New Ideas in Cancer's Recognition and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph by Space As Hyper Spin On Super Spacy

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.
net/publication/369118224
New Ideas In Cancer's Recognition And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph By

Space As Hyper Spin On Super Spacy
Preprint · March 2023

DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.33028.40321
CITATIONS
1 author:
Henry Garrett
357 PUBLICATIONS 5,560 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Featured Articles View project
Metric Dimension in fuzzy(neutrosophic) Graphs View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Henry Garrett on 10 March 2023.
The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 2
SuperHyperGraph By Space As Hyper Spin On Super Spacy 3
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · 5
DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA 6
1 ABSTRACT 7
In this scientific research, (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic 8
SuperHyperSpace). Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a Space 9
pair S = (V, E). Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs } and 10
E 0 = {E1 , E2 , . . . , Ez }. Then either V 0 or E 0 is called Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperSpace 11
if S = (V, E) is a probability P space where V is a sample space and E is a function space 12
E : V → [0, 1] such that ab∈V E(ab) = 1; Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperSpace if 13
S = (V, E) is a probability P space where V is a sample space and E is a function space 14
E : V → [0, 1] such that ab∈V E(ab) = 1; and 15
|Ei |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY = |Ej |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY ; Neutrosophic 16
v-SuperHyperSpace if S = (V, E) is a probability P space where V is a sample space and 17
E is a function space E : V → [0, 1] such that ab∈V E(ab) = 1; Neutrosophic 18
rv-SuperHyperSpace if S = (V, E) is a probability P space where V is a sample space and 19
E is a function space E : V → [0, 1] such that ab∈V E(ab) = 1; and 20
|Vi |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY = |Vj |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY ; Neutrosophic 21
SuperHyperSpace if it’s either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperSpace, Neutrosophic 22
re-SuperHyperSpace, Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperSpace, and Neutrosophic 23
rv-SuperHyperSpace. ((Neutrosophic) SuperHyperSpace). Assume a Neutrosophic 24
SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). Consider a Neutrosophic 25
SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) E = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then E is called an Extreme 26
SuperHyperSpace if it’s either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperSpace, Neutrosophic 27
re-SuperHyperSpace, Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperSpace, and Neutrosophic 28
rv-SuperHyperSpace and C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) 29
is the maximum Extreme cardinality of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme 30
cardinality of the Extreme SuperHyperEdges in the consecutive Extreme sequence of 31
Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 32
Extreme SuperHyperSpace; a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSpace if it’s either of 33
Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperSpace, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperSpace, Neutrosophic 34
v-SuperHyperSpace, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperSpace and C(N SHG) for a 35
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum Neutrosophic 36
cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S 37
of high Neutrosophic cardinality consecutive Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges and 38
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Neutrosophic 39
SuperHyperSpace; an Extreme SuperHyperSpace SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of 40
Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperSpace, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperSpace, Neutrosophic 41
v-SuperHyperSpace, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperSpace and C(N SHG) for an 42
Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Extreme SuperHyperPolynomial 43
contains the Extreme coefficients defined as the Extreme number of the maximum 44
Extreme cardinality of the Extreme SuperHyperEdges of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S 45
of high Extreme cardinality consecutive Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme 46
SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Extreme SuperHyperSpace; and the 47
Extreme power is corresponded to its Extreme coefficient; a Neutrosophic 48
SuperHyperSpace SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of Neutrosophic 49
e-SuperHyperSpace, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperSpace, Neutrosophic 50
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Neutrosophic 52
SuperHyperPolynomial contains the Neutrosophic coefficients defined as the 53
Neutrosophic number of the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic 54
SuperHyperEdges of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high Neutrosophic cardinality 55
consecutive Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such 56
that they form the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSpace; and the Neutrosophic power is 57
corresponded to its Neutrosophic coefficient; an Extreme V-SuperHyperSpace if it’s 58
either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperSpace, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperSpace, 59
Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperSpace, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperSpace and 60
C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum Extreme 61
cardinality of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality of the Extreme 62
SuperHyperVertices in the consecutive Extreme sequence of Extreme SuperHyperEdges 63
and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Extreme SuperHyperSpace; a 64
Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperSpace if it’s either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperSpace, 65
Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperSpace, Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperSpace, and Neutrosophic 66
rv-SuperHyperSpace and C(N SHG) for a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 67
N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic 68
SuperHyperVertices of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high Neutrosophic 69
cardinality consecutive Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic 70
SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSpace; an 71
Extreme V-SuperHyperSpace SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of Neutrosophic 72
Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Extreme SuperHyperPolynomial 75
contains the Extreme coefficients defined as the Extreme number of the maximum 76
Extreme cardinality of the Extreme SuperHyperVertices of an Extreme SuperHyperSet 77
S of high Extreme cardinality consecutive Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme 78
SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Extreme SuperHyperSpace; and the 79
Extreme power is corresponded to its Extreme coefficient; a Neutrosophic 80
SuperHyperSpace SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of Neutrosophic 81
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Neutrosophic 84
SuperHyperPolynomial contains the Neutrosophic coefficients defined as the 85
Neutrosophic number of the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic 86
SuperHyperVertices of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high Neutrosophic 87
cardinality consecutive Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic 88
SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSpace; and the 89
Neutrosophic power is corresponded to its Neutrosophic coefficient. In this scientific 90
research, new setting is introduced for new SuperHyperNotions, namely, a 91
SuperHyperSpace and Neutrosophic SuperHyperSpace. Two different types of 92
SuperHyperDefinitions are debut for them but the research goes further and the 93
SuperHyperNotion, SuperHyperUniform, and SuperHyperClass based on that are 94
well-defined and well-reviewed. The literature review is implemented in the whole of 95
this research. For shining the elegancy and the significancy of this research, the 96
comparison between this SuperHyperNotion with other SuperHyperNotions and 97
fundamental SuperHyperNumbers are featured. The definitions are followed by the 98
examples and the instances thus the clarifications are driven with different tools. The 99
applications are figured out to make sense about the theoretical aspect of this ongoing 100
research. The “Cancer’s Recognition” are the under research to figure out the 101
challenges make sense about ongoing and upcoming research. The special case is up. 102
The cells are viewed in the deemed ways. There are different types of them. Some of 103
them are individuals and some of them are well-modeled by the group of cells. These 104
types are all officially called “SuperHyperVertex” but the relations amid them all 105
officially called “SuperHyperEdge”. The frameworks “SuperHyperGraph” and 106
“Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” are chosen and elected to research about “Cancer’s 107
Recognition”. Thus these complex and dense SuperHyperModels open up some avenues 108
to research on theoretical segments and “Cancer’s Recognition”. Some avenues are 109
posed to pursue this research. It’s also officially collected in the form of some questions 110
and some problems. Assume a SuperHyperGraph. Assume a SuperHyperGraph. Then 111
δ−SuperHyperSpace is a maximal of SuperHyperVertices with a maximum cardinality 112
such that either of the following expressions hold for the (Neutrosophic) cardinalities of 113
SuperHyperNeighbors of s ∈ S : there are |S ∩ N (s)| > |S ∩ (V \ N (s))| + δ; and 114
|S ∩ N (s)| < |S ∩ (V \ N (s))| + δ. The first Expression, holds if S is an 115
δ−SuperHyperOffensive. And the second Expression, holds if S is an 116
δ−SuperHyperDefensive; a Neutrosophic δ−SuperHyperSpace is a maximal 117
Neutrosophic of SuperHyperVertices with maximum Neutrosophic cardinality such 118
that either of the following expressions hold for the Neutrosophic cardinalities of 119
SuperHyperNeighbors of s ∈ S there are: 120
|S ∩ N (s)|N eutrosophic > |S ∩ (V \ N (s))|N eutrosophic + δ; 121
and |S ∩ N (s)|N eutrosophic < |S ∩ (V \ N (s))|N eutrosophic + δ. The first Expression, 122
holds if S is a Neutrosophic δ−SuperHyperOffensive. And the second Expression, holds 123
if S is a Neutrosophic δ−SuperHyperDefensive It’s useful to define a “Neutrosophic” 124
version of a SuperHyperSpace . Since there’s more ways to get type-results to make a 125
SuperHyperSpace more understandable. For the sake of having Neutrosophic 126
SuperHyperSpace, there’s a need to “redefine” the notion of a “SuperHyperSpace ”. 127
The SuperHyperVertices and the SuperHyperEdges are assigned by the labels from the 128
letters of the alphabets. In this procedure, there’s the usage of the position of labels to 129
assign to the values. Assume a SuperHyperSpace . It’s redefined a Neutrosophic 130
SuperHyperSpace if the mentioned Table holds, concerning, “The Values of Vertices, 131
SuperVertices, Edges, HyperEdges, and SuperHyperEdges Belong to The Neutrosophic 132
SuperHyperGraph” with the key points, “The Values of The Vertices & The Number 133
of Position in Alphabet”, “The Values of The SuperVertices&The maximum Values of 134
Its Vertices”, “The Values of The Edges&The maximum Values of Its Vertices”, “The 135
Values of The HyperEdges&The maximum Values of Its Vertices”, “The Values of The 136
SuperHyperEdges&The maximum Values of Its Endpoints”. To get structural examples 137
and instances, I’m going to introduce the next SuperHyperClass of SuperHyperGraph 138
based on a SuperHyperSpace . It’s the main. It’ll be disciplinary to have the foundation 139
of previous definition in the kind of SuperHyperClass. If there’s a need to have all 140
SuperHyperSpace until the SuperHyperSpace, then it’s officially called a 141
“SuperHyperSpace” but otherwise, it isn’t a SuperHyperSpace . There are some 142
instances about the clarifications for the main definition titled a “SuperHyperSpace ”. 143
These two examples get more scrutiny and discernment since there are characterized in 144
the disciplinary ways of the SuperHyperClass based on a SuperHyperSpace . For the 145
sake of having a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSpace, there’s a need to “redefine” the notion 146
of a “Neutrosophic SuperHyperSpace” and a “Neutrosophic SuperHyperSpace ”. The 147
SuperHyperVertices and the SuperHyperEdges are assigned by the labels from the 148
letters of the alphabets. In this procedure, there’s the usage of the position of labels to 149
assign to the values. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. It’s redefined 150
“Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” if the intended Table holds. And a SuperHyperSpace 151
are redefined to a “Neutrosophic SuperHyperSpace” if the intended Table holds. It’s 152
useful to define “Neutrosophic” version of SuperHyperClasses. Since there’s more ways 153
to get Neutrosophic type-results to make a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSpace more 154
understandable. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. There are some 155
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses if the intended Table holds. Thus SuperHyperPath, 156
SuperHyperSpace, SuperHyperStar, SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultiPartite, and 157
SuperHyperWheel, are “Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath”, “Neutrosophic 158
SuperHyperSpace”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar”, “Neutrosophic 159
SuperHyperBipartite”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultiPartite”, and “Neutrosophic 160
SuperHyperWheel” if the intended Table holds. A SuperHyperGraph has a 161
“Neutrosophic SuperHyperSpace” where it’s the strongest [the maximum Neutrosophic 162
value from all the SuperHyperSpace amid the maximum value amid all 163
SuperHyperVertices from a SuperHyperSpace .] SuperHyperSpace . A graph is a 164
SuperHyperUniform if it’s a SuperHyperGraph and the number of elements of 165
SuperHyperEdges are the same. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. There are 166
some SuperHyperClasses as follows. It’s SuperHyperPath if it’s only one SuperVertex as 167
intersection amid two given SuperHyperEdges with two exceptions; it’s 168
SuperHyperSpace if it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two given 169
SuperHyperEdges; it’s SuperHyperStar it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid 170
all SuperHyperEdges; it’s SuperHyperBipartite it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection 171
amid two given SuperHyperEdges and these SuperVertices, forming two separate sets, 172
has no SuperHyperEdge in common; it’s SuperHyperMultiPartite it’s only one 173
SuperVertex as intersection amid two given SuperHyperEdges and these SuperVertices, 174
forming multi separate sets, has no SuperHyperEdge in common; it’s a 175
SuperHyperWheel if it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two given 176
SuperHyperEdges and one SuperVertex has one SuperHyperEdge with any common 177
SuperVertex. The SuperHyperModel proposes the specific designs and the specific 178
architectures. The SuperHyperModel is officially called “SuperHyperGraph” and 179
“Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”. In this SuperHyperModel, The “specific” cells and 180
“specific group” of cells are SuperHyperModeled as “SuperHyperVertices” and the 181
common and intended properties between “specific” cells and “specific group” of cells 182
are SuperHyperModeled as “SuperHyperEdges”. Sometimes, it’s useful to have some 183
degrees of determinacy, indeterminacy, and neutrality to have more precise 184
SuperHyperModel which in this case the SuperHyperModel is called “Neutrosophic”. In 185
the future research, the foundation will be based on the “Cancer’s Recognition” and the 186
results and the definitions will be introduced in redeemed ways. The recognition of the 187
cancer in the long-term function. The specific region has been assigned by the model 188
[it’s called SuperHyperGraph] and the long cycle of the move from the cancer is 189
identified by this research. Sometimes the move of the cancer hasn’t be easily identified 190
since there are some determinacy, indeterminacy and neutrality about the moves and 191
the effects of the cancer on that region; this event leads us to choose another model [it’s 192
said to be Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph] to have convenient perception on what’s 193
happened and what’s done. There are some specific models, which are well-known and 194
they’ve got the names, and some SuperHyperGeneral SuperHyperModels. The moves 195
and the traces of the cancer on the complex tracks and between complicated groups of 196
cells could be fantasized by a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath(-/SuperHyperSpace, 197
SuperHyperStar, SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, SuperHyperWheel). 198
The aim is to find either the longest SuperHyperSpace or the strongest 199
SuperHyperSpace in those Neutrosophic SuperHyperModels. For the longest 200
SuperHyperSpace, called SuperHyperSpace, and the strongest SuperHyperSpace, called 201
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSpace, some general results are introduced. Beyond that in 202
SuperHyperStar, all possible SuperHyperPaths have only two SuperHyperEdges but it’s 203
not enough since it’s essential to have at least three SuperHyperEdges to form any style 204
of a SuperHyperSpace. There isn’t any formation of any SuperHyperSpace but literarily, 205
it’s the deformation of any SuperHyperSpace. It, literarily, deforms and it doesn’t form. 206
A basic familiarity with Neutrosophic SuperHyperSpace theory, SuperHyperGraphs, 207
and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs theory are proposed. 208
Keywords: Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, SuperHyperSpace, Cancer’s 209
Neutrosophic Recognition 210
AMS Subject Classification: 05C17, 05C22, 05E45 211
2 Applied Notions Under The Scrutiny Of The 212
Motivation Of This Scientific Research 213
In this scientific research, there are some ideas in the featured frameworks of 214
motivations. I try to bring the motivations in the narrative ways. Some cells have been 215
faced with some attacks from the situation which is caused by the cancer’s attacks. In 216
this case, there are some embedded analysis on the ongoing situations which in that, the 217
cells could be labelled as some groups and some groups or individuals have excessive 218
labels which all are raised from the behaviors to overcome the cancer’s attacks. In the 219
embedded situations, the individuals of cells and the groups of cells could be considered 220
as “new groups”. Thus it motivates us to find the proper SuperHyperModels for getting 221
more proper analysis on this messy story. I’ve found the SuperHyperModels which are 222
officially called “SuperHyperGraphs” and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. In this 223
SuperHyperModel, the cells and the groups of cells are defined as “SuperHyperVertices” 224
and the relations between the individuals of cells and the groups of cells are defined as 225
“SuperHyperEdges”. Thus it’s another motivation for us to do research on this 226
SuperHyperModel based on the “Cancer’s Recognition”. Sometimes, the situations get 227
worst. The situation is passed from the certainty and precise style. Thus it’s the beyond 228
them. There are three descriptions, namely, the degrees of determinacy, indeterminacy 229
and neutrality, for any object based on vague forms, namely, incomplete data, imprecise 230
data, and uncertain analysis. The latter model could be considered on the previous 231
SuperHyperModel. It’s SuperHyperModel. It’s SuperHyperGraph but it’s officially 232
called “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. The cancer is the disease but the model is 233
going to figure out what’s going on this phenomenon. The special case of this disease is 234
considered and as the consequences of the model, some parameters are used. The cells 235
are under attack of this disease but the moves of the cancer in the special region are the 236
matter of mind. The recognition of the cancer could help to find some treatments for 237
this disease. The SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph are the 238
SuperHyperModels on the “Cancer’s Recognition” and both bases are the background 239
of this research. Sometimes the cancer has been happened on the region, full of cells, 240
groups of cells and embedded styles. In this segment, the SuperHyperModel proposes 241
some SuperHyperNotions based on the connectivities of the moves of the cancer in the 242
forms of alliances’ styles with the formation of the design and the architecture are 243
formally called “ SuperHyperSpace” in the themes of jargons and buzzwords. The prefix 244
“SuperHyper” refers to the theme of the embedded styles to figure out the background 245
for the SuperHyperNotions. The recognition of the cancer in the long-term function. 246
The specific region has been assigned by the model [it’s called SuperHyperGraph] and 247
the long cycle of the move from the cancer is identified by this research. Sometimes the 248
move of the cancer hasn’t be easily identified since there are some determinacy, 249
indeterminacy and neutrality about the moves and the effects of the cancer on that 250
region; this event leads us to choose another model [it’s said to be Neutrosophic 251
SuperHyperGraph] to have convenient perception on what’s happened and what’s done. 252
There are some specific models, which are well-known and they’ve got the names, and 253
some general models. The moves and the traces of the cancer on the complex tracks and 254
between complicated groups of cells could be fantasized by a Neutrosophic 255
SuperHyperPath (-/SuperHyperSpace, SuperHyperStar, SuperHyperBipartite, 256
SuperHyperMultipartite, SuperHyperWheel). The aim is to find either the optimal 257
SuperHyperSpace or the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSpace in those Neutrosophic 258
SuperHyperModels. Some general results are introduced. Beyond that in 259
SuperHyperStar, all possible Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath s have only two 260
SuperHyperEdges but it’s not enough since it’s essential to have at least three 261
SuperHyperEdges to form any style of a SuperHyperSpace. There isn’t any formation of 262
any SuperHyperSpace but literarily, it’s the deformation of any SuperHyperSpace. It, 263
literarily, deforms and it doesn’t form. 264
Question 2.1. How to define the SuperHyperNotions and to do research on them to 265
find the “ amount of SuperHyperSpace” of either individual of cells or the groups of cells 266
based on the fixed cell or the fixed group of cells, extensively, the “amount of 267
SuperHyperSpace” based on the fixed groups of cells or the fixed groups of group of cells? 268
Question 2.2. What are the best descriptions for the “Cancer’s Recognition” in terms 269
of these messy and dense SuperHyperModels where embedded notions are illustrated? 270
It’s motivation to find notions to use in this dense model is titled 271
“SuperHyperGraphs”. Thus it motivates us to define different types of “ 272
SuperHyperSpace” and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperSpace” on “SuperHyperGraph” and 273
“Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”. Then the research has taken more motivations to 274
define SuperHyperClasses and to find some connections amid this SuperHyperNotion 275
with other SuperHyperNotions. It motivates us to get some instances and examples to 276
make clarifications about the framework of this research. The general results and some 277
results about some connections are some avenues to make key point of this research, 278
“Cancer’s Recognition”, more understandable and more clear. 279
The framework of this research is as follows. In the beginning, I introduce basic 280
definitions to clarify about preliminaries. In the subsection “Preliminaries”, initial 281
definitions about SuperHyperGraphs and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph are 282
deeply-introduced and in-depth-discussed. The elementary concepts are clarified and 283
illustrated completely and sometimes review literature are applied to make sense about 284
what’s going to figure out about the upcoming sections. The main definitions and their 285
clarifications alongside some results about new notions, SuperHyperSpace and 286
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSpace, are figured out in sections “ SuperHyperSpace” and 287
“Neutrosophic SuperHyperSpace”. In the sense of tackling on getting results and in 288
Space to make sense about continuing the research, the ideas of SuperHyperUniform 289
and Neutrosophic SuperHyperUniform are introduced and as their consequences, 290
corresponded SuperHyperClasses are figured out to debut what’s done in this section, 291
titled “Results on SuperHyperClasses” and “Results on Neutrosophic 292
SuperHyperClasses”. As going back to origin of the notions, there are some smart steps 293
toward the common notions to extend the new notions in new frameworks, 294
SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, in the sections “Results on 295
SuperHyperClasses” and “Results on Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”. The starter 296
research about the general SuperHyperRelations and as concluding and closing section 297
of theoretical research are contained in the section “General Results”. Some general 298
SuperHyperRelations are fundamental and they are well-known as fundamental 299
SuperHyperNotions as elicited and discussed in the sections, “General Results”, “ 300
SuperHyperSpace”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperSpace”, “Results on SuperHyperClasses” 301
and “Results on Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”. There are curious questions about 302
what’s done about the SuperHyperNotions to make sense about excellency of this 303
research and going to figure out the word “best” as the description and adjective for 304
this research as presented in section, “ SuperHyperSpace”. The keyword of this research 305
debut in the section “Applications in Cancer’s Recognition” with two cases and 306
subsections “Case 1: The Initial Steps Toward SuperHyperBipartite as 307
SuperHyperModel” and “Case 2: The Increasing Steps Toward SuperHyperMultipartite 308
as SuperHyperModel”. In the section, “Open Problems”, there are some scrutiny and 309
discernment on what’s done and what’s happened in this research in the terms of 310
“questions” and “problems” to make sense to figure out this research in featured style. 311
The advantages and the limitations of this research alongside about what’s done in this 312
research to make sense and to get sense about what’s figured out are included in the 313
section, “Conclusion and Closing Remarks”. 314
3 Neutrosophic Preliminaries Of This Scientific 315
Research On the Redeemed Ways 316
In this section, the basic material in this scientific research, is referred to [Single Valued 317
Neutrosophic Set](Ref. [120],Definition 2.2,p.2), [Neutrosophic 318
Set](Ref. [120],Definition 2.1,p.1), [Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 319
(NSHG)](Ref. [120],Definition 2.5,p.2), [Characterization of the Neutrosophic 320
SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)](Ref. [120],Definition 2.7,p.3), [t-norm](Ref. [120], 321
Definition 2.7, p.3), and [Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 322
(NSHG)](Ref. [120],Definition 2.7,p.3), [Neutrosophic Strength of the Neutrosophic 323
SuperHyperPaths] (Ref. [120],Definition 5.3,p.7), and [Different Neutrosophic Types of 324
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)] (Ref. [120],Definition 5.4,p.7). Also, the new 325
ideas and their clarifications are addressed to Ref. [120]. 326
In this subsection, the basic material which is used in this scientific research, is 327
presented. Also, the new ideas and their clarifications are elicited. 328
Definition 3.1 (Neutrosophic Set). (Ref. [120],Definition 2.1,p.1). 329
Let X be a space of points (objects) with generic elements in X denoted by x; then

the Neutrosophic set A (NS A) is an object having the form
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}

+
where the functions T, I, F : X →]− 0, 1 [ define respectively the a
truth-membership function, an indeterminacy-membership function, and a
falsity-membership function of the element x ∈ X to the set A with the condition
−
0 ≤ TA (x) + IA (x) + FA (x) ≤ 3+ .
The functions TA (x), IA (x) and FA (x) are real standard or nonstandard subsets of 330
+
]− 0, 1 [. 331
Definition 3.2 (Single Valued Neutrosophic Set). (Ref. [120],Definition 2.2,p.2). 332
Let X be a space of points (objects) with generic elements in X denoted by x. A

single valued Neutrosophic set A (SVNS A) is characterized by truth-membership
function TA (x), an indeterminacy-membership function IA (x), and a falsity-membership
function FA (x). For each point x in X, TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) ∈ [0, 1]. A SVNS A can be
written as
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}.
Definition 3.3. The degree of truth-membership,
indeterminacy-membership and falsity-membership of the subset X ⊂ A of
the single valued Neutrosophic set A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}:
TA (X) = min[TA (vi ), TA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,
IA (X) = min[IA (vi ), IA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,

and FA (X) = min[FA (vi ), FA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X .
Definition 3.4. The support of X ⊂ A of the single valued Neutrosophic set
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}:
supp(X) = {x ∈ X : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) > 0}.
Definition 3.5 (Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). (Ref. [120],Definition 333
2.5,p.2). 334
Assume V 0 is a given set. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a 335
pair S = (V, E), where 336
(i) V = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vn } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of V 0 ; 337
(ii) V = {(Vi , TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi )) : TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi ) ≥ 0}, (i = 338
1, 2, . . . , n); 339
(iii) E = {E1 , E2 , . . . , En0 } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of 340
V; 341
(iv) E = {(Ei0 , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )) : TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 ) ≥ 0}, (i0 = 342
1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 343
(v) Vi 6= ∅, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 344
(vi) Ei0 6= ∅, (i0 = 1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 345
P
(vii) i supp(Vi ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 346
0 0
P
(viii) i0 supp(Ei ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n );
0 347
(ix) and the following conditions hold:
TV0 (Ei0 ) ≤ min[TV 0 (Vi ), TV 0 (Vj )]Vi ,Vj ∈Ei0 ,
IV0 (Ei0 ) ≤ min[IV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vj )]Vi ,Vj ∈Ei0 ,

and FV0 (Ei0 ) ≤ min[FV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vj )]Vi ,Vj ∈Ei0
where i0 = 1, 2, . . . , n0 . 348
Here the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ej 0 and the Neutrosophic 349
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) Vj are single valued Neutrosophic sets. TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), 350
and FV 0 (Vi ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 351
indeterminacy-membership and the degree of falsity-membership the Neutrosophic 352
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) V. 353
TV0 (Ei0 ), TV0 (Ei0 ), and TV0 (Ei0 ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 354
indeterminacy-membership and the degree of falsity-membership of the Neutrosophic 355
SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) Ei0 to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) E. Thus, 356
the ii0 th element of the incidence matrix of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) 357
are of the form (Vi , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )), the sets V and E are crisp sets. 358
Definition 3.6 (Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). 359
(Ref. [120],Definition 2.7,p.3). 360
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). The 361
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ei0 and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 362
(NSHV) Vi of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S = (V, E) could be 363
characterized as follow-up items. 364
(i) If |Vi | = 1, then Vi is called vertex; 365
(ii) if |Vi | ≥ 1, then Vi is called SuperVertex; 366
(iii) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called edge; 367
(iv) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 368
HyperEdge; 369
(v) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called 370
SuperEdge; 371
(vi) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 372
SuperHyperEdge. 373
If we choose different types of binary operations, then we could get hugely diverse 374
types of general forms of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG). 375
Definition 3.7 (t-norm). (Ref. [120], Definition 2.7, p.3). 376
A binary operation ⊗ : [0, 1] × [0, 1] → [0, 1] is a t-norm if it satisfies the following 377
for x, y, z, w ∈ [0, 1]: 378
(i) 1 ⊗ x = x; 379
(ii) x ⊗ y = y ⊗ x; 380
(iii) x ⊗ (y ⊗ z) = (x ⊗ y) ⊗ z; 381
(iv) If w ≤ x and y ≤ z then w ⊗ y ≤ x ⊗ z. 382
Definition 3.8. The degree of truth-membership, indeterminacy-membership

and falsity-membership of the subset X ⊂ A of the single valued Neutrosophic set
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X} (with respect to t-norm Tnorm ):
TA (X) = Tnorm [TA (vi ), TA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,
IA (X) = Tnorm [IA (vi ), IA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,

and FA (X) = Tnorm [FA (vi ), FA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X .
Definition 3.9. The support of X ⊂ A of the single valued Neutrosophic set
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}:
supp(X) = {x ∈ X : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) > 0}.
Definition 3.10. (General Forms of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). 383
Assume V 0 is a given set. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a 384
pair S = (V, E), where 385
0
(i) V = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vn } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of V ; 386
(ii) V = {(Vi , TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi )) : TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi ) ≥ 0}, (i = 387
1, 2, . . . , n); 388
(iii) E = {E1 , E2 , . . . , En0 } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of 389
V; 390
(iv) E = {(Ei0 , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )) : TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 ) ≥ 0}, (i0 = 391
1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 392
(v) Vi 6= ∅, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 393
(vi) Ei0 6= ∅, (i0 = 1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 394
P
(vii) i supp(Vi ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 395
0 0
P
(viii) i0 supp(Ei ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n ).
0 396
Here the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ej 0 and the Neutrosophic 397
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) Vj are single valued Neutrosophic sets. TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), 398
and FV 0 (Vi ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 399
indeterminacy-membership and the degree of falsity-membership the Neutrosophic 400
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) V. 401
TV0 (Ei0 ), TV0 (Ei0 ), and TV0 (Ei0 ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 402
indeterminacy-membership and the degree of falsity-membership of the Neutrosophic 403
SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) Ei0 to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) E. Thus, 404
the ii0 th element of the incidence matrix of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) 405
are of the form (Vi , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )), the sets V and E are crisp sets. 406
Definition 3.11 (Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). 407
(Ref. [120],Definition 2.7,p.3). 408
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). The 409
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ei0 and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 410
(NSHV) Vi of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S = (V, E) could be 411
characterized as follow-up items. 412
(i) If |Vi | = 1, then Vi is called vertex; 413
(ii) if |Vi | ≥ 1, then Vi is called SuperVertex; 414
(iii) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called edge; 415
(iv) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 416
HyperEdge; 417
(v) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called 418
SuperEdge; 419
(vi) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 420
SuperHyperEdge. 421
This SuperHyperModel is too messy and too dense. Thus there’s a need to have 422
some restrictions and conditions on SuperHyperGraph. The special case of this 423
SuperHyperGraph makes the patterns and regularities. 424
Definition 3.12. A graph is SuperHyperUniform if it’s SuperHyperGraph and the 425
number of elements of SuperHyperEdges are the same. 426
To get more visions on SuperHyperUniform, the some SuperHyperClasses are 427
introduced. It makes to have SuperHyperUniform more understandable. 428
Definition 3.13. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. There are some 429
SuperHyperClasses as follows. 430
(i). It’s Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath if it’s only one SuperVertex as 431
intersection amid two given SuperHyperEdges with two exceptions; 432
(ii). it’s SuperHyperCycle if it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two 433
given SuperHyperEdges; 434
(iii). it’s SuperHyperStar it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid all 435
SuperHyperEdges; 436
(iv). it’s SuperHyperBipartite it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two 437
given SuperHyperEdges and these SuperVertices, forming two separate sets, has 438
no SuperHyperEdge in common; 439
(v). it’s SuperHyperMultiPartite it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid 440
two given SuperHyperEdges and these SuperVertices, forming multi separate sets, 441
has no SuperHyperEdge in common; 442
(vi). it’s SuperHyperWheel if it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two 443
given SuperHyperEdges and one SuperVertex has one SuperHyperEdge with any 444
common SuperVertex. 445
Definition 3.14. Let a pair S = (V, E) be a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)

S. Then a sequence of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) and Neutrosophic
SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)
V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs
is called a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic 446
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) V1 to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vs if either 447
of following conditions hold: 448
(i) Vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 449
(ii) there’s a vertex vi ∈ Vi such that vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 450
(iii) there’s a SuperVertex Vi0 ∈ Vi such that Vi0 , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 451
(iv) there’s a vertex vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that Vi , vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 452
0 0
(v) there’s a SuperVertex Vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that Vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 453
(vi) there are a vertex vi ∈ Vi and a vertex vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that vi , vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 454
0 0
(vii) there are a vertex vi ∈ Vi and a SuperVertex Vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 455
(viii) there are a SuperVertex Vi0 ∈ Vi and a vertex vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that Vi0 , vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 456
(ix) there are a SuperVertex Vi0 ∈ Vi and a SuperVertex Vi+1

0
∈ Vi+1 such that 457
0 0
Vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 . 458
Definition 3.15. (Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPaths). 459
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). a

Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV)
V1 to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vs is sequence of Neutrosophic
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) and Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)
V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs ,
could be characterized as follow-up items. 460
(i) If for all Vi , Ej 0 , |Vi | = 1, |Ej 0 | = 2, then NSHP is called path; 461
(ii) if for all Ej 0 , |Ej 0 | = 2, and there’s Vi , |Vi | ≥ 1, then NSHP is called SuperPath; 462
(iii) if for all Vi , Ej 0 , |Vi | = 1, |Ej 0 | ≥ 2, then NSHP is called HyperPath; 463
(iv) if there are Vi , Ej 0 , |Vi | ≥ 1, |Ej 0 | ≥ 2, then NSHP is called Neutrosophic 464
SuperHyperPath . 465
Definition 3.16 (Neutrosophic Strength of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPaths). 466
(Ref. [120],Definition 5.3,p.7). 467
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). A

Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV)
V1 to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vs is sequence of Neutrosophic
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) and Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)
V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs ,
have 468
(i) Neutrosophic t-strength (min{T (Vi )}, m, n)si=1 ; 469
(ii) Neutrosophic i-strength (m, min{I(Vi )}, n)si=1 ; 470
(iii) Neutrosophic f-strength (m, n, min{F (Vi )})si=1 ; 471
(iv) Neutrosophic strength (min{T (Vi )}, min{I(Vi )}, min{F (Vi )})si=1 . 472
Definition 3.17 (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges 473
(NSHE)). (Ref. [120],Definition 5.4,p.7). 474
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). Consider 475
a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) E = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then E is called 476
(ix) Neutrosophic t-connective if T (E) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic 477
t-strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 478
(NSHV) Vi to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vj where 1 ≤ i, j ≤ s; 479
(x) Neutrosophic i-connective if I(E) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic 480
i-strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 481
(xi) Neutrosophic f-connective if F (E) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic 483
f-strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 484
(xii) Neutrosophic connective if (T (E), I(E), F (E)) ≥ maximum number of 486
Neutrosophic strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic 487
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vj 488
where 1 ≤ i, j ≤ s. 489
Definition 3.18. (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperSpace). 490
a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs } and E 0 = {E1 , E2 , . . . , Ez }. Then 492
either V 0 or E 0 is called 493
(i) Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperSpace if S = (V, E) is a probability space where 494
P is a sample space and E is a function space E : V → [0, 1] such that

V 495
ab∈V E(ab) = 1; 496
(ii) Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperSpace if S = (V, E) is a probability space 497
where
P V is a sample space and E is a function space E : V → [0, 1] such that 498
ab∈V E(ab) = 1; and 499
|Ei |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY = |Ej |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY ; 500
(iii) Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperSpace if S = (V, E) is a probability space where 501
P is a sample space and E is a function space E : V → [0, 1] such that

V 502
ab∈V E(ab) = 1; 503
(iv) Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperSpace if S = (V, E) is a probability space 504
where
P V is a sample space and E is a function space E : V → [0, 1] such that 505
ab∈V E(ab) = 1; and 506
|Vi |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY = |Vj |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY ; 507
(v) Neutrosophic SuperHyperSpace if it’s either of Neutrosophic 508
v-SuperHyperSpace, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperSpace. 510
Definition 3.19. ((Neutrosophic) SuperHyperSpace). 511
a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) E = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then E is called 513
(i) an Extreme SuperHyperSpace if it’s either of Neutrosophic 514
Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum Extreme cardinality 517
of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality of the Extreme 518
SuperHyperEdges in the consecutive Extreme sequence of Extreme 519
SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 520
Extreme SuperHyperSpace; 521
(ii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSpace if it’s either of Neutrosophic 522
cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges of a Neutrosophic 526
SuperHyperSet S of high Neutrosophic cardinality consecutive Neutrosophic 527
SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 528
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSpace; 529
(iii) an Extreme SuperHyperSpace SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of 530
Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperSpace, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperSpace, 531
C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Extreme 533
SuperHyperPolynomial contains the Extreme coefficients defined as the Extreme 534
number of the maximum Extreme cardinality of the Extreme SuperHyperEdges of 535
an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality consecutive Extreme 536
Extreme SuperHyperSpace; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its 538
Extreme coefficient; 539
(iv) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSpace SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of 540
C(N SHG) for a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the 543
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPolynomial contains the Neutrosophic coefficients 544
defined as the Neutrosophic number of the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of 545
the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high 546
Neutrosophic cardinality consecutive Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges and 547
SuperHyperSpace; and the Neutrosophic power is corresponded to its 549
Neutrosophic coefficient; 550
(v) an Extreme V-SuperHyperSpace if it’s either of Neutrosophic 551
Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum Extreme cardinality 554
of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality of the Extreme 555
SuperHyperVertices in the consecutive Extreme sequence of Extreme 556
Extreme SuperHyperSpace; 558
(vi) a Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperSpace if it’s either of Neutrosophic 559
cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of a Neutrosophic 563
SuperHyperSet S of high Neutrosophic cardinality consecutive Neutrosophic 564
SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 565
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSpace; 566
(vii) an Extreme V-SuperHyperSpace SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of 567
C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Extreme 570
SuperHyperPolynomial contains the Extreme coefficients defined as the Extreme 571
number of the maximum Extreme cardinality of the Extreme SuperHyperVertices 572
of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality consecutive Extreme 573
Extreme SuperHyperSpace; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its 575
Extreme coefficient; 576
(viii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSpace SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of 577
C(N SHG) for a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the 580
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPolynomial contains the Neutrosophic coefficients 581
defined as the Neutrosophic number of the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of 582
the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high 583
Neutrosophic cardinality consecutive Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges and 584
SuperHyperSpace; and the Neutrosophic power is corresponded to its 586
Neutrosophic coefficient. 587
Definition 3.20. ((Extreme/Neutrosophic)δ−SuperHyperSpace). 588
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). Then 589
(i) an δ−SuperHyperSpace is a Neutrosophic kind of Neutrosophic 590
SuperHyperSpace such that either of the following expressions hold for the 591
Neutrosophic cardinalities of SuperHyperNeighbors of s ∈ S : 592
|S ∩ N (s)| > |S ∩ (V \ N (s))| + δ;

|S ∩ N (s)| < |S ∩ (V \ N (s))| + δ.
The Expression (3.1), holds if S is an δ−SuperHyperOffensive. And the 593
Expression (3.1), holds if S is an δ−SuperHyperDefensive; 594
(ii) a Neutrosophic δ−SuperHyperSpace is a Neutrosophic kind of Neutrosophic 595
SuperHyperSpace such that either of the following Neutrosophic expressions hold 596
Table 1. The Values of Vertices, SuperVertices, Edges, HyperEdges, and SuperHy-

perEdges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph Mentioned in the Definition
(3.23)
The Values of The Vertices The Number of Position in Alphabet
The Values of The SuperVertices The maximum Values of Its Vertices
The Values of The Edges The maximum Values of Its Vertices
The Values of The HyperEdges The maximum Values of Its Vertices
The Values of The SuperHyperEdges The maximum Values of Its Endpoints

perEdges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, Mentioned in the Definition
(3.22)
for the Neutrosophic cardinalities of SuperHyperNeighbors of s ∈ S : 597
|S ∩ N (s)|N eutrosophic > |S ∩ (V \ N (s))|N eutrosophic + δ;

|S ∩ N (s)|N eutrosophic < |S ∩ (V \ N (s))|N eutrosophic + δ.
The Expression (3.1), holds if S is a Neutrosophic δ−SuperHyperOffensive. 598
And the Expression (3.1), holds if S is a Neutrosophic 599
δ−SuperHyperDefensive. 600
For the sake of having a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSpace, there’s a need to 601
“redefine” the notion of “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”. The SuperHyperVertices 602
and the SuperHyperEdges are assigned by the labels from the letters of the alphabets. 603
In this procedure, there’s the usage of the position of labels to assign to the values. 604
Definition 3.21. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair 605
S = (V, E). It’s redefined Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph if the Table (1) holds. 606
It’s useful to define a “Neutrosophic” version of SuperHyperClasses. Since there’s 607
more ways to get Neutrosophic type-results to make a Neutrosophic more 608
understandable. 609
Definition 3.22. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair 610
S = (V, E). There are some Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses if the Table (2) 611
holds. Thus Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath , SuperHyperSpace, SuperHyperStar, 612
SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultiPartite, and SuperHyperWheel, are 613
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath, Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle, 614
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar, Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite, 615
Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultiPartite, and Neutrosophic 616
SuperHyperWheel if the Table (2) holds. 617
It’s useful to define a “Neutrosophic” version of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSpace. 618
Since there’s more ways to get type-results to make a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSpace 619
more Neutrosophicly understandable. 620
For the sake of having a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSpace, there’s a need to “redefine” 621
the Neutrosophic notion of “Neutrosophic SuperHyperSpace”. The SuperHyperVertices 622
and the SuperHyperEdges are assigned by the labels from the letters of the alphabets. 623
In this procedure, there’s the usage of the position of labels to assign to the values. 624

perEdges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph Mentioned in the Definition
(3.23)
Definition 3.23. Assume a SuperHyperSpace. It’s redefined a Neutrosophic 625
SuperHyperSpace if the Table (3) holds. 626
4 Neutrosophic SuperHyperSpace But As The 627
Extensions Excerpt From Dense And Super 628
Forms 629
Definition 4.1. (Neutrosophic event). 630
S = (V, E) is a probability space. Any Neutrosophic k-subset of A of V is called 632
Neutrosophic k-event and if k = 2, then Neutrosophic subset of A of V is called 633
Neutrosophic event. The following expression is called Neutrosophic probability 634
of A. 635
X
E(A) = E(a). (4.1)
a∈A
Definition 4.2. (Neutrosophic Independent). 636
S = (V, E) is a probability space. s Neutrosophic k-events Ai , i ∈ I is called 638
Neutrosophic s-independent if the following expression is called Neutrosophic 639
s-independent criteria 640
Y
E(∩i∈I Ai ) = P (Ai ).
i∈I
And if s = 2, then Neutrosophic k-events of A and B is called Neutrosophic 641
independent. The following expression is called Neutrosophic independent 642
criteria 643
E(A ∩ B) = P (A)P (B). (4.2)
Definition 4.3. (Neutrosophic Variable). 644
S = (V, E) is a probability space. Any k-function space like E is called Neutrosophic 646
k-Variable. If k = 2, then any 2-function space like E is called Neutrosophic 647
Variable. 648
The notion of independent on Neutrosophic Variable is likewise. 649
Definition 4.4. (Neutrosophic Expectation). 650
S = (V, E) is a probability space. A Neutrosophic k-Variable E has a number is called 652
Neutrosophic Expectation if the following expression is called Neutrosophic 653
Expectation criteria 654
X
Ex(E) = E(α)P (α).
α∈V
Definition 4.5. (Neutrosophic Crossing). 655
S = (V, E) is a probability space. A Neutrosophic number is called Neutrosophic 657
Crossing if the following expression is called Neutrosophic Crossing criteria 658
Cr(S) = min{Number of Crossing in a Plane Embedding of S}.
Lemma 4.6. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair 659
S = (V, E). Consider S = (V, E) is a probability space. Let m and n propose special 660
space. Then with m ≥ 4n, 661
Proof. Consider a planar embedding G of G with cr(G) crossings. Let S be a 662
Neutrosophic random k-subset of V obtained by choosing each SuperHyperVertex of G 663
Neutrosophic independently with probability space p := 4n/m, and set H := G[S] and 664
H := G[S]. 665
Define random variables X, Y, Z on V as follows: X is the Neutrosophic number of

SuperHyperVertices, Y the Neutrosophic number of SuperHyperEdges, and Z the
Neutrosophic number of crossings of H. The trivial bound noted above, when applied to
H, yields the inequality Zcr(H)Y − 3X. By linearity of Neutrosophic Expectation,
E(Z)E(Y ) − 3E(X).
Now E(X) = pn, E(Y ) = p2 m (each SuperHyperEdge having some SuperHyperEnds)

and E(Z) = p4 cr(G) (each crossing being defined by some SuperHyperVertices). Hence
p4 cr(G)p2 m − 3pn.
Dividing both sides by p4 , we have: 666
pm − 3n n 1 3 2
cr(G) ≥ 3
= 3 = m n .
p (4n/m) 64
667
Theorem 4.7. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair 668
S = (V, E). Consider S = (V, E) is a probability space. Let P be a SuperHyperSet of n 669
points in the plane, and let l be the Neutrosophic number of SuperHyperLines

√ in the 670
plane passing through at least k + 1 of these points, where 1 ≤ k ≤ 2 2n. Then 671
l < 32n2 /k 3 . 672
Proof. Form a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph G with SuperHyperVertex 673
SuperHyperSet P whose SuperHyperEdge are the segments between consecutive points 674
on the SuperHyperLines which pass through at least k + 1 points of P. This 675
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph has at least kl SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic 676
crossing at most l choose two. Thus either kl < 4n, in which case l < 4n/k ≤ 32n2 /k 3 , 677
3
or l2 /2 > l choose 2 ≥ cr(G) ≥ (kl) /64n2 by the Neutrosophic Crossing Lemma, and 678
again l < 32n2 /k 3 . 679
S = (V, E). Consider S = (V, E) is a probability space. Let P be a SuperHyperSet of n 681
points in the plane, and let k be the number of pairs of points of P at unit 682
SuperHyperDistance. Then k < 5n4/3 . 683
Proof. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). 684
Consider S = (V, E) is a probability space. Draw a SuperHyperUnit SuperHyperCircle 685
around each SuperHyperPoint of P. Let ni be the Neutrosophic P number of these 686
SuperHyperCircles passing through exactly i points of P. Then i = 0n−1 ni = n and 687

1
P n−1
k=2 i=0 ini . Now form a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph H with 688
SuperHyperVertex SuperHyperSet P whose SuperHyperEdges are the SuperHyperArcs 689
between consecutive SuperHyperPoints on the SuperHyperCircles that pass through at 690
least three SuperHyperPoints of P. Then 691
n−1
X
e(H) = ini = 2k − n1 − 2n2 ≥ 2k − 2n.
i=3
Some SuperHyperPairs of SuperHyperVertices of H might be joined by some parallel 692
SuperHyperEdges. Delete from H one of each SuperHyperPair of parallel 693
SuperHyperEdges, so as to obtain a simple Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph G with 694
e(G)k − n. Now cr(G)n(n − 1) because G is formed from at most n SuperHyperCircles, 695
and any two SuperHyperCircles cross at most twice. Thus either e(G) < 4n, in which 696
3
case k < 5n < 5n4/3 , or n2 > n(n − 1)cr(G)(k − n) /64n2 by the Neutrosophic 697
4/3 4/3
Crossing Lemma, and k < 4n + n < 5n . 698
Proposition 4.9. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair 699
S = (V, E). Consider S = (V, E) is a probability space. Let X be a nonnegative 700
Neutrosophic Variable and t a positive real number. Then 701
E(X)
P (X ≥ t) ≤ .
t
Proof.
X X
E(X) = {X(a)P (a) : a ∈ V } ≥ {X(a)P (a) : a ∈ V, X(a) ≥ t}
X X
{tP (a) : a ∈ V, X(a) ≥ t} = t {P (a) : a ∈ V, X(a) ≥ t}
tP (X ≥ t).
Dividing the first and last members by t yields the asserted inequality. 702
Corollary 4.10. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair 703
S = (V, E). Consider S = (V, E) is a probability space. Let Xn be a nonnegative 704
integer-valued variable in a probability space (Vn , En ), n ≥ 1. If E(Xn ) → 0 as 705
n → ∞, then P (Xn = 0) → 1 as n → ∞. 706
Proof. 707
S = (V, E). Consider S = (V, E) is a probability space. A special SuperHyperGraph in 709
Gn,p almost surely has stability number at most d2p−1 log ne. 710
Consider S = (V, E) is a probability space. A special SuperHyperGraph in Gn,p is up. 712
Let G ∈ Gn,p and let S be a given SuperHyperSet of k + 1 SuperHyperVertices of G, 713
where k ∈ N. The probability that S is a stable SuperHyperSet of G is 714
(1 − p)(k+1)choose2 , this being the probability that none of the (k + 1)choose2 pairs of 715
SuperHyperVertices of S is a SuperHyperEdge of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 716
G. 717
Let AS denote the event that S is a stable SuperHyperSet of G, and let XS denote 718
the indicator Neutrosophic Variable for this Neutrosophic Event. By equation, we have 719
E(XS ) = P (XS = 1) = P (AS ) = (1 − p)(k+1)choose2 .

Let X be the number of stable SuperHyperSets of cardinality k + 1 in G. Then 720
X
X= {XS : S ⊆ V, |S| = k + 1}
and so, by those, 721
X
E(X) = {E(XS ) : S ⊆ V, |S| = k + 1 = (n choose k+1)(1 − p)(k+1)choose2 .
We bound the right-hand side by invoking two elementary inequalities: 722
k+1
n
(n choose k+1) ≤ and1 − pe−p .
(k + 1)!
This yields the following upper bound on E(X). 723
nk+1 e−p)(k+1)choose2 ne−pk/2k+1

E(X) ≤ =
(k + 1)! (k + 1)!
Suppose now that k = d2p−1 log ne. Then k2p−1 log n, so ne−pk/2 ≤ 1. Because k grows 724
at least as fast as the logarithm of n, implies that E(X) → 0 as n → ∞. Because X is 725
integer-valued and nonnegative, we deduce from Corollary that P (X = 0) → 1 as 726
n → ∞. Consequently, a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph in Gn,p almost surely has 727
stability number at most k. 728
Definition 4.12. (Neutrosophic Variance). 729
S = (V, E) is a probability space. A Neutrosophic k-Variable E has a number is called 731
Neutrosophic Variance if the following expression is called Neutrosophic 732
Variance criteria 733
2
V x(E) = Ex((X − Ex(X)) ).
S = (V, E). Consider S = (V, E) is a probability space. Let X be a Neutrosophic 735
Variable and let t be a positive real number. Then 736
V (X)
E(|X − Ex(X)| ≥ t) ≤ .
t2
Consider S = (V, E) is a probability space. Let X be a Neutrosophic Variable and let t 738
be a positive real number. Then 739
2
2 Ex((X − Ex(X)) ) V (X)
E(|X − Ex(X)| ≥ t) = E((X − Ex(X)) ≥ t2 ) ≤ = .
t2 t2
740
S = (V, E). Consider S = (V, E) is a probability space. Let Xn be a Neutrosophic 742
Variable in a probability space (Vn , En ), n ≥ 1. If Ex(Xn ) 6= 0 and V (Xn ) << E 2 (Xn ), 743
then 744
E(Xn = 0) → 0 as n → ∞
Consider S = (V, E) is a probability space. Set X := Xn and t := |Ex(Xn )| in 746
Chebyshev’s Inequality, and observe that E(Xn = 0) ≤ E(|Xn − Ex(Xn )| ≥ |Ex(Xn )|) 747
because |Xn − Ex(Xn )| = |Ex(Xn )| when Xn = 0. 748
S = (V, E). Consider S = (V, E) is a probability space. Let G ∈ Gn,1/2 . For 0 ≤ k ≤ n, 750
set f (k) := (n choose k)2−(k choose 2) and let k ∗ be the least value of k for which f (k) is 751
less than one. Then almost surely α(G) takes one of the three values k ∗ − 2, k ∗ − 1, k ∗ . 752
Consider S = (V, E) is a probability space. As in the proof of related Theorem, the 754
result is straightforward. 755
S = (V, E). Consider S = (V, E) is a probability space. Let G ∈ Gn,1/2 and let f and k ∗ 757
be as defined in previous Theorem. Then either: 758
(i). f (k ∗ ) << 1, in which case almost surely α(G) is equal to either k ∗ − 2 or k ∗ − 1, 759
or 760
(ii). f (k ∗ − 1) >> 1, in which case almost surely α(G) is equal to either k ∗ − 1 or k ∗ . 761
Consider S = (V, E) is a probability space. The latter is straightforward. 763
Definition 4.17. (Neutrosophic Threshold). 764
S = (V, E) is a probability space. Let P be a monotone property of SuperHyperGraphs 766
(one which is preserved when SuperHyperEdges are added). Then a Neutrosophic 767
Threshold for P is a function f (n) such that: 768
(i). if p << f (n), then G ∈ Gn,p almost surely does not have P, 769
(ii). if p >> f (n), then G ∈ Gn,p almost surely has P. 770
Definition 4.18. (Neutrosophic Balanced). 771
S = (V, E) is a probability space. Let F be a fixed Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. 773
Then there is a threshold function for the property of containing a copy of F as a 774
Neutrosophic SubSuperHyperGraph is called Neutrosophic Balanced. 775
S = (V, E). Consider S = (V, E) is a probability space. Let F be a nonempty balanced 777
Neutrosophic SubSuperHyperGraph with k SuperHyperVertices and l SuperHyperEdges. 778
Then n−k/l is a threshold function for the property of containing F as a Neutrosophic 779
SubSuperHyperGraph. 780
Consider S = (V, E) is a probability space. The latter is straightforward. 782
Example 4.20. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair 783
S = (V, E) in the mentioned Neutrosophic Figures in every Neutrosophic items. 784
• On the Figure (1), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 785
SuperHyperSpace, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly 786
straightforward. E1 and E3 are some empty Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges but 787
E2 is a loop Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge and E4 is a Neutrosophic 788
Figure 1. The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions

of Neutrosophic SuperHyperSpace in the Neutrosophic Example (4.20)
SuperHyperEdge. Thus in the terms of Neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbor, 789
there’s only one Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge, namely, E4 . The Neutrosophic 790
SuperHyperVertex, V3 is Neutrosophic isolated means that there’s no 791
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge has it as a Neutrosophic endpoint. Thus the 792
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 , is excluded in every given Neutrosophic 793
SuperHyperSpace. 794
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Space = {E4 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Space SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-Space = {Vi }i6=3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-Space SuperHyperPolynomial = z 3 .
795
straightforward. E1 , E2 and E3 are some empty Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges 798
but E4 is a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. Thus in the terms of Neutrosophic 799
SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only one Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge, namely, 800
E4 . The Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 is Neutrosophic isolated means that 801
there’s no Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge has it as a Neutrosophic endpoint. Thus 802
the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 , is excluded in every given Neutrosophic 803

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-Space = {Vi }i6=3 .
805

straightforward. 808

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-Space = {Vi }3i=1 .
809

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-Space = {V3 , V4 , H}.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-Space SuperHyperPolynomial
= z3.
813
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Space = {}.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Space SuperHyperPolynomial
= 0z 0 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-Space = {V5 }.
= z.



817
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Space

= {E1 , E2 , E13 }.
= az 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-Space
= {V1 , V3 , V12 }.
= bz 3 .
821
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Space =

{E12 , E13 }.
= 3z 2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-Space =
{V1 , V3 , V12 }.
= 3z 3 .

825

{E4 }.
= 4z.
{V12 }.
= 3z.
829

= {E1 , E2 , E13 }.
= 11z 3 .
= {V1 , V3 , V12 }.
= 11z 3 .



833

{E4 , E5 , E6 }.
= z3.
= {V12 }.
= 3z.
837

{E1 , E6 }.
= z2.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-Space = {V1 , V3 , V4 }.
= 6z 3 .
Figure 10. The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic

Notions of Neutrosophic SuperHyperSpace in the Neutrosophic Example (4.20)


841

= 5z.
= {V1 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-Space SuperHyperPolynomial =
= 5z.
845

{E6 , E7 , E8 }.
= z3.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-Space = {V1 , V3 , V4 }.
= 6z 3 .
849


C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Space SuperHyperPolynomial = 2z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-Space = {V1 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-Space SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
853

= {E1 }.
= {V1 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-Space SuperHyperPolynomial = 4z.
857




= {E1 }.
= {V2 }.
= z.
861

= {E1 }.
= {V2 }.
= z.
865


= {E1 }.
= {V2 }.
= 2z.
869

= {E1 , E3 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Space SuperHyperPolynomial = 12z 2 .
= {V1 , V2 }.
= 11z 2 .
873




= {}.
= 0z 0 .
= {V1 }.
= z.
877

= {E2 }.
= z.
= {}.
= 0z 0 .
881



= {E1 }.
= 5z.
= {V6 }.
= z.
885
5 The Neutrosophic Departures on The Theoretical 886
Results Toward Theoretical Motivations 887
The previous Neutrosophic approach apply on the upcoming Neutrosophic results on 888
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses. 889
Proposition 5.1. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath ESHP : (V, E). 890
Then 891

|E |
= {E2 }i=1N SHG .
= (|EN SHG | − 2)z.
= {ViEXT ERN AL }ViEXT ERN AL ∈E2 .
= (|EN SHG | − 2)z a .
Proof. Let 892
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
V |EN SHG |
, E |EN SHG |
3 3
893
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , V2EXT ERN AL ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
E |EN SHG | , V |EN SHG |
3 3
be a longest path taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath 894
ESHP : (V, E). There’s a new way to redefine as 895
ViEXT ERN AL ∼ VjEXT ERN AL ≡

∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL ∈ Ez ≡
∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , {ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL } ⊆ Ez .
The term “EXTERNAL” implies |N (ViEXT ERN AL )| ≥ |N (Vj )| where Vj is 896
corresponded to ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of SuperHyperSpace. The latter is 897
Example 5.2. In the Figure (23), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath 899
ESHP : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, in the 900
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (23), is the SuperHyperSpace. 901
Proposition 5.3. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle ESHC : (V, E). 902
Figure 23. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath Associated to the Notions of Neutrosophic

SuperHyperSpace in the Example (5.2)
Then 903

|E |
= {E1 , E3 }i=1N SHG .
= (|EN SHG |)z 2 .
= {ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL }ViEXT ERN AL ∈E1 ,VjEXT ERN AL ∈E2 .
= (|EN SHG |)z a .
Proof. Let 904
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
V |EN SHG |
, E |EN SHG |
3 3
905
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , V2EXT ERN AL ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
E |EN SHG | , V |EN SHG |
3 3
Figure 24. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions

be a longest path taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle 906
ESHC : (V, E). There’s a new way to redefine as 907

Example 5.4. In the Figure (24), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle 911
N SHC : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Neutrosophic 912
SuperHyperSet, in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (24), is the Neutrosophic 913
Proposition 5.5. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). 915
Then 916
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Space = {}.

= 0z 0 .
= {CEN T ER}.
= z0.
Figure 25. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of

Neutrosophic SuperHyperSpace in the Neutrosophic Example (5.6)
Proof. Let 917
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
CEN T ER, E2
918
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , CEN T ER
be a longest path taken a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). 919
There’s a new way to redefine as 920

Example 5.6. In the Figure (25), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar 924
ESHS : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, 925
by the Algorithm in previous Neutrosophic result, of the Neutrosophic 926
SuperHyperVertices of the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E), in 927
the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (25), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSpace. 928
Proposition 5.7. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite 929
ESHB : (V, E). Then 930

= {Ei , Ei ∈ P1 }.
min
= (|PNi SHG | × |PNj SHG |)z |PN SHG | .
= {ViEXT ERN AL , VVEXT ERN AL
EXT ERN AL ∈P }.
1

min
Proof. Let 931
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
V|Pi |=minP ∈E |Pj | , E|Pi |=minPj ∈EN SHG |Pj | .
j N SHG
932
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , V2EXT ERN AL ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
E|Pi |=minPj ∈EN SHG |Pj | , V|P i |=minP ∈E |Pj |
j N SHG
is a longest path taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite 933
ESHB : (V, E). There’s a new way to redefine as 934

straightforward. Then there’s no at least one SuperHyperSpace. Thus the notion of 937
quasi may be up but the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperSpace could be 938
applied. There are only two SuperHyperParts. Thus every SuperHyperPart could have 939
one SuperHyperVertex as the representative in the 940
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
is a longest SuperHyperSpace taken from a connected Neutrosophic 941
SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E). Thus only some SuperHyperVertices and only 942
minimum-Neutrosophic-of-SuperHyperPart SuperHyperEdges are attained in any 943
Figure 26. Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite Neutrosophic Associated to the Neutro-

sophic Notions of Neutrosophic SuperHyperSpace in the Example (5.8)
solution 944
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
The latter is straightforward. 945
Example 5.8. In the Neutrosophic Figure (26), the connected Neutrosophic 946
SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), is Neutrosophic highlighted and Neutrosophic 947
featured. The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Neutrosophic Algorithm in 948
previous Neutrosophic result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected 949
Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic 950
SuperHyperModel (26), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSpace. 951
Proposition 5.9. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite 952
ESHM : (V, E). Then 953

= {Ei , Ei ∈ P1 }.
min
= {ViEXT ERN AL , VVEXT ERN AL
EXT ERN AL ∈P }.
1

min
Proof. Let 954
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
V|Pi |=minP ∈E |Pj | , E|Pi |=minPj ∈EN SHG |Pj | .
j N SHG
955
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , V2EXT ERN AL ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
E|Pi |=minPj ∈EN SHG |Pj | , V|Pi |=minP ∈E |Pj |
j N SHG
is a longest SuperHyperSpace taken from a connected Neutrosophic 956
SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E). There’s a new way to redefine as 957

straightforward. Then there’s no at least one SuperHyperSpace. Thus the notion of 960
quasi may be up but the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperSpace could be 961
applied. There are only z 0 SuperHyperParts. Thus every SuperHyperPart could have 962
one SuperHyperVertex as the representative in the 963
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
is a longest path taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite 964
ESHM : (V, E). Thus only some SuperHyperVertices and only 965
minimum-Neutrosophic-of-SuperHyperPart SuperHyperEdges are attained in any 966
solution 967
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
is a longest path taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite 968
ESHM : (V, E). The latter is straightforward. 969
Example 5.10. In the Figure (27), the connected Neutrosophic 970
SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E), is highlighted and Neutrosophic featured. 971
The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Algorithm in previous Neutrosophic 972
result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected Neutrosophic 973
SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (27), 974
is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSpace. 975
Figure 27. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite Associated to the Notions of

Neutrosophic SuperHyperSpace in the Example (5.10)
Proposition 5.11. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel 976
ESHW : (V, E). Then, 977
|E ∗ |
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Space = {Ei∗ , E1 , E3 }i=1N SHG .
∗
= |EN SHG |z |EN SHG |+2 .
= {V1EXT ERN AL , V3EXT ERN AL , CEN T ER}.
= ||EN SHG |z 3 .
Proof. Let 978
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1∗ ,
CEN T ER, E2∗
979
P :
E1∗ , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2∗ , CEN T ER
is a longest SuperHyperSpace taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel 980
ESHW : (V, E). There’s a new way to redefine as 981

Figure 28. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel Neutrosophic Associated to the Neutro-

sophic Notions of Neutrosophic SuperHyperSpace in the Neutrosophic Example (5.12)
straightforward. Then there’s at least one SuperHyperSpace. Thus the notion of quasi 984
isn’t up and the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperSpace could be applied. The 985
unique embedded SuperHyperSpace proposes some longest SuperHyperSpace excerpt 986
from some representatives. The latter is straightforward. 987
Example 5.12. In the Neutrosophic Figure (28), the connected Neutrosophic 988
SuperHyperWheel N SHW : (V, E), is Neutrosophic highlighted and featured. The 989
obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Algorithm in previous result, of the 990
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel 991
ESHW : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (28), is the Neutrosophic 992
6 The Surveys of Mathematical Sets On The 994
Results But As The Initial Motivation 995
For the SuperHyperSpace, Neutrosophic SuperHyperSpace, and the Neutrosophic 996
SuperHyperSpace, some general results are introduced. 997
Remark 6.1. Let remind that the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSpace is “redefined” on the 998
positions of the alphabets. 999
Corollary 6.2. Assume Neutrosophic SuperHyperSpace. Then 1000
N eutrosophic SuperHyperSpace =
{theSuperHyperSpaceof theSuperHyperV ertices |
max |SuperHyperOf f ensive
SuperHyperSpace
|N eutrosophiccardinalityamidthoseSuperHyperSpace. }
plus one Neutrosophic SuperHypeNeighbor to one. Where σi is the unary operation on 1001
the SuperHyperVertices of the SuperHyperGraph to assign the determinacy, the 1002
indeterminacy and the neutrality, for i = 1, 2, 3, respectively. 1003
Corollary 6.3. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph on the same identical letter 1004
of the alphabet. Then the notion of Neutrosophic SuperHyperSpace and SuperHyperSpace 1005
coincide. 1006
of the alphabet. Then a consecutive sequence of the SuperHyperVertices is a 1008
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSpace if and only if it’s a SuperHyperSpace. 1009
of the alphabet. Then a consecutive sequence of the SuperHyperVertices is a strongest 1011
SuperHyperSpace if and only if it’s a longest SuperHyperSpace. 1012
Corollary 6.6. Assume SuperHyperClasses of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph on the 1013
same identical letter of the alphabet. Then its Neutrosophic SuperHyperSpace is its 1014
SuperHyperSpace and reversely. 1015
Corollary 6.7. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath(-/SuperHyperSpace, 1016
SuperHyperStar, SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, SuperHyperWheel) on 1017
the same identical letter of the alphabet. Then its Neutrosophic SuperHyperSpace is its 1018
SuperHyperSpace and reversely. 1019
Corollary 6.8. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. Then its Neutrosophic 1020
SuperHyperSpace isn’t well-defined if and only if its SuperHyperSpace isn’t well-defined. 1021
Corollary 6.9. Assume SuperHyperClasses of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. Then 1022
its Neutrosophic SuperHyperSpace isn’t well-defined if and only if its SuperHyperSpace 1023
isn’t well-defined. 1024
Then its Neutrosophic SuperHyperSpace isn’t well-defined if and only if its 1027
SuperHyperSpace isn’t well-defined. 1028
Corollary 6.11. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. Then its Neutrosophic 1029
SuperHyperSpace is well-defined if and only if its SuperHyperSpace is well-defined. 1030
Corollary 6.12. Assume SuperHyperClasses of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. 1031
Then its Neutrosophic SuperHyperSpace is well-defined if and only if its 1032
SuperHyperSpace is well-defined. 1033
Then its Neutrosophic SuperHyperSpace is well-defined if and only if its 1036
SuperHyperSpace is well-defined. 1037
7 Neutrosophic Applications in Cancer’s 1038
Neutrosophic Recognition 1039
The cancer is the Neutrosophic disease but the Neutrosophic model is going to figure 1040
out what’s going on this Neutrosophic phenomenon. The special Neutrosophic case of 1041
this Neutrosophic disease is considered and as the consequences of the model, some 1042
parameters are used. The cells are under attack of this disease but the moves of the 1043
cancer in the special region are the matter of mind. The Neutrosophic recognition of the 1044
cancer could help to find some Neutrosophic treatments for this Neutrosophic disease. 1045
In the following, some Neutrosophic steps are Neutrosophic devised on this disease. 1046
Step 1. (Neutrosophic Definition) The Neutrosophic recognition of the cancer in 1047
the long-term Neutrosophic function. 1048
Figure 29. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite Associated to the Notions of Neutro-

sophic SuperHyperSpace
Step 2. (Neutrosophic Issue) The specific region has been assigned by the 1049
Neutrosophic model [it’s called Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph] and the long 1050
Neutrosophic cycle of the move from the cancer is identified by this research. 1051
Sometimes the move of the cancer hasn’t be easily identified since there are some 1052
determinacy, indeterminacy and neutrality about the moves and the effects of the 1053
cancer on that region; this event leads us to choose another model [it’s said to be 1054
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph] to have convenient perception on what’s 1055
happened and what’s done. 1056
Step 3. (Neutrosophic Model) There are some specific Neutrosophic models, 1057
which are well-known and they’ve got the names, and some general Neutrosophic 1058
models. The moves and the Neutrosophic traces of the cancer on the complex 1059
tracks and between complicated groups of cells could be fantasized by a 1060
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath(-/SuperHyperSpace, SuperHyperStar, 1061
SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, SuperHyperWheel). The aim is to 1062
find either the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSpace or the Neutrosophic 1063
SuperHyperSpace in those Neutrosophic Neutrosophic SuperHyperModels. 1064
8 Case 1: The Initial Neutrosophic Steps 1065
Toward Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite as 1066
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel 1067
Step 4. (Neutrosophic Solution) In the Neutrosophic Figure (29), the 1068
Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite is Neutrosophic highlighted and Neutrosophic 1069
featured. 1070
By using the Neutrosophic Figure (29) and the Table (4), the Neutrosophic 1071
SuperHyperBipartite is obtained. 1072
The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Neutrosophic Algorithm in 1073
previous Neutrosophic result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the 1074
Table 4. The Values of Vertices, SuperVertices, Edges, HyperEdges, and SuperHyper-

Edges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite
Figure 30. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite Associated to the Notions of

Neutrosophic SuperHyperSpace
connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), in the 1075
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (29), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSpace. 1076
9 Case 2: The Increasing Neutrosophic Steps 1077
Toward Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite as 1078
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel 1079
Step 4. (Neutrosophic Solution) In the Neutrosophic Figure (30), the 1080
Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite is Neutrosophic highlighted and 1081
Neutrosophic featured. 1082
By using the Neutrosophic Figure (30) and the Table (5), the Neutrosophic 1083
SuperHyperMultipartite is obtained. 1084
The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Neutrosophic Algorithm in 1085
previous result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected 1086
Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic 1087
SuperHyperModel (30), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSpace. 1088
10 Wondering Open Problems But As The 1089
Directions To Forming The Motivations 1090
In what follows, some “problems” and some “questions” are proposed. 1091
Table 5. The Values of Vertices, SuperVertices, Edges, HyperEdges, and SuperHyper-

Edges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite
The SuperHyperSpace and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSpace are defined on a 1092
real-world application, titled “Cancer’s Recognitions”. 1093
Question 10.1. Which the else SuperHyperModels could be defined based on Cancer’s 1094
recognitions? 1095
Question 10.2. Are there some SuperHyperNotions related to SuperHyperSpace and 1096
the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSpace? 1097
Question 10.3. Are there some Algorithms to be defined on the SuperHyperModels to 1098
compute them? 1099
Question 10.4. Which the SuperHyperNotions are related to beyond the 1100
SuperHyperSpace and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSpace? 1101
Problem 10.5. The SuperHyperSpace and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSpace do a 1102
SuperHyperModel for the Cancer’s recognitions and they’re based on SuperHyperSpace, 1103
are there else? 1104
Problem 10.6. Which the fundamental SuperHyperNumbers are related to these 1105
SuperHyperNumbers types-results? 1106
Problem 10.7. What’s the independent research based on Cancer’s recognitions 1107
concerning the multiple types of SuperHyperNotions? 1108
11 Conclusion and Closing Remarks 1109
In this section, concluding remarks and closing remarks are represented. The drawbacks 1110
of this research are illustrated. Some benefits and some advantages of this research are 1111
highlighted. 1112
This research uses some approaches to make Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs more 1113
understandable. In this endeavor, two SuperHyperNotions are defined on the 1114
SuperHyperSpace. For that sake in the second definition, the main definition of the 1115
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph is redefined on the position of the alphabets. Based on 1116
the new definition for the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, the new SuperHyperNotion, 1117
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSpace, finds the convenient background to implement some 1118
results based on that. Some SuperHyperClasses and some Neutrosophic 1119
SuperHyperClasses are the cases of this research on the modeling of the regions where 1120
are under the attacks of the cancer to recognize this disease as it’s mentioned on the 1121
title “Cancer’s Recognitions”. To formalize the instances on the SuperHyperNotion, 1122
SuperHyperSpace, the new SuperHyperClasses and SuperHyperClasses, are introduced. 1123
Some general results are gathered in the section on the SuperHyperSpace and the 1124
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSpace. The clarifications, instances and literature reviews have 1125
taken the whole way through. In this research, the literature reviews have fulfilled the 1126
lines containing the notions and the results. The SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic 1127
SuperHyperGraph are the SuperHyperModels on the “Cancer’s Recognitions” and both 1128
bases are the background of this research. Sometimes the cancer has been happened on 1129
the region, full of cells, groups of cells and embedded styles. In this segment, the 1130
SuperHyperModel proposes some SuperHyperNotions based on the connectivities of the 1131
moves of the cancer in the longest and strongest styles with the formation of the design 1132
and the architecture are formally called “ SuperHyperSpace” in the themes of jargons 1133
and buzzwords. The prefix “SuperHyper” refers to the theme of the embedded styles to 1134
figure out the background for the SuperHyperNotions. In the Table (6), benefits and
Table 6. An Overlook On This Research And Beyond

Advantages Limitations
1. Redefining Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 1. General Results
2. SuperHyperSpace
3. Neutrosophic SuperHyperSpace 2. Other SuperHyperNumbers
4. Modeling of Cancer’s Recognitions
5. SuperHyperClasses 3. SuperHyperFamilies
1135
avenues for this research are, figured out, pointed out and spoken out. 1136
12 Background 1137
There are some scientific researches covering the topic of this research. In what follows, 1138
there are some discussion and literature reviews about them date back on March 09, 1139
2023. 1140
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “neutrosophic co-degree and 1141
neutrosophic degree alongside chromatic numbers in the setting of some classes related 1142
to neutrosophic hypergraphs” in Ref. [1] by Henry Garrett (2022). In this research 1143
article, a novel approach is implemented on SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic 1144
SuperHyperGraph based on general forms without using neutrosophic classes of 1145
neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. It’s published in prestigious and fancy journal is 1146
entitled “Journal of Current Trends in Computer Science Research (JCTCSR)” with 1147
ISO abbreviation “J Curr Trends Comp Sci Res” in volume 1 and issue 1 with pages 1148
06-14. The research article studies deeply with choosing neutrosophic hypergraphs 1149
instead of neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough toward independent 1150
results based on initial background. 1151
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “Super Hyper Dominating 1152
and Super Hyper Resolving on Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs and Their Directions 1153
in Game Theory and Neutrosophic Super Hyper Classes” in Ref. [2] by Henry Garrett 1154
(2022). In this research article, a novel approach is implemented on SuperHyperGraph 1155
and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on fundamental SuperHyperNumber and 1156
using neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses of neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. It’s 1157
published in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled “Journal of Mathematical 1158
Techniques and Computational Mathematics(JMTCM)” with ISO abbreviation “J Math 1159
Techniques Comput Math” in volume 1 and issue 3 with pages 242-263. The research 1160
article studies deeply with choosing directly neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph and 1161
SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough toward independent results based on initial 1162
background and fundamental SuperHyperNumbers. 1163
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “Some Super Hyper Degrees 1164
and Co-Super Hyper Degrees on Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs And Super Hyper 1165
Graphs Alongside Applications in Cancer’s Treatments” in Ref. [76] by Henry Garrett 1166
(2023). In this research article, a novel approach is implemented on SuperHyperGraph 1167
and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on fundamental notions and using vital tools 1168
in Cancer’s Treatments. It’s published in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled 1169
“Journal of Mathematical Techniques and Computational Mathematics(JMTCM)” with 1170
ISO abbreviation “J Math Techniques Comput Math” in volume 2 and issue 1 with 1171
pages 35-47. The research article studies deeply with choosing directly neutrosophic 1172
SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough toward independent 1173
results based on initial background and fundamental SuperHyperNumbers. 1174
In some articles are titled “0039 — Closing Numbers and Super-Closing Numbers as 1175
(Dual)Resolving and (Dual)Coloring alongside (Dual)Dominating in 1176
(Neutrosophic)n-SuperHyperGraph” in Ref. [4] by Henry Garrett (2022), “0049 — 1177
(Failed)1-Zero-Forcing Number in Neutrosophic Graphs” in Ref. [5] by Henry Garrett 1178
(2022), “Extreme SuperHyperClique as the Firm Scheme of Confrontation under 1179
Cancer’s Recognition as the Model in The Setting of (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” 1180
in Ref. [6] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Uncertainty On The Act And Effect Of Cancer 1181
Alongside The Foggy Positions Of Cells Toward Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique 1182
inside Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Titled Cancer’s Recognition” in Ref. [7] by 1183
Henry Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic Version Of Separates Groups Of Cells In Cancer’s 1184
Recognition On Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [8] by Henry Garrett (2022), 1185
“The Shift Paradigm To Classify Separately The Cells and Affected Cells Toward The 1186
Totality Under Cancer’s Recognition By New Multiple Definitions On the Sets 1187
Polynomials Alongside Numbers In The (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperMatching Theory 1188
Based on SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” in Ref. [9] by Henry 1189
Garrett (2022), “Breaking the Continuity and Uniformity of Cancer In The Worst Case 1190
of Full Connections With Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique In Cancer’s Recognition 1191
Applied in (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [10] by Henry Garrett (2022), 1192
“Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable as the Survivors on the Cancer’s Neutrosophic 1193
Recognition Based on Uncertainty to All Modes in Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in 1194
Ref. [11] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Extremism of the Attacked Body Under the 1195
Cancer’s Circumstances Where Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) 1196
SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [12] by Henry Garrett (2022), “(Neutrosophic) 1-Failed 1197
SuperHyperForcing in Cancer’s Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” 1198
in Ref. [13] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs 1199
To Form Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic 1200
Recognitions In Special ViewPoints” in Ref. [14] by Henry Garrett (2022), 1201
“Neutrosophic 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in the SuperHyperFunction To Use 1202
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond” 1203
in Ref. [15] by Henry Garrett (2022), “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperStable on Cancer’s 1204
Recognition by Well- SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs ” in 1205
Ref. [16] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To 1206
Form Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In 1207
Special ViewPoints” in Ref. [12] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Basic Notions on 1208
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperForcing And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling in 1209
Cancer’s Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [17] by Henry 1210
Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form Neutrosophic 1211
SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In Special ViewPoints” 1212
in Ref. [18] by Henry Garrett (2022),“(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s 1213
Recognitions Featuring (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances” in 1214
Ref. [19] by Henry Garrett (2022), “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperAlliances With 1215
SuperHyperDefensive and SuperHyperOffensive Type-SuperHyperSet On 1216
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of 1217
Cancer’s Recognitions And Related (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClasses” in Ref. [20] by 1218
Henry Garrett (2022), “SuperHyperGirth on SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic 1219
SuperHyperGraph With SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions” in Ref. [21] by 1220
Henry Garrett (2022), “Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on 1221
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs and SuperHyperGraphs Alongside Applications in 1222
Cancer’s Treatments” in Ref. [22] by Henry Garrett (2022), “SuperHyperDominating 1223
and SuperHyperResolving on Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs And Their Directions in 1224
Game Theory and Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses” in Ref. [23] by Henry Garrett 1225
(2022), “SuperHyperMatching By (R-)Definitions And Polynomials To Monitor 1226
Cancer’s Recognition In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [90] by Henry 1227
Garrett (2023), “The Focus on The Partitions Obtained By Parallel Moves In The 1228
Cancer’s Extreme Recognition With Different Types of Extreme SuperHyperMatching 1229
Set and Polynomial on (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [91] by Henry 1230
Garrett (2023), “Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique Decides the Failures on the 1231
Cancer’s Recognition in the Perfect Connections of Cancer’s Attacks By 1232
SuperHyperModels Named (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [92] by Henry 1233
Garrett (2023), “Indeterminacy On The All Possible Connections of Cells In Front of 1234
Cancer’s Attacks In The Terms of Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique on Cancer’s 1235
Recognition called Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [93] by Henry Garrett 1236
(2023), “Perfect Directions Toward Idealism in Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition 1237
Forwarding Neutrosophic SuperHyperClique on Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in 1238
Ref. [96] by Henry Garrett (2023), “Demonstrating Complete Connections in Every 1239
Embedded Regions and Sub-Regions in the Terms of Cancer’s Recognition and 1240
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClique” in 1241
Ref. [97] by Henry Garrett (2023), “Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic 1242
Regions titled neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable in Cancer’s Neutrosophic 1243
Recognition modeled in the Form of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [100] by 1244
Henry Garrett (2023), “Using the Tool As (Neutrosophic) Failed SuperHyperStable To 1245
SuperHyperModel Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in 1246
Ref. [103] by Henry Garrett (2023), “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To 1247
Form Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In 1248
Special ViewPoints” in Ref. [104] by Henry Garrett (2023), “(Neutrosophic) 1249
SuperHyperStable on Cancer’s Recognition by Well-SuperHyperModelled 1250
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [105] by Henry Garrett (2023), 1251
“Neutrosophic 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in the SuperHyperFunction To Use 1252
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond” 1253
in Ref. [106] by Henry Garrett (2022), “(Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in 1254
Cancer’s Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [107] by Henry 1255
Garrett (2022), “Basic Notions on (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperForcing And 1256
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling in Cancer’s Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) 1257
SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [108] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Basic Neutrosophic 1258
Notions Concerning SuperHyperDominating and Neutrosophic SuperHyperResolving in 1259
SuperHyperGraph” in Ref. [119] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Initial Material of 1260
Neutrosophic Preliminaries to Study Some Neutrosophic Notions Based on 1261
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) in Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)” in 1262
Ref. [120] by Henry Garrett (2022), and [24–44, 46–89, 94, 95, 98, 99, 101, 102, 109–118], 1263
there are some endeavors to formalize the basic SuperHyperNotions about neutrosophic 1264
SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph. 1265
Some scientific studies and scientific researches about neutrosophic graphs, are 1266
proposed as book in Ref. [121] by Henry Garrett (2022) which is indexed by Google 1267
Scholar and has more than 3230 readers in Scribd. It’s titled “Beyond Neutrosophic 1268
Graphs” and published by Ohio: E-publishing: Educational Publisher 1091 West 1st 1269
Ave Grandview Heights, Ohio 43212 United State. This research book covers different 1270
types of notions and settings in neutrosophic graph theory and neutrosophic 1271
SuperHyperGraph theory. 1272
Also, some scientific studies and scientific researches about neutrosophic graphs, are 1273
proposed as book in Ref. [122] by Henry Garrett (2022) which is indexed by Google 1274
Scholar and has more than 4117 readers in Scribd. It’s titled “Neutrosophic Duality” 1275
and published by Florida: GLOBAL KNOWLEDGE - Publishing House 848 Brickell 1276
Ave Ste 950 Miami, Florida 33131 United States. This research book presents different 1277
types of notions SuperHyperResolving and SuperHyperDominating in the setting of 1278
duality in neutrosophic graph theory and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph theory. This 1279
research book has scrutiny on the complement of the intended set and the intended set, 1280
simultaneously. It’s smart to consider a set but acting on its complement that what’s 1281
done in this research book which is popular in the terms of high readers in Scribd. 1282
See the seminal scientific researches [1, 2]. The formalization of the notions on the 1283
framework of notions In SuperHyperGraphs, Neutrosophic notions In 1284
SuperHyperGraphs theory, and (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs theory 1285
at [4–44, 46–120]. Two popular scientific research books in Scribd in the terms of high 1286
readers, 3230 and 4117 respectively, on neutrosophic science is on [121, 122]. 1287
– 1288
References 1289
1. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Co-degree and Neutrosophic Degree alongside 1290
Chromatic Numbers in the Setting of Some Classes Related to Neutrosophic 1291
Hypergraphs”, J Curr Trends Comp Sci Res 1(1) (2022) 06-14. 1292
2. Henry Garrett, “Super Hyper Dominating and Super Hyper Resolving on 1293
Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs and Their Directions in Game Theory and 1294
Neutrosophic Super Hyper Classes”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 1(3) 1295
(2022) 242-263. (doi: 10.33140/JMTCM.01.03.09) 1296
3. Henry Garrett, “Some Super Hyper Degrees and Co-Super Hyper Degrees on 1297
Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs And Super Hyper Graphs Alongside 1298
Applications in Cancer’s Treatments”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 2(1) 1299
(2023) 35-47. (https://www.opastpublishers.com/open-access-articles/some- 1300
super-hyper-degrees-and-cosuper-hyper-degrees-on-neutrosophic-super-hyper- 1301
graphs-and-super-hyper-graphs-alongside-a.pdf) 1302
4. Garrett, Henry. “0039 — Closing Numbers and Super-Closing Numbers as 1303
(Dual)Resolving and (Dual)Coloring alongside (Dual)Dominating in 1304
(Neutrosophic)n-SuperHyperGraph.” CERN European Organization for Nuclear 1305
Research - Zenodo, Nov. 2022. CERN European Organization for Nuclear 1306
Research, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6319942. 1307
https://oa.mg/work/10.5281/zenodo.6319942 1308
5. Garrett, Henry. “0049 — (Failed)1-Zero-Forcing Number in Neutrosophic 1309
Graphs.” CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research - Zenodo, Feb. 1310
2022. CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research, 1311
https://doi.org/10.13140/rg.2.2.35241.26724. 1312
https://oa.mg/work/10.13140/rg.2.2.35241.26724 1313
6. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperClique as the Firm Scheme of 1314
Confrontation under Cancer’s Recognition as the Model in The Setting of 1315
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010308 (doi: 1316
10.20944/preprints202301.0308.v1). 1317
7. Henry Garrett, “Uncertainty On The Act And Effect Of Cancer Alongside The 1318
Foggy Positions Of Cells Toward Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique inside 1319
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Titled Cancer’s Recognition”, Preprints 2023, 1320
2023010282 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0282.v1). 1321
8. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Version Of Separates Groups Of Cells In 1322
Cancer’s Recognition On Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 1323
2023010267 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0267.v1). 1324
9. Henry Garrett, “The Shift Paradigm To Classify Separately The Cells and 1325
Affected Cells Toward The Totality Under Cancer’s Recognition By New 1326
Multiple Definitions On the Sets Polynomials Alongside Numbers In The 1327
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperMatching Theory Based on SuperHyperGraph and 1328
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”, Preprints 2023, 2023010265 (doi: 1329
10.20944/preprints202301.0265.v1). 1330
10. Henry Garrett, “Breaking the Continuity and Uniformity of Cancer In The 1331
Worst Case of Full Connections With Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique In 1332
Cancer’s Recognition Applied in (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 1333
2023, 2023010262,(doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0262.v1). 1334
11. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable as the Survivors on the 1335
Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition Based on Uncertainty to All Modes in 1336
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010240 (doi: 1337
10.20944/preprints202301.0240.v1). 1338
12. Henry Garrett, “Extremism of the Attacked Body Under the Cancer’s 1339
Circumstances Where Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) 1340
SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010224, (doi: 1341
10.20944/preprints202301.0224.v1). 1342
13. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in Cancer’s 1343
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 1344
2023010105 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 1345
14. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form 1346
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions 1347
In Special ViewPoints”, Preprints 2023, 2023010088 (doi: 1348
10.20944/preprints202301.0088.v1). 1349
15. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in the 1350
SuperHyperFunction To Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs on Cancer’s 1351
Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond ”, Preprints 2023, 2023010044 1352
16. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperStable on Cancer’s Recognition by 1353
Well- SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 1354
2023010043 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0043.v1). 1355
17. Henry Garrett, “Basic Notions on (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperForcing And 1356
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling in Cancer’s Recognitions And 1357
10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 1359
10.20944/preprints202301.0088.v1). 1363
19. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions 1364
Featuring (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances”, Preprints 1365
2022, 2022120549 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0549.v1). 1366
20. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperAlliances With SuperHyperDefensive 1367
and SuperHyperOffensive Type-SuperHyperSet On (Neutrosophic) 1368
SuperHyperGraph With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s 1369
Recognitions And Related (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClasses”, Preprints 2022, 1370
2022120540 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0540.v1). 1371
21. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperGirth on SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic 1372
SuperHyperGraph With SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions”, 1373
Preprints 2022, 2022120500 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0500.v1). 1374
22. Henry Garrett, “Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on 1375
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs and SuperHyperGraphs Alongside Applications 1376
in Cancer’s Treatments”, Preprints 2022, 2022120324 (doi: 1377
10.20944/preprints202212.0324.v1). 1378
23. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDominating and SuperHyperResolving on 1379
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs And Their Directions in Game Theory and 1380
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”, Preprints 2022, 2022110576 (doi: 1381
10.20944/preprints202211.0576.v1). 1382
24. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 1383
SuperHyperGraph By Space As Hyper Sparse On Super Spark”, ResearchGate 1384
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.21756.21129). 1385
25. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Solidarity By Hyper Soul Of Space In 1386
Cancer’s Recognition With (Extreme) SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023, 1387
(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.30983.68009). 1388
SuperHyperGraph By Edge-Connectivity As Hyper Disclosure On Super 1390
Closure”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.28552.29445). 1391
27. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Uniform By Hyper Deformation Of 1392
Edge-Connectivity In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1393
SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.10936.21761). 1394
SuperHyperGraph By Vertex-Connectivity As Hyper Leak On Super Structure”, 1396
ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.35105.89447). 1397
29. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super System By Hyper Explosions Of 1398
Vertex-Connectivity In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1399
SuperHyperGraph By Tree-Decomposition As Hyper Forward On Super 1402
Returns”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.31147.52003). 1403
31. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nodes By Hyper Moves Of 1404
Tree-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1405
SuperHyperGraph By Chord As Hyper Excellence On Super Excess”, 1408
33. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Gap By Hyper Navigations Of Chord In 1410
Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 1411
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.11172.14720). 1412
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyper(i,j)-Domination As Hyper Controller On 1414
Super Waves”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.22011.80165). 1415
35. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Coincidence By Hyper Routes Of 1416
SuperHyper(i,j)-Domination In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1417
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperEdge-Domination As Hyper Reversion On 1420
Super Indirection”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.10493.84962). 1421
37. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Obstacles By Hyper Model Of 1422
SuperHyperEdge-Domination In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1423
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperK-Domination As Hyper k-Actions On Super 1426
Patterns”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.19944.14086). 1427
39. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Harmony By Hyper k-Function Of 1428
SuperHyperK-Domination In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1429
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperK-Number As Hyper k-Partition On Super 1432
Layers”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.33103.76968). 1433
41. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Gradient By Hyper k-Class Of 1434
SuperHyperK-Number In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1435
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperOrder As Hyper Enumerations On Super 1438
Landmarks”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.35646.56641). 1439
43. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Analogous By Hyper Visions Of 1440
SuperHyperOrder In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1441
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperColoring As Hyper Categories On Super 1444
Neighbors”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.13973.81121). 1445
45. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Relations By Hyper Identifications Of 1446
SuperHyperColoring In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1447
46. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Relations By Hyper Identifications Of 1449
SuperHyperColoring In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1450
47. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Contradiction By Hyper Detection of 1452
SuperHyperDefensive In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic 1453
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperDimension As Hyper Distinguishing On Super 1456
Distances”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.31956.88961). 1457
49. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Locations By Hyper Differing Of 1458
SuperHyperDimension In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1459
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperDominating As Hyper Closing On Super 1462
Messy”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.21510.45125). 1463
51. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Missing By Hyper Searching Of 1464
SuperHyperDominating In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1465
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperConnected As Hyper Group On Super Surge”, 1468
53. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Outbreak By Hyper Collections Of 1470
SuperHyperConnected In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1471
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperTotal As Hyper Covering On Super 1474
Infections”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.19360.87048). 1475
55. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Extremism By Hyper Treatments Of 1476
SuperHyperTotal In Cancer’s Recognition with (Neutrosophic) 1477
56. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Isolation By Hyper Perfectness Of 1479
SuperHyperPerfect In Cancer’s Recognition with (Neutrosophic) 1480
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperPerfect As Hyper Idealism On Super 1483
Vacancy”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.19911.37285). 1484
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperJoin As Hyper Separations On Super Sorts”, 1486
59. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super connections By Hyper disconnections Of 1488
SuperHyperJoin In Cancer’s Recognition with (Neutrosophic) 1489
60. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Mixed-Devastations By Hyper Decisions 1491
Of SuperHyperDuality In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic 1492
61. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition As (Neutrosophic) 1494
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperDuality As Hyper Imaginations On Super 1495
Mixed-Illustrations”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.33275.80161). 1496
62. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition As (Neutrosophic) 1497
SuperHyperGraph By Path SuperHyperColoring As Hyper Correction On Super 1498
Faults”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.30182.50241). 1499
63. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Reflections By Hyper Rotations Of Path 1500
SuperHyperColoring In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic 1501
64. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas As Hyper Deformations On Super Chains In 1503
Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph By 1504
SuperHyperDensity”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.13444.60806). 1505
65. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas As Hyper Ignorance By SuperHyperDensity On 1506
Super Resistances In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic 1507
SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.16800.05123). 1508
66. Henry Garrett, “New Research On Cancer’s Recognition and Neutrosophic 1509
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian SuperHyperCycles and Hamiltonian Sets As 1510
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-VI”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1511
10.13140/RG.2.2.29913.80482). 1512
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-V”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1515
10.13140/RG.2.2.33269.24809). 1516
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-IV”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1519
10.13140/RG.2.2.34946.96960). 1520
69. Henry Garrett, “A Research On Cancer’s Recognition and Neutrosophic 1521
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-III”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1523
10.13140/RG.2.2.14814.31040). 1524
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-II”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1527
10.13140/RG.2.2.15653.17125). 1528
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-I”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1531
10.13140/RG.2.2.25719.50089). 1532
72. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Disruptions In Cancer’s Extreme 1533
Recognition As Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph By Hyper Plans Called 1534
SuperHyperConnectivities”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1535
10.13140/RG.2.2.29441.94562). 1536
73. Henry Garrett, “Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition As Neutrosophic 1537
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperConnectivities As Hyper Diagnosis On Super 1538
Mechanism”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.17252.24968). 1539
74. Henry Garrett,“Cancer’s Recognition and (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph By 1540
the Criteria of Eulerian and Hamiltonian Type-Sets As Hyper Modified Cycles 1541
On Super Mess”, ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.16652.59525). 1542
75. Henry Garrett,“Eulerian and Hamiltonian In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition 1543
and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph On Super Interactions By Hyper 1544
Extensions of Cycles”, ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.34583.24485). 1545
76. Henry Garrett, “Some Super Hyper Degrees and Co-Super Hyper Degrees on 1546
Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs And Super Hyper Graphs Alongside 1547
Applications in Cancer’s Treatments”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 2(1) 1548
(2023) 35-47. 1549
77. Henry Garrett,“SuperHyperGirth Type-Results on extreme SuperHyperGirth 1550
theory and (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs Toward Cancer’s extreme 1551
Recognition”, Preprints 2023, 2023010396 (doi: 1552
10.20944/preprints202301.0396.v1). 1553
78. Henry Garrett,“Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Warns Hyper Landmark of 1554
neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth In Super Type-Versions of Cancer’s neutrosophic 1555
Recognition”, Preprints 2023, 2023010395 (doi: 1556
10.20944/preprints202301.0395.v1). 1557
79. Henry Garrett,“The Constructions of (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs on the 1558
Cancer’s Recognition in The Confrontation With Super Attacks In Hyper 1559
Situations By Implementing (Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in The 1560
Technical Approaches to Neutralize SuperHyperViews”, ResearchGate 2023, 1561
(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.26240.51204). 1562
80. Henry Garrett,“(Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing As the 1563
Entrepreneurs on Cancer’s Recognitions To Fail Forcing Style As the Super 1564
Classes With Hyper Effects In The Background of the Framework is So-Called 1565
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1566
10.13140/RG.2.2.12818.73925). 1567
81. Henry Garrett,“Super Actions On The Types of Hyper Levels In The Sensible 1568
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth On Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and 1569
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 1570
10.13140/RG.2.2.26836.88960). 1571
82. Henry Garrett,“SuperHyperGirth Approaches on the Super Challenges on the 1572
Cancer’s Recognition In the Hyper Model of (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, 1573
ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.36745.93289). 1574
83. Henry Garrett,“Extreme SuperHyperClique as the Firm Scheme of 1575
Confrontation under Cancer’s Recognition as the Model in The Setting of 1576
10.20944/preprints202301.0308.v1). 1578
84. Henry Garrett,“Uncertainty On The Act And Effect Of Cancer Alongside The 1579
Foggy Positions Of Cells Toward Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique inside 1580
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Titled Cancer’s Recognition”, Preprints 2023, 1581
2023010282 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0282.v1). 1582
85. Henry Garrett,“Neutrosophic Version Of Separates Groups Of Cells In Cancer’s 1583
Recognition On Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010267 1584
(doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0267.v1).). 1585
86. Henry Garrett, “The Shift Paradigm To Classify Separately The Cells and 1586
Affected Cells Toward The Totality Under Cancer’s Recognition By New 1587
Multiple Definitions On the Sets Polynomials Alongside Numbers In The 1588
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperMatching Theory Based on SuperHyperGraph and 1589
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”, Preprints 2023, 2023010265 (doi: 1590
10.20944/preprints202301.0265.v1). 1591
87. Henry Garrett,“Breaking the Continuity and Uniformity of Cancer In The 1592
Worst Case of Full Connections With Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique In 1593
Cancer’s Recognition Applied in (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 1594
2023, 2023010262,(doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0262.v1). 1595
88. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable as the Survivors on the 1596
Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition Based on Uncertainty to All Modes in 1597
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010240 (doi: 1598
10.20944/preprints202301.0240.v1). 1599
89. Henry Garrett, “Extremism of the Attacked Body Under the Cancer’s 1600
Circumstances Where Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) 1601
SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010224, (doi: 1602
10.20944/preprints202301.0224.v1). 1603
90. Henry Garrett,“SuperHyperMatching By (R-)Definitions And Polynomials To 1604
Monitor Cancer’s Recognition In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, 1605
ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.35061.65767). 1606
91. Henry Garrett,“The Focus on The Partitions Obtained By Parallel Moves In 1607
The Cancer’s Extreme Recognition With Different Types of Extreme 1608
SuperHyperMatching Set and Polynomial on (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, 1609
92. Henry Garrett,“Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique Decides the Failures on the 1611
SuperHyperModels Named (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 1613
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.32530.73922). 1614
93. Henry Garrett,“Indeterminacy On The All Possible Connections of Cells In 1615
Front of Cancer’s Attacks In The Terms of Neutrosophic Failed 1616
SuperHyperClique on Cancer’s Recognition called Neutrosophic 1617
SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.15897.70243). 1618
94. Henry Garrett,“Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique Decides the Failures on the 1619
SuperHyperModels Named (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 1621
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.32530.73922). 1622
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 1624
2023010105 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 1625
96. Henry Garrett,“Perfect Directions Toward Idealism in Cancer’s Neutrosophic 1626
Recognition Forwarding Neutrosophic SuperHyperClique on Neutrosophic 1627
97. Henry Garrett,“Demonstrating Complete Connections in Every Embedded 1629
Regions and Sub-Regions in the Terms of Cancer’s Recognition and 1630
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClique”, 1631
10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 1636
10.20944/preprints202301.0088.v1). 1640
100. Henry Garrett,“Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic Regions titled 1641
neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable in Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition 1642
modeled in the Form of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2023, 1643
(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.17385.36968). 1644
Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond”, Preprints 2023, 2023010044 1647
Well- SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 1649
2023010043 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0043.v1). 1650
103. Henry Garrett, “Using the Tool As (Neutrosophic) Failed SuperHyperStable To 1651
SuperHyperModel Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) 1652
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In 1655
Special ViewPoints”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.11447.80803). 1656
Well-SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 1658
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.35774.77123). 1659
Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond ”, ResearchGate 2022, (doi: 1662
10.13140/RG.2.2.36141.77287). 1663
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2022, (doi: 1665
10.13140/RG.2.2.29430.88642). 1666
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2022, (doi: 1669
10.13140/RG.2.2.11369.16487). 1670
Featuring (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances”, Preprints 1672
2022, 2022120549 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0549.v1). 1673
Featuring (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances”, 1675
111. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperAlliances With 1677
Cancer’s Recognitions And Related (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClasses”, 1680
112. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperAlliances With 1682
Cancer’s Recognitions And Related (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClasses”, 1685
ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.20993.12640). 1692
115. Henry Garrett,“Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on 1693
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs and SuperHyperGraphs Alongside 1694
Applications in Cancer’s Treatments”, Preprints 2022, 2022120324 (doi: 1695
10.20944/preprints202212.0324.v1). 1696
116. Henry Garrett, “Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on 1697
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs And SuperHyperGraphs Alongside 1698
Applications in Cancer’s Treatments”, ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 1699
10.13140/RG.2.2.23123.04641). 1700
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”, Preprints 2022, 2022110576 (doi: 1703
10.20944/preprints202211.0576.v1). 1704
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”, ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 1707
10.13140/RG.2.2.23324.56966). 1708
119. Henry Garrett, “Basic Neutrosophic Notions Concerning SuperHyperDominating 1709
and Neutrosophic SuperHyperResolving in SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 1710
2022 (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.29173.86244). 1711
120. Henry Garrett, “Initial Material of Neutrosophic Preliminaries to Study Some 1712
Neutrosophic Notions Based on Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) in 1713
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)”, ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 1714
10.13140/RG.2.2.25385.88160). 1715
121. Henry Garrett, (2022). “Beyond Neutrosophic Graphs”, Ohio: E-publishing: 1716
Educational Publisher 1091 West 1st Ave Grandview Heights, Ohio 43212 1717
United States. ISBN: 979-1-59973-725-6 1718
(http://fs.unm.edu/BeyondNeutrosophicGraphs.pdf). 1719
122. Henry Garrett, (2022). “Neutrosophic Duality”, Florida: GLOBAL 1720
KNOWLEDGE - Publishing House 848 Brickell Ave Ste 950 Miami, Florida 1721
33131 United States. ISBN: 978-1-59973-743-0 1722
(http://fs.unm.edu/NeutrosophicDuality.pdf). 1723
View publication stats

New Ideas in Cancer's Recognition and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph by Space As Hyper Spin On Super Spacy

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

New Ideas in Cancer's Recognition and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph by Space As Hyper Spin On Super Spacy

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

New Ideas In Cancer's Recognition And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph By

Preprint · March 2023

357 PUBLICATIONS 5,560 CITATIONS

Featured Articles View project

Metric Dimension in fuzzy(neutrosophic) Graphs View project

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 2

SuperHyperGraph By Space As Hyper Spin On Super Spacy 3

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · 5

DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA 6

In this scientific research, (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic 8

SuperHyperSpace). Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a Space 9

pair S = (V, E). Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs } and 10

E 0 = {E1 , E2 , . . . , Ez }. Then either V 0 or E 0 is called Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperSpace 11

if S = (V, E) is a probability P space where V is a sample space and E is a function space 12

E : V → [0, 1] such that ab∈V E(ab) = 1; Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperSpace if 13

S = (V, E) is a probability P space where V is a sample space and E is a function space 14

E : V → [0, 1] such that ab∈V E(ab) = 1; and 15

|Ei |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY = |Ej |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY ; Neutrosophic 16

v-SuperHyperSpace if S = (V, E) is a probability P space where V is a sample space and 17

E is a function space E : V → [0, 1] such that ab∈V E(ab) = 1; Neutrosophic 18

rv-SuperHyperSpace if S = (V, E) is a probability P space where V is a sample space and 19

E is a function space E : V → [0, 1] such that ab∈V E(ab) = 1; and 20

|Vi |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY = |Vj |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY ; Neutrosophic 21

SuperHyperSpace if it’s either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperSpace, Neutrosophic 22

re-SuperHyperSpace, Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperSpace, and Neutrosophic 23

rv-SuperHyperSpace. ((Neutrosophic) SuperHyperSpace). Assume a Neutrosophic 24

SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). Consider a Neutrosophic 25

SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) E = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then E is called an Extreme 26

SuperHyperSpace if it’s either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperSpace, Neutrosophic 27

re-SuperHyperSpace, Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperSpace, and Neutrosophic 28

rv-SuperHyperSpace and C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) 29

is the maximum Extreme cardinality of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme 30

cardinality of the Extreme SuperHyperEdges in the consecutive Extreme sequence of 31

Extreme SuperHyperSpace; a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSpace if it’s either of 33

Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperSpace, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperSpace, Neutrosophic 34

v-SuperHyperSpace, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperSpace and C(N SHG) for a 35

Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum Neutrosophic 36

cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S 37

of high Neutrosophic cardinality consecutive Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges and 38

Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Neutrosophic 39

SuperHyperSpace; an Extreme SuperHyperSpace SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of 40

Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperSpace, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperSpace, Neutrosophic 41

v-SuperHyperSpace, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperSpace and C(N SHG) for an 42

Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Extreme SuperHyperPolynomial 43

Extreme cardinality of the Extreme SuperHyperEdges of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S 45

of high Extreme cardinality consecutive Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme 46

Extreme power is corresponded to its Extreme coefficient; a Neutrosophic 48

SuperHyperSpace SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of Neutrosophic 49

e-SuperHyperSpace, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperSpace, Neutrosophic 50

v-SuperHyperSpace, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperSpace and C(N SHG) for a 51

Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Neutrosophic 52

SuperHyperPolynomial contains the Neutrosophic coefficients defined as the 53

Neutrosophic number of the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic 54

SuperHyperEdges of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high Neutrosophic cardinality 55

consecutive Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such 56

corresponded to its Neutrosophic coefficient; an Extreme V-SuperHyperSpace if it’s 58

either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperSpace, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperSpace, 59

Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperSpace, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperSpace and 60

cardinality of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality of the Extreme 62

SuperHyperVertices in the consecutive Extreme sequence of Extreme SuperHyperEdges 63

Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperSpace if it’s either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperSpace, 65