New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph With Counterproposal Star and Counteroffer Wheel by Counterargument Stable Sequence As Hyper Findings On Super Gatherings

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.
net/publication/379149519
New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph With

Counterproposal Star and Counteroffer Wheel By Counterargument Stable
Sequence As Hyper Findings On Super G...
Preprint · March 2024

DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.10851065
CITATIONS
1 author:
Henry Garrett
562 PUBLICATIONS 29,134 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Henry Garrett on 22 March 2024.
The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 2
SuperHyperGraph With Counterproposal Star and 3
Counteroffer Wheel By Counterargument Stable Sequence As 4
Hyper Findings On Super Gatherings 5
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · 7
DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA 8
1 SYNOPSIS 9
In this scientific research, (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic 10
SuperHyperStrongly Stable Sequence). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S be a 11
pair S = (V, E). Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then 12
V 0 is called Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Stable Sequence if the following expressions, 13
terms and statements is called Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Stable Sequence criteria holds. 14
X X X
|( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 Vi ∈V 0 Vi ∈V 0
X X X
= min
00 ⊆V
|{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V N SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
Vj ∈ VN SHG \ V , ∃Vi ∈ V 00 : 00
TV0 (Vi , Vj ∈ Ei0 ) > (−/ : NOT DEFINED) min[TV (Vi0 ), TV (Vj0 )]Vi0 ,Vj0 ∈EN SHG ,
IV0 (Vi , Vj ∈ Ei0 ) > (−/ : NOT DEFINED) min[IV (Vi0 ), IV (Vj0 )]Vi0 ,Vj0 ∈EN SHG ,
FV0 (Ei0 )(Vi , Vj ∈ Ei0 ) > (−/ : NOT DEFINED) min[FV (Vi0 ), FV (Vj0 )]Vi0 ,Vj0 ∈EN SHG ,
then Vj ∈ V 00 , until V 00 = VN SHG }
In this scientific research, new configurations are introduced for the new 15
SuperHyperNotions, namely a Strongly Stable Sequence and a Neutrosophic Strongly 16
Stable Sequence. Two different SuperHyperDefinitions were started for them, but 17
research has progressed and SuperHyperNotion, SuperHyperUniform, and 18
SuperHyperClass are well-defined and well-reviewed based on them. Literature review is 19
implemented throughout this research. To shine the light and importance of this 20
research, a comparison between this SuperHyperNotion with other SuperHyperNotions 21
and basic SuperHyperNumbers is presented. Definitions are followed by examples and 22
examples, so clarifications are guided by various tools. Applications are designed to 23
understand the theoretical aspect of this ongoing research. “Cancer diagnosis” are the 24
things that are being researched to explore the challenges that make sense in ongoing 25
research and future research. It is a special case. Cells are viewed in the intended 26
manner. There are different types of them. Some are individual and some are well 27
modeled by groups of cells. All these types are officially called “SuperHyperVertex”, but 28
the relationships between them all are officially called “SuperHyperEdge”. 29
“SuperHyperGraph” and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” frameworks are selected and 30
selected for research on “Cancer Diagnosis”. Thus, these complex and dense 31
super-hypermodels open avenues for research on theoretical aspects and “cancer 32
diagnosis”. Ways to pursue this scientific research have been considered. It has also 33
been formally collected in the form of several questions and problems. It is useful to 34
define a “neutrosophic” version of Strongly Stable Sequence. Since there are more ways 35
to get type results a Strongly Stable Sequence becomes more understandable. In order 36
to master the Neutrosophic Strongly Stable Sequence, there is a need to “re-define” the 37
concept of “Strongly Stable Sequence mastery”. SuperHyperVertices and 38
SuperHyperEdges are assigned by alphabetical labels. In this method, the position of 39
tags is used to assign values. Suppose a Strongly Stable Sequence. If the specified table 40
contains “values of vertices, supervertices, edges, hyperedges, and hyperedges belonging 41
to Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” with key points, it is redefined. ”values of vertices 42
& number of positions in alphabet”, ”Values of SuperVertices&maximum values of its 43
vertices”, ”values of edges&maximum values of its vertices”, ”super edge values&max 44
values of its vertices”, “super edge values” and maximum values of its endpoints”. To 45
get examples and structural examples, I would like to introduce the next 46
SuperHyperClass SuperHyperGraph based on Strongly Stable Sequence. This is the 47
original. Having the foundation of the previous definition in the SuperHyperClass type 48
would be disciplined. If there is a need to have all Strongly Stable Sequence until 49
Strongly Stable Sequence, then it is officially called “Strongly Stable Sequence”, but 50
otherwise, it is not Strongly Stable Sequence. There is some explanation for the original 51
definition titled “Strongly Stable Sequence”. These two examples are further explored 52
and distinguished because they are characterized in the SuperHyperClass disciplinary 53
methods based on a dominant Strongly Stable Sequence. Because of having Strongly 54
Stable Sequence, there is a need to “re-define” the concept of “neutrosophic Strongly 55
Stable Sequence” and “neutrosophic Strongly Stable Sequence”. SuperHyperVertices 56
and SuperHyperEdges are assigned by alphabetical labels. In this method, the position 57
of tags is used to assign values. Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. 58
“Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” is redefined if the desired table exists. And if the 59
desired table exists, a Strongly Stable Sequence is redefined to a “Neutrosophic Strongly 60
Stable Sequence”. It is useful to define a “Neutrosophic” version of SuperHyperClasses. 61
Since there are more ways to obtain Neutrosophic type results, a SuperHyper- 62
Neutrosophic Strongly Stable Sequence becomes more understandable. Consider a 63
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. If the desired table exists, there are a number of 64
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses. So are SuperHyperPath, SuperHyperCycle, 65
SuperHyperStar, SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultiPartite and SuperHyperWheel. 66
”Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle”, “Neutrosophic 67
SuperHyperStar”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite”, “Neutrosophic 68
SuperHyperMultiPartite” and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel”. A graph is 69
SuperHyperUniform if it is a SuperHyperGraph and the number of SuperHyperEdges 70
elements is the same. Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. There are a number 71
of SuperHyperClasses as follows. It is a SuperHyperPath if there is only one 72
SuperVertex as an intersection between two given SuperHyperEdges with two 73
exceptions. If only one SuperVertex is given as an intersection between two 74
SuperHyperEdges, it is SuperHyperCycle. It is SuperHyperStar and only one 75
SuperVertex as intersection among all SuperHyperEdges. It is SuperHyperBipartite, 76
and only one SuperVertex is given as the intersection between two SuperHyperEdges, 77
and these SuperVertices, which form two distinct sets, have no SuperHyperEdge in 78
common. This is SuperHyperMultiPartite. Only one SuperVertex is given as an 79
intersection between two SuperHyperEdges, and these SuperVertices, which form 80
separate multisets, have no SuperHyperEdge in common. If only one SuperHyperEdge 81
among the given two SuperHyperEdges is a SuperHyperWheel and a SuperVertex has a 82
SuperHyperEdge with any regular SuperVertex. SuperHyperModel suggests specific 83
designs and specific architectures. SuperHyperModel is officially called 84
“SuperHyperGraph” and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”. In this SuperHyperModel, 85
the “special” cells and the “special group” of cells are SuperHyperModeled as 86
“SuperHyperVertices” and the common and desired properties between the “special” 87
cells and the “special group” of cells. SuperHyperModeled as “SuperHyperEdges”. 88
Sometimes, to have a more accurate SuperHyperModel, it is useful to have some degree 89
of determinism, uncertainty, and neutrality, in this case the SuperHyperModel is called 90
“Neutrosophic”. In future scientific research, the foundation will be based on “diagnosis 91
of cancer” and the results and definitions will be introduced in redeemed methods. 92
Cancer diagnosis in long-term practice. The specific region is assigned by the model 93
(called SuperHyperGraph) and the long cycle of movement of the cancer is determined 94
by this scientific research. Sometimes the movement of cancer is not easy to detect, 95
because there is certainty, uncertainty and neutrality about the movements and effects 96
of cancer on that area. This event leads us to choose another model [which is said to be 97
the Neutrosophic superhypergraph] in order to have a proper understanding of what 98
happened and was done. There are some specific models, which are well known and 99
have names, and some SuperHyperGeneral SuperHyperModels. The movements and 100
effects of cancer in complex pathways and between complex groups of cells can be 101
visualized with a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (-/SuperHyperCycle, SuperHyperStar, 102
SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, SuperHyperWheel). The goal is to find 103
the longest Strongly Stable Sequence or the strongest Strongly Stable Sequence in those 104
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModels. Some general results are presented for the longest 105
Strongly Stable Sequence called Strongly Stable Sequence and the strongest Strongly 106
Stable Sequence called Neutrosophic Strongly Stable Sequence. Beyond that in 107
SuperHyperStar, all possible SuperHyperPaths have only two SuperHyperEdges, but it 108
is not enough as having at least three SuperHyperEdges is necessary to form any style 109
of cycle. There is no form of any cycle, but literally, it is the transformation of any 110
cycle. It literally transforms and does not form. A basic introduction to the theory of 111
Strongly Stable Sequence Neutrosophic, SuperHyperGraphs and Neutrosophic 112
SuperHyperGraphs is suggested. 113
Keywords: Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, SuperHyperStrongly Stable Sequence, 114
Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition 115
AMS Subject Classification: 05C17, 05C22, 05E45 116
2 Applied Notions Under The Scrutiny Of The 117
Motivation Of This Scientific Research 118
In this scientific research, there are ideas in the prominent frameworks of motivations. I 119
try to bring motivations in narrative ways. Some Cells have faced attacks from the 120
established situation with cancer attacks in this case, there is some analysis embedded 121
in the case current situations where cells can be labeled as some groups and some 122
groups or individuals are overlabeled, all from behaviors to overcome cancer attacks. In 123
embedded situations, cell individuals and cell groups can be considered as “new groups”. 124
So it encourages us to find suitable SuperHyperModels for more appropriate analysis 125
about this dirty story. I found SuperHyperModels, officially called “SuperHyperGraphs” 126
and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. In this SuperHyperModel, cells and groups of 127
cells are defined as “SuperHyperVertices” and relationships between individual cells and 128
groups of cells are defined as “SuperHyperEdges”. So this is another motivation for us 129
to do research on this SuperHyperModel based on “cancer diagnosis”. Sometimes, 130
things get worse. The situation has passed certainty and precise style. So it is beyond 131
them. There are three descriptions, i.e., degrees of determination, uncertainty, and 132
neutrality, for any object based on ambiguous forms, i.e., incomplete data, imprecise 133
data, and uncertain analysis. The second model can be considered in the previous 134
SuperHyperModel. This is SuperHyperModel. This is SuperHyperGraph but officially 135
called “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. Cancer is a disease, but the model is 136
supposed to understand what happens in this phenomenon. The special case of this 137
disease is considered and some parameters are used as consequences of the model. Cells 138
are attacked by the disease, but the movement of cancer is in a specific area. Knowing 139
the mind of cancer can help to find some cures for this disease. SuperHyperGraph and 140
Neutrosophic Super-HyperGraph are super-hypermodels used in “cancer diagnosis” and 141
both are the foundation of the background of this scientific research. Sometimes cancer 142
has occurred in an area full of cells, cell groups, and embedded styles. In this section, 143
SuperHyperModel proposes based on the links of cancer movements in the form of unity 144
styles with the formation of design and architecture officially called “Strongly Stable 145
Sequence”, in the themes of specialized terms and common words. Particle for direct 146
object. Applied concepts under the investigation of the motivation of this scientific 147
research. The “SuperHyper” prefix refers to the theme of embedded styles for 148
background discovery for SuperHyperNotions. Cancer diagnosis in long-term practice. 149
The specific region is assigned by the model (called SuperHyperGraph) and the long 150
cycle of movement of the cancer is determined by this scientific research. Sometimes the 151
movement of Cancer is not easy to identify because there is certainty, uncertainty and 152
neutrality about the movements and effects of Cancer in that region. This event leads 153
us to choose another model [said to be Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph]. Easy 154
understanding of what happened and what was done. There are some specific models 155
that are well known and named and some general models. The movements and effects 156
of cancer in complex pathways and between complex groups of cells can be visualized by 157
a neurosophic superhyperpath (-/SuperHyperCycle, SuperHyperStar, 158
SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, SuperHyperWheel). The goal is to find 159
Strongly Stable Sequence or Neutrosophic Strongly Stable Sequence for 160
SuperHyperModels in it. Some general results are presented. Beyond that in 161
SuperHyperStar, all possible Neutrosophic SuperHyperPaths have only two 162
SuperHyperEdges, but it is not enough as having at least three SuperHyperEdges is 163
necessary to form any style of cycle. There is no form of cycle, but it is literally a form 164
of any cycle. It literally transforms and does not form. 165
Question 2.1. How to define “SuperHyperNotions and to do research” to find the 166
“Strongly Stable Sequence Rate” of any cell or groups of cells based on fixed cell or fixed 167
group of cells broadly, “Strongly Stable Sequence Rate” based on fixed groups or fixed 168
cells. Groups of groups of cells? 169
Question 2.2. What are the best descriptions for “diagnosing cancer” in terms of 170
these chaotic and dense super-hypermodels in which embedded concepts are depicted? 171
This motivation to find concepts to use in this dense model is called 172
“SuperHyperGraphs”. So it motivates us to define different types of “Strongly Stable 173
Sequence” and “neutrosophic Strongly Stable Sequence” over “superhypergraph” and 174
“neutrosophic superhypergraph”. Then this scientific research has taken more 175
motivations to define SuperHyperClasses and find some connections among this 176
SuperHyperNotion with other SuperHyperNotions. It motivates us to obtain examples 177
and examples to clarify the framework of this scientific research. The general results 178
and some of the results about some of the connections are the ways that the key point 179
of this scientific research, “diagnosis of cancer” is more understandable and clear. 180
The framework of this research is as follows. First, I will introduce the basic 181
definitions to clarify the basics. In the “Introductions” subsection, basic definitions 182
about SuperHyperGraphs and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph are introduced and 183
discussed in depth. Basic concepts are thoroughly explained and illustrated, and 184
sometimes a literature review is used to make sense of what is to come in the coming 185
sections. The main definitions and their explanations, along with some results on the 186
new concepts, Strongly Stable Sequence and Neutrosophic Strongly Stable Sequence, are 187
specified in the sections “Strongly Stable Sequence” and “Neutrosophic Strongly Stable 188
Sequence”. In the concept of dealing with results and in Strongly Stable Sequence to 189
create logic about the continuation of the scientific research, the ideas of 190
SuperHyperUniform and Neutrosophic SuperHyperUniform are introduced and as their 191
consequences, the corresponding SuperHyperClasses are specified to summarize the 192
work done in this section, as “Results on SuperHyperClasses” and “Results on 193
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”. Going back to the core concepts, clever steps 194
towards common concepts to extend new concepts in new frameworks, 195
SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, in “Results on 196
SuperHyperClasses” and “Results on Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses” sections. There 197
is the initial scientific research on supergeneral relations and as the final and final part 198
of the theoretical scientific research is available in the section “General results”. Some 199
general SuperHyperRelations are fundamental and are known as fundamental 200
SuperHyperNotions, as in “General results” were extracted and discussed. “Strongly 201
Stable Sequence”, “Neutrosophic Strongly Stable Sequence”, “Results on 202
SuperHyperClasses” and “Results on Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”. There are 203
curious questions about what has been done about SuperHyperNotions to make sense of 204
the superiority of this scientific research and to discover the word “best” as a 205
description and adjective of this scientific research as presented in the “Strongly Stable 206
Sequence” section. The keyword of this scientific research was presented in the section 207
“Applications in cancer diagnosis” with two cases and sub-sections “Case 1: Initial steps 208
towards SuperHyperBipartite as SuperHyperModel” and “Case 2: Incremental steps 209
towards SuperHyperMultiperdel as SuperHyper. In the “open issues” section, there is a 210
detailed examination and recognition of what was done in this scientific research and 211
what happened in this scientific research in the form of “questions” and “issues” in 212
order to understand this scientific research in an outstanding style, the advantages and 213
limitations of this scientific research in addition to What has been done in this scientific 214
research is stated in the “conclusion and final remarks” section. 215
3 Neutrosophic Preliminaries Of This Scientific 216
Research On the Redeemed Ways 217
In this section, the basic material in this scientific research, is referred to [Single Valued 218
Neutrosophic Set](Ref. [1],Definition 2.2,p.2), [Neutrosophic Set](Ref. [1],Definition 219
2.1,p.1), [Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)](Ref. [1],Definition 2.5,p.2), 220
[Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)](Ref. [1],Definition 221
2.7,p.3), [t-norm](Ref. [1], Definition 2.7, p.3), and [Characterization of the 222
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)](Ref. [1],Definition 2.7,p.3), [Neutrosophic 223
Strength of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPaths] (Ref. [1],Definition 5.3,p.7), and 224
[Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)] 225
(Ref. [1],Definition 5.4,p.7). Also, the new ideas and their clarifications are addressed 226
to Ref. [1]. 227
In this subsection, the basic material which is used in this scientific research, is 228
presented. Also, the new ideas and their clarifications are elicited. 229
Definition 3.1 (Neutrosophic Set). (Ref. [1],Definition 2.1,p.1). 230
Let X be a Eulerian-Path-Cut of points (objects) with generic elements in X denoted by

x; then the Neutrosophic set A (NS A) is an object having the form
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}

+
where the functions T, I, F : X →]− 0, 1 [ define respectively the a
truth-membership function, an indeterminacy-membership function, and a

falsity-membership function of the element x ∈ X to the set A with the condition
−
0 ≤ TA (x) + IA (x) + FA (x) ≤ 3+ .
The functions TA (x), IA (x) and FA (x) are real standard or nonstandard subsets of 231
+
]− 0, 1 [. 232
Definition 3.2 (Single Valued Neutrosophic Set). (Ref. [1],Definition 2.2,p.2). 233
Let X be a Eulerian-Path-Cut of points (objects) with generic elements in X denoted by

x. A single valued Neutrosophic set A (SVNS A) is characterized by
truth-membership function TA (x), an indeterminacy-membership function IA (x), and a
falsity-membership function FA (x). For each point x in X, TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) ∈ [0, 1].
A SVNS A can be written as
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}.
Definition 3.3. The degree of truth-membership,

indeterminacy-membership and falsity-membership of the subset X ⊂ A of
the single valued Neutrosophic set A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}:
TA (X) = min[TA (vi ), TA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,
IA (X) = min[IA (vi ), IA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,

and FA (X) = min[FA (vi ), FA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X .
Definition 3.4. The support of X ⊂ A of the single valued Neutrosophic set
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}:
supp(X) = {x ∈ X : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) > 0}.
Definition 3.5 (Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). (Ref. [1],Definition 234
2.5,p.2). 235
Assume V 0 is a given set. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a 236
pair S = (V, E), where 237
(i) V = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vn } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of V 0 ; 238
(ii) V = {(Vi , TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi )) : TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi ) ≥ 0}, (i = 239
1, 2, . . . , n); 240
(iii) E = {E1 , E2 , . . . , En0 } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of 241
V; 242
(iv) E = {(Ei0 , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )) : TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 ) ≥ 0}, (i0 = 243
1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 244
(v) Vi 6= ∅, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 245
(vi) Ei0 6= ∅, (i0 = 1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 246
P
(vii) i supp(Vi ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 247
0 0
P
(viii) i0 supp(Ei ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n );
0 248
Figure 1. The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a illustrated SuperHyperModeling

on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
(ix) and the following conditions hold:
TV0 (Ei0 ) ≤ min[TV 0 (Vi ), TV 0 (Vj )]Vi ,Vj ∈Ei0 ,
IV0 (Ei0 ) ≤ min[IV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vj )]Vi ,Vj ∈Ei0 ,

and FV0 (Ei0 ) ≤ min[FV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vj )]Vi ,Vj ∈Ei0
where i0 = 1, 2, . . . , n0 . 249
Here the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ej 0 and the Neutrosophic 250
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) Vj are single valued Neutrosophic sets. TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), 251
and FV 0 (Vi ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 252
indeterminacy-membership and the degree of falsity-membership the Neutrosophic 253
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) V. 254
TV0 (Ei0 ), TV0 (Ei0 ), and TV0 (Ei0 ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 255
indeterminacy-membership and the degree of falsity-membership of the Neutrosophic 256
SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) Ei0 to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) E. Thus, 257
the ii0 th element of the incidence matrix of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) 258
are of the form (Vi , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )), the sets V and E are crisp sets. 259
Example 3.6. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair 260
S = (V, E) in the mentioned Neutrosophic Figures in every Neutrosophic items. 261
• On the Figure (1), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 262
notion, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. E1 263
and E3 are some empty Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges but E2 is a loop 264
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge and E4 is a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. Thus 265
in the terms of Neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only one Neutrosophic 266
SuperHyperEdge, namely, E4 . The Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 is 267
Neutrosophic isolated means that there’s no Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge has it 268
as a Neutrosophic endpoint. 269
notion, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 271
E1 , E2 and E3 are some empty Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges but E4 is a 272
Figure 2. TThe Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a illustrated SuperHyperModel-

ing on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. Thus in the terms of Neutrosophic 273
SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only one Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge, namely, 274
E4 . The Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 is Neutrosophic isolated means that 275
there’s no Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge has it as a Neutrosophic endpoint. 276
• On the Figure (3), the SuperHyperNotion, namely, SuperHyperGirth, is up. 277
E1 , E2 and E3 are some empty SuperHyperEdges but E4 is a SuperHyperEdge. 278
Thus in the terms of SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only one SuperHyperEdge, 279
namely, E4 . 280
• On the Figure (4), there’s no empty SuperHyperEdge but E3 are a loop 281
SuperHyperEdge on {F } and there are some SuperHyperEdges, namely, E1 on 282
{H, V1 , V3 }, alongside E2 on {O, H, V4 , V3 } and E4 , E5 on {N, V1 , V2 , V3 , F }. 283
• On the Figure (5),there’s neither empty SuperHyperEdge nor loop 284
SuperHyperEdge. 285
• On the Figure (6), there’s neither empty SuperHyperEdge nor loop 286
SuperHyperEdge. 287
SuperHyperEdge. 289
SuperHyperEdge. 291
SuperHyperEdge. 293
SuperHyperEdge. 295
SuperHyperEdge. 297
Figure 3. The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a illustrated SuperHyperModeling

on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 4. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a illustrated Super-

HyperModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 5. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs mentioned as the SuperHy-

perModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 6. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a illustrated Super-

HyperModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 7. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs depicted SuperHyperMod-

eling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 8. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with dense SuperHyper-

Modeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 9. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a messy SuperHyper-

Modeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 10. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with highly-embedding-

connected SuperHyperModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example
(3.6)
Figure 11. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a SuperHyperModel-

SuperHyperEdge. 299
SuperHyperEdge. 301
SuperHyperEdge. 303
SuperHyperEdge. 305
SuperHyperEdge. 307
SuperHyperEdge. 309
SuperHyperEdge. 311
SuperHyperEdge. 313
SuperHyperEdge. 315
SuperHyperEdge. 317
SuperHyperEdge. 319
Figure 12. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with highly-multiple-

connected-style SuperHyperModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic
Example (3.6)


Figure 15. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with Linearly-Connected

SuperHyperModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)

Figure 17. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a Linearly-over-

packed SuperHyperModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example
(3.6)





Definition 3.7 (Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). 320
(Ref. [1],Definition 2.7,p.3). 321
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). The 322
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ei0 and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 323
(NSHV) Vi of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S = (V, E) could be 324
characterized as follow-up items. 325
(i) If |Vi | = 1, then Vi is called vertex; 326
(ii) if |Vi | ≥ 1, then Vi is called SuperVertex; 327
(iii) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called edge; 328
(iv) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 329
HyperEdge; 330
(v) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called 331
SuperEdge; 332
(vi) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 333
SuperHyperEdge. 334
If we choose different types of binary operations, then we could get hugely diverse 335
types of general forms of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG). 336
Definition 3.8 (t-norm). (Ref. [1], Definition 2.7, p.3). 337
A binary operation ⊗ : [0, 1] × [0, 1] → [0, 1] is a t-norm if it satisfies the following 338
for x, y, z, w ∈ [0, 1]: 339
(i) 1 ⊗ x = x; 340
(ii) x ⊗ y = y ⊗ x; 341
(iii) x ⊗ (y ⊗ z) = (x ⊗ y) ⊗ z; 342
(iv) If w ≤ x and y ≤ z then w ⊗ y ≤ x ⊗ z. 343
Definition 3.9. The degree of truth-membership, indeterminacy-membership

and falsity-membership of the subset X ⊂ A of the single valued Neutrosophic set
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X} (with respect to t-norm Tnorm ):
TA (X) = Tnorm [TA (vi ), TA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,
IA (X) = Tnorm [IA (vi ), IA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,

and FA (X) = Tnorm [FA (vi ), FA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X .
Definition 3.10. The support of X ⊂ A of the single valued Neutrosophic set
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}:
supp(X) = {x ∈ X : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) > 0}.
Definition 3.11. (General Forms of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). 344
Assume V 0 is a given set. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a 345
pair S = (V, E), where 346
(i) V = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vn } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of V 0 ; 347
(ii) V = {(Vi , TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi )) : TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi ) ≥ 0}, (i = 348
1, 2, . . . , n); 349
(iii) E = {E1 , E2 , . . . , En0 } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of 350
V; 351
(iv) E = {(Ei0 , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )) : TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 ) ≥ 0}, (i0 = 352
1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 353
(v) Vi 6= ∅, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 354
(vi) Ei0 6= ∅, (i0 = 1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 355
P
(vii) i supp(Vi ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 356
0 0
P
(viii) i0 supp(Ei ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n ).
0 357
Here the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ej 0 and the Neutrosophic 358
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) Vj are single valued Neutrosophic sets. TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), 359
and FV 0 (Vi ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 360
indeterminacy-membership and the degree of falsity-membership the Neutrosophic 361
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) V. 362
TV0 (Ei0 ), TV0 (Ei0 ), and TV0 (Ei0 ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 363
indeterminacy-membership and the degree of falsity-membership of the Neutrosophic 364
SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) Ei0 to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) E. Thus, 365
the ii0 th element of the incidence matrix of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) 366
are of the form (Vi , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )), the sets V and E are crisp sets. 367
Definition 3.12 (Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). 368
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). The 370
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ei0 and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 371
(NSHV) Vi of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S = (V, E) could be 372
characterized as follow-up items. 373
(i) If |Vi | = 1, then Vi is called vertex; 374
(ii) if |Vi | ≥ 1, then Vi is called SuperVertex; 375
(iii) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called edge; 376
(iv) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 377
HyperEdge; 378
(v) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called 379
SuperEdge; 380
(vi) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 381
SuperHyperEdge. 382
This SuperHyperModel is too messy and too dense. Thus there’s a need to have 383
some restrictions and conditions on SuperHyperGraph. The special case of this 384
SuperHyperGraph makes the patterns and regularities. 385
Definition 3.13. A graph is SuperHyperUniform if it’s SuperHyperGraph and the 386
number of elements of SuperHyperEdges are the same. 387
To get more visions on SuperHyperUniform, the some SuperHyperClasses are 388
introduced. It makes to have SuperHyperUniform more understandable. 389
Definition 3.14. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. There are some 390
SuperHyperClasses as follows. 391
(i). It’s Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath if it’s only one SuperVertex as 392
intersection amid two given SuperHyperEdges with two exceptions; 393
(ii). it’s SuperHyperCycle if it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two 394
given SuperHyperEdges; 395
(iii). it’s SuperHyperStar it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid all 396
SuperHyperEdges; 397
(iv). it’s SuperHyperBipartite it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two 398
given SuperHyperEdges and these SuperVertices, forming two separate sets, has 399
no SuperHyperEdge in common; 400
(v). it’s SuperHyperMultiPartite it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid 401
two given SuperHyperEdges and these SuperVertices, forming multi separate sets, 402
has no SuperHyperEdge in common; 403
(vi). it’s SuperHyperWheel if it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two 404
given SuperHyperEdges and one SuperVertex has one SuperHyperEdge with any 405
common SuperVertex. 406
Example 3.15. In the Figure (23), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath 407
ESHP : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, in the 408
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (23), is the notion. 409
Example 3.16. In the Figure (24), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle 410
N SHC : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Neutrosophic 411
SuperHyperSet, in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (24), is up. 412
Example 3.17. In the Figure (25), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar 413
ESHS : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, 414
by the Algorithm in previous Neutrosophic result, of the Neutrosophic 415
SuperHyperVertices of the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E), in 416
the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (25), is up. 417
Figure 23. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath Associated to the Notions in the Example

(3.15)
Figure 24. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions

in the Neutrosophic Example (3.16)
Figure 25. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions in

the Neutrosophic Example (3.17)
Example 3.18. In the Neutrosophic Figure (26), the connected Neutrosophic 418
SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), is Neutrosophic highlighted and Neutrosophic 419
featured. The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Neutrosophic Algorithm in 420
previous Neutrosophic result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected 421
Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic 422
SuperHyperModel (26), is up. 423
Example 3.19. In the Figure (27), the connected Neutrosophic 424
SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E), is highlighted and Neutrosophic featured. 425
The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Algorithm in previous Neutrosophic 426
result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected Neutrosophic 427
SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (27), 428
is up. 429
Example 3.20. In the Neutrosophic Figure (28), the connected Neutrosophic 430
SuperHyperWheel N SHW : (V, E), is Neutrosophic highlighted and featured. The 431
obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Algorithm in previous result, of the 432
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel 433
ESHW : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (28), is up. 434
Definition 3.21. Let a pair S = (V, E) be a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)

S. Then a sequence of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) and Neutrosophic
SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)
V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs
is called a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic 435
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) V1 to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vs if either 436
of following conditions hold: 437
(i) Vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 438
Figure 26. Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite Neutrosophic Associated to the Neutro-

sophic Notions in the Example (3.18)
Figure 27. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite Associated to the Notions in the

Example (3.19)
Figure 28. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel Neutrosophic Associated to the Neutro-

sophic Notions in the Neutrosophic Example (3.20)
(ii) there’s a vertex vi ∈ Vi such that vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 439
(iii) there’s a SuperVertex Vi0 ∈ Vi such that Vi0 , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 440
(iv) there’s a vertex vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that Vi , vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 441
0 0
(v) there’s a SuperVertex Vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that Vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 442
(vi) there are a vertex vi ∈ Vi and a vertex vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that vi , vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 443
0 0
(vii) there are a vertex vi ∈ Vi and a SuperVertex Vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 444
(viii) there are a SuperVertex Vi0 ∈ Vi and a vertex vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that Vi0 , vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 445
(ix) there are a SuperVertex Vi0 ∈ Vi and a SuperVertex Vi+1

0
∈ Vi+1 such that 446
Vi0 , Vi+1
0
∈ Ei0 . 447
Definition 3.22. (Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPaths). 448
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). a

Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV)
V1 to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vs is sequence of Neutrosophic
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) and Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)
V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs ,
could be characterized as follow-up items. 449
(i) If for all Vi , Ej 0 , |Vi | = 1, |Ej 0 | = 2, then NSHP is called path; 450
(ii) if for all Ej 0 , |Ej 0 | = 2, and there’s Vi , |Vi | ≥ 1, then NSHP is called SuperPath; 451
(iii) if for all Vi , Ej 0 , |Vi | = 1, |Ej 0 | ≥ 2, then NSHP is called HyperPath; 452
(iv) if there are Vi , Ej 0 , |Vi | ≥ 1, |Ej 0 | ≥ 2, then NSHP is called Neutrosophic 453
SuperHyperPath . 454
Definition 3.23 (Neutrosophic Strength of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPaths). 455
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). A

Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV)
Table 1. The Values of Vertices, SuperVertices, Edges, HyperEdges, and SuperHy-

perEdges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph Mentioned in the Definition
(3.27)
The Values of The Vertices The Number of Position in Alphabet
The Values of The SuperVertices The maximum Values of Its Vertices
The Values of The Edges The maximum Values of Its Vertices
The Values of The HyperEdges The maximum Values of Its Vertices
The Values of The SuperHyperEdges The maximum Values of Its Endpoints
V1 to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vs is sequence of Neutrosophic

SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) and Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)
V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs ,
have 457
(i) Neutrosophic t-strength (min{T (Vi )}, m, n)si=1 ; 458
(ii) Neutrosophic i-strength (m, min{I(Vi )}, n)si=1 ; 459
(iii) Neutrosophic f-strength (m, n, min{F (Vi )})si=1 ; 460
(iv) Neutrosophic strength (min{T (Vi )}, min{I(Vi )}, min{F (Vi )})si=1 . 461
Definition 3.24 (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges 462
(NSHE)). (Ref. [1],Definition 5.4,p.7). 463
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). Consider 464
a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) E = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then E is called 465
(ix) Neutrosophic t-connective if T (E) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic 466
t-strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 467
(NSHV) Vi to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vj where 1 ≤ i, j ≤ s; 468
(x) Neutrosophic i-connective if I(E) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic 469
i-strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 470
(xi) Neutrosophic f-connective if F (E) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic 472
f-strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 473
(xii) Neutrosophic connective if (T (E), I(E), F (E)) ≥ maximum number of 475
Neutrosophic strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic 476
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vj 477
where 1 ≤ i, j ≤ s. 478
For the sake of having a Neutrosophic notion, there’s a need to “redefine” the 479
notion of “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”. The SuperHyperVertices and the 480
SuperHyperEdges are assigned by the labels from the letters of the alphabets. In this 481
procedure, there’s the usage of the position of labels to assign to the values. 482
Definition 3.25. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (SHG) S is a pair 483
S = (V, E). It’s redefined Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph if the Table (1) holds. 484
It’s useful to define a “Neutrosophic” version of SuperHyperClasses. Since there’s 485
more ways to get Neutrosophic type-results to make a Neutrosophic more 486
understandable. 487

perEdges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, Mentioned in the Definition
(3.26)

perEdges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph Mentioned in the Definition
(3.27)
Definition 3.26. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (SHG) S is a pair 488
S = (V, E). There are some Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses if the Table (2) 489
holds. Thus Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath , notion, SuperHyperStar, 490
SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultiPartite, and SuperHyperWheel, are 491
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath, Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle, 492
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar, Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite, 493
Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultiPartite, and Neutrosophic 494
SuperHyperWheel if the Table (2) holds. 495
It’s useful to define a “Neutrosophic” version of a Neutrosophic notion. Since there’s 496
more ways to get type-results to make a Neutrosophic notion more Neutrosophicly 497
understandable. 498
For the sake of having a Neutrosophic notion, there’s a need to “redefine” the 499
Neutrosophic notion of “Neutrosophic notion”. The SuperHyperVertices and the 500
SuperHyperEdges are assigned by the labels from the letters of the alphabets. In this 501
procedure, there’s the usage of the position of labels to assign to the values. 502
Definition 3.27. Assume a notion. It’s redefined a Neutrosophic notion if the 503
Table (3) holds. 504
Example 3.28. Referred to the Example (3.6), assume a Neutrosophic 505
SuperHyperGraph (SHG) S is a pair S = (V, E) in the mentioned Neutrosophic Figures 506
in every Neutrosophic items. 507
SuperHyperGraph (SHG), is up in the illustration of the Table (4). 509
Table 4. The Values of Vertices, SuperVertices, Edges, HyperEdges, and SuperHyper-

Edges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph
Vi (TVi , IVi , FVi ) Ei (TEi , IEi , FEi )
V1 (0.13, 0.13, 0.13) E1 (0, 0, 0)
V2 (0.13, 0.13, 0.13) E2 (0.13, 0.13, 0.13)
V3 (0.15, 0.15, 0.15) E3 (0, 0, 0)
V4 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14) E4 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14)

V1 (0.13, 0.13, 0.13) E1 (0, 0, 0)
V2 (0.03, 0.03, 0.03) E2 (0, 0, 0)
V3 (0.15, 0.15, 0.15) E3 (0, 0, 0)
V4 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14) E4 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14)

V1 (0.13, 0.13, 0.13) E1 (0, 0, 0)
V2 (0.11, 0.11, 0.11) E2 (0, 0, 0)
V3 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14) E3 (0, 0, 0)
- - E4 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14)
4 Main Resultant 516
Definition 4.1. (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Stable 517
Sequence). 518
Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Consider a 519
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then V 0 is called Neutrosophic 520
SuperHyperStrongly Stable Sequence if the following expressions, terms and statements is 521
called Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Stable Sequence criteria holds. 522
X X X
|( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 Vi ∈V 0 Vi ∈V 0
X X X
= min
00 ⊆V
|{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V N SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00

V1 (0.13, 0.13, 0.13) E1 (0.08, 0.08, 0.08)
V2 (0.11, 0.11, 0.11) E2 (0.15, 0.15, 0.15)
V3 (0.05, 0.05, 0.05) E3 (0, 0, 0)
V4 (0.12, 0.12, 0.12) E4 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14)
{F } (0.06, 0.06, 0.06) E5 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14)
{H} (0.08, 0.08, 0.08) - -
{N } (0.14, 0.14, 0.14) - -
{O} (0.15, 0.15, 0.15) - -


Edges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
Vj ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 , ∃Vi ∈ V 00 :
TV0 (Vi , Vj ∈ Ei0 ) > (−/ : NOT DEFINED) min[TV (Vi0 ), TV (Vj0 )]Vi0 ,Vj0 ∈EN SHG ,
IV0 (Vi , Vj ∈ Ei0 ) > (−/ : NOT DEFINED) min[IV (Vi0 ), IV (Vj0 )]Vi0 ,Vj0 ∈EN SHG ,
FV0 (Ei0 )(Vi , Vj ∈ Ei0 ) > (−/ : NOT DEFINED) min[FV (Vi0 ), FV (Vj0 )]Vi0 ,Vj0 ∈EN SHG ,
then Vj ∈ V 00 , until V 00 = VN SHG }
Example 4.2. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel (SHG) S is a pair S = (V, E) 523
in the mentioned Neutrosophic Figures in every Neutrosophic items. 524
SuperHyperWheel (SHG), is up in the illustration of the Table (8). 526
Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Consider a 527
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {Vi=1,4,6 }. Then V 0 is called Neutrosophic 528
SuperHyperStrongly Stable Sequence since the following expressions, terms and 529
statements is called Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Stable Sequence criteria holds. 530
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1,4,6 }


Figure 32. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar Neutrosophic Associated to the Neutro-











V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
V3 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E3 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V4 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V5 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V6 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1,4,6 }
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1,4,6 }
= (0.78, 0.78, 0.78) =
X X X
= max |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V 00 ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
Vi=1 ∈ V 00 = {V1,4,6 }, ∃Vj=5 ∈ VN SHG \ V 00

:
TV0 (Vi , Vj ∈ Ei0 ) : NOT DEFINED 6= 0.26 = min[TV (Vi0 ), TV (Vj0 )]Vi0 ,Vj0 ∈EN SHG ,
IV0 (Vi , Vj ∈ Ei0 ) : NOT DEFINED 6= 0.26 = min[IV (Vi0 ), IV (Vj0 )]Vi0 ,Vj0 ∈EN SHG ,
FV0 (Ei0 )(Vi , Vj ∈ Ei0 ) : NOT DEFINED 6= 0.26 = min[FV (Vi0 ), FV (Vj0 )]Vi0 ,Vj0 ∈EN SHG ,
then Vj=5 ∈ V 00 , but V 00 6= VN SHG ,
Vi=4 ∈ V 00 = {Vi=1,4−6 }, ∃Vj=3 ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 :
TV0 (Vi , Vj ∈ Ei0 ) = 0.26 > 0.24 = min[TV (Vi0 ), TV (Vj0 )]Vi0 ,Vj0 ∈EN SHG ,
IV0 (Vi , Vj ∈ Ei0 ) = 0.26 > 0.24 = min[IV (Vi0 ), IV (Vj0 )]Vi0 ,Vj0 ∈EN SHG ,
FV0 (Ei0 )(Vi , Vj ∈ Ei0 ) = 0.26 > 0.24 = min[FV (Vi0 ), FV (Vj0 )]Vi0 ,Vj0 ∈EN SHG ,
Vi=4 ∈ V 00 = {V1,3−6 }, ∃Vj6=5,6 ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 :
then Vj6=5,6 ∈ V 00 , then V 00 = VN SHG .}
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1,4,6 }
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1,4,6 }
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.19, 0.19, 0.19) E2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
V3 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E3 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V4 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V5 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V6 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1,4,6 }
= (0.78, 0.78, 0.78) =
X X X
= 00
max |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
Vi=1 ∈ V 00 = {V1,4,6 }, ∃Vj=5 ∈ VN SHG \ V 00

:
Vi=1 ∈ V 00 = {Vi=1,4−6 }, ∃Vj=2 ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 :
Vi=4 ∈ V 00 = {Vi=1−2,4−6 }, ∃Vj=3 ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 :

Vi=4 ∈ V 00 = {V1−2,3−6 }, ∃Vj6=5,6 ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 :
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {Vi=1,4 }. Then V 0 is called Neutrosophic 540
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1,4 }
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1,4 }
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1,4 }
= (0.52, 0.52, 0.52) =
X X X
= max
00 ⊆V
|{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V N SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
Vi=1 ∈ V 00 = {Vi=1,4 }, ∃Vj=2 ∈ VN SHG \ V 00

:
Vi=1 ∈ V 00 = {Vi=1−2,4 }, ∃Vj=6 ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 :
Vi=4 ∈ V 00 = {Vi=1−2,4,6 }, ∃Vj=3 ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 :
Vi=3 ∈ V 00 = {V1−2,3−4,6 }, ∃Vj=5,7 ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 :
then Vj=5,7 ∈ V 00 , then V 00 = VN SHG .}
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1,4 }
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={V
i=1,4 }
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.19, 0.19, 0.19) E2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
V3 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E3 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V4 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V5 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V6 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V7 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1,4 }
= (0.52, 0.52, 0.52) =
X X X
= 00
max |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
Vi=1 ∈ V 00 = {Vi=1,4 }, ∃Vj=2 ∈ VN SHG \ V 00

:
Vi=1 ∈ V 00 = {Vi=1−2,4 }, ∃Vj=6,7 ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 :
then Vj=6,7 ∈ V 00 , but V 00 6= VN SHG ,
Vi=4 ∈ V 00 = {Vi=1−2,4,6,7 }, ∃Vj=3 ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 :
Vi=3 ∈ V 00 = {V1−2,3−4,6,7 }, ∃Vj=5 ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 :
then Vj=5 ∈ V 00 , then V 00 = VN SHG .}
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1,4 }
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.19, 0.19, 0.19) E2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
V3 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E3 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
V4 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V5 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V6 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V7 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1,4 }
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1,4 }
= (0.52, 0.52, 0.52) =
X X X
= max |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V 00 ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
Vi=1 ∈ V 00 = {Vi=1,4 }, ∃Vj=2 ∈ VN SHG \ V 00

:
Vi=1 ∈ V 00 = {Vi=1−2,4 }, ∃Vj=6 ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 :
Vi=1 ∈ V 00 = {Vi=1−2,4,6 }, ∃Vj=7 ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 :
Vi=4 ∈ V 00 = {Vi=1−2,4,6,7 }, ∃Vj=3 ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 :
Vi=3 ∈ V 00 = {V1−2,3−4,6,7 }, ∃Vj=5 ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 :
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.19, 0.19, 0.19) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V6 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V7 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1,4 }
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1,4 }
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1,4 }
= (0.52, 0.52, 0.52) =
X X X
= max
00 ⊆V
|{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V N SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
Vi=1 ∈ V 00 = {Vi=1,4 }, ∃Vj=2 ∈ VN SHG \ V 00

:
Vi=1 ∈ V 00 = {Vi=1−2,4 }, ∃Vj=6 ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 :
Vi=1 ∈ V 00 = {Vi=1−2,4,6 }, ∃Vj=7 ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 :
Vi=4 ∈ V 00 = {Vi=1−2,4,6,7 }, ∃Vj=3 ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 :
Edges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
Vi=3 ∈ V 00 = {V1−2,3−4,6,7 }, ∃Vj=5 ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 :
Example 4.3. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar (SHG) S is a pair S = (V, E) 561
in the mentioned Neutrosophic Figures in every Neutrosophic items. 562
SuperHyperStar (SHG), is up in the illustration of the Table (14). 564
Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Consider a 565
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {Vi=5 }. Then V 0 is called Neutrosophic 566
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=5 }
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=5 }
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=5 }
= (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) =

X X X
= 00 max |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00 00
Vi=5 ∈ V = {V5 }, ∃Vj6=5 ∈ VN SHG \ V :
TV (Vi , Vj ∈ Ei0 ) : NOT DEFINED 6= 0.26 = min[TV (Vi0 ), TV (Vj0 )]Vi0 ,Vj0 ∈EN SHG ,
0
then Vj6=5 ∈ V 00 , then V 00 = VN SHG .}
V1 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V1 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=2,5 }
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=2,5 }
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=2,5 }
= (0.52, 0.52, 0.52) =

X X X
= 00 max |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00 00
Vi=2 ∈ V = {Vi=2,5 }, ∃Vj=1 ∈ VN SHG \ V :
TV (Vi , Vj ∈ Ei0 ) = 0.26 > 0.23 = min[TV (Vi0 ), TV (Vj0 )]Vi0 ,Vj0 ∈EN SHG ,
0
Vi=5 ∈ V 00 = {V1,2,5 }, ∃Vj6=1,2,5 ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 :
then Vj6=1,2,5 ∈ V 00 , then V 00 = VN SHG .}
V1 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=2,5 }
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={V
i=2,5 }
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=2,5 }
= (0.52, 0.52, 0.52) =

X X X
= 00 max |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00 00
Vi=2 ∈ V = {Vi=2,5 }, ∃Vj=1,3 ∈ VN SHG \ V :
0
then Vj=1,3 ∈ V 00 , but V 00 6= VN SHG ,
Vi=5 ∈ V 00 = {V1−3,5 }, ∃Vj6=1−3,5 ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 :
then Vj6=1−3,5 ∈ V 00 , then V 00 = VN SHG .}
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=2,5 }
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=2,5 }
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=2,5 }
= (0.52, 0.52, 0.52) =
V1 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V5 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
X X X
= 00
max |{ ( T (Vi ), F (Vi )) |
I(Vi ),
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
Vi ∈V 00
Vi=2 ∈ V 00 = {Vi=2,5 }, ∃Vj=1,3,4 ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 :

then Vj=1,3,4 ∈ V 00 , but V 00 6= VN SHG ,
Vi=5 ∈ V 00 = {V1−5 }, ∃Vj6=1−5 ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 :
then Vj6=1−5 ∈ V 00 , then V 00 = VN SHG .}
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=2,6,7 }
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=2,6,7 }
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=2,6,7 }
= (0.78, 0.78, 0.78) =

X X X
= 00 max |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00
Vi=2 ∈ V = {Vi=2,6,7 }, ∃Vj6=2,6,7 ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 :
then Vj6=2,6,7 ∈ V 00 , then V 00 = VN SHG .}
V1 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V5 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V6 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V1 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V5 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V6 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V7 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=2,7 }
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={V
i=2,7 }
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=2,7 }
= (0.52, 0.52, 0.52) =

X X X
= 00 max |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00 00
Vi=2 ∈ V = {Vi=2,7 }, ∃Vj6=2,7 ∈ VN SHG \ V :
0
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {Vi=2 }. Then V 0 is called Neutrosophic 602
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=2 }
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={V
i=2 }
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={V
i=2 }
= (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) =

X X X
= 00 max |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00 00
Vi=2 ∈ V = {Vi=2 }, ∃Vj6=2 ∈ VN SHG \ V :
then Vj6=2 ∈ V 00 , then V 00 = VN SHG .}
5 Main Result 605
Theorem 5.1. (Main Result and Main Theorem). 606
Assume every Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar has the letter z. The notion on the 607
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar and Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel coincides. 608
Proof. 609
(i). Let 610
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
CEN T ER, E2
611
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , CEN T ER
be a longest path taken a connected Extreme SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). There’s 612
a new way to redefine as 613
ViEXT ERN AL ∼ VjEXT ERN AL ≡

∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL ∈ Ez ≡
∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , {ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL } ⊆ Ez .
The term “EXTERNAL” implies |N (ViEXT ERN AL )| ≥ |N (Vj )| where Vj is 614
corresponded to ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Stable 615
Sequence. The latter is straightforward. 616
(ii). Let 617
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1∗ ,
CEN T ER, E2∗
618
P :
E1∗ , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2∗ , CEN T ER
is a longest SuperHyperStrongly Stable Sequence taken from a connected Extreme 619
SuperHyperWheel ESHW : (V, E). There’s a new way to redefine as 620

Sequence. The latter is straightforward. Then there’s at least one Neutrosophic 623
SuperHyperStrongly Stable Sequence. Thus the notion of quasi isn’t up and the 624
SuperHyperNotions based on Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Stable Sequence could be 625
applied. The unique embedded Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Stable Sequence proposes 626
some longest Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Stable Sequence excerpt from some 627
representatives. The latter is straightforward. 628
Proposition 5.2. Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E).

Assume every Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex has the letter z. The Neutrosophic
SuperHyperStrongly Stable Sequence set is as follows.
{CEN T ER}.
Proof. Let 629
P :
CEN T ER, E2∗
630
P :
E2∗ , CEN T ER


SuperHyperStrongly Stable Sequence number is as follows.
0.26.
Proof. Let 641
P :
CEN T ER, E2∗
642
P :
E2∗ , CEN T ER

Proposition 5.4. Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E).

SuperHyperStrongly Stable Sequence set is as follows.
{CEN T ER}.
Proof. Let 653
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
CEN T ER, E2
654
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , CEN T ER

Proposition 5.5. Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E).

SuperHyperStrongly Stable Sequence number is as follows.
0.26.
Proof. Let 660
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
CEN T ER, E2
661
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , CEN T ER

Definition 5.6. (Uniform Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar and Uniform Neutrosophic 667
SuperHyperStar). 668
(i). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Every pair of 669
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices has the same maximum letter, i.e., 670
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices mutually has the same maximum letter. A 671
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E) is called Uniform 672
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar. 673
(ii). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Every pair 674
of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices has the same maximum letter, i.e., 675
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices mutually has the same maximum letter. A 676
Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E) is called Uniform 677
Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel. 678
Proposition 5.7. Let an Uniform Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel (SHG) S be a pair

S = (V, E). The Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Stable Sequence set is as follows.
{CEN T ER}.
Proof. Let 679
P :
CEN T ER, E2∗
680
P :
E2∗ , CEN T ER


The Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Stable Sequence number is lower than as follows.
0.26.
Proof. Let 691
P :
CEN T ER, E2∗
692
P :
E2∗ , CEN T ER

Proposition 5.9. Let an Uniform Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar (SHG) S be a pair

S = (V, E). The Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Stable Sequence set is as follows.
{CEN T ER}.
Proof. Let 703
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
CEN T ER, E2
704
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , CEN T ER

Proposition 5.10. Let an Uniform Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar (SHG) S be a pair

S = (V, E). The Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Stable Sequence number is lower than as
follows.
0.26.
Proof. Let 710
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
CEN T ER, E2
711
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , CEN T ER

Proposition 5.11. (Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar and Neutrosophic 717
SuperHyperWheel). 718
(i). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Assume every 719
Neutrosophic CENTER has the letter maximum letter. Then the Neutrosophic 720
SuperHyperVertices don’t have the same maximum letter, are in every 721
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Stable Sequence set. 722
(ii). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Assume 723
every Neutrosophic CENTER has the letter maximum letter. Then the 724
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices don’t have the same maximum letter, are in 725
every Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Stable Sequence set. 726
Proof. 727
(i). Let 728
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
CEN T ER, E2
729
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , CEN T ER

(ii). Let 735
P :
CEN T ER, E2∗
736
P :
E2∗ , CEN T ER

Proposition 5.12. (Embedded Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar and Embedded 747
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar). 748
(i). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Then 749
CENTER is in every Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Stable Sequence set. 750
(ii). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Then 751
CENTER is in every Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Stable Sequence set. 752
Proof. 753
(i). Let 754
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
CEN T ER, E2
755
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , CEN T ER

(ii). Let 761
P :
CEN T ER, E2∗
762
P :
E2∗ , CEN T ER

6 Neutrosophic Applications in Cancer’s 773
Neutrosophic Recognition 774
The cancer is the Neutrosophic disease but the Neutrosophic model is going to figure 775
out what’s going on this Neutrosophic phenomenon. The special Neutrosophic case of 776
this Neutrosophic disease is considered and as the consequences of the model, some 777
parameters are used. The cells are under attack of this disease but the moves of the 778
cancer in the special region are the matter of mind. The Neutrosophic recognition of the 779
cancer could help to find some Neutrosophic treatments for this Neutrosophic disease. 780
In the following, some Neutrosophic steps are Neutrosophic devised on this disease. 781
Step 1. (Neutrosophic Definition) The Neutrosophic recognition of the cancer in 782
the long-term Neutrosophic function. 783
Step 2. (Neutrosophic Issue) The specific region has been assigned by the 784
Neutrosophic model [it’s called Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph] and the long 785
Neutrosophic cycle of the move from the cancer is identified by this research. 786
Sometimes the move of the cancer hasn’t be easily identified since there are some 787
determinacy, indeterminacy and neutrality about the moves and the effects of the 788
cancer on that region; this event leads us to choose another model [it’s said to be 789
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph] to have convenient perception on what’s 790
happened and what’s done. 791
Step 3. (Neutrosophic Model) There are some specific Neutrosophic models, 792
which are well-known and they’ve got the names, and some general Neutrosophic 793
models. The moves and the Neutrosophic traces of the cancer on the complex 794
tracks and between complicated groups of cells could be fantasized by a 795
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath(-/SuperHyperStrongly Stable Sequence, SuperHyperStar, 796
SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, SuperHyperWheel). The aim is to 797
find either the Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Stable Sequence or the Neutrosophic 798
SuperHyperStrongly Stable Sequence in those Neutrosophic Neutrosophic 799
SuperHyperModels. 800
7 Case 1: The Initial Neutrosophic Steps 801
Toward Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite as 802
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel 803
Step 4. (Neutrosophic Solution) In the Neutrosophic Figure (42), the 804
Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite is Neutrosophic highlighted and Neutrosophic 805
Figure 42. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite Associated to the Notions of Neutro-

sophic SuperHyperStrongly Stable Sequence
Edges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite
featured. 806
By using the Neutrosophic Figure (42) and the Table (21), the Neutrosophic 807
SuperHyperBipartite is obtained. 808
The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Neutrosophic Algorithm in 809
previous Neutrosophic result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the 810
connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic 811
SuperHyperModel (42), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Stable Sequence. 812
8 Case 2: The Increasing Neutrosophic Steps 813
Toward Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite as 814
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel 815
Step 4. (Neutrosophic Solution) In the Neutrosophic Figure (43), the 816
Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite is Neutrosophic highlighted and 817
Neutrosophic featured. 818
By using the Neutrosophic Figure (43) and the Table (22), the Neutrosophic 819
SuperHyperMultipartite is obtained. 820
The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Neutrosophic Algorithm in 821
previous result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected 822
Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic 823
Figure 43. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite Associated to the Notions of

Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Stable Sequence
Edges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite
SuperHyperModel (43), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Stable Sequence. 824
9 Neutrosophic Applications in Cancer’s 825
Neutrosophic Recognition 826
Cancer is a neutrosophic disease, but the neutrosophic model is supposed to understand 827
what is going on in this neutrosophic phenomenon. The special case of neutrosophic 828
disease is considered and some parameters have been used as consequences of the model. 829
Cells are subject to attack by the disease, but the movements of the cancer in the 830
specific area is a matter of mind. Neutrosophic diagnosis of cancer can help in finding 831
some Neutrosophic cures for this Neutrosophic disease. 832
In the following, several Neutrosophic stages are designed for this disease. 833
Step 1. (Neutrosophic Definition) Neutrosophic diagnosis of cancer in long-term 834
Neutrosophic performance. 835
Step 2. (Neutrosophic Issue) The specific region is assigned by the Neutrosophic 836
model (called Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph) and the long Neutrosophic cycle of 837
movement of cancer is identified by this scientific research. Sometimes the 838
movement of cancer is not easy to detect, because there is certainty, uncertainty 839
and neutrality about the movements and effects of cancer on that area. This event 840
leads us to choose another model [which is said to be the Neutrosophic 841
superhypergraph] in order to have a proper understanding of what happened and 842
was done. 843
Step 3. (Neutrosophic Model) There are some specific Neutrosophic models that 844
are well known and have names and some general Neutrosophic models. Cancer 845
neurtosophic movements and effects in complex pathways and between complex 846
groups of cells can be visualized by a SuperHyperPath (-/SuperHyperCycle, 847
SuperHyperStar, SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, 848
SuperHyperWheel). The goal is to find dominant neutrosophic Strongly Stable 849
Sequence models or dominant sStrongly Stable Sequence models. 850
10 Wondering Open Problems But As The 851
Directions To Forming The Motivations 852
In what follows, some “problems” and some “questions” are proposed. 853
The SuperHyperStrongly Stable Sequence and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Stable 854
Sequence are defined on a real-world application, titled “Cancer’s Recognitions”. 855
Question 10.1. Which the else SuperHyperModels could be defined based on Cancer’s 856
recognitions? 857
Question 10.2. Are there some SuperHyperNotions related to SuperHyperStrongly Stable 858
and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Stable Sequence?

Sequence 859
Question 10.3. Are there some Algorithms to be defined on the SuperHyperModels to 860
compute them? 861
Question 10.4. Which the SuperHyperNotions are related to beyond the 862
SuperHyperStrongly Stable Sequence and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Stable Sequence? 863
Problem 10.5. The SuperHyperStrongly Stable Sequence and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly 864
do a SuperHyperModel for the Cancer’s recognitions and they’re based on

Stable Sequence 865
SuperHyperStrongly Stable Sequence, are there else? 866
Problem 10.6. Which the fundamental SuperHyperNumbers are related to these 867
SuperHyperNumbers types-results? 868
Problem 10.7. What’s the independent research based on Cancer’s recognitions 869
concerning the multiple types of SuperHyperNotions? 870
11 Conclusion and Closing Remarks 871
In this section, closing and concluding remarks are presented. The drawbacks of this 872
scientific research are shown. Some advantages and disadvantages of this scientific 873
research are highlighted. 874
This scientific research uses some approaches to further understand the Neutrosophic 875
SuperHyperGraphs. In this effort, two SuperHyperNotions are defined on the Strongly 876
Stable Sequence. For this reason, in the second definition, the original definition of the 877
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph is redefined on the position of the alphabets. Based on 878
the new Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph definition, the new SuperHyperNotion, 879
Neutrosophic Strongly Stable Sequence, finds a suitable background to implement some 880
results on. Some SuperHyperClasses and some Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses are the 881
subjects of this scientific research on modeling areas that are subject to cancer attacks 882
in order to recognize this disease as mentioned under the title “Cancer Diagnosis”. To 883
formalize the SuperHyperNotion, Strongly Stable Sequence, SuperHyperClasses and 884
new SuperHyperClasses instances are introduced. Some general results are summarized 885
in the Strongly Stable Sequence and Neutrosophic Strongly Stable Sequence sections. 886
Clarifications, examples, and literature reviews go all the way. In this scientific research, 887
the literature review has met the lines containing concepts and results. 888
SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph are super-hypermodels in 889
“cancer diagnosis” and both are the foundation of the background of this scientific 890
research. Sometimes cancer has occurred in an area full of cells, cell groups, and 891
embedded styles. In this section, SuperHyperModel proposes SuperHyperNotions, 892
formally called “Strongly Stable Sequence”, based on the connections of Cancer’s 893
movements in the longest and strongest styles with the formation of design and 894
architecture, in terms of terms and whispering words. . The “SuperHyper” prefix refers 895
to the topic of embedded styles to explore the background of SuperHyperNotions. In
Table 23. A look at this scientific research and beyond

Advantages Limitations
1. Redefining the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 1. General Results
2. Strongly Stable Sequence
3. Neutrosophic Strongly Stable Sequence 2. Other SuperHyperNumbers
4. modeling cancer diagnoses
5. SuperHyperClasses 3. SuperHyperFamilies
896
the table (23), the advantages and ways of this scientific research are specified, pointed 897
out and expressed. 898
12 Background 899
There are some scientific researches covering the topic of this scientific research. In what 900
follows, there are some discussion and literature reviews about them. 901
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “New Ideas In Recognition of 902
Cancer And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph As Hyper Tool On Super Toot” in Ref. [1] 903
by Henry Garrett (2023). In this research article, a novel approach is implemented on 904
SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on general forms with 905
introducing used neutrosophic classes of neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. It’s published 906
in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled “Current Trends in Mass Communication 907
(CTMC)” with ISO abbreviation “Curr Trends Mass Comm” in volume 2 and issue 1 908
with pages 32-55. 909
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “Some Super Hyper Degrees 910
and Co-Super Hyper Degrees on Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs And Super Hyper 911
Graphs Alongside Applications in Cancer’s Treatments” in Ref. [2] by Henry Garrett 912
(2023). In this research article, a novel approach is implemented on SuperHyperGraph 913
and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on fundamental notions and using vital tools 914
in Cancer’s Treatments. It’s published in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled 915
“Journal of Mathematical Techniques and Computational Mathematics(JMTCM)” with 916
ISO abbreviation “J Math Techniques Comput Math” in volume 2 and issue 1 with 917
pages 35-47. The research article studies deeply with choosing directly neutrosophic 918
SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough toward independent 919
results based on initial background and fundamental SuperHyperNumbers. 920
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “A Research on Cancer’s 921
Recognition and Neutrosophic Super Hypergraph by Eulerian Super Hyper Cycles and 922
Hamiltonian Sets as Hyper Covering Versus Super separations” in Ref. [3] by Henry 923
Garrett (2023). In this research article, a novel approach is implemented on 924
SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on fundamental notions 925
and using vital tools in Cancer’s Recognition. It’s published in prestigious and fancy 926
journal is entitled “Journal of Mathematical Techniques and Computational 927
Mathematics(JMTCM)” with ISO abbreviation “J Math Techniques Comput Math” in 928
volume 2 and issue 3 with pages 136-148. The research article studies deeply with 929
choosing directly neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph. It’s the 930
breakthrough toward independent results based on initial background and fundamental 931
SuperHyperNumbers. 932
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “Neutrosophic 1-Failed 933
SuperHyperForcing in the SuperHyperFunction to Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs 934
on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Beyond ” in Ref. [4] by Henry Garrett (2023). 935
In this research article, a novel approach is implemented on SuperHyperGraph and 936
neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on fundamental SuperHyperNumber and using 937
neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses of neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. It’s published in 938
prestigious and fancy journal is entitled “Journal of Mathematical Techniques and 939
Computational Mathematics(JMTCM)” with ISO abbreviation “J Math Techniques 940
Comput Math” in volume 2 and issue 6 with pages 221-307. The research article studies 941
deeply with choosing directly neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph. 942
It’s the breakthrough toward independent results based on initial background and 943
fundamental SuperHyperNumbers. The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is 944
titled “New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph by 945
Initial Eulerian-Path-Cut as Hyper Initial Eulogy on Super Initial EULA” in Ref. [5] by 946
Henry Garrett (2023). In this research article, a novel approach is implemented on 947
SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on fundamental 948
SuperHyperNumber and using neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses of neutrosophic 949
SuperHyperGraph. It’s published in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled 950
“International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Research” with ISO 951
abbreviation “IJPAMR” in volume 3 and issue 2 with pages 60-88 and doi: 952
10.51483/IJPAMR.3.2.2023.60-88. The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is 953
titled “New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graph by 954
Eulerian-Path-Cut as Hyper Eulogy-Path-Cut on Super EULA-Path-Cut” in Ref. [6] by 955
SuperHyperGraph. It’s published in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled 959
“International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Research” with ISO 960
abbreviation “IJPAMR” in volume 3 and issue 2 with pages 102-124 and doi: 961
10.51483/IJPAMR.3.2.2023.102-124. The research article studies deeply with choosing 962
directly neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough 963
toward independent results based on initial background and fundamental 964
SuperHyperNumbers. The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “Super 965
Hyper Dominating and Super Hyper Resolving on Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs and 966
Their Directions in Game Theory and Neutrosophic Super Hyper Classes” in Ref. [7] by 967
SuperHyperGraph. It’s published in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled “Journal 971
of Mathematical Techniques and Computational Mathematics(JMTCM)” with ISO 972
abbreviation “J Math Techniques Comput Math” in volume 1 and issue 3 with pages 973
242-263. The research article studies deeply with choosing directly neutrosophic 974
SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough toward independent 975
results based on initial background and fundamental SuperHyperNumbers. The seminal 976
paper and groundbreaking article is titled “neutrosophic co-degree and neutrosophic 977
degree alongside chromatic numbers in the setting of some classes related to neutrosophic 978
hypergraphs” in Ref. [8] by Henry Garrett (2023). In this research article, a novel 979
approach is implemented on SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 980
based on general forms without using neutrosophic classes of neutrosophic 981
SuperHyperGraph. It’s published in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled “Journal 982
of Current Trends in Computer Science Research (JCTCSR)” with ISO abbreviation “J 983
Curr Trends Comp Sci Res” in volume 2 and issue 1 with pages 16-24. The research 984
article studies deeply with choosing neutrosophic hypergraphs instead of neutrosophic 985
SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough toward independent results based on initial 986
background. The research article studies deeply with choosing neutrosophic 987
hypergraphs instead of neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough toward 988
independent results based on initial background. In some articles are titled “0039 — 989
Closing Numbers and Super-Closing Numbers as (Dual)Resolving and (Dual)Coloring 990
alongside (Dual)Dominating in (Neutrosophic)n-SuperHyperGraph” in Ref. [9] by 991
Henry Garrett (2022), “0049 — (Failed)1-Zero-Forcing Number in Neutrosophic Graphs” 992
in Ref. [10] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Extreme SuperHyperClique as the Firm Scheme 993
of Confrontation under Cancer’s Recognition as the Model in The Setting of 994
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [11] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Uncertainty 995
On The Act And Effect Of Cancer Alongside The Foggy Positions Of Cells Toward 996
Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique inside Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Titled 997
Cancer’s Recognition” in Ref. [12] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic Version Of 998
Separates Groups Of Cells In Cancer’s Recognition On Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” 999
in Ref. [13] by Henry Garrett (2022), “The Shift Paradigm To Classify Separately The 1000
Cells and Affected Cells Toward The Totality Under Cancer’s Recognition By New 1001
Multiple Definitions On the Sets Polynomials Alongside Numbers In The (Neutrosophic) 1002
SuperHyperMatching Theory Based on SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic 1003
SuperHyperGraph” in Ref. [14] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Breaking the Continuity and 1004
Uniformity of Cancer In The Worst Case of Full Connections With Extreme Failed 1005
SuperHyperClique In Cancer’s Recognition Applied in (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” 1006
in Ref. [15] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable as the 1007
Survivors on the Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition Based on Uncertainty to All Modes 1008
in Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [16] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Extremism 1009
of the Attacked Body Under the Cancer’s Circumstances Where Cancer’s Recognition 1010
Titled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [17] by Henry Garrett (2022), 1011
“(Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in Cancer’s Recognitions And 1012
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [18] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic 1013
Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on 1014
Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In Special ViewPoints” in Ref. [19] by Henry 1015
Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in the SuperHyperFunction 1016
To Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition And 1017
Beyond ” in Ref. [20] by Henry Garrett (2022), “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperStable on 1018
Cancer’s Recognition by Well- SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs ” 1019
in Ref. [21] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To 1020
Form Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In 1021
Special ViewPoints” in Ref. [17] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Basic Notions on 1022
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperForcing And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling in Cancer’s 1023
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [22] by Henry Garrett 1024
(2022), “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form Neutrosophic 1025
SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In Special ViewPoints” 1026
in Ref. [23] by Henry Garrett (2022),“(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s 1027
Recognitions Featuring (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances” in 1028
Ref. [24] by Henry Garrett (2022), “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperAlliances With 1029
SuperHyperDefensive and SuperHyperOffensive Type-SuperHyperSet On (Neutrosophic) 1030
SuperHyperGraph With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions 1031
And Related (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClasses” in Ref. [25] by Henry Garrett (2022), 1032
“SuperHyperGirth on SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph With 1033
SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions” in Ref. [26] by Henry Garrett (2022), 1034
“Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on Neutrosophic 1035
SuperHyperGraphs and SuperHyperGraphs Alongside Applications in Cancer’s 1036
Treatments” in Ref. [27] by Henry Garrett (2022), “SuperHyperDominating and 1037
SuperHyperResolving on Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs And Their Directions in 1038
Game Theory and Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses” in Ref. [28] by Henry Garrett 1039
(2022), “SuperHyperMatching By (R-)Definitions And Polynomials To Monitor 1040
Cancer’s Recognition In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [227] by Henry 1041
Garrett (2023), “The Focus on The Partitions Obtained By Parallel Moves In The 1042
Cancer’s Extreme Recognition With Different Types of Extreme SuperHyperMatching Set 1043
and Polynomial on (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [228] by Henry Garrett 1044
(2023), “Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique Decides the Failures on the Cancer’s 1045
Recognition in the Perfect Connections of Cancer’s Attacks By SuperHyperModels 1046
Named (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [229] by Henry Garrett (2023), 1047
“Indeterminacy On The All Possible Connections of Cells In Front of Cancer’s Attacks 1048
In The Terms of Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique on Cancer’s Recognition called 1049
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [230] by Henry Garrett (2023), “Perfect 1050
Directions Toward Idealism in Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition Forwarding 1051
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClique on Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [233] by 1052
Henry Garrett (2023), “Demonstrating Complete Connections in Every Embedded 1053
Regions and Sub-Regions in the Terms of Cancer’s Recognition and (Neutrosophic) 1054
SuperHyperGraphs With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClique” in Ref. [234] by Henry 1055
Garrett (2023), “Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic Regions titled 1056
neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable in Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition modeled in 1057
the Form of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [237] by Henry Garrett (2023), 1058
“Using the Tool As (Neutrosophic) Failed SuperHyperStable To SuperHyperModel 1059
Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [240] by Henry 1060
Garrett (2023), “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form Neutrosophic 1061
SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In Special ViewPoints” 1062
in Ref. [241] by Henry Garrett (2023), “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperStable on Cancer’s 1063
Recognition by Well-SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in 1064
Ref. [242] by Henry Garrett (2023), “Neutrosophic 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in the 1065
SuperHyperFunction To Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs on Cancer’s Neutrosophic 1066
Recognition And Beyond ” in Ref. [243] by Henry Garrett (2022), “(Neutrosophic) 1067
1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in Cancer’s Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) 1068
SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [244] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Basic Notions on 1069
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperForcing And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling in Cancer’s 1070
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [245] by Henry Garrett 1071
(2022), “Basic Neutrosophic Notions Concerning SuperHyperDominating and 1072
Neutrosophic SuperHyperResolving in SuperHyperGraph” in Ref. [256] by Henry 1073
Garrett (2022), “Initial Material of Neutrosophic Preliminaries to Study Some 1074
Neutrosophic Notions Based on Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) in Neutrosophic 1075
SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)” in Ref. [257] by Henry Garrett (2022), and [4–257], there 1076
are some endeavors to formalize the basic SuperHyperNotions about neutrosophic 1077
SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph alongside scientific research books 1078
at [258–395]. Two popular scientific research books in Scribd in the terms of high 1079
readers, 5679 and 6667 respectively, on neutrosophic science is on [396, 397]. 1080
Some scientific studies and scientific researches about neutrosophic graphs, are 1081
proposed as book in Ref. [396] by Henry Garrett (2023) which is indexed by Google 1082
Scholar and has more than 5679 readers in Scribd. It’s titled “Beyond Neutrosophic 1083
Graphs” and published by Dr. Henry Garrett. This research book covers different types 1084
of notions and settings in neutrosophic graph theory and neutrosophic 1085
SuperHyperGraph theory. 1086
Also, some scientific studies and scientific researches about neutrosophic graphs, are 1087
proposed as book in Ref. [397] by Henry Garrett (2023) which is indexed by Google 1088
Scholar and has more than 6667 readers in Scribd. It’s titled “Neutrosophic Duality” 1089
and published by Dr. Henry Garrett. This research book presents different types of 1090
notions SuperHyperResolving and SuperHyperDominating in the setting of duality in 1091
neutrosophic graph theory and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph theory. This research 1092
book has scrutiny on the complement of the intended set and the intended set, 1093
simultaneously. It’s smart to consider a set but acting on its complement that what’s 1094
done in this research book which is popular in the terms of high readers in Scribd. 1095
See the seminal scientific researches [1–3]. The formalization of the notions on the 1096
framework of notions in SuperHyperGraphs, Neutrosophic notions in 1097
SuperHyperGraphs theory, and (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs theory at [4–257] 1098
alongside scientific research books at [258–395]. Two popular scientific research books 1099
in Scribd ,in the terms of high readers, 5679 and 6667 respectively, on neutrosophic 1100
science is on [396, 397]. 1101
References 1102
1. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 1103
SuperHyperGraph As Hyper Tool On Super Toot”, Curr Trends Mass Comm 1104
2(1) (2023) 32-55. (doi: 10.33140/CTMC.02.01.03). 1105
2. Henry Garrett, “Some Super Hyper Degrees and Co-Super Hyper Degrees on 1106
Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs And Super Hyper Graphs Alongside 1107
Applications in Cancer’s Treatments”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 2(1) 1108
(2023) 35-47. (doi: 10.33140/JMTCM.02.01.05). 1109
3. Henry Garrett, “A Research on Cancer’s Recognition and Neutrosophic Super 1110
Hypergraph by Eulerian Super Hyper Cycles and Hamiltonian Sets as Hyper 1111
Covering Versus Super separations”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 2(3) 1112
(2023) 136-148. (doi: 10.33140/JMTCM.02.03.03). 1113
4. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in the 1114
SuperHyperFunction to Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs on Cancer’s 1115
Neutrosophic Recognition and Beyond ”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 2(6) 1116
(2023) 221-307. (doi: 10.33140/JMTCM.02.06.04). 1117
5. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic 1118
SuperHyperGraph by Initial Eulerian-Path-Cut as Hyper Initial Eulogy on Super 1119
Initial EULA”, International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics 1120
Research 3(2) (2023) 60-88. (doi: 10.51483/IJPAMR.3.2.2023.60-88). 1121
6. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic Super 1122
Hyper Graph by Eulerian-Path-Cut as Hyper Eulogy-Path-Cut on Super 1123
EULA-Path-Cut”, International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics 1124
Research 3(2) (2023) 102-124. (doi: 10.51483/IJPAMR.3.2.2023.102-124). 1125
7. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic Super 1126
Hyper Graph by Eulerian-Path-Cut as Hyper Eulogy-Path-Cut on Super 1127
EULA-Path-Cut”, J Curr Trends Comp Sci Res 2(1) (2023) 16-24. (doi: 1128
10.33140/JCTCSR.02.01.04) 1129
8. Henry Garrett, “Super Hyper Dominating and Super Hyper Resolving on 1130
Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs and Their Directions in Game Theory and 1131
Neutrosophic Super Hyper Classes”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 1(3) 1132
(2022) 242-263. (doi: 10.33140/JMTCM.01.03.09) 1133
9. Garrett, Henry. “0039 — Closing Numbers and Super-Closing Numbers as 1134
(Dual)Resolving and (Dual)Coloring alongside (Dual)Dominating in 1135
(Neutrosophic)n-SuperHyperGraph.” CERN European Organization for Nuclear 1136
Research - Zenodo, Nov. 2022. CERN European Organization for Nuclear 1137
Research, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6319942. 1138
https://oa.mg/work/10.5281/zenodo.6319942 1139
10. Garrett, Henry. “0049 — (Failed)1-Zero-Forcing Number in Neutrosophic 1140
Graphs.” CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research - Zenodo, Feb. 1141
2022. CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research, 1142
https://doi.org/10.13140/rg.2.2.35241.26724. 1143
https://oa.mg/work/10.13140/rg.2.2.35241.26724 1144
11. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperClique as the Firm Scheme of 1145
Confrontation under Cancer’s Recognition as the Model in The Setting of 1146
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010308 (doi: 1147
10.20944/preprints202301.0308.v1). 1148
12. Henry Garrett, “Uncertainty On The Act And Effect Of Cancer Alongside The 1149
Foggy Positions Of Cells Toward Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique inside 1150
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Titled Cancer’s Recognition”, Preprints 2023, 1151
2023010282 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0282.v1). 1152
13. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Version Of Separates Groups Of Cells In 1153
Cancer’s Recognition On Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 1154
2023010267 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0267.v1). 1155
14. Henry Garrett, “The Shift Paradigm To Classify Separately The Cells and 1156
Affected Cells Toward The Totality Under Cancer’s Recognition By New 1157
Multiple Definitions On the Sets Polynomials Alongside Numbers In The 1158
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperMatching Theory Based on SuperHyperGraph and 1159
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”, Preprints 2023, 2023010265 (doi: 1160
10.20944/preprints202301.0265.v1). 1161
15. Henry Garrett, “Breaking the Continuity and Uniformity of Cancer In The 1162
Worst Case of Full Connections With Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique In 1163
Cancer’s Recognition Applied in (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 1164
2023, 2023010262,(doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0262.v1). 1165
16. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable as the Survivors on the 1166
Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition Based on Uncertainty to All Modes in 1167
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010240 (doi: 1168
10.20944/preprints202301.0240.v1). 1169
17. Henry Garrett, “Extremism of the Attacked Body Under the Cancer’s 1170
Circumstances Where Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) 1171
SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010224, (doi: 1172
10.20944/preprints202301.0224.v1). 1173
18. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in Cancer’s 1174
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 1175
2023010105 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 1176
19. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form 1177
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions 1178
In Special ViewPoints”, Preprints 2023, 2023010088 (doi: 1179
10.20944/preprints202301.0088.v1). 1180
SuperHyperFunction To Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs on Cancer’s 1182
Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond ”, Preprints 2023, 2023010044 1183
21. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperStable on Cancer’s Recognition by 1184
Well- SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 1185
2023010043 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0043.v1). 1186
22. Henry Garrett, “Basic Notions on (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperForcing And 1187
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling in Cancer’s Recognitions And 1188
10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 1190
10.20944/preprints202301.0088.v1). 1194
24. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions 1195
Featuring (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances”, Preprints 1196
2022, 2022120549 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0549.v1). 1197
25. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperAlliances With SuperHyperDefensive 1198
and SuperHyperOffensive Type-SuperHyperSet On (Neutrosophic) 1199
SuperHyperGraph With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s 1200
Recognitions And Related (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClasses”, Preprints 2022, 1201
2022120540 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0540.v1). 1202
26. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperGirth on SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic 1203
SuperHyperGraph With SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions”, 1204
Preprints 2022, 2022120500 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0500.v1). 1205
27. Henry Garrett, “Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on 1206
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs and SuperHyperGraphs Alongside Applications 1207
in Cancer’s Treatments”, Preprints 2022, 2022120324 (doi: 1208
10.20944/preprints202212.0324.v1). 1209
28. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDominating and SuperHyperResolving on 1210
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs And Their Directions in Game Theory and 1211
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”, Preprints 2022, 2022110576 (doi: 1212
10.20944/preprints202211.0576.v1). 1213
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By Strongly Resolving Sequence As 1215
Hyper Decoration On Super Density”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1216
10.13140/RG.2.2.17389.97769). 1217
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By Strongly Resolving Sequence As 1219
Hyper Decoration On Super Density”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1220
10.13140/RG.2.2.28685.10727). 1221
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By Strongly Resolving Sequence 1223
As Hyper Decoration On Super Density”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1224
10.13140/RG.2.2.24994.20169). 1225
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By Dominating Sequence As Hyper 1227
Decoration On Super Density”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10371529). 1228
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By Dominating Sequence As Hyper 1230
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By Dominating Sequence As 1233
Hyper Decoration On Super Density”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1234
10.5281/zenodo.10263440). 1235
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By STABLE As Hyper Decoration On 1237
Super Density”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10028600). 1238
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By STABLE As Hyper Decoration 1240
On Super Density”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8310454). 1241
37. Henry Garrett, “Recognition of Cancer With Bipartite and Path as 1242
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph By the Tool Called Stability”, Preprints 2023, 1243
2023081972 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202308.1972.v1). 1244
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By STABLE As Hyper 1246
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By REVERSE CONNECTIVE 1249
DOMINATION As Hyper Decoration On Super Density”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1250
10.5281/zenodo.8206877). 1251
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By REVERSE CONNECTIVE 1253
10.5281/zenodo.8206834). 1255
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By REVERSE CONNECTIVE 1257
10.5281/zenodo.8206773). 1259
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By EQUAL CONNECTIVE 1261
10.5281/zenodo.8201319). 1263
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By EQUAL CONNECTIVE 1265
10.5281/zenodo.8201255). 1267
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By EQUAL CONNECTIVE 1269
10.5281/zenodo.8201165). 1271
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By CONNECTIVE DOMINATION As 1273
Hyper Decoration On Super Density”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1274
10.5281/zenodo.8196147). 1275
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By CONNECTIVE DOMINATION 1277
As Hyper Decoration On Super Density”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1278
10.5281/zenodo.8196132). 1279
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By CONNECTIVE 1281
10.5281/zenodo.8196099). 1283
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By DOMINATION As Hyper 1285
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By DOMINATION As Hyper 1288
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By DOMINATION As Hyper 1291
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperPerfect Search As Hyper Perf On Super 1294
Perfidy”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8104836). 1295
52. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Perfidy By Hyper Perf Of 1296
SuperHyperPerfect Search In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1297
SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8104857). 1298
SuperHyperGraph By Reverse Strict Dimension Dominating As Hyper Dimple 1300
On Super Dimity”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8092796). 1301
54. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Dimity By Hyper Dimple Of Reverse 1302
Strict Dimension Dominating In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1303
SuperHyperGraph By Unequal Dimension Dominating As Hyper Dimple On 1306
Super Dimity”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8088438). 1307
56. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Dimity By Hyper Dimple Of Unequal 1308
Dimension Dominating In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1309
SuperHyperGraph By Strict Dimension Dominating As Hyper Dimple On Super 1312
Dimity”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8084436). 1313
58. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Dimity By Hyper Dimple Of Strict 1314
SuperHyperGraph By Reverse Strict Connective As Hyper Conceit On Super 1318
Con”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8080100). 1319
60. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Con By Hyper Conceit Of Reverse Strict 1320
Connective In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, 1321
Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8080068). 1322
SuperHyperGraph By Unequal Connective Dominating As Hyper Conceit On 1324
Super Con”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8078445). 1325
62. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Con By Hyper Conceit Of Unequal 1326
Connective Dominating In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1327
SuperHyperGraph By Strict Connective Dominating As Hyper Conceit On 1330
64. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Con By Hyper Conceit Of Strict 1332
SuperHyperGraph By Reverse Dimension Dominating As Hyper Dimple On 1336
Super Dimity”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8072171). 1337
66. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Dimity By Hyper Dimple Of Reverse 1338
SuperHyperGraph By Equal Dimension Dominating As Hyper Dimple On Super 1342
68. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Dimity By Hyper Dimple Of Equal 1344
SuperHyperGraph By Dimension Dominating As Hyper Dimple On Super 1348
70. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Dimity By Hyper Dimple Of Dimension 1350
Dominating In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, 1351
SuperHyperGraph By Reverse Connective Dominating As Hyper Conceit On 1354
72. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Con By Hyper Conceit Of Reverse 1356
SuperHyperGraph By Equal Connective Dominating As Hyper Conceit On 1360
74. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Con By Hyper Conceit Of Equal 1362
SuperHyperGraph By Connective Dominating As Hyper Conceit On Super 1366
Con”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8051346). 1367
76. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Con By Hyper Conceit Of Connective 1368
SuperHyperGraph By United Dominating As Hyper Ultra On Super Units”, 1372
78. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Units By Hyper Ultra Of United 1374
SuperHyperGraph By Zero Forcing As Hyper ford On Super forceps”, Zenodo 1378
2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8017246). 1379
80. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super forceps By Hyper ford Of Zero Forcing In 1380
Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 2023, 1381
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8020128). 1382
SuperHyperGraph By Matrix-Based As Hyper mat On Super matte”, Zenodo 1384
2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7978571). 1385
82. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super mat By Hyper matte Of Matrix-Based In 1386
Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 2023, 1387
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7978857). 1388
SuperHyperGraph By Dominating-Edges As Hyper Dome On Super Eddy”, 1390
84. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Eddy By Hyper Dome Of 1392
Dominating-Edges In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1393
SuperHyperGraph By Edge-Gap As Hyper Gape On Super Gab”, Zenodo 2023, 1396
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7916595). 1397
86. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Gab By Hyper Gape Of Edge-Gap In 1398
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7923632). 1400
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On 1402
Super Nebulous”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7904698). 1403
88. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nebulous By Hyper Nebbish Of 1404
Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1405
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition As Hyper 1408
Decompress On Super Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1409
10.5281/zenodo.7904529). 1410
90. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Decompensation By Hyper Decompress Of 1411
Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With 1412
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1413
10.5281/zenodo.7904401). 1414
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut As Hyper Nebbish On Super 1416
Nebulous”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7871026). 1417
Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1419
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Cycle-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super 1422
Eulerian-Cycle-Neighbor In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1425
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Cycle-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On 1428
Super Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7855661). 1429
Eulerian-Cycle-Decomposition In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1431
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Cycle-Cut As Hyper Eulogy On Super EULA”, 1434
98. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super EULA By Hyper Eulogy Of 1436
Eulerian-Cycle-Cut In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1437
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Path-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super 1440
Eulerian-Type-Path-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1443
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Path-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress 1446
On Super Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7839333). 1447
Eulerian-Type-Path-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1449
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Path-Cut As Hyper Eulogy On Super 1452
EULA”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7834229). 1453
Eulerian-Type-Path-Cut In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1455
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Path-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super 1458
Eulerian-Path-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1461
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Path-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On 1464
Eulerian-Path-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1467
SuperHyperGraph As Hyper Tool On Super Toot”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1470
10.5281/zenodo.7812236). 1471
SuperHyperGraph By initial Eulerian-Path-Cut As Hyper initial Eulogy On 1473
Super initial EULA”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7809365). 1474
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Path-Cut As Hyper Eulogy-Path-Cut On Super 1476
EULA-Path-Cut”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7809358). 1477
Eulerian-Path-Cut In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1479
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Path-Cut As Hyper Eulogy On Super EULA”, 1482
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On 1485
Super Nebulous”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7806767). 1486
Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1488
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition As Hyper 1491
Decompress On Super Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1492
10.5281/zenodo.7804238). 1493
Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With 1495
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7804228). 1496
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut As Hyper Hamper On Super 1498
Hammy”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7799902). 1499
119. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Hammy By Hyper Hamper Of 1500
Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1501
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Cycle-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super 1504
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Cycle-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress 1507
On Super Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7793372). 1508
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Cycle-Cut As Hyper Hamper On Super 1510
Hammy”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7791952). 1511
Hamiltonian-Cycle-Cut In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1513
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super 1516
Hamiltonian-Neighbor In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1519
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On 1522
Hamiltonian-Decomposition In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1525
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Cut As Hyper Hamper On Super Hammy”, 1528
Hamiltonian-Cut In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1531
SuperHyperGraph By Trace-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 1534
Trace-Neighbor In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1537
132. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 1539
SuperHyperGraph By Trace-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On Super 1540
Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7771831). 1541
Trace-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1543
SuperHyperGraph By Trace-Cut As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 1546
ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.20913.25446). 1547
135. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Tract By Hyper Track Of Trace-Cut In 1548
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7764916). 1550
SuperHyperGraph By Edge-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 1552
Edge-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, 1555
SuperHyperGraph By Edge-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On Super 1558
Decompensation”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.22545.10089). 1559
Edge-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1561
SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.29544.34564). 1562
SuperHyperGraph By Edge-Cut As Hyper Edify On Super Eddy”, ResearchGate 1564
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.11377.76644). 1565
141. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Eddy By Hyper Edify Of Edge-Cut In 1566
Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 1567
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.23750.96329). 1568
SuperHyperGraph By Vertex-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 1570
Vertex-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1573
SuperHyperGraph By Vertex-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On Super 1576
Decompensation”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.30212.81289). 1577
Vertex-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1579
SuperHyperGraph By Vertex-Cut As Hyper Vertu On Super Vertigo”, 1582
147. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Vertigo By Hyper Vertu Of Vertex-Cut In 1584
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.32467.25124). 1586
SuperHyperGraph By Stable-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 1588
149. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nebulizer By Hyper Nub Of 1590
Stable-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1591
SuperHyperGraph By Stable-Decompositions As Hyper Stain On Super Stagy”, 1594
151. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Stale By Hyper Stalk Of 1596
Stable-Decompositions In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1597
SuperHyperGraph By Stable-Cut As Hyper Stain On Super Stagy”, 1600
153. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Stale By Hyper Stalk Of Stable-Cut In 1602
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.20170.24000). 1604
SuperHyperGraph By Clique-Neighbors As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 1606
155. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nebulizer By Hyper Nub Of 1608
Clique-Neighbors In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1609
SuperHyperGraph By Clique-Decompositions As Hyper Decompile On Super 1612
Decommission”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.18780.87683). 1613
Clique- Decompositions In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1615
SuperHyperGraph By Clique-Cut As Hyper Click On Super Cliche”, 1618
159. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Cliff By Hyper Cling Of Clique-Cut In 1620
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.27392.30721). 1622
SuperHyperGraph By Space As Hyper Spin On Super Spacy”, ResearchGate 1624
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.33028.40321). 1625
SuperHyperGraph By List- Coloring As Hyper List On Super Lisle”, 1627
162. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Lith By Hyper Lite Of List-Coloring In 1629
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.16356.04489). 1631
SuperHyperGraph By Space As Hyper Sparse On Super Spark ”, ResearchGate 1633
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.21756.21129). 1634
164. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Solidarity By Hyper Soul Of Space In 1635
Cancer’s Recognition With (Extreme) SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023, 1636
(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.30983.68009). 1637
SuperHyperGraph By Edge-Connectivity As Hyper Disclosure On Super 1639
Closure”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.28552.29445). 1640
166. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Uniform By Hyper Deformation Of 1641
Edge-Connectivity In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1642
SuperHyperGraph By Vertex-Connectivity As Hyper Leak On Super Structure”, 1645
168. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super System By Hyper Explosions Of 1647
Vertex-Connectivity In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1648
SuperHyperGraph By Tree-Decomposition As Hyper Forward On Super Returns”, 1651
170. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nodes By Hyper Moves Of 1653
Tree-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1654
SuperHyperGraph By Chord As Hyper Excellence On Super Excess”, 1657
172. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Gap By Hyper Navigations Of Chord In 1659
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.11172.14720). 1661
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyper(i,j)-Domination As Hyper Controller On 1663
Super Waves”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.22011.80165). 1664
174. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Coincidence By Hyper Routes Of 1665
SuperHyper(i,j)-Domination In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1666
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperEdge-Domination As Hyper Reversion On 1669
Super Indirection”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.10493.84962). 1670
176. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Obstacles By Hyper Model Of 1671
SuperHyperEdge-Domination In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1672
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperK-Domination As Hyper k-Actions On Super 1675
Patterns”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.19944.14086). 1676
178. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Harmony By Hyper k-Function Of 1677
SuperHyperK-Domination In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1678
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperK-Number As Hyper k-Partition On Super 1681
Layers”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.33103.76968). 1682
180. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Gradient By Hyper k-Class Of 1683
SuperHyperK-Number In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1684
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperOrder As Hyper Enumerations On Super 1687
Landmarks”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.35646.56641). 1688
182. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Analogous By Hyper Visions Of 1689
SuperHyperOrder In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1690
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperColoring As Hyper Categories On Super 1693
Neighbors”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.13973.81121). 1694
184. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Relations By Hyper Identifications Of 1695
SuperHyperColoring In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1696
185. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Contradiction By Hyper Detection of 1698
SuperHyperDefensive In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic 1699
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperDimension As Hyper Distinguishing On Super 1702
Distances”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.31956.88961). 1703
187. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Locations By Hyper Differing Of 1704
SuperHyperDimension In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1705
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperDominating As Hyper Closing On Super 1708
Messy”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.21510.45125). 1709
189. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Missing By Hyper Searching Of 1710
SuperHyperDominating In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1711
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperConnected As Hyper Group On Super Surge”, 1714
191. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Outbreak By Hyper Collections Of 1716
SuperHyperConnected In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1717
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperTotal As Hyper Covering On Super Infections”, 1720
193. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Extremism By Hyper Treatments Of 1722
SuperHyperTotal In Cancer’s Recognition with (Neutrosophic) 1723
194. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Isolation By Hyper Perfectness Of 1725
SuperHyperPerfect In Cancer’s Recognition with (Neutrosophic) 1726
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperPerfect As Hyper Idealism On Super Vacancy”, 1729
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperJoin As Hyper Separations On Super Sorts”, 1732
197. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super connections By Hyper disconnections Of 1734
SuperHyperJoin In Cancer’s Recognition with (Neutrosophic) 1735
198. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Mixed-Devastations By Hyper Decisions 1737
Of SuperHyperDuality In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic 1738
199. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition As (Neutrosophic) 1740
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperDuality As Hyper Imaginations On Super 1741
Mixed-Illustrations”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.33275.80161). 1742
200. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition As (Neutrosophic) 1743
SuperHyperGraph By Path SuperHyperColoring As Hyper Correction On Super 1744
Faults”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.30182.50241). 1745
201. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Reflections By Hyper Rotations Of Path 1746
SuperHyperColoring In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic 1747
202. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas As Hyper Deformations On Super Chains In 1749
Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph By 1750
SuperHyperDensity”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.13444.60806). 1751
203. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas As Hyper Ignorance By SuperHyperDensity On 1752
Super Resistances In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic 1753
SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.16800.05123). 1754
204. Henry Garrett, “New Research On Cancer’s Recognition and Neutrosophic 1755
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian SuperHyperCycles and Hamiltonian Sets As 1756
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-VI ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1757
10.13140/RG.2.2.29913.80482). 1758
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-V ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1761
10.13140/RG.2.2.33269.24809). 1762
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-IV ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1765
10.13140/RG.2.2.34946.96960). 1766
207. Henry Garrett, “A Research On Cancer’s Recognition and Neutrosophic 1767
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-III ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1769
10.13140/RG.2.2.14814.31040). 1770
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-II ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1773
10.13140/RG.2.2.15653.17125). 1774
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-I ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1777
10.13140/RG.2.2.25719.50089). 1778
210. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Disruptions In Cancer’s Extreme 1779
Recognition As Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph By Hyper Plans Called 1780
SuperHyperConnectivities”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1781
10.13140/RG.2.2.29441.94562). 1782
211. Henry Garrett, “Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition As Neutrosophic 1783
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperConnectivities As Hyper Diagnosis On Super 1784
Mechanism”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.17252.24968). 1785
212. Henry Garrett,“Cancer’s Recognition and (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph By 1786
the Criteria of Eulerian and Hamiltonian Type-Sets As Hyper Modified Cycles 1787
On Super Mess”, ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.16652.59525). 1788
213. Henry Garrett,“Eulerian and Hamiltonian In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition 1789
and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph On Super Interactions By Hyper Extensions 1790
of Cycles”, ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.34583.24485). 1791
214. Henry Garrett,“SuperHyperGirth Type-Results on extreme SuperHyperGirth 1792
theory and (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs Toward Cancer’s extreme 1793
Recognition”, Preprints 2023, 2023010396 (doi: 1794
10.20944/preprints202301.0396.v1). 1795
215. Henry Garrett,“Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Warns Hyper Landmark of 1796
neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth In Super Type-Versions of Cancer’s neutrosophic 1797
Recognition”, Preprints 2023, 2023010395 (doi: 1798
10.20944/preprints202301.0395.v1). 1799
216. Henry Garrett,“The Constructions of (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs on the 1800
Cancer’s Recognition in The Confrontation With Super Attacks In Hyper 1801
Situations By Implementing (Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in The 1802
Technical Approaches to Neutralize SuperHyperViews”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1803
10.13140/RG.2.2.26240.51204). 1804
217. Henry Garrett,“(Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing As the 1805
Entrepreneurs on Cancer’s Recognitions To Fail Forcing Style As the Super 1806
Classes With Hyper Effects In The Background of the Framework is So-Called 1807
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1808
10.13140/RG.2.2.12818.73925). 1809
218. Henry Garrett,“Super Actions On The Types of Hyper Levels In The Sensible 1810
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth On Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and 1811
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 1812
10.13140/RG.2.2.26836.88960). 1813
219. Henry Garrett,“SuperHyperGirth Approaches on the Super Challenges on the 1814
Cancer’s Recognition In the Hyper Model of (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, 1815
ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.36745.93289). 1816
220. Henry Garrett,“Extreme SuperHyperClique as the Firm Scheme of 1817
Confrontation under Cancer’s Recognition as the Model in The Setting of 1818
10.20944/preprints202301.0308.v1). 1820
221. Henry Garrett,“Uncertainty On The Act And Effect Of Cancer Alongside The 1821
Foggy Positions Of Cells Toward Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique inside 1822
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Titled Cancer’s Recognition”, Preprints 2023, 1823
2023010282 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0282.v1). 1824
222. Henry Garrett,“Neutrosophic Version Of Separates Groups Of Cells In Cancer’s 1825
Recognition On Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010267 1826
(doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0267.v1).). 1827
223. Henry Garrett, “The Shift Paradigm To Classify Separately The Cells and 1828
Affected Cells Toward The Totality Under Cancer’s Recognition By New 1829
Multiple Definitions On the Sets Polynomials Alongside Numbers In The 1830
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperMatching Theory Based on SuperHyperGraph and 1831
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”, Preprints 2023, 2023010265 (doi: 1832
10.20944/preprints202301.0265.v1). 1833
224. Henry Garrett,“Breaking the Continuity and Uniformity of Cancer In The 1834
Worst Case of Full Connections With Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique In 1835
Cancer’s Recognition Applied in (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 1836
2023, 2023010262,(doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0262.v1). 1837
225. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable as the Survivors on the 1838
Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition Based on Uncertainty to All Modes in 1839
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010240 (doi: 1840
10.20944/preprints202301.0240.v1). 1841
226. Henry Garrett, “Extremism of the Attacked Body Under the Cancer’s 1842
Circumstances Where Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) 1843
SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010224, (doi: 1844
10.20944/preprints202301.0224.v1). 1845
227. Henry Garrett,“SuperHyperMatching By (R-)Definitions And Polynomials To 1846
Monitor Cancer’s Recognition In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, 1847
ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.35061.65767). 1848
228. Henry Garrett,“The Focus on The Partitions Obtained By Parallel Moves In 1849
The Cancer’s Extreme Recognition With Different Types of Extreme 1850
SuperHyperMatching Set and Polynomial on (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, 1851
229. Henry Garrett,“Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique Decides the Failures on the 1853
Cancer’s Recognition in the Perfect Connections of Cancer’s Attacks By 1854
SuperHyperModels Named (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 1855
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.32530.73922). 1856
230. Henry Garrett,“Indeterminacy On The All Possible Connections of Cells In 1857
Front of Cancer’s Attacks In The Terms of Neutrosophic Failed 1858
SuperHyperClique on Cancer’s Recognition called Neutrosophic 1859
SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.15897.70243). 1860
231. Henry Garrett,“Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique Decides the Failures on the 1861
Cancer’s Recognition in the Perfect Connections of Cancer’s Attacks By 1862
SuperHyperModels Named (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 1863
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.32530.73922). 1864
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 1866
2023010105 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 1867
233. Henry Garrett,“Perfect Directions Toward Idealism in Cancer’s Neutrosophic 1868
Recognition Forwarding Neutrosophic SuperHyperClique on Neutrosophic 1869
234. Henry Garrett,“Demonstrating Complete Connections in Every Embedded 1871
Regions and Sub-Regions in the Terms of Cancer’s Recognition and 1872
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClique”, 1873
10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 1878
10.20944/preprints202301.0088.v1). 1882
237. Henry Garrett,“Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic Regions titled 1883
neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable in Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition 1884
modeled in the Form of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2023, 1885
(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.17385.36968). 1886
Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond ”, Preprints 2023, 2023010044 1889
Well- SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 1891
2023010043 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0043.v1). 1892
240. Henry Garrett, “Using the Tool As (Neutrosophic) Failed SuperHyperStable To 1893
SuperHyperModel Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) 1894
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In 1897
Special ViewPoints”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.11447.80803). 1898
Well-SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 1900
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.35774.77123). 1901
Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond ”, ResearchGate 2022, (doi: 1904
10.13140/RG.2.2.36141.77287). 1905
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2022, (doi: 1907
10.13140/RG.2.2.29430.88642). 1908
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2022, (doi: 1911
10.13140/RG.2.2.11369.16487). 1912
Featuring (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances”, Preprints 1914
2022, 2022120549 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0549.v1). 1915
Featuring (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances”, 1917
Recognitions And Related (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClasses”, Preprints 2022, 1922
2022120540 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0540.v1). 1923
Recognitions And Related (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClasses”, ResearchGate 1927
2022, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.14426.41923). 1928
Preprints 2022, 2022120500 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0500.v1). 1931
ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.20993.12640). 1934
252. Henry Garrett,“Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on 1935
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs and SuperHyperGraphs Alongside Applications 1936
in Cancer’s Treatments”, Preprints 2022, 2022120324 (doi: 1937
10.20944/preprints202212.0324.v1). 1938
253. Henry Garrett, “Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on 1939
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs And SuperHyperGraphs Alongside Applications 1940
in Cancer’s Treatments”, ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 1941
10.13140/RG.2.2.23123.04641). 1942
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”, Preprints 2022, 2022110576 (doi: 1945
10.20944/preprints202211.0576.v1). 1946
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”, ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 1949
10.13140/RG.2.2.23324.56966). 1950
256. Henry Garrett, “Basic Neutrosophic Notions Concerning SuperHyperDominating 1951
and Neutrosophic SuperHyperResolving in SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 1952
2022 (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.29173.86244). 1953
257. Henry Garrett, “Initial Material of Neutrosophic Preliminaries to Study Some 1954
Neutrosophic Notions Based on Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) in 1955
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)”, ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 1956
10.13140/RG.2.2.25385.88160). 1957
258. Henry Garrett, “Stable Sequence In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1958
Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10523307). 1959
259. Henry Garrett, “Resolving Sequence In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1960
260. Henry Garrett, “Dominating Sequence In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1962
261. Henry Garrett, “Stable In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 1964
Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8210033). 1965
262. Henry Garrett, “Reverse Connective Domination In Neutrosophic 1966
SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8206898). 1967
263. Henry Garrett, “Equal Connective Domination In Neutrosophic 1968
SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8201378). 1969
264. Henry Garrett, “Connective Domination In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. 1970
Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8194003). 1971
265. Henry Garrett, “Domination In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 1972
266. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperPerfect Search In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 1974
267. Henry Garrett, “Reverse Strict Dimension Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. 1976
268. Henry Garrett, “Unequal Dimension Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1978
269. Henry Garrett, “Strict Dimension Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1980
270. Henry Garrett, “Reverse Strict Connective In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 1982
271. Henry Garrett, “Unequal Connective Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1984
272. Henry Garrett, “Strict Connective Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1986
273. Henry Garrett, “Reverse Dimension Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1988
274. Henry Garrett, “Equal Dimension Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1990
275. Henry Garrett, “Dimension Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 1992
276. Henry Garrett, “Reverse Connective Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1994
277. Henry Garrett, “Equal Connective Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1996
278. Henry Garrett, “Connective Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 1998
279. Henry Garrett, “United Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2000
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8027488). 2001
280. Henry Garrett, “Zero Forcing In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2002
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8020181). 2003
281. Henry Garrett, “Matrix-Based In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2004
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7978921). 2005
282. Henry Garrett, “Collections of Math II”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2006
10.5281/zenodo.7943878). 2007
283. Henry Garrett, “Dominating-Edges In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2008
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7943871). 2009
284. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Gap In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2010
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7923786). 2011
285. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2012
286. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. 2014
287. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2016
288. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Cycle-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2018
289. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Cycle-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2020
290. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Cycle-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2022
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7854561). 2023
291. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Path-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2024
292. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Path-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2026
293. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Path-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2028
294. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Path-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2030
295. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Path-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2032
296. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Path-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2034
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7812750). 2035
297. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2036
298. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. 2038
299. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2040
300. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Cycle-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2042
301. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Cycle-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2044
302. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Cycle-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2046
303. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2048
304. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2050
305. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2052
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7783791). 2053
306. Henry Garrett, “Trace-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2054
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7780123). 2055
307. Henry Garrett, “Trace-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2056
308. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDuality”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2058
10.5281/zenodo.7637762). 2059
309. Henry Garrett, “Trace-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2060
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7766174). 2061
310. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2062
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7762232). 2063
311. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2064
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7758601). 2065
312. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2066
10.5281/zenodo.7754661). 2067
313. Henry Garrett, “Vertex-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2068
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7750995) . 2069
314. Henry Garrett, “Vertex-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2070
315. Henry Garrett, “Vertex-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2072
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7747236). 2073
316. Henry Garrett, “Stable-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2074
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7742587). 2075
317. Henry Garrett, “Stable-Decompositions In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2076
318. Henry Garrett, “Stable-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2078
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7734719). 2079
319. Henry Garrett, “Clique-Neighbors In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2080
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7730484). 2081
320. Henry Garrett, “Clique-Decompositions In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2082
321. Henry Garrett, “Clique-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2084
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7722865). 2085
322. Henry Garrett, “Space In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2086
10.5281/zenodo.7713563). 2087
323. Henry Garrett, “Space In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2088
10.5281/zenodo.7709116). 2089
324. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Connectivity In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2090
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7706415). 2091
325. Henry Garrett, “Vertex-Connectivity In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2092
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7706063). 2093
326. Henry Garrett, “Tree-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2094
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7701906). 2095
327. Henry Garrett, “Chord In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2096
10.5281/zenodo.7700205). 2097
328. Henry Garrett, “(i,j)-Domination In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2098
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7694876). 2099
329. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Domination In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2100
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7679410). 2101
330. Henry Garrett, “K-Domination In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2102
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7675982). 2103
331. Henry Garrett, “K-Number In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2104
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7672388). 2105
332. Henry Garrett, “Order In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2106
10.5281/zenodo.7668648). 2107
333. Henry Garrett, “Coloring In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2108
10.5281/zenodo.7662810). 2109
334. Henry Garrett, “Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2110
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7659162). 2111
335. Henry Garrett, “Cancer In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2112
10.5281/zenodo.7653233). 2113
336. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperWheel ”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2114
10.5281/zenodo.7653204). 2115
337. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperMultipartite”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2116
10.5281/zenodo.7653142). 2117
338. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperBipartite”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2118
10.5281/zenodo.7653117). 2119
339. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperStar ”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2120
10.5281/zenodo.7653089). 2121
340. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2122
10.5281/zenodo.7651687). 2123
341. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperPath”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2124
10.5281/zenodo.7651619). 2125
342. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDomination”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2126
10.5281/zenodo.7651439). 2127
343. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDominating”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2128
10.5281/zenodo.7650729). 2129
344. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperConnected ”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2130
10.5281/zenodo.7647868). 2131
345. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperTotal ”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2132
10.5281/zenodo.7647017). 2133
346. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperPerfect”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2134
10.5281/zenodo.7644894). 2135
347. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperJoin”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2136
10.5281/zenodo.7641880). 2137
348. Henry Garrett, “Path SuperHyperColoring”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2138
10.5281/zenodo.7632923). 2139
349. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDensity”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2140
10.5281/zenodo.7623459). 2141
350. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2142
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7606416). 2143
351. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperConnectivities”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2144
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7606416). 2145
352. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperConnectivities”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2146
10.5281/zenodo.7606404). 2147
353. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2148
10.5281/zenodo.7580018). 2149
354. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2150
10.5281/zenodo.7580018). 2151
355. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2152
10.5281/zenodo.7580018). 2153
356. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2154
10.5281/zenodo.7579929). 2155
357. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2156
10.5281/zenodo.7563170). 2157
358. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2158
10.5281/zenodo.7563164). 2159
359. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2160
10.5281/zenodo.7563160). 2161
360. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2162
10.5281/zenodo.7563160). 2163
361. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2164
10.5281/zenodo.7563160). 2165
362. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2166
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7557063). 2167
363. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperMatching”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2168
10.5281/zenodo.7557009). 2169
364. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperMatching”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2170
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7539484). 2171
365. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2172
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7523390). 2173
366. Henry Garrett, “Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2174
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7523390). 2175
367. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On Failed SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2176
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7523390). 2177
368. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2178
10.5281/zenodo.7574952). 2179
369. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2180
10.5281/zenodo.7574992). 2181
370. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2182
10.5281/zenodo.7523357). 2183
371. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2184
10.5281/zenodo.7523357). 2185
372. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2186
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7504782). 2187
373. Henry Garrett, “Extreme Failed SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2188
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7504782). 2189
374. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On Failed SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2190
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7504782). 2191
375. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2192
10.5281/zenodo.7499395). 2193
376. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2194
10.5281/zenodo.7499395). 2195
377. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2196
10.5281/zenodo.7499395). 2197
378. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2198
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7497450). 2199
379. Henry Garrett, “Extreme Failed SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2200
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7497450). 2201
380. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2202
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7494862). 2203
381. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2204
10.5281/zenodo.7494862). 2205
382. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2206
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7494862). 2207
383. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperAlliances”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2208
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7493845). 2209
384. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperAlliances”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2210
10.5281/zenodo.7493845). 2211
385. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperAlliances”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2212
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7493845). 2213
386. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperMatching”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2214
10.5281/zenodo.7539484). 2215
387. Henry Garrett, “Failed SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2216
10.5281/zenodo.7523390). 2217
388. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2218
10.5281/zenodo.7523357). 2219
389. Henry Garrett, “Failed SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2220
10.5281/zenodo.7504782). 2221
390. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2222
10.5281/zenodo.7499395). 2223
391. Henry Garrett, “Failed SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2224
10.5281/zenodo.7497450). 2225
392. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2226
10.5281/zenodo.7494862). 2227
393. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperAlliances”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2228
10.5281/zenodo.7493845). 2229
394. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2230
10.5281/zenodo.7480110). 2231
395. Henry Garrett, “Neut. SuperHyperEdges”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2232
10.5281/zenodo.7378758). 2233
396. Henry Garrett, “Beyond Neutrosophic Graphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2234
10.5281/zenodo.6320305). 2235
397. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Duality”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2236
10.5281/zenodo.6677173). 2237
View publication stats

New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph With Counterproposal Star and Counteroffer Wheel by Counterargument Stable Sequence As Hyper Findings On Super Gatherings

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph With Counterproposal Star and Counteroffer Wheel by Counterargument Stable Sequence As Hyper Findings On Super Gatherings

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph With

Preprint · March 2024

562 PUBLICATIONS 29,134 CITATIONS

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 2

SuperHyperGraph With Counterproposal Star and 3

Counteroffer Wheel By Counterargument Stable Sequence As 4

Hyper Findings On Super Gatherings 5

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · 7

DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA 8

In this scientific research, (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic 10

SuperHyperStrongly Stable Sequence). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S be a 11

pair S = (V, E). Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then 12

V 0 is called Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Stable Sequence if the following expressions, 13

SuperHyperNotions, namely a Strongly Stable Sequence and a Neutrosophic Strongly 16

research has progressed and SuperHyperNotion, SuperHyperUniform, and 18

SuperHyperClass are well-defined and well-reviewed based on them. Literature review is 19

research, a comparison between this SuperHyperNotion with other SuperHyperNotions 21

and basic SuperHyperNumbers is presented. Definitions are followed by examples and 22

examples, so clarifications are guided by various tools. Applications are designed to 23

the relationships between them all are officially called “SuperHyperEdge”. 29

“SuperHyperGraph” and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” frameworks are selected and 30

super-hypermodels open avenues for research on theoretical aspects and “cancer 32

concept of “Strongly Stable Sequence mastery”. SuperHyperVertices and 38

SuperHyperEdges are assigned by alphabetical labels. In this method, the position of 39

contains “values of vertices, supervertices, edges, hyperedges, and hyperedges belonging 41

to Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” with key points, it is redefined. ”values of vertices 42

& number of positions in alphabet”, ”Values of SuperVertices&maximum values of its 43

vertices”, ”values of edges&maximum values of its vertices”, ”super edge values&max 44

SuperHyperClass SuperHyperGraph based on Strongly Stable Sequence. This is the 47

and distinguished because they are characterized in the SuperHyperClass disciplinary 53

methods based on a dominant Strongly Stable Sequence. Because of having Strongly 54

Stable Sequence, there is a need to “re-define” the concept of “neutrosophic Strongly 55

Stable Sequence” and “neutrosophic Strongly Stable Sequence”. SuperHyperVertices 56

of tags is used to assign values. Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. 58

“Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” is redefined if the desired table exists. And if the 59

desired table exists, a Strongly Stable Sequence is redefined to a “Neutrosophic Strongly 60

Stable Sequence”. It is useful to define a “Neutrosophic” version of SuperHyperClasses. 61

Neutrosophic Strongly Stable Sequence becomes more understandable. Consider a 63

Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. If the desired table exists, there are a number of 64

Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses. So are SuperHyperPath, SuperHyperCycle, 65

SuperHyperStar, SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultiPartite and SuperHyperWheel. 66

”Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle”, “Neutrosophic 67

SuperHyperStar”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite”, “Neutrosophic 68

SuperHyperMultiPartite” and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel”. A graph is 69

SuperHyperUniform if it is a SuperHyperGraph and the number of SuperHyperEdges 70

elements is the same. Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. There are a number 71

of SuperHyperClasses as follows. It is a SuperHyperPath if there is only one 72

SuperVertex as an intersection between two given SuperHyperEdges with two 73

exceptions. If only one SuperVertex is given as an intersection between two 74

SuperHyperEdges, it is SuperHyperCycle. It is SuperHyperStar and only one 75

SuperVertex as intersection among all SuperHyperEdges. It is SuperHyperBipartite, 76

common. This is SuperHyperMultiPartite. Only one SuperVertex is given as an 79

intersection between two SuperHyperEdges, and these SuperVertices, which form 80

separate multisets, have no SuperHyperEdge in common. If only one SuperHyperEdge 81

among the given two SuperHyperEdges is a SuperHyperWheel and a SuperVertex has a 82

SuperHyperEdge with any regular SuperVertex. SuperHyperModel suggests specific 83

designs and specific architectures. SuperHyperModel is officially called 84

“SuperHyperGraph” and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”. In this SuperHyperModel, 85

cells and the “special group” of cells. SuperHyperModeled as “SuperHyperEdges”. 88

Sometimes, to have a more accurate SuperHyperModel, it is useful to have some degree 89

of determinism, uncertainty, and neutrality, in this case the SuperHyperModel is called 90