New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel by Perfect Domination

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.
com · Manhattan, NY, USA
New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 2
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By Perfect 3
Domination 4
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · 6
DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA 7
1 SYNOPSIS 8
In this scientific research, (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic 9
SuperHyperStrongly Perfect Domination). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S be 10
a pair S = (V, E). Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then 11
V 0 is called Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Perfect Domination if the following expressions, 12
terms and statements is called Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Perfect Domination criteria 13
holds. 14
X X X
|( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 Vi ∈V 0 Vi ∈V 0
X X X
= min
00 ⊆V
|{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V N SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00 00
Vj ∈ VN SHG \ V , ∃!Vi ∈ V :
TV0 (EVi ,Vj ) = min[TV (Vi ), TV (Vj )],
IV0 (EVi ,Vj ) = min[IV (Vi ), IV (Vj )],
FV0 (EVi ,Vj ) = min[FV (Vi ), FV (Vj )]}
In this scientific research, new configurations are introduced for the new 15
SuperHyperNotions, namely a Strongly Perfect Domination and a Neutrosophic 16
Strongly Perfect Domination. Two different SuperHyperDefinitions were started for 17
them, but research has progressed and SuperHyperNotion, SuperHyperUniform, and 18
SuperHyperClass are well-defined and well-reviewed based on them. Literature review is 19
implemented throughout this research. To shine the light and importance of this 20
research, a comparison between this SuperHyperNotion with other SuperHyperNotions 21
and basic SuperHyperNumbers is presented. Definitions are followed by examples and 22
examples, so clarifications are guided by various tools. Applications are designed to 23
understand the theoretical aspect of this ongoing research. “Cancer diagnosis” are the 24
things that are being researched to explore the challenges that make sense in ongoing 25
research and future research. It is a special case. Cells are viewed in the intended 26
manner. There are different types of them. Some are individual and some are well 27
modeled by groups of cells. All these types are officially called “SuperHyperVertex”, but 28
the relationships between them all are officially called “SuperHyperEdge”. 29
“SuperHyperGraph” and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” frameworks are selected and 30
selected for research on “Cancer Diagnosis”. Thus, these complex and dense 31
super-hypermodels open avenues for research on theoretical aspects and “cancer 32
diagnosis”. Ways to pursue this scientific research have been considered. It has also 33
been formally collected in the form of several questions and problems. It is useful to 34
define a “neutrosophic” version of Strongly Perfect Domination. Since there are more 35
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
ways to get type results a Strongly Perfect Domination becomes more understandable. 36
In order to master the Neutrosophic Strongly Perfect Domination, there is a need to 37
“re-define” the concept of “Strongly Perfect Domination mastery”. SuperHyperVertices 38
and SuperHyperEdges are assigned by alphabetical labels. In this method, the position 39
of tags is used to assign values. Suppose a Strongly Perfect Domination. If the specified 40
table contains “values of vertices, supervertices, edges, hyperedges, and hyperedges 41
belonging to Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” with key points, it is redefined. ”values 42
of vertices & number of positions in alphabet”, ”Values of SuperVertices&maximum 43
values of its vertices”, ”values of edges&maximum values of its vertices”, ”super edge 44
values&max values of its vertices”, “super edge values” and maximum values of its 45
endpoints”. To get examples and structural examples, I would like to introduce the next 46
SuperHyperClass SuperHyperGraph based on Strongly Perfect Domination. This is the 47
original. Having the foundation of the previous definition in the SuperHyperClass type 48
would be disciplined. If there is a need to have all Strongly Perfect Domination until 49
Strongly Perfect Domination, then it is officially called “Strongly Perfect Domination”, 50
but otherwise, it is not Strongly Perfect Domination. There is some explanation for the 51
original definition titled “Strongly Perfect Domination”. These two examples are further 52
explored and distinguished because they are characterized in the SuperHyperClass 53
disciplinary methods based on a dominant Strongly Perfect Domination. Because of 54
having Strongly Perfect Domination, there is a need to “re-define” the concept of 55
“neutrosophic Strongly Perfect Domination” and “neutrosophic Strongly Perfect 56
Domination”. SuperHyperVertices and SuperHyperEdges are assigned by alphabetical 57
labels. In this method, the position of tags is used to assign values. Consider a 58
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” is redefined if the 59
desired table exists. And if the desired table exists, a Strongly Perfect Domination is 60
redefined to a “Neutrosophic Strongly Perfect Domination”. It is useful to define a 61
“Neutrosophic” version of SuperHyperClasses. Since there are more ways to obtain 62
Neutrosophic type results, a SuperHyper- Neutrosophic Strongly Perfect Domination 63
becomes more understandable. Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. If the 64
desired table exists, there are a number of Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses. So are 65
SuperHyperPath, SuperHyperCycle, SuperHyperStar, SuperHyperBipartite, 66
SuperHyperMultiPartite and SuperHyperWheel. ”Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath”, 67
“Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar”, “Neutrosophic 68
SuperHyperBipartite”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultiPartite” and “Neutrosophic 69
SuperHyperWheel”. A graph is SuperHyperUniform if it is a SuperHyperGraph and the 70
number of SuperHyperEdges elements is the same. Consider a Neutrosophic 71
SuperHyperGraph. There are a number of SuperHyperClasses as follows. It is a 72
SuperHyperPath if there is only one SuperVertex as an intersection between two given 73
SuperHyperEdges with two exceptions. If only one SuperVertex is given as an 74
intersection between two SuperHyperEdges, it is SuperHyperCycle. It is 75
SuperHyperStar and only one SuperVertex as intersection among all SuperHyperEdges. 76
It is SuperHyperBipartite, and only one SuperVertex is given as the intersection between 77
two SuperHyperEdges, and these SuperVertices, which form two distinct sets, have no 78
SuperHyperEdge in common. This is SuperHyperMultiPartite. Only one SuperVertex is 79
given as an intersection between two SuperHyperEdges, and these SuperVertices, which 80
form separate multisets, have no SuperHyperEdge in common. If only one 81
SuperHyperEdge among the given two SuperHyperEdges is a SuperHyperWheel and a 82
SuperVertex has a SuperHyperEdge with any regular SuperVertex. SuperHyperModel 83
suggests specific designs and specific architectures. SuperHyperModel is officially called 84
“SuperHyperGraph” and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”. In this SuperHyperModel, 85
the “special” cells and the “special group” of cells are SuperHyperModeled as 86
“SuperHyperVertices” and the common and desired properties between the “special” 87
cells and the “special group” of cells. SuperHyperModeled as “SuperHyperEdges”. 88
Sometimes, to have a more accurate SuperHyperModel, it is useful to have some degree 89
of determinism, uncertainty, and neutrality, in this case the SuperHyperModel is called 90
“Neutrosophic”. In future scientific research, the foundation will be based on “diagnosis 91
of cancer” and the results and definitions will be introduced in redeemed methods. 92
Cancer diagnosis in long-term practice. The specific region is assigned by the model 93
(called SuperHyperGraph) and the long cycle of movement of the cancer is determined 94
by this scientific research. Sometimes the movement of cancer is not easy to detect, 95
because there is certainty, uncertainty and neutrality about the movements and effects 96
of cancer on that area. This event leads us to choose another model [which is said to be 97
the Neutrosophic superhypergraph] in order to have a proper understanding of what 98
happened and was done. There are some specific models, which are well known and 99
have names, and some SuperHyperGeneral SuperHyperModels. The movements and 100
effects of cancer in complex pathways and between complex groups of cells can be 101
visualized with a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (-/SuperHyperCycle, SuperHyperStar, 102
SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, SuperHyperWheel). The goal is to find 103
the longest Strongly Perfect Domination or the strongest Strongly Perfect Domination 104
in those Neutrosophic SuperHyperModels. Some general results are presented for the 105
longest Strongly Perfect Domination called Strongly Perfect Domination and the 106
strongest Strongly Perfect Domination called Neutrosophic Strongly Perfect Domination. 107
Beyond that in SuperHyperStar, all possible SuperHyperPaths have only two 108
SuperHyperEdges, but it is not enough as having at least three SuperHyperEdges is 109
necessary to form any style of cycle. There is no form of any cycle, but literally, it is the 110
transformation of any cycle. It literally transforms and does not form. A basic 111
introduction to the theory of Strongly Perfect Domination Neutrosophic, 112
SuperHyperGraphs and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs is suggested. 113
Keywords: Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, SuperHyperStrongly Perfect Domination, 114
Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition 115
AMS Subject Classification: 05C17, 05C22, 05E45 116
2 Applied Notions Under The Scrutiny Of The 117
Motivation Of This Scientific Research 118
In this scientific research, there are ideas in the prominent frameworks of motivations. I 119
try to bring motivations in narrative ways. Some Cells have faced attacks from the 120
established situation with cancer attacks in this case, there is some analysis embedded 121
in the case current situations where cells can be labeled as some groups and some 122
groups or individuals are overlabeled, all from behaviors to overcome cancer attacks. In 123
embedded situations, cell individuals and cell groups can be considered as “new groups”. 124
So it encourages us to find suitable SuperHyperModels for more appropriate analysis 125
about this dirty story. I found SuperHyperModels, officially called “SuperHyperGraphs” 126
and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. In this SuperHyperModel, cells and groups of 127
cells are defined as “SuperHyperVertices” and relationships between individual cells and 128
groups of cells are defined as “SuperHyperEdges”. So this is another motivation for us 129
to do research on this SuperHyperModel based on “cancer diagnosis”. Sometimes, 130
things get worse. The situation has passed certainty and precise style. So it is beyond 131
them. There are three descriptions, i.e., degrees of determination, uncertainty, and 132
neutrality, for any object based on ambiguous forms, i.e., incomplete data, imprecise 133
data, and uncertain analysis. The second model can be considered in the previous 134
SuperHyperModel. This is SuperHyperModel. This is SuperHyperGraph but officially 135
called “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. Cancer is a disease, but the model is 136
supposed to understand what happens in this phenomenon. The special case of this 137
disease is considered and some parameters are used as consequences of the model. Cells 138
are attacked by the disease, but the movement of cancer is in a specific area. Knowing 139
the mind of cancer can help to find some cures for this disease. SuperHyperGraph and 140
Neutrosophic Super-HyperGraph are super-hypermodels used in “cancer diagnosis” and 141
both are the foundation of the background of this scientific research. Sometimes cancer 142
has occurred in an area full of cells, cell groups, and embedded styles. In this section, 143
SuperHyperModel proposes based on the links of cancer movements in the form of unity 144
styles with the formation of design and architecture officially called “Strongly Perfect 145
Domination”, in the themes of specialized terms and common words. Particle for direct 146
object. Applied concepts under the investigation of the motivation of this scientific 147
research. The “SuperHyper” prefix refers to the theme of embedded styles for 148
background discovery for SuperHyperNotions. Cancer diagnosis in long-term practice. 149
The specific region is assigned by the model (called SuperHyperGraph) and the long 150
cycle of movement of the cancer is determined by this scientific research. Sometimes the 151
movement of Cancer is not easy to identify because there is certainty, uncertainty and 152
neutrality about the movements and effects of Cancer in that region. This event leads 153
us to choose another model [said to be Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph]. Easy 154
understanding of what happened and what was done. There are some specific models 155
that are well known and named and some general models. The movements and effects 156
of cancer in complex pathways and between complex groups of cells can be visualized by 157
a neurosophic superhyperpath (-/SuperHyperCycle, SuperHyperStar, 158
SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, SuperHyperWheel). The goal is to find 159
Strongly Perfect Domination or Neutrosophic Strongly Perfect Domination for 160
SuperHyperModels in it. Some general results are presented. Beyond that in 161
SuperHyperStar, all possible Neutrosophic SuperHyperPaths have only two 162
SuperHyperEdges, but it is not enough as having at least three SuperHyperEdges is 163
necessary to form any style of cycle. There is no form of cycle, but it is literally a form 164
of any cycle. It literally transforms and does not form. 165
Question 2.1. How to define “SuperHyperNotions and to do research” to find the 166
“Strongly Perfect Domination Rate” of any cell or groups of cells based on fixed cell or 167
fixed group of cells broadly, “Strongly Perfect Domination Rate” based on fixed groups 168
or fixed cells. Groups of groups of cells? 169
Question 2.2. What are the best descriptions for “diagnosing cancer” in terms of 170
these chaotic and dense super-hypermodels in which embedded concepts are depicted? 171
This motivation to find concepts to use in this dense model is called 172
“SuperHyperGraphs”. So it motivates us to define different types of “Strongly Perfect 173
Domination” and “neutrosophic Strongly Perfect Domination” over “superhypergraph” 174
and “neutrosophic superhypergraph”. Then this scientific research has taken more 175
motivations to define SuperHyperClasses and find some connections among this 176
SuperHyperNotion with other SuperHyperNotions. It motivates us to obtain examples 177
and examples to clarify the framework of this scientific research. The general results 178
and some of the results about some of the connections are the ways that the key point 179
of this scientific research, “diagnosis of cancer” is more understandable and clear. 180
The framework of this research is as follows. First, I will introduce the basic 181
definitions to clarify the basics. In the “Introductions” subsection, basic definitions 182
about SuperHyperGraphs and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph are introduced and 183
discussed in depth. Basic concepts are thoroughly explained and illustrated, and 184
sometimes a literature review is used to make sense of what is to come in the coming 185
sections. The main definitions and their explanations, along with some results on the 186
new concepts, Strongly Perfect Domination and Neutrosophic Strongly Perfect 187
Domination, are specified in the sections “Strongly Perfect Domination” and 188
“Neutrosophic Strongly Perfect Domination”. In the concept of dealing with results and 189
in Strongly Perfect Domination to create logic about the continuation of the scientific 190
research, the ideas of SuperHyperUniform and Neutrosophic SuperHyperUniform are 191
introduced and as their consequences, the corresponding SuperHyperClasses are 192
specified to summarize the work done in this section, as “Results on SuperHyperClasses” 193
and “Results on Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”. Going back to the core concepts, 194
clever steps towards common concepts to extend new concepts in new frameworks, 195
SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, in “Results on 196
SuperHyperClasses” and “Results on Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses” sections. There 197
is the initial scientific research on supergeneral relations and as the final and final part 198
of the theoretical scientific research is available in the section “General results”. Some 199
general SuperHyperRelations are fundamental and are known as fundamental 200
SuperHyperNotions, as in “General results” were extracted and discussed. “Strongly 201
Perfect Domination”, “Neutrosophic Strongly Perfect Domination”, “Results on 202
SuperHyperClasses” and “Results on Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”. There are 203
curious questions about what has been done about SuperHyperNotions to make sense of 204
the superiority of this scientific research and to discover the word “best” as a 205
description and adjective of this scientific research as presented in the “Strongly Perfect 206
Domination” section. The keyword of this scientific research was presented in the 207
section “Applications in cancer diagnosis” with two cases and sub-sections “Case 1: 208
Initial steps towards SuperHyperBipartite as SuperHyperModel” and “Case 2: 209
Incremental steps towards SuperHyperMultiperdel as SuperHyper. In the “open issues” 210
section, there is a detailed examination and recognition of what was done in this 211
scientific research and what happened in this scientific research in the form of 212
“questions” and “issues” in order to understand this scientific research in an outstanding 213
style, the advantages and limitations of this scientific research in addition to What has 214
been done in this scientific research is stated in the “conclusion and final remarks” 215
section. 216
3 Neutrosophic Preliminaries Of This Scientific 217
Research On the Redeemed Ways 218
In this section, the basic material in this scientific research, is referred to [Single Valued 219
Neutrosophic Set](Ref. [1],Definition 2.2,p.2), [Neutrosophic Set](Ref. [1],Definition 220
2.1,p.1), [Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)](Ref. [1],Definition 2.5,p.2), 221
[Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)](Ref. [1],Definition 222
2.7,p.3), [t-norm](Ref. [1], Definition 2.7, p.3), and [Characterization of the 223
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)](Ref. [1],Definition 2.7,p.3), [Neutrosophic 224
Strength of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPaths] (Ref. [1],Definition 5.3,p.7), and 225
[Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)] 226
(Ref. [1],Definition 5.4,p.7). Also, the new ideas and their clarifications are addressed 227
to Ref. [1]. 228
In this subsection, the basic material which is used in this scientific research, is 229
presented. Also, the new ideas and their clarifications are elicited. 230
Definition 3.1 (Neutrosophic Set). (Ref. [1],Definition 2.1,p.1). 231
Let X be a Eulerian-Path-Cut of points (objects) with generic elements in X denoted by

x; then the Neutrosophic set A (NS A) is an object having the form
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}

+
where the functions T, I, F : X →]− 0, 1 [ define respectively the a
truth-membership function, an indeterminacy-membership function, and a
falsity-membership function of the element x ∈ X to the set A with the condition

−
0 ≤ TA (x) + IA (x) + FA (x) ≤ 3+ .
The functions TA (x), IA (x) and FA (x) are real standard or nonstandard subsets of 232
+
]− 0, 1 [. 233
Definition 3.2 (Single Valued Neutrosophic Set). (Ref. [1],Definition 2.2,p.2). 234
Let X be a Eulerian-Path-Cut of points (objects) with generic elements in X denoted by

x. A single valued Neutrosophic set A (SVNS A) is characterized by
truth-membership function TA (x), an indeterminacy-membership function IA (x), and a
falsity-membership function FA (x). For each point x in X, TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) ∈ [0, 1].
A SVNS A can be written as
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}.
Definition 3.3. The degree of truth-membership,
indeterminacy-membership and falsity-membership of the subset X ⊂ A of
the single valued Neutrosophic set A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}:
TA (X) = min[TA (vi ), TA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,
IA (X) = min[IA (vi ), IA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,
and FA (X) = min[FA (vi ), FA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X .
Definition 3.4. The support of X ⊂ A of the single valued Neutrosophic set
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}:
supp(X) = {x ∈ X : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) > 0}.
Definition 3.5 (Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). (Ref. [1],Definition 235
2.5,p.2). 236
Assume V 0 is a given set. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a 237
pair S = (V, E), where 238
(i) V = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vn } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of V 0 ; 239
(ii) V = {(Vi , TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi )) : TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi ) ≥ 0}, (i = 240
1, 2, . . . , n); 241
(iii) E = {E1 , E2 , . . . , En0 } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of 242
V; 243
(iv) E = {(Ei0 , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )) : TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 ) ≥ 0}, (i0 = 244
1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 245
(v) Vi 6= ∅, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 246
0 0
(vi) Ei0 6= ∅, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n ); 247
P
(vii) i supp(Vi ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 248
0 0
P
(viii) i0 supp(Ei ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n );
0 249
(ix) and the following conditions hold:

TV0 (Ei0 ) ≤ min[TV 0 (Vi ), TV 0 (Vj )]Vi ,Vj ∈Ei0 ,
IV0 (Ei0 ) ≤ min[IV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vj )]Vi ,Vj ∈Ei0 ,
and FV0 (Ei0 ) ≤ min[FV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vj )]Vi ,Vj ∈Ei0
where i0 = 1, 2, . . . , n0 . 250
Figure 1. The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a illustrated SuperHyperModeling

on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Here the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ej 0 and the Neutrosophic 251
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) Vj are single valued Neutrosophic sets. TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), 252
and FV 0 (Vi ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 253
indeterminacy-membership and the degree of falsity-membership the Neutrosophic 254
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) V. 255
TV0 (Ei0 ), TV0 (Ei0 ), and TV0 (Ei0 ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 256
indeterminacy-membership and the degree of falsity-membership of the Neutrosophic 257
SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) Ei0 to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) E. Thus, 258
the ii0 th element of the incidence matrix of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) 259
are of the form (Vi , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )), the sets V and E are crisp sets. 260
Example 3.6. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair 261
S = (V, E) in the mentioned Neutrosophic Figures in every Neutrosophic items. 262
• On the Figure (1), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 263
notion, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. E1 264
and E3 are some empty Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges but E2 is a loop 265
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge and E4 is a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. Thus 266
in the terms of Neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only one Neutrosophic 267
SuperHyperEdge, namely, E4 . The Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 is 268
Neutrosophic isolated means that there’s no Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge has it 269
as a Neutrosophic endpoint. 270
notion, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 272
E1 , E2 and E3 are some empty Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges but E4 is a 273
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. Thus in the terms of Neutrosophic 274
SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only one Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge, namely, 275
E4 . The Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 is Neutrosophic isolated means that 276
there’s no Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge has it as a Neutrosophic endpoint. 277
• On the Figure (3), the SuperHyperNotion, namely, SuperHyperGirth, is up. 278
E1 , E2 and E3 are some empty SuperHyperEdges but E4 is a SuperHyperEdge. 279
Thus in the terms of SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only one SuperHyperEdge, 280
namely, E4 . 281
Figure 2. TThe Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a illustrated SuperHyperModel-

ing on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 3. The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a illustrated SuperHyperModeling

on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 4. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a illustrated Super-

HyperModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
• On the Figure (4), there’s no empty SuperHyperEdge but E3 are a loop 282
SuperHyperEdge on {F } and there are some SuperHyperEdges, namely, E1 on 283
{H, V1 , V3 }, alongside E2 on {O, H, V4 , V3 } and E4 , E5 on {N, V1 , V2 , V3 , F }. 284
• On the Figure (5),there’s neither empty SuperHyperEdge nor loop 285
SuperHyperEdge. 286
• On the Figure (6), there’s neither empty SuperHyperEdge nor loop 287
SuperHyperEdge. 288
SuperHyperEdge. 290
SuperHyperEdge. 292
SuperHyperEdge. 294
SuperHyperEdge. 296
SuperHyperEdge. 298
SuperHyperEdge. 300
SuperHyperEdge. 302
SuperHyperEdge. 304
SuperHyperEdge. 306
Figure 5. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs mentioned as the SuperHy-

perModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 6. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a illustrated Super-

HyperModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 7. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs depicted SuperHyperMod-

eling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 8. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with dense SuperHyper-

Modeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 9. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a messy SuperHyper-

Modeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 10. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with highly-embedding-

connected SuperHyperModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example
(3.6)
Figure 11. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a SuperHyperModel-

Figure 12. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with highly-multiple-

connected-style SuperHyperModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic
Example (3.6)


Figure 15. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with Linearly-Connected

SuperHyperModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)

Figure 17. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a Linearly-over-

packed SuperHyperModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example
(3.6)
SuperHyperEdge. 308
SuperHyperEdge. 310
SuperHyperEdge. 312
SuperHyperEdge. 314
SuperHyperEdge. 316
SuperHyperEdge. 318
SuperHyperEdge. 320
Definition 3.7 (Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). 321
(Ref. [1],Definition 2.7,p.3). 322
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). The 323
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ei0 and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 324
(NSHV) Vi of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S = (V, E) could be 325
characterized as follow-up items. 326
(i) If |Vi | = 1, then Vi is called vertex; 327
(ii) if |Vi | ≥ 1, then Vi is called SuperVertex; 328





(iii) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called edge; 329
(iv) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 330
HyperEdge; 331
(v) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called 332
SuperEdge; 333
(vi) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 334
SuperHyperEdge. 335
If we choose different types of binary operations, then we could get hugely diverse 336
types of general forms of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG). 337
Definition 3.8 (t-norm). (Ref. [1], Definition 2.7, p.3). 338
A binary operation ⊗ : [0, 1] × [0, 1] → [0, 1] is a t-norm if it satisfies the following 339
for x, y, z, w ∈ [0, 1]: 340
(i) 1 ⊗ x = x; 341
(ii) x ⊗ y = y ⊗ x; 342
(iii) x ⊗ (y ⊗ z) = (x ⊗ y) ⊗ z; 343
(iv) If w ≤ x and y ≤ z then w ⊗ y ≤ x ⊗ z. 344
Definition 3.9. The degree of truth-membership, indeterminacy-membership

and falsity-membership of the subset X ⊂ A of the single valued Neutrosophic set
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X} (with respect to t-norm Tnorm ):
TA (X) = Tnorm [TA (vi ), TA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,
IA (X) = Tnorm [IA (vi ), IA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,

and FA (X) = Tnorm [FA (vi ), FA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X .
Definition 3.10. The support of X ⊂ A of the single valued Neutrosophic set

A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}:
supp(X) = {x ∈ X : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) > 0}.
Definition 3.11. (General Forms of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). 345
Assume V 0 is a given set. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a 346
pair S = (V, E), where 347
(i) V = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vn } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of V 0 ; 348
(ii) V = {(Vi , TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi )) : TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi ) ≥ 0}, (i = 349
1, 2, . . . , n); 350
(iii) E = {E1 , E2 , . . . , En0 } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of 351
V; 352
(iv) E = {(Ei0 , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )) : TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 ) ≥ 0}, (i0 = 353
1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 354
(v) Vi 6= ∅, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 355
(vi) Ei0 6= ∅, (i0 = 1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 356
P
(vii) i supp(Vi ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 357
0 0
P
(viii) i0 supp(Ei ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n ).
0 358
Here the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ej 0 and the Neutrosophic 359
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) Vj are single valued Neutrosophic sets. TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), 360
and FV 0 (Vi ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 361
indeterminacy-membership and the degree of falsity-membership the Neutrosophic 362
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) V. 363
TV0 (Ei0 ), TV0 (Ei0 ), and TV0 (Ei0 ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 364
indeterminacy-membership and the degree of falsity-membership of the Neutrosophic 365
SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) Ei0 to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) E. Thus, 366
the ii0 th element of the incidence matrix of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) 367
are of the form (Vi , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )), the sets V and E are crisp sets. 368
Definition 3.12 (Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). 369
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). The 371
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ei0 and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 372
(NSHV) Vi of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S = (V, E) could be 373
characterized as follow-up items. 374
(i) If |Vi | = 1, then Vi is called vertex; 375
(ii) if |Vi | ≥ 1, then Vi is called SuperVertex; 376
(iii) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called edge; 377
(iv) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 378
HyperEdge; 379
(v) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called 380
SuperEdge; 381
(vi) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 382
SuperHyperEdge. 383
This SuperHyperModel is too messy and too dense. Thus there’s a need to have 384
some restrictions and conditions on SuperHyperGraph. The special case of this 385
SuperHyperGraph makes the patterns and regularities. 386
Definition 3.13. A graph is SuperHyperUniform if it’s SuperHyperGraph and the 387
number of elements of SuperHyperEdges are the same. 388
To get more visions on SuperHyperUniform, the some SuperHyperClasses are 389
introduced. It makes to have SuperHyperUniform more understandable. 390
Definition 3.14. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. There are some 391
SuperHyperClasses as follows. 392
(i). It’s Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath if it’s only one SuperVertex as 393
intersection amid two given SuperHyperEdges with two exceptions; 394
(ii). it’s SuperHyperCycle if it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two 395
given SuperHyperEdges; 396
(iii). it’s SuperHyperStar it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid all 397
SuperHyperEdges; 398
(iv). it’s SuperHyperBipartite it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two 399
given SuperHyperEdges and these SuperVertices, forming two separate sets, has 400
no SuperHyperEdge in common; 401
(v). it’s SuperHyperMultiPartite it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid 402
two given SuperHyperEdges and these SuperVertices, forming multi separate sets, 403
has no SuperHyperEdge in common; 404
(vi). it’s SuperHyperWheel if it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two 405
given SuperHyperEdges and one SuperVertex has one SuperHyperEdge with any 406
common SuperVertex. 407
Example 3.15. In the Figure (23), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath 408
ESHP : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, in the 409
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (23), is the notion. 410
Example 3.16. In the Figure (24), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle 411
N SHC : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Neutrosophic 412
SuperHyperSet, in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (24), is up. 413
Example 3.17. In the Figure (25), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar 414
ESHS : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, 415
by the Algorithm in previous Neutrosophic result, of the Neutrosophic 416
SuperHyperVertices of the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E), in 417
the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (25), is up. 418
Example 3.18. In the Neutrosophic Figure (26), the connected Neutrosophic 419
SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), is Neutrosophic highlighted and Neutrosophic 420
featured. The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Neutrosophic Algorithm in 421
previous Neutrosophic result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected 422
Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic 423
SuperHyperModel (26), is up. 424
Figure 23. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath Associated to the Notions in the Example

(3.15)
Figure 24. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions

in the Neutrosophic Example (3.16)
Figure 25. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions in

the Neutrosophic Example (3.17)
Figure 26. Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite Neutrosophic Associated to the Neutro-

sophic Notions in the Example (3.18)
Figure 27. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite Associated to the Notions in the

Example (3.19)
Figure 28. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel Neutrosophic Associated to the Neutro-

sophic Notions in the Neutrosophic Example (3.20)
Example 3.19. In the Figure (27), the connected Neutrosophic 425
SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E), is highlighted and Neutrosophic featured. 426
The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Algorithm in previous Neutrosophic 427
result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected Neutrosophic 428
SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (27), 429
is up. 430
Example 3.20. In the Neutrosophic Figure (28), the connected Neutrosophic 431
SuperHyperWheel N SHW : (V, E), is Neutrosophic highlighted and featured. The 432
obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Algorithm in previous result, of the 433
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel 434
ESHW : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (28), is up. 435
Definition 3.21. Let a pair S = (V, E) be a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)

S. Then a sequence of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) and Neutrosophic
SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)
V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs
is called a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic 436
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) V1 to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vs if either 437
of following conditions hold: 438
(i) Vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 439
(ii) there’s a vertex vi ∈ Vi such that vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 440
(iii) there’s a SuperVertex Vi0 ∈ Vi such that Vi0 , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 441
(iv) there’s a vertex vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that Vi , vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 442
0 0
(v) there’s a SuperVertex Vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that Vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 443
(vi) there are a vertex vi ∈ Vi and a vertex vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that vi , vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 444
0 0
(vii) there are a vertex vi ∈ Vi and a SuperVertex Vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 445
(viii) there are a SuperVertex Vi0 ∈ Vi and a vertex vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that Vi0 , vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 446
(ix) there are a SuperVertex Vi0 ∈ Vi and a SuperVertex Vi+1

0
∈ Vi+1 such that 447
0 0
Vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 . 448
Definition 3.22. (Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPaths). 449
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). a

Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV)
V1 to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vs is sequence of Neutrosophic
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) and Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)
V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs ,
could be characterized as follow-up items. 450
(i) If for all Vi , Ej 0 , |Vi | = 1, |Ej 0 | = 2, then NSHP is called path; 451
(ii) if for all Ej 0 , |Ej 0 | = 2, and there’s Vi , |Vi | ≥ 1, then NSHP is called SuperPath; 452
(iii) if for all Vi , Ej 0 , |Vi | = 1, |Ej 0 | ≥ 2, then NSHP is called HyperPath; 453
(iv) if there are Vi , Ej 0 , |Vi | ≥ 1, |Ej 0 | ≥ 2, then NSHP is called Neutrosophic 454
SuperHyperPath . 455
Definition 3.23 (Neutrosophic Strength of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPaths). 456
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). A

Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV)
V1 to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vs is sequence of Neutrosophic
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) and Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)
V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs ,
have 458
(i) Neutrosophic t-strength (min{T (Vi )}, m, n)si=1 ; 459
(ii) Neutrosophic i-strength (m, min{I(Vi )}, n)si=1 ; 460
Table 1. The Values of Vertices, SuperVertices, Edges, HyperEdges, and SuperHy-

perEdges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph Mentioned in the Definition
(3.27)
The Values of The Vertices The Number of Position in Alphabet
The Values of The SuperVertices The maximum Values of Its Vertices
The Values of The Edges The maximum Values of Its Vertices
The Values of The HyperEdges The maximum Values of Its Vertices
The Values of The SuperHyperEdges The maximum Values of Its Endpoints
(iii) Neutrosophic f-strength (m, n, min{F (Vi )})si=1 ; 461
(iv) Neutrosophic strength (min{T (Vi )}, min{I(Vi )}, min{F (Vi )})si=1 . 462
Definition 3.24 (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges 463
(NSHE)). (Ref. [1],Definition 5.4,p.7). 464
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). Consider 465
a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) E = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then E is called 466
(ix) Neutrosophic t-connective if T (E) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic 467
t-strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 468
(NSHV) Vi to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vj where 1 ≤ i, j ≤ s; 469
(x) Neutrosophic i-connective if I(E) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic 470
i-strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 471
(xi) Neutrosophic f-connective if F (E) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic 473
f-strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 474
(xii) Neutrosophic connective if (T (E), I(E), F (E)) ≥ maximum number of 476
Neutrosophic strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic 477
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vj 478
where 1 ≤ i, j ≤ s. 479
For the sake of having a Neutrosophic notion, there’s a need to “redefine” the 480
notion of “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”. The SuperHyperVertices and the 481
SuperHyperEdges are assigned by the labels from the letters of the alphabets. In this 482
procedure, there’s the usage of the position of labels to assign to the values. 483
Definition 3.25. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (SHG) S is a pair 484
S = (V, E). It’s redefined Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph if the Table (1) holds. 485
It’s useful to define a “Neutrosophic” version of SuperHyperClasses. Since there’s 486
more ways to get Neutrosophic type-results to make a Neutrosophic more 487
understandable. 488
Definition 3.26. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (SHG) S is a pair 489
S = (V, E). There are some Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses if the Table (2) 490
holds. Thus Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath , notion, SuperHyperStar, 491
SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultiPartite, and SuperHyperWheel, are 492
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath, Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle, 493
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar, Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite, 494
Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultiPartite, and Neutrosophic 495
SuperHyperWheel if the Table (2) holds. 496

perEdges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, Mentioned in the Definition
(3.26)

perEdges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph Mentioned in the Definition
(3.27)
It’s useful to define a “Neutrosophic” version of a Neutrosophic notion. Since there’s 497
more ways to get type-results to make a Neutrosophic notion more Neutrosophicly 498
understandable. 499
For the sake of having a Neutrosophic notion, there’s a need to “redefine” the 500
Neutrosophic notion of “Neutrosophic notion”. The SuperHyperVertices and the 501
SuperHyperEdges are assigned by the labels from the letters of the alphabets. In this 502
procedure, there’s the usage of the position of labels to assign to the values. 503
Definition 3.27. Assume a notion. It’s redefined a Neutrosophic notion if the 504
Table (3) holds. 505
Example 3.28. Referred to the Example (3.6), assume a Neutrosophic 506
SuperHyperGraph (SHG) S is a pair S = (V, E) in the mentioned Neutrosophic Figures 507
in every Neutrosophic items. 508
SuperHyperGraph (SHG), is up in the illustration of the Table (4). 510
Table 4. The Values of Vertices, SuperVertices, Edges, HyperEdges, and SuperHyper-

Edges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph
Vi (TVi , IVi , FVi ) Ei (TEi , IEi , FEi )
V1 (0.13, 0.13, 0.13) E1 (0, 0, 0)
V2 (0.13, 0.13, 0.13) E2 (0.13, 0.13, 0.13)
V3 (0.15, 0.15, 0.15) E3 (0, 0, 0)
V4 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14) E4 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14)

V1 (0.13, 0.13, 0.13) E1 (0, 0, 0)
V2 (0.03, 0.03, 0.03) E2 (0, 0, 0)
V3 (0.15, 0.15, 0.15) E3 (0, 0, 0)
V4 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14) E4 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14)

V1 (0.13, 0.13, 0.13) E1 (0, 0, 0)
V2 (0.11, 0.11, 0.11) E2 (0, 0, 0)
V3 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14) E3 (0, 0, 0)
- - E4 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14)

V1 (0.13, 0.13, 0.13) E1 (0.08, 0.08, 0.08)
V2 (0.11, 0.11, 0.11) E2 (0.15, 0.15, 0.15)
V3 (0.05, 0.05, 0.05) E3 (0, 0, 0)
V4 (0.12, 0.12, 0.12) E4 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14)
{F } (0.06, 0.06, 0.06) E5 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14)
{H} (0.08, 0.08, 0.08) - -
{N } (0.14, 0.14, 0.14) - -
{O} (0.15, 0.15, 0.15) - -

4 Main Resultant 517
Definition 4.1. (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly 518
Perfect Domination). 519
Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Consider a 520
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then V 0 is called Neutrosophic 521
SuperHyperStrongly Perfect Domination if the following expressions, terms and statements is 522
called Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Perfect Domination criteria holds. 523
X X X
|( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 Vi ∈V 0 Vi ∈V 0
X X X
= min
00 ⊆V
|{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V N SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00 00
Vj ∈ VN SHG \ V , ∃!Vi ∈ V :
TV0 (EVi ,Vj ) = min[TV (Vi ), TV (Vj )],
IV0 (EVi ,Vj ) = min[IV (Vi ), IV (Vj )],
FV0 (EVi ,Vj ) = min[FV (Vi ), FV (Vj )]}
Example 4.2. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel (SHG) S is a pair S = (V, E) 524
in the mentioned Neutrosophic Figures in every Neutrosophic items. 525
SuperHyperWheel (SHG), is up in the illustration of the Table (8). 527
Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Consider a 528
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {Vi=1−7 }. Then V 0 is called Neutrosophic 529
SuperHyperStrongly Perfect Domination since the following expressions, terms and 530


Figure 32. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar Neutrosophic Associated to the Neutro-











Edges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)

V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
V3 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E3 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V4 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V5 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V6 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
statements is called Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Perfect Domination criteria holds. 531
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−7 }
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−7 }
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−7 }
= (1.82, 1.82, 1.82) =

X X X
= 00 min |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00 00
Vj ∈ VN SHG \ V = {}, ∃!Vi ∈ V = {Vi=1−7 } :
TV0 (EVi ,Vj ) = 0.26 = 0.26 = min[TV (Vi ), TV (Vj )],
IV0 (EVi ,Vj ) = 0.26 = 0.26 = min[IV (Vi ), IV (Vj )],
FV0 (EVi ,Vj ) = 0.26 = 0.26 = min[FV (Vi ), FV (Vj )]}
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {Vi=1−3,6 }. Then V 0 is called Neutrosophic 535
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−3,6 }
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−3,6 }
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−3,6 }
= (0.97, 0.97, 0.97) =
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.19, 0.19, 0.19) E2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
V3 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E3 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V4 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V5 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V6 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
X X X
= min |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V 00 ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00 00
V7 ∈ VN SHG \ V = {Vj=4,5,7 }, ∃!V1 ∈ V = {Vi=1−3,6 } :
0
TV (EVi ,Vj ) = 0.26 = 0.26 = min[TV (Vi ), TV (Vj )],
FV0 (EVi ,Vj ) = 0.26 = 0.26 = min[FV (Vi ), FV (Vj )]},
Vj=4,5 ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 = {Vj=4,5,7 }, ∃!V6 ∈ V 00 = {Vi=1−3,6 } :
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {Vi=1−3,6 }. Then V 0 is called Neutrosophic 541
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−3,6 }
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−3,6 }
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−3,6 }
= (0.92, 0.92, 0.92) =

X X X
= 00 min |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00 00
V7 ∈ VN SHG \ V = {Vj=4,5,7 }, ∃!V1 ∈ V = {Vi=1−3,6 } :
0
FV0 (EVi ,Vj ) = 0.26 = 0.26 = min[FV (Vi ), FV (Vj )]},
Vj=4,5 ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 = {Vj=4,5,7 }, ∃!V6 ∈ V 00 = {Vi=1−3,6 } :
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.19, 0.19, 0.19) E2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
V3 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E3 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V4 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V5 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V6 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V7 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.19, 0.19, 0.19) E2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
V3 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E3 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
V4 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V5 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V6 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V7 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {Vi=1−3,6−7 }. Then V 0 is called Neutrosophic 547
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−3,6−7 }
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−3,6−7 }
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−3,6−7 }
= (0.89, 0.89, 0.89) =

X X X
= 00 min |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
Vj=4,5 ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 00
= {Vj=4,5,7 }, ∃!V6 ∈ V = {Vi=1−3,6−7 } :
0
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−7 }
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−7 }
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.19, 0.19, 0.19) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V6 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V7 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−7 }
= (1.62, 1.62, 1.62) =

X X X
= 00 min |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
Vj=4,5 ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 = {Vj=4,5,7 }, ∃!V6 ∈ V 00

= {Vi=1−3,6−7 } :
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−7 }
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={V
i=1−7 }
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−7 }
= (1.65, 1.65, 1.65) =

X X X
= 00 min |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
Vj=4,5 ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 00
= {Vj=4,5,7 }, ∃!V6 ∈ V = {Vi=1−3,6−7 } :
0
Example 4.3. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar (SHG) S is a pair S = (V, E) 562
in the mentioned Neutrosophic Figures in every Neutrosophic items. 563
SuperHyperStar (SHG), is up in the illustration of the Table (14). 565
Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Consider a 566
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {Vi=2 }. Then V 0 is called Neutrosophic 567
Edges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V1 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=2 }
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=2 }
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=2 }
= (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) =

X X X
= 00 min |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00 00
Vj=1,3−7 ∈ VN SHG \ V = {Vj6=2 }, ∃!V2 ∈ V = {Vi=2 } :
0
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {Vi=1,2 }. Then V 0 is called Neutrosophic 573
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1,2 }
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1,2 }
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1,2 }
V1 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
= (0.49, 0.49, 0.49) =

X X X
= 00 min |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
Vj=3−7 ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 00
= {Vj6=1,2 }, ∃!V2 ∈ V = {Vi=1,2 } :
0
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−3 }
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−3 }
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−3 }
= (0.72, 0.72, 0.72) =

X X X
= 00 min |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
Vj=4−7 ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 00
= {Vj6=1−3 }, ∃!V2 ∈ V = {Vi=1−3 } :
0
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−4 }
V1 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V1 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V5 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−4 }
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−4 }
= (0.95, 0.95, 0.95) =

X X X
= 00 min |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00
Vj=1,5−7 ∈ VN SHG \ V = {Vj6=1−4 }, ∃!V2 ∈ V 00 = {Vi=1−4 } :
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−5 }
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−5 }
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−5 }
= (1.18, 1.18, 1.18) =

X X X
= 00 min |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
Vj=6,7 ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 = {Vj6=1−5 }, ∃!V2 ∈ V 00

= {Vi=1−5 } :
V1 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V5 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V6 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V1 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V5 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V6 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V7 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)

Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {Vi6=7 }. Then V 0 is called Neutrosophic 597
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi6=7 }
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={V
i6=7 }
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi6=7 }
= (1.41, 1.41, 1.41) =

X X X
= 00 min |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00 00
Vj=7 ∈ VN SHG \ V = {Vj=7 }, ∃!V2 ∈ V = {Vi6=7 } :
0
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−7 }
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−7 }
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−7 }
= (1.64, 1.64, 1.64) =

X X X
= 00 min |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00 00
Vj ∈ VN SHG \ V = {}, ∃!V2 ∈ V = {Vi=1−7 } :
0
5 Main Result 606
Theorem 5.1. (Main Result and Main Theorem). 607
Assume every Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar has the letter z. The notion on the 608
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar and Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel coincides. 609
Proof. 610
(i). Let 611
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
CEN T ER, E2
612
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , CEN T ER
be a longest path taken a connected Extreme SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). There’s 613
a new way to redefine as 614
ViEXT ERN AL ∼ VjEXT ERN AL ≡

∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL ∈ Ez ≡
∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , {ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL } ⊆ Ez .
The term “EXTERNAL” implies |N (ViEXT ERN AL )| ≥ |N (Vj )| where Vj is 615
corresponded to ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Perfect 616
Domination. The latter is straightforward. 617
(ii). Let 618
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1∗ ,
CEN T ER, E2∗
619
P :
E1∗ , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2∗ , CEN T ER
is a longest SuperHyperStrongly Perfect Domination taken from a connected Extreme 620
SuperHyperWheel ESHW : (V, E). There’s a new way to redefine as 621

Domination. The latter is straightforward. Then there’s at least one Neutrosophic 624
SuperHyperStrongly Perfect Domination. Thus the notion of quasi isn’t up and the 625
SuperHyperNotions based on Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Perfect Domination could be 626
applied. The unique embedded Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Perfect Domination proposes 627
some longest Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Perfect Domination excerpt from some 628
representatives. The latter is straightforward. 629
Proposition 5.2. Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E).

Assume every Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex has the letter z. The Neutrosophic
SuperHyperStrongly Perfect Domination set is as follows.
{CEN T ER}.
Proof. Let 630
P :
CEN T ER, E2∗
631
P :
E2∗ , CEN T ER


SuperHyperStrongly Perfect Domination number is as follows.
0.26.
Proof. Let 642
P :
CEN T ER, E2∗
643
P :
E2∗ , CEN T ER

Proposition 5.4. Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E).

SuperHyperStrongly Perfect Domination set is as follows.
{CEN T ER}.
Proof. Let 654
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
CEN T ER, E2
655
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , CEN T ER

Proposition 5.5. Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E).

SuperHyperStrongly Perfect Domination number is as follows.
0.26.
Proof. Let 661
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
CEN T ER, E2
662
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , CEN T ER

Definition 5.6. (Uniform Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar and Uniform Neutrosophic 668
SuperHyperStar). 669
(i). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Every pair of 670
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices has the same maximum letter, i.e., 671
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices mutually has the same maximum letter. A 672
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E) is called Uniform 673
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar. 674
(ii). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Every pair 675
of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices has the same maximum letter, i.e., 676
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices mutually has the same maximum letter. A 677
Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E) is called Uniform 678
Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel. 679
Proposition 5.7. Let an Uniform Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel (SHG) S be a pair

S = (V, E). The Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Perfect Domination set is as follows.
{CEN T ER}.
Proof. Let 680
P :
CEN T ER, E2∗
681
P :
E2∗ , CEN T ER


The Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Perfect Domination number is lower than as follows.
0.26.
Proof. Let 692
P :
CEN T ER, E2∗
693
P :
E2∗ , CEN T ER

. The latter is straightforward. Then there’s at least one Neutrosophic

Domination 698
Proposition 5.9. Let an Uniform Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar (SHG) S be a pair

S = (V, E). The Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Perfect Domination set is as follows.
{CEN T ER}.
Proof. Let 704
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
CEN T ER, E2
705
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , CEN T ER

Proposition 5.10. Let an Uniform Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar (SHG) S be a pair

S = (V, E). The Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Perfect Domination number is lower than as
follows.
0.26.
Proof. Let 711
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
CEN T ER, E2
712
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , CEN T ER

Proposition 5.11. (Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar and Neutrosophic 718
SuperHyperWheel). 719
(i). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Assume every 720
Neutrosophic CENTER has the letter maximum letter. Then the Neutrosophic 721
SuperHyperVertices don’t have the same maximum letter, are in every 722
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Perfect Domination set. 723
(ii). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Assume 724
every Neutrosophic CENTER has the letter maximum letter. Then the 725
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices don’t have the same maximum letter, are in 726
every Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Perfect Domination set. 727
Proof. 728
(i). Let 729
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
CEN T ER, E2
730
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , CEN T ER

(ii). Let 736
P :
CEN T ER, E2∗
737
P :
E2∗ , CEN T ER

Proposition 5.12. (Embedded Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar and Embedded 748
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar). 749
(i). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Then 750
CENTER is in every Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Perfect Domination set. 751
(ii). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Then 752
CENTER is in every Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Perfect Domination set. 753
Proof. 754
(i). Let 755
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
CEN T ER, E2
756
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , CEN T ER

(ii). Let 762
P :
CEN T ER, E2∗
763
P :
E2∗ , CEN T ER

6 Neutrosophic Applications in Cancer’s 774
Neutrosophic Recognition 775
The cancer is the Neutrosophic disease but the Neutrosophic model is going to figure 776
out what’s going on this Neutrosophic phenomenon. The special Neutrosophic case of 777
this Neutrosophic disease is considered and as the consequences of the model, some 778
parameters are used. The cells are under attack of this disease but the moves of the 779
cancer in the special region are the matter of mind. The Neutrosophic recognition of the 780
cancer could help to find some Neutrosophic treatments for this Neutrosophic disease. 781
In the following, some Neutrosophic steps are Neutrosophic devised on this disease. 782
Step 1. (Neutrosophic Definition) The Neutrosophic recognition of the cancer in 783
the long-term Neutrosophic function. 784
Step 2. (Neutrosophic Issue) The specific region has been assigned by the 785
Neutrosophic model [it’s called Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph] and the long 786
Neutrosophic cycle of the move from the cancer is identified by this research. 787
Sometimes the move of the cancer hasn’t be easily identified since there are some 788
determinacy, indeterminacy and neutrality about the moves and the effects of the 789
cancer on that region; this event leads us to choose another model [it’s said to be 790
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph] to have convenient perception on what’s 791
happened and what’s done. 792
Step 3. (Neutrosophic Model) There are some specific Neutrosophic models, 793
which are well-known and they’ve got the names, and some general Neutrosophic 794
models. The moves and the Neutrosophic traces of the cancer on the complex 795
tracks and between complicated groups of cells could be fantasized by a 796
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath(-/SuperHyperStrongly Perfect Domination, 797
SuperHyperStar, SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, 798
SuperHyperWheel). The aim is to find either the Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly 799
Perfect Domination or the Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Perfect Domination in those 800
Neutrosophic Neutrosophic SuperHyperModels. 801
Figure 42. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite Associated to the Notions of Neutro-

sophic SuperHyperStrongly Perfect Domination
Edges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite
7 Case 1: The Initial Neutrosophic Steps 802
Toward Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite as 803
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel 804
Step 4. (Neutrosophic Solution) In the Neutrosophic Figure (42), the 805
Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite is Neutrosophic highlighted and Neutrosophic 806
featured. 807
By using the Neutrosophic Figure (42) and the Table (21), the Neutrosophic 808
SuperHyperBipartite is obtained. 809
The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Neutrosophic Algorithm in 810
previous Neutrosophic result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the 811
connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic 812
SuperHyperModel (42), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Perfect Domination. 813
Figure 43. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite Associated to the Notions of

Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Perfect Domination
Edges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite
8 Case 2: The Increasing Neutrosophic Steps 814
Toward Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite as 815
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel 816
Step 4. (Neutrosophic Solution) In the Neutrosophic Figure (43), the 817
Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite is Neutrosophic highlighted and 818
Neutrosophic featured. 819
By using the Neutrosophic Figure (43) and the Table (22), the Neutrosophic 820
SuperHyperMultipartite is obtained. 821
The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Neutrosophic Algorithm in 822
previous result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected 823
Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic 824
SuperHyperModel (43), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Perfect Domination. 825
9 Neutrosophic Applications in Cancer’s 826
Neutrosophic Recognition 827
Cancer is a neutrosophic disease, but the neutrosophic model is supposed to understand 828
what is going on in this neutrosophic phenomenon. The special case of neutrosophic 829
disease is considered and some parameters have been used as consequences of the model. 830
Cells are subject to attack by the disease, but the movements of the cancer in the 831
specific area is a matter of mind. Neutrosophic diagnosis of cancer can help in finding 832
some Neutrosophic cures for this Neutrosophic disease. 833
In the following, several Neutrosophic stages are designed for this disease. 834
Step 1. (Neutrosophic Definition) Neutrosophic diagnosis of cancer in long-term 835
Neutrosophic performance. 836
Step 2. (Neutrosophic Issue) The specific region is assigned by the Neutrosophic 837
model (called Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph) and the long Neutrosophic cycle of 838
movement of cancer is identified by this scientific research. Sometimes the 839
movement of cancer is not easy to detect, because there is certainty, uncertainty 840
and neutrality about the movements and effects of cancer on that area. This event 841
leads us to choose another model [which is said to be the Neutrosophic 842
superhypergraph] in order to have a proper understanding of what happened and 843
was done. 844
Step 3. (Neutrosophic Model) There are some specific Neutrosophic models that 845
are well known and have names and some general Neutrosophic models. Cancer 846
neurtosophic movements and effects in complex pathways and between complex 847
groups of cells can be visualized by a SuperHyperPath (-/SuperHyperCycle, 848
SuperHyperStar, SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, 849
SuperHyperWheel). The goal is to find dominant neutrosophic Strongly Perfect 850
Domination models or dominant sStrongly Perfect Domination models. 851
10 Wondering Open Problems But As The 852
Directions To Forming The Motivations 853
In what follows, some “problems” and some “questions” are proposed. 854
The SuperHyperStrongly Perfect Domination and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Perfect 855
Domination are defined on a real-world application, titled “Cancer’s Recognitions”. 856
Question 10.1. Which the else SuperHyperModels could be defined based on Cancer’s 857
recognitions? 858
Question 10.2. Are there some SuperHyperNotions related to SuperHyperStrongly Perfect 859
and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Perfect Domination?

Domination 860
Question 10.3. Are there some Algorithms to be defined on the SuperHyperModels to 861
compute them? 862
Question 10.4. Which the SuperHyperNotions are related to beyond the 863
SuperHyperStrongly Perfect Domination and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Perfect Domination? 864
Problem 10.5. The SuperHyperStrongly Perfect Domination and the Neutrosophic 865
SuperHyperStrongly Perfect Domination do a SuperHyperModel for the Cancer’s recognitions and 866
they’re based on SuperHyperStrongly Perfect Domination, are there else? 867
Problem 10.6. Which the fundamental SuperHyperNumbers are related to these 868
SuperHyperNumbers types-results? 869
Problem 10.7. What’s the independent research based on Cancer’s recognitions 870
concerning the multiple types of SuperHyperNotions? 871
11 Conclusion and Closing Remarks 872
In this section, closing and concluding remarks are presented. The drawbacks of this 873
scientific research are shown. Some advantages and disadvantages of this scientific 874
research are highlighted. 875
This scientific research uses some approaches to further understand the Neutrosophic 876
SuperHyperGraphs. In this effort, two SuperHyperNotions are defined on the Strongly 877
Perfect Domination. For this reason, in the second definition, the original definition of 878
the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph is redefined on the position of the alphabets. Based 879
on the new Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph definition, the new SuperHyperNotion, 880
Neutrosophic Strongly Perfect Domination, finds a suitable background to implement 881
some results on. Some SuperHyperClasses and some Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses 882
are the subjects of this scientific research on modeling areas that are subject to cancer 883
attacks in order to recognize this disease as mentioned under the title “Cancer 884
Diagnosis”. To formalize the SuperHyperNotion, Strongly Perfect Domination, 885
SuperHyperClasses and new SuperHyperClasses instances are introduced. Some general 886
results are summarized in the Strongly Perfect Domination and Neutrosophic Strongly 887
Perfect Domination sections. Clarifications, examples, and literature reviews go all the 888
way. In this scientific research, the literature review has met the lines containing 889
concepts and results. SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph are 890
super-hypermodels in “cancer diagnosis” and both are the foundation of the background 891
of this scientific research. Sometimes cancer has occurred in an area full of cells, cell 892
groups, and embedded styles. In this section, SuperHyperModel proposes 893
SuperHyperNotions, formally called “Strongly Perfect Domination”, based on the 894
connections of Cancer’s movements in the longest and strongest styles with the 895
formation of design and architecture, in terms of terms and whispering words. . The 896
“SuperHyper” prefix refers to the topic of embedded styles to explore the background of 897
SuperHyperNotions. In the table (23), the advantages and ways of this scientific
Table 23. A look at this scientific research and beyond

Advantages Limitations
1. Redefining the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 1. General Results
2. Strongly Perfect Domination
3. Neutrosophic Strongly Perfect Domination 2. Other SuperHyperNumbers
4. modeling cancer diagnoses
5. SuperHyperClasses 3. SuperHyperFamilies
898
research are specified, pointed out and expressed. 899
12 Background 900
There are some scientific researches covering the topic of this scientific research. In what 901
follows, there are some discussion and literature reviews about them. 902
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “New Ideas In Recognition of 903
Cancer And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph As Hyper Tool On Super Toot” in Ref. [1] 904
by Henry Garrett (2023). In this research article, a novel approach is implemented on 905
SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on general forms with 906
introducing used neutrosophic classes of neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. It’s published 907
in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled “Current Trends in Mass Communication 908
(CTMC)” with ISO abbreviation “Curr Trends Mass Comm” in volume 2 and issue 1 909
with pages 32-55. 910
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “Some Super Hyper Degrees 911
and Co-Super Hyper Degrees on Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs And Super Hyper 912
Graphs Alongside Applications in Cancer’s Treatments” in Ref. [2] by Henry Garrett 913
(2023). In this research article, a novel approach is implemented on SuperHyperGraph 914
and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on fundamental notions and using vital tools 915
in Cancer’s Treatments. It’s published in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled 916
“Journal of Mathematical Techniques and Computational Mathematics(JMTCM)” with 917
ISO abbreviation “J Math Techniques Comput Math” in volume 2 and issue 1 with 918
pages 35-47. The research article studies deeply with choosing directly neutrosophic 919
SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough toward independent 920
results based on initial background and fundamental SuperHyperNumbers. 921
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “A Research on Cancer’s 922
Recognition and Neutrosophic Super Hypergraph by Eulerian Super Hyper Cycles and 923
Hamiltonian Sets as Hyper Covering Versus Super separations” in Ref. [3] by Henry 924
Garrett (2023). In this research article, a novel approach is implemented on 925
SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on fundamental notions 926
and using vital tools in Cancer’s Recognition. It’s published in prestigious and fancy 927
journal is entitled “Journal of Mathematical Techniques and Computational 928
Mathematics(JMTCM)” with ISO abbreviation “J Math Techniques Comput Math” in 929
volume 2 and issue 3 with pages 136-148. The research article studies deeply with 930
choosing directly neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph. It’s the 931
breakthrough toward independent results based on initial background and fundamental 932
SuperHyperNumbers. 933
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “Neutrosophic 1-Failed 934
SuperHyperForcing in the SuperHyperFunction to Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs 935
on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Beyond ” in Ref. [4] by Henry Garrett (2023). 936
In this research article, a novel approach is implemented on SuperHyperGraph and 937
neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on fundamental SuperHyperNumber and using 938
neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses of neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. It’s published in 939
prestigious and fancy journal is entitled “Journal of Mathematical Techniques and 940
Computational Mathematics(JMTCM)” with ISO abbreviation “J Math Techniques 941
Comput Math” in volume 2 and issue 6 with pages 221-307. The research article studies 942
deeply with choosing directly neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph. 943
It’s the breakthrough toward independent results based on initial background and 944
fundamental SuperHyperNumbers. The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is 945
titled “New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph by 946
Initial Eulerian-Path-Cut as Hyper Initial Eulogy on Super Initial EULA” in Ref. [5] by 947
Henry Garrett (2023). In this research article, a novel approach is implemented on 948
SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on fundamental 949
SuperHyperNumber and using neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses of neutrosophic 950
SuperHyperGraph. It’s published in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled 951
“International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Research” with ISO 952
abbreviation “IJPAMR” in volume 3 and issue 2 with pages 60-88 and doi: 953
10.51483/IJPAMR.3.2.2023.60-88. The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is 954
titled “New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graph by 955
Eulerian-Path-Cut as Hyper Eulogy-Path-Cut on Super EULA-Path-Cut” in Ref. [6] by 956
SuperHyperGraph. It’s published in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled 960
“International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Research” with ISO 961
abbreviation “IJPAMR” in volume 3 and issue 2 with pages 102-124 and doi: 962
10.51483/IJPAMR.3.2.2023.102-124. The research article studies deeply with choosing 963
directly neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough 964
toward independent results based on initial background and fundamental 965
SuperHyperNumbers. The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “Super 966
Hyper Dominating and Super Hyper Resolving on Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs and 967
Their Directions in Game Theory and Neutrosophic Super Hyper Classes” in Ref. [7] by 968
SuperHyperGraph. It’s published in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled “Journal 972
of Mathematical Techniques and Computational Mathematics(JMTCM)” with ISO 973
abbreviation “J Math Techniques Comput Math” in volume 1 and issue 3 with pages 974
242-263. The research article studies deeply with choosing directly neutrosophic 975
SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough toward independent 976
results based on initial background and fundamental SuperHyperNumbers. The seminal 977
paper and groundbreaking article is titled “neutrosophic co-degree and neutrosophic 978
degree alongside chromatic numbers in the setting of some classes related to neutrosophic 979
hypergraphs” in Ref. [8] by Henry Garrett (2023). In this research article, a novel 980
approach is implemented on SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 981
based on general forms without using neutrosophic classes of neutrosophic 982
SuperHyperGraph. It’s published in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled “Journal 983
of Current Trends in Computer Science Research (JCTCSR)” with ISO abbreviation “J 984
Curr Trends Comp Sci Res” in volume 2 and issue 1 with pages 16-24. The research 985
article studies deeply with choosing neutrosophic hypergraphs instead of neutrosophic 986
SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough toward independent results based on initial 987
background. The research article studies deeply with choosing neutrosophic 988
hypergraphs instead of neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough toward 989
independent results based on initial background. In some articles are titled “0039 — 990
Closing Numbers and Super-Closing Numbers as (Dual)Resolving and (Dual)Coloring 991
alongside (Dual)Dominating in (Neutrosophic)n-SuperHyperGraph” in Ref. [9] by 992
Henry Garrett (2022), “0049 — (Failed)1-Zero-Forcing Number in Neutrosophic Graphs” 993
in Ref. [10] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Extreme SuperHyperClique as the Firm Scheme 994
of Confrontation under Cancer’s Recognition as the Model in The Setting of 995
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [11] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Uncertainty 996
On The Act And Effect Of Cancer Alongside The Foggy Positions Of Cells Toward 997
Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique inside Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Titled 998
Cancer’s Recognition” in Ref. [12] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic Version Of 999
Separates Groups Of Cells In Cancer’s Recognition On Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” 1000
in Ref. [13] by Henry Garrett (2022), “The Shift Paradigm To Classify Separately The 1001
Cells and Affected Cells Toward The Totality Under Cancer’s Recognition By New 1002
Multiple Definitions On the Sets Polynomials Alongside Numbers In The (Neutrosophic) 1003
SuperHyperMatching Theory Based on SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic 1004
SuperHyperGraph” in Ref. [14] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Breaking the Continuity and 1005
Uniformity of Cancer In The Worst Case of Full Connections With Extreme Failed 1006
SuperHyperClique In Cancer’s Recognition Applied in (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” 1007
in Ref. [15] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable as the 1008
Survivors on the Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition Based on Uncertainty to All Modes 1009
in Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [16] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Extremism 1010
of the Attacked Body Under the Cancer’s Circumstances Where Cancer’s Recognition 1011
Titled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [17] by Henry Garrett (2022), 1012
“(Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in Cancer’s Recognitions And 1013
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [18] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic 1014
Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on 1015
Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In Special ViewPoints” in Ref. [19] by Henry 1016
Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in the SuperHyperFunction 1017
To Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition And 1018
Beyond ” in Ref. [20] by Henry Garrett (2022), “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperStable on 1019
Cancer’s Recognition by Well- SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs ” 1020
in Ref. [21] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To 1021
Form Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In 1022
Special ViewPoints” in Ref. [17] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Basic Notions on 1023
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperForcing And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling in Cancer’s 1024
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [22] by Henry Garrett 1025
(2022), “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form Neutrosophic 1026
SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In Special ViewPoints” 1027
in Ref. [23] by Henry Garrett (2022),“(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s 1028
Recognitions Featuring (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances” in 1029
Ref. [24] by Henry Garrett (2022), “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperAlliances With 1030
SuperHyperDefensive and SuperHyperOffensive Type-SuperHyperSet On (Neutrosophic) 1031
SuperHyperGraph With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions 1032
And Related (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClasses” in Ref. [25] by Henry Garrett (2022), 1033
“SuperHyperGirth on SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph With 1034
SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions” in Ref. [26] by Henry Garrett (2022), 1035
“Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on Neutrosophic 1036
SuperHyperGraphs and SuperHyperGraphs Alongside Applications in Cancer’s 1037
Treatments” in Ref. [27] by Henry Garrett (2022), “SuperHyperDominating and 1038
SuperHyperResolving on Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs And Their Directions in 1039
Game Theory and Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses” in Ref. [28] by Henry Garrett 1040
(2022), “SuperHyperMatching By (R-)Definitions And Polynomials To Monitor 1041
Cancer’s Recognition In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [227] by Henry 1042
Garrett (2023), “The Focus on The Partitions Obtained By Parallel Moves In The 1043
Cancer’s Extreme Recognition With Different Types of Extreme SuperHyperMatching Set 1044
and Polynomial on (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [228] by Henry Garrett 1045
(2023), “Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique Decides the Failures on the Cancer’s 1046
Recognition in the Perfect Connections of Cancer’s Attacks By SuperHyperModels 1047
Named (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [229] by Henry Garrett (2023), 1048
“Indeterminacy On The All Possible Connections of Cells In Front of Cancer’s Attacks 1049
In The Terms of Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique on Cancer’s Recognition called 1050
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [230] by Henry Garrett (2023), “Perfect 1051
Directions Toward Idealism in Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition Forwarding 1052
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClique on Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [233] by 1053
Henry Garrett (2023), “Demonstrating Complete Connections in Every Embedded 1054
Regions and Sub-Regions in the Terms of Cancer’s Recognition and (Neutrosophic) 1055
SuperHyperGraphs With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClique” in Ref. [234] by Henry 1056
Garrett (2023), “Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic Regions titled 1057
neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable in Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition modeled in 1058
the Form of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [237] by Henry Garrett (2023), 1059
“Using the Tool As (Neutrosophic) Failed SuperHyperStable To SuperHyperModel 1060
Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [240] by Henry 1061
Garrett (2023), “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form Neutrosophic 1062
SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In Special ViewPoints” 1063
in Ref. [241] by Henry Garrett (2023), “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperStable on Cancer’s 1064
Recognition by Well-SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in 1065
Ref. [242] by Henry Garrett (2023), “Neutrosophic 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in the 1066
SuperHyperFunction To Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs on Cancer’s Neutrosophic 1067
Recognition And Beyond ” in Ref. [243] by Henry Garrett (2022), “(Neutrosophic) 1068
1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in Cancer’s Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) 1069
SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [244] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Basic Notions on 1070
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperForcing And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling in Cancer’s 1071
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [245] by Henry Garrett 1072
(2022), “Basic Neutrosophic Notions Concerning SuperHyperDominating and 1073
Neutrosophic SuperHyperResolving in SuperHyperGraph” in Ref. [256] by Henry 1074
Garrett (2022), “Initial Material of Neutrosophic Preliminaries to Study Some 1075
Neutrosophic Notions Based on Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) in Neutrosophic 1076
SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)” in Ref. [257] by Henry Garrett (2022), and [4–257], there 1077
are some endeavors to formalize the basic SuperHyperNotions about neutrosophic 1078
SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph alongside scientific research books 1079
at [258–395]. Two popular scientific research books in Scribd in the terms of high 1080
readers, 5679 and 6667 respectively, on neutrosophic science is on [396, 397]. 1081
Some scientific studies and scientific researches about neutrosophic graphs, are 1082
proposed as book in Ref. [396] by Henry Garrett (2023) which is indexed by Google 1083
Scholar and has more than 5679 readers in Scribd. It’s titled “Beyond Neutrosophic 1084
Graphs” and published by Dr. Henry Garrett. This research book covers different types 1085
of notions and settings in neutrosophic graph theory and neutrosophic 1086
SuperHyperGraph theory. 1087
Also, some scientific studies and scientific researches about neutrosophic graphs, are 1088
proposed as book in Ref. [397] by Henry Garrett (2023) which is indexed by Google 1089
Scholar and has more than 6667 readers in Scribd. It’s titled “Neutrosophic Duality” 1090
and published by Dr. Henry Garrett. This research book presents different types of 1091
notions SuperHyperResolving and SuperHyperDominating in the setting of duality in 1092
neutrosophic graph theory and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph theory. This research 1093
book has scrutiny on the complement of the intended set and the intended set, 1094
simultaneously. It’s smart to consider a set but acting on its complement that what’s 1095
done in this research book which is popular in the terms of high readers in Scribd. 1096
See the seminal scientific researches [1–3]. The formalization of the notions on the 1097
framework of notions in SuperHyperGraphs, Neutrosophic notions in 1098
SuperHyperGraphs theory, and (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs theory at [4–257] 1099
alongside scientific research books at [258–395]. Two popular scientific research books 1100
in Scribd ,in the terms of high readers, 5679 and 6667 respectively, on neutrosophic 1101
science is on [396, 397]. 1102
References 1103
1. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 1104
SuperHyperGraph As Hyper Tool On Super Toot”, Curr Trends Mass Comm 1105
2(1) (2023) 32-55. (doi: 10.33140/CTMC.02.01.03). 1106
2. Henry Garrett, “Some Super Hyper Degrees and Co-Super Hyper Degrees on 1107
Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs And Super Hyper Graphs Alongside 1108
Applications in Cancer’s Treatments”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 2(1) 1109
(2023) 35-47. (doi: 10.33140/JMTCM.02.01.05). 1110
3. Henry Garrett, “A Research on Cancer’s Recognition and Neutrosophic Super 1111
Hypergraph by Eulerian Super Hyper Cycles and Hamiltonian Sets as Hyper 1112
Covering Versus Super separations”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 2(3) 1113
(2023) 136-148. (doi: 10.33140/JMTCM.02.03.03). 1114
4. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in the 1115
SuperHyperFunction to Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs on Cancer’s 1116
Neutrosophic Recognition and Beyond ”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 2(6) 1117
(2023) 221-307. (doi: 10.33140/JMTCM.02.06.04). 1118
5. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic 1119
SuperHyperGraph by Initial Eulerian-Path-Cut as Hyper Initial Eulogy on Super 1120
Initial EULA”, International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics 1121
Research 3(2) (2023) 60-88. (doi: 10.51483/IJPAMR.3.2.2023.60-88). 1122
6. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic Super 1123
Hyper Graph by Eulerian-Path-Cut as Hyper Eulogy-Path-Cut on Super 1124
EULA-Path-Cut”, International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics 1125
Research 3(2) (2023) 102-124. (doi: 10.51483/IJPAMR.3.2.2023.102-124). 1126
7. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic Super 1127
Hyper Graph by Eulerian-Path-Cut as Hyper Eulogy-Path-Cut on Super 1128
EULA-Path-Cut”, J Curr Trends Comp Sci Res 2(1) (2023) 16-24. (doi: 1129
10.33140/JCTCSR.02.01.04) 1130
8. Henry Garrett, “Super Hyper Dominating and Super Hyper Resolving on 1131
Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs and Their Directions in Game Theory and 1132
Neutrosophic Super Hyper Classes”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 1(3) 1133
(2022) 242-263. (doi: 10.33140/JMTCM.01.03.09) 1134
9. Garrett, Henry. “0039 — Closing Numbers and Super-Closing Numbers as 1135
(Dual)Resolving and (Dual)Coloring alongside (Dual)Dominating in 1136
(Neutrosophic)n-SuperHyperGraph.” CERN European Organization for Nuclear 1137
Research - Zenodo, Nov. 2022. CERN European Organization for Nuclear 1138
Research, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6319942. 1139
https://oa.mg/work/10.5281/zenodo.6319942 1140
10. Garrett, Henry. “0049 — (Failed)1-Zero-Forcing Number in Neutrosophic 1141
Graphs.” CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research - Zenodo, Feb. 1142
2022. CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research, 1143
https://doi.org/10.13140/rg.2.2.35241.26724. 1144
https://oa.mg/work/10.13140/rg.2.2.35241.26724 1145
11. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperClique as the Firm Scheme of 1146
Confrontation under Cancer’s Recognition as the Model in The Setting of 1147
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010308 (doi: 1148
10.20944/preprints202301.0308.v1). 1149
12. Henry Garrett, “Uncertainty On The Act And Effect Of Cancer Alongside The 1150
Foggy Positions Of Cells Toward Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique inside 1151
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Titled Cancer’s Recognition”, Preprints 2023, 1152
2023010282 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0282.v1). 1153
13. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Version Of Separates Groups Of Cells In 1154
Cancer’s Recognition On Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 1155
2023010267 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0267.v1). 1156
14. Henry Garrett, “The Shift Paradigm To Classify Separately The Cells and 1157
Affected Cells Toward The Totality Under Cancer’s Recognition By New 1158
Multiple Definitions On the Sets Polynomials Alongside Numbers In The 1159
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperMatching Theory Based on SuperHyperGraph and 1160
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”, Preprints 2023, 2023010265 (doi: 1161
10.20944/preprints202301.0265.v1). 1162
15. Henry Garrett, “Breaking the Continuity and Uniformity of Cancer In The 1163
Worst Case of Full Connections With Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique In 1164
Cancer’s Recognition Applied in (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 1165
2023, 2023010262,(doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0262.v1). 1166
16. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable as the Survivors on the 1167
Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition Based on Uncertainty to All Modes in 1168
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010240 (doi: 1169
10.20944/preprints202301.0240.v1). 1170
17. Henry Garrett, “Extremism of the Attacked Body Under the Cancer’s 1171
Circumstances Where Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) 1172
SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010224, (doi: 1173
10.20944/preprints202301.0224.v1). 1174
18. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in Cancer’s 1175
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 1176
2023010105 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 1177
19. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form 1178
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions 1179
In Special ViewPoints”, Preprints 2023, 2023010088 (doi: 1180
10.20944/preprints202301.0088.v1). 1181
SuperHyperFunction To Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs on Cancer’s 1183
Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond ”, Preprints 2023, 2023010044 1184
21. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperStable on Cancer’s Recognition by 1185
Well- SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 1186
2023010043 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0043.v1). 1187
22. Henry Garrett, “Basic Notions on (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperForcing And 1188
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling in Cancer’s Recognitions And 1189
10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 1191
10.20944/preprints202301.0088.v1). 1195
24. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions 1196
Featuring (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances”, Preprints 1197
2022, 2022120549 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0549.v1). 1198
25. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperAlliances With SuperHyperDefensive 1199
and SuperHyperOffensive Type-SuperHyperSet On (Neutrosophic) 1200
SuperHyperGraph With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s 1201
Recognitions And Related (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClasses”, Preprints 2022, 1202
2022120540 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0540.v1). 1203
26. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperGirth on SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic 1204
SuperHyperGraph With SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions”, 1205
Preprints 2022, 2022120500 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0500.v1). 1206
27. Henry Garrett, “Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on 1207
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs and SuperHyperGraphs Alongside Applications 1208
in Cancer’s Treatments”, Preprints 2022, 2022120324 (doi: 1209
10.20944/preprints202212.0324.v1). 1210
28. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDominating and SuperHyperResolving on 1211
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs And Their Directions in Game Theory and 1212
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”, Preprints 2022, 2022110576 (doi: 1213
10.20944/preprints202211.0576.v1). 1214
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By Strongly Resolving Sequence As 1216
Hyper Decoration On Super Density”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1217
10.13140/RG.2.2.17389.97769). 1218
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By Strongly Resolving Sequence As 1220
Hyper Decoration On Super Density”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1221
10.13140/RG.2.2.28685.10727). 1222
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By Strongly Resolving Sequence 1224
As Hyper Decoration On Super Density”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1225
10.13140/RG.2.2.24994.20169). 1226
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By Dominating Sequence As Hyper 1228
Decoration On Super Density”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10371529). 1229
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By Dominating Sequence As Hyper 1231
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By Dominating Sequence As 1234
Hyper Decoration On Super Density”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1235
10.5281/zenodo.10263440). 1236
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By STABLE As Hyper Decoration On 1238
Super Density”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10028600). 1239
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By STABLE As Hyper Decoration 1241
On Super Density”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8310454). 1242
37. Henry Garrett, “Recognition of Cancer With Bipartite and Path as 1243
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph By the Tool Called Stability”, Preprints 2023, 1244
2023081972 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202308.1972.v1). 1245
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By STABLE As Hyper 1247
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By REVERSE CONNECTIVE 1250
DOMINATION As Hyper Decoration On Super Density”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1251
10.5281/zenodo.8206877). 1252
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By REVERSE CONNECTIVE 1254
10.5281/zenodo.8206834). 1256
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By REVERSE CONNECTIVE 1258
10.5281/zenodo.8206773). 1260
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By EQUAL CONNECTIVE 1262
10.5281/zenodo.8201319). 1264
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By EQUAL CONNECTIVE 1266
10.5281/zenodo.8201255). 1268
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By EQUAL CONNECTIVE 1270
10.5281/zenodo.8201165). 1272
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By CONNECTIVE DOMINATION As 1274
Hyper Decoration On Super Density”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1275
10.5281/zenodo.8196147). 1276
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By CONNECTIVE DOMINATION 1278
As Hyper Decoration On Super Density”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1279
10.5281/zenodo.8196132). 1280
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By CONNECTIVE 1282
10.5281/zenodo.8196099). 1284
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By DOMINATION As Hyper 1286
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By DOMINATION As Hyper 1289
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By DOMINATION As Hyper 1292
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperPerfect Search As Hyper Perf On Super 1295
Perfidy”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8104836). 1296
52. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Perfidy By Hyper Perf Of 1297
SuperHyperPerfect Search In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1298
SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8104857). 1299
SuperHyperGraph By Reverse Strict Dimension Dominating As Hyper Dimple 1301
On Super Dimity”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8092796). 1302
54. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Dimity By Hyper Dimple Of Reverse 1303
Strict Dimension Dominating In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1304
SuperHyperGraph By Unequal Dimension Dominating As Hyper Dimple On 1307
Super Dimity”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8088438). 1308
56. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Dimity By Hyper Dimple Of Unequal 1309
Dimension Dominating In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1310
SuperHyperGraph By Strict Dimension Dominating As Hyper Dimple On Super 1313
Dimity”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8084436). 1314
58. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Dimity By Hyper Dimple Of Strict 1315
SuperHyperGraph By Reverse Strict Connective As Hyper Conceit On Super 1319
Con”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8080100). 1320
60. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Con By Hyper Conceit Of Reverse Strict 1321
Connective In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, 1322
Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8080068). 1323
SuperHyperGraph By Unequal Connective Dominating As Hyper Conceit On 1325
Super Con”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8078445). 1326
62. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Con By Hyper Conceit Of Unequal 1327
Connective Dominating In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1328
SuperHyperGraph By Strict Connective Dominating As Hyper Conceit On 1331
64. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Con By Hyper Conceit Of Strict 1333
SuperHyperGraph By Reverse Dimension Dominating As Hyper Dimple On 1337
Super Dimity”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8072171). 1338
66. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Dimity By Hyper Dimple Of Reverse 1339
SuperHyperGraph By Equal Dimension Dominating As Hyper Dimple On Super 1343
68. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Dimity By Hyper Dimple Of Equal 1345
SuperHyperGraph By Dimension Dominating As Hyper Dimple On Super 1349
70. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Dimity By Hyper Dimple Of Dimension 1351
Dominating In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, 1352
SuperHyperGraph By Reverse Connective Dominating As Hyper Conceit On 1355
72. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Con By Hyper Conceit Of Reverse 1357
SuperHyperGraph By Equal Connective Dominating As Hyper Conceit On 1361
74. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Con By Hyper Conceit Of Equal 1363
SuperHyperGraph By Connective Dominating As Hyper Conceit On Super 1367
Con”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8051346). 1368
76. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Con By Hyper Conceit Of Connective 1369
SuperHyperGraph By United Dominating As Hyper Ultra On Super Units”, 1373
78. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Units By Hyper Ultra Of United 1375
SuperHyperGraph By Zero Forcing As Hyper ford On Super forceps”, Zenodo 1379
2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8017246). 1380
80. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super forceps By Hyper ford Of Zero Forcing In 1381
Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 2023, 1382
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8020128). 1383
SuperHyperGraph By Matrix-Based As Hyper mat On Super matte”, Zenodo 1385
2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7978571). 1386
82. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super mat By Hyper matte Of Matrix-Based In 1387
Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 2023, 1388
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7978857). 1389
SuperHyperGraph By Dominating-Edges As Hyper Dome On Super Eddy”, 1391
84. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Eddy By Hyper Dome Of 1393
Dominating-Edges In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1394
SuperHyperGraph By Edge-Gap As Hyper Gape On Super Gab”, Zenodo 2023, 1397
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7916595). 1398
86. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Gab By Hyper Gape Of Edge-Gap In 1399
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7923632). 1401
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On 1403
Super Nebulous”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7904698). 1404
88. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nebulous By Hyper Nebbish Of 1405
Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1406
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition As Hyper 1409
Decompress On Super Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1410
10.5281/zenodo.7904529). 1411
90. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Decompensation By Hyper Decompress Of 1412
Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With 1413
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1414
10.5281/zenodo.7904401). 1415
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut As Hyper Nebbish On Super 1417
Nebulous”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7871026). 1418
Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1420
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Cycle-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super 1423
Eulerian-Cycle-Neighbor In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1426
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Cycle-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On 1429
Super Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7855661). 1430
Eulerian-Cycle-Decomposition In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1432
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Cycle-Cut As Hyper Eulogy On Super EULA”, 1435
98. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super EULA By Hyper Eulogy Of 1437
Eulerian-Cycle-Cut In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1438
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Path-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super 1441
Eulerian-Type-Path-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1444
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Path-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress 1447
On Super Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7839333). 1448
Eulerian-Type-Path-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1450
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Path-Cut As Hyper Eulogy On Super 1453
EULA”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7834229). 1454
Eulerian-Type-Path-Cut In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1456
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Path-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super 1459
Eulerian-Path-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1462
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Path-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On 1465
Eulerian-Path-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1468
SuperHyperGraph As Hyper Tool On Super Toot”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1471
10.5281/zenodo.7812236). 1472
SuperHyperGraph By initial Eulerian-Path-Cut As Hyper initial Eulogy On 1474
Super initial EULA”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7809365). 1475
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Path-Cut As Hyper Eulogy-Path-Cut On Super 1477
EULA-Path-Cut”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7809358). 1478
Eulerian-Path-Cut In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1480
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Path-Cut As Hyper Eulogy On Super EULA”, 1483
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On 1486
Super Nebulous”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7806767). 1487
Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1489
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition As Hyper 1492
Decompress On Super Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1493
10.5281/zenodo.7804238). 1494
Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With 1496
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7804228). 1497
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut As Hyper Hamper On Super 1499
Hammy”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7799902). 1500
119. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Hammy By Hyper Hamper Of 1501
Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1502
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Cycle-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super 1505
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Cycle-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress 1508
On Super Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7793372). 1509
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Cycle-Cut As Hyper Hamper On Super 1511
Hammy”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7791952). 1512
Hamiltonian-Cycle-Cut In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1514
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super 1517
Hamiltonian-Neighbor In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1520
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On 1523
Hamiltonian-Decomposition In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1526
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Cut As Hyper Hamper On Super Hammy”, 1529
Hamiltonian-Cut In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1532
SuperHyperGraph By Trace-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 1535
Trace-Neighbor In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1538
132. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 1540
SuperHyperGraph By Trace-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On Super 1541
Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7771831). 1542
Trace-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1544
SuperHyperGraph By Trace-Cut As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 1547
ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.20913.25446). 1548
135. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Tract By Hyper Track Of Trace-Cut In 1549
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7764916). 1551
SuperHyperGraph By Edge-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 1553
Edge-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, 1556
SuperHyperGraph By Edge-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On Super 1559
Decompensation”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.22545.10089). 1560
Edge-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1562
SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.29544.34564). 1563
SuperHyperGraph By Edge-Cut As Hyper Edify On Super Eddy”, ResearchGate 1565
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.11377.76644). 1566
141. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Eddy By Hyper Edify Of Edge-Cut In 1567
Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 1568
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.23750.96329). 1569
SuperHyperGraph By Vertex-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 1571
Vertex-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1574
SuperHyperGraph By Vertex-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On Super 1577
Decompensation”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.30212.81289). 1578
Vertex-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1580
SuperHyperGraph By Vertex-Cut As Hyper Vertu On Super Vertigo”, 1583
147. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Vertigo By Hyper Vertu Of Vertex-Cut In 1585
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.32467.25124). 1587
SuperHyperGraph By Stable-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 1589
149. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nebulizer By Hyper Nub Of 1591
Stable-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1592
SuperHyperGraph By Stable-Decompositions As Hyper Stain On Super Stagy”, 1595
151. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Stale By Hyper Stalk Of 1597
Stable-Decompositions In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1598
SuperHyperGraph By Stable-Cut As Hyper Stain On Super Stagy”, 1601
153. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Stale By Hyper Stalk Of Stable-Cut In 1603
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.20170.24000). 1605
SuperHyperGraph By Clique-Neighbors As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 1607
155. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nebulizer By Hyper Nub Of 1609
Clique-Neighbors In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1610
SuperHyperGraph By Clique-Decompositions As Hyper Decompile On Super 1613
Decommission”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.18780.87683). 1614
Clique- Decompositions In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1616
SuperHyperGraph By Clique-Cut As Hyper Click On Super Cliche”, 1619
159. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Cliff By Hyper Cling Of Clique-Cut In 1621
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.27392.30721). 1623
SuperHyperGraph By Space As Hyper Spin On Super Spacy”, ResearchGate 1625
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.33028.40321). 1626
SuperHyperGraph By List- Coloring As Hyper List On Super Lisle”, 1628
162. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Lith By Hyper Lite Of List-Coloring In 1630
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.16356.04489). 1632
SuperHyperGraph By Space As Hyper Sparse On Super Spark ”, ResearchGate 1634
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.21756.21129). 1635
164. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Solidarity By Hyper Soul Of Space In 1636
Cancer’s Recognition With (Extreme) SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023, 1637
(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.30983.68009). 1638
SuperHyperGraph By Edge-Connectivity As Hyper Disclosure On Super 1640
Closure”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.28552.29445). 1641
166. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Uniform By Hyper Deformation Of 1642
Edge-Connectivity In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1643
SuperHyperGraph By Vertex-Connectivity As Hyper Leak On Super Structure”, 1646
168. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super System By Hyper Explosions Of 1648
Vertex-Connectivity In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1649
SuperHyperGraph By Tree-Decomposition As Hyper Forward On Super Returns”, 1652
170. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nodes By Hyper Moves Of 1654
Tree-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1655
SuperHyperGraph By Chord As Hyper Excellence On Super Excess”, 1658
172. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Gap By Hyper Navigations Of Chord In 1660
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.11172.14720). 1662
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyper(i,j)-Domination As Hyper Controller On 1664
Super Waves”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.22011.80165). 1665
174. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Coincidence By Hyper Routes Of 1666
SuperHyper(i,j)-Domination In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1667
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperEdge-Domination As Hyper Reversion On 1670
Super Indirection”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.10493.84962). 1671
176. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Obstacles By Hyper Model Of 1672
SuperHyperEdge-Domination In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1673
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperK-Domination As Hyper k-Actions On Super 1676
Patterns”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.19944.14086). 1677
178. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Harmony By Hyper k-Function Of 1678
SuperHyperK-Domination In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1679
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperK-Number As Hyper k-Partition On Super 1682
Layers”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.33103.76968). 1683
180. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Gradient By Hyper k-Class Of 1684
SuperHyperK-Number In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1685
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperOrder As Hyper Enumerations On Super 1688
Landmarks”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.35646.56641). 1689
182. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Analogous By Hyper Visions Of 1690
SuperHyperOrder In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1691
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperColoring As Hyper Categories On Super 1694
Neighbors”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.13973.81121). 1695
184. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Relations By Hyper Identifications Of 1696
SuperHyperColoring In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1697
185. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Contradiction By Hyper Detection of 1699
SuperHyperDefensive In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic 1700
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperDimension As Hyper Distinguishing On Super 1703
Distances”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.31956.88961). 1704
187. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Locations By Hyper Differing Of 1705
SuperHyperDimension In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1706
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperDominating As Hyper Closing On Super 1709
Messy”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.21510.45125). 1710
189. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Missing By Hyper Searching Of 1711
SuperHyperDominating In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1712
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperConnected As Hyper Group On Super Surge”, 1715
191. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Outbreak By Hyper Collections Of 1717
SuperHyperConnected In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1718
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperTotal As Hyper Covering On Super Infections”, 1721
193. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Extremism By Hyper Treatments Of 1723
SuperHyperTotal In Cancer’s Recognition with (Neutrosophic) 1724
194. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Isolation By Hyper Perfectness Of 1726
SuperHyperPerfect In Cancer’s Recognition with (Neutrosophic) 1727
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperPerfect As Hyper Idealism On Super Vacancy”, 1730
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperJoin As Hyper Separations On Super Sorts”, 1733
197. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super connections By Hyper disconnections Of 1735
SuperHyperJoin In Cancer’s Recognition with (Neutrosophic) 1736
198. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Mixed-Devastations By Hyper Decisions 1738
Of SuperHyperDuality In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic 1739
199. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition As (Neutrosophic) 1741
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperDuality As Hyper Imaginations On Super 1742
Mixed-Illustrations”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.33275.80161). 1743
200. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition As (Neutrosophic) 1744
SuperHyperGraph By Path SuperHyperColoring As Hyper Correction On Super 1745
Faults”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.30182.50241). 1746
201. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Reflections By Hyper Rotations Of Path 1747
SuperHyperColoring In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic 1748
202. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas As Hyper Deformations On Super Chains In 1750
Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph By 1751
SuperHyperDensity”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.13444.60806). 1752
203. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas As Hyper Ignorance By SuperHyperDensity On 1753
Super Resistances In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic 1754
SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.16800.05123). 1755
204. Henry Garrett, “New Research On Cancer’s Recognition and Neutrosophic 1756
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian SuperHyperCycles and Hamiltonian Sets As 1757
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-VI ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1758
10.13140/RG.2.2.29913.80482). 1759
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-V ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1762
10.13140/RG.2.2.33269.24809). 1763
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-IV ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1766
10.13140/RG.2.2.34946.96960). 1767
207. Henry Garrett, “A Research On Cancer’s Recognition and Neutrosophic 1768
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-III ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1770
10.13140/RG.2.2.14814.31040). 1771
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-II ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1774
10.13140/RG.2.2.15653.17125). 1775
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-I ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1778
10.13140/RG.2.2.25719.50089). 1779
210. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Disruptions In Cancer’s Extreme 1780
Recognition As Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph By Hyper Plans Called 1781
SuperHyperConnectivities”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1782
10.13140/RG.2.2.29441.94562). 1783
211. Henry Garrett, “Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition As Neutrosophic 1784
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperConnectivities As Hyper Diagnosis On Super 1785
Mechanism”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.17252.24968). 1786
212. Henry Garrett,“Cancer’s Recognition and (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph By 1787
the Criteria of Eulerian and Hamiltonian Type-Sets As Hyper Modified Cycles 1788
On Super Mess”, ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.16652.59525). 1789
213. Henry Garrett,“Eulerian and Hamiltonian In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition 1790
and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph On Super Interactions By Hyper Extensions 1791
of Cycles”, ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.34583.24485). 1792
214. Henry Garrett,“SuperHyperGirth Type-Results on extreme SuperHyperGirth 1793
theory and (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs Toward Cancer’s extreme 1794
Recognition”, Preprints 2023, 2023010396 (doi: 1795
10.20944/preprints202301.0396.v1). 1796
215. Henry Garrett,“Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Warns Hyper Landmark of 1797
neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth In Super Type-Versions of Cancer’s neutrosophic 1798
Recognition”, Preprints 2023, 2023010395 (doi: 1799
10.20944/preprints202301.0395.v1). 1800
216. Henry Garrett,“The Constructions of (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs on the 1801
Cancer’s Recognition in The Confrontation With Super Attacks In Hyper 1802
Situations By Implementing (Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in The 1803
Technical Approaches to Neutralize SuperHyperViews”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1804
10.13140/RG.2.2.26240.51204). 1805
217. Henry Garrett,“(Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing As the 1806
Entrepreneurs on Cancer’s Recognitions To Fail Forcing Style As the Super 1807
Classes With Hyper Effects In The Background of the Framework is So-Called 1808
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1809
10.13140/RG.2.2.12818.73925). 1810
218. Henry Garrett,“Super Actions On The Types of Hyper Levels In The Sensible 1811
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth On Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and 1812
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 1813
10.13140/RG.2.2.26836.88960). 1814
219. Henry Garrett,“SuperHyperGirth Approaches on the Super Challenges on the 1815
Cancer’s Recognition In the Hyper Model of (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, 1816
ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.36745.93289). 1817
220. Henry Garrett,“Extreme SuperHyperClique as the Firm Scheme of 1818
Confrontation under Cancer’s Recognition as the Model in The Setting of 1819
10.20944/preprints202301.0308.v1). 1821
221. Henry Garrett,“Uncertainty On The Act And Effect Of Cancer Alongside The 1822
Foggy Positions Of Cells Toward Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique inside 1823
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Titled Cancer’s Recognition”, Preprints 2023, 1824
2023010282 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0282.v1). 1825
222. Henry Garrett,“Neutrosophic Version Of Separates Groups Of Cells In Cancer’s 1826
Recognition On Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010267 1827
(doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0267.v1).). 1828
223. Henry Garrett, “The Shift Paradigm To Classify Separately The Cells and 1829
Affected Cells Toward The Totality Under Cancer’s Recognition By New 1830
Multiple Definitions On the Sets Polynomials Alongside Numbers In The 1831
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperMatching Theory Based on SuperHyperGraph and 1832
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”, Preprints 2023, 2023010265 (doi: 1833
10.20944/preprints202301.0265.v1). 1834
224. Henry Garrett,“Breaking the Continuity and Uniformity of Cancer In The 1835
Worst Case of Full Connections With Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique In 1836
Cancer’s Recognition Applied in (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 1837
2023, 2023010262,(doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0262.v1). 1838
225. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable as the Survivors on the 1839
Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition Based on Uncertainty to All Modes in 1840
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010240 (doi: 1841
10.20944/preprints202301.0240.v1). 1842
226. Henry Garrett, “Extremism of the Attacked Body Under the Cancer’s 1843
Circumstances Where Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) 1844
SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010224, (doi: 1845
10.20944/preprints202301.0224.v1). 1846
227. Henry Garrett,“SuperHyperMatching By (R-)Definitions And Polynomials To 1847
Monitor Cancer’s Recognition In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, 1848
ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.35061.65767). 1849
228. Henry Garrett,“The Focus on The Partitions Obtained By Parallel Moves In 1850
The Cancer’s Extreme Recognition With Different Types of Extreme 1851
SuperHyperMatching Set and Polynomial on (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, 1852
229. Henry Garrett,“Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique Decides the Failures on the 1854
Cancer’s Recognition in the Perfect Connections of Cancer’s Attacks By 1855
SuperHyperModels Named (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 1856
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.32530.73922). 1857
230. Henry Garrett,“Indeterminacy On The All Possible Connections of Cells In 1858
Front of Cancer’s Attacks In The Terms of Neutrosophic Failed 1859
SuperHyperClique on Cancer’s Recognition called Neutrosophic 1860
SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.15897.70243). 1861
231. Henry Garrett,“Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique Decides the Failures on the 1862
Cancer’s Recognition in the Perfect Connections of Cancer’s Attacks By 1863
SuperHyperModels Named (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 1864
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.32530.73922). 1865
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 1867
2023010105 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 1868
233. Henry Garrett,“Perfect Directions Toward Idealism in Cancer’s Neutrosophic 1869
Recognition Forwarding Neutrosophic SuperHyperClique on Neutrosophic 1870
234. Henry Garrett,“Demonstrating Complete Connections in Every Embedded 1872
Regions and Sub-Regions in the Terms of Cancer’s Recognition and 1873
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClique”, 1874
10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 1879
10.20944/preprints202301.0088.v1). 1883
237. Henry Garrett,“Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic Regions titled 1884
neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable in Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition 1885
modeled in the Form of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2023, 1886
(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.17385.36968). 1887
Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond ”, Preprints 2023, 2023010044 1890
Well- SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 1892
2023010043 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0043.v1). 1893
240. Henry Garrett, “Using the Tool As (Neutrosophic) Failed SuperHyperStable To 1894
SuperHyperModel Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) 1895
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In 1898
Special ViewPoints”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.11447.80803). 1899
Well-SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 1901
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.35774.77123). 1902
Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond ”, ResearchGate 2022, (doi: 1905
10.13140/RG.2.2.36141.77287). 1906
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2022, (doi: 1908
10.13140/RG.2.2.29430.88642). 1909
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2022, (doi: 1912
10.13140/RG.2.2.11369.16487). 1913
Featuring (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances”, Preprints 1915
2022, 2022120549 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0549.v1). 1916
Featuring (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances”, 1918
Recognitions And Related (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClasses”, Preprints 2022, 1923
2022120540 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0540.v1). 1924
Recognitions And Related (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClasses”, ResearchGate 1928
2022, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.14426.41923). 1929
Preprints 2022, 2022120500 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0500.v1). 1932
ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.20993.12640). 1935
252. Henry Garrett,“Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on 1936
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs and SuperHyperGraphs Alongside Applications 1937
in Cancer’s Treatments”, Preprints 2022, 2022120324 (doi: 1938
10.20944/preprints202212.0324.v1). 1939
253. Henry Garrett, “Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on 1940
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs And SuperHyperGraphs Alongside Applications 1941
in Cancer’s Treatments”, ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 1942
10.13140/RG.2.2.23123.04641). 1943
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”, Preprints 2022, 2022110576 (doi: 1946
10.20944/preprints202211.0576.v1). 1947
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”, ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 1950
10.13140/RG.2.2.23324.56966). 1951
256. Henry Garrett, “Basic Neutrosophic Notions Concerning SuperHyperDominating 1952
and Neutrosophic SuperHyperResolving in SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 1953
2022 (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.29173.86244). 1954
257. Henry Garrett, “Initial Material of Neutrosophic Preliminaries to Study Some 1955
Neutrosophic Notions Based on Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) in 1956
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)”, ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 1957
10.13140/RG.2.2.25385.88160). 1958
258. Henry Garrett, “Perfect Domination In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1959
Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10523307). 1960
259. Henry Garrett, “Resolving Sequence In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1961
260. Henry Garrett, “Dominating Sequence In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1963
261. Henry Garrett, “Stable In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 1965
Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8210033). 1966
262. Henry Garrett, “Reverse Connective Domination In Neutrosophic 1967
SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8206898). 1968
263. Henry Garrett, “Equal Connective Domination In Neutrosophic 1969
SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8201378). 1970
264. Henry Garrett, “Connective Domination In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. 1971
Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8194003). 1972
265. Henry Garrett, “Domination In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 1973
266. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperPerfect Search In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 1975
267. Henry Garrett, “Reverse Strict Dimension Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. 1977
268. Henry Garrett, “Unequal Dimension Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1979
269. Henry Garrett, “Strict Dimension Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1981
270. Henry Garrett, “Reverse Strict Connective In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 1983
271. Henry Garrett, “Unequal Connective Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1985
272. Henry Garrett, “Strict Connective Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1987
273. Henry Garrett, “Reverse Dimension Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1989
274. Henry Garrett, “Equal Dimension Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1991
275. Henry Garrett, “Dimension Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 1993
276. Henry Garrett, “Reverse Connective Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1995
277. Henry Garrett, “Equal Connective Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1997
278. Henry Garrett, “Connective Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 1999
279. Henry Garrett, “United Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2001
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8027488). 2002
280. Henry Garrett, “Zero Forcing In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2003
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8020181). 2004
281. Henry Garrett, “Matrix-Based In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2005
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7978921). 2006
282. Henry Garrett, “Collections of Math II”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2007
10.5281/zenodo.7943878). 2008
283. Henry Garrett, “Dominating-Edges In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2009
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7943871). 2010
284. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Gap In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2011
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7923786). 2012
285. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2013
286. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. 2015
287. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2017
288. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Cycle-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2019
289. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Cycle-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2021
290. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Cycle-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7854561). 2024
291. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Path-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2025
292. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Path-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2027
293. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Path-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2029
294. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Path-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2031
295. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Path-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2033
296. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Path-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2035
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7812750). 2036
297. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2037
298. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. 2039
299. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2041
300. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Cycle-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2043
301. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Cycle-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2045
302. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Cycle-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2047
303. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2049
304. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2051
305. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2053
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7783791). 2054
306. Henry Garrett, “Trace-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2055
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7780123). 2056
307. Henry Garrett, “Trace-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2057
308. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDuality”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2059
10.5281/zenodo.7637762). 2060
309. Henry Garrett, “Trace-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2061
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7766174). 2062
310. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2063
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7762232). 2064
311. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2065
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7758601). 2066
312. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2067
10.5281/zenodo.7754661). 2068
313. Henry Garrett, “Vertex-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2069
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7750995) . 2070
314. Henry Garrett, “Vertex-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2071
315. Henry Garrett, “Vertex-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2073
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7747236). 2074
316. Henry Garrett, “Stable-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2075
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7742587). 2076
317. Henry Garrett, “Stable-Decompositions In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2077
318. Henry Garrett, “Stable-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2079
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7734719). 2080
319. Henry Garrett, “Clique-Neighbors In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2081
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7730484). 2082
320. Henry Garrett, “Clique-Decompositions In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2083
321. Henry Garrett, “Clique-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2085
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7722865). 2086
322. Henry Garrett, “Space In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2087
10.5281/zenodo.7713563). 2088
323. Henry Garrett, “Space In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2089
10.5281/zenodo.7709116). 2090
324. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Connectivity In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2091
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7706415). 2092
325. Henry Garrett, “Vertex-Connectivity In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2093
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7706063). 2094
326. Henry Garrett, “Tree-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2095
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7701906). 2096
327. Henry Garrett, “Chord In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2097
10.5281/zenodo.7700205). 2098
328. Henry Garrett, “(i,j)-Domination In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2099
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7694876). 2100
329. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Domination In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2101
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7679410). 2102
330. Henry Garrett, “K-Domination In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2103
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7675982). 2104
331. Henry Garrett, “K-Number In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2105
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7672388). 2106
332. Henry Garrett, “Order In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2107
10.5281/zenodo.7668648). 2108
333. Henry Garrett, “Coloring In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2109
10.5281/zenodo.7662810). 2110
334. Henry Garrett, “Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2111
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7659162). 2112
335. Henry Garrett, “Cancer In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2113
10.5281/zenodo.7653233). 2114
336. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperWheel ”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2115
10.5281/zenodo.7653204). 2116
337. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperMultipartite”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2117
10.5281/zenodo.7653142). 2118
338. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperBipartite”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2119
10.5281/zenodo.7653117). 2120
339. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperStar ”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2121
10.5281/zenodo.7653089). 2122
340. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2123
10.5281/zenodo.7651687). 2124
341. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperPath”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2125
10.5281/zenodo.7651619). 2126
342. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDomination”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2127
10.5281/zenodo.7651439). 2128
343. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDominating”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2129
10.5281/zenodo.7650729). 2130
344. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperConnected ”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2131
10.5281/zenodo.7647868). 2132
345. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperTotal ”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2133
10.5281/zenodo.7647017). 2134
346. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperPerfect”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2135
10.5281/zenodo.7644894). 2136
347. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperJoin”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2137
10.5281/zenodo.7641880). 2138
348. Henry Garrett, “Path SuperHyperColoring”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2139
10.5281/zenodo.7632923). 2140
349. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDensity”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2141
10.5281/zenodo.7623459). 2142
350. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2143
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7606416). 2144
351. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperConnectivities”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2145
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7606416). 2146
352. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperConnectivities”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2147
10.5281/zenodo.7606404). 2148
353. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2149
10.5281/zenodo.7580018). 2150
354. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2151
10.5281/zenodo.7580018). 2152
355. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2153
10.5281/zenodo.7580018). 2154
356. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2155
10.5281/zenodo.7579929). 2156
357. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2157
10.5281/zenodo.7563170). 2158
358. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2159
10.5281/zenodo.7563164). 2160
359. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2161
10.5281/zenodo.7563160). 2162
360. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2163
10.5281/zenodo.7563160). 2164
361. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2165
10.5281/zenodo.7563160). 2166
362. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2167
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7557063). 2168
363. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperMatching”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2169
10.5281/zenodo.7557009). 2170
364. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperMatching”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2171
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7539484). 2172
365. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2173
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7523390). 2174
366. Henry Garrett, “Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2175
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7523390). 2176
367. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On Failed SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2177
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7523390). 2178
368. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2179
10.5281/zenodo.7574952). 2180
369. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2181
10.5281/zenodo.7574992). 2182
370. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2183
10.5281/zenodo.7523357). 2184
371. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2185
10.5281/zenodo.7523357). 2186
372. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2187
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7504782). 2188
373. Henry Garrett, “Extreme Failed SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2189
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7504782). 2190
374. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On Failed SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2191
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7504782). 2192
375. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2193
10.5281/zenodo.7499395). 2194
376. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2195
10.5281/zenodo.7499395). 2196
377. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2197
10.5281/zenodo.7499395). 2198
378. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2199
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7497450). 2200
379. Henry Garrett, “Extreme Failed SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2201
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7497450). 2202
380. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2203
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7494862). 2204
381. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2205
10.5281/zenodo.7494862). 2206
382. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2207
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7494862). 2208
383. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperAlliances”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2209
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7493845). 2210
384. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperAlliances”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2211
10.5281/zenodo.7493845). 2212
385. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperAlliances”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2213
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7493845). 2214
386. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperMatching”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2215
10.5281/zenodo.7539484). 2216
387. Henry Garrett, “Failed SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2217
10.5281/zenodo.7523390). 2218
388. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2219
10.5281/zenodo.7523357). 2220
389. Henry Garrett, “Failed SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2221
10.5281/zenodo.7504782). 2222
390. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2223
10.5281/zenodo.7499395). 2224
391. Henry Garrett, “Failed SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2225
10.5281/zenodo.7497450). 2226
392. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2227
10.5281/zenodo.7494862). 2228
393. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperAlliances”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2229
10.5281/zenodo.7493845). 2230
394. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2231
10.5281/zenodo.7480110). 2232
395. Henry Garrett, “Neut. SuperHyperEdges”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2233
10.5281/zenodo.7378758). 2234
396. Henry Garrett, “Beyond Neutrosophic Graphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2235
10.5281/zenodo.6320305). 2236
397. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Duality”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2237
10.5281/zenodo.6677173). 2238

New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel by Perfect Domination

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel by Perfect Domination

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.

com · Manhattan, NY, USA

New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 2

SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By Perfect 3

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · 6

DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA 7

In this scientific research, (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic 9

SuperHyperStrongly Perfect Domination). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S be 10

a pair S = (V, E). Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then 11

V 0 is called Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Perfect Domination if the following expressions, 12

terms and statements is called Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Perfect Domination criteria 13

SuperHyperNotions, namely a Strongly Perfect Domination and a Neutrosophic 16

Strongly Perfect Domination. Two different SuperHyperDefinitions were started for 17

them, but research has progressed and SuperHyperNotion, SuperHyperUniform, and 18

SuperHyperClass are well-defined and well-reviewed based on them. Literature review is 19

research, a comparison between this SuperHyperNotion with other SuperHyperNotions 21

and basic SuperHyperNumbers is presented. Definitions are followed by examples and 22

examples, so clarifications are guided by various tools. Applications are designed to 23

the relationships between them all are officially called “SuperHyperEdge”. 29

“SuperHyperGraph” and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” frameworks are selected and 30

super-hypermodels open avenues for research on theoretical aspects and “cancer 32

In order to master the Neutrosophic Strongly Perfect Domination, there is a need to 37

“re-define” the concept of “Strongly Perfect Domination mastery”. SuperHyperVertices 38

table contains “values of vertices, supervertices, edges, hyperedges, and hyperedges 41

belonging to Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” with key points, it is redefined. ”values 42

of vertices & number of positions in alphabet”, ”Values of SuperVertices&maximum 43

SuperHyperClass SuperHyperGraph based on Strongly Perfect Domination. This is the 47

Strongly Perfect Domination, then it is officially called “Strongly Perfect Domination”, 50

explored and distinguished because they are characterized in the SuperHyperClass 53

disciplinary methods based on a dominant Strongly Perfect Domination. Because of 54

having Strongly Perfect Domination, there is a need to “re-define” the concept of 55

“neutrosophic Strongly Perfect Domination” and “neutrosophic Strongly Perfect 56

Domination”. SuperHyperVertices and SuperHyperEdges are assigned by alphabetical 57

Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” is redefined if the 59

redefined to a “Neutrosophic Strongly Perfect Domination”. It is useful to define a 61

“Neutrosophic” version of SuperHyperClasses. Since there are more ways to obtain 62

Neutrosophic type results, a SuperHyper- Neutrosophic Strongly Perfect Domination 63

becomes more understandable. Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. If the 64

desired table exists, there are a number of Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses. So are 65

SuperHyperPath, SuperHyperCycle, SuperHyperStar, SuperHyperBipartite, 66

SuperHyperMultiPartite and SuperHyperWheel. ”Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath”, 67

“Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar”, “Neutrosophic 68

SuperHyperBipartite”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultiPartite” and “Neutrosophic 69

SuperHyperWheel”. A graph is SuperHyperUniform if it is a SuperHyperGraph and the 70

number of SuperHyperEdges elements is the same. Consider a Neutrosophic 71

SuperHyperGraph. There are a number of SuperHyperClasses as follows. It is a 72

SuperHyperPath if there is only one SuperVertex as an intersection between two given 73

SuperHyperEdges with two exceptions. If only one SuperVertex is given as an 74

intersection between two SuperHyperEdges, it is SuperHyperCycle. It is 75

SuperHyperStar and only one SuperVertex as intersection among all SuperHyperEdges. 76

It is SuperHyperBipartite, and only one SuperVertex is given as the intersection between 77

SuperHyperEdge in common. This is SuperHyperMultiPartite. Only one SuperVertex is 79

given as an intersection between two SuperHyperEdges, and these SuperVertices, which 80

form separate multisets, have no SuperHyperEdge in common. If only one 81

SuperHyperEdge among the given two SuperHyperEdges is a SuperHyperWheel and a 82

SuperVertex has a SuperHyperEdge with any regular SuperVertex. SuperHyperModel 83

suggests specific designs and specific architectures. SuperHyperModel is officially called 84

“SuperHyperGraph” and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”. In this SuperHyperModel, 85

cells and the “special group” of cells. SuperHyperModeled as “SuperHyperEdges”. 88

Sometimes, to have a more accurate SuperHyperModel, it is useful to have some degree 89

of determinism, uncertainty, and neutrality, in this case the SuperHyperModel is called 90

“Neutrosophic”. In future scientific research, the foundation will be based on “diagnosis 91

the Neutrosophic superhypergraph] in order to have a proper understanding of what 98