New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle by Strongly Resolving Sequence As Hyper Decoration On Super Density

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.
net/publication/376796950
New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph With

Multipartite and Cycle By Strongly Resolving Sequence As Hyper Decoration On
Super Density
Preprint · December 2023

DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.24994.20169
CITATIONS
1 author:
Henry Garrett
555 PUBLICATIONS 28,581 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Henry Garrett on 24 December 2023.
The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 2
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By Strongly 3
Resolving Sequence As Hyper Decoration On Super Density 4
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · 6
DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA 7
1 ABSTRACT 8
In this scientific research, (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic 9
SuperHyperResolving Sequence). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S be a pair 10
S = (V, E). Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then V 0 is 11
called Neutrosophic SuperHyperResolving Sequence if the following expressions, terms and 12
statements is called Neutrosophic SuperHyperResolving Sequence criteria holds. 13
X X X
|( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 Vi ∈V 0 Vi ∈V 0
X X X
= min |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V 00 ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
∀Vb , Vc ∈ VN SHG \ V , ∃Va ∈ V 00 :

00
d(TV (Va , Vb )) 6= d(TV (Va , Vc )),

d(IV (Va , Vb )) 6= d(IV (Va , Vc )),
and d(FV (Va , Vb )) 6= d(FV (Va , Vc )),
then Vb , Vc ∈ V 00 , until V 00 = VN SHG }
In this scientific research, new configurations are introduced for the new 14
SuperHyperNotions, namely a Resolving Sequence and a Neutrosophic Resolving 15
Sequence. Two different SuperHyperDefinitions were started for them, but research has 16
progressed and SuperHyperNotion, SuperHyperUniform, and SuperHyperClass are 17
well-defined and well-reviewed based on them. Literature review is implemented 18
throughout this research. To shine the light and importance of this research, a 19
comparison between this SuperHyperNotion with other SuperHyperNotions and basic 20
SuperHyperNumbers is presented. Definitions are followed by examples and examples, 21
so clarifications are guided by various tools. Applications are designed to understand 22
the theoretical aspect of this ongoing research. “Cancer diagnosis” are the things that 23
are being researched to explore the challenges that make sense in ongoing research and 24
future research. It is a special case. Cells are viewed in the intended manner. There are 25
different types of them. Some are individual and some are well modeled by groups of 26
cells. All these types are officially called “SuperHyperVertex”, but the relationships 27
between them all are officially called “SuperHyperEdge”. “SuperHyperGraph” and 28
“Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” frameworks are selected and selected for research on 29
“Cancer Diagnosis”. Thus, these complex and dense super-hypermodels open avenues for 30
research on theoretical aspects and “cancer diagnosis”. Ways to pursue this scientific 31
research have been considered. It has also been formally collected in the form of several 32
questions and problems. It is useful to define a “neutrosophic” version of Resolving 33
Sequence. Since there are more ways to get type results a Resolving Sequence becomes 34
more understandable. In order to master the Neutrosophic Resolving Sequence, there is 35
a need to “re-define” the concept of “Resolving Sequence mastery”. SuperHyperVertices 36
and SuperHyperEdges are assigned by alphabetical labels. In this method, the position 37
of tags is used to assign values. Suppose a Resolving Sequence. If the specified table 38
contains “values of vertices, supervertices, edges, hyperedges, and hyperedges belonging 39
to Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” with key points, it is redefined. ”values of vertices 40
& number of positions in alphabet”, ”Values of SuperVertices&maximum values of its 41
vertices”, ”values of edges&maximum values of its vertices”, ”super edge values&max 42
values of its vertices”, “super edge values” and maximum values of its endpoints”. To 43
get examples and structural examples, I would like to introduce the next 44
SuperHyperClass SuperHyperGraph based on Resolving Sequence. This is the original. 45
Having the foundation of the previous definition in the SuperHyperClass type would be 46
disciplined. If there is a need to have all Resolving Sequence until Resolving Sequence, 47
then it is officially called “Resolving Sequence”, but otherwise, it is not Resolving 48
Sequence. There is some explanation for the original definition titled “Resolving 49
Sequence”. These two examples are further explored and distinguished because they are 50
characterized in the SuperHyperClass disciplinary methods based on a dominant 51
Resolving Sequence. Because of having Resolving Sequence, there is a need to 52
“re-define” the concept of “neutrosophic Resolving Sequence” and “neutrosophic 53
Resolving Sequence”. SuperHyperVertices and SuperHyperEdges are assigned by 54
alphabetical labels. In this method, the position of tags is used to assign values. 55
Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” is 56
redefined if the desired table exists. And if the desired table exists, a Resolving 57
Sequence is redefined to a “Neutrosophic Resolving Sequence”. It is useful to define a 58
“Neutrosophic” version of SuperHyperClasses. Since there are more ways to obtain 59
Neutrosophic type results, a SuperHyper- Neutrosophic Resolving Sequence becomes 60
more understandable. Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. If the desired table 61
exists, there are a number of Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses. So are SuperHyperPath, 62
SuperHyperCycle, SuperHyperStar, SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultiPartite and 63
SuperHyperWheel. ”Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle”, 64
“Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite”, “Neutrosophic 65
SuperHyperMultiPartite” and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel”. A graph is 66
SuperHyperUniform if it is a SuperHyperGraph and the number of SuperHyperEdges 67
elements is the same. Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. There are a number 68
of SuperHyperClasses as follows. It is a SuperHyperPath if there is only one 69
SuperVertex as an intersection between two given SuperHyperEdges with two 70
exceptions. If only one SuperVertex is given as an intersection between two 71
SuperHyperEdges, it is SuperHyperCycle. It is SuperHyperStar and only one 72
SuperVertex as intersection among all SuperHyperEdges. It is SuperHyperBipartite, 73
and only one SuperVertex is given as the intersection between two SuperHyperEdges, 74
and these SuperVertices, which form two distinct sets, have no SuperHyperEdge in 75
common. This is SuperHyperMultiPartite. Only one SuperVertex is given as an 76
intersection between two SuperHyperEdges, and these SuperVertices, which form 77
separate multisets, have no SuperHyperEdge in common. If only one SuperHyperEdge 78
among the given two SuperHyperEdges is a SuperHyperWheel and a SuperVertex has a 79
SuperHyperEdge with any regular SuperVertex. SuperHyperModel suggests specific 80
designs and specific architectures. SuperHyperModel is officially called 81
“SuperHyperGraph” and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”. In this SuperHyperModel, 82
the “special” cells and the “special group” of cells are SuperHyperModeled as 83
“SuperHyperVertices” and the common and desired properties between the “special” 84
cells and the “special group” of cells. SuperHyperModeled as “SuperHyperEdges”. 85
Sometimes, to have a more accurate SuperHyperModel, it is useful to have some degree 86
of determinism, uncertainty, and neutrality, in this case the SuperHyperModel is called 87
“Neutrosophic”. In future scientific research, the foundation will be based on “diagnosis 88
of cancer” and the results and definitions will be introduced in redeemed methods. 89
Cancer diagnosis in long-term practice. The specific region is assigned by the model 90
(called SuperHyperGraph) and the long cycle of movement of the cancer is determined 91
by this scientific research. Sometimes the movement of cancer is not easy to detect, 92
because there is certainty, uncertainty and neutrality about the movements and effects 93
of cancer on that area. This event leads us to choose another model [which is said to be 94
the Neutrosophic superhypergraph] in order to have a proper understanding of what 95
happened and was done. There are some specific models, which are well known and 96
have names, and some SuperHyperGeneral SuperHyperModels. The movements and 97
effects of cancer in complex pathways and between complex groups of cells can be 98
visualized with a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (-/SuperHyperCycle, SuperHyperStar, 99
SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, SuperHyperWheel). The goal is to find 100
the longest Resolving Sequence or the strongest Resolving Sequence in those 101
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModels. Some general results are presented for the longest 102
Resolving Sequence called Resolving Sequence and the strongest Resolving Sequence 103
called Neutrosophic Resolving Sequence. Beyond that in SuperHyperStar, all possible 104
SuperHyperPaths have only two SuperHyperEdges, but it is not enough as having at 105
least three SuperHyperEdges is necessary to form any style of cycle. There is no form of 106
any cycle, but literally, it is the transformation of any cycle. It literally transforms and 107
does not form. A basic introduction to the theory of Resolving Sequence Neutrosophic, 108
SuperHyperGraphs and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs is suggested. 109
Keywords: Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, SuperHyperResolving Sequence, Cancer’s 110
Neutrosophic Recognition 111
AMS Subject Classification: 05C17, 05C22, 05E45 112
2 Applied Notions Under The Scrutiny Of The 113
Motivation Of This Scientific Research 114
In this scientific research, there are ideas in the prominent frameworks of motivations. I 115
try to bring motivations in narrative ways. Some Cells have faced attacks from the 116
established situation with cancer attacks in this case, there is some analysis embedded 117
in the case current situations where cells can be labeled as some groups and some 118
groups or individuals are overlabeled, all from behaviors to overcome cancer attacks. In 119
embedded situations, cell individuals and cell groups can be considered as “new groups”. 120
So it encourages us to find suitable SuperHyperModels for more appropriate analysis 121
about this dirty story. I found SuperHyperModels, officially called “SuperHyperGraphs” 122
and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. In this SuperHyperModel, cells and groups of 123
cells are defined as “SuperHyperVertices” and relationships between individual cells and 124
groups of cells are defined as “SuperHyperEdges”. So this is another motivation for us 125
to do research on this SuperHyperModel based on “cancer diagnosis”. Sometimes, 126
things get worse. The situation has passed certainty and precise style. So it is beyond 127
them. There are three descriptions, i.e., degrees of determination, uncertainty, and 128
neutrality, for any object based on ambiguous forms, i.e., incomplete data, imprecise 129
data, and uncertain analysis. The second model can be considered in the previous 130
SuperHyperModel. This is SuperHyperModel. This is SuperHyperGraph but officially 131
called “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. Cancer is a disease, but the model is 132
supposed to understand what happens in this phenomenon. The special case of this 133
disease is considered and some parameters are used as consequences of the model. Cells 134
are attacked by the disease, but the movement of cancer is in a specific area. Knowing 135
the mind of cancer can help to find some cures for this disease. SuperHyperGraph and 136
Neutrosophic Super-HyperGraph are super-hypermodels used in “cancer diagnosis” and 137
both are the foundation of the background of this scientific research. Sometimes cancer 138
has occurred in an area full of cells, cell groups, and embedded styles. In this section, 139
SuperHyperModel proposes based on the links of cancer movements in the form of unity 140
styles with the formation of design and architecture officially called “Resolving 141
Sequence”, in the themes of specialized terms and common words. Particle for direct 142
object. Applied concepts under the investigation of the motivation of this scientific 143
research. The “SuperHyper” prefix refers to the theme of embedded styles for 144
background discovery for SuperHyperNotions. Cancer diagnosis in long-term practice. 145
The specific region is assigned by the model (called SuperHyperGraph) and the long 146
cycle of movement of the cancer is determined by this scientific research. Sometimes the 147
movement of Cancer is not easy to identify because there is certainty, uncertainty and 148
neutrality about the movements and effects of Cancer in that region. This event leads 149
us to choose another model [said to be Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph]. Easy 150
understanding of what happened and what was done. There are some specific models 151
that are well known and named and some general models. The movements and effects 152
of cancer in complex pathways and between complex groups of cells can be visualized by 153
a neurosophic superhyperpath (-/SuperHyperCycle, SuperHyperStar, 154
SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, SuperHyperWheel). The goal is to find 155
Resolving Sequence or Neutrosophic Resolving Sequence for SuperHyperModels in it. 156
Some general results are presented. Beyond that in SuperHyperStar, all possible 157
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPaths have only two SuperHyperEdges, but it is not enough 158
as having at least three SuperHyperEdges is necessary to form any style of cycle. There 159
is no form of cycle, but it is literally a form of any cycle. It literally transforms and does 160
not form. 161
Question 2.1. How to define “SuperHyperNotions and to do research” to find the 162
“Resolving Sequence Rate” of any cell or groups of cells based on fixed cell or fixed group 163
of cells broadly, “Resolving Sequence Rate” based on fixed groups or fixed cells. Groups 164
of groups of cells? 165
Question 2.2. What are the best descriptions for “diagnosing cancer” in terms of 166
these chaotic and dense super-hypermodels in which embedded concepts are depicted? 167
This motivation to find concepts to use in this dense model is called 168
“SuperHyperGraphs”. So it motivates us to define different types of “Resolving 169
Sequence” and “neutrosophic Resolving Sequence” over “superhypergraph” and 170
“neutrosophic superhypergraph”. Then this scientific research has taken more 171
motivations to define SuperHyperClasses and find some connections among this 172
SuperHyperNotion with other SuperHyperNotions. It motivates us to obtain examples 173
and examples to clarify the framework of this scientific research. The general results 174
and some of the results about some of the connections are the ways that the key point 175
of this scientific research, “diagnosis of cancer” is more understandable and clear. 176
The framework of this research is as follows. First, I will introduce the basic 177
definitions to clarify the basics. In the “Introductions” subsection, basic definitions 178
about SuperHyperGraphs and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph are introduced and 179
discussed in depth. Basic concepts are thoroughly explained and illustrated, and 180
sometimes a literature review is used to make sense of what is to come in the coming 181
sections. The main definitions and their explanations, along with some results on the 182
new concepts, Resolving Sequence and Neutrosophic Resolving Sequence, are specified 183
in the sections “Resolving Sequence” and “Neutrosophic Resolving Sequence”. In the 184
concept of dealing with results and in Resolving Sequence to create logic about the 185
continuation of the scientific research, the ideas of SuperHyperUniform and 186
Neutrosophic SuperHyperUniform are introduced and as their consequences, the 187
corresponding SuperHyperClasses are specified to summarize the work done in this 188
section, as “Results on SuperHyperClasses” and “Results on Neutrosophic 189
SuperHyperClasses”. Going back to the core concepts, clever steps towards common 190
concepts to extend new concepts in new frameworks, SuperHyperGraph and 191
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, in “Results on SuperHyperClasses” and “Results on 192
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses” sections. There is the initial scientific research on 193
supergeneral relations and as the final and final part of the theoretical scientific research 194
is available in the section “General results”. Some general SuperHyperRelations are 195
fundamental and are known as fundamental SuperHyperNotions, as in “General results” 196
were extracted and discussed. “Resolving Sequence”, “Neutrosophic Resolving 197
Sequence”, “Results on SuperHyperClasses” and “Results on Neutrosophic 198
SuperHyperClasses”. There are curious questions about what has been done about 199
SuperHyperNotions to make sense of the superiority of this scientific research and to 200
discover the word “best” as a description and adjective of this scientific research as 201
presented in the “Resolving Sequence” section. The keyword of this scientific research 202
was presented in the section “Applications in cancer diagnosis” with two cases and 203
sub-sections “Case 1: Initial steps towards SuperHyperBipartite as SuperHyperModel” 204
and “Case 2: Incremental steps towards SuperHyperMultiperdel as SuperHyper. In the 205
“open issues” section, there is a detailed examination and recognition of what was done 206
in this scientific research and what happened in this scientific research in the form of 207
“questions” and “issues” in order to understand this scientific research in an outstanding 208
style, the advantages and limitations of this scientific research in addition to What has 209
been done in this scientific research is stated in the “conclusion and final remarks” 210
section. 211
3 Neutrosophic Preliminaries Of This Scientific 212
Research On the Redeemed Ways 213
In this section, the basic material in this scientific research, is referred to [Single Valued 214
Neutrosophic Set](Ref. [1],Definition 2.2,p.2), [Neutrosophic Set](Ref. [1],Definition 215
2.1,p.1), [Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)](Ref. [1],Definition 2.5,p.2), 216
[Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)](Ref. [1],Definition 217
2.7,p.3), [t-norm](Ref. [1], Definition 2.7, p.3), and [Characterization of the 218
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)](Ref. [1],Definition 2.7,p.3), [Neutrosophic 219
Strength of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPaths] (Ref. [1],Definition 5.3,p.7), and 220
[Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)] 221
(Ref. [1],Definition 5.4,p.7). Also, the new ideas and their clarifications are addressed 222
to Ref. [1]. 223
In this subsection, the basic material which is used in this scientific research, is 224
presented. Also, the new ideas and their clarifications are elicited. 225
Definition 3.1 (Neutrosophic Set). (Ref. [1],Definition 2.1,p.1). 226
Let X be a Eulerian-Path-Cut of points (objects) with generic elements in X denoted by

x; then the Neutrosophic set A (NS A) is an object having the form
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}

+
where the functions T, I, F : X →]− 0, 1 [ define respectively the a
truth-membership function, an indeterminacy-membership function, and a
falsity-membership function of the element x ∈ X to the set A with the condition
−
0 ≤ TA (x) + IA (x) + FA (x) ≤ 3+ .
The functions TA (x), IA (x) and FA (x) are real standard or nonstandard subsets of 227
+
]− 0, 1 [. 228
Definition 3.2 (Single Valued Neutrosophic Set). (Ref. [1],Definition 2.2,p.2). 229
Let X be a Eulerian-Path-Cut of points (objects) with generic elements in X denoted by

x. A single valued Neutrosophic set A (SVNS A) is characterized by
truth-membership function TA (x), an indeterminacy-membership function IA (x), and a
falsity-membership function FA (x). For each point x in X, TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) ∈ [0, 1].
A SVNS A can be written as
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}.
Definition 3.3. The degree of truth-membership,

indeterminacy-membership and falsity-membership of the subset X ⊂ A of
the single valued Neutrosophic set A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}:
TA (X) = min[TA (vi ), TA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,
IA (X) = min[IA (vi ), IA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,

and FA (X) = min[FA (vi ), FA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X .
Definition 3.4. The support of X ⊂ A of the single valued Neutrosophic set
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}:
supp(X) = {x ∈ X : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) > 0}.
Definition 3.5 (Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). (Ref. [1],Definition 230
2.5,p.2). 231
Assume V 0 is a given set. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a 232
pair S = (V, E), where 233
(i) V = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vn } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of V 0 ; 234
(ii) V = {(Vi , TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi )) : TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi ) ≥ 0}, (i = 235
1, 2, . . . , n); 236
(iii) E = {E1 , E2 , . . . , En0 } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of 237
V; 238
(iv) E = {(Ei0 , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )) : TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 ) ≥ 0}, (i0 = 239
1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 240
(v) Vi 6= ∅, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 241
(vi) Ei0 6= ∅, (i0 = 1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 242
P
(vii) i supp(Vi ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 243
0 0
P
(viii) i0 supp(Ei ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n );
0 244
(ix) and the following conditions hold:
TV0 (Ei0 ) ≤ min[TV 0 (Vi ), TV 0 (Vj )]Vi ,Vj ∈Ei0 ,
IV0 (Ei0 ) ≤ min[IV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vj )]Vi ,Vj ∈Ei0 ,

and FV0 (Ei0 ) ≤ min[FV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vj )]Vi ,Vj ∈Ei0
where i0 = 1, 2, . . . , n0 . 245
Figure 1. The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a illustrated SuperHyperModeling

on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Here the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ej 0 and the Neutrosophic 246
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) Vj are single valued Neutrosophic sets. TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), 247
and FV 0 (Vi ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 248
indeterminacy-membership and the degree of falsity-membership the Neutrosophic 249
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) V. 250
TV0 (Ei0 ), TV0 (Ei0 ), and TV0 (Ei0 ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 251
indeterminacy-membership and the degree of falsity-membership of the Neutrosophic 252
SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) Ei0 to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) E. Thus, 253
the ii0 th element of the incidence matrix of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) 254
are of the form (Vi , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )), the sets V and E are crisp sets. 255
Example 3.6. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair 256
S = (V, E) in the mentioned Neutrosophic Figures in every Neutrosophic items. 257
• On the Figure (1), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 258
notion, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. E1 259
and E3 are some empty Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges but E2 is a loop 260
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge and E4 is a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. Thus 261
in the terms of Neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only one Neutrosophic 262
SuperHyperEdge, namely, E4 . The Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 is 263
Neutrosophic isolated means that there’s no Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge has it 264
as a Neutrosophic endpoint. 265
notion, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 267
E1 , E2 and E3 are some empty Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges but E4 is a 268
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. Thus in the terms of Neutrosophic 269
SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only one Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge, namely, 270
E4 . The Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 is Neutrosophic isolated means that 271
there’s no Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge has it as a Neutrosophic endpoint. 272
• On the Figure (3), the SuperHyperNotion, namely, SuperHyperGirth, is up. 273
E1 , E2 and E3 are some empty SuperHyperEdges but E4 is a SuperHyperEdge. 274
Thus in the terms of SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only one SuperHyperEdge, 275
namely, E4 . 276
Figure 2. TThe Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a illustrated SuperHyperModel-

ing on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 3. The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a illustrated SuperHyperModeling

on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 4. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a illustrated Super-

HyperModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
• On the Figure (4), there’s no empty SuperHyperEdge but E3 are a loop 277
SuperHyperEdge on {F } and there are some SuperHyperEdges, namely, E1 on 278
{H, V1 , V3 }, alongside E2 on {O, H, V4 , V3 } and E4 , E5 on {N, V1 , V2 , V3 , F }. 279
• On the Figure (5),there’s neither empty SuperHyperEdge nor loop 280
SuperHyperEdge. 281
• On the Figure (6), there’s neither empty SuperHyperEdge nor loop 282
SuperHyperEdge. 283
SuperHyperEdge. 285
SuperHyperEdge. 287
SuperHyperEdge. 289
SuperHyperEdge. 291
SuperHyperEdge. 293
SuperHyperEdge. 295
SuperHyperEdge. 297
SuperHyperEdge. 299
SuperHyperEdge. 301
Figure 5. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs mentioned as the SuperHy-

perModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 6. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a illustrated Super-

HyperModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 7. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs depicted SuperHyperMod-

eling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 8. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with dense SuperHyper-

Modeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 9. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a messy SuperHyper-

Modeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 10. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with highly-embedding-

connected SuperHyperModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example
(3.6)
Figure 11. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a SuperHyperModel-

Figure 12. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with highly-multiple-

connected-style SuperHyperModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic
Example (3.6)


Figure 15. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with Linearly-Connected

SuperHyperModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)

Figure 17. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a Linearly-over-

packed SuperHyperModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example
(3.6)
SuperHyperEdge. 303
SuperHyperEdge. 305
SuperHyperEdge. 307
SuperHyperEdge. 309
SuperHyperEdge. 311
SuperHyperEdge. 313
SuperHyperEdge. 315
Definition 3.7 (Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). 316
(Ref. [1],Definition 2.7,p.3). 317
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). The 318
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ei0 and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 319
(NSHV) Vi of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S = (V, E) could be 320
characterized as follow-up items. 321
(i) If |Vi | = 1, then Vi is called vertex; 322
(ii) if |Vi | ≥ 1, then Vi is called SuperVertex; 323





(iii) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called edge; 324
(iv) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 325
HyperEdge; 326
(v) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called 327
SuperEdge; 328
(vi) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 329
SuperHyperEdge. 330
If we choose different types of binary operations, then we could get hugely diverse 331
types of general forms of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG). 332
Definition 3.8 (t-norm). (Ref. [1], Definition 2.7, p.3). 333
A binary operation ⊗ : [0, 1] × [0, 1] → [0, 1] is a t-norm if it satisfies the following 334
for x, y, z, w ∈ [0, 1]: 335
(i) 1 ⊗ x = x; 336
(ii) x ⊗ y = y ⊗ x; 337
(iii) x ⊗ (y ⊗ z) = (x ⊗ y) ⊗ z; 338
(iv) If w ≤ x and y ≤ z then w ⊗ y ≤ x ⊗ z. 339
Definition 3.9. The degree of truth-membership, indeterminacy-membership

and falsity-membership of the subset X ⊂ A of the single valued Neutrosophic set
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X} (with respect to t-norm Tnorm ):
TA (X) = Tnorm [TA (vi ), TA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,
IA (X) = Tnorm [IA (vi ), IA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,

and FA (X) = Tnorm [FA (vi ), FA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X .
Definition 3.10. The support of X ⊂ A of the single valued Neutrosophic set

A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}:
supp(X) = {x ∈ X : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) > 0}.
Definition 3.11. (General Forms of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). 340
Assume V 0 is a given set. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a 341
pair S = (V, E), where 342
(i) V = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vn } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of V 0 ; 343
(ii) V = {(Vi , TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi )) : TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi ) ≥ 0}, (i = 344
1, 2, . . . , n); 345
(iii) E = {E1 , E2 , . . . , En0 } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of 346
V; 347
(iv) E = {(Ei0 , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )) : TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 ) ≥ 0}, (i0 = 348
1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 349
(v) Vi 6= ∅, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 350
(vi) Ei0 6= ∅, (i0 = 1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 351
P
(vii) i supp(Vi ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 352
0 0
P
(viii) i0 supp(Ei ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n ).
0 353
Here the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ej 0 and the Neutrosophic 354
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) Vj are single valued Neutrosophic sets. TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), 355
and FV 0 (Vi ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 356
indeterminacy-membership and the degree of falsity-membership the Neutrosophic 357
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) V. 358
TV0 (Ei0 ), TV0 (Ei0 ), and TV0 (Ei0 ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 359
indeterminacy-membership and the degree of falsity-membership of the Neutrosophic 360
SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) Ei0 to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) E. Thus, 361
the ii0 th element of the incidence matrix of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) 362
are of the form (Vi , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )), the sets V and E are crisp sets. 363
Definition 3.12 (Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). 364
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). The 366
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ei0 and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 367
(NSHV) Vi of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S = (V, E) could be 368
characterized as follow-up items. 369
(i) If |Vi | = 1, then Vi is called vertex; 370
(ii) if |Vi | ≥ 1, then Vi is called SuperVertex; 371
(iii) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called edge; 372
(iv) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 373
HyperEdge; 374
(v) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called 375
SuperEdge; 376
(vi) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 377
SuperHyperEdge. 378
This SuperHyperModel is too messy and too dense. Thus there’s a need to have 379
some restrictions and conditions on SuperHyperGraph. The special case of this 380
SuperHyperGraph makes the patterns and regularities. 381
Definition 3.13. A graph is SuperHyperUniform if it’s SuperHyperGraph and the 382
number of elements of SuperHyperEdges are the same. 383
To get more visions on SuperHyperUniform, the some SuperHyperClasses are 384
introduced. It makes to have SuperHyperUniform more understandable. 385
Definition 3.14. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. There are some 386
SuperHyperClasses as follows. 387
(i). It’s Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath if it’s only one SuperVertex as 388
intersection amid two given SuperHyperEdges with two exceptions; 389
(ii). it’s SuperHyperCycle if it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two 390
given SuperHyperEdges; 391
(iii). it’s SuperHyperStar it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid all 392
SuperHyperEdges; 393
(iv). it’s SuperHyperBipartite it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two 394
given SuperHyperEdges and these SuperVertices, forming two separate sets, has 395
no SuperHyperEdge in common; 396
(v). it’s SuperHyperMultiPartite it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid 397
two given SuperHyperEdges and these SuperVertices, forming multi separate sets, 398
has no SuperHyperEdge in common; 399
(vi). it’s SuperHyperWheel if it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two 400
given SuperHyperEdges and one SuperVertex has one SuperHyperEdge with any 401
common SuperVertex. 402
Example 3.15. In the Figure (23), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath 403
ESHP : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, in the 404
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (23), is the notion. 405
Example 3.16. In the Figure (24), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle 406
N SHC : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Neutrosophic 407
SuperHyperSet, in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (24), is up. 408
Example 3.17. In the Figure (25), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar 409
ESHS : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, 410
by the Algorithm in previous Neutrosophic result, of the Neutrosophic 411
SuperHyperVertices of the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E), in 412
the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (25), is up. 413
Example 3.18. In the Neutrosophic Figure (26), the connected Neutrosophic 414
SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), is Neutrosophic highlighted and Neutrosophic 415
featured. The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Neutrosophic Algorithm in 416
previous Neutrosophic result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected 417
Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic 418
SuperHyperModel (26), is up. 419
Figure 23. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath Associated to the Notions in the Example

(3.15)
Figure 24. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions

in the Neutrosophic Example (3.16)
Figure 25. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions in

the Neutrosophic Example (3.17)
Figure 26. Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite Neutrosophic Associated to the Neutro-

sophic Notions in the Example (3.18)
Figure 27. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite Associated to the Notions in the

Example (3.19)
Figure 28. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel Neutrosophic Associated to the Neutro-

sophic Notions in the Neutrosophic Example (3.20)
Example 3.19. In the Figure (27), the connected Neutrosophic 420
SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E), is highlighted and Neutrosophic featured. 421
The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Algorithm in previous Neutrosophic 422
result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected Neutrosophic 423
SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (27), 424
is up. 425
Example 3.20. In the Neutrosophic Figure (28), the connected Neutrosophic 426
SuperHyperWheel N SHW : (V, E), is Neutrosophic highlighted and featured. The 427
obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Algorithm in previous result, of the 428
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel 429
ESHW : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (28), is up. 430
Definition 3.21. Let a pair S = (V, E) be a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)

S. Then a sequence of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) and Neutrosophic
SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)
V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs
is called a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic 431
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) V1 to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vs if either 432
of following conditions hold: 433
(i) Vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 434
(ii) there’s a vertex vi ∈ Vi such that vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 435
(iii) there’s a SuperVertex Vi0 ∈ Vi such that Vi0 , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 436
(iv) there’s a vertex vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that Vi , vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 437
0 0
(v) there’s a SuperVertex Vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that Vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 438
(vi) there are a vertex vi ∈ Vi and a vertex vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that vi , vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 439
0 0
(vii) there are a vertex vi ∈ Vi and a SuperVertex Vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 440
(viii) there are a SuperVertex Vi0 ∈ Vi and a vertex vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that Vi0 , vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 441
(ix) there are a SuperVertex Vi0 ∈ Vi and a SuperVertex Vi+1

0
∈ Vi+1 such that 442
0 0
Vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 . 443
Definition 3.22. (Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPaths). 444
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). a

Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV)
V1 to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vs is sequence of Neutrosophic
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) and Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)
V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs ,
could be characterized as follow-up items. 445
(i) If for all Vi , Ej 0 , |Vi | = 1, |Ej 0 | = 2, then NSHP is called path; 446
(ii) if for all Ej 0 , |Ej 0 | = 2, and there’s Vi , |Vi | ≥ 1, then NSHP is called SuperPath; 447
(iii) if for all Vi , Ej 0 , |Vi | = 1, |Ej 0 | ≥ 2, then NSHP is called HyperPath; 448
(iv) if there are Vi , Ej 0 , |Vi | ≥ 1, |Ej 0 | ≥ 2, then NSHP is called Neutrosophic 449
SuperHyperPath . 450
Definition 3.23 (Neutrosophic Strength of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPaths). 451
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). A

Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV)
V1 to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vs is sequence of Neutrosophic
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) and Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)
V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs ,
have 453
(i) Neutrosophic t-strength (min{T (Vi )}, m, n)si=1 ; 454
(ii) Neutrosophic i-strength (m, min{I(Vi )}, n)si=1 ; 455
Table 1. The Values of Vertices, SuperVertices, Edges, HyperEdges, and SuperHy-

perEdges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph Mentioned in the Definition
(3.27)
The Values of The Vertices The Number of Position in Alphabet
The Values of The SuperVertices The maximum Values of Its Vertices
The Values of The Edges The maximum Values of Its Vertices
The Values of The HyperEdges The maximum Values of Its Vertices
The Values of The SuperHyperEdges The maximum Values of Its Endpoints
(iii) Neutrosophic f-strength (m, n, min{F (Vi )})si=1 ; 456
(iv) Neutrosophic strength (min{T (Vi )}, min{I(Vi )}, min{F (Vi )})si=1 . 457
Definition 3.24 (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges 458
(NSHE)). (Ref. [1],Definition 5.4,p.7). 459
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). Consider 460
a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) E = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then E is called 461
(ix) Neutrosophic t-connective if T (E) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic 462
t-strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 463
(NSHV) Vi to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vj where 1 ≤ i, j ≤ s; 464
(x) Neutrosophic i-connective if I(E) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic 465
i-strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 466
(xi) Neutrosophic f-connective if F (E) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic 468
f-strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 469
(xii) Neutrosophic connective if (T (E), I(E), F (E)) ≥ maximum number of 471
Neutrosophic strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic 472
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vj 473
where 1 ≤ i, j ≤ s. 474
For the sake of having a Neutrosophic notion, there’s a need to “redefine” the 475
notion of “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”. The SuperHyperVertices and the 476
SuperHyperEdges are assigned by the labels from the letters of the alphabets. In this 477
procedure, there’s the usage of the position of labels to assign to the values. 478
Definition 3.25. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (SHG) S is a pair 479
S = (V, E). It’s redefined Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph if the Table (1) holds. 480
It’s useful to define a “Neutrosophic” version of SuperHyperClasses. Since there’s 481
more ways to get Neutrosophic type-results to make a Neutrosophic more 482
understandable. 483
Definition 3.26. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (SHG) S is a pair 484
S = (V, E). There are some Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses if the Table (2) 485
holds. Thus Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath , notion, SuperHyperStar, 486
SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultiPartite, and SuperHyperWheel, are 487
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath, Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle, 488
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar, Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite, 489
Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultiPartite, and Neutrosophic 490
SuperHyperWheel if the Table (2) holds. 491

perEdges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, Mentioned in the Definition
(3.26)

perEdges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph Mentioned in the Definition
(3.27)
It’s useful to define a “Neutrosophic” version of a Neutrosophic notion. Since there’s 492
more ways to get type-results to make a Neutrosophic notion more Neutrosophicly 493
understandable. 494
For the sake of having a Neutrosophic notion, there’s a need to “redefine” the 495
Neutrosophic notion of “Neutrosophic notion”. The SuperHyperVertices and the 496
SuperHyperEdges are assigned by the labels from the letters of the alphabets. In this 497
procedure, there’s the usage of the position of labels to assign to the values. 498
Definition 3.27. Assume a notion. It’s redefined a Neutrosophic notion if the 499
Table (3) holds. 500
Example 3.28. Referred to the Example (3.6), assume a Neutrosophic 501
SuperHyperGraph (SHG) S is a pair S = (V, E) in the mentioned Neutrosophic Figures 502
in every Neutrosophic items. 503
SuperHyperGraph (SHG), is up in the illustration of the Table (4). 505
Table 4. The Values of Vertices, SuperVertices, Edges, HyperEdges, and SuperHyper-

Edges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph
Vi (TVi , IVi , FVi ) Ei (TEi , IEi , FEi )
V1 (0.13, 0.13, 0.13) E1 (0, 0, 0)
V2 (0.13, 0.13, 0.13) E2 (0.13, 0.13, 0.13)
V3 (0.15, 0.15, 0.15) E3 (0, 0, 0)
V4 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14) E4 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14)

V1 (0.13, 0.13, 0.13) E1 (0, 0, 0)
V2 (0.03, 0.03, 0.03) E2 (0, 0, 0)
V3 (0.15, 0.15, 0.15) E3 (0, 0, 0)
V4 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14) E4 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14)

V1 (0.13, 0.13, 0.13) E1 (0, 0, 0)
V2 (0.11, 0.11, 0.11) E2 (0, 0, 0)
V3 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14) E3 (0, 0, 0)
- - E4 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14)

V1 (0.13, 0.13, 0.13) E1 (0.08, 0.08, 0.08)
V2 (0.11, 0.11, 0.11) E2 (0.15, 0.15, 0.15)
V3 (0.05, 0.05, 0.05) E3 (0, 0, 0)
V4 (0.12, 0.12, 0.12) E4 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14)
{F } (0.06, 0.06, 0.06) E5 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14)
{H} (0.08, 0.08, 0.08) - -
{N } (0.14, 0.14, 0.14) - -
{O} (0.15, 0.15, 0.15) - -
Figure 29. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite Neutrosophic Associated to the

Neutrosophic Notions in the Neutrosophic Example (4.2)
4 Main Resultant 512
Definition 4.1. (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperResolving 513
Sequence). 514
Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Consider a 515
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then V 0 is called Neutrosophic 516
SuperHyperResolving Sequence if the following expressions, terms and statements is called 517
Neutrosophic SuperHyperResolving Sequence criteria holds. 518
X X X
|( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 Vi ∈V 0 Vi ∈V 0
X X X
= min
00 ⊆V
|{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V N SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
∀Vb , Vc ∈ VN SHG \ V , ∃Va ∈ V 00 :

00
d(TV (Va , Vb )) 6= d(TV (Va , Vc )),

d(IV (Va , Vb )) 6= d(IV (Va , Vc )),
and d(FV (Va , Vb )) 6= d(FV (Va , Vc )),
then Vb , Vc ∈ V 00 , until V 00 = VN SHG }
Example 4.2. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite (SHG) S is a pair 519
S = (V, E) in the mentioned Neutrosophic Figures in every Neutrosophic items. 520
SuperHyperMultipartite (SHG), is up in the illustration of the Table (8). 522
Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). 523
Assume SuperHyperPart {Vi }7i=1 and non-SuperHyperPart {Vi }12

i=7 . Consider a 524






Figure 36. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle Neutrosophic Associated to the Neutro-








Edges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {Vi=1 }. Then V 0 is called Neutrosophic 525
SuperHyperResolving Sequence since the following expressions, terms and statements is 526
called Neutrosophic SuperHyperResolving Sequence criteria holds. 527
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1 }
X X
I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1 } Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1 }
= (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) =

X X X
= 00 max |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00
Vi=1 ∈ V = {Vi=1 }, ∃Vj,j 0 =2,9,j6=j 0 ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 :
d(TV (Vi , Vj )) = 1(2) 6= 2(1) = d(TV (Vi , Vj 0 )),
d(IV (Vi , Vj )) = 1(2) 6= 2(1) = d(IV (Vi , Vj 0 )),
and d(FV (Vi , Vj )) = 1(2) 6= 2(1) = d(FV (Vi , Vj 0 )),
then Vj=2,9 ∈ V 00 , but V 00 6= VN SHG
Vi=9 ∈ V 00 = {V1−2,9 }, ∃Vj,j 0 =3,4,j6=j 0 ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 :
d(TV (Vi , Vj )) = 1(2) 6= 2(1) = d(TV (Vi , Vj 0 )),
d(IV (Vi , Vj )) = 1(2) 6= 2(1) = d(IV (Vi , Vj 0 )),
d(TV (Vi , Vj )) = 1(2) 6= 2(1) = d(TV (Vi , Vj 0 )),

V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
d(IV (Vi , Vj )) = 1(2) 6= 2(1) = d(IV (Vi , Vj 0 )),

Vi=1 ∈ V 00 = {V1−5,8−9 }, ∃Vj,j 0 =6,10,j6=j 0 ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 :
d(TV (Vi , Vj )) = 1(2) 6= 2(1) = d(TV (Vi , Vj 0 )),
d(IV (Vi , Vj )) = 1(2) 6= 2(1) = d(IV (Vi , Vj 0 )),
Vi=4 ∈ V 00 = {V1−6,8−10 }, ∃Vj,j 0 =7,11,j6=j 0 ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 :
d(TV (Vi , Vj )) = 1(2) 6= 2(1) = d(TV (Vi , Vj 0 )),
d(IV (Vi , Vj )) = 1(2) 6= 2(1) = d(IV (Vi , Vj 0 )),
Vi=1 ∈ V 00 = {V1−11 }, ∃Vj,j 0 =1,12,j6=j 0 ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 :
d(TV (Vi , Vj )) = 0(1) 6= 1(0) = d(TV (Vi , Vj 0 )),
d(IV (Vi , Vj )) = 0(1) 6= 1(0) = d(IV (Vi , Vj 0 )),
then Vj=12 ∈ V 00 , then V 00 = VN SHG }
Assume SuperHyperPart {Vi }7i=1 and non-SuperHyperPart {Vi }12 i=7 . Consider a 531
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {Vi=1,2 }. Then V 0 is called Neutrosophic 532
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1,2 }
X X
I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1,2 } Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1,2 }
= (0.5, 0.5, 0.5) =

X X X
= max
00 ⊆V
|{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V N SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
Vi=1 ∈ V 00 = {V1,2 }, ∃Vj,j 0 =12,9,j6=j 0 ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 :

d(TV (Vi , Vj )) = 1(2) 6= 2(1) = d(TV (Vi , Vj 0 )),
d(IV (Vi , Vj )) = 1(2) 6= 2(1) = d(IV (Vi , Vj 0 )),
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)

Vi=9 ∈ V 00 = {V1−2,9,12 }, ∃Vj,j 0 =3,4,j6=j 0 ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 :
d(TV (Vi , Vj )) = 1(2) 6= 2(1) = d(TV (Vi , Vj 0 )),
d(IV (Vi , Vj )) = 1(2) 6= 2(1) = d(IV (Vi , Vj 0 )),
d(TV (Vi , Vj )) = 1(2) 6= 2(1) = d(TV (Vi , Vj 0 )),
d(IV (Vi , Vj )) = 1(2) 6= 2(1) = d(IV (Vi , Vj 0 )),
Vi=1 ∈ V 00 = {V1−5,8−9,12 }, ∃Vj,j 0 =6,10,j6=j 0 ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 :
d(TV (Vi , Vj )) = 1(2) 6= 2(1) = d(TV (Vi , Vj 0 )),
d(IV (Vi , Vj )) = 1(2) 6= 2(1) = d(IV (Vi , Vj 0 )),
d(TV (Vi , Vj )) = 1(2) 6= 2(1) = d(TV (Vi , Vj 0 )),
d(IV (Vi , Vj )) = 1(2) 6= 2(1) = d(IV (Vi , Vj 0 )),
then Vj=7,11 ∈ V 00 , then V 00 = VN SHG }
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {Vi=1−3 }. Then V 0 is called Neutrosophic 539
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−3 }
X X
I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−3 } Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−3 }
= (0.74, 0.74, 0.74) =
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
X X X
= max
00 ⊆V
|{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V N SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
Vi=1 ∈ V 00 = {V1−3 }, ∃Vj,j 0 =12,9,j6=j 0 ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 :

d(TV (Vi , Vj )) = 1(2) 6= 2(1) = d(TV (Vi , Vj 0 )),
d(IV (Vi , Vj )) = 1(2) 6= 2(1) = d(IV (Vi , Vj 0 )),
d(TV (Vi , Vj )) = 1(2) 6= 2(1) = d(TV (Vi , Vj 0 )),
d(IV (Vi , Vj )) = 1(2) 6= 2(1) = d(IV (Vi , Vj 0 )),
d(TV (Vi , Vj )) = 1(2) 6= 2(1) = d(TV (Vi , Vj 0 )),
d(IV (Vi , Vj )) = 1(2) 6= 2(1) = d(IV (Vi , Vj 0 )),
d(TV (Vi , Vj )) = 1(2) 6= 2(1) = d(TV (Vi , Vj 0 )),
d(IV (Vi , Vj )) = 1(2) 6= 2(1) = d(IV (Vi , Vj 0 )),
d(TV (Vi , Vj )) = 1(2) 6= 2(1) = d(TV (Vi , Vj 0 )),
d(IV (Vi , Vj )) = 1(2) 6= 2(1) = d(IV (Vi , Vj 0 )),
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {Vi=1−3,5 }. Then V 0 is called Neutrosophic 546
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
V6 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−3,5 }
X X
I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={V 0 ={V
i=1−3,5 } Vi ∈V i=1−3,5 }
= (0.98, 0.98, 0.98) =

X X X
= 00 max |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00
Vi=1 ∈ V = {V1−3,5 }, ∃Vj,j 0 =12,9,j6=j 0 ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 :
d(TV (Vi , Vj )) = 1(2) 6= 2(1) = d(TV (Vi , Vj 0 )),
d(IV (Vi , Vj )) = 1(2) 6= 2(1) = d(IV (Vi , Vj 0 )),
Vi=9 ∈ V 00 = {V1−3,5,9,12 }, ∃Vj,j 0 =4,8,j6=j 0 ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 :
d(TV (Vi , Vj )) = 1(2) 6= 2(1) = d(TV (Vi , Vj 0 )),
d(IV (Vi , Vj )) = 1(2) 6= 2(1) = d(IV (Vi , Vj 0 )),
d(TV (Vi , Vj )) = 1(2) 6= 2(1) = d(TV (Vi , Vj 0 )),
d(IV (Vi , Vj )) = 1(2) 6= 2(1) = d(IV (Vi , Vj 0 )),
d(TV (Vi , Vj )) = 1(2) 6= 2(1) = d(TV (Vi , Vj 0 )),
d(IV (Vi , Vj )) = 1(2) 6= 2(1) = d(IV (Vi , Vj 0 )),
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {Vi=1−3,5,6 }. Then V 0 is called Neutrosophic 553
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
V6 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V7 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−3,5,6 }
X X
I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={V 0 ={V
i=1−3,5,6 } Vi ∈V i=1−3,5,6 }
= (1.22, 1.22, 1.22) =

X X X
= 00 max |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00
Vi=1 ∈ V = {V1−3,5,6 }, ∃Vj,j 0 =12,9,j6=j 0 ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 :
d(TV (Vi , Vj )) = 1(2) 6= 2(1) = d(TV (Vi , Vj 0 )),
d(IV (Vi , Vj )) = 1(2) 6= 2(1) = d(IV (Vi , Vj 0 )),
Vi=9 ∈ V 00 = {V1−3,5,6,9,12 }, ∃Vj,j 0 =4,8,j6=j 0 ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 :
d(TV (Vi , Vj )) = 1(2) 6= 2(1) = d(TV (Vi , Vj 0 )),
d(IV (Vi , Vj )) = 1(2) 6= 2(1) = d(IV (Vi , Vj 0 )),
Vi=1 ∈ V 00 = {V1−5,6,8−9,12 }, ∃Vj,j 0 =6,10,j6=j 0 ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 :
d(TV (Vi , Vj )) = 1(2) 6= 2(1) = d(TV (Vi , Vj 0 )),
d(IV (Vi , Vj )) = 1(2) 6= 2(1) = d(IV (Vi , Vj 0 )),
d(TV (Vi , Vj )) = 1(2) 6= 2(1) = d(TV (Vi , Vj 0 )),
d(IV (Vi , Vj )) = 1(2) 6= 2(1) = d(IV (Vi , Vj 0 )),
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {Vi=1−3,5−7 }. Then V 0 is called Neutrosophic 560
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
V6 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V7 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−3,5−7 }
X X
I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−3,5−7 } Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−3,5−7 }
= (1.46, 1.46, 1.46) =

X X X
= 00 max |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00
Vi=1 ∈ V = {V1−3,5−7 }, ∃Vj,j 0 =12,9,j6=j 0 ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 :
d(TV (Vi , Vj )) = 1(2) 6= 2(1) = d(TV (Vi , Vj 0 )),
d(IV (Vi , Vj )) = 1(2) 6= 2(1) = d(IV (Vi , Vj 0 )),
Vi=9 ∈ V 00 = {V1−3,5−7,9,12 }, ∃Vj,j 0 =4,8,j6=j 0 ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 :
d(TV (Vi , Vj )) = 1(2) 6= 2(1) = d(TV (Vi , Vj 0 )),
d(IV (Vi , Vj )) = 1(2) 6= 2(1) = d(IV (Vi , Vj 0 )),
d(TV (Vi , Vj )) = 1(2) 6= 2(1) = d(TV (Vi , Vj 0 )),
d(IV (Vi , Vj )) = 1(2) 6= 2(1) = d(IV (Vi , Vj 0 )),
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {Vi=1−12 }. Then V 0 is called Neutrosophic 567
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−12 }
X X
I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−12 } Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−12 }
= (2.92, 2.92, 2.92) =
Edges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) Eii=37 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
X X X
= max
00 ⊆V
|{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V N SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
then Vj=1−12 ∈ V , then V 00 = VN SHG }

00
Example 4.3. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle (SHG) S is a pair S = (V, E) 570
in the mentioned Neutrosophic Figures in every Neutrosophic items. 571
SuperHyperCycle (SHG), is up in the illustration of the Table (15). 573
Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Assume 574
SuperHyperExternal {Vi }7i=1 and non-SuperHyperInternal {Vi }34 i=8 . Consider a 575
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {Vi6=11,8,12,16 }. Then V 0 is called Neutrosophic 576
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi6=11,8,12,16 }
X X
I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi6=11,8,12,16 } Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi6=11,8,12,16 }
= (7.8, 7.8, 7.8) =

X X X
= max
00 ⊆V
|{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V N SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
Vi=1 ∈ V 00 = {Vi6=11,8,12,16 }, ∃Vj,j 0 =11,8,12,16 ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 :

d(TV (Vi , Vj )) = a 6= a + b = d(TV (Vi , Vj 0 )),
d(IV (Vi , Vj )) = a 6= a + b = d(IV (Vi , Vj 0 )),
and d(FV (Vi , Vj )) = a 6= a + b = d(FV (Vi , Vj 0 )),
then Vj=11,8,12,16 ∈ V 00 , then V 00 = VN SHG };
X X X
= 00 max |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00
Vi=1 ∈ V = {Vi6=11,8,12,16 }, ∃Vj,j 0 =11,8,j6=j 0 ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 :
d(TV (Vi , Vj )) = 1(2) 6= 2(1) = d(TV (Vi , Vj 0 )),
d(IV (Vi , Vj )) = 1(2) 6= 2(1) = d(IV (Vi , Vj 0 )),
then Vj=11,8 ∈ V 00 , but V 00 6= VN SHG ;
Vi=1 ∈ V 00 = {Vi6=12,16 }, ∃Vj,j 0 =12,16,j6=j 0 ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 :
d(TV (Vi , Vj )) = 3(4) 6= 4(3) = d(TV (Vi , Vj 0 )),
d(IV (Vi , Vj )) = 3(4) 6= 4(3)) = d(IV (Vi , Vj 0 )),
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) Eii=37 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
then Vj=12,16 ∈ V 00 , then V 00 = VN SHG .}
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {Vi6=8,12,16 }. Then V 0 is called Neutrosophic 583
X X X
|( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi6=8,12,16 } Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi6=8,12,16 } Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi6=8,12,16 }
= (8.04, 8.04, 8.04) =

X X X
= 00 max |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00
Vi=1 ∈ V = {Vi6=8,12,16 }, ∃Vj,j 0 =8,12,16 ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 :
then Vj=11,8,12,16 ∈ V 00 , then V 00 = VN SHG };
X X X
= 00 max |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00
Vi=1 ∈ V = {Vi6=8,12,16 }, ∃Vj,j 0 =11,8,j6=j 0 ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 :
d(TV (Vi , Vj )) = 1(2) 6= 2(1) = d(TV (Vi , Vj 0 )),
d(IV (Vi , Vj )) = 1(2) 6= 2(1) = d(IV (Vi , Vj 0 )),
then Vj=11,8 ∈ V 00 , but V 00 6= VN SHG ;
Vi=1 ∈ V 00 = {Vi6=12,16 }, ∃Vj,j 0 =12,16,j6=j 0 ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 :
d(TV (Vi , Vj )) = 3(4) 6= 4(3) = d(TV (Vi , Vj 0 )),
d(IV (Vi , Vj )) = 3(4) 6= 4(3)) = d(IV (Vi , Vj 0 )),
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {Vi6=3,16 }. Then V 0 is called Neutrosophic 590
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) Eii=37 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) Eii=37 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V7 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
X X X
|( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi6=3,16 } Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi6=3,16 } Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi6=3,16 }
= (8.28, 8.28, 8.28) =

X X X
= 00 max |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00
Vi=1 ∈ V = {Vi6=3,16 }, ∃Vj,j 0 =3,16 ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 :
then Vj=3,16 ∈ V 00 , then V 00 = VN SHG };
X X X
= 00 max |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00
Vi=1 ∈ V = {Vi6=3,16 }, ∃Vj,j 0 =3,16,j6=j 0 ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 :
d(TV (Vi , Vj )) = 2(4) 6= 4(2) = d(TV (Vi , Vj 0 )),
d(IV (Vi , Vj )) = 2(4) 6= 4(2)) = d(IV (Vi , Vj 0 )),
X X X
|( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) Eii=37 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V7 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
= (8.28, 8.28, 8.28) =

X X X
= 00 max |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00
X X X
= 00 max |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00
Vi=1 ∈ V = {Vi6=3,5 }, ∃V j,j 0 =3,5,j6=j 0 ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 :
d(TV (Vi , Vj )) = 2(4) 6= 4(2) = d(TV (Vi , Vj 0 )),
d(IV (Vi , Vj )) = 2(4) 6= 4(2)) = d(IV (Vi , Vj 0 )),
X X X
|( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
= (8.28, 8.28, 8.28) =

X X X
= 00 max |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00
X X X
= 00 max |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) Eii=37 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V5 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
V6 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V7 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
d(TV (Vi , Vj )) = 2(4) 6= 4(2) = d(TV (Vi , Vj 0 )),

d(IV (Vi , Vj )) = 2(4) 6= 4(2)) = d(IV (Vi , Vj 0 )),
Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Let a 609
Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Assume 610
X X X
|( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
= (8.28, 8.28, 8.28) =

X X X
= 00 max |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00
X X X
= 00 max |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00
d(TV (Vi , Vj )) = 2(3) 6= 3(2) = d(TV (Vi , Vj 0 )),
d(IV (Vi , Vj )) = 2(3) 6= 3(2)) = d(IV (Vi , Vj 0 )),
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {Vi6=12,22,27 }. Then V 0 is called Neutrosophic 619
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) Eii=37 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V5 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
V6 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V7 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi6=12,22,27 }
X X
I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi6=12,22,27 } Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi6=12,22,27 }
= (7.44, 7.44, 7.44) =

X X X
= 00 max |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00
Vi=1 ∈ V = {Vi6=12,22,27 }, ∃Vj,j 0 =12,22,j6=j 0 ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 :
d(TV (Vi , Vj )) = 3(5) 6= 5(3) = d(TV (Vi , Vj 0 )),
d(IV (Vi , Vj )) = 3(5) 6= 5(3)) = d(IV (Vi , Vj 0 )),
then Vj=12,22 ∈ V 00 , but V 00 6= VN SHG ,
Vi=1 ∈ V 00 = {Vi6=27 }, ∃Vj,j 0 =27,j6=j 0 ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 :
then Vj=27 ∈ V 00 , then V 00 = VN SHG .}
5 Main Result 622
Theorem 5.1. (Main Result and Main Theorem). 623
Assume every Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite has the letter z. The notion on 624
the Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite and Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle don’t 625
coincide. 626
Proof. 627
(i). Let 628
P :
V1Pi , E1 ,
P
V1 j , E2
629
P :
V1Pi , E1 ,
P
V1 j , E2
be a longest path taken a connected Extreme SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E). 630
There’s a new way to redefine as 631
ViEXT ERN AL ∼ VjEXT ERN AL ≡
∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL ∈ Ez ≡

∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , {ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL } ⊆ Ez .
The term “EXTERNAL” implies |N (ViEXT ERN AL )| ≥ |N (Vj )| where Vj is 632
corresponded to ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of Neutrosophic SuperHyperResolving 633
Sequence. The latter is straightforward. 634
(ii). Let 635
P :
ViEXT ERN AL , Ei∗ ,
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1
636
P :
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1
is a longest SuperHyperResolving Sequence taken from a connected Extreme 637
SuperHyperCycle ESHC : (V, E). There’s a new way to redefine as 638

Sequence. The latter is straightforward. Then there’s at least one Neutrosophic 641
SuperHyperResolving Sequence. Thus the notion of quasi isn’t up and the 642
SuperHyperNotions based on Neutrosophic SuperHyperResolving Sequence could be applied. 643
The unique embedded Neutrosophic SuperHyperResolving Sequence proposes some longest 644
Neutrosophic SuperHyperResolving Sequence excerpt from some representatives. The latter is 645
straightforward. 646
Proposition 5.2. Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM be a pair

S = (V, E). Assume every Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex has the letter z. The
Neutrosophic SuperHyperResolving Sequence set is as follows.
{V1Pi , V2Pi }, V3Pi , . . . , V|P

Pi
i|
. 647
Proof. Let 648
P :
V1Pi , E1 ,
P
V1 j , E2
649
P :
V1Pi , E1 ,
P
V1 j , E2

Proposition 5.3. Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM be a pair

Neutrosophic SuperHyperResolving Sequence number is as follows.
|Pi | × 0.26.
Proof. Let 655
P :
V1Pi , E1 ,
P
V1 j , E2
656
P :
V1Pi , E1 ,
P
V1 j , E2

Proposition 5.4. Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle (ESHC) S be a pair 662
S = (V, E). Assume every Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex has the letter z. The 663
Neutrosophic SuperHyperResolving Sequence set is as follows. 664
{
ViIN T ERN AL ,
IN T ERN AL
Vi+1 ,...
IN T ERN AL
V|E i|
Proof. Let 665
P :

EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1
666
P :
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1

Proposition 5.5. Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle (ESHC) S be a pair

Neutrosophic SuperHyperResolving Sequence number is as follows.
|Ei | × 0.26.
Proof. Let 677
P :
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1
678
P :
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1

Definition 5.6. (Uniform Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite and Uniform 689
Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle). 690
(i). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Every 691
pair of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices has the same maximum letter, i.e., 692
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices mutually has the same maximum letter. A 693
Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E) is called 694
Uniform Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite. 695
(ii). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Every pair of 696
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices has the same maximum letter, i.e., 697
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices mutually has the same maximum letter. A 698
Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E) is called Uniform 699
Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle. 700
Proposition 5.7. Let an Uniform Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM be a

pair S = (V, E). The Neutrosophic SuperHyperResolving Sequence set is as follows.
{V1Pi , V2Pi }, V3Pi , . . . , V|P

Pi
i|
. 701
Proof. Let 702
P :
V1Pi , E1 ,
P
V1 j , E2
703
P :
V1Pi , E1 ,
P
V1 j , E2

Proposition 5.8. Let an Uniform Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM be a

pair S = (V, E). The Neutrosophic SuperHyperResolving Sequence number is as follows.
|Pi | × 0.26.
Proof. Let 709
P :
V1Pi , E1 ,
P
V1 j , E2
710
P :
V1Pi , E1 ,
P
V1 j , E2

Proposition 5.9. Let an Uniform Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle (ESHC) S be a pair 716
S = (V, E). The Neutrosophic SuperHyperResolving Sequence set is as follows. 717
{
ViIN T ERN AL ,
IN T ERN AL
Vi+1 ,...
IN T ERN AL
V|E i|
Proof. Let 718
P :
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1
719
P :
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1

Proposition 5.10. Let an Uniform Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle (ESHC) S be a

pair S = (V, E). The Neutrosophic SuperHyperResolving Sequence number is as follows.
|Ei | × 0.26.
Proof. Let 730
P :
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1
731
P :
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1

Proposition 5.11. (Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite and Neutrosophic 742
SuperHyperCycle). 743
(i). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). 744
Assume two Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, from different SuperHyperParts, 745
have the maximum letter. Then the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices don’t have 746
the same maximum letter, are in every Neutrosophic SuperHyperResolving Sequence set. 747
(ii). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Assume every 748
Neutrosophic EXTERNAL SuperHyperVertices with distance two have the 749
maximum letter. Then the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices don’t have the same 750
maximum letter, are in every Neutrosophic SuperHyperResolving Sequence set. 751
Proof. 752
(i). Let 753
P :
V1Pi , E1 ,
P
V1 j , E2
754
P :
V1Pi , E1 ,
P
V1 j , E2

(ii). Let 760
P :
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1
761
P :
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1

Proposition 5.12. (Embedded Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar and Embedded 772
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar). 773
(i). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Then 774
two Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, from different SuperHyperParts, is in every 775
Neutrosophic SuperHyperResolving Sequence set. 776
(ii). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Then every 777
Neutrosophic EXTERNAL SuperHyperVertices with distance two is in every 778
Neutrosophic SuperHyperResolving Sequence set. 779
Proof. 780
(i). Let 781
P :
V1Pi , E1 ,
P
V1 j , E2
782
P :
V1Pi , E1 ,
P
V1 j , E2

(ii). Let 788
P :
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1
789
P :
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1

6 Neutrosophic Applications in Cancer’s 800
Neutrosophic Recognition 801
The cancer is the Neutrosophic disease but the Neutrosophic model is going to figure 802
out what’s going on this Neutrosophic phenomenon. The special Neutrosophic case of 803
Edges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite
this Neutrosophic disease is considered and as the consequences of the model, some 804
parameters are used. The cells are under attack of this disease but the moves of the 805
cancer in the special region are the matter of mind. The Neutrosophic recognition of the 806
cancer could help to find some Neutrosophic treatments for this Neutrosophic disease. 807
In the following, some Neutrosophic steps are Neutrosophic devised on this disease. 808
Step 1. (Neutrosophic Definition) The Neutrosophic recognition of the cancer in 809
the long-term Neutrosophic function. 810
Step 2. (Neutrosophic Issue) The specific region has been assigned by the 811
Neutrosophic model [it’s called Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph] and the long 812
Neutrosophic cycle of the move from the cancer is identified by this research. 813
Sometimes the move of the cancer hasn’t be easily identified since there are some 814
determinacy, indeterminacy and neutrality about the moves and the effects of the 815
cancer on that region; this event leads us to choose another model [it’s said to be 816
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph] to have convenient perception on what’s 817
happened and what’s done. 818
Step 3. (Neutrosophic Model) There are some specific Neutrosophic models, 819
which are well-known and they’ve got the names, and some general Neutrosophic 820
models. The moves and the Neutrosophic traces of the cancer on the complex 821
tracks and between complicated groups of cells could be fantasized by a 822
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath(-/SuperHyperResolving Sequence, SuperHyperStar, 823
SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, SuperHyperWheel). The aim is to 824
find either the Neutrosophic SuperHyperResolving Sequence or the Neutrosophic 825
SuperHyperResolving Sequence in those Neutrosophic Neutrosophic SuperHyperModels. 826
7 Case 1: The Initial Neutrosophic Steps 827
Toward Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite as 828
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel 829
Step 4. (Neutrosophic Solution) In the Neutrosophic Figure (43), the 830
Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite is Neutrosophic highlighted and Neutrosophic 831
featured. 832
By using the Neutrosophic Figure (43) and the Table (22), the Neutrosophic 833
SuperHyperBipartite is obtained. 834
The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Neutrosophic Algorithm in 835
previous Neutrosophic result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the 836
connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic 837
SuperHyperModel (43), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperResolving Sequence. 838
Figure 43. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite Associated to the Notions of Neutro-

sophic SuperHyperResolving Sequence
8 Case 2: The Increasing Neutrosophic Steps 839
Toward Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite as 840
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel 841
Step 4. (Neutrosophic Solution) In the Neutrosophic Figure (44), the 842
Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite is Neutrosophic highlighted and 843
Neutrosophic featured. 844
By using the Neutrosophic Figure (44) and the Table (23), the Neutrosophic 845
SuperHyperMultipartite is obtained. 846
The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Neutrosophic Algorithm in 847
previous result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected 848
Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic 849
SuperHyperModel (44), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperResolving Sequence. 850
9 Wondering Open Problems But As The 851
Directions To Forming The Motivations 852
In what follows, some “problems” and some “questions” are proposed. 853
The SuperHyperResolving Sequence and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperResolving Sequence are 854
defined on a real-world application, titled “Cancer’s Recognitions”. 855
Figure 44. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite Associated to the Notions of

Neutrosophic SuperHyperResolving Sequence
Question 9.1. Which the else SuperHyperModels could be defined based on Cancer’s 856
recognitions? 857
Question 9.2. Are there some SuperHyperNotions related to SuperHyperResolving Sequence 858
and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperResolving Sequence? 859
Question 9.3. Are there some Algorithms to be defined on the SuperHyperModels to 860
compute them? 861
Question 9.4. Which the SuperHyperNotions are related to beyond the 862
SuperHyperResolving Sequence and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperResolving Sequence? 863
Problem 9.5. The SuperHyperResolving Sequence and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperResolving 864
do a SuperHyperModel for the Cancer’s recognitions and they’re based on

Sequence 865
SuperHyperResolving Sequence, are there else? 866
Problem 9.6. Which the fundamental SuperHyperNumbers are related to these 867
SuperHyperNumbers types-results? 868
Problem 9.7. What’s the independent research based on Cancer’s recognitions 869
concerning the multiple types of SuperHyperNotions? 870
10 Conclusion and Closing Remarks 871
In this section, closing and concluding remarks are presented. The drawbacks of this 872
scientific research are shown. Some advantages and disadvantages of this scientific 873
research are highlighted. 874
This scientific research uses some approaches to further understand the Neutrosophic 875
SuperHyperGraphs. In this effort, two SuperHyperNotions are defined on the Resolving 876
Sequence. For this reason, in the second definition, the original definition of the 877
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph is redefined on the position of the alphabets. Based on 878
the new Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph definition, the new SuperHyperNotion, 879
Neutrosophic Resolving Sequence, finds a suitable background to implement some 880
results on. Some SuperHyperClasses and some Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses are the 881
subjects of this scientific research on modeling areas that are subject to cancer attacks 882
in order to recognize this disease as mentioned under the title “Cancer Diagnosis”. To 883
formalize the SuperHyperNotion, Resolving Sequence, SuperHyperClasses and new 884
SuperHyperClasses instances are introduced. Some general results are summarized in 885
the Resolving Sequence and Neutrosophic Resolving Sequence sections. Clarifications, 886
examples, and literature reviews go all the way. In this scientific research, the literature 887
review has met the lines containing concepts and results. SuperHyperGraph and 888
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph are super-hypermodels in “cancer diagnosis” and both 889
are the foundation of the background of this scientific research. Sometimes cancer has 890
occurred in an area full of cells, cell groups, and embedded styles. In this section, 891
SuperHyperModel proposes SuperHyperNotions, formally called “Resolving Sequence”, 892
based on the connections of Cancer’s movements in the longest and strongest styles with 893
the formation of design and architecture, in terms of terms and whispering words. . The 894
“SuperHyper” prefix refers to the topic of embedded styles to explore the background of 895
SuperHyperNotions. In the table (24), the advantages and ways of this scientific
Table 24. A look at this scientific research and beyond

Advantages Limitations
1. Redefining the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 1. General Results
2. Resolving Sequence
3. Neutrosophic Resolving Sequence 2. Other SuperHyperNumbers
4. modeling cancer diagnoses
5. SuperHyperClasses 3. SuperHyperFamilies
896
research are specified, pointed out and expressed. 897
11 Background 898
There are some scientific researches covering the topic of this scientific research. In what 899
follows, there are some discussion and literature reviews about them. 900
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “New Ideas In Recognition of 901
Cancer And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph As Hyper Tool On Super Toot” in Ref. [1] 902
by Henry Garrett (2023). In this research article, a novel approach is implemented on 903
SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on general forms with 904
introducing used neutrosophic classes of neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. It’s published 905
in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled “Current Trends in Mass Communication 906
(CTMC)” with ISO abbreviation “Curr Trends Mass Comm” in volume 2 and issue 1 907
with pages 32-55. 908
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “Some Super Hyper Degrees 909
and Co-Super Hyper Degrees on Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs And Super Hyper 910
Graphs Alongside Applications in Cancer’s Treatments” in Ref. [2] by Henry Garrett 911
(2023). In this research article, a novel approach is implemented on SuperHyperGraph 912
and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on fundamental notions and using vital tools 913
in Cancer’s Treatments. It’s published in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled 914
“Journal of Mathematical Techniques and Computational Mathematics(JMTCM)” with 915
ISO abbreviation “J Math Techniques Comput Math” in volume 2 and issue 1 with 916
pages 35-47. The research article studies deeply with choosing directly neutrosophic 917
SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough toward independent 918
results based on initial background and fundamental SuperHyperNumbers. 919
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “A Research on Cancer’s 920
Recognition and Neutrosophic Super Hypergraph by Eulerian Super Hyper Cycles and 921
Hamiltonian Sets as Hyper Covering Versus Super separations” in Ref. [3] by Henry 922
Garrett (2023). In this research article, a novel approach is implemented on 923
SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on fundamental notions 924
and using vital tools in Cancer’s Recognition. It’s published in prestigious and fancy 925
journal is entitled “Journal of Mathematical Techniques and Computational 926
Mathematics(JMTCM)” with ISO abbreviation “J Math Techniques Comput Math” in 927
volume 2 and issue 3 with pages 136-148. The research article studies deeply with 928
choosing directly neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph. It’s the 929
breakthrough toward independent results based on initial background and fundamental 930
SuperHyperNumbers. 931
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “Neutrosophic 1-Failed 932
SuperHyperForcing in the SuperHyperFunction to Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs 933
on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Beyond ” in Ref. [4] by Henry Garrett (2023). 934
In this research article, a novel approach is implemented on SuperHyperGraph and 935
neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on fundamental SuperHyperNumber and using 936
neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses of neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. It’s published in 937
prestigious and fancy journal is entitled “Journal of Mathematical Techniques and 938
Computational Mathematics(JMTCM)” with ISO abbreviation “J Math Techniques 939
Comput Math” in volume 2 and issue 6 with pages 221-307. The research article studies 940
deeply with choosing directly neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph. 941
It’s the breakthrough toward independent results based on initial background and 942
fundamental SuperHyperNumbers. The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is 943
titled “New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph by 944
Initial Eulerian-Path-Cut as Hyper Initial Eulogy on Super Initial EULA” in Ref. [5] by 945
Henry Garrett (2023). In this research article, a novel approach is implemented on 946
SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on fundamental 947
SuperHyperNumber and using neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses of neutrosophic 948
SuperHyperGraph. It’s published in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled 949
“International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Research” with ISO 950
abbreviation “IJPAMR” in volume 3 and issue 2 with pages 60-88 and doi: 951
10.51483/IJPAMR.3.2.2023.60-88. The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is 952
titled “New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graph by 953
Eulerian-Path-Cut as Hyper Eulogy-Path-Cut on Super EULA-Path-Cut” in Ref. [6] by 954
SuperHyperGraph. It’s published in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled 958
“International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Research” with ISO 959
abbreviation “IJPAMR” in volume 3 and issue 2 with pages 102-124 and doi: 960
10.51483/IJPAMR.3.2.2023.102-124. The research article studies deeply with choosing 961
directly neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough 962
toward independent results based on initial background and fundamental 963
SuperHyperNumbers. The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “Super 964
Hyper Resolving and Super Hyper Resolving on Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs and 965
Their Directions in Game Theory and Neutrosophic Super Hyper Classes” in Ref. [7] by 966
SuperHyperGraph. It’s published in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled “Journal 970
of Mathematical Techniques and Computational Mathematics(JMTCM)” with ISO 971
abbreviation “J Math Techniques Comput Math” in volume 1 and issue 3 with pages 972
242-263. The research article studies deeply with choosing directly neutrosophic 973
SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough toward independent 974
results based on initial background and fundamental SuperHyperNumbers. The seminal 975
paper and groundbreaking article is titled “neutrosophic co-degree and neutrosophic 976
degree alongside chromatic numbers in the setting of some classes related to neutrosophic 977
hypergraphs” in Ref. [8] by Henry Garrett (2023). In this research article, a novel 978
approach is implemented on SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 979
based on general forms without using neutrosophic classes of neutrosophic 980
SuperHyperGraph. It’s published in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled “Journal 981
of Current Trends in Computer Science Research (JCTCSR)” with ISO abbreviation “J 982
Curr Trends Comp Sci Res” in volume 2 and issue 1 with pages 16-24. The research 983
article studies deeply with choosing neutrosophic hypergraphs instead of neutrosophic 984
SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough toward independent results based on initial 985
background. The research article studies deeply with choosing neutrosophic 986
hypergraphs instead of neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough toward 987
independent results based on initial background. In some articles are titled “0039 — 988
Closing Numbers and Super-Closing Numbers as (Dual)Resolving and (Dual)Coloring 989
alongside (Dual)Resolving in (Neutrosophic)n-SuperHyperGraph” in Ref. [9] by Henry 990
Garrett (2022), “0049 — (Failed)1-Zero-Forcing Number in Neutrosophic Graphs” in 991
Ref. [10] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Extreme SuperHyperClique as the Firm Scheme of 992
Confrontation under Cancer’s Recognition as the Model in The Setting of 993
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [11] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Uncertainty 994
On The Act And Effect Of Cancer Alongside The Foggy Positions Of Cells Toward 995
Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique inside Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Titled 996
Cancer’s Recognition” in Ref. [12] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic Version Of 997
Separates Groups Of Cells In Cancer’s Recognition On Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” 998
in Ref. [13] by Henry Garrett (2022), “The Shift Paradigm To Classify Separately The 999
Cells and Affected Cells Toward The Totality Under Cancer’s Recognition By New 1000
Multiple Definitions On the Sets Polynomials Alongside Numbers In The (Neutrosophic) 1001
SuperHyperMatching Theory Based on SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic 1002
SuperHyperGraph” in Ref. [14] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Breaking the Continuity and 1003
Uniformity of Cancer In The Worst Case of Full Connections With Extreme Failed 1004
SuperHyperClique In Cancer’s Recognition Applied in (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” 1005
in Ref. [15] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable as the 1006
Survivors on the Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition Based on Uncertainty to All Modes 1007
in Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [16] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Extremism 1008
of the Attacked Body Under the Cancer’s Circumstances Where Cancer’s Recognition 1009
Titled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [17] by Henry Garrett (2022), 1010
“(Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in Cancer’s Recognitions And 1011
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [18] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic 1012
Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on 1013
Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In Special ViewPoints” in Ref. [19] by Henry 1014
Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in the SuperHyperFunction 1015
To Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition And 1016
Beyond ” in Ref. [20] by Henry Garrett (2022), “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperStable on 1017
Cancer’s Recognition by Well- SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs ” 1018
in Ref. [21] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To 1019
Form Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In 1020
Special ViewPoints” in Ref. [17] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Basic Notions on 1021
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperForcing And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling in Cancer’s 1022
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [22] by Henry Garrett 1023
(2022), “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form Neutrosophic 1024
SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In Special ViewPoints” 1025
in Ref. [23] by Henry Garrett (2022),“(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s 1026
Recognitions Featuring (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances” in 1027
Ref. [24] by Henry Garrett (2022), “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperAlliances With 1028
SuperHyperDefensive and SuperHyperOffensive Type-SuperHyperSet On (Neutrosophic) 1029
SuperHyperGraph With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions 1030
And Related (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClasses” in Ref. [25] by Henry Garrett (2022), 1031
“SuperHyperGirth on SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph With 1032
SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions” in Ref. [26] by Henry Garrett (2022), 1033
“Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on Neutrosophic 1034
SuperHyperGraphs and SuperHyperGraphs Alongside Applications in Cancer’s 1035
Treatments” in Ref. [27] by Henry Garrett (2022), “SuperHyperResolving and 1036
SuperHyperResolving on Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs And Their Directions in 1037
Game Theory and Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses” in Ref. [28] by Henry Garrett 1038
(2022), “SuperHyperMatching By (R-)Definitions And Polynomials To Monitor 1039
Cancer’s Recognition In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [221] by Henry 1040
Garrett (2023), “The Focus on The Partitions Obtained By Parallel Moves In The 1041
Cancer’s Extreme Recognition With Different Types of Extreme SuperHyperMatching Set 1042
and Polynomial on (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [222] by Henry Garrett 1043
(2023), “Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique Decides the Failures on the Cancer’s 1044
Recognition in the Perfect Connections of Cancer’s Attacks By SuperHyperModels 1045
Named (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [223] by Henry Garrett (2023), 1046
“Indeterminacy On The All Possible Connections of Cells In Front of Cancer’s Attacks 1047
In The Terms of Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique on Cancer’s Recognition called 1048
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [224] by Henry Garrett (2023), “Perfect 1049
Directions Toward Idealism in Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition Forwarding 1050
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClique on Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [227] by 1051
Henry Garrett (2023), “Demonstrating Complete Connections in Every Embedded 1052
Regions and Sub-Regions in the Terms of Cancer’s Recognition and (Neutrosophic) 1053
SuperHyperGraphs With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClique” in Ref. [228] by Henry 1054
Garrett (2023), “Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic Regions titled 1055
neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable in Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition modeled in 1056
the Form of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [231] by Henry Garrett (2023), 1057
“Using the Tool As (Neutrosophic) Failed SuperHyperStable To SuperHyperModel 1058
Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [234] by Henry 1059
Garrett (2023), “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form Neutrosophic 1060
SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In Special ViewPoints” 1061
in Ref. [235] by Henry Garrett (2023), “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperStable on Cancer’s 1062
Recognition by Well-SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in 1063
Ref. [236] by Henry Garrett (2023), “Neutrosophic 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in the 1064
SuperHyperFunction To Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs on Cancer’s Neutrosophic 1065
Recognition And Beyond ” in Ref. [237] by Henry Garrett (2022), “(Neutrosophic) 1066
1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in Cancer’s Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) 1067
SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [238] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Basic Notions on 1068
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperForcing And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling in Cancer’s 1069
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [239] by Henry Garrett 1070
(2022), “Basic Neutrosophic Notions Concerning SuperHyperResolving and Neutrosophic 1071
SuperHyperResolving in SuperHyperGraph” in Ref. [250] by Henry Garrett (2022), 1072
“Initial Material of Neutrosophic Preliminaries to Study Some Neutrosophic Notions 1073
Based on Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) in Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 1074
(NSHG)” in Ref. [251] by Henry Garrett (2022), and [4–251], there are some endeavors 1075
to formalize the basic SuperHyperNotions about neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph and 1076
SuperHyperGraph alongside scientific research books at [252–386]. Two popular 1077
scientific research books in Scribd in the terms of high readers, 5679 and 6667 1078
respectively, on neutrosophic science is on [387, 388]. 1079
Some scientific studies and scientific researches about neutrosophic graphs, are 1080
proposed as book in Ref. [387] by Henry Garrett (2023) which is indexed by Google 1081
Scholar and has more than 5679 readers in Scribd. It’s titled “Beyond Neutrosophic 1082
Graphs” and published by Dr. Henry Garrett. This research book covers different types 1083
of notions and settings in neutrosophic graph theory and neutrosophic 1084
SuperHyperGraph theory. 1085
Also, some scientific studies and scientific researches about neutrosophic graphs, are 1086
proposed as book in Ref. [388] by Henry Garrett (2023) which is indexed by Google 1087
Scholar and has more than 6667 readers in Scribd. It’s titled “Neutrosophic Duality” 1088
and published by Dr. Henry Garrett. This research book presents different types of 1089
notions SuperHyperResolving and SuperHyperResolving in the setting of duality in 1090
neutrosophic graph theory and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph theory. This research 1091
book has scrutiny on the complement of the intended set and the intended set, 1092
simultaneously. It’s smart to consider a set but acting on its complement that what’s 1093
done in this research book which is popular in the terms of high readers in Scribd. 1094
See the seminal scientific researches [1–3]. The formalization of the notions on the 1095
framework of notions in SuperHyperGraphs, Neutrosophic notions in 1096
SuperHyperGraphs theory, and (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs theory at [4–251] 1097
alongside scientific research books at [252–386]. Two popular scientific research books 1098
in Scribd ,in the terms of high readers, 5679 and 6667 respectively, on neutrosophic 1099
science is on [387, 388]. 1100
References 1101
1. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 1102
SuperHyperGraph As Hyper Tool On Super Toot”, Curr Trends Mass Comm 1103
2(1) (2023) 32-55. (doi: 10.33140/CTMC.02.01.03). 1104
2. Henry Garrett, “Some Super Hyper Degrees and Co-Super Hyper Degrees on 1105
Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs And Super Hyper Graphs Alongside 1106
Applications in Cancer’s Treatments”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 2(1) 1107
(2023) 35-47. (https://www.opastpublishers.com/open-access-articles/some- 1108
super-hyper-degrees-and-cosuper-hyper-degrees-on-neutrosophic-super-hyper- 1109
graphs-and-super-hyper-graphs-alongside-a.pdf) 1110
3. Henry Garrett, “A Research on Cancer’s Recognition and Neutrosophic Super 1111
Hypergraph by Eulerian Super Hyper Cycles and Hamiltonian Sets as Hyper 1112
Covering Versus Super separations”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 2(3) 1113
(2023) 136-148. (https://www.opastpublishers.com/open-access-articles/a- 1114
research-on-cancers-recognition-and-neutrosophic-super-hypergraph-by- 1115
eulerian-super-hyper-cycles-and-hamiltonian-sets-.pdf) 1116
4. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in the 1117
SuperHyperFunction to Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs on Cancer’s 1118
Neutrosophic Recognition and Beyond ”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 2(6) 1119
(2023) 221-307. (https://www.opastpublishers.com/open-access- 1120
articles/neutrosophic-1failed-superhyperforcing-in-the-superhyperfunction-to- 1121
use-neutrosophic-superhypergraphs-on-cancers-neutros.pdf) 1122
5. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic 1123
SuperHyperGraph by Initial Eulerian-Path-Cut as Hyper Initial Eulogy on Super 1124
Initial EULA”, International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics 1125
Research 3(2) (2023) 60-88. (doi: 10.51483/IJPAMR.3.2.2023.60-88). 1126
6. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic Super 1127
Hyper Graph by Eulerian-Path-Cut as Hyper Eulogy-Path-Cut on Super 1128
EULA-Path-Cut”, International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics 1129
Research 3(2) (2023) 102-124. (doi: 10.51483/IJPAMR.3.2.2023.102-124). 1130
7. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic Super 1131
Hyper Graph by Eulerian-Path-Cut as Hyper Eulogy-Path-Cut on Super 1132
EULA-Path-Cut”, J Curr Trends Comp Sci Res 2(1) (2023) 16-24. (doi: 1133
10.33140/JCTCSR.02.01.04) 1134
8. Henry Garrett, “Super Hyper Resolving and Super Hyper Resolving on 1135
Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs and Their Directions in Game Theory and 1136
Neutrosophic Super Hyper Classes”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 1(3) 1137
(2022) 242-263. (doi: 10.33140/JMTCM.01.03.09) 1138
9. Garrett, Henry. “0039 — Closing Numbers and Super-Closing Numbers as 1139
(Dual)Resolving and (Dual)Coloring alongside (Dual)Resolving in 1140
(Neutrosophic)n-SuperHyperGraph.” CERN European Organization for Nuclear 1141
Research - Zenodo, Nov. 2022. CERN European Organization for Nuclear 1142
Research, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6319942. 1143
https://oa.mg/work/10.5281/zenodo.6319942 1144
10. Garrett, Henry. “0049 — (Failed)1-Zero-Forcing Number in Neutrosophic 1145
Graphs.” CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research - Zenodo, Feb. 1146
2022. CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research, 1147
https://doi.org/10.13140/rg.2.2.35241.26724. 1148
https://oa.mg/work/10.13140/rg.2.2.35241.26724 1149
11. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperClique as the Firm Scheme of 1150
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010308 (doi: 1152
10.20944/preprints202301.0308.v1). 1153
12. Henry Garrett, “Uncertainty On The Act And Effect Of Cancer Alongside The 1154
Foggy Positions Of Cells Toward Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique inside 1155
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Titled Cancer’s Recognition”, Preprints 2023, 1156
2023010282 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0282.v1). 1157
13. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Version Of Separates Groups Of Cells In 1158
Cancer’s Recognition On Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 1159
2023010267 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0267.v1). 1160
14. Henry Garrett, “The Shift Paradigm To Classify Separately The Cells and 1161
Affected Cells Toward The Totality Under Cancer’s Recognition By New 1162
Multiple Definitions On the Sets Polynomials Alongside Numbers In The 1163
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperMatching Theory Based on SuperHyperGraph and 1164
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”, Preprints 2023, 2023010265 (doi: 1165
10.20944/preprints202301.0265.v1). 1166
15. Henry Garrett, “Breaking the Continuity and Uniformity of Cancer In The 1167
Worst Case of Full Connections With Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique In 1168
Cancer’s Recognition Applied in (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 1169
2023, 2023010262,(doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0262.v1). 1170
16. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable as the Survivors on the 1171
Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition Based on Uncertainty to All Modes in 1172
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010240 (doi: 1173
10.20944/preprints202301.0240.v1). 1174
17. Henry Garrett, “Extremism of the Attacked Body Under the Cancer’s 1175
Circumstances Where Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) 1176
SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010224, (doi: 1177
10.20944/preprints202301.0224.v1). 1178
18. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in Cancer’s 1179
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 1180
2023010105 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 1181
19. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form 1182
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions 1183
In Special ViewPoints”, Preprints 2023, 2023010088 (doi: 1184
10.20944/preprints202301.0088.v1). 1185
SuperHyperFunction To Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs on Cancer’s 1187
Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond ”, Preprints 2023, 2023010044 1188
21. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperStable on Cancer’s Recognition by 1189
Well- SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 1190
2023010043 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0043.v1). 1191
22. Henry Garrett, “Basic Notions on (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperForcing And 1192
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling in Cancer’s Recognitions And 1193
10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 1195
10.20944/preprints202301.0088.v1). 1199
24. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions 1200
Featuring (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances”, Preprints 1201
2022, 2022120549 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0549.v1). 1202
25. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperAlliances With SuperHyperDefensive 1203
and SuperHyperOffensive Type-SuperHyperSet On (Neutrosophic) 1204
SuperHyperGraph With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s 1205
Recognitions And Related (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClasses”, Preprints 2022, 1206
2022120540 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0540.v1). 1207
26. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperGirth on SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic 1208
SuperHyperGraph With SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions”, 1209
Preprints 2022, 2022120500 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0500.v1). 1210
27. Henry Garrett, “Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on 1211
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs and SuperHyperGraphs Alongside Applications 1212
in Cancer’s Treatments”, Preprints 2022, 2022120324 (doi: 1213
10.20944/preprints202212.0324.v1). 1214
28. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperResolving and SuperHyperResolving on Neutrosophic 1215
SuperHyperGraphs And Their Directions in Game Theory and Neutrosophic 1216
SuperHyperClasses”, Preprints 2022, 2022110576 (doi: 1217
10.20944/preprints202211.0576.v1). 1218
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By STABLE As Hyper Decoration On 1220
Super Density”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10028600). 1221
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By STABLE As Hyper Decoration 1223
On Super Density”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8310454). 1224
31. Henry Garrett, “Recognition of Cancer With Bipartite and Path as 1225
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph By the Tool Called Stability”, Preprints 2023, 1226
2023081972 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202308.1972.v1). 1227
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By STABLE As Hyper 1229
Decoration On Super Density”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8262182). 1230
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By REVERSE CONNECTIVE 1232
DOMINATION As Hyper Decoration On Super Density”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1233
10.5281/zenodo.8206877). 1234
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By REVERSE CONNECTIVE 1236
10.5281/zenodo.8206834). 1238
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By REVERSE CONNECTIVE 1240
10.5281/zenodo.8206773). 1242
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By EQUAL CONNECTIVE 1244
10.5281/zenodo.8201319). 1246
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By EQUAL CONNECTIVE 1248
10.5281/zenodo.8201255). 1250
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By EQUAL CONNECTIVE 1252
10.5281/zenodo.8201165). 1254
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By CONNECTIVE DOMINATION As 1256
Hyper Decoration On Super Density”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1257
10.5281/zenodo.8196147). 1258
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By CONNECTIVE DOMINATION 1260
As Hyper Decoration On Super Density”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1261
10.5281/zenodo.8196132). 1262
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By CONNECTIVE 1264
10.5281/zenodo.8196099). 1266
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By DOMINATION As Hyper 1268
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By DOMINATION As Hyper 1271
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By DOMINATION As Hyper 1274
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperPerfect Search As Hyper Perf On Super 1277
Perfidy”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8104836). 1278
46. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Perfidy By Hyper Perf Of 1279
SuperHyperPerfect Search In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1280
SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8104857). 1281
SuperHyperGraph By Reverse Strict Dimension Resolving As Hyper Dimple On 1283
Super Dimity”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8092796). 1284
48. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Dimity By Hyper Dimple Of Reverse 1285
Strict Dimension Resolving In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1286
SuperHyperGraph By Unequal Dimension Resolving As Hyper Dimple On 1289
Super Dimity”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8088438). 1290
50. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Dimity By Hyper Dimple Of Unequal 1291
Dimension Resolving In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1292
SuperHyperGraph By Strict Dimension Resolving As Hyper Dimple On Super 1295
Dimity”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8084436). 1296
52. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Dimity By Hyper Dimple Of Strict 1297
SuperHyperGraph By Reverse Strict Connective As Hyper Conceit On Super 1301
Con”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8080100). 1302
54. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Con By Hyper Conceit Of Reverse Strict 1303
Connective In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, 1304
Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8080068). 1305
SuperHyperGraph By Unequal Connective Resolving As Hyper Conceit On 1307
Super Con”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8078445). 1308
56. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Con By Hyper Conceit Of Unequal 1309
Connective Resolving In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1310
SuperHyperGraph By Strict Connective Resolving As Hyper Conceit On Super 1313
58. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Con By Hyper Conceit Of Strict 1315
SuperHyperGraph By Reverse Dimension Resolving As Hyper Dimple On Super 1319
60. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Dimity By Hyper Dimple Of Reverse 1321
SuperHyperGraph By Equal Dimension Resolving As Hyper Dimple On Super 1325
62. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Dimity By Hyper Dimple Of Equal 1327
SuperHyperGraph By Dimension Resolving As Hyper Dimple On Super 1331
64. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Dimity By Hyper Dimple Of Dimension 1333
Resolving In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, 1334
SuperHyperGraph By Reverse Connective Resolving As Hyper Conceit On 1337
Super Con”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8057696). 1338
66. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Con By Hyper Conceit Of Reverse 1339
SuperHyperGraph By Equal Connective Resolving As Hyper Conceit On Super 1343
68. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Con By Hyper Conceit Of Equal 1345
SuperHyperGraph By Connective Resolving As Hyper Conceit On Super Con”, 1349
70. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Con By Hyper Conceit Of Connective 1351
SuperHyperGraph By United Resolving As Hyper Ultra On Super Units”, 1355
72. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Units By Hyper Ultra Of United 1357
SuperHyperGraph By Zero Forcing As Hyper ford On Super forceps”, Zenodo 1361
2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8017246). 1362
74. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super forceps By Hyper ford Of Zero Forcing In 1363
Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 2023, 1364
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8020128). 1365
SuperHyperGraph By Matrix-Based As Hyper mat On Super matte”, Zenodo 1367
2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7978571). 1368
76. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super mat By Hyper matte Of Matrix-Based In 1369
Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 2023, 1370
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7978857). 1371
SuperHyperGraph By Resolving-Edges As Hyper Dome On Super Eddy”, 1373
78. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Eddy By Hyper Dome Of Resolving-Edges 1375
In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 2023, 1376
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7943578). 1377
SuperHyperGraph By Edge-Gap As Hyper Gape On Super Gab”, Zenodo 2023, 1379
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7916595). 1380
80. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Gab By Hyper Gape Of Edge-Gap In 1381
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7923632). 1383
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On 1385
Super Nebulous”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7904698). 1386
82. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nebulous By Hyper Nebbish Of 1387
Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1388
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition As Hyper 1391
Decompress On Super Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1392
10.5281/zenodo.7904529). 1393
84. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Decompensation By Hyper Decompress Of 1394
Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With 1395
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1396
10.5281/zenodo.7904401). 1397
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut As Hyper Nebbish On Super 1399
Nebulous”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7871026). 1400
Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1402
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Cycle-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super 1405
Eulerian-Cycle-Neighbor In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1408
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Cycle-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On 1411
Super Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7855661). 1412
Eulerian-Cycle-Decomposition In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1414
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Cycle-Cut As Hyper Eulogy On Super EULA”, 1417
92. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super EULA By Hyper Eulogy Of 1419
Eulerian-Cycle-Cut In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1420
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Path-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super 1423
Eulerian-Type-Path-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1426
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Path-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress 1429
On Super Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7839333). 1430
Eulerian-Type-Path-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1432
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Path-Cut As Hyper Eulogy On Super 1435
EULA”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7834229). 1436
Eulerian-Type-Path-Cut In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1438
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Path-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super 1441
Eulerian-Path-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1444
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Path-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On 1447
Eulerian-Path-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1450
SuperHyperGraph As Hyper Tool On Super Toot”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1453
10.5281/zenodo.7812236). 1454
SuperHyperGraph By initial Eulerian-Path-Cut As Hyper initial Eulogy On 1456
Super initial EULA”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7809365). 1457
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Path-Cut As Hyper Eulogy-Path-Cut On Super 1459
EULA-Path-Cut”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7809358). 1460
Eulerian-Path-Cut In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1462
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Path-Cut As Hyper Eulogy On Super EULA”, 1465
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On 1468
Super Nebulous”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7806767). 1469
Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1471
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition As Hyper 1474
Decompress On Super Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1475
10.5281/zenodo.7804238). 1476
Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With 1478
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7804228). 1479
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut As Hyper Hamper On Super 1481
Hammy”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7799902). 1482
113. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Hammy By Hyper Hamper Of 1483
Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1484
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Cycle-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super 1487
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Cycle-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress 1490
On Super Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7793372). 1491
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Cycle-Cut As Hyper Hamper On Super 1493
Hammy”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7791952). 1494
Hamiltonian-Cycle-Cut In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1496
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super 1499
Hamiltonian-Neighbor In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1502
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On 1505
Hamiltonian-Decomposition In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1508
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Cut As Hyper Hamper On Super Hammy”, 1511
Hamiltonian-Cut In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1514
SuperHyperGraph By Trace-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 1517
Trace-Neighbor In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1520
126. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 1522
SuperHyperGraph By Trace-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On Super 1523
Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7771831). 1524
Trace-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1526
SuperHyperGraph By Trace-Cut As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 1529
ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.20913.25446). 1530
129. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Tract By Hyper Track Of Trace-Cut In 1531
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7764916). 1533
SuperHyperGraph By Edge-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 1535
Edge-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, 1538
SuperHyperGraph By Edge-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On Super 1541
Decompensation”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.22545.10089). 1542
Edge-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1544
SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.29544.34564). 1545
SuperHyperGraph By Edge-Cut As Hyper Edify On Super Eddy”, ResearchGate 1547
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.11377.76644). 1548
135. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Eddy By Hyper Edify Of Edge-Cut In 1549
Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 1550
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.23750.96329). 1551
SuperHyperGraph By Vertex-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 1553
Vertex-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1556
SuperHyperGraph By Vertex-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On Super 1559
Decompensation”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.30212.81289). 1560
Vertex-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1562
SuperHyperGraph By Vertex-Cut As Hyper Vertu On Super Vertigo”, 1565
141. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Vertigo By Hyper Vertu Of Vertex-Cut In 1567
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.32467.25124). 1569
SuperHyperGraph By Stable-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 1571
143. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nebulizer By Hyper Nub Of 1573
Stable-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1574
SuperHyperGraph By Stable-Decompositions As Hyper Stain On Super Stagy”, 1577
145. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Stale By Hyper Stalk Of 1579
Stable-Decompositions In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1580
SuperHyperGraph By Stable-Cut As Hyper Stain On Super Stagy”, 1583
147. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Stale By Hyper Stalk Of Stable-Cut In 1585
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.20170.24000). 1587
SuperHyperGraph By Clique-Neighbors As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 1589
149. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nebulizer By Hyper Nub Of 1591
Clique-Neighbors In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1592
SuperHyperGraph By Clique-Decompositions As Hyper Decompile On Super 1595
Decommission”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.18780.87683). 1596
Clique- Decompositions In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1598
SuperHyperGraph By Clique-Cut As Hyper Click On Super Cliche”, 1601
153. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Cliff By Hyper Cling Of Clique-Cut In 1603
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.27392.30721). 1605
SuperHyperGraph By Space As Hyper Spin On Super Spacy”, ResearchGate 1607
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.33028.40321). 1608
SuperHyperGraph By List- Coloring As Hyper List On Super Lisle”, 1610
156. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Lith By Hyper Lite Of List-Coloring In 1612
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.16356.04489). 1614
SuperHyperGraph By Space As Hyper Sparse On Super Spark ”, ResearchGate 1616
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.21756.21129). 1617
158. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Solidarity By Hyper Soul Of Space In 1618
Cancer’s Recognition With (Extreme) SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023, 1619
(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.30983.68009). 1620
SuperHyperGraph By Edge-Connectivity As Hyper Disclosure On Super 1622
Closure”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.28552.29445). 1623
160. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Uniform By Hyper Deformation Of 1624
Edge-Connectivity In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1625
SuperHyperGraph By Vertex-Connectivity As Hyper Leak On Super Structure”, 1628
162. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super System By Hyper Explosions Of 1630
Vertex-Connectivity In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1631
SuperHyperGraph By Tree-Decomposition As Hyper Forward On Super Returns”, 1634
164. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nodes By Hyper Moves Of 1636
Tree-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1637
SuperHyperGraph By Chord As Hyper Excellence On Super Excess”, 1640
166. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Gap By Hyper Navigations Of Chord In 1642
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.11172.14720). 1644
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyper(i,j)-Domination As Hyper Controller On 1646
Super Waves”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.22011.80165). 1647
168. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Coincidence By Hyper Routes Of 1648
SuperHyper(i,j)-Domination In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1649
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperEdge-Domination As Hyper Reversion On 1652
Super Indirection”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.10493.84962). 1653
170. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Obstacles By Hyper Model Of 1654
SuperHyperEdge-Domination In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1655
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperK-Domination As Hyper k-Actions On Super 1658
Patterns”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.19944.14086). 1659
172. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Harmony By Hyper k-Function Of 1660
SuperHyperK-Domination In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1661
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperK-Number As Hyper k-Partition On Super 1664
Layers”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.33103.76968). 1665
174. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Gradient By Hyper k-Class Of 1666
SuperHyperK-Number In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1667
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperOrder As Hyper Enumerations On Super 1670
Landmarks”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.35646.56641). 1671
176. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Analogous By Hyper Visions Of 1672
SuperHyperOrder In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1673
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperColoring As Hyper Categories On Super 1676
Neighbors”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.13973.81121). 1677
178. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Relations By Hyper Identifications Of 1678
SuperHyperColoring In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1679
179. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Contradiction By Hyper Detection of 1681
SuperHyperDefensive In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic 1682
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperDimension As Hyper Distinguishing On Super 1685
Distances”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.31956.88961). 1686
181. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Locations By Hyper Differing Of 1687
SuperHyperDimension In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1688
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperResolving As Hyper Closing On Super Messy”, 1691
183. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Missing By Hyper Searching Of 1693
SuperHyperResolving In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1694
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperConnected As Hyper Group On Super Surge”, 1697
185. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Outbreak By Hyper Collections Of 1699
SuperHyperConnected In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1700
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperTotal As Hyper Covering On Super Infections”, 1703
187. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Extremism By Hyper Treatments Of 1705
SuperHyperTotal In Cancer’s Recognition with (Neutrosophic) 1706
188. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Isolation By Hyper Perfectness Of 1708
SuperHyperPerfect In Cancer’s Recognition with (Neutrosophic) 1709
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperPerfect As Hyper Idealism On Super Vacancy”, 1712
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperJoin As Hyper Separations On Super Sorts”, 1715
191. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super connections By Hyper disconnections Of 1717
SuperHyperJoin In Cancer’s Recognition with (Neutrosophic) 1718
192. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Mixed-Devastations By Hyper Decisions 1720
Of SuperHyperDuality In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic 1721
193. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition As (Neutrosophic) 1723
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperDuality As Hyper Imaginations On Super 1724
Mixed-Illustrations”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.33275.80161). 1725
194. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition As (Neutrosophic) 1726
SuperHyperGraph By Path SuperHyperColoring As Hyper Correction On Super 1727
Faults”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.30182.50241). 1728
195. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Reflections By Hyper Rotations Of Path 1729
SuperHyperColoring In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic 1730
196. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas As Hyper Deformations On Super Chains In 1732
Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph By 1733
SuperHyperDensity”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.13444.60806). 1734
197. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas As Hyper Ignorance By SuperHyperDensity On 1735
Super Resistances In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic 1736
SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.16800.05123). 1737
198. Henry Garrett, “New Research On Cancer’s Recognition and Neutrosophic 1738
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian SuperHyperCycles and Hamiltonian Sets As 1739
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-VI ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1740
10.13140/RG.2.2.29913.80482). 1741
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-V ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1744
10.13140/RG.2.2.33269.24809). 1745
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-IV ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1748
10.13140/RG.2.2.34946.96960). 1749
201. Henry Garrett, “A Research On Cancer’s Recognition and Neutrosophic 1750
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-III ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1752
10.13140/RG.2.2.14814.31040). 1753
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-II ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1756
10.13140/RG.2.2.15653.17125). 1757
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-I ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1760
10.13140/RG.2.2.25719.50089). 1761
204. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Disruptions In Cancer’s Extreme 1762
Recognition As Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph By Hyper Plans Called 1763
SuperHyperConnectivities”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1764
10.13140/RG.2.2.29441.94562). 1765
205. Henry Garrett, “Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition As Neutrosophic 1766
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperConnectivities As Hyper Diagnosis On Super 1767
Mechanism”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.17252.24968). 1768
206. Henry Garrett,“Cancer’s Recognition and (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph By 1769
the Criteria of Eulerian and Hamiltonian Type-Sets As Hyper Modified Cycles 1770
On Super Mess”, ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.16652.59525). 1771
207. Henry Garrett,“Eulerian and Hamiltonian In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition 1772
and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph On Super Interactions By Hyper Extensions 1773
of Cycles”, ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.34583.24485). 1774
208. Henry Garrett,“SuperHyperGirth Type-Results on extreme SuperHyperGirth 1775
theory and (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs Toward Cancer’s extreme 1776
Recognition”, Preprints 2023, 2023010396 (doi: 1777
10.20944/preprints202301.0396.v1). 1778
209. Henry Garrett,“Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Warns Hyper Landmark of 1779
neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth In Super Type-Versions of Cancer’s neutrosophic 1780
Recognition”, Preprints 2023, 2023010395 (doi: 1781
10.20944/preprints202301.0395.v1). 1782
210. Henry Garrett,“The Constructions of (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs on the 1783
Cancer’s Recognition in The Confrontation With Super Attacks In Hyper 1784
Situations By Implementing (Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in The 1785
Technical Approaches to Neutralize SuperHyperViews”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1786
10.13140/RG.2.2.26240.51204). 1787
211. Henry Garrett,“(Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing As the 1788
Entrepreneurs on Cancer’s Recognitions To Fail Forcing Style As the Super 1789
Classes With Hyper Effects In The Background of the Framework is So-Called 1790
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1791
10.13140/RG.2.2.12818.73925). 1792
212. Henry Garrett,“Super Actions On The Types of Hyper Levels In The Sensible 1793
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth On Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and 1794
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 1795
10.13140/RG.2.2.26836.88960). 1796
213. Henry Garrett,“SuperHyperGirth Approaches on the Super Challenges on the 1797
Cancer’s Recognition In the Hyper Model of (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, 1798
ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.36745.93289). 1799
214. Henry Garrett,“Extreme SuperHyperClique as the Firm Scheme of 1800
10.20944/preprints202301.0308.v1). 1803
215. Henry Garrett,“Uncertainty On The Act And Effect Of Cancer Alongside The 1804
Foggy Positions Of Cells Toward Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique inside 1805
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Titled Cancer’s Recognition”, Preprints 2023, 1806
2023010282 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0282.v1). 1807
216. Henry Garrett,“Neutrosophic Version Of Separates Groups Of Cells In Cancer’s 1808
Recognition On Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010267 1809
(doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0267.v1).). 1810
217. Henry Garrett, “The Shift Paradigm To Classify Separately The Cells and 1811
Affected Cells Toward The Totality Under Cancer’s Recognition By New 1812
Multiple Definitions On the Sets Polynomials Alongside Numbers In The 1813
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperMatching Theory Based on SuperHyperGraph and 1814
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”, Preprints 2023, 2023010265 (doi: 1815
10.20944/preprints202301.0265.v1). 1816
218. Henry Garrett,“Breaking the Continuity and Uniformity of Cancer In The 1817
Worst Case of Full Connections With Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique In 1818
Cancer’s Recognition Applied in (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 1819
2023, 2023010262,(doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0262.v1). 1820
219. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable as the Survivors on the 1821
Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition Based on Uncertainty to All Modes in 1822
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010240 (doi: 1823
10.20944/preprints202301.0240.v1). 1824
220. Henry Garrett, “Extremism of the Attacked Body Under the Cancer’s 1825
Circumstances Where Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) 1826
SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010224, (doi: 1827
10.20944/preprints202301.0224.v1). 1828
221. Henry Garrett,“SuperHyperMatching By (R-)Definitions And Polynomials To 1829
Monitor Cancer’s Recognition In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, 1830
ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.35061.65767). 1831
222. Henry Garrett,“The Focus on The Partitions Obtained By Parallel Moves In 1832
The Cancer’s Extreme Recognition With Different Types of Extreme 1833
SuperHyperMatching Set and Polynomial on (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, 1834
223. Henry Garrett,“Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique Decides the Failures on the 1836
Cancer’s Recognition in the Perfect Connections of Cancer’s Attacks By 1837
SuperHyperModels Named (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 1838
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.32530.73922). 1839
224. Henry Garrett,“Indeterminacy On The All Possible Connections of Cells In 1840
Front of Cancer’s Attacks In The Terms of Neutrosophic Failed 1841
SuperHyperClique on Cancer’s Recognition called Neutrosophic 1842
SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.15897.70243). 1843
225. Henry Garrett,“Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique Decides the Failures on the 1844
Cancer’s Recognition in the Perfect Connections of Cancer’s Attacks By 1845
SuperHyperModels Named (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 1846
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.32530.73922). 1847
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 1849
2023010105 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 1850
227. Henry Garrett,“Perfect Directions Toward Idealism in Cancer’s Neutrosophic 1851
Recognition Forwarding Neutrosophic SuperHyperClique on Neutrosophic 1852
228. Henry Garrett,“Demonstrating Complete Connections in Every Embedded 1854
Regions and Sub-Regions in the Terms of Cancer’s Recognition and 1855
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClique”, 1856
10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 1861
10.20944/preprints202301.0088.v1). 1865
231. Henry Garrett,“Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic Regions titled 1866
neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable in Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition 1867
modeled in the Form of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2023, 1868
(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.17385.36968). 1869
Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond ”, Preprints 2023, 2023010044 1872
Well- SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 1874
2023010043 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0043.v1). 1875
234. Henry Garrett, “Using the Tool As (Neutrosophic) Failed SuperHyperStable To 1876
SuperHyperModel Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) 1877
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In 1880
Special ViewPoints”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.11447.80803). 1881
Well-SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 1883
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.35774.77123). 1884
Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond ”, ResearchGate 2022, (doi: 1887
10.13140/RG.2.2.36141.77287). 1888
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2022, (doi: 1890
10.13140/RG.2.2.29430.88642). 1891
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2022, (doi: 1894
10.13140/RG.2.2.11369.16487). 1895
Featuring (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances”, Preprints 1897
2022, 2022120549 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0549.v1). 1898
Featuring (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances”, 1900
Recognitions And Related (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClasses”, Preprints 2022, 1905
2022120540 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0540.v1). 1906
Recognitions And Related (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClasses”, ResearchGate 1910
2022, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.14426.41923). 1911
Preprints 2022, 2022120500 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0500.v1). 1914
ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.20993.12640). 1917
246. Henry Garrett,“Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on 1918
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs and SuperHyperGraphs Alongside Applications 1919
in Cancer’s Treatments”, Preprints 2022, 2022120324 (doi: 1920
10.20944/preprints202212.0324.v1). 1921
247. Henry Garrett, “Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on 1922
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs And SuperHyperGraphs Alongside Applications 1923
in Cancer’s Treatments”, ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 1924
10.13140/RG.2.2.23123.04641). 1925
SuperHyperClasses”, Preprints 2022, 2022110576 (doi: 1928
10.20944/preprints202211.0576.v1). 1929
SuperHyperClasses”, ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.23324.56966). 1932
250. Henry Garrett, “Basic Neutrosophic Notions Concerning SuperHyperResolving 1933
and Neutrosophic SuperHyperResolving in SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 1934
2022 (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.29173.86244). 1935
251. Henry Garrett, “Initial Material of Neutrosophic Preliminaries to Study Some 1936
Neutrosophic Notions Based on Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) in 1937
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)”, ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 1938
10.13140/RG.2.2.25385.88160). 1939
252. Henry Garrett, “Stable In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 1940
Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8210033). 1941
253. Henry Garrett, “Reverse Connective Domination In Neutrosophic 1942
SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8206898). 1943
254. Henry Garrett, “Equal Connective Domination In Neutrosophic 1944
SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8201378). 1945
255. Henry Garrett, “Connective Domination In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. 1946
Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8194003). 1947
256. Henry Garrett, “Domination In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 1948
257. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperPerfect Search In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 1950
258. Henry Garrett, “Reverse Strict Dimension Resolving In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1952
Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8092816). 1953
259. Henry Garrett, “Unequal Dimension Resolving In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1954
260. Henry Garrett, “Strict Dimension Resolving In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 1956
261. Henry Garrett, “Reverse Strict Connective In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 1958
262. Henry Garrett, “Unequal Connective Resolving In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1960
263. Henry Garrett, “Strict Connective Resolving In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 1962
264. Henry Garrett, “Reverse Dimension Resolving In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1964
265. Henry Garrett, “Equal Dimension Resolving In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 1966
266. Henry Garrett, “Dimension Resolving In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 1968
267. Henry Garrett, “Reverse Connective Resolving In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1970
268. Henry Garrett, “Equal Connective Resolving In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 1972
269. Henry Garrett, “Connective Resolving In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 1974
270. Henry Garrett, “United Resolving In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 1976
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8027488). 1977
271. Henry Garrett, “Zero Forcing In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 1978
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8020181). 1979
272. Henry Garrett, “Matrix-Based In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 1980
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7978921). 1981
273. Henry Garrett, “Collections of Math II”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 1982
10.5281/zenodo.7943878). 1983
274. Henry Garrett, “Resolving-Edges In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 1984
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7943871). 1985
275. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Gap In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 1986
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7923786). 1987
276. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1988
277. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. 1990
278. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 1992
279. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Cycle-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 1994
280. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Cycle-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1996
281. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Cycle-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 1998
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7854561). 1999
282. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Path-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2000
283. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Path-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2002
284. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Path-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2004
285. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Path-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2006
286. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Path-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2008
287. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Path-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2010
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7812750). 2011
288. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2012
289. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. 2014
290. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2016
291. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Cycle-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2018
292. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Cycle-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2020
293. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Cycle-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2022
294. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2024
295. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2026
296. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2028
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7783791). 2029
297. Henry Garrett, “Trace-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2030
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7780123). 2031
298. Henry Garrett, “Trace-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2032
299. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDuality”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2034
10.5281/zenodo.7637762). 2035
300. Henry Garrett, “Trace-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2036
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7766174). 2037
301. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2038
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7762232). 2039
302. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2040
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7758601). 2041
303. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2042
10.5281/zenodo.7754661). 2043
304. Henry Garrett, “Vertex-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2044
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7750995) . 2045
305. Henry Garrett, “Vertex-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2046
306. Henry Garrett, “Vertex-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2048
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7747236). 2049
307. Henry Garrett, “Stable-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2050
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7742587). 2051
308. Henry Garrett, “Stable-Decompositions In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2052
309. Henry Garrett, “Stable-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2054
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7734719). 2055
310. Henry Garrett, “Clique-Neighbors In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2056
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7730484). 2057
311. Henry Garrett, “Clique-Decompositions In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2058
312. Henry Garrett, “Clique-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2060
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7722865). 2061
313. Henry Garrett, “Space In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2062
10.5281/zenodo.7713563). 2063
314. Henry Garrett, “Space In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2064
10.5281/zenodo.7709116). 2065
315. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Connectivity In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2066
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7706415). 2067
316. Henry Garrett, “Vertex-Connectivity In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2068
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7706063). 2069
317. Henry Garrett, “Tree-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2070
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7701906). 2071
318. Henry Garrett, “Chord In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2072
10.5281/zenodo.7700205). 2073
319. Henry Garrett, “(i,j)-Domination In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2074
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7694876). 2075
320. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Domination In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2076
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7679410). 2077
321. Henry Garrett, “K-Domination In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2078
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7675982). 2079
322. Henry Garrett, “K-Number In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2080
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7672388). 2081
323. Henry Garrett, “Order In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2082
10.5281/zenodo.7668648). 2083
324. Henry Garrett, “Coloring In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2084
10.5281/zenodo.7662810). 2085
325. Henry Garrett, “Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2086
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7659162). 2087
326. Henry Garrett, “Cancer In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2088
10.5281/zenodo.7653233). 2089
327. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperWheel ”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2090
10.5281/zenodo.7653204). 2091
328. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperMultipartite”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2092
10.5281/zenodo.7653142). 2093
329. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperBipartite”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2094
10.5281/zenodo.7653117). 2095
330. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperStar ”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2096
10.5281/zenodo.7653089). 2097
331. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2098
10.5281/zenodo.7651687). 2099
332. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperPath”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2100
10.5281/zenodo.7651619). 2101
333. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDomination”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2102
10.5281/zenodo.7651439). 2103
334. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperResolving”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2104
10.5281/zenodo.7650729). 2105
335. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperConnected ”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2106
10.5281/zenodo.7647868). 2107
336. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperTotal ”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2108
10.5281/zenodo.7647017). 2109
337. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperPerfect”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2110
10.5281/zenodo.7644894). 2111
338. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperJoin”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2112
10.5281/zenodo.7641880). 2113
339. Henry Garrett, “Path SuperHyperColoring”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2114
10.5281/zenodo.7632923). 2115
340. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDensity”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2116
10.5281/zenodo.7623459). 2117
341. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2118
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7606416). 2119
342. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperConnectivities”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2120
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7606416). 2121
343. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperConnectivities”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2122
10.5281/zenodo.7606404). 2123
344. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2124
10.5281/zenodo.7580018). 2125
345. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2126
10.5281/zenodo.7580018). 2127
346. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2128
10.5281/zenodo.7580018). 2129
347. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2130
10.5281/zenodo.7579929). 2131
348. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2132
10.5281/zenodo.7563170). 2133
349. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2134
10.5281/zenodo.7563164). 2135
350. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2136
10.5281/zenodo.7563160). 2137
351. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2138
10.5281/zenodo.7563160). 2139
352. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2140
10.5281/zenodo.7563160). 2141
353. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2142
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7557063). 2143
354. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperMatching”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2144
10.5281/zenodo.7557009). 2145
355. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperMatching”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2146
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7539484). 2147
356. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2148
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7523390). 2149
357. Henry Garrett, “Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2150
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7523390). 2151
358. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On Failed SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2152
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7523390). 2153
359. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2154
10.5281/zenodo.7574952). 2155
360. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2156
10.5281/zenodo.7574992). 2157
361. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2158
10.5281/zenodo.7523357). 2159
362. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2160
10.5281/zenodo.7523357). 2161
363. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2162
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7504782). 2163
364. Henry Garrett, “Extreme Failed SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2164
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7504782). 2165
365. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On Failed SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2166
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7504782). 2167
366. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2168
10.5281/zenodo.7499395). 2169
367. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2170
10.5281/zenodo.7499395). 2171
368. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2172
10.5281/zenodo.7499395). 2173
369. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2174
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7497450). 2175
370. Henry Garrett, “Extreme Failed SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2176
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7497450). 2177
371. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2178
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7494862). 2179
372. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2180
10.5281/zenodo.7494862). 2181
373. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2182
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7494862). 2183
374. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperAlliances”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2184
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7493845). 2185
375. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperAlliances”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2186
10.5281/zenodo.7493845). 2187
376. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperAlliances”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2188
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7493845). 2189
377. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperMatching”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2190
10.5281/zenodo.7539484). 2191
378. Henry Garrett, “Failed SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2192
10.5281/zenodo.7523390). 2193
379. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2194
10.5281/zenodo.7523357). 2195
380. Henry Garrett, “Failed SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2196
10.5281/zenodo.7504782). 2197
381. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2198
10.5281/zenodo.7499395). 2199
382. Henry Garrett, “Failed SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2200
10.5281/zenodo.7497450). 2201
383. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2202
10.5281/zenodo.7494862). 2203
384. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperAlliances”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2204
10.5281/zenodo.7493845). 2205
385. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2206
10.5281/zenodo.7480110). 2207
386. Henry Garrett, “Neut. SuperHyperEdges”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2208
10.5281/zenodo.7378758). 2209
387. Henry Garrett, “Beyond Neutrosophic Graphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2210
10.5281/zenodo.6320305). 2211
388. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Duality”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2212
10.5281/zenodo.6677173). 2213
View publication stats

New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle by Strongly Resolving Sequence As Hyper Decoration On Super Density

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle by Strongly Resolving Sequence As Hyper Decoration On Super Density

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph With

Preprint · December 2023

555 PUBLICATIONS 28,581 CITATIONS

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 2

SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By Strongly 3

Resolving Sequence As Hyper Decoration On Super Density 4

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · 6

DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA 7

In this scientific research, (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic 9

SuperHyperResolving Sequence). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S be a pair 10

S = (V, E). Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then V 0 is 11

called Neutrosophic SuperHyperResolving Sequence if the following expressions, terms and 12

statements is called Neutrosophic SuperHyperResolving Sequence criteria holds. 13

∀Vb , Vc ∈ VN SHG \ V , ∃Va ∈ V 00 :

d(TV (Va , Vb )) 6= d(TV (Va , Vc )),

SuperHyperNotions, namely a Resolving Sequence and a Neutrosophic Resolving 15

progressed and SuperHyperNotion, SuperHyperUniform, and SuperHyperClass are 17

well-defined and well-reviewed based on them. Literature review is implemented 18

comparison between this SuperHyperNotion with other SuperHyperNotions and basic 20

SuperHyperNumbers is presented. Definitions are followed by examples and examples, 21

so clarifications are guided by various tools. Applications are designed to understand 22

between them all are officially called “SuperHyperEdge”. “SuperHyperGraph” and 28

“Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” frameworks are selected and selected for research on 29

questions and problems. It is useful to define a “neutrosophic” version of Resolving 33

more understandable. In order to master the Neutrosophic Resolving Sequence, there is 35

a need to “re-define” the concept of “Resolving Sequence mastery”. SuperHyperVertices 36

contains “values of vertices, supervertices, edges, hyperedges, and hyperedges belonging 39

to Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” with key points, it is redefined. ”values of vertices 40

& number of positions in alphabet”, ”Values of SuperVertices&maximum values of its 41

vertices”, ”values of edges&maximum values of its vertices”, ”super edge values&max 42

SuperHyperClass SuperHyperGraph based on Resolving Sequence. This is the original. 45

then it is officially called “Resolving Sequence”, but otherwise, it is not Resolving 48

characterized in the SuperHyperClass disciplinary methods based on a dominant 51

Resolving Sequence. Because of having Resolving Sequence, there is a need to 52

“re-define” the concept of “neutrosophic Resolving Sequence” and “neutrosophic 53

Resolving Sequence”. SuperHyperVertices and SuperHyperEdges are assigned by 54

Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” is 56

Sequence is redefined to a “Neutrosophic Resolving Sequence”. It is useful to define a 58

“Neutrosophic” version of SuperHyperClasses. Since there are more ways to obtain 59

Neutrosophic type results, a SuperHyper- Neutrosophic Resolving Sequence becomes 60

more understandable. Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. If the desired table 61

exists, there are a number of Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses. So are SuperHyperPath, 62

SuperHyperCycle, SuperHyperStar, SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultiPartite and 63

SuperHyperWheel. ”Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle”, 64

“Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite”, “Neutrosophic 65

SuperHyperMultiPartite” and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel”. A graph is 66

SuperHyperUniform if it is a SuperHyperGraph and the number of SuperHyperEdges 67

elements is the same. Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. There are a number 68

of SuperHyperClasses as follows. It is a SuperHyperPath if there is only one 69

SuperVertex as an intersection between two given SuperHyperEdges with two 70

exceptions. If only one SuperVertex is given as an intersection between two 71

SuperHyperEdges, it is SuperHyperCycle. It is SuperHyperStar and only one 72

SuperVertex as intersection among all SuperHyperEdges. It is SuperHyperBipartite, 73

common. This is SuperHyperMultiPartite. Only one SuperVertex is given as an 76

intersection between two SuperHyperEdges, and these SuperVertices, which form 77

separate multisets, have no SuperHyperEdge in common. If only one SuperHyperEdge 78

among the given two SuperHyperEdges is a SuperHyperWheel and a SuperVertex has a 79

SuperHyperEdge with any regular SuperVertex. SuperHyperModel suggests specific 80

designs and specific architectures. SuperHyperModel is officially called 81

“SuperHyperGraph” and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”. In this SuperHyperModel, 82

cells and the “special group” of cells. SuperHyperModeled as “SuperHyperEdges”. 85