"New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path by Total Perfect Domination

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.
com · Manhattan, NY, USA
New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 2
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By Total Perfect 3
Domination 4
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · 6
DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA 7
1 SYNOPSIS 8
In this scientific research, (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic 9
SuperHyperTotal Perfect Domination). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S be a 10
pair S = (V, E). Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then 11
V 0 is called Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal Perfect Domination if the following expressions, 12
terms and statements is called Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal Perfect Domination criteria 13
holds. 14
X X X
|( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 Vi ∈V 0 Vi ∈V 0
X X X
= min
00 ⊆V
|{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V N SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
Vj ∈ VN SHG , ∃!Vi ∈ V 00 :
TV0 (EVi ,Vj ) = min[TV (Vi ), TV (Vj )],
IV0 (EVi ,Vj ) = min[IV (Vi ), IV (Vj )],
FV0 (EVi ,Vj ) = min[FV (Vi ), FV (Vj )]}
In this scientific research, new configurations are introduced for the new 15
SuperHyperNotions, namely a Total Perfect Domination and a Neutrosophic Total 16
Perfect Domination. Two different SuperHyperDefinitions were started for them, but 17
research has progressed and SuperHyperNotion, SuperHyperUniform, and 18
SuperHyperClass are well-defined and well-reviewed based on them. Literature review is 19
implemented throughout this research. To shine the light and importance of this 20
research, a comparison between this SuperHyperNotion with other SuperHyperNotions 21
and basic SuperHyperNumbers is presented. Definitions are followed by examples and 22
examples, so clarifications are guided by various tools. Applications are designed to 23
understand the theoretical aspect of this ongoing research. “Cancer diagnosis” are the 24
things that are being researched to explore the challenges that make sense in ongoing 25
research and future research. It is a special case. Cells are viewed in the intended 26
manner. There are different types of them. Some are individual and some are well 27
modeled by groups of cells. All these types are officially called “SuperHyperVertex”, but 28
the relationships between them all are officially called “SuperHyperEdge”. 29
“SuperHyperGraph” and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” frameworks are selected and 30
selected for research on “Cancer Diagnosis”. Thus, these complex and dense 31
super-hypermodels open avenues for research on theoretical aspects and “cancer 32
diagnosis”. Ways to pursue this scientific research have been considered. It has also 33
been formally collected in the form of several questions and problems. It is useful to 34
define a “neutrosophic” version of Total Perfect Domination. Since there are more ways 35
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
to get type results a Total Perfect Domination becomes more understandable. In order 36
to master the Neutrosophic Total Perfect Domination, there is a need to “re-define” the 37
concept of “Total Perfect Domination mastery”. SuperHyperVertices and 38
SuperHyperEdges are assigned by alphabetical labels. In this method, the position of 39
tags is used to assign values. Suppose a Total Perfect Domination. If the specified table 40
contains “values of vertices, supervertices, edges, hyperedges, and hyperedges belonging 41
to Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” with key points, it is redefined. ”values of vertices 42
& number of positions in alphabet”, ”Values of SuperVertices&maximum values of its 43
vertices”, ”values of edges&maximum values of its vertices”, ”super edge values&max 44
values of its vertices”, “super edge values” and maximum values of its endpoints”. To 45
get examples and structural examples, I would like to introduce the next 46
SuperHyperClass SuperHyperGraph based on Total Perfect Domination. This is the 47
original. Having the foundation of the previous definition in the SuperHyperClass type 48
would be disciplined. If there is a need to have all Total Perfect Domination until Total 49
Perfect Domination, then it is officially called “Total Perfect Domination”, but 50
otherwise, it is not Total Perfect Domination. There is some explanation for the original 51
definition titled “Total Perfect Domination”. These two examples are further explored 52
and distinguished because they are characterized in the SuperHyperClass disciplinary 53
methods based on a dominant Total Perfect Domination. Because of having Total 54
Perfect Domination, there is a need to “re-define” the concept of “neutrosophic Total 55
Perfect Domination” and “neutrosophic Total Perfect Domination”. 56
SuperHyperVertices and SuperHyperEdges are assigned by alphabetical labels. In this 57
method, the position of tags is used to assign values. Consider a Neutrosophic 58
SuperHyperGraph. “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” is redefined if the desired table 59
exists. And if the desired table exists, a Total Perfect Domination is redefined to a 60
“Neutrosophic Total Perfect Domination”. It is useful to define a “Neutrosophic” version 61
of SuperHyperClasses. Since there are more ways to obtain Neutrosophic type results, a 62
SuperHyper- Neutrosophic Total Perfect Domination becomes more understandable. 63
Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. If the desired table exists, there are a 64
number of Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses. So are SuperHyperPath, SuperHyperCycle, 65
SuperHyperStar, SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultiPartite and SuperHyperWheel. 66
”Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle”, “Neutrosophic 67
SuperHyperStar”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite”, “Neutrosophic 68
SuperHyperMultiPartite” and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel”. A graph is 69
SuperHyperUniform if it is a SuperHyperGraph and the number of SuperHyperEdges 70
elements is the same. Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. There are a number 71
of SuperHyperClasses as follows. It is a SuperHyperPath if there is only one 72
SuperVertex as an intersection between two given SuperHyperEdges with two 73
exceptions. If only one SuperVertex is given as an intersection between two 74
SuperHyperEdges, it is SuperHyperCycle. It is SuperHyperStar and only one 75
SuperVertex as intersection among all SuperHyperEdges. It is SuperHyperBipartite, 76
and only one SuperVertex is given as the intersection between two SuperHyperEdges, 77
and these SuperVertices, which form two distinct sets, have no SuperHyperEdge in 78
common. This is SuperHyperMultiPartite. Only one SuperVertex is given as an 79
intersection between two SuperHyperEdges, and these SuperVertices, which form 80
separate multisets, have no SuperHyperEdge in common. If only one SuperHyperEdge 81
among the given two SuperHyperEdges is a SuperHyperWheel and a SuperVertex has a 82
SuperHyperEdge with any regular SuperVertex. SuperHyperModel suggests specific 83
designs and specific architectures. SuperHyperModel is officially called 84
“SuperHyperGraph” and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”. In this SuperHyperModel, 85
the “special” cells and the “special group” of cells are SuperHyperModeled as 86
“SuperHyperVertices” and the common and desired properties between the “special” 87
cells and the “special group” of cells. SuperHyperModeled as “SuperHyperEdges”. 88
Sometimes, to have a more accurate SuperHyperModel, it is useful to have some degree 89
of determinism, uncertainty, and neutrality, in this case the SuperHyperModel is called 90
“Neutrosophic”. In future scientific research, the foundation will be based on “diagnosis 91
of cancer” and the results and definitions will be introduced in redeemed methods. 92
Cancer diagnosis in long-term practice. The specific region is assigned by the model 93
(called SuperHyperGraph) and the long cycle of movement of the cancer is determined 94
by this scientific research. Sometimes the movement of cancer is not easy to detect, 95
because there is certainty, uncertainty and neutrality about the movements and effects 96
of cancer on that area. This event leads us to choose another model [which is said to be 97
the Neutrosophic superhypergraph] in order to have a proper understanding of what 98
happened and was done. There are some specific models, which are well known and 99
have names, and some SuperHyperGeneral SuperHyperModels. The movements and 100
effects of cancer in complex pathways and between complex groups of cells can be 101
visualized with a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (-/SuperHyperCycle, SuperHyperStar, 102
SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, SuperHyperWheel). The goal is to find 103
the longest Total Perfect Domination or the strongest Total Perfect Domination in those 104
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModels. Some general results are presented for the longest 105
Total Perfect Domination called Total Perfect Domination and the strongest Total 106
Perfect Domination called Neutrosophic Total Perfect Domination. Beyond that in 107
SuperHyperStar, all possible SuperHyperPaths have only two SuperHyperEdges, but it 108
is not enough as having at least three SuperHyperEdges is necessary to form any style 109
of cycle. There is no form of any cycle, but literally, it is the transformation of any 110
cycle. It literally transforms and does not form. A basic introduction to the theory of 111
Total Perfect Domination Neutrosophic, SuperHyperGraphs and Neutrosophic 112
SuperHyperGraphs is suggested. 113
Keywords: Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, SuperHyperTotal Perfect Domination, 114
Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition 115
AMS Subject Classification: 05C17, 05C22, 05E45 116
2 Applied Notions Under The Scrutiny Of The 117
Motivation Of This Scientific Research 118
In this scientific research, there are ideas in the prominent frameworks of motivations. I 119
try to bring motivations in narrative ways. Some Cells have faced attacks from the 120
established situation with cancer attacks in this case, there is some analysis embedded 121
in the case current situations where cells can be labeled as some groups and some 122
groups or individuals are overlabeled, all from behaviors to overcome cancer attacks. In 123
embedded situations, cell individuals and cell groups can be considered as “new groups”. 124
So it encourages us to find suitable SuperHyperModels for more appropriate analysis 125
about this dirty story. I found SuperHyperModels, officially called “SuperHyperGraphs” 126
and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. In this SuperHyperModel, cells and groups of 127
cells are defined as “SuperHyperVertices” and relationships between individual cells and 128
groups of cells are defined as “SuperHyperEdges”. So this is another motivation for us 129
to do research on this SuperHyperModel based on “cancer diagnosis”. Sometimes, 130
things get worse. The situation has passed certainty and precise style. So it is beyond 131
them. There are three descriptions, i.e., degrees of determination, uncertainty, and 132
neutrality, for any object based on ambiguous forms, i.e., incomplete data, imprecise 133
data, and uncertain analysis. The second model can be considered in the previous 134
SuperHyperModel. This is SuperHyperModel. This is SuperHyperGraph but officially 135
called “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. Cancer is a disease, but the model is 136
supposed to understand what happens in this phenomenon. The special case of this 137
disease is considered and some parameters are used as consequences of the model. Cells 138
are attacked by the disease, but the movement of cancer is in a specific area. Knowing 139
the mind of cancer can help to find some cures for this disease. SuperHyperGraph and 140
Neutrosophic Super-HyperGraph are super-hypermodels used in “cancer diagnosis” and 141
both are the foundation of the background of this scientific research. Sometimes cancer 142
has occurred in an area full of cells, cell groups, and embedded styles. In this section, 143
SuperHyperModel proposes based on the links of cancer movements in the form of unity 144
styles with the formation of design and architecture officially called “Total Perfect 145
Domination”, in the themes of specialized terms and common words. Particle for direct 146
object. Applied concepts under the investigation of the motivation of this scientific 147
research. The “SuperHyper” prefix refers to the theme of embedded styles for 148
background discovery for SuperHyperNotions. Cancer diagnosis in long-term practice. 149
The specific region is assigned by the model (called SuperHyperGraph) and the long 150
cycle of movement of the cancer is determined by this scientific research. Sometimes the 151
movement of Cancer is not easy to identify because there is certainty, uncertainty and 152
neutrality about the movements and effects of Cancer in that region. This event leads 153
us to choose another model [said to be Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph]. Easy 154
understanding of what happened and what was done. There are some specific models 155
that are well known and named and some general models. The movements and effects 156
of cancer in complex pathways and between complex groups of cells can be visualized by 157
a neurosophic superhyperpath (-/SuperHyperCycle, SuperHyperStar, 158
SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, SuperHyperWheel). The goal is to find 159
Total Perfect Domination or Neutrosophic Total Perfect Domination for 160
SuperHyperModels in it. Some general results are presented. Beyond that in 161
SuperHyperStar, all possible Neutrosophic SuperHyperPaths have only two 162
SuperHyperEdges, but it is not enough as having at least three SuperHyperEdges is 163
necessary to form any style of cycle. There is no form of cycle, but it is literally a form 164
of any cycle. It literally transforms and does not form. 165
Question 2.1. How to define “SuperHyperNotions and to do research” to find the 166
“Total Perfect Domination Rate” of any cell or groups of cells based on fixed cell or fixed 167
group of cells broadly, “Total Perfect Domination Rate” based on fixed groups or fixed 168
cells. Groups of groups of cells? 169
Question 2.2. What are the best descriptions for “diagnosing cancer” in terms of 170
these chaotic and dense super-hypermodels in which embedded concepts are depicted? 171
This motivation to find concepts to use in this dense model is called 172
“SuperHyperGraphs”. So it motivates us to define different types of “Total Perfect 173
Domination” and “neutrosophic Total Perfect Domination” over “superhypergraph” and 174
“neutrosophic superhypergraph”. Then this scientific research has taken more 175
motivations to define SuperHyperClasses and find some connections among this 176
SuperHyperNotion with other SuperHyperNotions. It motivates us to obtain examples 177
and examples to clarify the framework of this scientific research. The general results 178
and some of the results about some of the connections are the ways that the key point 179
of this scientific research, “diagnosis of cancer” is more understandable and clear. 180
The framework of this research is as follows. First, I will introduce the basic 181
definitions to clarify the basics. In the “Introductions” subsection, basic definitions 182
about SuperHyperGraphs and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph are introduced and 183
discussed in depth. Basic concepts are thoroughly explained and illustrated, and 184
sometimes a literature review is used to make sense of what is to come in the coming 185
sections. The main definitions and their explanations, along with some results on the 186
new concepts, Total Perfect Domination and Neutrosophic Total Perfect Domination, 187
are specified in the sections “Total Perfect Domination” and “Neutrosophic Total 188
Perfect Domination”. In the concept of dealing with results and in Total Perfect 189
Domination to create logic about the continuation of the scientific research, the ideas of 190
SuperHyperUniform and Neutrosophic SuperHyperUniform are introduced and as their 191
consequences, the corresponding SuperHyperClasses are specified to summarize the 192
work done in this section, as “Results on SuperHyperClasses” and “Results on 193
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”. Going back to the core concepts, clever steps 194
towards common concepts to extend new concepts in new frameworks, 195
SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, in “Results on 196
SuperHyperClasses” and “Results on Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses” sections. There 197
is the initial scientific research on supergeneral relations and as the final and final part 198
of the theoretical scientific research is available in the section “General results”. Some 199
general SuperHyperRelations are fundamental and are known as fundamental 200
SuperHyperNotions, as in “General results” were extracted and discussed. “Total 201
Perfect Domination”, “Neutrosophic Total Perfect Domination”, “Results on 202
SuperHyperClasses” and “Results on Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”. There are 203
curious questions about what has been done about SuperHyperNotions to make sense of 204
the superiority of this scientific research and to discover the word “best” as a description 205
and adjective of this scientific research as presented in the “Total Perfect Domination” 206
section. The keyword of this scientific research was presented in the section 207
“Applications in cancer diagnosis” with two cases and sub-sections “Case 1: Initial steps 208
towards SuperHyperBipartite as SuperHyperModel” and “Case 2: Incremental steps 209
towards SuperHyperMultiperdel as SuperHyper. In the “open issues” section, there is a 210
detailed examination and recognition of what was done in this scientific research and 211
what happened in this scientific research in the form of “questions” and “issues” in 212
order to understand this scientific research in an outstanding style, the advantages and 213
limitations of this scientific research in addition to What has been done in this scientific 214
research is stated in the “conclusion and final remarks” section. 215
3 Neutrosophic Preliminaries Of This Scientific 216
Research On the Redeemed Ways 217
In this section, the basic material in this scientific research, is referred to [Single Valued 218
Neutrosophic Set](Ref. [1],Definition 2.2,p.2), [Neutrosophic Set](Ref. [1],Definition 219
2.1,p.1), [Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)](Ref. [1],Definition 2.5,p.2), 220
[Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)](Ref. [1],Definition 221
2.7,p.3), [t-norm](Ref. [1], Definition 2.7, p.3), and [Characterization of the 222
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)](Ref. [1],Definition 2.7,p.3), [Neutrosophic 223
Strength of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPaths] (Ref. [1],Definition 5.3,p.7), and 224
[Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)] 225
(Ref. [1],Definition 5.4,p.7). Also, the new ideas and their clarifications are addressed 226
to Ref. [1]. 227
In this subsection, the basic material which is used in this scientific research, is 228
presented. Also, the new ideas and their clarifications are elicited. 229
Definition 3.1 (Neutrosophic Set). (Ref. [1],Definition 2.1,p.1). 230
Let X be a Eulerian-Path-Cut of points (objects) with generic elements in X denoted by

x; then the Neutrosophic set A (NS A) is an object having the form
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}

+
where the functions T, I, F : X →]− 0, 1 [ define respectively the a
truth-membership function, an indeterminacy-membership function, and a
falsity-membership function of the element x ∈ X to the set A with the condition

−
0 ≤ TA (x) + IA (x) + FA (x) ≤ 3+ .
The functions TA (x), IA (x) and FA (x) are real standard or nonstandard subsets of 231
+
]− 0, 1 [. 232
Definition 3.2 (Single Valued Neutrosophic Set). (Ref. [1],Definition 2.2,p.2). 233
Let X be a Eulerian-Path-Cut of points (objects) with generic elements in X denoted by

x. A single valued Neutrosophic set A (SVNS A) is characterized by
truth-membership function TA (x), an indeterminacy-membership function IA (x), and a
falsity-membership function FA (x). For each point x in X, TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) ∈ [0, 1].
A SVNS A can be written as
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}.
Definition 3.3. The degree of truth-membership,
indeterminacy-membership and falsity-membership of the subset X ⊂ A of
the single valued Neutrosophic set A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}:
TA (X) = min[TA (vi ), TA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,
IA (X) = min[IA (vi ), IA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,
and FA (X) = min[FA (vi ), FA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X .
Definition 3.4. The support of X ⊂ A of the single valued Neutrosophic set
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}:
supp(X) = {x ∈ X : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) > 0}.
Definition 3.5 (Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). (Ref. [1],Definition 234
2.5,p.2). 235
Assume V 0 is a given set. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a 236
pair S = (V, E), where 237
(i) V = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vn } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of V 0 ; 238
(ii) V = {(Vi , TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi )) : TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi ) ≥ 0}, (i = 239
1, 2, . . . , n); 240
(iii) E = {E1 , E2 , . . . , En0 } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of 241
V; 242
(iv) E = {(Ei0 , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )) : TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 ) ≥ 0}, (i0 = 243
1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 244
(v) Vi 6= ∅, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 245
0 0
(vi) Ei0 6= ∅, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n ); 246
P
(vii) i supp(Vi ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 247
0 0
P
(viii) i0 supp(Ei ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n );
0 248
(ix) and the following conditions hold:

TV0 (Ei0 ) ≤ min[TV 0 (Vi ), TV 0 (Vj )]Vi ,Vj ∈Ei0 ,
IV0 (Ei0 ) ≤ min[IV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vj )]Vi ,Vj ∈Ei0 ,
and FV0 (Ei0 ) ≤ min[FV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vj )]Vi ,Vj ∈Ei0
where i0 = 1, 2, . . . , n0 . 249
Figure 1. The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a illustrated SuperHyperModeling

on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Here the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ej 0 and the Neutrosophic 250
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) Vj are single valued Neutrosophic sets. TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), 251
and FV 0 (Vi ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 252
indeterminacy-membership and the degree of falsity-membership the Neutrosophic 253
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) V. 254
TV0 (Ei0 ), TV0 (Ei0 ), and TV0 (Ei0 ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 255
indeterminacy-membership and the degree of falsity-membership of the Neutrosophic 256
SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) Ei0 to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) E. Thus, 257
the ii0 th element of the incidence matrix of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) 258
are of the form (Vi , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )), the sets V and E are crisp sets. 259
Example 3.6. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair 260
S = (V, E) in the mentioned Neutrosophic Figures in every Neutrosophic items. 261
• On the Figure (1), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 262
notion, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. E1 263
and E3 are some empty Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges but E2 is a loop 264
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge and E4 is a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. Thus 265
in the terms of Neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only one Neutrosophic 266
SuperHyperEdge, namely, E4 . The Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 is 267
Neutrosophic isolated means that there’s no Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge has it 268
as a Neutrosophic endpoint. 269
notion, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 271
E1 , E2 and E3 are some empty Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges but E4 is a 272
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. Thus in the terms of Neutrosophic 273
SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only one Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge, namely, 274
E4 . The Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 is Neutrosophic isolated means that 275
there’s no Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge has it as a Neutrosophic endpoint. 276
• On the Figure (3), the SuperHyperNotion, namely, SuperHyperGirth, is up. 277
E1 , E2 and E3 are some empty SuperHyperEdges but E4 is a SuperHyperEdge. 278
Thus in the terms of SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only one SuperHyperEdge, 279
namely, E4 . 280
Figure 2. TThe Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a illustrated SuperHyperModel-

ing on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 3. The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a illustrated SuperHyperModeling

on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 4. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a illustrated Super-

HyperModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
• On the Figure (4), there’s no empty SuperHyperEdge but E3 are a loop 281
SuperHyperEdge on {F } and there are some SuperHyperEdges, namely, E1 on 282
{H, V1 , V3 }, alongside E2 on {O, H, V4 , V3 } and E4 , E5 on {N, V1 , V2 , V3 , F }. 283
• On the Figure (5),there’s neither empty SuperHyperEdge nor loop 284
SuperHyperEdge. 285
• On the Figure (6), there’s neither empty SuperHyperEdge nor loop 286
SuperHyperEdge. 287
SuperHyperEdge. 289
SuperHyperEdge. 291
SuperHyperEdge. 293
SuperHyperEdge. 295
SuperHyperEdge. 297
SuperHyperEdge. 299
SuperHyperEdge. 301
SuperHyperEdge. 303
SuperHyperEdge. 305
Figure 5. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs mentioned as the SuperHy-

perModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 6. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a illustrated Super-

HyperModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 7. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs depicted SuperHyperMod-

eling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 8. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with dense SuperHyper-

Modeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 9. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a messy SuperHyper-

Modeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 10. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with highly-embedding-

connected SuperHyperModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example
(3.6)
Figure 11. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a SuperHyperModel-

Figure 12. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with highly-multiple-

connected-style SuperHyperModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic
Example (3.6)


Figure 15. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with Linearly-Connected

SuperHyperModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)

Figure 17. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a Linearly-over-

packed SuperHyperModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example
(3.6)
SuperHyperEdge. 307
SuperHyperEdge. 309
SuperHyperEdge. 311
SuperHyperEdge. 313
SuperHyperEdge. 315
SuperHyperEdge. 317
SuperHyperEdge. 319
Definition 3.7 (Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). 320
(Ref. [1],Definition 2.7,p.3). 321
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). The 322
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ei0 and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 323
(NSHV) Vi of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S = (V, E) could be 324
characterized as follow-up items. 325
(i) If |Vi | = 1, then Vi is called vertex; 326
(ii) if |Vi | ≥ 1, then Vi is called SuperVertex; 327





(iii) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called edge; 328
(iv) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 329
HyperEdge; 330
(v) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called 331
SuperEdge; 332
(vi) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 333
SuperHyperEdge. 334
If we choose different types of binary operations, then we could get hugely diverse 335
types of general forms of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG). 336
Definition 3.8 (t-norm). (Ref. [1], Definition 2.7, p.3). 337
A binary operation ⊗ : [0, 1] × [0, 1] → [0, 1] is a t-norm if it satisfies the following 338
for x, y, z, w ∈ [0, 1]: 339
(i) 1 ⊗ x = x; 340
(ii) x ⊗ y = y ⊗ x; 341
(iii) x ⊗ (y ⊗ z) = (x ⊗ y) ⊗ z; 342
(iv) If w ≤ x and y ≤ z then w ⊗ y ≤ x ⊗ z. 343
Definition 3.9. The degree of truth-membership, indeterminacy-membership

and falsity-membership of the subset X ⊂ A of the single valued Neutrosophic set
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X} (with respect to t-norm Tnorm ):
TA (X) = Tnorm [TA (vi ), TA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,
IA (X) = Tnorm [IA (vi ), IA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,

and FA (X) = Tnorm [FA (vi ), FA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X .
Definition 3.10. The support of X ⊂ A of the single valued Neutrosophic set

A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}:
supp(X) = {x ∈ X : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) > 0}.
Definition 3.11. (General Forms of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). 344
Assume V 0 is a given set. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a 345
pair S = (V, E), where 346
(i) V = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vn } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of V 0 ; 347
(ii) V = {(Vi , TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi )) : TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi ) ≥ 0}, (i = 348
1, 2, . . . , n); 349
(iii) E = {E1 , E2 , . . . , En0 } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of 350
V; 351
(iv) E = {(Ei0 , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )) : TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 ) ≥ 0}, (i0 = 352
1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 353
(v) Vi 6= ∅, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 354
(vi) Ei0 6= ∅, (i0 = 1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 355
P
(vii) i supp(Vi ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 356
0 0
P
(viii) i0 supp(Ei ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n ).
0 357
Here the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ej 0 and the Neutrosophic 358
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) Vj are single valued Neutrosophic sets. TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), 359
and FV 0 (Vi ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 360
indeterminacy-membership and the degree of falsity-membership the Neutrosophic 361
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) V. 362
TV0 (Ei0 ), TV0 (Ei0 ), and TV0 (Ei0 ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 363
indeterminacy-membership and the degree of falsity-membership of the Neutrosophic 364
SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) Ei0 to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) E. Thus, 365
the ii0 th element of the incidence matrix of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) 366
are of the form (Vi , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )), the sets V and E are crisp sets. 367
Definition 3.12 (Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). 368
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). The 370
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ei0 and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 371
(NSHV) Vi of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S = (V, E) could be 372
characterized as follow-up items. 373
(i) If |Vi | = 1, then Vi is called vertex; 374
(ii) if |Vi | ≥ 1, then Vi is called SuperVertex; 375
(iii) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called edge; 376
(iv) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 377
HyperEdge; 378
(v) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called 379
SuperEdge; 380
(vi) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 381
SuperHyperEdge. 382
This SuperHyperModel is too messy and too dense. Thus there’s a need to have 383
some restrictions and conditions on SuperHyperGraph. The special case of this 384
SuperHyperGraph makes the patterns and regularities. 385
Definition 3.13. A graph is SuperHyperUniform if it’s SuperHyperGraph and the 386
number of elements of SuperHyperEdges are the same. 387
To get more visions on SuperHyperUniform, the some SuperHyperClasses are 388
introduced. It makes to have SuperHyperUniform more understandable. 389
Definition 3.14. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. There are some 390
SuperHyperClasses as follows. 391
(i). It’s Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath if it’s only one SuperVertex as 392
intersection amid two given SuperHyperEdges with two exceptions; 393
(ii). it’s SuperHyperCycle if it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two 394
given SuperHyperEdges; 395
(iii). it’s SuperHyperStar it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid all 396
SuperHyperEdges; 397
(iv). it’s SuperHyperBipartite it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two 398
given SuperHyperEdges and these SuperVertices, forming two separate sets, has 399
no SuperHyperEdge in common; 400
(v). it’s SuperHyperMultiPartite it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid 401
two given SuperHyperEdges and these SuperVertices, forming multi separate sets, 402
has no SuperHyperEdge in common; 403
(vi). it’s SuperHyperWheel if it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two 404
given SuperHyperEdges and one SuperVertex has one SuperHyperEdge with any 405
common SuperVertex. 406
Example 3.15. In the Figure (23), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath 407
ESHP : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, in the 408
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (23), is the notion. 409
Example 3.16. In the Figure (24), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle 410
N SHC : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Neutrosophic 411
SuperHyperSet, in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (24), is up. 412
Example 3.17. In the Figure (25), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar 413
ESHS : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, 414
by the Algorithm in previous Neutrosophic result, of the Neutrosophic 415
SuperHyperVertices of the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E), in 416
the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (25), is up. 417
Example 3.18. In the Neutrosophic Figure (26), the connected Neutrosophic 418
SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), is Neutrosophic highlighted and Neutrosophic 419
featured. The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Neutrosophic Algorithm in 420
previous Neutrosophic result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected 421
Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic 422
SuperHyperModel (26), is up. 423
Figure 23. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath Associated to the Notions in the Example

(3.15)
Figure 24. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions

in the Neutrosophic Example (3.16)
Figure 25. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions in

the Neutrosophic Example (3.17)
Figure 26. Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite Neutrosophic Associated to the Neutro-

sophic Notions in the Example (3.18)
Figure 27. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite Associated to the Notions in the

Example (3.19)
Figure 28. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel Neutrosophic Associated to the Neutro-

sophic Notions in the Neutrosophic Example (3.20)
Example 3.19. In the Figure (27), the connected Neutrosophic 424
SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E), is highlighted and Neutrosophic featured. 425
The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Algorithm in previous Neutrosophic 426
result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected Neutrosophic 427
SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (27), 428
is up. 429
Example 3.20. In the Neutrosophic Figure (28), the connected Neutrosophic 430
SuperHyperWheel N SHW : (V, E), is Neutrosophic highlighted and featured. The 431
obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Algorithm in previous result, of the 432
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel 433
ESHW : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (28), is up. 434
Definition 3.21. Let a pair S = (V, E) be a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)

S. Then a sequence of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) and Neutrosophic
SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)
V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs
is called a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic 435
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) V1 to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vs if either 436
of following conditions hold: 437
(i) Vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 438
(ii) there’s a vertex vi ∈ Vi such that vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 439
(iii) there’s a SuperVertex Vi0 ∈ Vi such that Vi0 , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 440
(iv) there’s a vertex vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that Vi , vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 441
0 0
(v) there’s a SuperVertex Vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that Vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 442
(vi) there are a vertex vi ∈ Vi and a vertex vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that vi , vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 443
0 0
(vii) there are a vertex vi ∈ Vi and a SuperVertex Vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 444
(viii) there are a SuperVertex Vi0 ∈ Vi and a vertex vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that Vi0 , vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 445
(ix) there are a SuperVertex Vi0 ∈ Vi and a SuperVertex Vi+1

0
∈ Vi+1 such that 446
0 0
Vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 . 447
Definition 3.22. (Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPaths). 448
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). a

Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV)
V1 to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vs is sequence of Neutrosophic
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) and Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)
V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs ,
could be characterized as follow-up items. 449
(i) If for all Vi , Ej 0 , |Vi | = 1, |Ej 0 | = 2, then NSHP is called path; 450
(ii) if for all Ej 0 , |Ej 0 | = 2, and there’s Vi , |Vi | ≥ 1, then NSHP is called SuperPath; 451
(iii) if for all Vi , Ej 0 , |Vi | = 1, |Ej 0 | ≥ 2, then NSHP is called HyperPath; 452
(iv) if there are Vi , Ej 0 , |Vi | ≥ 1, |Ej 0 | ≥ 2, then NSHP is called Neutrosophic 453
SuperHyperPath . 454
Definition 3.23 (Neutrosophic Strength of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPaths). 455
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). A

Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV)
V1 to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vs is sequence of Neutrosophic
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) and Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)
V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs ,
have 457
(i) Neutrosophic t-strength (min{T (Vi )}, m, n)si=1 ; 458
(ii) Neutrosophic i-strength (m, min{I(Vi )}, n)si=1 ; 459
Table 1. The Values of Vertices, SuperVertices, Edges, HyperEdges, and SuperHy-

perEdges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph Mentioned in the Definition
(3.27)
The Values of The Vertices The Number of Position in Alphabet
The Values of The SuperVertices The maximum Values of Its Vertices
The Values of The Edges The maximum Values of Its Vertices
The Values of The HyperEdges The maximum Values of Its Vertices
The Values of The SuperHyperEdges The maximum Values of Its Endpoints
(iii) Neutrosophic f-strength (m, n, min{F (Vi )})si=1 ; 460
(iv) Neutrosophic strength (min{T (Vi )}, min{I(Vi )}, min{F (Vi )})si=1 . 461
Definition 3.24 (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges 462
(NSHE)). (Ref. [1],Definition 5.4,p.7). 463
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). Consider 464
a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) E = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then E is called 465
(ix) Neutrosophic t-connective if T (E) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic 466
t-strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 467
(NSHV) Vi to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vj where 1 ≤ i, j ≤ s; 468
(x) Neutrosophic i-connective if I(E) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic 469
i-strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 470
(xi) Neutrosophic f-connective if F (E) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic 472
f-strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 473
(xii) Neutrosophic connective if (T (E), I(E), F (E)) ≥ maximum number of 475
Neutrosophic strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic 476
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vj 477
where 1 ≤ i, j ≤ s. 478
For the sake of having a Neutrosophic notion, there’s a need to “redefine” the 479
notion of “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”. The SuperHyperVertices and the 480
SuperHyperEdges are assigned by the labels from the letters of the alphabets. In this 481
procedure, there’s the usage of the position of labels to assign to the values. 482
Definition 3.25. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (SHG) S is a pair 483
S = (V, E). It’s redefined Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph if the Table (1) holds. 484
It’s useful to define a “Neutrosophic” version of SuperHyperClasses. Since there’s 485
more ways to get Neutrosophic type-results to make a Neutrosophic more 486
understandable. 487
Definition 3.26. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (SHG) S is a pair 488
S = (V, E). There are some Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses if the Table (2) 489
holds. Thus Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath , notion, SuperHyperStar, 490
SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultiPartite, and SuperHyperWheel, are 491
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath, Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle, 492
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar, Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite, 493
Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultiPartite, and Neutrosophic 494
SuperHyperWheel if the Table (2) holds. 495

perEdges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, Mentioned in the Definition
(3.26)

perEdges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph Mentioned in the Definition
(3.27)
It’s useful to define a “Neutrosophic” version of a Neutrosophic notion. Since there’s 496
more ways to get type-results to make a Neutrosophic notion more Neutrosophicly 497
understandable. 498
For the sake of having a Neutrosophic notion, there’s a need to “redefine” the 499
Neutrosophic notion of “Neutrosophic notion”. The SuperHyperVertices and the 500
SuperHyperEdges are assigned by the labels from the letters of the alphabets. In this 501
procedure, there’s the usage of the position of labels to assign to the values. 502
Definition 3.27. Assume a notion. It’s redefined a Neutrosophic notion if the 503
Table (3) holds. 504
Example 3.28. Referred to the Example (3.6), assume a Neutrosophic 505
SuperHyperGraph (SHG) S is a pair S = (V, E) in the mentioned Neutrosophic Figures 506
in every Neutrosophic items. 507
SuperHyperGraph (SHG), is up in the illustration of the Table (4). 509
Table 4. The Values of Vertices, SuperVertices, Edges, HyperEdges, and SuperHyper-

Edges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph
Vi (TVi , IVi , FVi ) Ei (TEi , IEi , FEi )
V1 (0.13, 0.13, 0.13) E1 (0, 0, 0)
V2 (0.13, 0.13, 0.13) E2 (0.13, 0.13, 0.13)
V3 (0.15, 0.15, 0.15) E3 (0, 0, 0)
V4 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14) E4 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14)

V1 (0.13, 0.13, 0.13) E1 (0, 0, 0)
V2 (0.03, 0.03, 0.03) E2 (0, 0, 0)
V3 (0.15, 0.15, 0.15) E3 (0, 0, 0)
V4 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14) E4 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14)

V1 (0.13, 0.13, 0.13) E1 (0, 0, 0)
V2 (0.11, 0.11, 0.11) E2 (0, 0, 0)
V3 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14) E3 (0, 0, 0)
- - E4 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14)

V1 (0.13, 0.13, 0.13) E1 (0.08, 0.08, 0.08)
V2 (0.11, 0.11, 0.11) E2 (0.15, 0.15, 0.15)
V3 (0.05, 0.05, 0.05) E3 (0, 0, 0)
V4 (0.12, 0.12, 0.12) E4 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14)
{F } (0.06, 0.06, 0.06) E5 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14)
{H} (0.08, 0.08, 0.08) - -
{N } (0.14, 0.14, 0.14) - -
{O} (0.15, 0.15, 0.15) - -
Figure 29. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite Neutrosophic Associated to the

Neutrosophic Notions in the Neutrosophic Example (4.2)
4 Main Resultant 516
Definition 4.1. (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal Perfect 517
Domination). 518
Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Consider a 519
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then V 0 is called Neutrosophic 520
SuperHyperTotal Perfect Domination if the following expressions, terms and statements is 521
called Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal Perfect Domination criteria holds. 522
X X X
|( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 Vi ∈V 0 Vi ∈V 0
X X X
= min
00 ⊆V
|{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V N SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
Vj ∈ VN SHG , ∃!Vi ∈ V 00 :
Example 4.2. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite (SHG) S is a pair 523
S = (V, E) in the mentioned Neutrosophic Figures in every Neutrosophic items. 524
SuperHyperBipartite (SHG), is up in the illustration of the Table (8). 526
Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Assume 527
SuperHyperPart {Vi }7i=1 . Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet 528
V 0 : DOESN’T EXIST. Then V 0 is called Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal Perfect 529
Domination since the following expressions, terms and statements is called 530
Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal Perfect Domination criteria holds. 531
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={VDOESN’T EXIST }



Edges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) - -
V3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) - -
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)




Figure 36. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath Neutrosophic Associated to the Neutro-








V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) - -
V3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) - -
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
X
I(Vi ),
X
F (Vi ))|
: DOESN’T EXIST :
X X X
= 00 min |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00 00
Vj ∈ VN SHG \ V , ∃!Vi ∈ V :
X
|( T (Vi ),
X
I(Vi ),
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) - -
V3 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) - -
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
X
F (Vi ))|
: DOESN’T EXIST :
X X X
= 00 min |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00 00
Vj ∈ VN SHG \ V , ∃!Vi ∈ V :
X
|( T (Vi ),
X
I(Vi ),
X
F (Vi ))|
: DOESN’T EXIST :
X X X
= 00 min |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00 00
Vj ∈ VN SHG \ V , ∃!Vi ∈ V :
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) - -
V3 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) - -
V4 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) - -
V3 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) - -
V4 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V5 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
X
|( T (Vi ),
X
I(Vi ),
X
F (Vi ))|
: DOESN’T EXIST :
X X X
= 00 min |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00 00
Vj ∈ VN SHG \ V , ∃!Vi ∈ V :
X
|( T (Vi ),
X
I(Vi ),
X
F (Vi ))|
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) - -
V3 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) - -
V4 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V5 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
V6 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
: DOESN’T EXIST :
X X X
= 00 min |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00 00
Vj ∈ VN SHG \ V , ∃!Vi ∈ V :
X
|( T (Vi ),
X
I(Vi ),
X
F (Vi ))|
: DOESN’T EXIST :
X X X
= 00 min |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00 00
Vj ∈ VN SHG \ V , ∃!Vi ∈ V :
X
|( T (Vi ),
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) - -
V3 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) - -
V4 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V5 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
V6 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V7 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
Edges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) Eii=37 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
X
I(Vi ),
X
F (Vi ))|
: DOESN’T EXIST :
X X X
= 00 min |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00 00
Vj ∈ VN SHG \ V , ∃!Vi ∈ V :
Example 4.3. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (SHG) S is a pair S = (V, E) 574
in the mentioned Neutrosophic Figures in every Neutrosophic items. 575
SuperHyperPath (SHG), is up in the illustration of the Table (15). 577
Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Assume 578
SuperHyperExternal {Vi }7i=1 and non-SuperHyperInternal {Vi }34 i=8 . Consider a 579
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 : DOESN’T EXIST. Then V 0 is called 580
Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal Perfect Domination since the following expressions, terms 581
and statements is called Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal Perfect Domination criteria holds. 582
X
|( T (Vi ),
X
I(Vi ),
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={V
DOESN’T EXIST }
: DOESN’T EXIST :
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) Eii=37 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
X X X
= min
00 ⊆V
|{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V N SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00 00
Vj ∈ VN SHG \ V , ∃!Vi ∈ V :
X
|( T (Vi ),
X
I(Vi ),
X
F (Vi ))|
: DOESN’T EXIST :
X X X
= 00 min |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00 00
Vj ∈ VN SHG \ V , ∃!Vi ∈ V :
X
|( T (Vi ),
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) Eii=37 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) Eii=37 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
X
I(Vi ),
X
F (Vi ))|
: DOESN’T EXIST :
X X X
= 00 min |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00 00
Vj ∈ VN SHG \ V , ∃!Vi ∈ V :
X
|( T (Vi ),
X
I(Vi ),
X
F (Vi ))|
: DOESN’T EXIST :
X X X
= 00 min |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00 00
Vj ∈ VN SHG \ V , ∃!Vi ∈ V :
Edges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) Eii=37 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) Eii=37 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)

X
|( T (Vi ),
X
I(Vi ),
X
F (Vi ))|
: DOESN’T EXIST :
X X X
= 00 min |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00 00
Vj ∈ VN SHG \ V , ∃!Vi ∈ V :
SuperHyperExternal {Vi }7i=1 and non-SuperHyperInternal {Vi }34

i=8 . Consider a 614
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) Eii=37 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
X
|( T (Vi ),
X
I(Vi ),
X
F (Vi ))|
: DOESN’T EXIST :
X X X
= 00 min |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00 00
Vj ∈ VN SHG \ V , ∃!Vi ∈ V :
X
|( T (Vi ),
X
I(Vi ),
X
F (Vi ))|
: DOESN’T EXIST :
X X X
= 00 min |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00 00
Vj ∈ VN SHG \ V , ∃!Vi ∈ V :
5 Main Result 625
Theorem 5.1. (Main Result and Main Theorem). 626
Assume every Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite has the letter z. The notion on the 627
Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite and Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath coincide. 628
Proof. 629
(i). Let 630
P :
V1P1 , E1 ,
V1P1 , E2
631
P :
V1P1 , E1 ,
V1P1 , E2
be a longest path taken a connected Extreme SuperHyperBipartite ESHM : (V, E). 632
There’s a new way to redefine as 633
ViEXT ERN AL ∼ VjEXT ERN AL ≡

∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL ∈ Ez ≡
∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , {ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL } ⊆ Ez .
The term “EXTERNAL” implies |N (ViEXT ERN AL )| ≥ |N (Vj )| where Vj is 634
corresponded to ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal Perfect 635
Domination. The latter is straightforward. 636
(ii). Let 637
P :
ViEXT ERN AL , Ei∗ ,
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1
638
P :
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1
is a longest SuperHyperTotal Perfect Domination taken from a connected Extreme 639
SuperHyperPath ESHC : (V, E). There’s a new way to redefine as 640

Domination. The latter is straightforward. Then there’s at least one Neutrosophic 643
SuperHyperTotal Perfect Domination. Thus the notion of quasi isn’t up and the 644
SuperHyperNotions based on Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal Perfect Domination could be 645
applied. The unique embedded Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal Perfect Domination proposes 646
some longest Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal Perfect Domination excerpt from some 647
representatives. The latter is straightforward. 648
Proposition 5.2. Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite ESHM be a pair

S = (V, E). Assume every Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex has the letter z. The
Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal Perfect Domination set is as follows.
{V P1 }.
Proof. Let 649
P :
V1P1 , E1 ,
V2P1 , E2
650
P :
V1P1 , E1 ,
V2P1 , E2

Proposition 5.3. Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite ESHM be a pair

S = (V, E). Assume every Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex has the letter z. The
Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal Perfect Domination number is as follows.
|V P1 | × 0.26.
Proof. Let 656
P :
V1P1 , E1 ,
V1P1 , E2
657
P :
V1Pi , E1 ,
P
V1 j , E2

Proposition 5.4. Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (ESHC) S be a pair S = (V, E). 663
Assume every Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex has the letter z. The Neutrosophic 664
SuperHyperTotal Perfect Domination set is as follows. 665
{
ViEXT ERN AL ,
EXT ERN AL
Vi+1 ,...
}
Proof. Let 666
P :
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1
667
P :
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1

Proposition 5.5. Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (ESHC) S be a pair S = (V, E).

Assume every Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex has the letter z. The Neutrosophic
SuperHyperTotal Perfect Domination number is as follows.
|V |
× 0.26.
2
Proof. Let 678
P :
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1
679
P :
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1

Definition 5.6. (Uniform Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite and Uniform 690
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath). 691
(i). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Every 692
pair of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices has the same maximum letter, i.e., 693
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices mutually has the same maximum letter. A 694
Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E) is called 695
Uniform Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite. 696
(ii). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Every pair of 697
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices has the same maximum letter, i.e., 698
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices mutually has the same maximum letter. A 699
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E) is called Uniform 700
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath. 701
Proposition 5.7. Let an Uniform Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite ESHM be a pair

S = (V, E). The Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal Perfect Domination set is as follows.
{V P1 }.
Proof. Let 702
P :
V1P1 , E1 ,
V2P1 , E2
703
P :
V1P1 , E1 ,
V2P1 , E2

Proposition 5.8. Let an Uniform Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite ESHM be a pair

S = (V, E). The Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal Perfect Domination number is as follows.
|V P1 | × 0.26.
Proof. Let 709
P :
V1P1 , E1 ,
V1P1 , E2
710
P :
V1P1 , E1 ,
V1P1 , E2

Proposition 5.9. Let an Uniform Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (ESHC) S be a pair 716
S = (V, E). The Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal Perfect Domination set is as follows. 717
{
ViEXT ERN AL ,
EXT ERN AL
Vi+1 ,...
}
Proof. Let 718
P :
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1
719
P :
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1

Proposition 5.10. Let an Uniform Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (ESHC) S be a pair

S = (V, E). The Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal Perfect Domination number is as follows.
|V |
× 0.26.
2
Proof. Let 730
P :
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1
731
P :
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1

Proposition 5.11. (Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite and Neutrosophic 742
SuperHyperPath). 743
(i). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Assume 744
two Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, from different SuperHyperParts, have the 745
maximum letter. Then the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices don’t have the same 746
maximum letter, are in every Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal Perfect Domination set. 747
(ii). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Assume every 748
Neutrosophic EXTERNAL SuperHyperVertices with distance two have the 749
maximum letter. Then the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices don’t have the same 750
maximum letter, are in every Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal Perfect Domination set. 751
Proof. 752
(i). Let 753
P :
V1Pi , E1 ,
P
V1 j , E2
754
P :
V1Pi , E1 ,
P
V1 j , E2

(ii). Let 760
P :
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1
761
P :
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1

Proposition 5.12. (Embedded Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite and Embedded 772
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath). 773
(i). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Then two 774
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, from different SuperHyperParts, is in every 775
Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal Perfect Domination set. 776
(ii). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Then every 777
Neutrosophic EXTERNAL SuperHyperVertices with distance two is in every 778
Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal Perfect Domination set. 779
Proof. 780
(i). Let 781
P :
V1Pi , E1 ,
P
V1 j , E2
782
P :
V1Pi , E1 ,
P
V1 j , E2

(ii). Let 788
P :
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1
789
P :
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1

6 Neutrosophic Applications in Cancer’s 800
Neutrosophic Recognition 801
The cancer is the Neutrosophic disease but the Neutrosophic model is going to figure 802
out what’s going on this Neutrosophic phenomenon. The special Neutrosophic case of 803
this Neutrosophic disease is considered and as the consequences of the model, some 804
parameters are used. The cells are under attack of this disease but the moves of the 805
cancer in the special region are the matter of mind. The Neutrosophic recognition of the 806
cancer could help to find some Neutrosophic treatments for this Neutrosophic disease. 807
In the following, some Neutrosophic steps are Neutrosophic devised on this disease. 808
Step 1. (Neutrosophic Definition) The Neutrosophic recognition of the cancer in 809
the long-term Neutrosophic function. 810
Step 2. (Neutrosophic Issue) The specific region has been assigned by the 811
Neutrosophic model [it’s called Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph] and the long 812
Neutrosophic cycle of the move from the cancer is identified by this research. 813
Sometimes the move of the cancer hasn’t be easily identified since there are some 814
determinacy, indeterminacy and neutrality about the moves and the effects of the 815
cancer on that region; this event leads us to choose another model [it’s said to be 816
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph] to have convenient perception on what’s 817
happened and what’s done. 818
Step 3. (Neutrosophic Model) There are some specific Neutrosophic models, 819
which are well-known and they’ve got the names, and some general Neutrosophic 820
models. The moves and the Neutrosophic traces of the cancer on the complex 821
tracks and between complicated groups of cells could be fantasized by a 822
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath(-/SuperHyperTotal Perfect Domination, SuperHyperStar, 823
SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, SuperHyperWheel). The aim is to 824
find either the Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal Perfect Domination or the Neutrosophic 825
SuperHyperTotal Perfect Domination in those Neutrosophic Neutrosophic 826
SuperHyperModels. 827
7 Case 1: The Initial Neutrosophic Steps 828
Toward Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite as 829
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel 830
Step 4. (Neutrosophic Solution) In the Neutrosophic Figure (43), the 831
Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite is Neutrosophic highlighted and Neutrosophic 832
featured. 833
By using the Neutrosophic Figure (43) and the Table (22), the Neutrosophic 834
SuperHyperBipartite is obtained. 835
The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Neutrosophic Algorithm in 836
previous Neutrosophic result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the 837
connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic 838
SuperHyperModel (43), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal Perfect Domination. 839
Figure 43. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite Associated to the Notions of Neutro-

sophic SuperHyperTotal Perfect Domination
Figure 44. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite Associated to the Notions of

Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal Perfect Domination
Edges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite
8 Case 2: The Increasing Neutrosophic Steps 840
Toward Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite as 841
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel 842
Step 4. (Neutrosophic Solution) In the Neutrosophic Figure (44), the 843
Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite is Neutrosophic highlighted and 844
Neutrosophic featured. 845
By using the Neutrosophic Figure (44) and the Table (23), the Neutrosophic 846
SuperHyperMultipartite is obtained. 847
The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Neutrosophic Algorithm in 848
previous result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected 849
Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic 850
SuperHyperModel (44), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal Perfect Domination. 851
9 Wondering Open Problems But As The 852
Directions To Forming The Motivations 853
In what follows, some “problems” and some “questions” are proposed. 854
The SuperHyperTotal Perfect Domination and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal Perfect 855
Domination are defined on a real-world application, titled “Cancer’s Recognitions”. 856
Question 9.1. Which the else SuperHyperModels could be defined based on Cancer’s 857
recognitions? 858
Question 9.2. Are there some SuperHyperNotions related to SuperHyperTotal Perfect 859
and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal Perfect Domination?

Domination 860
Question 9.3. Are there some Algorithms to be defined on the SuperHyperModels to 861
compute them? 862
Question 9.4. Which the SuperHyperNotions are related to beyond the SuperHyperTotal 863
and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal Perfect Domination?

Perfect Domination 864
Problem 9.5. The SuperHyperTotal Perfect Domination and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal 865
do a SuperHyperModel for the Cancer’s recognitions and they’re based on

Perfect Domination 866
SuperHyperTotal Perfect Domination, are there else? 867
Problem 9.6. Which the fundamental SuperHyperNumbers are related to these 868
SuperHyperNumbers types-results? 869
Problem 9.7. What’s the independent research based on Cancer’s recognitions 870
concerning the multiple types of SuperHyperNotions? 871
10 Conclusion and Closing Remarks 872
In this section, closing and concluding remarks are presented. The drawbacks of this 873
scientific research are shown. Some advantages and disadvantages of this scientific 874
research are highlighted. 875
This scientific research uses some approaches to further understand the Neutrosophic 876
SuperHyperGraphs. In this effort, two SuperHyperNotions are defined on the Total 877
Perfect Domination. For this reason, in the second definition, the original definition of 878
the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph is redefined on the position of the alphabets. Based 879
on the new Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph definition, the new SuperHyperNotion, 880
Neutrosophic Total Perfect Domination, finds a suitable background to implement some 881
results on. Some SuperHyperClasses and some Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses are the 882
subjects of this scientific research on modeling areas that are subject to cancer attacks 883
in order to recognize this disease as mentioned under the title “Cancer Diagnosis”. To 884
formalize the SuperHyperNotion, Total Perfect Domination, SuperHyperClasses and 885
new SuperHyperClasses instances are introduced. Some general results are summarized 886
in the Total Perfect Domination and Neutrosophic Total Perfect Domination sections. 887
Clarifications, examples, and literature reviews go all the way. In this scientific research, 888
the literature review has met the lines containing concepts and results. 889
SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph are super-hypermodels in 890
“cancer diagnosis” and both are the foundation of the background of this scientific 891
research. Sometimes cancer has occurred in an area full of cells, cell groups, and 892
embedded styles. In this section, SuperHyperModel proposes SuperHyperNotions, 893
formally called “Total Perfect Domination”, based on the connections of Cancer’s 894
movements in the longest and strongest styles with the formation of design and 895
architecture, in terms of terms and whispering words. . The “SuperHyper” prefix refers 896
to the topic of embedded styles to explore the background of SuperHyperNotions. In 897
the table (24), the advantages and ways of this scientific research are specified, pointed 898
out and expressed. 899
11 Background 900
There are some scientific researches covering the topic of this scientific research. In what 901
follows, there are some discussion and literature reviews about them. 902
Table 24. A look at this scientific research and beyond

Advantages Limitations
1. Redefining the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 1. General Results
2. Total Perfect Domination
3. Neutrosophic Total Perfect Domination 2. Other SuperHyperNumbers
4. modeling cancer diagnoses
5. SuperHyperClasses 3. SuperHyperFamilies
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “New Ideas In Recognition of 903
Cancer And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph As Hyper Tool On Super Toot” in Ref. [1] 904
by Henry Garrett (2023). In this research article, a novel approach is implemented on 905
SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on general forms with 906
introducing used neutrosophic classes of neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. It’s published 907
in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled “Current Trends in Mass Communication 908
(CTMC)” with ISO abbreviation “Curr Trends Mass Comm” in volume 2 and issue 1 909
with pages 32-55. 910
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “Some Super Hyper Degrees 911
and Co-Super Hyper Degrees on Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs And Super Hyper 912
Graphs Alongside Applications in Cancer’s Treatments” in Ref. [2] by Henry Garrett 913
(2023). In this research article, a novel approach is implemented on SuperHyperGraph 914
and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on fundamental notions and using vital tools 915
in Cancer’s Treatments. It’s published in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled 916
“Journal of Mathematical Techniques and Computational Mathematics(JMTCM)” with 917
ISO abbreviation “J Math Techniques Comput Math” in volume 2 and issue 1 with 918
pages 35-47. The research article studies deeply with choosing directly neutrosophic 919
SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough toward independent 920
results based on initial background and fundamental SuperHyperNumbers. 921
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “A Research on Cancer’s 922
Recognition and Neutrosophic Super Hypergraph by Eulerian Super Hyper Cycles and 923
Hamiltonian Sets as Hyper Covering Versus Super separations” in Ref. [3] by Henry 924
Garrett (2023). In this research article, a novel approach is implemented on 925
SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on fundamental notions 926
and using vital tools in Cancer’s Recognition. It’s published in prestigious and fancy 927
journal is entitled “Journal of Mathematical Techniques and Computational 928
Mathematics(JMTCM)” with ISO abbreviation “J Math Techniques Comput Math” in 929
volume 2 and issue 3 with pages 136-148. The research article studies deeply with 930
choosing directly neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph. It’s the 931
breakthrough toward independent results based on initial background and fundamental 932
SuperHyperNumbers. 933
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “Neutrosophic 1-Failed 934
SuperHyperForcing in the SuperHyperFunction to Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs 935
on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Beyond ” in Ref. [4] by Henry Garrett (2023). 936
In this research article, a novel approach is implemented on SuperHyperGraph and 937
neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on fundamental SuperHyperNumber and using 938
neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses of neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. It’s published in 939
prestigious and fancy journal is entitled “Journal of Mathematical Techniques and 940
Computational Mathematics(JMTCM)” with ISO abbreviation “J Math Techniques 941
Comput Math” in volume 2 and issue 6 with pages 221-307. The research article studies 942
deeply with choosing directly neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph. 943
It’s the breakthrough toward independent results based on initial background and 944
fundamental SuperHyperNumbers. The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is 945
titled “New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph by 946
Initial Eulerian-Path-Cut as Hyper Initial Eulogy on Super Initial EULA” in Ref. [5] by 947
Henry Garrett (2023). In this research article, a novel approach is implemented on 948
SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on fundamental 949
SuperHyperNumber and using neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses of neutrosophic 950
SuperHyperGraph. It’s published in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled 951
“International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Research” with ISO 952
abbreviation “IJPAMR” in volume 3 and issue 2 with pages 60-88 and doi: 953
10.51483/IJPAMR.3.2.2023.60-88. The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is 954
titled “New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graph by 955
Eulerian-Path-Cut as Hyper Eulogy-Path-Cut on Super EULA-Path-Cut” in Ref. [6] by 956
SuperHyperGraph. It’s published in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled 960
“International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Research” with ISO 961
abbreviation “IJPAMR” in volume 3 and issue 2 with pages 102-124 and doi: 962
10.51483/IJPAMR.3.2.2023.102-124. The research article studies deeply with choosing 963
directly neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough 964
toward independent results based on initial background and fundamental 965
SuperHyperNumbers. The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “Super 966
Hyper Dominating and Super Hyper Resolving on Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs and 967
Their Directions in Game Theory and Neutrosophic Super Hyper Classes” in Ref. [7] by 968
SuperHyperGraph. It’s published in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled “Journal 972
of Mathematical Techniques and Computational Mathematics(JMTCM)” with ISO 973
abbreviation “J Math Techniques Comput Math” in volume 1 and issue 3 with pages 974
242-263. The research article studies deeply with choosing directly neutrosophic 975
SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough toward independent 976
results based on initial background and fundamental SuperHyperNumbers. The seminal 977
paper and groundbreaking article is titled “neutrosophic co-degree and neutrosophic 978
degree alongside chromatic numbers in the setting of some classes related to neutrosophic 979
hypergraphs” in Ref. [8] by Henry Garrett (2023). In this research article, a novel 980
approach is implemented on SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 981
based on general forms without using neutrosophic classes of neutrosophic 982
SuperHyperGraph. It’s published in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled “Journal 983
of Current Trends in Computer Science Research (JCTCSR)” with ISO abbreviation “J 984
Curr Trends Comp Sci Res” in volume 2 and issue 1 with pages 16-24. The research 985
article studies deeply with choosing neutrosophic hypergraphs instead of neutrosophic 986
SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough toward independent results based on initial 987
background. The research article studies deeply with choosing neutrosophic 988
hypergraphs instead of neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough toward 989
independent results based on initial background. In some articles are titled “0039 — 990
Closing Numbers and Super-Closing Numbers as (Dual)Resolving and (Dual)Coloring 991
alongside (Dual)Dominating in (Neutrosophic)n-SuperHyperGraph” in Ref. [9] by 992
Henry Garrett (2022), “0049 — (Failed)1-Zero-Forcing Number in Neutrosophic Graphs” 993
in Ref. [10] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Extreme SuperHyperClique as the Firm Scheme 994
of Confrontation under Cancer’s Recognition as the Model in The Setting of 995
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [11] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Uncertainty 996
On The Act And Effect Of Cancer Alongside The Foggy Positions Of Cells Toward 997
Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique inside Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Titled 998
Cancer’s Recognition” in Ref. [12] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic Version Of 999
Separates Groups Of Cells In Cancer’s Recognition On Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” 1000
in Ref. [13] by Henry Garrett (2022), “The Shift Paradigm To Classify Separately The 1001
Cells and Affected Cells Toward The Totality Under Cancer’s Recognition By New 1002
Multiple Definitions On the Sets Polynomials Alongside Numbers In The (Neutrosophic) 1003
SuperHyperMatching Theory Based on SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic 1004
SuperHyperGraph” in Ref. [14] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Breaking the Continuity and 1005
Uniformity of Cancer In The Worst Case of Full Connections With Extreme Failed 1006
SuperHyperClique In Cancer’s Recognition Applied in (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” 1007
in Ref. [15] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable as the 1008
Survivors on the Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition Based on Uncertainty to All Modes 1009
in Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [16] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Extremism 1010
of the Attacked Body Under the Cancer’s Circumstances Where Cancer’s Recognition 1011
Titled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [17] by Henry Garrett (2022), 1012
“(Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in Cancer’s Recognitions And 1013
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [18] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic 1014
Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on 1015
Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In Special ViewPoints” in Ref. [19] by Henry 1016
Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in the SuperHyperFunction 1017
To Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition And 1018
Beyond ” in Ref. [20] by Henry Garrett (2022), “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperStable on 1019
Cancer’s Recognition by Well- SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs ” 1020
in Ref. [21] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To 1021
Form Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In 1022
Special ViewPoints” in Ref. [17] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Basic Notions on 1023
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperForcing And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling in Cancer’s 1024
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [22] by Henry Garrett 1025
(2022), “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form Neutrosophic 1026
SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In Special ViewPoints” 1027
in Ref. [23] by Henry Garrett (2022),“(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s 1028
Recognitions Featuring (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances” in 1029
Ref. [24] by Henry Garrett (2022), “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperAlliances With 1030
SuperHyperDefensive and SuperHyperOffensive Type-SuperHyperSet On (Neutrosophic) 1031
SuperHyperGraph With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions 1032
And Related (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClasses” in Ref. [25] by Henry Garrett (2022), 1033
“SuperHyperGirth on SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph With 1034
SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions” in Ref. [26] by Henry Garrett (2022), 1035
“Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on Neutrosophic 1036
SuperHyperGraphs and SuperHyperGraphs Alongside Applications in Cancer’s 1037
Treatments” in Ref. [27] by Henry Garrett (2022), “SuperHyperDominating and 1038
SuperHyperResolving on Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs And Their Directions in 1039
Game Theory and Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses” in Ref. [28] by Henry Garrett 1040
(2022), “SuperHyperMatching By (R-)Definitions And Polynomials To Monitor 1041
Cancer’s Recognition In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [234] by Henry 1042
Garrett (2023), “The Focus on The Partitions Obtained By Parallel Moves In The 1043
Cancer’s Extreme Recognition With Different Types of Extreme SuperHyperMatching Set 1044
and Polynomial on (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [235] by Henry Garrett 1045
(2023), “Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique Decides the Failures on the Cancer’s 1046
Recognition in the Perfect Connections of Cancer’s Attacks By SuperHyperModels 1047
Named (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [236] by Henry Garrett (2023), 1048
“Indeterminacy On The All Possible Connections of Cells In Front of Cancer’s Attacks 1049
In The Terms of Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique on Cancer’s Recognition called 1050
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [237] by Henry Garrett (2023), “Perfect 1051
Directions Toward Idealism in Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition Forwarding 1052
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClique on Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [240] by 1053
Henry Garrett (2023), “Demonstrating Complete Connections in Every Embedded 1054
Regions and Sub-Regions in the Terms of Cancer’s Recognition and (Neutrosophic) 1055
SuperHyperGraphs With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClique” in Ref. [241] by Henry 1056
Garrett (2023), “Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic Regions titled 1057
neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable in Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition modeled in 1058
the Form of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [244] by Henry Garrett (2023), 1059
“Using the Tool As (Neutrosophic) Failed SuperHyperStable To SuperHyperModel 1060
Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [247] by Henry 1061
Garrett (2023), “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form Neutrosophic 1062
SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In Special ViewPoints” 1063
in Ref. [248] by Henry Garrett (2023), “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperStable on Cancer’s 1064
Recognition by Well-SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in 1065
Ref. [249] by Henry Garrett (2023), “Neutrosophic 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in the 1066
SuperHyperFunction To Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs on Cancer’s Neutrosophic 1067
Recognition And Beyond ” in Ref. [250] by Henry Garrett (2022), “(Neutrosophic) 1068
1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in Cancer’s Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) 1069
SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [251] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Basic Notions on 1070
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperForcing And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling in Cancer’s 1071
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [252] by Henry Garrett 1072
(2022), “Basic Neutrosophic Notions Concerning SuperHyperDominating and 1073
Neutrosophic SuperHyperResolving in SuperHyperGraph” in Ref. [263] by Henry 1074
Garrett (2022), “Initial Material of Neutrosophic Preliminaries to Study Some 1075
Neutrosophic Notions Based on Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) in Neutrosophic 1076
SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)” in Ref. [264] by Henry Garrett (2022), and [4–264], there 1077
are some endeavors to formalize the basic SuperHyperNotions about neutrosophic 1078
SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph alongside scientific research books 1079
at [265–403]. Two popular scientific research books in Scribd in the terms of high 1080
readers, 5679 and 6667 respectively, on neutrosophic science is on [404, 405]. 1081
Some scientific studies and scientific researches about neutrosophic graphs, are 1082
proposed as book in Ref. [404] by Henry Garrett (2023) which is indexed by Google 1083
Scholar and has more than 5679 readers in Scribd. It’s titled “Beyond Neutrosophic 1084
Graphs” and published by Dr. Henry Garrett. This research book covers different types 1085
of notions and settings in neutrosophic graph theory and neutrosophic 1086
SuperHyperGraph theory. 1087
Also, some scientific studies and scientific researches about neutrosophic graphs, are 1088
proposed as book in Ref. [405] by Henry Garrett (2023) which is indexed by Google 1089
Scholar and has more than 6667 readers in Scribd. It’s titled “Neutrosophic Duality” 1090
and published by Dr. Henry Garrett. This research book presents different types of 1091
notions SuperHyperResolving and SuperHyperDominating in the setting of duality in 1092
neutrosophic graph theory and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph theory. This research 1093
book has scrutiny on the complement of the intended set and the intended set, 1094
simultaneously. It’s smart to consider a set but acting on its complement that what’s 1095
done in this research book which is popular in the terms of high readers in Scribd. 1096
See the seminal scientific researches [1–3]. The formalization of the notions on the 1097
framework of notions in SuperHyperGraphs, Neutrosophic notions in 1098
SuperHyperGraphs theory, and (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs theory at [4–264] 1099
alongside scientific research books at [265–403]. Two popular scientific research books 1100
in Scribd ,in the terms of high readers, 5679 and 6667 respectively, on neutrosophic 1101
science is on [404, 405]. 1102
References 1103
1. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 1104
SuperHyperGraph As Hyper Tool On Super Toot”, Curr Trends Mass Comm 1105
2(1) (2023) 32-55. (doi: 10.33140/CTMC.02.01.03). 1106
2. Henry Garrett, “Some Super Hyper Degrees and Co-Super Hyper Degrees on 1107
Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs And Super Hyper Graphs Alongside 1108
Applications in Cancer’s Treatments”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 2(1) 1109
(2023) 35-47. (doi: 10.33140/JMTCM.02.01.05). 1110
3. Henry Garrett, “A Research on Cancer’s Recognition and Neutrosophic Super 1111
Hypergraph by Eulerian Super Hyper Cycles and Hamiltonian Sets as Hyper 1112
Covering Versus Super separations”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 2(3) 1113
(2023) 136-148. (doi: 10.33140/JMTCM.02.03.03). 1114
4. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in the 1115
SuperHyperFunction to Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs on Cancer’s 1116
Neutrosophic Recognition and Beyond ”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 2(6) 1117
(2023) 221-307. (doi: 10.33140/JMTCM.02.06.04). 1118
5. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic 1119
SuperHyperGraph by Initial Eulerian-Path-Cut as Hyper Initial Eulogy on Super 1120
Initial EULA”, International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics 1121
Research 3(2) (2023) 60-88. (doi: 10.51483/IJPAMR.3.2.2023.60-88). 1122
6. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic Super 1123
Hyper Graph by Eulerian-Path-Cut as Hyper Eulogy-Path-Cut on Super 1124
EULA-Path-Cut”, International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics 1125
Research 3(2) (2023) 102-124. (doi: 10.51483/IJPAMR.3.2.2023.102-124). 1126
7. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic Super 1127
Hyper Graph by Eulerian-Path-Cut as Hyper Eulogy-Path-Cut on Super 1128
EULA-Path-Cut”, J Curr Trends Comp Sci Res 2(1) (2023) 16-24. (doi: 1129
10.33140/JCTCSR.02.01.04) 1130
8. Henry Garrett, “Super Hyper Dominating and Super Hyper Resolving on 1131
Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs and Their Directions in Game Theory and 1132
Neutrosophic Super Hyper Classes”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 1(3) 1133
(2022) 242-263. (doi: 10.33140/JMTCM.01.03.09) 1134
9. Garrett, Henry. “0039 — Closing Numbers and Super-Closing Numbers as 1135
(Dual)Resolving and (Dual)Coloring alongside (Dual)Dominating in 1136
(Neutrosophic)n-SuperHyperGraph.” CERN European Organization for Nuclear 1137
Research - Zenodo, Nov. 2022. CERN European Organization for Nuclear 1138
Research, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6319942. 1139
https://oa.mg/work/10.5281/zenodo.6319942 1140
10. Garrett, Henry. “0049 — (Failed)1-Zero-Forcing Number in Neutrosophic 1141
Graphs.” CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research - Zenodo, Feb. 1142
2022. CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research, 1143
https://doi.org/10.13140/rg.2.2.35241.26724. 1144
https://oa.mg/work/10.13140/rg.2.2.35241.26724 1145
11. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperClique as the Firm Scheme of 1146
Confrontation under Cancer’s Recognition as the Model in The Setting of 1147
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010308 (doi: 1148
10.20944/preprints202301.0308.v1). 1149
12. Henry Garrett, “Uncertainty On The Act And Effect Of Cancer Alongside The 1150
Foggy Positions Of Cells Toward Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique inside 1151
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Titled Cancer’s Recognition”, Preprints 2023, 1152
2023010282 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0282.v1). 1153
13. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Version Of Separates Groups Of Cells In 1154
Cancer’s Recognition On Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 1155
2023010267 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0267.v1). 1156
14. Henry Garrett, “The Shift Paradigm To Classify Separately The Cells and 1157
Affected Cells Toward The Totality Under Cancer’s Recognition By New 1158
Multiple Definitions On the Sets Polynomials Alongside Numbers In The 1159
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperMatching Theory Based on SuperHyperGraph and 1160
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”, Preprints 2023, 2023010265 (doi: 1161
10.20944/preprints202301.0265.v1). 1162
15. Henry Garrett, “Breaking the Continuity and Uniformity of Cancer In The 1163
Worst Case of Full Connections With Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique In 1164
Cancer’s Recognition Applied in (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 1165
2023, 2023010262,(doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0262.v1). 1166
16. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable as the Survivors on the 1167
Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition Based on Uncertainty to All Modes in 1168
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010240 (doi: 1169
10.20944/preprints202301.0240.v1). 1170
17. Henry Garrett, “Extremism of the Attacked Body Under the Cancer’s 1171
Circumstances Where Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) 1172
SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010224, (doi: 1173
10.20944/preprints202301.0224.v1). 1174
18. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in Cancer’s 1175
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 1176
2023010105 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 1177
19. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form 1178
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions 1179
In Special ViewPoints”, Preprints 2023, 2023010088 (doi: 1180
10.20944/preprints202301.0088.v1). 1181
SuperHyperFunction To Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs on Cancer’s 1183
Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond ”, Preprints 2023, 2023010044 1184
21. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperStable on Cancer’s Recognition by 1185
Well- SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 1186
2023010043 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0043.v1). 1187
22. Henry Garrett, “Basic Notions on (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperForcing And 1188
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling in Cancer’s Recognitions And 1189
10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 1191
10.20944/preprints202301.0088.v1). 1195
24. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions 1196
Featuring (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances”, Preprints 1197
2022, 2022120549 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0549.v1). 1198
25. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperAlliances With SuperHyperDefensive 1199
and SuperHyperOffensive Type-SuperHyperSet On (Neutrosophic) 1200
SuperHyperGraph With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s 1201
Recognitions And Related (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClasses”, Preprints 2022, 1202
2022120540 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0540.v1). 1203
26. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperGirth on SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic 1204
SuperHyperGraph With SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions”, 1205
Preprints 2022, 2022120500 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0500.v1). 1206
27. Henry Garrett, “Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on 1207
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs and SuperHyperGraphs Alongside Applications 1208
in Cancer’s Treatments”, Preprints 2022, 2022120324 (doi: 1209
10.20944/preprints202212.0324.v1). 1210
28. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDominating and SuperHyperResolving on 1211
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs And Their Directions in Game Theory and 1212
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”, Preprints 2022, 2022110576 (doi: 1213
10.20944/preprints202211.0576.v1). 1214
29. Henry Garrett, “Star and Wheel on Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic 1215
SuperHyperGraph with a Specific Type of Independency of 1216
SuperHyperVertices”, Preprints 2024, , 2024020663 (doi: 1217
10.20944/preprints202402.0663.v1). 1218
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By Perfect Domination”, Zenodo 2023, 1220
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10899659). 1221
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By Perfect Domination”, Zenodo 1223
2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10895887). 1224
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By Perfect Domination”, 1226
Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10888691). 1227
SuperHyperGraph With Counterproposal Star and Counteroffer Wheel By 1229
Counterargument Stable Sequence As Hyper Findings On Super Gatherings”, 1230
SuperHyperGraph With Counterproposal Bipartite and Counteroffer Path By 1233
Counterargument Stable Sequence As Hyper Findings On Super Gatherings”, 1234
SuperHyperGraph With Counterproposal Multipartite and Counteroffer Cycle 1237
By Counterargument Stable Sequence As Hyper Findings On Super 1238
Gatherings”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10640905). 1239
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By Strongly Resolving Sequence As 1241
Hyper Decoration On Super Density”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1242
10.13140/RG.2.2.17389.97769). 1243
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By Strongly Resolving Sequence As 1245
Hyper Decoration On Super Density”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1246
10.13140/RG.2.2.28685.10727). 1247
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By Strongly Resolving Sequence 1249
As Hyper Decoration On Super Density”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1250
10.13140/RG.2.2.24994.20169). 1251
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By Dominating Sequence As Hyper 1253
Decoration On Super Density”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10371529). 1254
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By Dominating Sequence As Hyper 1256
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By Dominating Sequence As 1259
Hyper Decoration On Super Density”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1260
10.5281/zenodo.10263440). 1261
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By STABLE As Hyper Decoration On 1263
Super Density”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10028600). 1264
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By STABLE As Hyper Decoration 1266
On Super Density”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8310454). 1267
44. Henry Garrett, “Recognition of Cancer With Bipartite and Path as 1268
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph By the Tool Called Stability”, Preprints 2023, 1269
2023081972 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202308.1972.v1). 1270
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By STABLE As Hyper 1272
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By REVERSE CONNECTIVE 1275
DOMINATION As Hyper Decoration On Super Density”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1276
10.5281/zenodo.8206877). 1277
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By REVERSE CONNECTIVE 1279
10.5281/zenodo.8206834). 1281
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By REVERSE CONNECTIVE 1283
10.5281/zenodo.8206773). 1285
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By EQUAL CONNECTIVE 1287
10.5281/zenodo.8201319). 1289
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By EQUAL CONNECTIVE 1291
10.5281/zenodo.8201255). 1293
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By EQUAL CONNECTIVE 1295
10.5281/zenodo.8201165). 1297
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By CONNECTIVE DOMINATION As 1299
Hyper Decoration On Super Density”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1300
10.5281/zenodo.8196147). 1301
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By CONNECTIVE DOMINATION 1303
As Hyper Decoration On Super Density”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1304
10.5281/zenodo.8196132). 1305
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By CONNECTIVE 1307
10.5281/zenodo.8196099). 1309
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By DOMINATION As Hyper 1311
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By DOMINATION As Hyper 1314
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By DOMINATION As Hyper 1317
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperPerfect Search As Hyper Perf On Super 1320
Perfidy”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8104836). 1321
59. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Perfidy By Hyper Perf Of 1322
SuperHyperPerfect Search In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1323
SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8104857). 1324
SuperHyperGraph By Reverse Strict Dimension Dominating As Hyper Dimple 1326
On Super Dimity”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8092796). 1327
61. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Dimity By Hyper Dimple Of Reverse 1328
Strict Dimension Dominating In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1329
SuperHyperGraph By Unequal Dimension Dominating As Hyper Dimple On 1332
Super Dimity”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8088438). 1333
63. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Dimity By Hyper Dimple Of Unequal 1334
Dimension Dominating In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1335
SuperHyperGraph By Strict Dimension Dominating As Hyper Dimple On Super 1338
Dimity”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8084436). 1339
65. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Dimity By Hyper Dimple Of Strict 1340
SuperHyperGraph By Reverse Strict Connective As Hyper Conceit On Super 1344
Con”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8080100). 1345
67. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Con By Hyper Conceit Of Reverse Strict 1346
Connective In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, 1347
SuperHyperGraph By Unequal Connective Dominating As Hyper Conceit On 1350
Super Con”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8078445). 1351
69. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Con By Hyper Conceit Of Unequal 1352
Connective Dominating In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1353
SuperHyperGraph By Strict Connective Dominating As Hyper Conceit On 1356
71. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Con By Hyper Conceit Of Strict 1358
SuperHyperGraph By Reverse Dimension Dominating As Hyper Dimple On 1362
Super Dimity”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8072171). 1363
73. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Dimity By Hyper Dimple Of Reverse 1364
SuperHyperGraph By Equal Dimension Dominating As Hyper Dimple On Super 1368
75. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Dimity By Hyper Dimple Of Equal 1370
SuperHyperGraph By Dimension Dominating As Hyper Dimple On Super 1374
77. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Dimity By Hyper Dimple Of Dimension 1376
Dominating In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, 1377
SuperHyperGraph By Reverse Connective Dominating As Hyper Conceit On 1380
79. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Con By Hyper Conceit Of Reverse 1382
SuperHyperGraph By Equal Connective Dominating As Hyper Conceit On 1386
81. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Con By Hyper Conceit Of Equal 1388
SuperHyperGraph By Connective Dominating As Hyper Conceit On Super 1392
Con”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8051346). 1393
83. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Con By Hyper Conceit Of Connective 1394
SuperHyperGraph By United Dominating As Hyper Ultra On Super Units”, 1398
85. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Units By Hyper Ultra Of United 1400
SuperHyperGraph By Zero Forcing As Hyper ford On Super forceps”, Zenodo 1404
2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8017246). 1405
87. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super forceps By Hyper ford Of Zero Forcing In 1406
Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 2023, 1407
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8020128). 1408
SuperHyperGraph By Matrix-Based As Hyper mat On Super matte”, Zenodo 1410
2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7978571). 1411
89. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super mat By Hyper matte Of Matrix-Based In 1412
Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 2023, 1413
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7978857). 1414
SuperHyperGraph By Dominating-Edges As Hyper Dome On Super Eddy”, 1416
91. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Eddy By Hyper Dome Of 1418
Dominating-Edges In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1419
SuperHyperGraph By Edge-Gap As Hyper Gape On Super Gab”, Zenodo 2023, 1422
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7916595). 1423
93. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Gab By Hyper Gape Of Edge-Gap In 1424
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7923632). 1426
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On 1428
Super Nebulous”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7904698). 1429
95. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nebulous By Hyper Nebbish Of 1430
Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1431
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition As Hyper 1434
Decompress On Super Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1435
10.5281/zenodo.7904529). 1436
97. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Decompensation By Hyper Decompress Of 1437
Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With 1438
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1439
10.5281/zenodo.7904401). 1440
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut As Hyper Nebbish On Super 1442
Nebulous”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7871026). 1443
Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1445
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Cycle-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super 1448
Eulerian-Cycle-Neighbor In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1451
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Cycle-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On 1454
Super Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7855661). 1455
Eulerian-Cycle-Decomposition In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1457
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Cycle-Cut As Hyper Eulogy On Super EULA”, 1460
105. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super EULA By Hyper Eulogy Of 1462
Eulerian-Cycle-Cut In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1463
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Path-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super 1466
Eulerian-Type-Path-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1469
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Path-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress 1472
On Super Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7839333). 1473
Eulerian-Type-Path-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1475
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Path-Cut As Hyper Eulogy On Super 1478
EULA”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7834229). 1479
Eulerian-Type-Path-Cut In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1481
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Path-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super 1484
Eulerian-Path-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1487
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Path-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On 1490
Eulerian-Path-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1493
SuperHyperGraph As Hyper Tool On Super Toot”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1496
10.5281/zenodo.7812236). 1497
SuperHyperGraph By initial Eulerian-Path-Cut As Hyper initial Eulogy On 1499
Super initial EULA”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7809365). 1500
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Path-Cut As Hyper Eulogy-Path-Cut On Super 1502
EULA-Path-Cut”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7809358). 1503
Eulerian-Path-Cut In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1505
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Path-Cut As Hyper Eulogy On Super EULA”, 1508
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On 1511
Super Nebulous”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7806767). 1512
Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1514
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition As Hyper 1517
Decompress On Super Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1518
10.5281/zenodo.7804238). 1519
Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With 1521
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7804228). 1522
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut As Hyper Hamper On Super 1524
Hammy”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7799902). 1525
126. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Hammy By Hyper Hamper Of 1526
Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1527
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Cycle-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super 1530
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Cycle-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress 1533
On Super Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7793372). 1534
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Cycle-Cut As Hyper Hamper On Super 1536
Hammy”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7791952). 1537
Hamiltonian-Cycle-Cut In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1539
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super 1542
Hamiltonian-Neighbor In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1545
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On 1548
Hamiltonian-Decomposition In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1551
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Cut As Hyper Hamper On Super Hammy”, 1554
Hamiltonian-Cut In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1557
SuperHyperGraph By Trace-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 1560
Trace-Neighbor In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1563
139. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 1565
SuperHyperGraph By Trace-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On Super 1566
Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7771831). 1567
Trace-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1569
SuperHyperGraph By Trace-Cut As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 1572
ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.20913.25446). 1573
142. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Tract By Hyper Track Of Trace-Cut In 1574
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7764916). 1576
SuperHyperGraph By Edge-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 1578
Edge-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, 1581
SuperHyperGraph By Edge-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On Super 1584
Decompensation”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.22545.10089). 1585
Edge-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1587
SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.29544.34564). 1588
SuperHyperGraph By Edge-Cut As Hyper Edify On Super Eddy”, ResearchGate 1590
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.11377.76644). 1591
148. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Eddy By Hyper Edify Of Edge-Cut In 1592
Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 1593
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.23750.96329). 1594
SuperHyperGraph By Vertex-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 1596
Vertex-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1599
SuperHyperGraph By Vertex-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On Super 1602
Decompensation”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.30212.81289). 1603
Vertex-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1605
SuperHyperGraph By Vertex-Cut As Hyper Vertu On Super Vertigo”, 1608
154. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Vertigo By Hyper Vertu Of Vertex-Cut In 1610
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.32467.25124). 1612
SuperHyperGraph By Stable-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 1614
156. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nebulizer By Hyper Nub Of 1616
Stable-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1617
SuperHyperGraph By Stable-Decompositions As Hyper Stain On Super Stagy”, 1620
158. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Stale By Hyper Stalk Of 1622
Stable-Decompositions In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1623
SuperHyperGraph By Stable-Cut As Hyper Stain On Super Stagy”, 1626
160. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Stale By Hyper Stalk Of Stable-Cut In 1628
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.20170.24000). 1630
SuperHyperGraph By Clique-Neighbors As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 1632
162. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nebulizer By Hyper Nub Of 1634
Clique-Neighbors In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1635
SuperHyperGraph By Clique-Decompositions As Hyper Decompile On Super 1638
Decommission”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.18780.87683). 1639
Clique- Decompositions In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1641
SuperHyperGraph By Clique-Cut As Hyper Click On Super Cliche”, 1644
166. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Cliff By Hyper Cling Of Clique-Cut In 1646
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.27392.30721). 1648
SuperHyperGraph By Space As Hyper Spin On Super Spacy”, ResearchGate 1650
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.33028.40321). 1651
SuperHyperGraph By List- Coloring As Hyper List On Super Lisle”, 1653
169. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Lith By Hyper Lite Of List-Coloring In 1655
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.16356.04489). 1657
SuperHyperGraph By Space As Hyper Sparse On Super Spark ”, ResearchGate 1659
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.21756.21129). 1660
171. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Solidarity By Hyper Soul Of Space In 1661
Cancer’s Recognition With (Extreme) SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023, 1662
(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.30983.68009). 1663
SuperHyperGraph By Edge-Connectivity As Hyper Disclosure On Super 1665
Closure”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.28552.29445). 1666
173. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Uniform By Hyper Deformation Of 1667
Edge-Connectivity In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1668
SuperHyperGraph By Vertex-Connectivity As Hyper Leak On Super Structure”, 1671
175. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super System By Hyper Explosions Of 1673
Vertex-Connectivity In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1674
SuperHyperGraph By Tree-Decomposition As Hyper Forward On Super Returns”, 1677
177. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nodes By Hyper Moves Of 1679
Tree-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1680
SuperHyperGraph By Chord As Hyper Excellence On Super Excess”, 1683
179. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Gap By Hyper Navigations Of Chord In 1685
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.11172.14720). 1687
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyper(i,j)-Domination As Hyper Controller On 1689
Super Waves”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.22011.80165). 1690
181. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Coincidence By Hyper Routes Of 1691
SuperHyper(i,j)-Domination In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1692
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperEdge-Domination As Hyper Reversion On 1695
Super Indirection”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.10493.84962). 1696
183. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Obstacles By Hyper Model Of 1697
SuperHyperEdge-Domination In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1698
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperK-Domination As Hyper k-Actions On Super 1701
Patterns”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.19944.14086). 1702
185. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Harmony By Hyper k-Function Of 1703
SuperHyperK-Domination In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1704
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperK-Number As Hyper k-Partition On Super 1707
Layers”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.33103.76968). 1708
187. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Gradient By Hyper k-Class Of 1709
SuperHyperK-Number In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1710
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperOrder As Hyper Enumerations On Super 1713
Landmarks”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.35646.56641). 1714
189. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Analogous By Hyper Visions Of 1715
SuperHyperOrder In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1716
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperColoring As Hyper Categories On Super 1719
Neighbors”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.13973.81121). 1720
191. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Relations By Hyper Identifications Of 1721
SuperHyperColoring In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1722
192. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Contradiction By Hyper Detection of 1724
SuperHyperDefensive In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic 1725
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperDimension As Hyper Distinguishing On Super 1728
Distances”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.31956.88961). 1729
194. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Locations By Hyper Differing Of 1730
SuperHyperDimension In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1731
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperDominating As Hyper Closing On Super 1734
Messy”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.21510.45125). 1735
196. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Missing By Hyper Searching Of 1736
SuperHyperDominating In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1737
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperConnected As Hyper Group On Super Surge”, 1740
198. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Outbreak By Hyper Collections Of 1742
SuperHyperConnected In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1743
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperTotal As Hyper Covering On Super Infections”, 1746
200. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Extremism By Hyper Treatments Of 1748
SuperHyperTotal In Cancer’s Recognition with (Neutrosophic) 1749
201. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Isolation By Hyper Perfectness Of 1751
SuperHyperPerfect In Cancer’s Recognition with (Neutrosophic) 1752
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperPerfect As Hyper Idealism On Super Vacancy”, 1755
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperJoin As Hyper Separations On Super Sorts”, 1758
204. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super connections By Hyper disconnections Of 1760
SuperHyperJoin In Cancer’s Recognition with (Neutrosophic) 1761
205. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Mixed-Devastations By Hyper Decisions 1763
Of SuperHyperDuality In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic 1764
206. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition As (Neutrosophic) 1766
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperDuality As Hyper Imaginations On Super 1767
Mixed-Illustrations”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.33275.80161). 1768
207. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition As (Neutrosophic) 1769
SuperHyperGraph By Path SuperHyperColoring As Hyper Correction On Super 1770
Faults”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.30182.50241). 1771
208. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Reflections By Hyper Rotations Of Path 1772
SuperHyperColoring In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic 1773
209. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas As Hyper Deformations On Super Chains In 1775
Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph By 1776
SuperHyperDensity”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.13444.60806). 1777
210. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas As Hyper Ignorance By SuperHyperDensity On 1778
Super Resistances In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic 1779
SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.16800.05123). 1780
211. Henry Garrett, “New Research On Cancer’s Recognition and Neutrosophic 1781
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian SuperHyperCycles and Hamiltonian Sets As 1782
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-VI ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1783
10.13140/RG.2.2.29913.80482). 1784
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-V ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1787
10.13140/RG.2.2.33269.24809). 1788
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-IV ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1791
10.13140/RG.2.2.34946.96960). 1792
214. Henry Garrett, “A Research On Cancer’s Recognition and Neutrosophic 1793
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-III ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1795
10.13140/RG.2.2.14814.31040). 1796
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-II ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1799
10.13140/RG.2.2.15653.17125). 1800
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-I ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1803
10.13140/RG.2.2.25719.50089). 1804
217. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Disruptions In Cancer’s Extreme 1805
Recognition As Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph By Hyper Plans Called 1806
SuperHyperConnectivities”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1807
10.13140/RG.2.2.29441.94562). 1808
218. Henry Garrett, “Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition As Neutrosophic 1809
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperConnectivities As Hyper Diagnosis On Super 1810
Mechanism”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.17252.24968). 1811
219. Henry Garrett,“Cancer’s Recognition and (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph By 1812
the Criteria of Eulerian and Hamiltonian Type-Sets As Hyper Modified Cycles 1813
On Super Mess”, ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.16652.59525). 1814
220. Henry Garrett,“Eulerian and Hamiltonian In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition 1815
and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph On Super Interactions By Hyper Extensions 1816
of Cycles”, ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.34583.24485). 1817
221. Henry Garrett,“SuperHyperGirth Type-Results on extreme SuperHyperGirth 1818
theory and (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs Toward Cancer’s extreme 1819
Recognition”, Preprints 2023, 2023010396 (doi: 1820
10.20944/preprints202301.0396.v1). 1821
222. Henry Garrett,“Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Warns Hyper Landmark of 1822
neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth In Super Type-Versions of Cancer’s neutrosophic 1823
Recognition”, Preprints 2023, 2023010395 (doi: 1824
10.20944/preprints202301.0395.v1). 1825
223. Henry Garrett,“The Constructions of (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs on the 1826
Cancer’s Recognition in The Confrontation With Super Attacks In Hyper 1827
Situations By Implementing (Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in The 1828
Technical Approaches to Neutralize SuperHyperViews”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1829
10.13140/RG.2.2.26240.51204). 1830
224. Henry Garrett,“(Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing As the 1831
Entrepreneurs on Cancer’s Recognitions To Fail Forcing Style As the Super 1832
Classes With Hyper Effects In The Background of the Framework is So-Called 1833
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1834
10.13140/RG.2.2.12818.73925). 1835
225. Henry Garrett,“Super Actions On The Types of Hyper Levels In The Sensible 1836
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth On Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and 1837
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 1838
10.13140/RG.2.2.26836.88960). 1839
226. Henry Garrett,“SuperHyperGirth Approaches on the Super Challenges on the 1840
Cancer’s Recognition In the Hyper Model of (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, 1841
ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.36745.93289). 1842
227. Henry Garrett,“Extreme SuperHyperClique as the Firm Scheme of 1843
Confrontation under Cancer’s Recognition as the Model in The Setting of 1844
10.20944/preprints202301.0308.v1). 1846
228. Henry Garrett,“Uncertainty On The Act And Effect Of Cancer Alongside The 1847
Foggy Positions Of Cells Toward Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique inside 1848
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Titled Cancer’s Recognition”, Preprints 2023, 1849
2023010282 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0282.v1). 1850
229. Henry Garrett,“Neutrosophic Version Of Separates Groups Of Cells In Cancer’s 1851
Recognition On Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010267 1852
(doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0267.v1).). 1853
230. Henry Garrett, “The Shift Paradigm To Classify Separately The Cells and 1854
Affected Cells Toward The Totality Under Cancer’s Recognition By New 1855
Multiple Definitions On the Sets Polynomials Alongside Numbers In The 1856
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperMatching Theory Based on SuperHyperGraph and 1857
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”, Preprints 2023, 2023010265 (doi: 1858
10.20944/preprints202301.0265.v1). 1859
231. Henry Garrett,“Breaking the Continuity and Uniformity of Cancer In The 1860
Worst Case of Full Connections With Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique In 1861
Cancer’s Recognition Applied in (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 1862
2023, 2023010262,(doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0262.v1). 1863
232. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable as the Survivors on the 1864
Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition Based on Uncertainty to All Modes in 1865
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010240 (doi: 1866
10.20944/preprints202301.0240.v1). 1867
233. Henry Garrett, “Extremism of the Attacked Body Under the Cancer’s 1868
Circumstances Where Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) 1869
SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010224, (doi: 1870
10.20944/preprints202301.0224.v1). 1871
234. Henry Garrett,“SuperHyperMatching By (R-)Definitions And Polynomials To 1872
Monitor Cancer’s Recognition In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, 1873
ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.35061.65767). 1874
235. Henry Garrett,“The Focus on The Partitions Obtained By Parallel Moves In 1875
The Cancer’s Extreme Recognition With Different Types of Extreme 1876
SuperHyperMatching Set and Polynomial on (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, 1877
236. Henry Garrett,“Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique Decides the Failures on the 1879
Cancer’s Recognition in the Perfect Connections of Cancer’s Attacks By 1880
SuperHyperModels Named (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 1881
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.32530.73922). 1882
237. Henry Garrett,“Indeterminacy On The All Possible Connections of Cells In 1883
Front of Cancer’s Attacks In The Terms of Neutrosophic Failed 1884
SuperHyperClique on Cancer’s Recognition called Neutrosophic 1885
SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.15897.70243). 1886
238. Henry Garrett,“Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique Decides the Failures on the 1887
Cancer’s Recognition in the Perfect Connections of Cancer’s Attacks By 1888
SuperHyperModels Named (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 1889
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.32530.73922). 1890
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 1892
2023010105 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 1893
240. Henry Garrett,“Perfect Directions Toward Idealism in Cancer’s Neutrosophic 1894
Recognition Forwarding Neutrosophic SuperHyperClique on Neutrosophic 1895
241. Henry Garrett,“Demonstrating Complete Connections in Every Embedded 1897
Regions and Sub-Regions in the Terms of Cancer’s Recognition and 1898
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClique”, 1899
10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 1904
10.20944/preprints202301.0088.v1). 1908
244. Henry Garrett,“Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic Regions titled 1909
neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable in Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition 1910
modeled in the Form of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2023, 1911
(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.17385.36968). 1912
Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond ”, Preprints 2023, 2023010044 1915
Well- SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 1917
2023010043 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0043.v1). 1918
247. Henry Garrett, “Using the Tool As (Neutrosophic) Failed SuperHyperStable To 1919
SuperHyperModel Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) 1920
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In 1923
Special ViewPoints”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.11447.80803). 1924
Well-SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 1926
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.35774.77123). 1927
Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond ”, ResearchGate 2022, (doi: 1930
10.13140/RG.2.2.36141.77287). 1931
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2022, (doi: 1933
10.13140/RG.2.2.29430.88642). 1934
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2022, (doi: 1937
10.13140/RG.2.2.11369.16487). 1938
Featuring (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances”, Preprints 1940
2022, 2022120549 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0549.v1). 1941
Featuring (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances”, 1943
Recognitions And Related (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClasses”, Preprints 2022, 1948
2022120540 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0540.v1). 1949
Recognitions And Related (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClasses”, ResearchGate 1953
2022, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.14426.41923). 1954
Preprints 2022, 2022120500 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0500.v1). 1957
ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.20993.12640). 1960
259. Henry Garrett,“Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on 1961
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs and SuperHyperGraphs Alongside Applications 1962
in Cancer’s Treatments”, Preprints 2022, 2022120324 (doi: 1963
10.20944/preprints202212.0324.v1). 1964
260. Henry Garrett, “Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on 1965
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs And SuperHyperGraphs Alongside Applications 1966
in Cancer’s Treatments”, ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 1967
10.13140/RG.2.2.23123.04641). 1968
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”, Preprints 2022, 2022110576 (doi: 1971
10.20944/preprints202211.0576.v1). 1972
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”, ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 1975
10.13140/RG.2.2.23324.56966). 1976
263. Henry Garrett, “Basic Neutrosophic Notions Concerning SuperHyperDominating 1977
and Neutrosophic SuperHyperResolving in SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 1978
2022 (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.29173.86244). 1979
264. Henry Garrett, “Initial Material of Neutrosophic Preliminaries to Study Some 1980
Neutrosophic Notions Based on Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) in 1981
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)”, ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 1982
10.13140/RG.2.2.25385.88160). 1983
265. Henry Garrett, “Perfect Domination In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1984
Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10871136). 1985
266. Henry Garrett, “Stable Sequence In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1986
267. Henry Garrett, “Resolving Sequence In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1988
268. Henry Garrett, “Dominating Sequence In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1990
269. Henry Garrett, “Stable In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 1992
Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8210033). 1993
270. Henry Garrett, “Reverse Connective Domination In Neutrosophic 1994
SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8206898). 1995
271. Henry Garrett, “Equal Connective Domination In Neutrosophic 1996
SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8201378). 1997
272. Henry Garrett, “Connective Domination In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. 1998
Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8194003). 1999
273. Henry Garrett, “Domination In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2000
274. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperPerfect Search In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2002
275. Henry Garrett, “Reverse Strict Dimension Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. 2004
276. Henry Garrett, “Unequal Dimension Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2006
277. Henry Garrett, “Strict Dimension Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2008
278. Henry Garrett, “Reverse Strict Connective In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2010
279. Henry Garrett, “Unequal Connective Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2012
280. Henry Garrett, “Strict Connective Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2014
281. Henry Garrett, “Reverse Dimension Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2016
282. Henry Garrett, “Equal Dimension Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2018
283. Henry Garrett, “Dimension Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2020
284. Henry Garrett, “Reverse Connective Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2022
285. Henry Garrett, “Equal Connective Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2024
286. Henry Garrett, “Connective Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2026
287. Henry Garrett, “United Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2028
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8027488). 2029
288. Henry Garrett, “Zero Forcing In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2030
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8020181). 2031
289. Henry Garrett, “Matrix-Based In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2032
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7978921). 2033
290. Henry Garrett, “Collections of Math II”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2034
10.5281/zenodo.7943878). 2035
291. Henry Garrett, “Dominating-Edges In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2036
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7943871). 2037
292. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Gap In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2038
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7923786). 2039
293. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2040
294. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. 2042
295. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2044
296. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Cycle-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2046
297. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Cycle-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2048
298. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Cycle-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2050
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7854561). 2051
299. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Path-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2052
300. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Path-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2054
301. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Path-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2056
302. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Path-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2058
303. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Path-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2060
304. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Path-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2062
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7812750). 2063
305. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2064
306. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. 2066
307. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2068
308. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Cycle-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2070
309. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Cycle-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2072
310. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Cycle-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2074
311. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2076
312. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2078
313. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2080
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7783791). 2081
314. Henry Garrett, “Trace-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2082
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7780123). 2083
315. Henry Garrett, “Trace-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2084
316. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDuality”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2086
10.5281/zenodo.7637762). 2087
317. Henry Garrett, “Trace-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2088
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7766174). 2089
318. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2090
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7762232). 2091
319. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2092
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7758601). 2093
320. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2094
10.5281/zenodo.7754661). 2095
321. Henry Garrett, “Vertex-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2096
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7750995) . 2097
322. Henry Garrett, “Vertex-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2098
323. Henry Garrett, “Vertex-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2100
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7747236). 2101
324. Henry Garrett, “Stable-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2102
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7742587). 2103
325. Henry Garrett, “Stable-Decompositions In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2104
326. Henry Garrett, “Stable-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2106
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7734719). 2107
327. Henry Garrett, “Clique-Neighbors In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2108
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7730484). 2109
328. Henry Garrett, “Clique-Decompositions In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2110
329. Henry Garrett, “Clique-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2112
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7722865). 2113
330. Henry Garrett, “Space In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2114
10.5281/zenodo.7713563). 2115
331. Henry Garrett, “Space In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2116
10.5281/zenodo.7709116). 2117
332. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Connectivity In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2118
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7706415). 2119
333. Henry Garrett, “Vertex-Connectivity In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2120
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7706063). 2121
334. Henry Garrett, “Tree-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2122
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7701906). 2123
335. Henry Garrett, “Chord In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2124
10.5281/zenodo.7700205). 2125
336. Henry Garrett, “(i,j)-Domination In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2126
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7694876). 2127
337. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Domination In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2128
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7679410). 2129
338. Henry Garrett, “K-Domination In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2130
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7675982). 2131
339. Henry Garrett, “K-Number In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2132
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7672388). 2133
340. Henry Garrett, “Order In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2134
10.5281/zenodo.7668648). 2135
341. Henry Garrett, “Coloring In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2136
10.5281/zenodo.7662810). 2137
342. Henry Garrett, “Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2138
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7659162). 2139
343. Henry Garrett, “Cancer In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2140
10.5281/zenodo.7653233). 2141
344. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperWheel ”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2142
10.5281/zenodo.7653204). 2143
345. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperMultipartite”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2144
10.5281/zenodo.7653142). 2145
346. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperBipartite”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2146
10.5281/zenodo.7653117). 2147
347. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperStar ”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2148
10.5281/zenodo.7653089). 2149
348. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2150
10.5281/zenodo.7651687). 2151
349. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperPath”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2152
10.5281/zenodo.7651619). 2153
350. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDomination”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2154
10.5281/zenodo.7651439). 2155
351. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDominating”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2156
10.5281/zenodo.7650729). 2157
352. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperConnected ”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2158
10.5281/zenodo.7647868). 2159
353. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperTotal ”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2160
10.5281/zenodo.7647017). 2161
354. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperPerfect”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2162
10.5281/zenodo.7644894). 2163
355. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperJoin”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2164
10.5281/zenodo.7641880). 2165
356. Henry Garrett, “Path SuperHyperColoring”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2166
10.5281/zenodo.7632923). 2167
357. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDensity”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2168
10.5281/zenodo.7623459). 2169
358. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2170
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7606416). 2171
359. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperConnectivities”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2172
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7606416). 2173
360. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperConnectivities”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2174
10.5281/zenodo.7606404). 2175
361. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2176
10.5281/zenodo.7580018). 2177
362. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2178
10.5281/zenodo.7580018). 2179
363. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2180
10.5281/zenodo.7580018). 2181
364. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2182
10.5281/zenodo.7579929). 2183
365. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2184
10.5281/zenodo.7563170). 2185
366. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2186
10.5281/zenodo.7563164). 2187
367. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2188
10.5281/zenodo.7563160). 2189
368. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2190
10.5281/zenodo.7563160). 2191
369. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2192
10.5281/zenodo.7563160). 2193
370. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2194
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7557063). 2195
371. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperMatching”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2196
10.5281/zenodo.7557009). 2197
372. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperMatching”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2198
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7539484). 2199
373. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2200
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7523390). 2201
374. Henry Garrett, “Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2202
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7523390). 2203
375. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On Failed SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2204
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7523390). 2205
376. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2206
10.5281/zenodo.7574952). 2207
377. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2208
10.5281/zenodo.7574992). 2209
378. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2210
10.5281/zenodo.7523357). 2211
379. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2212
10.5281/zenodo.7523357). 2213
380. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2214
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7504782). 2215
381. Henry Garrett, “Extreme Failed SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2216
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7504782). 2217
382. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On Failed SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2218
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7504782). 2219
383. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2220
10.5281/zenodo.7499395). 2221
384. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2222
10.5281/zenodo.7499395). 2223
385. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2224
10.5281/zenodo.7499395). 2225
386. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2226
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7497450). 2227
387. Henry Garrett, “Extreme Failed SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2228
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7497450). 2229
388. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2230
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7494862). 2231
389. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2232
10.5281/zenodo.7494862). 2233
390. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2234
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7494862). 2235
391. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperAlliances”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2236
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7493845). 2237
392. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperAlliances”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2238
10.5281/zenodo.7493845). 2239
393. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperAlliances”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2240
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7493845). 2241
394. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperMatching”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2242
10.5281/zenodo.7539484). 2243
395. Henry Garrett, “Failed SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2244
10.5281/zenodo.7523390). 2245
396. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2246
10.5281/zenodo.7523357). 2247
397. Henry Garrett, “Failed SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2248
10.5281/zenodo.7504782). 2249
398. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2250
10.5281/zenodo.7499395). 2251
399. Henry Garrett, “Failed SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2252
10.5281/zenodo.7497450). 2253
400. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2254
10.5281/zenodo.7494862). 2255
401. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperAlliances”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2256
10.5281/zenodo.7493845). 2257
402. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2258
10.5281/zenodo.7480110). 2259
403. Henry Garrett, “Neut. SuperHyperEdges”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2260
10.5281/zenodo.7378758). 2261
404. Henry Garrett, “Beyond Neutrosophic Graphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2262
10.5281/zenodo.6320305). 2263
405. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Duality”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2264
10.5281/zenodo.6677173). 2265

"New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path by Total Perfect Domination

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

"New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path by Total Perfect Domination

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.

com · Manhattan, NY, USA

New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 2

SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By Total Perfect 3

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · 6

DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA 7

In this scientific research, (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic 9

SuperHyperTotal Perfect Domination). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S be a 10

pair S = (V, E). Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then 11

V 0 is called Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal Perfect Domination if the following expressions, 12

terms and statements is called Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal Perfect Domination criteria 13

SuperHyperNotions, namely a Total Perfect Domination and a Neutrosophic Total 16

research has progressed and SuperHyperNotion, SuperHyperUniform, and 18

SuperHyperClass are well-defined and well-reviewed based on them. Literature review is 19

research, a comparison between this SuperHyperNotion with other SuperHyperNotions 21

and basic SuperHyperNumbers is presented. Definitions are followed by examples and 22

examples, so clarifications are guided by various tools. Applications are designed to 23

the relationships between them all are officially called “SuperHyperEdge”. 29

“SuperHyperGraph” and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” frameworks are selected and 30

super-hypermodels open avenues for research on theoretical aspects and “cancer 32

concept of “Total Perfect Domination mastery”. SuperHyperVertices and 38

SuperHyperEdges are assigned by alphabetical labels. In this method, the position of 39

contains “values of vertices, supervertices, edges, hyperedges, and hyperedges belonging 41

to Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” with key points, it is redefined. ”values of vertices 42

& number of positions in alphabet”, ”Values of SuperVertices&maximum values of its 43

vertices”, ”values of edges&maximum values of its vertices”, ”super edge values&max 44

SuperHyperClass SuperHyperGraph based on Total Perfect Domination. This is the 47

Perfect Domination, then it is officially called “Total Perfect Domination”, but 50

and distinguished because they are characterized in the SuperHyperClass disciplinary 53

methods based on a dominant Total Perfect Domination. Because of having Total 54

Perfect Domination, there is a need to “re-define” the concept of “neutrosophic Total 55

Perfect Domination” and “neutrosophic Total Perfect Domination”. 56

SuperHyperVertices and SuperHyperEdges are assigned by alphabetical labels. In this 57

method, the position of tags is used to assign values. Consider a Neutrosophic 58

SuperHyperGraph. “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” is redefined if the desired table 59

“Neutrosophic Total Perfect Domination”. It is useful to define a “Neutrosophic” version 61

SuperHyper- Neutrosophic Total Perfect Domination becomes more understandable. 63

Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. If the desired table exists, there are a 64

number of Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses. So are SuperHyperPath, SuperHyperCycle, 65

SuperHyperStar, SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultiPartite and SuperHyperWheel. 66

”Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle”, “Neutrosophic 67

SuperHyperStar”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite”, “Neutrosophic 68

SuperHyperMultiPartite” and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel”. A graph is 69

SuperHyperUniform if it is a SuperHyperGraph and the number of SuperHyperEdges 70

elements is the same. Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. There are a number 71

of SuperHyperClasses as follows. It is a SuperHyperPath if there is only one 72

SuperVertex as an intersection between two given SuperHyperEdges with two 73

exceptions. If only one SuperVertex is given as an intersection between two 74

SuperHyperEdges, it is SuperHyperCycle. It is SuperHyperStar and only one 75

SuperVertex as intersection among all SuperHyperEdges. It is SuperHyperBipartite, 76

common. This is SuperHyperMultiPartite. Only one SuperVertex is given as an 79

intersection between two SuperHyperEdges, and these SuperVertices, which form 80

separate multisets, have no SuperHyperEdge in common. If only one SuperHyperEdge 81

among the given two SuperHyperEdges is a SuperHyperWheel and a SuperVertex has a 82

SuperHyperEdge with any regular SuperVertex. SuperHyperModel suggests specific 83

designs and specific architectures. SuperHyperModel is officially called 84

“SuperHyperGraph” and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”. In this SuperHyperModel, 85

cells and the “special group” of cells. SuperHyperModeled as “SuperHyperEdges”. 88

Sometimes, to have a more accurate SuperHyperModel, it is useful to have some degree 89

of determinism, uncertainty, and neutrality, in this case the SuperHyperModel is called 90

“Neutrosophic”. In future scientific research, the foundation will be based on “diagnosis 91

the Neutrosophic superhypergraph] in order to have a proper understanding of what 98

visualized with a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (-/SuperHyperCycle, SuperHyperStar, 102