New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph by Initial Eulerian-Path-Cut As Hyper Initial Eulogy On Super Initial EULA

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.
net/publication/369881613
New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph By

initial Eulerian-Path-Cut As Hyper initial Eulogy On Super initial EULA
Preprint · April 2023

DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.7809365
CITATIONS
1 author:
Henry Garrett
434 PUBLICATIONS 11,017 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Number Graphs And Numbers View project
On Algebraic Structures and Algebraic Hyperstructures View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Henry Garrett on 07 April 2023.
The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 2
SuperHyperGraph By initial Eulerian-Path-Cut As Hyper 3
initial Eulogy On Super initial EULA 4
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · 6
DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA 7
1 ABSTRACT 8
In this scientific research, some initial results are obtained on SuperHyperGraphs and 9
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs. Some well-known classes are used in this scientific 10
research. A basic familiarity with Neutrosophic SuperHyper Eulerian-Path-Cut theory, 11
SuperHyperGraphs, and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs theory are proposed. 12
Keywords: Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut, 13
Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition 14
AMS Subject Classification: 05C17, 05C22, 05E45 15
2 Neutrosophic Preliminaries Of This Scientific 16
Research On the Redeemed Ways 17
In this section, the basic material in this scientific research, is referred to [Single Valued 18
Neutrosophic Set](Ref. [23],Definition 2.2,p.2), [Neutrosophic Set](Ref. [23],Definition 19
2.1,p.1), [Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)](Ref. [23],Definition 2.5,p.2), 20
[Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)](Ref. [23],Definition 21
2.7,p.3), [t-norm](Ref. [23], Definition 2.7, p.3), and [Characterization of the 22
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)](Ref. [23],Definition 2.7,p.3), [Neutrosophic 23
Strength of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPaths] (Ref. [23],Definition 5.3,p.7), and 24
[Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)] 25
(Ref. [23],Definition 5.4,p.7). Also, the new ideas and their clarifications are addressed 26
to Ref. [23]. 27
Definition 2.1. (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic 28
SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut). 29
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). Consider 30
a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs } and E 0 = {E1 , E2 , . . . , Ez }. Then 31
either V 0 or E 0 is called 32
(i) Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut if the following expression 33
is called Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut criteria holds 34
∀Ea ∈ P : P is
a SuperHyperPath and it has
the all number of SuperHyperEdges;
(ii) Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut if the following expression 35
is called Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut criteria holds 36
∀Ea ∈ P : P is
and |Ei |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY = |Ej |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY ; 37
(iii) Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut if the following expression 38
is called Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut criteria holds 39
∀Va ∈ P : P is
(iv) Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut if the following expression 40
is called Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut criteria holds 41
∀Va ∈ P : P is
and |Vi |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY = |Vj |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY ; 42
(v) Neutrosophic SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut if it’s either of Neutrosophic 43
e-SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut, 44
Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut, and Neutrosophic 45
rv-SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut. 46
Definition 2.2. ((Neutrosophic) SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut). 47
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). Consider 48
a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) E = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then E is called 49
(i) an Extreme SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut if it’s either of Neutrosophic 50
rv-SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut and C(N SHG) for an Extreme 53
SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum Extreme cardinality of an 54
Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality of the Extreme 55
SuperHyperEdges in the conseNeighborive Extreme sequence of Extreme 56
SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 57
Extreme SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut; 58
(ii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut if it’s either of 59
Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut, Neutrosophic 60
re-SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut, Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut, 61
and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut and C(N SHG) for a 62
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum Neutrosophic 63
cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges of a Neutrosophic 64
SuperHyperSet S of high Neutrosophic cardinality conseNeighborive Neutrosophic 65
SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 66
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut; 67
(iii) an Extreme SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut SuperHyperPolynomial if 68
it’s either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut, Neutrosophic 69
and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut and C(N SHG) for an 71
Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Extreme 72
SuperHyperPolynomial contains the Extreme coefficients defined as the Extreme 73
number of the maximum Extreme cardinality of the Extreme SuperHyperEdges of 74
an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality conseNeighborive 75
Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form 76
the Extreme SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut; and the Extreme power is 77
corresponded to its Extreme coefficient; 78
(iv) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut SuperHyperPolynomial 79
if it’s either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut, Neutrosophic 80
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Neutrosophic 83
SuperHyperPolynomial contains the Neutrosophic coefficients defined as the 84
Neutrosophic number of the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of the 85
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high 86
Neutrosophic cardinality conseNeighborive Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges and 87
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Neutrosophic 88
SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut; and the Neutrosophic power is corresponded to its 89
Neutrosophic coefficient; 90
(v) an Extreme V-SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut if it’s either of Neutrosophic 91
rv-SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut and C(N SHG) for an Extreme 94
SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum Extreme cardinality of an 95
Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality of the Extreme 96
SuperHyperVertices in the conseNeighborive Extreme sequence of Extreme 97
SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 98
Extreme SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut; 99
(vi) a Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut if it’s either of 100
Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut, Neutrosophic 101
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum Neutrosophic 104
cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of a Neutrosophic 105
SuperHyperSet S of high Neutrosophic cardinality conseNeighborive Neutrosophic 106
SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 107
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut; 108
(vii) an Extreme V-SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut SuperHyperPolynomial 109
and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut and C(N SHG) for an 112
Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Extreme 113
SuperHyperPolynomial contains the Extreme coefficients defined as the Extreme 114
number of the maximum Extreme cardinality of the Extreme SuperHyperVertices 115
of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality conseNeighborive 116
Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form 117
the Extreme SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut; and the Extreme power is 118
corresponded to its Extreme coefficient; 119
(viii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut SuperHyperPolynomial 120
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Neutrosophic 124
SuperHyperPolynomial contains the Neutrosophic coefficients defined as the 125
Neutrosophic number of the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of the 126
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high 127
Neutrosophic cardinality conseNeighborive Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges and 128
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Neutrosophic 129
SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut; and the Neutrosophic power is corresponded to its 130
Neutrosophic coefficient. 131
3 Neutrosophic SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut But 132
As The Extensions Excerpt From Dense And 133
Super Forms 134
Proposition 3.1. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 135
ESHG : (V, E). The all interior Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices belong to any 136
Neutrosophic quasi-R-Eulerian-Path-Cut if for any of them, and any of other corresponded 137
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, some interior Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices are 138
mutually Neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbors with no Neutrosophic exception at all 139
minus all Neutrosophic SuperHypeNeighbors to any amount of them. 140
Proposition 3.2. Assume a connected non-obvious Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 141
ESHG : (V, E). There’s only one Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) has 142
only the maximum possibilities of the distinct interior Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 143
inside of any given Neutrosophic quasi-R-Eulerian-Path-Cut minus all Neutrosophic 144
SuperHypeNeighbor to some of them but not all of them. In other words, there’s only an 145
unique Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) has only two distinct 146
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices in an Neutrosophic quasi-R-Eulerian-Path-Cut, minus all 147
Neutrosophic SuperHypeNeighbor to some of them but not all of them. 148
Proposition 3.3. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph

ESHG : (V, E). If a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) has z
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, then the Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic
R-Eulerian-Path-Cut is at least
V \ (V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . . , zE }).
It’s straightforward that the Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Path-Cut 149
is at least the maximum Neutrosophic number of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of 150
the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges with the maximum number of the Neutrosophic 151
SuperHyperEdges. In other words, the maximum number of the Neutrosophic 152
SuperHyperEdges contains the maximum Neutrosophic number of Neutrosophic 153
SuperHyperVertices are renamed to Neutrosophic Eulerian-Path-Cut in some cases but the 154
maximum number of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge with the maximum Neutrosophic 155
number of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, has the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 156
are contained in a Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Path-Cut. 157
Proposition 3.4. Assume a simple Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E).

Then the Neutrosophic number of type-result-R-Eulerian-Path-Cut has, the least Neutrosophic
cardinality, the lower sharp Neutrosophic bound for Neutrosophic cardinality, is the
Neutrosophic cardinality of
V \ V \ {aE , bE 0 , cE 00 , cE 000 }E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .
If there’s a Neutrosophic type-result-R-Eulerian-Path-Cut with the least Neutrosophic 158
cardinality, the lower sharp Neutrosophic bound for cardinality. 159
Proposition 3.5. Assume a connected loopless Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 160
ESHG : (V, E). Then in the worst case, literally, 161
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−Eulerian−P ath−Cut = {V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , E3 , V4 , E4 , V1 }.

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−Eulerian−P ath−CutSuperHyperP olynomial = z 4 .
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−Eulerian−P ath−Cut = {V1 , V2 , V3 , V4 , V1 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−Eulerian−P ath−CutSuperHyperP olynomial = z 5 .
Is a Neutrosophic type-result-Eulerian-Path-Cut. In other words, the least cardinality, the lower 162
sharp bound for the cardinality, of a Neutrosophic type-result-Eulerian-Path-Cut is the 163
cardinality of 164
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−Eulerian−P ath−Cut = {V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , E3 , V4 , E4 , V1 }.

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−Eulerian−P ath−CutSuperHyperP olynomial = z 4 .
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−Eulerian−P ath−Cut = {V1 , V2 , V3 , V4 , V1 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−Eulerian−P ath−CutSuperHyperP olynomial = z 5 .
Proof. Assume a connected loopless Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E).

The SuperHyperSet of the SuperHyperVertices V \ V \ {z} isn’t a quasi-R-Eulerian-Path-Cut
since neither amount of Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges nor amount of
SuperHyperVertices where amount refers to the Neutrosophic number of
SuperHyperVertices(-/SuperHyperEdges) more than one to form any kind of
SuperHyperEdges or any number of SuperHyperEdges. Let us consider the
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet
V \V \{aE , bE , cE , . . . , aE 0 , bE 0 , cE 0 , . . .}E,E 0 ={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .
This Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices has the

eligibilities to propose property such that there’s no Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex of
a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge is common and there’s an Neutrosophic
SuperHyperEdge for all Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices but the maximum
Neutrosophic cardinality indicates that these Neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSets
couldn’t give us the Neutrosophic lower bound in the term of Neutrosophic sharpness.
In other words, the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet
V \V \{aE , bE , cE , . . . , aE 0 , bE 0 , cE 0 , . . .}E,E 0 ={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }}
of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices implies at least on-quasi-triangle style is up but

sometimes the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet
of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices is free-quasi-triangle and it doesn’t make a

contradiction to the supposition on the connected loopless Neutrosophic
SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). Thus the minimum case never happens in the
generality of the connected loopless Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs. Thus if we
assume in the worst case, literally,
V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .
Is a quasi-R-Eulerian-Path-Cut. In other words, the least cardinality, the lower sharp bound
for the cardinality, of a quasi-R-Eulerian-Path-Cut is the cardinality of
Then we’ve lost some connected loopless Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses of the

connected loopless Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs titled free-triangle, on-triangle, and
their quasi-types but the SuperHyperStable is only up in this quasi-R-Eulerian-Path-Cut. It’s
the contradiction to that fact on the generality. There are some counterexamples to
deny this statement. One of them comes from the setting of the graph titled path and
cycle as the counterexamples-classes or reversely direction star as the examples-classes,
are well-known classes in that setting and they could be considered as the
examples-classes and counterexamples-classes for the tight bound of
Let V \ V \ {z} in mind. There’s no necessity on the SuperHyperEdge since we need at 165
least two SuperHyperVertices to form a SuperHyperEdge. It doesn’t withdraw the 166
principles of the main definition since there’s no condition to be satisfied but the 167
condition is on the existence of the SuperHyperEdge instead of acting on the 168
SuperHyperVertices. In other words, if there’s a SuperHyperEdge, then the 169
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet has the necessary condition for the intended definition to 170
be applied. Thus the V \ V \ {z} is withdrawn not by the conditions of the main 171
definition but by the necessity of the pre-condition on the usage of the main definition. 172
The Neutrosophic structure of the Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Path-Cut decorates the

Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices don’t have received any Neutrosophic connections so
as this Neutrosophic style implies different versions of Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges
with the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality in the terms of Neutrosophic
SuperHyperVertices are spotlight. The lower Neutrosophic bound is to have the
maximum Neutrosophic groups of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices have perfect
Neutrosophic connections inside each of SuperHyperEdges and the outside of this
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet doesn’t matter but regarding the connectedness of the
used Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph arising from its Neutrosophic properties taken
from the fact that it’s simple. If there’s no more than one Neutrosophic
SuperHyperVertex in the targeted Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, then there’s no
Neutrosophic connection. Furthermore, the Neutrosophic existence of one Neutrosophic
SuperHyperVertex has no Neutrosophic effect to talk about the Neutrosophic
R-Eulerian-Path-Cut. Since at least two Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices involve to make a
title in the Neutrosophic background of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. The
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph is obvious if it has no Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge
but at least two Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices make the Neutrosophic version of
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. Thus in the Neutrosophic setting of non-obvious
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, there are at least one Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge.
It’s necessary to mention that the word “Simple” is used as Neutrosophic adjective for
the initial Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, induces there’s no Neutrosophic appearance
of the loop Neutrosophic version of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge and this
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph is said to be loopless. The Neutrosophic adjective “loop”
on the basic Neutrosophic framework engages one Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex but
it never happens in this Neutrosophic setting. With these Neutrosophic bases, on a

Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, there’s at least one Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge
thus there’s at least a Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Path-Cut has the Neutrosophic cardinality of
a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. Thus, a Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Path-Cut has the
Neutrosophic cardinality at least a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. Assume a
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V \ V \ {z}. This Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet isn’t a
Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Path-Cut since either the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph is an
obvious Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel thus it never happens since there’s no
Neutrosophic usage of this Neutrosophic framework and even more there’s no
Neutrosophic connection inside or the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph isn’t obvious and
as its consequences, there’s a Neutrosophic contradiction with the term “Neutrosophic
R-Eulerian-Path-Cut” since the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality never happens for this
Neutrosophic style of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet and beyond that there’s no
Neutrosophic connection inside as mentioned in first Neutrosophic case in the forms of
drawback for this selected Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet. Let
Comes up. This Neutrosophic case implies having the Neutrosophic style of
on-quasi-triangle Neutrosophic style on the every Neutrosophic elements of this
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet. Precisely, the Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Path-Cut is the
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that some
Neutrosophic amount of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices are on-quasi-triangle
Neutrosophic style. The Neutrosophic cardinality of the v SuperHypeSet
Is the maximum in comparison to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet

But the lower Neutrosophic bound is up. Thus the minimum Neutrosophic cardinality
of the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality ends up the Neutrosophic discussion. The
first Neutrosophic term refers to the Neutrosophic setting of the Neutrosophic
SuperHyperGraph but this key point is enough since there’s a Neutrosophic
SuperHyperClass of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph has no on-quasi-triangle
Neutrosophic style amid some amount of its Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. This
Neutrosophic setting of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel proposes a Neutrosophic
SuperHyperSet has only some amount Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices from one
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge such that there’s no Neutrosophic amount of
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges more than one involving these some amount of these
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. The Neutrosophic cardinality of this Neutrosophic
SuperHyperSet is the maximum and the Neutrosophic case is occurred in the minimum
Neutrosophic situation. To sum them up, the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet
Has the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality such that

Contains some Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s

distinct-covers-order-amount Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges for amount of
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices taken from the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet
It means that the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices
Is a Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Path-Cut for the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph as used 173
Neutrosophic background in the Neutrosophic terms of worst Neutrosophic case and the 174
common theme of the lower Neutrosophic bound occurred in the specific Neutrosophic 175
SuperHyperClasses of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs which are Neutrosophic 176
free-quasi-triangle. 177
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) has z Neutrosophic

number of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. Then every Neutrosophic
SuperHyperVertex has at least no Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge with others in
common. Thus those Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices have the eligibles to be
contained in a Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Path-Cut. Those Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices
are potentially included in a Neutrosophic style-R-Eulerian-Path-Cut. Formally, consider
V \ (V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . . , zE }).
Are the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge

E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) . Thus
Zi ∼ Zj , i 6= j, i, j = 1, 2, . . . , z.
where the ∼ isn’t an equivalence relation but only the symmetric relation on the
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. The formal
definition is as follows.
Zi ∼ Zj , i 6= j, i, j = 1, 2, . . . , z
if and only if Zi and Zj are the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices and there’s only and
only one Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) between the Neutrosophic
SuperHyperVertices Zi and Zj . The other definition for the Neutrosophic
SuperHyperEdge E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) in the terms of Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Path-Cut is
{aE , bE , cE , . . . , zE } .
This definition coincides with the definition of the Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Path-Cut but
with slightly differences in the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality amid those
Neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSets of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. Thus the
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices,
max |{Z1 , Z2 , . . . , Zz | Zi ∼ Zj , i 6= j, i, j = 1, 2, . . . , z}|Neutrosophic cardinality ,

z
and
is formalized with mathematical literatures on the Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Path-Cut. Let

E
Zi ∼ Zj , be defined as Zi and Zj are the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices belong to
the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) . Thus,
E
E = {Z1 , Z2 , . . . , Zz | Zi ∼ Zj , i 6= j, i, j = 1, 2, . . . , z}.
Or
{aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .
But with the slightly differences, 178
Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Path-Cut =
E
{Z1 , Z2 , . . . , Zz | ∀i 6= j, i, j = 1, 2, . . . , z, ∃Ex , Zi ∼x Zj , }.
179
Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Path-Cut =
Thus E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) is a Neutrosophic quasi-R-Eulerian-Path-Cut where E ∈ EESHG:(V,E)

is fixed that means Ex = E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) . for all Neutrosophic intended
SuperHyperVertices but in a Neutrosophic Eulerian-Path-Cut, Ex = E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) could
be different and it’s not unique. To sum them up, in a connected Neutrosophic
SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). If a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge
E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) has z Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, then the Neutrosophic
cardinality of the Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Path-Cut is at least
V \ (V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . . , zE }).
It’s straightforward that the Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic 180
R-Eulerian-Path-Cut is at least the maximum Neutrosophic number of Neutrosophic 181
SuperHyperVertices of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges with the maximum number 182
of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges. In other words, the maximum number of the 183
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges contains the maximum Neutrosophic number of 184
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices are renamed to Neutrosophic Eulerian-Path-Cut in some 185
cases but the maximum number of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge with the 186
maximum Neutrosophic number of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, has the 187
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices are contained in a Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Path-Cut. 188
The obvious SuperHyperGraph has no Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges. But the 189
non-obvious Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel is up. The quasi-SuperHyperModel 190
addresses some issues about the Neutrosophic optimal SuperHyperObject. It specially 191
delivers some remarks on the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the Neutrosophic 192
SuperHyperVertices such that there’s distinct amount of Neutrosophic 193
SuperHyperEdges for distinct amount of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices up to all 194
taken from that Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 195
but this Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices is either 196
has the maximum Neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality or it doesn’t have maximum 197
Neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality. In a non-obvious SuperHyperModel, there’s at 198
least one Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge containing at least all Neutrosophic 199
SuperHyperVertices. Thus it forms a Neutrosophic quasi-R-Eulerian-Path-Cut where the 200
Neutrosophic completion of the Neutrosophic incidence is up in that. Thus it’s, literarily, 201
a Neutrosophic embedded R-Eulerian-Path-Cut. The SuperHyperNotions of embedded 202
SuperHyperSet and quasi-SuperHyperSet coincide. In the original setting, these types of 203
SuperHyperSets only don’t satisfy on the maximum SuperHyperCardinality. Thus the 204
embedded setting is elected such that those SuperHyperSets have the maximum 205
Neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality and they’re Neutrosophic SuperHyperOptimal. 206
The less than two distinct types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices are included in the 207
minimum Neutrosophic style of the embedded Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Path-Cut. The 208
interior types of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices are deciders. Since the 209
Neutrosophic number of SuperHyperNeighbors are only affected by the interior 210
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. The common connections, more precise and more 211
formal, the perfect unique connections inside the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet for any 212
distinct types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices pose the Neutrosophic 213
R-Eulerian-Path-Cut. Thus Neutrosophic exterior SuperHyperVertices could be used only in 214
one Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge and in Neutrosophic SuperHyperRelation with the 215
interior Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices in that Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. In 216
the embedded Neutrosophic Eulerian-Path-Cut, there’s the usage of exterior Neutrosophic 217
SuperHyperVertices since they’ve more connections inside more than outside. Thus the 218
title “exterior” is more relevant than the title “interior”. One Neutrosophic 219
SuperHyperVertex has no connection, inside. Thus, the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of 220
the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices with one SuperHyperElement has been ignored in 221
the exploring to lead on the optimal case implying the Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Path-Cut. 222
The Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Path-Cut with the exclusion of the exclusion of all Neutrosophic 223
SuperHyperVertices in one Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge and with other terms, the 224
Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Path-Cut with the inclusion of all Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 225
in one Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge, is a Neutrosophic quasi-R-Eulerian-Path-Cut. To sum 226
them up, in a connected non-obvious Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). 227
There’s only one Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) has only the 228
maximum possibilities of the distinct interior Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices inside of 229
any given Neutrosophic quasi-R-Eulerian-Path-Cut minus all Neutrosophic 230
SuperHypeNeighbor to some of them but not all of them. In other words, there’s only 231
an unique Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) has only two distinct 232
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices in an Neutrosophic quasi-R-Eulerian-Path-Cut, minus all 233
Neutrosophic SuperHypeNeighbor to some of them but not all of them. 234
The main definition of the Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Path-Cut has two titles. a 235
Neutrosophic quasi-R-Eulerian-Path-Cut and its corresponded quasi-maximum Neutrosophic 236
R-SuperHyperCardinality are two titles in the terms of quasi-R-styles. For any 237
Neutrosophic number, there’s a Neutrosophic quasi-R-Eulerian-Path-Cut with that 238
quasi-maximum Neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality in the terms of the embedded 239
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. If there’s an embedded Neutrosophic 240
SuperHyperGraph, then the Neutrosophic quasi-SuperHyperNotions lead us to take the 241
collection of all the Neutrosophic quasi-R-Eulerian-Path-Cuts for all Neutrosophic numbers 242
less than its Neutrosophic corresponded maximum number. The essence of the 243
Neutrosophic Eulerian-Path-Cut ends up but this essence starts up in the terms of the 244
Neutrosophic quasi-R-Eulerian-Path-Cut, again and more in the operations of collecting all 245
the Neutrosophic quasi-R-Eulerian-Path-Cuts acted on the all possible used formations of the 246
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph to achieve one Neutrosophic number. This 247
Neutrosophic number is 248
considered as the equivalence class for all corresponded quasi-R-Eulerian-Path-Cuts. Let 249
zNeutrosophic Number , SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet and GNeutrosophic Eulerian-Path-Cut be a 250
Neutrosophic number, a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet and a Neutrosophic Eulerian-Path-Cut. 251
Then 252
[zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class = {SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet |

SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet = GNeutrosophic Eulerian-Path-Cut ,
|SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= zNeutrosophic Number }.
As its consequences, the formal definition of the Neutrosophic Eulerian-Path-Cut is 253
re-formalized and redefined as follows. 254
GNeutrosophic Eulerian-Path-Cut ∈ ∪zNeutrosophic Number [zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class =

∪zNeutrosophic Number {SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet |
= zNeutrosophic Number }.
To get more precise perceptions, the follow-up expressions propose another formal 255
technical definition for the Neutrosophic Eulerian-Path-Cut. 256
GNeutrosophic Eulerian-Path-Cut =
{S ∈ ∪zNeutrosophic Number [zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class =
= zNeutrosophic Number |
= max zNeutrosophic Number }.
[zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class
In more concise and more convenient ways, the modified definition for the Neutrosophic 257
poses the upcoming expressions.

Eulerian-Path-Cut 258
{S ∈ ∪zNeutrosophic Number [zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class |
To translate the statement to this mathematical literature, the formulae will be revised. 259
= max zNeutrosophic Number

= max |E| | E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.
And then, 260

To get more visions in the closer look-up, there’s an overall overlook. 261


262
{S ∈ ∪zNeutrosophic Number [zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class =

263

264

Now, the extension of these types of approaches is up. Since the new term, 265
“Neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood”, could be redefined as the collection of the 266
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that any amount of its Neutrosophic 267
SuperHyperVertices are incident to a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. It’s, literarily, 268
another name for “Neutrosophic Quasi-Eulerian-Path-Cut” but, precisely, it’s the 269
generalization of “Neutrosophic Quasi-Eulerian-Path-Cut” since “Neutrosophic 270
Quasi-Eulerian-Path-Cut” happens “Neutrosophic Eulerian-Path-Cut” in a Neutrosophic 271
SuperHyperGraph as initial framework and background but “Neutrosophic 272
SuperHyperNeighborhood” may not happens “Neutrosophic Eulerian-Path-Cut” in a 273
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph as initial framework and preliminarily background 274
since there are some ambiguities about the Neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality arise 275
from it. To get orderly keywords, the terms, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood”, 276
“Neutrosophic Quasi-Eulerian-Path-Cut”, and “Neutrosophic Eulerian-Path-Cut” are up. 277
Thus, let zNeutrosophic Number , NNeutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood and 278
GNeutrosophic Eulerian-Path-Cut be a Neutrosophic number, a Neutrosophic 279
SuperHyperNeighborhood and a Neutrosophic Eulerian-Path-Cut and the new terms are up. 280

∪zNeutrosophic Number {NNeutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |
|NNeutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |Neutrosophic Cardinality
281
{NNeutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood
∈ ∪zNeutrosophic Number [zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class =
|NNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet |Neutrosophic Cardinality
282
∈ ∪zNeutrosophic Number [zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class |
283
And with go back to initial structure, 284


285
∈ ∪zNeutrosophic Number [zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class =

286

287

Thus, in a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). The all interior 288
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices belong to any Neutrosophic quasi-R-Eulerian-Path-Cut if 289
for any of them, and any of other corresponded Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, some 290
interior Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices are mutually Neutrosophic 291
SuperHyperNeighbors with no Neutrosophic exception at all minus all Neutrosophic 292
SuperHypeNeighbors to any amount of them. 293
To make sense with the precise words in the terms of “R-’, the follow-up illustrations 294
are coming up. 295
The following Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices is

the simple Neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Path-Cut.
The Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices,
Is the simple Neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Path-Cut.

The Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices,
Is an Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Path-Cut C(ESHG) for an Neutrosophic 296
SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E) is a Neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet with 297
the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S

of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s no a Neutrosophic
SuperHyperEdge amid some Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices instead of all given by
Neutrosophic Eulerian-Path-Cut is related to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices,
There’s not only one Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex inside the intended Neutrosophic
SuperHyperSet. Thus the non-obvious Neutrosophic Eulerian-Path-Cut is up. The obvious
simple Neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet called the Neutrosophic Eulerian-Path-Cut is a
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet includes only one Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex. But
the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices,
doesn’t have less than two SuperHyperVertices inside the intended Neutrosophic
SuperHyperSet since they’ve come from at least so far an SuperHyperEdge. Thus the
non-obvious simple Neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the Neutrosophic
R-Eulerian-Path-Cut is up. To sum them up, the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices,
Is the non-obvious simple Neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the Neutrosophic

R-Eulerian-Path-Cut. Since the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the Neutrosophic
SuperHyperVertices,
(V \ V \ {x, z}) ∪ {xy}
or
(V \ V \ {x, z}) ∪ {zy}
is an Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Path-Cut C(ESHG) for an Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 298
ESHG : (V, E) is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of Neutrosophic 299
SuperHyperVertices such that there’s no a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge for some 300
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices instead of all given by that Neutrosophic 301
type-SuperHyperSet called the Neutrosophic Eulerian-Path-Cut and it’s an Neutrosophic 302
Eulerian-Path-Cut. Since it’s 303
the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S

of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s no a Neutrosophic
SuperHyperEdge for some amount Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices instead of all given
by that Neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet called the Neutrosophic Eulerian-Path-Cut. There
isn’t only less than two Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices inside the intended
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet,
Thus the non-obvious Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Path-Cut,
is up. The non-obvious simple Neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the Neutrosophic

Eulerian-Path-Cut, not:
Is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, not:
does includes only less than two SuperHyperVertices in a connected Neutrosophic 304
SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E) but it’s impossible in the case, they’ve corresponded 305
to an SuperHyperEdge. It’s interesting to mention that the only non-obvious simple 306
Neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet called the 307
“Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Path-Cut” 308
amid those obvious[non-obvious] simple Neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSets called the 309
Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Path-Cut, 310
is only and only
In a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E) with a illustrated

SuperHyperModeling. It’s also, not only a Neutrosophic free-triangle embedded
SuperHyperModel and a Neutrosophic on-triangle embedded SuperHyperModel but also
it’s a Neutrosophic stable embedded SuperHyperModel. But all only non-obvious simple
Neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSets of the Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Path-Cut amid those

obvious simple Neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSets of the Neutrosophic Eulerian-Path-Cut, are
In a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). 311
To sum them up, assume a connected loopless Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph

ESHG : (V, E). Then in the worst case, literally,
is a Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Path-Cut. In other words, the least cardinality, the lower sharp
bound for the cardinality, of a Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Path-Cut is the cardinality of
To sum them up, in a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). 312
The all interior Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices belong to any Neutrosophic 313
quasi-R-Eulerian-Path-Cut if for any of them, and any of other corresponded Neutrosophic 314
SuperHyperVertex, some interior Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices are mutually 315
Neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbors with no Neutrosophic exception at all minus all 316
Neutrosophic SuperHypeNeighbors to any amount of them. 317
Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). Let a 318
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge ESHE : E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) has some Neutrosophic 319
SuperHyperVertices r. Consider all Neutrosophic numbers of those Neutrosophic 320
SuperHyperVertices from that Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge excluding excluding more 321
than r distinct Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, exclude to any given Neutrosophic 322
SuperHyperSet of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. Consider there’s a 323
Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Path-Cut with the least cardinality, the lower sharp Neutrosophic 324
bound for Neutrosophic cardinality. Assume a connected Neutrosophic 325
SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). The Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the 326
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices VESHE \ {z} is a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of 327
the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge 328
to have some Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices uniquely but it isn’t a Neutrosophic 329
R-Eulerian-Path-Cut. Since it doesn’t have 330
the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S 331
of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge 332
to have some SuperHyperVertices uniquely. The Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the 333
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices VESHE ∪ {z} is the maximum Neutrosophic 334
cardinality of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices but 335
it isn’t a Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Path-Cut. Since it doesn’t do the Neutrosophic procedure 336
such that such that there’s a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge to have some Neutrosophic 337
SuperHyperVertices uniquely [there are at least one Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 338
outside implying there’s, sometimes in the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 339
ESHG : (V, E), a Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, titled its Neutrosophic 340
SuperHyperNeighbor, to that Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex in the Neutrosophic 341
SuperHyperSet S so as S doesn’t do “the Neutrosophic procedure”.]. There’s only one 342
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex outside the intended Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, 343
VESHE ∪ {z}, in the terms of Neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood. Thus the 344
obvious Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Path-Cut, VESHE is up. The obvious simple Neutrosophic 345
type-SuperHyperSet of the Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Path-Cut, VESHE , is a Neutrosophic 346
SuperHyperSet, VESHE , includes only all Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices does 347
forms any kind of Neutrosophic pairs are titled Neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbors in 348
a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). Since the Neutrosophic 349
SuperHyperSet of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices VESHE , is the 350
maximum Neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality of a Neutrosophic 351
SuperHyperSet S of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s a 352
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge to have some Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices uniquely. 353
Thus, in a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). Any 354
Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Path-Cut only contains all interior Neutrosophic 355
SuperHyperVertices and all exterior Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices from the unique 356
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge where there’s any of them has all possible Neutrosophic 357
SuperHyperNeighbors in and there’s all Neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhoods in 358
with no exception minus all Neutrosophic SuperHypeNeighbors to some of them not all 359
of them but everything is possible about Neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhoods and 360
Neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbors out. 361
The SuperHyperNotion, namely, Eulerian-Path-Cut, is up. There’s neither empty 362
SuperHyperEdge nor loop SuperHyperEdge. The following Neutrosophic 363
SuperHyperSet of Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges[SuperHyperVertices] is the simple 364
Neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the Neutrosophic Eulerian-Path-Cut. The Neutrosophic 365
SuperHyperSet of Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges[SuperHyperVertices], 366
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−Eulerian−P ath−Cut

|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
b c
= {E2i−1 }i=1 2
.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−Eulerian−P ath−CutSuperHyperP olynomial
= 2z b 2 c
.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−Eulerian−P ath−Cut = {Vi }si=1 , {Vj }tj=1 .
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−Eulerian−P ath−CutSuperHyperP olynomial = az s + bz t .
is the simple Neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the Neutrosophic Eulerian-Path-Cut . The 367
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the Neutrosophic 368
SuperHyperEdges[SuperHyperVertices], 369

b c
= {E2i−1 }i=1 2
.
= 2z b 2 c
.
Is an Neutrosophic Eulerian-Path-Cut C(ESHG) for an Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 370
ESHG : (V, E) is a Neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet with 371
of Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges[SuperHyperVertices] such that there’s no 373
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge is common and 374
there’s an Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge for all Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. 375
There are not only two Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices inside the intended 376
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet. Thus the non-obvious Neutrosophic Eulerian-Path-Cut is up. 377
The obvious simple Neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet called the Neutrosophic 378
Eulerian-Path-Cut is a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet includes only two Neutrosophic 379
SuperHyperVertices. But the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the Neutrosophic 380

b c
= {E2i−1 }i=1 2
.
= 2z b 2 c
.
Doesn’t have less than three SuperHyperVertices inside the intended Neutrosophic 382
SuperHyperSet. Thus the non-obvious simple Neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the 383
Neutrosophic Eulerian-Path-Cut is up. To sum them up, the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of 384
the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges[SuperHyperVertices], 385

b c
= {E2i−1 }i=1 2
.
= 2z b 2 c
.
Is the non-obvious simple Neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the Neutrosophic 386
Eulerian-Path-Cut. Since the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the Neutrosophic 387

b c
= {E2i−1 }i=1 2
.
= 2z b 2 c
.
Is an Neutrosophic Eulerian-Path-Cut C(ESHG) for an Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 389
ESHG : (V, E) is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of Neutrosophic 390
SuperHyperVertices such that there’s no a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge for some 391
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices given by that Neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet 392
called the Neutrosophic Eulerian-Path-Cut and it’s an Neutrosophic Eulerian-Path-Cut. Since 393
it’s 394
of Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges[SuperHyperVertices] such that there’s no 396
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge is common and 397
there’s an Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge for all Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. 398
There aren’t only less than three Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices inside the intended 399
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, 400

b c
= {E2i−1 }i=1 2
.
= 2z b 2 c
.
Thus the non-obvious Neutrosophic Eulerian-Path-Cut , 401

b c
= {E2i−1 }i=1 2
.
= 2z b 2 c
.
Is up. The obvious simple Neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the Neutrosophic 402
Eulerian-Path-Cut, not: 403

b c
= {E2i−1 }i=1 2
.
= 2z b 2 c
.
Is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, not: 404

b c
= {E2i−1 }i=1 2
.
= 2z b 2 c
.
Does includes only less than three SuperHyperVertices in a connected Neutrosophic 405
SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). It’s interesting to mention that the only non-obvious 406
simple Neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet called the 407
“Neutrosophic Eulerian-Path-Cut ” 408
amid those obvious[non-obvious] simple Neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSets called the 409
Neutrosophic ,
Eulerian-Path-Cut 410
is only and only 411

b c
= {E2i−1 }i=1 2
.
= 2z b 2 c
.
In a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). 412
4 The Neutrosophic Departures on The Theoretical 413
Results Toward Theoretical Motivations 414
The previous Neutrosophic approach apply on the upcoming Neutrosophic results on 415
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses. 416
Proposition 4.1. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath ESHP : (V, E). 417
Then 418
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Eulerian-Path-Cut

= {Ei ∈ EN SHG }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Eulerian-Path-Cut SuperHyperPolynomial
X
= z |Ei ∈EN SHG | .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-Eulerian-Path-Cut
= {Vi ∈ VN SHG }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-Eulerian-Path-Cut SuperHyperPolynomial
X
= z |Vi ∈VN SHG | .
Proof. Let 419
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
V |EN SHG |
, E |EN SHG |
3 3
420
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , V2EXT ERN AL ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
E |EN SHG | , V |EN SHG |
3 3
be a longest path taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath 421
Figure 1. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath Associated to the Notions of Neutrosophic

SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut in the Example (4.2)
ESHP : (V, E). There’s a new way to redefine as 422
ViEXT ERN AL ∼ VjEXT ERN AL ≡

∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL ∈ Ez ≡
∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , {ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL } ⊆ Ez .
The term “EXTERNAL” implies |N (ViEXT ERN AL )| ≥ |N (Vj )| where Vj is 423
corresponded to ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut. The 424
latter is straightforward. 425
Example 4.2. In the Figure (1), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath 426
ESHP : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, in the 427
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (1), is the SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut. 428
Proposition 4.3. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle ESHC : (V, E). 429
Then 430

= {}.
= 0z 0 .
= {}.
= 0z 0 .
Proof. Let 431
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
V |EN SHG |
, E |EN SHG |
3 3
432
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , V2EXT ERN AL ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
E |EN SHG | , V |EN SHG |
3 3
be a longest path taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle 433
ESHC : (V, E). There’s a new way to redefine as 434

Example 4.4. In the Figure (2), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle 438
N SHC : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Neutrosophic 439
SuperHyperSet, in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (2), is the Neutrosophic 440
SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut. 441
Proposition 4.5. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). 442
Then 443

= {}.
= 0z 0 .
= {}.
= 0z 0 .
Proof. Let 444
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
CEN T ER, E2
Figure 2. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of

Neutrosophic SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut in the Neutrosophic Example (4.4)
445
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , CEN T ER
be a longest path taken a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). 446
There’s a new way to redefine as 447

Example 4.6. In the Figure (3), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar 451
ESHS : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, 452
by the Algorithm in previous Neutrosophic result, of the Neutrosophic 453
SuperHyperVertices of the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E), in 454
the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (3), is the Neutrosophic 455
Proposition 4.7. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite 457
Figure 3. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of

Neutrosophic SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut in the Neutrosophic Example (4.6)
ESHB : (V, E). Then 458

= {}.
= 0z 0 .
= {}.
= 0z 0 .
Proof. Let 459
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
V|Pi |=minP ∈E |Pj | , E|Pi |=minPj ∈EN SHG |Pj | .
j N SHG
460
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , V2EXT ERN AL ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
E|Pi |=minPj ∈EN SHG |Pj | , V|P i |=minP ∈E |Pj |
j N SHG
is a longest path taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite 461
ESHB : (V, E). There’s a new way to redefine as 462

latter is straightforward. Then there’s no at least one SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut. 465
Thus the notion of quasi may be up but the SuperHyperNotions based on 466
SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut could be applied. There are only two SuperHyperParts. 467
Thus every SuperHyperPart could have one SuperHyperVertex as the representative in 468
the 469
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
is a longest SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut taken from a connected Neutrosophic 470
SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E). Thus only some SuperHyperVertices and only 471
minimum-Neutrosophic-of-SuperHyperPart SuperHyperEdges are attained in any 472
solution 473
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
The latter is straightforward. 474
Example 4.8. In the Neutrosophic Figure (4), the connected Neutrosophic 475
SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), is Neutrosophic highlighted and Neutrosophic 476
featured. The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Neutrosophic Algorithm in 477
previous Neutrosophic result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected 478
Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic 479
SuperHyperModel (4), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut. 480
Proposition 4.9. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite 481
ESHM : (V, E). Then 482

= {}.
= 0z 0 .
= {}.
= 0z 0 .
Figure 4. Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite Neutrosophic Associated to the Neutro-

sophic Notions of Neutrosophic SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut in the Example (4.8)
Proof. Let 483
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
V|Pi |=minP ∈E |Pj | , E|Pi |=minPj ∈EN SHG |Pj | .
j N SHG
484
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , V2EXT ERN AL ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
E|Pi |=minPj ∈EN SHG |Pj | , V|Pi |=minP ∈E |Pj |
j N SHG
SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E). There’s a new way to redefine as 486

latter is straightforward. Then there’s no at least one SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut. 489
Thus the notion of quasi may be up but the SuperHyperNotions based on 490
SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut could be applied. There are only z 0 SuperHyperParts. 491
Thus every SuperHyperPart could have one SuperHyperVertex as the representative in 492
Figure 5. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite Associated to the Notions of Neu-

trosophic SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut in the Example (4.10)
the 493
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
is a longest path taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite 494
ESHM : (V, E). Thus only some SuperHyperVertices and only 495
minimum-Neutrosophic-of-SuperHyperPart SuperHyperEdges are attained in any 496
solution 497
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
is a longest path taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite 498
ESHM : (V, E). The latter is straightforward. 499
Example 4.10. In the Figure (5), the connected Neutrosophic 500
SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E), is highlighted and Neutrosophic featured. 501
The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Algorithm in previous Neutrosophic 502
result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected Neutrosophic 503
SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (5), is 504
the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut. 505
Proposition 4.11. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel 506
ESHW : (V, E). Then, 507

= {}.
= 0z 0 .
= {}.
= 0z 0 .
Proof. Let 508
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1∗ ,
CEN T ER, E2∗
509
P :
E1∗ , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2∗ , CEN T ER
SuperHyperWheel ESHW : (V, E). There’s a new way to redefine as 511

latter is straightforward. Then there’s at least one SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut. Thus 514
the notion of quasi isn’t up and the SuperHyperNotions based on 515
SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut could be applied. The unique embedded 516
SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut proposes some longest SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut 517
excerpt from some representatives. The latter is straightforward. 518
Example 4.12. In the Neutrosophic Figure (6), the connected Neutrosophic 519
SuperHyperWheel N SHW : (V, E), is Neutrosophic highlighted and featured. The 520
obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Algorithm in previous result, of the 521
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel 522
ESHW : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (6), is the Neutrosophic 523
5 Background 525
See the seminal scientific researches [1–3]. The formalization of the notions on the 526
framework of notions in SuperHyperGraphs, Neutrosophic notions in 527
SuperHyperGraphs theory, and (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs theory at [5–23]. 528
Two popular scientific research books in Scribd in the terms of high readers, 4216 and 529
5214 respectively, on neutrosophic science is on [24, 25]. 530
Figure 6. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel Neutrosophic Associated to the Neu-

trosophic Notions of Neutrosophic SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut in the Neutrosophic
Example (4.12)
References 531
1. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Co-degree and Neutrosophic Degree alongside 532
Chromatic Numbers in the Setting of Some Classes Related to Neutrosophic 533
Hypergraphs”, J Curr Trends Comp Sci Res 1(1) (2022) 06-14. 534
2. Henry Garrett, “Super Hyper Dominating and Super Hyper Resolving on 535
Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs and Their Directions in Game Theory and 536
Neutrosophic Super Hyper Classes”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 1(3) 537
(2022) 242-263. (doi: 10.33140/JMTCM.01.03.09) 538
3. Henry Garrett, “Some Super Hyper Degrees and Co-Super Hyper Degrees on 539
Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs And Super Hyper Graphs Alongside 540
Applications in Cancer’s Treatments”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 2(1) 541
(2023) 35-47. (https://www.opastpublishers.com/open-access-articles/some- 542
super-hyper-degrees-and-cosuper-hyper-degrees-on-neutrosophic-super-hyper- 543
graphs-and-super-hyper-graphs-alongside-a.pdf) 544
4. Henry Garrett, “A Research on Cancers Recognition and Neutrosophic Super 545
Hypergraph by Eulerian Super Hyper Cycles and Hamiltonian Sets as Hyper 546
Covering Versus Super separations”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 2(3) 547
(2023) 136-148. (https://www.opastpublishers.com/open-access-articles/a- 548
research-on-cancers-recognition-and-neutrosophic-super-hypergraph-by- 549
eulerian-super-hyper-cycles-and-hamiltonian-sets-.pdf) 550
5. Garrett, Henry. “0039 — Closing Numbers and Super-Closing Numbers as 551
(Dual)Resolving and (Dual)Coloring alongside (Dual)Dominating in 552
(Neutrosophic)n-SuperHyperGraph.” CERN European Organization for Nuclear 553
Research - Zenodo, Nov. 2022. CERN European Organization for Nuclear 554
Research, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6319942. 555
https://oa.mg/work/10.5281/zenodo.6319942 556
6. Garrett, Henry. “0049 — (Failed)1-Zero-Forcing Number in Neutrosophic 557
Graphs.” CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research - Zenodo, Feb. 558
2022. CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research, 559
https://doi.org/10.13140/rg.2.2.35241.26724. 560
https://oa.mg/work/10.13140/rg.2.2.35241.26724 561
7. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperClique as the Firm Scheme of 562
Confrontation under Cancer’s Recognition as the Model in The Setting of 563
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010308 (doi: 564
10.20944/preprints202301.0308.v1). 565
8. Henry Garrett, “Uncertainty On The Act And Effect Of Cancer Alongside The 566
Foggy Positions Of Cells Toward Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique inside 567
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Titled Cancer’s Recognition”, Preprints 2023, 568
2023010282 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0282.v1). 569
9. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Version Of Separates Groups Of Cells In 570
Cancer’s Recognition On Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 571
2023010267 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0267.v1). 572
10. Henry Garrett, “The Shift Paradigm To Classify Separately The Cells and 573
Affected Cells Toward The Totality Under Cancer’s Recognition By New 574
Multiple Definitions On the Sets Polynomials Alongside Numbers In The 575
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperMatching Theory Based on SuperHyperGraph and 576
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”, Preprints 2023, 2023010265 (doi: 577
10.20944/preprints202301.0265.v1). 578
11. Henry Garrett, “Breaking the Continuity and Uniformity of Cancer In The 579
Worst Case of Full Connections With Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique In 580
Cancer’s Recognition Applied in (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 581
2023, 2023010262,(doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0262.v1). 582
12. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable as the Survivors on the 583
Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition Based on Uncertainty to All Modes in 584
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010240 (doi: 585
10.20944/preprints202301.0240.v1). 586
13. Henry Garrett, “Extremism of the Attacked Body Under the Cancer’s 587
Circumstances Where Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) 588
SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010224, (doi: 589
10.20944/preprints202301.0224.v1). 590
14. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in Cancer’s 591
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 592
2023010105 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 593
15. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form 594
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions 595
In Special ViewPoints”, Preprints 2023, 2023010088 (doi: 596
10.20944/preprints202301.0088.v1). 597
16. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in the 598
SuperHyperFunction To Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs on Cancer’s 599
Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond ”, Preprints 2023, 2023010044 600
17. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperStable on Cancer’s Recognition by 601
Well- SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 602
2023010043 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0043.v1). 603
18. Henry Garrett, “Basic Notions on (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperForcing And 604
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling in Cancer’s Recognitions And 605
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010105 (doi: 606
10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 607
19. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form 608
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions 609
In Special ViewPoints”, Preprints 2023, 2023010088 (doi: 610
10.20944/preprints202301.0088.v1). 611
20. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions 612
Featuring (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances”, Preprints 613
2022, 2022120549 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0549.v1). 614
21. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperAlliances With SuperHyperDefensive 615
and SuperHyperOffensive Type-SuperHyperSet On (Neutrosophic) 616
SuperHyperGraph With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s 617
Recognitions And Related (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClasses”, Preprints 2022, 618
2022120540 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0540.v1). 619
22. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperGirth on SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic 620
SuperHyperGraph With SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions”, 621
Preprints 2022, 2022120500 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0500.v1). 622
23. Henry Garrett, “Initial Material of Neutrosophic Preliminaries to Study Some 623
Neutrosophic Notions Based on Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) in 624
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)”, ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 625
10.13140/RG.2.2.25385.88160). 626
24. Henry Garrett, “Beyond Neutrosophic Graphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 627
10.5281/zenodo.6320305). 628
25. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Duality”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 629
10.5281/zenodo.6677173). 630
View publication stats

New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph by Initial Eulerian-Path-Cut As Hyper Initial Eulogy On Super Initial EULA

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph by Initial Eulerian-Path-Cut As Hyper Initial Eulogy On Super Initial EULA

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph By

Preprint · April 2023

434 PUBLICATIONS 11,017 CITATIONS

Number Graphs And Numbers View project

On Algebraic Structures and Algebraic Hyperstructures View project

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 2

SuperHyperGraph By initial Eulerian-Path-Cut As Hyper 3

initial Eulogy On Super initial EULA 4

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · 6

DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA 7

Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs. Some well-known classes are used in this scientific 10

research. A basic familiarity with Neutrosophic SuperHyper Eulerian-Path-Cut theory, 11

SuperHyperGraphs, and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs theory are proposed. 12

Keywords: Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut, 13

Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition 14

AMS Subject Classification: 05C17, 05C22, 05E45 15

2 Neutrosophic Preliminaries Of This Scientific 16

Research On the Redeemed Ways 17

Neutrosophic Set](Ref. [23],Definition 2.2,p.2), [Neutrosophic Set](Ref. [23],Definition 19

2.1,p.1), [Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)](Ref. [23],Definition 2.5,p.2), 20

[Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)](Ref. [23],Definition 21

2.7,p.3), [t-norm](Ref. [23], Definition 2.7, p.3), and [Characterization of the 22

Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)](Ref. [23],Definition 2.7,p.3), [Neutrosophic 23

Strength of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPaths] (Ref. [23],Definition 5.3,p.7), and 24

[Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)] 25

Definition 2.1. (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic 28

Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). Consider 30

a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs } and E 0 = {E1 , E2 , . . . , Ez }. Then 31

(i) Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut if the following expression 33

is called Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut criteria holds 34

(ii) Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut if the following expression 35

is called Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut criteria holds 36

and |Ei |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY = |Ej |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY ; 37

(iii) Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut if the following expression 38

is called Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut criteria holds 39

(iv) Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut if the following expression 40

is called Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut criteria holds 41

and |Vi |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY = |Vj |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY ; 42

(v) Neutrosophic SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut if it’s either of Neutrosophic 43

e-SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut, 44

Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut, and Neutrosophic 45

Definition 2.2. ((Neutrosophic) SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut). 47

Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). Consider 48

a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) E = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then E is called 49

(i) an Extreme SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut if it’s either of Neutrosophic 50

e-SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut, 51

Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut, and Neutrosophic 52

rv-SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut and C(N SHG) for an Extreme 53

SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum Extreme cardinality of an 54

Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality of the Extreme 55

SuperHyperEdges in the conseNeighborive Extreme sequence of Extreme 56

SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 57

(ii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut if it’s either of 59

Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut, Neutrosophic 60

re-SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut, Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut, 61

and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut and C(N SHG) for a 62

Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum Neutrosophic 63

cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges of a Neutrosophic 64

SuperHyperSet S of high Neutrosophic cardinality conseNeighborive Neutrosophic 65

SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 66

(iii) an Extreme SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut SuperHyperPolynomial if 68