Professional Documents
Culture Documents
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph 4
1 ABSTRACT 8
0
∀E ∈ P : P is a SuperHyperPath and it has all SuperHyperVertices;
0
∀E ∈ P : P is a SuperHyperPath and it has all SuperHyperVertices;
0
∀V ∈ E ∈ P : P is a SuperHyperPath and it has all SuperHyperVertices;
0
∀V ∈ E ∈ P : P is a SuperHyperPath and it has all SuperHyperVertices;
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
coefficients defined as the Extreme number of the maximum Extreme cardinality of the 51
that they form the Extreme SuperHyperTrace-Decomposition; and the Extreme power 54
coefficients defined as the Extreme number of the maximum Extreme cardinality of the 89
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 102
corresponded to its Neutrosophic coefficient. In this scientific research, new setting is 104
SuperHyperDefinitions are debut for them but the research goes further and the 107
well-defined and well-reviewed. The literature review is implemented in the whole of 109
this research. For shining the elegancy and the significancy of this research, the 110
fundamental SuperHyperNumbers are featured. The definitions are followed by the 112
examples and the instances thus the clarifications are driven with different tools. The 113
applications are figured out to make sense about the theoretical aspect of this ongoing 114
research. The “Cancer’s Recognition” are the under research to figure out the 115
challenges make sense about ongoing and upcoming research. The special case is up. 116
The cells are viewed in the deemed ways. There are different types of them. Some of 117
them are individuals and some of them are well-modeled by the group of cells. These 118
types are all officially called “SuperHyperVertex” but the relations amid them all 119
“Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” are chosen and elected to research about “Cancer’s 121
Recognition”. Thus these complex and dense SuperHyperModels open up some avenues 122
to research on theoretical segments and “Cancer’s Recognition”. Some avenues are 123
posed to pursue this research. It’s also officially collected in the form of some questions 124
maximum cardinality such that either of the following expressions hold for the 127
|S ∩ N (s)| > |S ∩ (V \ N (s))| + δ; and |S ∩ N (s)| < |S ∩ (V \ N (s))| + δ. The first 129
cardinality such that either of the following expressions hold for the Neutrosophic 133
and |S ∩ N (s)|N eutrosophic < |S ∩ (V \ N (s))|N eutrosophic + δ. The first Expression, 136
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
and the SuperHyperEdges are assigned by the labels from the letters of the alphabets. 143
In this procedure, there’s the usage of the position of labels to assign to the values. 144
The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” with the key points, “The Values of The 148
Vertices & The Number of Position in Alphabet”, “The Values of The 149
SuperVertices&The maximum Values of Its Vertices”, “The Values of The Edges&The 150
maximum Values of Its Vertices”, “The Values of The HyperEdges&The maximum 151
Values of Its Vertices”, “The Values of The SuperHyperEdges&The maximum Values of 152
Its Endpoints”. To get structural examples and instances, I’m going to introduce the 153
SuperHyperTrace-Decomposition . There are some instances about the clarifications for 159
get more scrutiny and discernment since there are characterized in the disciplinary ways 161
are assigned by the labels from the letters of the alphabets. In this procedure, there’s 166
the usage of the position of labels to assign to the values. Assume a Neutrosophic 167
where it’s the strongest [the maximum Neutrosophic value from all the 181
SuperHyperGraph and the number of elements of SuperHyperEdges are the same. 185
follows. It’s SuperHyperPath if it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two given 187
one SuperVertex as intersection amid two given SuperHyperEdges; it’s SuperHyperStar 189
it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid all SuperHyperEdges; it’s 190
SuperHyperBipartite it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two given 191
SuperHyperEdges and these SuperVertices, forming two separate sets, has no 192
intersection amid two given SuperHyperEdges and these SuperVertices, forming multi 194
separate sets, has no SuperHyperEdge in common; it’s a SuperHyperWheel if it’s only 195
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
one SuperVertex as intersection amid two given SuperHyperEdges and one SuperVertex 196
has one SuperHyperEdge with any common SuperVertex. The SuperHyperModel 197
proposes the specific designs and the specific architectures. The SuperHyperModel is 198
SuperHyperModel, The “specific” cells and “specific group” of cells are 200
between “specific” cells and “specific group” of cells are SuperHyperModeled as 202
indeterminacy, and neutrality to have more precise SuperHyperModel which in this case 204
the SuperHyperModel is called “Neutrosophic”. In the future research, the foundation 205
will be based on the “Cancer’s Recognition” and the results and the definitions will be 206
introduced in redeemed ways. The recognition of the cancer in the long-term function. 207
The specific region has been assigned by the model [it’s called SuperHyperGraph] and 208
the long cycle of the move from the cancer is identified by this research. Sometimes the 209
move of the cancer hasn’t be easily identified since there are some determinacy, 210
indeterminacy and neutrality about the moves and the effects of the cancer on that 211
region; this event leads us to choose another model [it’s said to be Neutrosophic 212
SuperHyperGraph] to have convenient perception on what’s happened and what’s done. 213
There are some specific models, which are well-known and they’ve got the names, and 214
some SuperHyperGeneral SuperHyperModels. The moves and the traces of the cancer 215
on the complex tracks and between complicated groups of cells could be fantasized by a 216
SuperHyperStar, all possible SuperHyperPaths have only two SuperHyperEdges but it’s 224
not enough since it’s essential to have at least three SuperHyperEdges to form any style 225
In this scientific research, there are some ideas in the featured frameworks of 236
motivations. I try to bring the motivations in the narrative ways. Some cells have been 237
faced with some attacks from the situation which is caused by the cancer’s attacks. In 238
this case, there are some embedded analysis on the ongoing situations which in that, the 239
cells could be labelled as some groups and some groups or individuals have excessive 240
labels which all are raised from the behaviors to overcome the cancer’s attacks. In the 241
embedded situations, the individuals of cells and the groups of cells could be considered 242
as “new groups”. Thus it motivates us to find the proper SuperHyperModels for getting 243
more proper analysis on this messy story. I’ve found the SuperHyperModels which are 244
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
SuperHyperModel, the cells and the groups of cells are defined as “SuperHyperVertices” 246
and the relations between the individuals of cells and the groups of cells are defined as 247
SuperHyperModel based on the “Cancer’s Recognition”. Sometimes, the situations get 249
worst. The situation is passed from the certainty and precise style. Thus it’s the beyond 250
them. There are three descriptions, namely, the degrees of determinacy, indeterminacy 251
and neutrality, for any object based on vague forms, namely, incomplete data, imprecise 252
data, and uncertain analysis. The latter model could be considered on the previous 253
called “Extreme SuperHyperGraphs”. The cancer is the disease but the model is going 255
to figure out what’s going on this phenomenon. The special case of this disease is 256
considered and as the consequences of the model, some parameters are used. The cells 257
are under attack of this disease but the moves of the cancer in the special region are the 258
matter of mind. The recognition of the cancer could help to find some treatments for 259
this disease. The SuperHyperGraph and Extreme SuperHyperGraph are the 260
SuperHyperModels on the “Cancer’s Recognition” and both bases are the background 261
of this research. Sometimes the cancer has been happened on the region, full of cells, 262
groups of cells and embedded styles. In this segment, the SuperHyperModel proposes 263
some SuperHyperNotions based on the connectivities of the moves of the cancer in the 264
forms of alliances’ styles with the formation of the design and the architecture are 265
buzzwords. The prefix “SuperHyper” refers to the theme of the embedded styles to 267
figure out the background for the SuperHyperNotions. The recognition of the cancer in 268
the long-term function. The specific region has been assigned by the model [it’s called 269
SuperHyperGraph] and the long cycle of the move from the cancer is identified by this 270
research. Sometimes the move of the cancer hasn’t be easily identified since there are 271
some determinacy, indeterminacy and neutrality about the moves and the effects of the 272
cancer on that region; this event leads us to choose another model [it’s said to be 273
what’s done. There are some specific models, which are well-known and they’ve got the 275
names, and some general models. The moves and the traces of the cancer on the 276
complex tracks and between complicated groups of cells could be fantasized by an 277
results are introduced. Beyond that in SuperHyperStar, all possible Extreme 282
SuperHyperPath s have only two SuperHyperEdges but it’s not enough since it’s 283
Question 2.1. How to define the SuperHyperNotions and to do research on them to 288
the groups of cells based on the fixed cell or the fixed group of cells, extensively, the 290
Question 2.2. What are the best descriptions for the “Cancer’s Recognition” in terms 293
of these messy and dense SuperHyperModels where embedded notions are illustrated? 294
It’s motivation to find notions to use in this dense model is titled 295
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
“SuperHyperGraph” and “Extreme SuperHyperGraph”. Then the research has taken 298
more motivations to define SuperHyperClasses and to find some connections amid this 299
instances and examples to make clarifications about the framework of this research. The 301
general results and some results about some connections are some avenues to make key 302
point of this research, “Cancer’s Recognition”, more understandable and more clear. 303
The framework of this research is as follows. In the beginning, I introduce basic 304
deeply-introduced and in-depth-discussed. The elementary concepts are clarified and 307
illustrated completely and sometimes review literature are applied to make sense about 308
what’s going to figure out about the upcoming sections. The main definitions and their 309
Trace-Decomposition to make sense about continuing the research, the ideas of 314
consequences, corresponded SuperHyperClasses are figured out to debut what’s done in 316
SuperHyperClasses”. As going back to origin of the notions, there are some smart steps 318
toward the common notions to extend the new notions in new frameworks, 319
research about the general SuperHyperRelations and as concluding and closing section 322
of theoretical research are contained in the section “General Results”. Some general 323
are curious questions about what’s done about the SuperHyperNotions to make sense 328
about excellency of this research and going to figure out the word “best” as the 329
“Applications in Cancer’s Recognition” with two cases and subsections “Case 1: The 332
“Open Problems”, there are some scrutiny and discernment on what’s done and what’s 335
happened in this research in the terms of “questions” and “problems” to make sense to 336
figure out this research in featured style. The advantages and the limitations of this 337
research alongside about what’s done in this research to make sense and to get sense 338
about what’s figured out are included in the section, “Conclusion and Closing Remarks”. 339
In this section, the basic material in this scientific research, is referred to [Single Valued 342
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)] (Ref. [148],Definition 5.4,p.7). Also, the new 350
In this subsection, the basic material which is used in this scientific research, is 352
presented. Also, the new ideas and their clarifications are elicited. 353
The functions TA (x), IA (x) and FA (x) are real standard or nonstandard subsets of 355
+
]− 0, 1 [. 356
Definition 3.2 (Single Valued Neutrosophic Set). (Ref. [148],Definition 2.2,p.2). 357
2.5,p.2). 359
(i) V = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vn } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of V 0 ; 362
(ii) V = {(Vi , TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi )) : TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi ) ≥ 0}, (i = 363
1, 2, . . . , n); 364
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
(iii) E = {E1 , E2 , . . . , En0 } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of 365
V; 366
(iv) E = {(Ei0 , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )) : TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 ) ≥ 0}, (i0 = 367
1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 368
P
(vii) i supp(Vi ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 371
0 0
P
(viii) i0 supp(Ei ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n );
0 372
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) Vj are single valued Neutrosophic sets. TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), 375
TV0 (Ei0 ), TV0 (Ei0 ), and TV0 (Ei0 ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 379
the ii0 th element of the incidence matrix of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) 382
are of the form (Vi , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )), the sets V and E are crisp sets. 383
(iii) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called edge; 392
(iv) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 393
HyperEdge; 394
(v) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called 395
SuperEdge; 396
(vi) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 397
SuperHyperEdge. 398
If we choose different types of binary operations, then we could get hugely diverse 399
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
A binary operation ⊗ : [0, 1] × [0, 1] → [0, 1] is a t-norm if it satisfies the following 402
(i) 1 ⊗ x = x; 404
(ii) x ⊗ y = y ⊗ x; 405
(iii) x ⊗ (y ⊗ z) = (x ⊗ y) ⊗ z; 406
(i) V = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vn } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of V 0 ; 411
(ii) V = {(Vi , TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi )) : TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi ) ≥ 0}, (i = 412
1, 2, . . . , n); 413
(iii) E = {E1 , E2 , . . . , En0 } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of 414
V; 415
(iv) E = {(Ei0 , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )) : TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 ) ≥ 0}, (i0 = 416
1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 417
P
(vii) i supp(Vi ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 420
0 0
P
(viii) i0 supp(Ei0 ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n ). 421
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) Vj are single valued Neutrosophic sets. TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), 423
TV0 (Ei0 ), TV0 (Ei0 ), and TV0 (Ei0 ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 427
the ii0 th element of the incidence matrix of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) 430
are of the form (Vi , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )), the sets V and E are crisp sets. 431
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
(iii) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called edge; 440
(iv) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 441
HyperEdge; 442
(v) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called 443
SuperEdge; 444
(vi) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 445
SuperHyperEdge. 446
This SuperHyperModel is too messy and too dense. Thus there’s a need to have 447
some restrictions and conditions on SuperHyperGraph. The special case of this 448
(ii). it’s SuperHyperCycle if it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two 458
(iii). it’s SuperHyperStar it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid all 460
SuperHyperEdges; 461
(iv). it’s SuperHyperBipartite it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two 462
given SuperHyperEdges and these SuperVertices, forming two separate sets, has 463
(v). it’s SuperHyperMultiPartite it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid 465
two given SuperHyperEdges and these SuperVertices, forming multi separate sets, 466
(vi). it’s SuperHyperWheel if it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two 468
given SuperHyperEdges and one SuperVertex has one SuperHyperEdge with any 469
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs
(iii) there’s a SuperVertex Vi0 ∈ Vi such that Vi0 , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 476
(iv) there’s a vertex vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that Vi , vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 477
0 0
(v) there’s a SuperVertex Vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that Vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 478
(vi) there are a vertex vi ∈ Vi and a vertex vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that vi , vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 479
0 0
(vii) there are a vertex vi ∈ Vi and a SuperVertex Vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 480
(viii) there are a SuperVertex Vi0 ∈ Vi and a vertex vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that Vi0 , vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 481
V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs ,
(i) If for all Vi , Ej 0 , |Vi | = 1, |Ej 0 | = 2, then NSHP is called path; 486
(ii) if for all Ej 0 , |Ej 0 | = 2, and there’s Vi , |Vi | ≥ 1, then NSHP is called SuperPath; 487
(iii) if for all Vi , Ej 0 , |Vi | = 1, |Ej 0 | ≥ 2, then NSHP is called HyperPath; 488
(iv) if there are Vi , Ej 0 , |Vi | ≥ 1, |Ej 0 | ≥ 2, then NSHP is called Neutrosophic 489
SuperHyperPath . 490
V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs ,
have 493
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
(iv) Neutrosophic strength (min{T (Vi )}, min{I(Vi )}, min{F (Vi )})si=1 . 497
where 1 ≤ i, j ≤ s. 514
SuperHyperTrace-Decomposition). 516
0
∀E ∈ P : P is a SuperHyperPath and it has all SuperHyperVertices;
0
∀E ∈ P : P is a SuperHyperPath and it has all SuperHyperVertices;
526
0
∀V ∈ E ∈ P : P is a SuperHyperPath and it has all SuperHyperVertices;
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
0
∀V ∈ E ∈ P : P is a SuperHyperPath and it has all SuperHyperVertices;
rv-SuperHyperTrace-Decomposition. 539
SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 551
SuperHyperTrace-Decomposition; 562
contains the Extreme coefficients defined as the Extreme number of the maximum 569
SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 572
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
contains the Neutrosophic coefficients defined as the Neutrosophic number of the 582
SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 596
SuperHyperTrace-Decomposition; 607
contains the Extreme coefficients defined as the Extreme number of the maximum 615
SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 618
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
contains the Neutrosophic coefficients defined as the Neutrosophic number of the 628
s∈S: 639
SuperHyperNeighbors of s ∈ S : 645
δ−SuperHyperDefensive. 648
SuperHyperVertices and the SuperHyperEdges are assigned by the labels from the 651
letters of the alphabets. In this procedure, there’s the usage of the position of labels to 652
S = (V, E). It’s redefined Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph if the Table (1) holds. 655
understandable. 658
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
S = (V, E). There are some Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses if the Table (2) 660
are assigned by the labels from the letters of the alphabets. In this procedure, there’s 673
X
E(A) = E(a). (4.1)
a∈A
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Y
E(∩i∈I Ai ) = P (Ai ).
i∈I
number is called Extreme Expectation if the following expression is called Extreme 701
X
Ex(E) = E(α)P (α).
α∈V
Extreme Crossing if the following expression is called Extreme Crossing criteria 706
Lemma 4.6. Assume an Extreme SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). 707
Proof. Consider a planar embedding G of G with cr(G) crossings. Let S be an Extreme 710
independently with probability Trace-Decomposition p := 4n/m, and set H := G[S] and 712
H := G[S]. 713
p4 cr(G) ≥ p2 m − 3pn.
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
pm − 3n n 1 3 2
cr(G) ≥ 3
= 3 = m n .
p (4n/m) 64
715
Theorem 4.7. Assume an Extreme SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). 716
passing through at least k + 1 of these points, where 1 ≤ k ≤ 2 2n. Then l < 32n2 /k 3 . 719
P whose SuperHyperEdge are the segments between conseNeighborive points on the 721
choose two. Thus either kl < 4n, in which case l < 4n/k ≤ 32n2 /k 3 , or 724
3
l2 /2 > l choose 2 ≥ cr(G) ≥ (kl) /64n2 by the Extreme Crossing Lemma, and again 725
Theorem 4.8. Assume an Extreme SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). 727
n points in the plane, and let k be the number of pairs of points of P at unit 729
Proof. Assume an Extreme SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). Consider 731
n−1
X
e(H) = ini = 2k − n1 − 2n2 ≥ 2k − 2n.
i=3
SuperHyperCircles, and any two SuperHyperCircles cross at most twice. Thus either 743
3
e(G) < 4n, in which case k < 5n < 5n4/3 , or n2 > n(n − 1) ≥ cr(G) ≥ (k − n) /64n2 744
by the Extreme Crossing Lemma, and k < 4n4/3 + n < 5n4/3 . 745
E(X)
P (X ≥ t) ≤ .
t
Proof.
X X
E(X) = {X(a)P (a) : a ∈ V } ≥ {X(a)P (a) : a ∈ V, X(a) ≥ t}
X X
{tP (a) : a ∈ V, X(a) ≥ t} = t {P (a) : a ∈ V, X(a) ≥ t}
tP (X ≥ t).
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Dividing the first and last members by t yields the asserted inequality. 749
Proof. 754
SuperHyperGraph in Gn,p almost surely has stability number at most d2p−1 log ne. 757
Proof. Assume an Extreme SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). Consider 758
(1 − p)(k+1)choose2 , this being the probability that none of the (k + 1)choose2 pairs of 762
Let AS denote the event that S is a stable SuperHyperSet of G, and let XS denote 764
the indicator Extreme Variable for this Extreme Event. By equation, we have 765
X
X= {XS : S ⊆ V, |S| = k + 1}
X
E(X) = {E(XS ) : S ⊆ V, |S| = k + 1} = (n choose k+1)(1 − p)(k+1)choose2 .
nk+1
(n choose k+1) ≤ and1 − p ≤ e−p .
(k + 1)!
Suppose now that k = d2p−1 log ne. Then k ≥ 2p−1 log n, so ne−pk/2 ≤ 1. Because k 770
grows at least as fast as the logarithm of n, implies that E(X) → 0 as n → ∞. Because 771
number is called Extreme Variance if the following expression is called Extreme 778
2
V x(E) = Ex((X − Ex(X)) ).
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
V (X)
E(|X − Ex(X)| ≥ t) ≤ .
t2
Proof. Assume an Extreme SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). Consider 783
2
2 Ex((X − Ex(X)) ) V (X)
E(|X − Ex(X)| ≥ t) = E((X − Ex(X)) ≥ t2 ) ≤ = .
t2 t2
786
E(Xn = 0) → 0 as n → ∞
Proof. Assume an Extreme SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). Consider 791
Chebyshev’s Inequality, and observe that E(Xn = 0) ≤ E(|Xn − Ex(Xn )| ≥ |Ex(Xn )|) 793
For 0 ≤ k ≤ n, set f (k) := (n choose k)2−(k choose 2) and let k ∗ be the least value of k 797
for which f (k) is less than one. Then almost surely α(G) takes one of the three values 798
k ∗ − 2, k ∗ − 1, k ∗ . 799
Proof. Assume an Extreme SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). Consider 800
(i). f (k ∗ ) << 1, in which case almost surely α(G) is equal to either k ∗ − 2 or k ∗ − 1, 806
or 807
(ii). f (k ∗ − 1) >> 1, in which case almost surely α(G) is equal to either k ∗ − 1 or k ∗ . 808
Proof. Assume an Extreme SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). Consider 809
SuperHyperGraphs (one which is preserved when SuperHyperEdges are added). Then a 814
(i). if p << f (n), then G ∈ Gn,p almost surely does not have P, 816
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
SuperHyperGraph. Then there is a threshold function for the property of containing a 821
SuperHyperEdges. Then n−k/l is a threshold function for the property of containing F 826
Proof. Assume an Extreme SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). Consider 828
841
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
SuperHyperTrace-Decomposition. 850
851
straightforward. 854
855
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
straightforward. 858
859
straightforward. 862
863
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
straightforward. 866
867
straightforward. 870
871
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
straightforward. 874
875
straightforward. 878
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
879
straightforward. 882
883
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
straightforward. 886
straightforward. 890
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
straightforward. 894
straightforward. 898
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
straightforward. 902
903
straightforward. 906
907
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
straightforward. 910
911
straightforward. 914
915
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
straightforward. 918
straightforward. 922
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
straightforward. 926
927
straightforward. 930
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
931
Proposition 4.21. Assume a connected Extreme SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). 932
quasi-R-Trace-Decomposition if for any of them, and any of other corresponded Extreme 934
ESHG : (V, E). There’s only one Extreme SuperHyperEdge E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) has only 939
the maximum possibilities of the distinct interior Extreme SuperHyperVertices inside of 940
to some of them but not all of them. In other words, there’s only an unique Extreme 942
is at least the maximum Extreme number of Extreme SuperHyperVertices of the Extreme 947
SuperHyperEdges with the maximum number of the Extreme SuperHyperEdges. In other 948
words, the maximum number of the Extreme SuperHyperEdges contains the maximum 949
Trace-Decomposition in some cases but the maximum number of the Extreme 951
R-Trace-Decomposition. 954
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Proposition 4.24. Assume a simple Extreme SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). Then
the Extreme number of type-result-R-Trace-Decomposition has, the least Extreme
cardinality, the lower sharp Extreme bound for Extreme cardinality, is the Extreme
cardinality of
Proof. Assume a connected loopless Extreme SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). The
SuperHyperSet of the SuperHyperVertices V \ V \ {z} isn’t a
quasi-R-Trace-Decomposition since neither amount of Extreme SuperHyperEdges nor
amount of SuperHyperVertices where amount refers to the Extreme number of
SuperHyperVertices(-/SuperHyperEdges) more than one to form any kind of
SuperHyperEdges or any number of SuperHyperEdges. Let us consider the Extreme
SuperHyperSet
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Then we’ve lost some connected loopless Extreme SuperHyperClasses of the connected
loopless Extreme SuperHyperGraphs titled free-triangle, on-triangle, and their
quasi-types but the SuperHyperStable is only up in this quasi-R-Trace-Decomposition.
It’s the contradiction to that fact on the generality. There are some counterexamples to
deny this statement. One of them comes from the setting of the graph titled path and
cycle as the counterexamples-classes or reversely direction star as the examples-classes,
are well-known classes in that setting and they could be considered as the
examples-classes and counterexamples-classes for the tight bound of
Let V \ V \ {z} in mind. There’s no necessity on the SuperHyperEdge since we need at 962
principles of the main definition since there’s no condition to be satisfied but the 964
SuperHyperSet has the necessary condition for the intended definition to be applied. 967
Thus the V \ V \ {z} is withdrawn not by the conditions of the main definition but by 968
the necessity of the pre-condition on the usage of the main definition. 969
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Comes up. This Extreme case implies having the Extreme style of on-quasi-triangle
Extreme style on the every Extreme elements of this Extreme SuperHyperSet. Precisely,
the Extreme R-Trace-Decomposition is the Extreme SuperHyperSet of the Extreme
SuperHyperVertices such that some Extreme amount of the Extreme
SuperHyperVertices are on-quasi-triangle Extreme style. The Extreme cardinality of the
v SuperHypeSet
But the lower Extreme bound is up. Thus the minimum Extreme cardinality of the
maximum Extreme cardinality ends up the Extreme discussion. The first Extreme term
refers to the Extreme setting of the Extreme SuperHyperGraph but this key point is
enough since there’s an Extreme SuperHyperClass of an Extreme SuperHyperGraph has
no on-quasi-triangle Extreme style amid some amount of its Extreme
SuperHyperVertices. This Extreme setting of the Extreme SuperHyperModel proposes
an Extreme SuperHyperSet has only some amount Extreme SuperHyperVertices from
one Extreme SuperHyperEdge such that there’s no Extreme amount of Extreme
SuperHyperEdges more than one involving these some amount of these Extreme
SuperHyperVertices. The Extreme cardinality of this Extreme SuperHyperSet is the
maximum and the Extreme case is occurred in the minimum Extreme situation. To sum
them up, the Extreme SuperHyperSet
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Extreme background in the Extreme terms of worst Extreme case and the common 971
theme of the lower Extreme bound occurred in the specific Extreme SuperHyperClasses 972
V \ (V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . . , zE }).
Zi ∼ Zj , i 6= j, i, j = 1, 2, . . . , z.
where the ∼ isn’t an equivalence relation but only the symmetric relation on the
Extreme SuperHyperVertices of the Extreme SuperHyperGraph. The formal definition
is as follows.
Zi ∼ Zj , i 6= j, i, j = 1, 2, . . . , z
if and only if Zi and Zj are the Extreme SuperHyperVertices and there’s only and only
one Extreme SuperHyperEdge E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) between the Extreme
SuperHyperVertices Zi and Zj . The other definition for the Extreme SuperHyperEdge
E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) in the terms of Extreme R-Trace-Decomposition is
{aE , bE , cE , . . . , zE } .
This definition coincides with the definition of the Extreme R-Trace-Decomposition but
with slightly differences in the maximum Extreme cardinality amid those Extreme
type-SuperHyperSets of the Extreme SuperHyperVertices. Thus the Extreme
SuperHyperSet of the Extreme SuperHyperVertices,
and
E
E = {Z1 , Z2 , . . . , Zz | Zi ∼ Zj , i 6= j, i, j = 1, 2, . . . , z}.
Or
{aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .
Extreme R-Trace-Decomposition =
E
{Z1 , Z2 , . . . , Zz | ∀i 6= j, i, j = 1, 2, . . . , z, ∃Ex , Zi ∼x Zj , }.
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
975
Extreme R-Trace-Decomposition =
V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .
V \ (V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . . , zE }).
the Extreme SuperHyperEdges. In other words, the maximum number of the Extreme 979
the maximum number of the Extreme SuperHyperEdge with the maximum Extreme 982
some issues about the Extreme optimal SuperHyperObject. It specially delivers some 987
remarks on the Extreme SuperHyperSet of the Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that 988
there’s distinct amount of Extreme SuperHyperEdges for distinct amount of Extreme 989
SuperHyperVertices up to all taken from that Extreme SuperHyperSet of the Extreme 990
SuperHyperModel, there’s at least one Extreme SuperHyperEdge containing at least all 994
where the Extreme completion of the Extreme incidence is up in that. Thus it’s, 996
SuperHyperCardinality. Thus the embedded setting is elected such that those 1000
Extreme SuperHyperOptimal. The less than two distinct types of Extreme 1002
SuperHyperVertices are included in the minimum Extreme style of the embedded 1003
are deciders. Since the Extreme number of SuperHyperNeighbors are only affected by 1005
the interior Extreme SuperHyperVertices. The common connections, more precise and 1006
more formal, the perfect unique connections inside the Extreme SuperHyperSet for any 1007
Thus Extreme exterior SuperHyperVertices could be used only in one Extreme 1009
they’ve more connections inside more than outside. Thus the title “exterior” is more 1013
relevant than the title “interior”. One Extreme SuperHyperVertex has no connection, 1014
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
inside. Thus, the Extreme SuperHyperSet of the Extreme SuperHyperVertices with one 1015
SuperHyperElement has been ignored in the exploring to lead on the optimal case 1016
with the exclusion of the exclusion of all Extreme SuperHyperVertices in one Extreme 1018
SuperHyperEdge and with other terms, the Extreme R-Trace-Decomposition with the 1019
Extreme SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). There’s only one Extreme SuperHyperEdge 1022
E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) has only the maximum possibilities of the distinct interior Extreme 1023
Extreme SuperHypeNeighbor to some of them but not all of them. In other words, 1025
there’s only an unique Extreme SuperHyperEdge E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) has only two 1026
minus all Extreme SuperHypeNeighbor to some of them but not all of them. 1028
The main definition of the Extreme R-Trace-Decomposition has two titles. an 1029
R-SuperHyperCardinality are two titles in the terms of quasi-R-styles. For any Extreme 1031
Extreme quasi-SuperHyperNotions lead us to take the collection of all the Extreme 1035
quasi-R-Trace-Decompositions for all Extreme numbers less than its Extreme 1036
corresponded maximum number. The essence of the Extreme Trace-Decomposition ends 1037
up but this essence starts up in the terms of the Extreme quasi-R-Trace-Decomposition, 1038
again and more in the operations of collecting all the Extreme 1039
quasi-R-Trace-Decompositions acted on the all possible used formations of the Extreme 1040
To get more precise perceptions, the follow-up expressions propose another formal 1048
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
GExtreme Trace-Decomposition =
{S ∈ ∪zExtreme Number [zExtreme Number ]Extreme Class =
∪zExtreme Number {SExtreme SuperHyperSet |
SExtreme SuperHyperSet = GExtreme Trace-Decomposition ,
|SExtreme SuperHyperSet |Extreme Cardinality
= zExtreme Number |
|SExtreme SuperHyperSet |Extreme Cardinality
= max zExtreme Number }.
[zExtreme Number ]Extreme Class
In more concise and more convenient ways, the modified definition for the Extreme 1050
GExtreme Trace-Decomposition =
{S ∈ ∪zExtreme Number [zExtreme Number ]Extreme Class |
|SExtreme SuperHyperSet |Extreme Cardinality
= max zExtreme Number }.
[zExtreme Number ]Extreme Class
To translate the statement to this mathematical literature, the formulae will be revised. 1052
GExtreme Trace-Decomposition =
{S ∈ ∪zExtreme Number [zExtreme Number ]Extreme Class |
|SExtreme SuperHyperSet |Extreme Cardinality
= maxzExtreme Number
[zExtreme Number ]Extreme Class
= max |E| | E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.
GExtreme Trace-Decomposition =
{S ∈ ∪zExtreme Number [zExtreme Number ]Extreme Class |
|SExtreme SuperHyperSet |Extreme Cardinality
= max |E| | E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.
To get more visions in the closer look-up, there’s an overall overlook. 1054
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
1055
GExtreme Trace-Decomposition =
{S ∈ ∪zExtreme Number [zExtreme Number ]Extreme Class =
∪zExtreme Number {SExtreme SuperHyperSet |
SExtreme SuperHyperSet = GExtreme Trace-Decomposition ,
|SExtreme SuperHyperSet |Extreme Cardinality
= zExtreme Number |
|SExtreme SuperHyperSet |Extreme Cardinality
= max |E| | E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.
1056
GExtreme Trace-Decomposition =
{S ∈ ∪zExtreme Number [zExtreme Number ]Extreme Class |
|SExtreme SuperHyperSet |Extreme Cardinality
= max zExtreme Number
[zExtreme Number ]Extreme Class
= max |E| | E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.
1057
GExtreme Trace-Decomposition =
{S ∈ ∪zExtreme Number [zExtreme Number ]Extreme Class |
|SExtreme SuperHyperSet |Extreme Cardinality
= max |E| | E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.
Now, the extension of these types of approaches is up. Since the new term, “Extreme 1058
SuperHyperVertices such that any amount of its Extreme SuperHyperVertices are 1060
incident to an Extreme SuperHyperEdge. It’s, literarily, another name for “Extreme 1061
and background but “Extreme SuperHyperNeighborhood” may not happens “Extreme 1065
preliminarily background since there are some ambiguities about the Extreme 1067
SuperHyperCardinality arise from it. To get orderly keywords, the terms, “Extreme 1068
SuperHyperNeighborhood and an Extreme Trace-Decomposition and the new terms are 1073
up. 1074
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
1075
GExtreme Trace-Decomposition =
{NExtreme SuperHyperNeighborhood
∈ ∪zExtreme Number [zExtreme Number ]Extreme Class =
∪zExtreme Number {NExtreme SuperHyperNeighborhood |
|NExtreme SuperHyperSet |Extreme Cardinality
= zExtreme Number |
|NExtreme SuperHyperNeighborhood |Extreme Cardinality
= max zExtreme Number }.
[zExtreme Number ]Extreme Class
1076
GExtreme Trace-Decomposition =
{NExtreme SuperHyperNeighborhood
∈ ∪zExtreme Number [zExtreme Number ]Extreme Class |
|NExtreme SuperHyperNeighborhood |Extreme Cardinality
= max zExtreme Number }.
[zExtreme Number ]Extreme Class
1077
GExtreme Trace-Decomposition =
{NExtreme SuperHyperNeighborhood
∈ ∪zExtreme Number [zExtreme Number ]Extreme Class |
|NExtreme SuperHyperSet |Extreme Cardinality
= max zExtreme Number }.
[zExtreme Number ]Extreme Class
GExtreme Trace-Decomposition =
{NExtreme SuperHyperNeighborhood
∈ ∪zExtreme Number [zExtreme Number ]Extreme Class =
∪zExtreme Number {NExtreme SuperHyperNeighborhood |
|NExtreme SuperHyperSet |Extreme Cardinality
= zExtreme Number |
|NExtreme SuperHyperNeighborhood |Extreme Cardinality
= max |E| | E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.
1080
GExtreme Trace-Decomposition =
{NExtreme SuperHyperNeighborhood
∈ ∪zExtreme Number [zExtreme Number ]Extreme Class |
|NExtreme SuperHyperNeighborhood |Extreme Cardinality
= max zExtreme Number
[zExtreme Number ]Extreme Class
= max |E| | E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
1081
GExtreme Trace-Decomposition =
{NExtreme SuperHyperNeighborhood
∈ ∪zExtreme Number [zExtreme Number ]Extreme Class |
|NExtreme SuperHyperSet |Extreme Cardinality
= max |E| | E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.
Thus, in a connected Extreme SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). The all interior 1082
any of them, and any of other corresponded Extreme SuperHyperVertex, some interior 1084
Extreme exception at all minus all Extreme SuperHypeNeighbors to any amount of 1086
them. 1087
To make sense with the precise words in the terms of “R-’, the follow-up illustrations 1088
There’s not only one Extreme SuperHyperVertex inside the intended Extreme
SuperHyperSet. Thus the non-obvious Extreme Trace-Decomposition is up. The
obvious simple Extreme type-SuperHyperSet called the Extreme Trace-Decomposition is
an Extreme SuperHyperSet includes only one Extreme SuperHyperVertex. But the
Extreme SuperHyperSet of Extreme SuperHyperVertices,
doesn’t have less than two SuperHyperVertices inside the intended Extreme
SuperHyperSet since they’ve come from at least so far an SuperHyperEdge. Thus the
non-obvious simple Extreme type-SuperHyperSet of the Extreme
R-Trace-Decomposition is up. To sum them up, the Extreme SuperHyperSet of
Extreme SuperHyperVertices,
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
instead of all given by that Extreme type-SuperHyperSet called the Extreme 1095
does includes only less than two SuperHyperVertices in a connected Extreme 1097
SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E) but it’s impossible in the case, they’ve corresponded 1098
to an SuperHyperEdge. It’s interesting to mention that the only non-obvious simple 1099
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Extreme SuperHyperNeighbors with no Extreme exception at all minus all Extreme 1109
Assume a connected Extreme SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). Let an Extreme 1111
Consider all Extreme numbers of those Extreme SuperHyperVertices from that Extreme 1113
least cardinality, the lower sharp Extreme bound for Extreme cardinality. Assume a 1117
connected Extreme SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). The Extreme SuperHyperSet of 1118
R-Trace-Decomposition. Since it doesn’t do the Extreme procedure such that such 1128
uniquely [there are at least one Extreme SuperHyperVertex outside implying there’s, 1130
sometimes in the connected Extreme SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E), an Extreme 1131
procedure”.]. There’s only one Extreme SuperHyperVertex outside the intended 1134
all Extreme SuperHyperVertices does forms any kind of Extreme pairs are titled 1139
ESHG : (V, E). Since the Extreme SuperHyperSet of the Extreme SuperHyperVertices 1141
R-Trace-Decomposition only contains all interior Extreme SuperHyperVertices and all 1146
exterior Extreme SuperHyperVertices from the unique Extreme SuperHyperEdge where 1147
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
there’s any of them has all possible Extreme SuperHyperNeighbors in and there’s all 1148
SuperHypeNeighbors to some of them not all of them but everything is possible about 1150
SuperHyperEdge for all Extreme SuperHyperVertices. There are not only two Extreme 1164
SuperHyperSet includes only two Extreme SuperHyperVertices. But the Extreme 1168
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Extreme Trace-Decomposition is up. To sum them up, the Extreme SuperHyperSet of 1172
SuperHyperEdges[SuperHyperVertices], 1176
SuperHyperEdge for all Extreme SuperHyperVertices. There aren’t only less than three 1185
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Does includes only less than three SuperHyperVertices in a connected Extreme 1191
SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). It’s interesting to mention that the only non-obvious 1192
The previous Extreme approach apply on the upcoming Extreme results on Extreme 1201
SuperHyperClasses. 1202
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Proposition 5.1. Assume a connected Extreme SuperHyperPath ESHP : (V, E). Then 1203
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
V |EN SHG |
, E |EN SHG |
3 3
1205
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , V2EXT ERN AL ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
E |EN SHG | , V |EN SHG |
3 3
be a longest path taken from a connected Extreme SuperHyperPath ESHP : (V, E). 1206
Example 5.2. In the Figure (23), the connected Extreme SuperHyperPath 1211
ESHP : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The Extreme SuperHyperSet, in the 1212
Proposition 5.3. Assume a connected Extreme SuperHyperCycle ESHC : (V, E). 1214
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Then 1215
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
V |EN SHG |
, E |EN SHG |
3 3
1217
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , V2EXT ERN AL ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
E |EN SHG | , V |EN SHG |
3 3
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
be a longest path taken from a connected Extreme SuperHyperCycle ESHC : (V, E). 1218
Example 5.4. In the Figure (24), the connected Extreme SuperHyperCycle 1223
N SHC : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Extreme SuperHyperSet, in 1224
Proposition 5.5. Assume a connected Extreme SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). Then 1226
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
CEN T ER, E2
1228
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , CEN T ER
be a longest path taken a connected Extreme SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). There’s 1229
Example 5.6. In the Figure (25), the connected Extreme SuperHyperStar 1234
ESHS : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Extreme SuperHyperSet, by 1235
the Algorithm in previous Extreme result, of the Extreme SuperHyperVertices of the 1236
connected Extreme SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E), in the Extreme SuperHyperModel 1237
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Proposition 5.7. Assume a connected Extreme SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E). 1239
Then 1240
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
V|Pi |=minP ∈E |Pj | , E|Pi |=minPj ∈EN SHG |Pj | .
j N SHG
1242
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , V2EXT ERN AL ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
E|Pi |=minPj ∈EN SHG |Pj | , V|Pi |=minP ∈E |Pj |
j N SHG
is a longest path taken from a connected Extreme SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E). 1243
are only two SuperHyperParts. Thus every SuperHyperPart could have one 1250
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E). Thus only some SuperHyperVertices and only 1253
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
Example 5.8. In the Extreme Figure (26), the connected Extreme 1256
SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), is Extreme highlighted and Extreme featured. 1257
The obtained Extreme SuperHyperSet, by the Extreme Algorithm in previous Extreme 1258
SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), in the Extreme SuperHyperModel (26), is the 1260
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
V|P i |=minP ∈E |Pj | , E|Pi |=minPj ∈EN SHG |Pj | .
j N SHG
1265
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , V2EXT ERN AL ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
E|Pi |=minPj ∈EN SHG |Pj | , V|Pi |=minP ∈E |Pj |
j N SHG
are only z 0 SuperHyperParts. Thus every SuperHyperPart could have one 1273
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
ESHM : (V, E). Thus only some SuperHyperVertices and only 1276
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
Example 5.10. In the Figure (27), the connected Extreme SuperHyperMultipartite 1280
ESHM : (V, E), is highlighted and Extreme featured. The obtained Extreme 1281
ESHM : (V, E), in the Extreme SuperHyperModel (27), is the Extreme 1284
SuperHyperTrace-Decomposition. 1285
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Proposition 5.11. Assume a connected Extreme SuperHyperWheel ESHW : (V, E). 1286
Then, 1287
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1∗ ,
CEN T ER, E2∗
1289
P :
E1∗ , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2∗ , CEN T ER
is a longest SuperHyperTrace-Decomposition taken from a connected Extreme 1290
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
straightforward. 1299
Example 5.12. In the Extreme Figure (28), the connected Extreme SuperHyperWheel 1300
N SHW : (V, E), is Extreme highlighted and featured. The obtained Extreme 1301
and the Extreme SuperHyperTrace-Decomposition, some general results are introduced. 1308
plus one Extreme SuperHypeNeighbor to one. Where σi is the unary operation on the 1312
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Corollary 6.3. Assume an Extreme SuperHyperGraph on the same identical letter of 1315
Corollary 6.4. Assume an Extreme SuperHyperGraph on the same identical letter of 1318
Corollary 6.5. Assume an Extreme SuperHyperGraph on the same identical letter of 1321
SuperHyperTrace-Decomposition. 1324
same identical letter of the alphabet. Then its Extreme SuperHyperTrace-Decomposition 1326
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
is a maximal 1379
Where the exterior SuperHyperVertices and the interior SuperHyperVertices coincide. 1386
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Where the exterior SuperHyperVertices and the interior SuperHyperVertices coincide. 1395
is one and it’s only V. Where the exterior SuperHyperVertices and the interior 1405
is one and it’s only V. Where the exterior SuperHyperVertices and the interior 1415
SuperHyperSet contains [the SuperHyperCenter and] the half of multiplying r with the 1420
number of all the SuperHyperEdges plus one of all the SuperHyperVertices is a 1421
O(ESHG)
(iv) : 2 + 1-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperTrace-Decomposition; 1425
O(ESHG)
(v) : strong 2 + 1-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperTrace-Decomposition; 1426
SuperHyperTrace-Decomposition. 1428
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
SuperHyperSet contains the half of multiplying r with the number of all the 1432
SuperHyperEdges plus one of all the SuperHyperVertices in the biggest SuperHyperPart 1433
is a 1434
number of 1444
O(ESHG)
(iv) : 2 + 1-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperTrace-Decomposition; 1448
O(ESHG)
(v) : strong 2 + 1-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperTrace-Decomposition; 1449
SuperHyperTrace-Decomposition. 1451
is one and it’s only S, a SuperHyperSet contains [the SuperHyperCenter and] the half of 1452
multiplying r with the number of all the SuperHyperEdges plus one of all the 1453
Proposition 6.24. Let ESHG : (V, E) be an Extreme SuperHyperGraph. The number 1456
Proposition 6.25. Let ESHG : (V, E) be an Extreme SuperHyperGraph. Then the 1464
number is at most O(ESHG) and the Extreme number is at most On (ESHG). 1465
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
min Σv∈{v1 ,v2 ,··· ,vt } O(ESHG:(V,E)) ⊆V σ(v), in the setting of dual 1468
t>
2
(iv) : ( O(ESHG:(V,E))
2 + 1)-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperTrace-Decomposition; 1472
SuperHyperTrace-Decomposition. 1475
The number is 0 and the Extreme number is 0, for an independent SuperHyperSet in the 1477
O(ESHG : (V, E)) and the Extreme number is On (ESHG : (V, E)), in the setting of a 1489
dual 1490
SuperHyperTrace-Decomposition. 1497
number is O(ESHG:(V,E))
2 + 1 and the Extreme number is 1500
min Σv∈{v1 ,v2 ,··· ,vt } O(ESHG:(V,E)) ⊆V σ(v), in the setting of a dual 1501
t>
2
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
(iv) : ( O(ESHG:(V,E))
2 + 1)-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperTrace-Decomposition; 1505
SuperHyperTrace-Decomposition. 1508
Proposition 6.31. Let N SHF : (V, E) be a SuperHyperFamily of the ESHGs : (V, E) 1509
Extreme SuperHyperGraphs which are from one-type SuperHyperClass which the result is 1510
obtained for the individuals. Then the results also hold for the SuperHyperFamily 1511
(ii) vx ∈ E. 1517
Proposition 6.34. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a strong Extreme SuperHyperGraph. Then 1522
(i) Γ ≤ O; 1523
(ii) Γs ≤ On . 1524
Proposition 6.35. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a strong Extreme SuperHyperGraph which is 1525
(i) Γ ≤ O − 1; 1527
SuperHyperTrace-Decomposition; 1531
(iii) Γs = min{Σs∈S={v2 ,v4 ,··· ,vn−1 } Σ3i=1 σi (s), Σs∈S={v1 ,v3 ,··· ,vn−1 } Σ3i=1 σi (s)}; 1533
(iv) the SuperHyperSets S1 = {v2 , v4 , · · · , vn−1 } and S2 = {v1 , v3 , · · · , vn−1 } are only 1534
SuperHyperTrace-Decomposition; 1538
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
(iii) Γs = min{Σs∈S={v2 ,v4 ,··· ,vn } Σ3i=1 σi (s), Σs∈S={v1 ,v3 ,··· .vn−1 } Σ3i=1 σi (s)}; 1541
(iv) the SuperHyperSets S1 = {v2 , v4 , · · · .vn } and S2 = {v1 , v3 , · · · .vn−1 } are only 1542
Then 1545
SuperHyperTrace-Decomposition; 1547
(iii) Γs = min{Σs∈S={v2 ,v4 ,··· ,vn } σ(s), Σs∈S={v1 ,v3 ,··· ,vn−1 } σ(s)}; 1550
(iv) the SuperHyperSets S1 = {v2 , v4 , · · · , vn } and S2 = {v1 , v3 , · · · , vn−1 } are only 1551
Then 1554
SuperHyperTrace-Decomposition; 1556
(iii) Γs = min{Σs∈S={v2 ,v4 ,··· .vn−1 } Σ3i=1 σi (s), Σs∈S={v1 ,v3 ,··· .vn−1 } Σ3i=1 σi (s)}; 1558
(iv) the SuperHyperSets S1 = {v2 , v4 , · · · .vn−1 } and S2 = {v1 , v3 , · · · .vn−1 } are only 1559
(ii) Γ = 1; 1563
SuperHyperTrace-Decomposition. 1566
6+3(i−1)≤n
(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {v1 , v3 } ∪ {v6 , v9 · · · , vi+6 , · · · , vn }i=1 is a dual 1568
6+3(i−1)≤n
(ii) Γ = |{v1 , v3 } ∪ {v6 , v9 · · · , vi+6 , · · · , vn }i=1 |; 1570
(iii) Γs = Σ{v1 ,v3 }∪{v6 ,v9 ··· ,vi+6 ,··· ,vn }6+3(i−1)≤n Σ3i=1 σi (s); 1571
i=1
6+3(i−1)≤n
(iv) the SuperHyperSet {v1 , v3 } ∪ {v6 , v9 · · · , vi+6 , · · · , vn }i=1 is only a dual 1572
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
b n c+1
(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {vi }i=1
2
is a dual SuperHyperDefensive 1575
SuperHyperTrace-Decomposition; 1576
(ii) Γ = b n2 c + 1; 1577
b n c+1
(iv) the SuperHyperSet S = {vi }i=1
2
is only a dual SuperHyperDefensive 1579
SuperHyperTrace-Decomposition. 1580
bnc
(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {vi }i=1
2
is a dual SuperHyperDefensive 1582
SuperHyperTrace-Decomposition; 1583
(ii) Γ = b n2 c; 1584
bnc
(iv) the SuperHyperSet S = {vi }i=1
2
is only a dual maximal SuperHyperDefensive 1586
SuperHyperTrace-Decomposition. 1587
(iii) Γs = Σm 3
i=1 Σj=1 σj (ci ) for N SHF : (V, E); 1593
bn
2 c+1
(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {vi }i=1 is a dual maximal SuperHyperDefensive 1599
b n c+1
(iv) the SuperHyperSets S = {vi }i=1
2
are only a dual maximal 1603
bnc
(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {vi }i=1
2
is a dual SuperHyperDefensive 1608
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
bnc
(iv) the SuperHyperSets S = {vi }i=1
2
are only dual maximal 1612
Proposition 6.47. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a strong Extreme SuperHyperGraph. Then 1614
Proposition 6.48. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a strong Extreme SuperHyperGraph. Then 1622
hold; 1632
SuperHyperTrace-Decomposition; 1638
hold; 1643
SuperHyperTrace-Decomposition; 1645
SuperHyperTrace-Decomposition; 1649
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
SuperHyperTrace-Decomposition; 1656
SuperHyperTrace-Decomposition; 1660
b O−1
(i) if ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| < 2 c
+ 1, then ESHG : (V, E) is an 1666
SuperHyperTrace-Decomposition; 1678
SuperHyperTrace-Decomposition; 1680
SuperHyperTrace-Decomposition; 1682
SuperHyperTrace-Decomposition; 1689
SuperHyperTrace-Decomposition; 1693
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Recognition 1697
The cancer is the Extreme disease but the Extreme model is going to figure out what’s 1698
going on this Extreme phenomenon. The special Extreme case of this Extreme disease 1699
is considered and as the consequences of the model, some parameters are used. The cells 1700
are under attack of this disease but the moves of the cancer in the special region are the 1701
matter of mind. The Extreme recognition of the cancer could help to find some 1702
In the following, some Extreme steps are Extreme devised on this disease. 1704
Step 1. (Extreme Definition) The Extreme recognition of the cancer in the 1705
Step 2. (Extreme Issue) The specific region has been assigned by the Extreme 1707
model [it’s called Extreme SuperHyperGraph] and the long Extreme cycle of the 1708
move from the cancer is identified by this research. Sometimes the move of the 1709
cancer hasn’t be easily identified since there are some determinacy, indeterminacy 1710
and neutrality about the moves and the effects of the cancer on that region; this 1711
event leads us to choose another model [it’s said to be Extreme SuperHyperGraph] 1712
Step 3. (Extreme Model) There are some specific Extreme models, which are 1714
well-known and they’ve got the names, and some general Extreme models. The 1715
moves and the Extreme traces of the cancer on the complex tracks and between 1716
SuperHyperModel 1724
Step 4. (Extreme Solution) In the Extreme Figure (29), the Extreme 1725
By using the Extreme Figure (29) and the Table (4), the Extreme 1727
SuperHyperModel 1735
Step 4. (Extreme Solution) In the Extreme Figure (30), the Extreme 1736
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
By using the Extreme Figure (30) and the Table (5), the Extreme 1738
In what follows, some “problems” and some “questions” are proposed. 1746
Question 10.1. Which the else SuperHyperModels could be defined based on Cancer’s 1750
recognitions? 1751
Question 10.3. Are there some Algorithms to be defined on the SuperHyperModels to 1754
Question 10.4. Which the SuperHyperNotions are related to beyond the 1756
Problem 10.6. Which the fundamental SuperHyperNumbers are related to these 1761
Problem 10.7. What’s the independent research based on Cancer’s recognitions 1763
In this section, concluding remarks and closing remarks are represented. The drawbacks 1766
of this research are illustrated. Some benefits and some advantages of this research are 1767
highlighted. 1768
This research uses some approaches to make Extreme SuperHyperGraphs more 1769
SuperHyperTrace-Decomposition. For that sake in the second definition, the main 1771
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
alphabets. Based on the new definition for the Extreme SuperHyperGraph, the new 1773
background to implement some results based on that. Some SuperHyperClasses and 1775
some Extreme SuperHyperClasses are the cases of this research on the modeling of the 1776
regions where are under the attacks of the cancer to recognize this disease as it’s 1777
mentioned on the title “Cancer’s Recognitions”. To formalize the instances on the 1778
SuperHyperClasses, are introduced. Some general results are gathered in the section on 1780
The clarifications, instances and literature reviews have taken the whole way through. 1782
In this research, the literature reviews have fulfilled the lines containing the notions and 1783
the results. The SuperHyperGraph and Extreme SuperHyperGraph are the 1784
SuperHyperModels on the “Cancer’s Recognitions” and both bases are the background 1785
of this research. Sometimes the cancer has been happened on the region, full of cells, 1786
groups of cells and embedded styles. In this segment, the SuperHyperModel proposes 1787
some SuperHyperNotions based on the connectivities of the moves of the cancer in the 1788
longest and strongest styles with the formation of the design and the architecture are 1789
buzzwords. The prefix “SuperHyper” refers to the theme of the embedded styles to 1791
figure out the background for the SuperHyperNotions. In the Table (6), benefits and
2. SuperHyperTrace-Decomposition
5. SuperHyperClasses 3. SuperHyperFamilies
1792
avenues for this research are, figured out, pointed out and spoken out. 1793
Forms 1796
V 0 or E 0 is called 1800
that Va ∈ Ei , Ej ; 1802
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
that Vi , Vj ∈ Ea ; 1807
rv-SuperHyperDuality. 1813
SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 1823
Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form 1839
the Extreme SuperHyperDuality; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its 1840
Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form 1849
the Extreme SuperHyperDuality; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its 1850
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 1858
Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form 1874
the Extreme SuperHyperDuality; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its 1875
Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form 1884
the Extreme SuperHyperDuality; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its 1885
E1 and E3 are some empty Extreme SuperHyperEdges but E2 is a loop Extreme 1891
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
The previous Extreme approach apply on the upcoming Extreme results on Extreme 1945
SuperHyperClasses. 1946
Proposition 12.4. Assume a connected Extreme SuperHyperPath ESHP : (V, E). 1947
Then 1948
= {Ei }i=1 3
.
C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality
= 3z 3 .
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperDuality
|EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
E |EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality , V EXT ERN AL |EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality .
3 3
be a longest path taken from a connected Extreme SuperHyperPath ESHP : (V, E). 1950
straightforward. 1954
Example 12.5. In the Figure (23), the connected Extreme SuperHyperPath 1955
ESHP : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The Extreme SuperHyperSet, in the 1956
Proposition 12.6. Assume a connected Extreme SuperHyperCycle ESHC : (V, E). 1958
Then 1959
= {Ei }i=1 3
.
C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality
= 3z 3 .
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperDuality
|EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
E |EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality , V EXT ERN AL |EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality .
3 3
be a longest path taken from a connected Extreme SuperHyperCycle ESHC : (V, E). 1961
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
straightforward. 1965
Example 12.7. In the Figure (24), the connected Extreme SuperHyperCycle 1966
N SHC : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Extreme SuperHyperSet, in 1967
Proposition 12.8. Assume a connected Extreme SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). 1969
Then 1970
straightforward. 1976
Example 12.9. In the Figure (25), the connected Extreme SuperHyperStar 1977
ESHS : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Extreme SuperHyperSet, by 1978
the Algorithm in previous Extreme result, of the Extreme SuperHyperVertices of the 1979
connected Extreme SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E), in the Extreme SuperHyperModel 1980
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmin i |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1
is a longest path taken from a connected Extreme SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E). 1985
straightforward. Then there’s at least one SuperHyperDuality. Thus the notion of quasi 1989
There are only two SuperHyperParts. Thus every SuperHyperPart could have one 1991
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmin i |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1
ESHB : (V, E). Thus only some SuperHyperVertices and only 1994
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmin i |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1
Example 12.11. In the Extreme Figure (26), the connected Extreme 1997
SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), is Extreme highlighted and Extreme featured. 1998
The obtained Extreme SuperHyperSet, by the Extreme Algorithm in previous Extreme 1999
SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), in the Extreme SuperHyperModel (26), is the 2001
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmin i |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1
straightforward. Then there’s at least one SuperHyperDuality. Thus the notion of quasi 2010
There are only z 0 SuperHyperParts. Thus every SuperHyperPart could have one 2012
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmin i |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1
ESHM : (V, E). Thus only some SuperHyperVertices and only 2015
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmin i |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1
Example 12.13. In the Figure (27), the connected Extreme SuperHyperMultipartite 2019
ESHM : (V, E), is highlighted and Extreme featured. The obtained Extreme 2020
Proposition 12.14. Assume a connected Extreme SuperHyperWheel ESHW : (V, E). 2024
Then, 2025
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1∗ ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2∗ ,
...,
∗ EXT ERN AL
E|E ∗ | , V|E ∗ |Extreme Cardinality +1
ESHG:(V,E) Extreme Cardinality ESHG:(V,E)
straightforward. Then there’s at least one SuperHyperDuality. Thus the notion of quasi 2031
Example 12.15. In the Extreme Figure (28), the connected Extreme 2035
SuperHyperWheel N SHW : (V, E), is Extreme highlighted and featured. The obtained 2036
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Forms 2042
V 0 or E 0 is called 2046
0 0
(i) Extreme e-SuperHyperJoin if ∀Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ E , ∃Ej ∈ E , such that 2047
Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Extreme SuperHyperJoin; 2068
Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form 2083
the Extreme SuperHyperJoin; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its 2084
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form 2093
the Extreme SuperHyperJoin; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its 2094
Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Extreme SuperHyperJoin; 2102
Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form 2117
the Extreme SuperHyperJoin; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its 2118
Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form 2127
the Extreme SuperHyperJoin; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its 2128
and E3 are some empty Extreme SuperHyperEdges but E2 is a loop Extreme 2134
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
The previous Extreme approach apply on the upcoming Extreme results on Extreme 2188
SuperHyperClasses. 2189
Proposition 13.4. Assume a connected Extreme SuperHyperPath ESHP : (V, E). 2190
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Then 2191
= {Ei }i=1 3
.
C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality
= 3z 3 .
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperJoin
|EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
E |EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality , V EXT ERN AL |EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality .
3 3
be a longest path taken from a connected Extreme SuperHyperPath ESHP : (V, E). 2193
straightforward. 2197
Example 13.5. In the Figure (23), the connected Extreme SuperHyperPath 2198
ESHP : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The Extreme SuperHyperSet, in the 2199
Proposition 13.6. Assume a connected Extreme SuperHyperCycle ESHC : (V, E). 2201
Then 2202
= {Ei }i=1 3
.
C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality
= 3z 3 .
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperJoin
|EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
E |EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality , V EXT ERN AL |EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality .
3 3
be a longest path taken from a connected Extreme SuperHyperCycle ESHC : (V, E). 2204
straightforward. 2208
Example 13.7. In the Figure (24), the connected Extreme SuperHyperCycle 2209
N SHC : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Extreme SuperHyperSet, in 2210
Proposition 13.8. Assume a connected Extreme SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). 2212
Then 2213
be a longest path taken a connected Extreme SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). There’s 2215
straightforward. 2219
Example 13.9. In the Figure (25), the connected Extreme SuperHyperStar 2220
ESHS : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Extreme SuperHyperSet, by 2221
the Algorithm in previous Extreme result, of the Extreme SuperHyperVertices of the 2222
connected Extreme SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E), in the Extreme SuperHyperModel 2223
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmin i |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1
is a longest path taken from a connected Extreme SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E). 2228
straightforward. Then there’s no at least one SuperHyperJoin. Thus the notion of quasi 2232
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
There are only two SuperHyperParts. Thus every SuperHyperPart could have one 2234
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmin i |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1
ESHB : (V, E). Thus only some SuperHyperVertices and only 2237
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmin i |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1
Example 13.11. In the Extreme Figure (26), the connected Extreme 2240
SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), is Extreme highlighted and Extreme featured. 2241
The obtained Extreme SuperHyperSet, by the Extreme Algorithm in previous Extreme 2242
SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), in the Extreme SuperHyperModel (26), is the 2244
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmin i |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1
straightforward. Then there’s no at least one SuperHyperJoin. Thus the notion of quasi 2253
There are only z 0 SuperHyperParts. Thus every SuperHyperPart could have one 2255
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmin i |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1
ESHM : (V, E). Thus only some SuperHyperVertices and only 2258
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmin i |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1
Example 13.13. In the Figure (27), the connected Extreme SuperHyperMultipartite 2262
ESHM : (V, E), is highlighted and Extreme featured. The obtained Extreme 2263
Proposition 13.14. Assume a connected Extreme SuperHyperWheel ESHW : (V, E). 2267
Then, 2268
= {Ei }i=1 3
.
C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality
= 3z 3 .
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperJoin
|EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
E |EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality , V EXT ERN AL |EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality .
3 3
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
straightforward. Then there’s at least one SuperHyperJoin. Thus the notion of quasi 2274
isn’t up and the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperJoin could be applied. The 2275
unique embedded SuperHyperJoin proposes some longest SuperHyperJoin excerpt from 2276
Example 13.15. In the Extreme Figure (28), the connected Extreme 2278
SuperHyperWheel N SHW : (V, E), is Extreme highlighted and featured. The obtained 2279
Forms 2285
V 0 or E 0 is called 2289
that Va ∈ Ei , Ej ; 2291
that Vi , Vj ∈ Ea ; 2296
rv-SuperHyperPerfect. 2302
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
SuperHyperPerfect; 2313
Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form 2328
the Extreme SuperHyperPerfect; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its 2329
Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form 2338
the Extreme SuperHyperPerfect; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its 2339
SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 2347
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form 2363
the Extreme SuperHyperPerfect; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its 2364
Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form 2373
the Extreme SuperHyperPerfect; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its 2374
E1 and E3 are some empty Extreme SuperHyperEdges but E2 is a loop Extreme 2380
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
The previous Extreme approach apply on the upcoming Extreme results on Extreme 2434
SuperHyperClasses. 2435
Proposition 14.4. Assume a connected Extreme SuperHyperPath ESHP : (V, E). 2436
Then 2437
= {Ei }i=1 3
.
C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality
= 3z 3 .
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperPerfect
|EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
E |EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality , V EXT ERN AL |EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality .
3 3
be a longest path taken from a connected Extreme SuperHyperPath ESHP : (V, E). 2439
straightforward. 2443
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Example 14.5. In the Figure (23), the connected Extreme SuperHyperPath 2444
ESHP : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The Extreme SuperHyperSet, in the 2445
Proposition 14.6. Assume a connected Extreme SuperHyperCycle ESHC : (V, E). 2447
Then 2448
= {Ei }i=1 3
.
C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality
= 3z 3 .
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperPerfect
|EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
E |EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality , V EXT ERN AL |EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality .
3 3
be a longest path taken from a connected Extreme SuperHyperCycle ESHC : (V, E). 2450
straightforward. 2454
Example 14.7. In the Figure (24), the connected Extreme SuperHyperCycle 2455
N SHC : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Extreme SuperHyperSet, in 2456
Proposition 14.8. Assume a connected Extreme SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). 2458
Then 2459
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
be a longest path taken a connected Extreme SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). There’s 2461
straightforward. 2465
Example 14.9. In the Figure (25), the connected Extreme SuperHyperStar 2466
ESHS : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Extreme SuperHyperSet, by 2467
the Algorithm in previous Extreme result, of the Extreme SuperHyperVertices of the 2468
connected Extreme SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E), in the Extreme SuperHyperModel 2469
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmin i |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1
is a longest path taken from a connected Extreme SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E). 2474
straightforward. Then there’s no at least one SuperHyperPerfect. Thus the notion of 2478
applied. There are only two SuperHyperParts. Thus every SuperHyperPart could have 2480
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmin i |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1
ESHB : (V, E). Thus only some SuperHyperVertices and only 2483
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmin i |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1
Example 14.11. In the Extreme Figure (26), the connected Extreme 2486
SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), is Extreme highlighted and Extreme featured. 2487
The obtained Extreme SuperHyperSet, by the Extreme Algorithm in previous Extreme 2488
SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), in the Extreme SuperHyperModel (26), is the 2490
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmin i |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1
straightforward. Then there’s no at least one SuperHyperPerfect. Thus the notion of 2499
applied. There are only z 0 SuperHyperParts. Thus every SuperHyperPart could have 2501
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmin i |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1
ESHM : (V, E). Thus only some SuperHyperVertices and only 2504
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmin i |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1
Example 14.13. In the Figure (27), the connected Extreme SuperHyperMultipartite 2508
ESHM : (V, E), is highlighted and Extreme featured. The obtained Extreme 2509
Proposition 14.14. Assume a connected Extreme SuperHyperWheel ESHW : (V, E). 2513
Then, 2514
straightforward. Then there’s at least one SuperHyperPerfect. Thus the notion of quasi 2520
isn’t up and the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperPerfect could be applied. The 2521
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Example 14.15. In the Extreme Figure (28), the connected Extreme 2524
SuperHyperWheel N SHW : (V, E), is Extreme highlighted and featured. The obtained 2525
Forms 2531
V 0 or E 0 is called 2535
Va ∈ Ei , Ej ; 2537
Va ∈ Ei , Ej ; and 2539
Vi , Vj ∈ Ea ; 2542
Vi , Vj ∈ Ea ; and 2544
rv-SuperHyperTotal. 2548
Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Extreme SuperHyperTotal; 2558
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form 2573
the Extreme SuperHyperTotal; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its 2574
Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form 2583
the Extreme SuperHyperTotal; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its 2584
Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Extreme SuperHyperTotal; 2592
Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form 2607
the Extreme SuperHyperTotal; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its 2608
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form 2617
the Extreme SuperHyperTotal; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its 2618
E1 and E3 are some empty Extreme SuperHyperEdges but E2 is a loop Extreme 2624
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
The previous Extreme approach apply on the upcoming Extreme results on Extreme 2678
SuperHyperClasses. 2679
Proposition 15.4. Assume a connected Extreme SuperHyperPath ESHP : (V, E). 2680
Then 2681
P :
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
V3EXT ERN AL , E3 ,
...
be a longest path taken from a connected Extreme SuperHyperPath ESHP : (V, E). 2683
straightforward. 2687
Example 15.5. In the Figure (23), the connected Extreme SuperHyperPath 2688
ESHP : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The Extreme SuperHyperSet, in the 2689
Proposition 15.6. Assume a connected Extreme SuperHyperCycle ESHC : (V, E). 2691
Then 2692
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
P :
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
V3EXT ERN AL , E3 ,
...,
E |E|EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality −1 .
, V EXT ERN AL |EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality −1
be a longest path taken from a connected Extreme SuperHyperCycle ESHC : (V, E). 2694
straightforward. 2698
Example 15.7. In the Figure (24), the connected Extreme SuperHyperCycle 2699
N SHC : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Extreme SuperHyperSet, in 2700
Proposition 15.8. Assume a connected Extreme SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). 2702
Then 2703
straightforward. 2709
Example 15.9. In the Figure (25), the connected Extreme SuperHyperStar 2710
ESHS : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Extreme SuperHyperSet, by 2711
the Algorithm in previous Extreme result, of the Extreme SuperHyperVertices of the 2712
connected Extreme SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E), in the Extreme SuperHyperModel 2713
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
is a longest path taken from a connected Extreme SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E). 2718
straightforward. Then there’s no at least one SuperHyperTotal. Thus the notion of 2722
applied. There are only two SuperHyperParts. Thus every SuperHyperPart could have 2724
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
is a longest SuperHyperTotal taken from a connected Extreme SuperHyperBipartite 2726
ESHB : (V, E). Thus only some SuperHyperVertices and only 2727
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
The latter is straightforward. 2729
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Example 15.11. In the Extreme Figure (26), the connected Extreme 2730
SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), is Extreme highlighted and Extreme featured. 2731
The obtained Extreme SuperHyperSet, by the Extreme Algorithm in previous Extreme 2732
SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), in the Extreme SuperHyperModel (26), is the 2734
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
straightforward. Then there’s no at least one SuperHyperTotal. Thus the notion of 2743
applied. There are only z 0 SuperHyperParts. Thus every SuperHyperPart could have 2745
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
ESHM : (V, E). Thus only some SuperHyperVertices and only 2748
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
Example 15.13. In the Figure (27), the connected Extreme SuperHyperMultipartite 2752
ESHM : (V, E), is highlighted and Extreme featured. The obtained Extreme 2753
Proposition 15.14. Assume a connected Extreme SuperHyperWheel ESHW : (V, E). 2757
Then, 2758
∗
C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperTotal = {Ei , Ej ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.
C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial
∗
= |i(i − 1) | Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E)|Extreme Cardinality
|z 2 .
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal = {CEN T ER, Vj ∈ VESHG:(V,E) }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial =
(|VESHG:(V,E)|Extreme Cardinality |) choose (|VESHG:(V,E)|Extreme Cardinality | − 1)
z2.
straightforward. Then there’s at least one SuperHyperTotal. Thus the notion of quasi 2764
isn’t up and the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperTotal could be applied. The 2765
Example 15.15. In the Extreme Figure (28), the connected Extreme 2768
SuperHyperWheel N SHW : (V, E), is Extreme highlighted and featured. The obtained 2769
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Forms 2775
V 0 or E 0 is called 2779
SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 2802
SuperHyperConnected; 2811
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form 2819
the Extreme SuperHyperConnected; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its 2820
Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form 2829
the Extreme SuperHyperConnected; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its 2830
Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form 2838
SuperHyperConnected; 2847
C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Extreme 2851
Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form 2855
the Extreme SuperHyperConnected; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its 2856
Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form 2865
the Extreme SuperHyperConnected; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its 2866
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
straightforward. 2889
straightforward. 2892
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
straightforward. 2895
straightforward. 2898
straightforward. 2901
straightforward. 2904
straightforward. 2907
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
straightforward. 2910
straightforward. 2913
straightforward. 2916
straightforward. 2919
straightforward. 2922
straightforward. 2925
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
straightforward. 2928
straightforward. 2931
straightforward. 2934
straightforward. 2937
straightforward. 2940
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
straightforward. 2943
straightforward. 2946
The previous Extreme approach apply on the upcoming Extreme results on Extreme 2947
SuperHyperClasses. 2948
Proposition 16.4. Assume a connected Extreme SuperHyperPath ESHP : (V, E). 2949
Then 2950
P :
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
V3EXT ERN AL , E3 ,
...,
E|EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality −1 , V EXT ERN AL |EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality −1 .
be a longest path taken from a connected Extreme SuperHyperPath ESHP : (V, E). 2952
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
straightforward. 2956
Example 16.5. In the Figure (23), the connected Extreme SuperHyperPath 2957
ESHP : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The Extreme SuperHyperSet, in the 2958
Proposition 16.6. Assume a connected Extreme SuperHyperCycle ESHC : (V, E). 2960
Then 2961
P :
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
V3EXT ERN AL , E3 ,
...,
E|EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality −1 , V EXT ERN AL |EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality −1 .
be a longest path taken from a connected Extreme SuperHyperCycle ESHC : (V, E). 2963
straightforward. 2967
Example 16.7. In the Figure (24), the connected Extreme SuperHyperCycle 2968
N SHC : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Extreme SuperHyperSet, in 2969
Proposition 16.8. Assume a connected Extreme SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). 2971
Then 2972
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
be a longest path taken a connected Extreme SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). There’s 2974
straightforward. 2978
Example 16.9. In the Figure (25), the connected Extreme SuperHyperStar 2979
ESHS : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Extreme SuperHyperSet, by 2980
the Algorithm in previous Extreme result, of the Extreme SuperHyperVertices of the 2981
connected Extreme SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E), in the Extreme SuperHyperModel 2982
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
is a longest path taken from a connected Extreme SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E). 2987
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
straightforward. Then there’s no at least one SuperHyperConnected. Thus the notion of 2991
applied. There are only two SuperHyperParts. Thus every SuperHyperPart could have 2993
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E). Thus only some SuperHyperVertices and only 2996
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
Example 16.11. In the Extreme Figure (26), the connected Extreme 2999
SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), is Extreme highlighted and Extreme featured. 3000
The obtained Extreme SuperHyperSet, by the Extreme Algorithm in previous Extreme 3001
SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), in the Extreme SuperHyperModel (26), is the 3003
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
straightforward. Then there’s no at least one SuperHyperConnected. Thus the notion of 3012
applied. There are only z 0 SuperHyperParts. Thus every SuperHyperPart could have 3014
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
is a longest path taken from a connected Extreme SuperHyperMultipartite 3016
ESHM : (V, E). Thus only some SuperHyperVertices and only 3017
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
is a longest path taken from a connected Extreme SuperHyperMultipartite 3019
Example 16.13. In the Figure (27), the connected Extreme SuperHyperMultipartite 3021
ESHM : (V, E), is highlighted and Extreme featured. The obtained Extreme 3022
Proposition 16.14. Assume a connected Extreme SuperHyperWheel ESHW : (V, E). 3026
Then, 3027
∗
C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperConnected = {Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.
C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial
= |i | Ei ∈ |E ∗ ESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality |z.
C(N SHG)Extreme V-SuperHyperConnected = {CEN T ER ∈ VESHG:(V,E) }.
C(N SHG)Extreme V-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
Proof. Let 3028
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
straightforward. Then there’s at least one SuperHyperConnected. Thus the notion of 3033
straightforward. 3037
Example 16.15. In the Extreme Figure (28), the connected Extreme 3038
SuperHyperWheel N SHW : (V, E), is Extreme highlighted and featured. The obtained 3039
17 Background 3043
There are some scientific researches covering the topic of this research. In what follows, 3044
there are some discussion and literature reviews about them. 3045
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “neutrosophic co-degree and 3046
neutrosophic degree alongside chromatic numbers in the setting of some classes related 3047
to neutrosophic hypergraphs” in Ref. [1] by Henry Garrett (2022). In this research 3048
entitled “Journal of Current Trends in Computer Science Research (JCTCSR)” with 3052
ISO abbreviation “J Curr Trends Comp Sci Res” in volume 1 and issue 1 with pages 3053
06-14. The research article studies deeply with choosing neutrosophic hypergraphs 3054
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “Super Hyper Dominating 3057
and Super Hyper Resolving on Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs and Their Directions 3058
in Game Theory and Neutrosophic Super Hyper Classes” in Ref. [2] by Henry Garrett 3059
Techniques Comput Math” in volume 1 and issue 3 with pages 242-263. The research 3065
article studies deeply with choosing directly neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph and 3066
SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough toward independent results based on initial 3067
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “Some Super Hyper Degrees 3069
and Co-Super Hyper Degrees on Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs And Super Hyper 3070
Graphs Alongside Applications in Cancer’s Treatments” in Ref. [3] by Henry Garrett 3071
and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on fundamental notions and using vital tools 3073
in Cancer’s Treatments. It’s published in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled 3074
ISO abbreviation “J Math Techniques Comput Math” in volume 2 and issue 1 with 3076
pages 35-47. The research article studies deeply with choosing directly neutrosophic 3077
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
In some articles are titled “0039 — Closing Numbers and Super-Closing Numbers as 3080
in Ref. [6] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Uncertainty On The Act And Effect Of Cancer 3086
Alongside The Foggy Positions Of Cells Toward Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique 3087
Henry Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic Version Of Separates Groups Of Cells In Cancer’s 3089
“The Shift Paradigm To Classify Separately The Cells and Affected Cells Toward The 3091
Totality Under Cancer’s Recognition By New Multiple Definitions On the Sets 3092
Garrett (2022), “Breaking the Continuity and Uniformity of Cancer In The Worst Case 3095
Ref. [11] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Extremism of the Attacked Body Under the 3100
Special ViewPoints” in Ref. [12] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Basic Notions on 3113
Game Theory and Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses” in Ref. [23] by Henry Garrett 3130
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
(2023), “The Focus on The Partitions Obtained By Parallel Moves In The Cancer’s 3133
Extreme Recognition With Different Types of Extreme SuperHyperMatching Set and 3134
(2023), “Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique Decides the Failures on the Cancer’s 3136
“Indeterminacy On The All Possible Connections of Cells In Front of Cancer’s Attacks In 3139
Regions and Sub-Regions in the Terms of Cancer’s Recognition and (Neutrosophic) 3145
the Form of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [128] by Henry Garrett (2023), 3149
Ref. [133] by Henry Garrett (2023), “Neutrosophic 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in the 3156
Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond” in Ref. [134] by Henry Garrett (2022), 3158
in Ref. [136] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Basic Neutrosophic Notions Concerning 3163
in Ref. [147] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Initial Material of Neutrosophic Preliminaries 3165
and [4–148], there are some endeavors to formalize the basic SuperHyperNotions about 3168
books at [91, 150–236]. Two popular scientific research books in Scribd in the terms of 3170
high readers, 4087 and 5084 respectively, on neutrosophic science is on [237, 238]. 3171
Some scientific studies and scientific researches about neutrosophic graphs, are 3172
proposed as book in Ref. [225] by Henry Garrett (2023) which is indexed by Google 3173
Scholar and has more than 4093 readers in Scribd. It’s titled “Beyond Neutrosophic 3174
Graphs” and published by Dr. Henry Garrett. This research book covers different types 3175
Also, some scientific studies and scientific researches about neutrosophic graphs, are 3178
proposed as book in Ref. [226] by Henry Garrett (2023) which is indexed by Google 3179
Scholar and has more than 5090 readers in Scribd. It’s titled “Neutrosophic Duality” 3180
and published by Dr. Henry Garrett. This research book presents different types of 3181
neutrosophic graph theory and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph theory. This research 3183
book has scrutiny on the complement of the intended set and the intended set, 3184
simultaneously. It’s smart to consider a set but acting on its complement that what’s 3185
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
done in this research book which is popular in the terms of high readers in Scribd. 3186
See the seminal scientific researches [1–3]. The formalization of the notions on the 3187
alongside scientific research books at [149–236]. Two popular scientific research books 3190
in Scribd in the terms of high readers, 4093 and 5090 respectively, on neutrosophic 3191
References 3193
Hypergraphs”, J Curr Trends Comp Sci Res 1(1) (2022) 06-14. 3196
2. Henry Garrett, “Super Hyper Dominating and Super Hyper Resolving on 3197
Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs and Their Directions in Game Theory and 3198
Neutrosophic Super Hyper Classes”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 1(3) 3199
3. Henry Garrett, “Some Super Hyper Degrees and Co-Super Hyper Degrees on 3201
Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs And Super Hyper Graphs Alongside 3202
super-hyper-degrees-and-cosuper-hyper-degrees-on-neutrosophic-super-hyper- 3205
graphs-and-super-hyper-graphs-alongside-a.pdf) 3206
Research - Zenodo, Nov. 2022. CERN European Organization for Nuclear 3210
https://oa.mg/work/10.5281/zenodo.6319942 3212
Graphs.” CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research - Zenodo, Feb. 3214
https://doi.org/10.13140/rg.2.2.35241.26724. 3216
https://oa.mg/work/10.13140/rg.2.2.35241.26724 3217
10.20944/preprints202301.0308.v1). 3221
7. Henry Garrett, “Uncertainty On The Act And Effect Of Cancer Alongside The 3222
9. Henry Garrett, “The Shift Paradigm To Classify Separately The Cells and 3229
Affected Cells Toward The Totality Under Cancer’s Recognition By New 3230
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
10.20944/preprints202301.0265.v1). 3234
10. Henry Garrett, “Breaking the Continuity and Uniformity of Cancer In The 3235
11. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable as the Survivors on the 3239
10.20944/preprints202301.0240.v1). 3242
12. Henry Garrett, “Extremism of the Attacked Body Under the Cancer’s 3243
10.20944/preprints202301.0224.v1). 3246
10.20944/preprints202301.0088.v1). 3253
10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 3263
10.20944/preprints202301.0088.v1). 3267
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
10.20944/preprints202212.0324.v1). 3282
10.20944/preprints202211.0576.v1). 3286
24. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3287
25. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3290
26. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Tract By Hyper Track Of Trace-Cut In 3293
27. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3296
28. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nebulous By Hyper Nebbish Of 3299
29. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3302
30. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Decompensation By Hyper Decompress Of 3305
31. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3308
32. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Eddy By Hyper Edify Of Edge-Cut In 3311
33. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3314
34. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nebulous By Hyper Nebbish Of 3317
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
35. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3320
36. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Decompensation By Hyper Decompress Of 3323
37. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3326
38. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Vertigo By Hyper Vertu Of Vertex-Cut In 3329
39. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3332
40. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nebulizer By Hyper Nub Of 3335
41. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3338
42. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Stale By Hyper Stalk Of 3341
43. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3344
44. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Stale By Hyper Stalk Of Stable-Cut In 3347
45. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3350
46. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nebulizer By Hyper Nub Of 3353
47. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3356
48. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Decompensation By Hyper Decompress Of 3359
49. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3362
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
50. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Cliff By Hyper Cling Of Clique-Cut In 3365
51. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3368
52. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3371
53. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Lith By Hyper Lite Of List-Coloring In 3374
54. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3377
55. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Solidarity By Hyper Soul Of Space In 3380
56. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3383
57. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Uniform By Hyper Deformation Of 3386
58. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3389
59. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super System By Hyper Explosions Of 3392
60. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3395
61. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nodes By Hyper Moves Of 3398
62. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3401
63. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Gap By Hyper Navigations Of Chord In 3404
64. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3407
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
65. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Coincidence By Hyper Routes Of 3410
66. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3413
67. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Obstacles By Hyper Model Of 3416
68. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3419
69. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Harmony By Hyper k-Function Of 3422
70. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3425
71. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Gradient By Hyper k-Class Of 3428
72. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3431
73. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Analogous By Hyper Visions Of 3434
74. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3437
75. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Relations By Hyper Identifications Of 3440
76. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Contradiction By Hyper Detection of 3443
77. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3446
78. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Locations By Hyper Differing Of 3449
79. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3452
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
80. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Missing By Hyper Searching Of 3455
81. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3458
82. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Outbreak By Hyper Collections Of 3461
83. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3464
84. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Extremism By Hyper Treatments Of 3467
85. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Isolation By Hyper Perfectness Of 3470
86. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3473
87. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3476
88. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super connections By Hyper disconnections Of 3479
89. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Mixed-Devastations By Hyper Decisions 3482
92. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Reflections By Hyper Rotations Of Path 3491
93. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas As Hyper Deformations On Super Chains In 3494
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
95. Henry Garrett, “New Research On Cancer’s Recognition and Neutrosophic 3500
10.13140/RG.2.2.29913.80482). 3503
96. Henry Garrett, “New Research On Cancer’s Recognition and Neutrosophic 3504
10.13140/RG.2.2.33269.24809). 3507
97. Henry Garrett, “New Research On Cancer’s Recognition and Neutrosophic 3508
10.13140/RG.2.2.34946.96960). 3511
10.13140/RG.2.2.14814.31040). 3515
10.13140/RG.2.2.15653.17125). 3519
10.13140/RG.2.2.25719.50089). 3523
101. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Disruptions In Cancer’s Extreme 3524
10.13140/RG.2.2.29441.94562). 3527
the Criteria of Eulerian and Hamiltonian Type-Sets As Hyper Modified Cycles 3532
10.20944/preprints202301.0396.v1). 3540
10.20944/preprints202301.0395.v1). 3544
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Classes With Hyper Effects In The Background of the Framework is So-Called 3552
10.13140/RG.2.2.12818.73925). 3554
109. Henry Garrett,“Super Actions On The Types of Hyper Levels In The Sensible 3555
10.13140/RG.2.2.26836.88960). 3558
10.20944/preprints202301.0308.v1). 3565
112. Henry Garrett,“Uncertainty On The Act And Effect Of Cancer Alongside The 3566
114. Henry Garrett, “The Shift Paradigm To Classify Separately The Cells and 3573
Affected Cells Toward The Totality Under Cancer’s Recognition By New 3574
10.20944/preprints202301.0265.v1). 3578
115. Henry Garrett,“Breaking the Continuity and Uniformity of Cancer In The 3579
116. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable as the Survivors on the 3583
10.20944/preprints202301.0240.v1). 3586
117. Henry Garrett, “Extremism of the Attacked Body Under the Cancer’s 3587
10.20944/preprints202301.0224.v1). 3590
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
119. Henry Garrett,“The Focus on The Partitions Obtained By Parallel Moves In 3594
120. Henry Garrett,“Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique Decides the Failures on the 3598
122. Henry Garrett,“Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique Decides the Failures on the 3606
10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 3623
10.20944/preprints202301.0088.v1). 3627
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
131. Henry Garrett, “Using the Tool As (Neutrosophic) Failed SuperHyperStable To 3638
10.13140/RG.2.2.36141.77287). 3650
10.13140/RG.2.2.29430.88642). 3653
10.13140/RG.2.2.11369.16487). 3657
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
10.20944/preprints202212.0324.v1). 3683
10.13140/RG.2.2.23123.04641). 3687
10.20944/preprints202211.0576.v1). 3691
10.13140/RG.2.2.23324.56966). 3695
148. Henry Garrett, “Initial Material of Neutrosophic Preliminaries to Study Some 3699
10.13140/RG.2.2.25385.88160). 3702
149. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDuality”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3703
10.5281/zenodo.7637762). 3704
150. Henry Garrett, “Trace-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 3705
153. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 3711
156. Henry Garrett, “Vertex-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 3717
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
159. Henry Garrett, “Stable-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 3723
162. Henry Garrett, “Clique-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 3729
163. Henry Garrett, “Space In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3731
10.5281/zenodo.7713563). 3732
164. Henry Garrett, “Space In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3733
10.5281/zenodo.7709116). 3734
168. Henry Garrett, “Chord In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3741
10.5281/zenodo.7700205). 3742
171. Henry Garrett, “K-Domination In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 3747
172. Henry Garrett, “K-Number In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 3749
173. Henry Garrett, “Order In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3751
10.5281/zenodo.7668648). 3752
174. Henry Garrett, “Coloring In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3753
10.5281/zenodo.7662810). 3754
175. Henry Garrett, “Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 3755
176. Henry Garrett, “Cancer In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3757
10.5281/zenodo.7653233). 3758
177. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperWheel”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3759
10.5281/zenodo.7653204). 3760
178. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperMultipartite”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3761
10.5281/zenodo.7653142). 3762
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
179. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperBipartite”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3763
10.5281/zenodo.7653117). 3764
180. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperStar”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3765
10.5281/zenodo.7653089). 3766
181. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3767
10.5281/zenodo.7651687). 3768
182. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperPath”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3769
10.5281/zenodo.7651619). 3770
183. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDomination”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3771
10.5281/zenodo.7651439). 3772
184. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDominating”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3773
10.5281/zenodo.7650729). 3774
185. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperConnected”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3775
10.5281/zenodo.7647868). 3776
186. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperTotal”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3777
10.5281/zenodo.7647017). 3778
187. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperPerfect”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3779
10.5281/zenodo.7644894). 3780
188. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperJoin”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3781
10.5281/zenodo.7641880). 3782
189. Henry Garrett, “Path SuperHyperColoring”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3783
10.5281/zenodo.7632923). 3784
190. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDensity”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3785
10.5281/zenodo.7623459). 3786
192. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperConnectivities”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 3789
193. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperConnectivities”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3791
10.5281/zenodo.7606404). 3792
194. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3793
10.5281/zenodo.7580018). 3794
195. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3795
10.5281/zenodo.7580018). 3796
196. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3797
10.5281/zenodo.7580018). 3798
197. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3799
10.5281/zenodo.7579929). 3800
198. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3801
10.5281/zenodo.7563170). 3802
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
199. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3803
10.5281/zenodo.7563164). 3804
200. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3805
10.5281/zenodo.7563160). 3806
201. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3807
10.5281/zenodo.7563160). 3808
202. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3809
10.5281/zenodo.7563160). 3810
203. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 3811
204. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperMatching”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3813
10.5281/zenodo.7557009). 3814
205. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperMatching”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 3815
206. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 3817
207. Henry Garrett, “Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 3819
208. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On Failed SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 3821
209. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3823
10.5281/zenodo.7574952). 3824
210. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 3825
211. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3827
10.5281/zenodo.7523357). 3828
212. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3829
10.5281/zenodo.7523357). 3830
213. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 3831
214. Henry Garrett, “Extreme Failed SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 3833
215. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On Failed SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 3835
216. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3837
10.5281/zenodo.7499395). 3838
217. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3839
10.5281/zenodo.7499395). 3840
218. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3841
10.5281/zenodo.7499395). 3842
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
219. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 3843
220. Henry Garrett, “Extreme Failed SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 3845
221. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 3847
222. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3849
10.5281/zenodo.7494862). 3850
223. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 3851
224. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperAlliances”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 3853
225. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperAlliances”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3855
10.5281/zenodo.7493845). 3856
226. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperAlliances”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 3857
227. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperMatching”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3859
10.5281/zenodo.7539484). 3860
228. Henry Garrett, “Failed SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3861
10.5281/zenodo.7523390). 3862
229. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3863
10.5281/zenodo.7523357). 3864
230. Henry Garrett, “Failed SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3865
10.5281/zenodo.7504782). 3866
231. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3867
10.5281/zenodo.7499395). 3868
232. Henry Garrett, “Failed SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3869
10.5281/zenodo.7497450). 3870
233. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3871
10.5281/zenodo.7494862). 3872
234. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperAlliances”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3873
10.5281/zenodo.7493845). 3874
235. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3875
10.5281/zenodo.7480110). 3876
236. Henry Garrett, “Neut. SuperHyperEdges”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3877
10.5281/zenodo.7378758). 3878
237. Henry Garrett, “Beyond Neutrosophic Graphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3879
10.5281/zenodo.6320305). 3880
238. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Duality”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3881
10.5281/zenodo.6677173). 3882
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA