New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel by Stable Perfect Domination

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.
net/publication/380128187
New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph With

Star and Wheel By Stable Perfect Domination
Preprint · April 2024

DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.11075522
CITATIONS
1 author:
Henry Garrett
574 PUBLICATIONS 30,489 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Henry Garrett on 26 April 2024.
The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 2
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By Stable Perfect 3
Domination 4
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · 6
DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA 7
1 SYNOPSIS 8
In this scientific research, (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic 9
SuperHyperStrongly Stable Perfect Domination). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) 10
S be a pair S = (V, E). Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. 11
Then V 0 is called Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Stable Perfect Domination if the following 12
expressions, terms and statements is called Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Stable Perfect 13
Domination criteria holds. 14
X X X
|( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 Vi ∈V 0 Vi ∈V 0
X X X
= min
00 ⊆V
|{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V N SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00 00
Vj ∈ VN SHG \ V , ∃!Vi ∈ V :
TV0 (EVi ,Vj ) = min[TV (Vi ), TV (Vj )],
IV0 (EVi ,Vj ) = min[IV (Vi ), IV (Vj )],
FV0 (EVi ,Vj ) = min[FV (Vi ), FV (Vj )],
Vi , Vj ∈ V 00 : Vi , Vj 6∈ Ej∗ = {Va , Vb |
}}|.
In this scientific research, new configurations are introduced for the new 15
SuperHyperNotions, namely a Strongly Stable Perfect Domination and a Neutrosophic 16
Strongly Stable Perfect Domination. Two different SuperHyperDefinitions were started 17
for them, but research has progressed and SuperHyperNotion, SuperHyperUniform, and 18
SuperHyperClass are well-defined and well-reviewed based on them. Literature review is 19
implemented throughout this research. To shine the light and importance of this 20
research, a comparison between this SuperHyperNotion with other SuperHyperNotions 21
and basic SuperHyperNumbers is presented. Definitions are followed by examples and 22
examples, so clarifications are guided by various tools. Applications are designed to 23
understand the theoretical aspect of this ongoing research. “Cancer diagnosis” are the 24
things that are being researched to explore the challenges that make sense in ongoing 25
research and future research. It is a special case. Cells are viewed in the intended 26
manner. There are different types of them. Some are individual and some are well 27
modeled by groups of cells. All these types are officially called “SuperHyperVertex”, but 28
the relationships between them all are officially called “SuperHyperEdge”. 29
“SuperHyperGraph” and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” frameworks are selected and 30
selected for research on “Cancer Diagnosis”. Thus, these complex and dense 31
super-hypermodels open avenues for research on theoretical aspects and “cancer 32
diagnosis”. Ways to pursue this scientific research have been considered. It has also 33
been formally collected in the form of several questions and problems. It is useful to 34
define a “neutrosophic” version of Strongly Stable Perfect Domination. Since there are 35
more ways to get type results a Strongly Stable Perfect Domination becomes more 36
understandable. In order to master the Neutrosophic Strongly Stable Perfect 37
Domination, there is a need to “re-define” the concept of “Strongly Stable Perfect 38
Domination mastery”. SuperHyperVertices and SuperHyperEdges are assigned by 39
alphabetical labels. In this method, the position of tags is used to assign values. 40
Suppose a Strongly Stable Perfect Domination. If the specified table contains “values of 41
vertices, supervertices, edges, hyperedges, and hyperedges belonging to Neutrosophic 42
SuperHyperGraph” with key points, it is redefined. ”values of vertices & number of 43
positions in alphabet”, ”Values of SuperVertices&maximum values of its vertices”, 44
”values of edges&maximum values of its vertices”, ”super edge values&max values of its 45
vertices”, “super edge values” and maximum values of its endpoints”. To get examples 46
and structural examples, I would like to introduce the next SuperHyperClass 47
SuperHyperGraph based on Strongly Stable Perfect Domination. This is the original. 48
Having the foundation of the previous definition in the SuperHyperClass type would be 49
disciplined. If there is a need to have all Strongly Stable Perfect Domination until 50
Strongly Stable Perfect Domination, then it is officially called “Strongly Stable Perfect 51
Domination”, but otherwise, it is not Strongly Stable Perfect Domination. There is 52
some explanation for the original definition titled “Strongly Stable Perfect Domination”. 53
These two examples are further explored and distinguished because they are 54
characterized in the SuperHyperClass disciplinary methods based on a dominant 55
Strongly Stable Perfect Domination. Because of having Strongly Stable Perfect 56
Domination, there is a need to “re-define” the concept of “neutrosophic Strongly Stable 57
Perfect Domination” and “neutrosophic Strongly Stable Perfect Domination”. 58
SuperHyperVertices and SuperHyperEdges are assigned by alphabetical labels. In this 59
method, the position of tags is used to assign values. Consider a Neutrosophic 60
SuperHyperGraph. “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” is redefined if the desired table 61
exists. And if the desired table exists, a Strongly Stable Perfect Domination is redefined 62
to a “Neutrosophic Strongly Stable Perfect Domination”. It is useful to define a 63
“Neutrosophic” version of SuperHyperClasses. Since there are more ways to obtain 64
Neutrosophic type results, a SuperHyper- Neutrosophic Strongly Stable Perfect 65
Domination becomes more understandable. Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. 66
If the desired table exists, there are a number of Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses. So 67
are SuperHyperPath, SuperHyperCycle, SuperHyperStar, SuperHyperBipartite, 68
SuperHyperMultiPartite and SuperHyperWheel. ”Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath”, 69
“Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar”, “Neutrosophic 70
SuperHyperBipartite”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultiPartite” and “Neutrosophic 71
SuperHyperWheel”. A graph is SuperHyperUniform if it is a SuperHyperGraph and the 72
number of SuperHyperEdges elements is the same. Consider a Neutrosophic 73
SuperHyperGraph. There are a number of SuperHyperClasses as follows. It is a 74
SuperHyperPath if there is only one SuperVertex as an intersection between two given 75
SuperHyperEdges with two exceptions. If only one SuperVertex is given as an 76
intersection between two SuperHyperEdges, it is SuperHyperCycle. It is 77
SuperHyperStar and only one SuperVertex as intersection among all SuperHyperEdges. 78
It is SuperHyperBipartite, and only one SuperVertex is given as the intersection between 79
two SuperHyperEdges, and these SuperVertices, which form two distinct sets, have no 80
SuperHyperEdge in common. This is SuperHyperMultiPartite. Only one SuperVertex is 81
given as an intersection between two SuperHyperEdges, and these SuperVertices, which 82
form separate multisets, have no SuperHyperEdge in common. If only one 83
SuperHyperEdge among the given two SuperHyperEdges is a SuperHyperWheel and a 84
SuperVertex has a SuperHyperEdge with any regular SuperVertex. SuperHyperModel 85
suggests specific designs and specific architectures. SuperHyperModel is officially called 86
“SuperHyperGraph” and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”. In this SuperHyperModel, 87
the “special” cells and the “special group” of cells are SuperHyperModeled as 88
“SuperHyperVertices” and the common and desired properties between the “special” 89
cells and the “special group” of cells. SuperHyperModeled as “SuperHyperEdges”. 90
Sometimes, to have a more accurate SuperHyperModel, it is useful to have some degree 91
of determinism, uncertainty, and neutrality, in this case the SuperHyperModel is called 92
“Neutrosophic”. In future scientific research, the foundation will be based on “diagnosis 93
of cancer” and the results and definitions will be introduced in redeemed methods. 94
Cancer diagnosis in long-term practice. The specific region is assigned by the model 95
(called SuperHyperGraph) and the long cycle of movement of the cancer is determined 96
by this scientific research. Sometimes the movement of cancer is not easy to detect, 97
because there is certainty, uncertainty and neutrality about the movements and effects 98
of cancer on that area. This event leads us to choose another model [which is said to be 99
the Neutrosophic superhypergraph] in order to have a proper understanding of what 100
happened and was done. There are some specific models, which are well known and 101
have names, and some SuperHyperGeneral SuperHyperModels. The movements and 102
effects of cancer in complex pathways and between complex groups of cells can be 103
visualized with a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (-/SuperHyperCycle, SuperHyperStar, 104
SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, SuperHyperWheel). The goal is to find 105
the longest Strongly Stable Perfect Domination or the strongest Strongly Stable Perfect 106
Domination in those Neutrosophic SuperHyperModels. Some general results are 107
presented for the longest Strongly Stable Perfect Domination called Strongly Stable 108
Perfect Domination and the strongest Strongly Stable Perfect Domination called 109
Neutrosophic Strongly Stable Perfect Domination. Beyond that in SuperHyperStar, all 110
possible SuperHyperPaths have only two SuperHyperEdges, but it is not enough as 111
having at least three SuperHyperEdges is necessary to form any style of cycle. There is 112
no form of any cycle, but literally, it is the transformation of any cycle. It literally 113
transforms and does not form. A basic introduction to the theory of Strongly Stable 114
Perfect Domination Neutrosophic, SuperHyperGraphs and Neutrosophic 115
SuperHyperGraphs is suggested. 116
Keywords: Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, SuperHyperStrongly Stable Perfect Domination, 117
Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition 118
AMS Subject Classification: 05C17, 05C22, 05E45 119
2 Applied Notions Under The Scrutiny Of The 120
Motivation Of This Scientific Research 121
In this scientific research, there are ideas in the prominent frameworks of motivations. I 122
try to bring motivations in narrative ways. Some Cells have faced attacks from the 123
established situation with cancer attacks in this case, there is some analysis embedded 124
in the case current situations where cells can be labeled as some groups and some 125
groups or individuals are overlabeled, all from behaviors to overcome cancer attacks. In 126
embedded situations, cell individuals and cell groups can be considered as “new groups”. 127
So it encourages us to find suitable SuperHyperModels for more appropriate analysis 128
about this dirty story. I found SuperHyperModels, officially called “SuperHyperGraphs” 129
and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. In this SuperHyperModel, cells and groups of 130
cells are defined as “SuperHyperVertices” and relationships between individual cells and 131
groups of cells are defined as “SuperHyperEdges”. So this is another motivation for us 132
to do research on this SuperHyperModel based on “cancer diagnosis”. Sometimes, 133
things get worse. The situation has passed certainty and precise style. So it is beyond 134
them. There are three descriptions, i.e., degrees of determination, uncertainty, and 135
neutrality, for any object based on ambiguous forms, i.e., incomplete data, imprecise 136
data, and uncertain analysis. The second model can be considered in the previous 137
SuperHyperModel. This is SuperHyperModel. This is SuperHyperGraph but officially 138
called “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. Cancer is a disease, but the model is 139
supposed to understand what happens in this phenomenon. The special case of this 140
disease is considered and some parameters are used as consequences of the model. Cells 141
are attacked by the disease, but the movement of cancer is in a specific area. Knowing 142
the mind of cancer can help to find some cures for this disease. SuperHyperGraph and 143
Neutrosophic Super-HyperGraph are super-hypermodels used in “cancer diagnosis” and 144
both are the foundation of the background of this scientific research. Sometimes cancer 145
has occurred in an area full of cells, cell groups, and embedded styles. In this section, 146
SuperHyperModel proposes based on the links of cancer movements in the form of unity 147
styles with the formation of design and architecture officially called “Strongly Stable 148
Perfect Domination”, in the themes of specialized terms and common words. Particle 149
for direct object. Applied concepts under the investigation of the motivation of this 150
scientific research. The “SuperHyper” prefix refers to the theme of embedded styles for 151
background discovery for SuperHyperNotions. Cancer diagnosis in long-term practice. 152
The specific region is assigned by the model (called SuperHyperGraph) and the long 153
cycle of movement of the cancer is determined by this scientific research. Sometimes the 154
movement of Cancer is not easy to identify because there is certainty, uncertainty and 155
neutrality about the movements and effects of Cancer in that region. This event leads 156
us to choose another model [said to be Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph]. Easy 157
understanding of what happened and what was done. There are some specific models 158
that are well known and named and some general models. The movements and effects 159
of cancer in complex pathways and between complex groups of cells can be visualized by 160
a neurosophic superhyperpath (-/SuperHyperCycle, SuperHyperStar, 161
SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, SuperHyperWheel). The goal is to find 162
Strongly Stable Perfect Domination or Neutrosophic Strongly Stable Perfect 163
Domination for SuperHyperModels in it. Some general results are presented. Beyond 164
that in SuperHyperStar, all possible Neutrosophic SuperHyperPaths have only two 165
SuperHyperEdges, but it is not enough as having at least three SuperHyperEdges is 166
necessary to form any style of cycle. There is no form of cycle, but it is literally a form 167
of any cycle. It literally transforms and does not form. 168
Question 2.1. How to define “SuperHyperNotions and to do research” to find the 169
“Strongly Stable Perfect Domination Rate” of any cell or groups of cells based on fixed 170
cell or fixed group of cells broadly, “Strongly Stable Perfect Domination Rate” based on 171
fixed groups or fixed cells. Groups of groups of cells? 172
Question 2.2. What are the best descriptions for “diagnosing cancer” in terms of 173
these chaotic and dense super-hypermodels in which embedded concepts are depicted? 174
This motivation to find concepts to use in this dense model is called 175
“SuperHyperGraphs”. So it motivates us to define different types of “Strongly Stable 176
Perfect Domination” and “neutrosophic Strongly Stable Perfect Domination” over 177
“superhypergraph” and “neutrosophic superhypergraph”. Then this scientific research 178
has taken more motivations to define SuperHyperClasses and find some connections 179
among this SuperHyperNotion with other SuperHyperNotions. It motivates us to obtain 180
examples and examples to clarify the framework of this scientific research. The general 181
results and some of the results about some of the connections are the ways that the key 182
point of this scientific research, “diagnosis of cancer” is more understandable and clear. 183
The framework of this research is as follows. First, I will introduce the basic 184
definitions to clarify the basics. In the “Introductions” subsection, basic definitions 185
about SuperHyperGraphs and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph are introduced and 186
discussed in depth. Basic concepts are thoroughly explained and illustrated, and 187
sometimes a literature review is used to make sense of what is to come in the coming 188
sections. The main definitions and their explanations, along with some results on the 189
new concepts, Strongly Stable Perfect Domination and Neutrosophic Strongly Stable 190
Perfect Domination, are specified in the sections “Strongly Stable Perfect Domination” 191
and “Neutrosophic Strongly Stable Perfect Domination”. In the concept of dealing with 192
results and in Strongly Stable Perfect Domination to create logic about the continuation 193
of the scientific research, the ideas of SuperHyperUniform and Neutrosophic 194
SuperHyperUniform are introduced and as their consequences, the corresponding 195
SuperHyperClasses are specified to summarize the work done in this section, as “Results 196
on SuperHyperClasses” and “Results on Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”. Going back 197
to the core concepts, clever steps towards common concepts to extend new concepts in 198
new frameworks, SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, in “Results 199
on SuperHyperClasses” and “Results on Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses” sections. 200
There is the initial scientific research on supergeneral relations and as the final and final 201
part of the theoretical scientific research is available in the section “General results”. 202
Some general SuperHyperRelations are fundamental and are known as fundamental 203
SuperHyperNotions, as in “General results” were extracted and discussed. “Strongly 204
Stable Perfect Domination”, “Neutrosophic Strongly Stable Perfect Domination”, 205
“Results on SuperHyperClasses” and “Results on Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”. 206
There are curious questions about what has been done about SuperHyperNotions to 207
make sense of the superiority of this scientific research and to discover the word “best” 208
as a description and adjective of this scientific research as presented in the “Strongly 209
Stable Perfect Domination” section. The keyword of this scientific research was 210
presented in the section “Applications in cancer diagnosis” with two cases and 211
sub-sections “Case 1: Initial steps towards SuperHyperBipartite as SuperHyperModel” 212
and “Case 2: Incremental steps towards SuperHyperMultiperdel as SuperHyper. In the 213
“open issues” section, there is a detailed examination and recognition of what was done 214
in this scientific research and what happened in this scientific research in the form of 215
“questions” and “issues” in order to understand this scientific research in an outstanding 216
style, the advantages and limitations of this scientific research in addition to What has 217
been done in this scientific research is stated in the “conclusion and final remarks” 218
section. 219
3 Neutrosophic Preliminaries Of This Scientific 220
Research On the Redeemed Ways 221
In this section, the basic material in this scientific research, is referred to [Single Valued 222
Neutrosophic Set](Ref. [1],Definition 2.2,p.2), [Neutrosophic Set](Ref. [1],Definition 223
2.1,p.1), [Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)](Ref. [1],Definition 2.5,p.2), 224
[Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)](Ref. [1],Definition 225
2.7,p.3), [t-norm](Ref. [1], Definition 2.7, p.3), and [Characterization of the 226
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)](Ref. [1],Definition 2.7,p.3), [Neutrosophic 227
Strength of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPaths] (Ref. [1],Definition 5.3,p.7), and 228
[Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)] 229
(Ref. [1],Definition 5.4,p.7). Also, the new ideas and their clarifications are addressed 230
to Ref. [1]. 231
In this subsection, the basic material which is used in this scientific research, is 232
presented. Also, the new ideas and their clarifications are elicited. 233
Definition 3.1 (Neutrosophic Set). (Ref. [1],Definition 2.1,p.1). 234
Let X be a Eulerian-Path-Cut of points (objects) with generic elements in X denoted by

x; then the Neutrosophic set A (NS A) is an object having the form
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}

+
where the functions T, I, F : X →]− 0, 1 [ define respectively the a
truth-membership function, an indeterminacy-membership function, and a
falsity-membership function of the element x ∈ X to the set A with the condition
−
0 ≤ TA (x) + IA (x) + FA (x) ≤ 3+ .
The functions TA (x), IA (x) and FA (x) are real standard or nonstandard subsets of 235
+
]− 0, 1 [. 236
Definition 3.2 (Single Valued Neutrosophic Set). (Ref. [1],Definition 2.2,p.2). 237
Let X be a Eulerian-Path-Cut of points (objects) with generic elements in X denoted by

x. A single valued Neutrosophic set A (SVNS A) is characterized by
truth-membership function TA (x), an indeterminacy-membership function IA (x), and a
falsity-membership function FA (x). For each point x in X, TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) ∈ [0, 1].
A SVNS A can be written as
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}.
Definition 3.3. The degree of truth-membership,

indeterminacy-membership and falsity-membership of the subset X ⊂ A of
the single valued Neutrosophic set A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}:
TA (X) = min[TA (vi ), TA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,
IA (X) = min[IA (vi ), IA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,

and FA (X) = min[FA (vi ), FA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X .
Definition 3.4. The support of X ⊂ A of the single valued Neutrosophic set
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}:
supp(X) = {x ∈ X : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) > 0}.
Definition 3.5 (Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). (Ref. [1],Definition 238
2.5,p.2). 239
Assume V 0 is a given set. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a 240
pair S = (V, E), where 241
(i) V = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vn } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of V 0 ; 242
(ii) V = {(Vi , TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi )) : TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi ) ≥ 0}, (i = 243
1, 2, . . . , n); 244
(iii) E = {E1 , E2 , . . . , En0 } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of 245
V; 246
(iv) E = {(Ei0 , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )) : TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 ) ≥ 0}, (i0 = 247
1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 248
(v) Vi 6= ∅, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 249
(vi) Ei0 6= ∅, (i0 = 1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 250
Figure 1. The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a illustrated SuperHyperModeling

on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
P
(vii) i supp(Vi ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 251
supp(Ei0 ) = V, (i0 = 1, 2, . . . , n0 );
P
(viii) i0 252
(ix) and the following conditions hold:
TV0 (Ei0 ) ≤ min[TV 0 (Vi ), TV 0 (Vj )]Vi ,Vj ∈Ei0 ,
IV0 (Ei0 ) ≤ min[IV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vj )]Vi ,Vj ∈Ei0 ,

and FV0 (Ei0 ) ≤ min[FV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vj )]Vi ,Vj ∈Ei0
where i0 = 1, 2, . . . , n0 . 253
Here the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ej 0 and the Neutrosophic 254
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) Vj are single valued Neutrosophic sets. TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), 255
and FV 0 (Vi ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 256
indeterminacy-membership and the degree of falsity-membership the Neutrosophic 257
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) V. 258
TV0 (Ei0 ), TV0 (Ei0 ), and TV0 (Ei0 ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 259
indeterminacy-membership and the degree of falsity-membership of the Neutrosophic 260
SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) Ei0 to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) E. Thus, 261
the ii0 th element of the incidence matrix of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) 262
are of the form (Vi , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )), the sets V and E are crisp sets. 263
Example 3.6. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair 264
S = (V, E) in the mentioned Neutrosophic Figures in every Neutrosophic items. 265
• On the Figure (1), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 266
notion, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. E1 267
and E3 are some empty Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges but E2 is a loop 268
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge and E4 is a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. Thus 269
in the terms of Neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only one Neutrosophic 270
SuperHyperEdge, namely, E4 . The Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 is 271
Neutrosophic isolated means that there’s no Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge has it 272
as a Neutrosophic endpoint. 273
Figure 2. TThe Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a illustrated SuperHyperModel-

ing on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
notion, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 275
E1 , E2 and E3 are some empty Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges but E4 is a 276
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. Thus in the terms of Neutrosophic 277
SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only one Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge, namely, 278
E4 . The Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 is Neutrosophic isolated means that 279
there’s no Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge has it as a Neutrosophic endpoint. 280
• On the Figure (3), the SuperHyperNotion, namely, SuperHyperGirth, is up. 281
E1 , E2 and E3 are some empty SuperHyperEdges but E4 is a SuperHyperEdge. 282
Thus in the terms of SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only one SuperHyperEdge, 283
namely, E4 . 284
• On the Figure (4), there’s no empty SuperHyperEdge but E3 are a loop 285
SuperHyperEdge on {F } and there are some SuperHyperEdges, namely, E1 on 286
{H, V1 , V3 }, alongside E2 on {O, H, V4 , V3 } and E4 , E5 on {N, V1 , V2 , V3 , F }. 287
• On the Figure (5),there’s neither empty SuperHyperEdge nor loop 288
SuperHyperEdge. 289
• On the Figure (6), there’s neither empty SuperHyperEdge nor loop 290
SuperHyperEdge. 291
SuperHyperEdge. 293
SuperHyperEdge. 295
SuperHyperEdge. 297
SuperHyperEdge. 299
Figure 3. The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a illustrated SuperHyperModeling

on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 4. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a illustrated Super-

HyperModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 5. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs mentioned as the SuperHy-

perModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 6. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a illustrated Super-

HyperModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 7. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs depicted SuperHyperMod-

eling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 8. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with dense SuperHyper-

Modeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 9. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a messy SuperHyper-

Modeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 10. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with highly-embedding-

connected SuperHyperModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example
(3.6)
Figure 11. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a SuperHyperModel-

SuperHyperEdge. 301
SuperHyperEdge. 303
SuperHyperEdge. 305
SuperHyperEdge. 307
SuperHyperEdge. 309
SuperHyperEdge. 311
SuperHyperEdge. 313
SuperHyperEdge. 315
SuperHyperEdge. 317
SuperHyperEdge. 319
SuperHyperEdge. 321
SuperHyperEdge. 323
Figure 12. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with highly-multiple-

connected-style SuperHyperModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic
Example (3.6)


Figure 15. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with Linearly-Connected

SuperHyperModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)

Figure 17. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a Linearly-over-

packed SuperHyperModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example
(3.6)





Definition 3.7 (Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). 324
(Ref. [1],Definition 2.7,p.3). 325
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). The 326
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ei0 and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 327
(NSHV) Vi of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S = (V, E) could be 328
characterized as follow-up items. 329
(i) If |Vi | = 1, then Vi is called vertex; 330
(ii) if |Vi | ≥ 1, then Vi is called SuperVertex; 331
(iii) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called edge; 332
(iv) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 333
HyperEdge; 334
(v) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called 335
SuperEdge; 336
(vi) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 337
SuperHyperEdge. 338
If we choose different types of binary operations, then we could get hugely diverse 339
types of general forms of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG). 340
Definition 3.8 (t-norm). (Ref. [1], Definition 2.7, p.3). 341
A binary operation ⊗ : [0, 1] × [0, 1] → [0, 1] is a t-norm if it satisfies the following 342
for x, y, z, w ∈ [0, 1]: 343
(i) 1 ⊗ x = x; 344
(ii) x ⊗ y = y ⊗ x; 345
(iii) x ⊗ (y ⊗ z) = (x ⊗ y) ⊗ z; 346
(iv) If w ≤ x and y ≤ z then w ⊗ y ≤ x ⊗ z. 347
Definition 3.9. The degree of truth-membership, indeterminacy-membership

and falsity-membership of the subset X ⊂ A of the single valued Neutrosophic set
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X} (with respect to t-norm Tnorm ):
TA (X) = Tnorm [TA (vi ), TA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,
IA (X) = Tnorm [IA (vi ), IA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,

and FA (X) = Tnorm [FA (vi ), FA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X .
Definition 3.10. The support of X ⊂ A of the single valued Neutrosophic set
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}:
supp(X) = {x ∈ X : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) > 0}.
Definition 3.11. (General Forms of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). 348
Assume V 0 is a given set. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a 349
pair S = (V, E), where 350
(i) V = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vn } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of V 0 ; 351
(ii) V = {(Vi , TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi )) : TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi ) ≥ 0}, (i = 352
1, 2, . . . , n); 353
(iii) E = {E1 , E2 , . . . , En0 } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of 354
V; 355
(iv) E = {(Ei0 , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )) : TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 ) ≥ 0}, (i0 = 356
1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 357
(v) Vi 6= ∅, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 358
(vi) Ei0 6= ∅, (i0 = 1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 359
P
(vii) i supp(Vi ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 360
0 0
P
(viii) i0 supp(Ei ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n ).
0 361
Here the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ej 0 and the Neutrosophic 362
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) Vj are single valued Neutrosophic sets. TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), 363
and FV 0 (Vi ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 364
indeterminacy-membership and the degree of falsity-membership the Neutrosophic 365
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) V. 366
TV0 (Ei0 ), TV0 (Ei0 ), and TV0 (Ei0 ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 367
indeterminacy-membership and the degree of falsity-membership of the Neutrosophic 368
SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) Ei0 to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) E. Thus, 369
the ii0 th element of the incidence matrix of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) 370
are of the form (Vi , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )), the sets V and E are crisp sets. 371
Definition 3.12 (Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). 372
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). The 374
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ei0 and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 375
(NSHV) Vi of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S = (V, E) could be 376
characterized as follow-up items. 377
(i) If |Vi | = 1, then Vi is called vertex; 378
(ii) if |Vi | ≥ 1, then Vi is called SuperVertex; 379
(iii) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called edge; 380
(iv) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 381
HyperEdge; 382
(v) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called 383
SuperEdge; 384
(vi) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 385
SuperHyperEdge. 386
This SuperHyperModel is too messy and too dense. Thus there’s a need to have 387
some restrictions and conditions on SuperHyperGraph. The special case of this 388
SuperHyperGraph makes the patterns and regularities. 389
Definition 3.13. A graph is SuperHyperUniform if it’s SuperHyperGraph and the 390
number of elements of SuperHyperEdges are the same. 391
To get more visions on SuperHyperUniform, the some SuperHyperClasses are 392
introduced. It makes to have SuperHyperUniform more understandable. 393
Definition 3.14. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. There are some 394
SuperHyperClasses as follows. 395
(i). It’s Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath if it’s only one SuperVertex as 396
intersection amid two given SuperHyperEdges with two exceptions; 397
(ii). it’s SuperHyperCycle if it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two 398
given SuperHyperEdges; 399
(iii). it’s SuperHyperStar it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid all 400
SuperHyperEdges; 401
(iv). it’s SuperHyperBipartite it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two 402
given SuperHyperEdges and these SuperVertices, forming two separate sets, has 403
no SuperHyperEdge in common; 404
(v). it’s SuperHyperMultiPartite it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid 405
two given SuperHyperEdges and these SuperVertices, forming multi separate sets, 406
has no SuperHyperEdge in common; 407
(vi). it’s SuperHyperWheel if it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two 408
given SuperHyperEdges and one SuperVertex has one SuperHyperEdge with any 409
common SuperVertex. 410
Example 3.15. In the Figure (23), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath 411
ESHP : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, in the 412
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (23), is the notion. 413
Example 3.16. In the Figure (24), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle 414
N SHC : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Neutrosophic 415
SuperHyperSet, in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (24), is up. 416
Example 3.17. In the Figure (25), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar 417
ESHS : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, 418
by the Algorithm in previous Neutrosophic result, of the Neutrosophic 419
SuperHyperVertices of the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E), in 420
the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (25), is up. 421
Figure 23. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath Associated to the Notions in the Example

(3.15)
Figure 24. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions

in the Neutrosophic Example (3.16)
Figure 25. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions in

the Neutrosophic Example (3.17)
Example 3.18. In the Neutrosophic Figure (26), the connected Neutrosophic 422
SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), is Neutrosophic highlighted and Neutrosophic 423
featured. The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Neutrosophic Algorithm in 424
previous Neutrosophic result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected 425
Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic 426
SuperHyperModel (26), is up. 427
Example 3.19. In the Figure (27), the connected Neutrosophic 428
SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E), is highlighted and Neutrosophic featured. 429
The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Algorithm in previous Neutrosophic 430
result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected Neutrosophic 431
SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (27), 432
is up. 433
Example 3.20. In the Neutrosophic Figure (28), the connected Neutrosophic 434
SuperHyperWheel N SHW : (V, E), is Neutrosophic highlighted and featured. The 435
obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Algorithm in previous result, of the 436
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel 437
ESHW : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (28), is up. 438
Definition 3.21. Let a pair S = (V, E) be a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)

S. Then a sequence of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) and Neutrosophic
SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)
V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs
is called a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic 439
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) V1 to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vs if either 440
of following conditions hold: 441
(i) Vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 442
Figure 26. Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite Neutrosophic Associated to the Neutro-

sophic Notions in the Example (3.18)
Figure 27. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite Associated to the Notions in the

Example (3.19)
Figure 28. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel Neutrosophic Associated to the Neutro-

sophic Notions in the Neutrosophic Example (3.20)
(ii) there’s a vertex vi ∈ Vi such that vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 443
(iii) there’s a SuperVertex Vi0 ∈ Vi such that Vi0 , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 444
(iv) there’s a vertex vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that Vi , vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 445
0 0
(v) there’s a SuperVertex Vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that Vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 446
(vi) there are a vertex vi ∈ Vi and a vertex vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that vi , vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 447
0 0
(vii) there are a vertex vi ∈ Vi and a SuperVertex Vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 448
(viii) there are a SuperVertex Vi0 ∈ Vi and a vertex vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that Vi0 , vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 449
(ix) there are a SuperVertex Vi0 ∈ Vi and a SuperVertex Vi+1

0
∈ Vi+1 such that 450
Vi0 , Vi+1
0
∈ Ei0 . 451
Definition 3.22. (Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPaths). 452
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). a

Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV)
V1 to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vs is sequence of Neutrosophic
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) and Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)
V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs ,
could be characterized as follow-up items. 453
(i) If for all Vi , Ej 0 , |Vi | = 1, |Ej 0 | = 2, then NSHP is called path; 454
(ii) if for all Ej 0 , |Ej 0 | = 2, and there’s Vi , |Vi | ≥ 1, then NSHP is called SuperPath; 455
(iii) if for all Vi , Ej 0 , |Vi | = 1, |Ej 0 | ≥ 2, then NSHP is called HyperPath; 456
(iv) if there are Vi , Ej 0 , |Vi | ≥ 1, |Ej 0 | ≥ 2, then NSHP is called Neutrosophic 457
SuperHyperPath . 458
Definition 3.23 (Neutrosophic Strength of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPaths). 459
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). A

Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV)
Table 1. The Values of Vertices, SuperVertices, Edges, HyperEdges, and SuperHy-

perEdges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph Mentioned in the Definition
(3.27)
The Values of The Vertices The Number of Position in Alphabet
The Values of The SuperVertices The maximum Values of Its Vertices
The Values of The Edges The maximum Values of Its Vertices
The Values of The HyperEdges The maximum Values of Its Vertices
The Values of The SuperHyperEdges The maximum Values of Its Endpoints
V1 to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vs is sequence of Neutrosophic

SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) and Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)
V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs ,
have 461
(i) Neutrosophic t-strength (min{T (Vi )}, m, n)si=1 ; 462
(ii) Neutrosophic i-strength (m, min{I(Vi )}, n)si=1 ; 463
(iii) Neutrosophic f-strength (m, n, min{F (Vi )})si=1 ; 464
(iv) Neutrosophic strength (min{T (Vi )}, min{I(Vi )}, min{F (Vi )})si=1 . 465
Definition 3.24 (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges 466
(NSHE)). (Ref. [1],Definition 5.4,p.7). 467
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). Consider 468
a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) E = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then E is called 469
(ix) Neutrosophic t-connective if T (E) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic 470
t-strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 471
(NSHV) Vi to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vj where 1 ≤ i, j ≤ s; 472
(x) Neutrosophic i-connective if I(E) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic 473
i-strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 474
(xi) Neutrosophic f-connective if F (E) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic 476
f-strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 477
(xii) Neutrosophic connective if (T (E), I(E), F (E)) ≥ maximum number of 479
Neutrosophic strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic 480
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vj 481
where 1 ≤ i, j ≤ s. 482
For the sake of having a Neutrosophic notion, there’s a need to “redefine” the 483
notion of “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”. The SuperHyperVertices and the 484
SuperHyperEdges are assigned by the labels from the letters of the alphabets. In this 485
procedure, there’s the usage of the position of labels to assign to the values. 486
Definition 3.25. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (SHG) S is a pair 487
S = (V, E). It’s redefined Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph if the Table (1) holds. 488
It’s useful to define a “Neutrosophic” version of SuperHyperClasses. Since there’s 489
more ways to get Neutrosophic type-results to make a Neutrosophic more 490
understandable. 491

perEdges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, Mentioned in the Definition
(3.26)

perEdges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph Mentioned in the Definition
(3.27)
Definition 3.26. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (SHG) S is a pair 492
S = (V, E). There are some Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses if the Table (2) 493
holds. Thus Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath , notion, SuperHyperStar, 494
SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultiPartite, and SuperHyperWheel, are 495
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath, Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle, 496
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar, Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite, 497
Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultiPartite, and Neutrosophic 498
SuperHyperWheel if the Table (2) holds. 499
It’s useful to define a “Neutrosophic” version of a Neutrosophic notion. Since there’s 500
more ways to get type-results to make a Neutrosophic notion more Neutrosophicly 501
understandable. 502
For the sake of having a Neutrosophic notion, there’s a need to “redefine” the 503
Neutrosophic notion of “Neutrosophic notion”. The SuperHyperVertices and the 504
SuperHyperEdges are assigned by the labels from the letters of the alphabets. In this 505
procedure, there’s the usage of the position of labels to assign to the values. 506
Definition 3.27. Assume a notion. It’s redefined a Neutrosophic notion if the 507
Table (3) holds. 508
Example 3.28. Referred to the Example (3.6), assume a Neutrosophic 509
SuperHyperGraph (SHG) S is a pair S = (V, E) in the mentioned Neutrosophic Figures 510
in every Neutrosophic items. 511
SuperHyperGraph (SHG), is up in the illustration of the Table (4). 513
Table 4. The Values of Vertices, SuperVertices, Edges, HyperEdges, and SuperHyper-

Edges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph
Vi (TVi , IVi , FVi ) Ei (TEi , IEi , FEi )
V1 (0.13, 0.13, 0.13) E1 (0, 0, 0)
V2 (0.13, 0.13, 0.13) E2 (0.13, 0.13, 0.13)
V3 (0.15, 0.15, 0.15) E3 (0, 0, 0)
V4 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14) E4 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14)

V1 (0.13, 0.13, 0.13) E1 (0, 0, 0)
V2 (0.03, 0.03, 0.03) E2 (0, 0, 0)
V3 (0.15, 0.15, 0.15) E3 (0, 0, 0)
V4 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14) E4 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14)

V1 (0.13, 0.13, 0.13) E1 (0, 0, 0)
V2 (0.11, 0.11, 0.11) E2 (0, 0, 0)
V3 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14) E3 (0, 0, 0)
- - E4 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14)
4 Main Resultant 520
Definition 4.1. (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Stable 521
Perfect Domination). 522
Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Consider a 523
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then V 0 is called Neutrosophic 524
SuperHyperStrongly Stable Perfect Domination if the following expressions, terms and statements 525
is called Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Stable Perfect Domination criteria holds. 526
X X X
|( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 Vi ∈V 0 Vi ∈V 0
X X X
= min
00 ⊆V
|{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V N SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00

V1 (0.13, 0.13, 0.13) E1 (0.08, 0.08, 0.08)
V2 (0.11, 0.11, 0.11) E2 (0.15, 0.15, 0.15)
V3 (0.05, 0.05, 0.05) E3 (0, 0, 0)
V4 (0.12, 0.12, 0.12) E4 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14)
{F } (0.06, 0.06, 0.06) E5 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14)
{H} (0.08, 0.08, 0.08) - -
{N } (0.14, 0.14, 0.14) - -
{O} (0.15, 0.15, 0.15) - -


Edges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
Vj ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 , ∃!Vi ∈ V 00 :
}}|.
Example 4.2. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel (SHG) S is a pair S = (V, E) 527
in the mentioned Neutrosophic Figures in every Neutrosophic items. 528
SuperHyperWheel (SHG), is up in the illustration of the Table (8). 530
Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Consider a 531
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 : DOESN’T EXIST. Then V 0 is called 532


Figure 32. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar Neutrosophic Associated to the Neutro-











V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
V3 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E3 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V4 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V5 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V6 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable Perfect Domination since the following expressions, terms 533
and statements is called Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable Perfect Domination criteria 534
holds. 535
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={VDOESN’T EXIST }
X
I(Vi ),
X
F (Vi ))|
: DOESN’T EXIST :
X X X
= 00 min |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00 00
Vj ∈ VN SHG \ V , ∃!Vi ∈ V :
}}|.
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {Vi=1−4 }. Then V 0 is called Neutrosophic 539
SuperHyperStable Perfect Domination since the following expressions, terms and 540
statements is called Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable Perfect Domination criteria holds. 541
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−4 }
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={V
i=1−4 }
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−4 }
= (1.04, 1.04, 1.04) =

X X X
= 00 min |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.19, 0.19, 0.19) E2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
V3 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E3 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V4 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V5 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V6 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V7 ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 = {Vi=5−7 }, ∃!V1 ∈ V 00 = {Vi=1−4 } :

Vj=5−6 ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 = {Vi=5−7 }, ∃!V4 ∈ V 00 = {Vi=1−4 } :
}}|.
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−4 }
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−4 }
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−4 }
= (0.99, 0.99, 0.99) =

X X X
= 00 min |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00 00
V7 ∈ VN SHG \ V = {Vi=5−7 }, ∃!V1 ∈ V = {Vi=1−4 } :
Vj=5−6 ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 = {Vi=5−7 }, ∃!V4 ∈ V 00 = {Vi=1−4 } :
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.19, 0.19, 0.19) E2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
V3 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E3 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V4 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V5 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V6 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V7 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)

}}|.
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {Vi=1−4,7 }. Then V 0 is called Neutrosophic 551
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−4,7 }
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−4,7 }
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−4,7 }
= (1.25, 1.25, 1.25) =

X X X
= 00 min |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
Vj=5−6 ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 = {Vi=5−6 }, ∃!V4 ∈V 00

= {Vi=1−4,7 } :
0
TV (EVi ,Vj ) = min[TV (Vi ), TV (Vj )],
}}|.
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.19, 0.19, 0.19) E2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
V3 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E3 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
V4 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V5 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V6 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V7 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.19, 0.19, 0.19) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V6 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V7 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−7 }
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={V
i=1−7 }
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−7 }
= (1.62, 1.62, 1.62) =

X X X
= 00 min |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00 00
Vj ∈ VN SHG \ V = {}, ∃!V4 ∈ V = {Vi=1−7 } :
0
}}|.
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−7 }
Edges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−7 }
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={V
i=1−7 }
= (1.62, 1.62, 1.62) =

X X X
= 00 min |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00 00
Vj ∈ VN SHG \ V = {}, ∃!V4 ∈ V = {Vi=1−7 } :
0
}}|.
Example 4.3. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar (SHG) S is a pair S = (V, E) 566
in the mentioned Neutrosophic Figures in every Neutrosophic items. 567
SuperHyperStar (SHG), is up in the illustration of the Table (14). 569
Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Consider a 570
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {Vi=2 }. Then V 0 is called Neutrosophic 571
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=2 }
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=2 }
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=2 }
= (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) =

X X X
= 00 min |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00 00
Vj ∈ VN SHG \ V = {Vi=1,3−7 }, ∃!V2 ∈ V = {Vi=2 } :
V1 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)

}}|.
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−2 }
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−2 }
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−2 }
= (0.49, 0.49, 0.49) =

X X X
= 00 min |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00 00
Vj ∈ VN SHG \ V = {Vi=3−7 }, ∃!V2 ∈ V = {Vi=1−2 } :
}}|.
V1 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V1 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−3 }
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={V
i=1−3 }
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−3 }
= (0.72, 0.72, 0.72) =

X X X
= 00 min |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00 00
Vj ∈ VN SHG \ V = {Vi=4−7 }, ∃!V2 ∈V = {Vi=1−3 } :
0
}}|.
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−4 }
V1 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V5 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−4 }
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−4 }
= (0.95, 0.95, 0.95) =

X X X
= 00 min |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00 00
Vj ∈ VN SHG \ V = {Vi=5−7 }, ∃!V2 ∈V = {Vi=1−4 } :
0
}}|.
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−5 }
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−5 }
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={V
i=1−5 }
= (1.18, 1.18, 1.18) =

X X X
= 00 min |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00 00
Vj ∈ VN SHG \ V = {Vi=6−7 }, ∃!V2 ∈V = {Vi=1−5 } :
0
V1 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V5 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V6 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
}}|.
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−6 }
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−6 }
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−6 }
= (1.41, 1.41, 1.41) =

X X X
= 00 min |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00 00
Vj ∈ VN SHG \ V = {Vi=7 }, ∃!V2 ∈ V = {Vi=1−6 } :
}}|.
V1 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V5 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V6 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V7 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−7 }
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−7 }
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−7 }
= (1.64, 1.64, 1.64) =

X X X
= 00 min |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00 00
Vj ∈ VN SHG \ V = {}, ∃!V2 ∈ V = {Vi=1−7 } :
0
}}|.
5 Main Result 610
Theorem 5.1. (Main Result and Main Theorem). 611
Assume every Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar has the letter z. The notion on the 612
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar and Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel coincides. 613
Proof. 614
(i). Let 615
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
CEN T ER, E2
616
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , CEN T ER
be a longest path taken a connected Extreme SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). There’s 617
a new way to redefine as 618
ViEXT ERN AL ∼ VjEXT ERN AL ≡

∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL ∈ Ez ≡
∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , {ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL } ⊆ Ez .
The term “EXTERNAL” implies |N (ViEXT ERN AL )| ≥ |N (Vj )| where Vj is 619
corresponded to ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Stable 620
Perfect Domination. The latter is straightforward. 621
(ii). Let 622
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1∗ ,
CEN T ER, E2∗
623
P :
E1∗ , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2∗ , CEN T ER
is a longest SuperHyperStrongly Stable Perfect Domination taken from a connected Extreme 624
SuperHyperWheel ESHW : (V, E). There’s a new way to redefine as 625

Perfect Domination. The latter is straightforward. Then there’s at least one Neutrosophic 628
SuperHyperStrongly Stable Perfect Domination. Thus the notion of quasi isn’t up and the 629
SuperHyperNotions based on Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Stable Perfect Domination could 630
be applied. The unique embedded Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Stable Perfect Domination 631
proposes some longest Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Stable Perfect Domination excerpt from 632
some representatives. The latter is straightforward. 633
Proposition 5.2. Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E).

Assume every Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex has the letter z. The Neutrosophic
SuperHyperStrongly Stable Perfect Domination set is as follows.
{CEN T ER}.
Proof. Let 634
P :
CEN T ER, E2∗
635
P :
E2∗ , CEN T ER


SuperHyperStrongly Stable Perfect Domination number is as follows.
0.26.
Proof. Let 646
P :
CEN T ER, E2∗
647
P :
E2∗ , CEN T ER

Proposition 5.4. Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E).

SuperHyperStrongly Stable Perfect Domination set is as follows.
{CEN T ER}.
Proof. Let 658
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
CEN T ER, E2
659
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , CEN T ER

Proposition 5.5. Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E).

SuperHyperStrongly Stable Perfect Domination number is as follows.
0.26.
Proof. Let 665
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
CEN T ER, E2
666
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , CEN T ER

Definition 5.6. (Uniform Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar and Uniform Neutrosophic 672
SuperHyperStar). 673
(i). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Every pair of 674
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices has the same maximum letter, i.e., 675
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices mutually has the same maximum letter. A 676
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E) is called Uniform 677
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar. 678
(ii). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Every pair 679
of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices has the same maximum letter, i.e., 680
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices mutually has the same maximum letter. A 681
Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E) is called Uniform 682
Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel. 683
Proposition 5.7. Let an Uniform Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel (SHG) S be a pair

S = (V, E). The Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Stable Perfect Domination set is as follows.
{CEN T ER}.
Proof. Let 684
P :
CEN T ER, E2∗
685
P :
E2∗ , CEN T ER


The Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Stable Perfect Domination number is lower than as follows.
0.26.
Proof. Let 696
P :
CEN T ER, E2∗
697
P :
E2∗ , CEN T ER

Proposition 5.9. Let an Uniform Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar (SHG) S be a pair

S = (V, E). The Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Stable Perfect Domination set is as follows.
{CEN T ER}.
Proof. Let 708
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
CEN T ER, E2
709
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , CEN T ER

Proposition 5.10. Let an Uniform Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar (SHG) S be a pair

S = (V, E). The Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Stable Perfect Domination number is lower than as
follows.
0.26.
Proof. Let 715
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
CEN T ER, E2
716
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , CEN T ER

Proposition 5.11. (Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar and Neutrosophic 722
SuperHyperWheel). 723
(i). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Assume every 724
Neutrosophic CENTER has the letter maximum letter. Then the Neutrosophic 725
SuperHyperVertices don’t have the same maximum letter, are in every 726
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Stable Perfect Domination set. 727
(ii). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Assume 728
every Neutrosophic CENTER has the letter maximum letter. Then the 729
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices don’t have the same maximum letter, are in 730
every Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Stable Perfect Domination set. 731
Proof. 732
(i). Let 733
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
CEN T ER, E2
734
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , CEN T ER

(ii). Let 740
P :
CEN T ER, E2∗
741
P :
E2∗ , CEN T ER

Proposition 5.12. (Embedded Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar and Embedded 752
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar). 753
(i). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Then 754
CENTER is in every Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Stable Perfect Domination set. 755
(ii). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Then 756
CENTER is in every Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Stable Perfect Domination set. 757
Proof. 758
(i). Let 759
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
CEN T ER, E2
760
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , CEN T ER

(ii). Let 766
P :
CEN T ER, E2∗
767
P :
E2∗ , CEN T ER

6 Neutrosophic Applications in Cancer’s 778
Neutrosophic Recognition 779
The cancer is the Neutrosophic disease but the Neutrosophic model is going to figure 780
out what’s going on this Neutrosophic phenomenon. The special Neutrosophic case of 781
this Neutrosophic disease is considered and as the consequences of the model, some 782
parameters are used. The cells are under attack of this disease but the moves of the 783
cancer in the special region are the matter of mind. The Neutrosophic recognition of the 784
cancer could help to find some Neutrosophic treatments for this Neutrosophic disease. 785
In the following, some Neutrosophic steps are Neutrosophic devised on this disease. 786
Step 1. (Neutrosophic Definition) The Neutrosophic recognition of the cancer in 787
the long-term Neutrosophic function. 788
Figure 42. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite Associated to the Notions of Neutro-

sophic SuperHyperStrongly Stable Perfect Domination
Step 2. (Neutrosophic Issue) The specific region has been assigned by the 789
Neutrosophic model [it’s called Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph] and the long 790
Neutrosophic cycle of the move from the cancer is identified by this research. 791
Sometimes the move of the cancer hasn’t be easily identified since there are some 792
determinacy, indeterminacy and neutrality about the moves and the effects of the 793
cancer on that region; this event leads us to choose another model [it’s said to be 794
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph] to have convenient perception on what’s 795
happened and what’s done. 796
Step 3. (Neutrosophic Model) There are some specific Neutrosophic models, 797
which are well-known and they’ve got the names, and some general Neutrosophic 798
models. The moves and the Neutrosophic traces of the cancer on the complex 799
tracks and between complicated groups of cells could be fantasized by a 800
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath(-/SuperHyperStrongly Stable Perfect Domination, 801
SuperHyperStar, SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, 802
SuperHyperWheel). The aim is to find either the Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly 803
Stable Perfect Domination or the Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Stable Perfect Domination in 804
those Neutrosophic Neutrosophic SuperHyperModels. 805
7 Case 1: The Initial Neutrosophic Steps 806
Toward Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite as 807
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel 808
Step 4. (Neutrosophic Solution) In the Neutrosophic Figure (42), the 809
Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite is Neutrosophic highlighted and Neutrosophic 810
featured. 811
By using the Neutrosophic Figure (42) and the Table (21), the Neutrosophic 812
SuperHyperBipartite is obtained. 813
Edges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite
Figure 43. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite Associated to the Notions of

Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Stable Perfect Domination
The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Neutrosophic Algorithm in 814
previous Neutrosophic result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the 815
connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), in the 816
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (42), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Stable 817
Perfect Domination. 818
8 Case 2: The Increasing Neutrosophic Steps 819
Toward Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite as 820
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel 821
Step 4. (Neutrosophic Solution) In the Neutrosophic Figure (43), the 822
Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite is Neutrosophic highlighted and 823
Neutrosophic featured. 824
By using the Neutrosophic Figure (43) and the Table (22), the Neutrosophic 825
SuperHyperMultipartite is obtained. 826
The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Neutrosophic Algorithm in 827
previous result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected 828
Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic 829
SuperHyperModel (43), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Stable Perfect Domination. 830
831
Edges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite
9 Neutrosophic Applications in Cancer’s 832
Neutrosophic Recognition 833
Cancer is a neutrosophic disease, but the neutrosophic model is supposed to understand 834
what is going on in this neutrosophic phenomenon. The special case of neutrosophic 835
disease is considered and some parameters have been used as consequences of the model. 836
Cells are subject to attack by the disease, but the movements of the cancer in the 837
specific area is a matter of mind. Neutrosophic diagnosis of cancer can help in finding 838
some Neutrosophic cures for this Neutrosophic disease. 839
In the following, several Neutrosophic stages are designed for this disease. 840
Step 1. (Neutrosophic Definition) Neutrosophic diagnosis of cancer in long-term 841
Neutrosophic performance. 842
Step 2. (Neutrosophic Issue) The specific region is assigned by the Neutrosophic 843
model (called Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph) and the long Neutrosophic cycle of 844
movement of cancer is identified by this scientific research. Sometimes the 845
movement of cancer is not easy to detect, because there is certainty, uncertainty 846
and neutrality about the movements and effects of cancer on that area. This event 847
leads us to choose another model [which is said to be the Neutrosophic 848
superhypergraph] in order to have a proper understanding of what happened and 849
was done. 850
Step 3. (Neutrosophic Model) There are some specific Neutrosophic models that 851
are well known and have names and some general Neutrosophic models. Cancer 852
neurtosophic movements and effects in complex pathways and between complex 853
groups of cells can be visualized by a SuperHyperPath (-/SuperHyperCycle, 854
SuperHyperStar, SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, 855
SuperHyperWheel). The goal is to find dominant neutrosophic Strongly Stable 856
Perfect Domination models or dominant sStrongly Stable Perfect Domination 857
models. 858
10 Wondering Open Problems But As The 859
Directions To Forming The Motivations 860
In what follows, some “problems” and some “questions” are proposed. 861
The SuperHyperStrongly Stable Perfect Domination and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly 862
Stable Perfect Domination are defined on a real-world application, titled “Cancer’s 863
Recognitions”. 864
Question 10.1. Which the else SuperHyperModels could be defined based on Cancer’s 865
recognitions? 866
Question 10.2. Are there some SuperHyperNotions related to SuperHyperStrongly Stable 867
and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Stable Perfect Domination?

Perfect Domination 868
Question 10.3. Are there some Algorithms to be defined on the SuperHyperModels to 869
compute them? 870
Question 10.4. Which the SuperHyperNotions are related to beyond the 871
SuperHyperStrongly Stable Perfect Domination and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Stable Perfect 872
Domination? 873
Problem 10.5. The SuperHyperStrongly Stable Perfect Domination and the Neutrosophic 874
SuperHyperStrongly Stable Perfect Domination do a SuperHyperModel for the Cancer’s recognitions 875
and they’re based on SuperHyperStrongly Stable Perfect Domination, are there else? 876
Problem 10.6. Which the fundamental SuperHyperNumbers are related to these 877
SuperHyperNumbers types-results? 878
Problem 10.7. What’s the independent research based on Cancer’s recognitions 879
concerning the multiple types of SuperHyperNotions? 880
11 Conclusion and Closing Remarks 881
In this section, closing and concluding remarks are presented. The drawbacks of this 882
scientific research are shown. Some advantages and disadvantages of this scientific 883
research are highlighted. 884
This scientific research uses some approaches to further understand the Neutrosophic 885
SuperHyperGraphs. In this effort, two SuperHyperNotions are defined on the Strongly 886
Stable Perfect Domination. For this reason, in the second definition, the original 887
definition of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph is redefined on the position of the 888
alphabets. Based on the new Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph definition, the new 889
SuperHyperNotion, Neutrosophic Strongly Stable Perfect Domination, finds a suitable 890
background to implement some results on. Some SuperHyperClasses and some 891
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses are the subjects of this scientific research on modeling 892
areas that are subject to cancer attacks in order to recognize this disease as mentioned 893
under the title “Cancer Diagnosis”. To formalize the SuperHyperNotion, Strongly 894
Stable Perfect Domination, SuperHyperClasses and new SuperHyperClasses instances 895
are introduced. Some general results are summarized in the Strongly Stable Perfect 896
Domination and Neutrosophic Strongly Stable Perfect Domination sections. 897
Clarifications, examples, and literature reviews go all the way. In this scientific research, 898
the literature review has met the lines containing concepts and results. 899
SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph are super-hypermodels in 900
“cancer diagnosis” and both are the foundation of the background of this scientific 901
research. Sometimes cancer has occurred in an area full of cells, cell groups, and 902
embedded styles. In this section, SuperHyperModel proposes SuperHyperNotions, 903
formally called “Strongly Stable Perfect Domination”, based on the connections of 904
Cancer’s movements in the longest and strongest styles with the formation of design 905
and architecture, in terms of terms and whispering words. . The “SuperHyper” prefix 906
refers to the topic of embedded styles to explore the background of SuperHyperNotions. 907
In the table (23), the advantages and ways of this scientific research are specified, 908
pointed out and expressed. 909
12 Background 910
There are some scientific researches covering the topic of this scientific research. In what 911
follows, there are some discussion and literature reviews about them. 912
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “New Ideas In Recognition of 913
Cancer And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph As Hyper Tool On Super Toot” in Ref. [1] 914
Table 23. A look at this scientific research and beyond

Advantages Limitations
1. Redefining the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 1. General Results
2. Strongly Stable Perfect Domination
3. Neutrosophic Strongly Stable Perfect Domination 2. Other SuperHyperNumbers
4. modeling cancer diagnoses
5. SuperHyperClasses 3. SuperHyperFamilies
by Henry Garrett (2023). In this research article, a novel approach is implemented on 915
SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on general forms with 916
introducing used neutrosophic classes of neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. It’s published 917
in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled “Current Trends in Mass Communication 918
(CTMC)” with ISO abbreviation “Curr Trends Mass Comm” in volume 2 and issue 1 919
with pages 32-55. 920
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “Some Super Hyper Degrees 921
and Co-Super Hyper Degrees on Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs And Super Hyper 922
Graphs Alongside Applications in Cancer’s Treatments” in Ref. [2] by Henry Garrett 923
(2023). In this research article, a novel approach is implemented on SuperHyperGraph 924
and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on fundamental notions and using vital tools 925
in Cancer’s Treatments. It’s published in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled 926
“Journal of Mathematical Techniques and Computational Mathematics(JMTCM)” with 927
ISO abbreviation “J Math Techniques Comput Math” in volume 2 and issue 1 with 928
pages 35-47. The research article studies deeply with choosing directly neutrosophic 929
SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough toward independent 930
results based on initial background and fundamental SuperHyperNumbers. 931
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “A Research on Cancer’s 932
Recognition and Neutrosophic Super Hypergraph by Eulerian Super Hyper Cycles and 933
Hamiltonian Sets as Hyper Covering Versus Super separations” in Ref. [3] by Henry 934
Garrett (2023). In this research article, a novel approach is implemented on 935
SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on fundamental notions 936
and using vital tools in Cancer’s Recognition. It’s published in prestigious and fancy 937
journal is entitled “Journal of Mathematical Techniques and Computational 938
Mathematics(JMTCM)” with ISO abbreviation “J Math Techniques Comput Math” in 939
volume 2 and issue 3 with pages 136-148. The research article studies deeply with 940
choosing directly neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph. It’s the 941
breakthrough toward independent results based on initial background and fundamental 942
SuperHyperNumbers. 943
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “Neutrosophic 1-Failed 944
SuperHyperForcing in the SuperHyperFunction to Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs 945
on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Beyond ” in Ref. [4] by Henry Garrett (2023). 946
In this research article, a novel approach is implemented on SuperHyperGraph and 947
neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on fundamental SuperHyperNumber and using 948
neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses of neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. It’s published in 949
prestigious and fancy journal is entitled “Journal of Mathematical Techniques and 950
Computational Mathematics(JMTCM)” with ISO abbreviation “J Math Techniques 951
Comput Math” in volume 2 and issue 6 with pages 221-307. The research article studies 952
deeply with choosing directly neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph. 953
It’s the breakthrough toward independent results based on initial background and 954
fundamental SuperHyperNumbers. The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is 955
titled “New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph by 956
Initial Eulerian-Path-Cut as Hyper Initial Eulogy on Super Initial EULA” in Ref. [5] by 957
Henry Garrett (2023). In this research article, a novel approach is implemented on 958
SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on fundamental 959
SuperHyperNumber and using neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses of neutrosophic 960
SuperHyperGraph. It’s published in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled 961
“International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Research” with ISO 962
abbreviation “IJPAMR” in volume 3 and issue 2 with pages 60-88 and doi: 963
10.51483/IJPAMR.3.2.2023.60-88. The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is 964
titled “New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graph by 965
Eulerian-Path-Cut as Hyper Eulogy-Path-Cut on Super EULA-Path-Cut” in Ref. [6] by 966
SuperHyperGraph. It’s published in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled 970
“International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Research” with ISO 971
abbreviation “IJPAMR” in volume 3 and issue 2 with pages 102-124 and doi: 972
10.51483/IJPAMR.3.2.2023.102-124. The research article studies deeply with choosing 973
directly neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough 974
toward independent results based on initial background and fundamental 975
SuperHyperNumbers. The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “Super 976
Hyper Dominating and Super Hyper Resolving on Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs and 977
Their Directions in Game Theory and Neutrosophic Super Hyper Classes” in Ref. [7] by 978
SuperHyperGraph. It’s published in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled “Journal 982
of Mathematical Techniques and Computational Mathematics(JMTCM)” with ISO 983
abbreviation “J Math Techniques Comput Math” in volume 1 and issue 3 with pages 984
242-263. The research article studies deeply with choosing directly neutrosophic 985
SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough toward independent 986
results based on initial background and fundamental SuperHyperNumbers. The seminal 987
paper and groundbreaking article is titled “neutrosophic co-degree and neutrosophic 988
degree alongside chromatic numbers in the setting of some classes related to neutrosophic 989
hypergraphs” in Ref. [8] by Henry Garrett (2023). In this research article, a novel 990
approach is implemented on SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 991
based on general forms without using neutrosophic classes of neutrosophic 992
SuperHyperGraph. It’s published in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled “Journal 993
of Current Trends in Computer Science Research (JCTCSR)” with ISO abbreviation “J 994
Curr Trends Comp Sci Res” in volume 2 and issue 1 with pages 16-24. The research 995
article studies deeply with choosing neutrosophic hypergraphs instead of neutrosophic 996
SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough toward independent results based on initial 997
background. The research article studies deeply with choosing neutrosophic 998
hypergraphs instead of neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough toward 999
independent results based on initial background. In some articles are titled “0039 — 1000
Closing Numbers and Super-Closing Numbers as (Dual)Resolving and (Dual)Coloring 1001
alongside (Dual)Dominating in (Neutrosophic)n-SuperHyperGraph” in Ref. [9] by 1002
Henry Garrett (2022), “0049 — (Failed)1-Zero-Forcing Number in Neutrosophic Graphs” 1003
in Ref. [10] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Extreme SuperHyperClique as the Firm Scheme 1004
of Confrontation under Cancer’s Recognition as the Model in The Setting of 1005
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [11] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Uncertainty 1006
On The Act And Effect Of Cancer Alongside The Foggy Positions Of Cells Toward 1007
Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique inside Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Titled 1008
Cancer’s Recognition” in Ref. [12] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic Version Of 1009
Separates Groups Of Cells In Cancer’s Recognition On Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” 1010
in Ref. [13] by Henry Garrett (2022), “The Shift Paradigm To Classify Separately The 1011
Cells and Affected Cells Toward The Totality Under Cancer’s Recognition By New 1012
Multiple Definitions On the Sets Polynomials Alongside Numbers In The (Neutrosophic) 1013
SuperHyperMatching Theory Based on SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic 1014
SuperHyperGraph” in Ref. [14] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Breaking the Continuity and 1015
Uniformity of Cancer In The Worst Case of Full Connections With Extreme Failed 1016
SuperHyperClique In Cancer’s Recognition Applied in (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” 1017
in Ref. [15] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable as the 1018
Survivors on the Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition Based on Uncertainty to All Modes 1019
in Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [16] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Extremism 1020
of the Attacked Body Under the Cancer’s Circumstances Where Cancer’s Recognition 1021
Titled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [17] by Henry Garrett (2022), 1022
“(Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in Cancer’s Recognitions And 1023
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [18] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic 1024
Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on 1025
Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In Special ViewPoints” in Ref. [19] by Henry 1026
Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in the SuperHyperFunction 1027
To Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition And 1028
Beyond ” in Ref. [20] by Henry Garrett (2022), “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperStable on 1029
Cancer’s Recognition by Well- SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs ” 1030
in Ref. [21] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To 1031
Form Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In 1032
Special ViewPoints” in Ref. [17] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Basic Notions on 1033
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperForcing And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling in Cancer’s 1034
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [22] by Henry Garrett 1035
(2022), “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form Neutrosophic 1036
SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In Special ViewPoints” 1037
in Ref. [23] by Henry Garrett (2022),“(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s 1038
Recognitions Featuring (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances” in 1039
Ref. [24] by Henry Garrett (2022), “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperAlliances With 1040
SuperHyperDefensive and SuperHyperOffensive Type-SuperHyperSet On (Neutrosophic) 1041
SuperHyperGraph With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions 1042
And Related (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClasses” in Ref. [25] by Henry Garrett (2022), 1043
“SuperHyperGirth on SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph With 1044
SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions” in Ref. [26] by Henry Garrett (2022), 1045
“Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on Neutrosophic 1046
SuperHyperGraphs and SuperHyperGraphs Alongside Applications in Cancer’s 1047
Treatments” in Ref. [27] by Henry Garrett (2022), “SuperHyperDominating and 1048
SuperHyperResolving on Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs And Their Directions in 1049
Game Theory and Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses” in Ref. [28] by Henry Garrett 1050
(2022), “SuperHyperMatching By (R-)Definitions And Polynomials To Monitor 1051
Cancer’s Recognition In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [237] by Henry 1052
Garrett (2023), “The Focus on The Partitions Obtained By Parallel Moves In The 1053
Cancer’s Extreme Recognition With Different Types of Extreme SuperHyperMatching Set 1054
and Polynomial on (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [238] by Henry Garrett 1055
(2023), “Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique Decides the Failures on the Cancer’s 1056
Recognition in the Perfect Connections of Cancer’s Attacks By SuperHyperModels 1057
Named (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [239] by Henry Garrett (2023), 1058
“Indeterminacy On The All Possible Connections of Cells In Front of Cancer’s Attacks 1059
In The Terms of Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique on Cancer’s Recognition called 1060
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [240] by Henry Garrett (2023), “Perfect 1061
Directions Toward Idealism in Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition Forwarding 1062
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClique on Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [243] by 1063
Henry Garrett (2023), “Demonstrating Complete Connections in Every Embedded 1064
Regions and Sub-Regions in the Terms of Cancer’s Recognition and (Neutrosophic) 1065
SuperHyperGraphs With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClique” in Ref. [244] by Henry 1066
Garrett (2023), “Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic Regions titled 1067
neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable in Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition modeled in 1068
the Form of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [247] by Henry Garrett (2023), 1069
“Using the Tool As (Neutrosophic) Failed SuperHyperStable To SuperHyperModel 1070
Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [250] by Henry 1071
Garrett (2023), “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form Neutrosophic 1072
SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In Special ViewPoints” 1073
in Ref. [251] by Henry Garrett (2023), “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperStable on Cancer’s 1074
Recognition by Well-SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in 1075
Ref. [252] by Henry Garrett (2023), “Neutrosophic 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in the 1076
SuperHyperFunction To Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs on Cancer’s Neutrosophic 1077
Recognition And Beyond ” in Ref. [253] by Henry Garrett (2022), “(Neutrosophic) 1078
1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in Cancer’s Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) 1079
SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [254] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Basic Notions on 1080
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperForcing And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling in Cancer’s 1081
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [255] by Henry Garrett 1082
(2022), “Basic Neutrosophic Notions Concerning SuperHyperDominating and 1083
Neutrosophic SuperHyperResolving in SuperHyperGraph” in Ref. [266] by Henry 1084
Garrett (2022), “Initial Material of Neutrosophic Preliminaries to Study Some 1085
Neutrosophic Notions Based on Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) in Neutrosophic 1086
SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)” in Ref. [267] by Henry Garrett (2022), and [4–267], there 1087
are some endeavors to formalize the basic SuperHyperNotions about neutrosophic 1088
SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph alongside scientific research books 1089
at [268–407]. Two popular scientific research books in Scribd in the terms of high 1090
readers, 5679 and 6667 respectively, on neutrosophic science is on [408, 409]. 1091
Some scientific studies and scientific researches about neutrosophic graphs, are 1092
proposed as book in Ref. [408] by Henry Garrett (2023) which is indexed by Google 1093
Scholar and has more than 5679 readers in Scribd. It’s titled “Beyond Neutrosophic 1094
Graphs” and published by Dr. Henry Garrett. This research book covers different types 1095
of notions and settings in neutrosophic graph theory and neutrosophic 1096
SuperHyperGraph theory. 1097
Also, some scientific studies and scientific researches about neutrosophic graphs, are 1098
proposed as book in Ref. [409] by Henry Garrett (2023) which is indexed by Google 1099
Scholar and has more than 6667 readers in Scribd. It’s titled “Neutrosophic Duality” 1100
and published by Dr. Henry Garrett. This research book presents different types of 1101
notions SuperHyperResolving and SuperHyperDominating in the setting of duality in 1102
neutrosophic graph theory and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph theory. This research 1103
book has scrutiny on the complement of the intended set and the intended set, 1104
simultaneously. It’s smart to consider a set but acting on its complement that what’s 1105
done in this research book which is popular in the terms of high readers in Scribd. 1106
See the seminal scientific researches [1–3]. The formalization of the notions on the 1107
framework of notions in SuperHyperGraphs, Neutrosophic notions in 1108
SuperHyperGraphs theory, and (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs theory at [4–267] 1109
alongside scientific research books at [268–407]. Two popular scientific research books 1110
in Scribd ,in the terms of high readers, 5679 and 6667 respectively, on neutrosophic 1111
science is on [408, 409]. 1112
References 1113
1. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 1114
SuperHyperGraph As Hyper Tool On Super Toot”, Curr Trends Mass Comm 1115
2(1) (2023) 32-55. (doi: 10.33140/CTMC.02.01.03). 1116
2. Henry Garrett, “Some Super Hyper Degrees and Co-Super Hyper Degrees on 1117
Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs And Super Hyper Graphs Alongside 1118
Applications in Cancer’s Treatments”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 2(1) 1119
(2023) 35-47. (doi: 10.33140/JMTCM.02.01.05). 1120
3. Henry Garrett, “A Research on Cancer’s Recognition and Neutrosophic Super 1121
Hypergraph by Eulerian Super Hyper Cycles and Hamiltonian Sets as Hyper 1122
Covering Versus Super separations”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 2(3) 1123
(2023) 136-148. (doi: 10.33140/JMTCM.02.03.03). 1124
4. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in the 1125
SuperHyperFunction to Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs on Cancer’s 1126
Neutrosophic Recognition and Beyond ”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 2(6) 1127
(2023) 221-307. (doi: 10.33140/JMTCM.02.06.04). 1128
5. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic 1129
SuperHyperGraph by Initial Eulerian-Path-Cut as Hyper Initial Eulogy on Super 1130
Initial EULA”, International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics 1131
Research 3(2) (2023) 60-88. (doi: 10.51483/IJPAMR.3.2.2023.60-88). 1132
6. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic Super 1133
Hyper Graph by Eulerian-Path-Cut as Hyper Eulogy-Path-Cut on Super 1134
EULA-Path-Cut”, International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics 1135
Research 3(2) (2023) 102-124. (doi: 10.51483/IJPAMR.3.2.2023.102-124). 1136
7. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic Super 1137
Hyper Graph by Eulerian-Path-Cut as Hyper Eulogy-Path-Cut on Super 1138
EULA-Path-Cut”, J Curr Trends Comp Sci Res 2(1) (2023) 16-24. (doi: 1139
10.33140/JCTCSR.02.01.04) 1140
8. Henry Garrett, “Super Hyper Dominating and Super Hyper Resolving on 1141
Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs and Their Directions in Game Theory and 1142
Neutrosophic Super Hyper Classes”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 1(3) 1143
(2022) 242-263. (doi: 10.33140/JMTCM.01.03.09) 1144
9. Garrett, Henry. “0039 — Closing Numbers and Super-Closing Numbers as 1145
(Dual)Resolving and (Dual)Coloring alongside (Dual)Dominating in 1146
(Neutrosophic)n-SuperHyperGraph.” CERN European Organization for Nuclear 1147
Research - Zenodo, Nov. 2022. CERN European Organization for Nuclear 1148
Research, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6319942. 1149
https://oa.mg/work/10.5281/zenodo.6319942 1150
10. Garrett, Henry. “0049 — (Failed)1-Zero-Forcing Number in Neutrosophic 1151
Graphs.” CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research - Zenodo, Feb. 1152
2022. CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research, 1153
https://doi.org/10.13140/rg.2.2.35241.26724. 1154
https://oa.mg/work/10.13140/rg.2.2.35241.26724 1155
11. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperClique as the Firm Scheme of 1156
Confrontation under Cancer’s Recognition as the Model in The Setting of 1157
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010308 (doi: 1158
10.20944/preprints202301.0308.v1). 1159
12. Henry Garrett, “Uncertainty On The Act And Effect Of Cancer Alongside The 1160
Foggy Positions Of Cells Toward Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique inside 1161
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Titled Cancer’s Recognition”, Preprints 2023, 1162
2023010282 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0282.v1). 1163
13. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Version Of Separates Groups Of Cells In 1164
Cancer’s Recognition On Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 1165
2023010267 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0267.v1). 1166
14. Henry Garrett, “The Shift Paradigm To Classify Separately The Cells and 1167
Affected Cells Toward The Totality Under Cancer’s Recognition By New 1168
Multiple Definitions On the Sets Polynomials Alongside Numbers In The 1169
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperMatching Theory Based on SuperHyperGraph and 1170
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”, Preprints 2023, 2023010265 (doi: 1171
10.20944/preprints202301.0265.v1). 1172
15. Henry Garrett, “Breaking the Continuity and Uniformity of Cancer In The 1173
Worst Case of Full Connections With Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique In 1174
Cancer’s Recognition Applied in (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 1175
2023, 2023010262,(doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0262.v1). 1176
16. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable as the Survivors on the 1177
Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition Based on Uncertainty to All Modes in 1178
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010240 (doi: 1179
10.20944/preprints202301.0240.v1). 1180
17. Henry Garrett, “Extremism of the Attacked Body Under the Cancer’s 1181
Circumstances Where Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) 1182
SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010224, (doi: 1183
10.20944/preprints202301.0224.v1). 1184
18. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in Cancer’s 1185
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 1186
2023010105 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 1187
19. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form 1188
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions 1189
In Special ViewPoints”, Preprints 2023, 2023010088 (doi: 1190
10.20944/preprints202301.0088.v1). 1191
SuperHyperFunction To Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs on Cancer’s 1193
Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond ”, Preprints 2023, 2023010044 1194
21. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperStable on Cancer’s Recognition by 1195
Well- SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 1196
2023010043 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0043.v1). 1197
22. Henry Garrett, “Basic Notions on (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperForcing And 1198
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling in Cancer’s Recognitions And 1199
10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 1201
10.20944/preprints202301.0088.v1). 1205
24. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions 1206
Featuring (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances”, Preprints 1207
2022, 2022120549 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0549.v1). 1208
25. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperAlliances With SuperHyperDefensive 1209
and SuperHyperOffensive Type-SuperHyperSet On (Neutrosophic) 1210
SuperHyperGraph With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s 1211
Recognitions And Related (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClasses”, Preprints 2022, 1212
2022120540 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0540.v1). 1213
26. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperGirth on SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic 1214
SuperHyperGraph With SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions”, 1215
Preprints 2022, 2022120500 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0500.v1). 1216
27. Henry Garrett, “Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on 1217
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs and SuperHyperGraphs Alongside Applications 1218
in Cancer’s Treatments”, Preprints 2022, 2022120324 (doi: 1219
10.20944/preprints202212.0324.v1). 1220
28. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDominating and SuperHyperResolving on 1221
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs And Their Directions in Game Theory and 1222
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”, Preprints 2022, 2022110576 (doi: 1223
10.20944/preprints202211.0576.v1). 1224
29. Henry Garrett, “Star and Wheel on Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic 1225
SuperHyperGraph with a Specific Type of Independency of 1226
SuperHyperVertices”, Preprints 2024, , 2024020663 (doi: 1227
10.20944/preprints202402.0663.v1). 1228
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By Total Perfect Domination”, Zenodo 1230
2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10929590). 1231
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By Total Perfect Domination”, 1233
Zenodo 2024, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10918770). 1234
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By Total Perfect Domination”, 1236
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By Perfect Domination”, Zenodo 2023, 1239
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10899659). 1240
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By Perfect Domination”, Zenodo 1242
2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10895887). 1243
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By Perfect Domination”, 1245
SuperHyperGraph With Counterproposal Star and Counteroffer Wheel By 1248
Counterargument Stable Sequence As Hyper Findings On Super Gatherings”, 1249
SuperHyperGraph With Counterproposal Bipartite and Counteroffer Path By 1252
Counterargument Stable Sequence As Hyper Findings On Super Gatherings”, 1253
SuperHyperGraph With Counterproposal Multipartite and Counteroffer Cycle 1256
By Counterargument Stable Sequence As Hyper Findings On Super 1257
Gatherings”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10640905). 1258
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By Strongly Resolving Sequence As 1260
Hyper Decoration On Super Density”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1261
10.13140/RG.2.2.17389.97769). 1262
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By Strongly Resolving Sequence As 1264
Hyper Decoration On Super Density”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1265
10.13140/RG.2.2.28685.10727). 1266
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By Strongly Resolving Sequence 1268
As Hyper Decoration On Super Density”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1269
10.13140/RG.2.2.24994.20169). 1270
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By Dominating Sequence As Hyper 1272
Decoration On Super Density”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10371529). 1273
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By Dominating Sequence As Hyper 1275
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By Dominating Sequence As 1278
Hyper Decoration On Super Density”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1279
10.5281/zenodo.10263440). 1280
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By STABLE As Hyper Decoration On 1282
Super Density”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10028600). 1283
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By STABLE As Hyper Decoration 1285
On Super Density”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8310454). 1286
47. Henry Garrett, “Recognition of Cancer With Bipartite and Path as 1287
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph By the Tool Called Stability”, Preprints 2023, 1288
2023081972 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202308.1972.v1). 1289
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By STABLE As Hyper 1291
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By REVERSE CONNECTIVE 1294
DOMINATION As Hyper Decoration On Super Density”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1295
10.5281/zenodo.8206877). 1296
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By REVERSE CONNECTIVE 1298
10.5281/zenodo.8206834). 1300
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By REVERSE CONNECTIVE 1302
10.5281/zenodo.8206773). 1304
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By EQUAL CONNECTIVE 1306
10.5281/zenodo.8201319). 1308
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By EQUAL CONNECTIVE 1310
10.5281/zenodo.8201255). 1312
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By EQUAL CONNECTIVE 1314
10.5281/zenodo.8201165). 1316
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By CONNECTIVE DOMINATION As 1318
Hyper Decoration On Super Density”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1319
10.5281/zenodo.8196147). 1320
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By CONNECTIVE DOMINATION 1322
As Hyper Decoration On Super Density”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1323
10.5281/zenodo.8196132). 1324
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By CONNECTIVE 1326
10.5281/zenodo.8196099). 1328
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By DOMINATION As Hyper 1330
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By DOMINATION As Hyper 1333
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By DOMINATION As Hyper 1336
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperPerfect Search As Hyper Perf On Super 1339
Perfidy”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8104836). 1340
62. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Perfidy By Hyper Perf Of 1341
SuperHyperPerfect Search In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1342
SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8104857). 1343
SuperHyperGraph By Reverse Strict Dimension Dominating As Hyper Dimple 1345
On Super Dimity”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8092796). 1346
64. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Dimity By Hyper Dimple Of Reverse 1347
Strict Dimension Dominating In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1348
SuperHyperGraph By Unequal Dimension Dominating As Hyper Dimple On 1351
Super Dimity”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8088438). 1352
66. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Dimity By Hyper Dimple Of Unequal 1353
Dimension Dominating In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1354
SuperHyperGraph By Strict Dimension Dominating As Hyper Dimple On Super 1357
Dimity”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8084436). 1358
68. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Dimity By Hyper Dimple Of Strict 1359
SuperHyperGraph By Reverse Strict Connective As Hyper Conceit On Super 1363
Con”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8080100). 1364
70. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Con By Hyper Conceit Of Reverse Strict 1365
Connective In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, 1366
SuperHyperGraph By Unequal Connective Dominating As Hyper Conceit On 1369
Super Con”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8078445). 1370
72. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Con By Hyper Conceit Of Unequal 1371
Connective Dominating In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1372
SuperHyperGraph By Strict Connective Dominating As Hyper Conceit On 1375
74. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Con By Hyper Conceit Of Strict 1377
SuperHyperGraph By Reverse Dimension Dominating As Hyper Dimple On 1381
Super Dimity”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8072171). 1382
76. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Dimity By Hyper Dimple Of Reverse 1383
SuperHyperGraph By Equal Dimension Dominating As Hyper Dimple On Super 1387
78. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Dimity By Hyper Dimple Of Equal 1389
SuperHyperGraph By Dimension Dominating As Hyper Dimple On Super 1393
80. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Dimity By Hyper Dimple Of Dimension 1395
Dominating In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, 1396
SuperHyperGraph By Reverse Connective Dominating As Hyper Conceit On 1399
82. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Con By Hyper Conceit Of Reverse 1401
SuperHyperGraph By Equal Connective Dominating As Hyper Conceit On 1405
84. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Con By Hyper Conceit Of Equal 1407
SuperHyperGraph By Connective Dominating As Hyper Conceit On Super 1411
Con”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8051346). 1412
86. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Con By Hyper Conceit Of Connective 1413
SuperHyperGraph By United Dominating As Hyper Ultra On Super Units”, 1417
88. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Units By Hyper Ultra Of United 1419
SuperHyperGraph By Zero Forcing As Hyper ford On Super forceps”, Zenodo 1423
2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8017246). 1424
90. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super forceps By Hyper ford Of Zero Forcing In 1425
Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 2023, 1426
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8020128). 1427
SuperHyperGraph By Matrix-Based As Hyper mat On Super matte”, Zenodo 1429
2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7978571). 1430
92. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super mat By Hyper matte Of Matrix-Based In 1431
Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 2023, 1432
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7978857). 1433
SuperHyperGraph By Dominating-Edges As Hyper Dome On Super Eddy”, 1435
94. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Eddy By Hyper Dome Of 1437
Dominating-Edges In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1438
SuperHyperGraph By Edge-Gap As Hyper Gape On Super Gab”, Zenodo 2023, 1441
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7916595). 1442
96. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Gab By Hyper Gape Of Edge-Gap In 1443
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7923632). 1445
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On 1447
Super Nebulous”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7904698). 1448
98. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nebulous By Hyper Nebbish Of 1449
Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1450
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition As Hyper 1453
Decompress On Super Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1454
10.5281/zenodo.7904529). 1455
100. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Decompensation By Hyper Decompress Of 1456
Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With 1457
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1458
10.5281/zenodo.7904401). 1459
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut As Hyper Nebbish On Super 1461
Nebulous”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7871026). 1462
Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1464
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Cycle-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super 1467
Eulerian-Cycle-Neighbor In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1470
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Cycle-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On 1473
Super Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7855661). 1474
Eulerian-Cycle-Decomposition In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1476
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Cycle-Cut As Hyper Eulogy On Super EULA”, 1479
108. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super EULA By Hyper Eulogy Of 1481
Eulerian-Cycle-Cut In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1482
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Path-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super 1485
Eulerian-Type-Path-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1488
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Path-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress 1491
On Super Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7839333). 1492
Eulerian-Type-Path-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1494
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Path-Cut As Hyper Eulogy On Super 1497
EULA”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7834229). 1498
Eulerian-Type-Path-Cut In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1500
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Path-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super 1503
Eulerian-Path-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1506
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Path-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On 1509
Eulerian-Path-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1512
SuperHyperGraph As Hyper Tool On Super Toot”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1515
10.5281/zenodo.7812236). 1516
SuperHyperGraph By initial Eulerian-Path-Cut As Hyper initial Eulogy On 1518
Super initial EULA”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7809365). 1519
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Path-Cut As Hyper Eulogy-Path-Cut On Super 1521
EULA-Path-Cut”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7809358). 1522
Eulerian-Path-Cut In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1524
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Path-Cut As Hyper Eulogy On Super EULA”, 1527
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On 1530
Super Nebulous”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7806767). 1531
Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1533
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition As Hyper 1536
Decompress On Super Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1537
10.5281/zenodo.7804238). 1538
Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With 1540
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7804228). 1541
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut As Hyper Hamper On Super 1543
Hammy”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7799902). 1544
129. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Hammy By Hyper Hamper Of 1545
Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1546
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Cycle-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super 1549
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Cycle-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress 1552
On Super Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7793372). 1553
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Cycle-Cut As Hyper Hamper On Super 1555
Hammy”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7791952). 1556
Hamiltonian-Cycle-Cut In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1558
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super 1561
Hamiltonian-Neighbor In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1564
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On 1567
Hamiltonian-Decomposition In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1570
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Cut As Hyper Hamper On Super Hammy”, 1573
Hamiltonian-Cut In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1576
SuperHyperGraph By Trace-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 1579
Trace-Neighbor In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1582
142. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 1584
SuperHyperGraph By Trace-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On Super 1585
Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7771831). 1586
Trace-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1588
SuperHyperGraph By Trace-Cut As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 1591
ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.20913.25446). 1592
145. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Tract By Hyper Track Of Trace-Cut In 1593
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7764916). 1595
SuperHyperGraph By Edge-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 1597
Edge-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, 1600
SuperHyperGraph By Edge-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On Super 1603
Decompensation”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.22545.10089). 1604
Edge-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1606
SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.29544.34564). 1607
SuperHyperGraph By Edge-Cut As Hyper Edify On Super Eddy”, ResearchGate 1609
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.11377.76644). 1610
151. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Eddy By Hyper Edify Of Edge-Cut In 1611
Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 1612
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.23750.96329). 1613
SuperHyperGraph By Vertex-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 1615
Vertex-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1618
SuperHyperGraph By Vertex-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On Super 1621
Decompensation”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.30212.81289). 1622
Vertex-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1624
SuperHyperGraph By Vertex-Cut As Hyper Vertu On Super Vertigo”, 1627
157. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Vertigo By Hyper Vertu Of Vertex-Cut In 1629
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.32467.25124). 1631
SuperHyperGraph By Stable-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 1633
159. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nebulizer By Hyper Nub Of 1635
Stable-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1636
SuperHyperGraph By Stable-Decompositions As Hyper Stain On Super Stagy”, 1639
161. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Stale By Hyper Stalk Of 1641
Stable-Decompositions In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1642
SuperHyperGraph By Stable-Cut As Hyper Stain On Super Stagy”, 1645
163. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Stale By Hyper Stalk Of Stable-Cut In 1647
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.20170.24000). 1649
SuperHyperGraph By Clique-Neighbors As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 1651
165. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nebulizer By Hyper Nub Of 1653
Clique-Neighbors In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1654
SuperHyperGraph By Clique-Decompositions As Hyper Decompile On Super 1657
Decommission”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.18780.87683). 1658
Clique- Decompositions In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1660
SuperHyperGraph By Clique-Cut As Hyper Click On Super Cliche”, 1663
169. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Cliff By Hyper Cling Of Clique-Cut In 1665
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.27392.30721). 1667
SuperHyperGraph By Space As Hyper Spin On Super Spacy”, ResearchGate 1669
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.33028.40321). 1670
SuperHyperGraph By List- Coloring As Hyper List On Super Lisle”, 1672
172. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Lith By Hyper Lite Of List-Coloring In 1674
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.16356.04489). 1676
SuperHyperGraph By Space As Hyper Sparse On Super Spark ”, ResearchGate 1678
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.21756.21129). 1679
174. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Solidarity By Hyper Soul Of Space In 1680
Cancer’s Recognition With (Extreme) SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023, 1681
(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.30983.68009). 1682
SuperHyperGraph By Edge-Connectivity As Hyper Disclosure On Super 1684
Closure”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.28552.29445). 1685
176. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Uniform By Hyper Deformation Of 1686
Edge-Connectivity In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1687
SuperHyperGraph By Vertex-Connectivity As Hyper Leak On Super Structure”, 1690
178. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super System By Hyper Explosions Of 1692
Vertex-Connectivity In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1693
SuperHyperGraph By Tree-Decomposition As Hyper Forward On Super Returns”, 1696
180. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nodes By Hyper Moves Of 1698
Tree-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1699
SuperHyperGraph By Chord As Hyper Excellence On Super Excess”, 1702
182. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Gap By Hyper Navigations Of Chord In 1704
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.11172.14720). 1706
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyper(i,j)-Domination As Hyper Controller On 1708
Super Waves”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.22011.80165). 1709
184. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Coincidence By Hyper Routes Of 1710
SuperHyper(i,j)-Domination In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1711
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperEdge-Domination As Hyper Reversion On 1714
Super Indirection”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.10493.84962). 1715
186. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Obstacles By Hyper Model Of 1716
SuperHyperEdge-Domination In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1717
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperK-Domination As Hyper k-Actions On Super 1720
Patterns”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.19944.14086). 1721
188. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Harmony By Hyper k-Function Of 1722
SuperHyperK-Domination In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1723
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperK-Number As Hyper k-Partition On Super 1726
Layers”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.33103.76968). 1727
190. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Gradient By Hyper k-Class Of 1728
SuperHyperK-Number In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1729
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperOrder As Hyper Enumerations On Super 1732
Landmarks”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.35646.56641). 1733
192. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Analogous By Hyper Visions Of 1734
SuperHyperOrder In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1735
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperColoring As Hyper Categories On Super 1738
Neighbors”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.13973.81121). 1739
194. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Relations By Hyper Identifications Of 1740
SuperHyperColoring In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1741
195. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Contradiction By Hyper Detection of 1743
SuperHyperDefensive In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic 1744
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperDimension As Hyper Distinguishing On Super 1747
Distances”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.31956.88961). 1748
197. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Locations By Hyper Differing Of 1749
SuperHyperDimension In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1750
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperDominating As Hyper Closing On Super 1753
Messy”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.21510.45125). 1754
199. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Missing By Hyper Searching Of 1755
SuperHyperDominating In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1756
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperConnected As Hyper Group On Super Surge”, 1759
201. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Outbreak By Hyper Collections Of 1761
SuperHyperConnected In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1762
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperTotal As Hyper Covering On Super Infections”, 1765
203. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Extremism By Hyper Treatments Of 1767
SuperHyperTotal In Cancer’s Recognition with (Neutrosophic) 1768
204. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Isolation By Hyper Perfectness Of 1770
SuperHyperPerfect In Cancer’s Recognition with (Neutrosophic) 1771
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperPerfect As Hyper Idealism On Super Vacancy”, 1774
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperJoin As Hyper Separations On Super Sorts”, 1777
207. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super connections By Hyper disconnections Of 1779
SuperHyperJoin In Cancer’s Recognition with (Neutrosophic) 1780
208. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Mixed-Devastations By Hyper Decisions 1782
Of SuperHyperDuality In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic 1783
209. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition As (Neutrosophic) 1785
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperDuality As Hyper Imaginations On Super 1786
Mixed-Illustrations”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.33275.80161). 1787
210. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition As (Neutrosophic) 1788
SuperHyperGraph By Path SuperHyperColoring As Hyper Correction On Super 1789
Faults”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.30182.50241). 1790
211. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Reflections By Hyper Rotations Of Path 1791
SuperHyperColoring In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic 1792
212. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas As Hyper Deformations On Super Chains In 1794
Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph By 1795
SuperHyperDensity”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.13444.60806). 1796
213. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas As Hyper Ignorance By SuperHyperDensity On 1797
Super Resistances In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic 1798
SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.16800.05123). 1799
214. Henry Garrett, “New Research On Cancer’s Recognition and Neutrosophic 1800
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian SuperHyperCycles and Hamiltonian Sets As 1801
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-VI ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1802
10.13140/RG.2.2.29913.80482). 1803
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-V ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1806
10.13140/RG.2.2.33269.24809). 1807
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-IV ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1810
10.13140/RG.2.2.34946.96960). 1811
217. Henry Garrett, “A Research On Cancer’s Recognition and Neutrosophic 1812
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-III ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1814
10.13140/RG.2.2.14814.31040). 1815
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-II ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1818
10.13140/RG.2.2.15653.17125). 1819
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-I ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1822
10.13140/RG.2.2.25719.50089). 1823
220. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Disruptions In Cancer’s Extreme 1824
Recognition As Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph By Hyper Plans Called 1825
SuperHyperConnectivities”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1826
10.13140/RG.2.2.29441.94562). 1827
221. Henry Garrett, “Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition As Neutrosophic 1828
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperConnectivities As Hyper Diagnosis On Super 1829
Mechanism”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.17252.24968). 1830
222. Henry Garrett,“Cancer’s Recognition and (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph By 1831
the Criteria of Eulerian and Hamiltonian Type-Sets As Hyper Modified Cycles 1832
On Super Mess”, ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.16652.59525). 1833
223. Henry Garrett,“Eulerian and Hamiltonian In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition 1834
and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph On Super Interactions By Hyper Extensions 1835
of Cycles”, ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.34583.24485). 1836
224. Henry Garrett,“SuperHyperGirth Type-Results on extreme SuperHyperGirth 1837
theory and (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs Toward Cancer’s extreme 1838
Recognition”, Preprints 2023, 2023010396 (doi: 1839
10.20944/preprints202301.0396.v1). 1840
225. Henry Garrett,“Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Warns Hyper Landmark of 1841
neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth In Super Type-Versions of Cancer’s neutrosophic 1842
Recognition”, Preprints 2023, 2023010395 (doi: 1843
10.20944/preprints202301.0395.v1). 1844
226. Henry Garrett,“The Constructions of (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs on the 1845
Cancer’s Recognition in The Confrontation With Super Attacks In Hyper 1846
Situations By Implementing (Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in The 1847
Technical Approaches to Neutralize SuperHyperViews”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1848
10.13140/RG.2.2.26240.51204). 1849
227. Henry Garrett,“(Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing As the 1850
Entrepreneurs on Cancer’s Recognitions To Fail Forcing Style As the Super 1851
Classes With Hyper Effects In The Background of the Framework is So-Called 1852
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1853
10.13140/RG.2.2.12818.73925). 1854
228. Henry Garrett,“Super Actions On The Types of Hyper Levels In The Sensible 1855
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth On Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and 1856
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 1857
10.13140/RG.2.2.26836.88960). 1858
229. Henry Garrett,“SuperHyperGirth Approaches on the Super Challenges on the 1859
Cancer’s Recognition In the Hyper Model of (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, 1860
ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.36745.93289). 1861
230. Henry Garrett,“Extreme SuperHyperClique as the Firm Scheme of 1862
Confrontation under Cancer’s Recognition as the Model in The Setting of 1863
10.20944/preprints202301.0308.v1). 1865
231. Henry Garrett,“Uncertainty On The Act And Effect Of Cancer Alongside The 1866
Foggy Positions Of Cells Toward Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique inside 1867
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Titled Cancer’s Recognition”, Preprints 2023, 1868
2023010282 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0282.v1). 1869
232. Henry Garrett,“Neutrosophic Version Of Separates Groups Of Cells In Cancer’s 1870
Recognition On Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010267 1871
(doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0267.v1).). 1872
233. Henry Garrett, “The Shift Paradigm To Classify Separately The Cells and 1873
Affected Cells Toward The Totality Under Cancer’s Recognition By New 1874
Multiple Definitions On the Sets Polynomials Alongside Numbers In The 1875
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperMatching Theory Based on SuperHyperGraph and 1876
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”, Preprints 2023, 2023010265 (doi: 1877
10.20944/preprints202301.0265.v1). 1878
234. Henry Garrett,“Breaking the Continuity and Uniformity of Cancer In The 1879
Worst Case of Full Connections With Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique In 1880
Cancer’s Recognition Applied in (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 1881
2023, 2023010262,(doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0262.v1). 1882
235. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable as the Survivors on the 1883
Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition Based on Uncertainty to All Modes in 1884
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010240 (doi: 1885
10.20944/preprints202301.0240.v1). 1886
236. Henry Garrett, “Extremism of the Attacked Body Under the Cancer’s 1887
Circumstances Where Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) 1888
SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010224, (doi: 1889
10.20944/preprints202301.0224.v1). 1890
237. Henry Garrett,“SuperHyperMatching By (R-)Definitions And Polynomials To 1891
Monitor Cancer’s Recognition In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, 1892
ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.35061.65767). 1893
238. Henry Garrett,“The Focus on The Partitions Obtained By Parallel Moves In 1894
The Cancer’s Extreme Recognition With Different Types of Extreme 1895
SuperHyperMatching Set and Polynomial on (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, 1896
239. Henry Garrett,“Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique Decides the Failures on the 1898
Cancer’s Recognition in the Perfect Connections of Cancer’s Attacks By 1899
SuperHyperModels Named (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 1900
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.32530.73922). 1901
240. Henry Garrett,“Indeterminacy On The All Possible Connections of Cells In 1902
Front of Cancer’s Attacks In The Terms of Neutrosophic Failed 1903
SuperHyperClique on Cancer’s Recognition called Neutrosophic 1904
SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.15897.70243). 1905
241. Henry Garrett,“Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique Decides the Failures on the 1906
Cancer’s Recognition in the Perfect Connections of Cancer’s Attacks By 1907
SuperHyperModels Named (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 1908
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.32530.73922). 1909
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 1911
2023010105 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 1912
243. Henry Garrett,“Perfect Directions Toward Idealism in Cancer’s Neutrosophic 1913
Recognition Forwarding Neutrosophic SuperHyperClique on Neutrosophic 1914
244. Henry Garrett,“Demonstrating Complete Connections in Every Embedded 1916
Regions and Sub-Regions in the Terms of Cancer’s Recognition and 1917
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClique”, 1918
10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 1923
10.20944/preprints202301.0088.v1). 1927
247. Henry Garrett,“Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic Regions titled 1928
neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable in Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition 1929
modeled in the Form of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2023, 1930
(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.17385.36968). 1931
Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond ”, Preprints 2023, 2023010044 1934
Well- SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 1936
2023010043 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0043.v1). 1937
250. Henry Garrett, “Using the Tool As (Neutrosophic) Failed SuperHyperStable To 1938
SuperHyperModel Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) 1939
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In 1942
Special ViewPoints”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.11447.80803). 1943
Well-SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 1945
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.35774.77123). 1946
Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond ”, ResearchGate 2022, (doi: 1949
10.13140/RG.2.2.36141.77287). 1950
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2022, (doi: 1952
10.13140/RG.2.2.29430.88642). 1953
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2022, (doi: 1956
10.13140/RG.2.2.11369.16487). 1957
Featuring (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances”, Preprints 1959
2022, 2022120549 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0549.v1). 1960
Featuring (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances”, 1962
Recognitions And Related (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClasses”, Preprints 2022, 1967
2022120540 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0540.v1). 1968
Recognitions And Related (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClasses”, ResearchGate 1972
2022, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.14426.41923). 1973
Preprints 2022, 2022120500 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0500.v1). 1976
ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.20993.12640). 1979
262. Henry Garrett,“Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on 1980
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs and SuperHyperGraphs Alongside Applications 1981
in Cancer’s Treatments”, Preprints 2022, 2022120324 (doi: 1982
10.20944/preprints202212.0324.v1). 1983
263. Henry Garrett, “Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on 1984
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs And SuperHyperGraphs Alongside Applications 1985
in Cancer’s Treatments”, ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 1986
10.13140/RG.2.2.23123.04641). 1987
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”, Preprints 2022, 2022110576 (doi: 1990
10.20944/preprints202211.0576.v1). 1991
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”, ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 1994
10.13140/RG.2.2.23324.56966). 1995
266. Henry Garrett, “Basic Neutrosophic Notions Concerning SuperHyperDominating 1996
and Neutrosophic SuperHyperResolving in SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 1997
2022 (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.29173.86244). 1998
267. Henry Garrett, “Initial Material of Neutrosophic Preliminaries to Study Some 1999
Neutrosophic Notions Based on Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) in 2000
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)”, ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 2001
10.13140/RG.2.2.25385.88160). 2002
268. Henry Garrett, “Perfect Domination In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs 2”. Dr. 2003
Henry Garrett, 2024 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10909931). 2004
269. Henry Garrett, “Perfect Domination In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2005
270. Henry Garrett, “Stable Sequence In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2007
271. Henry Garrett, “Resolving Sequence In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2009
272. Henry Garrett, “Dominating Sequence In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2011
273. Henry Garrett, “Stable In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2013
Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8210033). 2014
274. Henry Garrett, “Reverse Connective Domination In Neutrosophic 2015
SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8206898). 2016
275. Henry Garrett, “Equal Connective Domination In Neutrosophic 2017
SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8201378). 2018
276. Henry Garrett, “Connective Domination In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. 2019
Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8194003). 2020
277. Henry Garrett, “Domination In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2021
278. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperPerfect Search In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2023
279. Henry Garrett, “Reverse Strict Dimension Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. 2025
280. Henry Garrett, “Unequal Dimension Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2027
281. Henry Garrett, “Strict Dimension Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2029
282. Henry Garrett, “Reverse Strict Connective In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2031
283. Henry Garrett, “Unequal Connective Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2033
284. Henry Garrett, “Strict Connective Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2035
285. Henry Garrett, “Reverse Dimension Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2037
286. Henry Garrett, “Equal Dimension Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2039
287. Henry Garrett, “Dimension Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2041
288. Henry Garrett, “Reverse Connective Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2043
289. Henry Garrett, “Equal Connective Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2045
290. Henry Garrett, “Connective Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2047
291. Henry Garrett, “United Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2049
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8027488). 2050
292. Henry Garrett, “Zero Forcing In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2051
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8020181). 2052
293. Henry Garrett, “Matrix-Based In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2053
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7978921). 2054
294. Henry Garrett, “Collections of Math II”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2055
10.5281/zenodo.7943878). 2056
295. Henry Garrett, “Dominating-Edges In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2057
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7943871). 2058
296. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Gap In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2059
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7923786). 2060
297. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2061
298. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. 2063
299. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2065
300. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Cycle-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2067
301. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Cycle-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2069
302. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Cycle-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2071
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7854561). 2072
303. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Path-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2073
304. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Path-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2075
305. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Path-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2077
306. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Path-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2079
307. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Path-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2081
308. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Path-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2083
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7812750). 2084
309. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2085
310. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. 2087
311. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2089
312. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Cycle-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2091
313. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Cycle-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2093
314. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Cycle-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2095
315. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2097
316. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2099
317. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2101
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7783791). 2102
318. Henry Garrett, “Trace-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2103
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7780123). 2104
319. Henry Garrett, “Trace-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2105
320. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDuality”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2107
10.5281/zenodo.7637762). 2108
321. Henry Garrett, “Trace-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2109
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7766174). 2110
322. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2111
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7762232). 2112
323. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2113
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7758601). 2114
324. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2115
10.5281/zenodo.7754661). 2116
325. Henry Garrett, “Vertex-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2117
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7750995) . 2118
326. Henry Garrett, “Vertex-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2119
327. Henry Garrett, “Vertex-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2121
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7747236). 2122
328. Henry Garrett, “Stable-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2123
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7742587). 2124
329. Henry Garrett, “Stable-Decompositions In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2125
330. Henry Garrett, “Stable-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2127
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7734719). 2128
331. Henry Garrett, “Clique-Neighbors In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2129
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7730484). 2130
332. Henry Garrett, “Clique-Decompositions In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2131
333. Henry Garrett, “Clique-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2133
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7722865). 2134
334. Henry Garrett, “Space In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2135
10.5281/zenodo.7713563). 2136
335. Henry Garrett, “Space In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2137
10.5281/zenodo.7709116). 2138
336. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Connectivity In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2139
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7706415). 2140
337. Henry Garrett, “Vertex-Connectivity In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2141
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7706063). 2142
338. Henry Garrett, “Tree-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2143
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7701906). 2144
339. Henry Garrett, “Chord In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2145
10.5281/zenodo.7700205). 2146
340. Henry Garrett, “(i,j)-Domination In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2147
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7694876). 2148
341. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Domination In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2149
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7679410). 2150
342. Henry Garrett, “K-Domination In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2151
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7675982). 2152
343. Henry Garrett, “K-Number In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2153
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7672388). 2154
344. Henry Garrett, “Order In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2155
10.5281/zenodo.7668648). 2156
345. Henry Garrett, “Coloring In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2157
10.5281/zenodo.7662810). 2158
346. Henry Garrett, “Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2159
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7659162). 2160
347. Henry Garrett, “Cancer In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2161
10.5281/zenodo.7653233). 2162
348. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperWheel ”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2163
10.5281/zenodo.7653204). 2164
349. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperMultipartite”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2165
10.5281/zenodo.7653142). 2166
350. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperBipartite”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2167
10.5281/zenodo.7653117). 2168
351. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperStar ”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2169
10.5281/zenodo.7653089). 2170
352. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2171
10.5281/zenodo.7651687). 2172
353. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperPath”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2173
10.5281/zenodo.7651619). 2174
354. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDomination”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2175
10.5281/zenodo.7651439). 2176
355. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDominating”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2177
10.5281/zenodo.7650729). 2178
356. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperConnected ”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2179
10.5281/zenodo.7647868). 2180
357. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperTotal ”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2181
10.5281/zenodo.7647017). 2182
358. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperPerfect”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2183
10.5281/zenodo.7644894). 2184
359. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperJoin”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2185
10.5281/zenodo.7641880). 2186
360. Henry Garrett, “Path SuperHyperColoring”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2187
10.5281/zenodo.7632923). 2188
361. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDensity”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2189
10.5281/zenodo.7623459). 2190
362. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2191
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7606416). 2192
363. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperConnectivities”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2193
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7606416). 2194
364. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperConnectivities”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2195
10.5281/zenodo.7606404). 2196
365. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2197
10.5281/zenodo.7580018). 2198
366. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2199
10.5281/zenodo.7580018). 2200
367. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2201
10.5281/zenodo.7580018). 2202
368. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2203
10.5281/zenodo.7579929). 2204
369. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2205
10.5281/zenodo.7563170). 2206
370. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2207
10.5281/zenodo.7563164). 2208
371. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2209
10.5281/zenodo.7563160). 2210
372. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2211
10.5281/zenodo.7563160). 2212
373. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2213
10.5281/zenodo.7563160). 2214
374. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2215
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7557063). 2216
375. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperMatching”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2217
10.5281/zenodo.7557009). 2218
376. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperMatching”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2219
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7539484). 2220
377. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2221
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7523390). 2222
378. Henry Garrett, “Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2223
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7523390). 2224
379. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On Failed SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2225
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7523390). 2226
380. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2227
10.5281/zenodo.7574952). 2228
381. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2229
10.5281/zenodo.7574992). 2230
382. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2231
10.5281/zenodo.7523357). 2232
383. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2233
10.5281/zenodo.7523357). 2234
384. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2235
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7504782). 2236
385. Henry Garrett, “Extreme Failed SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2237
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7504782). 2238
386. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On Failed SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2239
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7504782). 2240
387. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2241
10.5281/zenodo.7499395). 2242
388. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2243
10.5281/zenodo.7499395). 2244
389. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2245
10.5281/zenodo.7499395). 2246
390. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2247
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7497450). 2248
391. Henry Garrett, “Extreme Failed SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2249
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7497450). 2250
392. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2251
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7494862). 2252
393. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2253
10.5281/zenodo.7494862). 2254
394. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2255
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7494862). 2256
395. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperAlliances”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2257
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7493845). 2258
396. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperAlliances”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2259
10.5281/zenodo.7493845). 2260
397. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperAlliances”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2261
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7493845). 2262
398. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperMatching”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2263
10.5281/zenodo.7539484). 2264
399. Henry Garrett, “Failed SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2265
10.5281/zenodo.7523390). 2266
400. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2267
10.5281/zenodo.7523357). 2268
401. Henry Garrett, “Failed SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2269
10.5281/zenodo.7504782). 2270
402. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2271
10.5281/zenodo.7499395). 2272
403. Henry Garrett, “Failed SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2273
10.5281/zenodo.7497450). 2274
404. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2275
10.5281/zenodo.7494862). 2276
405. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperAlliances”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2277
10.5281/zenodo.7493845). 2278
406. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2279
10.5281/zenodo.7480110). 2280
407. Henry Garrett, “Neut. SuperHyperEdges”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2281
10.5281/zenodo.7378758). 2282
408. Henry Garrett, “Beyond Neutrosophic Graphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2283
10.5281/zenodo.6320305). 2284
409. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Duality”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2285
10.5281/zenodo.6677173). 2286
View publication stats

New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel by Stable Perfect Domination

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel by Stable Perfect Domination

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph With

Preprint · April 2024

574 PUBLICATIONS 30,489 CITATIONS

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 2

SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By Stable Perfect 3

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · 6

DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA 7

In this scientific research, (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic 9

SuperHyperStrongly Stable Perfect Domination). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) 10

S be a pair S = (V, E). Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. 11

Then V 0 is called Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Stable Perfect Domination if the following 12

expressions, terms and statements is called Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Stable Perfect 13

Domination criteria holds. 14

SuperHyperNotions, namely a Strongly Stable Perfect Domination and a Neutrosophic 16

Strongly Stable Perfect Domination. Two different SuperHyperDefinitions were started 17

SuperHyperClass are well-defined and well-reviewed based on them. Literature review is 19

research, a comparison between this SuperHyperNotion with other SuperHyperNotions 21

and basic SuperHyperNumbers is presented. Definitions are followed by examples and 22

examples, so clarifications are guided by various tools. Applications are designed to 23

the relationships between them all are officially called “SuperHyperEdge”. 29

“SuperHyperGraph” and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” frameworks are selected and 30

super-hypermodels open avenues for research on theoretical aspects and “cancer 32

understandable. In order to master the Neutrosophic Strongly Stable Perfect 37

Domination, there is a need to “re-define” the concept of “Strongly Stable Perfect 38

Domination mastery”. SuperHyperVertices and SuperHyperEdges are assigned by 39

vertices, supervertices, edges, hyperedges, and hyperedges belonging to Neutrosophic 42

SuperHyperGraph” with key points, it is redefined. ”values of vertices & number of 43

positions in alphabet”, ”Values of SuperVertices&maximum values of its vertices”, 44

and structural examples, I would like to introduce the next SuperHyperClass 47

SuperHyperGraph based on Strongly Stable Perfect Domination. This is the original. 48

Domination”, but otherwise, it is not Strongly Stable Perfect Domination. There is 52

characterized in the SuperHyperClass disciplinary methods based on a dominant 55

Strongly Stable Perfect Domination. Because of having Strongly Stable Perfect 56

Domination, there is a need to “re-define” the concept of “neutrosophic Strongly Stable 57

Perfect Domination” and “neutrosophic Strongly Stable Perfect Domination”. 58

SuperHyperVertices and SuperHyperEdges are assigned by alphabetical labels. In this 59

method, the position of tags is used to assign values. Consider a Neutrosophic 60

SuperHyperGraph. “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” is redefined if the desired table 61

to a “Neutrosophic Strongly Stable Perfect Domination”. It is useful to define a 63

“Neutrosophic” version of SuperHyperClasses. Since there are more ways to obtain 64

Neutrosophic type results, a SuperHyper- Neutrosophic Strongly Stable Perfect 65

Domination becomes more understandable. Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. 66

If the desired table exists, there are a number of Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses. So 67

are SuperHyperPath, SuperHyperCycle, SuperHyperStar, SuperHyperBipartite, 68

SuperHyperMultiPartite and SuperHyperWheel. ”Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath”, 69

“Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar”, “Neutrosophic 70

SuperHyperBipartite”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultiPartite” and “Neutrosophic 71

SuperHyperWheel”. A graph is SuperHyperUniform if it is a SuperHyperGraph and the 72

number of SuperHyperEdges elements is the same. Consider a Neutrosophic 73

SuperHyperGraph. There are a number of SuperHyperClasses as follows. It is a 74

SuperHyperPath if there is only one SuperVertex as an intersection between two given 75

SuperHyperEdges with two exceptions. If only one SuperVertex is given as an 76

intersection between two SuperHyperEdges, it is SuperHyperCycle. It is 77

SuperHyperStar and only one SuperVertex as intersection among all SuperHyperEdges. 78

It is SuperHyperBipartite, and only one SuperVertex is given as the intersection between 79

SuperHyperEdge in common. This is SuperHyperMultiPartite. Only one SuperVertex is 81

given as an intersection between two SuperHyperEdges, and these SuperVertices, which 82

form separate multisets, have no SuperHyperEdge in common. If only one 83

SuperHyperEdge among the given two SuperHyperEdges is a SuperHyperWheel and a 84

SuperVertex has a SuperHyperEdge with any regular SuperVertex. SuperHyperModel 85

suggests specific designs and specific architectures. SuperHyperModel is officially called 86