New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle by Total Perfect Domination

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.
net/publication/379509104
New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph With

Multipartite and Cycle By Total Perfect Domination
Preprint · April 2024

DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.10910154
CITATIONS
1 author:
Henry Garrett
568 PUBLICATIONS 29,726 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Henry Garrett on 03 April 2024.
The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 2
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By Total 3
Perfect Domination 4
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · 6
DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA 7
1 SYNOPSIS 8
In this scientific research, (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic 9
SuperHyperTotal Perfect Domination). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S be a 10
pair S = (V, E). Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then 11
V 0 is called Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal Perfect Domination if the following expressions, 12
terms and statements is called Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal Perfect Domination criteria 13
holds. 14
X X X
|( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 Vi ∈V 0 Vi ∈V 0
X X X
= min
00 ⊆V
|{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V N SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
Vj ∈ VN SHG , ∃!Vi ∈ V 00 :
TV0 (EVi ,Vj ) = min[TV (Vi ), TV (Vj )],
IV0 (EVi ,Vj ) = min[IV (Vi ), IV (Vj )],
FV0 (EVi ,Vj ) = min[FV (Vi ), FV (Vj )]}
In this scientific research, new configurations are introduced for the new 15
SuperHyperNotions, namely a Total Perfect Domination and a Neutrosophic Total 16
Perfect Domination. Two different SuperHyperDefinitions were started for them, but 17
research has progressed and SuperHyperNotion, SuperHyperUniform, and 18
SuperHyperClass are well-defined and well-reviewed based on them. Literature review is 19
implemented throughout this research. To shine the light and importance of this 20
research, a comparison between this SuperHyperNotion with other SuperHyperNotions 21
and basic SuperHyperNumbers is presented. Definitions are followed by examples and 22
examples, so clarifications are guided by various tools. Applications are designed to 23
understand the theoretical aspect of this ongoing research. “Cancer diagnosis” are the 24
things that are being researched to explore the challenges that make sense in ongoing 25
research and future research. It is a special case. Cells are viewed in the intended 26
manner. There are different types of them. Some are individual and some are well 27
modeled by groups of cells. All these types are officially called “SuperHyperVertex”, but 28
the relationships between them all are officially called “SuperHyperEdge”. 29
“SuperHyperGraph” and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” frameworks are selected and 30
selected for research on “Cancer Diagnosis”. Thus, these complex and dense 31
super-hypermodels open avenues for research on theoretical aspects and “cancer 32
diagnosis”. Ways to pursue this scientific research have been considered. It has also 33
been formally collected in the form of several questions and problems. It is useful to 34
define a “neutrosophic” version of Total Perfect Domination. Since there are more ways 35
to get type results a Total Perfect Domination becomes more understandable. In order 36
to master the Neutrosophic Total Perfect Domination, there is a need to “re-define” the 37
concept of “Total Perfect Domination mastery”. SuperHyperVertices and 38
SuperHyperEdges are assigned by alphabetical labels. In this method, the position of 39
tags is used to assign values. Suppose a Total Perfect Domination. If the specified table 40
contains “values of vertices, supervertices, edges, hyperedges, and hyperedges belonging 41
to Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” with key points, it is redefined. ”values of vertices 42
& number of positions in alphabet”, ”Values of SuperVertices&maximum values of its 43
vertices”, ”values of edges&maximum values of its vertices”, ”super edge values&max 44
values of its vertices”, “super edge values” and maximum values of its endpoints”. To 45
get examples and structural examples, I would like to introduce the next 46
SuperHyperClass SuperHyperGraph based on Total Perfect Domination. This is the 47
original. Having the foundation of the previous definition in the SuperHyperClass type 48
would be disciplined. If there is a need to have all Total Perfect Domination until Total 49
Perfect Domination, then it is officially called “Total Perfect Domination”, but 50
otherwise, it is not Total Perfect Domination. There is some explanation for the original 51
definition titled “Total Perfect Domination”. These two examples are further explored 52
and distinguished because they are characterized in the SuperHyperClass disciplinary 53
methods based on a dominant Total Perfect Domination. Because of having Total 54
Perfect Domination, there is a need to “re-define” the concept of “neutrosophic Total 55
Perfect Domination” and “neutrosophic Total Perfect Domination”. 56
SuperHyperVertices and SuperHyperEdges are assigned by alphabetical labels. In this 57
method, the position of tags is used to assign values. Consider a Neutrosophic 58
SuperHyperGraph. “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” is redefined if the desired table 59
exists. And if the desired table exists, a Total Perfect Domination is redefined to a 60
“Neutrosophic Total Perfect Domination”. It is useful to define a “Neutrosophic” version 61
of SuperHyperClasses. Since there are more ways to obtain Neutrosophic type results, a 62
SuperHyper- Neutrosophic Total Perfect Domination becomes more understandable. 63
Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. If the desired table exists, there are a 64
number of Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses. So are SuperHyperPath, SuperHyperCycle, 65
SuperHyperStar, SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultiPartite and SuperHyperWheel. 66
”Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle”, “Neutrosophic 67
SuperHyperStar”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite”, “Neutrosophic 68
SuperHyperMultiPartite” and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel”. A graph is 69
SuperHyperUniform if it is a SuperHyperGraph and the number of SuperHyperEdges 70
elements is the same. Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. There are a number 71
of SuperHyperClasses as follows. It is a SuperHyperPath if there is only one 72
SuperVertex as an intersection between two given SuperHyperEdges with two 73
exceptions. If only one SuperVertex is given as an intersection between two 74
SuperHyperEdges, it is SuperHyperCycle. It is SuperHyperStar and only one 75
SuperVertex as intersection among all SuperHyperEdges. It is SuperHyperBipartite, 76
and only one SuperVertex is given as the intersection between two SuperHyperEdges, 77
and these SuperVertices, which form two distinct sets, have no SuperHyperEdge in 78
common. This is SuperHyperMultiPartite. Only one SuperVertex is given as an 79
intersection between two SuperHyperEdges, and these SuperVertices, which form 80
separate multisets, have no SuperHyperEdge in common. If only one SuperHyperEdge 81
among the given two SuperHyperEdges is a SuperHyperWheel and a SuperVertex has a 82
SuperHyperEdge with any regular SuperVertex. SuperHyperModel suggests specific 83
designs and specific architectures. SuperHyperModel is officially called 84
“SuperHyperGraph” and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”. In this SuperHyperModel, 85
the “special” cells and the “special group” of cells are SuperHyperModeled as 86
“SuperHyperVertices” and the common and desired properties between the “special” 87
cells and the “special group” of cells. SuperHyperModeled as “SuperHyperEdges”. 88
Sometimes, to have a more accurate SuperHyperModel, it is useful to have some degree 89
of determinism, uncertainty, and neutrality, in this case the SuperHyperModel is called 90
“Neutrosophic”. In future scientific research, the foundation will be based on “diagnosis 91
of cancer” and the results and definitions will be introduced in redeemed methods. 92
Cancer diagnosis in long-term practice. The specific region is assigned by the model 93
(called SuperHyperGraph) and the long cycle of movement of the cancer is determined 94
by this scientific research. Sometimes the movement of cancer is not easy to detect, 95
because there is certainty, uncertainty and neutrality about the movements and effects 96
of cancer on that area. This event leads us to choose another model [which is said to be 97
the Neutrosophic superhypergraph] in order to have a proper understanding of what 98
happened and was done. There are some specific models, which are well known and 99
have names, and some SuperHyperGeneral SuperHyperModels. The movements and 100
effects of cancer in complex pathways and between complex groups of cells can be 101
visualized with a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (-/SuperHyperCycle, SuperHyperStar, 102
SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, SuperHyperWheel). The goal is to find 103
the longest Total Perfect Domination or the strongest Total Perfect Domination in those 104
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModels. Some general results are presented for the longest 105
Total Perfect Domination called Total Perfect Domination and the strongest Total 106
Perfect Domination called Neutrosophic Total Perfect Domination. Beyond that in 107
SuperHyperStar, all possible SuperHyperPaths have only two SuperHyperEdges, but it 108
is not enough as having at least three SuperHyperEdges is necessary to form any style 109
of cycle. There is no form of any cycle, but literally, it is the transformation of any 110
cycle. It literally transforms and does not form. A basic introduction to the theory of 111
Total Perfect Domination Neutrosophic, SuperHyperGraphs and Neutrosophic 112
SuperHyperGraphs is suggested. 113
Keywords: Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, SuperHyperTotal Perfect Domination, 114
Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition 115
AMS Subject Classification: 05C17, 05C22, 05E45 116
2 Applied Notions Under The Scrutiny Of The 117
Motivation Of This Scientific Research 118
In this scientific research, there are ideas in the prominent frameworks of motivations. I 119
try to bring motivations in narrative ways. Some Cells have faced attacks from the 120
established situation with cancer attacks in this case, there is some analysis embedded 121
in the case current situations where cells can be labeled as some groups and some 122
groups or individuals are overlabeled, all from behaviors to overcome cancer attacks. In 123
embedded situations, cell individuals and cell groups can be considered as “new groups”. 124
So it encourages us to find suitable SuperHyperModels for more appropriate analysis 125
about this dirty story. I found SuperHyperModels, officially called “SuperHyperGraphs” 126
and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. In this SuperHyperModel, cells and groups of 127
cells are defined as “SuperHyperVertices” and relationships between individual cells and 128
groups of cells are defined as “SuperHyperEdges”. So this is another motivation for us 129
to do research on this SuperHyperModel based on “cancer diagnosis”. Sometimes, 130
things get worse. The situation has passed certainty and precise style. So it is beyond 131
them. There are three descriptions, i.e., degrees of determination, uncertainty, and 132
neutrality, for any object based on ambiguous forms, i.e., incomplete data, imprecise 133
data, and uncertain analysis. The second model can be considered in the previous 134
SuperHyperModel. This is SuperHyperModel. This is SuperHyperGraph but officially 135
called “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. Cancer is a disease, but the model is 136
supposed to understand what happens in this phenomenon. The special case of this 137
disease is considered and some parameters are used as consequences of the model. Cells 138
are attacked by the disease, but the movement of cancer is in a specific area. Knowing 139
the mind of cancer can help to find some cures for this disease. SuperHyperGraph and 140
Neutrosophic Super-HyperGraph are super-hypermodels used in “cancer diagnosis” and 141
both are the foundation of the background of this scientific research. Sometimes cancer 142
has occurred in an area full of cells, cell groups, and embedded styles. In this section, 143
SuperHyperModel proposes based on the links of cancer movements in the form of unity 144
styles with the formation of design and architecture officially called “Total Perfect 145
Domination”, in the themes of specialized terms and common words. Particle for direct 146
object. Applied concepts under the investigation of the motivation of this scientific 147
research. The “SuperHyper” prefix refers to the theme of embedded styles for 148
background discovery for SuperHyperNotions. Cancer diagnosis in long-term practice. 149
The specific region is assigned by the model (called SuperHyperGraph) and the long 150
cycle of movement of the cancer is determined by this scientific research. Sometimes the 151
movement of Cancer is not easy to identify because there is certainty, uncertainty and 152
neutrality about the movements and effects of Cancer in that region. This event leads 153
us to choose another model [said to be Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph]. Easy 154
understanding of what happened and what was done. There are some specific models 155
that are well known and named and some general models. The movements and effects 156
of cancer in complex pathways and between complex groups of cells can be visualized by 157
a neurosophic superhyperpath (-/SuperHyperCycle, SuperHyperStar, 158
SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, SuperHyperWheel). The goal is to find 159
Total Perfect Domination or Neutrosophic Total Perfect Domination for 160
SuperHyperModels in it. Some general results are presented. Beyond that in 161
SuperHyperStar, all possible Neutrosophic SuperHyperPaths have only two 162
SuperHyperEdges, but it is not enough as having at least three SuperHyperEdges is 163
necessary to form any style of cycle. There is no form of cycle, but it is literally a form 164
of any cycle. It literally transforms and does not form. 165
Question 2.1. How to define “SuperHyperNotions and to do research” to find the 166
“Total Perfect Domination Rate” of any cell or groups of cells based on fixed cell or fixed 167
group of cells broadly, “Total Perfect Domination Rate” based on fixed groups or fixed 168
cells. Groups of groups of cells? 169
Question 2.2. What are the best descriptions for “diagnosing cancer” in terms of 170
these chaotic and dense super-hypermodels in which embedded concepts are depicted? 171
This motivation to find concepts to use in this dense model is called 172
“SuperHyperGraphs”. So it motivates us to define different types of “Total Perfect 173
Domination” and “neutrosophic Total Perfect Domination” over “superhypergraph” and 174
“neutrosophic superhypergraph”. Then this scientific research has taken more 175
motivations to define SuperHyperClasses and find some connections among this 176
SuperHyperNotion with other SuperHyperNotions. It motivates us to obtain examples 177
and examples to clarify the framework of this scientific research. The general results 178
and some of the results about some of the connections are the ways that the key point 179
of this scientific research, “diagnosis of cancer” is more understandable and clear. 180
The framework of this research is as follows. First, I will introduce the basic 181
definitions to clarify the basics. In the “Introductions” subsection, basic definitions 182
about SuperHyperGraphs and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph are introduced and 183
discussed in depth. Basic concepts are thoroughly explained and illustrated, and 184
sometimes a literature review is used to make sense of what is to come in the coming 185
sections. The main definitions and their explanations, along with some results on the 186
new concepts, Total Perfect Domination and Neutrosophic Total Perfect Domination, 187
are specified in the sections “Total Perfect Domination” and “Neutrosophic Total 188
Perfect Domination”. In the concept of dealing with results and in Total Perfect 189
Domination to create logic about the continuation of the scientific research, the ideas of 190
SuperHyperUniform and Neutrosophic SuperHyperUniform are introduced and as their 191
consequences, the corresponding SuperHyperClasses are specified to summarize the 192
work done in this section, as “Results on SuperHyperClasses” and “Results on 193
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”. Going back to the core concepts, clever steps 194
towards common concepts to extend new concepts in new frameworks, 195
SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, in “Results on 196
SuperHyperClasses” and “Results on Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses” sections. There 197
is the initial scientific research on supergeneral relations and as the final and final part 198
of the theoretical scientific research is available in the section “General results”. Some 199
general SuperHyperRelations are fundamental and are known as fundamental 200
SuperHyperNotions, as in “General results” were extracted and discussed. “Total 201
Perfect Domination”, “Neutrosophic Total Perfect Domination”, “Results on 202
SuperHyperClasses” and “Results on Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”. There are 203
curious questions about what has been done about SuperHyperNotions to make sense of 204
the superiority of this scientific research and to discover the word “best” as a description 205
and adjective of this scientific research as presented in the “Total Perfect Domination” 206
section. The keyword of this scientific research was presented in the section 207
“Applications in cancer diagnosis” with two cases and sub-sections “Case 1: Initial steps 208
towards SuperHyperBipartite as SuperHyperModel” and “Case 2: Incremental steps 209
towards SuperHyperMultiperdel as SuperHyper. In the “open issues” section, there is a 210
detailed examination and recognition of what was done in this scientific research and 211
what happened in this scientific research in the form of “questions” and “issues” in 212
order to understand this scientific research in an outstanding style, the advantages and 213
limitations of this scientific research in addition to What has been done in this scientific 214
research is stated in the “conclusion and final remarks” section. 215
3 Neutrosophic Preliminaries Of This Scientific 216
Research On the Redeemed Ways 217
In this section, the basic material in this scientific research, is referred to [Single Valued 218
Neutrosophic Set](Ref. [1],Definition 2.2,p.2), [Neutrosophic Set](Ref. [1],Definition 219
2.1,p.1), [Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)](Ref. [1],Definition 2.5,p.2), 220
[Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)](Ref. [1],Definition 221
2.7,p.3), [t-norm](Ref. [1], Definition 2.7, p.3), and [Characterization of the 222
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)](Ref. [1],Definition 2.7,p.3), [Neutrosophic 223
Strength of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPaths] (Ref. [1],Definition 5.3,p.7), and 224
[Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)] 225
(Ref. [1],Definition 5.4,p.7). Also, the new ideas and their clarifications are addressed 226
to Ref. [1]. 227
In this subsection, the basic material which is used in this scientific research, is 228
presented. Also, the new ideas and their clarifications are elicited. 229
Definition 3.1 (Neutrosophic Set). (Ref. [1],Definition 2.1,p.1). 230
Let X be a Eulerian-Path-Cut of points (objects) with generic elements in X denoted by

x; then the Neutrosophic set A (NS A) is an object having the form
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}

+
where the functions T, I, F : X →]− 0, 1 [ define respectively the a
truth-membership function, an indeterminacy-membership function, and a
falsity-membership function of the element x ∈ X to the set A with the condition

−
0 ≤ TA (x) + IA (x) + FA (x) ≤ 3+ .
The functions TA (x), IA (x) and FA (x) are real standard or nonstandard subsets of 231
+
]− 0, 1 [. 232
Definition 3.2 (Single Valued Neutrosophic Set). (Ref. [1],Definition 2.2,p.2). 233
Let X be a Eulerian-Path-Cut of points (objects) with generic elements in X denoted by

x. A single valued Neutrosophic set A (SVNS A) is characterized by
truth-membership function TA (x), an indeterminacy-membership function IA (x), and a
falsity-membership function FA (x). For each point x in X, TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) ∈ [0, 1].
A SVNS A can be written as
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}.
Definition 3.3. The degree of truth-membership,
indeterminacy-membership and falsity-membership of the subset X ⊂ A of
the single valued Neutrosophic set A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}:
TA (X) = min[TA (vi ), TA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,
IA (X) = min[IA (vi ), IA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,
FA (X) = min[FA (vi ), FA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X .
Definition 3.4. The support of X ⊂ A of the single valued Neutrosophic set
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}:
supp(X) = {x ∈ X : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) > 0}.
Definition 3.5 (Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). (Ref. [1],Definition 234
2.5,p.2). 235
Assume V 0 is a given set. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a 236
pair S = (V, E), where 237
(i) V = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vn } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of V 0 ; 238
(ii) V = {(Vi , TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi )) : TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi ) ≥ 0}, (i = 239
1, 2, . . . , n); 240
(iii) E = {E1 , E2 , . . . , En0 } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of 241
V; 242
(iv) E = {(Ei0 , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )) : TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 ) ≥ 0}, (i0 = 243
1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 244
(v) Vi 6= ∅, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 245
0 0
(vi) Ei0 6= ∅, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n ); 246
P
(vii) i supp(Vi ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 247
0 0
P
(viii) i0 supp(Ei ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n );
0 248
(ix) and the following conditions hold:

TV0 (Ei0 ) ≤ min[TV 0 (Vi ), TV 0 (Vj )]Vi ,Vj ∈Ei0 ,
IV0 (Ei0 ) ≤ min[IV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vj )]Vi ,Vj ∈Ei0 ,
FV0 (Ei0 ) ≤ min[FV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vj )]Vi ,Vj ∈Ei0
where i0 = 1, 2, . . . , n0 . 249
Figure 1. The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a illustrated SuperHyperModeling

on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Here the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ej 0 and the Neutrosophic 250
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) Vj are single valued Neutrosophic sets. TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), 251
and FV 0 (Vi ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 252
indeterminacy-membership and the degree of falsity-membership the Neutrosophic 253
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) V. 254
TV0 (Ei0 ), TV0 (Ei0 ), and TV0 (Ei0 ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 255
indeterminacy-membership and the degree of falsity-membership of the Neutrosophic 256
SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) Ei0 to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) E. Thus, 257
the ii0 th element of the incidence matrix of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) 258
are of the form (Vi , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )), the sets V and E are crisp sets. 259
Example 3.6. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair 260
S = (V, E) in the mentioned Neutrosophic Figures in every Neutrosophic items. 261
• On the Figure (1), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 262
notion, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. E1 263
and E3 are some empty Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges but E2 is a loop 264
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge and E4 is a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. Thus 265
in the terms of Neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only one Neutrosophic 266
SuperHyperEdge, namely, E4 . The Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 is 267
Neutrosophic isolated means that there’s no Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge has it 268
as a Neutrosophic endpoint. 269
notion, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 271
E1 , E2 and E3 are some empty Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges but E4 is a 272
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. Thus in the terms of Neutrosophic 273
SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only one Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge, namely, 274
E4 . The Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 is Neutrosophic isolated means that 275
there’s no Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge has it as a Neutrosophic endpoint. 276
• On the Figure (3), the SuperHyperNotion, namely, SuperHyperGirth, is up. 277
E1 , E2 and E3 are some empty SuperHyperEdges but E4 is a SuperHyperEdge. 278
Thus in the terms of SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only one SuperHyperEdge, 279
namely, E4 . 280
Figure 2. TThe Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a illustrated SuperHyperModel-

ing on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 3. The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a illustrated SuperHyperModeling

on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 4. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a illustrated Super-

HyperModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
• On the Figure (4), there’s no empty SuperHyperEdge but E3 are a loop 281
SuperHyperEdge on {F } and there are some SuperHyperEdges, namely, E1 on 282
{H, V1 , V3 }, alongside E2 on {O, H, V4 , V3 } and E4 , E5 on {N, V1 , V2 , V3 , F }. 283
• On the Figure (5),there’s neither empty SuperHyperEdge nor loop 284
SuperHyperEdge. 285
• On the Figure (6), there’s neither empty SuperHyperEdge nor loop 286
SuperHyperEdge. 287
SuperHyperEdge. 289
SuperHyperEdge. 291
SuperHyperEdge. 293
SuperHyperEdge. 295
SuperHyperEdge. 297
SuperHyperEdge. 299
SuperHyperEdge. 301
SuperHyperEdge. 303
SuperHyperEdge. 305
Figure 5. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs mentioned as the SuperHy-

perModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 6. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a illustrated Super-

HyperModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 7. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs depicted SuperHyperMod-

eling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 8. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with dense SuperHyper-

Modeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 9. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a messy SuperHyper-

Modeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 10. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with highly-embedding-

connected SuperHyperModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example
(3.6)
Figure 11. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a SuperHyperModel-

Figure 12. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with highly-multiple-

connected-style SuperHyperModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic
Example (3.6)


Figure 15. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with Linearly-Connected

SuperHyperModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)

Figure 17. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a Linearly-over-

packed SuperHyperModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example
(3.6)
SuperHyperEdge. 307
SuperHyperEdge. 309
SuperHyperEdge. 311
SuperHyperEdge. 313
SuperHyperEdge. 315
SuperHyperEdge. 317
SuperHyperEdge. 319
Definition 3.7 (Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). 320
(Ref. [1],Definition 2.7,p.3). 321
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). The 322
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ei0 and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 323
(NSHV) Vi of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S = (V, E) could be 324
characterized as follow-up items. 325
(i) If |Vi | = 1, then Vi is called vertex; 326
(ii) if |Vi | ≥ 1, then Vi is called SuperVertex; 327





(iii) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called edge; 328
(iv) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 329
HyperEdge; 330
(v) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called 331
SuperEdge; 332
(vi) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 333
SuperHyperEdge. 334
If we choose different types of binary operations, then we could get hugely diverse 335
types of general forms of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG). 336
Definition 3.8 (t-norm). (Ref. [1], Definition 2.7, p.3). 337
A binary operation ⊗ : [0, 1] × [0, 1] → [0, 1] is a t-norm if it satisfies the following 338
for x, y, z, w ∈ [0, 1]: 339
(i) 1 ⊗ x = x; 340
(ii) x ⊗ y = y ⊗ x; 341
(iii) x ⊗ (y ⊗ z) = (x ⊗ y) ⊗ z; 342
(iv) If w ≤ x and y ≤ z then w ⊗ y ≤ x ⊗ z. 343
Definition 3.9. The degree of truth-membership, indeterminacy-membership

and falsity-membership of the subset X ⊂ A of the single valued Neutrosophic set
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X} (with respect to t-norm Tnorm ):
TA (X) = Tnorm [TA (vi ), TA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,
IA (X) = Tnorm [IA (vi ), IA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,

FA (X) = Tnorm [FA (vi ), FA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X .
Definition 3.10. The support of X ⊂ A of the single valued Neutrosophic set

A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}:
supp(X) = {x ∈ X : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) > 0}.
Definition 3.11. (General Forms of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). 344
Assume V 0 is a given set. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a 345
pair S = (V, E), where 346
(i) V = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vn } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of V 0 ; 347
(ii) V = {(Vi , TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi )) : TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi ) ≥ 0}, (i = 348
1, 2, . . . , n); 349
(iii) E = {E1 , E2 , . . . , En0 } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of 350
V; 351
(iv) E = {(Ei0 , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )) : TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 ) ≥ 0}, (i0 = 352
1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 353
(v) Vi 6= ∅, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 354
(vi) Ei0 6= ∅, (i0 = 1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 355
P
(vii) i supp(Vi ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 356
0 0
P
(viii) i0 supp(Ei ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n ).
0 357
Here the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ej 0 and the Neutrosophic 358
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) Vj are single valued Neutrosophic sets. TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), 359
and FV 0 (Vi ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 360
indeterminacy-membership and the degree of falsity-membership the Neutrosophic 361
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) V. 362
TV0 (Ei0 ), TV0 (Ei0 ), and TV0 (Ei0 ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 363
indeterminacy-membership and the degree of falsity-membership of the Neutrosophic 364
SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) Ei0 to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) E. Thus, 365
the ii0 th element of the incidence matrix of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) 366
are of the form (Vi , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )), the sets V and E are crisp sets. 367
Definition 3.12 (Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). 368
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). The 370
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ei0 and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 371
(NSHV) Vi of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S = (V, E) could be 372
characterized as follow-up items. 373
(i) If |Vi | = 1, then Vi is called vertex; 374
(ii) if |Vi | ≥ 1, then Vi is called SuperVertex; 375
(iii) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called edge; 376
(iv) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 377
HyperEdge; 378
(v) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called 379
SuperEdge; 380
(vi) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 381
SuperHyperEdge. 382
This SuperHyperModel is too messy and too dense. Thus there’s a need to have 383
some restrictions and conditions on SuperHyperGraph. The special case of this 384
SuperHyperGraph makes the patterns and regularities. 385
Definition 3.13. A graph is SuperHyperUniform if it’s SuperHyperGraph and the 386
number of elements of SuperHyperEdges are the same. 387
To get more visions on SuperHyperUniform, the some SuperHyperClasses are 388
introduced. It makes to have SuperHyperUniform more understandable. 389
Definition 3.14. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. There are some 390
SuperHyperClasses as follows. 391
(i). It’s Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath if it’s only one SuperVertex as 392
intersection amid two given SuperHyperEdges with two exceptions; 393
(ii). it’s SuperHyperCycle if it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two 394
given SuperHyperEdges; 395
(iii). it’s SuperHyperStar it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid all 396
SuperHyperEdges; 397
(iv). it’s SuperHyperBipartite it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two 398
given SuperHyperEdges and these SuperVertices, forming two separate sets, has 399
no SuperHyperEdge in common; 400
(v). it’s SuperHyperMultiPartite it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid 401
two given SuperHyperEdges and these SuperVertices, forming multi separate sets, 402
has no SuperHyperEdge in common; 403
(vi). it’s SuperHyperWheel if it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two 404
given SuperHyperEdges and one SuperVertex has one SuperHyperEdge with any 405
common SuperVertex. 406
Example 3.15. In the Figure (23), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath 407
ESHP : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, in the 408
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (23), is the notion. 409
Example 3.16. In the Figure (24), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle 410
N SHC : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Neutrosophic 411
SuperHyperSet, in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (24), is up. 412
Example 3.17. In the Figure (25), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar 413
ESHS : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, 414
by the Algorithm in previous Neutrosophic result, of the Neutrosophic 415
SuperHyperVertices of the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E), in 416
the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (25), is up. 417
Example 3.18. In the Neutrosophic Figure (26), the connected Neutrosophic 418
SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), is Neutrosophic highlighted and Neutrosophic 419
featured. The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Neutrosophic Algorithm in 420
previous Neutrosophic result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected 421
Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic 422
SuperHyperModel (26), is up. 423
Figure 23. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath Associated to the Notions in the Example

(3.15)
Figure 24. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions

in the Neutrosophic Example (3.16)
Figure 25. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions in

the Neutrosophic Example (3.17)
Figure 26. Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite Neutrosophic Associated to the Neutro-

sophic Notions in the Example (3.18)
Figure 27. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite Associated to the Notions in the

Example (3.19)
Figure 28. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel Neutrosophic Associated to the Neutro-

sophic Notions in the Neutrosophic Example (3.20)
Example 3.19. In the Figure (27), the connected Neutrosophic 424
SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E), is highlighted and Neutrosophic featured. 425
The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Algorithm in previous Neutrosophic 426
result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected Neutrosophic 427
SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (27), 428
is up. 429
Example 3.20. In the Neutrosophic Figure (28), the connected Neutrosophic 430
SuperHyperWheel N SHW : (V, E), is Neutrosophic highlighted and featured. The 431
obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Algorithm in previous result, of the 432
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel 433
ESHW : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (28), is up. 434
Definition 3.21. Let a pair S = (V, E) be a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)

S. Then a sequence of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) and Neutrosophic
SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)
V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs
is called a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic 435
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) V1 to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vs if either 436
of following conditions hold: 437
(i) Vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 438
(ii) there’s a vertex vi ∈ Vi such that vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 439
(iii) there’s a SuperVertex Vi0 ∈ Vi such that Vi0 , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 440
(iv) there’s a vertex vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that Vi , vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 441
0 0
(v) there’s a SuperVertex Vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that Vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 442
(vi) there are a vertex vi ∈ Vi and a vertex vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that vi , vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 443
0 0
(vii) there are a vertex vi ∈ Vi and a SuperVertex Vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 444
(viii) there are a SuperVertex Vi0 ∈ Vi and a vertex vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that Vi0 , vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 445
(ix) there are a SuperVertex Vi0 ∈ Vi and a SuperVertex Vi+1

0
∈ Vi+1 such that 446
0 0
Vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 . 447
Definition 3.22. (Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPaths). 448
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). a

Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV)
V1 to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vs is sequence of Neutrosophic
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) and Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)
V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs ,
could be characterized as follow-up items. 449
(i) If for all Vi , Ej 0 , |Vi | = 1, |Ej 0 | = 2, then NSHP is called path; 450
(ii) if for all Ej 0 , |Ej 0 | = 2, and there’s Vi , |Vi | ≥ 1, then NSHP is called SuperPath; 451
(iii) if for all Vi , Ej 0 , |Vi | = 1, |Ej 0 | ≥ 2, then NSHP is called HyperPath; 452
(iv) if there are Vi , Ej 0 , |Vi | ≥ 1, |Ej 0 | ≥ 2, then NSHP is called Neutrosophic 453
SuperHyperPath . 454
Definition 3.23 (Neutrosophic Strength of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPaths). 455
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). A

Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV)
V1 to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vs is sequence of Neutrosophic
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) and Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)
V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs ,
have 457
(i) Neutrosophic t-strength (min{T (Vi )}, m, n)si=1 ; 458
(ii) Neutrosophic i-strength (m, min{I(Vi )}, n)si=1 ; 459
Table 1. The Values of Vertices, SuperVertices, Edges, HyperEdges, and SuperHy-

perEdges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph Mentioned in the Definition
(3.27)
The Values of The Vertices The Number of Position in Alphabet
The Values of The SuperVertices The maximum Values of Its Vertices
The Values of The Edges The maximum Values of Its Vertices
The Values of The HyperEdges The maximum Values of Its Vertices
The Values of The SuperHyperEdges The maximum Values of Its Endpoints
(iii) Neutrosophic f-strength (m, n, min{F (Vi )})si=1 ; 460
(iv) Neutrosophic strength (min{T (Vi )}, min{I(Vi )}, min{F (Vi )})si=1 . 461
Definition 3.24 (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges 462
(NSHE)). (Ref. [1],Definition 5.4,p.7). 463
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). Consider 464
a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) E = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then E is called 465
(ix) Neutrosophic t-connective if T (E) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic 466
t-strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 467
(NSHV) Vi to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vj where 1 ≤ i, j ≤ s; 468
(x) Neutrosophic i-connective if I(E) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic 469
i-strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 470
(xi) Neutrosophic f-connective if F (E) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic 472
f-strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 473
(xii) Neutrosophic connective if (T (E), I(E), F (E)) ≥ maximum number of 475
Neutrosophic strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic 476
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vj 477
where 1 ≤ i, j ≤ s. 478
For the sake of having a Neutrosophic notion, there’s a need to “redefine” the 479
notion of “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”. The SuperHyperVertices and the 480
SuperHyperEdges are assigned by the labels from the letters of the alphabets. In this 481
procedure, there’s the usage of the position of labels to assign to the values. 482
Definition 3.25. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (SHG) S is a pair 483
S = (V, E). It’s redefined Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph if the Table (1) holds. 484
It’s useful to define a “Neutrosophic” version of SuperHyperClasses. Since there’s 485
more ways to get Neutrosophic type-results to make a Neutrosophic more 486
understandable. 487
Definition 3.26. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (SHG) S is a pair 488
S = (V, E). There are some Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses if the Table (2) 489
holds. Thus Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath , notion, SuperHyperStar, 490
SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultiPartite, and SuperHyperWheel, are 491
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath, Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle, 492
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar, Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite, 493
Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultiPartite, and Neutrosophic 494
SuperHyperWheel if the Table (2) holds. 495

perEdges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, Mentioned in the Definition
(3.26)

perEdges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph Mentioned in the Definition
(3.27)
It’s useful to define a “Neutrosophic” version of a Neutrosophic notion. Since there’s 496
more ways to get type-results to make a Neutrosophic notion more Neutrosophicly 497
understandable. 498
For the sake of having a Neutrosophic notion, there’s a need to “redefine” the 499
Neutrosophic notion of “Neutrosophic notion”. The SuperHyperVertices and the 500
SuperHyperEdges are assigned by the labels from the letters of the alphabets. In this 501
procedure, there’s the usage of the position of labels to assign to the values. 502
Definition 3.27. Assume a notion. It’s redefined a Neutrosophic notion if the 503
Table (3) holds. 504
Example 3.28. Referred to the Example (3.6), assume a Neutrosophic 505
SuperHyperGraph (SHG) S is a pair S = (V, E) in the mentioned Neutrosophic Figures 506
in every Neutrosophic items. 507
SuperHyperGraph (SHG), is up in the illustration of the Table (4). 509
Table 4. The Values of Vertices, SuperVertices, Edges, HyperEdges, and SuperHyper-

Edges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph
Vi (TVi , IVi , FVi ) Ei (TEi , IEi , FEi )
V1 (0.13, 0.13, 0.13) E1 (0, 0, 0)
V2 (0.13, 0.13, 0.13) E2 (0.13, 0.13, 0.13)
V3 (0.15, 0.15, 0.15) E3 (0, 0, 0)
V4 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14) E4 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14)

V1 (0.13, 0.13, 0.13) E1 (0, 0, 0)
V2 (0.03, 0.03, 0.03) E2 (0, 0, 0)
V3 (0.15, 0.15, 0.15) E3 (0, 0, 0)
V4 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14) E4 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14)

V1 (0.13, 0.13, 0.13) E1 (0, 0, 0)
V2 (0.11, 0.11, 0.11) E2 (0, 0, 0)
V3 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14) E3 (0, 0, 0)
- - E4 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14)

V1 (0.13, 0.13, 0.13) E1 (0.08, 0.08, 0.08)
V2 (0.11, 0.11, 0.11) E2 (0.15, 0.15, 0.15)
V3 (0.05, 0.05, 0.05) E3 (0, 0, 0)
V4 (0.12, 0.12, 0.12) E4 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14)
{F } (0.06, 0.06, 0.06) E5 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14)
{H} (0.08, 0.08, 0.08) - -
{N } (0.14, 0.14, 0.14) - -
{O} (0.15, 0.15, 0.15) - -
Figure 29. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite Neutrosophic Associated to the

Neutrosophic Notions in the Neutrosophic Example (4.2)
4 Main Resultant 516
Definition 4.1. (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal Perfect 517
Domination). 518
Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Consider a 519
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then V 0 is called Neutrosophic 520
SuperHyperTotal Perfect Domination if the following expressions, terms and statements is 521
called Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal Perfect Domination criteria holds. 522
X X X
|( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 Vi ∈V 0 Vi ∈V 0
X X X
= min |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V 00 ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
Vj ∈ VN SHG , ∃!Vi ∈ V 00 :
Example 4.2. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite (SHG) S is a pair 523
S = (V, E) in the mentioned Neutrosophic Figures in every Neutrosophic items. 524
SuperHyperMultipartite (SHG), is up in the illustration of the Table (8). 526
Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). 527
Assume SuperHyperPart {Vi }7i=1 and non-SuperHyperPart {Vi }12

i=7 . Consider a 528
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 : DOESN’T EXIST. Then V 0 is called 529






Figure 36. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle Neutrosophic Associated to the Neutro-








Edges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal Perfect Domination since the following expressions, terms 530
and statements is called Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal Perfect Domination criteria holds. 531
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={VDOESN’T EXIST }
X
I(Vi ),
X
F (Vi ))|
: DOESN’T EXIST :
X X X
= 00 min |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00 00
Vj ∈ VN SHG \ V , ∃!Vi ∈ V :
Assume SuperHyperPart {Vi }7i=1 and non-SuperHyperPart {Vi }12 i=7 . Consider a 535

V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
X
|( T (Vi ),
X
I(Vi ),
X
F (Vi ))|
: DOESN’T EXIST :
X X X
= 00 min |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00 00
Vj ∈ VN SHG \ V , ∃!Vi ∈ V :
X
|( T (Vi ),
X
I(Vi ),
X
F (Vi ))|
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
: DOESN’T EXIST :
X X X
= 00 min |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00 00
Vj ∈ VN SHG \ V , ∃!Vi ∈ V :
X
|( T (Vi ),
X
I(Vi ),
X
F (Vi ))|
: DOESN’T EXIST :
X X X
= 00 min |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00 00
Vj ∈ VN SHG \ V , ∃!Vi ∈ V :
X
|( T (Vi ),
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
V6 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
V6 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V7 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
X
I(Vi ),
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={V
DOESN’T EXIST }
: DOESN’T EXIST :
X X X
= 00 min |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00 00
Vj ∈ VN SHG \ V , ∃!Vi ∈ V :
X
|( T (Vi ),
X
I(Vi ),
X
F (Vi ))|
: DOESN’T EXIST :
X X X
= 00 min |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00 00
Vj ∈ VN SHG \ V , ∃!Vi ∈ V :
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
V6 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V7 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)

X
|( T (Vi ),
X
I(Vi ),
X
F (Vi ))|
: DOESN’T EXIST :
X X X
= 00 min |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00 00
Vj ∈ VN SHG \ V , ∃!Vi ∈ V :
Example 4.3. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle (SHG) S is a pair S = (V, E) 574
in the mentioned Neutrosophic Figures in every Neutrosophic items. 575
SuperHyperCycle (SHG), is up in the illustration of the Table (15). 577
Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Assume 578
SuperHyperExternal {Vi }7i=1 and non-SuperHyperInternal {Vi }34 i=8 . Consider a 579
X
|( T (Vi ),
Edges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) Eii=37 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) Eii=37 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
X
I(Vi ),
X
F (Vi ))|
: DOESN’T EXIST :
X X X
= 00 min |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00 00
Vj ∈ VN SHG \ V , ∃!Vi ∈ V :
X
|( T (Vi ),
X
I(Vi ),
X
F (Vi ))|
: DOESN’T EXIST :
X X X
= 00 min |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00 00
Vj ∈ VN SHG \ V , ∃!Vi ∈ V :
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) Eii=37 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) Eii=37 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V7 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)

X
|( T (Vi ),
X
I(Vi ),
X
F (Vi ))|
: DOESN’T EXIST :
X X X
= 00 min |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00 00
Vj ∈ VN SHG \ V , ∃!Vi ∈ V :
SuperHyperExternal {Vi }7i=1 and non-SuperHyperInternal {Vi }34

i=8 . Consider a 600
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) Eii=37 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V7 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
X
|( T (Vi ),
X
I(Vi ),
X
F (Vi ))|
: DOESN’T EXIST :
X X X
= 00 min |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00 00
Vj ∈ VN SHG \ V , ∃!Vi ∈ V :
X
|( T (Vi ),
X
I(Vi ),
X
F (Vi ))|
: DOESN’T EXIST :
X X X
= 00 min |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00 00
Vj ∈ VN SHG \ V , ∃!Vi ∈ V :
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) Eii=37 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V5 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
V6 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V7 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) Eii=37 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V5 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
V6 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V7 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
X
|( T (Vi ),
X
I(Vi ),
X
F (Vi ))|
: DOESN’T EXIST :
X X X
= 00 min |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00 00
Vj ∈ VN SHG \ V , ∃!Vi ∈ V :
X
|( T (Vi ),
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={V
DOESN’T EXIST }
X
F (Vi ))|
: DOESN’T EXIST :
X X X
= 00 min |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00 00
Vj ∈ VN SHG \ V , ∃!Vi ∈ V :
5 Main Result 625
Theorem 5.1. (Main Result and Main Theorem). 626
Assume every Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite has the letter z. The notion on 627
the Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite and Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle don’t 628
coincide. 629
Proof. 630
(i). Let 631
P :
V1Pi , E1 ,
P
V1 j , E2
632
P :
V1Pi , E1 ,
P
V1 j , E2
be a longest path taken a connected Extreme SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E). 633
There’s a new way to redefine as 634
ViEXT ERN AL ∼ VjEXT ERN AL ≡

∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL ∈ Ez ≡
∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , {ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL } ⊆ Ez .
The term “EXTERNAL” implies |N (ViEXT ERN AL )| ≥ |N (Vj )| where Vj is 635
corresponded to ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal Perfect 636
Domination. The latter is straightforward. 637
(ii). Let 638
P :
ViEXT ERN AL , Ei∗ ,
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1
639
P :

EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1
is a longest SuperHyperTotal Perfect Domination taken from a connected Extreme 640
SuperHyperCycle ESHC : (V, E). There’s a new way to redefine as 641

Domination. The latter is straightforward. Then there’s at least one Neutrosophic 644
SuperHyperTotal Perfect Domination. Thus the notion of quasi isn’t up and the 645
SuperHyperNotions based on Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal Perfect Domination could be 646
applied. The unique embedded Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal Perfect Domination proposes 647
some longest Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal Perfect Domination excerpt from some 648
representatives. The latter is straightforward. 649
Proposition 5.2. Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM be a pair

S = (V, E). Assume every Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex has the letter z. The
Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal Perfect Domination set is as follows.
{V1Pi , V2Pi }, V3Pi , . . . , V|P

Pi
i|
. 650
Proof. Let 651
P :
V1Pi , E1 ,
P
V1 j , E2
652
P :
V1Pi , E1 ,
P
V1 j , E2

Proposition 5.3. Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM be a pair

Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal Perfect Domination number is as follows.
|Pi | × 0.26.
Proof. Let 658
P :
V1Pi , E1 ,
P
V1 j , E2
659
P :
V1Pi , E1 ,
P
V1 j , E2

Proposition 5.4. Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle (ESHC) S be a pair 665
S = (V, E). Assume every Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex has the letter z. The 666
Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal Perfect Domination set is as follows. 667
{
ViIN T ERN AL ,
IN T ERN AL
Vi+1 ,...
IN T ERN AL
V|E i|
Proof. Let 668
P :
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1
669
P :
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1

. The latter is straightforward. Then there’s at least one Neutrosophic

Domination 674
Proposition 5.5. Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle (ESHC) S be a pair

Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal Perfect Domination number is as follows.
|Ei | × 0.26.
Proof. Let 680
P :
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1
681
P :
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1

Definition 5.6. (Uniform Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite and Uniform 692
Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle). 693
(i). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Every 694
pair of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices has the same maximum letter, i.e., 695
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices mutually has the same maximum letter. A 696
Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E) is called 697
Uniform Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite. 698
(ii). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Every pair of 699
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices has the same maximum letter, i.e., 700
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices mutually has the same maximum letter. A 701
Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E) is called Uniform 702
Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle. 703
Proposition 5.7. Let an Uniform Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM be a

pair S = (V, E). The Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal Perfect Domination set is as follows.
{V1Pi , V2Pi }, V3Pi , . . . , V|P
Pi
i|
. 704
Proof. Let 705
P :
V1Pi , E1 ,
P
V1 j , E2
706
P :
V1Pi , E1 ,
P
V1 j , E2

Proposition 5.8. Let an Uniform Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM be a

pair S = (V, E). The Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal Perfect Domination number is as follows.
|Pi | × 0.26.
Proof. Let 712
P :
V1Pi , E1 ,
P
V1 j , E2
713
P :
V1Pi , E1 ,
P
V1 j , E2

Proposition 5.9. Let an Uniform Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle (ESHC) S be a pair 719
S = (V, E). The Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal Perfect Domination set is as follows. 720
{
ViIN T ERN AL ,
IN T ERN AL
Vi+1 ,...
IN T ERN AL
V|E i|
Proof. Let 721
P :
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1
722
P :
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1

Proposition 5.10. Let an Uniform Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle (ESHC) S be a

pair S = (V, E). The Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal Perfect Domination number is as follows.
|Ei | × 0.26.
Proof. Let 733
P :
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1
734
P :
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1

Proposition 5.11. (Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite and Neutrosophic 745
SuperHyperCycle). 746
(i). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Assume 747
two Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, from different SuperHyperParts, have the 748
maximum letter. Then the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices don’t have the same 749
maximum letter, are in every Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal Perfect Domination set. 750
(ii). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Assume every 751
Neutrosophic EXTERNAL SuperHyperVertices with distance two have the 752
maximum letter. Then the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices don’t have the same 753
maximum letter, are in every Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal Perfect Domination set. 754
Proof. 755
(i). Let 756
P :
V1Pi , E1 ,
P
V1 j , E2
757
P :
V1Pi , E1 ,
P
V1 j , E2

(ii). Let 763
P :
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1
764
P :
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1

Proposition 5.12. (Embedded Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar and Embedded 775
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar). 776
(i). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Then 777
two Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, from different SuperHyperParts, is in every 778
Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal Perfect Domination set. 779
(ii). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Then every 780
Neutrosophic EXTERNAL SuperHyperVertices with distance two is in every 781
Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal Perfect Domination set. 782
Proof. 783
(i). Let 784
P :
V1Pi , E1 ,
P
V1 j , E2
785
P :
V1Pi , E1 ,
P
V1 j , E2

(ii). Let 791
P :
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1
792
P :
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1

6 Neutrosophic Applications in Cancer’s 803
Neutrosophic Recognition 804
The cancer is the Neutrosophic disease but the Neutrosophic model is going to figure 805
out what’s going on this Neutrosophic phenomenon. The special Neutrosophic case of 806
this Neutrosophic disease is considered and as the consequences of the model, some 807
parameters are used. The cells are under attack of this disease but the moves of the 808
cancer in the special region are the matter of mind. The Neutrosophic recognition of the 809
cancer could help to find some Neutrosophic treatments for this Neutrosophic disease. 810
In the following, some Neutrosophic steps are Neutrosophic devised on this disease. 811
Step 1. (Neutrosophic Definition) The Neutrosophic recognition of the cancer in 812
the long-term Neutrosophic function. 813
Step 2. (Neutrosophic Issue) The specific region has been assigned by the 814
Neutrosophic model [it’s called Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph] and the long 815
Neutrosophic cycle of the move from the cancer is identified by this research. 816
Sometimes the move of the cancer hasn’t be easily identified since there are some 817
Figure 43. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite Associated to the Notions of Neutro-

sophic SuperHyperTotal Perfect Domination
determinacy, indeterminacy and neutrality about the moves and the effects of the 818
cancer on that region; this event leads us to choose another model [it’s said to be 819
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph] to have convenient perception on what’s 820
happened and what’s done. 821
Step 3. (Neutrosophic Model) There are some specific Neutrosophic models, 822
which are well-known and they’ve got the names, and some general Neutrosophic 823
models. The moves and the Neutrosophic traces of the cancer on the complex 824
tracks and between complicated groups of cells could be fantasized by a 825
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath(-/SuperHyperTotal Perfect Domination, SuperHyperStar, 826
SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, SuperHyperWheel). The aim is to 827
find either the Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal Perfect Domination or the Neutrosophic 828
SuperHyperTotal Perfect Domination in those Neutrosophic Neutrosophic 829
SuperHyperModels. 830
7 Case 1: The Initial Neutrosophic Steps 831
Toward Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite as 832
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel 833
Step 4. (Neutrosophic Solution) In the Neutrosophic Figure (43), the 834
Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite is Neutrosophic highlighted and Neutrosophic 835
featured. 836
By using the Neutrosophic Figure (43) and the Table (22), the Neutrosophic 837
SuperHyperBipartite is obtained. 838
The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Neutrosophic Algorithm in 839
previous Neutrosophic result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the 840
connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic 841
SuperHyperModel (43), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal Perfect Domination. 842
Edges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite
Figure 44. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite Associated to the Notions of

Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal Perfect Domination
8 Case 2: The Increasing Neutrosophic Steps 843
Toward Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite as 844
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel 845
Step 4. (Neutrosophic Solution) In the Neutrosophic Figure (44), the 846
Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite is Neutrosophic highlighted and 847
Neutrosophic featured. 848
By using the Neutrosophic Figure (44) and the Table (23), the Neutrosophic 849
SuperHyperMultipartite is obtained. 850
The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Neutrosophic Algorithm in 851
previous result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected 852
Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic 853
SuperHyperModel (44), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal Perfect Domination. 854
9 Wondering Open Problems But As The 855
Directions To Forming The Motivations 856
In what follows, some “problems” and some “questions” are proposed. 857
The SuperHyperTotal Perfect Domination and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal Perfect 858
Domination are defined on a real-world application, titled “Cancer’s Recognitions”. 859
Question 9.1. Which the else SuperHyperModels could be defined based on Cancer’s 860
recognitions? 861
Question 9.2. Are there some SuperHyperNotions related to SuperHyperTotal Perfect 862
and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal Perfect Domination?

Domination 863
Question 9.3. Are there some Algorithms to be defined on the SuperHyperModels to 864
compute them? 865
Question 9.4. Which the SuperHyperNotions are related to beyond the SuperHyperTotal 866
and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal Perfect Domination?

Problem 9.5. The SuperHyperTotal Perfect Domination and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal 868
do a SuperHyperModel for the Cancer’s recognitions and they’re based on

SuperHyperTotal Perfect Domination, are there else? 870
Problem 9.6. Which the fundamental SuperHyperNumbers are related to these 871
SuperHyperNumbers types-results? 872
Problem 9.7. What’s the independent research based on Cancer’s recognitions 873
concerning the multiple types of SuperHyperNotions? 874
10 Conclusion and Closing Remarks 875
In this section, closing and concluding remarks are presented. The drawbacks of this 876
scientific research are shown. Some advantages and disadvantages of this scientific 877
research are highlighted. 878
This scientific research uses some approaches to further understand the Neutrosophic 879
SuperHyperGraphs. In this effort, two SuperHyperNotions are defined on the Total 880
Perfect Domination. For this reason, in the second definition, the original definition of 881
the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph is redefined on the position of the alphabets. Based 882
on the new Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph definition, the new SuperHyperNotion, 883
Neutrosophic Total Perfect Domination, finds a suitable background to implement some 884
results on. Some SuperHyperClasses and some Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses are the 885
subjects of this scientific research on modeling areas that are subject to cancer attacks 886
in order to recognize this disease as mentioned under the title “Cancer Diagnosis”. To 887
formalize the SuperHyperNotion, Total Perfect Domination, SuperHyperClasses and 888
new SuperHyperClasses instances are introduced. Some general results are summarized 889
in the Total Perfect Domination and Neutrosophic Total Perfect Domination sections. 890
Clarifications, examples, and literature reviews go all the way. In this scientific research, 891
the literature review has met the lines containing concepts and results. 892
SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph are super-hypermodels in 893
“cancer diagnosis” and both are the foundation of the background of this scientific 894
research. Sometimes cancer has occurred in an area full of cells, cell groups, and 895
embedded styles. In this section, SuperHyperModel proposes SuperHyperNotions, 896
formally called “Total Perfect Domination”, based on the connections of Cancer’s 897
movements in the longest and strongest styles with the formation of design and 898
architecture, in terms of terms and whispering words. . The “SuperHyper” prefix refers 899
Table 24. A look at this scientific research and beyond

Advantages Limitations
1. Redefining the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 1. General Results
2. Total Perfect Domination
3. Neutrosophic Total Perfect Domination 2. Other SuperHyperNumbers
4. modeling cancer diagnoses
5. SuperHyperClasses 3. SuperHyperFamilies
to the topic of embedded styles to explore the background of SuperHyperNotions. In 900
the table (24), the advantages and ways of this scientific research are specified, pointed 901
out and expressed. 902
11 Background 903
There are some scientific researches covering the topic of this scientific research. In what 904
follows, there are some discussion and literature reviews about them. 905
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “New Ideas In Recognition of 906
Cancer And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph As Hyper Tool On Super Toot” in Ref. [1] 907
by Henry Garrett (2023). In this research article, a novel approach is implemented on 908
SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on general forms with 909
introducing used neutrosophic classes of neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. It’s published 910
in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled “Current Trends in Mass Communication 911
(CTMC)” with ISO abbreviation “Curr Trends Mass Comm” in volume 2 and issue 1 912
with pages 32-55. 913
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “Some Super Hyper Degrees 914
and Co-Super Hyper Degrees on Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs And Super Hyper 915
Graphs Alongside Applications in Cancer’s Treatments” in Ref. [2] by Henry Garrett 916
(2023). In this research article, a novel approach is implemented on SuperHyperGraph 917
and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on fundamental notions and using vital tools 918
in Cancer’s Treatments. It’s published in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled 919
“Journal of Mathematical Techniques and Computational Mathematics(JMTCM)” with 920
ISO abbreviation “J Math Techniques Comput Math” in volume 2 and issue 1 with 921
pages 35-47. The research article studies deeply with choosing directly neutrosophic 922
SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough toward independent 923
results based on initial background and fundamental SuperHyperNumbers. 924
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “A Research on Cancer’s 925
Recognition and Neutrosophic Super Hypergraph by Eulerian Super Hyper Cycles and 926
Hamiltonian Sets as Hyper Covering Versus Super separations” in Ref. [3] by Henry 927
Garrett (2023). In this research article, a novel approach is implemented on 928
SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on fundamental notions 929
and using vital tools in Cancer’s Recognition. It’s published in prestigious and fancy 930
journal is entitled “Journal of Mathematical Techniques and Computational 931
Mathematics(JMTCM)” with ISO abbreviation “J Math Techniques Comput Math” in 932
volume 2 and issue 3 with pages 136-148. The research article studies deeply with 933
choosing directly neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph. It’s the 934
breakthrough toward independent results based on initial background and fundamental 935
SuperHyperNumbers. 936
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “Neutrosophic 1-Failed 937
SuperHyperForcing in the SuperHyperFunction to Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs 938
on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Beyond ” in Ref. [4] by Henry Garrett (2023). 939
In this research article, a novel approach is implemented on SuperHyperGraph and 940
neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on fundamental SuperHyperNumber and using 941
neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses of neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. It’s published in 942
prestigious and fancy journal is entitled “Journal of Mathematical Techniques and 943
Computational Mathematics(JMTCM)” with ISO abbreviation “J Math Techniques 944
Comput Math” in volume 2 and issue 6 with pages 221-307. The research article studies 945
deeply with choosing directly neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph. 946
It’s the breakthrough toward independent results based on initial background and 947
fundamental SuperHyperNumbers. The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is 948
titled “New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph by 949
Initial Eulerian-Path-Cut as Hyper Initial Eulogy on Super Initial EULA” in Ref. [5] by 950
Henry Garrett (2023). In this research article, a novel approach is implemented on 951
SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on fundamental 952
SuperHyperNumber and using neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses of neutrosophic 953
SuperHyperGraph. It’s published in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled 954
“International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Research” with ISO 955
abbreviation “IJPAMR” in volume 3 and issue 2 with pages 60-88 and doi: 956
10.51483/IJPAMR.3.2.2023.60-88. The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is 957
titled “New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graph by 958
Eulerian-Path-Cut as Hyper Eulogy-Path-Cut on Super EULA-Path-Cut” in Ref. [6] by 959
SuperHyperGraph. It’s published in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled 963
“International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Research” with ISO 964
abbreviation “IJPAMR” in volume 3 and issue 2 with pages 102-124 and doi: 965
10.51483/IJPAMR.3.2.2023.102-124. The research article studies deeply with choosing 966
directly neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough 967
toward independent results based on initial background and fundamental 968
SuperHyperNumbers. The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “Super 969
Hyper Dominating and Super Hyper Resolving on Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs and 970
Their Directions in Game Theory and Neutrosophic Super Hyper Classes” in Ref. [7] by 971
SuperHyperGraph. It’s published in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled “Journal 975
of Mathematical Techniques and Computational Mathematics(JMTCM)” with ISO 976
abbreviation “J Math Techniques Comput Math” in volume 1 and issue 3 with pages 977
242-263. The research article studies deeply with choosing directly neutrosophic 978
SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough toward independent 979
results based on initial background and fundamental SuperHyperNumbers. The seminal 980
paper and groundbreaking article is titled “neutrosophic co-degree and neutrosophic 981
degree alongside chromatic numbers in the setting of some classes related to neutrosophic 982
hypergraphs” in Ref. [8] by Henry Garrett (2023). In this research article, a novel 983
approach is implemented on SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 984
based on general forms without using neutrosophic classes of neutrosophic 985
SuperHyperGraph. It’s published in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled “Journal 986
of Current Trends in Computer Science Research (JCTCSR)” with ISO abbreviation “J 987
Curr Trends Comp Sci Res” in volume 2 and issue 1 with pages 16-24. The research 988
article studies deeply with choosing neutrosophic hypergraphs instead of neutrosophic 989
SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough toward independent results based on initial 990
background. The research article studies deeply with choosing neutrosophic 991
hypergraphs instead of neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough toward 992
independent results based on initial background. In some articles are titled “0039 — 993
Closing Numbers and Super-Closing Numbers as (Dual)Resolving and (Dual)Coloring 994
alongside (Dual)Dominating in (Neutrosophic)n-SuperHyperGraph” in Ref. [9] by 995
Henry Garrett (2022), “0049 — (Failed)1-Zero-Forcing Number in Neutrosophic Graphs” 996
in Ref. [10] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Extreme SuperHyperClique as the Firm Scheme 997
of Confrontation under Cancer’s Recognition as the Model in The Setting of 998
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [11] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Uncertainty 999
On The Act And Effect Of Cancer Alongside The Foggy Positions Of Cells Toward 1000
Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique inside Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Titled 1001
Cancer’s Recognition” in Ref. [12] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic Version Of 1002
Separates Groups Of Cells In Cancer’s Recognition On Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” 1003
in Ref. [13] by Henry Garrett (2022), “The Shift Paradigm To Classify Separately The 1004
Cells and Affected Cells Toward The Totality Under Cancer’s Recognition By New 1005
Multiple Definitions On the Sets Polynomials Alongside Numbers In The (Neutrosophic) 1006
SuperHyperMatching Theory Based on SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic 1007
SuperHyperGraph” in Ref. [14] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Breaking the Continuity and 1008
Uniformity of Cancer In The Worst Case of Full Connections With Extreme Failed 1009
SuperHyperClique In Cancer’s Recognition Applied in (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” 1010
in Ref. [15] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable as the 1011
Survivors on the Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition Based on Uncertainty to All Modes 1012
in Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [16] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Extremism 1013
of the Attacked Body Under the Cancer’s Circumstances Where Cancer’s Recognition 1014
Titled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [17] by Henry Garrett (2022), 1015
“(Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in Cancer’s Recognitions And 1016
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [18] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic 1017
Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on 1018
Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In Special ViewPoints” in Ref. [19] by Henry 1019
Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in the SuperHyperFunction 1020
To Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition And 1021
Beyond ” in Ref. [20] by Henry Garrett (2022), “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperStable on 1022
Cancer’s Recognition by Well- SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs ” 1023
in Ref. [21] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To 1024
Form Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In 1025
Special ViewPoints” in Ref. [17] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Basic Notions on 1026
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperForcing And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling in Cancer’s 1027
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [22] by Henry Garrett 1028
(2022), “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form Neutrosophic 1029
SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In Special ViewPoints” 1030
in Ref. [23] by Henry Garrett (2022),“(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s 1031
Recognitions Featuring (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances” in 1032
Ref. [24] by Henry Garrett (2022), “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperAlliances With 1033
SuperHyperDefensive and SuperHyperOffensive Type-SuperHyperSet On (Neutrosophic) 1034
SuperHyperGraph With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions 1035
And Related (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClasses” in Ref. [25] by Henry Garrett (2022), 1036
“SuperHyperGirth on SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph With 1037
SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions” in Ref. [26] by Henry Garrett (2022), 1038
“Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on Neutrosophic 1039
SuperHyperGraphs and SuperHyperGraphs Alongside Applications in Cancer’s 1040
Treatments” in Ref. [27] by Henry Garrett (2022), “SuperHyperDominating and 1041
SuperHyperResolving on Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs And Their Directions in 1042
Game Theory and Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses” in Ref. [28] by Henry Garrett 1043
(2022), “SuperHyperMatching By (R-)Definitions And Polynomials To Monitor 1044
Cancer’s Recognition In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [230] by Henry 1045
Garrett (2023), “The Focus on The Partitions Obtained By Parallel Moves In The 1046
Cancer’s Extreme Recognition With Different Types of Extreme SuperHyperMatching Set 1047
and Polynomial on (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [231] by Henry Garrett 1048
(2023), “Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique Decides the Failures on the Cancer’s 1049
Recognition in the Perfect Connections of Cancer’s Attacks By SuperHyperModels 1050
Named (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [232] by Henry Garrett (2023), 1051
“Indeterminacy On The All Possible Connections of Cells In Front of Cancer’s Attacks 1052
In The Terms of Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique on Cancer’s Recognition called 1053
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [233] by Henry Garrett (2023), “Perfect 1054
Directions Toward Idealism in Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition Forwarding 1055
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClique on Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [236] by 1056
Henry Garrett (2023), “Demonstrating Complete Connections in Every Embedded 1057
Regions and Sub-Regions in the Terms of Cancer’s Recognition and (Neutrosophic) 1058
SuperHyperGraphs With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClique” in Ref. [237] by Henry 1059
Garrett (2023), “Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic Regions titled 1060
neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable in Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition modeled in 1061
the Form of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [240] by Henry Garrett (2023), 1062
“Using the Tool As (Neutrosophic) Failed SuperHyperStable To SuperHyperModel 1063
Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [243] by Henry 1064
Garrett (2023), “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form Neutrosophic 1065
SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In Special ViewPoints” 1066
in Ref. [244] by Henry Garrett (2023), “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperStable on Cancer’s 1067
Recognition by Well-SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in 1068
Ref. [245] by Henry Garrett (2023), “Neutrosophic 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in the 1069
SuperHyperFunction To Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs on Cancer’s Neutrosophic 1070
Recognition And Beyond ” in Ref. [246] by Henry Garrett (2022), “(Neutrosophic) 1071
1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in Cancer’s Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) 1072
SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [247] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Basic Notions on 1073
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperForcing And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling in Cancer’s 1074
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [248] by Henry Garrett 1075
(2022), “Basic Neutrosophic Notions Concerning SuperHyperDominating and 1076
Neutrosophic SuperHyperResolving in SuperHyperGraph” in Ref. [259] by Henry 1077
Garrett (2022), “Initial Material of Neutrosophic Preliminaries to Study Some 1078
Neutrosophic Notions Based on Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) in Neutrosophic 1079
SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)” in Ref. [260] by Henry Garrett (2022), and [?, ?, ?, ?, 4–260], 1080
there are some endeavors to formalize the basic SuperHyperNotions about neutrosophic 1081
SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph alongside scientific research books 1082
at [?, 261–398]. Two popular scientific research books in Scribd in the terms of high 1083
readers, 5679 and 6667 respectively, on neutrosophic science is on [399, 400]. 1084
Some scientific studies and scientific researches about neutrosophic graphs, are 1085
proposed as book in Ref. [399] by Henry Garrett (2023) which is indexed by Google 1086
Scholar and has more than 5679 readers in Scribd. It’s titled “Beyond Neutrosophic 1087
Graphs” and published by Dr. Henry Garrett. This research book covers different types 1088
of notions and settings in neutrosophic graph theory and neutrosophic 1089
SuperHyperGraph theory. 1090
Also, some scientific studies and scientific researches about neutrosophic graphs, are 1091
proposed as book in Ref. [400] by Henry Garrett (2023) which is indexed by Google 1092
Scholar and has more than 6667 readers in Scribd. It’s titled “Neutrosophic Duality” 1093
and published by Dr. Henry Garrett. This research book presents different types of 1094
notions SuperHyperResolving and SuperHyperDominating in the setting of duality in 1095
neutrosophic graph theory and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph theory. This research 1096
book has scrutiny on the complement of the intended set and the intended set, 1097
simultaneously. It’s smart to consider a set but acting on its complement that what’s 1098
done in this research book which is popular in the terms of high readers in Scribd. 1099
See the seminal scientific researches [1–3]. The formalization of the notions on the 1100
framework of notions in SuperHyperGraphs, Neutrosophic notions in 1101
SuperHyperGraphs theory, and (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs theory 1102
at [?, ?, ?, ?, 4–260] alongside scientific research books at [?, 261–398]. Two popular 1103
scientific research books in Scribd ,in the terms of high readers, 5679 and 6667 1104
respectively, on neutrosophic science is on [399, 400]. 1105
References 1106
1. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 1107
SuperHyperGraph As Hyper Tool On Super Toot”, Curr Trends Mass Comm 1108
2(1) (2023) 32-55. (doi: 10.33140/CTMC.02.01.03). 1109
2. Henry Garrett, “Some Super Hyper Degrees and Co-Super Hyper Degrees on 1110
Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs And Super Hyper Graphs Alongside 1111
Applications in Cancer’s Treatments”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 2(1) 1112
(2023) 35-47. (doi: 10.33140/JMTCM.02.01.05). 1113
3. Henry Garrett, “A Research on Cancer’s Recognition and Neutrosophic Super 1114
Hypergraph by Eulerian Super Hyper Cycles and Hamiltonian Sets as Hyper 1115
Covering Versus Super separations”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 2(3) 1116
(2023) 136-148. (doi: 10.33140/JMTCM.02.03.03). 1117
4. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in the 1118
SuperHyperFunction to Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs on Cancer’s 1119
Neutrosophic Recognition and Beyond ”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 2(6) 1120
(2023) 221-307. (doi: 10.33140/JMTCM.02.06.04). 1121
5. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic 1122
SuperHyperGraph by Initial Eulerian-Path-Cut as Hyper Initial Eulogy on Super 1123
Initial EULA”, International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics 1124
Research 3(2) (2023) 60-88. (doi: 10.51483/IJPAMR.3.2.2023.60-88). 1125
6. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic Super 1126
Hyper Graph by Eulerian-Path-Cut as Hyper Eulogy-Path-Cut on Super 1127
EULA-Path-Cut”, International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics 1128
Research 3(2) (2023) 102-124. (doi: 10.51483/IJPAMR.3.2.2023.102-124). 1129
7. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic Super 1130
Hyper Graph by Eulerian-Path-Cut as Hyper Eulogy-Path-Cut on Super 1131
EULA-Path-Cut”, J Curr Trends Comp Sci Res 2(1) (2023) 16-24. (doi: 1132
10.33140/JCTCSR.02.01.04) 1133
8. Henry Garrett, “Super Hyper Dominating and Super Hyper Resolving on 1134
Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs and Their Directions in Game Theory and 1135
Neutrosophic Super Hyper Classes”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 1(3) 1136
(2022) 242-263. (doi: 10.33140/JMTCM.01.03.09) 1137
9. Garrett, Henry. “0039 — Closing Numbers and Super-Closing Numbers as 1138
(Dual)Resolving and (Dual)Coloring alongside (Dual)Dominating in 1139
(Neutrosophic)n-SuperHyperGraph.” CERN European Organization for Nuclear 1140
Research - Zenodo, Nov. 2022. CERN European Organization for Nuclear 1141
Research, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6319942. 1142
https://oa.mg/work/10.5281/zenodo.6319942 1143
10. Garrett, Henry. “0049 — (Failed)1-Zero-Forcing Number in Neutrosophic 1144
Graphs.” CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research - Zenodo, Feb. 1145
2022. CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research, 1146
https://doi.org/10.13140/rg.2.2.35241.26724. 1147
https://oa.mg/work/10.13140/rg.2.2.35241.26724 1148
11. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperClique as the Firm Scheme of 1149
Confrontation under Cancer’s Recognition as the Model in The Setting of 1150
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010308 (doi: 1151
10.20944/preprints202301.0308.v1). 1152
12. Henry Garrett, “Uncertainty On The Act And Effect Of Cancer Alongside The 1153
Foggy Positions Of Cells Toward Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique inside 1154
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Titled Cancer’s Recognition”, Preprints 2023, 1155
2023010282 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0282.v1). 1156
13. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Version Of Separates Groups Of Cells In 1157
Cancer’s Recognition On Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 1158
2023010267 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0267.v1). 1159
14. Henry Garrett, “The Shift Paradigm To Classify Separately The Cells and 1160
Affected Cells Toward The Totality Under Cancer’s Recognition By New 1161
Multiple Definitions On the Sets Polynomials Alongside Numbers In The 1162
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperMatching Theory Based on SuperHyperGraph and 1163
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”, Preprints 2023, 2023010265 (doi: 1164
10.20944/preprints202301.0265.v1). 1165
15. Henry Garrett, “Breaking the Continuity and Uniformity of Cancer In The 1166
Worst Case of Full Connections With Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique In 1167
Cancer’s Recognition Applied in (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 1168
2023, 2023010262,(doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0262.v1). 1169
16. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable as the Survivors on the 1170
Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition Based on Uncertainty to All Modes in 1171
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010240 (doi: 1172
10.20944/preprints202301.0240.v1). 1173
17. Henry Garrett, “Extremism of the Attacked Body Under the Cancer’s 1174
Circumstances Where Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) 1175
SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010224, (doi: 1176
10.20944/preprints202301.0224.v1). 1177
18. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in Cancer’s 1178
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 1179
2023010105 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 1180
19. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form 1181
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions 1182
In Special ViewPoints”, Preprints 2023, 2023010088 (doi: 1183
10.20944/preprints202301.0088.v1). 1184
SuperHyperFunction To Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs on Cancer’s 1186
Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond ”, Preprints 2023, 2023010044 1187
21. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperStable on Cancer’s Recognition by 1188
Well- SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 1189
2023010043 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0043.v1). 1190
22. Henry Garrett, “Basic Notions on (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperForcing And 1191
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling in Cancer’s Recognitions And 1192
10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 1194
10.20944/preprints202301.0088.v1). 1198
24. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions 1199
Featuring (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances”, Preprints 1200
2022, 2022120549 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0549.v1). 1201
25. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperAlliances With SuperHyperDefensive 1202
and SuperHyperOffensive Type-SuperHyperSet On (Neutrosophic) 1203
SuperHyperGraph With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s 1204
Recognitions And Related (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClasses”, Preprints 2022, 1205
2022120540 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0540.v1). 1206
26. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperGirth on SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic 1207
SuperHyperGraph With SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions”, 1208
Preprints 2022, 2022120500 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0500.v1). 1209
27. Henry Garrett, “Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on 1210
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs and SuperHyperGraphs Alongside Applications 1211
in Cancer’s Treatments”, Preprints 2022, 2022120324 (doi: 1212
10.20944/preprints202212.0324.v1). 1213
28. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDominating and SuperHyperResolving on 1214
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs And Their Directions in Game Theory and 1215
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”, Preprints 2022, 2022110576 (doi: 1216
10.20944/preprints202211.0576.v1). 1217
29. Henry Garrett, “Star and Wheel on Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic 1218
SuperHyperGraph with a Specific Type of Independency of 1219
SuperHyperVertices”, Preprints 2024, , 2024020663 (doi: 1220
10.20944/preprints202402.0663.v1). 1221
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By Perfect Domination”, Zenodo 2023, 1223
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10899659). 1224
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By Perfect Domination”, Zenodo 1226
2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10895887). 1227
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By Perfect Domination”, 1229
Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10888691). 1230
SuperHyperGraph With Counterproposal Star and Counteroffer Wheel By 1232
Counterargument Stable Sequence As Hyper Findings On Super Gatherings”, 1233
SuperHyperGraph With Counterproposal Bipartite and Counteroffer Path By 1236
Counterargument Stable Sequence As Hyper Findings On Super Gatherings”, 1237
SuperHyperGraph With Counterproposal Multipartite and Counteroffer Cycle 1240
By Counterargument Stable Sequence As Hyper Findings On Super 1241
Gatherings”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10640905). 1242
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By Strongly Resolving Sequence As 1244
Hyper Decoration On Super Density”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1245
10.13140/RG.2.2.17389.97769). 1246
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By Strongly Resolving Sequence As 1248
Hyper Decoration On Super Density”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1249
10.13140/RG.2.2.28685.10727). 1250
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By Strongly Resolving Sequence 1252
As Hyper Decoration On Super Density”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1253
10.13140/RG.2.2.24994.20169). 1254
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By Dominating Sequence As Hyper 1256
Decoration On Super Density”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10371529). 1257
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By Dominating Sequence As Hyper 1259
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By Dominating Sequence As 1262
Hyper Decoration On Super Density”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1263
10.5281/zenodo.10263440). 1264
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By STABLE As Hyper Decoration On 1266
Super Density”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10028600). 1267
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By STABLE As Hyper Decoration 1269
On Super Density”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8310454). 1270
44. Henry Garrett, “Recognition of Cancer With Bipartite and Path as 1271
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph By the Tool Called Stability”, Preprints 2023, 1272
2023081972 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202308.1972.v1). 1273
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By STABLE As Hyper 1275
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By REVERSE CONNECTIVE 1278
DOMINATION As Hyper Decoration On Super Density”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1279
10.5281/zenodo.8206877). 1280
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By REVERSE CONNECTIVE 1282
10.5281/zenodo.8206834). 1284
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By REVERSE CONNECTIVE 1286
10.5281/zenodo.8206773). 1288
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By EQUAL CONNECTIVE 1290
10.5281/zenodo.8201319). 1292
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By EQUAL CONNECTIVE 1294
10.5281/zenodo.8201255). 1296
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By EQUAL CONNECTIVE 1298
10.5281/zenodo.8201165). 1300
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By CONNECTIVE DOMINATION As 1302
Hyper Decoration On Super Density”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1303
10.5281/zenodo.8196147). 1304
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By CONNECTIVE DOMINATION 1306
As Hyper Decoration On Super Density”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1307
10.5281/zenodo.8196132). 1308
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By CONNECTIVE 1310
10.5281/zenodo.8196099). 1312
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By DOMINATION As Hyper 1314
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By DOMINATION As Hyper 1317
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By DOMINATION As Hyper 1320
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperPerfect Search As Hyper Perf On Super 1323
Perfidy”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8104836). 1324
59. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Perfidy By Hyper Perf Of 1325
SuperHyperPerfect Search In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1326
SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8104857). 1327
SuperHyperGraph By Reverse Strict Dimension Dominating As Hyper Dimple 1329
On Super Dimity”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8092796). 1330
61. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Dimity By Hyper Dimple Of Reverse 1331
Strict Dimension Dominating In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1332
SuperHyperGraph By Unequal Dimension Dominating As Hyper Dimple On 1335
Super Dimity”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8088438). 1336
63. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Dimity By Hyper Dimple Of Unequal 1337
Dimension Dominating In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1338
SuperHyperGraph By Strict Dimension Dominating As Hyper Dimple On Super 1341
Dimity”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8084436). 1342
65. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Dimity By Hyper Dimple Of Strict 1343
SuperHyperGraph By Reverse Strict Connective As Hyper Conceit On Super 1347
Con”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8080100). 1348
67. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Con By Hyper Conceit Of Reverse Strict 1349
Connective In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, 1350
SuperHyperGraph By Unequal Connective Dominating As Hyper Conceit On 1353
Super Con”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8078445). 1354
69. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Con By Hyper Conceit Of Unequal 1355
Connective Dominating In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1356
SuperHyperGraph By Strict Connective Dominating As Hyper Conceit On 1359
71. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Con By Hyper Conceit Of Strict 1361
SuperHyperGraph By Reverse Dimension Dominating As Hyper Dimple On 1365
Super Dimity”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8072171). 1366
73. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Dimity By Hyper Dimple Of Reverse 1367
SuperHyperGraph By Equal Dimension Dominating As Hyper Dimple On Super 1371
75. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Dimity By Hyper Dimple Of Equal 1373
SuperHyperGraph By Dimension Dominating As Hyper Dimple On Super 1377
77. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Dimity By Hyper Dimple Of Dimension 1379
Dominating In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, 1380
SuperHyperGraph By Reverse Connective Dominating As Hyper Conceit On 1383
79. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Con By Hyper Conceit Of Reverse 1385
SuperHyperGraph By Equal Connective Dominating As Hyper Conceit On 1389
81. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Con By Hyper Conceit Of Equal 1391
SuperHyperGraph By Connective Dominating As Hyper Conceit On Super 1395
Con”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8051346). 1396
83. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Con By Hyper Conceit Of Connective 1397
SuperHyperGraph By United Dominating As Hyper Ultra On Super Units”, 1401
85. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Units By Hyper Ultra Of United 1403
SuperHyperGraph By Zero Forcing As Hyper ford On Super forceps”, Zenodo 1407
2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8017246). 1408
87. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super forceps By Hyper ford Of Zero Forcing In 1409
Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 2023, 1410
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8020128). 1411
SuperHyperGraph By Matrix-Based As Hyper mat On Super matte”, Zenodo 1413
2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7978571). 1414
89. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super mat By Hyper matte Of Matrix-Based In 1415
Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 2023, 1416
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7978857). 1417
SuperHyperGraph By Dominating-Edges As Hyper Dome On Super Eddy”, 1419
91. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Eddy By Hyper Dome Of 1421
Dominating-Edges In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1422
SuperHyperGraph By Edge-Gap As Hyper Gape On Super Gab”, Zenodo 2023, 1425
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7916595). 1426
93. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Gab By Hyper Gape Of Edge-Gap In 1427
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7923632). 1429
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On 1431
Super Nebulous”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7904698). 1432
95. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nebulous By Hyper Nebbish Of 1433
Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1434
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition As Hyper 1437
Decompress On Super Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1438
10.5281/zenodo.7904529). 1439
97. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Decompensation By Hyper Decompress Of 1440
Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With 1441
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1442
10.5281/zenodo.7904401). 1443
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut As Hyper Nebbish On Super 1445
Nebulous”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7871026). 1446
Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1448
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Cycle-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super 1451
Eulerian-Cycle-Neighbor In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1454
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Cycle-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On 1457
Super Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7855661). 1458
Eulerian-Cycle-Decomposition In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1460
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Cycle-Cut As Hyper Eulogy On Super EULA”, 1463
105. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super EULA By Hyper Eulogy Of 1465
Eulerian-Cycle-Cut In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1466
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Path-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super 1469
Eulerian-Type-Path-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1472
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Path-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress 1475
On Super Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7839333). 1476
Eulerian-Type-Path-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1478
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Path-Cut As Hyper Eulogy On Super 1481
EULA”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7834229). 1482
Eulerian-Type-Path-Cut In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1484
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Path-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super 1487
Eulerian-Path-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1490
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Path-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On 1493
Eulerian-Path-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1496
SuperHyperGraph As Hyper Tool On Super Toot”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1499
10.5281/zenodo.7812236). 1500
SuperHyperGraph By initial Eulerian-Path-Cut As Hyper initial Eulogy On 1502
Super initial EULA”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7809365). 1503
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Path-Cut As Hyper Eulogy-Path-Cut On Super 1505
EULA-Path-Cut”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7809358). 1506
Eulerian-Path-Cut In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1508
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Path-Cut As Hyper Eulogy On Super EULA”, 1511
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On 1514
Super Nebulous”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7806767). 1515
Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1517
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition As Hyper 1520
Decompress On Super Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1521
10.5281/zenodo.7804238). 1522
Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With 1524
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7804228). 1525
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut As Hyper Hamper On Super 1527
Hammy”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7799902). 1528
126. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Hammy By Hyper Hamper Of 1529
Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1530
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Cycle-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super 1533
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Cycle-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress 1536
On Super Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7793372). 1537
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Cycle-Cut As Hyper Hamper On Super 1539
Hammy”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7791952). 1540
Hamiltonian-Cycle-Cut In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1542
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super 1545
Hamiltonian-Neighbor In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1548
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On 1551
Hamiltonian-Decomposition In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1554
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Cut As Hyper Hamper On Super Hammy”, 1557
Hamiltonian-Cut In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1560
SuperHyperGraph By Trace-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 1563
Trace-Neighbor In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1566
139. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 1568
SuperHyperGraph By Trace-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On Super 1569
Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7771831). 1570
Trace-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1572
SuperHyperGraph By Trace-Cut As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 1575
ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.20913.25446). 1576
142. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Tract By Hyper Track Of Trace-Cut In 1577
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7764916). 1579
SuperHyperGraph By Edge-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 1581
Edge-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, 1584
SuperHyperGraph By Edge-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On Super 1587
Decompensation”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.22545.10089). 1588
Edge-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1590
SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.29544.34564). 1591
SuperHyperGraph By Edge-Cut As Hyper Edify On Super Eddy”, ResearchGate 1593
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.11377.76644). 1594
148. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Eddy By Hyper Edify Of Edge-Cut In 1595
Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 1596
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.23750.96329). 1597
SuperHyperGraph By Vertex-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 1599
Vertex-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1602
SuperHyperGraph By Vertex-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On Super 1605
Decompensation”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.30212.81289). 1606
Vertex-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1608
SuperHyperGraph By Vertex-Cut As Hyper Vertu On Super Vertigo”, 1611
154. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Vertigo By Hyper Vertu Of Vertex-Cut In 1613
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.32467.25124). 1615
SuperHyperGraph By Stable-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 1617
156. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nebulizer By Hyper Nub Of 1619
Stable-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1620
SuperHyperGraph By Stable-Decompositions As Hyper Stain On Super Stagy”, 1623
158. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Stale By Hyper Stalk Of 1625
Stable-Decompositions In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1626
SuperHyperGraph By Stable-Cut As Hyper Stain On Super Stagy”, 1629
160. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Stale By Hyper Stalk Of Stable-Cut In 1631
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.20170.24000). 1633
SuperHyperGraph By Clique-Neighbors As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 1635
162. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nebulizer By Hyper Nub Of 1637
Clique-Neighbors In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1638
SuperHyperGraph By Clique-Decompositions As Hyper Decompile On Super 1641
Decommission”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.18780.87683). 1642
Clique- Decompositions In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1644
SuperHyperGraph By Clique-Cut As Hyper Click On Super Cliche”, 1647
166. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Cliff By Hyper Cling Of Clique-Cut In 1649
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.27392.30721). 1651
SuperHyperGraph By Space As Hyper Spin On Super Spacy”, ResearchGate 1653
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.33028.40321). 1654
SuperHyperGraph By List- Coloring As Hyper List On Super Lisle”, 1656
169. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Lith By Hyper Lite Of List-Coloring In 1658
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.16356.04489). 1660
SuperHyperGraph By Space As Hyper Sparse On Super Spark ”, ResearchGate 1662
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.21756.21129). 1663
171. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Solidarity By Hyper Soul Of Space In 1664
Cancer’s Recognition With (Extreme) SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023, 1665
(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.30983.68009). 1666
SuperHyperGraph By Edge-Connectivity As Hyper Disclosure On Super 1668
Closure”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.28552.29445). 1669
173. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Uniform By Hyper Deformation Of 1670
Edge-Connectivity In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1671
SuperHyperGraph By Vertex-Connectivity As Hyper Leak On Super Structure”, 1674
175. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super System By Hyper Explosions Of 1676
Vertex-Connectivity In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1677
SuperHyperGraph By Tree-Decomposition As Hyper Forward On Super Returns”, 1680
177. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nodes By Hyper Moves Of 1682
Tree-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1683
SuperHyperGraph By Chord As Hyper Excellence On Super Excess”, 1686
179. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Gap By Hyper Navigations Of Chord In 1688
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.11172.14720). 1690
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyper(i,j)-Domination As Hyper Controller On 1692
Super Waves”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.22011.80165). 1693
181. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Coincidence By Hyper Routes Of 1694
SuperHyper(i,j)-Domination In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1695
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperEdge-Domination As Hyper Reversion On 1698
Super Indirection”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.10493.84962). 1699
183. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Obstacles By Hyper Model Of 1700
SuperHyperEdge-Domination In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1701
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperK-Domination As Hyper k-Actions On Super 1704
Patterns”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.19944.14086). 1705
185. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Harmony By Hyper k-Function Of 1706
SuperHyperK-Domination In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1707
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperK-Number As Hyper k-Partition On Super 1710
Layers”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.33103.76968). 1711
187. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Gradient By Hyper k-Class Of 1712
SuperHyperK-Number In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1713
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperOrder As Hyper Enumerations On Super 1716
Landmarks”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.35646.56641). 1717
189. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Analogous By Hyper Visions Of 1718
SuperHyperOrder In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1719
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperColoring As Hyper Categories On Super 1722
Neighbors”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.13973.81121). 1723
191. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Relations By Hyper Identifications Of 1724
SuperHyperColoring In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1725
192. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Contradiction By Hyper Detection of 1727
SuperHyperDefensive In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic 1728
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperDimension As Hyper Distinguishing On Super 1731
Distances”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.31956.88961). 1732
194. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Locations By Hyper Differing Of 1733
SuperHyperDimension In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1734
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperDominating As Hyper Closing On Super 1737
Messy”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.21510.45125). 1738
196. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Missing By Hyper Searching Of 1739
SuperHyperDominating In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1740
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperConnected As Hyper Group On Super Surge”, 1743
198. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Outbreak By Hyper Collections Of 1745
SuperHyperConnected In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1746
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperTotal As Hyper Covering On Super Infections”, 1749
200. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Extremism By Hyper Treatments Of 1751
SuperHyperTotal In Cancer’s Recognition with (Neutrosophic) 1752
201. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Isolation By Hyper Perfectness Of 1754
SuperHyperPerfect In Cancer’s Recognition with (Neutrosophic) 1755
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperPerfect As Hyper Idealism On Super Vacancy”, 1758
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperJoin As Hyper Separations On Super Sorts”, 1761
204. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super connections By Hyper disconnections Of 1763
SuperHyperJoin In Cancer’s Recognition with (Neutrosophic) 1764
205. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Mixed-Devastations By Hyper Decisions 1766
Of SuperHyperDuality In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic 1767
206. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition As (Neutrosophic) 1769
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperDuality As Hyper Imaginations On Super 1770
Mixed-Illustrations”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.33275.80161). 1771
207. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition As (Neutrosophic) 1772
SuperHyperGraph By Path SuperHyperColoring As Hyper Correction On Super 1773
Faults”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.30182.50241). 1774
208. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Reflections By Hyper Rotations Of Path 1775
SuperHyperColoring In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic 1776
209. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas As Hyper Deformations On Super Chains In 1778
Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph By 1779
SuperHyperDensity”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.13444.60806). 1780
210. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas As Hyper Ignorance By SuperHyperDensity On 1781
Super Resistances In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic 1782
SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.16800.05123). 1783
211. Henry Garrett, “New Research On Cancer’s Recognition and Neutrosophic 1784
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian SuperHyperCycles and Hamiltonian Sets As 1785
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-VI ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1786
10.13140/RG.2.2.29913.80482). 1787
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-V ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1790
10.13140/RG.2.2.33269.24809). 1791
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-IV ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1794
10.13140/RG.2.2.34946.96960). 1795
214. Henry Garrett, “A Research On Cancer’s Recognition and Neutrosophic 1796
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-III ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1798
10.13140/RG.2.2.14814.31040). 1799
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-II ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1802
10.13140/RG.2.2.15653.17125). 1803
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-I ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1806
10.13140/RG.2.2.25719.50089). 1807
217. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Disruptions In Cancer’s Extreme 1808
Recognition As Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph By Hyper Plans Called 1809
SuperHyperConnectivities”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1810
10.13140/RG.2.2.29441.94562). 1811
218. Henry Garrett, “Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition As Neutrosophic 1812
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperConnectivities As Hyper Diagnosis On Super 1813
Mechanism”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.17252.24968). 1814
219. Henry Garrett,“Cancer’s Recognition and (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph By 1815
the Criteria of Eulerian and Hamiltonian Type-Sets As Hyper Modified Cycles 1816
On Super Mess”, ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.16652.59525). 1817
220. Henry Garrett,“Eulerian and Hamiltonian In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition 1818
and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph On Super Interactions By Hyper Extensions 1819
of Cycles”, ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.34583.24485). 1820
221. Henry Garrett,“SuperHyperGirth Type-Results on extreme SuperHyperGirth 1821
theory and (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs Toward Cancer’s extreme 1822
Recognition”, Preprints 2023, 2023010396 (doi: 1823
10.20944/preprints202301.0396.v1). 1824
222. Henry Garrett,“Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Warns Hyper Landmark of 1825
neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth In Super Type-Versions of Cancer’s neutrosophic 1826
Recognition”, Preprints 2023, 2023010395 (doi: 1827
10.20944/preprints202301.0395.v1). 1828
223. Henry Garrett,“The Constructions of (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs on the 1829
Cancer’s Recognition in The Confrontation With Super Attacks In Hyper 1830
Situations By Implementing (Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in The 1831
Technical Approaches to Neutralize SuperHyperViews”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1832
10.13140/RG.2.2.26240.51204). 1833
224. Henry Garrett,“(Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing As the 1834
Entrepreneurs on Cancer’s Recognitions To Fail Forcing Style As the Super 1835
Classes With Hyper Effects In The Background of the Framework is So-Called 1836
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1837
10.13140/RG.2.2.12818.73925). 1838
225. Henry Garrett,“Super Actions On The Types of Hyper Levels In The Sensible 1839
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth On Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and 1840
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 1841
10.13140/RG.2.2.26836.88960). 1842
226. Henry Garrett,“SuperHyperGirth Approaches on the Super Challenges on the 1843
Cancer’s Recognition In the Hyper Model of (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, 1844
ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.36745.93289). 1845
227. Henry Garrett,“Extreme SuperHyperClique as the Firm Scheme of 1846
Confrontation under Cancer’s Recognition as the Model in The Setting of 1847
10.20944/preprints202301.0308.v1). 1849
228. Henry Garrett,“Uncertainty On The Act And Effect Of Cancer Alongside The 1850
Foggy Positions Of Cells Toward Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique inside 1851
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Titled Cancer’s Recognition”, Preprints 2023, 1852
2023010282 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0282.v1). 1853
229. Henry Garrett,“Neutrosophic Version Of Separates Groups Of Cells In Cancer’s 1854
Recognition On Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010267 1855
(doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0267.v1).). 1856
230. Henry Garrett, “The Shift Paradigm To Classify Separately The Cells and 1857
Affected Cells Toward The Totality Under Cancer’s Recognition By New 1858
Multiple Definitions On the Sets Polynomials Alongside Numbers In The 1859
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperMatching Theory Based on SuperHyperGraph and 1860
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”, Preprints 2023, 2023010265 (doi: 1861
10.20944/preprints202301.0265.v1). 1862
231. Henry Garrett,“Breaking the Continuity and Uniformity of Cancer In The 1863
Worst Case of Full Connections With Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique In 1864
Cancer’s Recognition Applied in (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 1865
2023, 2023010262,(doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0262.v1). 1866
232. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable as the Survivors on the 1867
Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition Based on Uncertainty to All Modes in 1868
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010240 (doi: 1869
10.20944/preprints202301.0240.v1). 1870
233. Henry Garrett, “Extremism of the Attacked Body Under the Cancer’s 1871
Circumstances Where Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) 1872
SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010224, (doi: 1873
10.20944/preprints202301.0224.v1). 1874
234. Henry Garrett,“SuperHyperMatching By (R-)Definitions And Polynomials To 1875
Monitor Cancer’s Recognition In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, 1876
ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.35061.65767). 1877
235. Henry Garrett,“The Focus on The Partitions Obtained By Parallel Moves In 1878
The Cancer’s Extreme Recognition With Different Types of Extreme 1879
SuperHyperMatching Set and Polynomial on (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, 1880
236. Henry Garrett,“Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique Decides the Failures on the 1882
Cancer’s Recognition in the Perfect Connections of Cancer’s Attacks By 1883
SuperHyperModels Named (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 1884
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.32530.73922). 1885
237. Henry Garrett,“Indeterminacy On The All Possible Connections of Cells In 1886
Front of Cancer’s Attacks In The Terms of Neutrosophic Failed 1887
SuperHyperClique on Cancer’s Recognition called Neutrosophic 1888
SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.15897.70243). 1889
238. Henry Garrett,“Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique Decides the Failures on the 1890
Cancer’s Recognition in the Perfect Connections of Cancer’s Attacks By 1891
SuperHyperModels Named (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 1892
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.32530.73922). 1893
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 1895
2023010105 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 1896
240. Henry Garrett,“Perfect Directions Toward Idealism in Cancer’s Neutrosophic 1897
Recognition Forwarding Neutrosophic SuperHyperClique on Neutrosophic 1898
241. Henry Garrett,“Demonstrating Complete Connections in Every Embedded 1900
Regions and Sub-Regions in the Terms of Cancer’s Recognition and 1901
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClique”, 1902
10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 1907
10.20944/preprints202301.0088.v1). 1911
244. Henry Garrett,“Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic Regions titled 1912
neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable in Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition 1913
modeled in the Form of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2023, 1914
(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.17385.36968). 1915
Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond ”, Preprints 2023, 2023010044 1918
Well- SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 1920
2023010043 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0043.v1). 1921
247. Henry Garrett, “Using the Tool As (Neutrosophic) Failed SuperHyperStable To 1922
SuperHyperModel Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) 1923
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In 1926
Special ViewPoints”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.11447.80803). 1927
Well-SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 1929
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.35774.77123). 1930
Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond ”, ResearchGate 2022, (doi: 1933
10.13140/RG.2.2.36141.77287). 1934
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2022, (doi: 1936
10.13140/RG.2.2.29430.88642). 1937
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2022, (doi: 1940
10.13140/RG.2.2.11369.16487). 1941
Featuring (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances”, Preprints 1943
2022, 2022120549 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0549.v1). 1944
Featuring (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances”, 1946
Recognitions And Related (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClasses”, Preprints 2022, 1951
2022120540 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0540.v1). 1952
Recognitions And Related (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClasses”, ResearchGate 1956
2022, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.14426.41923). 1957
Preprints 2022, 2022120500 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0500.v1). 1960
ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.20993.12640). 1963
259. Henry Garrett,“Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on 1964
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs and SuperHyperGraphs Alongside Applications 1965
in Cancer’s Treatments”, Preprints 2022, 2022120324 (doi: 1966
10.20944/preprints202212.0324.v1). 1967
260. Henry Garrett, “Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on 1968
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs And SuperHyperGraphs Alongside Applications 1969
in Cancer’s Treatments”, ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 1970
10.13140/RG.2.2.23123.04641). 1971
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”, Preprints 2022, 2022110576 (doi: 1974
10.20944/preprints202211.0576.v1). 1975
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”, ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 1978
10.13140/RG.2.2.23324.56966). 1979
263. Henry Garrett, “Basic Neutrosophic Notions Concerning SuperHyperDominating 1980
and Neutrosophic SuperHyperResolving in SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 1981
2022 (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.29173.86244). 1982
264. Henry Garrett, “Initial Material of Neutrosophic Preliminaries to Study Some 1983
Neutrosophic Notions Based on Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) in 1984
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)”, ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 1985
10.13140/RG.2.2.25385.88160). 1986
265. Henry Garrett, “Perfect Domination In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1987
Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10871136). 1988
266. Henry Garrett, “Stable Sequence In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1989
267. Henry Garrett, “Resolving Sequence In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1991
268. Henry Garrett, “Dominating Sequence In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1993
269. Henry Garrett, “Stable In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 1995
Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8210033). 1996
270. Henry Garrett, “Reverse Connective Domination In Neutrosophic 1997
SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8206898). 1998
271. Henry Garrett, “Equal Connective Domination In Neutrosophic 1999
SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8201378). 2000
272. Henry Garrett, “Connective Domination In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. 2001
Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8194003). 2002
273. Henry Garrett, “Domination In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2003
274. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperPerfect Search In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2005
275. Henry Garrett, “Reverse Strict Dimension Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. 2007
276. Henry Garrett, “Unequal Dimension Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2009
277. Henry Garrett, “Strict Dimension Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2011
278. Henry Garrett, “Reverse Strict Connective In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2013
279. Henry Garrett, “Unequal Connective Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2015
280. Henry Garrett, “Strict Connective Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2017
281. Henry Garrett, “Reverse Dimension Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2019
282. Henry Garrett, “Equal Dimension Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2021
283. Henry Garrett, “Dimension Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2023
284. Henry Garrett, “Reverse Connective Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2025
285. Henry Garrett, “Equal Connective Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2027
286. Henry Garrett, “Connective Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2029
287. Henry Garrett, “United Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2031
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8027488). 2032
288. Henry Garrett, “Zero Forcing In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2033
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8020181). 2034
289. Henry Garrett, “Matrix-Based In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2035
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7978921). 2036
290. Henry Garrett, “Collections of Math II”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2037
10.5281/zenodo.7943878). 2038
291. Henry Garrett, “Dominating-Edges In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2039
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7943871). 2040
292. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Gap In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2041
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7923786). 2042
293. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2043
294. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. 2045
295. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2047
296. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Cycle-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2049
297. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Cycle-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2051
298. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Cycle-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2053
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7854561). 2054
299. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Path-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2055
300. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Path-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2057
301. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Path-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2059
302. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Path-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2061
303. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Path-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2063
304. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Path-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2065
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7812750). 2066
305. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2067
306. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. 2069
307. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2071
308. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Cycle-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2073
309. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Cycle-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2075
310. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Cycle-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2077
311. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2079
312. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2081
313. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2083
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7783791). 2084
314. Henry Garrett, “Trace-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2085
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7780123). 2086
315. Henry Garrett, “Trace-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2087
316. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDuality”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2089
10.5281/zenodo.7637762). 2090
317. Henry Garrett, “Trace-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2091
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7766174). 2092
318. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2093
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7762232). 2094
319. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2095
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7758601). 2096
320. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2097
10.5281/zenodo.7754661). 2098
321. Henry Garrett, “Vertex-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2099
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7750995) . 2100
322. Henry Garrett, “Vertex-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2101
323. Henry Garrett, “Vertex-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2103
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7747236). 2104
324. Henry Garrett, “Stable-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2105
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7742587). 2106
325. Henry Garrett, “Stable-Decompositions In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2107
326. Henry Garrett, “Stable-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2109
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7734719). 2110
327. Henry Garrett, “Clique-Neighbors In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2111
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7730484). 2112
328. Henry Garrett, “Clique-Decompositions In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2113
329. Henry Garrett, “Clique-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2115
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7722865). 2116
330. Henry Garrett, “Space In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2117
10.5281/zenodo.7713563). 2118
331. Henry Garrett, “Space In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2119
10.5281/zenodo.7709116). 2120
332. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Connectivity In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2121
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7706415). 2122
333. Henry Garrett, “Vertex-Connectivity In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2123
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7706063). 2124
334. Henry Garrett, “Tree-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2125
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7701906). 2126
335. Henry Garrett, “Chord In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2127
10.5281/zenodo.7700205). 2128
336. Henry Garrett, “(i,j)-Domination In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2129
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7694876). 2130
337. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Domination In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2131
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7679410). 2132
338. Henry Garrett, “K-Domination In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2133
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7675982). 2134
339. Henry Garrett, “K-Number In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2135
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7672388). 2136
340. Henry Garrett, “Order In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2137
10.5281/zenodo.7668648). 2138
341. Henry Garrett, “Coloring In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2139
10.5281/zenodo.7662810). 2140
342. Henry Garrett, “Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2141
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7659162). 2142
343. Henry Garrett, “Cancer In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2143
10.5281/zenodo.7653233). 2144
344. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperWheel ”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2145
10.5281/zenodo.7653204). 2146
345. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperMultipartite”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2147
10.5281/zenodo.7653142). 2148
346. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperBipartite”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2149
10.5281/zenodo.7653117). 2150
347. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperStar ”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2151
10.5281/zenodo.7653089). 2152
348. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2153
10.5281/zenodo.7651687). 2154
349. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperPath”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2155
10.5281/zenodo.7651619). 2156
350. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDomination”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2157
10.5281/zenodo.7651439). 2158
351. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDominating”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2159
10.5281/zenodo.7650729). 2160
352. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperConnected ”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2161
10.5281/zenodo.7647868). 2162
353. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperTotal ”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2163
10.5281/zenodo.7647017). 2164
354. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperPerfect”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2165
10.5281/zenodo.7644894). 2166
355. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperJoin”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2167
10.5281/zenodo.7641880). 2168
356. Henry Garrett, “Path SuperHyperColoring”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2169
10.5281/zenodo.7632923). 2170
357. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDensity”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2171
10.5281/zenodo.7623459). 2172
358. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2173
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7606416). 2174
359. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperConnectivities”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2175
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7606416). 2176
360. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperConnectivities”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2177
10.5281/zenodo.7606404). 2178
361. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2179
10.5281/zenodo.7580018). 2180
362. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2181
10.5281/zenodo.7580018). 2182
363. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2183
10.5281/zenodo.7580018). 2184
364. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2185
10.5281/zenodo.7579929). 2186
365. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2187
10.5281/zenodo.7563170). 2188
366. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2189
10.5281/zenodo.7563164). 2190
367. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2191
10.5281/zenodo.7563160). 2192
368. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2193
10.5281/zenodo.7563160). 2194
369. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2195
10.5281/zenodo.7563160). 2196
370. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2197
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7557063). 2198
371. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperMatching”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2199
10.5281/zenodo.7557009). 2200
372. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperMatching”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2201
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7539484). 2202
373. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2203
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7523390). 2204
374. Henry Garrett, “Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2205
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7523390). 2206
375. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On Failed SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2207
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7523390). 2208
376. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2209
10.5281/zenodo.7574952). 2210
377. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2211
10.5281/zenodo.7574992). 2212
378. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2213
10.5281/zenodo.7523357). 2214
379. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2215
10.5281/zenodo.7523357). 2216
380. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2217
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7504782). 2218
381. Henry Garrett, “Extreme Failed SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2219
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7504782). 2220
382. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On Failed SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2221
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7504782). 2222
383. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2223
10.5281/zenodo.7499395). 2224
384. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2225
10.5281/zenodo.7499395). 2226
385. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2227
10.5281/zenodo.7499395). 2228
386. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2229
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7497450). 2230
387. Henry Garrett, “Extreme Failed SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2231
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7497450). 2232
388. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2233
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7494862). 2234
389. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2235
10.5281/zenodo.7494862). 2236
390. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2237
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7494862). 2238
391. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperAlliances”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2239
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7493845). 2240
392. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperAlliances”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2241
10.5281/zenodo.7493845). 2242
393. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperAlliances”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2243
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7493845). 2244
394. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperMatching”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2245
10.5281/zenodo.7539484). 2246
395. Henry Garrett, “Failed SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2247
10.5281/zenodo.7523390). 2248
396. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2249
10.5281/zenodo.7523357). 2250
397. Henry Garrett, “Failed SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2251
10.5281/zenodo.7504782). 2252
398. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2253
10.5281/zenodo.7499395). 2254
399. Henry Garrett, “Failed SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2255
10.5281/zenodo.7497450). 2256
400. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2257
10.5281/zenodo.7494862). 2258
401. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperAlliances”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2259
10.5281/zenodo.7493845). 2260
402. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2261
10.5281/zenodo.7480110). 2262
403. Henry Garrett, “Neut. SuperHyperEdges”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2263
10.5281/zenodo.7378758). 2264
404. Henry Garrett, “Beyond Neutrosophic Graphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2265
10.5281/zenodo.6320305). 2266
405. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Duality”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2267
10.5281/zenodo.6677173). 2268
View publication stats

New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle by Total Perfect Domination

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle by Total Perfect Domination

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph With

Preprint · April 2024

568 PUBLICATIONS 29,726 CITATIONS

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 2

SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By Total 3

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · 6

DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA 7

In this scientific research, (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic 9

SuperHyperTotal Perfect Domination). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S be a 10

pair S = (V, E). Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then 11

V 0 is called Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal Perfect Domination if the following expressions, 12

terms and statements is called Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal Perfect Domination criteria 13

SuperHyperNotions, namely a Total Perfect Domination and a Neutrosophic Total 16

research has progressed and SuperHyperNotion, SuperHyperUniform, and 18

SuperHyperClass are well-defined and well-reviewed based on them. Literature review is 19

research, a comparison between this SuperHyperNotion with other SuperHyperNotions 21

and basic SuperHyperNumbers is presented. Definitions are followed by examples and 22

examples, so clarifications are guided by various tools. Applications are designed to 23

the relationships between them all are officially called “SuperHyperEdge”. 29

“SuperHyperGraph” and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” frameworks are selected and 30

super-hypermodels open avenues for research on theoretical aspects and “cancer 32

concept of “Total Perfect Domination mastery”. SuperHyperVertices and 38

SuperHyperEdges are assigned by alphabetical labels. In this method, the position of 39

contains “values of vertices, supervertices, edges, hyperedges, and hyperedges belonging 41

to Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” with key points, it is redefined. ”values of vertices 42

& number of positions in alphabet”, ”Values of SuperVertices&maximum values of its 43

vertices”, ”values of edges&maximum values of its vertices”, ”super edge values&max 44

SuperHyperClass SuperHyperGraph based on Total Perfect Domination. This is the 47

Perfect Domination, then it is officially called “Total Perfect Domination”, but 50

and distinguished because they are characterized in the SuperHyperClass disciplinary 53

methods based on a dominant Total Perfect Domination. Because of having Total 54

Perfect Domination, there is a need to “re-define” the concept of “neutrosophic Total 55

Perfect Domination” and “neutrosophic Total Perfect Domination”. 56

SuperHyperVertices and SuperHyperEdges are assigned by alphabetical labels. In this 57

method, the position of tags is used to assign values. Consider a Neutrosophic 58

SuperHyperGraph. “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” is redefined if the desired table 59

“Neutrosophic Total Perfect Domination”. It is useful to define a “Neutrosophic” version 61

SuperHyper- Neutrosophic Total Perfect Domination becomes more understandable. 63

Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. If the desired table exists, there are a 64

number of Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses. So are SuperHyperPath, SuperHyperCycle, 65

SuperHyperStar, SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultiPartite and SuperHyperWheel. 66

”Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle”, “Neutrosophic 67

SuperHyperStar”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite”, “Neutrosophic 68

SuperHyperMultiPartite” and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel”. A graph is 69

SuperHyperUniform if it is a SuperHyperGraph and the number of SuperHyperEdges 70

elements is the same. Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. There are a number 71

of SuperHyperClasses as follows. It is a SuperHyperPath if there is only one 72

SuperVertex as an intersection between two given SuperHyperEdges with two 73

exceptions. If only one SuperVertex is given as an intersection between two 74

SuperHyperEdges, it is SuperHyperCycle. It is SuperHyperStar and only one 75

SuperVertex as intersection among all SuperHyperEdges. It is SuperHyperBipartite, 76

common. This is SuperHyperMultiPartite. Only one SuperVertex is given as an 79

intersection between two SuperHyperEdges, and these SuperVertices, which form 80

separate multisets, have no SuperHyperEdge in common. If only one SuperHyperEdge 81

among the given two SuperHyperEdges is a SuperHyperWheel and a SuperVertex has a 82

SuperHyperEdge with any regular SuperVertex. SuperHyperModel suggests specific 83

designs and specific architectures. SuperHyperModel is officially called 84

“SuperHyperGraph” and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”. In this SuperHyperModel, 85

cells and the “special group” of cells. SuperHyperModeled as “SuperHyperEdges”. 88

Sometimes, to have a more accurate SuperHyperModel, it is useful to have some degree 89

of determinism, uncertainty, and neutrality, in this case the SuperHyperModel is called 90