New Research On Cancer's Recognition and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph by Eulerian SuperHyperCycles and Hamiltonian Sets As Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-VI

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.
net/publication/368291720
New Research On Cancer's Recognition and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph By

Eulerian SuperHyperCycles and Hamiltonian Sets As Hyper Covering Versus
Super separations-VI
Preprint · February 2023

DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.29913.80482
CITATIONS
1 author:
Henry Garrett
289 PUBLICATIONS 2,902 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Number Graphs And Numbers View project
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs and SuperHyperGraphs View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Henry Garrett on 06 February 2023.
The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
New Research On Cancer’s Recognition and Neutrosophic 2
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian SuperHyperCycles and 3
Hamiltonian Sets As Hyper Covering Versus Super 4
separations-VI 5
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · 7
DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA 8
ABSTRACT 9
In this research, assume a SuperHyperGraph. Then some notions on Extreme 10
SuperHyperCycle based on the backgrounds of Eulerian and Hamiltonian styles are 11
proposed. Some results are directed in the way that, the starting definitions make sense 12
on the motivation and the continuous approaches for this research. [Neutrosophic 13
Strength of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPaths] Assume a Neutrosophic 14
SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an ordered pair S = (V, E). A Neutrosophic 15
SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) V1 to 16
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vs is sequence of Neutrosophic 17
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) and Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges 18
(NSHE) V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs , have Neutrosophic t-strength 19
(min{T (Vi )}, m, n)si=1 ; Neutrosophic i-strength (m, min{I(Vi )}, n)si=1 ; Neutrosophic 20
f-strength (m, n, min{F (Vi )})si=1 ; Neutrosophic strength 21
(min{T (Vi )}, min{I(Vi )}, min{F (Vi )})si=1 . [Different Neutrosophic Types of 22
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)] Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 23
(NSHG) S is an ordered pair S = (V, E). Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge 24
(NSHE) E = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then E is called Neutrosophic t-connective if T (E) ≥ 25
maximum number of Neutrosophic t-strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from 26
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 27
(NSHV) Vj where 1 ≤ i, j ≤ s; Neutrosophic i-connective if I(E) ≥ maximum number of 28
Neutrosophic i-strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic 29
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vj where 30
1 ≤ i, j ≤ s; Neutrosophic f-connective if F (E) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic 31
f-strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) 32
Vi to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vj where 1 ≤ i, j ≤ s; Neutrosophic 33
connective if (T (E), I(E), F (E)) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic strength of 34
SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi to 35
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vj where 1 ≤ i, j ≤ s. ((Neutrosophic) 36
SuperHyperConnectivities). Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an 37
ordered pair S = (V, E). Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) 38
E = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then E is called an Extreme SuperHyperConnectivities if it’s 39
either of Neutrosophic t-connective, Neutrosophic i-connective, Neutrosophic 40
f-connective, and Neutrosophic connective and C(N SHG) for an Extreme 41
SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum Extreme cardinality of an Extreme 42
SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality of the Extreme SuperHyperEdges in the 43
consecutive Extreme sequence of Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme 44
SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Extreme SuperHyperConnectivities; a 45
Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities if it’s either of Neutrosophic t-connective, 46
Neutrosophic i-connective, Neutrosophic f-connective, and Neutrosophic connective and 47
C(N SHG) for a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum 48
Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges of a Neutrosophic 49
SuperHyperSet S of high Neutrosophic cardinality consecutive Neutrosophic 50
SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 51
Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities; an Extreme SuperHyperConnectivities 52
SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of Neutrosophic t-connective, Neutrosophic 53
i-connective, Neutrosophic f-connective, and Neutrosophic connective and C(N SHG) for 54
an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Extreme SuperHyperPolynomial 55
contains the Extreme coefficients defined as the Extreme number of the maximum 56
Extreme cardinality of the Extreme SuperHyperEdges of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S 57
of high Extreme cardinality consecutive Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme 58
SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Extreme SuperHyperConnectivities; and 59
the Extreme power is corresponded to its Extreme coefficient; a Neutrosophic 60
SuperHyperConnectivities SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of Neutrosophic 61
t-connective, Neutrosophic i-connective, Neutrosophic f-connective, and Neutrosophic 62
connective and C(N SHG) for a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the 63
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPolynomial contains the Neutrosophic coefficients defined as 64
the Neutrosophic number of the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic 65
SuperHyperEdges of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high Neutrosophic cardinality 66
consecutive Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such 67
that they form the Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities; and the Neutrosophic power 68
is corresponded to its Neutrosophic coefficient; an Extreme R-SuperHyperConnectivities 69
if it’s either of Neutrosophic t-connective, Neutrosophic i-connective, Neutrosophic 70
SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum Extreme cardinality of an Extreme 72
SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality of the Extreme SuperHyperVertices in the 73
consecutive Extreme sequence of Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme 74
SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Extreme SuperHyperConnectivities; a 75
Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnectivities if it’s either of Neutrosophic t-connective, 76
Neutrosophic i-connective, Neutrosophic f-connective, and Neutrosophic connective and 77
C(N SHG) for a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum 78
Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of a Neutrosophic 79
SuperHyperSet S of high Neutrosophic cardinality consecutive Neutrosophic 80
SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 81
Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities; an Extreme R-SuperHyperConnectivities 82
SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of Neutrosophic t-connective, Neutrosophic 83
i-connective, Neutrosophic f-connective, and Neutrosophic connective and C(N SHG) for 84
an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Extreme SuperHyperPolynomial 85
Extreme cardinality of the Extreme SuperHyperVertices of an Extreme SuperHyperSet 87
S of high Extreme cardinality consecutive Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme 88
SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Extreme SuperHyperConnectivities; and 89
the Extreme power is corresponded to its Extreme coefficient; a Neutrosophic 90
SuperHyperConnectivities SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of Neutrosophic 91
t-connective, Neutrosophic i-connective, Neutrosophic f-connective, and Neutrosophic 92
connective and C(N SHG) for a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the 93
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPolynomial contains the Neutrosophic coefficients defined as 94
the Neutrosophic number of the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic 95
SuperHyperVertices of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high Neutrosophic 96
cardinality consecutive Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic 97
SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities; 98
and the Neutrosophic power is corresponded to its Neutrosophic coefficient. A basic 99
familiarity with neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle theory, SuperHyperGraphs, and 100
neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs theory are proposed. 101
Keywords: neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, (neutrosophic) SuperHyperCycle, 102
Cancer’s neutrosophic Recognition 103
AMS Subject Classification: 05C17, 05C22, 05E45 104
1 Wondering open Problems But As The Directions 105
To Forming The Motivations 106
In what follows, some “Neutrosophic problems” and some “Neutrosophic questions” are 107
Neutrosophicly proposed. 108
The SuperHyperCycle and the neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle are Neutrosophicly 109
defined on a real-world Neutrosophic application, titled “Cancer’s neutrosophic 110
recognitions”. 111
Question 1.1. Which the else neutrosophic SuperHyperModels could be defined based 112
on Cancer’s neutrosophic recognitions? 113
Question 1.2. Are there some neutrosophic SuperHyperNotions related to 114
SuperHyperCycle and the neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle? 115
Question 1.3. Are there some Neutrosophic Algorithms to be defined on the 116
neutrosophic SuperHyperModels to compute them Neutrosophicly? 117
Question 1.4. Which the neutrosophic SuperHyperNotions are related to beyond the 118
SuperHyperCycle and the neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle? 119
Problem 1.5. The SuperHyperCycle and the neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle do 120
Neutrosophicly a neutrosophic SuperHyperModel for the Cancer’s neutrosophic 121
recognitions and they’re based Neutrosophicly on neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle, are 122
there else Neutrosophicly? 123
Problem 1.6. Which the fundamental Neutrosophic SuperHyperNumbers are related to 124
these Neutrosophic SuperHyperNumbers types-results? 125
Problem 1.7. What’s the independent research based on Cancer’s neutrosophic 126
recognitions concerning the multiple types of neutrosophic SuperHyperNotions? 127
2 The Surveys of Mathematical Sets On The 128
Results But As The Initial Motivation 129
Definition 2.1 (Neutrosophic Strength of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPaths). 130
(Ref. [38],Definition 5.3,p.7). 131
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an ordered pair S = (V, E).

A Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex
(NSHV) V1 to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vs is sequence of Neutrosophic
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) and Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)
V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs ,
have 132
(i) Neutrosophic t-strength (min{T (Vi )}, m, n)si=1 ; 133
(ii) Neutrosophic i-strength (m, min{I(Vi )}, n)si=1 ; 134
(iii) Neutrosophic f-strength (m, n, min{F (Vi )})si=1 ; 135
(iv) Neutrosophic strength (min{T (Vi )}, min{I(Vi )}, min{F (Vi )})si=1 . 136
Definition 2.2 (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges 137
(NSHE)). (Ref. [38],Definition 5.4,p.7). 138
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an ordered pair S = (V, E). 139
Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) E = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then E is 140
called 141
(ix) Neutrosophic t-connective if T (E) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic 142
t-strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 143
(NSHV) Vi to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vj where 1 ≤ i, j ≤ s; 144
(x) Neutrosophic i-connective if I(E) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic 145
i-strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 146
(xi) Neutrosophic f-connective if F (E) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic 148
f-strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 149
(xii) Neutrosophic connective if (T (E), I(E), F (E)) ≥ maximum number of 151
Neutrosophic strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic 152
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vj 153
where 1 ≤ i, j ≤ s. 154
Definition 2.3. ((Neutrosophic) SuperHyperConnectivities). 155
called 158
(i) an Extreme SuperHyperConnectivities if it’s either of Neutrosophic 159
t-connective, Neutrosophic i-connective, Neutrosophic f-connective, and 160
Neutrosophic connective and C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph 161
N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum Extreme cardinality of an Extreme 162
SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality of the Extreme SuperHyperEdges in 163
the consecutive Extreme sequence of Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme 164
SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Extreme SuperHyperConnectivities; 165
(ii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities if it’s either of Neutrosophic 166
Neutrosophic connective and C(N SHG) for a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 168
N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic 169
SuperHyperEdges of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high Neutrosophic 170
SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Neutrosophic 172
SuperHyperConnectivities; 173
(iii) an Extreme SuperHyperConnectivities SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s 174
SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Extreme SuperHyperPolynomial 177
Extreme cardinality of the Extreme SuperHyperEdges of an Extreme 179
SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality consecutive Extreme 180
SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 181
Extreme SuperHyperConnectivities; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its 182
Extreme coefficient; 183
(iv) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities SuperHyperPolynomial if 184
it’s either of Neutrosophic t-connective, Neutrosophic i-connective, Neutrosophic 185
f-connective, and Neutrosophic connective and C(N SHG) for a Neutrosophic 186
SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPolynomial 187
contains the Neutrosophic coefficients defined as the Neutrosophic number of the 188
maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges of a 189
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high Neutrosophic cardinality consecutive 190
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that 191
they form the Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities; and the Neutrosophic 192
power is corresponded to its Neutrosophic coefficient; 193
(v) an Extreme R-SuperHyperConnectivities if it’s either of Neutrosophic 194
Neutrosophic connective and C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph 196
N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum Extreme cardinality of an Extreme 197
SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality of the Extreme SuperHyperVertices 198
in the consecutive Extreme sequence of Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme 199
SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Extreme SuperHyperConnectivities; 200
(vi) a Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnectivities if it’s either of Neutrosophic 201
Neutrosophic connective and C(N SHG) for a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 203
N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic 204
SuperHyperVertices of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high Neutrosophic 205
SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Neutrosophic 207
SuperHyperConnectivities; 208
(vii) an Extreme R-SuperHyperConnectivities SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s 209
SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Extreme SuperHyperPolynomial 212
Extreme cardinality of the Extreme SuperHyperVertices of an Extreme 214
SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality consecutive Extreme 215
SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 216
Extreme SuperHyperConnectivities; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its 217
Extreme coefficient; 218
(viii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities SuperHyperPolynomial if 219
it’s either of Neutrosophic t-connective, Neutrosophic i-connective, Neutrosophic 220
f-connective, and Neutrosophic connective and C(N SHG) for a Neutrosophic 221
SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPolynomial 222
contains the Neutrosophic coefficients defined as the Neutrosophic number of the 223
maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of a 224
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high Neutrosophic cardinality consecutive 225
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that 226
they form the Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities; and the Neutrosophic 227
power is corresponded to its Neutrosophic coefficient. 228
Figure 1. The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions

of Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities in the Neutrosophic Example (??)
Example 2.4. • On the Figure (1), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, 229
Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities, is up. E1 and E3 are some empty 230
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges but E2 is a loop Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge 231
and E4 is a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. Thus in the terms of Neutrosophic 232
SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only one Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge, namely, 233
E4 . The Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 is Neutrosophic isolated means that 234
there’s no Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge has it as a Neutrosophic endpoint. Thus 235
the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 , is excluded in every given Neutrosophic 236
SuperHyperConnectivities. 237
C(N SHG) = {E4 } is a Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities.

C(N SHG) = z is a Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities SuperHyperPolynomial.
C(N SHG) = {Vi }i6=3 is a Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnectivities.
C(N SHG) = 3z is a Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnectivities SuperHyperPolynomial.
238
• On the Figure (2), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 239
SuperHyperConnectivities, is up. E1 , E2 and E3 are some empty Neutrosophic 240
SuperHyperEdges but E4 is a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. Thus in the terms 241
of Neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only one Neutrosophic 242
SuperHyperEdge, namely, E4 . The Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 is 243
Neutrosophic isolated means that there’s no Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge has it 244
as a Neutrosophic endpoint. Thus the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 , is 245
excluded in every given Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities. 246
C(N SHG) = {E4 } is a Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities.

C(N SHG) = z is a Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities SuperHyperPolynomial.
C(N SHG) = {Vi }i6=3 is a Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnectivities.
C(N SHG) = 3z is a Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnectivities SuperHyperPolynomial.
247
Figure 2. The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions

of Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities in the Neutrosophic Example (??)
3 Applied Notions Under The Scrutiny Of The 248
Motivation Of This Research 249
In this research, there are some ideas in the featured frameworks of motivations. I try 250
to bring the motivations in the narrative ways. 251
Question 3.1. How to define the SuperHyperNotions and to do research on them to 252
find the “ amount of SuperHyperCycle” of either individual of cells or the groups of cells 253
based on the fixed cell or the fixed group of cells, extensively, the “amount of 254
SuperHyperCycle” based on the fixed groups of cells or the fixed groups of group of cells? 255
Question 3.2. What are the best descriptions for the “Cancer’s Recognition” in terms 256
of these messy and dense SuperHyperModels where embedded notions are illustrated? 257
It’s motivation to find notions to use in this dense model is titled 258
“SuperHyperGraphs”. Thus it motivates us to define different types of “ 259
SuperHyperCycle” and “neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle” on “SuperHyperGraph” and 260
“neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”. 261
4 Preliminaries Of This Research On the Redeemed 262
Ways 263
In this section, the basic material in this research, is referred to [Single Valued 264
Neutrosophic Set](Ref. [38],Definition 2.2,p.2), [Neutrosophic Set](Ref. [38],Definition 265
2.1,p.1), [Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)](Ref. [38],Definition 2.5,p.2), 266
[Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)](Ref. [38],Definition 267
2.7,p.3), [t-norm](Ref. [38], Definition 2.7, p.3), and [Characterization of the 268
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)](Ref. [38],Definition 2.7,p.3), [Neutrosophic 269
Strength of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPaths] (Ref. [38],Definition 5.3,p.7), and 270
[Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)] 271
(Ref. [38],Definition 5.4,p.7). Also, the new ideas and their clarifications are addressed 272
to Ref. [38]. 273
In this subsection, the basic material which is used in this research, is presented. 274
Also, the new ideas and their clarifications are elicited. 275
Definition 4.1 (Neutrosophic Set). (Ref. [38],Definition 2.1,p.1). 276
Let X be a space of points (objects) with generic elements in X denoted by x; then

the Neutrosophic set A (NS A) is an object having the form
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}

+
where the functions T, I, F : X →]− 0, 1 [ define respectively the a
truth-membership function, an indeterminacy-membership function, and a
falsity-membership function of the element x ∈ X to the set A with the condition
−
0 ≤ TA (x) + IA (x) + FA (x) ≤ 3+ .
The functions TA (x), IA (x) and FA (x) are real standard or nonstandard subsets of 277
+
]− 0, 1 [. 278
Definition 4.2 (Single Valued Neutrosophic Set). (Ref. [38],Definition 2.2,p.2). 279
Let X be a space of points (objects) with generic elements in X denoted by x. A

single valued Neutrosophic set A (SVNS A) is characterized by truth-membership
function TA (x), an indeterminacy-membership function IA (x), and a falsity-membership
function FA (x). For each point x in X, TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) ∈ [0, 1]. A SVNS A can be
written as
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}.
Definition 4.3. The degree of truth-membership,
indeterminacy-membership and falsity-membership of the subset X ⊂ A of
the single valued Neutrosophic set A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}:
TA (X) = min[TA (vi ), TA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,
IA (X) = min[IA (vi ), IA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,

and FA (X) = min[FA (vi ), FA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X .
Definition 4.4. The support of X ⊂ A of the single valued Neutrosophic set
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}:
supp(X) = {x ∈ X : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) > 0}.
Definition 4.5 (Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). (Ref. [38],Definition 280
2.5,p.2). 281
Assume V 0 is a given set. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an 282
ordered pair S = (V, E), where 283
(i) V = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vn } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of V 0 ; 284
(ii) V = {(Vi , TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi )) : TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi ) ≥ 0}, (i = 285
1, 2, . . . , n); 286
(iii) E = {E1 , E2 , . . . , En0 } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of 287
V; 288
(iv) E = {(Ei0 , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )) : TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 ) ≥ 0}, (i0 = 289
1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 290
(v) Vi 6= ∅, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 291
(vi) Ei0 6= ∅, (i0 = 1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 292
P
(vii) i supp(Vi ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 293
0 0
P
(viii) i0 supp(Ei ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n );
0 294
(ix) and the following conditions hold:
TV0 (Ei0 ) ≤ min[TV 0 (Vi ), TV 0 (Vj )]Vi ,Vj ∈Ei0 ,
IV0 (Ei0 ) ≤ min[IV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vj )]Vi ,Vj ∈Ei0 ,

and FV0 (Ei0 ) ≤ min[FV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vj )]Vi ,Vj ∈Ei0
where i0 = 1, 2, . . . , n0 . 295
Here the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ej 0 and the Neutrosophic 296
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) Vj are single valued Neutrosophic sets. TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), 297
and FV 0 (Vi ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 298
indeterminacy-membership and the degree of falsity-membership the Neutrosophic 299
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) V. 300
TV0 (Ei0 ), TV0 (Ei0 ), and TV0 (Ei0 ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 301
indeterminacy-membership and the degree of falsity-membership of the Neutrosophic 302
SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) Ei0 to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) E. Thus, 303
the ii0 th element of the incidence matrix of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) 304
are of the form (Vi , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )), the sets V and E are crisp sets. 305
Definition 4.6 (Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). 306
The Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ei0 and the Neutrosophic 309
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) Vi of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S = (V, E) 310
could be characterized as follow-up items. 311
(i) If |Vi | = 1, then Vi is called vertex; 312
(ii) if |Vi | ≥ 1, then Vi is called SuperVertex; 313
(iii) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called edge; 314
(iv) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 315
HyperEdge; 316
(v) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called 317
SuperEdge; 318
(vi) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 319
SuperHyperEdge. 320
If we choose different types of binary operations, then we could get hugely diverse 321
types of general forms of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG). 322
Definition 4.7 (t-norm). (Ref. [38], Definition 2.7, p.3). 323
A binary operation ⊗ : [0, 1] × [0, 1] → [0, 1] is a t-norm if it satisfies the following 324
for x, y, z, w ∈ [0, 1]: 325
(i) 1 ⊗ x = x; 326
(ii) x ⊗ y = y ⊗ x; 327
(iii) x ⊗ (y ⊗ z) = (x ⊗ y) ⊗ z; 328
(iv) If w ≤ x and y ≤ z then w ⊗ y ≤ x ⊗ z. 329
Definition 4.8. The degree of truth-membership, indeterminacy-membership

and falsity-membership of the subset X ⊂ A of the single valued Neutrosophic set
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X} (with respect to t-norm Tnorm ):
TA (X) = Tnorm [TA (vi ), TA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,
IA (X) = Tnorm [IA (vi ), IA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,
and FA (X) = Tnorm [FA (vi ), FA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X .
Definition 4.9. The support of X ⊂ A of the single valued Neutrosophic set
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}:
supp(X) = {x ∈ X : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) > 0}.
Definition 4.10. (General Forms of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). 330
Assume V 0 is a given set. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an 331
ordered pair S = (V, E), where 332
(i) V = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vn } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of V 0 ; 333
(ii) V = {(Vi , TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi )) : TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi ) ≥ 0}, (i = 334
1, 2, . . . , n); 335
(iii) E = {E1 , E2 , . . . , En0 } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of 336
V; 337
(iv) E = {(Ei0 , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )) : TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 ) ≥ 0}, (i0 = 338
1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 339
(v) Vi 6= ∅, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 340
(vi) Ei0 6= ∅, (i0 = 1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 341
P
(vii) i supp(Vi ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 342
0 0
P
(viii) i0 supp(Ei ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n ).
0 343
Here the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ej 0 and the Neutrosophic 344
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) Vj are single valued Neutrosophic sets. TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), 345
and FV 0 (Vi ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 346
indeterminacy-membership and the degree of falsity-membership the Neutrosophic 347
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) V. 348
TV0 (Ei0 ), TV0 (Ei0 ), and TV0 (Ei0 ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 349
indeterminacy-membership and the degree of falsity-membership of the Neutrosophic 350
SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) Ei0 to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) E. Thus, 351
the ii0 th element of the incidence matrix of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) 352
are of the form (Vi , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )), the sets V and E are crisp sets. 353
Definition 4.11 (Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). 354
The Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ei0 and the Neutrosophic 357
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) Vi of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S = (V, E) 358
(i) If |Vi | = 1, then Vi is called vertex; 360
(ii) if |Vi | ≥ 1, then Vi is called SuperVertex; 361
(iii) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called edge; 362
(iv) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 363
HyperEdge; 364
(v) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called 365
SuperEdge; 366
(vi) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 367
SuperHyperEdge. 368
This SuperHyperModel is too messy and too dense. Thus there’s a need to have 369
some restrictions and conditions on SuperHyperGraph. The special case of this 370
SuperHyperGraph makes the patterns and regularities. 371
Definition 4.12. A graph is SuperHyperUniform if it’s SuperHyperGraph and the 372
number of elements of SuperHyperEdges are the same. 373
To get more visions on SuperHyperUniform, the some SuperHyperClasses are 374
introduced. It makes to have SuperHyperUniform more understandable. 375
Definition 4.13. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. There are some 376
SuperHyperClasses as follows. 377
(i). It’s Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath if it’s only one SuperVertex as 378
intersection amid two given SuperHyperEdges with two exceptions; 379
(ii). it’s SuperHyperCycle if it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two 380
given SuperHyperEdges; 381
(iii). it’s SuperHyperStar it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid all 382
SuperHyperEdges; 383
(iv). it’s SuperHyperBipartite it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two 384
given SuperHyperEdges and these SuperVertices, forming two separate sets, has 385
no SuperHyperEdge in common; 386
(v). it’s SuperHyperMultiPartite it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid 387
two given SuperHyperEdges and these SuperVertices, forming multi separate sets, 388
has no SuperHyperEdge in common; 389
(vi). it’s SuperHyperWheel if it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two 390
given SuperHyperEdges and one SuperVertex has one SuperHyperEdge with any 391
common SuperVertex. 392
Definition 4.14. Let an ordered pair S = (V, E) be a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph

(NSHG) S. Then a sequence of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) and
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)
V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs
is called a Neutrosophic Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from 393
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) V1 to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 394
(NSHV) Vs if either of following conditions hold: 395
(i) Vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 396
(ii) there’s a vertex vi ∈ Vi such that vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 397
(iii) there’s a SuperVertex Vi0 ∈ Vi such that Vi0 , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 398
(iv) there’s a vertex vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that Vi , vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 399
0 0
(v) there’s a SuperVertex Vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that Vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 400
(vi) there are a vertex vi ∈ Vi and a vertex vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that vi , vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 401
0 0
(vii) there are a vertex vi ∈ Vi and a SuperVertex Vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 402
(viii) there are a SuperVertex Vi0 ∈ Vi and a vertex vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that Vi0 , vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 403
(ix) there are a SuperVertex Vi0 ∈ Vi and a SuperVertex Vi+1

0
∈ Vi+1 such that 404
0 0
Vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 . 405
Definition 4.15. (Characterization of the Neutrosophic Neutrosophic 406
SuperHyperPaths). 407

a Neutrosophic Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) V1 to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vs is
sequence of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) and Neutrosophic
SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)
V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs ,
(i) If for all Vi , Ej 0 , |Vi | = 1, |Ej 0 | = 2, then NSHP is called path; 409
(ii) if for all Ej 0 , |Ej 0 | = 2, and there’s Vi , |Vi | ≥ 1, then NSHP is called SuperPath; 410
(iii) if for all Vi , Ej 0 , |Vi | = 1, |Ej 0 | ≥ 2, then NSHP is called HyperPath; 411
(iv) if there are Vi , Ej 0 , |Vi | ≥ 1, |Ej 0 | ≥ 2, then NSHP is called Neutrosophic 412
SuperHyperPath . 413
Definition 4.16 (Neutrosophic Strength of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPaths). 414

A Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex
(NSHV) V1 to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vs is sequence of Neutrosophic
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) and Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)
V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs ,
have 416
(i) Neutrosophic t-strength (min{T (Vi )}, m, n)si=1 ; 417
(ii) Neutrosophic i-strength (m, min{I(Vi )}, n)si=1 ; 418
(iii) Neutrosophic f-strength (m, n, min{F (Vi )})si=1 ; 419
(iv) Neutrosophic strength (min{T (Vi )}, min{I(Vi )}, min{F (Vi )})si=1 . 420
Definition 4.17 (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges 421
(NSHE)). (Ref. [38],Definition 5.4,p.7). 422
called 425
(ix) Neutrosophic t-connective if T (E) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic 426
t-strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 427
(x) Neutrosophic i-connective if I(E) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic 429
i-strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 430
(xi) Neutrosophic f-connective if F (E) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic 432
f-strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 433
(xii) Neutrosophic connective if (T (E), I(E), F (E)) ≥ maximum number of 435
Neutrosophic strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic 436
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vj 437
where 1 ≤ i, j ≤ s. 438
Definition 4.18. ((neutrosophic) SuperHyperCycle). 439
Assume a SuperHyperGraph. Then 440
(i) an Extreme SuperHyperCycle C(N SHG) for an extreme SuperHyperGraph 441
N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum extreme cardinality of an extreme 442
SuperHyperSet S of high extreme cardinality of the extreme SuperHyperEdges in 443
the consecutive extreme sequence of extreme SuperHyperEdges and extreme 444
SuperHyperVertices such that they form the extreme SuperHyperCycle and either 445
all extreme SuperHyperVertices or all extreme SuperHyperEdges; 446
(ii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle C(N SHG) for a neutrosophic 447
SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of 448
the neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges of a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high 449
neutrosophic cardinality consecutive neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges and 450
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that they form the neutrosophic 451
SuperHyperCycle and either all neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices or all 452
neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges; 453
(iii) an Extreme SuperHyperCycle SuperHyperPolynomial C(N SHG) for an 454
extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the extreme SuperHyperPolynomial 455
contains the extreme coefficients defined as the extreme number of the maximum 456
extreme cardinality of the extreme SuperHyperEdges of an extreme 457
SuperHyperSet S of high extreme cardinality consecutive extreme 458
SuperHyperEdges and extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 459
extreme SuperHyperCycle and either all extreme SuperHyperVertices or all 460
extreme SuperHyperEdges; and the extreme power is corresponded to its extreme 461
coefficient; 462
(iv) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle SuperHyperPolynomial C(N SHG) for 463
a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the neutrosophic 464
SuperHyperPolynomial contains the neutrosophic coefficients defined as the 465
neutrosophic number of the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of the neutrosophic 466
SuperHyperEdges of a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high neutrosophic 467
cardinality consecutive neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges and neutrosophic 468
SuperHyperVertices such that they form the neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle and 469
either all neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices or all neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges; 470
and the neutrosophic power is corresponded to its neutrosophic coefficient; 471
(v) an Extreme R-SuperHyperCycle C(N SHG) for an extreme 472
SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum extreme cardinality of an 473
extreme SuperHyperSet S of high extreme cardinality of the extreme 474
SuperHyperVertices in the consecutive extreme sequence of extreme 475
extreme SuperHyperEdges; 478
(vi) a Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperCycle C(N SHG) for a neutrosophic 479
SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of 480
the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high 481
neutrosophic cardinality consecutive neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges and 482
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that they form the neutrosophic 483
SuperHyperCycle and either all neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices or all 484
neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges;; 485
(vii) an Extreme R-SuperHyperCycle SuperHyperPolynomial C(N SHG) for 486
an extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the extreme 487
SuperHyperPolynomial contains the extreme coefficients defined as the extreme 488
number of the maximum extreme cardinality of the extreme SuperHyperVertices 489
of an extreme SuperHyperSet S of high extreme cardinality consecutive extreme 490
extreme SuperHyperEdges; and the extreme power is corresponded to its extreme 493
coefficient; 494
(viii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle SuperHyperPolynomial C(N SHG) for 495
a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the neutrosophic 496
SuperHyperPolynomial contains the neutrosophic coefficients defined as the 497
neutrosophic number of the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of the neutrosophic 498
SuperHyperVertices of a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high neutrosophic 499
cardinality consecutive neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges and neutrosophic 500
SuperHyperVertices such that they form the neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle and 501
either all neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices or all neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges; 502
and the neutrosophic power is corresponded to its neutrosophic coefficient. 503
Definition 4.19. ((neutrosophic/neutrosophic)δ−SuperHyperCycle). 504
Assume a SuperHyperGraph. Then 505
(i) an δ−SuperHyperCycle is a neutrosophic kind of neutrosophic 506
SuperHyperCycle such that either of the following expressions hold for the 507
neutrosophic cardinalities of SuperHyperNeighbors of s ∈ S : 508
|S ∩ N (s)| > |S ∩ (V \ N (s))| + δ;

|S ∩ N (s)| < |S ∩ (V \ N (s))| + δ.
The Expression (4.1), holds if S is an δ−SuperHyperOffensive. And the 509
Expression (4.1), holds if S is an δ−SuperHyperDefensive; 510
(ii) a Neutrosophic δ−SuperHyperCycle is a neutrosophic kind of neutrosophic 511
SuperHyperCycle such that either of the following neutrosophic expressions hold 512
Table 1. The Values of Vertices, SuperVertices, Edges, HyperEdges, and SuperHy-

perEdges Belong to The neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph Mentioned in the Definition
(4.22)
The Values of The Vertices The Number of Position in Alphabet
The Values of The SuperVertices The maximum Values of Its Vertices
The Values of The Edges The maximum Values of Its Vertices
The Values of The HyperEdges The maximum Values of Its Vertices
The Values of The SuperHyperEdges The maximum Values of Its Endpoints

perEdges Belong to The neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, Mentioned in the Definition
(4.21)
for the neutrosophic cardinalities of SuperHyperNeighbors of s ∈ S : 513
|S ∩ N (s)|N eutrosophic > |S ∩ (V \ N (s))|N eutrosophic + δ;

|S ∩ N (s)|N eutrosophic < |S ∩ (V \ N (s))|N eutrosophic + δ.
The Expression (4.1), holds if S is a Neutrosophic δ−SuperHyperOffensive. 514
And the Expression (4.1), holds if S is a Neutrosophic 515
δ−SuperHyperDefensive. 516
For the sake of having a neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle, there’s a need to “redefine” 517
the notion of “neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”. The SuperHyperVertices and the 518
SuperHyperEdges are assigned by the labels from the letters of the alphabets. In this 519
procedure, there’s the usage of the position of labels to assign to the values. 520
Definition 4.20. Assume a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. It’s redefined 521
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph if the Table (1) holds. 522
It’s useful to define a “neutrosophic” version of SuperHyperClasses. Since there’s 523
more ways to get neutrosophic type-results to make a neutrosophic more 524
understandable. 525
Definition 4.21. Assume a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. There are some 526
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses if the Table (2) holds. Thus neutrosophic 527
SuperHyperPath , SuperHyperCycle, SuperHyperStar, SuperHyperBipartite, 528
SuperHyperMultiPartite, and SuperHyperWheel, are Neutrosophic 529
SuperHyperPath , Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle, Neutrosophic 530
SuperHyperStar, Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite, Neutrosophic 531
SuperHyperMultiPartite, and Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel if the Table 532
(2) holds. 533
It’s useful to define a “neutrosophic” version of a neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle. 534
Since there’s more ways to get type-results to make a neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle 535
more neutrosophicly understandable. 536
For the sake of having a neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle, there’s a need to “redefine” 537
the neutrosophic notion of “neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle”. The SuperHyperVertices 538
and the SuperHyperEdges are assigned by the labels from the letters of the alphabets. 539
In this procedure, there’s the usage of the position of labels to assign to the values. 540

perEdges Belong to The neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph Mentioned in the Definition
(4.22)
Definition 4.22. Assume a SuperHyperCycle. It’s redefined a Neutrosophic 541
SuperHyperCycle if the Table (3) holds. 542
5 Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle But As The 543
Extensions Except From Eulerian And 544
Hamiltonian Forms 545
The extreme SuperHyperNotion, namely, extreme SuperHyperCycle, is up. Thus the 546
non-obvious extreme SuperHyperCycle, S is up. The extreme type-SuperHyperSet of 547
the extreme SuperHyperCycle, is: S is a extreme SuperHyperSet, is: S does includes 548
only more than four extreme SuperHyperVertices in a connected neutrosophic 549
SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). It’s interesting to mention that the extreme 550
type-SuperHyperSet called the 551
“extreme SuperHyperCycle” 552
amid those obvious[non-obvious] simple[non-simple] extreme type-SuperHyperSets 553
called the 554
SuperHyperCycle, 555
is only and only S in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E) with 556
a illustrated SuperHyperModeling. But all only obvious[non-obvious] simple[non-simple] 557
extreme type-SuperHyperSets of the obvious[non-obvious] simple[non-simple] extreme 558
SuperHyperCycle amid those type-SuperHyperSets, are S. A connected neutrosophic 559
SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E) as a linearly-over-packed SuperHyperModel is 560
featured on the Figures. 561
Example 5.1. Assume the SuperHyperGraphs in the Figures (3), (4), (5), (6), (7), (8), 562
(9), (10), (11), (12), (13), (14), (15), (16), (17), (18), (19), (20), (21), and (22). 563
• On the Figure (3), the neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, neutrosophic 564
SuperHyperCycle, is up. E1 and E3 are some empty neutrosophic 565
SuperHyperEdges but E2 is a loop neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge and E4 is a 566
neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. Thus in the terms of neutrosophic 567
SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only one neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge, namely, E4 . 568
The neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 is neutrosophic isolated means that 569
there’s no neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge has it as a neutrosophic endpoint. Thus 570
the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 , is excluded in every given neutrosophic 571
SuperHyperCycle. 572
C(N SHG) = {E2 } is a neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle.

C(N SHG) = z is an neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle SuperHyperPolynomial.
C(N SHG) = {V1 } is a neutrosophic R-SuperHyperCycle.
C(N SHG) = z is a neutrosophic R-SuperHyperCycle SuperHyperPolynomial.
• On the Figure (4), the SuperHyperNotion, namely, SuperHyperCycle, is up. 573
E1 , E2 and E3 are some empty SuperHyperEdges but E2 isn’t a loop 574
SuperHyperEdge and E4 is a SuperHyperEdge. Thus in the terms of 575
SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only one SuperHyperEdge, namely, E4 . The 576
SuperHyperVertex, V3 is isolated means that there’s no SuperHyperEdge has it as 577
an endpoint. Thus the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 , is excluded in every 578
given neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle. Thus the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, 579
V3 , is excluded in every given neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle. 580

C(N SHG) = {V1 } is a neutrosophic R-SuperHyperCycle.
E1 , E2 and E3 are some empty SuperHyperEdges but E4 is a SuperHyperEdge. 582
Thus in the terms of SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only one SuperHyperEdge, 583
namely, E4 . E2 is an isolated SuperHyperEdge. 584
With the exception of E2 , the concept could be applied. With keeping E2 in the 585
mind, the story is coming up. 586

C(N SHG) = {V1 , V2 , V3 } is a neutrosophic R-SuperHyperCycle.
• On the Figure (6), the SuperHyperNotion, namely, a SuperHyperCycle, is up. 587
There’s no empty SuperHyperEdge but E3 are a loop SuperHyperEdge on {F }, 588
and there are some SuperHyperEdges, namely, E1 on {H, V1 , V3 }, alongside E2 on 589
{O, H, V4 , V3 } and E4 , E5 on {N, V1 , V2 , V3 , F }. 590
C(N SHG) = {V3 , E1 , V4 , E2 , H, E1 , V3 } is a neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle.

C(N SHG) = 4z 3 is a neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle SuperHyperPolynomial.
C(N SHG) = {V3 , V4 , H, V3 } is a neutrosophic R-SuperHyperCycle.
C(N SHG) = 4z 4 is a neutrosophic R-SuperHyperCycle SuperHyperPolynomial.
There’s neither empty SuperHyperEdge nor loop SuperHyperEdge. The following 592
neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices is the simple 593
neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle. 594
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperCycle = {V5 , E1 , V4 , E4 , V5 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperCycle SuperHyperPolynomial = 2z 2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-R-SuperHyperCycle = {V5 , V4 , V5 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-R-SuperHyperCycle SuperHyperPolynomial = 2z 3 .
There’s neither empty SuperHyperEdge nor loop SuperHyperEdge. 596
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicSuperHyperCycle = {Vi , Ei , Vi+1 }21

i=1
∪{V22 , E32 , Vi , Ei+11 , E11 , V1 }9j=21−j .
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicSuperHyperCycleSuperHyperP olynomial = 11z 22 .
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−SuperHyperCycle =
{Vi , Vi+1 }21
i=1
∪{V22 , Vi , V1 }9j=21−j .
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−SuperHyperCycleSuperHyperP olynomial = 11z 23 .
• On the Figure (9), the SuperHyperNotion, namely, SuperHyperCycle, is up. The 597
following neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic 598
SuperHyperEdges[SuperHyperVertices] is the simple neutrosophic 599
type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle. The neutrosophic 600
SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges[SuperHyperVertices], 601
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicSuperHyperCycle =

{V8 , E17 , V14 , E12 , V12 , E15 , V3 , E3 , V4 , E16 , V7 , E7 , V8 }
{V8 , V14 , V12 , V3 , V4 , V7 , V8 }
neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic 604
type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle. The following 606
SuperHyperEdges[SuperHyperVertices] is the neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of 608
the neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle. The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of 609
neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges[SuperHyperVertices], 610
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicSuperHyperCycle = {}

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicSuperHyperCycleSuperHyperP olynomial = 0.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−SuperHyperCycle = {}
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−SuperHyperCycleSuperHyperP olynomial = 0.
neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices is the simple 613
neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle. There’s 614
no coverage on either all SuperHyperVertices or all SuperHyperEdges. Thus the 615
quasi-discussion on the intended notion is up. Disclaimer: The terms are in this 616
item are referred to the prefix “quasi” since the notion isn’t seen and applied 617
totally but somehow the coincidence is achieved in the terms of neither of all 618
SuperHyperVertices or all SuperHyperEdges in any coverage. Thus the terms 619
Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle, Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperCycle 620
SuperHyperPolynomial, Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperCycle, and 621
Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperCycle SuperHyperPolynomial are up even 622
neither of the analogous terms have the prefix ‘quasi” and even more all the 623
context are about the quasi-style of the studied notion and the used notion is 624
quasi-notion even they’re addressed without the term “quasi”. Furthermore, for 625
the convenient usage and the harmony of the context with the used title and other 626
applied segments , the term “quasi” isn’t used more than the following groups of 627
expressions. 628

{Vi , Ei , V6 , E17 , V16 , d1 , V1 }5i=2
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperCycleSuperHyperP olynomial = 11z 8 .
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperCycle = {V1 , Vi , V16 , V1 }6i=2 .
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperCycleSuperHyperP olynomial = 11z 8 .
type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle. There’s no coverage 633
on either all SuperHyperVertices or all SuperHyperEdges. Thus the 634
quasi-discussion on the intended notion is up. Disclaimer: The terms are in this 635
item are referred to the prefix “quasi” since the notion isn’t seen and applied 636
totally but somehow the coincidence is achieved in the terms of neither of all 637
SuperHyperVertices or all SuperHyperEdges in any coverage. Thus the terms 638
Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle, Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperCycle 639
SuperHyperPolynomial, Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperCycle, and 640
Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperCycle SuperHyperPolynomial are up even 641
neither of the analogous terms have the prefix ‘quasi” and even more all the 642
context are about the quasi-style of the studied notion and the used notion is 643
quasi-notion even they’re addressed without the term “quasi”. Furthermore, for 644
the convenient usage and the harmony of the context with the used title and other 645
applied segments , the term “quasi” isn’t used more than the following groups of 646
expressions. The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic 647
SuperHyperEdges[SuperHyperVertices], 648

{V14 , E4 , V12 , E6 , V13 , E7 , V14 }
{V14 V12 , V13 , V14 }
There’s neither empty SuperHyperEdge nor loop SuperHyperEdge. The 650

{V1 , E6 , V5 , E5 , V6 , E4 , V4 , E7 , V2 , E1 , V1 }
{V1 , V5 , V6 , V4 , V2 , V1 }
type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle. There’s only one 657
neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges between any given neutrosophic amount of 658
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. Thus there isn’t any neutrosophic 659
SuperHyperCycle at all. The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic 660
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicSuperHyperCycle = {}

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicSuperHyperCycleSuperHyperP olynomial = 0.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−SuperHyperCycle = {}
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−SuperHyperCycleSuperHyperP olynomial = 0.

{V1 , E1 , V2 , E10 , V3 , E8 , V6 , E4 , V4 , E2 , V5 , E6 , V1 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicSuperHyperCycleSuperHyperP olynomial = z 6 .
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−SuperHyperCycle = {Vi }6i=1 .
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−SuperHyperCycleSuperHyperP olynomial = z 6 .
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperCycle = {}.

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperCycleSuperHyperP olynomial = 0.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperCycle = {}.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperCycleSuperHyperP olynomial = 0
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperCycle = {}.

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperCycleSuperHyperP olynomial = 0.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperCycle = {}.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperCycleSuperHyperP olynomial = 0
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperCycle = {V8 , E3 , V9 , E4 , V8 }.

686

687

688

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperCycleSuperHyperP olynomial = 28z 2 .
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperCycle = {V8 , V9 , V8 }.
689

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperCycle = {V15 V17 , V15 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperCycleSuperHyperP olynomial = 14z 3 .
Algorithm is straightforward. 691
Proposition 5.2. Assume a connected loopless neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 696
ESHG : (V, E). Then in the worst case, literally, 697
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperCycle = {V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , E3 , V4 , E4 , V1 }.

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperCycleSuperHyperP olynomial = z 4 .
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperCycle = {V1 , V2 , V3 , V4 , V1 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperCycleSuperHyperP olynomial = z 5 .
Is a neutrosophic type-result-SuperHyperCycle. In other words, the least cardinality, the 698
lower sharp bound for the cardinality, of a neutrosophic type-result-SuperHyperCycle is 699
the cardinality of 700
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperCycle = {V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , E3 , V4 , E4 , V1 }.

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperCycleSuperHyperP olynomial = z 4 .
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperCycle = {V1 , V2 , V3 , V4 , V1 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperCycleSuperHyperP olynomial = z 5 .
Figure 3. The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperCycle in

the Example (5.1)

the Example (5.1)

the Example (5.1)

the Example (5.1)

the Example (5.1)

the Example (5.1)

the Example (5.1)

the Example (5.1)

the Example (5.1)

the Example (5.1)

the Example (5.1)

the Example (5.1)

the Example (5.1)

the Example (5.1)

the Example (5.1)

the Example (5.1)

the Example (5.1)

the Example (5.1)

the Example (5.1)

the Example (5.1)
Proposition 5.3. Assume a simple neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E).

Then the neutrosophic number of type-result-R-SuperHyperCycle has, the least
neutrosophic cardinality, the lower sharp neutrosophic bound for neutrosophic
cardinality, is the neutrosophic cardinality of
V \ V \ {aE , bE 0 , cE 00 , cE 000 }E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .
If there’s a neutrosophic type-result-R-SuperHyperCycle with the least neutrosophic 701
cardinality, the lower sharp neutrosophic bound for cardinality. 702
6 The Departures on The Theoretical Results 703
Toward Theoretical Motivations 704
The previous neutrosophic approaches apply on the upcoming neutrosophic results on 705
neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses. 706
Proposition 6.1. Assume a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperPath ESHP : (V, E). 707
Then 708
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperCycle

|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
b c
= {E2i−1 }i=1 2
.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperCycleSuperHyperP olynomial
= 2z b 2 c
.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperCycle = {Vi }si=1 , {Vj }tj=1 .
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperCycleSuperHyperP olynomial = az s + bz t .
Proof. Let P : V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , . . . , Vz is a longest path taken from a connected 709
neutrosophic SuperHyperPath ESHP : (V, E). Then there’s no cycle. Thus the notion 710
of quasi is up. The latter is straightforward. 711
Example 6.2. In the Figure (23), the connected neutrosophic SuperHyperPath 712
ESHP : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, in the 713
neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (23), is the SuperHyperCycle. 714
Proposition 6.3. Assume a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle ESHC : (V, E). 715
Then 716

b c
= {E2i−1 }i=1 2
.
= 2z b 2 c
.
Proof. Let C : V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , . . . , Vz is a longest cycle taken from a connected 717
neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle ESHC : (V, E). Then there’s at least one cycle. Thus 718
the notion of quasi isn’t up and the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperCycle 719
could be applied. The latter is straightforward. 720
Figure 23. a neutrosophic SuperHyperPath Associated to the Notions of neutrosophic

SuperHyperCycle in the Example (6.2)
Figure 24. a neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle Associated to the neutrosophic Notions of

neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle in the neutrosophic Example (6.4)
Figure 25. a neutrosophic SuperHyperStar Associated to the neutrosophic Notions of

neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle in the neutrosophic Example (6.6)
Example 6.4. In the Figure (24), the connected neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle 721
N SHC : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, 722
in the neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (24), is the neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle. 723
Proposition 6.5. Assume a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). 724
Then 725

= {E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.
X
= z |E|Neutrosophic Cardinality | E:∈EESHG:(V,E) .
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperCycle = {Vi }si=1 , {Vj }tj=1 , . . . .

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperCycleSuperHyperP olynomial = z s + z t +, . . . .
Proof. Let P : V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , . . . , Vz is a longest path taken from a connected 726
neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). Then there’s no cycle. Thus the notion of 727
quasi is up. The latter is straightforward. 728
Example 6.6. In the Figure (25), the connected neutrosophic SuperHyperStar 729
ESHS : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, 730
by the Algorithm in previous neutrosophic result, of the neutrosophic 731
SuperHyperVertices of the connected neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E), in 732
the neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (25), is the neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle. 733
Proposition 6.7. Assume a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite 734
Figure 26. a neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite neutrosophic Associated to the neutro-

sophic Notions of neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle in the Example (6.8)
ESHB : (V, E). Then 735

min |PESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= {E2i−1 }i=1 .
= z min |PESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality .
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperCycle = {Vi }si=1 .
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperCycleSuperHyperP olynomial = az s .
neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E). Then there’s at least one cycle. 737
Thus the notion of quasi isn’t up and the SuperHyperNotions based on 738
SuperHyperCycle could be applied. There are only two SuperHyperParts. Thus every 739
SuperHyperPart could have one SuperHyperVertex as the representative in the 740
C : V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , . . . , Vz is a longest cycle taken from a connected neutrosophic 741
SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E). Thus only four SuperHyperVertices and only four 742
SuperHyperEdges are attained in any solution C : V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , . . . , Vz . The latter is 743
straightforward. 744
Example 6.8. In the neutrosophic Figure (26), the connected neutrosophic 745
SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), is neutrosophic highlighted and neutrosophic 746
featured. The obtained neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the neutrosophic Algorithm in 747
previous neutrosophic result, of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected 748
neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), in the neutrosophic 749
SuperHyperModel (26), is the neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle. 750
Proposition 6.9. Assume a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite 751
Figure 27. a neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite Associated to the Notions of

neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle in the Example (6.10)
ESHM : (V, E). Then 752

min |PESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= {E2i−1 }i=1 .
= z min |PESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality .
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperCycle = {Vi }si=1 .
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperCycleSuperHyperP olynomial = az s .
neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E). Then there’s at least one cycle. 754
Thus the notion of quasi isn’t up and the SuperHyperNotions based on 755
SuperHyperCycle could be applied. There are only z 0 SuperHyperParts. Thus every 756
SuperHyperPart could have one SuperHyperVertex as the representative in the 757
C : V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , . . . , Vz is a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite 758
ESHM : (V, E). Thus only z 0 SuperHyperVertices and only z 0 SuperHyperEdges are 759
attained in any solution C : V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , . . . , Vz . The latter is straightforward. 760
Example 6.10. In the Figure (27), the connected neutrosophic 761
SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E), is highlighted and neutrosophic featured. The 762
obtained neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Algorithm in previous neutrosophic result, 763
of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected neutrosophic 764
SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E), in the neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (27), is 765
the neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle. 766
Proposition 6.11. Assume a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel 767
Figure 28. a neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel neutrosophic Associated to the neutro-

sophic Notions of neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle in the neutrosophic Example (6.12)
ESHW : (V, E). Then, 768

b c
= {E2i−1 }i=1 2
.
= 2z b 2 c
.
neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel ESHW : (V, E). Then there’s at least one cycle. Thus 770
the notion of quasi isn’t up and the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperCycle 771
could be applied. The unique embedded SuperHyperCycle proposes some longest cycles 772
excerpt from some representatives. The latter is straightforward. 773
Example 6.12. In the neutrosophic Figure (28), the connected neutrosophic 774
SuperHyperWheel N SHW : (V, E), is neutrosophic highlighted and featured. The 775
obtained neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Algorithm in previous result, of the 776
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel 777
ESHW : (V, E), in the neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (28), is the neutrosophic 778
SuperHyperCycle. 779
7 Background 780
There are some researches covering the topic of this research. In what follows, there are 781
some discussion and literature reviews about them. 782
First article is titled “properties of SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic 783
SuperHyperGraph” in Ref. [1] by Henry Garrett (2022). It’s first step toward the 784
research on neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs. This research article is published on the 785
journal “Neutrosophic Sets and Systems” in issue 49 and the pages 531-561. In this 786
research article, different types of notions like dominating, resolving, coloring, 787
Eulerian(Hamiltonian) neutrosophic path, n-Eulerian(Hamiltonian) neutrosophic path, 788
zero forcing number, zero forcing neutrosophic- number, independent number, 789
independent neutrosophic-number, clique number, clique neutrosophic-number, 790
matching number, matching neutrosophic-number, girth, neutrosophic girth, 791
1-zero-forcing number, 1-zero- forcing neutrosophic-number, failed 1-zero-forcing 792
number, failed 1-zero-forcing neutrosophic-number, global- offensive alliance, t-offensive 793
alliance, t-defensive alliance, t-powerful alliance, and global-powerful alliance are defined 794
in SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. Some Classes of 795
SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph are cases of research. Some 796
results are applied in family of SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. 797
Thus this research article has concentrated on the vast notions and introducing the 798
majority of notions. 799
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “neutrosophic co-degree and 800
neutrosophic degree alongside chromatic numbers in the setting of some classes related 801
to neutrosophic hypergraphs” in Ref. [2] by Henry Garrett (2022). In this research 802
article, a novel approach is implemented on SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic 803
SuperHyperGraph based on general forms without using neutrosophic classes of 804
neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. It’s published in prestigious and fancy journal is 805
entitled “Journal of Current Trends in Computer Science Research (JCTCSR)” with 806
abbreviation “J Curr Trends Comp Sci Res” in volume 1 and issue 1 with pages 06-14. 807
The research article studies deeply with choosing neutrosophic hypergraphs instead of 808
neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough toward independent results 809
based on initial background. 810
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “Super Hyper Dominating 811
and Super Hyper Resolving on Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs and Their Directions 812
in Game Theory and Neutrosophic Super Hyper Classes” in Ref. [3] by Henry Garrett 813
(2022). In this research article, a novel approach is implemented on SuperHyperGraph 814
and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on fundamental SuperHyperNumber and 815
using neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses of neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. It’s 816
published in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled “Journal of Mathematical 817
Techniques and Computational Mathematics(JMTCM)” with abbreviation “J Math 818
Techniques Comput Math” in volume 1 and issue 3 with pages 242-263. The research 819
article studies deeply with choosing directly neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph and 820
SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough toward independent results based on initial 821
background and fundamental SuperHyperNumbers. 822
In some articles are titled “0039 — Closing Numbers and Super-Closing Numbers as 823
(Dual)Resolving and (Dual)Coloring alongside (Dual)Dominating in 824
(Neutrosophic)n-SuperHyperGraph” in Ref. [4] by Henry Garrett (2022), “0049 — 825
(Failed)1-Zero-Forcing Number in Neutrosophic Graphs” in Ref. [5] by Henry Garrett 826
(2022), “Extreme SuperHyperClique as the Firm Scheme of Confrontation under 827
Cancer’s Recognition as the Model in The Setting of (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” 828
in Ref. [6] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Uncertainty On The Act And Effect Of Cancer 829
Alongside The Foggy Positions Of Cells Toward Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique 830
inside Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Titled Cancer’s Recognition” in Ref. [7] by 831
Henry Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic Version Of Separates Groups Of Cells In Cancer’s 832
Recognition On Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [8] by Henry Garrett (2022), 833
“The Shift Paradigm To Classify Separately The Cells and Affected Cells Toward The 834
Totality Under Cancer’s Recognition By New Multiple Definitions On the Sets 835
Polynomials Alongside Numbers In The (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperMatching Theory 836
Based on SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” in Ref. [9] by Henry 837
Garrett (2022), “Breaking the Continuity and Uniformity of Cancer In The Worst Case 838
of Full Connections With Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique In Cancer’s Recognition 839
Applied in (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [10] by Henry Garrett (2022), 840
“Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable as the Survivors on the Cancer’s Neutrosophic 841
Recognition Based on Uncertainty to All Modes in Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in 842
Ref. [11] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Extremism of the Attacked Body Under the 843
Cancer’s Circumstances Where Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) 844
SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [12] by Henry Garrett (2022), “(Neutrosophic) 1-Failed 845
SuperHyperForcing in Cancer’s Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” 846
in Ref. [13] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs 847
To Form Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic 848
Recognitions In Special ViewPoints” in Ref. [14] by Henry Garrett (2022), 849
“Neutrosophic 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in the SuperHyperFunction To Use 850
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond” 851
in Ref. [15] by Henry Garrett (2022), “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperStable on Cancer’s 852
Recognition by Well- SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs ” in 853
Ref. [16] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To 854
Form Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In 855
Special ViewPoints” in Ref. [12] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Basic Notions on 856
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperForcing And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling in 857
Cancer’s Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [17] by Henry 858
Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form Neutrosophic 859
SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In Special ViewPoints” 860
in Ref. [18] by Henry Garrett (2022),“(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s 861
Recognitions Featuring (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances” in 862
Ref. [19] by Henry Garrett (2022), “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperAlliances With 863
SuperHyperDefensive and SuperHyperOffensive Type-SuperHyperSet On 864
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of 865
Cancer’s Recognitions And Related (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClasses” in Ref. [20] by 866
Henry Garrett (2022), “SuperHyperGirth on SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic 867
SuperHyperGraph With SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions” in Ref. [21] by 868
Henry Garrett (2022), “Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on 869
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs and SuperHyperGraphs Alongside Applications in 870
Cancer’s Treatments” in Ref. [22] by Henry Garrett (2022), “SuperHyperDominating 871
and SuperHyperResolving on Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs And Their Directions in 872
Game Theory and Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses” in Ref. [23] by Henry Garrett 873
(2022), “SuperHyperMatching By (R-)Definitions And Polynomials To Monitor 874
Cancer’s Recognition In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [24] by Henry 875
Garrett (2023), “The Focus on The Partitions Obtained By Parallel Moves In The 876
Cancer’s Extreme Recognition With Different Types of Extreme SuperHyperMatching 877
Set and Polynomial on (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [25] by Henry 878
Garrett (2023), “Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique Decides the Failures on the 879
Cancer’s Recognition in the Perfect Connections of Cancer’s Attacks By 880
SuperHyperModels Named (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [26] by Henry 881
Garrett (2023), “Indeterminacy On The All Possible Connections of Cells In Front of 882
Cancer’s Attacks In The Terms of Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique on Cancer’s 883
Recognition called Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [27] by Henry Garrett 884
(2023), “Perfect Directions Toward Idealism in Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition 885
Forwarding Neutrosophic SuperHyperClique on Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in 886
Ref. [28] by Henry Garrett (2023), “Demonstrating Complete Connections in Every 887
Embedded Regions and Sub-Regions in the Terms of Cancer’s Recognition and 888
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClique” in 889
Ref. [29] by Henry Garrett (2023), “Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic 890
Regions titled neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable in Cancer’s Neutrosophic 891
Recognition modeled in the Form of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [30] by 892
Henry Garrett (2023), “Using the Tool As (Neutrosophic) Failed SuperHyperStable To 893
SuperHyperModel Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in 894
Ref. [31] by Henry Garrett (2023), “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To 895
Form Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In 896
Special ViewPoints” in Ref. [32] by Henry Garrett (2023), “(Neutrosophic) 897
SuperHyperStable on Cancer’s Recognition by Well-SuperHyperModelled 898
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [33] by Henry Garrett (2023), 899
“Neutrosophic 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in the SuperHyperFunction To Use 900
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond” 901
in Ref. [34] by Henry Garrett (2022), “(Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in 902
Cancer’s Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [35] by Henry 903
Garrett (2022), “Basic Notions on (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperForcing And 904
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling in Cancer’s Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) 905
SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [36] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Basic Neutrosophic Notions 906
Concerning SuperHyperDominating and Neutrosophic SuperHyperResolving in 907
SuperHyperGraph” in Ref. [37] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Initial Material of 908
Neutrosophic Preliminaries to Study Some Neutrosophic Notions Based on 909
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) in Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)” in 910
Ref. [38] by Henry Garrett (2022), there are some endeavors to formalize the basic 911
SuperHyperNotions about neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph. 912
Some studies and researches about neutrosophic graphs, are proposed as book in 913
Ref. [39] by Henry Garrett (2022) which is indexed by Google Scholar and has more 914
than 2732 readers in Scribd. It’s titled “Beyond Neutrosophic Graphs” and published 915
by Ohio: E-publishing: Educational Publisher 1091 West 1st Ave Grandview Heights, 916
Ohio 43212 United State. This research book covers different types of notions and 917
settings in neutrosophic graph theory and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph theory. 918
Also, some studies and researches about neutrosophic graphs, are proposed as book 919
in Ref. [40] by Henry Garrett (2022) which is indexed by Google Scholar and has more 920
than 3504 readers in Scribd. It’s titled “Neutrosophic Duality” and published by 921
Florida: GLOBAL KNOWLEDGE - Publishing House 848 Brickell Ave Ste 950 Miami, 922
Florida 33131 United States. This research book presents different types of notions 923
SuperHyperResolving and SuperHyperDominating in the setting of duality in 924
neutrosophic graph theory and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph theory. This research 925
book has scrutiny on the complement of the intended set and the intended set, 926
simultaneously. It’s smart to consider a set but acting on its complement that what’s 927
done in this research book which is popular in the terms of high readers in Scribd. 928
See the seminal researches [1–3]. The formalization of the notions on the framework 929
of Extreme SuperHyperCycle theory, Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle theory, and 930
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs theory at [4–38]. Two popular research books in 931
Scribd in the terms of high readers, 2638 and 3363 respectively, on neutrosophic science 932
is on [39, 40]. 933
References 934
1. Henry Garrett, “Properties of SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic 935
SuperHyperGraph”, Neutrosophic Sets and Systems 49 (2022) 531-561 (doi: 936
10.5281/zenodo.6456413). 937
(http://fs.unm.edu/NSS/NeutrosophicSuperHyperGraph34.pdf). 938
(https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nss journal/vol49/iss1/34). 939
2. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Co-degree and Neutrosophic Degree alongside 940
Chromatic Numbers in the Setting of Some Classes Related to Neutrosophic 941
Hypergraphs”, J Curr Trends Comp Sci Res 1(1) (2022) 06-14. 942
3. Henry Garrett, “Super Hyper Dominating and Super Hyper Resolving on 943
Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs and Their Directions in Game Theory and 944
Neutrosophic Super Hyper Classes”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 1(3) 945
(2022) 242-263. 946
4. Garrett, Henry. “0039 — Closing Numbers and Super-Closing Numbers as 947
(Dual)Resolving and (Dual)Coloring alongside (Dual)Dominating in 948
(Neutrosophic)n-SuperHyperGraph.” CERN European Organization for Nuclear 949
Research - Zenodo, Nov. 2022. CERN European Organization for Nuclear 950
Research, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6319942. 951
https://oa.mg/work/10.5281/zenodo.6319942 952
5. Garrett, Henry. “0049 — (Failed)1-Zero-Forcing Number in Neutrosophic 953
Graphs.” CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research - Zenodo, Feb. 954
2022. CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research, 955
https://doi.org/10.13140/rg.2.2.35241.26724. 956
https://oa.mg/work/10.13140/rg.2.2.35241.26724 957
6. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperClique as the Firm Scheme of 958
Confrontation under Cancer’s Recognition as the Model in The Setting of 959
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010308 (doi: 960
10.20944/preprints202301.0308.v1). 961
7. Henry Garrett, “Uncertainty On The Act And Effect Of Cancer Alongside The 962
Foggy Positions Of Cells Toward Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique inside 963
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Titled Cancer’s Recognition”, Preprints 2023, 964
2023010282 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0282.v1). 965
8. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Version Of Separates Groups Of Cells In 966
Cancer’s Recognition On Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 967
2023010267 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0267.v1). 968
9. Henry Garrett, “The Shift Paradigm To Classify Separately The Cells and 969
Affected Cells Toward The Totality Under Cancer’s Recognition By New 970
Multiple Definitions On the Sets Polynomials Alongside Numbers In The 971
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperMatching Theory Based on SuperHyperGraph and 972
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”, Preprints 2023, 2023010265 (doi: 973
10.20944/preprints202301.0265.v1). 974
10. Henry Garrett, “Breaking the Continuity and Uniformity of Cancer In The 975
Worst Case of Full Connections With Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique In 976
Cancer’s Recognition Applied in (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 977
2023, 2023010262,(doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0262.v1). 978
11. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable as the Survivors on the 979
Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition Based on Uncertainty to All Modes in 980
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010240 (doi: 981
10.20944/preprints202301.0240.v1). 982
12. Henry Garrett, “Extremism of the Attacked Body Under the Cancer’s 983
Circumstances Where Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) 984
SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010224, (doi: 985
10.20944/preprints202301.0224.v1). 986
13. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in Cancer’s 987
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 988
2023010105 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 989
14. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form 990
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions 991
In Special ViewPoints”, Preprints 2023, 2023010088 (doi: 992
10.20944/preprints202301.0088.v1). 993
15. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in the 994
SuperHyperFunction To Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs on Cancer’s 995
Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond ”, Preprints 2023, 2023010044 996
16. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperStable on Cancer’s Recognition by 997
Well- SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 998
2023010043 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0043.v1). 999
17. Henry Garrett, “Basic Notions on (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperForcing And 1000
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling in Cancer’s Recognitions And 1001
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010105 (doi: 1002
10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 1003
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions 1005
In Special ViewPoints”, Preprints 2023, 2023010088 (doi: 1006
10.20944/preprints202301.0088.v1). 1007
19. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions 1008
Featuring (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances”, Preprints 1009
2022, 2022120549 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0549.v1). 1010
20. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperAlliances With SuperHyperDefensive 1011
and SuperHyperOffensive Type-SuperHyperSet On (Neutrosophic) 1012
SuperHyperGraph With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s 1013
Recognitions And Related (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClasses”, Preprints 2022, 1014
2022120540 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0540.v1). 1015
21. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperGirth on SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic 1016
SuperHyperGraph With SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions”, 1017
Preprints 2022, 2022120500 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0500.v1). 1018
22. Henry Garrett, “Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on 1019
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs and SuperHyperGraphs Alongside Applications 1020
in Cancer’s Treatments”, Preprints 2022, 2022120324 (doi: 1021
10.20944/preprints202212.0324.v1). 1022
23. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDominating and SuperHyperResolving on 1023
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs And Their Directions in Game Theory and 1024
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”, Preprints 2022, 2022110576 (doi: 1025
10.20944/preprints202211.0576.v1). 1026
24. Henry Garrett,“SuperHyperMatching By (R-)Definitions And Polynomials To 1027
Monitor Cancer’s Recognition In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, 1028
ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.35061.65767). 1029
25. Henry Garrett,“The Focus on The Partitions Obtained By Parallel Moves In 1030
The Cancer’s Extreme Recognition With Different Types of Extreme 1031
SuperHyperMatching Set and Polynomial on (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, 1032
ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.18494.15680). 1033
26. Henry Garrett,“Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique Decides the Failures on the 1034
Cancer’s Recognition in the Perfect Connections of Cancer’s Attacks By 1035
SuperHyperModels Named (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 1036
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.32530.73922). 1037
27. Henry Garrett,“Indeterminacy On The All Possible Connections of Cells In 1038
Front of Cancer’s Attacks In The Terms of Neutrosophic Failed 1039
SuperHyperClique on Cancer’s Recognition called Neutrosophic 1040
SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.15897.70243). 1041
28. Henry Garrett,“Perfect Directions Toward Idealism in Cancer’s Neutrosophic 1042
Recognition Forwarding Neutrosophic SuperHyperClique on Neutrosophic 1043
29. Henry Garrett,“Demonstrating Complete Connections in Every Embedded 1045
Regions and Sub-Regions in the Terms of Cancer’s Recognition and 1046
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClique”, 1047
ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.23172.19849). 1048
30. Henry Garrett,“Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic Regions titled 1049
neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable in Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition 1050
modeled in the Form of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2023, 1051
(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.17385.36968). 1052
31. Henry Garrett, “Using the Tool As (Neutrosophic) Failed SuperHyperStable To 1053
SuperHyperModel Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) 1054
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In 1057
Special ViewPoints”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.11447.80803). 1058
33. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperStable on Cancer’s Recognition by 1059
Well-SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 1060
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.35774.77123). 1061
34. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in the 1062
SuperHyperFunction To Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs on Cancer’s 1063
Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond ”, ResearchGate 2022, (doi: 1064
10.13140/RG.2.2.36141.77287). 1065
35. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in Cancer’s 1066
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2022, (doi: 1067
10.13140/RG.2.2.29430.88642). 1068
36. Henry Garrett, “Basic Notions on (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperForcing And 1069
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling in Cancer’s Recognitions And 1070
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2022, (doi: 1071
10.13140/RG.2.2.11369.16487). 1072
37. Henry Garrett, “Basic Neutrosophic Notions Concerning SuperHyperDominating 1073
and Neutrosophic SuperHyperResolving in SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 1074
2022 (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.29173.86244). 1075
38. Henry Garrett, “Initial Material of Neutrosophic Preliminaries to Study Some 1076
Neutrosophic Notions Based on Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) in 1077
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)”, ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 1078
10.13140/RG.2.2.25385.88160). 1079
39. Henry Garrett, (2022). “Beyond Neutrosophic Graphs”, Ohio: E-publishing: 1080
Educational Publisher 1091 West 1st Ave Grandview Heights, Ohio 43212 1081
United States. ISBN: 979-1-59973-725-6 1082
(http://fs.unm.edu/BeyondNeutrosophicGraphs.pdf). 1083
40. Henry Garrett, (2022). “Neutrosophic Duality”, Florida: GLOBAL 1084
KNOWLEDGE - Publishing House 848 Brickell Ave Ste 950 Miami, Florida 1085
33131 United States. ISBN: 978-1-59973-743-0 1086
(http://fs.unm.edu/NeutrosophicDuality.pdf). 1087
View publication stats

New Research On Cancer's Recognition and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph by Eulerian SuperHyperCycles and Hamiltonian Sets As Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-VI

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

New Research On Cancer's Recognition and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph by Eulerian SuperHyperCycles and Hamiltonian Sets As Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-VI

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

New Research On Cancer's Recognition and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph By

Preprint · February 2023

289 PUBLICATIONS 2,902 CITATIONS

Number Graphs And Numbers View project

Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs and SuperHyperGraphs View project

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

New Research On Cancer’s Recognition and Neutrosophic 2

SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian SuperHyperCycles and 3

Hamiltonian Sets As Hyper Covering Versus Super 4

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · 7

DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA 8

In this research, assume a SuperHyperGraph. Then some notions on Extreme 10

SuperHyperCycle based on the backgrounds of Eulerian and Hamiltonian styles are 11

Strength of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPaths] Assume a Neutrosophic 14

SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an ordered pair S = (V, E). A Neutrosophic 15

SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) V1 to 16

Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vs is sequence of Neutrosophic 17

SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) and Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges 18

(NSHE) V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs , have Neutrosophic t-strength 19

f-strength (m, n, min{F (Vi )})si=1 ; Neutrosophic strength 21

Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)] Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 23

(NSHG) S is an ordered pair S = (V, E). Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge 24

(NSHE) E = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then E is called Neutrosophic t-connective if T (E) ≥ 25

maximum number of Neutrosophic t-strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from 26

Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 27

(NSHV) Vj where 1 ≤ i, j ≤ s; Neutrosophic i-connective if I(E) ≥ maximum number of 28

Neutrosophic i-strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic 29

SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vj where 30

1 ≤ i, j ≤ s; Neutrosophic f-connective if F (E) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic 31

f-strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) 32

Vi to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vj where 1 ≤ i, j ≤ s; Neutrosophic 33

connective if (T (E), I(E), F (E)) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic strength of 34

SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi to 35

Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vj where 1 ≤ i, j ≤ s. ((Neutrosophic) 36

SuperHyperConnectivities). Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an 37

ordered pair S = (V, E). Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) 38

E = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then E is called an Extreme SuperHyperConnectivities if it’s 39

either of Neutrosophic t-connective, Neutrosophic i-connective, Neutrosophic 40

f-connective, and Neutrosophic connective and C(N SHG) for an Extreme 41

SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum Extreme cardinality of an Extreme 42

SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality of the Extreme SuperHyperEdges in the 43

consecutive Extreme sequence of Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme 44

SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Extreme SuperHyperConnectivities; a 45

Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities if it’s either of Neutrosophic t-connective, 46

Neutrosophic i-connective, Neutrosophic f-connective, and Neutrosophic connective and 47

C(N SHG) for a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum 48

Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges of a Neutrosophic 49

SuperHyperSet S of high Neutrosophic cardinality consecutive Neutrosophic 50

SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 51

Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities; an Extreme SuperHyperConnectivities 52

SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of Neutrosophic t-connective, Neutrosophic 53

an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Extreme SuperHyperPolynomial 55

Extreme cardinality of the Extreme SuperHyperEdges of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S 57

of high Extreme cardinality consecutive Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme 58

SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Extreme SuperHyperConnectivities; and 59

the Extreme power is corresponded to its Extreme coefficient; a Neutrosophic 60

SuperHyperConnectivities SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of Neutrosophic 61

t-connective, Neutrosophic i-connective, Neutrosophic f-connective, and Neutrosophic 62

Neutrosophic SuperHyperPolynomial contains the Neutrosophic coefficients defined as 64

the Neutrosophic number of the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic 65

SuperHyperEdges of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high Neutrosophic cardinality 66

consecutive Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such 67