). It’s redefined Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph if the Table (1) holds. 493
It’s useful to define a “Neutrosophic” version of SuperHyperClasses. Since there’s 494
more ways to get Neutrosophic type-results to make a Neutrosophic more 495
understandable. 496

perEdges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, Mentioned in the Definition
(3.26)

perEdges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph Mentioned in the Definition
(3.27)
Definition 3.26. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (SHG) S is a pair 497
S = (V, E). There are some Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses if the Table (2) 498
holds. Thus Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath , notion, SuperHyperStar, 499
SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultiPartite, and SuperHyperWheel, are 500
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath, Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle, 501
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar, Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite, 502
Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultiPartite, and Neutrosophic 503
SuperHyperWheel if the Table (2) holds. 504
It’s useful to define a “Neutrosophic” version of a Neutrosophic notion. Since there’s 505
more ways to get type-results to make a Neutrosophic notion more Neutrosophicly 506
understandable. 507
For the sake of having a Neutrosophic notion, there’s a need to “redefine” the 508
Neutrosophic notion of “Neutrosophic notion”. The SuperHyperVertices and the 509
SuperHyperEdges are assigned by the labels from the letters of the alphabets. In this 510
procedure, there’s the usage of the position of labels to assign to the values. 511
Definition 3.27. Assume a notion. It’s redefined a Neutrosophic notion if the 512
Table (3) holds. 513
Example 3.28. Referred to the Example (3.6), assume a Neutrosophic 514
SuperHyperGraph (SHG) S is a pair S = (V, E) in the mentioned Neutrosophic Figures 515
in every Neutrosophic items. 516
SuperHyperGraph (SHG), is up in the illustration of the Table (4). 518
Table 4. The Values of Vertices, SuperVertices, Edges, HyperEdges, and SuperHyper-

Edges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph
Vi (TVi , IVi , FVi ) Ei (TEi , IEi , FEi )
V1 (0.13, 0.13, 0.13) E1 (0, 0, 0)
V2 (0.13, 0.13, 0.13) E2 (0.13, 0.13, 0.13)
V3 (0.15, 0.15, 0.15) E3 (0, 0, 0)
V4 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14) E4 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14)

V1 (0.13, 0.13, 0.13) E1 (0, 0, 0)
V2 (0.03, 0.03, 0.03) E2 (0, 0, 0)
V3 (0.15, 0.15, 0.15) E3 (0, 0, 0)
V4 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14) E4 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14)

V1 (0.13, 0.13, 0.13) E1 (0, 0, 0)
V2 (0.11, 0.11, 0.11) E2 (0, 0, 0)
V3 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14) E3 (0, 0, 0)
- - E4 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14)
4 Main Resultant 525
Definition 4.1. (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperREVERSE 526
CONNECTIVE DOMINATION). 527
Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Consider a 528
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then V 0 is called Neutrosophic 529
SuperHyperREVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION if the following expressions, terms and 530
statements is called Neutrosophic SuperHyperREVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION criteria 531

V1 (0.13, 0.13, 0.13) E1 (0.08, 0.08, 0.08)
V2 (0.11, 0.11, 0.11) E2 (0.15, 0.15, 0.15)
V3 (0.05, 0.05, 0.05) E3 (0, 0, 0)
V4 (0.12, 0.12, 0.12) E4 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14)
{F } (0.06, 0.06, 0.06) E5 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14)
{H} (0.08, 0.08, 0.08) - -
{N } (0.14, 0.14, 0.14) - -
{O} (0.15, 0.15, 0.15) - -


Edges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
holds. 532
X X X
|( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 Vi ∈V 0 Vi ∈V 0
X X X
= 00
max |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) | ∀Vi ∈ VN SHG , ∃Vj ∈ V 00 :
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
0 0 0
TV (Vi , Vj ∈ Ei0 ) ≤ min[TV (Vi ), TV (Vj )]Vi0 ,Vj0 ∈P :Vi ,...,Vj ,
IV0 (Vi , Vj ∈ Ei0 ) ≤ min[IV (Vi0 ), IV (Vj0 )]Vi ,Vj ∈Ei0 Vi0 ,Vj0 ∈P :Vi ,...,Vj ,
and FV0 (Ei0 )(Vi , Vj ∈ Ei0 ) ≤ min[FV (Vi0 ), FV (Vj0 )]Vi ,Vj ∈Ei0 Vi0 ,Vj0 ∈P :Vi ,...,Vj
}
Example 4.2. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel (SHG) S is a pair S = (V, E) 533
in the mentioned Neutrosophic Figures in every Neutrosophic items. 534
SuperHyperWheel (SHG), is up in the illustration of the Table (8). 536
Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Consider a 537
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V3 , V6 }. Then V 0 is called Neutrosophic 538


Figure 32. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar Neutrosophic Associated to the Neutro-











V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
V3 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E3 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V4 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V5 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V6 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
SuperHyperREVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION since the following expressions, terms 539
and statements is called Neutrosophic SuperHyperREVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION 540
criteria holds. 541
X X X
|( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={V3 ,V6 } Vi ∈V 0 ={V3 ,V6 } Vi ∈V 0 ={V3 ,V6 }
= (0.52, 0.52, 0.52) =

X X X
= 00max |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) | V1 ∈ VSHG \ V 00 , ∃V6 ∈ V 00 :
V ⊆VSHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
0
TV (E1 ) = 0.26 = min[TV 0 (V1 ), TV 0 (V6 )]V1 ,V6 ∈E1 ,
IV0 (E1 ) = 0.26 = min[IV 0 (V1 ), IV 0 (V6 )]V1 ,V6 ∈E1 ,
and FV0 (E1 ) = 0.26 = min[FV 0 (V1 ), FV 0 (V6 )]V1 ,V6 ∈E1 ,
,
V2 ∈ VSHG \ V 00 , ∃V6 ∈ V 00 :
TV0 (E1 ) = 0.26 = min[TV 0 (V2 ), TV 0 (V6 )]V2 ,V6 ∈E1 ,
,
V7 ∈ VSHG \ V 00 , ∃V6 ∈ V 00 :
,
V4 ∈ VSHG \ V 00 , ∃V6 ∈ V 00 :
,
V5 ∈ VSHG \ V 00 , ∃V6 ∈ V 00 :
}
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.19, 0.19, 0.19) E2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
V3 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E3 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V4 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V5 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V6 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V3 , V5 }. Then V 0 is called Neutrosophic 545
criteria holds. 548
X X X
|( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={V1 ,V3 ,V5 } Vi ∈V 0 ={V1 ,V3 ,V5 } Vi ∈V 0 ={V1 ,V3 ,V5 }
= (0.73, 0.73, 0.73) =

X X X
V ⊆VSHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
0
,
V2 ∈ VSHG \ V 00 , ∃V3 ∈ V 00 :
,
V4 , V6 ∈ VSHG \ V 00 , ∃V5 ∈ V 00 :
,
}
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V2 , V3 , V5 }. Then V 0 is called 552
Neutrosophic SuperHyperREVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION since the following 553
expressions, terms and statements is called Neutrosophic SuperHyperREVERSE 554
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.19, 0.19, 0.19) E2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
V3 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E3 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V4 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V5 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V6 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V7 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
CONNECTIVE DOMINATION criteria holds. 555
X X X
|( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={V1 ,V2 ,V3 ,V5 } Vi ∈V 0 ={V1 ,V2 ,V3 ,V5 } Vi ∈V 0 ={V1 ,V2 ,V3 ,V5 }
= (0.92, 0.92, 0.92) =

X X X
V ⊆VSHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
0
,
V4 , V6 ∈ VSHG \ V 00 , ∃V5 ∈ V 00 :
,
}
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V2 , V3 , V5 , V7 }. Then V 0 is called 559
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.19, 0.19, 0.19) E2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
V3 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E3 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V4 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V5 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V6 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V7 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={V1 ,V2 ,V3 ,V5 ,V7 }
X X
I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={V1 ,V2 ,V3 ,V5 ,V7 } Vi ∈V 0 ={V1 ,V2 ,V3 ,V5 ,V7 }
= (1.15, 1.15, 1.15) =

X X X
= 00max |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) | V4 , V6 ∈ VSHG \ V 00 , ∃V5 ∈ V 00
V ⊆VSHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
0
,
}
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V2 , V3 , V5 , V6 , V7 }. Then V 0 is called 566
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={V1 ,V2 ,V3 ,V5 ,V6 ,V7 }
X X
I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={V1 ,V2 ,V3 ,V5 ,V6 ,V7 } Vi ∈V 0 ={V1 ,V2 ,V3 ,V5 ,V6 ,V7 }
= (1.39, 1.39, 1.39) =

X X X
V ⊆VSHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
0
and FV0 (E3 ) = 0.23 = min[FV 0 (V4 ), FV 0 (V5 )]V4 ,V5 ∈E3
}
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.19, 0.19, 0.19) E2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
V3 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E3 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V6 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V7 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
Edges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V2 , V3 , V4 , V5 , V6 , V7 }. Then V 0 is called 573
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={V1 ,V2 ,V3 ,V4 ,V5 ,V6 ,V7 }
X X
I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={V1 ,V2 ,V3 ,V4 ,V5 ,V6 ,V7 } Vi ∈V 0 ={V1 ,V2 ,V3 ,V4 ,V5 ,V6 ,V7 }
= (1.65, 1.65, 1.65).
Example 4.3. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar (SHG) S is a pair S = (V, E) 577
in the mentioned Neutrosophic Figures in every Neutrosophic items. 578
SuperHyperStar (SHG), is up in the illustration of the Table (14). 580
Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Consider a 581
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V2 }. Then V 0 is called Neutrosophic 582
criteria holds. 585
X X X
|( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={V2 } Vi ∈V 0 ={V2 } Vi ∈V 0 ={V2 }
= (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) =

X X X
V ⊆VSHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
0
,
V6 ∈ VSHG \ V 00 , ∃V2 ∈ V 00 :
,
V7 ∈ VSHG \ V 00 , ∃V2 ∈ V 00 :
,
V4 ∈ VSHG \ V 00 , ∃V2 ∈ V 00 :
,
V3 ∈ VSHG \ V 00 , ∃V2 ∈ V 00 :
,
V5 ∈ VSHG \ V 00 , ∃V2 ∈ V 00 :
}
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V2 }. Then V 0 is called Neutrosophic 589
V1 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
criteria holds. 592
X X X
|( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={V1 ,V2 } Vi ∈V 0 ={V1 ,V2 } Vi ∈V 0 ={V1 ,V2 }
= (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) =

X X X
V ⊆VSHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
0
,
V7 ∈ VSHG \ V 00 , ∃V2 ∈ V 00 :
,
V4 ∈ VSHG \ V 00 , ∃V2 ∈ V 00 :
,
V3 ∈ VSHG \ V 00 , ∃V2 ∈ V 00 :
,
V5 ∈ VSHG \ V 00 , ∃V2 ∈ V 00 :
}
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V2 , V3 }. Then V 0 is called Neutrosophic 596
V1 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
criteria holds. 599
X X X
|( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={V1 ,V2 ,V3 } Vi ∈V 0 ={V1 ,V2 ,V3 } Vi ∈V 0 ={V1 ,V2 ,V3 }
= (0.49, 0.49, 0.49) =

X X X
V ⊆VSHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
0
,
V7 ∈ VSHG \ V 00 , ∃V2 ∈ V 00 :
,
V4 ∈ VSHG \ V 00 , ∃V2 ∈ V 00 :
,
V5 ∈ VSHG \ V 00 , ∃V2 ∈ V 00 :
}
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V2 , V3 , V4 }. Then V 0 is called 603
V1 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V1 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V5 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
X X X
|( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={V ,V ,V ,V } Vi ∈V 0 ={V ,V ,V ,V } Vi ∈V 0 ={V
1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 ,V2 ,V3 ,V4 }
= (0.72, 0.72, 0.72) =

X X X
V ⊆VSHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
0
,
V7 ∈ VSHG \ V 00 , ∃V2 ∈ V 00 :
,
V5 ∈ VSHG \ V 00 , ∃V2 ∈ V 00 :
}
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V2 , V3 , V4 , V5 }. Then V 0 is called 610
V1 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V5 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V6 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={V1 ,V2 ,V3 ,V4 ,V5 }
X X
I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={V1 ,V2 ,V3 ,V4 ,V5 } Vi ∈V 0 ={V1 ,V2 ,V3 ,V4 ,V5 }
= (0.95, 0.95, 0.95) =

X X X
V ⊆VSHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
0
,
V7 ∈ VSHG \ V 00 , ∃V2 ∈ V 00 :
}
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V2 , V3 , V4 , V5 , V6 }. Then V 0 is called 617
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={V1 ,V2 ,V3 ,V4 ,V5 ,V6 }
X X
I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={V ,V ,V ,V ,V ,V } Vi ∈V 0 ={V
1 2 3 4 5 6 1 ,V2 ,V3 ,V4 ,V5 ,V6 }
= (1.18, 1.18, 1.18) =

X X X
V ⊆VSHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
0
}
V1 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V5 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V6 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V7 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V2 , V3 , V4 , V5 , V6 , V7 }. Then V 0 is called 624
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={V1 ,V2 ,V3 ,V4 ,V5 ,V6 ,V7 }
X X
I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={V1 ,V2 ,V3 ,V4 ,V5 ,V6 ,V7 } Vi ∈V 0 ={V1 ,V2 ,V3 ,V4 ,V5 ,V6 ,V7 }
= (1.41, 1.41, 1.41).
5 Main Result 628
Theorem 5.1. (Main Result and Main Theorem). 629
Assume every Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar has the letter z. The notion on the 630
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar and Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel coincides. 631
Proof. 632
(i). Let 633
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
CEN T ER, E2
634
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , CEN T ER
be a longest path taken a connected Extreme SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). There’s 635
a new way to redefine as 636
ViEXT ERN AL ∼ VjEXT ERN AL ≡

∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL ∈ Ez ≡
∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , {ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL } ⊆ Ez .
The term “EXTERNAL” implies |N (ViEXT ERN AL )| ≥ |N (Vj )| where Vj is 637
corresponded to ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of Neutrosophic SuperHyperREVERSE 638
CONNECTIVE DOMINATION. The latter is straightforward. 639
(ii). Let 640
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1∗ ,
CEN T ER, E2∗
641
P :
E1∗ , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2∗ , CEN T ER
is a longest SuperHyperREVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION taken from a connected Extreme 642
SuperHyperWheel ESHW : (V, E). There’s a new way to redefine as 643

CONNECTIVE DOMINATION. The latter is straightforward. Then there’s at least one 646
Neutrosophic SuperHyperREVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION. Thus the notion of quasi isn’t 647
up and the SuperHyperNotions based on Neutrosophic SuperHyperREVERSE CONNECTIVE 648
DOMINATION could be applied. The unique embedded Neutrosophic SuperHyperREVERSE 649
CONNECTIVE DOMINATION proposes some longest Neutrosophic SuperHyperREVERSE 650
CONNECTIVE DOMINATION excerpt from some representatives. The latter is 651
straightforward. 652
Proposition 5.2. Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E).

Assume every Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex has the letter z. The Neutrosophic
SuperHyperREVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION set is as follows.
{CEN T ER}.
Proof. Let 653
P :
CEN T ER, E2∗
654
P :
E2∗ , CEN T ER


SuperHyperREVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION number is as follows.
0.26.
Proof. Let 666
P :
CEN T ER, E2∗
667
P :
E2∗ , CEN T ER

Proposition 5.4. Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E).

SuperHyperREVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION set is as follows.
{CEN T ER}.
Proof. Let 679
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
CEN T ER, E2
680
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , CEN T ER

Proposition 5.5. Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E).

SuperHyperREVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION number is as follows.
0.26.
Proof. Let 686
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
CEN T ER, E2
687
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , CEN T ER

Definition 5.6. (Uniform Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar and Uniform Neutrosophic 693
SuperHyperStar). 694
(i). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Every pair of 695
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices has the same maximum letter, i.e., 696
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices mutually has the same maximum letter. A 697
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E) is called Uniform 698
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar. 699
(ii). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Every pair 700
of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices has the same maximum letter, i.e., 701
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices mutually has the same maximum letter. A 702
Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E) is called Uniform 703
Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel. 704
Proposition 5.7. Let an Uniform Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel (SHG) S be a pair

S = (V, E). The Neutrosophic SuperHyperREVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION set is as follows.
{CEN T ER}.
Proof. Let 705
P :
CEN T ER, E2∗
706
P :
E2∗ , CEN T ER


The Neutrosophic SuperHyperREVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION number is lower than as follows.
0.26.
Proof. Let 718
P :
CEN T ER, E2∗
719
P :
E2∗ , CEN T ER

Proposition 5.9. Let an Uniform Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar (SHG) S be a pair

S = (V, E). The Neutrosophic SuperHyperREVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION set is as follows.
{CEN T ER}.
Proof. Let 731
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
CEN T ER, E2
732
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , CEN T ER

Proposition 5.10. Let an Uniform Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar (SHG) S be a pair

S = (V, E). The Neutrosophic SuperHyperREVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION number is lower
than as follows.
0.26.
Proof. Let 738
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
CEN T ER, E2
739
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , CEN T ER

Proposition 5.11. (Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar and Neutrosophic 745
SuperHyperWheel). 746
(i). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Assume every 747
Neutrosophic CENTER has the letter maximum letter. Then the Neutrosophic 748
SuperHyperVertices don’t have the same maximum letter, are in every 749
Neutrosophic SuperHyperREVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION set. 750
(ii). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Assume 751
every Neutrosophic CENTER has the letter maximum letter. Then the 752
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices don’t have the same maximum letter, are in 753
every Neutrosophic SuperHyperREVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION set. 754
Proof. 755
(i). Let 756
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
CEN T ER, E2
757
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , CEN T ER

(ii). Let 763
P :
CEN T ER, E2∗
764
P :
E2∗ , CEN T ER

Proposition 5.12. (Embedded Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar and Embedded 776
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar). 777
(i). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Then 778
CENTER is in every Neutrosophic SuperHyperREVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION set. 779
(ii). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Then 780
CENTER is in every Neutrosophic SuperHyperREVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION set. 781
Proof. 782
(i). Let 783
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
CEN T ER, E2
784
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , CEN T ER

(ii). Let 790
P :
CEN T ER, E2∗
791
P :
E2∗ , CEN T ER

6 Neutrosophic Applications in Cancer’s 803
Neutrosophic Recognition 804
The cancer is the Neutrosophic disease but the Neutrosophic model is going to figure 805
out what’s going on this Neutrosophic phenomenon. The special Neutrosophic case of 806
this Neutrosophic disease is considered and as the consequences of the model, some 807
parameters are used. The cells are under attack of this disease but the moves of the 808
cancer in the special region are the matter of mind. The Neutrosophic recognition of the 809
cancer could help to find some Neutrosophic treatments for this Neutrosophic disease. 810
In the following, some Neutrosophic steps are Neutrosophic devised on this disease. 811
Step 1. (Neutrosophic Definition) The Neutrosophic recognition of the cancer in 812
the long-term Neutrosophic function. 813
Step 2. (Neutrosophic Issue) The specific region has been assigned by the 814
Neutrosophic model [it’s called Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph] and the long 815
Neutrosophic cycle of the move from the cancer is identified by this research. 816
Sometimes the move of the cancer hasn’t be easily identified since there are some 817
determinacy, indeterminacy and neutrality about the moves and the effects of the 818
cancer on that region; this event leads us to choose another model [it’s said to be 819
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph] to have convenient perception on what’s 820
happened and what’s done. 821
Figure 42. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite Associated to the Notions of Neutro-

sophic SuperHyperREVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION
Step 3. (Neutrosophic Model) There are some specific Neutrosophic models, 822
which are well-known and they’ve got the names, and some general Neutrosophic 823
models. The moves and the Neutrosophic traces of the cancer on the complex 824
tracks and between complicated groups of cells could be fantasized by a 825
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath(-/SuperHyperREVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION, 826
SuperHyperStar, SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, 827
SuperHyperWheel). The aim is to find either the Neutrosophic 828
SuperHyperREVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION or the Neutrosophic SuperHyperREVERSE 829
CONNECTIVE DOMINATION in those Neutrosophic Neutrosophic SuperHyperModels. 830
7 Case 1: The Initial Neutrosophic Steps 831
Toward Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite as 832
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel 833
Step 4. (Neutrosophic Solution) In the Neutrosophic Figure (42), the 834
Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite is Neutrosophic highlighted and Neutrosophic 835
featured. 836
By using the Neutrosophic Figure (42) and the Table (21), the Neutrosophic 837
SuperHyperBipartite is obtained. 838
The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Neutrosophic Algorithm in 839
previous Neutrosophic result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the 840
connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), in the 841
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (42), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperREVERSE 842
CONNECTIVE DOMINATION. 843
Edges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite
Figure 43. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite Associated to the Notions of

Neutrosophic SuperHyperREVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION
8 Case 2: The Increasing Neutrosophic Steps 844
Toward Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite as 845
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel 846
Step 4. (Neutrosophic Solution) In the Neutrosophic Figure (43), the 847
Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite is Neutrosophic highlighted and 848
Neutrosophic featured. 849
By using the Neutrosophic Figure (43) and the Table (22), the Neutrosophic 850
SuperHyperMultipartite is obtained. 851
The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Neutrosophic Algorithm in 852
previous result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected 853
Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic 854
SuperHyperModel (43), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperREVERSE CONNECTIVE 855
DOMINATION. 856
Edges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite
9 Neutrosophic Applications in Cancer’s 857
Neutrosophic Recognition 858
Cancer is a neutrosophic disease, but the neutrosophic model is supposed to understand 859
what is going on in this neutrosophic phenomenon. The special case of neutrosophic 860
disease is considered and some parameters have been used as consequences of the model. 861
Cells are subject to attack by the disease, but the movements of the cancer in the 862
specific area is a matter of mind. Neutrosophic diagnosis of cancer can help in finding 863
some Neutrosophic cures for this Neutrosophic disease. 864
In the following, several Neutrosophic stages are designed for this disease. 865
Step 1. (Neutrosophic Definition) Neutrosophic diagnosis of cancer in long-term 866
Neutrosophic performance. 867
Step 2. (Neutrosophic Issue) The specific region is assigned by the Neutrosophic 868
model (called Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph) and the long Neutrosophic cycle of 869
movement of cancer is identified by this scientific research. Sometimes the 870
movement of cancer is not easy to detect, because there is certainty, uncertainty 871
and neutrality about the movements and effects of cancer on that area. This event 872
leads us to choose another model [which is said to be the Neutrosophic 873
superhypergraph] in order to have a proper understanding of what happened and 874
was done. 875
Step 3. (Neutrosophic Model) There are some specific Neutrosophic models that 876
are well known and have names and some general Neutrosophic models. Cancer 877
neurtosophic movements and effects in complex pathways and between complex 878
groups of cells can be visualized by a SuperHyperPath (-/SuperHyperCycle, 879
SuperHyperStar, SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, 880
SuperHyperWheel). The goal is to find dominant neutrosophic REVERSE 881
CONNECTIVE DOMINATION models or dominant sREVERSE CONNECTIVE 882
DOMINATION models. 883
10 Wondering Open Problems But As The 884
Directions To Forming The Motivations 885
In what follows, some “problems” and some “questions” are proposed. 886
The SuperHyperREVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION and the Neutrosophic 887
SuperHyperREVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION are defined on a real-world application, titled 888
“Cancer’s Recognitions”. 889
Question 10.1. Which the else SuperHyperModels could be defined based on Cancer’s 890
recognitions? 891
Question 10.2. Are there some SuperHyperNotions related to SuperHyperREVERSE 892
and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperREVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION?

CONNECTIVE DOMINATION 893
Question 10.3. Are there some Algorithms to be defined on the SuperHyperModels to 894
compute them? 895
Question 10.4. Which the SuperHyperNotions are related to beyond the 896
SuperHyperREVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperREVERSE CONNECTIVE 897
DOMINATION? 898
Problem 10.5. The SuperHyperREVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION and the Neutrosophic 899
SuperHyperREVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION do a SuperHyperModel for the Cancer’s 900
recognitions and they’re based on SuperHyperREVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION, are there else? 901
Problem 10.6. Which the fundamental SuperHyperNumbers are related to these 902
SuperHyperNumbers types-results? 903
Problem 10.7. What’s the independent research based on Cancer’s recognitions 904
concerning the multiple types of SuperHyperNotions? 905
11 Conclusion and Closing Remarks 906
In this section, closing and concluding remarks are presented. The drawbacks of this 907
scientific research are shown. Some advantages and disadvantages of this scientific 908
research are highlighted. 909
This scientific research uses some approaches to further understand the Neutrosophic 910
SuperHyperGraphs. In this effort, two SuperHyperNotions are defined on the 911
REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION. For this reason, in the second definition, 912
the original definition of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph is redefined on the 913
position of the alphabets. Based on the new Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph definition, 914
the new SuperHyperNotion, Neutrosophic REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION, 915
finds a suitable background to implement some results on. Some SuperHyperClasses 916
and some Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses are the subjects of this scientific research on 917
modeling areas that are subject to cancer attacks in order to recognize this disease as 918
mentioned under the title “Cancer Diagnosis”. To formalize the SuperHyperNotion, 919
REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION, SuperHyperClasses and new 920
SuperHyperClasses instances are introduced. Some general results are summarized in 921
the REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION and Neutrosophic REVERSE 922
CONNECTIVE DOMINATION sections. Clarifications, examples, and literature 923
reviews go all the way. In this scientific research, the literature review has met the lines 924
containing concepts and results. SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 925
are super-hypermodels in “cancer diagnosis” and both are the foundation of the 926
background of this scientific research. Sometimes cancer has occurred in an area full of 927
cells, cell groups, and embedded styles. In this section, SuperHyperModel proposes 928
SuperHyperNotions, formally called “REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION”, 929
based on the connections of Cancer’s movements in the longest and strongest styles with 930
the formation of design and architecture, in terms of terms and whispering words. . The 931
“SuperHyper” prefix refers to the topic of embedded styles to explore the background of 932
SuperHyperNotions. In the table (23), the advantages and ways of this scientific
Table 23. A look at this scientific research and beyond

Advantages Limitations
1. Redefining the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 1. General Results
2. REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION
3. Neutrosophic REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION 2. Other SuperHyperNumb
4. modeling cancer diagnoses
5. SuperHyperClasses 3. SuperHyperFamilies
933
research are specified, pointed out and expressed. 934
12 Background 935
There are some scientific researches covering the topic of this scientific research. In what 936
follows, there are some discussion and literature reviews about them. 937
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “New Ideas In Recognition of 938
Cancer And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph As Hyper Tool On Super Toot” in Ref. [1] 939
by Henry Garrett (2023). In this research article, a novel approach is implemented on 940
SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on general forms with 941
introducing used neutrosophic classes of neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. It’s published 942
in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled “Current Trends in Mass Communication 943
(CTMC)” with ISO abbreviation “Curr Trends Mass Comm” in volume 2 and issue 1 944
with pages 32-55. 945
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “Some Super Hyper Degrees 946
and Co-Super Hyper Degrees on Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs And Super Hyper 947
Graphs Alongside Applications in Cancer’s Treatments” in Ref. [2] by Henry Garrett 948
(2023). In this research article, a novel approach is implemented on SuperHyperGraph 949
and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on fundamental notions and using vital tools 950
in Cancer’s Treatments. It’s published in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled 951
“Journal of Mathematical Techniques and Computational Mathematics(JMTCM)” with 952
ISO abbreviation “J Math Techniques Comput Math” in volume 2 and issue 1 with 953
pages 35-47. The research article studies deeply with choosing directly neutrosophic 954
SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough toward independent 955
results based on initial background and fundamental SuperHyperNumbers. 956
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “A Research on Cancer’s 957
Recognition and Neutrosophic Super Hypergraph by Eulerian Super Hyper Cycles and 958
Hamiltonian Sets as Hyper Covering Versus Super separations” in Ref. [3] by Henry 959
Garrett (2023). In this research article, a novel approach is implemented on 960
SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on fundamental notions 961
and using vital tools in Cancer’s Recognition. It’s published in prestigious and fancy 962
journal is entitled “Journal of Mathematical Techniques and Computational 963
Mathematics(JMTCM)” with ISO abbreviation “J Math Techniques Comput Math” in 964
volume 2 and issue 3 with pages 136-148. The research article studies deeply with 965
choosing directly neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph. It’s the 966
breakthrough toward independent results based on initial background and fundamental 967
SuperHyperNumbers. 968
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “Neutrosophic 1-Failed 969
SuperHyperForcing in the SuperHyperFunction to Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs 970
on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Beyond ” in Ref. [4] by Henry Garrett (2023). 971
In this research article, a novel approach is implemented on SuperHyperGraph and 972
neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on fundamental SuperHyperNumber and using 973
neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses of neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. It’s published in 974
prestigious and fancy journal is entitled “Journal of Mathematical Techniques and 975
Computational Mathematics(JMTCM)” with ISO abbreviation “J Math Techniques 976
Comput Math” in volume 2 and issue 6 with pages 221-307. The research article studies 977
deeply with choosing directly neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph. 978
It’s the breakthrough toward independent results based on initial background and 979
fundamental SuperHyperNumbers. The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is 980
titled “Super Hyper Dominating and Super Hyper Resolving on Neutrosophic Super 981
Hyper Graphs and Their Directions in Game Theory and Neutrosophic Super Hyper 982
Classes” in Ref. [5] by Henry Garrett (2022). In this research article, a novel approach 983
is implemented on SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on 984
fundamental SuperHyperNumber and using neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses of 985
neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. It’s published in prestigious and fancy journal is 986
entitled “Journal of Mathematical Techniques and Computational 987
Mathematics(JMTCM)” with ISO abbreviation “J Math Techniques Comput Math” in 988
choosing directly neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph. It’s the 990
breakthrough toward independent results based on initial background and fundamental 991
SuperHyperNumbers. The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled 992
“neutrosophic co-degree and neutrosophic degree alongside chromatic numbers in the 993
setting of some classes related to neutrosophic hypergraphs” in Ref. [6] by Henry 994
Garrett (2023). In this research article, a novel approach is implemented on 995
SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on general forms without 996
using neutrosophic classes of neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. It’s published in 997
prestigious and fancy journal is entitled “Journal of Current Trends in Computer 998
Science Research (JCTCSR)” with ISO abbreviation “J Curr Trends Comp Sci Res” in 999
choosing neutrosophic hypergraphs instead of neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. It’s the 1001
breakthrough toward independent results based on initial background. The research 1002
article studies deeply with choosing neutrosophic hypergraphs instead of neutrosophic 1003
SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough toward independent results based on initial 1004
background. In some articles are titled “0039 — Closing Numbers and Super-Closing 1005
Numbers as (Dual)Resolving and (Dual)Coloring alongside (Dual)Dominating in 1006
(Neutrosophic)n-SuperHyperGraph” in Ref. [7] by Henry Garrett (2022), “0049 — 1007
(Failed)1-Zero-Forcing Number in Neutrosophic Graphs” in Ref. [8] by Henry Garrett 1008
(2022), “Extreme SuperHyperClique as the Firm Scheme of Confrontation under 1009
Cancer’s Recognition as the Model in The Setting of (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” 1010
in Ref. [9] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Uncertainty On The Act And Effect Of Cancer 1011
Alongside The Foggy Positions Of Cells Toward Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique 1012
inside Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Titled Cancer’s Recognition” in Ref. [10] by 1013
Henry Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic Version Of Separates Groups Of Cells In Cancer’s 1014
Recognition On Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [11] by Henry Garrett (2022), 1015
“The Shift Paradigm To Classify Separately The Cells and Affected Cells Toward The 1016
Totality Under Cancer’s Recognition By New Multiple Definitions On the Sets 1017
Polynomials Alongside Numbers In The (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperMatching Theory 1018
Based on SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” in Ref. [12] by Henry 1019
Garrett (2022), “Breaking the Continuity and Uniformity of Cancer In The Worst Case 1020
of Full Connections With Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique In Cancer’s Recognition 1021
Applied in (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [13] by Henry Garrett (2022), 1022
“Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable as the Survivors on the Cancer’s Neutrosophic 1023
Recognition Based on Uncertainty to All Modes in Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in 1024
Ref. [14] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Extremism of the Attacked Body Under the 1025
Cancer’s Circumstances Where Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) 1026
SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [15] by Henry Garrett (2022), “(Neutrosophic) 1-Failed 1027
SuperHyperForcing in Cancer’s Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in 1028
Ref. [16] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To 1029
Form Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In 1030
Special ViewPoints” in Ref. [17] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic 1-Failed 1031
SuperHyperForcing in the SuperHyperFunction To Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs 1032
on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond ” in Ref. [18] by Henry Garrett 1033
(2022), “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperStable on Cancer’s Recognition by Well- 1034
SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs ” in Ref. [19] by Henry Garrett 1035
(2022), “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form Neutrosophic 1036
SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In Special ViewPoints” 1037
in Ref. [15] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Basic Notions on (Neutrosophic) 1038
SuperHyperForcing And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling in Cancer’s Recognitions 1039
And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [20] by Henry Garrett (2022), 1040
“Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable 1041
To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In Special ViewPoints” in Ref. [21] by 1042
Henry Garrett (2022),“(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions 1043
Featuring (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances” in Ref. [22] by 1044
Henry Garrett (2022), “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperAlliances With SuperHyperDefensive 1045
and SuperHyperOffensive Type-SuperHyperSet On (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph 1046
With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions And Related 1047
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClasses” in Ref. [23] by Henry Garrett (2022), 1048
“SuperHyperGirth on SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph With 1049
SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions” in Ref. [24] by Henry Garrett (2022), 1050
“Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on Neutrosophic 1051
SuperHyperGraphs and SuperHyperGraphs Alongside Applications in Cancer’s 1052
Treatments” in Ref. [25] by Henry Garrett (2022), “SuperHyperDominating and 1053
SuperHyperResolving on Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs And Their Directions in 1054
Game Theory and Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses” in Ref. [26] by Henry Garrett 1055
(2022), “SuperHyperMatching By (R-)Definitions And Polynomials To Monitor 1056
Cancer’s Recognition In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [212] by Henry 1057
Garrett (2023), “The Focus on The Partitions Obtained By Parallel Moves In The 1058
Cancer’s Extreme Recognition With Different Types of Extreme SuperHyperMatching Set 1059
and Polynomial on (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [213] by Henry Garrett 1060
(2023), “Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique Decides the Failures on the Cancer’s 1061
Recognition in the Perfect Connections of Cancer’s Attacks By SuperHyperModels 1062
Named (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [214] by Henry Garrett (2023), 1063
“Indeterminacy On The All Possible Connections of Cells In Front of Cancer’s Attacks 1064
In The Terms of Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique on Cancer’s Recognition called 1065
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [215] by Henry Garrett (2023), “Perfect 1066
Directions Toward Idealism in Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition Forwarding 1067
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClique on Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [218] by 1068
Henry Garrett (2023), “Demonstrating Complete Connections in Every Embedded 1069
Regions and Sub-Regions in the Terms of Cancer’s Recognition and (Neutrosophic) 1070
SuperHyperGraphs With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClique” in Ref. [219] by Henry 1071
Garrett (2023), “Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic Regions titled 1072
neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable in Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition modeled in 1073
the Form of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [222] by Henry Garrett (2023), 1074
“Using the Tool As (Neutrosophic) Failed SuperHyperStable To SuperHyperModel 1075
Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [225] by Henry 1076
Garrett (2023), “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form Neutrosophic 1077
SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In Special ViewPoints” 1078
in Ref. [226] by Henry Garrett (2023), “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperStable on Cancer’s 1079
Recognition by Well-SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in 1080
Ref. [227] by Henry Garrett (2023), “Neutrosophic 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in the 1081
SuperHyperFunction To Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs on Cancer’s Neutrosophic 1082
Recognition And Beyond ” in Ref. [228] by Henry Garrett (2022), “(Neutrosophic) 1083
1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in Cancer’s Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) 1084
SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [229] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Basic Notions on 1085
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperForcing And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling in Cancer’s 1086
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [230] by Henry Garrett 1087
(2022), “Basic Neutrosophic Notions Concerning SuperHyperDominating and 1088
Neutrosophic SuperHyperResolving in SuperHyperGraph” in Ref. [241] by Henry 1089
Garrett (2022), “Initial Material of Neutrosophic Preliminaries to Study Some 1090
Neutrosophic Notions Based on Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) in Neutrosophic 1091
SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)” in Ref. [242] by Henry Garrett (2022), and [4–26, 30–242], 1092
there are some endeavors to formalize the basic SuperHyperNotions about neutrosophic 1093
SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph alongside scientific research books 1094
at [243–375]. Two popular scientific research books in Scribd in the terms of high 1095
readers, 4728 and 5721 respectively, on neutrosophic science is on [376, 377]. 1096
Some scientific studies and scientific researches about neutrosophic graphs, are 1097
proposed as book in Ref. [376] by Henry Garrett (2023) which is indexed by Google 1098
Scholar and has more than 4728 readers in Scribd. It’s titled “Beyond Neutrosophic 1099
Graphs” and published by Dr. Henry Garrett. This research book covers different types 1100
of notions and settings in neutrosophic graph theory and neutrosophic 1101
SuperHyperGraph theory. 1102
Also, some scientific studies and scientific researches about neutrosophic graphs, are 1103
proposed as book in Ref. [377] by Henry Garrett (2023) which is indexed by Google 1104
Scholar and has more than 5721 readers in Scribd. It’s titled “Neutrosophic Duality” 1105
and published by Dr. Henry Garrett. This research book presents different types of 1106
notions SuperHyperResolving and SuperHyperDominating in the setting of duality in 1107
neutrosophic graph theory and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph theory. This research 1108
book has scrutiny on the complement of the intended set and the intended set, 1109
simultaneously. It’s smart to consider a set but acting on its complement that what’s 1110
done in this research book which is popular in the terms of high readers in Scribd. 1111
See the seminal scientific researches [1–3]. The formalization of the notions on the 1112
framework of notions in SuperHyperGraphs, Neutrosophic notions in 1113
SuperHyperGraphs theory, and (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs theory at [4–242] 1114
alongside scientific research books at [243–375]. Two popular scientific research books 1115
in Scribd ,in the terms of high readers, 4728 and 5721 respectively, on neutrosophic 1116
science is on [376, 377]. 1117
References 1118
1. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 1119
SuperHyperGraph As Hyper Tool On Super Toot”, Curr Trends Mass Comm 1120
2(1) (2023) 32-55. (https://www.opastpublishers.com/open-access-articles/new- 1121
ideas-in-recognition-of-cancer-and-neutrosophic-super-hypergraph-as-hyper- 1122
tool-on-super-toot.pdf) 1123
2. Henry Garrett, “Some Super Hyper Degrees and Co-Super Hyper Degrees on 1124
Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs And Super Hyper Graphs Alongside 1125
Applications in Cancer’s Treatments”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 2(1) 1126
(2023) 35-47. (https://www.opastpublishers.com/open-access-articles/some- 1127
super-hyper-degrees-and-cosuper-hyper-degrees-on-neutrosophic-super-hyper- 1128
graphs-and-super-hyper-graphs-alongside-a.pdf) 1129
3. Henry Garrett, “A Research on Cancer’s Recognition and Neutrosophic Super 1130
Hypergraph by Eulerian Super Hyper Cycles and Hamiltonian Sets as Hyper 1131
Covering Versus Super separations”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 2(3) 1132
(2023) 136-148. (https://www.opastpublishers.com/open-access-articles/a- 1133
research-on-cancers-recognition-and-neutrosophic-super-hypergraph-by- 1134
eulerian-super-hyper-cycles-and-hamiltonian-sets-.pdf) 1135
4. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in the 1136
SuperHyperFunction to Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs on Cancer’s 1137
Neutrosophic Recognition and Beyond ”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 2(6) 1138
(2023) 221-307. (https://www.opastpublishers.com/open-access- 1139
articles/neutrosophic-1failed-superhyperforcing-in-the-superhyperfunction-to- 1140
use-neutrosophic-superhypergraphs-on-cancers-neutros.pdf) 1141
5. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Co-degree and Neutrosophic Degree alongside 1142
Chromatic Numbers in the Setting of Some Classes Related to Neutrosophic 1143
Hypergraphs”, J Curr Trends Comp Sci Res 2(1) (2023) 16-24. (doi: 1144
10.33140/JCTCSR.02.01.04) 1145
6. Henry Garrett, “Super Hyper Dominating and Super Hyper Resolving on 1146
Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs and Their Directions in Game Theory and 1147
Neutrosophic Super Hyper Classes”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 1(3) 1148
(2022) 242-263. (doi: 10.33140/JMTCM.01.03.09) 1149
7. Garrett, Henry. “0039 — Closing Numbers and Super-Closing Numbers as 1150
(Dual)Resolving and (Dual)Coloring alongside (Dual)Dominating in 1151
(Neutrosophic)n-SuperHyperGraph.” CERN European Organization for Nuclear 1152
Research - Zenodo, Nov. 2022. CERN European Organization for Nuclear 1153
Research, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6319942. 1154
https://oa.mg/work/10.5281/zenodo.6319942 1155
8. Garrett, Henry. “0049 — (Failed)1-Zero-Forcing Number in Neutrosophic 1156
Graphs.” CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research - Zenodo, Feb. 1157
2022. CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research, 1158
https://doi.org/10.13140/rg.2.2.35241.26724. 1159
https://oa.mg/work/10.13140/rg.2.2.35241.26724 1160
9. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperClique as the Firm Scheme of 1161
Confrontation under Cancer’s Recognition as the Model in The Setting of 1162
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010308 (doi: 1163
10.20944/preprints202301.0308.v1). 1164
10. Henry Garrett, “Uncertainty On The Act And Effect Of Cancer Alongside The 1165
Foggy Positions Of Cells Toward Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique inside 1166
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Titled Cancer’s Recognition”, Preprints 2023, 1167
2023010282 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0282.v1). 1168
11. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Version Of Separates Groups Of Cells In 1169
Cancer’s Recognition On Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 1170
2023010267 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0267.v1). 1171
12. Henry Garrett, “The Shift Paradigm To Classify Separately The Cells and 1172
Affected Cells Toward The Totality Under Cancer’s Recognition By New 1173
Multiple Definitions On the Sets Polynomials Alongside Numbers In The 1174
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperMatching Theory Based on SuperHyperGraph and 1175
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”, Preprints 2023, 2023010265 (doi: 1176
10.20944/preprints202301.0265.v1). 1177
13. Henry Garrett, “Breaking the Continuity and Uniformity of Cancer In The 1178
Worst Case of Full Connections With Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique In 1179
Cancer’s Recognition Applied in (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 1180
2023, 2023010262,(doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0262.v1). 1181
14. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable as the Survivors on the 1182
Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition Based on Uncertainty to All Modes in 1183
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010240 (doi: 1184
10.20944/preprints202301.0240.v1). 1185
15. Henry Garrett, “Extremism of the Attacked Body Under the Cancer’s 1186
Circumstances Where Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) 1187
SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010224, (doi: 1188
10.20944/preprints202301.0224.v1). 1189
16. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in Cancer’s 1190
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 1191
2023010105 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 1192
17. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form 1193
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions 1194
In Special ViewPoints”, Preprints 2023, 2023010088 (doi: 1195
10.20944/preprints202301.0088.v1). 1196
SuperHyperFunction To Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs on Cancer’s 1198
Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond ”, Preprints 2023, 2023010044 1199
19. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperStable on Cancer’s Recognition by 1200
Well- SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 1201
2023010043 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0043.v1). 1202
20. Henry Garrett, “Basic Notions on (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperForcing And 1203
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling in Cancer’s Recognitions And 1204
10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 1206
10.20944/preprints202301.0088.v1). 1210
22. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions 1211
Featuring (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances”, Preprints 1212
2022, 2022120549 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0549.v1). 1213
23. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperAlliances With SuperHyperDefensive 1214
and SuperHyperOffensive Type-SuperHyperSet On (Neutrosophic) 1215
SuperHyperGraph With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s 1216
Recognitions And Related (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClasses”, Preprints 2022, 1217
2022120540 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0540.v1). 1218
24. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperGirth on SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic 1219
SuperHyperGraph With SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions”, 1220
Preprints 2022, 2022120500 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0500.v1). 1221
25. Henry Garrett, “Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on 1222
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs and SuperHyperGraphs Alongside Applications 1223
in Cancer’s Treatments”, Preprints 2022, 2022120324 (doi: 1224
10.20944/preprints202212.0324.v1). 1225
26. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDominating and SuperHyperResolving on 1226
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs And Their Directions in Game Theory and 1227
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”, Preprints 2022, 2022110576 (doi: 1228
10.20944/preprints202211.0576.v1). 1229
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By EQUAL CONNECTIVE 1231
DOMINATION As Hyper Decoration On Super Density”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1232
10.5281/zenodo.8201319). 1233
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By EQUAL CONNECTIVE 1235
10.5281/zenodo.8201255). 1237
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By EQUAL CONNECTIVE 1239
10.5281/zenodo.8201165). 1241
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By CONNECTIVE DOMINATION As 1243
Hyper Decoration On Super Density”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1244
10.5281/zenodo.8196147). 1245
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By CONNECTIVE DOMINATION 1247
As Hyper Decoration On Super Density”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1248
10.5281/zenodo.8196132). 1249
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By CONNECTIVE 1251
10.5281/zenodo.8196099). 1253
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By DOMINATION As Hyper 1255
Decoration On Super Density”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8187955). 1256
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By DOMINATION As Hyper 1258
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By DOMINATION As Hyper 1261
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperPerfect Search As Hyper Perf On Super 1264
Perfidy”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8104836). 1265
37. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Perfidy By Hyper Perf Of 1266
SuperHyperPerfect Search In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1267
SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8104857). 1268
SuperHyperGraph By Reverse Strict Dimension Dominating As Hyper Dimple 1270
On Super Dimity”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8092796). 1271
39. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Dimity By Hyper Dimple Of Reverse 1272
Strict Dimension Dominating In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1273
SuperHyperGraph By Unequal Dimension Dominating As Hyper Dimple On 1276
Super Dimity”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8088438). 1277
41. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Dimity By Hyper Dimple Of Unequal 1278
Dimension Dominating In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1279
SuperHyperGraph By Strict Dimension Dominating As Hyper Dimple On Super 1282
Dimity”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8084436). 1283
43. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Dimity By Hyper Dimple Of Strict 1284
SuperHyperGraph By Reverse Strict Connective As Hyper Conceit On Super 1288
Con”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8080100). 1289
45. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Con By Hyper Conceit Of Reverse Strict 1290
Connective In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, 1291
Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8080068). 1292
SuperHyperGraph By Unequal Connective Dominating As Hyper Conceit On 1294
Super Con”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8078445). 1295
47. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Con By Hyper Conceit Of Unequal 1296
Connective Dominating In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1297
SuperHyperGraph By Strict Connective Dominating As Hyper Conceit On 1300
49. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Con By Hyper Conceit Of Strict 1302
SuperHyperGraph By Reverse Dimension Dominating As Hyper Dimple On 1306
Super Dimity”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8072171). 1307
51. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Dimity By Hyper Dimple Of Reverse 1308
SuperHyperGraph By Equal Dimension Dominating As Hyper Dimple On Super 1312
53. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Dimity By Hyper Dimple Of Equal 1314
SuperHyperGraph By Dimension Dominating As Hyper Dimple On Super 1318
55. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Dimity By Hyper Dimple Of Dimension 1320
Dominating In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, 1321
SuperHyperGraph By Reverse Connective Dominating As Hyper Conceit On 1324
57. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Con By Hyper Conceit Of Reverse 1326
SuperHyperGraph By Equal Connective Dominating As Hyper Conceit On 1330
59. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Con By Hyper Conceit Of Equal 1332
SuperHyperGraph By Connective Dominating As Hyper Conceit On Super 1336
Con”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8051346). 1337
61. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Con By Hyper Conceit Of Connective 1338
SuperHyperGraph By United Dominating As Hyper Ultra On Super Units”, 1342
63. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Units By Hyper Ultra Of United 1344
SuperHyperGraph By Zero Forcing As Hyper ford On Super forceps”, Zenodo 1348
2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8017246). 1349
65. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super forceps By Hyper ford Of Zero Forcing In 1350
Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 2023, 1351
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8020128). 1352
SuperHyperGraph By Matrix-Based As Hyper mat On Super matte”, Zenodo 1354
2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7978571). 1355
67. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super mat By Hyper matte Of Matrix-Based In 1356
Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 2023, 1357
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7978857). 1358
SuperHyperGraph By Dominating-Edges As Hyper Dome On Super Eddy”, 1360
69. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Eddy By Hyper Dome Of 1362
Dominating-Edges In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1363
SuperHyperGraph By Edge-Gap As Hyper Gape On Super Gab”, Zenodo 2023, 1366
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7916595). 1367
71. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Gab By Hyper Gape Of Edge-Gap In 1368
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7923632). 1370
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On 1372
Super Nebulous”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7904698). 1373
73. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nebulous By Hyper Nebbish Of 1374
Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1375
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition As Hyper 1378
Decompress On Super Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1379
10.5281/zenodo.7904529). 1380
75. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Decompensation By Hyper Decompress Of 1381
Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With 1382
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1383
10.5281/zenodo.7904401). 1384
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut As Hyper Nebbish On Super 1386
Nebulous”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7871026). 1387
Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1389
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Cycle-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super 1392
Eulerian-Cycle-Neighbor In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1395
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Cycle-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On 1398
Super Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7855661). 1399
Eulerian-Cycle-Decomposition In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1401
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Cycle-Cut As Hyper Eulogy On Super EULA”, 1404
83. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super EULA By Hyper Eulogy Of 1406
Eulerian-Cycle-Cut In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1407
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Path-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super 1410
Eulerian-Type-Path-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1413
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Path-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress 1416
On Super Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7839333). 1417
Eulerian-Type-Path-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1419
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Path-Cut As Hyper Eulogy On Super 1422
EULA”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7834229). 1423
Eulerian-Type-Path-Cut In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1425
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Path-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super 1428
Eulerian-Path-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1431
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Path-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On 1434
Eulerian-Path-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1437
SuperHyperGraph As Hyper Tool On Super Toot”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1440
10.5281/zenodo.7812236). 1441
SuperHyperGraph By initial Eulerian-Path-Cut As Hyper initial Eulogy On 1443
Super initial EULA”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7809365). 1444
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Path-Cut As Hyper Eulogy-Path-Cut On Super 1446
EULA-Path-Cut”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7809358). 1447
Eulerian-Path-Cut In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1449
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Path-Cut As Hyper Eulogy On Super EULA”, 1452
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On 1455
Super Nebulous”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7806767). 1456
Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1458
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition As Hyper 1461
Decompress On Super Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1462
10.5281/zenodo.7804238). 1463
Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With 1465
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7804228). 1466
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut As Hyper Hamper On Super 1468
Hammy”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7799902). 1469
104. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Hammy By Hyper Hamper Of 1470
Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1471
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Cycle-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super 1474
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Cycle-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress 1477
On Super Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7793372). 1478
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Cycle-Cut As Hyper Hamper On Super 1480
Hammy”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7791952). 1481
Hamiltonian-Cycle-Cut In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1483
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super 1486
Hamiltonian-Neighbor In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1489
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On 1492
Hamiltonian-Decomposition In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1495
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Cut As Hyper Hamper On Super Hammy”, 1498
Hamiltonian-Cut In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1501
SuperHyperGraph By Trace-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 1504
Trace-Neighbor In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1507
117. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 1509
SuperHyperGraph By Trace-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On Super 1510
Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7771831). 1511
Trace-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1513
SuperHyperGraph By Trace-Cut As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 1516
ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.20913.25446). 1517
120. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Tract By Hyper Track Of Trace-Cut In 1518
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7764916). 1520
SuperHyperGraph By Edge-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 1522
Edge-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, 1525
SuperHyperGraph By Edge-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On Super 1528
Decompensation”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.22545.10089). 1529
Edge-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1531
SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.29544.34564). 1532
SuperHyperGraph By Edge-Cut As Hyper Edify On Super Eddy”, ResearchGate 1534
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.11377.76644). 1535
126. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Eddy By Hyper Edify Of Edge-Cut In 1536
Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 1537
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.23750.96329). 1538
SuperHyperGraph By Vertex-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 1540
Vertex-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1543
SuperHyperGraph By Vertex-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On Super 1546
Decompensation”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.30212.81289). 1547
Vertex-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1549
SuperHyperGraph By Vertex-Cut As Hyper Vertu On Super Vertigo”, 1552
132. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Vertigo By Hyper Vertu Of Vertex-Cut In 1554
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.32467.25124). 1556
SuperHyperGraph By Stable-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 1558
134. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nebulizer By Hyper Nub Of 1560
Stable-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1561
SuperHyperGraph By Stable-Decompositions As Hyper Stain On Super Stagy”, 1564
136. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Stale By Hyper Stalk Of 1566
Stable-Decompositions In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1567
SuperHyperGraph By Stable-Cut As Hyper Stain On Super Stagy”, 1570
138. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Stale By Hyper Stalk Of Stable-Cut In 1572
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.20170.24000). 1574
SuperHyperGraph By Clique-Neighbors As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 1576
140. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nebulizer By Hyper Nub Of 1578
Clique-Neighbors In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1579
SuperHyperGraph By Clique-Decompositions As Hyper Decompile On Super 1582
Decommission”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.18780.87683). 1583
Clique- Decompositions In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1585
SuperHyperGraph By Clique-Cut As Hyper Click On Super Cliche”, 1588
144. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Cliff By Hyper Cling Of Clique-Cut In 1590
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.27392.30721). 1592
SuperHyperGraph By Space As Hyper Spin On Super Spacy”, ResearchGate 1594
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.33028.40321). 1595
SuperHyperGraph By List- Coloring As Hyper List On Super Lisle”, 1597
147. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Lith By Hyper Lite Of List-Coloring In 1599
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.16356.04489). 1601
SuperHyperGraph By Space As Hyper Sparse On Super Spark ”, ResearchGate 1603
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.21756.21129). 1604
149. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Solidarity By Hyper Soul Of Space In 1605
Cancer’s Recognition With (Extreme) SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023, 1606
(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.30983.68009). 1607
SuperHyperGraph By Edge-Connectivity As Hyper Disclosure On Super 1609
Closure”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.28552.29445). 1610
151. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Uniform By Hyper Deformation Of 1611
Edge-Connectivity In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1612
SuperHyperGraph By Vertex-Connectivity As Hyper Leak On Super Structure”, 1615
153. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super System By Hyper Explosions Of 1617
Vertex-Connectivity In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1618
SuperHyperGraph By Tree-Decomposition As Hyper Forward On Super Returns”, 1621
155. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nodes By Hyper Moves Of 1623
Tree-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1624
SuperHyperGraph By Chord As Hyper Excellence On Super Excess”, 1627
157. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Gap By Hyper Navigations Of Chord In 1629
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.11172.14720). 1631
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyper(i,j)-Domination As Hyper Controller On 1633
Super Waves”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.22011.80165). 1634
159. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Coincidence By Hyper Routes Of 1635
SuperHyper(i,j)-Domination In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1636
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperEdge-Domination As Hyper Reversion On 1639
Super Indirection”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.10493.84962). 1640
161. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Obstacles By Hyper Model Of 1641
SuperHyperEdge-Domination In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1642
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperK-Domination As Hyper k-Actions On Super 1645
Patterns”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.19944.14086). 1646
163. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Harmony By Hyper k-Function Of 1647
SuperHyperK-Domination In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1648
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperK-Number As Hyper k-Partition On Super 1651
Layers”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.33103.76968). 1652
165. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Gradient By Hyper k-Class Of 1653
SuperHyperK-Number In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1654
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperOrder As Hyper Enumerations On Super 1657
Landmarks”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.35646.56641). 1658
167. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Analogous By Hyper Visions Of 1659
SuperHyperOrder In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1660
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperColoring As Hyper Categories On Super 1663
Neighbors”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.13973.81121). 1664
169. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Relations By Hyper Identifications Of 1665
SuperHyperColoring In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1666
170. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Contradiction By Hyper Detection of 1668
SuperHyperDefensive In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic 1669
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperDimension As Hyper Distinguishing On Super 1672
Distances”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.31956.88961). 1673
172. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Locations By Hyper Differing Of 1674
SuperHyperDimension In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1675
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperDominating As Hyper Closing On Super 1678
Messy”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.21510.45125). 1679
174. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Missing By Hyper Searching Of 1680
SuperHyperDominating In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1681
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperConnected As Hyper Group On Super Surge”, 1684
176. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Outbreak By Hyper Collections Of 1686
SuperHyperConnected In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1687
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperTotal As Hyper Covering On Super Infections”, 1690
178. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Extremism By Hyper Treatments Of 1692
SuperHyperTotal In Cancer’s Recognition with (Neutrosophic) 1693
179. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Isolation By Hyper Perfectness Of 1695
SuperHyperPerfect In Cancer’s Recognition with (Neutrosophic) 1696
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperPerfect As Hyper Idealism On Super Vacancy”, 1699
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperJoin As Hyper Separations On Super Sorts”, 1702
182. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super connections By Hyper disconnections Of 1704
SuperHyperJoin In Cancer’s Recognition with (Neutrosophic) 1705
183. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Mixed-Devastations By Hyper Decisions 1707
Of SuperHyperDuality In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic 1708
184. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition As (Neutrosophic) 1710
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperDuality As Hyper Imaginations On Super 1711
Mixed-Illustrations”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.33275.80161). 1712
185. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition As (Neutrosophic) 1713
SuperHyperGraph By Path SuperHyperColoring As Hyper Correction On Super 1714
Faults”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.30182.50241). 1715
186. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Reflections By Hyper Rotations Of Path 1716
SuperHyperColoring In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic 1717
187. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas As Hyper Deformations On Super Chains In 1719
Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph By 1720
SuperHyperDensity”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.13444.60806). 1721
188. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas As Hyper Ignorance By SuperHyperDensity On 1722
Super Resistances In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic 1723
SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.16800.05123). 1724
189. Henry Garrett, “New Research On Cancer’s Recognition and Neutrosophic 1725
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian SuperHyperCycles and Hamiltonian Sets As 1726
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-VI ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1727
10.13140/RG.2.2.29913.80482). 1728
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-V ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1731
10.13140/RG.2.2.33269.24809). 1732
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-IV ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1735
10.13140/RG.2.2.34946.96960). 1736
192. Henry Garrett, “A Research On Cancer’s Recognition and Neutrosophic 1737
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-III ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1739
10.13140/RG.2.2.14814.31040). 1740
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-II ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1743
10.13140/RG.2.2.15653.17125). 1744
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-I ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1747
10.13140/RG.2.2.25719.50089). 1748
195. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Disruptions In Cancer’s Extreme 1749
Recognition As Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph By Hyper Plans Called 1750
SuperHyperConnectivities”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1751
10.13140/RG.2.2.29441.94562). 1752
196. Henry Garrett, “Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition As Neutrosophic 1753
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperConnectivities As Hyper Diagnosis On Super 1754
Mechanism”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.17252.24968). 1755
197. Henry Garrett,“Cancer’s Recognition and (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph By 1756
the Criteria of Eulerian and Hamiltonian Type-Sets As Hyper Modified Cycles 1757
On Super Mess”, ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.16652.59525). 1758
198. Henry Garrett,“Eulerian and Hamiltonian In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition 1759
and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph On Super Interactions By Hyper Extensions 1760
of Cycles”, ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.34583.24485). 1761
199. Henry Garrett,“SuperHyperGirth Type-Results on extreme SuperHyperGirth 1762
theory and (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs Toward Cancer’s extreme 1763
Recognition”, Preprints 2023, 2023010396 (doi: 1764
10.20944/preprints202301.0396.v1). 1765
200. Henry Garrett,“Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Warns Hyper Landmark of 1766
neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth In Super Type-Versions of Cancer’s neutrosophic 1767
Recognition”, Preprints 2023, 2023010395 (doi: 1768
10.20944/preprints202301.0395.v1). 1769
201. Henry Garrett,“The Constructions of (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs on the 1770
Cancer’s Recognition in The Confrontation With Super Attacks In Hyper 1771
Situations By Implementing (Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in The 1772
Technical Approaches to Neutralize SuperHyperViews”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1773
10.13140/RG.2.2.26240.51204). 1774
202. Henry Garrett,“(Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing As the 1775
Entrepreneurs on Cancer’s Recognitions To Fail Forcing Style As the Super 1776
Classes With Hyper Effects In The Background of the Framework is So-Called 1777
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1778
10.13140/RG.2.2.12818.73925). 1779
203. Henry Garrett,“Super Actions On The Types of Hyper Levels In The Sensible 1780
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth On Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and 1781
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 1782
10.13140/RG.2.2.26836.88960). 1783
204. Henry Garrett,“SuperHyperGirth Approaches on the Super Challenges on the 1784
Cancer’s Recognition In the Hyper Model of (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, 1785
ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.36745.93289). 1786
205. Henry Garrett,“Extreme SuperHyperClique as the Firm Scheme of 1787
Confrontation under Cancer’s Recognition as the Model in The Setting of 1788
10.20944/preprints202301.0308.v1). 1790
206. Henry Garrett,“Uncertainty On The Act And Effect Of Cancer Alongside The 1791
Foggy Positions Of Cells Toward Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique inside 1792
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Titled Cancer’s Recognition”, Preprints 2023, 1793
2023010282 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0282.v1). 1794
207. Henry Garrett,“Neutrosophic Version Of Separates Groups Of Cells In Cancer’s 1795
Recognition On Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010267 1796
(doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0267.v1).). 1797
208. Henry Garrett, “The Shift Paradigm To Classify Separately The Cells and 1798
Affected Cells Toward The Totality Under Cancer’s Recognition By New 1799
Multiple Definitions On the Sets Polynomials Alongside Numbers In The 1800
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperMatching Theory Based on SuperHyperGraph and 1801
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”, Preprints 2023, 2023010265 (doi: 1802
10.20944/preprints202301.0265.v1). 1803
209. Henry Garrett,“Breaking the Continuity and Uniformity of Cancer In The 1804
Worst Case of Full Connections With Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique In 1805
Cancer’s Recognition Applied in (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 1806
2023, 2023010262,(doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0262.v1). 1807
210. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable as the Survivors on the 1808
Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition Based on Uncertainty to All Modes in 1809
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010240 (doi: 1810
10.20944/preprints202301.0240.v1). 1811
211. Henry Garrett, “Extremism of the Attacked Body Under the Cancer’s 1812
Circumstances Where Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) 1813
SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010224, (doi: 1814
10.20944/preprints202301.0224.v1). 1815
212. Henry Garrett,“SuperHyperMatching By (R-)Definitions And Polynomials To 1816
Monitor Cancer’s Recognition In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, 1817
ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.35061.65767). 1818
213. Henry Garrett,“The Focus on The Partitions Obtained By Parallel Moves In 1819
The Cancer’s Extreme Recognition With Different Types of Extreme 1820
SuperHyperMatching Set and Polynomial on (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, 1821
214. Henry Garrett,“Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique Decides the Failures on the 1823
Cancer’s Recognition in the Perfect Connections of Cancer’s Attacks By 1824
SuperHyperModels Named (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 1825
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.32530.73922). 1826
215. Henry Garrett,“Indeterminacy On The All Possible Connections of Cells In 1827
Front of Cancer’s Attacks In The Terms of Neutrosophic Failed 1828
SuperHyperClique on Cancer’s Recognition called Neutrosophic 1829
SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.15897.70243). 1830
216. Henry Garrett,“Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique Decides the Failures on the 1831
Cancer’s Recognition in the Perfect Connections of Cancer’s Attacks By 1832
SuperHyperModels Named (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 1833
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.32530.73922). 1834
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 1836
2023010105 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 1837
218. Henry Garrett,“Perfect Directions Toward Idealism in Cancer’s Neutrosophic 1838
Recognition Forwarding Neutrosophic SuperHyperClique on Neutrosophic 1839
219. Henry Garrett,“Demonstrating Complete Connections in Every Embedded 1841
Regions and Sub-Regions in the Terms of Cancer’s Recognition and 1842
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClique”, 1843
10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 1848
10.20944/preprints202301.0088.v1). 1852
222. Henry Garrett,“Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic Regions titled 1853
neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable in Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition 1854
modeled in the Form of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2023, 1855
(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.17385.36968). 1856
Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond ”, Preprints 2023, 2023010044 1859
Well- SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 1861
2023010043 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0043.v1). 1862
225. Henry Garrett, “Using the Tool As (Neutrosophic) Failed SuperHyperStable To 1863
SuperHyperModel Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) 1864
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In 1867
Special ViewPoints”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.11447.80803). 1868
Well-SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 1870
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.35774.77123). 1871
Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond ”, ResearchGate 2022, (doi: 1874
10.13140/RG.2.2.36141.77287). 1875
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2022, (doi: 1877
10.13140/RG.2.2.29430.88642). 1878
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2022, (doi: 1881
10.13140/RG.2.2.11369.16487). 1882
Featuring (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances”, Preprints 1884
2022, 2022120549 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0549.v1). 1885
Featuring (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances”, 1887
Recognitions And Related (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClasses”, Preprints 2022, 1892
2022120540 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0540.v1). 1893
Recognitions And Related (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClasses”, ResearchGate 1897
2022, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.14426.41923). 1898
Preprints 2022, 2022120500 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0500.v1). 1901
ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.20993.12640). 1904
237. Henry Garrett,“Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on 1905
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs and SuperHyperGraphs Alongside Applications 1906
in Cancer’s Treatments”, Preprints 2022, 2022120324 (doi: 1907
10.20944/preprints202212.0324.v1). 1908
238. Henry Garrett, “Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on 1909
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs And SuperHyperGraphs Alongside Applications 1910
in Cancer’s Treatments”, ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 1911
10.13140/RG.2.2.23123.04641). 1912
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”, Preprints 2022, 2022110576 (doi: 1915
10.20944/preprints202211.0576.v1). 1916
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”, ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 1919
10.13140/RG.2.2.23324.56966). 1920
241. Henry Garrett, “Basic Neutrosophic Notions Concerning SuperHyperDominating 1921
and Neutrosophic SuperHyperResolving in SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 1922
2022 (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.29173.86244). 1923
242. Henry Garrett, “Initial Material of Neutrosophic Preliminaries to Study Some 1924
Neutrosophic Notions Based on Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) in 1925
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)”, ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 1926
10.13140/RG.2.2.25385.88160). 1927
243. Henry Garrett, “Equal Connective Domination In Neutrosophic 1928
SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8201378). 1929
244. Henry Garrett, “Connective Domination In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. 1930
Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8194003). 1931
245. Henry Garrett, “Domination In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 1932
Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8113416). 1933
246. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperPerfect Search In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 1934
247. Henry Garrett, “Reverse Strict Dimension Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. 1936
248. Henry Garrett, “Unequal Dimension Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1938
Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8090194). 1939
249. Henry Garrett, “Strict Dimension Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1940
250. Henry Garrett, “Reverse Strict Connective In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 1942
251. Henry Garrett, “Unequal Connective Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1944
252. Henry Garrett, “Strict Connective Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1946
253. Henry Garrett, “Reverse Dimension Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1948
254. Henry Garrett, “Equal Dimension Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1950
255. Henry Garrett, “Dimension Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 1952
256. Henry Garrett, “Reverse Connective Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1954
257. Henry Garrett, “Equal Connective Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1956
258. Henry Garrett, “Connective Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 1958
259. Henry Garrett, “United Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 1960
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8027488). 1961
260. Henry Garrett, “Zero Forcing In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 1962
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8020181). 1963
261. Henry Garrett, “Matrix-Based In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 1964
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7978921). 1965
262. Henry Garrett, “Collections of Math II”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 1966
10.5281/zenodo.7943878). 1967
263. Henry Garrett, “Dominating-Edges In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 1968
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7943871). 1969
264. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Gap In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 1970
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7923786). 1971
265. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1972
266. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. 1974
267. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 1976
268. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Cycle-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 1978
269. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Cycle-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1980
270. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Cycle-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 1982
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7854561). 1983
271. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Path-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1984
272. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Path-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1986
273. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Path-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 1988
274. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Path-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 1990
275. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Path-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1992
276. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Path-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 1994
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7812750). 1995
277. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1996
278. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. 1998
279. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2000
280. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Cycle-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2002
281. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Cycle-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2004
282. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Cycle-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2006
283. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2008
284. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2010
285. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2012
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7783791). 2013
286. Henry Garrett, “Trace-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2014
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7780123). 2015
287. Henry Garrett, “Trace-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2016
288. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDuality”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2018
10.5281/zenodo.7637762). 2019
289. Henry Garrett, “Trace-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2020
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7766174). 2021
290. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2022
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7762232). 2023
291. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2024
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7758601). 2025
292. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2026
10.5281/zenodo.7754661). 2027
293. Henry Garrett, “Vertex-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2028
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7750995) . 2029
294. Henry Garrett, “Vertex-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2030
295. Henry Garrett, “Vertex-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2032
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7747236). 2033
296. Henry Garrett, “Stable-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2034
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7742587). 2035
297. Henry Garrett, “Stable-Decompositions In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2036
298. Henry Garrett, “Stable-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2038
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7734719). 2039
299. Henry Garrett, “Clique-Neighbors In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2040
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7730484). 2041
300. Henry Garrett, “Clique-Decompositions In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2042
301. Henry Garrett, “Clique-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2044
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7722865). 2045
302. Henry Garrett, “Space In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2046
10.5281/zenodo.7713563). 2047
303. Henry Garrett, “Space In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2048
10.5281/zenodo.7709116). 2049
304. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Connectivity In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2050
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7706415). 2051
305. Henry Garrett, “Vertex-Connectivity In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2052
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7706063). 2053
306. Henry Garrett, “Tree-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2054
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7701906). 2055
307. Henry Garrett, “Chord In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2056
10.5281/zenodo.7700205). 2057
308. Henry Garrett, “(i,j)-Domination In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2058
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7694876). 2059
309. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Domination In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2060
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7679410). 2061
310. Henry Garrett, “K-Domination In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2062
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7675982). 2063
311. Henry Garrett, “K-Number In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2064
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7672388). 2065
312. Henry Garrett, “Order In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2066
10.5281/zenodo.7668648). 2067
313. Henry Garrett, “Coloring In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2068
10.5281/zenodo.7662810). 2069
314. Henry Garrett, “Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2070
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7659162). 2071
315. Henry Garrett, “Cancer In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2072
10.5281/zenodo.7653233). 2073
316. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperWheel ”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2074
10.5281/zenodo.7653204). 2075
317. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperMultipartite”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2076
10.5281/zenodo.7653142). 2077
318. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperBipartite”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2078
10.5281/zenodo.7653117). 2079
319. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperStar ”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2080
10.5281/zenodo.7653089). 2081
320. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2082
10.5281/zenodo.7651687). 2083
321. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperPath”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2084
10.5281/zenodo.7651619). 2085
322. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDomination”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2086
10.5281/zenodo.7651439). 2087
323. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDominating”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2088
10.5281/zenodo.7650729). 2089
324. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperConnected ”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2090
10.5281/zenodo.7647868). 2091
325. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperTotal ”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2092
10.5281/zenodo.7647017). 2093
326. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperPerfect”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2094
10.5281/zenodo.7644894). 2095
327. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperJoin”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2096
10.5281/zenodo.7641880). 2097
328. Henry Garrett, “Path SuperHyperColoring”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2098
10.5281/zenodo.7632923). 2099
329. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDensity”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2100
10.5281/zenodo.7623459). 2101
330. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2102
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7606416). 2103
331. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperConnectivities”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2104
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7606416). 2105
332. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperConnectivities”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2106
10.5281/zenodo.7606404). 2107
333. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2108
10.5281/zenodo.7580018). 2109
334. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2110
10.5281/zenodo.7580018). 2111
335. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2112
10.5281/zenodo.7580018). 2113
336. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2114
10.5281/zenodo.7579929). 2115
337. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2116
10.5281/zenodo.7563170). 2117
338. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2118
10.5281/zenodo.7563164). 2119
339. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2120
10.5281/zenodo.7563160). 2121
340. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2122
10.5281/zenodo.7563160). 2123
341. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2124
10.5281/zenodo.7563160). 2125
342. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2126
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7557063). 2127
343. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperMatching”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2128
10.5281/zenodo.7557009). 2129
344. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperMatching”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2130
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7539484). 2131
345. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2132
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7523390). 2133
346. Henry Garrett, “Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2134
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7523390). 2135
347. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On Failed SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2136
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7523390). 2137
348. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2138
10.5281/zenodo.7574952). 2139
349. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2140
10.5281/zenodo.7574992). 2141
350. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2142
10.5281/zenodo.7523357). 2143
351. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2144
10.5281/zenodo.7523357). 2145
352. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2146
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7504782). 2147
353. Henry Garrett, “Extreme Failed SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2148
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7504782). 2149
354. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On Failed SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2150
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7504782). 2151
355. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2152
10.5281/zenodo.7499395). 2153
356. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2154
10.5281/zenodo.7499395). 2155
357. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2156
10.5281/zenodo.7499395). 2157
358. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2158
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7497450). 2159
359. Henry Garrett, “Extreme Failed SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2160
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7497450). 2161
360. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2162
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7494862). 2163
361. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2164
10.5281/zenodo.7494862). 2165
362. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2166
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7494862). 2167
363. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperAlliances”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2168
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7493845). 2169
364. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperAlliances”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2170
10.5281/zenodo.7493845). 2171
365. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperAlliances”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2172
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7493845). 2173
366. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperMatching”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2174
10.5281/zenodo.7539484). 2175
367. Henry Garrett, “Failed SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2176
10.5281/zenodo.7523390). 2177
368. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2178
10.5281/zenodo.7523357). 2179
369. Henry Garrett, “Failed SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2180
10.5281/zenodo.7504782). 2181
370. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2182
10.5281/zenodo.7499395). 2183
371. Henry Garrett, “Failed SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2184
10.5281/zenodo.7497450). 2185
372. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2186
10.5281/zenodo.7494862). 2187
373. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperAlliances”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2188
10.5281/zenodo.7493845). 2189
374. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2190
10.5281/zenodo.7480110). 2191
375. Henry Garrett, “Neut. SuperHyperEdges”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2192
10.5281/zenodo.7378758). 2193
376. Henry Garrett, “Beyond Neutrosophic Graphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2194
10.5281/zenodo.6320305). 2195
377. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Duality”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2196
10.5281/zenodo.6677173). 2197
View publication stats

New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel by REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION As Hyper Decoration On Super Density

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel by REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION As Hyper Decoration On Super Density

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph With

Preprint · August 2023

541 PUBLICATIONS 27,882 CITATIONS

Featured Articles View project

On Fuzzy Logic View project

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 2

SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By REVERSE 3

CONNECTIVE DOMINATION As Hyper Decoration On 4

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · 7

DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA 8

In this scientific research, (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic 10

SuperHyperREVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 11

(NSHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet 12

V 0 = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then V 0 is called Neutrosophic SuperHyperREVERSE CONNECTIVE 13

DOMINATION if the following expressions, terms and statements is called Neutrosophic 14

SuperHyperREVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION criteria holds. 15

SuperHyperNotions, namely a REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION and a 17

Neutrosophic REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION. Two different 18

SuperHyperNotion, SuperHyperUniform, and SuperHyperClass are well-defined and 20

well-reviewed based on them. Literature review is implemented throughout this research. 21

SuperHyperNotion with other SuperHyperNotions and basic SuperHyperNumbers is 23

presented. Definitions are followed by examples and examples, so clarifications are 24

officially called “SuperHyperEdge”. “SuperHyperGraph” and “Neutrosophic 31

SuperHyperGraph” frameworks are selected and selected for research on “Cancer 32

questions and problems. It is useful to define a “neutrosophic” version of REVERSE 36

REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION becomes more understandable. In order to 38

master the Neutrosophic REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION, there is a need to 39

“re-define” the concept of “REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION mastery”. 40

SuperHyperVertices and SuperHyperEdges are assigned by alphabetical labels. In this 41

method, the position of tags is used to assign values. Suppose a REVERSE 42

CONNECTIVE DOMINATION. If the specified table contains “values of vertices, 43

supervertices, edges, hyperedges, and hyperedges belonging to Neutrosophic 44

SuperHyperGraph” with key points, it is redefined. ”values of vertices & number of 45

positions in alphabet”, ”Values of SuperVertices&maximum values of its vertices”, 46

and structural examples, I would like to introduce the next SuperHyperClass 49

SuperHyperGraph based on REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION. This is the 50

would be disciplined. If there is a need to have all REVERSE CONNECTIVE 52

DOMINATION until REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION, then it is officially 53

called “REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION”, but otherwise, it is not REVERSE 54

CONNECTIVE DOMINATION. There is some explanation for the original definition 55

titled “REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION”. These two examples are further 56

explored and distinguished because they are characterized in the SuperHyperClass 57

disciplinary methods based on a dominant REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION. 58

Because of having REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION, there is a need to 59

“re-define” the concept of “neutrosophic REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION” 60

and “neutrosophic REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION”. SuperHyperVertices 61

of tags is used to assign values. Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. 63

“Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” is redefined if the desired table exists. And if the 64

desired table exists, a REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION is redefined to a 65

“Neutrosophic REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION”. It is useful to define a 66

“Neutrosophic” version of SuperHyperClasses. Since there are more ways to obtain 67

Neutrosophic type results, a SuperHyper- Neutrosophic REVERSE CONNECTIVE 68

DOMINATION becomes more understandable. Consider a Neutrosophic 69

SuperHyperGraph. If the desired table exists, there are a number of Neutrosophic 70

SuperHyperClasses. So are SuperHyperPath, SuperHyperCycle, SuperHyperStar, 71

SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultiPartite and SuperHyperWheel. ”Neutrosophic 72

SuperHyperPath”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar”, 73

“Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultiPartite” and 74

“Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel”. A graph is SuperHyperUniform if it is a 75

SuperHyperGraph and the number of SuperHyperEdges elements is the same. Consider 76

a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. There are a number of SuperHyperClasses as follows. 77