New Ideas in Cancer's Recognition and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph by SuperHyperDimension As Hyper Distinguishing On Super Distances

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.
net/publication/368663284
New Ideas In Cancer's Recognition And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph By

SuperHyperDimension As Hyper Distinguishing On Super Distances
Preprint · February 2023

DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.31956.88961
CITATIONS
1 author:
Henry Garrett
323 PUBLICATIONS 3,990 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
On Fuzzy Logic View project
Number Graphs And Numbers View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Henry Garrett on 20 February 2023.
The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 2
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperDimension As Hyper 3
Distinguishing On Super Distances 4
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · 6
DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA 7
1 ABSTRACT 8
In this scientific research, (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic 9
SuperHyperDimension). Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an 10
ordered pair S = (V, E). Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs } 11
and E 0 = {E1 , E2 , . . . , Ez }. Then either V 0 or E 0 is called Neutrosophic 12
e-SuperHyperDimension if ∀Ea , Eb ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ E 0 , ∃Ec ∈ E 0 , such that 13
d(Ea , Ec ) 6= d(Eb , Ec ); Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperDimension if 14
∀Ea , Eb ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ E 0 , ∃Ec ∈ E 0 , such that d(Ea , Ec ) 6= d(Eb , Ec ); and 15
|Ei |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY = |Ej |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY ; Neutrosophic 16
v-SuperHyperDimension if ∀Va , Vb ∈ VESHG:(V,E) \ V 0 , ∃Vc ∈ V 0 , such that 17
d(Va , Vc ) 6= d(Vb , Vc ); Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperDimension if 18
∀Va , Vb ∈ VESHG:(V,E) \ V 0 , ∃Vc ∈ V 0 , such that d(Va , Vc ) 6= d(Vb , Vc ); and 19
|Vi |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY = |Vj |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY ; Neutrosophic 20
SuperHyperDimension if it’s either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperDimension, 21
Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperDimension, Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperDimension, and 22
Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperDimension. ((Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDimension). 23
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an ordered pair S = (V, E). 24
Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) E = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then E is 25
called an Extreme SuperHyperDimension if it’s either of Neutrosophic 26
e-SuperHyperDimension, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperDimension, Neutrosophic 27
v-SuperHyperDimension, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperDimension and C(N SHG) 28
for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum Extreme cardinality 29
of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality of the Extreme 30
SuperHyperEdges in the consecutive Extreme sequence of Extreme SuperHyperEdges 31
and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Extreme 32
SuperHyperDimension; a Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension if it’s either of 33
Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperDimension, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperDimension, 34
Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperDimension, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperDimension and 35
C(N SHG) for a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum 36
Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges of a Neutrosophic 37
SuperHyperSet S of high Neutrosophic cardinality consecutive Neutrosophic 38
SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 39
Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension; an Extreme SuperHyperDimension 40
SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperDimension, 41
Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperDimension and C(N SHG) for an Extreme 43
SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Extreme SuperHyperPolynomial contains the 44
Extreme coefficients defined as the Extreme number of the maximum Extreme 45
cardinality of the Extreme SuperHyperEdges of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high 46
Extreme cardinality consecutive Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme 47
SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Extreme SuperHyperDimension; and the 48
Extreme power is corresponded to its Extreme coefficient; a Neutrosophic 49
SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of Neutrosophic 50
for a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Neutrosophic 53
SuperHyperPolynomial contains the Neutrosophic coefficients defined as the 54
Neutrosophic number of the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic 55
SuperHyperEdges of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high Neutrosophic cardinality 56
consecutive Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such 57
that they form the Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension; and the Neutrosophic power is 58
corresponded to its Neutrosophic coefficient; an Extreme V-SuperHyperDimension if it’s 59
either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperDimension, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperDimension, 60
C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum Extreme 62
cardinality of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality of the Extreme 63
SuperHyperVertices in the consecutive Extreme sequence of Extreme SuperHyperEdges 64
and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Extreme 65
SuperHyperDimension; a Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDimension if it’s either of 66
Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperDimension, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperDimension, 67
Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of a Neutrosophic 70
Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension; an Extreme V-SuperHyperDimension 73
SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperDimension, 74
SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Extreme SuperHyperPolynomial contains the 77
Extreme coefficients defined as the Extreme number of the maximum Extreme 78
cardinality of the Extreme SuperHyperVertices of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high 79
SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Extreme SuperHyperDimension; and the 81
Extreme power is corresponded to its Extreme coefficient; a Neutrosophic 82
SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of Neutrosophic 83
for a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Neutrosophic 86
Neutrosophic number of the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic 88
SuperHyperVertices of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high Neutrosophic 89
cardinality consecutive Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic 90
SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension; and 91
the Neutrosophic power is corresponded to its Neutrosophic coefficient. In this scientific 92
research, new setting is introduced for new SuperHyperNotions, namely, a 93
SuperHyperDimension and Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension. Two different types of 94
SuperHyperDefinitions are debut for them but the research goes further and the 95
SuperHyperNotion, SuperHyperUniform, and SuperHyperClass based on that are 96
well-defined and well-reviewed. The literature review is implemented in the whole of 97
this research. For shining the elegancy and the significancy of this research, the 98
comparison between this SuperHyperNotion with other SuperHyperNotions and 99
fundamental SuperHyperNumbers are featured. The definitions are followed by the 100
examples and the instances thus the clarifications are driven with different tools. The 101
applications are figured out to make sense about the theoretical aspect of this ongoing 102
research. The “Cancer’s Recognition” are the under research to figure out the 103
challenges make sense about ongoing and upcoming research. The special case is up. 104
The cells are viewed in the deemed ways. There are different types of them. Some of 105
them are individuals and some of them are well-modeled by the group of cells. These 106
types are all officially called “SuperHyperVertex” but the relations amid them all 107
officially called “SuperHyperEdge”. The frameworks “SuperHyperGraph” and 108
“Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” are chosen and elected to research about “Cancer’s 109
Recognition”. Thus these complex and dense SuperHyperModels open up some avenues 110
to research on theoretical segments and “Cancer’s Recognition”. Some avenues are 111
posed to pursue this research. It’s also officially collected in the form of some questions 112
and some problems. Assume a SuperHyperGraph. Assume a SuperHyperGraph. Then 113
δ−SuperHyperDimension is a maximal of SuperHyperVertices with a maximum 114
cardinality such that either of the following expressions hold for the (Neutrosophic) 115
cardinalities of SuperHyperNeighbors of s ∈ S : there are 116
|S ∩ N (s)| > |S ∩ (V \ N (s))| + δ; and |S ∩ N (s)| < |S ∩ (V \ N (s))| + δ. The first 117
Expression, holds if S is an δ−SuperHyperOffensive. And the second Expression, holds 118
if S is an δ−SuperHyperDefensive; a Neutrosophic δ−SuperHyperDimension is a 119
maximal Neutrosophic of SuperHyperVertices with maximum Neutrosophic 120
cardinality such that either of the following expressions hold for the Neutrosophic 121
cardinalities of SuperHyperNeighbors of s ∈ S there are: 122
|S ∩ N (s)|N eutrosophic > |S ∩ (V \ N (s))|N eutrosophic + δ; 123
and |S ∩ N (s)|N eutrosophic < |S ∩ (V \ N (s))|N eutrosophic + δ. The first Expression, 124
holds if S is a Neutrosophic δ−SuperHyperOffensive. And the second Expression, holds 125
if S is a Neutrosophic δ−SuperHyperDefensive It’s useful to define a “Neutrosophic” 126
version of a SuperHyperDimension . Since there’s more ways to get type-results to make 127
a SuperHyperDimension more understandable. For the sake of having Neutrosophic 128
SuperHyperDimension, there’s a need to “redefine” the notion of a 129
“SuperHyperDimension ”. The SuperHyperVertices and the SuperHyperEdges are 130
assigned by the labels from the letters of the alphabets. In this procedure, there’s the 131
usage of the position of labels to assign to the values. Assume a SuperHyperDimension . 132
It’s redefined a Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension if the mentioned Table holds, 133
concerning, “The Values of Vertices, SuperVertices, Edges, HyperEdges, and 134
SuperHyperEdges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” with the key points, 135
“The Values of The Vertices & The Number of Position in Alphabet”, “The Values of 136
The SuperVertices&The maximum Values of Its Vertices”, “The Values of The 137
Edges&The maximum Values of Its Vertices”, “The Values of The HyperEdges&The 138
maximum Values of Its Vertices”, “The Values of The SuperHyperEdges&The 139
maximum Values of Its Endpoints”. To get structural examples and instances, I’m 140
going to introduce the next SuperHyperClass of SuperHyperGraph based on a 141
SuperHyperDimension . It’s the main. It’ll be disciplinary to have the foundation of 142
previous definition in the kind of SuperHyperClass. If there’s a need to have all 143
SuperHyperDimension until the SuperHyperDimension, then it’s officially called a 144
“SuperHyperDimension” but otherwise, it isn’t a SuperHyperDimension . There are 145
some instances about the clarifications for the main definition titled a 146
“SuperHyperDimension ”. These two examples get more scrutiny and discernment since 147
there are characterized in the disciplinary ways of the SuperHyperClass based on a 148
SuperHyperDimension . For the sake of having a Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension, 149
there’s a need to “redefine” the notion of a “Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension” and 150
a “Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension ”. The SuperHyperVertices and the 151
SuperHyperEdges are assigned by the labels from the letters of the alphabets. In this 152
procedure, there’s the usage of the position of labels to assign to the values. Assume a 153
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. It’s redefined “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” if the 154
intended Table holds. And a SuperHyperDimension are redefined to a “Neutrosophic 155
SuperHyperDimension” if the intended Table holds. It’s useful to define “Neutrosophic” 156
version of SuperHyperClasses. Since there’s more ways to get Neutrosophic type-results 157
to make a Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension more understandable. Assume a 158
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. There are some Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses if 159
the intended Table holds. Thus SuperHyperPath, SuperHyperDimension, 160
SuperHyperStar, SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultiPartite, and 161
SuperHyperWheel, are “Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath”, “Neutrosophic 162
SuperHyperDimension”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar”, “Neutrosophic 163
SuperHyperBipartite”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultiPartite”, and “Neutrosophic 164
SuperHyperWheel” if the intended Table holds. A SuperHyperGraph has a 165
“Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension” where it’s the strongest [the maximum 166
Neutrosophic value from all the SuperHyperDimension amid the maximum value amid 167
all SuperHyperVertices from a SuperHyperDimension .] SuperHyperDimension . A 168
graph is a SuperHyperUniform if it’s a SuperHyperGraph and the number of elements 169
of SuperHyperEdges are the same. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. There 170
are some SuperHyperClasses as follows. It’s SuperHyperPath if it’s only one 171
SuperVertex as intersection amid two given SuperHyperEdges with two exceptions; it’s 172
SuperHyperDimension if it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two given 173
SuperHyperEdges; it’s SuperHyperStar it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid 174
all SuperHyperEdges; it’s SuperHyperBipartite it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection 175
amid two given SuperHyperEdges and these SuperVertices, forming two separate sets, 176
has no SuperHyperEdge in common; it’s SuperHyperMultiPartite it’s only one 177
SuperVertex as intersection amid two given SuperHyperEdges and these SuperVertices, 178
forming multi separate sets, has no SuperHyperEdge in common; it’s a 179
SuperHyperWheel if it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two given 180
SuperHyperEdges and one SuperVertex has one SuperHyperEdge with any common 181
SuperVertex. The SuperHyperModel proposes the specific designs and the specific 182
architectures. The SuperHyperModel is officially called “SuperHyperGraph” and 183
“Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”. In this SuperHyperModel, The “specific” cells and 184
“specific group” of cells are SuperHyperModeled as “SuperHyperVertices” and the 185
common and intended properties between “specific” cells and “specific group” of cells 186
are SuperHyperModeled as “SuperHyperEdges”. Sometimes, it’s useful to have some 187
degrees of determinacy, indeterminacy, and neutrality to have more precise 188
SuperHyperModel which in this case the SuperHyperModel is called “Neutrosophic”. In 189
the future research, the foundation will be based on the “Cancer’s Recognition” and the 190
results and the definitions will be introduced in redeemed ways. The recognition of the 191
cancer in the long-term function. The specific region has been assigned by the model 192
[it’s called SuperHyperGraph] and the long cycle of the move from the cancer is 193
identified by this research. Sometimes the move of the cancer hasn’t be easily identified 194
since there are some determinacy, indeterminacy and neutrality about the moves and 195
the effects of the cancer on that region; this event leads us to choose another model [it’s 196
said to be Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph] to have convenient perception on what’s 197
happened and what’s done. There are some specific models, which are well-known and 198
they’ve got the names, and some SuperHyperGeneral SuperHyperModels. The moves 199
and the traces of the cancer on the complex tracks and between complicated groups of 200
cells could be fantasized by a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath(-/SuperHyperDimension, 201
SuperHyperStar, SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, SuperHyperWheel). 202
The aim is to find either the longest SuperHyperDimension or the strongest 203
SuperHyperDimension in those Neutrosophic SuperHyperModels. For the longest 204
SuperHyperDimension, called SuperHyperDimension, and the strongest 205
SuperHyperDimension, called Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension, some general results 206
are introduced. Beyond that in SuperHyperStar, all possible SuperHyperPaths have 207
only two SuperHyperEdges but it’s not enough since it’s essential to have at least three 208
SuperHyperEdges to form any style of a SuperHyperDimension. There isn’t any 209
formation of any SuperHyperDimension but literarily, it’s the deformation of any 210
SuperHyperDimension. It, literarily, deforms and it doesn’t form. A basic familiarity 211
with Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension theory, SuperHyperGraphs, and 212
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs theory are proposed. 213
Keywords: Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, SuperHyperDimension, Cancer’s 214
Neutrosophic Recognition 215
AMS Subject Classification: 05C17, 05C22, 05E45 216
2 Applied Notions Under The Scrutiny Of The 217
Motivation Of This Scientific Research 218
In this scientific research, there are some ideas in the featured frameworks of 219
motivations. I try to bring the motivations in the narrative ways. Some cells have been 220
faced with some attacks from the situation which is caused by the cancer’s attacks. In 221
this case, there are some embedded analysis on the ongoing situations which in that, the 222
cells could be labelled as some groups and some groups or individuals have excessive 223
labels which all are raised from the behaviors to overcome the cancer’s attacks. In the 224
embedded situations, the individuals of cells and the groups of cells could be considered 225
as “new groups”. Thus it motivates us to find the proper SuperHyperModels for getting 226
more proper analysis on this messy story. I’ve found the SuperHyperModels which are 227
officially called “SuperHyperGraphs” and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. In this 228
SuperHyperModel, the cells and the groups of cells are defined as “SuperHyperVertices” 229
and the relations between the individuals of cells and the groups of cells are defined as 230
“SuperHyperEdges”. Thus it’s another motivation for us to do research on this 231
SuperHyperModel based on the “Cancer’s Recognition”. Sometimes, the situations get 232
worst. The situation is passed from the certainty and precise style. Thus it’s the beyond 233
them. There are three descriptions, namely, the degrees of determinacy, indeterminacy 234
and neutrality, for any object based on vague forms, namely, incomplete data, imprecise 235
data, and uncertain analysis. The latter model could be considered on the previous 236
SuperHyperModel. It’s SuperHyperModel. It’s SuperHyperGraph but it’s officially 237
called “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. The cancer is the disease but the model is 238
going to figure out what’s going on this phenomenon. The special case of this disease is 239
considered and as the consequences of the model, some parameters are used. The cells 240
are under attack of this disease but the moves of the cancer in the special region are the 241
matter of mind. The recognition of the cancer could help to find some treatments for 242
this disease. The SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph are the 243
SuperHyperModels on the “Cancer’s Recognition” and both bases are the background 244
of this research. Sometimes the cancer has been happened on the region, full of cells, 245
groups of cells and embedded styles. In this segment, the SuperHyperModel proposes 246
some SuperHyperNotions based on the connectivities of the moves of the cancer in the 247
forms of alliances’ styles with the formation of the design and the architecture are 248
formally called “ SuperHyperDimension” in the themes of jargons and buzzwords. The 249
prefix “SuperHyper” refers to the theme of the embedded styles to figure out the 250
background for the SuperHyperNotions. The recognition of the cancer in the long-term 251
function. The specific region has been assigned by the model [it’s called 252
SuperHyperGraph] and the long cycle of the move from the cancer is identified by this 253
research. Sometimes the move of the cancer hasn’t be easily identified since there are 254
some determinacy, indeterminacy and neutrality about the moves and the effects of the 255
cancer on that region; this event leads us to choose another model [it’s said to be 256
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph] to have convenient perception on what’s happened and 257
what’s done. There are some specific models, which are well-known and they’ve got the 258
names, and some general models. The moves and the traces of the cancer on the 259
complex tracks and between complicated groups of cells could be fantasized by a 260
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (-/SuperHyperDimension, SuperHyperStar, 261
SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, SuperHyperWheel). The aim is to find 262
either the optimal SuperHyperDimension or the Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension in 263
those Neutrosophic SuperHyperModels. Some general results are introduced. Beyond 264
that in SuperHyperStar, all possible Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath s have only two 265
SuperHyperEdges but it’s not enough since it’s essential to have at least three 266
SuperHyperEdges to form any style of a SuperHyperDimension. There isn’t any 267
formation of any SuperHyperDimension but literarily, it’s the deformation of any 268
SuperHyperDimension. It, literarily, deforms and it doesn’t form. 269
Question 2.1. How to define the SuperHyperNotions and to do research on them to 270
find the “ amount of SuperHyperDimension” of either individual of cells or the groups 271
of cells based on the fixed cell or the fixed group of cells, extensively, the “amount of 272
SuperHyperDimension” based on the fixed groups of cells or the fixed groups of group of 273
cells? 274
Question 2.2. What are the best descriptions for the “Cancer’s Recognition” in terms 275
of these messy and dense SuperHyperModels where embedded notions are illustrated? 276
It’s motivation to find notions to use in this dense model is titled 277
“SuperHyperGraphs”. Thus it motivates us to define different types of “ 278
SuperHyperDimension” and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension” on 279
“SuperHyperGraph” and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”. Then the research has 280
taken more motivations to define SuperHyperClasses and to find some connections amid 281
this SuperHyperNotion with other SuperHyperNotions. It motivates us to get some 282
instances and examples to make clarifications about the framework of this research. The 283
general results and some results about some connections are some avenues to make key 284
point of this research, “Cancer’s Recognition”, more understandable and more clear. 285
The framework of this research is as follows. In the beginning, I introduce basic 286
definitions to clarify about preliminaries. In the subsection “Preliminaries”, initial 287
definitions about SuperHyperGraphs and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph are 288
deeply-introduced and in-depth-discussed. The elementary concepts are clarified and 289
illustrated completely and sometimes review literature are applied to make sense about 290
what’s going to figure out about the upcoming sections. The main definitions and their 291
clarifications alongside some results about new notions, SuperHyperDimension and 292
Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension, are figured out in sections “ 293
SuperHyperDimension” and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension”. In the sense of 294
tackling on getting results and in order to make sense about continuing the research, the 295
ideas of SuperHyperUniform and Neutrosophic SuperHyperUniform are introduced and 296
as their consequences, corresponded SuperHyperClasses are figured out to debut what’s 297
done in this section, titled “Results on SuperHyperClasses” and “Results on 298
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”. As going back to origin of the notions, there are 299
some smart steps toward the common notions to extend the new notions in new 300
frameworks, SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, in the sections 301
“Results on SuperHyperClasses” and “Results on Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”. 302
The starter research about the general SuperHyperRelations and as concluding and 303
closing section of theoretical research are contained in the section “General Results”. 304
Some general SuperHyperRelations are fundamental and they are well-known as 305
fundamental SuperHyperNotions as elicited and discussed in the sections, “General 306
Results”, “ SuperHyperDimension”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension”, “Results on 307
SuperHyperClasses” and “Results on Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”. There are 308
curious questions about what’s done about the SuperHyperNotions to make sense about 309
excellency of this research and going to figure out the word “best” as the description 310
and adjective for this research as presented in section, “ SuperHyperDimension”. The 311
keyword of this research debut in the section “Applications in Cancer’s Recognition” 312
with two cases and subsections “Case 1: The Initial Steps Toward SuperHyperBipartite 313
as SuperHyperModel” and “Case 2: The Increasing Steps Toward 314
SuperHyperMultipartite as SuperHyperModel”. In the section, “Open Problems”, there 315
are some scrutiny and discernment on what’s done and what’s happened in this research 316
in the terms of “questions” and “problems” to make sense to figure out this research in 317
featured style. The advantages and the limitations of this research alongside about 318
what’s done in this research to make sense and to get sense about what’s figured out are 319
included in the section, “Conclusion and Closing Remarks”. 320
3 Neutrosophic Preliminaries Of This Scientific 321
Research On the Redeemed Ways 322
In this section, the basic material in this scientific research, is referred to [Single Valued 323
Neutrosophic Set](Ref. [96],Definition 2.2,p.2), [Neutrosophic Set](Ref. [96],Definition 324
2.1,p.1), [Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)](Ref. [96],Definition 2.5,p.2), 325
[Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)](Ref. [96],Definition 326
2.7,p.3), [t-norm](Ref. [96], Definition 2.7, p.3), and [Characterization of the 327
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)](Ref. [96],Definition 2.7,p.3), [Neutrosophic 328
Strength of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPaths] (Ref. [96],Definition 5.3,p.7), and 329
[Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)] 330
(Ref. [96],Definition 5.4,p.7). Also, the new ideas and their clarifications are addressed 331
to Ref. [96]. 332
In this subsection, the basic material which is used in this scientific research, is 333
presented. Also, the new ideas and their clarifications are elicited. 334
Definition 3.1 (Neutrosophic Set). (Ref. [96],Definition 2.1,p.1). 335
Let X be a space of points (objects) with generic elements in X denoted by x; then

the Neutrosophic set A (NS A) is an object having the form
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}

+
where the functions T, I, F : X →]− 0, 1 [ define respectively the a
truth-membership function, an indeterminacy-membership function, and a
falsity-membership function of the element x ∈ X to the set A with the condition
−
0 ≤ TA (x) + IA (x) + FA (x) ≤ 3+ .
The functions TA (x), IA (x) and FA (x) are real standard or nonstandard subsets of 336
+
]− 0, 1 [. 337
Definition 3.2 (Single Valued Neutrosophic Set). (Ref. [96],Definition 2.2,p.2). 338
Let X be a space of points (objects) with generic elements in X denoted by x. A

single valued Neutrosophic set A (SVNS A) is characterized by truth-membership
function TA (x), an indeterminacy-membership function IA (x), and a falsity-membership
function FA (x). For each point x in X, TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) ∈ [0, 1]. A SVNS A can be
written as
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}.
Definition 3.3. The degree of truth-membership,

indeterminacy-membership and falsity-membership of the subset X ⊂ A of
the single valued Neutrosophic set A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}:
TA (X) = min[TA (vi ), TA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,
IA (X) = min[IA (vi ), IA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,

and FA (X) = min[FA (vi ), FA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X .
Definition 3.4. The support of X ⊂ A of the single valued Neutrosophic set
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}:
supp(X) = {x ∈ X : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) > 0}.
Definition 3.5 (Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). (Ref. [96],Definition 339
2.5,p.2). 340
Assume V 0 is a given set. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an 341
ordered pair S = (V, E), where 342
(i) V = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vn } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of V 0 ; 343
(ii) V = {(Vi , TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi )) : TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi ) ≥ 0}, (i = 344
1, 2, . . . , n); 345
(iii) E = {E1 , E2 , . . . , En0 } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of 346
V; 347
(iv) E = {(Ei0 , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )) : TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 ) ≥ 0}, (i0 = 348
1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 349
(v) Vi 6= ∅, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 350
(vi) Ei0 6= ∅, (i0 = 1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 351
P
(vii) i supp(Vi ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 352
0 0
P
(viii) i0 supp(Ei ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n );
0 353
(ix) and the following conditions hold:
TV0 (Ei0 ) ≤ min[TV 0 (Vi ), TV 0 (Vj )]Vi ,Vj ∈Ei0 ,
IV0 (Ei0 ) ≤ min[IV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vj )]Vi ,Vj ∈Ei0 ,

and FV0 (Ei0 ) ≤ min[FV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vj )]Vi ,Vj ∈Ei0
where i0 = 1, 2, . . . , n0 . 354
Here the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ej 0 and the Neutrosophic 355
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) Vj are single valued Neutrosophic sets. TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), 356
and FV 0 (Vi ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 357
indeterminacy-membership and the degree of falsity-membership the Neutrosophic 358
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) V. 359
TV0 (Ei0 ), TV0 (Ei0 ), and TV0 (Ei0 ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 360
indeterminacy-membership and the degree of falsity-membership of the Neutrosophic 361
SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) Ei0 to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) E. Thus, 362
the ii0 th element of the incidence matrix of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) 363
are of the form (Vi , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )), the sets V and E are crisp sets. 364
Definition 3.6 (Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). 365
(Ref. [96],Definition 2.7,p.3). 366
The Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ei0 and the Neutrosophic 368
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) Vi of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S = (V, E) 369
could be characterized as follow-up items. 370
(i) If |Vi | = 1, then Vi is called vertex; 371
(ii) if |Vi | ≥ 1, then Vi is called SuperVertex; 372
(iii) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called edge; 373
(iv) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 374
HyperEdge; 375
(v) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called 376
SuperEdge; 377
(vi) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 378
SuperHyperEdge. 379
If we choose different types of binary operations, then we could get hugely diverse 380
types of general forms of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG). 381
Definition 3.7 (t-norm). (Ref. [96], Definition 2.7, p.3). 382
A binary operation ⊗ : [0, 1] × [0, 1] → [0, 1] is a t-norm if it satisfies the following 383
for x, y, z, w ∈ [0, 1]: 384
(i) 1 ⊗ x = x; 385
(ii) x ⊗ y = y ⊗ x; 386
(iii) x ⊗ (y ⊗ z) = (x ⊗ y) ⊗ z; 387
(iv) If w ≤ x and y ≤ z then w ⊗ y ≤ x ⊗ z. 388
Definition 3.8. The degree of truth-membership, indeterminacy-membership

and falsity-membership of the subset X ⊂ A of the single valued Neutrosophic set
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X} (with respect to t-norm Tnorm ):
TA (X) = Tnorm [TA (vi ), TA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,
IA (X) = Tnorm [IA (vi ), IA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,

and FA (X) = Tnorm [FA (vi ), FA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X .
Definition 3.9. The support of X ⊂ A of the single valued Neutrosophic set
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}:
supp(X) = {x ∈ X : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) > 0}.
Definition 3.10. (General Forms of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). 389
Assume V 0 is a given set. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an 390
ordered pair S = (V, E), where 391
(i) V = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vn } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of V 0 ; 392
(ii) V = {(Vi , TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi )) : TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi ) ≥ 0}, (i = 393
1, 2, . . . , n); 394
(iii) E = {E1 , E2 , . . . , En0 } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of 395
V; 396
(iv) E = {(Ei0 , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )) : TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 ) ≥ 0}, (i0 = 397
1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 398
(v) Vi 6= ∅, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 399
(vi) Ei0 6= ∅, (i0 = 1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 400
P
(vii) i supp(Vi ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 401
0 0
P
(viii) i0 supp(Ei ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n ).
0 402
Here the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ej 0 and the Neutrosophic 403
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) Vj are single valued Neutrosophic sets. TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), 404
and FV 0 (Vi ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 405
indeterminacy-membership and the degree of falsity-membership the Neutrosophic 406
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) V. 407
TV0 (Ei0 ), TV0 (Ei0 ), and TV0 (Ei0 ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 408
indeterminacy-membership and the degree of falsity-membership of the Neutrosophic 409
SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) Ei0 to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) E. Thus, 410
the ii0 th element of the incidence matrix of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) 411
are of the form (Vi , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )), the sets V and E are crisp sets. 412
Definition 3.11 (Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). 413
The Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ei0 and the Neutrosophic 416
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) Vi of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S = (V, E) 417
(i) If |Vi | = 1, then Vi is called vertex; 419
(ii) if |Vi | ≥ 1, then Vi is called SuperVertex; 420
(iii) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called edge; 421
(iv) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 422
HyperEdge; 423
(v) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called 424
SuperEdge; 425
(vi) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 426
SuperHyperEdge. 427
This SuperHyperModel is too messy and too dense. Thus there’s a need to have 428
some restrictions and conditions on SuperHyperGraph. The special case of this 429
SuperHyperGraph makes the patterns and regularities. 430
Definition 3.12. A graph is SuperHyperUniform if it’s SuperHyperGraph and the 431
number of elements of SuperHyperEdges are the same. 432
To get more visions on SuperHyperUniform, the some SuperHyperClasses are 433
introduced. It makes to have SuperHyperUniform more understandable. 434
Definition 3.13. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. There are some 435
SuperHyperClasses as follows. 436
(i). It’s Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath if it’s only one SuperVertex as 437
intersection amid two given SuperHyperEdges with two exceptions; 438
(ii). it’s SuperHyperCycle if it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two 439
given SuperHyperEdges; 440
(iii). it’s SuperHyperStar it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid all 441
SuperHyperEdges; 442
(iv). it’s SuperHyperBipartite it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two 443
given SuperHyperEdges and these SuperVertices, forming two separate sets, has 444
no SuperHyperEdge in common; 445
(v). it’s SuperHyperMultiPartite it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid 446
two given SuperHyperEdges and these SuperVertices, forming multi separate sets, 447
has no SuperHyperEdge in common; 448
(vi). it’s SuperHyperWheel if it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two 449
given SuperHyperEdges and one SuperVertex has one SuperHyperEdge with any 450
common SuperVertex. 451
Definition 3.14. Let an ordered pair S = (V, E) be a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph

(NSHG) S. Then a sequence of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) and
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)
V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs
is called a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic 452
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) V1 to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vs if either 453
of following conditions hold: 454
(i) Vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 455
(ii) there’s a vertex vi ∈ Vi such that vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 456
(iii) there’s a SuperVertex Vi0 ∈ Vi such that Vi0 , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 457
(iv) there’s a vertex vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that Vi , vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 458
0 0
(v) there’s a SuperVertex Vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that Vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 459
(vi) there are a vertex vi ∈ Vi and a vertex vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that vi , vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 460
0 0
(vii) there are a vertex vi ∈ Vi and a SuperVertex Vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 461
(viii) there are a SuperVertex Vi0 ∈ Vi and a vertex vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that Vi0 , vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 462
(ix) there are a SuperVertex Vi0 ∈ Vi and a SuperVertex Vi+1

0
∈ Vi+1 such that 463
0 0
Vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 . 464
Definition 3.15. (Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPaths). 465
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an ordered pair S = (V, E).

a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV)
V1 to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vs is sequence of Neutrosophic
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) and Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)
V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs ,
(i) If for all Vi , Ej 0 , |Vi | = 1, |Ej 0 | = 2, then NSHP is called path; 467
(ii) if for all Ej 0 , |Ej 0 | = 2, and there’s Vi , |Vi | ≥ 1, then NSHP is called SuperPath; 468
(iii) if for all Vi , Ej 0 , |Vi | = 1, |Ej 0 | ≥ 2, then NSHP is called HyperPath; 469
(iv) if there are Vi , Ej 0 , |Vi | ≥ 1, |Ej 0 | ≥ 2, then NSHP is called Neutrosophic 470
SuperHyperPath . 471
Definition 3.16 (Neutrosophic Strength of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPaths). 472
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an ordered pair S = (V, E).

A Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex
(NSHV) V1 to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vs is sequence of Neutrosophic
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) and Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)
V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs ,
have 474
(i) Neutrosophic t-strength (min{T (Vi )}, m, n)si=1 ; 475
(ii) Neutrosophic i-strength (m, min{I(Vi )}, n)si=1 ; 476
(iii) Neutrosophic f-strength (m, n, min{F (Vi )})si=1 ; 477
(iv) Neutrosophic strength (min{T (Vi )}, min{I(Vi )}, min{F (Vi )})si=1 . 478
Definition 3.17 (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges 479
(NSHE)). (Ref. [96],Definition 5.4,p.7). 480
called 483
(ix) Neutrosophic t-connective if T (E) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic 484
t-strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 485
(NSHV) Vi to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vj where 1 ≤ i, j ≤ s; 486
(x) Neutrosophic i-connective if I(E) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic 487
i-strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 488
(xi) Neutrosophic f-connective if F (E) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic 490
f-strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 491
(xii) Neutrosophic connective if (T (E), I(E), F (E)) ≥ maximum number of 493
Neutrosophic strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic 494
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vj 495
where 1 ≤ i, j ≤ s. 496
Definition 3.18. (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic 497
SuperHyperDimension). 498
Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs } and 500
E 0 = {E1 , E2 , . . . , Ez }. Then either V 0 or E 0 is called 501
(i) Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperDimension if 502
∀Ea , Eb ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ E 0 , ∃Ec ∈ E 0 , such that d(Ea , Ec ) 6= d(Eb , Ec ); 503
(ii) Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperDimension if 504
∀Ea , Eb ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ E 0 , ∃Ec ∈ E 0 , such that d(Ea , Ec ) 6= d(Eb , Ec ); and 505
|Ei |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY = |Ej |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY ; 506
(iii) Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperDimension if 507
∀Va , Vb ∈ VESHG:(V,E) \ V 0 , ∃Vc ∈ V 0 , such that d(Va , Vc ) 6= d(Vb , Vc ); 508
(iv) Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperDimension if 509
∀Va , Vb ∈ VESHG:(V,E) \ V 0 , ∃Vc ∈ V 0 , such that d(Va , Vc ) 6= d(Vb , Vc ); and 510
|Vi |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY = |Vj |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY ; 511
(v) Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension if it’s either of Neutrosophic 512
v-SuperHyperDimension, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperDimension. 514
Definition 3.19. ((Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDimension). 515
called 518
(i) an Extreme SuperHyperDimension if it’s either of Neutrosophic 519
v-SuperHyperDimension, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperDimension and 521
C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum 522
Extreme cardinality of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality 523
of the Extreme SuperHyperEdges in the consecutive Extreme sequence of Extreme 524
SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 525
Extreme SuperHyperDimension; 526
(ii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension if it’s either of Neutrosophic 527
Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension; 534
(iii) an Extreme SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either 535
of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperDimension, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperDimension, 536
Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperDimension, and Neutrosophic 537
rv-SuperHyperDimension and C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph 538
N SHG : (V, E) is the Extreme SuperHyperPolynomial contains the Extreme 539
coefficients defined as the Extreme number of the maximum Extreme cardinality 540
of the Extreme SuperHyperEdges of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high 541
SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Extreme SuperHyperDimension; and 543
the Extreme power is corresponded to its Extreme coefficient; 544
(iv) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s 545
either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperDimension, Neutrosophic 546
re-SuperHyperDimension, Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperDimension, and 547
Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperDimension and C(N SHG) for a Neutrosophic 548
SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPolynomial 549
contains the Neutrosophic coefficients defined as the Neutrosophic number of the 550
maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges of a 551
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high Neutrosophic cardinality consecutive 552
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that 553
they form the Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension; and the Neutrosophic power is 554
corresponded to its Neutrosophic coefficient; 555
(v) an Extreme V-SuperHyperDimension if it’s either of Neutrosophic 556
of the Extreme SuperHyperVertices in the consecutive Extreme sequence of 561
Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form 562
the Extreme SuperHyperDimension; 563
(vi) a Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDimension if it’s either of Neutrosophic 564
Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of a 568
they form the Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension; 571
(vii) an Extreme V-SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s 572
SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Extreme SuperHyperPolynomial 576
contains the Extreme coefficients defined as the Extreme number of the maximum 577
Extreme cardinality of the Extreme SuperHyperVertices of an Extreme 578
SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality consecutive Extreme 579
Extreme SuperHyperDimension; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its 581
Extreme coefficient; 582
(viii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s 583
Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperDimension and C(N SHG) for a Neutrosophic 586
maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of a 589
they form the Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension; and the Neutrosophic power is 592
corresponded to its Neutrosophic coefficient. 593
Definition 3.20. ((Extreme/Neutrosophic)δ−SuperHyperDimension). 594
Then 596
(i) an δ−SuperHyperDimension is a Neutrosophic kind of Neutrosophic 597
SuperHyperDimension such that either of the following expressions hold for the 598
Table 1. The Values of Vertices, SuperVertices, Edges, HyperEdges, and SuperHy-

perEdges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph Mentioned in the Definition
(3.23)
The Values of The Vertices The Number of Position in Alphabet
The Values of The SuperVertices The maximum Values of Its Vertices
The Values of The Edges The maximum Values of Its Vertices
The Values of The HyperEdges The maximum Values of Its Vertices
The Values of The SuperHyperEdges The maximum Values of Its Endpoints
Neutrosophic cardinalities of SuperHyperNeighbors of s ∈ S : 599
|S ∩ N (s)| > |S ∩ (V \ N (s))| + δ;

|S ∩ N (s)| < |S ∩ (V \ N (s))| + δ.
The Expression (3.1), holds if S is an δ−SuperHyperOffensive. And the 600
Expression (3.1), holds if S is an δ−SuperHyperDefensive; 601
(ii) a Neutrosophic δ−SuperHyperDimension is a Neutrosophic kind of 602
Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension such that either of the following 603
Neutrosophic expressions hold for the Neutrosophic cardinalities of 604
SuperHyperNeighbors of s ∈ S : 605
|S ∩ N (s)|N eutrosophic > |S ∩ (V \ N (s))|N eutrosophic + δ;

|S ∩ N (s)|N eutrosophic < |S ∩ (V \ N (s))|N eutrosophic + δ.
The Expression (3.1), holds if S is a Neutrosophic δ−SuperHyperOffensive. 606
And the Expression (3.1), holds if S is a Neutrosophic 607
δ−SuperHyperDefensive. 608
For the sake of having a Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension, there’s a need to 609
“redefine” the notion of “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”. The SuperHyperVertices 610
and the SuperHyperEdges are assigned by the labels from the letters of the alphabets. 611
In this procedure, there’s the usage of the position of labels to assign to the values. 612
Definition 3.21. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an ordered 613
pair S = (V, E). It’s redefined Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph if the Table (1) 614
holds. 615
It’s useful to define a “Neutrosophic” version of SuperHyperClasses. Since there’s 616
more ways to get Neutrosophic type-results to make a Neutrosophic more 617
understandable. 618
Definition 3.22. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an ordered 619
pair S = (V, E). There are some Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses if the Table (2) 620
holds. Thus Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath , SuperHyperDimension, SuperHyperStar, 621
SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultiPartite, and SuperHyperWheel, are 622
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath, Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle, 623
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar, Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite, 624
Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultiPartite, and Neutrosophic 625
SuperHyperWheel if the Table (2) holds. 626
It’s useful to define a “Neutrosophic” version of a Neutrosophic 627
SuperHyperDimension. Since there’s more ways to get type-results to make a 628
Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension more Neutrosophicly understandable. 629

perEdges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, Mentioned in the Definition
(3.22)

perEdges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph Mentioned in the Definition
(3.23)
For the sake of having a Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension, there’s a need to 630
“redefine” the Neutrosophic notion of “Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension”. The 631
SuperHyperVertices and the SuperHyperEdges are assigned by the labels from the 632
letters of the alphabets. In this procedure, there’s the usage of the position of labels to 633
assign to the values. 634
Definition 3.23. Assume a SuperHyperDimension. It’s redefined a Neutrosophic 635
SuperHyperDimension if the Table (3) holds. 636
4 Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension But As The 637
Extensions Excerpt From Dense And Super 638
Forms 639
Example 4.1. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an ordered pair 640
S = (V, E) in the mentioned Neutrosophic Figures in every Neutrosophic items. 641
• On the Figure (1), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 642
SuperHyperDimension, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly 643
straightforward. E1 and E3 are some empty Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges but 644
E2 is a loop Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge and E4 is a Neutrosophic 645
SuperHyperEdge. Thus in the terms of Neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbor, 646
there’s only one Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge, namely, E4 . The Neutrosophic 647
SuperHyperVertex, V3 is Neutrosophic isolated means that there’s no 648
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge has it as a Neutrosophic endpoint. Thus the 649
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 , is excluded in every given Neutrosophic 650
SuperHyperDimension. 651
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension = {Ei }3i=1 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial = 4z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDimension = {Vi }3i=1 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial = 4z 3 .
652
Figure 1. The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions

of Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension in the Neutrosophic Example (16.3)
straightforward. E1 , E2 and E3 are some empty Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges 655
but E4 is a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. Thus in the terms of Neutrosophic 656
SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only one Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge, namely, 657
E4 . The Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 is Neutrosophic isolated means that 658
there’s no Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge has it as a Neutrosophic endpoint. Thus 659
the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 , is excluded in every given Neutrosophic 660

662
straightforward. 665

666



C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension = {Ei }i6=1,2 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial = z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDimension = {Vi }Vi 6=V3 ,V4 ,O .
670
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension = {Ei }i6=1 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDimension = {Vi }i6=5,6 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial
= 5 × 4 + 4 × 3 + 4 × 5 × 4z 13 .
674

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial
= 2 × 8z 21 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-Quasi-SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial
= 2 × 820 .
678



C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension = {Ei }i6=13,15,16 .

= 3 × 2 × 1z 13 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDimension = {Vi }i6=6,12,13 .
= (3 × 2 × 4) + (2 × 4 × 2 × 3) + z 11 .
682

= 3 × 1 × 2z 2 .
= (3 × 2 × 4) + (2 × 4 × 2 × 3) + z 11 .
686


= 2 × 8z 21 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-Quasi-SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial
= 2 × 820 .
690

= 3 × 1 × 2z 2 .
= (3 × 2 × 4) + (2 × 4 × 2 × 3) + z 11 .
694

Figure 10. The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic

Notions of Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension in the Neutrosophic Example (16.3)


C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial sz 6 .
= 3 × 2z 4 .
698
C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperDimension = {Ei }i6=1 .

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial = 6z 5 .
C(N SHG)Extreme V-SuperHyperDimension = {Vi }i6=2,4 .
C(N SHG)Extreme V-SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial =
= 4z 8 .
702

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial sz 6 .
= 3 × 2z 4 .

706
C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperDimension = {E2 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial = 2z.
C(N SHG)Extreme V-SuperHyperDimension = {V2 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme V-SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial = 2z.
710
C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperDimension = {E1 }

C(N SHG)Extreme V-SuperHyperDimension = {V5 , Vi }i6=2,4 .
C(N SHG)Extreme V-SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial = 2z.
714

C(N SHG)Extreme V-SuperHyperDimension = {V1 , Vi }i6=2,6,10,17,22 .
C(N SHG)Extreme V-SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial = 8z n−5 .



718

C(N SHG)Extreme V-SuperHyperDimension = {V27 , Vi }i6=2,6,10,17,22 .
722

C(N SHG)Extreme V-SuperHyperDimension = {V27 , Vi }i6=1,2,6,10,17,22 .
726
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension = {E1 , E2 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDimension = {V1 , V2 }.
730





C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperDimension = {Ei }i6=1 .

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial = 10z 10 .
C(N SHG)Extreme V-SuperHyperDimension
= {Vi }Vi 6=V1 ,{H13 } .
C(N SHG)Extreme V-SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial = sz.
734
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension = {E2 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial = 2z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDimension = {V1 , V2 }.
738



C(N SHG)Extreme V-SuperHyperDimension
= {V1 , Vi }i6=2,10,6,5 .
C(N SHG)Extreme V-SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial
= 5 × 1z n−4 .
742
5 The Neutrosophic Departures on The Theoretical 743
Results Toward Theoretical Motivations 744
The previous Neutrosophic approach apply on the upcoming Neutrosophic results on 745
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses. 746
Proposition 5.1. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath ESHP : (V, E). 747
Then 748
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension = {E1 }

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial = 2z
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDimension
= {V1 , V EXT ERN AL , V IN T ERN AL }Vi 6=nV EXT ERN AL
n−{V1 ,V EXT ERN AL ,V IN T ERN AL }V EXT ERN AL
= nz i 6=nV
Figure 23. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath Associated to the Notions of Neutrosophic

SuperHyperDimension in the Example (16.5)
Proof. Let 749
P :
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
V3EXT ERN AL , E3 ,
...
be a longest path taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath 750
ESHP : (V, E). There’s a new way to redefine as 751
ViEXT ERN AL ∼ VjEXT ERN AL ≡

∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL ∈ Ez ≡
∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , {ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL } ⊆ Ez .
The term “EXTERNAL” implies |N (ViEXT ERN AL )| ≥ |N (Vj )| where Vj is 752
corresponded to ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of SuperHyperDimension. The latter is 753
Example 5.2. In the Figure (23), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath 755
ESHP : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, in the 756
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (23), is the SuperHyperDimension. 757
There are two notions on SuperHyperDimension in SuperHyperCycle. Twin and 758
antipodal. The first is about having the same SuperHyperNeighborhoods and the latter 759
is having the same SuperHyperDistance but both could not be out of the any given 760
SuperHyperDimension easily. All Twin SuperHyperVertices could not be out of the any 761
given SuperHyperDimension and one of them could be out but the latter have to be 762
inside. All Antipodal SuperHyperVertices could not be out of the any given 763
SuperHyperDimension and one of them could be out but the latter have to be inside. 764
and one of them could be out but the latter have to be inside. The proof for both of the 765
is straightforward. 766
Proposition 5.3. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle ESHC : (V, E). 767
Then 768
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension = {E1 , E2 }

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial = nz 2
= {V1 , V2 , V EXT ERN AL , V IN T ERN AL }Vi 6=nV EXT ERN AL
n−{V1 ,V2 ,V EXT ERN AL ,V IN T ERN AL }V EXT ERN AL
= nz i 6=nV
Proof. Let 769
P :
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
V3EXT ERN AL , E3 ,
...
be a longest path taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle 770
ESHC : (V, E). There’s a new way to redefine as 771

Example 5.4. In the Figure (24), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle 775
N SHC : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Neutrosophic 776
SuperHyperSet, in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (24), is the Neutrosophic 777
Proposition 5.5. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). 779
Then 780
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension

= {Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }Ei 6=E1 .
= nz |i | E1 6=Ei ∈EESHG:(V,E) |
.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDimension = {Vi ∈ VESHG:(V,E) }Vi 6=V1 ,V2 .
= n choose two z n−|{Vi ∈VESHG:(V,E) }Vi 6=V1 ,V2 | .
Proof. Let 781
P : ViEXT ERN AL , Ei , CEN T ER, Ej .

be a longest path taken a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). 782
There’s a new way to redefine as 783

Figure 24. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions

Example 5.6. In the Figure (25), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar 787
ESHS : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, 788
by the Algorithm in previous Neutrosophic result, of the Neutrosophic 789
SuperHyperVertices of the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E), in 790
the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (25), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension. 791
Proposition 5.7. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite 792
ESHB : (V, E). Then 793

= {Ea ∈ EPi ESHG:(V,E) ,
∀Pi ESHG:(V,E) , |Pi ESHG:(V,E) | = min |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈ P ESHG:(V,E) |}.
i
ESHG:(V,E)
∈P ESHG:(V,E) |
= z min |Pi
where ∀Pi ESHG:(V,E) , |Pi ESHG:(V,E) |
= min |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈ P ESHG:(V,E) |}.
i
= {VaEXT ERN AL ∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , Vb
EXT ERN AL
∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , i 6= j}.

X X
= =( (|Pi ESHG:(V,E) |choose 2) = z 2 .
EXT ERN AL |
|VESHG:(V,E) i=|P ESHG:(V,E) |
Neutrosophic Cardinality
Figure 25. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of

Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension in the Neutrosophic Example (16.9)
Proof. Let 794
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
is a longest path taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite 795
ESHB : (V, E). There’s a new way to redefine as 796

straightforward. Then there’s no at least one SuperHyperDimension. Thus the notion of 799
quasi may be up but the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperDimension could be 800
applied. There are only two SuperHyperParts. Thus every SuperHyperPart could have 801
one SuperHyperVertex as the representative in the 802
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
is a longest SuperHyperDimension taken from a connected Neutrosophic 803
SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E). Thus only some SuperHyperVertices and only 804
minimum-Neutrosophic-of-SuperHyperPart SuperHyperEdges are attained in any 805
Figure 26. Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite Neutrosophic Associated to the Neutro-

sophic Notions of Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension in the Example (16.11)
solution 806
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
The latter is straightforward. 807
Example 5.8. In the Neutrosophic Figure (26), the connected Neutrosophic 808
SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), is Neutrosophic highlighted and Neutrosophic 809
featured. The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Neutrosophic Algorithm in 810
previous Neutrosophic result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected 811
Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic 812
SuperHyperModel (26), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension. 813
Proposition 5.9. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite 814
ESHM : (V, E). Then 815

i
ESHG:(V,E)
∈P ESHG:(V,E) |
= z min |Pi
i
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , Vb
EXT ERN AL
∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , i 6= j}.

X X
EXT ERN AL |
Proof. Let 816
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E). There’s a new way to redefine as 818

straightforward. Then there’s no at least one SuperHyperDimension. Thus the notion of 821
quasi may be up but the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperDimension could be 822
applied. There are only z 0 SuperHyperParts. Thus every SuperHyperPart could have 823
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
is a longest path taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite 825
ESHM : (V, E). Thus only some SuperHyperVertices and only 826
solution 828
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
ESHM : (V, E). The latter is straightforward. 830
Figure 27. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite Associated to the Notions of

Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension in the Example (16.13)
Example 5.10. In the Figure (27), the connected Neutrosophic 831
SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E), is highlighted and Neutrosophic featured. 832
The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Algorithm in previous Neutrosophic 833
result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected Neutrosophic 834
SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (27), 835
is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension. 836
Proposition 5.11. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel 837
ESHW : (V, E). Then, 838

= {Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }Ei 6=E1 .
= nz |i | E1 6=Ei ∈EESHG:(V,E) | .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDimension = {Vi ∈ VESHG:(V,E) }Vi 6=V1 ,V2 .
= n choose two z n−|{Vi ∈VESHG:(V,E) }Vi 6=V1 ,V2 | .
Proof. Let 839
P : V EXT ERN AL i , E ∗ i , CEN T ER, Ej .
SuperHyperWheel ESHW : (V, E). There’s a new way to redefine as 841

straightforward. Then there’s at least one SuperHyperDimension. Thus the notion of 844
Figure 28. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel Neutrosophic Associated to the Neutro-

sophic Notions of Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension in the Neutrosophic Example
(16.15)
quasi isn’t up and the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperDimension could be 845
applied. The unique embedded SuperHyperDimension proposes some longest 846
SuperHyperDimension excerpt from some representatives. The latter is 847
SuperHyperWheel N SHW : (V, E), is Neutrosophic highlighted and featured. The 850
obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Algorithm in previous result, of the 851
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel 852
ESHW : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (28), is the Neutrosophic 853
6 The Surveys of Mathematical Sets On The 855
Results But As The Initial Motivation 856
For the SuperHyperDimension, Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension, and the 857
Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension, some general results are introduced. 858
Remark 6.1. Let remind that the Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension is “redefined” on 859
the positions of the alphabets. 860
Corollary 6.2. Assume Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension. Then 861
N eutrosophic SuperHyperDimension =
{theSuperHyperDimensionof theSuperHyperV ertices |
max |SuperHyperOf f ensive
SuperHyperDimension
|N eutrosophiccardinalityamidthoseSuperHyperDimension. }
plus one Neutrosophic SuperHypeNeighbor to one. Where σi is the unary operation on 862
the SuperHyperVertices of the SuperHyperGraph to assign the determinacy, the 863
indeterminacy and the neutrality, for i = 1, 2, 3, respectively. 864
Corollary 6.3. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph on the same identical letter 865
of the alphabet. Then the notion of Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension and 866
SuperHyperDimension coincide. 867
of the alphabet. Then a consecutive sequence of the SuperHyperVertices is a 869
Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension if and only if it’s a SuperHyperDimension. 870
of the alphabet. Then a consecutive sequence of the SuperHyperVertices is a strongest 872
SuperHyperDimension if and only if it’s a longest SuperHyperDimension. 873
Corollary 6.6. Assume SuperHyperClasses of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph on the 874
same identical letter of the alphabet. Then its Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension is its 875
SuperHyperDimension and reversely. 876
Corollary 6.7. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath(-/SuperHyperDimension, 877
SuperHyperStar, SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, SuperHyperWheel) on 878
the same identical letter of the alphabet. Then its Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension is 879
its SuperHyperDimension and reversely. 880
Corollary 6.8. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. Then its Neutrosophic 881
SuperHyperDimension isn’t well-defined if and only if its SuperHyperDimension isn’t 882
well-defined. 883
Corollary 6.9. Assume SuperHyperClasses of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. Then 884
its Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension isn’t well-defined if and only if its 885
SuperHyperDimension isn’t well-defined. 886
Then its Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension isn’t well-defined if and only if its 889
SuperHyperDimension isn’t well-defined. 890
Corollary 6.11. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. Then its Neutrosophic 891
SuperHyperDimension is well-defined if and only if its SuperHyperDimension is 892
well-defined. 893
Corollary 6.12. Assume SuperHyperClasses of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. 894
Then its Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension is well-defined if and only if its 895
SuperHyperDimension is well-defined. 896
Then its Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension is well-defined if and only if its 899
SuperHyperDimension is well-defined. 900
Proposition 6.14. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. Then V 901
is 902
(i) : the dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension; 903
(ii) : the strong dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension; 904
(iii) : the connected dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension; 905
(iv) : the δ-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension; 906
(v) : the strong δ-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension; 907
(vi) : the connected δ-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension. 908
Proposition 6.15. Let N T G : (V, E, σ, µ) be a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. Then 909
∅ is 910
(i) : the SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension; 911
(ii) : the strong SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension; 912
(iii) : the connected defensive SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension; 913
(iv) : the δ-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension; 914
(v) : the strong δ-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension; 915
(vi) : the connected δ-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension. 916
Proposition 6.16. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. Then an 917
independent SuperHyperSet is 918
(i) : the SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension; 919
(ii) : the strong SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension; 920
(iii) : the connected SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension; 921
(iv) : the δ-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension; 922
(v) : the strong δ-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension; 923
(vi) : the connected δ-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension. 924
Proposition 6.17. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a Neutrosophic SuperHyperUniform 925
SuperHyperGraph which is a SuperHyperDimension/SuperHyperPath. Then V is a 926
maximal 927
(i) : SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension; 928
(ii) : strong SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension; 929
(iii) : connected SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension; 930
(iv) : O(ESHG)-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension; 931
(v) : strong O(ESHG)-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension; 932
(vi) : connected O(ESHG)-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension; 933
Where the exterior SuperHyperVertices and the interior SuperHyperVertices coincide. 934
Proposition 6.18. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph which is a 935
SuperHyperUniform SuperHyperWheel. Then V is a maximal 936
(i) : dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension; 937
(ii) : strong dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension; 938
(iii) : connected dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension; 939
(iv) : O(ESHG)-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension; 940
(v) : strong O(ESHG)-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension; 941
(vi) : connected O(ESHG)-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension; 942
Where the exterior SuperHyperVertices and the interior SuperHyperVertices coincide. 943
SuperHyperGraph which is a SuperHyperDimension/SuperHyperPath. Then the number 945
of 946
(i) : the SuperHyperDimension; 947
(ii) : the SuperHyperDimension; 948
(iii) : the connected SuperHyperDimension; 949
(iv) : the O(ESHG)-SuperHyperDimension; 950
(v) : the strong O(ESHG)-SuperHyperDimension; 951
(vi) : the connected O(ESHG)-SuperHyperDimension. 952
is one and it’s only V. Where the exterior SuperHyperVertices and the interior 953
SuperHyperVertices coincide. 954
SuperHyperGraph which is a SuperHyperWheel. Then the number of 956
(i) : the dual SuperHyperDimension; 957
(ii) : the dual SuperHyperDimension; 958
(iii) : the dual connected SuperHyperDimension; 959
(iv) : the dual O(ESHG)-SuperHyperDimension; 960
(v) : the strong dual O(ESHG)-SuperHyperDimension; 961
(vi) : the connected dual O(ESHG)-SuperHyperDimension. 962
is one and it’s only V. Where the exterior SuperHyperVertices and the interior 963
SuperHyperGraph which is a SuperHyperStar/SuperHyperComplete 966
SuperHyperBipartite/SuperHyperComplete SuperHyperMultipartite. Then a 967
SuperHyperSet contains [the SuperHyperCenter and] the half of multiplying r with the 968
number of all the SuperHyperEdges plus one of all the SuperHyperVertices is a 969
O(ESHG)
(iv) : 2 + 1-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension; 973
O(ESHG)
(v) : strong 2 + 1-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension; 974
O(ESHG)
(vi) : connected 2 + 1-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension. 975
SuperHyperBipartite/SuperHyperComplete SuperHyperMultipartite. Then a 978
SuperHyperSet contains the half of multiplying r with the number of all the 979
SuperHyperEdges plus one of all the SuperHyperVertices in the biggest SuperHyperPart 980
is a 981
(iv) : δ-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension; 985
(v) : strong δ-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension; 986
(vi) : connected δ-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension. 987
SuperHyperBipartite/SuperHyperComplete SuperHyperMultipartite. Then Then the 990
number of 991
O(ESHG)
(iv) : 2 + 1-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension; 995
O(ESHG)
(v) : strong 2 + 1-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension; 996
O(ESHG)
(vi) : connected 2 + 1-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension. 997
is one and it’s only S, a SuperHyperSet contains [the SuperHyperCenter and] the half of 998
multiplying r with the number of all the SuperHyperEdges plus one of all the 999
SuperHyperVertices. Where the exterior SuperHyperVertices and the interior 1000
Proposition 6.24. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. The 1002
number of connected component is |V − S| if there’s a SuperHyperSet which is a dual 1003
(iv) : SuperHyperDimension; 1007
(v) : strong 1-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension; 1008
(vi) : connected 1-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension. 1009
Proposition 6.25. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. Then the 1010
number is at most O(ESHG) and the Neutrosophic number is at most On (ESHG). 1011
Proposition 6.26. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph which is 1012
SuperHyperComplete. The number is O(ESHG:(V,E)) 2 + 1 and the Neutrosophic number is 1013
min Σv∈{v1 ,v2 ,··· ,vt } O(ESHG:(V,E)) ⊆V σ(v), in the setting of dual 1014
t>
2
(iv) : ( O(ESHG:(V,E))
2 + 1)-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension; 1018
(v) : strong ( O(ESHG:(V,E))

(vi) : connected ( O(ESHG:(V,E))

2 + 1)-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension. 1020
∅. The number is 0 and the Neutrosophic number is 0, for an independent 1022
SuperHyperSet in the setting of dual 1023
(iv) : 0-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension; 1027
(v) : strong 0-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension; 1028
(vi) : connected 0-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension. 1029
SuperHyperComplete. Then there’s no independent SuperHyperSet. 1031
SuperHyperDimension/SuperHyperPath/SuperHyperWheel. The number is 1033
O(ESHG : (V, E)) and the Neutrosophic number is On (ESHG : (V, E)), in the setting 1034
of a dual 1035
(iv) : O(ESHG : (V, E))-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension; 1039
(v) : strong O(ESHG : (V, E))-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension; 1040
(vi) : connected O(ESHG : (V, E))-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension. 1041
SuperHyperStar/complete SuperHyperBipartite/complete SuperHyperMultiPartite. The 1043
number is O(ESHG:(V,E))
2 + 1 and the Neutrosophic number is 1044
min Σv∈{v1 ,v2 ,··· ,vt } O(ESHG:(V,E)) ⊆V σ(v), in the setting of a dual 1045
t>
2
(iv) : ( O(ESHG:(V,E))
(v) : strong ( O(ESHG:(V,E))

(vi) : connected ( O(ESHG:(V,E))

2 + 1)-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension. 1051
Proposition 6.31. Let N SHF : (V, E) be a SuperHyperFamily of the ESHGs : (V, E) 1052
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs which are from one-type SuperHyperClass which the 1053
result is obtained for the individuals. Then the results also hold for the 1054
SuperHyperFamily N SHF : (V, E) of these specific SuperHyperClasses of the 1055
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs. 1056
Proposition 6.32. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a strong Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. If 1057
S is a dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension, then ∀v ∈ V \ S, ∃x ∈ S such 1058
that 1059
(i) v ∈ Ns (x); 1060
(ii) vx ∈ E. 1061
Proposition 6.33. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a strong Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. If 1062
S is a dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension, then 1063
(i) S is SuperHyperDimension set; 1064
(ii) there’s S ⊆ S 0 such that |S 0 | is SuperHyperChromatic number. 1065
Proposition 6.34. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a strong Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. 1066
Then 1067
(i) Γ ≤ O; 1068
(ii) Γs ≤ On . 1069
Proposition 6.35. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a strong Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 1070
which is connected. Then 1071
(i) Γ ≤ O − 1; 1072
(ii) Γs ≤ On − Σ3i=1 σi (x). 1073
Proposition 6.36. Let ESHG : (V, E) be an odd SuperHyperPath. Then 1074
(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {v2 , v4 , · · · , vn−1 } is a dual SuperHyperDefensive 1075
SuperHyperDimension; 1076
(ii) Γ = b n2 c + 1 and corresponded SuperHyperSet is S = {v2 , v4 , · · · , vn−1 }; 1077
(iii) Γs = min{Σs∈S={v2 ,v4 ,··· ,vn−1 } Σ3i=1 σi (s), Σs∈S={v1 ,v3 ,··· ,vn−1 } Σ3i=1 σi (s)}; 1078
(iv) the SuperHyperSets S1 = {v2 , v4 , · · · , vn−1 } and S2 = {v1 , v3 , · · · , vn−1 } are only 1079
a dual SuperHyperDimension. 1080
Proposition 6.37. Let ESHG : (V, E) be an even SuperHyperPath. Then 1081
(i) the set S = {v2 , v4 , · · · .vn } is a dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension; 1082
(ii) Γ = b n2 c and corresponded SuperHyperSets are {v2 , v4 , · · · .vn } and 1083
{v1 , v3 , · · · .vn−1 }; 1084
(iii) Γs = min{Σs∈S={v2 ,v4 ,··· ,vn } Σ3i=1 σi (s), Σs∈S={v1 ,v3 ,··· .vn−1 } Σ3i=1 σi (s)}; 1085
(iv) the SuperHyperSets S1 = {v2 , v4 , · · · .vn } and S2 = {v1 , v3 , · · · .vn−1 } are only 1086
dual SuperHyperDimension. 1087
Proposition 6.38. Let ESHG : (V, E) be an even SuperHyperDimension. Then 1088
(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {v2 , v4 , · · · , vn } is a dual SuperHyperDefensive 1089
(ii) Γ = b n2 c and corresponded SuperHyperSets are {v2 , v4 , · · · , vn } and 1091
{v1 , v3 , · · · , vn−1 }; 1092
(iii) Γs = min{Σs∈S={v2 ,v4 ,··· ,vn } σ(s), Σs∈S={v1 ,v3 ,··· ,vn−1 } σ(s)}; 1093
(iv) the SuperHyperSets S1 = {v2 , v4 , · · · , vn } and S2 = {v1 , v3 , · · · , vn−1 } are only 1094
Proposition 6.39. Let ESHG : (V, E) be an odd SuperHyperDimension. Then 1096
(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {v2 , v4 , · · · , vn−1 } is a dual SuperHyperDefensive 1097
(ii) Γ = b n2 c + 1 and corresponded SuperHyperSet is S = {v2 , v4 , · · · , vn−1 }; 1099
(iii) Γs = min{Σs∈S={v2 ,v4 ,··· .vn−1 } Σ3i=1 σi (s), Σs∈S={v1 ,v3 ,··· .vn−1 } Σ3i=1 σi (s)}; 1100
(iv) the SuperHyperSets S1 = {v2 , v4 , · · · .vn−1 } and S2 = {v1 , v3 , · · · .vn−1 } are only 1101
Proposition 6.40. Let ESHG : (V, E) be SuperHyperStar. Then 1103
(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {c} is a dual maximal SuperHyperDimension; 1104
(ii) Γ = 1; 1105
(iii) Γs = Σ3i=1 σi (c); 1106
(iv) the SuperHyperSets S = {c} and S ⊂ S 0 are only dual SuperHyperDimension. 1107
Proposition 6.41. Let ESHG : (V, E) be SuperHyperWheel. Then 1108
6+3(i−1)≤n
(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {v1 , v3 } ∪ {v6 , v9 · · · , vi+6 , · · · , vn }i=1 is a dual 1109
maximal SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension; 1110
6+3(i−1)≤n
(ii) Γ = |{v1 , v3 } ∪ {v6 , v9 · · · , vi+6 , · · · , vn }i=1 |; 1111
(iii) Γs = Σ{v1 ,v3 }∪{v6 ,v9 ··· ,vi+6 ,··· ,vn }6+3(i−1)≤n Σ3i=1 σi (s); 1112
i=1
6+3(i−1)≤n
(iv) the SuperHyperSet {v1 , v3 } ∪ {v6 , v9 · · · , vi+6 , · · · , vn }i=1 is only a dual 1113
maximal SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension. 1114
Proposition 6.42. Let ESHG : (V, E) be an odd SuperHyperComplete. Then 1115
b n c+1
(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {vi }i=1
2
is a dual SuperHyperDefensive 1116
(ii) Γ = b n2 c + 1; 1118
(iii) Γs = min{Σs∈S Σ3i=1 σi (s)} b n c+1

2
; 1119
S={vi }i=1
b n c+1
(iv) the SuperHyperSet S = {vi }i=1
2
is only a dual SuperHyperDefensive 1120
Proposition 6.43. Let ESHG : (V, E) be an even SuperHyperComplete. Then 1122
bnc
(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {vi }i=1
2
is a dual SuperHyperDefensive 1123
(ii) Γ = b n2 c; 1125
(iii) Γs = min{Σs∈S Σ3i=1 σi (s)} 2

bnc ; 1126
S={vi }i=1
bnc
(iv) the SuperHyperSet S = {vi }i=1
2
is only a dual maximal SuperHyperDefensive 1127
Proposition 6.44. Let N SHF : (V, E) be a m-SuperHyperFamily of Neutrosophic 1129
SuperHyperStars with common Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex SuperHyperSet. Then 1130
(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {c1 , c2 , · · · , cm } is a dual SuperHyperDefensive 1131
SuperHyperDimension for N SHF; 1132
(ii) Γ = m for N SHF : (V, E); 1133
(iii) Γs = Σm 3
i=1 Σj=1 σj (ci ) for N SHF : (V, E); 1134
(iv) the SuperHyperSets S = {c1 , c2 , · · · , cm } and S ⊂ S 0 are only dual 1135
SuperHyperDimension for N SHF : (V, E). 1136
Proposition 6.45. Let N SHF : (V, E) be an m-SuperHyperFamily of odd 1137
SuperHyperComplete SuperHyperGraphs with common Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 1138
SuperHyperSet. Then 1139
bn
2 c+1
(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {vi }i=1 is a dual maximal SuperHyperDefensive 1140
SuperHyperDimension for N SHF; 1141
(ii) Γ = b n2 c + 1 for N SHF : (V, E); 1142

b n c+1 for N SHF : (V, E); 1143
S={vi }i=1
b n c+1
(iv) the SuperHyperSets S = {vi }i=1
2
are only a dual maximal SuperHyperDimension 1144
for N SHF : (V, E). 1145
Proposition 6.46. Let N SHF : (V, E) be a m-SuperHyperFamily of even 1146
SuperHyperComplete SuperHyperGraphs with common Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 1147
SuperHyperSet. Then 1148
bn
2c
(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {vi }i=1 is a dual SuperHyperDefensive 1149
SuperHyperDimension for N SHF : (V, E); 1150
(ii) Γ = b n2 c for N SHF : (V, E); 1151

bnc for N SHF : (V, E); 1152
S={vi }i=1
bnc
(iv) the SuperHyperSets S = {vi }i=1
2
are only dual maximal SuperHyperDimension for 1153
N SHF : (V, E). 1154
Then following statements hold; 1156
(i) if s ≥ t and a SuperHyperSet S of SuperHyperVertices is an 1157
t-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension, then S is an 1158
s-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension; 1159
(ii) if s ≤ t and a SuperHyperSet S of SuperHyperVertices is a dual 1160
t-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension, then S is a dual 1161
s-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension. 1162
Then following statements hold; 1164
(i) if s ≥ t + 2 and a SuperHyperSet S of SuperHyperVertices is an 1165
t-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension, then S is an s-SuperHyperPowerful 1166
(ii) if s ≤ t and a SuperHyperSet S of SuperHyperVertices is a dual 1168
t-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension, then S is a dual 1169
s-SuperHyperPowerful SuperHyperDimension. 1170
Proposition 6.49. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a[an] 1171
[V-]SuperHyperUniform-strong-Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. Then following 1172
statements hold; 1173
(i) if ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| < b 2r c + 1, then ESHG : (V, E) is an 1174
2-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension; 1175
(ii) if ∀a ∈ V \ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| > b 2r c

+ 1, then ESHG : (V, E) is a dual 1176
(iii) if ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ V \ S| = 0, then ESHG : (V, E) is an V-SuperHyperDefensive 1178
(iv) if ∀a ∈ V \ S, |Ns (a) ∩ V \ S| = 0, then ESHG : (V, E) is a dual 1180
V-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension. 1181
Proposition 6.50. Let ESHG : (V, E) is a[an] 1182
[V-]SuperHyperUniform-strong-Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. Then following 1183
statements hold; 1184
(i) ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| < b 2r c + 1 if ESHG : (V, E) is an 2-SuperHyperDefensive 1185
(ii) ∀a ∈ V \ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| > b 2r c + 1 if ESHG : (V, E) is a dual 1187
(iii) ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ V \ S| = 0 if ESHG : (V, E) is an V-SuperHyperDefensive 1189
(iv) ∀a ∈ V \ S, |Ns (a) ∩ V \ S| = 0 if ESHG : (V, E) is a dual 1191
V-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension. 1192
[V-]SuperHyperUniform-strong-Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph which is a 1194
SuperHyperComplete. Then following statements hold; 1195
(i) ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| < b O−1

2 c + 1 if ESHG : (V, E) is an 2-SuperHyperDefensive 1196
(ii) ∀a ∈ V \ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| > b O−1

2 c + 1 if ESHG : (V, E) is a dual 1198
(iii) ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ V \ S| = 0 if ESHG : (V, E) is an (O − 1)-SuperHyperDefensive 1200
(O − 1)-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension. 1203
[V-]SuperHyperUniform-strong-Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph which is a 1205
SuperHyperComplete. Then following statements hold; 1206
(i) if ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| < b O−1

2 c + 1, then ESHG : (V, E) is an 1207
(ii) if ∀a ∈ V \ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| > b O−1

2 c + 1, then ESHG : (V, E) is a dual 1209
(iii) if ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ V \ S| = 0, then ESHG : (V, E) is 1211
(O − 1)-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension; 1212
(O − 1)-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension. 1214
[V-]SuperHyperUniform-strong-Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph which is 1216
SuperHyperDimension. Then following statements hold; 1217
(i) ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| < 2 if ESHG : (V, E)) is an 2-SuperHyperDefensive 1218
(ii) ∀a ∈ V \ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| > 2 if ESHG : (V, E) is a dual 2-SuperHyperDefensive 1220
(iii) ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ V \ S| = 0 if ESHG : (V, E) is an 2-SuperHyperDefensive 1222
2-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension. 1225
[V-]SuperHyperUniform-strong-Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph which is 1227
SuperHyperDimension. Then following statements hold; 1228
(i) if ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| < 2, then ESHG : (V, E) is an 2-SuperHyperDefensive 1229
(ii) if ∀a ∈ V \ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| > 2, then ESHG : (V, E) is a dual 1231
(iii) if ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ V \ S| = 0, then ESHG : (V, E) is an 2-SuperHyperDefensive 1233
2-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension. 1236
7 Neutrosophic Applications in Cancer’s 1237
Neutrosophic Recognition 1238
The cancer is the Neutrosophic disease but the Neutrosophic model is going to figure 1239
out what’s going on this Neutrosophic phenomenon. The special Neutrosophic case of 1240
this Neutrosophic disease is considered and as the consequences of the model, some 1241
parameters are used. The cells are under attack of this disease but the moves of the 1242
cancer in the special region are the matter of mind. The Neutrosophic recognition of the 1243
cancer could help to find some Neutrosophic treatments for this Neutrosophic disease. 1244
In the following, some Neutrosophic steps are Neutrosophic devised on this disease. 1245
Step 1. (Neutrosophic Definition) The Neutrosophic recognition of the cancer in 1246
the long-term Neutrosophic function. 1247
Step 2. (Neutrosophic Issue) The specific region has been assigned by the 1248
Neutrosophic model [it’s called Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph] and the long 1249
Neutrosophic cycle of the move from the cancer is identified by this research. 1250
Sometimes the move of the cancer hasn’t be easily identified since there are some 1251
determinacy, indeterminacy and neutrality about the moves and the effects of the 1252
cancer on that region; this event leads us to choose another model [it’s said to be 1253
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph] to have convenient perception on what’s 1254
happened and what’s done. 1255
Step 3. (Neutrosophic Model) There are some specific Neutrosophic models, 1256
which are well-known and they’ve got the names, and some general Neutrosophic 1257
models. The moves and the Neutrosophic traces of the cancer on the complex 1258
tracks and between complicated groups of cells could be fantasized by a 1259
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath(-/SuperHyperDimension, SuperHyperStar, 1260
SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, SuperHyperWheel). The aim is to 1261
find either the Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension or the Neutrosophic 1262
SuperHyperDimension in those Neutrosophic Neutrosophic SuperHyperModels. 1263
8 Case 1: The Initial Neutrosophic Steps 1264
Toward Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite as 1265
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel 1266
Step 4. (Neutrosophic Solution) In the Neutrosophic Figure (29), the 1267
Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite is Neutrosophic highlighted and Neutrosophic 1268
featured. 1269
By using the Neutrosophic Figure (29) and the Table (4), the Neutrosophic 1270
SuperHyperBipartite is obtained. 1271
The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Neutrosophic Algorithm in 1272
previous Neutrosophic result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the 1273
connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), in the 1274
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (29), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension. 1275
Figure 29. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite Associated to the Notions of Neutro-

sophic SuperHyperDimension
Table 4. The Values of Vertices, SuperVertices, Edges, HyperEdges, and SuperHyper-

Edges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite
Figure 30. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite Associated to the Notions of

Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension
Table 5. The Values of Vertices, SuperVertices, Edges, HyperEdges, and SuperHyper-

Edges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite
9 Case 2: The Increasing Neutrosophic Steps 1276
Toward Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite as 1277
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel 1278
Step 4. (Neutrosophic Solution) In the Neutrosophic Figure (30), the 1279
Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite is Neutrosophic highlighted and 1280
Neutrosophic featured. 1281
By using the Neutrosophic Figure (30) and the Table (5), the Neutrosophic 1282
SuperHyperMultipartite is obtained. 1283
The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Neutrosophic Algorithm in 1284
previous result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected 1285
Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic 1286
SuperHyperModel (30), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension. 1287
10 Wondering Open Problems But As The 1288
Directions To Forming The Motivations 1289
In what follows, some “problems” and some “questions” are proposed. 1290
The SuperHyperDimension and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension are defined 1291
on a real-world application, titled “Cancer’s Recognitions”. 1292
Question 10.1. Which the else SuperHyperModels could be defined based on Cancer’s 1293
recognitions? 1294
Question 10.2. Are there some SuperHyperNotions related to SuperHyperDimension 1295
and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension? 1296
Question 10.3. Are there some Algorithms to be defined on the SuperHyperModels to 1297
compute them? 1298
Question 10.4. Which the SuperHyperNotions are related to beyond the 1299
SuperHyperDimension and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension? 1300
Problem 10.5. The SuperHyperDimension and the Neutrosophic 1301
SuperHyperDimension do a SuperHyperModel for the Cancer’s recognitions and they’re 1302
based on SuperHyperDimension, are there else? 1303
Problem 10.6. Which the fundamental SuperHyperNumbers are related to these 1304
SuperHyperNumbers types-results? 1305
Problem 10.7. What’s the independent research based on Cancer’s recognitions 1306
concerning the multiple types of SuperHyperNotions? 1307
11 Conclusion and Closing Remarks 1308
In this section, concluding remarks and closing remarks are represented. The drawbacks 1309
of this research are illustrated. Some benefits and some advantages of this research are 1310
highlighted. 1311
This research uses some approaches to make Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs more 1312
understandable. In this endeavor, two SuperHyperNotions are defined on the 1313
SuperHyperDimension. For that sake in the second definition, the main definition of the 1314
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph is redefined on the position of the alphabets. Based on 1315
the new definition for the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, the new SuperHyperNotion, 1316
Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension, finds the convenient background to implement 1317
some results based on that. Some SuperHyperClasses and some Neutrosophic 1318
SuperHyperClasses are the cases of this research on the modeling of the regions where 1319
are under the attacks of the cancer to recognize this disease as it’s mentioned on the 1320
title “Cancer’s Recognitions”. To formalize the instances on the SuperHyperNotion, 1321
SuperHyperDimension, the new SuperHyperClasses and SuperHyperClasses, are 1322
introduced. Some general results are gathered in the section on the 1323
SuperHyperDimension and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension. The clarifications, 1324
instances and literature reviews have taken the whole way through. In this research, the 1325
literature reviews have fulfilled the lines containing the notions and the results. The 1326
SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph are the SuperHyperModels on 1327
the “Cancer’s Recognitions” and both bases are the background of this research. 1328
Sometimes the cancer has been happened on the region, full of cells, groups of cells and 1329
embedded styles. In this segment, the SuperHyperModel proposes some 1330
SuperHyperNotions based on the connectivities of the moves of the cancer in the longest 1331
and strongest styles with the formation of the design and the architecture are formally 1332
called “ SuperHyperDimension” in the themes of jargons and buzzwords. The prefix 1333
“SuperHyper” refers to the theme of the embedded styles to figure out the background 1334
for the SuperHyperNotions. In the Table (6), benefits and avenues for this research are, 1335
figured out, pointed out and spoken out. 1336
Table 6. An Overlook On This Research And Beyond

Advantages Limitations
1. Redefining Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 1. General Results
2. SuperHyperDimension
3. Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension 2. Other SuperHyperNumbers
4. Modeling of Cancer’s Recognitions
5. SuperHyperClasses 3. SuperHyperFamilies
12 Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality But As The 1337
Forms 1339
Definition 12.1. (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality). 1340
(i) Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperDuality if ∀Ei ∈ E 0 , ∃Ej ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ E 0 1344
such that Va ∈ Ei , Ej ; 1345
(ii) Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperDuality if ∀Ei ∈ E 0 , ∃Ej ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ E 0 1346
such that Va ∈ Ei , Ej and 1347
(iii) Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperDuality if ∀Vi ∈ V 0 , ∃Vj ∈ VESHG:(V,E) \ V 0 1349
such that Vi , Vj ∈ Ea ; 1350
(iv) Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperDuality if ∀Vi ∈ V 0 , ∃Vj ∈ VESHG:(V,E) \ V 0 1351
such that Vi , Vj ∈ Ea and 1352
(v) Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality if it’s either of Neutrosophic 1354
e-SuperHyperDuality, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperDuality, Neutrosophic 1355
v-SuperHyperDuality, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperDuality. 1356
Definition 12.2. ((Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDuality). 1357
called 1360
(i) an Extreme SuperHyperDuality if it’s either of Neutrosophic 1361
v-SuperHyperDuality, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperDuality and C(N SHG) for 1363
an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum Extreme 1364
cardinality of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality of the 1365
Extreme SuperHyperEdges in the consecutive Extreme sequence of Extreme 1366
Extreme SuperHyperDuality; 1368
(ii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality if it’s either of Neutrosophic 1369
a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum Neutrosophic 1372
cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges of a Neutrosophic 1373
Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality; 1376
(iii) an Extreme SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of 1377
Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperDuality, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperDuality, 1378
Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperDuality, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperDuality and 1379
C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Extreme 1380
SuperHyperPolynomial contains the Extreme coefficients defined as the Extreme 1381
number of the maximum Extreme cardinality of the Extreme SuperHyperEdges of 1382
an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality consecutive Extreme 1383
Extreme SuperHyperDuality; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its 1385
(iv) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either 1387
of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperDuality, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperDuality, 1388
C(N SHG) for a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the 1390
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPolynomial contains the Neutrosophic coefficients 1391
defined as the Neutrosophic number of the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of 1392
the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high 1393
Neutrosophic cardinality consecutive Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges and 1394
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Neutrosophic 1395
SuperHyperDuality; and the Neutrosophic power is corresponded to its 1396
Neutrosophic coefficient; 1397
(v) an Extreme R-SuperHyperDuality if it’s either of Neutrosophic 1398
Extreme SuperHyperVertices in the consecutive Extreme sequence of Extreme 1403
Extreme SuperHyperDuality; 1405
(vi) a Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality if it’s either of Neutrosophic 1406
cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of a Neutrosophic 1410
Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality; 1413
(vii) an Extreme R-SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either 1414
number of the maximum Extreme cardinality of the Extreme SuperHyperVertices 1419
of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality consecutive Extreme 1420
Extreme SuperHyperDuality; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its 1422
(viii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either 1424
the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high 1430
SuperHyperDuality; and the Neutrosophic power is corresponded to its 1433
Neutrosophic coefficient. 1434
Example 12.3. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an ordered 1435
pair S = (V, E) in the mentioned Neutrosophic Figures in every Neutrosophic items. 1436
SuperHyperDuality, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly 1438
straightforward. E1 and E3 are some empty Extreme SuperHyperEdges but E2 is 1439
a loop Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge and E4 is a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. 1440
Thus in the terms of Neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only one 1441
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge, namely, E4 . The Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, 1442
V3 is Neutrosophic isolated means that there’s no Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge 1443
has it as a Neutrosophic endpoint. Thus the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 , 1444
is excluded in every given Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality. 1445
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality = {E4 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality = {V4 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z.
SuperHyperDuality. 1454


C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality = {E4 , E2 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial = 2z 2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality = {V1 , V4 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial = 15z 2 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial = 4z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality = {E3i+13i=0 , E3i+243i=0 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial 6z 8 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality = {V3i+17i=0 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality = {E15 , E16 , E17 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial = z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality = {V3 , V13 , V8 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial =
4 × 5 × 5z 3 .

4 × 5 × 5z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality = {E3i+13i=0 , E23 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality = {V3i+13i=0 , V15 }.

4 × 5 × 5z 3 .

3 × 3z 2 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality = {V1 , Vii610=5,7,8 }.
i=4

3 × 3z 2 .



(2 × 1 × 2) + (2 × 4 × 5)z.

(1 × 1 × 2)z.

(2 × 2 × 2)z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality = {E3i+1i=03 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality = {V2i+1i=05 }.



C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial
= 10 × 9 + 10 × 6 + 12 × 9 + 12 × 6z 2 .
Proposition 12.4. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath 1517
ESHP : (V, E). Then 1518
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality =

|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= {Ei }i=1 3
.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial
= 3z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality
= {ViEXT ERN AL }i=1 3

.
Y |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= |V EXT ERN AL ESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality z 3 .
Proof. Let 1519
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
E |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality , V EXT ERN AL |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality .
3 3

corresponded to ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of SuperHyperDuality. The latter is 1523
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (23), is the SuperHyperDuality. 1527
Proposition 12.6. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle 1528
ESHC : (V, E). Then 1529
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality =

= {Ei }i=1 3
.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial
= 3z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality

.
Proof. Let 1530
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
3 3

Then 1541
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperDuality = {E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial
= |i | Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E)|Neutrosophic Cardinality |z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperDuality = {CEN T ER ∈ VESHG:(V,E) }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
Proof. Let 1542
P : ViEXT ERN AL , Ei , CEN T ER, VjEXT ERN AL .

the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (25), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality. 1552
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperDuality

= {Ei ∈ EPi ESHG:(V,E) , |Pi ESHG:(V,E) | = min |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈ P ESHG:(V,E) |}.
i
X
=( (min |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈ P ESHG:(V,E) |)choose|Pi ESHG:(V,E) |)
i
i=|P ESHG:(V,E) |
ESHG:(V,E)
∈P ESHG:(V,E) |
z min |Pi
= {ViEXT ERN AL ∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , Vi
EXT ERN AL
∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , i 6= j}.

X X
EXT ERN AL |
Proof. Let 1555
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmin i |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1

straightforward. Then there’s at least one SuperHyperDuality. Thus the notion of quasi 1560
isn’t up and the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperDuality could be applied. 1561
There are only two SuperHyperParts. Thus every SuperHyperPart could have one 1562
SuperHyperVertex as the representative in the 1563
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
is a longest SuperHyperDuality taken from a connected Neutrosophic 1564
solution 1567
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
SuperHyperModel (26), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality. 1574

= {Ei ∈ EPi ESHG:(V,E) , |Pi ESHG:(V,E) | = min |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈ P ESHG:(V,E) |}.
i
X
i
i=|P ESHG:(V,E) |
ESHG:(V,E)
∈P ESHG:(V,E) |
z min |Pi
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , Vi
EXT ERN AL
∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , i 6= j}.

X X
EXT ERN AL |
Proof. Let 1577
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
is a longest SuperHyperDuality taken from a connected Neutrosophic 1578

There are only z 0 SuperHyperParts. Thus every SuperHyperPart could have one 1584
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
solution 1589
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality. 1597
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperDuality = {E ∗ ∈ EESHG:(V,E)

∗
}.
= |i | Ei∗ ∈ EESHG:(V,E)|
∗
|z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperDuality = {CEN T ER ∈ VESHG:(V,E) }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
Proof. Let 1600
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1∗ ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2∗ ,
...,
∗ EXT ERN AL
E|E ∗ | , V|E ∗ |Neutrosophic Cardinality +1
ESHG:(V,E) Neutrosophic Cardinality ESHG:(V,E)
is a longest SuperHyperDuality taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel 1601
ESHW : (V, E). There’s a new way to redefine as 1602

∃!Ez∗ ∈ EESHG:(V,E)
∗
, ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL ∈ Ez∗ ≡
∃!Ez∗ ∈ EESHG:(V,E)
∗
, {ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL } ⊆ Ez∗ .
The unique embedded SuperHyperDuality proposes some longest SuperHyperDuality 1607
excerpt from some representatives. The latter is straightforward. 1608
13 Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin But As The 1615
Forms 1617
Definition 13.1. (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin). 1618
(i) Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperJoin if ∀Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ E 0 , ∃Ej ∈ E 0 , such 1622
that Va ∈ Ei , Ej ; and ∀Ei , Ej ∈ E 0 , such that Va 6∈ Ei , Ej ; 1623
(ii) Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperJoin if ∀Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ E 0 , ∃Ej ∈ E 0 , 1624
such that Va ∈ Ei , Ej ; ∀Ei , Ej ∈ E 0 , such that Va 6∈ Ei , Ej ; and 1625
(iii) Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperJoin if ∀Vi ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ V 0 , ∃Vj ∈ V 0 , such 1627
that Vi , Vj 6∈ Ea ; and ∀Vi , Vj ∈ V 0 , such that Vi , Vj 6∈ Ea ; 1628
(iv) Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperJoin if ∀Vi ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ V 0 , ∃Vj ∈ V 0 , such 1629
that Vi , Vj ∈ Ea ; ∀Vi , Vj ∈ V 0 , such that Vi , Vj 6∈ Ea ; and 1630
(v) Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin if it’s either of Neutrosophic 1632
e-SuperHyperJoin, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperJoin, Neutrosophic 1633
v-SuperHyperJoin, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperJoin. 1634
Definition 13.2. ((Neutrosophic) SuperHyperJoin). 1635
called 1638
(i) an Extreme SuperHyperJoin if it’s either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperJoin, 1639
Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperJoin, Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperJoin, and 1640
Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperJoin and C(N SHG) for an Extreme 1641
SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum Extreme cardinality of an 1642
Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality of the Extreme 1643
SuperHyperEdges in the consecutive Extreme sequence of Extreme 1644
Extreme SuperHyperJoin; 1646
(ii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin if it’s either of Neutrosophic 1647
v-SuperHyperJoin, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperJoin and C(N SHG) for a 1649
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum Neutrosophic 1650
Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin; 1654
(iii) an Extreme SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of 1655
Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperJoin, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperJoin, Neutrosophic 1656
v-SuperHyperJoin, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperJoin and C(N SHG) for an 1657
Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Extreme 1658
Extreme SuperHyperJoin; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its Extreme 1663
coefficient; 1664
(iv) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of 1665
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Neutrosophic 1668
Neutrosophic number of the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of the 1670
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high 1671
SuperHyperJoin; and the Neutrosophic power is corresponded to its Neutrosophic 1674
coefficient; 1675
(v) an Extreme R-SuperHyperJoin if it’s either of Neutrosophic 1676
Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum Extreme cardinality 1679
SuperHyperVertices in the consecutive Extreme sequence of Extreme 1681
Extreme SuperHyperJoin; 1683
(vi) a Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin if it’s either of Neutrosophic 1684
Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin; 1691
(vii) an Extreme R-SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of 1692
Extreme SuperHyperJoin; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its Extreme 1700
coefficient; 1701
(viii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of 1702
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high 1708
SuperHyperJoin; and the Neutrosophic power is corresponded to its Neutrosophic 1711
coefficient. 1712
SuperHyperJoin, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly 1716
SuperHyperJoin. 1724
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin = {E4 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin = {V4 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z.


C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin = {E4 , E2 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial = 2z 2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin = {V1 , V4 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial = 15z 2 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial = 4z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin = {E3i+13i=0 , E3i+243i=0 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial 6z 8 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin = {V3i+17i=0 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin = {E15 , E16 , E17 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial = z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin = {V3 , V13 , V8 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial =
4 × 5 × 5z 3 .

4 × 5 × 5z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin = {E3i+13i=0 , E23 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin = {V3i+13i=0 , V15 }.

4 × 5 × 5z 3 .

3 × 3z 2 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin = {V1 , Vii610=5,7,8 }.
i=4

3 × 3z 2 .



(1 × 5 × 5) + (1 × 2 + 1)z 3 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin = {V27 , V2 , V7 , V17 }.
(1 × 1 × 2 + 1)z 4 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin = {V27 , V2 , V7 , V17 }.
(1 × 1 × 2 + 1)z 4 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin = {E3i+1i=03 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin = {V2i+1i=05 }.



C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial
= 10 × 6 + 10 × 6 + 12 × 6 + 12 × 6z 2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin =

= {Ei }i=1 3
.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial
= 3z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin

.
Proof. Let 1798
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
3 3

corresponded to ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of SuperHyperJoin. The latter is 1802
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (23), is the SuperHyperJoin. 1806

= {Ei }i=1 3
.
= 3z 3 .

.
Proof. Let 1809
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
3 3

Then 1820
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperJoin = {E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperJoin = {CEN T ER ∈ VESHG:(V,E) }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
Proof. Let 1821

the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (25), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin. 1831
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperJoin

= (PERFECT MATCHING).
{Ei ∈ EPi ESHG:(V,E) ,
i
= (OTHERWISE).
{},
If ∃Pi ESHG:(V,E) , |Pi ESHG:(V,E) | =
6 min |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈ P ESHG:(V,E) |.
i
X
i
i=|P ESHG:(V,E) |
ESHG:(V,E)
∈P ESHG:(V,E) |
z min |Pi
i
= (OTHERWISE)0.
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , Vi
EXT ERN AL
∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , i 6= j}.

X X
EXT ERN AL |
Proof. Let 1834
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL

straightforward. Then there’s no at least one SuperHyperJoin. Thus the notion of quasi 1839
may be up but the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperJoin could be applied. 1840
There are only two SuperHyperParts. Thus every SuperHyperPart could have one 1841
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
is a longest SuperHyperJoin taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite 1843
ESHB : (V, E). Thus only some SuperHyperVertices and only 1844
solution 1846
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
SuperHyperModel (26), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin. 1853

i
= (OTHERWISE).
{},
i
X
i
i=|P ESHG:(V,E) |
ESHG:(V,E)
∈P ESHG:(V,E) |
z min |Pi
i
= (OTHERWISE)0.
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , Vi
EXT ERN AL
∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , i 6= j}.

X X
EXT ERN AL |
Proof. Let 1856
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
is a longest SuperHyperJoin taken from a connected Neutrosophic 1857

straightforward. Then there’s no at least one SuperHyperJoin. Thus the notion of quasi 1861
may be up but the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperJoin could be applied. 1862
There are only z 0 SuperHyperParts. Thus every SuperHyperPart could have one 1863
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
solution 1868
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin. 1876

= {Ei }i=1 3
.
= 3z 3 .

.
Proof. Let 1879
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
3 3
is a longest SuperHyperJoin taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel 1880

straightforward. Then there’s at least one SuperHyperJoin. Thus the notion of quasi 1884
isn’t up and the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperJoin could be applied. The 1885
unique embedded SuperHyperJoin proposes some longest SuperHyperJoin excerpt from 1886
some representatives. The latter is straightforward. 1887
14 Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect But As The 1894
Forms 1896
Definition 14.1. (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect). 1897
(i) Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperPerfect if ∀Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ E 0 , ∃!Ej ∈ E 0 , 1901
such that Va ∈ Ei , Ej ; 1902
(ii) Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperPerfect if ∀Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ E 0 , ∃!Ej ∈ E 0 , 1903
such that Va ∈ Ei , Ej ; and 1904
(iii) Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperPerfect if ∀Vi ∈ VESHG:(V,E) \ V 0 , ∃!Vj ∈ V 0 , 1906
such that Vi , Vj ∈ Ea ; 1907
(iv) Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperPerfect if ∀Vi ∈ VESHG:(V,E) \ V 0 , ∃!Vj ∈ V 0 , 1908
such that Vi , Vj ∈ Ea ; and 1909
(v) Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect if it’s either of Neutrosophic 1911
e-SuperHyperPerfect, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperPerfect, Neutrosophic 1912
v-SuperHyperPerfect, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperPerfect. 1913
Definition 14.2. ((Neutrosophic) SuperHyperPerfect). 1914
called 1917
(i) an Extreme SuperHyperPerfect if it’s either of Neutrosophic 1918
v-SuperHyperPerfect, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperPerfect and C(N SHG) for 1920
Extreme SuperHyperEdges in the consecutive Extreme sequence of Extreme 1923
Extreme SuperHyperPerfect; 1925
(ii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect if it’s either of Neutrosophic 1926
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect; 1933
(iii) an Extreme SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of 1934
Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperPerfect, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperPerfect, 1935
Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperPerfect, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperPerfect and 1936
Extreme SuperHyperPerfect; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its 1942
(iv) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either 1944
of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperPerfect, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperPerfect, 1945
the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high 1950
SuperHyperPerfect; and the Neutrosophic power is corresponded to its 1953
(v) an Extreme R-SuperHyperPerfect if it’s either of Neutrosophic 1955
Extreme SuperHyperVertices in the consecutive Extreme sequence of Extreme 1960
Extreme SuperHyperPerfect; 1962
(vi) a Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect if it’s either of Neutrosophic 1963
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect; 1970
(vii) an Extreme R-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either 1971
Extreme SuperHyperPerfect; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its 1979
(viii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either 1981
the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high 1987
SuperHyperPerfect; and the Neutrosophic power is corresponded to its 1990
SuperHyperPerfect, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly 1995
SuperHyperPerfect. 2003
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect = {E4 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect = {V4 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z.


C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect = {E4 , E2 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = 2z 2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect = {V1 , V4 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = 15z 2 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = 4z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect = {E3i+13i=0 , E3i+243i=0 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial 6z 8 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect = {V3i+17i=0 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect = {E15 , E16 , E17 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect = {V3 , V6 , V8 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial =
3 × 4 × 4z 3 .

3 × 4 × 4z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect = {E3i+13i=0 , E23 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z 5 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect = {V3i+13i=0 , V15 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z 5 .

3 × 4 × 4z 3 .

3 × 2z 2 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect = {V1 , Vii610=5,7,8 }.
i=4

3 × 3z 2 .



C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect = {V2 , V7 , V17 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial =
(1 × 5 × 5) + (1 × 2 + 1)z 3 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect = {V27 , V2 , V7 , V17 }.
(1 × 1 × 2 + 1)z 4 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect = {V27 , V2 , V7 , V17 }.
(1 × 1 × 2 + 1)z 4 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect = {E3i+1i=03 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect = {V2i+1i=05 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = 2z 6 .



C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect = {V3 , V6 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial
= 10 × 6 + 10 × 6 + 12 × 6 + 12 × 6z 2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect =

= {Ei }i=1 3
.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial
= 3z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect

.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial
Proof. Let 2077
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
3 3

corresponded to ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of SuperHyperPerfect. The latter is 2081
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (23), is the SuperHyperPerfect. 2085
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect =

= {Ei }i=1 3
.
= 3z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect

.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial
Proof. Let 2088
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
3 3

Then 2099
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect = {E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect = {CEN T ER ∈ VESHG:(V,E) }.
Proof. Let 2100

the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (25), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect. 2110
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect

i
= (OTHERWISE).
{},
i
X
i
i=|P ESHG:(V,E) |
ESHG:(V,E)
∈P ESHG:(V,E) |
z min |Pi
i
= (OTHERWISE)0.
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , Vi
EXT ERN AL
∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , i 6= j}.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial

X X
EXT ERN AL |
Proof. Let 2113
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL

straightforward. Then there’s no at least one SuperHyperPerfect. Thus the notion of 2118
quasi may be up but the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperPerfect could be 2119
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
is a longest SuperHyperPerfect taken from a connected Neutrosophic 2122
solution 2125
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
SuperHyperModel (26), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect. 2132

i
= (OTHERWISE).
{},
i
X
i
i=|P ESHG:(V,E) |
ESHG:(V,E)
∈P ESHG:(V,E) |
z min |Pi
i
= (OTHERWISE)0.
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , Vi
EXT ERN AL
∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , i 6= j}.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial

X X
EXT ERN AL |
Proof. Let 2135
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
is a longest SuperHyperPerfect taken from a connected Neutrosophic 2136

straightforward. Then there’s no at least one SuperHyperPerfect. Thus the notion of 2140
quasi may be up but the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperPerfect could be 2141
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
solution 2147
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect. 2155
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect = {E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect = {CEN T ER ∈ VESHG:(V,E) }.
Proof. Let 2158

is a longest SuperHyperPerfect taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel 2159

straightforward. Then there’s at least one SuperHyperPerfect. Thus the notion of quasi 2163
isn’t up and the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperPerfect could be applied. The 2164
unique embedded SuperHyperPerfect proposes some longest SuperHyperPerfect excerpt 2165
from some representatives. The latter is straightforward. 2166
15 Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal But As The 2173
Forms 2175
Definition 15.1. (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal). 2176
(i) Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperTotal if ∀Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , ∃!Ej ∈ E 0 , such 2180
that Va ∈ Ei , Ej ; 2181
(ii) Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperTotal if ∀Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , ∃!Ej ∈ E 0 , such 2182
that Va ∈ Ei , Ej ; and 2183
(iii) Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperTotal if ∀Vi ∈ VESHG:(V,E) , ∃!Vj ∈ V 0 , such 2185
that Vi , Vj ∈ Ea ; 2186
(iv) Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperTotal if ∀Vi ∈ VESHG:(V,E) , ∃!Vj ∈ V 0 , such 2187
that Vi , Vj ∈ Ea ; and 2188
(v) Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal if it’s either of Neutrosophic 2190
e-SuperHyperTotal, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperTotal, Neutrosophic 2191
v-SuperHyperTotal, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperTotal. 2192
Definition 15.2. ((Neutrosophic) SuperHyperTotal). 2193
called 2196
(i) an Extreme SuperHyperTotal if it’s either of Neutrosophic 2197
v-SuperHyperTotal, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperTotal and C(N SHG) for an 2199
SuperHyperEdges in the consecutive Extreme sequence of Extreme 2202
Extreme SuperHyperTotal; 2204
(ii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal if it’s either of Neutrosophic 2205
v-SuperHyperTotal, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperTotal and C(N SHG) for a 2207
Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal; 2212
(iii) an Extreme SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of 2213
Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperTotal, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperTotal, Neutrosophic 2214
Extreme SuperHyperTotal; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its Extreme 2221
coefficient; 2222
(iv) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of 2223
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high 2229
SuperHyperTotal; and the Neutrosophic power is corresponded to its 2232
(v) an Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal if it’s either of Neutrosophic 2234
SuperHyperVertices in the consecutive Extreme sequence of Extreme 2239
Extreme SuperHyperTotal; 2241
(vi) a Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperTotal if it’s either of Neutrosophic 2242
Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal; 2249
(vii) an Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of 2250
Extreme SuperHyperTotal; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its Extreme 2258
coefficient; 2259
(viii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of 2260
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high 2266
SuperHyperTotal; and the Neutrosophic power is corresponded to its 2269
SuperHyperTotal, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly 2274
SuperHyperTotal. 2282
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperTotal = {E4 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperTotal = {V4 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z.


C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi- = {E4 , E2 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = 2z 2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperTotal = {V1 , V4 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = 15z 2 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = 4z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal = {Ei+19i=0 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial 20z 10 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperTotal = {Vi+19i=0 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = 20z 10 .
C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperTotal = {E12 , E13 , E14 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = z 3 .
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal = {V12 , V13 , V14 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = z 3 .
C(N SHG)Extreme Quasi-SuperHyperTotal = {E4 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme Quasi-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial =
3 × 4 × 4z 3 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial 10z 10 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperTotal = {Vi+19i=0 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme Quasi-SuperHyperTotal = {E5 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme Quasi-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
3 × 4 × 4z 3 .
C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperTotal = {E1 , E6 , E7 , E8 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = 2z 4 .
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal = {V1 , V5 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z 2 .
C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperTotal = {E1 , E2 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal = {V1 , Vii68=4,5,6 }.
i=1




4 × 3z 3 .

C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal = {V1 , V2 , V6 , V17 }.
4 × 3z 4 .

C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal = {V1 , V2 , V6 , V17 }.
2 × 4 × 3z 4 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = 11z 10 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperTotal = {Vi+2i=011 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = 11z 10 .

C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal = {V1 , V }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial
= |(|V | − 1)z 2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal = {E1 , E2 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = 2z 2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperTotal = {V1 , V2 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme R-Quasi-SuperHyperTotal = {V3 , V10 , V6 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-Quasi-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial
= 3 × 6z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal =

|E | −2
= {Ei }i=1ESHG:(V,E) Neutrosophic Cardinality .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial
= z |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality −2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperTotal
|E | −2
= {ViEXT ERN AL }i=1ESHG:(V,E) Neutrosophic Cardinality .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial
Y
= |V EXT ERN AL ESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality z |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality −2
Proof. Let 2356
P :
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
V3EXT ERN AL , E3 ,
...

corresponded to ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of SuperHyperTotal. The latter is 2360
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (23), is the SuperHyperTotal. 2364
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal =

|E | −2
= {Ei }i=1ESHG:(V,E) Neutrosophic Cardinality .
= (|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality − 1)
z |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality −2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperTotal
|E | −2
= {ViEXT ERN AL }i=1ESHG:(V,E) Neutrosophic Cardinality .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial
Y
= |V EXT ERN AL ESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality z |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality −2
Proof. Let 2367
P :
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
V3EXT ERN AL , E3 ,
...,
E |E|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality −1 .
, V EXT ERN AL |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality −1

Then 2378
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal = {Ei , Ej ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.

= |i(i − 1) | Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E)|Neutrosophic Cardinality |z 2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperTotal = {CEN T ER, Vj ∈ VESHG:(V,E) }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial =
(|VESHG:(V,E)|Neutrosophic Cardinality |) choose (|VESHG:(V,E)|Neutrosophic Cardinality | − 1)
z2.
Proof. Let 2379

the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (25), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal. 2389
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal

i
ESHG:(V,E)
∈P ESHG:(V,E) |
= z min |Pi
i
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , Vb
EXT ERN AL
∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , i 6= j}.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial

X X
EXT ERN AL |
Proof. Let 2392
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2

straightforward. Then there’s no at least one SuperHyperTotal. Thus the notion of 2397
quasi may be up but the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperTotal could be 2398
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
is a longest SuperHyperTotal taken from a connected Neutrosophic 2401
solution 2404
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
SuperHyperModel (26), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal. 2411

i
ESHG:(V,E)
∈P ESHG:(V,E) |
= z min |Pi
i
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , Vb
EXT ERN AL
∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , i 6= j}.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial

X X
EXT ERN AL |
Proof. Let 2414
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
is a longest SuperHyperTotal taken from a connected Neutrosophic 2415

straightforward. Then there’s no at least one SuperHyperTotal. Thus the notion of 2419
quasi may be up but the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperTotal could be 2420
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
solution 2426
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal. 2434
∗
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal = {Ei , Ej ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.
∗
= |i(i − 1) | Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E)|Neutrosophic Cardinality
|z 2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperTotal = {CEN T ER, Vj ∈ VESHG:(V,E) }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial =
(|VESHG:(V,E)|Neutrosophic Cardinality |) choose (|VESHG:(V,E)|Neutrosophic Cardinality | − 1)
z2.
Proof. Let 2437
P : ViEXT ERN AL , Ei∗ , CEN T ER, Ej .

is a longest SuperHyperTotal taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel 2438

straightforward. Then there’s at least one SuperHyperTotal. Thus the notion of quasi 2442
isn’t up and the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperTotal could be applied. The 2443
unique embedded SuperHyperTotal proposes some longest SuperHyperTotal excerpt 2444
from some representatives. The latter is straightforward. 2445
16 Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected But As 2452
The Extensions Excerpt From Dense And Super 2453
Forms 2454
Definition 16.1. (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic 2455
SuperHyperConnected). 2456
(i) Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperConnected if 2460
∀Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ E 0 , ∃Ej ∈ E 0 , such that Va ∈ Ei , Ej ; and ∀Ei , Ej ∈ E 0 , such 2461
that Va 6∈ Ei , Ej ; 2462
(ii) Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperConnected if 2463
∀Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ E 0 , ∃Ej ∈ E 0 , such that Va ∈ Ei , Ej ; ∀Ei , Ej ∈ E 0 , such 2464
that Va 6∈ Ei , Ej ; and 2465
(iii) Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperConnected if 2467
∀Vi ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ V 0 , ∃Vj ∈ V 0 , such that Vi , Vj 6∈ Ea ; and ∀Vi , Vj ∈ V 0 , such 2468
that Vi , Vj 6∈ Ea ; 2469
(iv) Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperConnected if 2470
∀Vi ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ V 0 , ∃Vj ∈ V 0 , such that Vi , Vj ∈ Ea ; ∀Vi , Vj ∈ V 0 , such that 2471
Vi , Vj 6∈ Ea ; and 2472
(v) Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected if it’s either of Neutrosophic 2474
e-SuperHyperConnected, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperConnected, Neutrosophic 2475
v-SuperHyperConnected, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperConnected. 2476
Definition 16.2. ((Neutrosophic) SuperHyperConnected). 2477
called 2480
(i) an Extreme SuperHyperConnected if it’s either of Neutrosophic 2481
v-SuperHyperConnected, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperConnected and 2483
of the Extreme SuperHyperEdges in the consecutive Extreme sequence of Extreme 2486
Extreme SuperHyperConnected; 2488
(ii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected if it’s either of Neutrosophic 2489
Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected; 2496
(iii) an Extreme SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either 2497
of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperConnected, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperConnected, 2498
Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperConnected, and Neutrosophic 2499
rv-SuperHyperConnected and C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph 2500
N SHG : (V, E) is the Extreme SuperHyperPolynomial contains the Extreme 2501
coefficients defined as the Extreme number of the maximum Extreme cardinality 2502
of the Extreme SuperHyperEdges of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high 2503
SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Extreme SuperHyperConnected; and 2505
the Extreme power is corresponded to its Extreme coefficient; 2506
(iv) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s 2507
either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperConnected, Neutrosophic 2508
re-SuperHyperConnected, Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperConnected, and 2509
Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperConnected and C(N SHG) for a Neutrosophic 2510
maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges of a 2513
they form the Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected; and the Neutrosophic power is 2516
corresponded to its Neutrosophic coefficient; 2517
(v) an Extreme R-SuperHyperConnected if it’s either of Neutrosophic 2518
of the Extreme SuperHyperVertices in the consecutive Extreme sequence of 2523
Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form 2524
the Extreme SuperHyperConnected; 2525
(vi) a Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnected if it’s either of Neutrosophic 2526
Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of a 2530
they form the Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected; 2533
(vii) an Extreme R-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s 2534
Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperConnected and C(N SHG) for an Extreme 2537
SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Extreme SuperHyperPolynomial 2538
contains the Extreme coefficients defined as the Extreme number of the maximum 2539
Extreme cardinality of the Extreme SuperHyperVertices of an Extreme 2540
SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality consecutive Extreme 2541
Extreme SuperHyperConnected; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its 2543
(viii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s 2545
Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperConnected and C(N SHG) for a Neutrosophic 2548
maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of a 2551
they form the Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected; and the Neutrosophic power is 2554
corresponded to its Neutrosophic coefficient. 2555
SuperHyperConnected, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly 2559
SuperHyperConnected. 2567
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected = {E4 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnected = {V4 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z.


C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected = {E1 , E2 , E4 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {V1 , V4 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = 15z 2 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = 4z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {Ei+19i=0 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial 20z 10 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {Vi+19i=0 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperConnected = {E12 , E13 , E14 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z 3 .
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperConnected = {V12 , V13 , V14 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z 3 .
C(N SHG)Extreme Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {E4 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial =
3 × 4 × 4z 3 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial 10z 10 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnected = {Vi+119
i=11
, V22 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = 20z 10 .
C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperConnected = {E5 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
3 × 4 × 4z 3 .
C(N SHG)Extreme Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {E1 , E6 , E7 , E8 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = 2z 4 .
C(N SHG)Extreme R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {V1 , V5 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z 2 .
C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperConnected = {E1 , E2 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = 5z 2 .
C(N SHG)Extreme R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {V1 , Vii68=4,5,6 }.
i=1
C(N SHG)Extreme R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z 5 .
C(N SHG)Extreme Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {E3 , E9 , E6 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z 3 .
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperConnected = {V1 , V5 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z 2 .

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperConnected = {V1 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z.

C(N SHG)Extreme Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z 3 .
C(N SHG)Extreme R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {V2 , V3 , V4 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z 3 .
C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperConnected = {E2 , E3 , E4 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z 3 .
4 × 3z 3 .

C(N SHG)Extreme R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {V1 , V2 , V6 , V17 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial =
4 × 3z 4 .

C(N SHG)Extreme R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {V1 , V2 , V6 , V17 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial =
2 × 4 × 3z 4 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = 11z 10 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {Vi+2i=011 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = 10z.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperConnected = {V1 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z.

C(N SHG)Extreme Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {E3 , E4 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {V3 , V10 , V6 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial
= 3 × 6z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperConnected =

−2
= {Ei }i=1 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic −2
=z Cardinality .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected
= {ViEXT ERN AL }i=1 Cardinality
.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial
|E | −2
Y
= |V EXT ERN AL ESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality z ESHG:(V,E) Neutrosophic Cardinality
Proof. Let 2641
P :
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
V3EXT ERN AL , E3 ,
...,
E|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality −1 , V EXT ERN AL |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality −1 .

corresponded to ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of SuperHyperConnected. The latter is 2645
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (23), is the SuperHyperConnected. 2649
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperConnected =

−2
= {Ei }i=1 .
= (|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality − 1)
z Cardinality .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected
= {ViEXT ERN AL }i=1 Cardinality
.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial
|E | −2
Y
= |V EXT ERN AL ESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality z ESHG:(V,E) Neutrosophic Cardinality
Proof. Let 2652
P :
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
V3EXT ERN AL , E3 ,
...,
E|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality −1 , V EXT ERN AL |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality −1 .

Then 2663
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected = {Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial
= |i | Ei ∈ |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnected = {CEN T ER ∈ VESHG:(V,E) }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
Proof. Let 2664

the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (25), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected. 2674
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperConnected

i
ESHG:(V,E)
∈P ESHG:(V,E) |
= z min |Pi
i
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperConnected
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , Vb
EXT ERN AL
∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , i 6= j}.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial

X X
EXT ERN AL |
Proof. Let 2677
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2

straightforward. Then there’s no at least one SuperHyperConnected. Thus the notion of 2682
quasi may be up but the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperConnected could be 2683
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
is a longest SuperHyperConnected taken from a connected Neutrosophic 2686
solution 2689
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
SuperHyperModel (26), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected. 2696
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperConnected

i
ESHG:(V,E)
∈P ESHG:(V,E) |
= z min |Pi
i
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperConnected
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , Vb
EXT ERN AL
∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , i 6= j}.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial

X X
EXT ERN AL |
Proof. Let 2699
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2

straightforward. Then there’s no at least one SuperHyperConnected. Thus the notion of 2704
quasi may be up but the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperConnected could be 2705
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
solution 2711
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected. 2719
∗
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected = {Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial
= |i | Ei ∈ |E ∗ ESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality |z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperConnected = {CEN T ER ∈ VESHG:(V,E) }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
Proof. Let 2722
P : V EXT ERN AL i , E ∗ i , CEN T ER, Ej .
SuperHyperWheel ESHW : (V, E). There’s a new way to redefine as 2724

straightforward. Then there’s at least one SuperHyperConnected. Thus the notion of 2727
quasi isn’t up and the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperConnected could be 2728
applied. The unique embedded SuperHyperConnected proposes some longest 2729
SuperHyperConnected excerpt from some representatives. The latter is 2730
17 Background 2738
There are some scientific researches covering the topic of this research. In what follows, 2739
there are some discussion and literature reviews about them date back on February 19, 2740
2023. 2741
First article is titled “properties of SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic 2742
SuperHyperGraph” in Ref. [1] by Henry Garrett (2022). It’s first step toward the 2743
research on neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs. This research article is published on the 2744
journal “Neutrosophic Sets and Systems” in issue 49 and the pages 531-561. In this 2745
research article, different types of notions like dominating, resolving, coloring, 2746
Eulerian(Hamiltonian) neutrosophic path, n-Eulerian(Hamiltonian) neutrosophic path, 2747
zero forcing number, zero forcing neutrosophic- number, independent number, 2748
independent neutrosophic-number, clique number, clique neutrosophic-number, 2749
matching number, matching neutrosophic-number, girth, neutrosophic girth, 2750
1-zero-forcing number, 1-zero- forcing neutrosophic-number, failed 1-zero-forcing 2751
number, failed 1-zero-forcing neutrosophic-number, global- offensive alliance, t-offensive 2752
alliance, t-defensive alliance, t-powerful alliance, and global-powerful alliance are defined 2753
in SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. Some Classes of 2754
SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph are cases of research. Some 2755
results are applied in family of SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. 2756
Thus this research article has concentrated on the vast notions and introducing the 2757
majority of notions. 2758
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “neutrosophic co-degree and 2759
neutrosophic degree alongside chromatic numbers in the setting of some classes related 2760
to neutrosophic hypergraphs” in Ref. [2] by Henry Garrett (2022). In this research 2761
article, a novel approach is implemented on SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic 2762
SuperHyperGraph based on general forms without using neutrosophic classes of 2763
neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. It’s published in prestigious and fancy journal is 2764
entitled “Journal of Current Trends in Computer Science Research (JCTCSR)” with 2765
ISO abbreviation “J Curr Trends Comp Sci Res” in volume 1 and issue 1 with pages 2766
06-14. The research article studies deeply with choosing neutrosophic hypergraphs 2767
instead of neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough toward independent 2768
results based on initial background. 2769
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “Super Hyper Dominating 2770
and Super Hyper Resolving on Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs and Their Directions 2771
in Game Theory and Neutrosophic Super Hyper Classes” in Ref. [3] by Henry Garrett 2772
(2022). In this research article, a novel approach is implemented on SuperHyperGraph 2773
and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on fundamental SuperHyperNumber and 2774
using neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses of neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. It’s 2775
published in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled “Journal of Mathematical 2776
Techniques and Computational Mathematics(JMTCM)” with ISO abbreviation “J Math 2777
Techniques Comput Math” in volume 1 and issue 3 with pages 242-263. The research 2778
article studies deeply with choosing directly neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph and 2779
SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough toward independent results based on initial 2780
background and fundamental SuperHyperNumbers. 2781
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “Some Super Hyper Degrees 2782
and Co-Super Hyper Degrees on Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs And Super Hyper 2783
Graphs Alongside Applications in Cancer’s Treatments” in Ref. [52] by Henry Garrett 2784
(2023). In this research article, a novel approach is implemented on SuperHyperGraph 2785
and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on fundamental notions and using vital tools 2786
in Cancer’s Treatments. It’s published in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled 2787
“Journal of Mathematical Techniques and Computational Mathematics(JMTCM)” with 2788
ISO abbreviation “J Math Techniques Comput Math” in volume 2 and issue 1 with 2789
pages 35-47. The research article studies deeply with choosing directly neutrosophic 2790
SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough toward independent 2791
results based on initial background and fundamental SuperHyperNumbers. 2792
In some articles are titled “0039 — Closing Numbers and Super-Closing Numbers as 2793
(Dual)Resolving and (Dual)Coloring alongside (Dual)Dominating in 2794
(Neutrosophic)n-SuperHyperGraph” in Ref. [5] by Henry Garrett (2022), “0049 — 2795
(Failed)1-Zero-Forcing Number in Neutrosophic Graphs” in Ref. [6] by Henry Garrett 2796
(2022), “Extreme SuperHyperClique as the Firm Scheme of Confrontation under 2797
Cancer’s Recognition as the Model in The Setting of (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” 2798
in Ref. [7] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Uncertainty On The Act And Effect Of Cancer 2799
Alongside The Foggy Positions Of Cells Toward Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique 2800
inside Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Titled Cancer’s Recognition” in Ref. [8] by 2801
Henry Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic Version Of Separates Groups Of Cells In Cancer’s 2802
Recognition On Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [9] by Henry Garrett (2022), 2803
“The Shift Paradigm To Classify Separately The Cells and Affected Cells Toward The 2804
Totality Under Cancer’s Recognition By New Multiple Definitions On the Sets 2805
Polynomials Alongside Numbers In The (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperMatching Theory 2806
Based on SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” in Ref. [10] by 2807
Henry Garrett (2022), “Breaking the Continuity and Uniformity of Cancer In The 2808
Worst Case of Full Connections With Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique In Cancer’s 2809
Recognition Applied in (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [11] by Henry 2810
Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable as the Survivors on the 2811
Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition Based on Uncertainty to All Modes in Neutrosophic 2812
SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [12] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Extremism of the Attacked 2813
Body Under the Cancer’s Circumstances Where Cancer’s Recognition Titled 2814
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [13] by Henry Garrett (2022), 2815
“(Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in Cancer’s Recognitions And 2816
“Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable 2818
To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In Special ViewPoints” in Ref. [15] by 2819
Henry Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in the 2820
SuperHyperFunction To Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs on Cancer’s 2821
Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond” in Ref. [16] by Henry Garrett (2022), 2822
“(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperStable on Cancer’s Recognition by Well- 2823
SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs ” in Ref. [17] by Henry 2824
Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form Neutrosophic 2825
SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In Special ViewPoints” 2826
in Ref. [13] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Basic Notions on (Neutrosophic) 2827
SuperHyperForcing And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling in Cancer’s Recognitions 2828
And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [18] by Henry Garrett (2022), 2829
“Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable 2830
To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In Special ViewPoints” in Ref. [19] by 2831
Henry Garrett (2022),“(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions 2832
Featuring (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances” in Ref. [20] by 2833
Henry Garrett (2022), “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperAlliances With 2834
SuperHyperDefensive and SuperHyperOffensive Type-SuperHyperSet On 2835
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of 2836
Cancer’s Recognitions And Related (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClasses” in Ref. [21] by 2837
Henry Garrett (2022), “SuperHyperGirth on SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic 2838
SuperHyperGraph With SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions” in Ref. [22] by 2839
Henry Garrett (2022), “Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on 2840
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs and SuperHyperGraphs Alongside Applications in 2841
Cancer’s Treatments” in Ref. [23] by Henry Garrett (2022), “SuperHyperDominating 2842
and SuperHyperResolving on Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs And Their Directions in 2843
Game Theory and Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses” in Ref. [24] by Henry Garrett 2844
(2022), “SuperHyperMatching By (R-)Definitions And Polynomials To Monitor 2845
Cancer’s Recognition In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [66] by Henry 2846
Garrett (2023), “The Focus on The Partitions Obtained By Parallel Moves In The 2847
Cancer’s Extreme Recognition With Different Types of Extreme SuperHyperMatching 2848
Set and Polynomial on (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [67] by Henry 2849
Garrett (2023), “Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique Decides the Failures on the 2850
Cancer’s Recognition in the Perfect Connections of Cancer’s Attacks By 2851
SuperHyperModels Named (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [68] by Henry 2852
Garrett (2023), “Indeterminacy On The All Possible Connections of Cells In Front of 2853
Cancer’s Attacks In The Terms of Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique on Cancer’s 2854
Recognition called Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [69] by Henry Garrett 2855
(2023), “Perfect Directions Toward Idealism in Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition 2856
Forwarding Neutrosophic SuperHyperClique on Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in 2857
Ref. [72] by Henry Garrett (2023), “Demonstrating Complete Connections in Every 2858
Embedded Regions and Sub-Regions in the Terms of Cancer’s Recognition and 2859
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClique” in 2860
Ref. [73] by Henry Garrett (2023), “Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic 2861
Regions titled neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable in Cancer’s Neutrosophic 2862
Recognition modeled in the Form of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [76] by 2863
Henry Garrett (2023), “Using the Tool As (Neutrosophic) Failed SuperHyperStable To 2864
SuperHyperModel Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in 2865
Ref. [79] by Henry Garrett (2023), “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To 2866
Form Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In 2867
Special ViewPoints” in Ref. [80] by Henry Garrett (2023), “(Neutrosophic) 2868
SuperHyperStable on Cancer’s Recognition by Well-SuperHyperModelled 2869
“Neutrosophic 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in the SuperHyperFunction To Use 2871
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond” 2872
in Ref. [82] by Henry Garrett (2022), “(Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in 2873
Cancer’s Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [83] by Henry 2874
Garrett (2022), “Basic Notions on (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperForcing And 2875
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling in Cancer’s Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) 2876
SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [84] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Basic Neutrosophic Notions 2877
Concerning SuperHyperDominating and Neutrosophic SuperHyperResolving in 2878
SuperHyperGraph” in Ref. [95] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Initial Material of 2879
Neutrosophic Preliminaries to Study Some Neutrosophic Notions Based on 2880
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) in Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)” in 2881
Ref. [96] by Henry Garrett (2022), there are some endeavors to formalize the basic 2882
SuperHyperNotions about neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph. 2883
Some scientific studies and scientific researches about neutrosophic graphs, are 2884
proposed as book in Ref. [97] by Henry Garrett (2022) which is indexed by Google 2885
Scholar and has more than 3230 readers in Scribd. It’s titled “Beyond Neutrosophic 2886
Graphs” and published by Ohio: E-publishing: Educational Publisher 1091 West 1st 2887
Ave Grandview Heights, Ohio 43212 United State. This research book covers different 2888
types of notions and settings in neutrosophic graph theory and neutrosophic 2889
SuperHyperGraph theory. 2890
Also, some scientific studies and scientific researches about neutrosophic graphs, are 2891
proposed as book in Ref. [98] by Henry Garrett (2022) which is indexed by Google 2892
Scholar and has more than 4117 readers in Scribd. It’s titled “Neutrosophic Duality” 2893
and published by Florida: GLOBAL KNOWLEDGE - Publishing House 848 Brickell 2894
Ave Ste 950 Miami, Florida 33131 United States. This research book presents different 2895
types of notions SuperHyperResolving and SuperHyperDominating in the setting of 2896
duality in neutrosophic graph theory and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph theory. This 2897
research book has scrutiny on the complement of the intended set and the intended set, 2898
simultaneously. It’s smart to consider a set but acting on its complement that what’s 2899
done in this research book which is popular in the terms of high readers in Scribd. 2900
See the seminal scientific researches [1–3]. The formalization of the notions on the 2901
framework of Extreme SuperHyperDominating, Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating 2902
theory, and (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs theory at [5–96]. Two popular scientific 2903
research books in Scribd in the terms of high readers, 3230 and 4117 respectively, on 2904
neutrosophic science is on [97, 98]. 2905
– 2906
References 2907
1. Henry Garrett, “Properties of SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic 2908
SuperHyperGraph”, Neutrosophic Sets and Systems 49 (2022) 531-561 (doi: 2909
10.5281/zenodo.6456413). 2910
(http://fs.unm.edu/NSS/NeutrosophicSuperHyperGraph34.pdf). 2911
(https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nss journal/vol49/iss1/34). 2912
2. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Co-degree and Neutrosophic Degree alongside 2913
Chromatic Numbers in the Setting of Some Classes Related to Neutrosophic 2914
Hypergraphs”, J Curr Trends Comp Sci Res 1(1) (2022) 06-14. 2915
3. Henry Garrett, “Super Hyper Dominating and Super Hyper Resolving on 2916
Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs and Their Directions in Game Theory and 2917
Neutrosophic Super Hyper Classes”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 1(3) 2918
(2022) 242-263. (doi: 10.33140/JMTCM.01.03.09) 2919
4. Henry Garrett, “Some Super Hyper Degrees and Co-Super Hyper Degrees on 2920
Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs And Super Hyper Graphs Alongside 2921
Applications in Cancer’s Treatments”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 2(1) 2922
(2023) 35-47. (https://www.opastpublishers.com/open-access-articles/some- 2923
super-hyper-degrees-and-cosuper-hyper-degrees-on-neutrosophic-super-hyper- 2924
graphs-and-super-hyper-graphs-alongside-a.pdf) 2925
5. Garrett, Henry. “0039 — Closing Numbers and Super-Closing Numbers as 2926
(Dual)Resolving and (Dual)Coloring alongside (Dual)Dominating in 2927
(Neutrosophic)n-SuperHyperGraph.” CERN European Organization for Nuclear 2928
Research - Zenodo, Nov. 2022. CERN European Organization for Nuclear 2929
Research, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6319942. 2930
https://oa.mg/work/10.5281/zenodo.6319942 2931
6. Garrett, Henry. “0049 — (Failed)1-Zero-Forcing Number in Neutrosophic 2932
Graphs.” CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research - Zenodo, Feb. 2933
2022. CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research, 2934
https://doi.org/10.13140/rg.2.2.35241.26724. 2935
https://oa.mg/work/10.13140/rg.2.2.35241.26724 2936
7. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperClique as the Firm Scheme of 2937
Confrontation under Cancer’s Recognition as the Model in The Setting of 2938
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010308 (doi: 2939
10.20944/preprints202301.0308.v1). 2940
8. Henry Garrett, “Uncertainty On The Act And Effect Of Cancer Alongside The 2941
Foggy Positions Of Cells Toward Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique inside 2942
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Titled Cancer’s Recognition”, Preprints 2023, 2943
2023010282 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0282.v1). 2944
9. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Version Of Separates Groups Of Cells In 2945
Cancer’s Recognition On Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2946
2023010267 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0267.v1). 2947
10. Henry Garrett, “The Shift Paradigm To Classify Separately The Cells and 2948
Affected Cells Toward The Totality Under Cancer’s Recognition By New 2949
Multiple Definitions On the Sets Polynomials Alongside Numbers In The 2950
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperMatching Theory Based on SuperHyperGraph and 2951
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”, Preprints 2023, 2023010265 (doi: 2952
10.20944/preprints202301.0265.v1). 2953
11. Henry Garrett, “Breaking the Continuity and Uniformity of Cancer In The 2954
Worst Case of Full Connections With Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique In 2955
Cancer’s Recognition Applied in (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2956
2023, 2023010262,(doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0262.v1). 2957
12. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable as the Survivors on the 2958
Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition Based on Uncertainty to All Modes in 2959
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010240 (doi: 2960
10.20944/preprints202301.0240.v1). 2961
13. Henry Garrett, “Extremism of the Attacked Body Under the Cancer’s 2962
Circumstances Where Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) 2963
SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010224, (doi: 2964
10.20944/preprints202301.0224.v1). 2965
14. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in Cancer’s 2966
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2967
2023010105 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 2968
15. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form 2969
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions 2970
In Special ViewPoints”, Preprints 2023, 2023010088 (doi: 2971
10.20944/preprints202301.0088.v1). 2972
16. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in the 2973
Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond ”, Preprints 2023, 2023010044 2975
17. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperStable on Cancer’s Recognition by 2976
Well- SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2977
2023010043 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0043.v1). 2978
18. Henry Garrett, “Basic Notions on (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperForcing And 2979
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling in Cancer’s Recognitions And 2980
10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 2982
10.20944/preprints202301.0088.v1). 2986
20. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions 2987
Featuring (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances”, Preprints 2988
2022, 2022120549 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0549.v1). 2989
21. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperAlliances With SuperHyperDefensive 2990
and SuperHyperOffensive Type-SuperHyperSet On (Neutrosophic) 2991
SuperHyperGraph With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s 2992
Recognitions And Related (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClasses”, Preprints 2022, 2993
2022120540 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0540.v1). 2994
22. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperGirth on SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic 2995
SuperHyperGraph With SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions”, 2996
Preprints 2022, 2022120500 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0500.v1). 2997
23. Henry Garrett, “Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on 2998
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs and SuperHyperGraphs Alongside Applications 2999
in Cancer’s Treatments”, Preprints 2022, 2022120324 (doi: 3000
10.20944/preprints202212.0324.v1). 3001
24. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDominating and SuperHyperResolving on 3002
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs And Their Directions in Game Theory and 3003
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”, Preprints 2022, 2022110576 (doi: 3004
10.20944/preprints202211.0576.v1). 3005
25. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Contradiction By Hyper Detection of 3006
SuperHyperDefensive In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic 3007
SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.13397.09446). 3008
26. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3009
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperDominating As Hyper Closing On Super 3010
Messy”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.21510.45125). 3011
27. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Missing By Hyper Searching Of 3012
SuperHyperDominating In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 3013
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperConnected As Hyper Group On Super Surge”, 3016
ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.11758.69441). 3017
29. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Outbreak By Hyper Collections Of 3018
SuperHyperConnected In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 3019
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperTotal As Hyper Covering On Super 3022
Infections”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.19360.87048). 3023
31. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Extremism By Hyper Treatments Of 3024
SuperHyperTotal In Cancer’s Recognition with (Neutrosophic) 3025
32. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Isolation By Hyper Perfectness Of 3027
SuperHyperPerfect In Cancer’s Recognition with (Neutrosophic) 3028
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperPerfect As Hyper Idealism On Super 3031
Vacancy”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.19911.37285). 3032
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperJoin As Hyper Separations On Super Sorts”, 3034
35. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super connections By Hyper disconnections Of 3036
SuperHyperJoin In Cancer’s Recognition with (Neutrosophic) 3037
36. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Mixed-Devastations By Hyper Decisions 3039
Of SuperHyperDuality In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic 3040
37. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition As (Neutrosophic) 3042
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperDuality As Hyper Imaginations On Super 3043
Mixed-Illustrations”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.33275.80161). 3044
38. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition As (Neutrosophic) 3045
SuperHyperGraph By Path SuperHyperColoring As Hyper Correction On Super 3046
Faults”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.30182.50241). 3047
39. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Reflections By Hyper Rotations Of Path 3048
SuperHyperColoring In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic 3049
40. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas As Hyper Deformations On Super Chains In 3051
Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph By 3052
SuperHyperDensity”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.13444.60806). 3053
41. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas As Hyper Ignorance By SuperHyperDensity On 3054
Super Resistances In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic 3055
SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.16800.05123). 3056
42. Henry Garrett, “New Research On Cancer’s Recognition and Neutrosophic 3057
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian SuperHyperCycles and Hamiltonian Sets As 3058
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-VI”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 3059
10.13140/RG.2.2.29913.80482). 3060
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-V”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 3063
10.13140/RG.2.2.33269.24809). 3064
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-IV”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 3067
10.13140/RG.2.2.34946.96960). 3068
45. Henry Garrett, “A Research On Cancer’s Recognition and Neutrosophic 3069
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-III”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 3071
10.13140/RG.2.2.14814.31040). 3072
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-II”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 3075
10.13140/RG.2.2.15653.17125). 3076
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-I”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 3079
10.13140/RG.2.2.25719.50089). 3080
48. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Disruptions In Cancer’s Extreme 3081
Recognition As Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph By Hyper Plans Called 3082
SuperHyperConnectivities”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 3083
10.13140/RG.2.2.29441.94562). 3084
49. Henry Garrett, “Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition As Neutrosophic 3085
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperConnectivities As Hyper Diagnosis On Super 3086
Mechanism”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.17252.24968). 3087
50. Henry Garrett,“Cancer’s Recognition and (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph By 3088
the Criteria of Eulerian and Hamiltonian Type-Sets As Hyper Modified Cycles 3089
On Super Mess”, ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.16652.59525). 3090
51. Henry Garrett,“Eulerian and Hamiltonian In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition 3091
and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph On Super Interactions By Hyper 3092
Extensions of Cycles”, ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.34583.24485). 3093
52. Henry Garrett, “Some Super Hyper Degrees and Co-Super Hyper Degrees on 3094
Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs And Super Hyper Graphs Alongside 3095
Applications in Cancer’s Treatments”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 2(1) 3096
(2023) 35-47. 3097
53. Henry Garrett,“SuperHyperGirth Type-Results on extreme SuperHyperGirth 3098
theory and (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs Toward Cancer’s extreme 3099
Recognition”, Preprints 2023, 2023010396 (doi: 3100
10.20944/preprints202301.0396.v1). 3101
54. Henry Garrett,“Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Warns Hyper Landmark of 3102
neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth In Super Type-Versions of Cancer’s neutrosophic 3103
Recognition”, Preprints 2023, 2023010395 (doi: 3104
10.20944/preprints202301.0395.v1). 3105
55. Henry Garrett,“The Constructions of (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs on the 3106
Cancer’s Recognition in The Confrontation With Super Attacks In Hyper 3107
Situations By Implementing (Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in The 3108
Technical Approaches to Neutralize SuperHyperViews”, ResearchGate 2023, 3109
(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.26240.51204). 3110
56. Henry Garrett,“(Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing As the 3111
Entrepreneurs on Cancer’s Recognitions To Fail Forcing Style As the Super 3112
Classes With Hyper Effects In The Background of the Framework is So-Called 3113
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 3114
10.13140/RG.2.2.12818.73925). 3115
57. Henry Garrett,“Super Actions On The Types of Hyper Levels In The Sensible 3116
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth On Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and 3117
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 3118
10.13140/RG.2.2.26836.88960). 3119
58. Henry Garrett,“SuperHyperGirth Approaches on the Super Challenges on the 3120
Cancer’s Recognition In the Hyper Model of (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, 3121
ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.36745.93289). 3122
59. Henry Garrett,“Extreme SuperHyperClique as the Firm Scheme of 3123
Confrontation under Cancer’s Recognition as the Model in The Setting of 3124
10.20944/preprints202301.0308.v1). 3126
60. Henry Garrett,“Uncertainty On The Act And Effect Of Cancer Alongside The 3127
Foggy Positions Of Cells Toward Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique inside 3128
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Titled Cancer’s Recognition”, Preprints 2023, 3129
2023010282 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0282.v1). 3130
61. Henry Garrett,“Neutrosophic Version Of Separates Groups Of Cells In Cancer’s 3131
Recognition On Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010267 3132
(doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0267.v1).). 3133
62. Henry Garrett, “The Shift Paradigm To Classify Separately The Cells and 3134
Affected Cells Toward The Totality Under Cancer’s Recognition By New 3135
Multiple Definitions On the Sets Polynomials Alongside Numbers In The 3136
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperMatching Theory Based on SuperHyperGraph and 3137
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”, Preprints 2023, 2023010265 (doi: 3138
10.20944/preprints202301.0265.v1). 3139
63. Henry Garrett,“Breaking the Continuity and Uniformity of Cancer In The 3140
Worst Case of Full Connections With Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique In 3141
Cancer’s Recognition Applied in (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 3142
2023, 2023010262,(doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0262.v1). 3143
64. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable as the Survivors on the 3144
Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition Based on Uncertainty to All Modes in 3145
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010240 (doi: 3146
10.20944/preprints202301.0240.v1). 3147
65. Henry Garrett, “Extremism of the Attacked Body Under the Cancer’s 3148
Circumstances Where Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) 3149
SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010224, (doi: 3150
10.20944/preprints202301.0224.v1). 3151
66. Henry Garrett,“SuperHyperMatching By (R-)Definitions And Polynomials To 3152
Monitor Cancer’s Recognition In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, 3153
ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.35061.65767). 3154
67. Henry Garrett,“The Focus on The Partitions Obtained By Parallel Moves In 3155
The Cancer’s Extreme Recognition With Different Types of Extreme 3156
SuperHyperMatching Set and Polynomial on (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, 3157
68. Henry Garrett,“Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique Decides the Failures on the 3159
SuperHyperModels Named (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 3161
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.32530.73922). 3162
69. Henry Garrett,“Indeterminacy On The All Possible Connections of Cells In 3163
Front of Cancer’s Attacks In The Terms of Neutrosophic Failed 3164
SuperHyperClique on Cancer’s Recognition called Neutrosophic 3165
SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.15897.70243). 3166
70. Henry Garrett,“Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique Decides the Failures on the 3167
SuperHyperModels Named (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 3169
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.32530.73922). 3170
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 3172
2023010105 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 3173
72. Henry Garrett,“Perfect Directions Toward Idealism in Cancer’s Neutrosophic 3174
Recognition Forwarding Neutrosophic SuperHyperClique on Neutrosophic 3175
73. Henry Garrett,“Demonstrating Complete Connections in Every Embedded 3177
Regions and Sub-Regions in the Terms of Cancer’s Recognition and 3178
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClique”, 3179
10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 3184
10.20944/preprints202301.0088.v1). 3188
76. Henry Garrett,“Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic Regions titled 3189
neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable in Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition 3190
modeled in the Form of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2023, 3191
(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.17385.36968). 3192
Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond”, Preprints 2023, 2023010044 3195
Well- SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 3197
2023010043 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0043.v1). 3198
79. Henry Garrett, “Using the Tool As (Neutrosophic) Failed SuperHyperStable To 3199
SuperHyperModel Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) 3200
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In 3203
Special ViewPoints”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.11447.80803). 3204
Well-SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 3206
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.35774.77123). 3207
Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond ”, ResearchGate 2022, (doi: 3210
10.13140/RG.2.2.36141.77287). 3211
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2022, (doi: 3213
10.13140/RG.2.2.29430.88642). 3214
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2022, (doi: 3217
10.13140/RG.2.2.11369.16487). 3218
Featuring (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances”, Preprints 3220
2022, 2022120549 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0549.v1). 3221
Featuring (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances”, 3223
87. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperAlliances With 3225
Cancer’s Recognitions And Related (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClasses”, 3228
88. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperAlliances With 3230
Cancer’s Recognitions And Related (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClasses”, 3233
ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.20993.12640). 3240
91. Henry Garrett,“Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on 3241
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs and SuperHyperGraphs Alongside 3242
Applications in Cancer’s Treatments”, Preprints 2022, 2022120324 (doi: 3243
10.20944/preprints202212.0324.v1). 3244
92. Henry Garrett, “Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on 3245
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs And SuperHyperGraphs Alongside 3246
Applications in Cancer’s Treatments”, ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 3247
10.13140/RG.2.2.23123.04641). 3248
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”, Preprints 2022, 2022110576 (doi: 3251
10.20944/preprints202211.0576.v1). 3252
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”, ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 3255
10.13140/RG.2.2.23324.56966). 3256
95. Henry Garrett, “Basic Neutrosophic Notions Concerning SuperHyperDominating 3257
and Neutrosophic SuperHyperResolving in SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 3258
2022 (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.29173.86244). 3259
96. Henry Garrett, “Initial Material of Neutrosophic Preliminaries to Study Some 3260
Neutrosophic Notions Based on Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) in 3261
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)”, ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 3262
10.13140/RG.2.2.25385.88160). 3263
97. Henry Garrett, (2022). “Beyond Neutrosophic Graphs”, Ohio: E-publishing: 3264
Educational Publisher 1091 West 1st Ave Grandview Heights, Ohio 43212 3265
United States. ISBN: 979-1-59973-725-6 3266
(http://fs.unm.edu/BeyondNeutrosophicGraphs.pdf). 3267
98. Henry Garrett, (2022). “Neutrosophic Duality”, Florida: GLOBAL 3268
KNOWLEDGE - Publishing House 848 Brickell Ave Ste 950 Miami, Florida 3269
33131 United States. ISBN: 978-1-59973-743-0 3270
(http://fs.unm.edu/NeutrosophicDuality.pdf). 3271
View publication stats

New Ideas in Cancer's Recognition and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph by SuperHyperDimension As Hyper Distinguishing On Super Distances

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

New Ideas in Cancer's Recognition and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph by SuperHyperDimension As Hyper Distinguishing On Super Distances

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

New Ideas In Cancer's Recognition And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph By

Preprint · February 2023

323 PUBLICATIONS 3,990 CITATIONS

On Fuzzy Logic View project

Number Graphs And Numbers View project

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 2

SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperDimension As Hyper 3

Distinguishing On Super Distances 4

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · 6

DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA 7

In this scientific research, (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic 9

SuperHyperDimension). Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an 10

ordered pair S = (V, E). Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs } 11

and E 0 = {E1 , E2 , . . . , Ez }. Then either V 0 or E 0 is called Neutrosophic 12

e-SuperHyperDimension if ∀Ea , Eb ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ E 0 , ∃Ec ∈ E 0 , such that 13

d(Ea , Ec ) 6= d(Eb , Ec ); Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperDimension if 14

∀Ea , Eb ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ E 0 , ∃Ec ∈ E 0 , such that d(Ea , Ec ) 6= d(Eb , Ec ); and 15

|Ei |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY = |Ej |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY ; Neutrosophic 16

v-SuperHyperDimension if ∀Va , Vb ∈ VESHG:(V,E) \ V 0 , ∃Vc ∈ V 0 , such that 17

d(Va , Vc ) 6= d(Vb , Vc ); Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperDimension if 18

∀Va , Vb ∈ VESHG:(V,E) \ V 0 , ∃Vc ∈ V 0 , such that d(Va , Vc ) 6= d(Vb , Vc ); and 19

|Vi |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY = |Vj |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY ; Neutrosophic 20

SuperHyperDimension if it’s either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperDimension, 21

Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperDimension, Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperDimension, and 22

Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperDimension. ((Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDimension). 23

Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an ordered pair S = (V, E). 24

Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) E = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then E is 25

called an Extreme SuperHyperDimension if it’s either of Neutrosophic 26

e-SuperHyperDimension, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperDimension, Neutrosophic 27

v-SuperHyperDimension, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperDimension and C(N SHG) 28

for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum Extreme cardinality 29

of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality of the Extreme 30

SuperHyperEdges in the consecutive Extreme sequence of Extreme SuperHyperEdges 31

and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Extreme 32

SuperHyperDimension; a Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension if it’s either of 33

Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperDimension, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperDimension, 34

Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperDimension, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperDimension and 35

C(N SHG) for a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum 36

Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges of a Neutrosophic 37

SuperHyperSet S of high Neutrosophic cardinality consecutive Neutrosophic 38

SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 39

Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension; an Extreme SuperHyperDimension 40

SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperDimension, 41

Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperDimension, Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperDimension, and 42

Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperDimension and C(N SHG) for an Extreme 43

SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Extreme SuperHyperPolynomial contains the 44

Extreme coefficients defined as the Extreme number of the maximum Extreme 45

cardinality of the Extreme SuperHyperEdges of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high 46

Extreme cardinality consecutive Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme 47

Extreme power is corresponded to its Extreme coefficient; a Neutrosophic 49

SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of Neutrosophic 50

e-SuperHyperDimension, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperDimension, Neutrosophic 51

v-SuperHyperDimension, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperDimension and C(N SHG) 52

for a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Neutrosophic 53

SuperHyperPolynomial contains the Neutrosophic coefficients defined as the 54

Neutrosophic number of the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic 55

SuperHyperEdges of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high Neutrosophic cardinality 56

consecutive Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such 57

corresponded to its Neutrosophic coefficient; an Extreme V-SuperHyperDimension if it’s 59

either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperDimension, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperDimension, 60

Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperDimension, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperDimension and 61