New Ideas in Cancer's Recognition and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph by Chord As Hyper Excellence On Super Excess

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.
net/publication/369019923
New Ideas In Cancer's Recognition And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph By

Chord As Hyper Excellence On Super Excess
Preprint · March 2023

DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.13059.58401
CITATIONS
1 author:
Henry Garrett
344 PUBLICATIONS 4,746 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
On Algebraic Structures and Algebraic Hyperstructures View project
On Combinatorics View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Henry Garrett on 05 March 2023.
The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 2
SuperHyperGraph By Chord As Hyper Excellence On Super 3
Excess 4
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · 6
DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA 7
1 ABSTRACT 8
In this scientific research, (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic 9
SuperHyperChord). Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an Chord 10
pair S = (V, E). Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs } and 11
E 0 = {E1 , E2 , . . . , Ez }. Then either V 0 or E 0 is called Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperChord 12
if it’s a SuperHyperChord such that |N (E 0 ) ∩ E 0 | ≥ i and —N(E’)∩(E \ E 0 )| ≥ j; 13
Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperChord if it’s a SuperHyperChord such that 14
|N (E 0 ) ∩ E 0 | ≥ i and —N(E’)∩(E \ E 0 )| ≥ j; and 15
|Ei |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY = |Ej |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY ; Neutrosophic 16
v-SuperHyperChord if it’s a SuperHyperChord such that |N (V 0 ) ∩ V 0 | ≥ i and 17
—N(V’)∩(V \ V 0 )| ≥ j; Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperChord if it’s a SuperHyperChord 18
such that |N (V 0 ) ∩ V 0 | ≥ i and —N(V’)∩(V \ V 0 )| ≥ j; and 19
|Vi |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY = |Vj |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY ; Neutrosophic 20
SuperHyperChord if it’s either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperChord, Neutrosophic 21
re-SuperHyperChord, Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperChord, and Neutrosophic 22
rv-SuperHyperChord. ((Neutrosophic) SuperHyperChord). Assume a Neutrosophic 23
SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an Chorded pair S = (V, E). Consider a Neutrosophic 24
SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) E = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then E is called an Extreme 25
SuperHyperChord if it’s either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperChord, Neutrosophic 26
re-SuperHyperChord, Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperChord, and Neutrosophic 27
rv-SuperHyperChord and C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) 28
is the maximum Extreme cardinality of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme 29
cardinality of the Extreme SuperHyperEdges in the consecutive Extreme sequence of 30
Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 31
Extreme SuperHyperChord; a Neutrosophic SuperHyperChord if it’s either of 32
Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperChord, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperChord, Neutrosophic 33
v-SuperHyperChord, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperChord and C(N SHG) for a 34
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum Neutrosophic 35
cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S 36
of high Neutrosophic cardinality consecutive Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges and 37
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Neutrosophic 38
SuperHyperChord; an Extreme SuperHyperChord SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either 39
of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperChord, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperChord, Neutrosophic 40
v-SuperHyperChord, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperChord and C(N SHG) for an 41
Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Extreme SuperHyperPolynomial 42
contains the Extreme coefficients defined as the Extreme number of the maximum 43
Extreme cardinality of the Extreme SuperHyperEdges of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S 44
of high Extreme cardinality consecutive Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme 45
SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Extreme SuperHyperChord; and the 46
Extreme power is corresponded to its Extreme coefficient; a Neutrosophic 47
SuperHyperChord SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of Neutrosophic 48
e-SuperHyperChord, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperChord, Neutrosophic 49
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Neutrosophic 51
SuperHyperPolynomial contains the Neutrosophic coefficients defined as the 52
Neutrosophic number of the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic 53
SuperHyperEdges of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high Neutrosophic cardinality 54
consecutive Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such 55
that they form the Neutrosophic SuperHyperChord; and the Neutrosophic power is 56
corresponded to its Neutrosophic coefficient; an Extreme V-SuperHyperChord if it’s 57
either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperChord, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperChord, 58
Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperChord, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperChord and 59
C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum Extreme 60
cardinality of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality of the Extreme 61
SuperHyperVertices in the consecutive Extreme sequence of Extreme SuperHyperEdges 62
and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Extreme SuperHyperChord; 63
a Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperChord if it’s either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperChord, 64
Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperChord, Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperChord, and 65
Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperChord and C(N SHG) for a Neutrosophic 66
SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of the 67
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high 68
Neutrosophic cardinality consecutive Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic 69
SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Neutrosophic SuperHyperChord; an 70
Extreme V-SuperHyperChord SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of Neutrosophic 71
v-SuperHyperChord, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperChord and C(N SHG) for an 73
Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Extreme SuperHyperPolynomial 74
Extreme cardinality of the Extreme SuperHyperVertices of an Extreme SuperHyperSet 76
S of high Extreme cardinality consecutive Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme 77
SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Extreme SuperHyperChord; and the 78
Extreme power is corresponded to its Extreme coefficient; a Neutrosophic 79
SuperHyperChord SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of Neutrosophic 80
Neutrosophic number of the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic 85
SuperHyperVertices of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high Neutrosophic 86
cardinality consecutive Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic 87
SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Neutrosophic SuperHyperChord; and the 88
Neutrosophic power is corresponded to its Neutrosophic coefficient. In this scientific 89
research, new setting is introduced for new SuperHyperNotions, namely, a 90
SuperHyperChord and Neutrosophic SuperHyperChord. Two different types of 91
SuperHyperDefinitions are debut for them but the research goes further and the 92
SuperHyperNotion, SuperHyperUniform, and SuperHyperClass based on that are 93
well-defined and well-reviewed. The literature review is implemented in the whole of 94
this research. For shining the elegancy and the significancy of this research, the 95
comparison between this SuperHyperNotion with other SuperHyperNotions and 96
fundamental SuperHyperNumbers are featured. The definitions are followed by the 97
examples and the instances thus the clarifications are driven with different tools. The 98
applications are figured out to make sense about the theoretical aspect of this ongoing 99
research. The “Cancer’s Recognition” are the under research to figure out the 100
challenges make sense about ongoing and upcoming research. The special case is up. 101
The cells are viewed in the deemed ways. There are different types of them. Some of 102
them are individuals and some of them are well-modeled by the group of cells. These 103
types are all officially called “SuperHyperVertex” but the relations amid them all 104
officially called “SuperHyperEdge”. The frameworks “SuperHyperGraph” and 105
“Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” are chosen and elected to research about “Cancer’s 106
Recognition”. Thus these complex and dense SuperHyperModels open up some avenues 107
to research on theoretical segments and “Cancer’s Recognition”. Some avenues are 108
posed to pursue this research. It’s also officially collected in the form of some questions 109
and some problems. Assume a SuperHyperGraph. Assume a SuperHyperGraph. Then 110
δ−SuperHyperChord is a maximal of SuperHyperVertices with a maximum 111
cardinality such that either of the following expressions hold for the (Neutrosophic) 112
cardinalities of SuperHyperNeighbors of s ∈ S : there are 113
|S ∩ N (s)| > |S ∩ (V \ N (s))| + δ; and |S ∩ N (s)| < |S ∩ (V \ N (s))| + δ. The first 114
Expression, holds if S is an δ−SuperHyperOffensive. And the second Expression, holds 115
if S is an δ−SuperHyperDefensive; a Neutrosophic δ−SuperHyperChord is a maximal 116
Neutrosophic of SuperHyperVertices with maximum Neutrosophic cardinality such 117
that either of the following expressions hold for the Neutrosophic cardinalities of 118
SuperHyperNeighbors of s ∈ S there are: 119
|S ∩ N (s)|N eutrosophic > |S ∩ (V \ N (s))|N eutrosophic + δ; 120
and |S ∩ N (s)|N eutrosophic < |S ∩ (V \ N (s))|N eutrosophic + δ. The first Expression, 121
holds if S is a Neutrosophic δ−SuperHyperOffensive. And the second Expression, holds 122
if S is a Neutrosophic δ−SuperHyperDefensive It’s useful to define a “Neutrosophic” 123
version of a SuperHyperChord . Since there’s more ways to get type-results to make a 124
SuperHyperChord more understandable. For the sake of having Neutrosophic 125
SuperHyperChord, there’s a need to “redefine” the notion of a “SuperHyperChord ”. 126
The SuperHyperVertices and the SuperHyperEdges are assigned by the labels from the 127
letters of the alphabets. In this procedure, there’s the usage of the position of labels to 128
assign to the values. Assume a SuperHyperChord . It’s redefined a Neutrosophic 129
SuperHyperChord if the mentioned Table holds, concerning, “The Values of Vertices, 130
SuperVertices, Edges, HyperEdges, and SuperHyperEdges Belong to The Neutrosophic 131
SuperHyperGraph” with the key points, “The Values of The Vertices & The Number 132
of Position in Alphabet”, “The Values of The SuperVertices&The maximum Values of 133
Its Vertices”, “The Values of The Edges&The maximum Values of Its Vertices”, “The 134
Values of The HyperEdges&The maximum Values of Its Vertices”, “The Values of The 135
SuperHyperEdges&The maximum Values of Its Endpoints”. To get structural examples 136
and instances, I’m going to introduce the next SuperHyperClass of SuperHyperGraph 137
based on a SuperHyperChord . It’s the main. It’ll be disciplinary to have the 138
foundation of previous definition in the kind of SuperHyperClass. If there’s a need to 139
have all SuperHyperChord until the SuperHyperChord, then it’s officially called a 140
“SuperHyperChord” but otherwise, it isn’t a SuperHyperChord . There are some 141
instances about the clarifications for the main definition titled a “SuperHyperChord ”. 142
These two examples get more scrutiny and discernment since there are characterized in 143
the disciplinary ways of the SuperHyperClass based on a SuperHyperChord . For the 144
sake of having a Neutrosophic SuperHyperChord, there’s a need to “redefine” the 145
notion of a “Neutrosophic SuperHyperChord” and a “Neutrosophic SuperHyperChord ”. 146
The SuperHyperVertices and the SuperHyperEdges are assigned by the labels from the 147
assign to the values. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. It’s redefined 149
“Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” if the intended Table holds. And a SuperHyperChord 150
are redefined to a “Neutrosophic SuperHyperChord” if the intended Table holds. It’s 151
useful to define “Neutrosophic” version of SuperHyperClasses. Since there’s more ways 152
to get Neutrosophic type-results to make a Neutrosophic SuperHyperChord more 153
understandable. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. There are some 154
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses if the intended Table holds. Thus SuperHyperPath, 155
SuperHyperChord, SuperHyperStar, SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultiPartite, 156
and SuperHyperWheel, are “Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath”, “Neutrosophic 157
SuperHyperChord”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar”, “Neutrosophic 158
SuperHyperBipartite”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultiPartite”, and “Neutrosophic 159
SuperHyperWheel” if the intended Table holds. A SuperHyperGraph has a 160
“Neutrosophic SuperHyperChord” where it’s the strongest [the maximum Neutrosophic 161
value from all the SuperHyperChord amid the maximum value amid all 162
SuperHyperVertices from a SuperHyperChord .] SuperHyperChord . A graph is a 163
SuperHyperUniform if it’s a SuperHyperGraph and the number of elements of 164
SuperHyperEdges are the same. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. There are 165
some SuperHyperClasses as follows. It’s SuperHyperPath if it’s only one SuperVertex as 166
intersection amid two given SuperHyperEdges with two exceptions; it’s 167
SuperHyperChord if it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two given 168
SuperHyperEdges; it’s SuperHyperStar it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid 169
all SuperHyperEdges; it’s SuperHyperBipartite it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection 170
amid two given SuperHyperEdges and these SuperVertices, forming two separate sets, 171
has no SuperHyperEdge in common; it’s SuperHyperMultiPartite it’s only one 172
SuperVertex as intersection amid two given SuperHyperEdges and these SuperVertices, 173
forming multi separate sets, has no SuperHyperEdge in common; it’s a 174
SuperHyperWheel if it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two given 175
SuperHyperEdges and one SuperVertex has one SuperHyperEdge with any common 176
SuperVertex. The SuperHyperModel proposes the specific designs and the specific 177
architectures. The SuperHyperModel is officially called “SuperHyperGraph” and 178
“Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”. In this SuperHyperModel, The “specific” cells and 179
“specific group” of cells are SuperHyperModeled as “SuperHyperVertices” and the 180
common and intended properties between “specific” cells and “specific group” of cells 181
are SuperHyperModeled as “SuperHyperEdges”. Sometimes, it’s useful to have some 182
degrees of determinacy, indeterminacy, and neutrality to have more precise 183
SuperHyperModel which in this case the SuperHyperModel is called “Neutrosophic”. In 184
the future research, the foundation will be based on the “Cancer’s Recognition” and the 185
results and the definitions will be introduced in redeemed ways. The recognition of the 186
cancer in the long-term function. The specific region has been assigned by the model 187
[it’s called SuperHyperGraph] and the long cycle of the move from the cancer is 188
identified by this research. Sometimes the move of the cancer hasn’t be easily identified 189
since there are some determinacy, indeterminacy and neutrality about the moves and 190
the effects of the cancer on that region; this event leads us to choose another model [it’s 191
said to be Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph] to have convenient perception on what’s 192
happened and what’s done. There are some specific models, which are well-known and 193
they’ve got the names, and some SuperHyperGeneral SuperHyperModels. The moves 194
and the traces of the cancer on the complex tracks and between complicated groups of 195
cells could be fantasized by a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath(-/SuperHyperChord, 196
SuperHyperStar, SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, SuperHyperWheel). 197
The aim is to find either the longest SuperHyperChord or the strongest 198
SuperHyperChord in those Neutrosophic SuperHyperModels. For the longest 199
SuperHyperChord, called SuperHyperChord, and the strongest SuperHyperChord, 200
called Neutrosophic SuperHyperChord, some general results are introduced. Beyond 201
that in SuperHyperStar, all possible SuperHyperPaths have only two SuperHyperEdges 202
but it’s not enough since it’s essential to have at least three SuperHyperEdges to form 203
any style of a SuperHyperChord. There isn’t any formation of any SuperHyperChord 204
but literarily, it’s the deformation of any SuperHyperChord. It, literarily, deforms and it 205
doesn’t form. A basic familiarity with Neutrosophic SuperHyperChord theory, 206
SuperHyperGraphs, and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs theory are proposed. 207
Keywords: Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, SuperHyperChord, Cancer’s 208
Neutrosophic Recognition 209
AMS Subject Classification: 05C17, 05C22, 05E45 210
2 Applied Notions Under The Scrutiny Of The 211
Motivation Of This Scientific Research 212
In this scientific research, there are some ideas in the featured frameworks of 213
motivations. I try to bring the motivations in the narrative ways. Some cells have been 214
faced with some attacks from the situation which is caused by the cancer’s attacks. In 215
this case, there are some embedded analysis on the ongoing situations which in that, the 216
cells could be labelled as some groups and some groups or individuals have excessive 217
labels which all are raised from the behaviors to overcome the cancer’s attacks. In the 218
embedded situations, the individuals of cells and the groups of cells could be considered 219
as “new groups”. Thus it motivates us to find the proper SuperHyperModels for getting 220
more proper analysis on this messy story. I’ve found the SuperHyperModels which are 221
officially called “SuperHyperGraphs” and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. In this 222
SuperHyperModel, the cells and the groups of cells are defined as “SuperHyperVertices” 223
and the relations between the individuals of cells and the groups of cells are defined as 224
“SuperHyperEdges”. Thus it’s another motivation for us to do research on this 225
SuperHyperModel based on the “Cancer’s Recognition”. Sometimes, the situations get 226
worst. The situation is passed from the certainty and precise style. Thus it’s the beyond 227
them. There are three descriptions, namely, the degrees of determinacy, indeterminacy 228
and neutrality, for any object based on vague forms, namely, incomplete data, imprecise 229
data, and uncertain analysis. The latter model could be considered on the previous 230
SuperHyperModel. It’s SuperHyperModel. It’s SuperHyperGraph but it’s officially 231
called “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. The cancer is the disease but the model is 232
going to figure out what’s going on this phenomenon. The special case of this disease is 233
considered and as the consequences of the model, some parameters are used. The cells 234
are under attack of this disease but the moves of the cancer in the special region are the 235
matter of mind. The recognition of the cancer could help to find some treatments for 236
this disease. The SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph are the 237
SuperHyperModels on the “Cancer’s Recognition” and both bases are the background 238
of this research. Sometimes the cancer has been happened on the region, full of cells, 239
groups of cells and embedded styles. In this segment, the SuperHyperModel proposes 240
some SuperHyperNotions based on the connectivities of the moves of the cancer in the 241
forms of alliances’ styles with the formation of the design and the architecture are 242
formally called “ SuperHyperChord” in the themes of jargons and buzzwords. The 243
prefix “SuperHyper” refers to the theme of the embedded styles to figure out the 244
background for the SuperHyperNotions. The recognition of the cancer in the long-term 245
function. The specific region has been assigned by the model [it’s called 246
SuperHyperGraph] and the long cycle of the move from the cancer is identified by this 247
research. Sometimes the move of the cancer hasn’t be easily identified since there are 248
some determinacy, indeterminacy and neutrality about the moves and the effects of the 249
cancer on that region; this event leads us to choose another model [it’s said to be 250
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph] to have convenient perception on what’s happened and 251
what’s done. There are some specific models, which are well-known and they’ve got the 252
names, and some general models. The moves and the traces of the cancer on the 253
complex tracks and between complicated groups of cells could be fantasized by a 254
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (-/SuperHyperChord, SuperHyperStar, 255
SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, SuperHyperWheel). The aim is to find 256
either the optimal SuperHyperChord or the Neutrosophic SuperHyperChord in those 257
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModels. Some general results are introduced. Beyond that in 258
SuperHyperStar, all possible Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath s have only two 259
SuperHyperEdges but it’s not enough since it’s essential to have at least three 260
SuperHyperEdges to form any style of a SuperHyperChord. There isn’t any formation 261
of any SuperHyperChord but literarily, it’s the deformation of any SuperHyperChord. 262
It, literarily, deforms and it doesn’t form. 263
Question 2.1. How to define the SuperHyperNotions and to do research on them to 264
find the “ amount of SuperHyperChord” of either individual of cells or the groups of 265
cells based on the fixed cell or the fixed group of cells, extensively, the “amount of 266
SuperHyperChord” based on the fixed groups of cells or the fixed groups of group of cells? 267
Question 2.2. What are the best descriptions for the “Cancer’s Recognition” in terms 268
of these messy and dense SuperHyperModels where embedded notions are illustrated? 269
It’s motivation to find notions to use in this dense model is titled 270
“SuperHyperGraphs”. Thus it motivates us to define different types of “ 271
SuperHyperChord” and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperChord” on “SuperHyperGraph” and 272
“Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”. Then the research has taken more motivations to 273
define SuperHyperClasses and to find some connections amid this SuperHyperNotion 274
with other SuperHyperNotions. It motivates us to get some instances and examples to 275
make clarifications about the framework of this research. The general results and some 276
results about some connections are some avenues to make key point of this research, 277
“Cancer’s Recognition”, more understandable and more clear. 278
The framework of this research is as follows. In the beginning, I introduce basic 279
definitions to clarify about preliminaries. In the subsection “Preliminaries”, initial 280
definitions about SuperHyperGraphs and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph are 281
deeply-introduced and in-depth-discussed. The elementary concepts are clarified and 282
illustrated completely and sometimes review literature are applied to make sense about 283
what’s going to figure out about the upcoming sections. The main definitions and their 284
clarifications alongside some results about new notions, SuperHyperChord and 285
Neutrosophic SuperHyperChord, are figured out in sections “ SuperHyperChord” and 286
“Neutrosophic SuperHyperChord”. In the sense of tackling on getting results and in 287
Chord to make sense about continuing the research, the ideas of SuperHyperUniform 288
and Neutrosophic SuperHyperUniform are introduced and as their consequences, 289
corresponded SuperHyperClasses are figured out to debut what’s done in this section, 290
titled “Results on SuperHyperClasses” and “Results on Neutrosophic 291
SuperHyperClasses”. As going back to origin of the notions, there are some smart steps 292
toward the common notions to extend the new notions in new frameworks, 293
SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, in the sections “Results on 294
SuperHyperClasses” and “Results on Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”. The starter 295
research about the general SuperHyperRelations and as concluding and closing section 296
of theoretical research are contained in the section “General Results”. Some general 297
SuperHyperRelations are fundamental and they are well-known as fundamental 298
SuperHyperNotions as elicited and discussed in the sections, “General Results”, “ 299
SuperHyperChord”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperChord”, “Results on SuperHyperClasses” 300
and “Results on Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”. There are curious questions about 301
what’s done about the SuperHyperNotions to make sense about excellency of this 302
research and going to figure out the word “best” as the description and adjective for 303
this research as presented in section, “ SuperHyperChord”. The keyword of this 304
research debut in the section “Applications in Cancer’s Recognition” with two cases and 305
subsections “Case 1: The Initial Steps Toward SuperHyperBipartite as 306
SuperHyperModel” and “Case 2: The Increasing Steps Toward SuperHyperMultipartite 307
as SuperHyperModel”. In the section, “Open Problems”, there are some scrutiny and 308
discernment on what’s done and what’s happened in this research in the terms of 309
“questions” and “problems” to make sense to figure out this research in featured style. 310
The advantages and the limitations of this research alongside about what’s done in this 311
research to make sense and to get sense about what’s figured out are included in the 312
section, “Conclusion and Closing Remarks”. 313
3 Neutrosophic Preliminaries Of This Scientific 314
Research On the Redeemed Ways 315
In this section, the basic material in this scientific research, is referred to [Single Valued 316
Neutrosophic Set](Ref. [107],Definition 2.2,p.2), [Neutrosophic 317
Set](Ref. [107],Definition 2.1,p.1), [Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 318
(NSHG)](Ref. [107],Definition 2.5,p.2), [Characterization of the Neutrosophic 319
SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)](Ref. [107],Definition 2.7,p.3), [t-norm](Ref. [107], 320
Definition 2.7, p.3), and [Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 321
(NSHG)](Ref. [107],Definition 2.7,p.3), [Neutrosophic Strength of the Neutrosophic 322
SuperHyperPaths] (Ref. [107],Definition 5.3,p.7), and [Different Neutrosophic Types of 323
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)] (Ref. [107],Definition 5.4,p.7). Also, the new 324
ideas and their clarifications are addressed to Ref. [107]. 325
In this subsection, the basic material which is used in this scientific research, is 326
presented. Also, the new ideas and their clarifications are elicited. 327
Definition 3.1 (Neutrosophic Set). (Ref. [107],Definition 2.1,p.1). 328
Let X be a space of points (objects) with generic elements in X denoted by x; then

the Neutrosophic set A (NS A) is an object having the form
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}
+
where the functions T, I, F : X →]− 0, 1 [ define respectively the a
truth-membership function, an indeterminacy-membership function, and a
falsity-membership function of the element x ∈ X to the set A with the condition
−
0 ≤ TA (x) + IA (x) + FA (x) ≤ 3+ .
The functions TA (x), IA (x) and FA (x) are real standard or nonstandard subsets of 329
+
]− 0, 1 [. 330
Definition 3.2 (Single Valued Neutrosophic Set). (Ref. [107],Definition 2.2,p.2). 331
Let X be a space of points (objects) with generic elements in X denoted by x. A

single valued Neutrosophic set A (SVNS A) is characterized by truth-membership
function TA (x), an indeterminacy-membership function IA (x), and a falsity-membership
function FA (x). For each point x in X, TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) ∈ [0, 1]. A SVNS A can be
written as
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}.
Definition 3.3. The degree of truth-membership,
indeterminacy-membership and falsity-membership of the subset X ⊂ A of
the single valued Neutrosophic set A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}:
TA (X) = min[TA (vi ), TA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,
IA (X) = min[IA (vi ), IA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,
and FA (X) = min[FA (vi ), FA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X .
Definition 3.4. The support of X ⊂ A of the single valued Neutrosophic set

A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}:
supp(X) = {x ∈ X : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) > 0}.
Definition 3.5 (Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). (Ref. [107],Definition 332
2.5,p.2). 333
Assume V 0 is a given set. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an 334
Chorded pair S = (V, E), where 335
(i) V = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vn } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of V 0 ; 336
(ii) V = {(Vi , TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi )) : TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi ) ≥ 0}, (i = 337
1, 2, . . . , n); 338
(iii) E = {E1 , E2 , . . . , En0 } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of 339
V; 340
(iv) E = {(Ei0 , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )) : TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 ) ≥ 0}, (i0 = 341
1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 342
(v) Vi 6= ∅, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 343
(vi) Ei0 6= ∅, (i0 = 1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 344
P
(vii) i supp(Vi ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 345
0 0
P
(viii) i0 supp(Ei ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n );
0 346
(ix) and the following conditions hold:
TV0 (Ei0 ) ≤ min[TV 0 (Vi ), TV 0 (Vj )]Vi ,Vj ∈Ei0 ,
IV0 (Ei0 ) ≤ min[IV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vj )]Vi ,Vj ∈Ei0 ,

and FV0 (Ei0 ) ≤ min[FV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vj )]Vi ,Vj ∈Ei0
where i0 = 1, 2, . . . , n0 . 347
Here the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ej 0 and the Neutrosophic 348
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) Vj are single valued Neutrosophic sets. TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), 349
and FV 0 (Vi ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 350
indeterminacy-membership and the degree of falsity-membership the Neutrosophic 351
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) V. 352
TV0 (Ei0 ), TV0 (Ei0 ), and TV0 (Ei0 ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 353
indeterminacy-membership and the degree of falsity-membership of the Neutrosophic 354
SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) Ei0 to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) E. Thus, 355
the ii0 th element of the incidence matrix of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) 356
are of the form (Vi , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )), the sets V and E are crisp sets. 357
Definition 3.6 (Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). 358
(Ref. [107],Definition 2.7,p.3). 359
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an Chorded pair 360
S = (V, E). The Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ei0 and the Neutrosophic 361
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) Vi of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S = (V, E) 362
could be characterized as follow-up items. 363
(i) If |Vi | = 1, then Vi is called vertex; 364
(ii) if |Vi | ≥ 1, then Vi is called SuperVertex; 365
(iii) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called edge; 366
(iv) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 367
HyperEdge; 368
(v) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called 369
SuperEdge; 370
(vi) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 371
SuperHyperEdge. 372
If we choose different types of binary operations, then we could get hugely diverse 373
types of general forms of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG). 374
Definition 3.7 (t-norm). (Ref. [107], Definition 2.7, p.3). 375
A binary operation ⊗ : [0, 1] × [0, 1] → [0, 1] is a t-norm if it satisfies the following 376
for x, y, z, w ∈ [0, 1]: 377
(i) 1 ⊗ x = x; 378
(ii) x ⊗ y = y ⊗ x; 379
(iii) x ⊗ (y ⊗ z) = (x ⊗ y) ⊗ z; 380
(iv) If w ≤ x and y ≤ z then w ⊗ y ≤ x ⊗ z. 381
Definition 3.8. The degree of truth-membership, indeterminacy-membership

and falsity-membership of the subset X ⊂ A of the single valued Neutrosophic set
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X} (with respect to t-norm Tnorm ):
TA (X) = Tnorm [TA (vi ), TA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,
IA (X) = Tnorm [IA (vi ), IA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,

and FA (X) = Tnorm [FA (vi ), FA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X .
Definition 3.9. The support of X ⊂ A of the single valued Neutrosophic set
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}:
supp(X) = {x ∈ X : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) > 0}.
Definition 3.10. (General Forms of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). 382
Assume V 0 is a given set. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an 383
Chorded pair S = (V, E), where 384
(i) V = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vn } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of V 0 ; 385
(ii) V = {(Vi , TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi )) : TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi ) ≥ 0}, (i = 386
1, 2, . . . , n); 387
(iii) E = {E1 , E2 , . . . , En0 } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of 388
V; 389
(iv) E = {(Ei0 , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )) : TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 ) ≥ 0}, (i0 = 390
1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 391
(v) Vi 6= ∅, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 392
(vi) Ei0 6= ∅, (i0 = 1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 393
P
(vii) i supp(Vi ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 394
supp(Ei0 ) = V, (i0 = 1, 2, . . . , n0 ).
P
(viii) i0 395
Here the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ej 0 and the Neutrosophic 396
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) Vj are single valued Neutrosophic sets. TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), 397
and FV 0 (Vi ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 398
indeterminacy-membership and the degree of falsity-membership the Neutrosophic 399
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) V. 400
TV0 (Ei0 ), TV0 (Ei0 ), and TV0 (Ei0 ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 401
indeterminacy-membership and the degree of falsity-membership of the Neutrosophic 402
SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) Ei0 to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) E. Thus, 403
the ii0 th element of the incidence matrix of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) 404
are of the form (Vi , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )), the sets V and E are crisp sets. 405
Definition 3.11 (Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). 406
(Ref. [107],Definition 2.7,p.3). 407
S = (V, E). The Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ei0 and the Neutrosophic 409
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) Vi of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S = (V, E) 410
(i) If |Vi | = 1, then Vi is called vertex; 412
(ii) if |Vi | ≥ 1, then Vi is called SuperVertex; 413
(iii) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called edge; 414
(iv) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 415
HyperEdge; 416
(v) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called 417
SuperEdge; 418
(vi) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 419
SuperHyperEdge. 420
This SuperHyperModel is too messy and too dense. Thus there’s a need to have 421
some restrictions and conditions on SuperHyperGraph. The special case of this 422
SuperHyperGraph makes the patterns and regularities. 423
Definition 3.12. A graph is SuperHyperUniform if it’s SuperHyperGraph and the 424
number of elements of SuperHyperEdges are the same. 425
To get more visions on SuperHyperUniform, the some SuperHyperClasses are 426
introduced. It makes to have SuperHyperUniform more understandable. 427
Definition 3.13. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. There are some 428
SuperHyperClasses as follows. 429
(i). It’s Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath if it’s only one SuperVertex as 430
intersection amid two given SuperHyperEdges with two exceptions; 431
(ii). it’s SuperHyperCycle if it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two 432
given SuperHyperEdges; 433
(iii). it’s SuperHyperStar it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid all 434
SuperHyperEdges; 435
(iv). it’s SuperHyperBipartite it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two 436
given SuperHyperEdges and these SuperVertices, forming two separate sets, has 437
no SuperHyperEdge in common; 438
(v). it’s SuperHyperMultiPartite it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid 439
two given SuperHyperEdges and these SuperVertices, forming multi separate sets, 440
has no SuperHyperEdge in common; 441
(vi). it’s SuperHyperWheel if it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two 442
given SuperHyperEdges and one SuperVertex has one SuperHyperEdge with any 443
common SuperVertex. 444
Definition 3.14. Let an Chorded pair S = (V, E) be a Neutrosophic

SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S. Then a sequence of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices
(NSHV) and Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)
V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs
is called a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic 445
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) V1 to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vs if either 446
of following conditions hold: 447
(i) Vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 448
(ii) there’s a vertex vi ∈ Vi such that vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 449
(iii) there’s a SuperVertex Vi0 ∈ Vi such that Vi0 , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 450
(iv) there’s a vertex vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that Vi , vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 451
0 0
(v) there’s a SuperVertex Vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that Vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 452
(vi) there are a vertex vi ∈ Vi and a vertex vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that vi , vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 453
0 0
(vii) there are a vertex vi ∈ Vi and a SuperVertex Vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 454
(viii) there are a SuperVertex Vi0 ∈ Vi and a vertex vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that Vi0 , vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 455
(ix) there are a SuperVertex Vi0 ∈ Vi and a SuperVertex Vi+1

0
∈ Vi+1 such that 456
0 0
Vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 . 457
Definition 3.15. (Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPaths). 458
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an Chorded pair S = (V, E).

a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV)
V1 to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vs is sequence of Neutrosophic
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) and Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)
V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs ,
(i) If for all Vi , Ej 0 , |Vi | = 1, |Ej 0 | = 2, then NSHP is called path; 460
(ii) if for all Ej 0 , |Ej 0 | = 2, and there’s Vi , |Vi | ≥ 1, then NSHP is called SuperPath; 461
(iii) if for all Vi , Ej 0 , |Vi | = 1, |Ej 0 | ≥ 2, then NSHP is called HyperPath; 462
(iv) if there are Vi , Ej 0 , |Vi | ≥ 1, |Ej 0 | ≥ 2, then NSHP is called Neutrosophic 463
SuperHyperPath . 464
Definition 3.16 (Neutrosophic Strength of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPaths). 465
(Ref. [107],Definition 5.3,p.7). 466
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an Chorded pair S = (V, E).

A Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex
(NSHV) V1 to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vs is sequence of Neutrosophic
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) and Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)
V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs ,
have 467
(i) Neutrosophic t-strength (min{T (Vi )}, m, n)si=1 ; 468
(ii) Neutrosophic i-strength (m, min{I(Vi )}, n)si=1 ; 469
(iii) Neutrosophic f-strength (m, n, min{F (Vi )})si=1 ; 470
(iv) Neutrosophic strength (min{T (Vi )}, min{I(Vi )}, min{F (Vi )})si=1 . 471
Definition 3.17 (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges 472
(NSHE)). (Ref. [107],Definition 5.4,p.7). 473
S = (V, E). Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) E = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. 475
Then E is called 476
(ix) Neutrosophic t-connective if T (E) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic 477
t-strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 478
(NSHV) Vi to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vj where 1 ≤ i, j ≤ s; 479
(x) Neutrosophic i-connective if I(E) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic 480
i-strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 481
(xi) Neutrosophic f-connective if F (E) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic 483
f-strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 484
(xii) Neutrosophic connective if (T (E), I(E), F (E)) ≥ maximum number of 486
Neutrosophic strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic 487
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vj 488
where 1 ≤ i, j ≤ s. 489
Definition 3.18. (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperChord). 490
S = (V, E). Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs } and 492
E 0 = {E1 , E2 , . . . , Ez }. Then either V 0 or E 0 is called 493
(i) Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperChord if there’s a SuperHyperCycle OCHC 494

0 0
such that ∃a, b ∈ VOCHC , ab 6∈ EOCHC , ab ∈ EN SHG \ EOCHC ; 495
(ii) Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperChord if there’s a SuperHyperCycle OCHC 496

0 0
such that ∃a, b ∈ VOCHC , ab 6∈ EOCHC , ab ∈ EN SHG \ EOCHC ; and 497
|Ei |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY = |Ej |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY ; 498
(iii) Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperChord if there’s a SuperHyperCycle OCHC 499

0 0
such that ∃a, b ∈ VOCHC , ab 6∈ EOCHC , ab ∈ EN SHG \ EOCHC ; 500
(iv) Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperChord if there’s a SuperHyperCycle OCHC 501

0 0
such that ∃a, b ∈ VOCHC , ab 6∈ EOCHC , ab ∈ EN SHG \ EOCHC ; and 502
|Vi |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY = |Vj |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY ; 503
(v) Neutrosophic SuperHyperChord if it’s either of Neutrosophic 504
v-SuperHyperChord, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperChord. 506
Definition 3.19. ((Neutrosophic) SuperHyperChord). 507
(i) an Extreme SuperHyperChord if it’s either of Neutrosophic 511
v-SuperHyperChord, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperChord and C(N SHG) for 513
an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum Extreme 514
cardinality of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality of the 515
Extreme SuperHyperEdges in the consecutive Extreme sequence of Extreme 516
SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 517
Extreme SuperHyperChord; 518
(ii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperChord if it’s either of Neutrosophic 519
cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges of a Neutrosophic 523
SuperHyperSet S of high Neutrosophic cardinality consecutive Neutrosophic 524
SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 525
Neutrosophic SuperHyperChord; 526
(iii) an Extreme SuperHyperChord SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of 527
Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperChord, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperChord, 528
C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Extreme 530
SuperHyperPolynomial contains the Extreme coefficients defined as the Extreme 531
number of the maximum Extreme cardinality of the Extreme SuperHyperEdges of 532
an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality consecutive Extreme 533
Extreme SuperHyperChord; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its 535
Extreme coefficient; 536
(iv) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperChord SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either 537
of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperChord, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperChord, 538
C(N SHG) for a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the 540
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPolynomial contains the Neutrosophic coefficients 541
defined as the Neutrosophic number of the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of 542
the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high 543
Neutrosophic cardinality consecutive Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges and 544
SuperHyperChord; and the Neutrosophic power is corresponded to its 546
Neutrosophic coefficient; 547
(v) an Extreme V-SuperHyperChord if it’s either of Neutrosophic 548
v-SuperHyperChord, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperChord and C(N SHG) for 550
Extreme SuperHyperVertices in the consecutive Extreme sequence of Extreme 553
Extreme SuperHyperChord; 555
(vi) a Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperChord if it’s either of Neutrosophic 556
cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of a Neutrosophic 560
Neutrosophic SuperHyperChord; 563
(vii) an Extreme V-SuperHyperChord SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of 564
Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperChord, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperChord, 565
number of the maximum Extreme cardinality of the Extreme SuperHyperVertices 569
of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality consecutive Extreme 570
Extreme SuperHyperChord; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its 572
(viii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperChord SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either 574
of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperChord, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperChord, 575
the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high 580
SuperHyperChord; and the Neutrosophic power is corresponded to its 583
Neutrosophic coefficient. 584
Definition 3.20. ((Extreme/Neutrosophic)δ−SuperHyperChord). 585
S = (V, E). Then 587
(i) an δ−SuperHyperChord is a Neutrosophic kind of Neutrosophic 588
SuperHyperChord such that either of the following expressions hold for the 589
Neutrosophic cardinalities of SuperHyperNeighbors of s ∈ S : 590
|S ∩ N (s)| > |S ∩ (V \ N (s))| + δ;

|S ∩ N (s)| < |S ∩ (V \ N (s))| + δ.
The Expression (3.1), holds if S is an δ−SuperHyperOffensive. And the 591
Expression (3.1), holds if S is an δ−SuperHyperDefensive; 592
(ii) a Neutrosophic δ−SuperHyperChord is a Neutrosophic kind of Neutrosophic 593
SuperHyperChord such that either of the following Neutrosophic expressions hold 594
Table 1. The Values of Vertices, SuperVertices, Edges, HyperEdges, and SuperHy-

perEdges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph Mentioned in the Definition
(3.23)
The Values of The Vertices The Number of Position in Alphabet
The Values of The SuperVertices The maximum Values of Its Vertices
The Values of The Edges The maximum Values of Its Vertices
The Values of The HyperEdges The maximum Values of Its Vertices
The Values of The SuperHyperEdges The maximum Values of Its Endpoints

perEdges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, Mentioned in the Definition
(3.22)
for the Neutrosophic cardinalities of SuperHyperNeighbors of s ∈ S : 595
|S ∩ N (s)|N eutrosophic > |S ∩ (V \ N (s))|N eutrosophic + δ;

|S ∩ N (s)|N eutrosophic < |S ∩ (V \ N (s))|N eutrosophic + δ.
The Expression (3.1), holds if S is a Neutrosophic δ−SuperHyperOffensive. 596
And the Expression (3.1), holds if S is a Neutrosophic 597
δ−SuperHyperDefensive. 598
For the sake of having a Neutrosophic SuperHyperChord, there’s a need to 599
“redefine” the notion of “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”. The SuperHyperVertices 600
and the SuperHyperEdges are assigned by the labels from the letters of the alphabets. 601
In this procedure, there’s the usage of the position of labels to assign to the values. 602
Definition 3.21. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an Chorded 603
pair S = (V, E). It’s redefined Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph if the Table (1) 604
holds. 605
It’s useful to define a “Neutrosophic” version of SuperHyperClasses. Since there’s 606
more ways to get Neutrosophic type-results to make a Neutrosophic more 607
understandable. 608
Definition 3.22. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an Chorded 609
pair S = (V, E). There are some Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses if the Table (2) 610
holds. Thus Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath , SuperHyperChord, SuperHyperStar, 611
SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultiPartite, and SuperHyperWheel, are 612
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath, Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle, 613
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar, Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite, 614
Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultiPartite, and Neutrosophic 615
SuperHyperWheel if the Table (2) holds. 616
It’s useful to define a “Neutrosophic” version of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperChord. 617
Since there’s more ways to get type-results to make a Neutrosophic SuperHyperChord 618
more Neutrosophicly understandable. 619
For the sake of having a Neutrosophic SuperHyperChord, there’s a need to 620
“redefine” the Neutrosophic notion of “Neutrosophic SuperHyperChord”. The 621

perEdges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph Mentioned in the Definition
(3.23)
SuperHyperVertices and the SuperHyperEdges are assigned by the labels from the 622
assign to the values. 624
Definition 3.23. Assume a SuperHyperChord. It’s redefined a Neutrosophic 625
SuperHyperChord if the Table (3) holds. 626
4 Neutrosophic SuperHyperChord But As The 627
Extensions Excerpt From Dense And Super 628
Forms 629
Example 4.1. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an Chorded 630
pair S = (V, E) in the mentioned Neutrosophic Figures in every Neutrosophic items. 631
• On the Figure (1), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 632
SuperHyperChord, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly 633
straightforward. E1 and E3 are some empty Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges but 634
E2 is a loop Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge and E4 is a Neutrosophic 635
SuperHyperEdge. Thus in the terms of Neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbor, 636
there’s only one Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge, namely, E4 . The Neutrosophic 637
SuperHyperVertex, V3 is Neutrosophic isolated means that there’s no 638
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge has it as a Neutrosophic endpoint. Thus the 639
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 , is excluded in every given Neutrosophic 640
SuperHyperChord. 641
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Chord = {E4 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Chord SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-Chord = {Vi }i6=2,3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-Chord SuperHyperPolynomial = z 2 .
642
straightforward. E1 , E2 and E3 are some empty Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges 645
but E4 is a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. Thus in the terms of Neutrosophic 646
SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only one Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge, namely, 647
E4 . The Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 is Neutrosophic isolated means that 648
there’s no Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge has it as a Neutrosophic endpoint. Thus 649
the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 , is excluded in every given Neutrosophic 650
Figure 1. The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions

of Neutrosophic SuperHyperChord in the Neutrosophic Example (16.3)

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-Chord = {Vi }i6=3 .
652
straightforward. 655

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-Chord = {Vi }i=1,2,3 .
656

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Chord SuperHyperPolynomial = 8z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-Chord = {V3 , V4 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-Chord SuperHyperPolynomial
= 2z 2 .
660



C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Chord = {}.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Chord SuperHyperPolynomial = 0.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-Chord = {}.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-Chord SuperHyperPolynomial = 0.
664
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Chord

= {Ei }22
i=12 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Chord SuperHyperPolynomial
= z 11 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-Chord
= {Vi , Vi+10 , V21 , V22 }10
i=1 .
= z 22 .
668



C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Chord =

{E17 }.
= az b .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-Chord =
{V8 , V10 }.
= az b .
672

{}.
= 0.
{}.
= 0.
676


= {Ei }22
i=12 .
= z 11 .
= {Vi , Vj+10 , V21 , V22 }10
i=1 .
= z 22 .
680

{E4 , E6 , E7 }.
= 3z.
{V12 , V13 }.
= 3z 2 .
684

Figure 10. The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic

Notions of Neutrosophic SuperHyperChord in the Neutrosophic Example (16.3)


{E1 , E3 }.
= z2.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-Chord = {V1 , V6 }.
= 3 × 3z 2 .
688

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Chord SuperHyperPolynomial = 0z 0 .
= {}.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-Chord SuperHyperPolynomial =
= 0z 0 .
692


{}.
= 0z 0 .
= 0z 0 .
696

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-Chord SuperHyperPolynomial = 0z 0 .
700




704

708

= {}.
= 0z 0 .
712




= {}.
= 0z 0 .
716

= {}.
= 0z 0 .
= 0z 0 .
720


= {}.
= 0z 0 .
= {}.
= 0z 0 .
724

= {}.
= 0z 0 .
= {}.
= 0z 0 .
728




= {}.
= 0z 0 .
= {}.
= 0z 0 .
732
5 The Neutrosophic Departures on The Theoretical 733
Results Toward Theoretical Motivations 734
The previous Neutrosophic approach apply on the upcoming Neutrosophic results on 735
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses. 736
Proposition 5.1. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath ESHP : (V, E). 737
Then 738

= {}.
= 0z 0 .
= {}.
= 0z 0 .
Proof. Let 739
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
V |EN SHG |
, E |EN SHG |
3 3
740
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , V2EXT ERN AL ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
E |EN SHG | , V |EN SHG |
3 3
be a longest path taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath 741
ESHP : (V, E). There’s a new way to redefine as 742
ViEXT ERN AL ∼ VjEXT ERN AL ≡

∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL ∈ Ez ≡
∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , {ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL } ⊆ Ez .
The term “EXTERNAL” implies |N (ViEXT ERN AL )| ≥ |N (Vj )| where Vj is 743
corresponded to ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of SuperHyperChord. The latter is 744
Example 5.2. In the Figure (23), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath 746
ESHP : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, in the 747
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (23), is the SuperHyperChord. 748
Proposition 5.3. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle ESHC : (V, E). 749
Then 750

= {}.
= 0z 0
= {}.
= 0z 0
Figure 23. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath Associated to the Notions of Neutrosophic

SuperHyperChord in the Example (16.5)
Proof. Let 751
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
V |EN SHG |
, E |EN SHG |
3 3
752
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , V2EXT ERN AL ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
E |EN SHG | , V |EN SHG |
3 3
be a longest path taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle 753
ESHC : (V, E). There’s a new way to redefine as 754

Example 5.4. In the Figure (24), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle 758
N SHC : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Neutrosophic 759
Figure 24. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions

SuperHyperSet, in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (24), is the Neutrosophic 760
Proposition 5.5. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). 762
Then 763

= z0.
= {}.
= 0z 0 .
Proof. Let 764
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
CEN T ER, E2
765
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , CEN T ER
be a longest path taken a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). 766
There’s a new way to redefine as 767

Figure 25. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of

Neutrosophic SuperHyperChord in the Neutrosophic Example (16.9)
Example 5.6. In the Figure (25), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar 771
ESHS : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, 772
by the Algorithm in previous Neutrosophic result, of the Neutrosophic 773
SuperHyperVertices of the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E), in 774
the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (25), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperChord. 775
Proposition 5.7. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite 776
ESHB : (V, E). Then 777

= {Ei , Ej Ei ∈Pi , Ej ∈Pj , i6=j }.
= (|{Pi | |Pi | = min |Pj |}|)z |Pi |=minPj ∈EN SHG |Pj | .
Pj ∈EN SHG

= {V EXT ERN AL , V EXT ERN AL V EXT ERN AL ∈Pi , VjEXT ERN AL ∈Pj , i6=j }.

Pj ∈EN SHG
Proof. Let 778
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
V|Pi |=minP ∈E |Pj | , E|Pi |=minPj ∈EN SHG |Pj | .
j N SHG
779
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , V2EXT ERN AL ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
E|Pi |=minPj ∈EN SHG |Pj | , V|Pi |=minP ∈E |Pj |
j N SHG
is a longest path taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite 780
ESHB : (V, E). There’s a new way to redefine as 781

straightforward. Then there’s no at least one SuperHyperChord. Thus the notion of 784
quasi may be up but the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperChord could be 785
applied. There are only two SuperHyperParts. Thus every SuperHyperPart could have 786
one SuperHyperVertex as the representative in the 787
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
is a longest SuperHyperChord taken from a connected Neutrosophic 788
SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E). Thus only some SuperHyperVertices and only 789
minimum-Neutrosophic-of-SuperHyperPart SuperHyperEdges are attained in any 790
solution 791
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
The latter is straightforward. 792
Example 5.8. In the Neutrosophic Figure (26), the connected Neutrosophic 793
SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), is Neutrosophic highlighted and Neutrosophic 794
featured. The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Neutrosophic Algorithm in 795
previous Neutrosophic result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected 796
Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic 797
SuperHyperModel (26), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperChord. 798
Figure 26. Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite Neutrosophic Associated to the Neutro-

sophic Notions of Neutrosophic SuperHyperChord in the Example (16.11)
Proposition 5.9. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite 799
ESHM : (V, E). Then 800

= {Ei , Ej Ei ∈Pi , Ej ∈Pj , i6=j }.
Pj ∈EN SHG

= {V EXT ERN AL , V EXT ERN AL V EXT ERN AL ∈Pi , VjEXT ERN AL ∈Pj , i6=j }.

Pj ∈EN SHG
Proof. Let 801
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
V|P i |=minP ∈E |Pj | , E|Pi |=minPj ∈EN SHG |Pj | .
j N SHG
802
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , V2EXT ERN AL ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
E|Pi |=minPj ∈EN SHG |Pj | , V|Pi |=minP ∈E |Pj |
j N SHG
is a longest SuperHyperChord taken from a connected Neutrosophic 803
SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E). There’s a new way to redefine as 804

straightforward. Then there’s no at least one SuperHyperChord. Thus the notion of 807
quasi may be up but the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperChord could be 808
applied. There are only z 0 SuperHyperParts. Thus every SuperHyperPart could have 809
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
is a longest path taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite 811
ESHM : (V, E). Thus only some SuperHyperVertices and only 812
solution 814
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
ESHM : (V, E). The latter is straightforward. 816
Example 5.10. In the Figure (27), the connected Neutrosophic 817
SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E), is highlighted and Neutrosophic featured. 818
The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Algorithm in previous Neutrosophic 819
result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected Neutrosophic 820
SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (27), 821
is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperChord. 822
Proposition 5.11. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel 823
ESHW : (V, E). Then, 824
∗
|EN SHG |
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Chord = {Ei∗ }i=1 .
∗
= z |EN SHG | .
|E ∗ |
= {V EXT ERN AL ∈ Ei∗ }i=1N SHG .
∗
= z 2×|EN SHG | .
Proof. Let 825
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1∗ ,
CEN T ER, E2∗
Figure 27. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite Associated to the Notions of

Neutrosophic SuperHyperChord in the Example (16.13)
826
P :
E1∗ , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2∗ , CEN T ER
is a longest SuperHyperChord taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel 827
ESHW : (V, E). There’s a new way to redefine as 828

straightforward. Then there’s at least one SuperHyperChord. Thus the notion of quasi 831
isn’t up and the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperChord could be applied. The 832
unique embedded SuperHyperChord proposes some longest SuperHyperChord excerpt 833
from some representatives. The latter is straightforward. 834
SuperHyperWheel N SHW : (V, E), is Neutrosophic highlighted and featured. The 836
obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Algorithm in previous result, of the 837
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel 838
ESHW : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (28), is the Neutrosophic 839
6 The Surveys of Mathematical Sets On The 841
Results But As The Initial Motivation 842
For the SuperHyperChord, Neutrosophic SuperHyperChord, and the Neutrosophic 843
SuperHyperChord, some general results are introduced. 844
Figure 28. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel Neutrosophic Associated to the Neu-

trosophic Notions of Neutrosophic SuperHyperChord in the Neutrosophic Example
(16.15)
Remark 6.1. Let remind that the Neutrosophic SuperHyperChord is “redefined” on the 845
positions of the alphabets. 846
Corollary 6.2. Assume Neutrosophic SuperHyperChord. Then 847
N eutrosophic SuperHyperChord =
{theSuperHyperChordof theSuperHyperV ertices |
max |SuperHyperOf f ensive
SuperHyperChord
|N eutrosophiccardinalityamidthoseSuperHyperChord. }
plus one Neutrosophic SuperHypeNeighbor to one. Where σi is the unary operation on 848
the SuperHyperVertices of the SuperHyperGraph to assign the determinacy, the 849
indeterminacy and the neutrality, for i = 1, 2, 3, respectively. 850
Corollary 6.3. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph on the same identical letter 851
of the alphabet. Then the notion of Neutrosophic SuperHyperChord and 852
SuperHyperChord coincide. 853
of the alphabet. Then a consecutive sequence of the SuperHyperVertices is a 855
Neutrosophic SuperHyperChord if and only if it’s a SuperHyperChord. 856
of the alphabet. Then a consecutive sequence of the SuperHyperVertices is a strongest 858
SuperHyperChord if and only if it’s a longest SuperHyperChord. 859
Corollary 6.6. Assume SuperHyperClasses of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph on the 860
same identical letter of the alphabet. Then its Neutrosophic SuperHyperChord is its 861
SuperHyperChord and reversely. 862
Corollary 6.7. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath(-/SuperHyperChord, 863
SuperHyperStar, SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, SuperHyperWheel) on 864
the same identical letter of the alphabet. Then its Neutrosophic SuperHyperChord is its 865
SuperHyperChord and reversely. 866
Corollary 6.8. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. Then its Neutrosophic 867
SuperHyperChord isn’t well-defined if and only if its SuperHyperChord isn’t well-defined. 868
Corollary 6.9. Assume SuperHyperClasses of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. Then 869
its Neutrosophic SuperHyperChord isn’t well-defined if and only if its SuperHyperChord 870
isn’t well-defined. 871
Then its Neutrosophic SuperHyperChord isn’t well-defined if and only if its 874
SuperHyperChord isn’t well-defined. 875
Corollary 6.11. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. Then its Neutrosophic 876
SuperHyperChord is well-defined if and only if its SuperHyperChord is well-defined. 877
Corollary 6.12. Assume SuperHyperClasses of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. 878
Then its Neutrosophic SuperHyperChord is well-defined if and only if its 879
SuperHyperChord is well-defined. 880
Then its Neutrosophic SuperHyperChord is well-defined if and only if its 883
SuperHyperChord is well-defined. 884
Proposition 6.14. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. Then V 885
is 886
(i) : the dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperChord; 887
(ii) : the strong dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperChord; 888
(iii) : the connected dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperChord; 889
(iv) : the δ-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperChord; 890
(v) : the strong δ-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperChord; 891
(vi) : the connected δ-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperChord. 892
Proposition 6.15. Let N T G : (V, E, σ, µ) be a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. Then 893
∅ is 894
(i) : the SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperChord; 895
(ii) : the strong SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperChord; 896
(iii) : the connected defensive SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperChord; 897
(iv) : the δ-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperChord; 898
(v) : the strong δ-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperChord; 899
(vi) : the connected δ-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperChord. 900
Proposition 6.16. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. Then an 901
independent SuperHyperSet is 902
(i) : the SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperChord; 903
(ii) : the strong SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperChord; 904
(iii) : the connected SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperChord; 905
(iv) : the δ-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperChord; 906
(v) : the strong δ-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperChord; 907
(vi) : the connected δ-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperChord. 908
Proposition 6.17. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a Neutrosophic SuperHyperUniform 909
SuperHyperGraph which is a SuperHyperChord/SuperHyperPath. Then V is a maximal 910
(i) : SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperChord; 911
(ii) : strong SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperChord; 912
(iii) : connected SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperChord; 913
(iv) : O(ESHG)-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperChord; 914
(v) : strong O(ESHG)-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperChord; 915
(vi) : connected O(ESHG)-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperChord; 916
Where the exterior SuperHyperVertices and the interior SuperHyperVertices coincide. 917
Proposition 6.18. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph which is a 918
SuperHyperUniform SuperHyperWheel. Then V is a maximal 919
(i) : dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperChord; 920
(ii) : strong dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperChord; 921
(iii) : connected dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperChord; 922
(iv) : O(ESHG)-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperChord; 923
(v) : strong O(ESHG)-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperChord; 924
(vi) : connected O(ESHG)-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperChord; 925
Where the exterior SuperHyperVertices and the interior SuperHyperVertices coincide. 926
SuperHyperGraph which is a SuperHyperChord/SuperHyperPath. Then the number of 928
(i) : the SuperHyperChord; 929
(ii) : the SuperHyperChord; 930
(iii) : the connected SuperHyperChord; 931
(iv) : the O(ESHG)-SuperHyperChord; 932
(v) : the strong O(ESHG)-SuperHyperChord; 933
(vi) : the connected O(ESHG)-SuperHyperChord. 934
is one and it’s only V. Where the exterior SuperHyperVertices and the interior 935
SuperHyperVertices coincide. 936
SuperHyperGraph which is a SuperHyperWheel. Then the number of 938
(i) : the dual SuperHyperChord; 939
(ii) : the dual SuperHyperChord; 940
(iii) : the dual connected SuperHyperChord; 941
(iv) : the dual O(ESHG)-SuperHyperChord; 942
(v) : the strong dual O(ESHG)-SuperHyperChord; 943
(vi) : the connected dual O(ESHG)-SuperHyperChord. 944
is one and it’s only V. Where the exterior SuperHyperVertices and the interior 945
SuperHyperGraph which is a SuperHyperStar/SuperHyperComplete 948
SuperHyperBipartite/SuperHyperComplete SuperHyperMultipartite. Then a 949
SuperHyperSet contains [the SuperHyperCenter and] the half of multiplying r with the 950
number of all the SuperHyperEdges plus one of all the SuperHyperVertices is a 951
O(ESHG)
(iv) : 2 + 1-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperChord; 955
O(ESHG)
(v) : strong 2 + 1-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperChord; 956
O(ESHG)
(vi) : connected 2 + 1-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperChord. 957
SuperHyperBipartite/SuperHyperComplete SuperHyperMultipartite. Then a 960
SuperHyperSet contains the half of multiplying r with the number of all the 961
SuperHyperEdges plus one of all the SuperHyperVertices in the biggest SuperHyperPart 962
is a 963
(iv) : δ-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperChord; 967
(v) : strong δ-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperChord; 968
(vi) : connected δ-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperChord. 969
SuperHyperBipartite/SuperHyperComplete SuperHyperMultipartite. Then Then the 972
number of 973
O(ESHG)
(iv) : 2 + 1-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperChord; 977
O(ESHG)
(v) : strong 2 + 1-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperChord; 978
O(ESHG)
(vi) : connected 2 + 1-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperChord. 979
is one and it’s only S, a SuperHyperSet contains [the SuperHyperCenter and] the half of 980
multiplying r with the number of all the SuperHyperEdges plus one of all the 981
SuperHyperVertices. Where the exterior SuperHyperVertices and the interior 982
Proposition 6.24. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. The 984
number of connected component is |V − S| if there’s a SuperHyperSet which is a dual 985
(iv) : SuperHyperChord; 989
(v) : strong 1-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperChord; 990
(vi) : connected 1-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperChord. 991
Proposition 6.25. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. Then the 992
number is at most O(ESHG) and the Neutrosophic number is at most On (ESHG). 993
Proposition 6.26. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph which is 994
SuperHyperComplete. The number is O(ESHG:(V,E)) 2 + 1 and the Neutrosophic number is 995
min Σv∈{v1 ,v2 ,··· ,vt } O(ESHG:(V,E)) ⊆V σ(v), in the setting of dual 996
t>
2
(iv) : ( O(ESHG:(V,E))
2 + 1)-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperChord; 1000
(v) : strong ( O(ESHG:(V,E))

(vi) : connected ( O(ESHG:(V,E))

2 + 1)-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperChord. 1002
∅. The number is 0 and the Neutrosophic number is 0, for an independent 1004
SuperHyperSet in the setting of dual 1005
(iv) : 0-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperChord; 1009
(v) : strong 0-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperChord; 1010
(vi) : connected 0-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperChord. 1011
SuperHyperComplete. Then there’s no independent SuperHyperSet. 1013
SuperHyperChord/SuperHyperPath/SuperHyperWheel. The number is 1015
O(ESHG : (V, E)) and the Neutrosophic number is On (ESHG : (V, E)), in the setting 1016
of a dual 1017
(iv) : O(ESHG : (V, E))-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperChord; 1021
(v) : strong O(ESHG : (V, E))-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperChord; 1022
(vi) : connected O(ESHG : (V, E))-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperChord. 1023
SuperHyperStar/complete SuperHyperBipartite/complete SuperHyperMultiPartite. The 1025
number is O(ESHG:(V,E))
2 + 1 and the Neutrosophic number is 1026
min Σv∈{v1 ,v2 ,··· ,vt } O(ESHG:(V,E)) ⊆V σ(v), in the setting of a dual 1027
t>
2
(iv) : ( O(ESHG:(V,E))
(v) : strong ( O(ESHG:(V,E))

(vi) : connected ( O(ESHG:(V,E))

2 + 1)-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperChord. 1033
Proposition 6.31. Let N SHF : (V, E) be a SuperHyperFamily of the ESHGs : (V, E) 1034
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs which are from one-type SuperHyperClass which the 1035
result is obtained for the individuals. Then the results also hold for the 1036
SuperHyperFamily N SHF : (V, E) of these specific SuperHyperClasses of the 1037
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs. 1038
Proposition 6.32. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a strong Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. If 1039
S is a dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperChord, then ∀v ∈ V \ S, ∃x ∈ S such that 1040
(i) v ∈ Ns (x); 1041
(ii) vx ∈ E. 1042
Proposition 6.33. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a strong Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. If 1043
S is a dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperChord, then 1044
(i) S is SuperHyperChord set; 1045
(ii) there’s S ⊆ S 0 such that |S 0 | is SuperHyperChromatic number. 1046
Proposition 6.34. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a strong Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. 1047
Then 1048
(i) Γ ≤ O; 1049
(ii) Γs ≤ On . 1050
Proposition 6.35. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a strong Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 1051
which is connected. Then 1052
(i) Γ ≤ O − 1; 1053
(ii) Γs ≤ On − Σ3i=1 σi (x). 1054
Proposition 6.36. Let ESHG : (V, E) be an odd SuperHyperPath. Then 1055
(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {v2 , v4 , · · · , vn−1 } is a dual SuperHyperDefensive 1056
SuperHyperChord; 1057
(ii) Γ = b n2 c + 1 and corresponded SuperHyperSet is S = {v2 , v4 , · · · , vn−1 }; 1058
(iii) Γs = min{Σs∈S={v2 ,v4 ,··· ,vn−1 } Σ3i=1 σi (s), Σs∈S={v1 ,v3 ,··· ,vn−1 } Σ3i=1 σi (s)}; 1059
(iv) the SuperHyperSets S1 = {v2 , v4 , · · · , vn−1 } and S2 = {v1 , v3 , · · · , vn−1 } are only 1060
a dual SuperHyperChord. 1061
Proposition 6.37. Let ESHG : (V, E) be an even SuperHyperPath. Then 1062
(i) the set S = {v2 , v4 , · · · .vn } is a dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperChord; 1063
(ii) Γ = b n2 c and corresponded SuperHyperSets are {v2 , v4 , · · · .vn } and 1064
{v1 , v3 , · · · .vn−1 }; 1065
(iii) Γs = min{Σs∈S={v2 ,v4 ,··· ,vn } Σ3i=1 σi (s), Σs∈S={v1 ,v3 ,··· .vn−1 } Σ3i=1 σi (s)}; 1066
(iv) the SuperHyperSets S1 = {v2 , v4 , · · · .vn } and S2 = {v1 , v3 , · · · .vn−1 } are only 1067
dual SuperHyperChord. 1068
Proposition 6.38. Let ESHG : (V, E) be an even SuperHyperChord. Then 1069
(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {v2 , v4 , · · · , vn } is a dual SuperHyperDefensive 1070
(ii) Γ = b n2 c and corresponded SuperHyperSets are {v2 , v4 , · · · , vn } and 1072
{v1 , v3 , · · · , vn−1 }; 1073
(iii) Γs = min{Σs∈S={v2 ,v4 ,··· ,vn } σ(s), Σs∈S={v1 ,v3 ,··· ,vn−1 } σ(s)}; 1074
(iv) the SuperHyperSets S1 = {v2 , v4 , · · · , vn } and S2 = {v1 , v3 , · · · , vn−1 } are only 1075
Proposition 6.39. Let ESHG : (V, E) be an odd SuperHyperChord. Then 1077
(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {v2 , v4 , · · · , vn−1 } is a dual SuperHyperDefensive 1078
(ii) Γ = b n2 c + 1 and corresponded SuperHyperSet is S = {v2 , v4 , · · · , vn−1 }; 1080
(iii) Γs = min{Σs∈S={v2 ,v4 ,··· .vn−1 } Σ3i=1 σi (s), Σs∈S={v1 ,v3 ,··· .vn−1 } Σ3i=1 σi (s)}; 1081
(iv) the SuperHyperSets S1 = {v2 , v4 , · · · .vn−1 } and S2 = {v1 , v3 , · · · .vn−1 } are only 1082
Proposition 6.40. Let ESHG : (V, E) be SuperHyperStar. Then 1084
(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {c} is a dual maximal SuperHyperChord; 1085
(ii) Γ = 1; 1086
(iii) Γs = Σ3i=1 σi (c); 1087
(iv) the SuperHyperSets S = {c} and S ⊂ S 0 are only dual SuperHyperChord. 1088
Proposition 6.41. Let ESHG : (V, E) be SuperHyperWheel. Then 1089
6+3(i−1)≤n
(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {v1 , v3 } ∪ {v6 , v9 · · · , vi+6 , · · · , vn }i=1 is a dual 1090
maximal SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperChord; 1091
6+3(i−1)≤n
(ii) Γ = |{v1 , v3 } ∪ {v6 , v9 · · · , vi+6 , · · · , vn }i=1 |; 1092
(iii) Γs = Σ{v1 ,v3 }∪{v6 ,v9 ··· ,vi+6 ,··· ,vn }6+3(i−1)≤n Σ3i=1 σi (s); 1093
i=1
6+3(i−1)≤n
(iv) the SuperHyperSet {v1 , v3 } ∪ {v6 , v9 · · · , vi+6 , · · · , vn }i=1 is only a dual 1094
maximal SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperChord. 1095
Proposition 6.42. Let ESHG : (V, E) be an odd SuperHyperComplete. Then 1096
bn
2 c+1
(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {vi }i=1 is a dual SuperHyperDefensive 1097
(ii) Γ = b n2 c + 1; 1099
(iii) Γs = min{Σs∈S Σ3i=1 σi (s)} 2

b n c+1 ; 1100
S={vi }i=1
b n c+1
(iv) the SuperHyperSet S = {vi }i=1
2
is only a dual SuperHyperDefensive 1101
Proposition 6.43. Let ESHG : (V, E) be an even SuperHyperComplete. Then 1103
bnc
(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {vi }i=1
2
is a dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperChord; 1104
(ii) Γ = b n2 c; 1105

bnc ; 1106
S={vi }i=1
bnc
(iv) the SuperHyperSet S = {vi }i=1
2
is only a dual maximal SuperHyperDefensive 1107
Proposition 6.44. Let N SHF : (V, E) be a m-SuperHyperFamily of Neutrosophic 1109
SuperHyperStars with common Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex SuperHyperSet. Then 1110
(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {c1 , c2 , · · · , cm } is a dual SuperHyperDefensive 1111
SuperHyperChord for N SHF; 1112
(ii) Γ = m for N SHF : (V, E); 1113
(iii) Γs = Σm 3
i=1 Σj=1 σj (ci ) for N SHF : (V, E); 1114
(iv) the SuperHyperSets S = {c1 , c2 , · · · , cm } and S ⊂ S 0 are only dual 1115
SuperHyperChord for N SHF : (V, E). 1116
Proposition 6.45. Let N SHF : (V, E) be an m-SuperHyperFamily of odd 1117
SuperHyperComplete SuperHyperGraphs with common Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 1118
SuperHyperSet. Then 1119
b n c+1
(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {vi }i=1
2
is a dual maximal SuperHyperDefensive 1120
SuperHyperChord for N SHF; 1121
(ii) Γ = b n2 c + 1 for N SHF : (V, E); 1122

b n c+1 for N SHF : (V, E); 1123
S={vi }i=1
b n c+1
(iv) the SuperHyperSets S = {vi }i=1
2
are only a dual maximal SuperHyperChord for 1124
N SHF : (V, E). 1125
Proposition 6.46. Let N SHF : (V, E) be a m-SuperHyperFamily of even 1126
SuperHyperComplete SuperHyperGraphs with common Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 1127
SuperHyperSet. Then 1128
bn
2c
(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {vi }i=1 is a dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperChord 1129
for N SHF : (V, E); 1130
(ii) Γ = b n2 c for N SHF : (V, E); 1131

bnc for N SHF : (V, E); 1132
S={vi }i=1
bnc
(iv) the SuperHyperSets S = {vi }i=1
2
are only dual maximal SuperHyperChord for 1133
N SHF : (V, E). 1134
Then following statements hold; 1136
(i) if s ≥ t and a SuperHyperSet S of SuperHyperVertices is an 1137
t-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperChord, then S is an s-SuperHyperDefensive 1138
(ii) if s ≤ t and a SuperHyperSet S of SuperHyperVertices is a dual 1140
t-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperChord, then S is a dual s-SuperHyperDefensive 1141
Then following statements hold; 1144
(i) if s ≥ t + 2 and a SuperHyperSet S of SuperHyperVertices is an 1145
t-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperChord, then S is an s-SuperHyperPowerful 1146
(ii) if s ≤ t and a SuperHyperSet S of SuperHyperVertices is a dual 1148
t-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperChord, then S is a dual s-SuperHyperPowerful 1149
Proposition 6.49. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a[an] 1151
[V-]SuperHyperUniform-strong-Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. Then following 1152
statements hold; 1153
(i) if ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| < b 2r c + 1, then ESHG : (V, E) is an 1154
2-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperChord; 1155
(ii) if ∀a ∈ V \ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| > b 2r c + 1, then ESHG : (V, E) is a dual 1156
(iii) if ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ V \ S| = 0, then ESHG : (V, E) is an V-SuperHyperDefensive 1158
(iv) if ∀a ∈ V \ S, |Ns (a) ∩ V \ S| = 0, then ESHG : (V, E) is a dual 1160
V-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperChord. 1161
Proposition 6.50. Let ESHG : (V, E) is a[an] 1162
[V-]SuperHyperUniform-strong-Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. Then following 1163
statements hold; 1164
(i) ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| < b 2r c + 1 if ESHG : (V, E) is an 2-SuperHyperDefensive 1165
(ii) ∀a ∈ V \ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| > b 2r c + 1 if ESHG : (V, E) is a dual 1167
(iii) ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ V \ S| = 0 if ESHG : (V, E) is an V-SuperHyperDefensive 1169
(iv) ∀a ∈ V \ S, |Ns (a) ∩ V \ S| = 0 if ESHG : (V, E) is a dual 1171
V-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperChord. 1172
[V-]SuperHyperUniform-strong-Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph which is a 1174
SuperHyperComplete. Then following statements hold; 1175
(i) ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| < b O−1

2 c + 1 if ESHG : (V, E) is an 2-SuperHyperDefensive 1176
(ii) ∀a ∈ V \ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| > b O−1

2 c + 1 if ESHG : (V, E) is a dual 1178
(iii) ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ V \ S| = 0 if ESHG : (V, E) is an (O − 1)-SuperHyperDefensive 1180
(O − 1)-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperChord. 1183
[V-]SuperHyperUniform-strong-Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph which is a 1185
SuperHyperComplete. Then following statements hold; 1186
(i) if ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| < b O−1

2 c + 1, then ESHG : (V, E) is an 1187
(ii) if ∀a ∈ V \ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| > b O−1

2 c + 1, then ESHG : (V, E) is a dual 1189
(iii) if ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ V \ S| = 0, then ESHG : (V, E) is 1191
(O − 1)-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperChord; 1192
(O − 1)-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperChord. 1194
[V-]SuperHyperUniform-strong-Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph which is 1196
SuperHyperChord. Then following statements hold; 1197
(i) ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| < 2 if ESHG : (V, E)) is an 2-SuperHyperDefensive 1198
(ii) ∀a ∈ V \ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| > 2 if ESHG : (V, E) is a dual 2-SuperHyperDefensive 1200
(iii) ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ V \ S| = 0 if ESHG : (V, E) is an 2-SuperHyperDefensive 1202
2-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperChord. 1205
[V-]SuperHyperUniform-strong-Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph which is 1207
SuperHyperChord. Then following statements hold; 1208
(i) if ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| < 2, then ESHG : (V, E) is an 2-SuperHyperDefensive 1209
(ii) if ∀a ∈ V \ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| > 2, then ESHG : (V, E) is a dual 1211
(iii) if ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ V \ S| = 0, then ESHG : (V, E) is an 2-SuperHyperDefensive 1213
2-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperChord. 1216
7 Neutrosophic Applications in Cancer’s 1217
Neutrosophic Recognition 1218
The cancer is the Neutrosophic disease but the Neutrosophic model is going to figure 1219
out what’s going on this Neutrosophic phenomenon. The special Neutrosophic case of 1220
this Neutrosophic disease is considered and as the consequences of the model, some 1221
parameters are used. The cells are under attack of this disease but the moves of the 1222
cancer in the special region are the matter of mind. The Neutrosophic recognition of the 1223
cancer could help to find some Neutrosophic treatments for this Neutrosophic disease. 1224
In the following, some Neutrosophic steps are Neutrosophic devised on this disease. 1225
Step 1. (Neutrosophic Definition) The Neutrosophic recognition of the cancer in 1226
the long-term Neutrosophic function. 1227
Step 2. (Neutrosophic Issue) The specific region has been assigned by the 1228
Neutrosophic model [it’s called Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph] and the long 1229
Neutrosophic cycle of the move from the cancer is identified by this research. 1230
Sometimes the move of the cancer hasn’t be easily identified since there are some 1231
determinacy, indeterminacy and neutrality about the moves and the effects of the 1232
cancer on that region; this event leads us to choose another model [it’s said to be 1233
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph] to have convenient perception on what’s 1234
happened and what’s done. 1235
Step 3. (Neutrosophic Model) There are some specific Neutrosophic models, 1236
which are well-known and they’ve got the names, and some general Neutrosophic 1237
models. The moves and the Neutrosophic traces of the cancer on the complex 1238
tracks and between complicated groups of cells could be fantasized by a 1239
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath(-/SuperHyperChord, SuperHyperStar, 1240
SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, SuperHyperWheel). The aim is to 1241
find either the Neutrosophic SuperHyperChord or the Neutrosophic 1242
SuperHyperChord in those Neutrosophic Neutrosophic SuperHyperModels. 1243
Figure 29. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite Associated to the Notions of Neutro-

sophic SuperHyperChord
Table 4. The Values of Vertices, SuperVertices, Edges, HyperEdges, and SuperHyper-

Edges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite
8 Case 1: The Initial Neutrosophic Steps 1244
Toward Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite as 1245
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel 1246
Step 4. (Neutrosophic Solution) In the Neutrosophic Figure (29), the 1247
Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite is Neutrosophic highlighted and Neutrosophic 1248
featured. 1249
By using the Neutrosophic Figure (29) and the Table (4), the Neutrosophic 1250
SuperHyperBipartite is obtained. 1251
The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Neutrosophic Algorithm in 1252
previous Neutrosophic result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the 1253
connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), in the 1254
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (29), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperChord. 1255
Figure 30. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite Associated to the Notions of

Neutrosophic SuperHyperChord
Table 5. The Values of Vertices, SuperVertices, Edges, HyperEdges, and SuperHyper-

Edges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite
9 Case 2: The Increasing Neutrosophic Steps 1256
Toward Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite as 1257
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel 1258
Step 4. (Neutrosophic Solution) In the Neutrosophic Figure (30), the 1259
Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite is Neutrosophic highlighted and 1260
Neutrosophic featured. 1261
By using the Neutrosophic Figure (30) and the Table (5), the Neutrosophic 1262
SuperHyperMultipartite is obtained. 1263
The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Neutrosophic Algorithm in 1264
previous result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected 1265
Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic 1266
SuperHyperModel (30), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperChord. 1267
10 Wondering Open Problems But As The 1268
Directions To Forming The Motivations 1269
In what follows, some “problems” and some “questions” are proposed. 1270
The SuperHyperChord and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperChord are defined on a 1271
real-world application, titled “Cancer’s Recognitions”. 1272
Question 10.1. Which the else SuperHyperModels could be defined based on Cancer’s 1273
recognitions? 1274
Question 10.2. Are there some SuperHyperNotions related to SuperHyperChord and 1275
the Neutrosophic SuperHyperChord? 1276
Question 10.3. Are there some Algorithms to be defined on the SuperHyperModels to 1277
compute them? 1278
Question 10.4. Which the SuperHyperNotions are related to beyond the 1279
SuperHyperChord and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperChord? 1280
Problem 10.5. The SuperHyperChord and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperChord do a 1281
SuperHyperModel for the Cancer’s recognitions and they’re based on SuperHyperChord, 1282
are there else? 1283
Problem 10.6. Which the fundamental SuperHyperNumbers are related to these 1284
SuperHyperNumbers types-results? 1285
Problem 10.7. What’s the independent research based on Cancer’s recognitions 1286
concerning the multiple types of SuperHyperNotions? 1287
11 Conclusion and Closing Remarks 1288
In this section, concluding remarks and closing remarks are represented. The drawbacks 1289
of this research are illustrated. Some benefits and some advantages of this research are 1290
highlighted. 1291
This research uses some approaches to make Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs more 1292
understandable. In this endeavor, two SuperHyperNotions are defined on the 1293
SuperHyperChord. For that sake in the second definition, the main definition of the 1294
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph is redefined on the position of the alphabets. Based on 1295
the new definition for the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, the new SuperHyperNotion, 1296
Neutrosophic SuperHyperChord, finds the convenient background to implement some 1297
results based on that. Some SuperHyperClasses and some Neutrosophic 1298
SuperHyperClasses are the cases of this research on the modeling of the regions where 1299
are under the attacks of the cancer to recognize this disease as it’s mentioned on the 1300
title “Cancer’s Recognitions”. To formalize the instances on the SuperHyperNotion, 1301
SuperHyperChord, the new SuperHyperClasses and SuperHyperClasses, are introduced. 1302
Some general results are gathered in the section on the SuperHyperChord and the 1303
Neutrosophic SuperHyperChord. The clarifications, instances and literature reviews 1304
have taken the whole way through. In this research, the literature reviews have fulfilled 1305
the lines containing the notions and the results. The SuperHyperGraph and 1306
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph are the SuperHyperModels on the “Cancer’s 1307
Recognitions” and both bases are the background of this research. Sometimes the 1308
cancer has been happened on the region, full of cells, groups of cells and embedded 1309
styles. In this segment, the SuperHyperModel proposes some SuperHyperNotions based 1310
on the connectivities of the moves of the cancer in the longest and strongest styles with 1311
the formation of the design and the architecture are formally called “ SuperHyperChord” 1312
in the themes of jargons and buzzwords. The prefix “SuperHyper” refers to the theme 1313
of the embedded styles to figure out the background for the SuperHyperNotions. In the 1314
Table (6), benefits and avenues for this research are, figured out, pointed out and 1315
spoken out. 1316
Table 6. An Overlook On This Research And Beyond

Advantages Limitations
1. Redefining Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 1. General Results
2. SuperHyperChord
3. Neutrosophic SuperHyperChord 2. Other SuperHyperNumbers
4. Modeling of Cancer’s Recognitions
5. SuperHyperClasses 3. SuperHyperFamilies
12 Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality But As The 1317
Forms 1319
Definition 12.1. (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality). 1320
(i) Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperDuality if ∀Ei ∈ E 0 , ∃Ej ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ E 0 1324
such that Va ∈ Ei , Ej ; 1325
(ii) Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperDuality if ∀Ei ∈ E 0 , ∃Ej ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ E 0 1326
such that Va ∈ Ei , Ej and 1327
(iii) Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperDuality if ∀Vi ∈ V 0 , ∃Vj ∈ VESHG:(V,E) \ V 0 1329
such that Vi , Vj ∈ Ea ; 1330
(iv) Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperDuality if ∀Vi ∈ V 0 , ∃Vj ∈ VESHG:(V,E) \ V 0 1331
such that Vi , Vj ∈ Ea and 1332
(v) Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality if it’s either of Neutrosophic 1334
e-SuperHyperDuality, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperDuality, Neutrosophic 1335
v-SuperHyperDuality, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperDuality. 1336
Definition 12.2. ((Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDuality). 1337
(i) an Extreme SuperHyperDuality if it’s either of Neutrosophic 1341
v-SuperHyperDuality, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperDuality and C(N SHG) for 1343
Extreme SuperHyperDuality; 1348
(ii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality if it’s either of Neutrosophic 1349
a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum Neutrosophic 1352
Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality; 1356
(iii) an Extreme SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of 1357
Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperDuality, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperDuality, 1358
Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperDuality, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperDuality and 1359
Extreme SuperHyperDuality; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its 1365
(iv) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either 1367
of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperDuality, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperDuality, 1368
SuperHyperDuality; and the Neutrosophic power is corresponded to its 1376
(v) an Extreme R-SuperHyperDuality if it’s either of Neutrosophic 1378
Extreme SuperHyperDuality; 1385
(vi) a Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality if it’s either of Neutrosophic 1386
Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality; 1393
(vii) an Extreme R-SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either 1394
Extreme SuperHyperDuality; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its 1402
(viii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either 1404
SuperHyperDuality; and the Neutrosophic power is corresponded to its 1413
SuperHyperDuality, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly 1418
straightforward. E1 and E3 are some empty Extreme SuperHyperEdges but E2 is 1419
a loop Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge and E4 is a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. 1420
Thus in the terms of Neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only one 1421
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge, namely, E4 . The Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, 1422
V3 is Neutrosophic isolated means that there’s no Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge 1423
has it as a Neutrosophic endpoint. Thus the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 , 1424
is excluded in every given Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality. 1425
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality = {E4 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality = {V4 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z.
SuperHyperDuality. 1434


C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality = {E4 , E2 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial = 2z 2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality = {V1 , V4 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial = 15z 2 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial = 4z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality = {E3i+13i=0 , E3i+243i=0 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial 6z 8 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality = {V3i+17i=0 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality = {E15 , E16 , E17 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial = z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality = {V3 , V13 , V8 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial =
4 × 5 × 5z 3 .

4 × 5 × 5z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality = {E3i+13i=0 , E23 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality = {V3i+13i=0 , V15 }.

4 × 5 × 5z 3 .

3 × 3z 2 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality = {V1 , Vii610=5,7,8 }.
i=4

3 × 3z 2 .



(2 × 1 × 2) + (2 × 4 × 5)z.

(1 × 1 × 2)z.

(2 × 2 × 2)z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality = {E3i+1i=03 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality = {V2i+1i=05 }.



C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial
= 10 × 9 + 10 × 6 + 12 × 9 + 12 × 6z 2 .
Proposition 12.4. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath 1497
ESHP : (V, E). Then 1498
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality =

|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= {Ei }i=1 3
.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial
= 3z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality
= {ViEXT ERN AL }i=1 3

.
Y |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= |V EXT ERN AL ESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality z 3 .
Proof. Let 1499
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
E |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality , V EXT ERN AL |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality .
3 3

corresponded to ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of SuperHyperDuality. The latter is 1503
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (23), is the SuperHyperDuality. 1507
Proposition 12.6. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle 1508
ESHC : (V, E). Then 1509
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality =

= {Ei }i=1 3
.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial
= 3z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality

.
Proof. Let 1510
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
3 3

Then 1521
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperDuality = {E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial
= |i | Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E)|Neutrosophic Cardinality |z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperDuality = {CEN T ER ∈ VESHG:(V,E) }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
Proof. Let 1522
P : ViEXT ERN AL , Ei , CEN T ER, VjEXT ERN AL .

the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (25), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality. 1532
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperDuality

= {Ei ∈ EPi ESHG:(V,E) , |Pi ESHG:(V,E) | = min |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈ P ESHG:(V,E) |}.
i
X
=( (min |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈ P ESHG:(V,E) |)choose|Pi ESHG:(V,E) |)
i
i=|P ESHG:(V,E) |
ESHG:(V,E)
∈P ESHG:(V,E) |
z min |Pi
= {ViEXT ERN AL ∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , Vi
EXT ERN AL
∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , i 6= j}.

X X
= =( (|Pi ESHG:(V,E) |choose 2) = z 2 .
EXT ERN AL |
|VESHG:(V,E) i=|P ESHG:(V,E) |
Neutrosophic Cardinality
Proof. Let 1535
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmin i |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1

straightforward. Then there’s at least one SuperHyperDuality. Thus the notion of quasi 1540
isn’t up and the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperDuality could be applied. 1541
There are only two SuperHyperParts. Thus every SuperHyperPart could have one 1542
SuperHyperVertex as the representative in the 1543
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
is a longest SuperHyperDuality taken from a connected Neutrosophic 1544
solution 1547
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
SuperHyperModel (26), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality. 1554

= {Ei ∈ EPi ESHG:(V,E) , |Pi ESHG:(V,E) | = min |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈ P ESHG:(V,E) |}.
i
X
i
i=|P ESHG:(V,E) |
ESHG:(V,E)
∈P ESHG:(V,E) |
z min |Pi
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , Vi
EXT ERN AL
∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , i 6= j}.

X X
EXT ERN AL |
Proof. Let 1557
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
is a longest SuperHyperDuality taken from a connected Neutrosophic 1558

There are only z 0 SuperHyperParts. Thus every SuperHyperPart could have one 1564
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
solution 1569
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality. 1577
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperDuality = {E ∗ ∈ EESHG:(V,E)

∗
}.
= |i | Ei∗ ∈ EESHG:(V,E)|
∗
|z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperDuality = {CEN T ER ∈ VESHG:(V,E) }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
Proof. Let 1580
P :
...,
∗ EXT ERN AL
E|E ∗ | , V|E ∗ |Neutrosophic Cardinality +1
ESHG:(V,E) Neutrosophic Cardinality ESHG:(V,E)
is a longest SuperHyperDuality taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel 1581

∃!Ez∗ ∈ EESHG:(V,E)
∗
, ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL ∈ Ez∗ ≡
∃!Ez∗ ∈ EESHG:(V,E)
∗
, {ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL } ⊆ Ez∗ .
The unique embedded SuperHyperDuality proposes some longest SuperHyperDuality 1587
excerpt from some representatives. The latter is straightforward. 1588
13 Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin But As The 1595
Forms 1597
Definition 13.1. (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin). 1598
(i) Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperJoin if ∀Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ E 0 , ∃Ej ∈ E 0 , such 1602
that Va ∈ Ei , Ej ; and ∀Ei , Ej ∈ E 0 , such that Va 6∈ Ei , Ej ; 1603
(ii) Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperJoin if ∀Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ E 0 , ∃Ej ∈ E 0 , 1604
such that Va ∈ Ei , Ej ; ∀Ei , Ej ∈ E 0 , such that Va 6∈ Ei , Ej ; and 1605
(iii) Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperJoin if ∀Vi ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ V 0 , ∃Vj ∈ V 0 , such 1607
that Vi , Vj 6∈ Ea ; and ∀Vi , Vj ∈ V 0 , such that Vi , Vj 6∈ Ea ; 1608
(iv) Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperJoin if ∀Vi ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ V 0 , ∃Vj ∈ V 0 , such 1609
that Vi , Vj ∈ Ea ; ∀Vi , Vj ∈ V 0 , such that Vi , Vj 6∈ Ea ; and 1610
(v) Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin if it’s either of Neutrosophic 1612
e-SuperHyperJoin, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperJoin, Neutrosophic 1613
v-SuperHyperJoin, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperJoin. 1614
Definition 13.2. ((Neutrosophic) SuperHyperJoin). 1615
(i) an Extreme SuperHyperJoin if it’s either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperJoin, 1619
Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperJoin, Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperJoin, and 1620
Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperJoin and C(N SHG) for an Extreme 1621
SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum Extreme cardinality of an 1622
Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality of the Extreme 1623
SuperHyperEdges in the consecutive Extreme sequence of Extreme 1624
Extreme SuperHyperJoin; 1626
(ii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin if it’s either of Neutrosophic 1627
v-SuperHyperJoin, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperJoin and C(N SHG) for a 1629
Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin; 1634
(iii) an Extreme SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of 1635
Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperJoin, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperJoin, Neutrosophic 1636
v-SuperHyperJoin, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperJoin and C(N SHG) for an 1637
Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Extreme 1638
Extreme SuperHyperJoin; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its Extreme 1643
coefficient; 1644
(iv) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of 1645
Neutrosophic number of the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of the 1650
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high 1651
SuperHyperJoin; and the Neutrosophic power is corresponded to its Neutrosophic 1654
coefficient; 1655
(v) an Extreme R-SuperHyperJoin if it’s either of Neutrosophic 1656
Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum Extreme cardinality 1659
of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality of the Extreme 1660
SuperHyperVertices in the consecutive Extreme sequence of Extreme 1661
Extreme SuperHyperJoin; 1663
(vi) a Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin if it’s either of Neutrosophic 1664
Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin; 1671
(vii) an Extreme R-SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of 1672
Extreme SuperHyperJoin; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its Extreme 1680
coefficient; 1681
(viii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of 1682
SuperHyperJoin; and the Neutrosophic power is corresponded to its Neutrosophic 1691
coefficient. 1692
SuperHyperJoin, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly 1696
SuperHyperJoin. 1704
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin = {E4 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin = {V4 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z.


C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin = {E4 , E2 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial = 2z 2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin = {V1 , V4 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial = 15z 2 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial = 4z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin = {E3i+13i=0 , E3i+243i=0 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial 6z 8 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin = {V3i+17i=0 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin = {E15 , E16 , E17 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial = z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin = {V3 , V13 , V8 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial =
4 × 5 × 5z 3 .

4 × 5 × 5z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin = {E3i+13i=0 , E23 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin = {V3i+13i=0 , V15 }.

4 × 5 × 5z 3 .

3 × 3z 2 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin = {V1 , Vii610=5,7,8 }.
i=4

3 × 3z 2 .



(1 × 5 × 5) + (1 × 2 + 1)z 3 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin = {V27 , V2 , V7 , V17 }.
(1 × 1 × 2 + 1)z 4 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin = {V27 , V2 , V7 , V17 }.
(1 × 1 × 2 + 1)z 4 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin = {E3i+1i=03 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin = {V2i+1i=05 }.



C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial
= 10 × 6 + 10 × 6 + 12 × 6 + 12 × 6z 2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin =

= {Ei }i=1 3
.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial
= 3z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin

.
Proof. Let 1778
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
3 3

corresponded to ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of SuperHyperJoin. The latter is 1782
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (23), is the SuperHyperJoin. 1786

= {Ei }i=1 3
.
= 3z 3 .

.
Proof. Let 1789
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
3 3

Then 1800
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperJoin = {E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperJoin = {CEN T ER ∈ VESHG:(V,E) }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
Proof. Let 1801

the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (25), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin. 1811
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperJoin

= (PERFECT MATCHING).
{Ei ∈ EPi ESHG:(V,E) ,
∀Pi ESHG:(V,E) , |Pi ESHG:(V,E) | = min |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈ P ESHG:(V,E) |}.
i
= (OTHERWISE).
{},
If ∃Pi ESHG:(V,E) , |Pi ESHG:(V,E) | =
6 min |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈ P ESHG:(V,E) |.
i
X
i
i=|P ESHG:(V,E) |
ESHG:(V,E)
∈P ESHG:(V,E) |
z min |Pi
where ∀Pi ESHG:(V,E) , |Pi ESHG:(V,E) |
= min |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈ P ESHG:(V,E) |}.
i
= (OTHERWISE)0.
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , Vi
EXT ERN AL
∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , i 6= j}.

X X
EXT ERN AL |
Proof. Let 1814
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL

straightforward. Then there’s no at least one SuperHyperJoin. Thus the notion of quasi 1819
may be up but the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperJoin could be applied. 1820
There are only two SuperHyperParts. Thus every SuperHyperPart could have one 1821
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
is a longest SuperHyperJoin taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite 1823
ESHB : (V, E). Thus only some SuperHyperVertices and only 1824
solution 1826
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
SuperHyperModel (26), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin. 1833

i
= (OTHERWISE).
{},
i
X
i
i=|P ESHG:(V,E) |
ESHG:(V,E)
∈P ESHG:(V,E) |
z min |Pi
i
= (OTHERWISE)0.
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , Vi
EXT ERN AL
∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , i 6= j}.

X X
EXT ERN AL |
Proof. Let 1836
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
is a longest SuperHyperJoin taken from a connected Neutrosophic 1837

straightforward. Then there’s no at least one SuperHyperJoin. Thus the notion of quasi 1841
may be up but the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperJoin could be applied. 1842
There are only z 0 SuperHyperParts. Thus every SuperHyperPart could have one 1843
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
solution 1848
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin. 1856

= {Ei }i=1 3
.
= 3z 3 .

.
Proof. Let 1859
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
3 3
is a longest SuperHyperJoin taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel 1860

straightforward. Then there’s at least one SuperHyperJoin. Thus the notion of quasi 1864
isn’t up and the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperJoin could be applied. The 1865
unique embedded SuperHyperJoin proposes some longest SuperHyperJoin excerpt from 1866
some representatives. The latter is straightforward. 1867
14 Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect But As The 1874
Forms 1876
Definition 14.1. (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect). 1877
(i) Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperPerfect if ∀Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ E 0 , ∃!Ej ∈ E 0 , 1881
such that Va ∈ Ei , Ej ; 1882
(ii) Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperPerfect if ∀Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ E 0 , ∃!Ej ∈ E 0 , 1883
such that Va ∈ Ei , Ej ; and 1884
(iii) Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperPerfect if ∀Vi ∈ VESHG:(V,E) \ V 0 , ∃!Vj ∈ V 0 , 1886
such that Vi , Vj ∈ Ea ; 1887
(iv) Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperPerfect if ∀Vi ∈ VESHG:(V,E) \ V 0 , ∃!Vj ∈ V 0 , 1888
such that Vi , Vj ∈ Ea ; and 1889
(v) Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect if it’s either of Neutrosophic 1891
e-SuperHyperPerfect, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperPerfect, Neutrosophic 1892
v-SuperHyperPerfect, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperPerfect. 1893
Definition 14.2. ((Neutrosophic) SuperHyperPerfect). 1894
(i) an Extreme SuperHyperPerfect if it’s either of Neutrosophic 1898
v-SuperHyperPerfect, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperPerfect and C(N SHG) for 1900
Extreme SuperHyperPerfect; 1905
(ii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect if it’s either of Neutrosophic 1906
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect; 1913
(iii) an Extreme SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of 1914
Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperPerfect, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperPerfect, 1915
Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperPerfect, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperPerfect and 1916
Extreme SuperHyperPerfect; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its 1922
(iv) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either 1924
of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperPerfect, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperPerfect, 1925
SuperHyperPerfect; and the Neutrosophic power is corresponded to its 1933
(v) an Extreme R-SuperHyperPerfect if it’s either of Neutrosophic 1935
Extreme SuperHyperPerfect; 1942
(vi) a Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect if it’s either of Neutrosophic 1943
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect; 1950
(vii) an Extreme R-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either 1951
Extreme SuperHyperPerfect; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its 1959
(viii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either 1961
SuperHyperPerfect; and the Neutrosophic power is corresponded to its 1970
SuperHyperPerfect, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly 1975
SuperHyperPerfect. 1983
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect = {E4 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect = {V4 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z.


C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect = {E4 , E2 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = 2z 2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect = {V1 , V4 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = 15z 2 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = 4z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect = {E3i+13i=0 , E3i+243i=0 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial 6z 8 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect = {V3i+17i=0 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect = {E15 , E16 , E17 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect = {V3 , V6 , V8 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial =
3 × 4 × 4z 3 .

3 × 4 × 4z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect = {E3i+13i=0 , E23 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z 5 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect = {V3i+13i=0 , V15 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z 5 .

3 × 4 × 4z 3 .

3 × 2z 2 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect = {V1 , Vii610=5,7,8 }.
i=4

3 × 3z 2 .



C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect = {V2 , V7 , V17 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial =
(1 × 5 × 5) + (1 × 2 + 1)z 3 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect = {V27 , V2 , V7 , V17 }.
(1 × 1 × 2 + 1)z 4 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect = {V27 , V2 , V7 , V17 }.
(1 × 1 × 2 + 1)z 4 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect = {E3i+1i=03 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect = {V2i+1i=05 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = 2z 6 .



C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect = {V3 , V6 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial
= 10 × 6 + 10 × 6 + 12 × 6 + 12 × 6z 2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect =

= {Ei }i=1 3
.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial
= 3z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect

.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial
Proof. Let 2057
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
3 3

corresponded to ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of SuperHyperPerfect. The latter is 2061
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (23), is the SuperHyperPerfect. 2065
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect =

= {Ei }i=1 3
.
= 3z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect

.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial
Proof. Let 2068
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
3 3

Then 2079
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect = {E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect = {CEN T ER ∈ VESHG:(V,E) }.
Proof. Let 2080

the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (25), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect. 2090
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect

i
= (OTHERWISE).
{},
i
X
i
i=|P ESHG:(V,E) |
ESHG:(V,E)
∈P ESHG:(V,E) |
z min |Pi
i
= (OTHERWISE)0.
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , Vi
EXT ERN AL
∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , i 6= j}.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial

X X
EXT ERN AL |
Proof. Let 2093
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL

straightforward. Then there’s no at least one SuperHyperPerfect. Thus the notion of 2098
quasi may be up but the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperPerfect could be 2099
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
is a longest SuperHyperPerfect taken from a connected Neutrosophic 2102
solution 2105
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
SuperHyperModel (26), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect. 2112

i
= (OTHERWISE).
{},
i
X
i
i=|P ESHG:(V,E) |
ESHG:(V,E)
∈P ESHG:(V,E) |
z min |Pi
i
= (OTHERWISE)0.
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , Vi
EXT ERN AL
∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , i 6= j}.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial

X X
EXT ERN AL |
Proof. Let 2115
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
is a longest SuperHyperPerfect taken from a connected Neutrosophic 2116

straightforward. Then there’s no at least one SuperHyperPerfect. Thus the notion of 2120
quasi may be up but the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperPerfect could be 2121
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
solution 2127
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect. 2135
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect = {E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect = {CEN T ER ∈ VESHG:(V,E) }.
Proof. Let 2138

is a longest SuperHyperPerfect taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel 2139

straightforward. Then there’s at least one SuperHyperPerfect. Thus the notion of quasi 2143
isn’t up and the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperPerfect could be applied. The 2144
unique embedded SuperHyperPerfect proposes some longest SuperHyperPerfect excerpt 2145
15 Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal But As The 2153
Forms 2155
Definition 15.1. (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal). 2156
(i) Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperTotal if ∀Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , ∃!Ej ∈ E 0 , such 2160
that Va ∈ Ei , Ej ; 2161
(ii) Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperTotal if ∀Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , ∃!Ej ∈ E 0 , such 2162
that Va ∈ Ei , Ej ; and 2163
(iii) Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperTotal if ∀Vi ∈ VESHG:(V,E) , ∃!Vj ∈ V 0 , such 2165
that Vi , Vj ∈ Ea ; 2166
(iv) Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperTotal if ∀Vi ∈ VESHG:(V,E) , ∃!Vj ∈ V 0 , such 2167
that Vi , Vj ∈ Ea ; and 2168
(v) Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal if it’s either of Neutrosophic 2170
e-SuperHyperTotal, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperTotal, Neutrosophic 2171
v-SuperHyperTotal, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperTotal. 2172
Definition 15.2. ((Neutrosophic) SuperHyperTotal). 2173
(i) an Extreme SuperHyperTotal if it’s either of Neutrosophic 2177
v-SuperHyperTotal, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperTotal and C(N SHG) for an 2179
SuperHyperEdges in the consecutive Extreme sequence of Extreme 2182
Extreme SuperHyperTotal; 2184
(ii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal if it’s either of Neutrosophic 2185
v-SuperHyperTotal, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperTotal and C(N SHG) for a 2187
Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal; 2192
(iii) an Extreme SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of 2193
Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperTotal, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperTotal, Neutrosophic 2194
Extreme SuperHyperTotal; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its Extreme 2201
coefficient; 2202
(iv) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of 2203
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high 2209
SuperHyperTotal; and the Neutrosophic power is corresponded to its 2212
(v) an Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal if it’s either of Neutrosophic 2214
SuperHyperVertices in the consecutive Extreme sequence of Extreme 2219
Extreme SuperHyperTotal; 2221
(vi) a Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperTotal if it’s either of Neutrosophic 2222
Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal; 2229
(vii) an Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of 2230
Extreme SuperHyperTotal; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its Extreme 2238
coefficient; 2239
(viii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of 2240
SuperHyperTotal; and the Neutrosophic power is corresponded to its 2249
SuperHyperTotal, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly 2254
SuperHyperTotal. 2262
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperTotal = {E4 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperTotal = {V4 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z.


C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi- = {E4 , E2 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = 2z 2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperTotal = {V1 , V4 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = 15z 2 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = 4z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal = {Ei+19i=0 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial 20z 10 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperTotal = {Vi+19i=0 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = 20z 10 .
C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperTotal = {E12 , E13 , E14 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = z 3 .
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal = {V12 , V13 , V14 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = z 3 .
C(N SHG)Extreme Quasi-SuperHyperTotal = {E4 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme Quasi-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial =
3 × 4 × 4z 3 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial 10z 10 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperTotal = {Vi+19i=0 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme Quasi-SuperHyperTotal = {E5 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme Quasi-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
3 × 4 × 4z 3 .
C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperTotal = {E1 , E6 , E7 , E8 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = 2z 4 .
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal = {V1 , V5 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z 2 .
C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperTotal = {E1 , E2 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal = {V1 , Vii68=4,5,6 }.
i=1




4 × 3z 3 .

C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal = {V1 , V2 , V6 , V17 }.
4 × 3z 4 .

C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal = {V1 , V2 , V6 , V17 }.
2 × 4 × 3z 4 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = 11z 10 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperTotal = {Vi+2i=011 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = 11z 10 .

C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal = {V1 , V }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial
= |(|V | − 1)z 2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal = {E1 , E2 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = 2z 2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperTotal = {V1 , V2 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme R-Quasi-SuperHyperTotal = {V3 , V10 , V6 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-Quasi-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial
= 3 × 6z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal =

|E | −2
= {Ei }i=1ESHG:(V,E) Neutrosophic Cardinality .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial
= z |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality −2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperTotal
|E | −2
= {ViEXT ERN AL }i=1ESHG:(V,E) Neutrosophic Cardinality .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial
Y
= |V EXT ERN AL ESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality z |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality −2
Proof. Let 2336
P :
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
V3EXT ERN AL , E3 ,
...

corresponded to ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of SuperHyperTotal. The latter is 2340
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (23), is the SuperHyperTotal. 2344
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal =

|E | −2
= {Ei }i=1ESHG:(V,E) Neutrosophic Cardinality .
= (|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality − 1)
z |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality −2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperTotal
|E | −2
= {ViEXT ERN AL }i=1ESHG:(V,E) Neutrosophic Cardinality .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial
Y
= |V EXT ERN AL ESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality z |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality −2
Proof. Let 2347
P :
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
V3EXT ERN AL , E3 ,
...,
E |E|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality −1 .
, V EXT ERN AL |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality −1

Then 2358
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal = {Ei , Ej ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.

= |i(i − 1) | Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E)|Neutrosophic Cardinality |z 2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperTotal = {CEN T ER, Vj ∈ VESHG:(V,E) }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial =
(|VESHG:(V,E)|Neutrosophic Cardinality |) choose (|VESHG:(V,E)|Neutrosophic Cardinality | − 1)
z2.
Proof. Let 2359
P : ViEXT ERN AL , Ei , CEN T ER, Ej .

the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (25), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal. 2369
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal

= {Ea ∈ EPi ESHG:(V,E) ,
i
ESHG:(V,E)
∈P ESHG:(V,E) |
= z min |Pi
i
= {VaEXT ERN AL ∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , Vb
EXT ERN AL
∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , i 6= j}.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial

X X
EXT ERN AL |
Proof. Let 2372
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2

straightforward. Then there’s no at least one SuperHyperTotal. Thus the notion of 2377
quasi may be up but the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperTotal could be 2378
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
is a longest SuperHyperTotal taken from a connected Neutrosophic 2381
solution 2384
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
SuperHyperModel (26), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal. 2391

i
ESHG:(V,E)
∈P ESHG:(V,E) |
= z min |Pi
i
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , Vb
EXT ERN AL
∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , i 6= j}.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial

X X
EXT ERN AL |
Proof. Let 2394
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
is a longest SuperHyperTotal taken from a connected Neutrosophic 2395

straightforward. Then there’s no at least one SuperHyperTotal. Thus the notion of 2399
quasi may be up but the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperTotal could be 2400
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
solution 2406
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal. 2414
∗
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal = {Ei , Ej ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.
∗
= |i(i − 1) | Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E)|Neutrosophic Cardinality
|z 2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperTotal = {CEN T ER, Vj ∈ VESHG:(V,E) }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial =
(|VESHG:(V,E)|Neutrosophic Cardinality |) choose (|VESHG:(V,E)|Neutrosophic Cardinality | − 1)
z2.
Proof. Let 2417
P : ViEXT ERN AL , Ei∗ , CEN T ER, Ej .

is a longest SuperHyperTotal taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel 2418

straightforward. Then there’s at least one SuperHyperTotal. Thus the notion of quasi 2422
isn’t up and the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperTotal could be applied. The 2423
unique embedded SuperHyperTotal proposes some longest SuperHyperTotal excerpt 2424
16 Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected But As 2432
The Extensions Excerpt From Dense And Super 2433
Forms 2434
Definition 16.1. (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic 2435
SuperHyperConnected). 2436
(i) Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperConnected if 2440
∀Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ E 0 , ∃Ej ∈ E 0 , such that Va ∈ Ei , Ej ; and ∀Ei , Ej ∈ E 0 , such 2441
that Va 6∈ Ei , Ej ; 2442
(ii) Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperConnected if 2443
∀Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ E 0 , ∃Ej ∈ E 0 , such that Va ∈ Ei , Ej ; ∀Ei , Ej ∈ E 0 , such 2444
that Va 6∈ Ei , Ej ; and 2445
(iii) Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperConnected if 2447
∀Vi ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ V 0 , ∃Vj ∈ V 0 , such that Vi , Vj 6∈ Ea ; and ∀Vi , Vj ∈ V 0 , such 2448
that Vi , Vj 6∈ Ea ; 2449
(iv) Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperConnected if 2450
∀Vi ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ V 0 , ∃Vj ∈ V 0 , such that Vi , Vj ∈ Ea ; ∀Vi , Vj ∈ V 0 , such that 2451
Vi , Vj 6∈ Ea ; and 2452
(v) Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected if it’s either of Neutrosophic 2454
e-SuperHyperConnected, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperConnected, Neutrosophic 2455
v-SuperHyperConnected, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperConnected. 2456
Definition 16.2. ((Neutrosophic) SuperHyperConnected). 2457
(i) an Extreme SuperHyperConnected if it’s either of Neutrosophic 2461
v-SuperHyperConnected, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperConnected and 2463
C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum 2464
Extreme cardinality of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality 2465
of the Extreme SuperHyperEdges in the consecutive Extreme sequence of Extreme 2466
Extreme SuperHyperConnected; 2468
(ii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected if it’s either of Neutrosophic 2469
C(N SHG) for a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum 2472
Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges of a Neutrosophic 2473
Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected; 2476
(iii) an Extreme SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either 2477
of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperConnected, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperConnected, 2478
Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperConnected, and Neutrosophic 2479
rv-SuperHyperConnected and C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph 2480
N SHG : (V, E) is the Extreme SuperHyperPolynomial contains the Extreme 2481
coefficients defined as the Extreme number of the maximum Extreme cardinality 2482
of the Extreme SuperHyperEdges of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high 2483
Extreme cardinality consecutive Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme 2484
SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Extreme SuperHyperConnected; and 2485
the Extreme power is corresponded to its Extreme coefficient; 2486
(iv) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s 2487
either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperConnected, Neutrosophic 2488
re-SuperHyperConnected, Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperConnected, and 2489
Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperConnected and C(N SHG) for a Neutrosophic 2490
SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPolynomial 2491
contains the Neutrosophic coefficients defined as the Neutrosophic number of the 2492
maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges of a 2493
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high Neutrosophic cardinality consecutive 2494
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that 2495
they form the Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected; and the Neutrosophic power is 2496
corresponded to its Neutrosophic coefficient; 2497
(v) an Extreme R-SuperHyperConnected if it’s either of Neutrosophic 2498
C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum 2501
Extreme cardinality of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality 2502
of the Extreme SuperHyperVertices in the consecutive Extreme sequence of 2503
Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form 2504
the Extreme SuperHyperConnected; 2505
(vi) a Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnected if it’s either of Neutrosophic 2506
C(N SHG) for a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum 2509
Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of a 2510
they form the Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected; 2513
(vii) an Extreme R-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s 2514
Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperConnected and C(N SHG) for an Extreme 2517
SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Extreme SuperHyperPolynomial 2518
Extreme cardinality of the Extreme SuperHyperVertices of an Extreme 2520
SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality consecutive Extreme 2521
Extreme SuperHyperConnected; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its 2523
(viii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s 2525
Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperConnected and C(N SHG) for a Neutrosophic 2528
SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPolynomial 2529
contains the Neutrosophic coefficients defined as the Neutrosophic number of the 2530
maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of a 2531
they form the Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected; and the Neutrosophic power is 2534
corresponded to its Neutrosophic coefficient. 2535
SuperHyperConnected, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly 2539
SuperHyperConnected. 2547
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected = {E4 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnected = {V4 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z.


C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected = {E1 , E2 , E4 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {V1 , V4 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = 15z 2 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = 4z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {Ei+19i=0 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial 20z 10 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {Vi+19i=0 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperConnected = {E12 , E13 , E14 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z 3 .
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperConnected = {V12 , V13 , V14 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z 3 .
C(N SHG)Extreme Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {E4 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial =
3 × 4 × 4z 3 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial 10z 10 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnected = {Vi+119
i=11
, V22 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = 20z 10 .
C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperConnected = {E5 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
3 × 4 × 4z 3 .
C(N SHG)Extreme Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {E1 , E6 , E7 , E8 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = 2z 4 .
C(N SHG)Extreme R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {V1 , V5 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z 2 .
C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperConnected = {E1 , E2 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = 5z 2 .
C(N SHG)Extreme R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {V1 , Vii68=4,5,6 }.
i=1
C(N SHG)Extreme R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z 5 .
C(N SHG)Extreme Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {E3 , E9 , E6 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z 3 .
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperConnected = {V1 , V5 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z 2 .

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperConnected = {V1 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z.

C(N SHG)Extreme Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z 3 .
C(N SHG)Extreme R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {V2 , V3 , V4 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z 3 .
C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperConnected = {E2 , E3 , E4 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z 3 .
4 × 3z 3 .

C(N SHG)Extreme R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {V1 , V2 , V6 , V17 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial =
4 × 3z 4 .

C(N SHG)Extreme R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {V1 , V2 , V6 , V17 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial =
2 × 4 × 3z 4 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = 11z 10 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {Vi+2i=011 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = 10z.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperConnected = {V1 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z.

C(N SHG)Extreme Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {E3 , E4 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {V3 , V10 , V6 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial
= 3 × 6z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperConnected =

−2
= {Ei }i=1 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic −2
=z Cardinality .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected
= {ViEXT ERN AL }i=1 Cardinality
.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial
|E | −2
Y
= |V EXT ERN AL ESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality z ESHG:(V,E) Neutrosophic Cardinality
Proof. Let 2621
P :
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
V3EXT ERN AL , E3 ,
...,
E|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality −1 , V EXT ERN AL |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality −1 .

corresponded to ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of SuperHyperConnected. The latter is 2625
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (23), is the SuperHyperConnected. 2629
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperConnected =

−2
= {Ei }i=1 .
= (|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality − 1)
z Cardinality .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected
= {ViEXT ERN AL }i=1 Cardinality
.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial
|E | −2
Y
= |V EXT ERN AL ESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality z ESHG:(V,E) Neutrosophic Cardinality
Proof. Let 2632
P :
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
V3EXT ERN AL , E3 ,
...,
E|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality −1 , V EXT ERN AL |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality −1 .

Then 2643
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected = {Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial
= |i | Ei ∈ |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnected = {CEN T ER ∈ VESHG:(V,E) }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
Proof. Let 2644
P : ViEXT ERN AL , Ei , CEN T ER, Ej .

the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (25), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected. 2654
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperConnected

i
ESHG:(V,E)
∈P ESHG:(V,E) |
= z min |Pi
i
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperConnected
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , Vb
EXT ERN AL
∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , i 6= j}.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial

X X
EXT ERN AL |
Proof. Let 2657
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2

straightforward. Then there’s no at least one SuperHyperConnected. Thus the notion of 2662
quasi may be up but the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperConnected could be 2663
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
is a longest SuperHyperConnected taken from a connected Neutrosophic 2666
solution 2669
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
SuperHyperModel (26), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected. 2676
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperConnected

i
ESHG:(V,E)
∈P ESHG:(V,E) |
= z min |Pi
i
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperConnected
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , Vb
EXT ERN AL
∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , i 6= j}.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial

X X
EXT ERN AL |
Proof. Let 2679
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2

straightforward. Then there’s no at least one SuperHyperConnected. Thus the notion of 2684
quasi may be up but the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperConnected could be 2685
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
solution 2691
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected. 2699
∗
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected = {Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial
= |i | Ei ∈ |E ∗ ESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality |z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperConnected = {CEN T ER ∈ VESHG:(V,E) }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
Proof. Let 2702
P : V EXT ERN AL i , E ∗ i , CEN T ER, Ej .
SuperHyperWheel ESHW : (V, E). There’s a new way to redefine as 2704

straightforward. Then there’s at least one SuperHyperConnected. Thus the notion of 2707
quasi isn’t up and the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperConnected could be 2708
applied. The unique embedded SuperHyperConnected proposes some longest 2709
SuperHyperConnected excerpt from some representatives. The latter is 2710
17 Background 2718
There are some scientific researches covering the topic of this research. In what follows, 2719
there are some discussion and literature reviews about them date back on February 19, 2720
2023. 2721
First article is titled “properties of SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic 2722
SuperHyperGraph” in Ref. [1] by Henry Garrett (2022). It’s first step toward the 2723
research on neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs. This research article is published on the 2724
journal “Neutrosophic Sets and Systems” in issue 49 and the pages 531-561. In this 2725
research article, different types of notions like dominating, resolving, coloring, 2726
Eulerian(Hamiltonian) neutrosophic path, n-Eulerian(Hamiltonian) neutrosophic path, 2727
zero forcing number, zero forcing neutrosophic- number, independent number, 2728
independent neutrosophic-number, clique number, clique neutrosophic-number, 2729
matching number, matching neutrosophic-number, girth, neutrosophic girth, 2730
1-zero-forcing number, 1-zero- forcing neutrosophic-number, failed 1-zero-forcing 2731
number, failed 1-zero-forcing neutrosophic-number, global- offensive alliance, t-offensive 2732
alliance, t-defensive alliance, t-powerful alliance, and global-powerful alliance are defined 2733
in SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. Some Classes of 2734
SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph are cases of research. Some 2735
results are applied in family of SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. 2736
Thus this research article has concentrated on the vast notions and introducing the 2737
majority of notions. 2738
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “neutrosophic co-degree and 2739
neutrosophic degree alongside chromatic numbers in the setting of some classes related 2740
to neutrosophic hypergraphs” in Ref. [2] by Henry Garrett (2022). In this research 2741
article, a novel approach is implemented on SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic 2742
SuperHyperGraph based on general forms without using neutrosophic classes of 2743
neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. It’s published in prestigious and fancy journal is 2744
entitled “Journal of Current Trends in Computer Science Research (JCTCSR)” with 2745
ISO abbreviation “J Curr Trends Comp Sci Res” in volume 1 and issue 1 with pages 2746
06-14. The research article studies deeply with choosing neutrosophic hypergraphs 2747
instead of neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough toward independent 2748
results based on initial background. 2749
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “Super Hyper Dominating 2750
and Super Hyper Resolving on Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs and Their Directions 2751
in Game Theory and Neutrosophic Super Hyper Classes” in Ref. [3] by Henry Garrett 2752
(2022). In this research article, a novel approach is implemented on SuperHyperGraph 2753
and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on fundamental SuperHyperNumber and 2754
using neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses of neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. It’s 2755
published in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled “Journal of Mathematical 2756
Techniques and Computational Mathematics(JMTCM)” with ISO abbreviation “J Math 2757
Techniques Comput Math” in volume 1 and issue 3 with pages 242-263. The research 2758
article studies deeply with choosing directly neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph and 2759
SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough toward independent results based on initial 2760
background and fundamental SuperHyperNumbers. 2761
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “Some Super Hyper Degrees 2762
and Co-Super Hyper Degrees on Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs And Super Hyper 2763
Graphs Alongside Applications in Cancer’s Treatments” in Ref. [63] by Henry Garrett 2764
(2023). In this research article, a novel approach is implemented on SuperHyperGraph 2765
and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on fundamental notions and using vital tools 2766
in Cancer’s Treatments. It’s published in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled 2767
“Journal of Mathematical Techniques and Computational Mathematics(JMTCM)” with 2768
ISO abbreviation “J Math Techniques Comput Math” in volume 2 and issue 1 with 2769
pages 35-47. The research article studies deeply with choosing directly neutrosophic 2770
SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough toward independent 2771
results based on initial background and fundamental SuperHyperNumbers. 2772
In some articles are titled “0039 — Closing Numbers and Super-Closing Numbers as 2773
(Dual)Resolving and (Dual)Coloring alongside (Dual)Dominating in 2774
(Neutrosophic)n-SuperHyperGraph” in Ref. [5] by Henry Garrett (2022), “0049 — 2775
(Failed)1-Zero-Forcing Number in Neutrosophic Graphs” in Ref. [6] by Henry Garrett 2776
(2022), “Extreme SuperHyperClique as the Firm Scheme of Confrontation under 2777
Cancer’s Recognition as the Model in The Setting of (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” 2778
in Ref. [7] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Uncertainty On The Act And Effect Of Cancer 2779
Alongside The Foggy Positions Of Cells Toward Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique 2780
inside Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Titled Cancer’s Recognition” in Ref. [8] by 2781
Henry Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic Version Of Separates Groups Of Cells In Cancer’s 2782
Recognition On Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [9] by Henry Garrett (2022), 2783
“The Shift Paradigm To Classify Separately The Cells and Affected Cells Toward The 2784
Totality Under Cancer’s Recognition By New Multiple Definitions On the Sets 2785
Polynomials Alongside Numbers In The (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperMatching Theory 2786
Based on SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” in Ref. [10] by 2787
Henry Garrett (2022), “Breaking the Continuity and Uniformity of Cancer In The 2788
Worst Case of Full Connections With Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique In Cancer’s 2789
Recognition Applied in (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [11] by Henry 2790
Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable as the Survivors on the 2791
Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition Based on Uncertainty to All Modes in Neutrosophic 2792
SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [12] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Extremism of the Attacked 2793
Body Under the Cancer’s Circumstances Where Cancer’s Recognition Titled 2794
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [13] by Henry Garrett (2022), 2795
“(Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in Cancer’s Recognitions And 2796
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [14] by Henry Garrett (2022), 2797
“Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable 2798
To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In Special ViewPoints” in Ref. [15] by 2799
Henry Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in the 2800
SuperHyperFunction To Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs on Cancer’s 2801
Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond” in Ref. [16] by Henry Garrett (2022), 2802
“(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperStable on Cancer’s Recognition by Well- 2803
SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs ” in Ref. [17] by Henry 2804
Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form Neutrosophic 2805
SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In Special ViewPoints” 2806
in Ref. [13] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Basic Notions on (Neutrosophic) 2807
SuperHyperForcing And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling in Cancer’s Recognitions 2808
And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [18] by Henry Garrett (2022), 2809
“Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable 2810
To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In Special ViewPoints” in Ref. [19] by 2811
Henry Garrett (2022),“(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions 2812
Featuring (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances” in Ref. [20] by 2813
Henry Garrett (2022), “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperAlliances With 2814
SuperHyperDefensive and SuperHyperOffensive Type-SuperHyperSet On 2815
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of 2816
Cancer’s Recognitions And Related (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClasses” in Ref. [21] by 2817
Henry Garrett (2022), “SuperHyperGirth on SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic 2818
SuperHyperGraph With SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions” in Ref. [22] by 2819
Henry Garrett (2022), “Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on 2820
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs and SuperHyperGraphs Alongside Applications in 2821
Cancer’s Treatments” in Ref. [23] by Henry Garrett (2022), “SuperHyperDominating 2822
and SuperHyperResolving on Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs And Their Directions in 2823
Game Theory and Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses” in Ref. [24] by Henry Garrett 2824
(2022), “SuperHyperMatching By (R-)Definitions And Polynomials To Monitor Cancer’s 2825
Recognition In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [77] by Henry Garrett (2023), 2826
“The Focus on The Partitions Obtained By Parallel Moves In The Cancer’s Extreme 2827
Recognition With Different Types of Extreme SuperHyperMatching Set and Polynomial 2828
on (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [78] by Henry Garrett (2023), “Extreme 2829
Failed SuperHyperClique Decides the Failures on the Cancer’s Recognition in the 2830
Perfect Connections of Cancer’s Attacks By SuperHyperModels Named (Neutrosophic) 2831
SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [79] by Henry Garrett (2023), “Indeterminacy On The All 2832
Possible Connections of Cells In Front of Cancer’s Attacks In The Terms of 2833
Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique on Cancer’s Recognition called Neutrosophic 2834
SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [80] by Henry Garrett (2023), “Perfect Directions Toward 2835
Idealism in Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition Forwarding Neutrosophic 2836
SuperHyperClique on Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [83] by Henry Garrett 2837
(2023), “Demonstrating Complete Connections in Every Embedded Regions and 2838
Sub-Regions in the Terms of Cancer’s Recognition and (Neutrosophic) 2839
SuperHyperGraphs With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClique” in Ref. [84] by Henry 2840
Garrett (2023), “Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic Regions titled 2841
neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable in Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition modeled in 2842
the Form of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [87] by Henry Garrett (2023), 2843
“Using the Tool As (Neutrosophic) Failed SuperHyperStable To SuperHyperModel 2844
Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [90] by Henry 2845
Garrett (2023), “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form Neutrosophic 2846
SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In Special ViewPoints” 2847
in Ref. [91] by Henry Garrett (2023), “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperStable on Cancer’s 2848
Recognition by Well-SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in 2849
Ref. [92] by Henry Garrett (2023), “Neutrosophic 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in the 2850
Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond” in Ref. [93] by Henry Garrett (2022), 2852
“(Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in Cancer’s Recognitions And 2853
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [94] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Basic 2854
Notions on (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperForcing And (Neutrosophic) 2855
SuperHyperModeling in Cancer’s Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” 2856
in Ref. [95] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Basic Neutrosophic Notions Concerning 2857
SuperHyperDominating and Neutrosophic SuperHyperResolving in SuperHyperGraph” 2858
in Ref. [106] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Initial Material of Neutrosophic Preliminaries 2859
to Study Some Neutrosophic Notions Based on Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) 2860
in Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)” in Ref. [107] by Henry Garrett (2022), 2861
and [25–31, 33–76, 81, 82, 85, 86, 88, 89, 96–105], there are some endeavors to formalize the 2862
basic SuperHyperNotions about neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph. 2863
Some scientific studies and scientific researches about neutrosophic graphs, are 2864
proposed as book in Ref. [108] by Henry Garrett (2022) which is indexed by Google 2865
Scholar and has more than 3230 readers in Scribd. It’s titled “Beyond Neutrosophic 2866
Graphs” and published by Ohio: E-publishing: Educational Publisher 1091 West 1st 2867
Ave Grandview Heights, Ohio 43212 United State. This research book covers different 2868
types of notions and settings in neutrosophic graph theory and neutrosophic 2869
SuperHyperGraph theory. 2870
Also, some scientific studies and scientific researches about neutrosophic graphs, are 2871
proposed as book in Ref. [109] by Henry Garrett (2022) which is indexed by Google 2872
Scholar and has more than 4117 readers in Scribd. It’s titled “Neutrosophic Duality” 2873
and published by Florida: GLOBAL KNOWLEDGE - Publishing House 848 Brickell 2874
Ave Ste 950 Miami, Florida 33131 United States. This research book presents different 2875
types of notions SuperHyperResolving and SuperHyperDominating in the setting of 2876
duality in neutrosophic graph theory and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph theory. This 2877
research book has scrutiny on the complement of the intended set and the intended set, 2878
simultaneously. It’s smart to consider a set but acting on its complement that what’s 2879
done in this research book which is popular in the terms of high readers in Scribd. 2880
See the seminal scientific researches [1–3]. The formalization of the notions on the 2881
framework of Extreme K-Chord In SuperHyperGraphs, Neutrosophic K-Chord In 2882
SuperHyperGraphs theory, and (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs theory 2883
at [5–31, 33–107]. Two popular scientific research books in Scribd in the terms of high 2884
readers, 3230 and 4117 respectively, on neutrosophic science is on [108, 109]. 2885
– 2886
References 2887
1. Henry Garrett, “Properties of SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic 2888
SuperHyperGraph”, Neutrosophic Sets and Systems 49 (2022) 531-561 (doi: 2889
10.5281/zenodo.6456413). 2890
(http://fs.unm.edu/NSS/NeutrosophicSuperHyperGraph34.pdf). 2891
(https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nss journal/vol49/iss1/34). 2892
2. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Co-degree and Neutrosophic Degree alongside 2893
Chromatic Numbers in the Setting of Some Classes Related to Neutrosophic 2894
Hypergraphs”, J Curr Trends Comp Sci Res 1(1) (2022) 06-14. 2895
3. Henry Garrett, “Super Hyper Dominating and Super Hyper Resolving on 2896
Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs and Their Directions in Game Theory and 2897
Neutrosophic Super Hyper Classes”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 1(3) 2898
(2022) 242-263. (doi: 10.33140/JMTCM.01.03.09) 2899
4. Henry Garrett, “Some Super Hyper Degrees and Co-Super Hyper Degrees on 2900
Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs And Super Hyper Graphs Alongside 2901
Applications in Cancer’s Treatments”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 2(1) 2902
(2023) 35-47. (https://www.opastpublishers.com/open-access-articles/some- 2903
super-hyper-degrees-and-cosuper-hyper-degrees-on-neutrosophic-super-hyper- 2904
graphs-and-super-hyper-graphs-alongside-a.pdf) 2905
5. Garrett, Henry. “0039 — Closing Numbers and Super-Closing Numbers as 2906
(Dual)Resolving and (Dual)Coloring alongside (Dual)Dominating in 2907
(Neutrosophic)n-SuperHyperGraph.” CERN European Organization for Nuclear 2908
Research - Zenodo, Nov. 2022. CERN European Organization for Nuclear 2909
Research, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6319942. 2910
https://oa.mg/work/10.5281/zenodo.6319942 2911
6. Garrett, Henry. “0049 — (Failed)1-Zero-Forcing Number in Neutrosophic 2912
Graphs.” CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research - Zenodo, Feb. 2913
2022. CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research, 2914
https://doi.org/10.13140/rg.2.2.35241.26724. 2915
https://oa.mg/work/10.13140/rg.2.2.35241.26724 2916
7. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperClique as the Firm Scheme of 2917
Confrontation under Cancer’s Recognition as the Model in The Setting of 2918
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010308 (doi: 2919
10.20944/preprints202301.0308.v1). 2920
8. Henry Garrett, “Uncertainty On The Act And Effect Of Cancer Alongside The 2921
Foggy Positions Of Cells Toward Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique inside 2922
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Titled Cancer’s Recognition”, Preprints 2023, 2923
2023010282 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0282.v1). 2924
9. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Version Of Separates Groups Of Cells In 2925
Cancer’s Recognition On Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2926
2023010267 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0267.v1). 2927
10. Henry Garrett, “The Shift Paradigm To Classify Separately The Cells and 2928
Affected Cells Toward The Totality Under Cancer’s Recognition By New 2929
Multiple Definitions On the Sets Polynomials Alongside Numbers In The 2930
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperMatching Theory Based on SuperHyperGraph and 2931
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”, Preprints 2023, 2023010265 (doi: 2932
10.20944/preprints202301.0265.v1). 2933
11. Henry Garrett, “Breaking the Continuity and Uniformity of Cancer In The 2934
Worst Case of Full Connections With Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique In 2935
Cancer’s Recognition Applied in (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2936
2023, 2023010262,(doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0262.v1). 2937
12. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable as the Survivors on the 2938
Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition Based on Uncertainty to All Modes in 2939
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010240 (doi: 2940
10.20944/preprints202301.0240.v1). 2941
13. Henry Garrett, “Extremism of the Attacked Body Under the Cancer’s 2942
Circumstances Where Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) 2943
SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010224, (doi: 2944
10.20944/preprints202301.0224.v1). 2945
14. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in Cancer’s 2946
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2947
2023010105 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 2948
15. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form 2949
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions 2950
In Special ViewPoints”, Preprints 2023, 2023010088 (doi: 2951
10.20944/preprints202301.0088.v1). 2952
16. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in the 2953
Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond ”, Preprints 2023, 2023010044 2955
17. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperStable on Cancer’s Recognition by 2956
Well- SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2957
2023010043 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0043.v1). 2958
18. Henry Garrett, “Basic Notions on (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperForcing And 2959
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling in Cancer’s Recognitions And 2960
10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 2962
10.20944/preprints202301.0088.v1). 2966
20. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions 2967
Featuring (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances”, Preprints 2968
2022, 2022120549 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0549.v1). 2969
21. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperAlliances With SuperHyperDefensive 2970
and SuperHyperOffensive Type-SuperHyperSet On (Neutrosophic) 2971
SuperHyperGraph With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s 2972
Recognitions And Related (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClasses”, Preprints 2022, 2973
2022120540 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0540.v1). 2974
22. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperGirth on SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic 2975
SuperHyperGraph With SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions”, 2976
Preprints 2022, 2022120500 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0500.v1). 2977
23. Henry Garrett, “Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on 2978
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs and SuperHyperGraphs Alongside Applications 2979
in Cancer’s Treatments”, Preprints 2022, 2022120324 (doi: 2980
10.20944/preprints202212.0324.v1). 2981
24. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDominating and SuperHyperResolving on 2982
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs And Their Directions in Game Theory and 2983
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”, Preprints 2022, 2022110576 (doi: 2984
10.20944/preprints202211.0576.v1). 2985
25. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 2986
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperK-Chord As Hyper k-Actions On Super 2987
Patterns”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.19944.14086). 2988
26. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Harmony By Hyper k-Function Of 2989
SuperHyperK-Chord In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 2990
SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.23299.58404). 2991
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperK-Number As Hyper k-Partition On Super 2993
Layers”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.33103.76968). 2994
28. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Gradient By Hyper k-Class Of 2995
SuperHyperK-Number In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 2996
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperOrder As Hyper Enumerations On Super 2999
Landmarks”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.35646.56641). 3000
30. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Analogous By Hyper Visions Of 3001
SuperHyperOrder In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 3002
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperColoring As Hyper Categories On Super 3005
Neighbors”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.13973.81121). 3006
32. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Relations By Hyper Identifications Of 3007
SuperHyperColoring In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 3008
33. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Relations By Hyper Identifications Of 3010
SuperHyperColoring In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 3011
34. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Contradiction By Hyper Detection of 3013
SuperHyperDefensive In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic 3014
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperDimension As Hyper Distinguishing On Super 3017
Distances”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.31956.88961). 3018
36. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Locations By Hyper Differing Of 3019
SuperHyperDimension In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 3020
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperDominating As Hyper Closing On Super 3023
Messy”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.21510.45125). 3024
38. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Missing By Hyper Searching Of 3025
SuperHyperDominating In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 3026
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperConnected As Hyper Group On Super Surge”, 3029
ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.11758.69441). 3030
40. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Outbreak By Hyper Collections Of 3031
SuperHyperConnected In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 3032
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperTotal As Hyper Covering On Super 3035
Infections”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.19360.87048). 3036
42. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Extremism By Hyper Treatments Of 3037
SuperHyperTotal In Cancer’s Recognition with (Neutrosophic) 3038
43. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Isolation By Hyper Perfectness Of 3040
SuperHyperPerfect In Cancer’s Recognition with (Neutrosophic) 3041
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperPerfect As Hyper Idealism On Super 3044
Vacancy”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.19911.37285). 3045
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperJoin As Hyper Separations On Super Sorts”, 3047
46. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super connections By Hyper disconnections Of 3049
SuperHyperJoin In Cancer’s Recognition with (Neutrosophic) 3050
47. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Mixed-Devastations By Hyper Decisions 3052
Of SuperHyperDuality In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic 3053
48. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition As (Neutrosophic) 3055
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperDuality As Hyper Imaginations On Super 3056
Mixed-Illustrations”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.33275.80161). 3057
49. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition As (Neutrosophic) 3058
SuperHyperGraph By Path SuperHyperColoring As Hyper Correction On Super 3059
Faults”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.30182.50241). 3060
50. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Reflections By Hyper Rotations Of Path 3061
SuperHyperColoring In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic 3062
51. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas As Hyper Deformations On Super Chains In 3064
Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph By 3065
SuperHyperDensity”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.13444.60806). 3066
52. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas As Hyper Ignorance By SuperHyperDensity On 3067
Super Resistances In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic 3068
SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.16800.05123). 3069
53. Henry Garrett, “New Research On Cancer’s Recognition and Neutrosophic 3070
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian SuperHyperCycles and Hamiltonian Sets As 3071
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-VI”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 3072
10.13140/RG.2.2.29913.80482). 3073
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-V”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 3076
10.13140/RG.2.2.33269.24809). 3077
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-IV”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 3080
10.13140/RG.2.2.34946.96960). 3081
56. Henry Garrett, “A Research On Cancer’s Recognition and Neutrosophic 3082
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-III”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 3084
10.13140/RG.2.2.14814.31040). 3085
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-II”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 3088
10.13140/RG.2.2.15653.17125). 3089
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-I”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 3092
10.13140/RG.2.2.25719.50089). 3093
59. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Disruptions In Cancer’s Extreme 3094
Recognition As Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph By Hyper Plans Called 3095
SuperHyperConnectivities”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 3096
10.13140/RG.2.2.29441.94562). 3097
60. Henry Garrett, “Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition As Neutrosophic 3098
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperConnectivities As Hyper Diagnosis On Super 3099
Mechanism”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.17252.24968). 3100
61. Henry Garrett,“Cancer’s Recognition and (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph By 3101
the Criteria of Eulerian and Hamiltonian Type-Sets As Hyper Modified Cycles 3102
On Super Mess”, ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.16652.59525). 3103
62. Henry Garrett,“Eulerian and Hamiltonian In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition 3104
and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph On Super Interactions By Hyper 3105
Extensions of Cycles”, ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.34583.24485). 3106
63. Henry Garrett, “Some Super Hyper Degrees and Co-Super Hyper Degrees on 3107
Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs And Super Hyper Graphs Alongside 3108
Applications in Cancer’s Treatments”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 2(1) 3109
(2023) 35-47. 3110
64. Henry Garrett,“SuperHyperGirth Type-Results on extreme SuperHyperGirth 3111
theory and (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs Toward Cancer’s extreme 3112
Recognition”, Preprints 2023, 2023010396 (doi: 3113
10.20944/preprints202301.0396.v1). 3114
65. Henry Garrett,“Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Warns Hyper Landmark of 3115
neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth In Super Type-Versions of Cancer’s neutrosophic 3116
Recognition”, Preprints 2023, 2023010395 (doi: 3117
10.20944/preprints202301.0395.v1). 3118
66. Henry Garrett,“The Constructions of (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs on the 3119
Cancer’s Recognition in The Confrontation With Super Attacks In Hyper 3120
Situations By Implementing (Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in The 3121
Technical Approaches to Neutralize SuperHyperViews”, ResearchGate 2023, 3122
(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.26240.51204). 3123
67. Henry Garrett,“(Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing As the 3124
Entrepreneurs on Cancer’s Recognitions To Fail Forcing Style As the Super 3125
Classes With Hyper Effects In The Background of the Framework is So-Called 3126
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 3127
10.13140/RG.2.2.12818.73925). 3128
68. Henry Garrett,“Super Actions On The Types of Hyper Levels In The Sensible 3129
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth On Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and 3130
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 3131
10.13140/RG.2.2.26836.88960). 3132
69. Henry Garrett,“SuperHyperGirth Approaches on the Super Challenges on the 3133
Cancer’s Recognition In the Hyper Model of (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, 3134
ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.36745.93289). 3135
70. Henry Garrett,“Extreme SuperHyperClique as the Firm Scheme of 3136
Confrontation under Cancer’s Recognition as the Model in The Setting of 3137
10.20944/preprints202301.0308.v1). 3139
71. Henry Garrett,“Uncertainty On The Act And Effect Of Cancer Alongside The 3140
Foggy Positions Of Cells Toward Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique inside 3141
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Titled Cancer’s Recognition”, Preprints 2023, 3142
2023010282 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0282.v1). 3143
72. Henry Garrett,“Neutrosophic Version Of Separates Groups Of Cells In Cancer’s 3144
Recognition On Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010267 3145
(doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0267.v1).). 3146
73. Henry Garrett, “The Shift Paradigm To Classify Separately The Cells and 3147
Affected Cells Toward The Totality Under Cancer’s Recognition By New 3148
Multiple Definitions On the Sets Polynomials Alongside Numbers In The 3149
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperMatching Theory Based on SuperHyperGraph and 3150
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”, Preprints 2023, 2023010265 (doi: 3151
10.20944/preprints202301.0265.v1). 3152
74. Henry Garrett,“Breaking the Continuity and Uniformity of Cancer In The 3153
Worst Case of Full Connections With Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique In 3154
Cancer’s Recognition Applied in (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 3155
2023, 2023010262,(doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0262.v1). 3156
75. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable as the Survivors on the 3157
Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition Based on Uncertainty to All Modes in 3158
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010240 (doi: 3159
10.20944/preprints202301.0240.v1). 3160
76. Henry Garrett, “Extremism of the Attacked Body Under the Cancer’s 3161
Circumstances Where Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) 3162
SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010224, (doi: 3163
10.20944/preprints202301.0224.v1). 3164
77. Henry Garrett,“SuperHyperMatching By (R-)Definitions And Polynomials To 3165
Monitor Cancer’s Recognition In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, 3166
ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.35061.65767). 3167
78. Henry Garrett,“The Focus on The Partitions Obtained By Parallel Moves In 3168
The Cancer’s Extreme Recognition With Different Types of Extreme 3169
SuperHyperMatching Set and Polynomial on (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, 3170
79. Henry Garrett,“Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique Decides the Failures on the 3172
Cancer’s Recognition in the Perfect Connections of Cancer’s Attacks By 3173
SuperHyperModels Named (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 3174
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.32530.73922). 3175
80. Henry Garrett,“Indeterminacy On The All Possible Connections of Cells In 3176
Front of Cancer’s Attacks In The Terms of Neutrosophic Failed 3177
SuperHyperClique on Cancer’s Recognition called Neutrosophic 3178
SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.15897.70243). 3179
81. Henry Garrett,“Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique Decides the Failures on the 3180
Cancer’s Recognition in the Perfect Connections of Cancer’s Attacks By 3181
SuperHyperModels Named (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 3182
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.32530.73922). 3183
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 3185
2023010105 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 3186
83. Henry Garrett,“Perfect Directions Toward Idealism in Cancer’s Neutrosophic 3187
Recognition Forwarding Neutrosophic SuperHyperClique on Neutrosophic 3188
84. Henry Garrett,“Demonstrating Complete Connections in Every Embedded 3190
Regions and Sub-Regions in the Terms of Cancer’s Recognition and 3191
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClique”, 3192
10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 3197
10.20944/preprints202301.0088.v1). 3201
87. Henry Garrett,“Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic Regions titled 3202
neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable in Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition 3203
modeled in the Form of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2023, 3204
(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.17385.36968). 3205
Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond”, Preprints 2023, 2023010044 3208
Well- SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 3210
2023010043 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0043.v1). 3211
90. Henry Garrett, “Using the Tool As (Neutrosophic) Failed SuperHyperStable To 3212
SuperHyperModel Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) 3213
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In 3216
Special ViewPoints”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.11447.80803). 3217
Well-SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 3219
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.35774.77123). 3220
Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond ”, ResearchGate 2022, (doi: 3223
10.13140/RG.2.2.36141.77287). 3224
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2022, (doi: 3226
10.13140/RG.2.2.29430.88642). 3227
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2022, (doi: 3230
10.13140/RG.2.2.11369.16487). 3231
Featuring (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances”, Preprints 3233
2022, 2022120549 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0549.v1). 3234
Featuring (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances”, 3236
98. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperAlliances With 3238
Cancer’s Recognitions And Related (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClasses”, 3241
99. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperAlliances With 3243
Cancer’s Recognitions And Related (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClasses”, 3246
ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.20993.12640). 3253
102. Henry Garrett,“Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on 3254
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs and SuperHyperGraphs Alongside 3255
Applications in Cancer’s Treatments”, Preprints 2022, 2022120324 (doi: 3256
10.20944/preprints202212.0324.v1). 3257
103. Henry Garrett, “Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on 3258
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs And SuperHyperGraphs Alongside 3259
Applications in Cancer’s Treatments”, ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 3260
10.13140/RG.2.2.23123.04641). 3261
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”, Preprints 2022, 2022110576 (doi: 3264
10.20944/preprints202211.0576.v1). 3265
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”, ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 3268
10.13140/RG.2.2.23324.56966). 3269
106. Henry Garrett, “Basic Neutrosophic Notions Concerning SuperHyperDominating 3270
and Neutrosophic SuperHyperResolving in SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 3271
2022 (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.29173.86244). 3272
107. Henry Garrett, “Initial Material of Neutrosophic Preliminaries to Study Some 3273
Neutrosophic Notions Based on Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) in 3274
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)”, ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 3275
10.13140/RG.2.2.25385.88160). 3276
108. Henry Garrett, (2022). “Beyond Neutrosophic Graphs”, Ohio: E-publishing: 3277
Educational Publisher 1091 West 1st Ave Grandview Heights, Ohio 43212 3278
United States. ISBN: 979-1-59973-725-6 3279
(http://fs.unm.edu/BeyondNeutrosophicGraphs.pdf). 3280
109. Henry Garrett, (2022). “Neutrosophic Duality”, Florida: GLOBAL 3281
KNOWLEDGE - Publishing House 848 Brickell Ave Ste 950 Miami, Florida 3282
33131 United States. ISBN: 978-1-59973-743-0 3283
(http://fs.unm.edu/NeutrosophicDuality.pdf). 3284
View publication stats

New Ideas in Cancer's Recognition and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph by Chord As Hyper Excellence On Super Excess

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

New Ideas in Cancer's Recognition and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph by Chord As Hyper Excellence On Super Excess

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

New Ideas In Cancer's Recognition And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph By

Preprint · March 2023

344 PUBLICATIONS 4,746 CITATIONS

On Algebraic Structures and Algebraic Hyperstructures View project

On Combinatorics View project

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 2

SuperHyperGraph By Chord As Hyper Excellence On Super 3

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · 6

DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA 7

In this scientific research, (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic 9

SuperHyperChord). Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an Chord 10

pair S = (V, E). Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs } and 11

E 0 = {E1 , E2 , . . . , Ez }. Then either V 0 or E 0 is called Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperChord 12

if it’s a SuperHyperChord such that |N (E 0 ) ∩ E 0 | ≥ i and —N(E’)∩(E \ E 0 )| ≥ j; 13

Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperChord if it’s a SuperHyperChord such that 14

|N (E 0 ) ∩ E 0 | ≥ i and —N(E’)∩(E \ E 0 )| ≥ j; and 15

|Ei |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY = |Ej |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY ; Neutrosophic 16

v-SuperHyperChord if it’s a SuperHyperChord such that |N (V 0 ) ∩ V 0 | ≥ i and 17

—N(V’)∩(V \ V 0 )| ≥ j; Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperChord if it’s a SuperHyperChord 18

such that |N (V 0 ) ∩ V 0 | ≥ i and —N(V’)∩(V \ V 0 )| ≥ j; and 19

|Vi |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY = |Vj |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY ; Neutrosophic 20

SuperHyperChord if it’s either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperChord, Neutrosophic 21

re-SuperHyperChord, Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperChord, and Neutrosophic 22

rv-SuperHyperChord. ((Neutrosophic) SuperHyperChord). Assume a Neutrosophic 23

SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an Chorded pair S = (V, E). Consider a Neutrosophic 24

SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) E = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then E is called an Extreme 25

SuperHyperChord if it’s either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperChord, Neutrosophic 26

re-SuperHyperChord, Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperChord, and Neutrosophic 27

rv-SuperHyperChord and C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) 28

is the maximum Extreme cardinality of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme 29

cardinality of the Extreme SuperHyperEdges in the consecutive Extreme sequence of 30

Extreme SuperHyperChord; a Neutrosophic SuperHyperChord if it’s either of 32

Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperChord, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperChord, Neutrosophic 33

v-SuperHyperChord, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperChord and C(N SHG) for a 34

Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum Neutrosophic 35

cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S 36

of high Neutrosophic cardinality consecutive Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges and 37

Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Neutrosophic 38

SuperHyperChord; an Extreme SuperHyperChord SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either 39

of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperChord, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperChord, Neutrosophic 40

v-SuperHyperChord, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperChord and C(N SHG) for an 41

Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Extreme SuperHyperPolynomial 42

Extreme cardinality of the Extreme SuperHyperEdges of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S 44

of high Extreme cardinality consecutive Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme 45

Extreme power is corresponded to its Extreme coefficient; a Neutrosophic 47

SuperHyperChord SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of Neutrosophic 48

e-SuperHyperChord, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperChord, Neutrosophic 49

v-SuperHyperChord, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperChord and C(N SHG) for a 50

Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Neutrosophic 51

SuperHyperPolynomial contains the Neutrosophic coefficients defined as the 52

Neutrosophic number of the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic 53

SuperHyperEdges of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high Neutrosophic cardinality 54

consecutive Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such 55

corresponded to its Neutrosophic coefficient; an Extreme V-SuperHyperChord if it’s 57

either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperChord, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperChord, 58

Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperChord, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperChord and 59

cardinality of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality of the Extreme 61

SuperHyperVertices in the consecutive Extreme sequence of Extreme SuperHyperEdges 62

a Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperChord if it’s either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperChord, 64

Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperChord, Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperChord, and 65

Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperChord and C(N SHG) for a Neutrosophic 66