Professional Documents
Culture Documents
(Extreme) SuperHyperGraph 4
1 ABSTRACT 8
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Dominating and C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the 32
Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 35
Dominating, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperReverse Connective Dominating and C(N SHG) for a 39
Dominating and C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the 48
form the Extreme SuperHyperReverse Connective Dominating; and the Extreme power is 53
Dominating and C(N SHG) for a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the 58
that they form the Neutrosophic SuperHyperReverse Connective Dominating; and the 63
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Dominating and C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the 68
Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 71
Dominating, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperReverse Connective Dominating and C(N SHG) for a 75
Dominating and C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the 84
form the Extreme SuperHyperReverse Connective Dominating; and the Extreme power is 89
Dominating and C(N SHG) for a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the 94
Dominating; and the Neutrosophic power is corresponded to its Neutrosophic coefficient. In 100
this scientific research, new setting is introduced for new SuperHyperNotions, namely, a 101
Two different types of SuperHyperDefinitions are debut for them but the research goes 103
on that are well-defined and well-reviewed. The literature review is implemented in the 105
whole of this research. For shining the elegancy and the significancy of this research, the 106
fundamental SuperHyperNumbers are featured. The definitions are followed by the 108
examples and the instances thus the clarifications are driven with different tools. The 109
applications are figured out to make sense about the theoretical aspect of this ongoing 110
research. The “Cancer’s Recognition” are the under research to figure out the 111
challenges make sense about ongoing and upcoming research. The special case is up. 112
The cells are viewed in the deemed ways. There are different types of them. Some of 113
them are individuals and some of them are well-modeled by the group of cells. These 114
types are all officially called “SuperHyperVertex” but the relations amid them all 115
“Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” are chosen and elected to research about “Cancer’s 117
Recognition”. Thus these complex and dense SuperHyperModels open up some avenues 118
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
to research on theoretical segments and “Cancer’s Recognition”. Some avenues are 119
posed to pursue this research. It’s also officially collected in the form of some questions 120
maximum cardinality such that either of the following expressions hold for the 123
|S ∩ N (s)| > |S ∩ (V \ N (s))| + δ; and |S ∩ N (s)| < |S ∩ (V \ N (s))| + δ. The first 125
cardinality such that either of the following expressions hold for the Neutrosophic 129
and |S ∩ N (s)|N eutrosophic < |S ∩ (V \ N (s))|N eutrosophic + δ. The first Expression, 132
version of a SuperHyperReverse Connective Dominating . Since there’s more ways to get 135
type-results to make a SuperHyperReverse Connective Dominating more understandable. For the 136
and the SuperHyperEdges are assigned by the labels from the letters of the alphabets. 139
In this procedure, there’s the usage of the position of labels to assign to the values. 140
SuperHyperReverse Connective Dominating if the mentioned Table holds, concerning, “The 142
The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” with the key points, “The Values of The 144
Vertices & The Number of Position in Alphabet”, “The Values of The 145
SuperVertices&The maximum Values of Its Vertices”, “The Values of The Edges&The 146
maximum Values of Its Vertices”, “The Values of The HyperEdges&The maximum 147
Values of Its Vertices”, “The Values of The SuperHyperEdges&The maximum Values of 148
Its Endpoints”. To get structural examples and instances, I’m going to introduce the 149
Dominating . It’s the main. It’ll be disciplinary to have the foundation of previous 151
definition in the kind of SuperHyperClass. If there’s a need to have all SuperHyperReverse 152
Connective Dominating until the SuperHyperReverse Connective Dominating, then it’s officially called a 153
Dominating . There are some instances about the clarifications for the main definition 155
titled a “SuperHyperReverse Connective Dominating ”. These two examples get more scrutiny 156
and discernment since there are characterized in the disciplinary ways of the 157
SuperHyperClass based on a SuperHyperReverse Connective Dominating . For the sake of having 158
SuperHyperEdges are assigned by the labels from the letters of the alphabets. In this 162
procedure, there’s the usage of the position of labels to assign to the values. Assume a 163
intended Table holds. And a SuperHyperReverse Connective Dominating are redefined to a 165
“Neutrosophic SuperHyperReverse Connective Dominating” if the intended Table holds. It’s useful 166
to define “Neutrosophic” version of SuperHyperClasses. Since there’s more ways to get 167
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
where it’s the strongest [the maximum Neutrosophic value from all the SuperHyperReverse 177
Connective Dominating amid the maximum value amid all SuperHyperVertices from a 178
SuperHyperEdges are the same. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. There are 181
some SuperHyperClasses as follows. It’s SuperHyperPath if it’s only one SuperVertex as 182
intersection amid two given SuperHyperEdges with two exceptions; it’s 183
SuperHyperReverse Connective Dominating if it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two 184
given SuperHyperEdges; it’s SuperHyperStar it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection 185
amid all SuperHyperEdges; it’s SuperHyperBipartite it’s only one SuperVertex as 186
intersection amid two given SuperHyperEdges and these SuperVertices, forming two 187
only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two given SuperHyperEdges and these 189
SuperVertices, forming multi separate sets, has no SuperHyperEdge in common; it’s a 190
SuperHyperWheel if it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two given 191
SuperHyperEdges and one SuperVertex has one SuperHyperEdge with any common 192
SuperVertex. The SuperHyperModel proposes the specific designs and the specific 193
common and intended properties between “specific” cells and “specific group” of cells 197
the future research, the foundation will be based on the “Cancer’s Recognition” and the 201
results and the definitions will be introduced in redeemed ways. The recognition of the 202
cancer in the long-term function. The specific region has been assigned by the model 203
[it’s called SuperHyperGraph] and the long cycle of the move from the cancer is 204
identified by this research. Sometimes the move of the cancer hasn’t be easily identified 205
since there are some determinacy, indeterminacy and neutrality about the moves and 206
the effects of the cancer on that region; this event leads us to choose another model [it’s 207
happened and what’s done. There are some specific models, which are well-known and 209
they’ve got the names, and some SuperHyperGeneral SuperHyperModels. The moves 210
and the traces of the cancer on the complex tracks and between complicated groups of 211
SuperHyperWheel). The aim is to find either the longest SuperHyperReverse Connective 214
SuperHyperReverse Connective Dominating, and the strongest SuperHyperReverse Connective Dominating, 217
called Neutrosophic SuperHyperReverse Connective Dominating, some general results are 218
introduced. Beyond that in SuperHyperStar, all possible SuperHyperPaths have only 219
two SuperHyperEdges but it’s not enough since it’s essential to have at least three 220
SuperHyperEdges to form any style of a SuperHyperReverse Connective Dominating. There isn’t 221
any formation of any SuperHyperReverse Connective Dominating but literarily, it’s the 222
deformation of any SuperHyperReverse Connective Dominating. It, literarily, deforms and it 223
doesn’t form. A basic familiarity with Neutrosophic SuperHyperReverse Connective Dominating 224
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
In this scientific research, there are some ideas in the featured frameworks of 231
motivations. I try to bring the motivations in the narrative ways. Some cells have been 232
faced with some attacks from the situation which is caused by the cancer’s attacks. In 233
this case, there are some embedded analysis on the ongoing situations which in that, the 234
cells could be labelled as some groups and some groups or individuals have excessive 235
labels which all are raised from the behaviors to overcome the cancer’s attacks. In the 236
embedded situations, the individuals of cells and the groups of cells could be considered 237
as “new groups”. Thus it motivates us to find the proper SuperHyperModels for getting 238
more proper analysis on this messy story. I’ve found the SuperHyperModels which are 239
SuperHyperModel, the cells and the groups of cells are defined as “SuperHyperVertices” 241
and the relations between the individuals of cells and the groups of cells are defined as 242
SuperHyperModel based on the “Cancer’s Recognition”. Sometimes, the situations get 244
worst. The situation is passed from the certainty and precise style. Thus it’s the beyond 245
them. There are three descriptions, namely, the degrees of determinacy, indeterminacy 246
and neutrality, for any object based on vague forms, namely, incomplete data, imprecise 247
data, and uncertain analysis. The latter model could be considered on the previous 248
called “Extreme SuperHyperGraphs”. The cancer is the disease but the model is going 250
to figure out what’s going on this phenomenon. The special case of this disease is 251
considered and as the consequences of the model, some parameters are used. The cells 252
are under attack of this disease but the moves of the cancer in the special region are the 253
matter of mind. The recognition of the cancer could help to find some treatments for 254
this disease. The SuperHyperGraph and Extreme SuperHyperGraph are the 255
SuperHyperModels on the “Cancer’s Recognition” and both bases are the background 256
of this research. Sometimes the cancer has been happened on the region, full of cells, 257
groups of cells and embedded styles. In this segment, the SuperHyperModel proposes 258
some SuperHyperNotions based on the connectivities of the moves of the cancer in the 259
forms of alliances’ styles with the formation of the design and the architecture are 260
formally called “ SuperHyperReverse Connective Dominating” in the themes of jargons and 261
buzzwords. The prefix “SuperHyper” refers to the theme of the embedded styles to 262
figure out the background for the SuperHyperNotions. The recognition of the cancer in 263
the long-term function. The specific region has been assigned by the model [it’s called 264
SuperHyperGraph] and the long cycle of the move from the cancer is identified by this 265
research. Sometimes the move of the cancer hasn’t be easily identified since there are 266
some determinacy, indeterminacy and neutrality about the moves and the effects of the 267
cancer on that region; this event leads us to choose another model [it’s said to be 268
what’s done. There are some specific models, which are well-known and they’ve got the 270
names, and some general models. The moves and the traces of the cancer on the 271
complex tracks and between complicated groups of cells could be fantasized by an 272
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
either the optimal SuperHyperReverse Connective Dominating or the Extreme SuperHyperReverse 275
Connective Dominating in those Extreme SuperHyperModels. Some general results are 276
have only two SuperHyperEdges but it’s not enough since it’s essential to have at least 278
three SuperHyperEdges to form any style of a SuperHyperReverse Connective Dominating. There 279
isn’t any formation of any SuperHyperReverse Connective Dominating but literarily, it’s the 280
deformation of any SuperHyperReverse Connective Dominating. It, literarily, deforms and it 281
Question 2.1. How to define the SuperHyperNotions and to do research on them to 283
find the “ amount of SuperHyperReverse Connective Dominating” of either individual of cells or the 284
groups of cells based on the fixed cell or the fixed group of cells, extensively, the “amount 285
of SuperHyperReverse Connective Dominating” based on the fixed groups of cells or the fixed groups 286
Question 2.2. What are the best descriptions for the “Cancer’s Recognition” in terms 288
of these messy and dense SuperHyperModels where embedded notions are illustrated? 289
It’s motivation to find notions to use in this dense model is titled 290
taken more motivations to define SuperHyperClasses and to find some connections amid 294
instances and examples to make clarifications about the framework of this research. The 296
general results and some results about some connections are some avenues to make key 297
point of this research, “Cancer’s Recognition”, more understandable and more clear. 298
The framework of this research is as follows. In the beginning, I introduce basic 299
deeply-introduced and in-depth-discussed. The elementary concepts are clarified and 302
illustrated completely and sometimes review literature are applied to make sense about 303
what’s going to figure out about the upcoming sections. The main definitions and their 304
clarifications alongside some results about new notions, SuperHyperReverse Connective 305
Dominating and Extreme SuperHyperReverse Connective Dominating, are figured out in sections “ 306
In the sense of tackling on getting results and in Reverse Connective Dominating to make sense 308
about continuing the research, the ideas of SuperHyperUniform and Extreme 309
SuperHyperClasses are figured out to debut what’s done in this section, titled “Results 311
to origin of the notions, there are some smart steps toward the common notions to 313
extend the new notions in new frameworks, SuperHyperGraph and Extreme 314
SuperHyperRelations and as concluding and closing section of theoretical research are 317
contained in the section “General Results”. Some general SuperHyperRelations are 318
and discussed in the sections, “General Results”, “ SuperHyperReverse Connective Dominating”, 320
“Results on Extreme SuperHyperClasses”. There are curious questions about what’s 322
done about the SuperHyperNotions to make sense about excellency of this research and 323
going to figure out the word “best” as the description and adjective for this research as 324
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
research debut in the section “Applications in Cancer’s Recognition” with two cases and 326
as SuperHyperModel”. In the section, “Open Problems”, there are some scrutiny and 329
discernment on what’s done and what’s happened in this research in the terms of 330
“questions” and “problems” to make sense to figure out this research in featured style. 331
The advantages and the limitations of this research alongside about what’s done in this 332
research to make sense and to get sense about what’s figured out are included in the 333
In this section, the basic material in this scientific research, is referred to [Single Valued 337
2.7,p.3), [t-norm](Ref. [1], Definition 2.7, p.3), and [Characterization of the 341
(Ref. [1],Definition 5.4,p.7). Also, the new ideas and their clarifications are addressed 345
In this subsection, the basic material which is used in this scientific research, is 347
presented. Also, the new ideas and their clarifications are elicited. 348
Definition 3.2 (Single Valued Neutrosophic Set). (Ref. [1],Definition 2.2,p.2). 352
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
2.5,p.2). 354
(i) V = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vn } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of V 0 ; 357
(ii) V = {(Vi , TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi )) : TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi ) ≥ 0}, (i = 358
1, 2, . . . , n); 359
(iii) E = {E1 , E2 , . . . , En0 } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of 360
V; 361
(iv) E = {(Ei0 , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )) : TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 ) ≥ 0}, (i0 = 362
1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 363
P
(vii) i supp(Vi ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 366
0 0
P
(viii) i0 supp(Ei ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n );
0 367
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) Vj are single valued Neutrosophic sets. TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), 370
TV0 (Ei0 ), TV0 (Ei0 ), and TV0 (Ei0 ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 374
SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) are of the form (Vi , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )), the sets V 378
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
(iii) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called edge; 388
(iv) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 389
HyperEdge; 390
(v) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called 391
SuperEdge; 392
(vi) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 393
SuperHyperEdge. 394
If we choose different types of binary operations, then we could get hugely diverse 395
A binary operation ⊗ : [0, 1] × [0, 1] → [0, 1] is a t-norm if it satisfies the following 398
(i) 1 ⊗ x = x; 400
(ii) x ⊗ y = y ⊗ x; 401
(iii) x ⊗ (y ⊗ z) = (x ⊗ y) ⊗ z; 402
0
(i) V = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vn } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of V ; 407
(ii) V = {(Vi , TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi )) : TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi ) ≥ 0}, (i = 408
1, 2, . . . , n); 409
(iii) E = {E1 , E2 , . . . , En0 } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of 410
V; 411
(iv) E = {(Ei0 , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )) : TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 ) ≥ 0}, (i0 = 412
1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 413
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
P
(vii) i supp(Vi ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 416
0 0
P
(viii) i0 supp(Ei0 ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n ). 417
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) Vj are single valued Neutrosophic sets. TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), 419
TV0 (Ei0 ), TV0 (Ei0 ), and TV0 (Ei0 ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 423
SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) are of the form (Vi , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )), the sets V 427
(iii) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called edge; 437
(iv) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 438
HyperEdge; 439
(v) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called 440
SuperEdge; 441
(vi) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 442
SuperHyperEdge. 443
This SuperHyperModel is too messy and too dense. Thus there’s a need to have 444
some restrictions and conditions on SuperHyperGraph. The special case of this 445
(ii). it’s SuperHyperCycle if it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two 455
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
(iii). it’s SuperHyperStar it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid all 457
SuperHyperEdges; 458
(iv). it’s SuperHyperBipartite it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two 459
given SuperHyperEdges and these SuperVertices, forming two separate sets, has 460
(v). it’s SuperHyperMultiPartite it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid 462
two given SuperHyperEdges and these SuperVertices, forming multi separate sets, 463
(vi). it’s SuperHyperWheel if it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two 465
given SuperHyperEdges and one SuperVertex has one SuperHyperEdge with any 466
V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs
(iii) there’s a SuperVertex Vi0 ∈ Vi such that Vi0 , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 473
(iv) there’s a vertex vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that Vi , vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 474
0 0
(v) there’s a SuperVertex Vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that Vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 475
(vi) there are a vertex vi ∈ Vi and a vertex vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that vi , vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 476
0 0
(vii) there are a vertex vi ∈ Vi and a SuperVertex Vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 477
(viii) there are a SuperVertex Vi0 ∈ Vi and a vertex vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that Vi0 , vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 478
V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs ,
(i) If for all Vi , Ej 0 , |Vi | = 1, |Ej 0 | = 2, then NSHP is called path; 483
(ii) if for all Ej 0 , |Ej 0 | = 2, and there’s Vi , |Vi | ≥ 1, then NSHP is called SuperPath; 484
(iii) if for all Vi , Ej 0 , |Vi | = 1, |Ej 0 | ≥ 2, then NSHP is called HyperPath; 485
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
(iv) if there are Vi , Ej 0 , |Vi | ≥ 1, |Ej 0 | ≥ 2, then NSHP is called Neutrosophic 486
SuperHyperPath . 487
(iv) Neutrosophic strength (min{T (Vi )}, min{I(Vi )}, min{F (Vi )})si=1 . 494
where 1 ≤ i, j ≤ s. 511
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 545
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Dominating, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperReverse Connective Dominating and C(N SHG) 550
SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 554
Dominating, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperReverse Connective Dominating and C(N SHG) 559
SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 564
contains the Neutrosophic coefficients defined as the Neutrosophic number of the 573
they form the Neutrosophic SuperHyperReverse Connective Dominating; and the 577
Dominating, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperReverse Connective Dominating and C(N SHG) 582
SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 586
Dominating, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperReverse Connective Dominating and C(N SHG) 591
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
contains the Extreme coefficients defined as the Extreme number of the maximum 603
SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 606
contains the Neutrosophic coefficients defined as the Neutrosophic number of the 615
they form the Neutrosophic SuperHyperReverse Connective Dominating; and the 619
Neutrosophic SuperHyperReverse Connective Dominating such that either of the following 624
s∈S: 626
kind of Neutrosophic SuperHyperReverse Connective Dominating such that either of the 630
SuperHyperNeighbors of s ∈ S : 632
δ−SuperHyperDefensive. 635
For the sake of having a Neutrosophic SuperHyperReverse Connective Dominating, there’s a 636
SuperHyperVertices and the SuperHyperEdges are assigned by the labels from the 638
letters of the alphabets. In this procedure, there’s the usage of the position of labels to 639
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
S = (V, E). It’s redefined Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph if the Table (1) holds. 642
understandable. 645
S = (V, E). There are some Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses if the Table (2) 647
For the sake of having a Neutrosophic SuperHyperReverse Connective Dominating, there’s a 657
Dominating”. The SuperHyperVertices and the SuperHyperEdges are assigned by the 659
labels from the letters of the alphabets. In this procedure, there’s the usage of the 660
Forms 666
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
X
E(A) = E(a). (4.1)
a∈A
Y
E(∩i∈I Ai ) = P (Ai ).
i∈I
S = (V, E) is a probability Reverse Connective Dominating. Any k-function Reverse Connective 681
Dominating like E is called Extreme k-Variable. If k = 2, then any 2-function Reverse 682
number is called Extreme Expectation if the following expression is called Extreme 688
X
Ex(E) = E(α)P (α).
α∈V
Extreme Crossing if the following expression is called Extreme Crossing criteria 693
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Lemma 4.6. Assume an Extreme SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). 694
Consider S = (V, E) is a probability Reverse Connective Dominating. Let m and n propose special 695
Proof. Consider a planar embedding G of G with cr(G) crossings. Let S be an Extreme 697
independently with probability Reverse Connective Dominating p := 4n/m, and set H := G[S] 699
p4 cr(G) ≥ p2 m − 3pn.
pm − 3n n 1 3 2
cr(G) ≥ 3
= 3 = m n .
p (4n/m) 64
702
Theorem 4.7. Assume an Extreme SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). 703
points in the plane, and let l be the Extreme number of SuperHyperLines √ in the plane 705
passing through at least k + 1 of these points, where 1 ≤ k ≤ 2 2n. Then l < 32n2 /k 3 . 706
P whose SuperHyperEdge are the segments between consecutive points on the 708
choose two. Thus either kl < 4n, in which case l < 4n/k ≤ 32n2 /k 3 , or 711
3
l2 /2 > l choose 2 ≥ cr(G) ≥ (kl) /64n2 by the Extreme Crossing Lemma, and again 712
2 3
l < 32n /k . 713
Theorem 4.8. Assume an Extreme SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). 714
points in the plane, and let k be the number of pairs of points of P at unit 716
Proof. Assume an Extreme SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). Consider 718
n−1
X
e(H) = ini = 2k − n1 − 2n2 ≥ 2k − 2n.
i=3
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
SuperHyperCircles, and any two SuperHyperCircles cross at most twice. Thus either 730
3
e(G) < 4n, in which case k < 5n < 5n4/3 , or n2 > n(n − 1) ≥ cr(G) ≥ (k − n) /64n2 731
4/3 4/3
by the Extreme Crossing Lemma, and k < 4n + n < 5n . 732
S = (V, E). Consider S = (V, E) is a probability Reverse Connective Dominating. Let X be a 734
E(X)
P (X ≥ t) ≤ .
t
Proof.
X X
E(X) = {X(a)P (a) : a ∈ V } ≥ {X(a)P (a) : a ∈ V, X(a) ≥ t}
X X
{tP (a) : a ∈ V, X(a) ≥ t} = t {P (a) : a ∈ V, X(a) ≥ t}
tP (X ≥ t).
Dividing the first and last members by t yields the asserted inequality. 736
S = (V, E). Consider S = (V, E) is a probability Reverse Connective Dominating. Let Xn be a 738
Proof. 741
S = (V, E). Consider S = (V, E) is a probability Reverse Connective Dominating. A special 743
SuperHyperGraph in Gn,p almost surely has stability number at most d2p−1 log ne. 744
Proof. Assume an Extreme SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). Consider 745
(1 − p)(k+1)choose2 , this being the probability that none of the (k + 1)choose2 pairs of 749
Let AS denote the event that S is a stable SuperHyperSet of G, and let XS denote 751
the indicator Extreme Variable for this Extreme Event. By equation, we have 752
X
X= {XS : S ⊆ V, |S| = k + 1}
X
E(X) = {E(XS ) : S ⊆ V, |S| = k + 1} = (n choose k+1)(1 − p)(k+1)choose2 .
nk+1
(n choose k+1) ≤ and1 − p ≤ e−p .
(k + 1)!
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Suppose now that k = d2p−1 log ne. Then k ≥ 2p−1 log n, so ne−pk/2 ≤ 1. Because k 757
grows at least as fast as the logarithm of n, implies that E(X) → 0 as n → ∞. Because 758
number is called Extreme Variance if the following expression is called Extreme 765
2
V x(E) = Ex((X − Ex(X)) ).
S = (V, E). Consider S = (V, E) is a probability Reverse Connective Dominating. Let X be an 768
V (X)
E(|X − Ex(X)| ≥ t) ≤ .
t2
Proof. Assume an Extreme SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). Consider 770
S = (V, E) is a probability Reverse Connective Dominating. Let X be an Extreme Variable and 771
2
2 Ex((X − Ex(X)) ) V (X)
E(|X − Ex(X)| ≥ t) = E((X − Ex(X)) ≥ t2 ) ≤ 2
= .
t t2
773
S = (V, E). Consider S = (V, E) is a probability Reverse Connective Dominating. Let Xn be an 775
E(Xn = 0) → 0 as n → ∞
Proof. Assume an Extreme SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). Consider 778
Chebyshev’s Inequality, and observe that E(Xn = 0) ≤ E(|Xn − Ex(Xn )| ≥ |Ex(Xn )|) 780
Theorem 4.15. Assume an Extreme SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). 782
Consider S = (V, E) is a probability Reverse Connective Dominating. Let G ∈ Gn,1/2 . For 0 ≤ k ≤ n, 783
set f (k) := (n choose k)2−(k choose 2) and let k ∗ be the least value of k for which f (k) is 784
less than one. Then almost surely α(G) takes one of the three values k ∗ − 2, k ∗ − 1, k ∗ . 785
Proof. Assume an Extreme SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). Consider 786
S = (V, E) is a probability Reverse Connective Dominating. As in the proof of related Theorem, 787
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
S = (V, E). Consider S = (V, E) is a probability Reverse Connective Dominating. Let G ∈ Gn,1/2 790
∗ ∗ ∗
(i). f (k ) << 1, in which case almost surely α(G) is equal to either k − 2 or k − 1, 792
or 793
(ii). f (k ∗ − 1) >> 1, in which case almost surely α(G) is equal to either k ∗ − 1 or k ∗ . 794
Proof. Assume an Extreme SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). Consider 795
SuperHyperGraphs (one which is preserved when SuperHyperEdges are added). Then a 800
(i). if p << f (n), then G ∈ Gn,p almost surely does not have P, 802
SuperHyperGraph. Then there is a threshold function for the property of containing a 807
S = (V, E). Consider S = (V, E) is a probability Reverse Connective Dominating. Let F be a 810
SuperHyperEdges. Then n−k/l is a threshold function for the property of containing F 812
Proof. Assume an Extreme SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). Consider 814
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
827
837
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
straightforward. 840
841
straightforward. 844
845
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
straightforward. 848
straightforward. 852
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
straightforward. 856
857
straightforward. 860
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
861
straightforward. 864
straightforward. 868
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
869
straightforward. 872
873
straightforward. 876
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
877
straightforward. 880
straightforward. 884
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
885
straightforward. 888
889
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
straightforward. 892
893
straightforward. 896
897
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
straightforward. 900
901
straightforward. 904
905
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
straightforward. 908
909
straightforward. 912
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
913
straightforward. 916
917
Proposition 4.21. Assume a connected Extreme SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). 918
The all interior Extreme SuperHyperVertices belong to any Extreme quasi-R-Reverse Connective 919
Dominating if for any of them, and any of other corresponded Extreme SuperHyperVertex, 920
with no Extreme exception at all minus all Extreme SuperHypeNeighbors to any amount 922
of them. 923
ESHG : (V, E). There’s only one Extreme SuperHyperEdge E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) has only 925
the maximum possibilities of the distinct interior Extreme SuperHyperVertices inside of 926
any given Extreme quasi-R-Reverse Connective Dominating minus all Extreme SuperHypeNeighbor to 927
some of them but not all of them. In other words, there’s only an unique Extreme 928
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
an Extreme quasi-R-Reverse Connective Dominating, minus all Extreme SuperHypeNeighbor to some 930
V \ (V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . . , zE }).
It’s straightforward that the Extreme cardinality of the Extreme R-Reverse Connective Dominating is 932
at least the maximum Extreme number of Extreme SuperHyperVertices of the Extreme 933
SuperHyperEdges with the maximum number of the Extreme SuperHyperEdges. In other 934
words, the maximum number of the Extreme SuperHyperEdges contains the maximum 935
Extreme number of Extreme SuperHyperVertices are renamed to Extreme Reverse Connective 936
Dominating in some cases but the maximum number of the Extreme SuperHyperEdge with 937
the maximum Extreme number of Extreme SuperHyperVertices, has the Extreme 938
Proposition 4.24. Assume a simple Extreme SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). Then
the Extreme number of type-result-R-Reverse Connective Dominating has, the least Extreme
cardinality, the lower sharp Extreme bound for Extreme cardinality, is the Extreme
cardinality of
If there’s an Extreme type-result-R-Reverse Connective Dominating with the least Extreme 940
C(N SHG)ExtremeQuasi−ReverseConnectiveDominating
= {V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , E3 , V4 , E4 , V1 }.
C(N SHG)ExtremeQuasi−ReverseConnectiveDominatingSuperHyperP olynomial = z 4 .
C(N SHG)ExtremeQuasi−ReverseConnectiveDominating = {V1 , V2 , V3 , V4 , V1 }.
C(N SHG)ExtremeR−Quasi−ReverseConnectiveDominatingSuperHyperP olynomial = z 5 .
Is an Extreme type-result-Reverse Connective Dominating. In other words, the least cardinality, the 944
lower sharp bound for the cardinality, of an Extreme type-result-Reverse Connective Dominating is 945
C(N SHG)ExtremeQuasi−ReverseConnectiveDominating
= {V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , E3 , V4 , E4 , V1 }.
C(N SHG)ExtremeQuasi−ReverseConnectiveDominatingSuperHyperP olynomial = z 4 .
C(N SHG)ExtremeQuasi−ReverseConnectiveDominating = {V1 , V2 , V3 , V4 , V1 }.
C(N SHG)ExtremeR−Quasi−ReverseConnectiveDominatingSuperHyperP olynomial = z 5 .
Proof. Assume a connected loopless Extreme SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). The
SuperHyperSet of the SuperHyperVertices V \ V \ {z} isn’t a quasi-R-Reverse Connective
Dominating since neither amount of Extreme SuperHyperEdges nor amount of
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Is a quasi-R-Reverse Connective Dominating. In other words, the least cardinality, the lower
sharp bound for the cardinality, of a quasi-R-Reverse Connective Dominating is the cardinality of
Then we’ve lost some connected loopless Extreme SuperHyperClasses of the connected
loopless Extreme SuperHyperGraphs titled free-triangle, on-triangle, and their
quasi-types but the SuperHyperStable is only up in this quasi-R-Reverse Connective Dominating.
It’s the contradiction to that fact on the generality. There are some counterexamples to
deny this statement. One of them comes from the setting of the graph titled path and
cycle as the counterexamples-classes or reversely direction star as the examples-classes,
are well-known classes in that setting and they could be considered as the
examples-classes and counterexamples-classes for the tight bound of
Let V \ V \ {z} in mind. There’s no necessity on the SuperHyperEdge since we need at 947
principles of the main definition since there’s no condition to be satisfied but the 949
SuperHyperSet has the necessary condition for the intended definition to be applied. 952
Thus the V \ V \ {z} is withdrawn not by the conditions of the main definition but by 953
the necessity of the pre-condition on the usage of the main definition. 954
The Extreme structure of the Extreme R-Reverse Connective Dominating decorates the
Extreme SuperHyperVertices don’t have received any Extreme connections so as this
Extreme style implies different versions of Extreme SuperHyperEdges with the
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Comes up. This Extreme case implies having the Extreme style of on-quasi-triangle
Extreme style on the every Extreme elements of this Extreme SuperHyperSet. Precisely,
the Extreme R-Reverse Connective Dominating is the Extreme SuperHyperSet of the Extreme
SuperHyperVertices such that some Extreme amount of the Extreme
SuperHyperVertices are on-quasi-triangle Extreme style. The Extreme cardinality of the
v SuperHypeSet
But the lower Extreme bound is up. Thus the minimum Extreme cardinality of the
maximum Extreme cardinality ends up the Extreme discussion. The first Extreme term
refers to the Extreme setting of the Extreme SuperHyperGraph but this key point is
enough since there’s an Extreme SuperHyperClass of an Extreme SuperHyperGraph has
no on-quasi-triangle Extreme style amid some amount of its Extreme
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Is an Extreme R-Reverse Connective Dominating for the Extreme SuperHyperGraph as used 955
Extreme background in the Extreme terms of worst Extreme case and the common 956
theme of the lower Extreme bound occurred in the specific Extreme SuperHyperClasses 957
V \ (V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . . , zE }).
Zi ∼ Zj , i 6= j, i, j = 1, 2, . . . , z.
where the ∼ isn’t an equivalence relation but only the symmetric relation on the
Extreme SuperHyperVertices of the Extreme SuperHyperGraph. The formal definition
is as follows.
Zi ∼ Zj , i 6= j, i, j = 1, 2, . . . , z
if and only if Zi and Zj are the Extreme SuperHyperVertices and there’s only and only
one Extreme SuperHyperEdge E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) between the Extreme
SuperHyperVertices Zi and Zj . The other definition for the Extreme SuperHyperEdge
E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) in the terms of Extreme R-Reverse Connective Dominating is
{aE , bE , cE , . . . , zE } .
This definition coincides with the definition of the Extreme R-Reverse Connective Dominating
but with slightly differences in the maximum Extreme cardinality amid those Extreme
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
and
E
E = {Z1 , Z2 , . . . , Zz | Zi ∼ Zj , i 6= j, i, j = 1, 2, . . . , z}.
Or
{aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .
V \ (V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . . , zE }).
It’s straightforward that the Extreme cardinality of the Extreme R-Reverse Connective 961
the Extreme SuperHyperEdges with the maximum number of the Extreme 963
SuperHyperVertices are renamed to Extreme Reverse Connective Dominating in some cases but 966
the maximum number of the Extreme SuperHyperEdge with the maximum Extreme 967
some issues about the Extreme optimal SuperHyperObject. It specially delivers some 972
remarks on the Extreme SuperHyperSet of the Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that 973
there’s distinct amount of Extreme SuperHyperEdges for distinct amount of Extreme 974
SuperHyperVertices up to all taken from that Extreme SuperHyperSet of the Extreme 975
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
SuperHyperModel, there’s at least one Extreme SuperHyperEdge containing at least all 979
where the Extreme completion of the Extreme incidence is up in that. Thus it’s, 981
SuperHyperCardinality. Thus the embedded setting is elected such that those 985
Extreme SuperHyperOptimal. The less than two distinct types of Extreme 987
SuperHyperVertices are included in the minimum Extreme style of the embedded 988
Extreme R-Reverse Connective Dominating. The interior types of the Extreme 989
are only affected by the interior Extreme SuperHyperVertices. The common 991
connections, more precise and more formal, the perfect unique connections inside the 992
Extreme SuperHyperSet for any distinct types of Extreme SuperHyperVertices pose the 993
Extreme R-Reverse Connective Dominating. Thus Extreme exterior SuperHyperVertices could be 994
used only in one Extreme SuperHyperEdge and in Extreme SuperHyperRelation with 995
embedded Extreme Reverse Connective Dominating, there’s the usage of exterior Extreme 997
SuperHyperVertices since they’ve more connections inside more than outside. Thus the 998
title “exterior” is more relevant than the title “interior”. One Extreme 999
SuperHyperVertex has no connection, inside. Thus, the Extreme SuperHyperSet of the 1000
Extreme SuperHyperVertices with one SuperHyperElement has been ignored in the 1001
exploring to lead on the optimal case implying the Extreme R-Reverse Connective Dominating. 1002
The Extreme R-Reverse Connective Dominating with the exclusion of the exclusion of all 1003
Extreme SuperHyperVertices in one Extreme SuperHyperEdge and with other terms, 1004
the Extreme R-Reverse Connective Dominating with the inclusion of all Extreme 1005
SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). There’s only one Extreme SuperHyperEdge 1008
E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) has only the maximum possibilities of the distinct interior Extreme 1009
SuperHyperVertices inside of any given Extreme quasi-R-Reverse Connective Dominating minus 1010
all Extreme SuperHypeNeighbor to some of them but not all of them. In other words, 1011
there’s only an unique Extreme SuperHyperEdge E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) has only two 1012
minus all Extreme SuperHypeNeighbor to some of them but not all of them. 1014
The main definition of the Extreme R-Reverse Connective Dominating has two titles. an 1015
Extreme quasi-R-Reverse Connective Dominating and its corresponded quasi-maximum Extreme 1016
R-SuperHyperCardinality are two titles in the terms of quasi-R-styles. For any Extreme 1017
number, there’s an Extreme quasi-R-Reverse Connective Dominating with that quasi-maximum 1018
Extreme quasi-SuperHyperNotions lead us to take the collection of all the Extreme 1021
quasi-R-Reverse Connective Dominatings for all Extreme numbers less than its Extreme 1022
corresponded maximum number. The essence of the Extreme Reverse Connective Dominating 1023
ends up but this essence starts up in the terms of the Extreme quasi-R-Reverse Connective 1024
Dominating, again and more in the operations of collecting all the Extreme quasi-R-Reverse 1025
Connective Dominatings acted on the all possible used formations of the Extreme 1026
considered as the equivalence class for all corresponded quasi-R-Reverse Connective 1028
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
As its consequences, the formal definition of the Extreme Reverse Connective Dominating is 1032
To get more precise perceptions, the follow-up expressions propose another formal 1034
In more concise and more convenient ways, the modified definition for the Extreme 1036
To translate the statement to this mathematical literature, the formulae will be revised. 1038
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
To get more visions in the closer look-up, there’s an overall overlook. 1040
GExtreme Reverse Connective Dominating ∈ ∪zExtreme Number [zExtreme Number ]Extreme Class =
∪zExtreme Number {SExtreme SuperHyperSet |
SExtreme SuperHyperSet = GExtreme Reverse Connective Dominating ,
|SExtreme SuperHyperSet |Extreme Cardinality
= max |E| | E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.
1041
Now, the extension of these types of approaches is up. Since the new term, “Extreme 1044
SuperHyperVertices such that any amount of its Extreme SuperHyperVertices are 1046
incident to an Extreme SuperHyperEdge. It’s, literarily, another name for “Extreme 1047
Quasi-Reverse Connective Dominating” but, precisely, it’s the generalization of “Extreme 1048
Quasi-Reverse Connective Dominating” since “Extreme Quasi-Reverse Connective Dominating” happens 1049
and background but “Extreme SuperHyperNeighborhood” may not happens “Extreme 1051
preliminarily background since there are some ambiguities about the Extreme 1053
SuperHyperCardinality arise from it. To get orderly keywords, the terms, “Extreme 1054
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
SuperHyperNeighborhood and an Extreme Reverse Connective Dominating and the new terms 1060
1062
1063
1064
GExtreme Reverse Connective Dominating ∈ ∪zExtreme Number [zExtreme Number ]Extreme Class =
∪zExtreme Number {NExtreme SuperHyperNeighborhood |
|NExtreme SuperHyperNeighborhood |Extreme Cardinality
= max |E| | E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
1066
Thus, in a connected Extreme SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). The all interior 1069
for any of them, and any of other corresponded Extreme SuperHyperVertex, some 1071
no Extreme exception at all minus all Extreme SuperHypeNeighbors to any amount of 1073
them. 1074
To make sense with the precise words in the terms of “R-’, the follow-up illustrations 1075
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
There’s not only one Extreme SuperHyperVertex inside the intended Extreme
SuperHyperSet. Thus the non-obvious Extreme Reverse Connective Dominating is up. The
obvious simple Extreme type-SuperHyperSet called the Extreme Reverse Connective Dominating
is an Extreme SuperHyperSet includes only one Extreme SuperHyperVertex. But the
Extreme SuperHyperSet of Extreme SuperHyperVertices,
doesn’t have less than two SuperHyperVertices inside the intended Extreme
SuperHyperSet since they’ve come from at least so far an SuperHyperEdge. Thus the
non-obvious simple Extreme type-SuperHyperSet of the Extreme R-Reverse Connective
Dominating is up. To sum them up, the Extreme SuperHyperSet of Extreme
SuperHyperVertices,
or
(V \ V \ {x, z}) ∪ {zy}
is an Extreme R-Reverse Connective Dominating C(ESHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph 1082
instead of all given by that Extreme type-SuperHyperSet called the Extreme Reverse 1085
Connective Dominating and it’s an Extreme Reverse Connective Dominating. Since it’s 1086
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
does includes only less than two SuperHyperVertices in a connected Extreme 1087
SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E) but it’s impossible in the case, they’ve corresponded 1088
to an SuperHyperEdge. It’s interesting to mention that the only non-obvious simple 1089
is an Extreme R-Reverse Connective Dominating. In other words, the least cardinality, the lower
sharp bound for the cardinality, of an Extreme R-Reverse Connective Dominating is the
cardinality of
To sum them up, in a connected Extreme SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). The 1095
all interior Extreme SuperHyperVertices belong to any Extreme quasi-R-Reverse Connective 1096
Dominating if for any of them, and any of other corresponded Extreme SuperHyperVertex, 1097
with no Extreme exception at all minus all Extreme SuperHypeNeighbors to any 1099
Assume a connected Extreme SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). Let an Extreme 1101
Consider all Extreme numbers of those Extreme SuperHyperVertices from that Extreme 1103
SuperHyperVertices. Consider there’s an Extreme R-Reverse Connective Dominating with the 1106
least cardinality, the lower sharp Extreme bound for Extreme cardinality. Assume a 1107
connected Extreme SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). The Extreme SuperHyperSet of 1108
some Extreme SuperHyperVertices uniquely but it isn’t an Extreme R-Reverse Connective 1111
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Connective Dominating. Since it doesn’t do the Extreme procedure such that such that 1118
uniquely [there are at least one Extreme SuperHyperVertex outside implying there’s, 1120
sometimes in the connected Extreme SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E), an Extreme 1121
procedure”.]. There’s only one Extreme SuperHyperVertex outside the intended 1124
SuperHyperNeighborhood. Thus the obvious Extreme R-Reverse Connective Dominating, VESHE 1126
is up. The obvious simple Extreme type-SuperHyperSet of the Extreme R-Reverse Connective 1127
Dominating, VESHE , is an Extreme SuperHyperSet, VESHE , includes only all Extreme 1128
SuperHyperVertices does forms any kind of Extreme pairs are titled 1129
ESHG : (V, E). Since the Extreme SuperHyperSet of the Extreme SuperHyperVertices 1131
connected Extreme SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). Any Extreme R-Reverse Connective 1135
Dominating only contains all interior Extreme SuperHyperVertices and all exterior Extreme 1136
SuperHyperVertices from the unique Extreme SuperHyperEdge where there’s any of 1137
them has all possible Extreme SuperHyperNeighbors in and there’s all Extreme 1138
SuperHypeNeighbors to some of them not all of them but everything is possible about 1140
The SuperHyperNotion, namely, Reverse Connective Dominating, is up. There’s neither 1142
Extreme type-SuperHyperSet of the Extreme Reverse Connective Dominating. The Extreme 1145
C(N SHG)ExtremeQuasi−ReverseConnectiveDominating
|EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality
b c
= {E2i−1 }i=1 2
.
C(N SHG)ExtremeQuasi−ReverseConnectiveDominatingSuperHyperP olynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality
= 2z b 2 c
.
C(N SHG)ExtremeR−Quasi−ReverseConnectiveDominating = {Vi }si=1 , {Vj }tj=1 .
C(N SHG)ExtremeR−Quasi−ReverseConnectiveDominatingSuperHyperP olynomial
= az s + bz t .
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
C(N SHG)ExtremeQuasi−ReverseConnectiveDominating
|EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality
b c
= {E2i−1 }i=1 2
.
C(N SHG)ExtremeQuasi−ReverseConnectiveDominatingSuperHyperP olynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality
= 2z b 2 c
.
C(N SHG)ExtremeR−Quasi−ReverseConnectiveDominating = {Vi }si=1 , {Vj }tj=1 .
C(N SHG)ExtremeR−Quasi−ReverseConnectiveDominatingSuperHyperP olynomial
= az s + bz t .
SuperHyperEdge for all Extreme SuperHyperVertices. There are not only two Extreme 1154
non-obvious Extreme Reverse Connective Dominating is up. The obvious simple Extreme 1156
SuperHyperSet includes only two Extreme SuperHyperVertices. But the Extreme 1158
C(N SHG)ExtremeQuasi−ReverseConnectiveDominating
|EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality
b c
= {E2i−1 }i=1 2
.
C(N SHG)ExtremeQuasi−ReverseConnectiveDominatingSuperHyperP olynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality
= 2z b 2 c
.
C(N SHG)ExtremeR−Quasi−ReverseConnectiveDominating = {Vi }si=1 , {Vj }tj=1 .
C(N SHG)ExtremeR−Quasi−ReverseConnectiveDominatingSuperHyperP olynomial
= az s + bz t .
Doesn’t have less than three SuperHyperVertices inside the intended Extreme 1160
Extreme Reverse Connective Dominating is up. To sum them up, the Extreme SuperHyperSet of 1162
C(N SHG)ExtremeQuasi−ReverseConnectiveDominating
|EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality
b c
= {E2i−1 }i=1 2
.
C(N SHG)ExtremeQuasi−ReverseConnectiveDominatingSuperHyperP olynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality
= 2z b 2 c
.
C(N SHG)ExtremeR−Quasi−ReverseConnectiveDominating = {Vi }si=1 , {Vj }tj=1 .
C(N SHG)ExtremeR−Quasi−ReverseConnectiveDominatingSuperHyperP olynomial
= az s + bz t .
Is the non-obvious simple Extreme type-SuperHyperSet of the Extreme Reverse Connective 1164
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
SuperHyperEdges[SuperHyperVertices], 1166
C(N SHG)ExtremeQuasi−ReverseConnectiveDominating
|EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality
b c
= {E2i−1 }i=1 2
.
C(N SHG)ExtremeQuasi−ReverseConnectiveDominatingSuperHyperP olynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality
= 2z b 2 c
.
C(N SHG)ExtremeR−Quasi−ReverseConnectiveDominating = {Vi }si=1 , {Vj }tj=1 .
C(N SHG)ExtremeR−Quasi−ReverseConnectiveDominatingSuperHyperP olynomial
= az s + bz t .
given by that Extreme type-SuperHyperSet called the Extreme Reverse Connective Dominating 1170
SuperHyperEdge for all Extreme SuperHyperVertices. There aren’t only less than three 1175
C(N SHG)ExtremeQuasi−ReverseConnectiveDominating
|EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality
b c
= {E2i−1 }i=1 2
.
C(N SHG)ExtremeQuasi−ReverseConnectiveDominatingSuperHyperP olynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality
= 2z b 2 c
.
C(N SHG)ExtremeR−Quasi−ReverseConnectiveDominating = {Vi }si=1 , {Vj }tj=1 .
C(N SHG)ExtremeR−Quasi−ReverseConnectiveDominatingSuperHyperP olynomial
= az s + bz t .
C(N SHG)ExtremeQuasi−ReverseConnectiveDominating
|EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality
b c
= {E2i−1 }i=1 2
.
C(N SHG)ExtremeQuasi−ReverseConnectiveDominatingSuperHyperP olynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality
= 2z b 2 c
.
C(N SHG)ExtremeR−Quasi−ReverseConnectiveDominating = {Vi }si=1 , {Vj }tj=1 .
C(N SHG)ExtremeR−Quasi−ReverseConnectiveDominatingSuperHyperP olynomial
= az s + bz t .
Is up. The obvious simple Extreme type-SuperHyperSet of the Extreme Reverse Connective 1178
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
, not:
Dominating 1179
C(N SHG)ExtremeQuasi−ReverseConnectiveDominating
|EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality
b c
= {E2i−1 }i=1 2
.
C(N SHG)ExtremeQuasi−ReverseConnectiveDominatingSuperHyperP olynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality
= 2z b 2 c
.
C(N SHG)ExtremeR−Quasi−ReverseConnectiveDominating = {Vi }si=1 , {Vj }tj=1 .
C(N SHG)ExtremeR−Quasi−ReverseConnectiveDominatingSuperHyperP olynomial
= az s + bz t .
C(N SHG)ExtremeQuasi−ReverseConnectiveDominating
|EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality
b c
= {E2i−1 }i=1 2
.
C(N SHG)ExtremeQuasi−ReverseConnectiveDominatingSuperHyperP olynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality
= 2z b 2 c
.
C(N SHG)ExtremeR−Quasi−ReverseConnectiveDominating = {Vi }si=1 , {Vj }tj=1 .
C(N SHG)ExtremeR−Quasi−ReverseConnectiveDominatingSuperHyperP olynomial
= az s + bz t .
Does includes only less than three SuperHyperVertices in a connected Extreme 1181
SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). It’s interesting to mention that the only non-obvious 1182
C(N SHG)ExtremeQuasi−ReverseConnectiveDominating
|EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality
b c
= {E2i−1 }i=1 2
.
C(N SHG)ExtremeQuasi−ReverseConnectiveDominatingSuperHyperP olynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality
= 2z b 2 c
.
C(N SHG)ExtremeR−Quasi−ReverseConnectiveDominating = {Vi }si=1 , {Vj }tj=1 .
C(N SHG)ExtremeR−Quasi−ReverseConnectiveDominatingSuperHyperP olynomial
= az s + bz t .
The previous Extreme approach apply on the upcoming Extreme results on Extreme 1191
SuperHyperClasses. 1192
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Proposition 5.1. Assume a connected Extreme SuperHyperPath ESHP : (V, E). Then 1193
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
V |EN SHG |
, E |EN SHG |
3 3
1195
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , V2EXT ERN AL ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
E |EN SHG | , V |EN SHG |
3 3
be a longest path taken from a connected Extreme SuperHyperPath ESHP : (V, E). 1196
Example 5.2. In the Figure (23), the connected Extreme SuperHyperPath 1201
ESHP : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The Extreme SuperHyperSet, in the 1202
Proposition 5.3. Assume a connected Extreme SuperHyperCycle ESHC : (V, E). 1204
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Then 1205
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
V |EN SHG |
, E |EN SHG |
3 3
1207
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , V2EXT ERN AL ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
E |EN SHG | , V |EN SHG |
3 3
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
be a longest path taken from a connected Extreme SuperHyperCycle ESHC : (V, E). 1208
Example 5.4. In the Figure (24), the connected Extreme SuperHyperCycle 1213
N SHC : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Extreme SuperHyperSet, in 1214
the Extreme SuperHyperModel (24), is the Extreme SuperHyperReverse Connective Dominating. 1215
Proposition 5.5. Assume a connected Extreme SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). Then 1216
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
CEN T ER, E2
1218
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , CEN T ER
be a longest path taken a connected Extreme SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). There’s 1219
Example 5.6. In the Figure (25), the connected Extreme SuperHyperStar 1224
ESHS : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Extreme SuperHyperSet, by 1225
the Algorithm in previous Extreme result, of the Extreme SuperHyperVertices of the 1226
connected Extreme SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E), in the Extreme SuperHyperModel 1227
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Proposition 5.7. Assume a connected Extreme SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E). 1229
Then 1230
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
V|Pi |=minP ∈E |Pj | , E|Pi |=minPj ∈EN SHG |Pj | .
j N SHG
1232
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , V2EXT ERN AL ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
E|Pi |=minPj ∈EN SHG |Pj | , V|P i |=minP ∈E |Pj |
j N SHG
is a longest path taken from a connected Extreme SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E). 1233
The latter is straightforward. Then there’s no at least one SuperHyperReverse Connective 1237
Dominating. Thus the notion of quasi may be up but the SuperHyperNotions based on 1238
SuperHyperReverse Connective Dominating could be applied. There are only two 1239
SuperHyperParts. Thus every SuperHyperPart could have one SuperHyperVertex as the 1240
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E). Thus only some SuperHyperVertices and only 1243
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
Example 5.8. In the Extreme Figure (26), the connected Extreme 1246
SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), is Extreme highlighted and Extreme featured. 1247
The obtained Extreme SuperHyperSet, by the Extreme Algorithm in previous Extreme 1248
SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), in the Extreme SuperHyperModel (26), is the 1250
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
V|P i |=minP ∈E |Pj | , E|Pi |=minPj ∈EN SHG |Pj | .
j N SHG
1255
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , V2EXT ERN AL ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
E|Pi |=minPj ∈EN SHG |Pj | , V|Pi |=minP ∈E |Pj |
j N SHG
The latter is straightforward. Then there’s no at least one SuperHyperReverse Connective 1260
Dominating. Thus the notion of quasi may be up but the SuperHyperNotions based on 1261
SuperHyperReverse Connective Dominating could be applied. There are only z 0 SuperHyperParts. 1262
Thus every SuperHyperPart could have one SuperHyperVertex as the representative in 1263
the 1264
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
ESHM : (V, E). Thus only some SuperHyperVertices and only 1266
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
Example 5.10. In the Figure (27), the connected Extreme SuperHyperMultipartite 1270
ESHM : (V, E), is highlighted and Extreme featured. The obtained Extreme 1271
ESHM : (V, E), in the Extreme SuperHyperModel (27), is the Extreme 1274
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1∗ ,
CEN T ER, E2∗
1279
P :
E1∗ , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2∗ , CEN T ER
is a longest SuperHyperReverse Connective Dominating taken from a connected Extreme 1280
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
The latter is straightforward. Then there’s at least one SuperHyperReverse Connective 1284
Dominating. Thus the notion of quasi isn’t up and the SuperHyperNotions based on 1285
Example 5.12. In the Extreme Figure (28), the connected Extreme SuperHyperWheel 1289
N SHW : (V, E), is Extreme highlighted and featured. The obtained Extreme 1290
of the connected Extreme SuperHyperWheel ESHW : (V, E), in the Extreme 1292
For the SuperHyperReverse Connective Dominating, Extreme SuperHyperReverse Connective Dominating, 1296
and the Extreme SuperHyperReverse Connective Dominating, some general results are 1297
introduced. 1298
Remark 6.1. Let remind that the Extreme SuperHyperReverse Connective Dominating is 1299
Extreme SuperHyperReverseConnectiveDominating =
{theSuperHyperReverseConnectiveDominatingof theSuperHyperV ertices |
max |SuperHyperOf f ensive
SuperHyperReverseConnectiveDominating
|ExtremecardinalityamidthoseSuperHyperReverseConnectiveDominating. }
plus one Extreme SuperHypeNeighbor to one. Where σi is the unary operation on the 1302
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Corollary 6.3. Assume an Extreme SuperHyperGraph on the same identical letter of 1305
the alphabet. Then the notion of Extreme SuperHyperReverse Connective Dominating and 1306
Corollary 6.4. Assume an Extreme SuperHyperGraph on the same identical letter of 1308
SuperHyperReverse Connective Dominating if and only if it’s a SuperHyperReverse Connective Dominating. 1310
Corollary 6.5. Assume an Extreme SuperHyperGraph on the same identical letter of 1311
SuperHyperReverse Connective Dominating if and only if it’s a longest SuperHyperReverse Connective 1313
Dominating. 1314
same identical letter of the alphabet. Then its Extreme SuperHyperReverse Connective Dominating is 1316
the same identical letter of the alphabet. Then its Extreme SuperHyperReverse Connective 1320
SuperHyperReverse Connective Dominating isn’t well-defined if and only if its SuperHyperReverse 1323
Extreme SuperHyperReverse Connective Dominating isn’t well-defined if and only if its 1326
SuperHyperWheel). Then its Extreme SuperHyperReverse Connective Dominating isn’t well-defined 1330
SuperHyperReverse Connective Dominating is well-defined if and only if its SuperHyperReverse Connective 1333
its Extreme SuperHyperReverse Connective Dominating is well-defined if and only if its 1336
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
is a maximal 1366
Where the exterior SuperHyperVertices and the interior SuperHyperVertices coincide. 1373
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Where the exterior SuperHyperVertices and the interior SuperHyperVertices coincide. 1382
number of 1385
is one and it’s only V. Where the exterior SuperHyperVertices and the interior 1392
is one and it’s only V. Where the exterior SuperHyperVertices and the interior 1402
SuperHyperSet contains [the SuperHyperCenter and] the half of multiplying r with the 1407
number of all the SuperHyperEdges plus one of all the SuperHyperVertices is a 1408
O(ESHG)
(iv) : 2 + 1-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperReverse Connective Dominating; 1412
O(ESHG)
(v) : strong 2 + 1-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperReverse Connective Dominating; 1413
O(ESHG)
(vi) : connected 2 + 1-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperReverse Connective Dominating. 1414
SuperHyperSet contains the half of multiplying r with the number of all the 1418
SuperHyperEdges plus one of all the SuperHyperVertices in the biggest SuperHyperPart 1419
is a 1420
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
number of 1430
O(ESHG)
(iv) : 2 + 1-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperReverse Connective Dominating; 1434
O(ESHG)
(v) : strong 2 + 1-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperReverse Connective Dominating; 1435
O(ESHG)
(vi) : connected 2 + 1-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperReverse Connective Dominating. 1436
is one and it’s only S, a SuperHyperSet contains [the SuperHyperCenter and] the half of 1437
multiplying r with the number of all the SuperHyperEdges plus one of all the 1438
Proposition 6.24. Let ESHG : (V, E) be an Extreme SuperHyperGraph. The number 1441
Proposition 6.25. Let ESHG : (V, E) be an Extreme SuperHyperGraph. Then the 1449
number is at most O(ESHG) and the Extreme number is at most On (ESHG). 1450
min Σv∈{v1 ,v2 ,··· ,vt } O(ESHG:(V,E)) ⊆V σ(v), in the setting of dual 1453
t>
2
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
(iv) : ( O(ESHG:(V,E))
2 + 1)-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperReverse Connective Dominating; 1457
Dominating. 1460
The number is 0 and the Extreme number is 0, for an independent SuperHyperSet in the 1462
O(ESHG : (V, E)) and the Extreme number is On (ESHG : (V, E)), in the setting of a 1474
dual 1475
Dominating. 1482
number is O(ESHG:(V,E))
2 + 1 and the Extreme number is 1485
min Σv∈{v1 ,v2 ,··· ,vt } O(ESHG:(V,E)) ⊆V σ(v), in the setting of a dual 1486
t>
2
(iv) : ( O(ESHG:(V,E))
2 + 1)-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperReverse Connective Dominating; 1490
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Dominating. 1493
Proposition 6.31. Let N SHF : (V, E) be a SuperHyperFamily of the ESHGs : (V, E) 1494
Extreme SuperHyperGraphs which are from one-type SuperHyperClass which the result is 1495
obtained for the individuals. Then the results also hold for the SuperHyperFamily 1496
(ii) vx ∈ E. 1502
Proposition 6.34. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a strong Extreme SuperHyperGraph. Then 1507
(i) Γ ≤ O; 1508
(ii) Γs ≤ On . 1509
Proposition 6.35. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a strong Extreme SuperHyperGraph which is 1510
(i) Γ ≤ O − 1; 1512
(iii) Γs = min{Σs∈S={v2 ,v4 ,··· ,vn−1 } Σ3i=1 σi (s), Σs∈S={v1 ,v3 ,··· ,vn−1 } Σ3i=1 σi (s)}; 1518
(iv) the SuperHyperSets S1 = {v2 , v4 , · · · , vn−1 } and S2 = {v1 , v3 , · · · , vn−1 } are only 1519
(i) the set S = {v2 , v4 , · · · .vn } is a dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperReverse Connective 1522
Dominating; 1523
(iii) Γs = min{Σs∈S={v2 ,v4 ,··· ,vn } Σ3i=1 σi (s), Σs∈S={v1 ,v3 ,··· .vn−1 } Σ3i=1 σi (s)}; 1526
(iv) the SuperHyperSets S1 = {v2 , v4 , · · · .vn } and S2 = {v1 , v3 , · · · .vn−1 } are only 1527
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Proposition 6.38. Let ESHG : (V, E) be an even SuperHyperReverse Connective Dominating. 1529
Then 1530
(iii) Γs = min{Σs∈S={v2 ,v4 ,··· ,vn } σ(s), Σs∈S={v1 ,v3 ,··· ,vn−1 } σ(s)}; 1535
(iv) the SuperHyperSets S1 = {v2 , v4 , · · · , vn } and S2 = {v1 , v3 , · · · , vn−1 } are only 1536
Proposition 6.39. Let ESHG : (V, E) be an odd SuperHyperReverse Connective Dominating. 1538
Then 1539
(iii) Γs = min{Σs∈S={v2 ,v4 ,··· .vn−1 } Σ3i=1 σi (s), Σs∈S={v1 ,v3 ,··· .vn−1 } Σ3i=1 σi (s)}; 1543
(iv) the SuperHyperSets S1 = {v2 , v4 , · · · .vn−1 } and S2 = {v1 , v3 , · · · .vn−1 } are only 1544
(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {c} is a dual maximal SuperHyperReverse Connective Dominating; 1547
(ii) Γ = 1; 1548
(iv) the SuperHyperSets S = {c} and S ⊂ S 0 are only dual SuperHyperReverse Connective 1550
Dominating. 1551
6+3(i−1)≤n
(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {v1 , v3 } ∪ {v6 , v9 · · · , vi+6 , · · · , vn }i=1 is a dual 1553
6+3(i−1)≤n
(ii) Γ = |{v1 , v3 } ∪ {v6 , v9 · · · , vi+6 , · · · , vn }i=1 |; 1555
(iii) Γs = Σ{v1 ,v3 }∪{v6 ,v9 ··· ,vi+6 ,··· ,vn }6+3(i−1)≤n Σ3i=1 σi (s); 1556
i=1
6+3(i−1)≤n
(iv) the SuperHyperSet {v1 , v3 } ∪ {v6 , v9 · · · , vi+6 , · · · , vn }i=1 is only a dual 1557
b n c+1
(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {vi }i=1
2
is a dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperReverse 1560
(ii) Γ = b n2 c + 1; 1562
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
b n c+1
(iv) the SuperHyperSet S = {vi }i=1 2
is only a dual SuperHyperDefensive 1564
bnc
(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {vi }i=1
2
is a dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperReverse 1567
(ii) Γ = b n2 c; 1569
bnc
(iv) the SuperHyperSet S = {vi }i=1 2
is only a dual maximal SuperHyperDefensive 1571
(iii) Γs = Σm 3
i=1 Σj=1 σj (ci ) for N SHF : (V, E); 1578
bn
2 c+1
(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {vi }i=1 is a dual maximal SuperHyperDefensive 1584
b n c+1
(iv) the SuperHyperSets S = {vi }i=1 2
are only a dual maximal SuperHyperReverse 1588
bn
2c
(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {vi }i=1 is a dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperReverse 1593
bnc
(iv) the SuperHyperSets S = {vi }i=12
are only dual maximal SuperHyperReverse Connective 1597
Proposition 6.47. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a strong Extreme SuperHyperGraph. Then 1599
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Proposition 6.48. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a strong Extreme SuperHyperGraph. Then 1607
hold; 1617
hold; 1628
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Recognition 1682
The cancer is the Extreme disease but the Extreme model is going to figure out what’s 1683
going on this Extreme phenomenon. The special Extreme case of this Extreme disease 1684
is considered and as the consequences of the model, some parameters are used. The cells 1685
are under attack of this disease but the moves of the cancer in the special region are the 1686
matter of mind. The Extreme recognition of the cancer could help to find some 1687
In the following, some Extreme steps are Extreme devised on this disease. 1689
Step 1. (Extreme Definition) The Extreme recognition of the cancer in the 1690
Step 2. (Extreme Issue) The specific region has been assigned by the Extreme 1692
model [it’s called Extreme SuperHyperGraph] and the long Extreme cycle of the 1693
move from the cancer is identified by this research. Sometimes the move of the 1694
cancer hasn’t be easily identified since there are some determinacy, indeterminacy 1695
and neutrality about the moves and the effects of the cancer on that region; this 1696
event leads us to choose another model [it’s said to be Extreme SuperHyperGraph] 1697
Step 3. (Extreme Model) There are some specific Extreme models, which are 1699
well-known and they’ve got the names, and some general Extreme models. The 1700
moves and the Extreme traces of the cancer on the complex tracks and between 1701
find either the Extreme SuperHyperReverse Connective Dominating or the Extreme 1705
SuperHyperModel 1709
Step 4. (Extreme Solution) In the Extreme Figure (29), the Extreme 1710
By using the Extreme Figure (29) and the Table (4), the Extreme 1712
SuperHyperModel 1720
Step 4. (Extreme Solution) In the Extreme Figure (30), the Extreme 1721
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
By using the Extreme Figure (30) and the Table (5), the Extreme 1723
In what follows, some “problems” and some “questions” are proposed. 1731
The SuperHyperReverse Connective Dominating and the Extreme SuperHyperReverse Connective 1732
Question 10.1. Which the else SuperHyperModels could be defined based on Cancer’s 1734
recognitions? 1735
Question 10.2. Are there some SuperHyperNotions related to SuperHyperReverse Connective 1736
Question 10.3. Are there some Algorithms to be defined on the SuperHyperModels to 1738
Question 10.4. Which the SuperHyperNotions are related to beyond the 1740
SuperHyperReverse Connective Dominating and the Extreme SuperHyperReverse Connective Dominating? 1741
Problem 10.5. The SuperHyperReverse Connective Dominating and the Extreme SuperHyperReverse 1742
Problem 10.6. Which the fundamental SuperHyperNumbers are related to these 1745
Problem 10.7. What’s the independent research based on Cancer’s recognitions 1747
In this section, concluding remarks and closing remarks are represented. The drawbacks 1750
of this research are illustrated. Some benefits and some advantages of this research are 1751
highlighted. 1752
This research uses some approaches to make Extreme SuperHyperGraphs more 1753
SuperHyperReverse Connective Dominating. For that sake in the second definition, the main 1755
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
alphabets. Based on the new definition for the Extreme SuperHyperGraph, the new 1757
background to implement some results based on that. Some SuperHyperClasses and 1759
some Extreme SuperHyperClasses are the cases of this research on the modeling of the 1760
regions where are under the attacks of the cancer to recognize this disease as it’s 1761
mentioned on the title “Cancer’s Recognitions”. To formalize the instances on the 1762
SuperHyperClasses, are introduced. Some general results are gathered in the section on 1764
the SuperHyperReverse Connective Dominating and the Extreme SuperHyperReverse Connective 1765
Dominating. The clarifications, instances and literature reviews have taken the whole way 1766
through. In this research, the literature reviews have fulfilled the lines containing the 1767
notions and the results. The SuperHyperGraph and Extreme SuperHyperGraph are the 1768
SuperHyperModels on the “Cancer’s Recognitions” and both bases are the background 1769
of this research. Sometimes the cancer has been happened on the region, full of cells, 1770
groups of cells and embedded styles. In this segment, the SuperHyperModel proposes 1771
some SuperHyperNotions based on the connectivities of the moves of the cancer in the 1772
longest and strongest styles with the formation of the design and the architecture are 1773
formally called “ SuperHyperReverse Connective Dominating” in the themes of jargons and 1774
buzzwords. The prefix “SuperHyper” refers to the theme of the embedded styles to 1775
figure out the background for the SuperHyperNotions. In the Table (6), benefits and
5. SuperHyperClasses 3. SuperHyperFamilies
1776
avenues for this research are, figured out, pointed out and spoken out. 1777
Forms 1780
V 0 or E 0 is called 1784
that Va ∈ Ei , Ej ; 1786
that Vi , Vj ∈ Ea ; 1790
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
rv-SuperHyperDuality. 1795
SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 1805
SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 1821
SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 1831
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 1840
SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 1856
SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 1866
E1 and E3 are some empty Extreme SuperHyperEdges but E2 is a loop Extreme 1873
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
The previous Extreme approach apply on the upcoming Extreme results on Extreme 1927
SuperHyperClasses. 1928
Proposition 12.4. Assume a connected Extreme SuperHyperPath ESHP : (V, E). 1929
Then 1930
= {Ei }i=1 3
.
C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality
= 3z 3 .
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperDuality
|EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
E |EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality , V EXT ERN AL |EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality .
3 3
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
be a longest path taken from a connected Extreme SuperHyperPath ESHP : (V, E). 1932
straightforward. 1936
Example 12.5. In the Figure (23), the connected Extreme SuperHyperPath 1937
ESHP : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The Extreme SuperHyperSet, in the 1938
Proposition 12.6. Assume a connected Extreme SuperHyperCycle ESHC : (V, E). 1940
Then 1941
= {Ei }i=1 3
.
C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality
= 3z 3 .
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperDuality
|EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
E |EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality , V EXT ERN AL |EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality .
3 3
be a longest path taken from a connected Extreme SuperHyperCycle ESHC : (V, E). 1943
straightforward. 1947
Example 12.7. In the Figure (24), the connected Extreme SuperHyperCycle 1948
N SHC : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Extreme SuperHyperSet, in 1949
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Proposition 12.8. Assume a connected Extreme SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). 1951
Then 1952
straightforward. 1958
Example 12.9. In the Figure (25), the connected Extreme SuperHyperStar 1959
ESHS : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Extreme SuperHyperSet, by 1960
the Algorithm in previous Extreme result, of the Extreme SuperHyperVertices of the 1961
connected Extreme SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E), in the Extreme SuperHyperModel 1962
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmin i |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
is a longest path taken from a connected Extreme SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E). 1967
straightforward. Then there’s at least one SuperHyperDuality. Thus the notion of quasi 1971
There are only two SuperHyperParts. Thus every SuperHyperPart could have one 1973
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmin i |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1
ESHB : (V, E). Thus only some SuperHyperVertices and only 1976
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmin i |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1
Example 12.11. In the Extreme Figure (26), the connected Extreme 1979
SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), is Extreme highlighted and Extreme featured. 1980
The obtained Extreme SuperHyperSet, by the Extreme Algorithm in previous Extreme 1981
SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), in the Extreme SuperHyperModel (26), is the 1983
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmin i |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1
straightforward. Then there’s at least one SuperHyperDuality. Thus the notion of quasi 1992
There are only z 0 SuperHyperParts. Thus every SuperHyperPart could have one 1994
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmin i |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1
ESHM : (V, E). Thus only some SuperHyperVertices and only 1997
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmin i |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1
Example 12.13. In the Figure (27), the connected Extreme SuperHyperMultipartite 2001
ESHM : (V, E), is highlighted and Extreme featured. The obtained Extreme 2002
Proposition 12.14. Assume a connected Extreme SuperHyperWheel ESHW : (V, E). 2006
Then, 2007
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1∗ ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2∗ ,
...,
∗ EXT ERN AL
E|E ∗ | , V|E ∗ |Extreme Cardinality +1
ESHG:(V,E) Extreme Cardinality ESHG:(V,E)
straightforward. Then there’s at least one SuperHyperDuality. Thus the notion of quasi 2013
Example 12.15. In the Extreme Figure (28), the connected Extreme 2017
SuperHyperWheel N SHW : (V, E), is Extreme highlighted and featured. The obtained 2018
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Forms 2024
V 0 or E 0 is called 2028
0 0
(i) Extreme e-SuperHyperJoin if ∀Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ E , ∃Ej ∈ E , such that 2029
SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 2065
Extreme SuperHyperJoin; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its Extreme 2066
coefficient; 2067
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 2075
Extreme SuperHyperJoin; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its Extreme 2076
coefficient; 2077
SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 2099
Extreme SuperHyperJoin; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its Extreme 2100
coefficient; 2101
SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 2109
Extreme SuperHyperJoin; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its Extreme 2110
coefficient. 2111
and E3 are some empty Extreme SuperHyperEdges but E2 is a loop Extreme 2116
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
The previous Extreme approach apply on the upcoming Extreme results on Extreme 2170
SuperHyperClasses. 2171
Proposition 13.4. Assume a connected Extreme SuperHyperPath ESHP : (V, E). 2172
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Then 2173
= {Ei }i=1 3
.
C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality
= 3z 3 .
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperJoin
|EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
E |EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality , V EXT ERN AL |EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality .
3 3
be a longest path taken from a connected Extreme SuperHyperPath ESHP : (V, E). 2175
straightforward. 2179
Example 13.5. In the Figure (23), the connected Extreme SuperHyperPath 2180
ESHP : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The Extreme SuperHyperSet, in the 2181
Proposition 13.6. Assume a connected Extreme SuperHyperCycle ESHC : (V, E). 2183
Then 2184
= {Ei }i=1 3
.
C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality
= 3z 3 .
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperJoin
|EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
E |EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality , V EXT ERN AL |EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality .
3 3
be a longest path taken from a connected Extreme SuperHyperCycle ESHC : (V, E). 2186
straightforward. 2190
Example 13.7. In the Figure (24), the connected Extreme SuperHyperCycle 2191
N SHC : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Extreme SuperHyperSet, in 2192
Proposition 13.8. Assume a connected Extreme SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). 2194
Then 2195
be a longest path taken a connected Extreme SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). There’s 2197
straightforward. 2201
Example 13.9. In the Figure (25), the connected Extreme SuperHyperStar 2202
ESHS : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Extreme SuperHyperSet, by 2203
the Algorithm in previous Extreme result, of the Extreme SuperHyperVertices of the 2204
connected Extreme SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E), in the Extreme SuperHyperModel 2205
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmin i |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1
is a longest path taken from a connected Extreme SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E). 2210
straightforward. Then there’s no at least one SuperHyperJoin. Thus the notion of quasi 2214
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
There are only two SuperHyperParts. Thus every SuperHyperPart could have one 2216
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmin i |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1
ESHB : (V, E). Thus only some SuperHyperVertices and only 2219
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmin i |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1
Example 13.11. In the Extreme Figure (26), the connected Extreme 2222
SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), is Extreme highlighted and Extreme featured. 2223
The obtained Extreme SuperHyperSet, by the Extreme Algorithm in previous Extreme 2224
SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), in the Extreme SuperHyperModel (26), is the 2226
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmin i |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1
straightforward. Then there’s no at least one SuperHyperJoin. Thus the notion of quasi 2235
There are only z 0 SuperHyperParts. Thus every SuperHyperPart could have one 2237
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmin i |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1
ESHM : (V, E). Thus only some SuperHyperVertices and only 2240
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmin i |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1
Example 13.13. In the Figure (27), the connected Extreme SuperHyperMultipartite 2244
ESHM : (V, E), is highlighted and Extreme featured. The obtained Extreme 2245
Proposition 13.14. Assume a connected Extreme SuperHyperWheel ESHW : (V, E). 2249
Then, 2250
= {Ei }i=1 3
.
C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality
= 3z 3 .
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperJoin
|EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
E |EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality , V EXT ERN AL |EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality .
3 3
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
straightforward. Then there’s at least one SuperHyperJoin. Thus the notion of quasi 2256
isn’t up and the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperJoin could be applied. The 2257
unique embedded SuperHyperJoin proposes some longest SuperHyperJoin excerpt from 2258
Example 13.15. In the Extreme Figure (28), the connected Extreme 2260
SuperHyperWheel N SHW : (V, E), is Extreme highlighted and featured. The obtained 2261
Forms 2267
V 0 or E 0 is called 2271
that Va ∈ Ei , Ej ; 2273
that Vi , Vj ∈ Ea ; 2277
rv-SuperHyperPerfect. 2282
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 2307
SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 2317
SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 2326
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 2342
SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 2352
E1 and E3 are some empty Extreme SuperHyperEdges but E2 is a loop Extreme 2359
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
The previous Extreme approach apply on the upcoming Extreme results on Extreme 2413
SuperHyperClasses. 2414
Proposition 14.4. Assume a connected Extreme SuperHyperPath ESHP : (V, E). 2415
Then 2416
= {Ei }i=1 3
.
C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality
= 3z 3 .
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperPerfect
|EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
E |EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality , V EXT ERN AL |EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality .
3 3
be a longest path taken from a connected Extreme SuperHyperPath ESHP : (V, E). 2418
straightforward. 2422
Example 14.5. In the Figure (23), the connected Extreme SuperHyperPath 2423
ESHP : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The Extreme SuperHyperSet, in the 2424
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Proposition 14.6. Assume a connected Extreme SuperHyperCycle ESHC : (V, E). 2426
Then 2427
= {Ei }i=1 3
.
C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality
= 3z 3 .
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperPerfect
|EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
E |EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality , V EXT ERN AL |EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality .
3 3
be a longest path taken from a connected Extreme SuperHyperCycle ESHC : (V, E). 2429
straightforward. 2433
Example 14.7. In the Figure (24), the connected Extreme SuperHyperCycle 2434
N SHC : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Extreme SuperHyperSet, in 2435
Proposition 14.8. Assume a connected Extreme SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). 2437
Then 2438
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
be a longest path taken a connected Extreme SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). There’s 2440
straightforward. 2444
Example 14.9. In the Figure (25), the connected Extreme SuperHyperStar 2445
ESHS : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Extreme SuperHyperSet, by 2446
the Algorithm in previous Extreme result, of the Extreme SuperHyperVertices of the 2447
connected Extreme SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E), in the Extreme SuperHyperModel 2448
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmin i |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1
is a longest path taken from a connected Extreme SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E). 2453
straightforward. Then there’s no at least one SuperHyperPerfect. Thus the notion of 2457
applied. There are only two SuperHyperParts. Thus every SuperHyperPart could have 2459
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmin i |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1
ESHB : (V, E). Thus only some SuperHyperVertices and only 2462
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmin i |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1
Example 14.11. In the Extreme Figure (26), the connected Extreme 2465
SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), is Extreme highlighted and Extreme featured. 2466
The obtained Extreme SuperHyperSet, by the Extreme Algorithm in previous Extreme 2467
SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), in the Extreme SuperHyperModel (26), is the 2469
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmin i |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1
straightforward. Then there’s no at least one SuperHyperPerfect. Thus the notion of 2478
applied. There are only z 0 SuperHyperParts. Thus every SuperHyperPart could have 2480
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmin i |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1
ESHM : (V, E). Thus only some SuperHyperVertices and only 2483
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmin i |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1
Example 14.13. In the Figure (27), the connected Extreme SuperHyperMultipartite 2487
ESHM : (V, E), is highlighted and Extreme featured. The obtained Extreme 2488
Proposition 14.14. Assume a connected Extreme SuperHyperWheel ESHW : (V, E). 2492
Then, 2493
straightforward. Then there’s at least one SuperHyperPerfect. Thus the notion of quasi 2499
isn’t up and the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperPerfect could be applied. The 2500
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Example 14.15. In the Extreme Figure (28), the connected Extreme 2503
SuperHyperWheel N SHW : (V, E), is Extreme highlighted and featured. The obtained 2504
Forms 2510
V 0 or E 0 is called 2514
Va ∈ Ei , Ej ; 2516
Vi , Vj ∈ Ea ; 2520
rv-SuperHyperTotal. 2525
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 2550
Extreme SuperHyperTotal; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its Extreme 2551
coefficient; 2552
SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 2560
Extreme SuperHyperTotal; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its Extreme 2561
coefficient; 2562
SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 2584
Extreme SuperHyperTotal; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its Extreme 2585
coefficient; 2586
SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 2594
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Extreme SuperHyperTotal; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its Extreme 2595
coefficient. 2596
E1 and E3 are some empty Extreme SuperHyperEdges but E2 is a loop Extreme 2601
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
The previous Extreme approach apply on the upcoming Extreme results on Extreme 2655
SuperHyperClasses. 2656
Proposition 15.4. Assume a connected Extreme SuperHyperPath ESHP : (V, E). 2657
Then 2658
P :
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
V3EXT ERN AL , E3 ,
...
be a longest path taken from a connected Extreme SuperHyperPath ESHP : (V, E). 2660
straightforward. 2664
Example 15.5. In the Figure (23), the connected Extreme SuperHyperPath 2665
ESHP : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The Extreme SuperHyperSet, in the 2666
Proposition 15.6. Assume a connected Extreme SuperHyperCycle ESHC : (V, E). 2668
Then 2669
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
P :
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
V3EXT ERN AL , E3 ,
...,
E |E|EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality −1 .
, V EXT ERN AL |EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality −1
be a longest path taken from a connected Extreme SuperHyperCycle ESHC : (V, E). 2671
straightforward. 2675
Example 15.7. In the Figure (24), the connected Extreme SuperHyperCycle 2676
N SHC : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Extreme SuperHyperSet, in 2677
Proposition 15.8. Assume a connected Extreme SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). 2679
Then 2680
straightforward. 2686
Example 15.9. In the Figure (25), the connected Extreme SuperHyperStar 2687
ESHS : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Extreme SuperHyperSet, by 2688
the Algorithm in previous Extreme result, of the Extreme SuperHyperVertices of the 2689
connected Extreme SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E), in the Extreme SuperHyperModel 2690
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
is a longest path taken from a connected Extreme SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E). 2695
straightforward. Then there’s no at least one SuperHyperTotal. Thus the notion of 2699
applied. There are only two SuperHyperParts. Thus every SuperHyperPart could have 2701
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
is a longest SuperHyperTotal taken from a connected Extreme SuperHyperBipartite 2703
ESHB : (V, E). Thus only some SuperHyperVertices and only 2704
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
The latter is straightforward. 2706
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Example 15.11. In the Extreme Figure (26), the connected Extreme 2707
SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), is Extreme highlighted and Extreme featured. 2708
The obtained Extreme SuperHyperSet, by the Extreme Algorithm in previous Extreme 2709
SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), in the Extreme SuperHyperModel (26), is the 2711
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
straightforward. Then there’s no at least one SuperHyperTotal. Thus the notion of 2720
applied. There are only z 0 SuperHyperParts. Thus every SuperHyperPart could have 2722
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
ESHM : (V, E). Thus only some SuperHyperVertices and only 2725
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
Example 15.13. In the Figure (27), the connected Extreme SuperHyperMultipartite 2729
ESHM : (V, E), is highlighted and Extreme featured. The obtained Extreme 2730
Proposition 15.14. Assume a connected Extreme SuperHyperWheel ESHW : (V, E). 2734
Then, 2735
∗
C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperTotal = {Ei , Ej ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.
C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial
∗
= |i(i − 1) | Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E)|Extreme Cardinality
|z 2 .
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal = {CEN T ER, Vj ∈ VESHG:(V,E) }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial =
(|VESHG:(V,E)|Extreme Cardinality |) choose (|VESHG:(V,E)|Extreme Cardinality | − 1)
z2.
straightforward. Then there’s at least one SuperHyperTotal. Thus the notion of quasi 2741
isn’t up and the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperTotal could be applied. The 2742
Example 15.15. In the Extreme Figure (28), the connected Extreme 2745
SuperHyperWheel N SHW : (V, E), is Extreme highlighted and featured. The obtained 2746
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Forms 2752
V 0 or E 0 is called 2756
SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 2779
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 2795
SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 2805
SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 2814
C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Extreme 2826
SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 2830
SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 2840
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
straightforward. 2864
straightforward. 2867
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
straightforward. 2870
straightforward. 2873
straightforward. 2876
straightforward. 2879
straightforward. 2882
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
straightforward. 2885
straightforward. 2888
straightforward. 2891
straightforward. 2894
straightforward. 2897
straightforward. 2900
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
straightforward. 2903
straightforward. 2906
straightforward. 2909
straightforward. 2912
straightforward. 2915
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
straightforward. 2918
straightforward. 2921
The previous Extreme approach apply on the upcoming Extreme results on Extreme 2922
SuperHyperClasses. 2923
Proposition 16.4. Assume a connected Extreme SuperHyperPath ESHP : (V, E). 2924
Then 2925
P :
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
V3EXT ERN AL , E3 ,
...,
E|EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality −1 , V EXT ERN AL |EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality −1 .
be a longest path taken from a connected Extreme SuperHyperPath ESHP : (V, E). 2927
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
straightforward. 2931
Example 16.5. In the Figure (23), the connected Extreme SuperHyperPath 2932
ESHP : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The Extreme SuperHyperSet, in the 2933
Proposition 16.6. Assume a connected Extreme SuperHyperCycle ESHC : (V, E). 2935
Then 2936
P :
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
V3EXT ERN AL , E3 ,
...,
E|EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality −1 , V EXT ERN AL |EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality −1 .
be a longest path taken from a connected Extreme SuperHyperCycle ESHC : (V, E). 2938
straightforward. 2942
Example 16.7. In the Figure (24), the connected Extreme SuperHyperCycle 2943
N SHC : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Extreme SuperHyperSet, in 2944
Proposition 16.8. Assume a connected Extreme SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). 2946
Then 2947
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
be a longest path taken a connected Extreme SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). There’s 2949
straightforward. 2953
Example 16.9. In the Figure (25), the connected Extreme SuperHyperStar 2954
ESHS : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Extreme SuperHyperSet, by 2955
the Algorithm in previous Extreme result, of the Extreme SuperHyperVertices of the 2956
connected Extreme SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E), in the Extreme SuperHyperModel 2957
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
is a longest path taken from a connected Extreme SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E). 2962
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
straightforward. Then there’s no at least one SuperHyperConnected. Thus the notion of 2966
applied. There are only two SuperHyperParts. Thus every SuperHyperPart could have 2968
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E). Thus only some SuperHyperVertices and only 2971
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
Example 16.11. In the Extreme Figure (26), the connected Extreme 2974
SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), is Extreme highlighted and Extreme featured. 2975
The obtained Extreme SuperHyperSet, by the Extreme Algorithm in previous Extreme 2976
SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), in the Extreme SuperHyperModel (26), is the 2978
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
straightforward. Then there’s no at least one SuperHyperConnected. Thus the notion of 2987
applied. There are only z 0 SuperHyperParts. Thus every SuperHyperPart could have 2989
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
is a longest path taken from a connected Extreme SuperHyperMultipartite 2991
ESHM : (V, E). Thus only some SuperHyperVertices and only 2992
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
is a longest path taken from a connected Extreme SuperHyperMultipartite 2994
Example 16.13. In the Figure (27), the connected Extreme SuperHyperMultipartite 2996
ESHM : (V, E), is highlighted and Extreme featured. The obtained Extreme 2997
Proposition 16.14. Assume a connected Extreme SuperHyperWheel ESHW : (V, E). 3001
Then, 3002
∗
C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperConnected = {Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.
C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial
= |i | Ei ∈ |E ∗ ESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality |z.
C(N SHG)Extreme V-SuperHyperConnected = {CEN T ER ∈ VESHG:(V,E) }.
C(N SHG)Extreme V-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
Proof. Let 3003
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
straightforward. Then there’s at least one SuperHyperConnected. Thus the notion of 3008
straightforward. 3012
Example 16.15. In the Extreme Figure (28), the connected Extreme 3013
SuperHyperWheel N SHW : (V, E), is Extreme highlighted and featured. The obtained 3014
17 Background 3018
There are some scientific researches covering the topic of this research. In what follows, 3019
there are some discussion and literature reviews about them. 3020
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “New Ideas In Recognition of 3021
Cancer And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph As Hyper Tool On Super Toot” in Ref. [1] 3022
by Henry Garrett (2023). In this research article, a novel approach is implemented on 3023
in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled “Current Trends in Mass Communication 3026
(CTMC)” with ISO abbreviation “Curr Trends Mass Comm” in volume 2 and issue 1 3027
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “Some Super Hyper Degrees 3029
and Co-Super Hyper Degrees on Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs And Super Hyper 3030
Graphs Alongside Applications in Cancer’s Treatments” in Ref. [2] by Henry Garrett 3031
and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on fundamental notions and using vital tools 3033
in Cancer’s Treatments. It’s published in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled 3034
ISO abbreviation “J Math Techniques Comput Math” in volume 2 and issue 1 with 3036
pages 35-47. The research article studies deeply with choosing directly neutrosophic 3037
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “A Research on Cancer’s 3040
Recognition and Neutrosophic Super Hypergraph by Eulerian Super Hyper Cycles and 3041
Hamiltonian Sets as Hyper Covering Versus Super separations” in Ref. [3] by Henry 3042
and using vital tools in Cancer’s Recognition. It’s published in prestigious and fancy 3045
volume 2 and issue 3 with pages 136-148. The research article studies deeply with 3048
breakthrough toward independent results based on initial background and fundamental 3050
SuperHyperNumbers. 3051
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “Super Hyper Dominating 3052
and Super Hyper Resolving on Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs and Their Directions 3053
in Game Theory and Neutrosophic Super Hyper Classes” in Ref. [4] by Henry Garrett 3054
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Techniques Comput Math” in volume 1 and issue 3 with pages 242-263. The research 3060
article studies deeply with choosing directly neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph and 3061
SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough toward independent results based on initial 3062
alongside chromatic numbers in the setting of some classes related to neutrosophic 3065
hypergraphs” in Ref. [5] by Henry Garrett (2023). In this research article, a novel 3066
SuperHyperGraph. It’s published in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled “Journal 3069
of Current Trends in Computer Science Research (JCTCSR)” with ISO abbreviation “J 3070
Curr Trends Comp Sci Res” in volume 2 and issue 1 with pages 16-24. The research 3071
article studies deeply with choosing neutrosophic hypergraphs instead of neutrosophic 3072
SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough toward independent results based on initial 3073
background. The research article studies deeply with choosing neutrosophic 3074
independent results based on initial background. In some articles are titled “0039 — 3076
in Ref. [7] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Extreme SuperHyperClique as the Firm Scheme 3080
On The Act And Effect Of Cancer Alongside The Foggy Positions Of Cells Toward 3083
Cancer’s Recognition” in Ref. [9] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic Version Of 3085
in Ref. [10] by Henry Garrett (2022), “The Shift Paradigm To Classify Separately The 3087
Cells and Affected Cells Toward The Totality Under Cancer’s Recognition By New 3088
Multiple Definitions On the Sets Polynomials Alongside Numbers In The (Neutrosophic) 3089
SuperHyperGraph” in Ref. [11] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Breaking the Continuity and 3091
Uniformity of Cancer In The Worst Case of Full Connections With Extreme Failed 3092
in Ref. [12] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable as the 3094
Survivors on the Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition Based on Uncertainty to All Modes 3095
of the Attacked Body Under the Cancer’s Circumstances Where Cancer’s Recognition 3097
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Special ViewPoints” in Ref. [14] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Basic Notions on 3109
And Related (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClasses” in Ref. [22] by Henry Garrett (2022), 3119
Game Theory and Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses” in Ref. [25] by Henry Garrett 3126
Garrett (2023), “The Focus on The Partitions Obtained By Parallel Moves In The 3129
Cancer’s Extreme Recognition With Different Types of Extreme SuperHyperMatching Set 3130
(2023), “Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique Decides the Failures on the Cancer’s 3132
“Indeterminacy On The All Possible Connections of Cells In Front of Cancer’s Attacks 3135
Regions and Sub-Regions in the Terms of Cancer’s Recognition and (Neutrosophic) 3141
the Form of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [190] by Henry Garrett (2023), 3145
Ref. [195] by Henry Garrett (2023), “Neutrosophic 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in the 3152
Recognition And Beyond ” in Ref. [196] by Henry Garrett (2022), “(Neutrosophic) 3154
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)” in Ref. [210] by Henry Garrett (2022), and [?, 4–210], there 3163
are some endeavors to formalize the basic SuperHyperNotions about neutrosophic 3164
at [211–329]. Two popular scientific research books in Scribd in the terms of high 3166
readers, 4728 and 5721 respectively, on neutrosophic science is on [330, 331]. 3167
Some scientific studies and scientific researches about neutrosophic graphs, are 3168
proposed as book in Ref. [330] by Henry Garrett (2023) which is indexed by Google 3169
Scholar and has more than 4728 readers in Scribd. It’s titled “Beyond Neutrosophic 3170
Graphs” and published by Dr. Henry Garrett. This research book covers different types 3171
Also, some scientific studies and scientific researches about neutrosophic graphs, are 3174
proposed as book in Ref. [331] by Henry Garrett (2023) which is indexed by Google 3175
Scholar and has more than 5721 readers in Scribd. It’s titled “Neutrosophic Duality” 3176
and published by Dr. Henry Garrett. This research book presents different types of 3177
neutrosophic graph theory and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph theory. This research 3179
book has scrutiny on the complement of the intended set and the intended set, 3180
simultaneously. It’s smart to consider a set but acting on its complement that what’s 3181
done in this research book which is popular in the terms of high readers in Scribd. 3182
See the seminal scientific researches [1–3]. The formalization of the notions on the 3183
alongside scientific research books at [211–329]. Two popular scientific research books 3186
in Scribd in the terms of high readers, 4728 and 5721 respectively, on neutrosophic 3187
References 3189
SuperHyperGraph As Hyper Tool On Super Toot”, Curr Trends Mass Comm 3191
ideas-in-recognition-of-cancer-and-neutrosophic-super-hypergraph-as-hyper- 3193
tool-on-super-toot.pdf) 3194
2. Henry Garrett, “Some Super Hyper Degrees and Co-Super Hyper Degrees on 3195
Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs And Super Hyper Graphs Alongside 3196
super-hyper-degrees-and-cosuper-hyper-degrees-on-neutrosophic-super-hyper- 3199
graphs-and-super-hyper-graphs-alongside-a.pdf) 3200
Hypergraph by Eulerian Super Hyper Cycles and Hamiltonian Sets as Hyper 3202
Covering Versus Super separations”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 2(3) 3203
research-on-cancers-recognition-and-neutrosophic-super-hypergraph-by- 3205
eulerian-super-hyper-cycles-and-hamiltonian-sets-.pdf) 3206
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Hypergraphs”, J Curr Trends Comp Sci Res 2(1) (2023) 16-24. (doi: 3209
10.33140/JCTCSR.02.01.04) 3210
5. Henry Garrett, “Super Hyper Dominating and Super Hyper Resolving on 3211
Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs and Their Directions in Game Theory and 3212
Neutrosophic Super Hyper Classes”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 1(3) 3213
Research - Zenodo, Nov. 2022. CERN European Organization for Nuclear 3218
https://oa.mg/work/10.5281/zenodo.6319942 3220
Graphs.” CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research - Zenodo, Feb. 3222
https://doi.org/10.13140/rg.2.2.35241.26724. 3224
https://oa.mg/work/10.13140/rg.2.2.35241.26724 3225
10.20944/preprints202301.0308.v1). 3229
9. Henry Garrett, “Uncertainty On The Act And Effect Of Cancer Alongside The 3230
11. Henry Garrett, “The Shift Paradigm To Classify Separately The Cells and 3237
Affected Cells Toward The Totality Under Cancer’s Recognition By New 3238
10.20944/preprints202301.0265.v1). 3242
12. Henry Garrett, “Breaking the Continuity and Uniformity of Cancer In The 3243
13. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable as the Survivors on the 3247
10.20944/preprints202301.0240.v1). 3250
14. Henry Garrett, “Extremism of the Attacked Body Under the Cancer’s 3251
10.20944/preprints202301.0224.v1). 3254
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
10.20944/preprints202301.0088.v1). 3261
10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 3271
10.20944/preprints202301.0088.v1). 3275
10.20944/preprints202212.0324.v1). 3290
10.20944/preprints202211.0576.v1). 3294
26. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 3295
27. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Con By Hyper Conceit Of Equal 3298
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
28. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 3301
29. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Con By Hyper Conceit Of Connective 3304
30. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 3307
31. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Units By Hyper Ultra Of United 3310
32. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 3313
33. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super forceps By Hyper ford Of Zero Forcing In 3316
34. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 3319
35. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super mat By Hyper matte Of Matrix-Based In 3322
36. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 3325
37. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Eddy By Hyper Dome Of 3328
38. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 3331
39. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Gab By Hyper Gape Of Edge-Gap In 3334
40. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 3337
41. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nebulous By Hyper Nebbish Of 3340
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
42. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 3343
10.5281/zenodo.7904529). 3346
43. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Decompensation By Hyper Decompress Of 3347
10.5281/zenodo.7904401). 3350
44. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 3351
45. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nebulous By Hyper Nebbish Of 3354
46. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 3357
47. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nebulous By Hyper Nebbish Of 3360
48. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 3363
49. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Decompensation By Hyper Decompress Of 3366
50. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 3369
51. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super EULA By Hyper Eulogy Of 3372
52. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 3375
53. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nebulous By Hyper Nebbish Of 3378
54. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 3381
55. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Decompensation By Hyper Decompress Of 3384
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
56. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 3387
57. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super EULA By Hyper Eulogy Of 3390
58. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 3393
59. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nebulous By Hyper Nebbish Of 3396
60. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 3399
61. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Decompensation By Hyper Decompress Of 3402
62. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 3405
10.5281/zenodo.7812236). 3407
63. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 3408
64. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 3411
65. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super EULA By Hyper Eulogy Of 3414
66. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 3417
67. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 3420
68. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nebulous By Hyper Nebbish Of 3423
69. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 3426
10.5281/zenodo.7804238). 3429
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
70. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Decompensation By Hyper Decompress Of 3430
71. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 3433
72. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Hammy By Hyper Hamper Of 3436
73. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 3439
74. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 3442
75. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 3445
76. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Hammy By Hyper Hamper Of 3448
77. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 3451
78. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nebulous By Hyper Nebbish Of 3454
79. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 3457
80. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Decompensation By Hyper Decompress Of 3460
81. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 3463
82. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Hammy By Hyper Hamper Of 3466
83. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 3469
84. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nebulous By Hyper Nebbish Of 3472
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
85. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3475
86. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Decompensation By Hyper Decompress Of 3478
87. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3481
88. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Tract By Hyper Track Of Trace-Cut In 3484
89. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3487
90. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nebulous By Hyper Nebbish Of 3490
91. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3493
92. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Decompensation By Hyper Decompress Of 3496
93. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3499
94. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Eddy By Hyper Edify Of Edge-Cut In 3502
95. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3505
96. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nebulous By Hyper Nebbish Of 3508
97. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3511
98. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Decompensation By Hyper Decompress Of 3514
99. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3517
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
100. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Vertigo By Hyper Vertu Of Vertex-Cut In 3520
101. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3523
102. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nebulizer By Hyper Nub Of 3526
103. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3529
104. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Stale By Hyper Stalk Of 3532
105. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3535
106. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Stale By Hyper Stalk Of Stable-Cut In 3538
107. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3541
108. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nebulizer By Hyper Nub Of 3544
109. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3547
110. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Decompensation By Hyper Decompress Of 3550
111. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3553
112. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Cliff By Hyper Cling Of Clique-Cut In 3556
113. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3559
114. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3562
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
115. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Lith By Hyper Lite Of List-Coloring In 3565
116. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3568
117. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Solidarity By Hyper Soul Of Space In 3571
118. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3574
119. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Uniform By Hyper Deformation Of 3577
120. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3580
121. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super System By Hyper Explosions Of 3583
122. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3586
123. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nodes By Hyper Moves Of 3589
124. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3592
125. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Gap By Hyper Navigations Of Chord In 3595
126. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3598
127. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Coincidence By Hyper Routes Of 3601
128. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3604
129. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Obstacles By Hyper Model Of 3607
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
130. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3610
131. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Harmony By Hyper k-Function Of 3613
132. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3616
133. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Gradient By Hyper k-Class Of 3619
134. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3622
135. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Analogous By Hyper Visions Of 3625
136. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3628
137. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Relations By Hyper Identifications Of 3631
138. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Contradiction By Hyper Detection of 3634
139. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3637
140. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Locations By Hyper Differing Of 3640
141. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3643
142. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Missing By Hyper Searching Of 3646
143. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3649
144. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Outbreak By Hyper Collections Of 3652
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
145. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3655
146. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Extremism By Hyper Treatments Of 3658
147. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Isolation By Hyper Perfectness Of 3661
148. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3664
149. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3667
150. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super connections By Hyper disconnections Of 3670
151. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Mixed-Devastations By Hyper Decisions 3673
154. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Reflections By Hyper Rotations Of Path 3682
155. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas As Hyper Deformations On Super Chains In 3685
157. Henry Garrett, “New Research On Cancer’s Recognition and Neutrosophic 3691
10.13140/RG.2.2.29913.80482). 3694
158. Henry Garrett, “New Research On Cancer’s Recognition and Neutrosophic 3695
10.13140/RG.2.2.33269.24809). 3698
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
159. Henry Garrett, “New Research On Cancer’s Recognition and Neutrosophic 3699
10.13140/RG.2.2.34946.96960). 3702
10.13140/RG.2.2.14814.31040). 3706
10.13140/RG.2.2.15653.17125). 3710
10.13140/RG.2.2.25719.50089). 3714
163. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Disruptions In Cancer’s Extreme 3715
10.13140/RG.2.2.29441.94562). 3718
the Criteria of Eulerian and Hamiltonian Type-Sets As Hyper Modified Cycles 3723
10.20944/preprints202301.0396.v1). 3731
10.20944/preprints202301.0395.v1). 3735
10.13140/RG.2.2.26240.51204). 3740
Classes With Hyper Effects In The Background of the Framework is So-Called 3743
10.13140/RG.2.2.12818.73925). 3745
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
171. Henry Garrett,“Super Actions On The Types of Hyper Levels In The Sensible 3746
10.13140/RG.2.2.26836.88960). 3749
10.20944/preprints202301.0308.v1). 3756
174. Henry Garrett,“Uncertainty On The Act And Effect Of Cancer Alongside The 3757
176. Henry Garrett, “The Shift Paradigm To Classify Separately The Cells and 3764
Affected Cells Toward The Totality Under Cancer’s Recognition By New 3765
10.20944/preprints202301.0265.v1). 3769
177. Henry Garrett,“Breaking the Continuity and Uniformity of Cancer In The 3770
178. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable as the Survivors on the 3774
10.20944/preprints202301.0240.v1). 3777
179. Henry Garrett, “Extremism of the Attacked Body Under the Cancer’s 3778
10.20944/preprints202301.0224.v1). 3781
181. Henry Garrett,“The Focus on The Partitions Obtained By Parallel Moves In 3785
182. Henry Garrett,“Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique Decides the Failures on the 3789
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
184. Henry Garrett,“Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique Decides the Failures on the 3797
10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 3814
10.20944/preprints202301.0088.v1). 3818
193. Henry Garrett, “Using the Tool As (Neutrosophic) Failed SuperHyperStable To 3829
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
10.13140/RG.2.2.36141.77287). 3841
10.13140/RG.2.2.29430.88642). 3844
10.13140/RG.2.2.11369.16487). 3848
10.20944/preprints202212.0324.v1). 3874
10.13140/RG.2.2.23123.04641). 3878
10.20944/preprints202211.0576.v1). 3882
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
10.13140/RG.2.2.23324.56966). 3886
210. Henry Garrett, “Initial Material of Neutrosophic Preliminaries to Study Some 3890
10.13140/RG.2.2.25385.88160). 3893
213. Henry Garrett, “United Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 3898
214. Henry Garrett, “Zero Forcing In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 3900
215. Henry Garrett, “Matrix-Based In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 3902
216. Henry Garrett, “Collections of Math II”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3904
10.5281/zenodo.7943878). 3905
218. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Gap In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 3908
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
242. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDuality”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3956
10.5281/zenodo.7637762). 3957
243. Henry Garrett, “Trace-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 3958
244. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 3960
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
246. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3964
10.5281/zenodo.7754661). 3965
249. Henry Garrett, “Vertex-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 3970
252. Henry Garrett, “Stable-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 3976
255. Henry Garrett, “Clique-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 3982
256. Henry Garrett, “Space In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3984
10.5281/zenodo.7713563). 3985
257. Henry Garrett, “Space In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3986
10.5281/zenodo.7709116). 3987
261. Henry Garrett, “Chord In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3994
10.5281/zenodo.7700205). 3995
264. Henry Garrett, “K-Domination In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 4000
265. Henry Garrett, “K-Number In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 4002
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
266. Henry Garrett, “Order In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4004
10.5281/zenodo.7668648). 4005
267. Henry Garrett, “Coloring In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4006
10.5281/zenodo.7662810). 4007
268. Henry Garrett, “Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 4008
269. Henry Garrett, “Cancer In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4010
10.5281/zenodo.7653233). 4011
270. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperWheel ”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4012
10.5281/zenodo.7653204). 4013
271. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperMultipartite”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4014
10.5281/zenodo.7653142). 4015
272. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperBipartite”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4016
10.5281/zenodo.7653117). 4017
273. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperStar ”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4018
10.5281/zenodo.7653089). 4019
274. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4020
10.5281/zenodo.7651687). 4021
275. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperPath”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4022
10.5281/zenodo.7651619). 4023
276. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDomination”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4024
10.5281/zenodo.7651439). 4025
277. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDominating”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4026
10.5281/zenodo.7650729). 4027
278. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperConnected ”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4028
10.5281/zenodo.7647868). 4029
279. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperTotal ”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4030
10.5281/zenodo.7647017). 4031
280. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperPerfect”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4032
10.5281/zenodo.7644894). 4033
281. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperJoin”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4034
10.5281/zenodo.7641880). 4035
282. Henry Garrett, “Path SuperHyperColoring”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4036
10.5281/zenodo.7632923). 4037
283. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDensity”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4038
10.5281/zenodo.7623459). 4039
285. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperConnectivities”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 4042
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
286. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperConnectivities”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4044
10.5281/zenodo.7606404). 4045
287. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4046
10.5281/zenodo.7580018). 4047
288. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4048
10.5281/zenodo.7580018). 4049
289. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4050
10.5281/zenodo.7580018). 4051
290. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4052
10.5281/zenodo.7579929). 4053
291. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4054
10.5281/zenodo.7563170). 4055
292. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4056
10.5281/zenodo.7563164). 4057
293. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4058
10.5281/zenodo.7563160). 4059
294. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4060
10.5281/zenodo.7563160). 4061
295. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4062
10.5281/zenodo.7563160). 4063
296. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 4064
297. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperMatching”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4066
10.5281/zenodo.7557009). 4067
298. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperMatching”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 4068
299. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 4070
300. Henry Garrett, “Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 4072
301. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On Failed SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 4074
302. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4076
10.5281/zenodo.7574952). 4077
303. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4078
10.5281/zenodo.7574992). 4079
304. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4080
10.5281/zenodo.7523357). 4081
305. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4082
10.5281/zenodo.7523357). 4083
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
306. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 4084
307. Henry Garrett, “Extreme Failed SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 4086
308. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On Failed SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 4088
309. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4090
10.5281/zenodo.7499395). 4091
310. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4092
10.5281/zenodo.7499395). 4093
311. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4094
10.5281/zenodo.7499395). 4095
312. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 4096
313. Henry Garrett, “Extreme Failed SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 4098
314. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 4100
315. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4102
10.5281/zenodo.7494862). 4103
316. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 4104
317. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperAlliances”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 4106
318. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperAlliances”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4108
10.5281/zenodo.7493845). 4109
319. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperAlliances”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 4110
320. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperMatching”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4112
10.5281/zenodo.7539484). 4113
321. Henry Garrett, “Failed SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4114
10.5281/zenodo.7523390). 4115
322. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4116
10.5281/zenodo.7523357). 4117
323. Henry Garrett, “Failed SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4118
10.5281/zenodo.7504782). 4119
324. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4120
10.5281/zenodo.7499395). 4121
325. Henry Garrett, “Failed SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4122
10.5281/zenodo.7497450). 4123
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
326. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4124
10.5281/zenodo.7494862). 4125
327. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperAlliances”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4126
10.5281/zenodo.7493845). 4127
328. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4128
10.5281/zenodo.7480110). 4129
329. Henry Garrett, “Neut. SuperHyperEdges”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4130
10.5281/zenodo.7378758). 4131
330. Henry Garrett, “Beyond Neutrosophic Graphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4132
10.5281/zenodo.6320305). 4133
331. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Duality”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4134
10.5281/zenodo.6677173). 4135
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA