New Ideas in Cancer's Recognition and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph by SuperHyperColoring As Hyper Categories On Super Neighbors

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.
net/publication/368686241
New Ideas In Cancer's Recognition And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph By

SuperHyperColoring As Hyper Categories On Super Neighbors
Preprint · February 2023

DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.13973.81121
CITATIONS
1 author:
Henry Garrett
326 PUBLICATIONS 4,091 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
On Algebraic Structures and Algebraic Hyperstructures View project
Featured Articles View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Henry Garrett on 21 February 2023.
The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 2
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperColoring As Hyper 3
Categories On Super Neighbors 4
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · 6
DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA 7
1 ABSTRACT 8
In this scientific research, (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic 9
SuperHyperColoring). Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an 10
ordered pair S = (V, E). Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs } 11
and E 0 = {E1 , E2 , . . . , Ez }. Then either V 0 or E 0 is called Neutrosophic 12
e-SuperHyperColoring if Vc ∈ Ea , Eb ∈ E 0 such that d(Ea ) 6= d(Eb ); Neutrosophic 13
re-SuperHyperColoring if Vc ∈ Ea , Eb ∈ E 0 such that d(Ea ) 6= d(Eb ); and 14
|Ei |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY = |Ej |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY ; Neutrosophic 15
v-SuperHyperColoring if Va , Vb ∈ V 0 , Va , Vb ∈ Ec such that d(Va ) 6= V (Eb ); 16
Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperColoring if Va , Vb ∈ V 0 , Va , Vb ∈ Ec such that 17
d(Va ) 6= V (Eb ); and |Vi |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY = |Vj |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY ; 18
Neutrosophic SuperHyperColoring if it’s either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperColoring, 19
Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperColoring, Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperColoring, and 20
Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperColoring. ((Neutrosophic) SuperHyperColoring). Assume a 21
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an ordered pair S = (V, E). Consider a 22
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) E = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then E is called an 23
Extreme SuperHyperColoring if it’s either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperColoring, 24
Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperColoring and C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph 26
N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum Extreme cardinality of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S 27
of high Extreme cardinality of the Extreme SuperHyperEdges in the consecutive 28
Extreme sequence of Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such 29
that they form the Extreme SuperHyperColoring; a Neutrosophic SuperHyperColoring 30
if it’s either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperColoring, Neutrosophic 31
re-SuperHyperColoring, Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperColoring, and Neutrosophic 32
rv-SuperHyperColoring and C(N SHG) for a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 33
N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic 34
SuperHyperEdges of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high Neutrosophic cardinality 35
consecutive Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such 36
that they form the Neutrosophic SuperHyperColoring; an Extreme SuperHyperColoring 37
SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperColoring, 38
N SHG : (V, E) is the Extreme SuperHyperPolynomial contains the Extreme 41
coefficients defined as the Extreme number of the maximum Extreme cardinality of the 42
Extreme SuperHyperEdges of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality 43
consecutive Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they 44
form the Extreme SuperHyperColoring; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its 45
Extreme coefficient; a Neutrosophic SuperHyperColoring SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s 46
either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperColoring, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperColoring, 47
Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperColoring, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperColoring and 48
C(N SHG) for a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Neutrosophic 49
SuperHyperPolynomial contains the Neutrosophic coefficients defined as the 50
Neutrosophic number of the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic 51
SuperHyperEdges of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high Neutrosophic cardinality 52
consecutive Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such 53
that they form the Neutrosophic SuperHyperColoring; and the Neutrosophic power is 54
corresponded to its Neutrosophic coefficient; an Extreme V-SuperHyperColoring if it’s 55
either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperColoring, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperColoring, 56
C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum Extreme 58
cardinality of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality of the Extreme 59
SuperHyperVertices in the consecutive Extreme sequence of Extreme SuperHyperEdges 60
and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Extreme 61
SuperHyperColoring; a Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperColoring if it’s either of 62
Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperColoring, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperColoring, 63
C(N SHG) for a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum 65
Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of a Neutrosophic 66
SuperHyperSet S of high Neutrosophic cardinality consecutive Neutrosophic 67
SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 68
Neutrosophic SuperHyperColoring; an Extreme V-SuperHyperColoring 69
coefficients defined as the Extreme number of the maximum Extreme cardinality of the 74
Extreme SuperHyperVertices of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme 75
cardinality consecutive Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices 76
such that they form the Extreme SuperHyperColoring; and the Extreme power is 77
corresponded to its Extreme coefficient; a Neutrosophic SuperHyperColoring 78
Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperColoring and C(N SHG) for a Neutrosophic 81
SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPolynomial contains 82
the Neutrosophic coefficients defined as the Neutrosophic number of the maximum 83
Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of a Neutrosophic 84
Neutrosophic SuperHyperColoring; and the Neutrosophic power is corresponded to its 87
Neutrosophic coefficient. In this scientific research, new setting is introduced for new 88
SuperHyperNotions, namely, a SuperHyperColoring and Neutrosophic 89
SuperHyperColoring. Two different types of SuperHyperDefinitions are debut for them 90
but the research goes further and the SuperHyperNotion, SuperHyperUniform, and 91
SuperHyperClass based on that are well-defined and well-reviewed. The literature 92
review is implemented in the whole of this research. For shining the elegancy and the 93
significancy of this research, the comparison between this SuperHyperNotion with other 94
SuperHyperNotions and fundamental SuperHyperNumbers are featured. The definitions 95
are followed by the examples and the instances thus the clarifications are driven with 96
different tools. The applications are figured out to make sense about the theoretical 97
aspect of this ongoing research. The “Cancer’s Recognition” are the under research to 98
figure out the challenges make sense about ongoing and upcoming research. The special 99
case is up. The cells are viewed in the deemed ways. There are different types of them. 100
Some of them are individuals and some of them are well-modeled by the group of cells. 101
These types are all officially called “SuperHyperVertex” but the relations amid them all 102
officially called “SuperHyperEdge”. The frameworks “SuperHyperGraph” and 103
“Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” are chosen and elected to research about “Cancer’s 104
Recognition”. Thus these complex and dense SuperHyperModels open up some avenues 105
to research on theoretical segments and “Cancer’s Recognition”. Some avenues are 106
posed to pursue this research. It’s also officially collected in the form of some questions 107
and some problems. Assume a SuperHyperGraph. Assume a SuperHyperGraph. Then 108
δ−SuperHyperColoring is a maximal of SuperHyperVertices with a maximum 109
cardinality such that either of the following expressions hold for the (Neutrosophic) 110
cardinalities of SuperHyperNeighbors of s ∈ S : there are 111
|S ∩ N (s)| > |S ∩ (V \ N (s))| + δ; and |S ∩ N (s)| < |S ∩ (V \ N (s))| + δ. The first 112
Expression, holds if S is an δ−SuperHyperOffensive. And the second Expression, holds 113
if S is an δ−SuperHyperDefensive; a Neutrosophic δ−SuperHyperColoring is a maximal 114
Neutrosophic of SuperHyperVertices with maximum Neutrosophic cardinality such 115
that either of the following expressions hold for the Neutrosophic cardinalities of 116
SuperHyperNeighbors of s ∈ S there are: 117
|S ∩ N (s)|N eutrosophic > |S ∩ (V \ N (s))|N eutrosophic + δ; 118
and |S ∩ N (s)|N eutrosophic < |S ∩ (V \ N (s))|N eutrosophic + δ. The first Expression, 119
holds if S is a Neutrosophic δ−SuperHyperOffensive. And the second Expression, holds 120
if S is a Neutrosophic δ−SuperHyperDefensive It’s useful to define a “Neutrosophic” 121
version of a SuperHyperColoring . Since there’s more ways to get type-results to make a 122
SuperHyperColoring more understandable. For the sake of having Neutrosophic 123
SuperHyperColoring, there’s a need to “redefine” the notion of a “SuperHyperColoring 124
”. The SuperHyperVertices and the SuperHyperEdges are assigned by the labels from 125
the letters of the alphabets. In this procedure, there’s the usage of the position of labels 126
to assign to the values. Assume a SuperHyperColoring . It’s redefined a Neutrosophic 127
SuperHyperColoring if the mentioned Table holds, concerning, “The Values of Vertices, 128
SuperVertices, Edges, HyperEdges, and SuperHyperEdges Belong to The Neutrosophic 129
SuperHyperGraph” with the key points, “The Values of The Vertices & The Number 130
of Position in Alphabet”, “The Values of The SuperVertices&The maximum Values of 131
Its Vertices”, “The Values of The Edges&The maximum Values of Its Vertices”, “The 132
Values of The HyperEdges&The maximum Values of Its Vertices”, “The Values of The 133
SuperHyperEdges&The maximum Values of Its Endpoints”. To get structural examples 134
and instances, I’m going to introduce the next SuperHyperClass of SuperHyperGraph 135
based on a SuperHyperColoring . It’s the main. It’ll be disciplinary to have the 136
foundation of previous definition in the kind of SuperHyperClass. If there’s a need to 137
have all SuperHyperColoring until the SuperHyperColoring, then it’s officially called a 138
“SuperHyperColoring” but otherwise, it isn’t a SuperHyperColoring . There are some 139
instances about the clarifications for the main definition titled a “SuperHyperColoring ”. 140
These two examples get more scrutiny and discernment since there are characterized in 141
the disciplinary ways of the SuperHyperClass based on a SuperHyperColoring . For the 142
sake of having a Neutrosophic SuperHyperColoring, there’s a need to “redefine” the 143
notion of a “Neutrosophic SuperHyperColoring” and a “Neutrosophic 144
SuperHyperColoring ”. The SuperHyperVertices and the SuperHyperEdges are assigned 145
by the labels from the letters of the alphabets. In this procedure, there’s the usage of 146
the position of labels to assign to the values. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. 147
It’s redefined “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” if the intended Table holds. And a 148
SuperHyperColoring are redefined to a “Neutrosophic SuperHyperColoring” if the 149
intended Table holds. It’s useful to define “Neutrosophic” version of SuperHyperClasses. 150
Since there’s more ways to get Neutrosophic type-results to make a Neutrosophic 151
SuperHyperColoring more understandable. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. 152
There are some Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses if the intended Table holds. Thus 153
SuperHyperPath, SuperHyperColoring, SuperHyperStar, SuperHyperBipartite, 154
SuperHyperMultiPartite, and SuperHyperWheel, are “Neutrosophic 155
SuperHyperPath”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperColoring”, “Neutrosophic 156
SuperHyperStar”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite”, “Neutrosophic 157
SuperHyperMultiPartite”, and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel” if the intended Table 158
holds. A SuperHyperGraph has a “Neutrosophic SuperHyperColoring” where it’s the 159
strongest [the maximum Neutrosophic value from all the SuperHyperColoring amid the 160
maximum value amid all SuperHyperVertices from a SuperHyperColoring .] 161
SuperHyperColoring . A graph is a SuperHyperUniform if it’s a SuperHyperGraph and 162
the number of elements of SuperHyperEdges are the same. Assume a Neutrosophic 163
SuperHyperGraph. There are some SuperHyperClasses as follows. It’s SuperHyperPath 164
if it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two given SuperHyperEdges with two 165
exceptions; it’s SuperHyperColoring if it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid 166
two given SuperHyperEdges; it’s SuperHyperStar it’s only one SuperVertex as 167
intersection amid all SuperHyperEdges; it’s SuperHyperBipartite it’s only one 168
SuperVertex as intersection amid two given SuperHyperEdges and these SuperVertices, 169
forming two separate sets, has no SuperHyperEdge in common; it’s 170
SuperHyperMultiPartite it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two given 171
SuperHyperEdges and these SuperVertices, forming multi separate sets, has no 172
SuperHyperEdge in common; it’s a SuperHyperWheel if it’s only one SuperVertex as 173
intersection amid two given SuperHyperEdges and one SuperVertex has one 174
SuperHyperEdge with any common SuperVertex. The SuperHyperModel proposes the 175
specific designs and the specific architectures. The SuperHyperModel is officially called 176
“SuperHyperGraph” and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”. In this SuperHyperModel, 177
The “specific” cells and “specific group” of cells are SuperHyperModeled as 178
“SuperHyperVertices” and the common and intended properties between “specific” cells 179
and “specific group” of cells are SuperHyperModeled as “SuperHyperEdges”. 180
Sometimes, it’s useful to have some degrees of determinacy, indeterminacy, and 181
neutrality to have more precise SuperHyperModel which in this case the 182
SuperHyperModel is called “Neutrosophic”. In the future research, the foundation will 183
be based on the “Cancer’s Recognition” and the results and the definitions will be 184
introduced in redeemed ways. The recognition of the cancer in the long-term function. 185
The specific region has been assigned by the model [it’s called SuperHyperGraph] and 186
the long cycle of the move from the cancer is identified by this research. Sometimes the 187
move of the cancer hasn’t be easily identified since there are some determinacy, 188
indeterminacy and neutrality about the moves and the effects of the cancer on that 189
region; this event leads us to choose another model [it’s said to be Neutrosophic 190
SuperHyperGraph] to have convenient perception on what’s happened and what’s done. 191
There are some specific models, which are well-known and they’ve got the names, and 192
some SuperHyperGeneral SuperHyperModels. The moves and the traces of the cancer 193
on the complex tracks and between complicated groups of cells could be fantasized by a 194
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath(-/SuperHyperColoring, SuperHyperStar, 195
SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, SuperHyperWheel). The aim is to find 196
either the longest SuperHyperColoring or the strongest SuperHyperColoring in those 197
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModels. For the longest SuperHyperColoring, called 198
SuperHyperColoring, and the strongest SuperHyperColoring, called Neutrosophic 199
SuperHyperColoring, some general results are introduced. Beyond that in 200
SuperHyperStar, all possible SuperHyperPaths have only two SuperHyperEdges but it’s 201
not enough since it’s essential to have at least three SuperHyperEdges to form any style 202
of a SuperHyperColoring. There isn’t any formation of any SuperHyperColoring but 203
literarily, it’s the deformation of any SuperHyperColoring. It, literarily, deforms and it 204
doesn’t form. A basic familiarity with Neutrosophic SuperHyperColoring theory, 205
SuperHyperGraphs, and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs theory are proposed. 206
Keywords: Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, SuperHyperColoring, Cancer’s 207
Neutrosophic Recognition 208
AMS Subject Classification: 05C17, 05C22, 05E45 209
2 Applied Notions Under The Scrutiny Of The 210
Motivation Of This Scientific Research 211
In this scientific research, there are some ideas in the featured frameworks of 212
motivations. I try to bring the motivations in the narrative ways. Some cells have been 213
faced with some attacks from the situation which is caused by the cancer’s attacks. In 214
this case, there are some embedded analysis on the ongoing situations which in that, the 215
cells could be labelled as some groups and some groups or individuals have excessive 216
labels which all are raised from the behaviors to overcome the cancer’s attacks. In the 217
embedded situations, the individuals of cells and the groups of cells could be considered 218
as “new groups”. Thus it motivates us to find the proper SuperHyperModels for getting 219
more proper analysis on this messy story. I’ve found the SuperHyperModels which are 220
officially called “SuperHyperGraphs” and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. In this 221
SuperHyperModel, the cells and the groups of cells are defined as “SuperHyperVertices” 222
and the relations between the individuals of cells and the groups of cells are defined as 223
“SuperHyperEdges”. Thus it’s another motivation for us to do research on this 224
SuperHyperModel based on the “Cancer’s Recognition”. Sometimes, the situations get 225
worst. The situation is passed from the certainty and precise style. Thus it’s the beyond 226
them. There are three descriptions, namely, the degrees of determinacy, indeterminacy 227
and neutrality, for any object based on vague forms, namely, incomplete data, imprecise 228
data, and uncertain analysis. The latter model could be considered on the previous 229
SuperHyperModel. It’s SuperHyperModel. It’s SuperHyperGraph but it’s officially 230
called “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. The cancer is the disease but the model is 231
going to figure out what’s going on this phenomenon. The special case of this disease is 232
considered and as the consequences of the model, some parameters are used. The cells 233
are under attack of this disease but the moves of the cancer in the special region are the 234
matter of mind. The recognition of the cancer could help to find some treatments for 235
this disease. The SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph are the 236
SuperHyperModels on the “Cancer’s Recognition” and both bases are the background 237
of this research. Sometimes the cancer has been happened on the region, full of cells, 238
groups of cells and embedded styles. In this segment, the SuperHyperModel proposes 239
some SuperHyperNotions based on the connectivities of the moves of the cancer in the 240
forms of alliances’ styles with the formation of the design and the architecture are 241
formally called “ SuperHyperColoring” in the themes of jargons and buzzwords. The 242
prefix “SuperHyper” refers to the theme of the embedded styles to figure out the 243
background for the SuperHyperNotions. The recognition of the cancer in the long-term 244
function. The specific region has been assigned by the model [it’s called 245
SuperHyperGraph] and the long cycle of the move from the cancer is identified by this 246
research. Sometimes the move of the cancer hasn’t be easily identified since there are 247
some determinacy, indeterminacy and neutrality about the moves and the effects of the 248
cancer on that region; this event leads us to choose another model [it’s said to be 249
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph] to have convenient perception on what’s happened and 250
what’s done. There are some specific models, which are well-known and they’ve got the 251
names, and some general models. The moves and the traces of the cancer on the 252
complex tracks and between complicated groups of cells could be fantasized by a 253
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (-/SuperHyperColoring, SuperHyperStar, 254
SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, SuperHyperWheel). The aim is to find 255
either the optimal SuperHyperColoring or the Neutrosophic SuperHyperColoring in 256
those Neutrosophic SuperHyperModels. Some general results are introduced. Beyond 257
that in SuperHyperStar, all possible Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath s have only two 258
SuperHyperEdges but it’s not enough since it’s essential to have at least three 259
SuperHyperEdges to form any style of a SuperHyperColoring. There isn’t any 260
formation of any SuperHyperColoring but literarily, it’s the deformation of any 261
SuperHyperColoring. It, literarily, deforms and it doesn’t form. 262
Question 2.1. How to define the SuperHyperNotions and to do research on them to 263
find the “ amount of SuperHyperColoring” of either individual of cells or the groups of 264
cells based on the fixed cell or the fixed group of cells, extensively, the “amount of 265
SuperHyperColoring” based on the fixed groups of cells or the fixed groups of group of 266
cells? 267
Question 2.2. What are the best descriptions for the “Cancer’s Recognition” in terms 268
of these messy and dense SuperHyperModels where embedded notions are illustrated? 269
It’s motivation to find notions to use in this dense model is titled 270
“SuperHyperGraphs”. Thus it motivates us to define different types of “ 271
SuperHyperColoring” and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperColoring” on “SuperHyperGraph” 272
and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”. Then the research has taken more motivations 273
to define SuperHyperClasses and to find some connections amid this SuperHyperNotion 274
with other SuperHyperNotions. It motivates us to get some instances and examples to 275
make clarifications about the framework of this research. The general results and some 276
results about some connections are some avenues to make key point of this research, 277
“Cancer’s Recognition”, more understandable and more clear. 278
The framework of this research is as follows. In the beginning, I introduce basic 279
definitions to clarify about preliminaries. In the subsection “Preliminaries”, initial 280
definitions about SuperHyperGraphs and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph are 281
deeply-introduced and in-depth-discussed. The elementary concepts are clarified and 282
illustrated completely and sometimes review literature are applied to make sense about 283
what’s going to figure out about the upcoming sections. The main definitions and their 284
clarifications alongside some results about new notions, SuperHyperColoring and 285
Neutrosophic SuperHyperColoring, are figured out in sections “ SuperHyperColoring” 286
and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperColoring”. In the sense of tackling on getting results and 287
in order to make sense about continuing the research, the ideas of SuperHyperUniform 288
and Neutrosophic SuperHyperUniform are introduced and as their consequences, 289
corresponded SuperHyperClasses are figured out to debut what’s done in this section, 290
titled “Results on SuperHyperClasses” and “Results on Neutrosophic 291
SuperHyperClasses”. As going back to origin of the notions, there are some smart steps 292
toward the common notions to extend the new notions in new frameworks, 293
SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, in the sections “Results on 294
SuperHyperClasses” and “Results on Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”. The starter 295
research about the general SuperHyperRelations and as concluding and closing section 296
of theoretical research are contained in the section “General Results”. Some general 297
SuperHyperRelations are fundamental and they are well-known as fundamental 298
SuperHyperNotions as elicited and discussed in the sections, “General Results”, “ 299
SuperHyperColoring”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperColoring”, “Results on 300
SuperHyperClasses” and “Results on Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”. There are 301
curious questions about what’s done about the SuperHyperNotions to make sense about 302
excellency of this research and going to figure out the word “best” as the description 303
and adjective for this research as presented in section, “ SuperHyperColoring”. The 304
keyword of this research debut in the section “Applications in Cancer’s Recognition” 305
with two cases and subsections “Case 1: The Initial Steps Toward SuperHyperBipartite 306
as SuperHyperModel” and “Case 2: The Increasing Steps Toward 307
SuperHyperMultipartite as SuperHyperModel”. In the section, “Open Problems”, there 308
are some scrutiny and discernment on what’s done and what’s happened in this research 309
in the terms of “questions” and “problems” to make sense to figure out this research in 310
featured style. The advantages and the limitations of this research alongside about 311
what’s done in this research to make sense and to get sense about what’s figured out are 312
included in the section, “Conclusion and Closing Remarks”. 313
3 Neutrosophic Preliminaries Of This Scientific 314
Research On the Redeemed Ways 315
In this section, the basic material in this scientific research, is referred to [Single Valued 316
Neutrosophic Set](Ref. [96],Definition 2.2,p.2), [Neutrosophic Set](Ref. [96],Definition 317
2.1,p.1), [Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)](Ref. [96],Definition 2.5,p.2), 318
[Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)](Ref. [96],Definition 319
2.7,p.3), [t-norm](Ref. [96], Definition 2.7, p.3), and [Characterization of the 320
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)](Ref. [96],Definition 2.7,p.3), [Neutrosophic 321
Strength of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPaths] (Ref. [96],Definition 5.3,p.7), and 322
[Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)] 323
(Ref. [96],Definition 5.4,p.7). Also, the new ideas and their clarifications are addressed 324
to Ref. [96]. 325
In this subsection, the basic material which is used in this scientific research, is 326
presented. Also, the new ideas and their clarifications are elicited. 327
Definition 3.1 (Neutrosophic Set). (Ref. [96],Definition 2.1,p.1). 328
Let X be a space of points (objects) with generic elements in X denoted by x; then

the Neutrosophic set A (NS A) is an object having the form
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}
+
where the functions T, I, F : X →]− 0, 1 [ define respectively the a
truth-membership function, an indeterminacy-membership function, and a
falsity-membership function of the element x ∈ X to the set A with the condition
−
0 ≤ TA (x) + IA (x) + FA (x) ≤ 3+ .
The functions TA (x), IA (x) and FA (x) are real standard or nonstandard subsets of 329
+
]− 0, 1 [. 330
Definition 3.2 (Single Valued Neutrosophic Set). (Ref. [96],Definition 2.2,p.2). 331
Let X be a space of points (objects) with generic elements in X denoted by x. A

single valued Neutrosophic set A (SVNS A) is characterized by truth-membership
function TA (x), an indeterminacy-membership function IA (x), and a falsity-membership
function FA (x). For each point x in X, TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) ∈ [0, 1]. A SVNS A can be
written as
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}.
Definition 3.3. The degree of truth-membership,
indeterminacy-membership and falsity-membership of the subset X ⊂ A of
the single valued Neutrosophic set A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}:
TA (X) = min[TA (vi ), TA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,
IA (X) = min[IA (vi ), IA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,
and FA (X) = min[FA (vi ), FA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X .
Definition 3.4. The support of X ⊂ A of the single valued Neutrosophic set

A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}:
supp(X) = {x ∈ X : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) > 0}.
Definition 3.5 (Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). (Ref. [96],Definition 332
2.5,p.2). 333
Assume V 0 is a given set. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an 334
ordered pair S = (V, E), where 335
(i) V = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vn } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of V 0 ; 336
(ii) V = {(Vi , TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi )) : TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi ) ≥ 0}, (i = 337
1, 2, . . . , n); 338
(iii) E = {E1 , E2 , . . . , En0 } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of 339
V; 340
(iv) E = {(Ei0 , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )) : TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 ) ≥ 0}, (i0 = 341
1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 342
(v) Vi 6= ∅, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 343
(vi) Ei0 6= ∅, (i0 = 1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 344
P
(vii) i supp(Vi ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 345
0 0
P
(viii) i0 supp(Ei ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n );
0 346
(ix) and the following conditions hold:
TV0 (Ei0 ) ≤ min[TV 0 (Vi ), TV 0 (Vj )]Vi ,Vj ∈Ei0 ,
IV0 (Ei0 ) ≤ min[IV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vj )]Vi ,Vj ∈Ei0 ,

and FV0 (Ei0 ) ≤ min[FV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vj )]Vi ,Vj ∈Ei0
where i0 = 1, 2, . . . , n0 . 347
Here the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ej 0 and the Neutrosophic 348
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) Vj are single valued Neutrosophic sets. TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), 349
and FV 0 (Vi ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 350
indeterminacy-membership and the degree of falsity-membership the Neutrosophic 351
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) V. 352
TV0 (Ei0 ), TV0 (Ei0 ), and TV0 (Ei0 ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 353
indeterminacy-membership and the degree of falsity-membership of the Neutrosophic 354
SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) Ei0 to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) E. Thus, 355
the ii0 th element of the incidence matrix of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) 356
are of the form (Vi , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )), the sets V and E are crisp sets. 357
Definition 3.6 (Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). 358
(Ref. [96],Definition 2.7,p.3). 359
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an ordered pair S = (V, E). 360
The Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ei0 and the Neutrosophic 361
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) Vi of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S = (V, E) 362
could be characterized as follow-up items. 363
(i) If |Vi | = 1, then Vi is called vertex; 364
(ii) if |Vi | ≥ 1, then Vi is called SuperVertex; 365
(iii) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called edge; 366
(iv) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 367
HyperEdge; 368
(v) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called 369
SuperEdge; 370
(vi) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 371
SuperHyperEdge. 372
If we choose different types of binary operations, then we could get hugely diverse 373
types of general forms of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG). 374
Definition 3.7 (t-norm). (Ref. [96], Definition 2.7, p.3). 375
A binary operation ⊗ : [0, 1] × [0, 1] → [0, 1] is a t-norm if it satisfies the following 376
for x, y, z, w ∈ [0, 1]: 377
(i) 1 ⊗ x = x; 378
(ii) x ⊗ y = y ⊗ x; 379
(iii) x ⊗ (y ⊗ z) = (x ⊗ y) ⊗ z; 380
(iv) If w ≤ x and y ≤ z then w ⊗ y ≤ x ⊗ z. 381
Definition 3.8. The degree of truth-membership, indeterminacy-membership

and falsity-membership of the subset X ⊂ A of the single valued Neutrosophic set
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X} (with respect to t-norm Tnorm ):
TA (X) = Tnorm [TA (vi ), TA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,
IA (X) = Tnorm [IA (vi ), IA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,

and FA (X) = Tnorm [FA (vi ), FA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X .
Definition 3.9. The support of X ⊂ A of the single valued Neutrosophic set
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}:
supp(X) = {x ∈ X : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) > 0}.
Definition 3.10. (General Forms of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). 382
Assume V 0 is a given set. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an 383
ordered pair S = (V, E), where 384
(i) V = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vn } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of V 0 ; 385
(ii) V = {(Vi , TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi )) : TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi ) ≥ 0}, (i = 386
1, 2, . . . , n); 387
(iii) E = {E1 , E2 , . . . , En0 } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of 388
V; 389
(iv) E = {(Ei0 , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )) : TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 ) ≥ 0}, (i0 = 390
1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 391
(v) Vi 6= ∅, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 392
(vi) Ei0 6= ∅, (i0 = 1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 393
P
(vii) i supp(Vi ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 394
supp(Ei0 ) = V, (i0 = 1, 2, . . . , n0 ).
P
(viii) i0 395
Here the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ej 0 and the Neutrosophic 396
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) Vj are single valued Neutrosophic sets. TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), 397
and FV 0 (Vi ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 398
indeterminacy-membership and the degree of falsity-membership the Neutrosophic 399
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) V. 400
TV0 (Ei0 ), TV0 (Ei0 ), and TV0 (Ei0 ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 401
indeterminacy-membership and the degree of falsity-membership of the Neutrosophic 402
SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) Ei0 to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) E. Thus, 403
the ii0 th element of the incidence matrix of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) 404
are of the form (Vi , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )), the sets V and E are crisp sets. 405
Definition 3.11 (Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). 406
The Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ei0 and the Neutrosophic 409
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) Vi of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S = (V, E) 410
(i) If |Vi | = 1, then Vi is called vertex; 412
(ii) if |Vi | ≥ 1, then Vi is called SuperVertex; 413
(iii) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called edge; 414
(iv) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 415
HyperEdge; 416
(v) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called 417
SuperEdge; 418
(vi) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 419
SuperHyperEdge. 420
This SuperHyperModel is too messy and too dense. Thus there’s a need to have 421
some restrictions and conditions on SuperHyperGraph. The special case of this 422
SuperHyperGraph makes the patterns and regularities. 423
Definition 3.12. A graph is SuperHyperUniform if it’s SuperHyperGraph and the 424
number of elements of SuperHyperEdges are the same. 425
To get more visions on SuperHyperUniform, the some SuperHyperClasses are 426
introduced. It makes to have SuperHyperUniform more understandable. 427
Definition 3.13. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. There are some 428
SuperHyperClasses as follows. 429
(i). It’s Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath if it’s only one SuperVertex as 430
intersection amid two given SuperHyperEdges with two exceptions; 431
(ii). it’s SuperHyperCycle if it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two 432
given SuperHyperEdges; 433
(iii). it’s SuperHyperStar it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid all 434
SuperHyperEdges; 435
(iv). it’s SuperHyperBipartite it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two 436
given SuperHyperEdges and these SuperVertices, forming two separate sets, has 437
no SuperHyperEdge in common; 438
(v). it’s SuperHyperMultiPartite it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid 439
two given SuperHyperEdges and these SuperVertices, forming multi separate sets, 440
has no SuperHyperEdge in common; 441
(vi). it’s SuperHyperWheel if it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two 442
given SuperHyperEdges and one SuperVertex has one SuperHyperEdge with any 443
common SuperVertex. 444
Definition 3.14. Let an ordered pair S = (V, E) be a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph

(NSHG) S. Then a sequence of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) and
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)
V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs
is called a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic 445
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) V1 to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vs if either 446
of following conditions hold: 447
(i) Vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 448
(ii) there’s a vertex vi ∈ Vi such that vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 449
(iii) there’s a SuperVertex Vi0 ∈ Vi such that Vi0 , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 450
(iv) there’s a vertex vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that Vi , vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 451
0 0
(v) there’s a SuperVertex Vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that Vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 452
(vi) there are a vertex vi ∈ Vi and a vertex vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that vi , vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 453
0 0
(vii) there are a vertex vi ∈ Vi and a SuperVertex Vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 454
(viii) there are a SuperVertex Vi0 ∈ Vi and a vertex vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that Vi0 , vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 455
(ix) there are a SuperVertex Vi0 ∈ Vi and a SuperVertex Vi+1

0
∈ Vi+1 such that 456
0 0
Vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 . 457
Definition 3.15. (Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPaths). 458
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an ordered pair S = (V, E).

a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV)
V1 to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vs is sequence of Neutrosophic
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) and Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)
V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs ,
(i) If for all Vi , Ej 0 , |Vi | = 1, |Ej 0 | = 2, then NSHP is called path; 460
(ii) if for all Ej 0 , |Ej 0 | = 2, and there’s Vi , |Vi | ≥ 1, then NSHP is called SuperPath; 461
(iii) if for all Vi , Ej 0 , |Vi | = 1, |Ej 0 | ≥ 2, then NSHP is called HyperPath; 462
(iv) if there are Vi , Ej 0 , |Vi | ≥ 1, |Ej 0 | ≥ 2, then NSHP is called Neutrosophic 463
SuperHyperPath . 464
Definition 3.16 (Neutrosophic Strength of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPaths). 465
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an ordered pair S = (V, E).

A Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex
(NSHV) V1 to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vs is sequence of Neutrosophic
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) and Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)
V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs ,
have 467
(i) Neutrosophic t-strength (min{T (Vi )}, m, n)si=1 ; 468
(ii) Neutrosophic i-strength (m, min{I(Vi )}, n)si=1 ; 469
(iii) Neutrosophic f-strength (m, n, min{F (Vi )})si=1 ; 470
(iv) Neutrosophic strength (min{T (Vi )}, min{I(Vi )}, min{F (Vi )})si=1 . 471
Definition 3.17 (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges 472
(NSHE)). (Ref. [96],Definition 5.4,p.7). 473
Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) E = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then E is 475
called 476
(ix) Neutrosophic t-connective if T (E) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic 477
t-strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 478
(NSHV) Vi to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vj where 1 ≤ i, j ≤ s; 479
(x) Neutrosophic i-connective if I(E) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic 480
i-strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 481
(xi) Neutrosophic f-connective if F (E) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic 483
f-strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 484
(xii) Neutrosophic connective if (T (E), I(E), F (E)) ≥ maximum number of 486
Neutrosophic strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic 487
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vj 488
where 1 ≤ i, j ≤ s. 489
Definition 3.18. (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperColoring). 490
Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs } and 492
E 0 = {E1 , E2 , . . . , Ez }. Then either V 0 or E 0 is called 493
(i) Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperColoring if Vc ∈ Ea , Eb ∈ E 0 such that 494
d(Ea ) 6= d(Eb ); 495
(ii) Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperColoring if Vc ∈ Ea , Eb ∈ E 0 such that 496
d(Ea ) 6= d(Eb ); and 497
|Ei |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY = |Ej |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY ; 498
(iii) Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperColoring if Va , Vb ∈ V 0 , Va , Vb ∈ Ec such that 499
d(Va ) 6= V (Eb ); 500
(iv) Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperColoring if Va , Vb ∈ V 0 , Va , Vb ∈ Ec such that 501
d(Va ) 6= V (Eb ); and 502
|Vi |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY = |Vj |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY ; 503
(v) Neutrosophic SuperHyperColoring if it’s either of Neutrosophic 504
e-SuperHyperColoring, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperColoring, Neutrosophic 505
v-SuperHyperColoring, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperColoring. 506
Definition 3.19. ((Neutrosophic) SuperHyperColoring). 507
called 510
(i) an Extreme SuperHyperColoring if it’s either of Neutrosophic 511
v-SuperHyperColoring, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperColoring and C(N SHG) 513
for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum Extreme 514
cardinality of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality of the 515
Extreme SuperHyperEdges in the consecutive Extreme sequence of Extreme 516
SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 517
Extreme SuperHyperColoring; 518
(ii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperColoring if it’s either of Neutrosophic 519
for a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum 522
Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges of a Neutrosophic 523
Neutrosophic SuperHyperColoring; 526
(iii) an Extreme SuperHyperColoring SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of 527
Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperColoring, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperColoring, 528
Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperColoring, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperColoring 529
and C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Extreme 530
SuperHyperPolynomial contains the Extreme coefficients defined as the Extreme 531
number of the maximum Extreme cardinality of the Extreme SuperHyperEdges of 532
an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality consecutive Extreme 533
Extreme SuperHyperColoring; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its 535
Extreme coefficient; 536
(iv) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperColoring SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s 537
either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperColoring, Neutrosophic 538
N SHG : (V, E) is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPolynomial contains the 541
Neutrosophic coefficients defined as the Neutrosophic number of the maximum 542
Neutrosophic SuperHyperColoring; and the Neutrosophic power is corresponded 546
to its Neutrosophic coefficient; 547
(v) an Extreme V-SuperHyperColoring if it’s either of Neutrosophic 548
for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum Extreme 551
Extreme SuperHyperVertices in the consecutive Extreme sequence of Extreme 553
Extreme SuperHyperColoring; 555
(vi) a Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperColoring if it’s either of Neutrosophic 556
for a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum 559
Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of a 560
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high Neutrosophic cardinality consecutive 561
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that 562
they form the Neutrosophic SuperHyperColoring; 563
(vii) an Extreme V-SuperHyperColoring SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either 564
of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperColoring, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperColoring, 565
Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperColoring, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperColoring 566
and C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Extreme 567
number of the maximum Extreme cardinality of the Extreme SuperHyperVertices 569
of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality consecutive Extreme 570
Extreme SuperHyperColoring; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its 572
(viii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperColoring SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s 574
either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperColoring, Neutrosophic 575
N SHG : (V, E) is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPolynomial contains the 578
Neutrosophic coefficients defined as the Neutrosophic number of the maximum 579
they form the Neutrosophic SuperHyperColoring; and the Neutrosophic power is 583
corresponded to its Neutrosophic coefficient. 584
Definition 3.20. ((Extreme/Neutrosophic)δ−SuperHyperColoring). 585
Then 587
(i) an δ−SuperHyperColoring is a Neutrosophic kind of Neutrosophic 588
SuperHyperColoring such that either of the following expressions hold for the 589
Neutrosophic cardinalities of SuperHyperNeighbors of s ∈ S : 590
|S ∩ N (s)| > |S ∩ (V \ N (s))| + δ;

|S ∩ N (s)| < |S ∩ (V \ N (s))| + δ.
The Expression (3.1), holds if S is an δ−SuperHyperOffensive. And the 591
Expression (3.1), holds if S is an δ−SuperHyperDefensive; 592
(ii) a Neutrosophic δ−SuperHyperColoring is a Neutrosophic kind of 593
Neutrosophic SuperHyperColoring such that either of the following Neutrosophic 594
Table 1. The Values of Vertices, SuperVertices, Edges, HyperEdges, and SuperHy-

perEdges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph Mentioned in the Definition
(3.23)
The Values of The Vertices The Number of Position in Alphabet
The Values of The SuperVertices The maximum Values of Its Vertices
The Values of The Edges The maximum Values of Its Vertices
The Values of The HyperEdges The maximum Values of Its Vertices
The Values of The SuperHyperEdges The maximum Values of Its Endpoints

perEdges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, Mentioned in the Definition
(3.22)
expressions hold for the Neutrosophic cardinalities of SuperHyperNeighbors of 595
s∈S: 596
|S ∩ N (s)|N eutrosophic > |S ∩ (V \ N (s))|N eutrosophic + δ;

|S ∩ N (s)|N eutrosophic < |S ∩ (V \ N (s))|N eutrosophic + δ.
The Expression (3.1), holds if S is a Neutrosophic δ−SuperHyperOffensive. 597
And the Expression (3.1), holds if S is a Neutrosophic 598
δ−SuperHyperDefensive. 599
For the sake of having a Neutrosophic SuperHyperColoring, there’s a need to 600
“redefine” the notion of “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”. The SuperHyperVertices 601
and the SuperHyperEdges are assigned by the labels from the letters of the alphabets. 602
In this procedure, there’s the usage of the position of labels to assign to the values. 603
Definition 3.21. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an ordered 604
pair S = (V, E). It’s redefined Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph if the Table (1) 605
holds. 606
It’s useful to define a “Neutrosophic” version of SuperHyperClasses. Since there’s 607
more ways to get Neutrosophic type-results to make a Neutrosophic more 608
understandable. 609
Definition 3.22. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an ordered 610
pair S = (V, E). There are some Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses if the Table (2) 611
holds. Thus Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath , SuperHyperColoring, SuperHyperStar, 612
SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultiPartite, and SuperHyperWheel, are 613
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath, Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle, 614
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar, Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite, 615
Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultiPartite, and Neutrosophic 616
SuperHyperWheel if the Table (2) holds. 617
It’s useful to define a “Neutrosophic” version of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperColoring. 618
Since there’s more ways to get type-results to make a Neutrosophic SuperHyperColoring 619
more Neutrosophicly understandable. 620

perEdges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph Mentioned in the Definition
(3.23)
For the sake of having a Neutrosophic SuperHyperColoring, there’s a need to 621
“redefine” the Neutrosophic notion of “Neutrosophic SuperHyperColoring”. The 622
SuperHyperVertices and the SuperHyperEdges are assigned by the labels from the 623
letters of the alphabets. In this procedure, there’s the usage of the position of labels to 624
assign to the values. 625
Definition 3.23. Assume a SuperHyperColoring. It’s redefined a Neutrosophic 626
SuperHyperColoring if the Table (3) holds. 627
4 Neutrosophic SuperHyperColoring But As The 628
Extensions Excerpt From Dense And Super 629
Forms 630
Example 4.1. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an ordered pair 631
S = (V, E) in the mentioned Neutrosophic Figures in every Neutrosophic items. 632
• On the Figure (1), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 633
SuperHyperColoring, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly 634
straightforward. E1 and E3 are some empty Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges but 635
E2 is a loop Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge and E4 is a Neutrosophic 636
SuperHyperEdge. Thus in the terms of Neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbor, 637
there’s only one Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge, namely, E4 . The Neutrosophic 638
SuperHyperVertex, V3 is Neutrosophic isolated means that there’s no 639
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge has it as a Neutrosophic endpoint. Thus the 640
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 , is excluded in every given Neutrosophic 641
SuperHyperColoring. 642
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperColoring = {E4 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperColoring SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperColoring = {Vi }i6=4 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperColoring SuperHyperPolynomial = z 3 .
643
straightforward. E1 , E2 and E3 are some empty Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges 646
but E4 is a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. Thus in the terms of Neutrosophic 647
SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only one Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge, namely, 648
E4 . The Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 is Neutrosophic isolated means that 649
there’s no Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge has it as a Neutrosophic endpoint. Thus 650
Figure 1. The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions

of Neutrosophic SuperHyperColoring in the Neutrosophic Example (16.3)
the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 , is excluded in every given Neutrosophic 651

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperColoring = {Vi }i6=4 .
653
straightforward. 656

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperColoring = {Vi }3i=1 .
657
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperColoring = {Ei }i6=1,2 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperColoring SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperColoring = {Vi }Vi 6=H,V4 ,O .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperColoring SuperHyperPolynomial
= 3 × 4z 5 .
661



C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperColoring = {Ei }4i=1 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperColoring SuperHyperPolynomial = z 4 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperColoring = {Vi }8i=5 .
= sz 5 .
665
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperColoring = {Ei }i=1,2,3 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperColoring SuperHyperPolynomial = az 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperColoring = {Vi }i=1,2,3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-Quasi-SuperHyperColoring SuperHyperPolynomial = bz 3 .
669
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperColoring =

{Ei , E12 , E14 , E17 }11
i=7 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperColoring = {Vi }i=8,9,10,11,14 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperColoring SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z 5 .
673



C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperColoring = {Ei }i=1,4 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperColoring = {Vi , V14 }11
i=8 .
677
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperColoring = {Ei }i=1,2,13 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperColoring SuperHyperPolynomial = az 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperColoring = {Vi }22
i=11 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-Quasi-SuperHyperColoring SuperHyperPolynomial = z 11 .
681
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperColoring = {Ei }i=1,4,5,6 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperColoring = {Vi , V14 }11
i=8 .
685


Figure 10. The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic

Notions of Neutrosophic SuperHyperColoring in the Neutrosophic Example (16.3)
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperColoring = {Ei }i=1,6,7,8 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperColoring = {Vi }i6=4,5,6 .
689
C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperColoring = {Ei }6i=1 .

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperColoring SuperHyperPolynomial = z 6 .
C(N SHG)Extreme V-SuperHyperColoring = {Vi }i6=4,5,6,9,10 .
C(N SHG)Extreme V-SuperHyperColoring SuperHyperPolynomial =
= 5z 6 .
693



C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperColoring = {Ei }i6=1,9,10 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperColoring = {Vi }i6=4,6 .
= 6z 4 .
697
C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperColoring = {E1 , E2 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperColoring SuperHyperPolynomial = z 2 .
C(N SHG)Extreme V-SuperHyperColoring = {V1 , V2 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme V-SuperHyperColoring SuperHyperPolynomial = z 2 .
701

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperColoring SuperHyperPolynomial = 4z 2 .
C(N SHG)Extreme V-SuperHyperColoring = {V1 , V2 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme V-SuperHyperColoring SuperHyperPolynomial = 5z 2 .
705




C(N SHG)Extreme V-SuperHyperColoring = {V1 , Vi }17
i=8 .
C(N SHG)Extreme V-SuperHyperColoring SuperHyperPolynomial = az 10 .
709

i=8 .
713

i=8 .
717




C(N SHG)Extreme V-SuperHyperColoring = {Vi }Vi ∈E8 .
721

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperColoring SuperHyperPolynomial
= ten choose two z 2 .
C(N SHG)Extreme V-SuperHyperColoring = {Vi }Vi ∈E8 .
C(N SHG)Extreme V-SuperHyperColoring SuperHyperPolynomial = az |E8 | .
725
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperColoring = {E1 , E2 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperColoring = {Vi }ViN SHG .

729

C(N SHG)Extreme V-SuperHyperColoring
= {Vi }Vi ∈E3 .
C(N SHG)Extreme V-SuperHyperColoring SuperHyperPolynomial
= az 12 .
733
5 The Neutrosophic Departures on The Theoretical 734
Results Toward Theoretical Motivations 735
The previous Neutrosophic approach apply on the upcoming Neutrosophic results on 736
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses. 737
Proposition 5.1. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath ESHP : (V, E). 738


Then 739
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperColoring = {Ei , Ei+1 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperColoring SuperHyperPolynomial
= (|EN SHG | − 1)z 2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperColoring
= {Vi }Vi ∈Ei ||Ei |=maxEj ∈EN SHG |Ej | .
= az |Ei |=maxEj ∈EN SHG |Ej | .
Proof. Let 740
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 .
741
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
V|E i |=maxE ∈E |Ej | , E1 ,
j N SHG
be a longest path taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath 742
ESHP : (V, E). There’s a new way to redefine as 743
ViEXT ERN AL ∼ VjEXT ERN AL ≡

∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL ∈ Ez ≡
∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , {ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL } ⊆ Ez .
The term “EXTERNAL” implies |N (ViEXT ERN AL )| ≥ |N (Vj )| where Vj is 744
corresponded to ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of SuperHyperColoring. The latter is 745
Example 5.2. In the Figure (23), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath 747
ESHP : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, in the 748
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (23), is the SuperHyperColoring. 749
There are two notions on SuperHyperColoring in SuperHyperCycle. Twin and 750
antipodal. The first is about having the same SuperHyperNeighborhoods and the latter 751
is having the same SuperHyperDistance but both could not be out of the any given 752
SuperHyperColoring easily. All Twin SuperHyperVertices could not be out of the any 753
given SuperHyperColoring and one of them could be out but the latter have to be 754
inside. All Antipodal SuperHyperVertices could not be out of the any given 755
SuperHyperColoring and one of them could be out but the latter have to be inside. and 756
one of them could be out but the latter have to be inside. The proof for both of the is 757
Proposition 5.3. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle ESHC : (V, E). 759
Figure 23. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath Associated to the Notions of Neutrosophic

SuperHyperColoring in the Example (16.5)
Then 760

= (|EN SHG |)z 2 .
Proof. Let 761
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 .
762
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
V|E i |=maxE ∈E |Ej | , E1 ,
j N SHG
be a longest path taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle 763
ESHC : (V, E). There’s a new way to redefine as 764

Figure 24. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions

Example 5.4. In the Figure (24), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle 768
N SHC : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Neutrosophic 769
SuperHyperSet, in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (24), is the Neutrosophic 770
Proposition 5.5. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). 772
Then 773

= |EN SHG | choose twoz 2 .
Proof. Let 774
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 .
Figure 25. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of

Neutrosophic SuperHyperColoring in the Neutrosophic Example (16.9)
775
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
V|E i |=maxE ∈E |Ej | , E1 ,
j N SHG
be a longest path taken a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). 776
There’s a new way to redefine as 777

Example 5.6. In the Figure (25), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar 781
ESHS : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, 782
by the Algorithm in previous Neutrosophic result, of the Neutrosophic 783
SuperHyperVertices of the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E), in 784
the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (25), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperColoring. 785
Proposition 5.7. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite 786
ESHB : (V, E). Then 787

∗ s
= |EN SHG | choose sz .
Proof. Let 788
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 .
789
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
V|E i |=maxE ∈E |Ej | , E1 ,
j N SHG
is a longest path taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite 790
ESHB : (V, E). There’s a new way to redefine as 791

straightforward. Then there’s no at least one SuperHyperColoring. Thus the notion of 794
quasi may be up but the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperColoring could be 795
applied. There are only two SuperHyperParts. Thus every SuperHyperPart could have 796
one SuperHyperVertex as the representative in the 797
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
is a longest SuperHyperColoring taken from a connected Neutrosophic 798
SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E). Thus only some SuperHyperVertices and only 799
minimum-Neutrosophic-of-SuperHyperPart SuperHyperEdges are attained in any 800
solution 801
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
The latter is straightforward. 802
Figure 26. Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite Neutrosophic Associated to the Neutro-

sophic Notions of Neutrosophic SuperHyperColoring in the Example (16.11)
Example 5.8. In the Neutrosophic Figure (26), the connected Neutrosophic 803
SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), is Neutrosophic highlighted and Neutrosophic 804
featured. The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Neutrosophic Algorithm in 805
previous Neutrosophic result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected 806
Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic 807
SuperHyperModel (26), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperColoring. 808
Proposition 5.9. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite 809
ESHM : (V, E). Then 810

∗ s
= |EN SHG | choose sz .
Proof. Let 811
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 .
812
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
V|E i |=maxE ∈E |Ej | , E1
j N SHG
SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E). There’s a new way to redefine as 814

straightforward. Then there’s no at least one SuperHyperColoring. Thus the notion of 817
quasi may be up but the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperColoring could be 818
applied. There are only z 0 SuperHyperParts. Thus every SuperHyperPart could have 819
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
is a longest path taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite 821
ESHM : (V, E). Thus only some SuperHyperVertices and only 822
solution 824
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
ESHM : (V, E). The latter is straightforward. 826
Example 5.10. In the Figure (27), the connected Neutrosophic 827
SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E), is highlighted and Neutrosophic featured. 828
The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Algorithm in previous Neutrosophic 829
result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected Neutrosophic 830
SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (27), 831
is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperColoring. 832
Proposition 5.11. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel 833
ESHW : (V, E). Then, 834

∗ 2
= |EN SHG | choose twoz .
Proof. Let 835
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 .
Figure 27. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite Associated to the Notions of

Neutrosophic SuperHyperColoring in the Example (16.13)
836
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
V|E i |=maxE ∈E |Ej | , E1
j N SHG
SuperHyperWheel ESHW : (V, E). There’s a new way to redefine as 838

straightforward. Then there’s at least one SuperHyperColoring. Thus the notion of 841
quasi isn’t up and the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperColoring could be 842
applied. The unique embedded SuperHyperColoring proposes some longest 843
SuperHyperColoring excerpt from some representatives. The latter is 844
SuperHyperWheel N SHW : (V, E), is Neutrosophic highlighted and featured. The 847
obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Algorithm in previous result, of the 848
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel 849
ESHW : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (28), is the Neutrosophic 850
Figure 28. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel Neutrosophic Associated to the Neu-

trosophic Notions of Neutrosophic SuperHyperColoring in the Neutrosophic Example
(16.15)
6 The Surveys of Mathematical Sets On The 852
Results But As The Initial Motivation 853
For the SuperHyperColoring, Neutrosophic SuperHyperColoring, and the Neutrosophic 854
SuperHyperColoring, some general results are introduced. 855
Remark 6.1. Let remind that the Neutrosophic SuperHyperColoring is “redefined” on 856
the positions of the alphabets. 857
Corollary 6.2. Assume Neutrosophic SuperHyperColoring. Then 858
N eutrosophic SuperHyperColoring =
{theSuperHyperColoringof theSuperHyperV ertices |
max |SuperHyperOf f ensive
SuperHyperColoring
|N eutrosophiccardinalityamidthoseSuperHyperColoring. }
plus one Neutrosophic SuperHypeNeighbor to one. Where σi is the unary operation on 859
the SuperHyperVertices of the SuperHyperGraph to assign the determinacy, the 860
indeterminacy and the neutrality, for i = 1, 2, 3, respectively. 861
Corollary 6.3. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph on the same identical letter 862
of the alphabet. Then the notion of Neutrosophic SuperHyperColoring and 863
SuperHyperColoring coincide. 864
of the alphabet. Then a consecutive sequence of the SuperHyperVertices is a 866
Neutrosophic SuperHyperColoring if and only if it’s a SuperHyperColoring. 867
of the alphabet. Then a consecutive sequence of the SuperHyperVertices is a strongest 869
SuperHyperColoring if and only if it’s a longest SuperHyperColoring. 870
Corollary 6.6. Assume SuperHyperClasses of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph on the 871
same identical letter of the alphabet. Then its Neutrosophic SuperHyperColoring is its 872
SuperHyperColoring and reversely. 873
Corollary 6.7. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath(-/SuperHyperColoring, 874
SuperHyperStar, SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, SuperHyperWheel) on 875
the same identical letter of the alphabet. Then its Neutrosophic SuperHyperColoring is 876
its SuperHyperColoring and reversely. 877
Corollary 6.8. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. Then its Neutrosophic 878
SuperHyperColoring isn’t well-defined if and only if its SuperHyperColoring isn’t 879
well-defined. 880
Corollary 6.9. Assume SuperHyperClasses of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. Then 881
its Neutrosophic SuperHyperColoring isn’t well-defined if and only if its 882
SuperHyperColoring isn’t well-defined. 883
SuperHyperStar, SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, SuperHyperWheel). 885
Then its Neutrosophic SuperHyperColoring isn’t well-defined if and only if its 886
SuperHyperColoring isn’t well-defined. 887
Corollary 6.11. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. Then its Neutrosophic 888
SuperHyperColoring is well-defined if and only if its SuperHyperColoring is well-defined. 889
Corollary 6.12. Assume SuperHyperClasses of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. 890
Then its Neutrosophic SuperHyperColoring is well-defined if and only if its 891
SuperHyperColoring is well-defined. 892
SuperHyperStar, SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, SuperHyperWheel). 894
Then its Neutrosophic SuperHyperColoring is well-defined if and only if its 895
SuperHyperColoring is well-defined. 896
Proposition 6.14. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. Then V 897
is 898
(i) : the dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperColoring; 899
(ii) : the strong dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperColoring; 900
(iii) : the connected dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperColoring; 901
(iv) : the δ-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperColoring; 902
(v) : the strong δ-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperColoring; 903
(vi) : the connected δ-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperColoring. 904
Proposition 6.15. Let N T G : (V, E, σ, µ) be a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. Then 905
∅ is 906
(i) : the SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperColoring; 907
(ii) : the strong SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperColoring; 908
(iii) : the connected defensive SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperColoring; 909
(iv) : the δ-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperColoring; 910
(v) : the strong δ-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperColoring; 911
(vi) : the connected δ-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperColoring. 912
Proposition 6.16. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. Then an 913
independent SuperHyperSet is 914
(i) : the SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperColoring; 915
(ii) : the strong SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperColoring; 916
(iii) : the connected SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperColoring; 917
(iv) : the δ-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperColoring; 918
(v) : the strong δ-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperColoring; 919
(vi) : the connected δ-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperColoring. 920
Proposition 6.17. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a Neutrosophic SuperHyperUniform 921
SuperHyperGraph which is a SuperHyperColoring/SuperHyperPath. Then V is a 922
maximal 923
(i) : SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperColoring; 924
(ii) : strong SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperColoring; 925
(iii) : connected SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperColoring; 926
(iv) : O(ESHG)-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperColoring; 927
(v) : strong O(ESHG)-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperColoring; 928
(vi) : connected O(ESHG)-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperColoring; 929
Where the exterior SuperHyperVertices and the interior SuperHyperVertices coincide. 930
Proposition 6.18. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph which is a 931
SuperHyperUniform SuperHyperWheel. Then V is a maximal 932
(i) : dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperColoring; 933
(ii) : strong dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperColoring; 934
(iii) : connected dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperColoring; 935
(iv) : O(ESHG)-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperColoring; 936
(v) : strong O(ESHG)-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperColoring; 937
(vi) : connected O(ESHG)-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperColoring; 938
Where the exterior SuperHyperVertices and the interior SuperHyperVertices coincide. 939
SuperHyperGraph which is a SuperHyperColoring/SuperHyperPath. Then the number of 941
(i) : the SuperHyperColoring; 942
(ii) : the SuperHyperColoring; 943
(iii) : the connected SuperHyperColoring; 944
(iv) : the O(ESHG)-SuperHyperColoring; 945
(v) : the strong O(ESHG)-SuperHyperColoring; 946
(vi) : the connected O(ESHG)-SuperHyperColoring. 947
is one and it’s only V. Where the exterior SuperHyperVertices and the interior 948
SuperHyperVertices coincide. 949
SuperHyperGraph which is a SuperHyperWheel. Then the number of 951
(i) : the dual SuperHyperColoring; 952
(ii) : the dual SuperHyperColoring; 953
(iii) : the dual connected SuperHyperColoring; 954
(iv) : the dual O(ESHG)-SuperHyperColoring; 955
(v) : the strong dual O(ESHG)-SuperHyperColoring; 956
(vi) : the connected dual O(ESHG)-SuperHyperColoring. 957
is one and it’s only V. Where the exterior SuperHyperVertices and the interior 958
SuperHyperGraph which is a SuperHyperStar/SuperHyperComplete 961
SuperHyperBipartite/SuperHyperComplete SuperHyperMultipartite. Then a 962
SuperHyperSet contains [the SuperHyperCenter and] the half of multiplying r with the 963
number of all the SuperHyperEdges plus one of all the SuperHyperVertices is a 964
O(ESHG)
(iv) : 2 + 1-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperColoring; 968
O(ESHG)
(v) : strong 2 + 1-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperColoring; 969
O(ESHG)
(vi) : connected 2 + 1-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperColoring. 970
SuperHyperBipartite/SuperHyperComplete SuperHyperMultipartite. Then a 973
SuperHyperSet contains the half of multiplying r with the number of all the 974
SuperHyperEdges plus one of all the SuperHyperVertices in the biggest SuperHyperPart 975
is a 976
(iv) : δ-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperColoring; 980
(v) : strong δ-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperColoring; 981
(vi) : connected δ-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperColoring. 982
SuperHyperBipartite/SuperHyperComplete SuperHyperMultipartite. Then Then the 985
number of 986
O(ESHG)
(iv) : 2 + 1-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperColoring; 990
O(ESHG)
(v) : strong 2 + 1-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperColoring; 991
O(ESHG)
(vi) : connected 2 + 1-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperColoring. 992
is one and it’s only S, a SuperHyperSet contains [the SuperHyperCenter and] the half of 993
multiplying r with the number of all the SuperHyperEdges plus one of all the 994
SuperHyperVertices. Where the exterior SuperHyperVertices and the interior 995
Proposition 6.24. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. The 997
number of connected component is |V − S| if there’s a SuperHyperSet which is a dual 998
(iv) : SuperHyperColoring; 1002
(v) : strong 1-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperColoring; 1003
(vi) : connected 1-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperColoring. 1004
Proposition 6.25. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. Then the 1005
number is at most O(ESHG) and the Neutrosophic number is at most On (ESHG). 1006
Proposition 6.26. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph which is 1007
SuperHyperComplete. The number is O(ESHG:(V,E)) 2 + 1 and the Neutrosophic number is 1008
min Σv∈{v1 ,v2 ,··· ,vt } O(ESHG:(V,E)) ⊆V σ(v), in the setting of dual 1009
t>
2
(iv) : ( O(ESHG:(V,E))
2 + 1)-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperColoring; 1013
(v) : strong ( O(ESHG:(V,E))

(vi) : connected ( O(ESHG:(V,E))

2 + 1)-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperColoring. 1015
∅. The number is 0 and the Neutrosophic number is 0, for an independent 1017
SuperHyperSet in the setting of dual 1018
(iv) : 0-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperColoring; 1022
(v) : strong 0-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperColoring; 1023
(vi) : connected 0-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperColoring. 1024
SuperHyperComplete. Then there’s no independent SuperHyperSet. 1026
SuperHyperColoring/SuperHyperPath/SuperHyperWheel. The number is 1028
O(ESHG : (V, E)) and the Neutrosophic number is On (ESHG : (V, E)), in the setting 1029
of a dual 1030
(iv) : O(ESHG : (V, E))-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperColoring; 1034
(v) : strong O(ESHG : (V, E))-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperColoring; 1035
(vi) : connected O(ESHG : (V, E))-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperColoring. 1036
SuperHyperStar/complete SuperHyperBipartite/complete SuperHyperMultiPartite. The 1038
number is O(ESHG:(V,E))
2 + 1 and the Neutrosophic number is 1039
min Σv∈{v1 ,v2 ,··· ,vt } O(ESHG:(V,E)) ⊆V σ(v), in the setting of a dual 1040
t>
2
(iv) : ( O(ESHG:(V,E))
(v) : strong ( O(ESHG:(V,E))

(vi) : connected ( O(ESHG:(V,E))

2 + 1)-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperColoring. 1046
Proposition 6.31. Let N SHF : (V, E) be a SuperHyperFamily of the ESHGs : (V, E) 1047
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs which are from one-type SuperHyperClass which the 1048
result is obtained for the individuals. Then the results also hold for the 1049
SuperHyperFamily N SHF : (V, E) of these specific SuperHyperClasses of the 1050
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs. 1051
Proposition 6.32. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a strong Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. If 1052
S is a dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperColoring, then ∀v ∈ V \ S, ∃x ∈ S such 1053
that 1054
(i) v ∈ Ns (x); 1055
(ii) vx ∈ E. 1056
Proposition 6.33. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a strong Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. If 1057
S is a dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperColoring, then 1058
(i) S is SuperHyperColoring set; 1059
(ii) there’s S ⊆ S 0 such that |S 0 | is SuperHyperChromatic number. 1060
Proposition 6.34. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a strong Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. 1061
Then 1062
(i) Γ ≤ O; 1063
(ii) Γs ≤ On . 1064
Proposition 6.35. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a strong Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 1065
which is connected. Then 1066
(i) Γ ≤ O − 1; 1067
(ii) Γs ≤ On − Σ3i=1 σi (x). 1068
Proposition 6.36. Let ESHG : (V, E) be an odd SuperHyperPath. Then 1069
(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {v2 , v4 , · · · , vn−1 } is a dual SuperHyperDefensive 1070
SuperHyperColoring; 1071
(ii) Γ = b n2 c + 1 and corresponded SuperHyperSet is S = {v2 , v4 , · · · , vn−1 }; 1072
(iii) Γs = min{Σs∈S={v2 ,v4 ,··· ,vn−1 } Σ3i=1 σi (s), Σs∈S={v1 ,v3 ,··· ,vn−1 } Σ3i=1 σi (s)}; 1073
(iv) the SuperHyperSets S1 = {v2 , v4 , · · · , vn−1 } and S2 = {v1 , v3 , · · · , vn−1 } are only 1074
a dual SuperHyperColoring. 1075
Proposition 6.37. Let ESHG : (V, E) be an even SuperHyperPath. Then 1076
(i) the set S = {v2 , v4 , · · · .vn } is a dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperColoring; 1077
(ii) Γ = b n2 c and corresponded SuperHyperSets are {v2 , v4 , · · · .vn } and 1078
{v1 , v3 , · · · .vn−1 }; 1079
(iii) Γs = min{Σs∈S={v2 ,v4 ,··· ,vn } Σ3i=1 σi (s), Σs∈S={v1 ,v3 ,··· .vn−1 } Σ3i=1 σi (s)}; 1080
(iv) the SuperHyperSets S1 = {v2 , v4 , · · · .vn } and S2 = {v1 , v3 , · · · .vn−1 } are only 1081
dual SuperHyperColoring. 1082
Proposition 6.38. Let ESHG : (V, E) be an even SuperHyperColoring. Then 1083
(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {v2 , v4 , · · · , vn } is a dual SuperHyperDefensive 1084
(ii) Γ = b n2 c and corresponded SuperHyperSets are {v2 , v4 , · · · , vn } and 1086
{v1 , v3 , · · · , vn−1 }; 1087
(iii) Γs = min{Σs∈S={v2 ,v4 ,··· ,vn } σ(s), Σs∈S={v1 ,v3 ,··· ,vn−1 } σ(s)}; 1088
(iv) the SuperHyperSets S1 = {v2 , v4 , · · · , vn } and S2 = {v1 , v3 , · · · , vn−1 } are only 1089
Proposition 6.39. Let ESHG : (V, E) be an odd SuperHyperColoring. Then 1091
(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {v2 , v4 , · · · , vn−1 } is a dual SuperHyperDefensive 1092
(ii) Γ = b n2 c + 1 and corresponded SuperHyperSet is S = {v2 , v4 , · · · , vn−1 }; 1094
(iii) Γs = min{Σs∈S={v2 ,v4 ,··· .vn−1 } Σ3i=1 σi (s), Σs∈S={v1 ,v3 ,··· .vn−1 } Σ3i=1 σi (s)}; 1095
(iv) the SuperHyperSets S1 = {v2 , v4 , · · · .vn−1 } and S2 = {v1 , v3 , · · · .vn−1 } are only 1096
Proposition 6.40. Let ESHG : (V, E) be SuperHyperStar. Then 1098
(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {c} is a dual maximal SuperHyperColoring; 1099
(ii) Γ = 1; 1100
(iii) Γs = Σ3i=1 σi (c); 1101
(iv) the SuperHyperSets S = {c} and S ⊂ S 0 are only dual SuperHyperColoring. 1102
Proposition 6.41. Let ESHG : (V, E) be SuperHyperWheel. Then 1103
6+3(i−1)≤n
(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {v1 , v3 } ∪ {v6 , v9 · · · , vi+6 , · · · , vn }i=1 is a dual 1104
maximal SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperColoring; 1105
6+3(i−1)≤n
(ii) Γ = |{v1 , v3 } ∪ {v6 , v9 · · · , vi+6 , · · · , vn }i=1 |; 1106
(iii) Γs = Σ{v1 ,v3 }∪{v6 ,v9 ··· ,vi+6 ,··· ,vn }6+3(i−1)≤n Σ3i=1 σi (s); 1107
i=1
6+3(i−1)≤n
(iv) the SuperHyperSet {v1 , v3 } ∪ {v6 , v9 · · · , vi+6 , · · · , vn }i=1 is only a dual 1108
maximal SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperColoring. 1109
Proposition 6.42. Let ESHG : (V, E) be an odd SuperHyperComplete. Then 1110
b n c+1
(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {vi }i=1
2
is a dual SuperHyperDefensive 1111
(ii) Γ = b n2 c + 1; 1113
(iii) Γs = min{Σs∈S Σ3i=1 σi (s)} 2

b n c+1 ; 1114
S={vi }i=1
b n c+1
(iv) the SuperHyperSet S = {vi }i=1
2
is only a dual SuperHyperDefensive 1115
Proposition 6.43. Let ESHG : (V, E) be an even SuperHyperComplete. Then 1117
bn
2c
(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {vi }i=1 is a dual SuperHyperDefensive 1118
(ii) Γ = b n2 c; 1120

bnc ; 1121
S={vi }i=1
bnc
(iv) the SuperHyperSet S = {vi }i=1
2
is only a dual maximal SuperHyperDefensive 1122
Proposition 6.44. Let N SHF : (V, E) be a m-SuperHyperFamily of Neutrosophic 1124
SuperHyperStars with common Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex SuperHyperSet. Then 1125
(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {c1 , c2 , · · · , cm } is a dual SuperHyperDefensive 1126
SuperHyperColoring for N SHF; 1127
(ii) Γ = m for N SHF : (V, E); 1128
(iii) Γs = Σm 3
i=1 Σj=1 σj (ci ) for N SHF : (V, E); 1129
(iv) the SuperHyperSets S = {c1 , c2 , · · · , cm } and S ⊂ S 0 are only dual 1130
SuperHyperColoring for N SHF : (V, E). 1131
Proposition 6.45. Let N SHF : (V, E) be an m-SuperHyperFamily of odd 1132
SuperHyperComplete SuperHyperGraphs with common Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 1133
SuperHyperSet. Then 1134
b n c+1
(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {vi }i=1
2
is a dual maximal SuperHyperDefensive 1135
SuperHyperColoring for N SHF; 1136
(ii) Γ = b n2 c + 1 for N SHF : (V, E); 1137
(iii) Γs = min{Σs∈S Σ3i=1 σi (s)} b n c+1

2
for N SHF : (V, E); 1138
S={vi }i=1
b n c+1
(iv) the SuperHyperSets S = {vi }i=1
2
are only a dual maximal SuperHyperColoring 1139
for N SHF : (V, E). 1140
Proposition 6.46. Let N SHF : (V, E) be a m-SuperHyperFamily of even 1141
SuperHyperComplete SuperHyperGraphs with common Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 1142
SuperHyperSet. Then 1143
bn
2c
(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {vi }i=1 is a dual SuperHyperDefensive 1144
SuperHyperColoring for N SHF : (V, E); 1145
(ii) Γ = b n2 c for N SHF : (V, E); 1146

bnc for N SHF : (V, E); 1147
S={vi }i=1
bnc
(iv) the SuperHyperSets S = {vi }i=1
2
are only dual maximal SuperHyperColoring for 1148
N SHF : (V, E). 1149
Then following statements hold; 1151
(i) if s ≥ t and a SuperHyperSet S of SuperHyperVertices is an 1152
t-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperColoring, then S is an s-SuperHyperDefensive 1153
(ii) if s ≤ t and a SuperHyperSet S of SuperHyperVertices is a dual 1155
t-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperColoring, then S is a dual 1156
s-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperColoring. 1157
Then following statements hold; 1159
(i) if s ≥ t + 2 and a SuperHyperSet S of SuperHyperVertices is an 1160
t-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperColoring, then S is an s-SuperHyperPowerful 1161
(ii) if s ≤ t and a SuperHyperSet S of SuperHyperVertices is a dual 1163
t-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperColoring, then S is a dual 1164
s-SuperHyperPowerful SuperHyperColoring. 1165
Proposition 6.49. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a[an] 1166
[V-]SuperHyperUniform-strong-Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. Then following 1167
statements hold; 1168
(i) if ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| < b 2r c + 1, then ESHG : (V, E) is an 1169
2-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperColoring; 1170
(ii) if ∀a ∈ V \ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| > b 2r c + 1, then ESHG : (V, E) is a dual 1171
(iii) if ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ V \ S| = 0, then ESHG : (V, E) is an V-SuperHyperDefensive 1173
(iv) if ∀a ∈ V \ S, |Ns (a) ∩ V \ S| = 0, then ESHG : (V, E) is a dual 1175
V-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperColoring. 1176
Proposition 6.50. Let ESHG : (V, E) is a[an] 1177
[V-]SuperHyperUniform-strong-Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. Then following 1178
statements hold; 1179
(i) ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| < b 2r c + 1 if ESHG : (V, E) is an 2-SuperHyperDefensive 1180
(ii) ∀a ∈ V \ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| > b 2r c + 1 if ESHG : (V, E) is a dual 1182
(iii) ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ V \ S| = 0 if ESHG : (V, E) is an V-SuperHyperDefensive 1184
(iv) ∀a ∈ V \ S, |Ns (a) ∩ V \ S| = 0 if ESHG : (V, E) is a dual 1186
V-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperColoring. 1187
[V-]SuperHyperUniform-strong-Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph which is a 1189
SuperHyperComplete. Then following statements hold; 1190
(i) ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| < b O−1

2 c + 1 if ESHG : (V, E) is an 2-SuperHyperDefensive 1191
(ii) ∀a ∈ V \ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| > b O−1

2 c + 1 if ESHG : (V, E) is a dual 1193
(iii) ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ V \ S| = 0 if ESHG : (V, E) is an (O − 1)-SuperHyperDefensive 1195
(O − 1)-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperColoring. 1198
[V-]SuperHyperUniform-strong-Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph which is a 1200
SuperHyperComplete. Then following statements hold; 1201
(i) if ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| <b O−1

2 c
+ 1, then ESHG : (V, E) is an 1202
(ii) if ∀a ∈ V \ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| > b O−1

2 c + 1, then ESHG : (V, E) is a dual 1204
(iii) if ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ V \ S| = 0, then ESHG : (V, E) is 1206
(O − 1)-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperColoring; 1207
(O − 1)-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperColoring. 1209
[V-]SuperHyperUniform-strong-Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph which is 1211
SuperHyperColoring. Then following statements hold; 1212
(i) ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| < 2 if ESHG : (V, E)) is an 2-SuperHyperDefensive 1213
(ii) ∀a ∈ V \ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| > 2 if ESHG : (V, E) is a dual 2-SuperHyperDefensive 1215
(iii) ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ V \ S| = 0 if ESHG : (V, E) is an 2-SuperHyperDefensive 1217
2-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperColoring. 1220
[V-]SuperHyperUniform-strong-Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph which is 1222
SuperHyperColoring. Then following statements hold; 1223
(i) if ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| < 2, then ESHG : (V, E) is an 2-SuperHyperDefensive 1224
(ii) if ∀a ∈ V \ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| > 2, then ESHG : (V, E) is a dual 1226
(iii) if ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ V \ S| = 0, then ESHG : (V, E) is an 2-SuperHyperDefensive 1228
2-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperColoring. 1231
7 Neutrosophic Applications in Cancer’s 1232
Neutrosophic Recognition 1233
The cancer is the Neutrosophic disease but the Neutrosophic model is going to figure 1234
out what’s going on this Neutrosophic phenomenon. The special Neutrosophic case of 1235
this Neutrosophic disease is considered and as the consequences of the model, some 1236
parameters are used. The cells are under attack of this disease but the moves of the 1237
cancer in the special region are the matter of mind. The Neutrosophic recognition of the 1238
cancer could help to find some Neutrosophic treatments for this Neutrosophic disease. 1239
In the following, some Neutrosophic steps are Neutrosophic devised on this disease. 1240
Step 1. (Neutrosophic Definition) The Neutrosophic recognition of the cancer in 1241
the long-term Neutrosophic function. 1242
Step 2. (Neutrosophic Issue) The specific region has been assigned by the 1243
Neutrosophic model [it’s called Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph] and the long 1244
Neutrosophic cycle of the move from the cancer is identified by this research. 1245
Sometimes the move of the cancer hasn’t be easily identified since there are some 1246
determinacy, indeterminacy and neutrality about the moves and the effects of the 1247
cancer on that region; this event leads us to choose another model [it’s said to be 1248
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph] to have convenient perception on what’s 1249
happened and what’s done. 1250
Figure 29. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite Associated to the Notions of Neutro-

sophic SuperHyperColoring
Step 3. (Neutrosophic Model) There are some specific Neutrosophic models, 1251
which are well-known and they’ve got the names, and some general Neutrosophic 1252
models. The moves and the Neutrosophic traces of the cancer on the complex 1253
tracks and between complicated groups of cells could be fantasized by a 1254
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath(-/SuperHyperColoring, SuperHyperStar, 1255
SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, SuperHyperWheel). The aim is to 1256
find either the Neutrosophic SuperHyperColoring or the Neutrosophic 1257
SuperHyperColoring in those Neutrosophic Neutrosophic SuperHyperModels. 1258
8 Case 1: The Initial Neutrosophic Steps 1259
Toward Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite as 1260
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel 1261
Step 4. (Neutrosophic Solution) In the Neutrosophic Figure (29), the 1262
Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite is Neutrosophic highlighted and Neutrosophic 1263
featured. 1264
By using the Neutrosophic Figure (29) and the Table (4), the Neutrosophic 1265
SuperHyperBipartite is obtained. 1266
The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Neutrosophic Algorithm in 1267
previous Neutrosophic result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the 1268
connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), in the 1269
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (29), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperColoring. 1270
Table 4. The Values of Vertices, SuperVertices, Edges, HyperEdges, and SuperHyper-

Edges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite
Figure 30. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite Associated to the Notions of

Neutrosophic SuperHyperColoring
9 Case 2: The Increasing Neutrosophic Steps 1271
Toward Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite as 1272
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel 1273
Step 4. (Neutrosophic Solution) In the Neutrosophic Figure (30), the 1274
Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite is Neutrosophic highlighted and 1275
Neutrosophic featured. 1276
By using the Neutrosophic Figure (30) and the Table (5), the Neutrosophic 1277
SuperHyperMultipartite is obtained. 1278
The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Neutrosophic Algorithm in 1279
previous result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected 1280
Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic 1281
SuperHyperModel (30), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperColoring. 1282
Table 5. The Values of Vertices, SuperVertices, Edges, HyperEdges, and SuperHyper-

Edges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite
10 Wondering Open Problems But As The 1283
Directions To Forming The Motivations 1284
In what follows, some “problems” and some “questions” are proposed. 1285
The SuperHyperColoring and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperColoring are defined on 1286
a real-world application, titled “Cancer’s Recognitions”. 1287
Question 10.1. Which the else SuperHyperModels could be defined based on Cancer’s 1288
recognitions? 1289
Question 10.2. Are there some SuperHyperNotions related to SuperHyperColoring and 1290
the Neutrosophic SuperHyperColoring? 1291
Question 10.3. Are there some Algorithms to be defined on the SuperHyperModels to 1292
compute them? 1293
Question 10.4. Which the SuperHyperNotions are related to beyond the 1294
SuperHyperColoring and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperColoring? 1295
Problem 10.5. The SuperHyperColoring and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperColoring do 1296
a SuperHyperModel for the Cancer’s recognitions and they’re based on 1297
SuperHyperColoring, are there else? 1298
Problem 10.6. Which the fundamental SuperHyperNumbers are related to these 1299
SuperHyperNumbers types-results? 1300
Problem 10.7. What’s the independent research based on Cancer’s recognitions 1301
concerning the multiple types of SuperHyperNotions? 1302
11 Conclusion and Closing Remarks 1303
In this section, concluding remarks and closing remarks are represented. The drawbacks 1304
of this research are illustrated. Some benefits and some advantages of this research are 1305
highlighted. 1306
This research uses some approaches to make Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs more 1307
understandable. In this endeavor, two SuperHyperNotions are defined on the 1308
SuperHyperColoring. For that sake in the second definition, the main definition of the 1309
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph is redefined on the position of the alphabets. Based on 1310
the new definition for the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, the new SuperHyperNotion, 1311
Neutrosophic SuperHyperColoring, finds the convenient background to implement some 1312
results based on that. Some SuperHyperClasses and some Neutrosophic 1313
SuperHyperClasses are the cases of this research on the modeling of the regions where 1314
are under the attacks of the cancer to recognize this disease as it’s mentioned on the 1315
title “Cancer’s Recognitions”. To formalize the instances on the SuperHyperNotion, 1316
SuperHyperColoring, the new SuperHyperClasses and SuperHyperClasses, are 1317
introduced. Some general results are gathered in the section on the SuperHyperColoring 1318
and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperColoring. The clarifications, instances and literature 1319
reviews have taken the whole way through. In this research, the literature reviews have 1320
fulfilled the lines containing the notions and the results. The SuperHyperGraph and 1321
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph are the SuperHyperModels on the “Cancer’s 1322
Recognitions” and both bases are the background of this research. Sometimes the 1323
cancer has been happened on the region, full of cells, groups of cells and embedded 1324
styles. In this segment, the SuperHyperModel proposes some SuperHyperNotions based 1325
on the connectivities of the moves of the cancer in the longest and strongest styles with 1326
the formation of the design and the architecture are formally called “ 1327
SuperHyperColoring” in the themes of jargons and buzzwords. The prefix “SuperHyper” 1328
refers to the theme of the embedded styles to figure out the background for the 1329
SuperHyperNotions. In the Table (6), benefits and avenues for this research are, figured
Table 6. An Overlook On This Research And Beyond

Advantages Limitations
1. Redefining Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 1. General Results
2. SuperHyperColoring
3. Neutrosophic SuperHyperColoring 2. Other SuperHyperNumbers
4. Modeling of Cancer’s Recognitions
5. SuperHyperClasses 3. SuperHyperFamilies
1330
out, pointed out and spoken out. 1331
12 Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality But As The 1332
Forms 1334
Definition 12.1. (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality). 1335
(i) Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperDuality if ∀Ei ∈ E 0 , ∃Ej ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ E 0 1339
such that Va ∈ Ei , Ej ; 1340
(ii) Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperDuality if ∀Ei ∈ E 0 , ∃Ej ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ E 0 1341
such that Va ∈ Ei , Ej and 1342
(iii) Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperDuality if ∀Vi ∈ V 0 , ∃Vj ∈ VESHG:(V,E) \ V 0 1344
such that Vi , Vj ∈ Ea ; 1345
(iv) Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperDuality if ∀Vi ∈ V 0 , ∃Vj ∈ VESHG:(V,E) \ V 0 1346
such that Vi , Vj ∈ Ea and 1347
(v) Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality if it’s either of Neutrosophic 1349
e-SuperHyperDuality, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperDuality, Neutrosophic 1350
v-SuperHyperDuality, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperDuality. 1351
Definition 12.2. ((Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDuality). 1352
called 1355
(i) an Extreme SuperHyperDuality if it’s either of Neutrosophic 1356
v-SuperHyperDuality, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperDuality and C(N SHG) for 1358
an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum Extreme 1359
Extreme SuperHyperDuality; 1363
(ii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality if it’s either of Neutrosophic 1364
a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum Neutrosophic 1367
cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges of a Neutrosophic 1368
Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality; 1371
(iii) an Extreme SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of 1372
Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperDuality, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperDuality, 1373
Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperDuality, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperDuality and 1374
C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Extreme 1375
Extreme SuperHyperDuality; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its 1380
(iv) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either 1382
of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperDuality, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperDuality, 1383
C(N SHG) for a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the 1385
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPolynomial contains the Neutrosophic coefficients 1386
defined as the Neutrosophic number of the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of 1387
the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high 1388
Neutrosophic cardinality consecutive Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges and 1389
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Neutrosophic 1390
SuperHyperDuality; and the Neutrosophic power is corresponded to its 1391
Neutrosophic coefficient; 1392
(v) an Extreme R-SuperHyperDuality if it’s either of Neutrosophic 1393
Extreme SuperHyperDuality; 1400
(vi) a Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality if it’s either of Neutrosophic 1401
cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of a Neutrosophic 1405
Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality; 1408
(vii) an Extreme R-SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either 1409
Extreme SuperHyperDuality; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its 1417
(viii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either 1419
the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high 1425
SuperHyperDuality; and the Neutrosophic power is corresponded to its 1428
Neutrosophic coefficient. 1429
Example 12.3. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an ordered 1430
pair S = (V, E) in the mentioned Neutrosophic Figures in every Neutrosophic items. 1431
SuperHyperDuality, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly 1433
straightforward. E1 and E3 are some empty Extreme SuperHyperEdges but E2 is 1434
a loop Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge and E4 is a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. 1435
Thus in the terms of Neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only one 1436
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge, namely, E4 . The Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, 1437
V3 is Neutrosophic isolated means that there’s no Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge 1438
has it as a Neutrosophic endpoint. Thus the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 , 1439
is excluded in every given Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality. 1440
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality = {E4 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality = {V4 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z.
SuperHyperDuality. 1449


C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality = {E4 , E2 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial = 2z 2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality = {V1 , V4 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial = 15z 2 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial = 4z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality = {E3i+13i=0 , E3i+243i=0 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial 6z 8 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality = {V3i+17i=0 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality = {E15 , E16 , E17 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial = z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality = {V3 , V13 , V8 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial =
4 × 5 × 5z 3 .

4 × 5 × 5z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality = {E3i+13i=0 , E23 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality = {V3i+13i=0 , V15 }.

4 × 5 × 5z 3 .

3 × 3z 2 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality = {V1 , Vii610=5,7,8 }.
i=4

3 × 3z 2 .



(2 × 1 × 2) + (2 × 4 × 5)z.

(1 × 1 × 2)z.

(2 × 2 × 2)z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality = {E3i+1i=03 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality = {V2i+1i=05 }.



C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial
= 10 × 9 + 10 × 6 + 12 × 9 + 12 × 6z 2 .
Proposition 12.4. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath 1512
ESHP : (V, E). Then 1513
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality =

|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= {Ei }i=1 3
.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial
= 3z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality
= {ViEXT ERN AL }i=1 3

.
Y |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= |V EXT ERN AL ESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality z 3 .
Proof. Let 1514
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
E |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality , V EXT ERN AL |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality .
3 3

corresponded to ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of SuperHyperDuality. The latter is 1518
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (23), is the SuperHyperDuality. 1522
Proposition 12.6. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle 1523
ESHC : (V, E). Then 1524
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality =

= {Ei }i=1 3
.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial
= 3z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality

.
Proof. Let 1525
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
3 3

Then 1536
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperDuality = {E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial
= |i | Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E)|Neutrosophic Cardinality |z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperDuality = {CEN T ER ∈ VESHG:(V,E) }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
Proof. Let 1537
P : ViEXT ERN AL , Ei , CEN T ER, VjEXT ERN AL .

the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (25), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality. 1547
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperDuality

= {Ei ∈ EPi ESHG:(V,E) , |Pi ESHG:(V,E) | = min |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈ P ESHG:(V,E) |}.
i
X
=( (min |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈ P ESHG:(V,E) |)choose|Pi ESHG:(V,E) |)
i
i=|P ESHG:(V,E) |
ESHG:(V,E)
∈P ESHG:(V,E) |
z min |Pi
= {ViEXT ERN AL ∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , Vi
EXT ERN AL
∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , i 6= j}.

X X
= =( (|Pi ESHG:(V,E) |choose 2) = z 2 .
EXT ERN AL |
|VESHG:(V,E) i=|P ESHG:(V,E) |
Neutrosophic Cardinality
Proof. Let 1550
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmin i |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1

straightforward. Then there’s at least one SuperHyperDuality. Thus the notion of quasi 1555
isn’t up and the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperDuality could be applied. 1556
There are only two SuperHyperParts. Thus every SuperHyperPart could have one 1557
SuperHyperVertex as the representative in the 1558
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
is a longest SuperHyperDuality taken from a connected Neutrosophic 1559
solution 1562
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
SuperHyperModel (26), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality. 1569

= {Ei ∈ EPi ESHG:(V,E) , |Pi ESHG:(V,E) | = min |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈ P ESHG:(V,E) |}.
i
X
i
i=|P ESHG:(V,E) |
ESHG:(V,E)
∈P ESHG:(V,E) |
z min |Pi
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , Vi
EXT ERN AL
∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , i 6= j}.

X X
EXT ERN AL |
Proof. Let 1572
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
is a longest SuperHyperDuality taken from a connected Neutrosophic 1573

There are only z 0 SuperHyperParts. Thus every SuperHyperPart could have one 1579
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
solution 1584
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality. 1592
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperDuality = {E ∗ ∈ EESHG:(V,E)

∗
}.
= |i | Ei∗ ∈ EESHG:(V,E)|
∗
|z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperDuality = {CEN T ER ∈ VESHG:(V,E) }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
Proof. Let 1595
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1∗ ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2∗ ,
...,
∗ EXT ERN AL
E|E ∗ | , V|E ∗ |Neutrosophic Cardinality +1
ESHG:(V,E) Neutrosophic Cardinality ESHG:(V,E)
is a longest SuperHyperDuality taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel 1596
ESHW : (V, E). There’s a new way to redefine as 1597

∃!Ez∗ ∈ EESHG:(V,E)
∗
, ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL ∈ Ez∗ ≡
∃!Ez∗ ∈ EESHG:(V,E)
∗
, {ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL } ⊆ Ez∗ .
The unique embedded SuperHyperDuality proposes some longest SuperHyperDuality 1602
excerpt from some representatives. The latter is straightforward. 1603
13 Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin But As The 1610
Forms 1612
Definition 13.1. (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin). 1613
(i) Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperJoin if ∀Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ E 0 , ∃Ej ∈ E 0 , such 1617
that Va ∈ Ei , Ej ; and ∀Ei , Ej ∈ E 0 , such that Va 6∈ Ei , Ej ; 1618
(ii) Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperJoin if ∀Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ E 0 , ∃Ej ∈ E 0 , 1619
such that Va ∈ Ei , Ej ; ∀Ei , Ej ∈ E 0 , such that Va 6∈ Ei , Ej ; and 1620
(iii) Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperJoin if ∀Vi ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ V 0 , ∃Vj ∈ V 0 , such 1622
that Vi , Vj 6∈ Ea ; and ∀Vi , Vj ∈ V 0 , such that Vi , Vj 6∈ Ea ; 1623
(iv) Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperJoin if ∀Vi ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ V 0 , ∃Vj ∈ V 0 , such 1624
that Vi , Vj ∈ Ea ; ∀Vi , Vj ∈ V 0 , such that Vi , Vj 6∈ Ea ; and 1625
(v) Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin if it’s either of Neutrosophic 1627
e-SuperHyperJoin, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperJoin, Neutrosophic 1628
v-SuperHyperJoin, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperJoin. 1629
Definition 13.2. ((Neutrosophic) SuperHyperJoin). 1630
called 1633
(i) an Extreme SuperHyperJoin if it’s either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperJoin, 1634
Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperJoin, Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperJoin, and 1635
Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperJoin and C(N SHG) for an Extreme 1636
SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum Extreme cardinality of an 1637
Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality of the Extreme 1638
SuperHyperEdges in the consecutive Extreme sequence of Extreme 1639
Extreme SuperHyperJoin; 1641
(ii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin if it’s either of Neutrosophic 1642
v-SuperHyperJoin, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperJoin and C(N SHG) for a 1644
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum Neutrosophic 1645
Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin; 1649
(iii) an Extreme SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of 1650
Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperJoin, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperJoin, Neutrosophic 1651
v-SuperHyperJoin, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperJoin and C(N SHG) for an 1652
Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Extreme 1653
Extreme SuperHyperJoin; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its Extreme 1658
coefficient; 1659
(iv) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of 1660
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Neutrosophic 1663
Neutrosophic number of the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of the 1665
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high 1666
SuperHyperJoin; and the Neutrosophic power is corresponded to its Neutrosophic 1669
coefficient; 1670
(v) an Extreme R-SuperHyperJoin if it’s either of Neutrosophic 1671
Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum Extreme cardinality 1674
of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality of the Extreme 1675
SuperHyperVertices in the consecutive Extreme sequence of Extreme 1676
Extreme SuperHyperJoin; 1678
(vi) a Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin if it’s either of Neutrosophic 1679
Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin; 1686
(vii) an Extreme R-SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of 1687
Extreme SuperHyperJoin; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its Extreme 1695
coefficient; 1696
(viii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of 1697
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high 1703
SuperHyperJoin; and the Neutrosophic power is corresponded to its Neutrosophic 1706
coefficient. 1707
SuperHyperJoin, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly 1711
SuperHyperJoin. 1719
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin = {E4 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin = {V4 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z.


C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin = {E4 , E2 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial = 2z 2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin = {V1 , V4 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial = 15z 2 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial = 4z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin = {E3i+13i=0 , E3i+243i=0 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial 6z 8 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin = {V3i+17i=0 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin = {E15 , E16 , E17 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial = z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin = {V3 , V13 , V8 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial =
4 × 5 × 5z 3 .

4 × 5 × 5z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin = {E3i+13i=0 , E23 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin = {V3i+13i=0 , V15 }.

4 × 5 × 5z 3 .

3 × 3z 2 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin = {V1 , Vii610=5,7,8 }.
i=4

3 × 3z 2 .



(1 × 5 × 5) + (1 × 2 + 1)z 3 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin = {V27 , V2 , V7 , V17 }.
(1 × 1 × 2 + 1)z 4 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin = {V27 , V2 , V7 , V17 }.
(1 × 1 × 2 + 1)z 4 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin = {E3i+1i=03 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin = {V2i+1i=05 }.



C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial
= 10 × 6 + 10 × 6 + 12 × 6 + 12 × 6z 2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin =

= {Ei }i=1 3
.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial
= 3z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin

.
Proof. Let 1793
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
3 3

corresponded to ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of SuperHyperJoin. The latter is 1797
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (23), is the SuperHyperJoin. 1801

= {Ei }i=1 3
.
= 3z 3 .

.
Proof. Let 1804
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
3 3

Then 1815
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperJoin = {E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperJoin = {CEN T ER ∈ VESHG:(V,E) }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
Proof. Let 1816

the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (25), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin. 1826
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperJoin

= (PERFECT MATCHING).
{Ei ∈ EPi ESHG:(V,E) ,
∀Pi ESHG:(V,E) , |Pi ESHG:(V,E) | = min |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈ P ESHG:(V,E) |}.
i
= (OTHERWISE).
{},
If ∃Pi ESHG:(V,E) , |Pi ESHG:(V,E) | =
6 min |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈ P ESHG:(V,E) |.
i
X
i
i=|P ESHG:(V,E) |
ESHG:(V,E)
∈P ESHG:(V,E) |
z min |Pi
where ∀Pi ESHG:(V,E) , |Pi ESHG:(V,E) |
= min |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈ P ESHG:(V,E) |}.
i
= (OTHERWISE)0.
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , Vi
EXT ERN AL
∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , i 6= j}.

X X
EXT ERN AL |
Proof. Let 1829
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL

straightforward. Then there’s no at least one SuperHyperJoin. Thus the notion of quasi 1834
may be up but the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperJoin could be applied. 1835
There are only two SuperHyperParts. Thus every SuperHyperPart could have one 1836
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
is a longest SuperHyperJoin taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite 1838
ESHB : (V, E). Thus only some SuperHyperVertices and only 1839
solution 1841
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
SuperHyperModel (26), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin. 1848

i
= (OTHERWISE).
{},
i
X
i
i=|P ESHG:(V,E) |
ESHG:(V,E)
∈P ESHG:(V,E) |
z min |Pi
i
= (OTHERWISE)0.
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , Vi
EXT ERN AL
∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , i 6= j}.

X X
EXT ERN AL |
Proof. Let 1851
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
is a longest SuperHyperJoin taken from a connected Neutrosophic 1852

straightforward. Then there’s no at least one SuperHyperJoin. Thus the notion of quasi 1856
may be up but the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperJoin could be applied. 1857
There are only z 0 SuperHyperParts. Thus every SuperHyperPart could have one 1858
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
solution 1863
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin. 1871

= {Ei }i=1 3
.
= 3z 3 .

.
Proof. Let 1874
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
3 3
is a longest SuperHyperJoin taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel 1875

straightforward. Then there’s at least one SuperHyperJoin. Thus the notion of quasi 1879
isn’t up and the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperJoin could be applied. The 1880
unique embedded SuperHyperJoin proposes some longest SuperHyperJoin excerpt from 1881
some representatives. The latter is straightforward. 1882
14 Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect But As The 1889
Forms 1891
Definition 14.1. (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect). 1892
(i) Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperPerfect if ∀Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ E 0 , ∃!Ej ∈ E 0 , 1896
such that Va ∈ Ei , Ej ; 1897
(ii) Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperPerfect if ∀Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ E 0 , ∃!Ej ∈ E 0 , 1898
such that Va ∈ Ei , Ej ; and 1899
(iii) Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperPerfect if ∀Vi ∈ VESHG:(V,E) \ V 0 , ∃!Vj ∈ V 0 , 1901
such that Vi , Vj ∈ Ea ; 1902
(iv) Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperPerfect if ∀Vi ∈ VESHG:(V,E) \ V 0 , ∃!Vj ∈ V 0 , 1903
such that Vi , Vj ∈ Ea ; and 1904
(v) Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect if it’s either of Neutrosophic 1906
e-SuperHyperPerfect, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperPerfect, Neutrosophic 1907
v-SuperHyperPerfect, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperPerfect. 1908
Definition 14.2. ((Neutrosophic) SuperHyperPerfect). 1909
called 1912
(i) an Extreme SuperHyperPerfect if it’s either of Neutrosophic 1913
v-SuperHyperPerfect, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperPerfect and C(N SHG) for 1915
Extreme SuperHyperPerfect; 1920
(ii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect if it’s either of Neutrosophic 1921
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect; 1928
(iii) an Extreme SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of 1929
Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperPerfect, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperPerfect, 1930
Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperPerfect, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperPerfect and 1931
Extreme SuperHyperPerfect; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its 1937
(iv) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either 1939
of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperPerfect, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperPerfect, 1940
the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high 1945
SuperHyperPerfect; and the Neutrosophic power is corresponded to its 1948
(v) an Extreme R-SuperHyperPerfect if it’s either of Neutrosophic 1950
Extreme SuperHyperPerfect; 1957
(vi) a Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect if it’s either of Neutrosophic 1958
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect; 1965
(vii) an Extreme R-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either 1966
Extreme SuperHyperPerfect; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its 1974
(viii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either 1976
the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high 1982
SuperHyperPerfect; and the Neutrosophic power is corresponded to its 1985
SuperHyperPerfect, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly 1990
SuperHyperPerfect. 1998
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect = {E4 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect = {V4 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z.


C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect = {E4 , E2 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = 2z 2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect = {V1 , V4 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = 15z 2 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = 4z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect = {E3i+13i=0 , E3i+243i=0 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial 6z 8 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect = {V3i+17i=0 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect = {E15 , E16 , E17 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect = {V3 , V6 , V8 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial =
3 × 4 × 4z 3 .

3 × 4 × 4z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect = {E3i+13i=0 , E23 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z 5 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect = {V3i+13i=0 , V15 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z 5 .

3 × 4 × 4z 3 .

3 × 2z 2 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect = {V1 , Vii610=5,7,8 }.
i=4

3 × 3z 2 .



C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect = {V2 , V7 , V17 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial =
(1 × 5 × 5) + (1 × 2 + 1)z 3 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect = {V27 , V2 , V7 , V17 }.
(1 × 1 × 2 + 1)z 4 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect = {V27 , V2 , V7 , V17 }.
(1 × 1 × 2 + 1)z 4 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect = {E3i+1i=03 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect = {V2i+1i=05 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = 2z 6 .



C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect = {V3 , V6 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial
= 10 × 6 + 10 × 6 + 12 × 6 + 12 × 6z 2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect =

= {Ei }i=1 3
.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial
= 3z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect

.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial
Proof. Let 2072
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
3 3

corresponded to ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of SuperHyperPerfect. The latter is 2076
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (23), is the SuperHyperPerfect. 2080
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect =

= {Ei }i=1 3
.
= 3z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect

.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial
Proof. Let 2083
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
3 3

Then 2094
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect = {E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect = {CEN T ER ∈ VESHG:(V,E) }.
Proof. Let 2095

the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (25), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect. 2105
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect

i
= (OTHERWISE).
{},
i
X
i
i=|P ESHG:(V,E) |
ESHG:(V,E)
∈P ESHG:(V,E) |
z min |Pi
i
= (OTHERWISE)0.
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , Vi
EXT ERN AL
∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , i 6= j}.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial

X X
EXT ERN AL |
Proof. Let 2108
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL

straightforward. Then there’s no at least one SuperHyperPerfect. Thus the notion of 2113
quasi may be up but the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperPerfect could be 2114
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
is a longest SuperHyperPerfect taken from a connected Neutrosophic 2117
solution 2120
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
SuperHyperModel (26), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect. 2127

i
= (OTHERWISE).
{},
i
X
i
i=|P ESHG:(V,E) |
ESHG:(V,E)
∈P ESHG:(V,E) |
z min |Pi
i
= (OTHERWISE)0.
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , Vi
EXT ERN AL
∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , i 6= j}.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial

X X
EXT ERN AL |
Proof. Let 2130
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
is a longest SuperHyperPerfect taken from a connected Neutrosophic 2131

straightforward. Then there’s no at least one SuperHyperPerfect. Thus the notion of 2135
quasi may be up but the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperPerfect could be 2136
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
solution 2142
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect. 2150
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect = {E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect = {CEN T ER ∈ VESHG:(V,E) }.
Proof. Let 2153

is a longest SuperHyperPerfect taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel 2154

straightforward. Then there’s at least one SuperHyperPerfect. Thus the notion of quasi 2158
isn’t up and the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperPerfect could be applied. The 2159
unique embedded SuperHyperPerfect proposes some longest SuperHyperPerfect excerpt 2160
from some representatives. The latter is straightforward. 2161
15 Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal But As The 2168
Forms 2170
Definition 15.1. (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal). 2171
(i) Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperTotal if ∀Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , ∃!Ej ∈ E 0 , such 2175
that Va ∈ Ei , Ej ; 2176
(ii) Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperTotal if ∀Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , ∃!Ej ∈ E 0 , such 2177
that Va ∈ Ei , Ej ; and 2178
(iii) Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperTotal if ∀Vi ∈ VESHG:(V,E) , ∃!Vj ∈ V 0 , such 2180
that Vi , Vj ∈ Ea ; 2181
(iv) Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperTotal if ∀Vi ∈ VESHG:(V,E) , ∃!Vj ∈ V 0 , such 2182
that Vi , Vj ∈ Ea ; and 2183
(v) Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal if it’s either of Neutrosophic 2185
e-SuperHyperTotal, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperTotal, Neutrosophic 2186
v-SuperHyperTotal, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperTotal. 2187
Definition 15.2. ((Neutrosophic) SuperHyperTotal). 2188
called 2191
(i) an Extreme SuperHyperTotal if it’s either of Neutrosophic 2192
v-SuperHyperTotal, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperTotal and C(N SHG) for an 2194
SuperHyperEdges in the consecutive Extreme sequence of Extreme 2197
Extreme SuperHyperTotal; 2199
(ii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal if it’s either of Neutrosophic 2200
v-SuperHyperTotal, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperTotal and C(N SHG) for a 2202
Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal; 2207
(iii) an Extreme SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of 2208
Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperTotal, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperTotal, Neutrosophic 2209
Extreme SuperHyperTotal; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its Extreme 2216
coefficient; 2217
(iv) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of 2218
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high 2224
SuperHyperTotal; and the Neutrosophic power is corresponded to its 2227
(v) an Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal if it’s either of Neutrosophic 2229
SuperHyperVertices in the consecutive Extreme sequence of Extreme 2234
Extreme SuperHyperTotal; 2236
(vi) a Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperTotal if it’s either of Neutrosophic 2237
Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal; 2244
(vii) an Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of 2245
Extreme SuperHyperTotal; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its Extreme 2253
coefficient; 2254
(viii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of 2255
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high 2261
SuperHyperTotal; and the Neutrosophic power is corresponded to its 2264
SuperHyperTotal, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly 2269
SuperHyperTotal. 2277
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperTotal = {E4 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperTotal = {V4 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z.


C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi- = {E4 , E2 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = 2z 2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperTotal = {V1 , V4 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = 15z 2 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = 4z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal = {Ei+19i=0 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial 20z 10 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperTotal = {Vi+19i=0 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = 20z 10 .
C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperTotal = {E12 , E13 , E14 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = z 3 .
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal = {V12 , V13 , V14 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = z 3 .
C(N SHG)Extreme Quasi-SuperHyperTotal = {E4 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme Quasi-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial =
3 × 4 × 4z 3 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial 10z 10 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperTotal = {Vi+19i=0 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme Quasi-SuperHyperTotal = {E5 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme Quasi-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
3 × 4 × 4z 3 .
C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperTotal = {E1 , E6 , E7 , E8 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = 2z 4 .
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal = {V1 , V5 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z 2 .
C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperTotal = {E1 , E2 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal = {V1 , Vii68=4,5,6 }.
i=1




4 × 3z 3 .

C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal = {V1 , V2 , V6 , V17 }.
4 × 3z 4 .

C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal = {V1 , V2 , V6 , V17 }.
2 × 4 × 3z 4 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = 11z 10 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperTotal = {Vi+2i=011 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = 11z 10 .

C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal = {V1 , V }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial
= |(|V | − 1)z 2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal = {E1 , E2 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = 2z 2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperTotal = {V1 , V2 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme R-Quasi-SuperHyperTotal = {V3 , V10 , V6 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-Quasi-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial
= 3 × 6z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal =

|E | −2
= {Ei }i=1ESHG:(V,E) Neutrosophic Cardinality .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial
= z |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality −2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperTotal
|E | −2
= {ViEXT ERN AL }i=1ESHG:(V,E) Neutrosophic Cardinality .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial
Y
= |V EXT ERN AL ESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality z |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality −2
Proof. Let 2351
P :
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
V3EXT ERN AL , E3 ,
...

corresponded to ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of SuperHyperTotal. The latter is 2355
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (23), is the SuperHyperTotal. 2359
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal =

|E | −2
= {Ei }i=1ESHG:(V,E) Neutrosophic Cardinality .
= (|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality − 1)
z |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality −2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperTotal
|E | −2
= {ViEXT ERN AL }i=1ESHG:(V,E) Neutrosophic Cardinality .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial
Y
= |V EXT ERN AL ESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality z |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality −2
Proof. Let 2362
P :
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
V3EXT ERN AL , E3 ,
...,
E |E|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality −1 .
, V EXT ERN AL |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality −1

Then 2373
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal = {Ei , Ej ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.

= |i(i − 1) | Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E)|Neutrosophic Cardinality |z 2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperTotal = {CEN T ER, Vj ∈ VESHG:(V,E) }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial =
(|VESHG:(V,E)|Neutrosophic Cardinality |) choose (|VESHG:(V,E)|Neutrosophic Cardinality | − 1)
z2.
Proof. Let 2374
P : ViEXT ERN AL , Ei , CEN T ER, Ej .

the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (25), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal. 2384
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal

= {Ea ∈ EPi ESHG:(V,E) ,
i
ESHG:(V,E)
∈P ESHG:(V,E) |
= z min |Pi
i
= {VaEXT ERN AL ∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , Vb
EXT ERN AL
∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , i 6= j}.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial

X X
EXT ERN AL |
Proof. Let 2387
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2

straightforward. Then there’s no at least one SuperHyperTotal. Thus the notion of 2392
quasi may be up but the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperTotal could be 2393
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
is a longest SuperHyperTotal taken from a connected Neutrosophic 2396
solution 2399
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
SuperHyperModel (26), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal. 2406

i
ESHG:(V,E)
∈P ESHG:(V,E) |
= z min |Pi
i
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , Vb
EXT ERN AL
∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , i 6= j}.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial

X X
EXT ERN AL |
Proof. Let 2409
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
is a longest SuperHyperTotal taken from a connected Neutrosophic 2410

straightforward. Then there’s no at least one SuperHyperTotal. Thus the notion of 2414
quasi may be up but the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperTotal could be 2415
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
solution 2421
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal. 2429
∗
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal = {Ei , Ej ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.
∗
= |i(i − 1) | Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E)|Neutrosophic Cardinality
|z 2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperTotal = {CEN T ER, Vj ∈ VESHG:(V,E) }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial =
(|VESHG:(V,E)|Neutrosophic Cardinality |) choose (|VESHG:(V,E)|Neutrosophic Cardinality | − 1)
z2.
Proof. Let 2432
P : ViEXT ERN AL , Ei∗ , CEN T ER, Ej .

is a longest SuperHyperTotal taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel 2433

straightforward. Then there’s at least one SuperHyperTotal. Thus the notion of quasi 2437
isn’t up and the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperTotal could be applied. The 2438
unique embedded SuperHyperTotal proposes some longest SuperHyperTotal excerpt 2439
from some representatives. The latter is straightforward. 2440
16 Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected But As 2447
The Extensions Excerpt From Dense And Super 2448
Forms 2449
Definition 16.1. (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic 2450
SuperHyperConnected). 2451
(i) Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperConnected if 2455
∀Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ E 0 , ∃Ej ∈ E 0 , such that Va ∈ Ei , Ej ; and ∀Ei , Ej ∈ E 0 , such 2456
that Va 6∈ Ei , Ej ; 2457
(ii) Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperConnected if 2458
∀Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ E 0 , ∃Ej ∈ E 0 , such that Va ∈ Ei , Ej ; ∀Ei , Ej ∈ E 0 , such 2459
that Va 6∈ Ei , Ej ; and 2460
(iii) Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperConnected if 2462
∀Vi ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ V 0 , ∃Vj ∈ V 0 , such that Vi , Vj 6∈ Ea ; and ∀Vi , Vj ∈ V 0 , such 2463
that Vi , Vj 6∈ Ea ; 2464
(iv) Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperConnected if 2465
∀Vi ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ V 0 , ∃Vj ∈ V 0 , such that Vi , Vj ∈ Ea ; ∀Vi , Vj ∈ V 0 , such that 2466
Vi , Vj 6∈ Ea ; and 2467
(v) Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected if it’s either of Neutrosophic 2469
e-SuperHyperConnected, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperConnected, Neutrosophic 2470
v-SuperHyperConnected, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperConnected. 2471
Definition 16.2. ((Neutrosophic) SuperHyperConnected). 2472
called 2475
(i) an Extreme SuperHyperConnected if it’s either of Neutrosophic 2476
v-SuperHyperConnected, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperConnected and 2478
C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum 2479
Extreme cardinality of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality 2480
of the Extreme SuperHyperEdges in the consecutive Extreme sequence of Extreme 2481
Extreme SuperHyperConnected; 2483
(ii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected if it’s either of Neutrosophic 2484
Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected; 2491
(iii) an Extreme SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either 2492
of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperConnected, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperConnected, 2493
Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperConnected, and Neutrosophic 2494
rv-SuperHyperConnected and C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph 2495
coefficients defined as the Extreme number of the maximum Extreme cardinality 2497
of the Extreme SuperHyperEdges of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high 2498
Extreme cardinality consecutive Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme 2499
SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Extreme SuperHyperConnected; and 2500
the Extreme power is corresponded to its Extreme coefficient; 2501
(iv) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s 2502
either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperConnected, Neutrosophic 2503
re-SuperHyperConnected, Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperConnected, and 2504
Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperConnected and C(N SHG) for a Neutrosophic 2505
SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPolynomial 2506
contains the Neutrosophic coefficients defined as the Neutrosophic number of the 2507
maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges of a 2508
they form the Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected; and the Neutrosophic power is 2511
corresponded to its Neutrosophic coefficient; 2512
(v) an Extreme R-SuperHyperConnected if it’s either of Neutrosophic 2513
C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum 2516
Extreme cardinality of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality 2517
of the Extreme SuperHyperVertices in the consecutive Extreme sequence of 2518
Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form 2519
the Extreme SuperHyperConnected; 2520
(vi) a Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnected if it’s either of Neutrosophic 2521
they form the Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected; 2528
(vii) an Extreme R-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s 2529
Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperConnected and C(N SHG) for an Extreme 2532
SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Extreme SuperHyperPolynomial 2533
contains the Extreme coefficients defined as the Extreme number of the maximum 2534
Extreme cardinality of the Extreme SuperHyperVertices of an Extreme 2535
SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality consecutive Extreme 2536
Extreme SuperHyperConnected; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its 2538
(viii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s 2540
Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperConnected and C(N SHG) for a Neutrosophic 2543
SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPolynomial 2544
contains the Neutrosophic coefficients defined as the Neutrosophic number of the 2545
maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of a 2546
they form the Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected; and the Neutrosophic power is 2549
corresponded to its Neutrosophic coefficient. 2550
SuperHyperConnected, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly 2554
SuperHyperConnected. 2562
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected = {E4 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnected = {V4 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z.


C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected = {E1 , E2 , E4 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {V1 , V4 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = 15z 2 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = 4z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {Ei+19i=0 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial 20z 10 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {Vi+19i=0 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperConnected = {E12 , E13 , E14 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z 3 .
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperConnected = {V12 , V13 , V14 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z 3 .
C(N SHG)Extreme Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {E4 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial =
3 × 4 × 4z 3 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial 10z 10 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnected = {Vi+119
i=11
, V22 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = 20z 10 .
C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperConnected = {E5 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
3 × 4 × 4z 3 .
C(N SHG)Extreme Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {E1 , E6 , E7 , E8 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = 2z 4 .
C(N SHG)Extreme R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {V1 , V5 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z 2 .
C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperConnected = {E1 , E2 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = 5z 2 .
C(N SHG)Extreme R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {V1 , Vii68=4,5,6 }.
i=1
C(N SHG)Extreme R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z 5 .
C(N SHG)Extreme Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {E3 , E9 , E6 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z 3 .
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperConnected = {V1 , V5 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z 2 .

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperConnected = {V1 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z.

C(N SHG)Extreme Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z 3 .
C(N SHG)Extreme R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {V2 , V3 , V4 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z 3 .
C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperConnected = {E2 , E3 , E4 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z 3 .
4 × 3z 3 .

C(N SHG)Extreme R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {V1 , V2 , V6 , V17 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial =
4 × 3z 4 .

C(N SHG)Extreme R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {V1 , V2 , V6 , V17 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial =
2 × 4 × 3z 4 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = 11z 10 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {Vi+2i=011 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = 10z.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperConnected = {V1 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z.

C(N SHG)Extreme Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {E3 , E4 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {V3 , V10 , V6 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial
= 3 × 6z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperConnected =

−2
= {Ei }i=1 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic −2
=z Cardinality .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected
= {ViEXT ERN AL }i=1 Cardinality
.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial
|E | −2
Y
= |V EXT ERN AL ESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality z ESHG:(V,E) Neutrosophic Cardinality
Proof. Let 2636
P :
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
V3EXT ERN AL , E3 ,
...,
E|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality −1 , V EXT ERN AL |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality −1 .

corresponded to ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of SuperHyperConnected. The latter is 2640
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (23), is the SuperHyperConnected. 2644
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperConnected =

−2
= {Ei }i=1 .
= (|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality − 1)
z Cardinality .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected
= {ViEXT ERN AL }i=1 Cardinality
.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial
|E | −2
Y
= |V EXT ERN AL ESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality z ESHG:(V,E) Neutrosophic Cardinality
Proof. Let 2647
P :
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
V3EXT ERN AL , E3 ,
...,
E|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality −1 , V EXT ERN AL |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality −1 .

Then 2658
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected = {Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial
= |i | Ei ∈ |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnected = {CEN T ER ∈ VESHG:(V,E) }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
Proof. Let 2659
P : ViEXT ERN AL , Ei , CEN T ER, Ej .

the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (25), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected. 2669
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperConnected

i
ESHG:(V,E)
∈P ESHG:(V,E) |
= z min |Pi
i
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperConnected
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , Vb
EXT ERN AL
∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , i 6= j}.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial

X X
EXT ERN AL |
Proof. Let 2672
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2

straightforward. Then there’s no at least one SuperHyperConnected. Thus the notion of 2677
quasi may be up but the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperConnected could be 2678
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
is a longest SuperHyperConnected taken from a connected Neutrosophic 2681
solution 2684
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
SuperHyperModel (26), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected. 2691
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperConnected

i
ESHG:(V,E)
∈P ESHG:(V,E) |
= z min |Pi
i
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperConnected
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , Vb
EXT ERN AL
∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , i 6= j}.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial

X X
EXT ERN AL |
Proof. Let 2694
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2

straightforward. Then there’s no at least one SuperHyperConnected. Thus the notion of 2699
quasi may be up but the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperConnected could be 2700
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
solution 2706
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected. 2714
∗
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected = {Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial
= |i | Ei ∈ |E ∗ ESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality |z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperConnected = {CEN T ER ∈ VESHG:(V,E) }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
Proof. Let 2717
P : V EXT ERN AL i , E ∗ i , CEN T ER, Ej .
SuperHyperWheel ESHW : (V, E). There’s a new way to redefine as 2719

straightforward. Then there’s at least one SuperHyperConnected. Thus the notion of 2722
quasi isn’t up and the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperConnected could be 2723
applied. The unique embedded SuperHyperConnected proposes some longest 2724
SuperHyperConnected excerpt from some representatives. The latter is 2725
17 Background 2733
There are some scientific researches covering the topic of this research. In what follows, 2734
there are some discussion and literature reviews about them date back on February 19, 2735
2023. 2736
First article is titled “properties of SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic 2737
SuperHyperGraph” in Ref. [1] by Henry Garrett (2022). It’s first step toward the 2738
research on neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs. This research article is published on the 2739
journal “Neutrosophic Sets and Systems” in issue 49 and the pages 531-561. In this 2740
research article, different types of notions like dominating, resolving, coloring, 2741
Eulerian(Hamiltonian) neutrosophic path, n-Eulerian(Hamiltonian) neutrosophic path, 2742
zero forcing number, zero forcing neutrosophic- number, independent number, 2743
independent neutrosophic-number, clique number, clique neutrosophic-number, 2744
matching number, matching neutrosophic-number, girth, neutrosophic girth, 2745
1-zero-forcing number, 1-zero- forcing neutrosophic-number, failed 1-zero-forcing 2746
number, failed 1-zero-forcing neutrosophic-number, global- offensive alliance, t-offensive 2747
alliance, t-defensive alliance, t-powerful alliance, and global-powerful alliance are defined 2748
in SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. Some Classes of 2749
SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph are cases of research. Some 2750
results are applied in family of SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. 2751
Thus this research article has concentrated on the vast notions and introducing the 2752
majority of notions. 2753
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “neutrosophic co-degree and 2754
neutrosophic degree alongside chromatic numbers in the setting of some classes related 2755
to neutrosophic hypergraphs” in Ref. [2] by Henry Garrett (2022). In this research 2756
article, a novel approach is implemented on SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic 2757
SuperHyperGraph based on general forms without using neutrosophic classes of 2758
neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. It’s published in prestigious and fancy journal is 2759
entitled “Journal of Current Trends in Computer Science Research (JCTCSR)” with 2760
ISO abbreviation “J Curr Trends Comp Sci Res” in volume 1 and issue 1 with pages 2761
06-14. The research article studies deeply with choosing neutrosophic hypergraphs 2762
instead of neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough toward independent 2763
results based on initial background. 2764
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “Super Hyper Dominating 2765
and Super Hyper Resolving on Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs and Their Directions 2766
in Game Theory and Neutrosophic Super Hyper Classes” in Ref. [3] by Henry Garrett 2767
(2022). In this research article, a novel approach is implemented on SuperHyperGraph 2768
and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on fundamental SuperHyperNumber and 2769
using neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses of neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. It’s 2770
published in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled “Journal of Mathematical 2771
Techniques and Computational Mathematics(JMTCM)” with ISO abbreviation “J Math 2772
Techniques Comput Math” in volume 1 and issue 3 with pages 242-263. The research 2773
article studies deeply with choosing directly neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph and 2774
SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough toward independent results based on initial 2775
background and fundamental SuperHyperNumbers. 2776
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “Some Super Hyper Degrees 2777
and Co-Super Hyper Degrees on Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs And Super Hyper 2778
Graphs Alongside Applications in Cancer’s Treatments” in Ref. [52] by Henry Garrett 2779
(2023). In this research article, a novel approach is implemented on SuperHyperGraph 2780
and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on fundamental notions and using vital tools 2781
in Cancer’s Treatments. It’s published in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled 2782
“Journal of Mathematical Techniques and Computational Mathematics(JMTCM)” with 2783
ISO abbreviation “J Math Techniques Comput Math” in volume 2 and issue 1 with 2784
pages 35-47. The research article studies deeply with choosing directly neutrosophic 2785
SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough toward independent 2786
results based on initial background and fundamental SuperHyperNumbers. 2787
In some articles are titled “0039 — Closing Numbers and Super-Closing Numbers as 2788
(Dual)Resolving and (Dual)Coloring alongside (Dual)Dominating in 2789
(Neutrosophic)n-SuperHyperGraph” in Ref. [5] by Henry Garrett (2022), “0049 — 2790
(Failed)1-Zero-Forcing Number in Neutrosophic Graphs” in Ref. [6] by Henry Garrett 2791
(2022), “Extreme SuperHyperClique as the Firm Scheme of Confrontation under 2792
Cancer’s Recognition as the Model in The Setting of (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” 2793
in Ref. [7] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Uncertainty On The Act And Effect Of Cancer 2794
Alongside The Foggy Positions Of Cells Toward Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique 2795
inside Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Titled Cancer’s Recognition” in Ref. [8] by 2796
Henry Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic Version Of Separates Groups Of Cells In Cancer’s 2797
Recognition On Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [9] by Henry Garrett (2022), 2798
“The Shift Paradigm To Classify Separately The Cells and Affected Cells Toward The 2799
Totality Under Cancer’s Recognition By New Multiple Definitions On the Sets 2800
Polynomials Alongside Numbers In The (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperMatching Theory 2801
Based on SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” in Ref. [10] by 2802
Henry Garrett (2022), “Breaking the Continuity and Uniformity of Cancer In The 2803
Worst Case of Full Connections With Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique In Cancer’s 2804
Recognition Applied in (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [11] by Henry 2805
Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable as the Survivors on the 2806
Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition Based on Uncertainty to All Modes in Neutrosophic 2807
SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [12] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Extremism of the Attacked 2808
Body Under the Cancer’s Circumstances Where Cancer’s Recognition Titled 2809
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [13] by Henry Garrett (2022), 2810
“(Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in Cancer’s Recognitions And 2811
“Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable 2813
To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In Special ViewPoints” in Ref. [15] by 2814
Henry Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in the 2815
SuperHyperFunction To Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs on Cancer’s 2816
Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond” in Ref. [16] by Henry Garrett (2022), 2817
“(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperStable on Cancer’s Recognition by Well- 2818
SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs ” in Ref. [17] by Henry 2819
Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form Neutrosophic 2820
SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In Special ViewPoints” 2821
in Ref. [13] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Basic Notions on (Neutrosophic) 2822
SuperHyperForcing And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling in Cancer’s Recognitions 2823
And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [18] by Henry Garrett (2022), 2824
“Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable 2825
To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In Special ViewPoints” in Ref. [19] by 2826
Henry Garrett (2022),“(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions 2827
Featuring (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances” in Ref. [20] by 2828
Henry Garrett (2022), “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperAlliances With 2829
SuperHyperDefensive and SuperHyperOffensive Type-SuperHyperSet On 2830
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of 2831
Cancer’s Recognitions And Related (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClasses” in Ref. [21] by 2832
Henry Garrett (2022), “SuperHyperGirth on SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic 2833
SuperHyperGraph With SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions” in Ref. [22] by 2834
Henry Garrett (2022), “Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on 2835
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs and SuperHyperGraphs Alongside Applications in 2836
Cancer’s Treatments” in Ref. [23] by Henry Garrett (2022), “SuperHyperDominating 2837
and SuperHyperResolving on Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs And Their Directions in 2838
Game Theory and Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses” in Ref. [24] by Henry Garrett 2839
(2022), “SuperHyperMatching By (R-)Definitions And Polynomials To Monitor 2840
Cancer’s Recognition In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [66] by Henry 2841
Garrett (2023), “The Focus on The Partitions Obtained By Parallel Moves In The 2842
Cancer’s Extreme Recognition With Different Types of Extreme SuperHyperMatching 2843
Set and Polynomial on (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [67] by Henry 2844
Garrett (2023), “Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique Decides the Failures on the 2845
Cancer’s Recognition in the Perfect Connections of Cancer’s Attacks By 2846
SuperHyperModels Named (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [68] by Henry 2847
Garrett (2023), “Indeterminacy On The All Possible Connections of Cells In Front of 2848
Cancer’s Attacks In The Terms of Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique on Cancer’s 2849
Recognition called Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [69] by Henry Garrett 2850
(2023), “Perfect Directions Toward Idealism in Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition 2851
Forwarding Neutrosophic SuperHyperClique on Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in 2852
Ref. [72] by Henry Garrett (2023), “Demonstrating Complete Connections in Every 2853
Embedded Regions and Sub-Regions in the Terms of Cancer’s Recognition and 2854
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClique” in 2855
Ref. [73] by Henry Garrett (2023), “Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic 2856
Regions titled neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable in Cancer’s Neutrosophic 2857
Recognition modeled in the Form of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [76] by 2858
Henry Garrett (2023), “Using the Tool As (Neutrosophic) Failed SuperHyperStable To 2859
SuperHyperModel Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in 2860
Ref. [79] by Henry Garrett (2023), “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To 2861
Form Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In 2862
Special ViewPoints” in Ref. [80] by Henry Garrett (2023), “(Neutrosophic) 2863
SuperHyperStable on Cancer’s Recognition by Well-SuperHyperModelled 2864
“Neutrosophic 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in the SuperHyperFunction To Use 2866
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond” 2867
in Ref. [82] by Henry Garrett (2022), “(Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in 2868
Cancer’s Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [83] by Henry 2869
Garrett (2022), “Basic Notions on (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperForcing And 2870
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling in Cancer’s Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) 2871
SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [84] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Basic Neutrosophic Notions 2872
Concerning SuperHyperDominating and Neutrosophic SuperHyperResolving in 2873
SuperHyperGraph” in Ref. [95] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Initial Material of 2874
Neutrosophic Preliminaries to Study Some Neutrosophic Notions Based on 2875
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) in Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)” in 2876
Ref. [96] by Henry Garrett (2022), there are some endeavors to formalize the basic 2877
SuperHyperNotions about neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph. 2878
Some scientific studies and scientific researches about neutrosophic graphs, are 2879
proposed as book in Ref. [97] by Henry Garrett (2022) which is indexed by Google 2880
Scholar and has more than 3230 readers in Scribd. It’s titled “Beyond Neutrosophic 2881
Graphs” and published by Ohio: E-publishing: Educational Publisher 1091 West 1st 2882
Ave Grandview Heights, Ohio 43212 United State. This research book covers different 2883
types of notions and settings in neutrosophic graph theory and neutrosophic 2884
SuperHyperGraph theory. 2885
Also, some scientific studies and scientific researches about neutrosophic graphs, are 2886
proposed as book in Ref. [98] by Henry Garrett (2022) which is indexed by Google 2887
Scholar and has more than 4117 readers in Scribd. It’s titled “Neutrosophic Duality” 2888
and published by Florida: GLOBAL KNOWLEDGE - Publishing House 848 Brickell 2889
Ave Ste 950 Miami, Florida 33131 United States. This research book presents different 2890
types of notions SuperHyperResolving and SuperHyperDominating in the setting of 2891
duality in neutrosophic graph theory and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph theory. This 2892
research book has scrutiny on the complement of the intended set and the intended set, 2893
simultaneously. It’s smart to consider a set but acting on its complement that what’s 2894
done in this research book which is popular in the terms of high readers in Scribd. 2895
See the seminal scientific researches [1–3]. The formalization of the notions on the 2896
framework of Extreme SuperHyperDominating, Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating 2897
theory, and (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs theory at [5–96]. Two popular scientific 2898
research books in Scribd in the terms of high readers, 3230 and 4117 respectively, on 2899
neutrosophic science is on [97, 98]. 2900
– 2901
References 2902
1. Henry Garrett, “Properties of SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic 2903
SuperHyperGraph”, Neutrosophic Sets and Systems 49 (2022) 531-561 (doi: 2904
10.5281/zenodo.6456413). 2905
(http://fs.unm.edu/NSS/NeutrosophicSuperHyperGraph34.pdf). 2906
(https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nss journal/vol49/iss1/34). 2907
2. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Co-degree and Neutrosophic Degree alongside 2908
Chromatic Numbers in the Setting of Some Classes Related to Neutrosophic 2909
Hypergraphs”, J Curr Trends Comp Sci Res 1(1) (2022) 06-14. 2910
3. Henry Garrett, “Super Hyper Dominating and Super Hyper Resolving on 2911
Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs and Their Directions in Game Theory and 2912
Neutrosophic Super Hyper Classes”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 1(3) 2913
(2022) 242-263. (doi: 10.33140/JMTCM.01.03.09) 2914
4. Henry Garrett, “Some Super Hyper Degrees and Co-Super Hyper Degrees on 2915
Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs And Super Hyper Graphs Alongside 2916
Applications in Cancer’s Treatments”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 2(1) 2917
(2023) 35-47. (https://www.opastpublishers.com/open-access-articles/some- 2918
super-hyper-degrees-and-cosuper-hyper-degrees-on-neutrosophic-super-hyper- 2919
graphs-and-super-hyper-graphs-alongside-a.pdf) 2920
5. Garrett, Henry. “0039 — Closing Numbers and Super-Closing Numbers as 2921
(Dual)Resolving and (Dual)Coloring alongside (Dual)Dominating in 2922
(Neutrosophic)n-SuperHyperGraph.” CERN European Organization for Nuclear 2923
Research - Zenodo, Nov. 2022. CERN European Organization for Nuclear 2924
Research, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6319942. 2925
https://oa.mg/work/10.5281/zenodo.6319942 2926
6. Garrett, Henry. “0049 — (Failed)1-Zero-Forcing Number in Neutrosophic 2927
Graphs.” CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research - Zenodo, Feb. 2928
2022. CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research, 2929
https://doi.org/10.13140/rg.2.2.35241.26724. 2930
https://oa.mg/work/10.13140/rg.2.2.35241.26724 2931
7. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperClique as the Firm Scheme of 2932
Confrontation under Cancer’s Recognition as the Model in The Setting of 2933
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010308 (doi: 2934
10.20944/preprints202301.0308.v1). 2935
8. Henry Garrett, “Uncertainty On The Act And Effect Of Cancer Alongside The 2936
Foggy Positions Of Cells Toward Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique inside 2937
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Titled Cancer’s Recognition”, Preprints 2023, 2938
2023010282 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0282.v1). 2939
9. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Version Of Separates Groups Of Cells In 2940
Cancer’s Recognition On Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2941
2023010267 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0267.v1). 2942
10. Henry Garrett, “The Shift Paradigm To Classify Separately The Cells and 2943
Affected Cells Toward The Totality Under Cancer’s Recognition By New 2944
Multiple Definitions On the Sets Polynomials Alongside Numbers In The 2945
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperMatching Theory Based on SuperHyperGraph and 2946
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”, Preprints 2023, 2023010265 (doi: 2947
10.20944/preprints202301.0265.v1). 2948
11. Henry Garrett, “Breaking the Continuity and Uniformity of Cancer In The 2949
Worst Case of Full Connections With Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique In 2950
Cancer’s Recognition Applied in (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2951
2023, 2023010262,(doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0262.v1). 2952
12. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable as the Survivors on the 2953
Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition Based on Uncertainty to All Modes in 2954
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010240 (doi: 2955
10.20944/preprints202301.0240.v1). 2956
13. Henry Garrett, “Extremism of the Attacked Body Under the Cancer’s 2957
Circumstances Where Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) 2958
SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010224, (doi: 2959
10.20944/preprints202301.0224.v1). 2960
14. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in Cancer’s 2961
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2962
2023010105 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 2963
15. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form 2964
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions 2965
In Special ViewPoints”, Preprints 2023, 2023010088 (doi: 2966
10.20944/preprints202301.0088.v1). 2967
16. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in the 2968
Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond ”, Preprints 2023, 2023010044 2970
17. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperStable on Cancer’s Recognition by 2971
Well- SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2972
2023010043 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0043.v1). 2973
18. Henry Garrett, “Basic Notions on (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperForcing And 2974
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling in Cancer’s Recognitions And 2975
10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 2977
10.20944/preprints202301.0088.v1). 2981
20. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions 2982
Featuring (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances”, Preprints 2983
2022, 2022120549 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0549.v1). 2984
21. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperAlliances With SuperHyperDefensive 2985
and SuperHyperOffensive Type-SuperHyperSet On (Neutrosophic) 2986
SuperHyperGraph With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s 2987
Recognitions And Related (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClasses”, Preprints 2022, 2988
2022120540 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0540.v1). 2989
22. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperGirth on SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic 2990
SuperHyperGraph With SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions”, 2991
Preprints 2022, 2022120500 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0500.v1). 2992
23. Henry Garrett, “Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on 2993
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs and SuperHyperGraphs Alongside Applications 2994
in Cancer’s Treatments”, Preprints 2022, 2022120324 (doi: 2995
10.20944/preprints202212.0324.v1). 2996
24. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDominating and SuperHyperResolving on 2997
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs And Their Directions in Game Theory and 2998
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”, Preprints 2022, 2022110576 (doi: 2999
10.20944/preprints202211.0576.v1). 3000
25. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Contradiction By Hyper Detection of 3001
SuperHyperDefensive In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic 3002
SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.13397.09446). 3003
26. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3004
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperDominating As Hyper Closing On Super 3005
Messy”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.21510.45125). 3006
27. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Missing By Hyper Searching Of 3007
SuperHyperDominating In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 3008
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperConnected As Hyper Group On Super Surge”, 3011
ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.11758.69441). 3012
29. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Outbreak By Hyper Collections Of 3013
SuperHyperConnected In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 3014
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperTotal As Hyper Covering On Super 3017
Infections”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.19360.87048). 3018
31. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Extremism By Hyper Treatments Of 3019
SuperHyperTotal In Cancer’s Recognition with (Neutrosophic) 3020
32. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Isolation By Hyper Perfectness Of 3022
SuperHyperPerfect In Cancer’s Recognition with (Neutrosophic) 3023
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperPerfect As Hyper Idealism On Super 3026
Vacancy”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.19911.37285). 3027
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperJoin As Hyper Separations On Super Sorts”, 3029
35. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super connections By Hyper disconnections Of 3031
SuperHyperJoin In Cancer’s Recognition with (Neutrosophic) 3032
36. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Mixed-Devastations By Hyper Decisions 3034
Of SuperHyperDuality In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic 3035
37. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition As (Neutrosophic) 3037
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperDuality As Hyper Imaginations On Super 3038
Mixed-Illustrations”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.33275.80161). 3039
38. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition As (Neutrosophic) 3040
SuperHyperGraph By Path SuperHyperColoring As Hyper Correction On Super 3041
Faults”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.30182.50241). 3042
39. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Reflections By Hyper Rotations Of Path 3043
SuperHyperColoring In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic 3044
40. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas As Hyper Deformations On Super Chains In 3046
Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph By 3047
SuperHyperDensity”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.13444.60806). 3048
41. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas As Hyper Ignorance By SuperHyperDensity On 3049
Super Resistances In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic 3050
SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.16800.05123). 3051
42. Henry Garrett, “New Research On Cancer’s Recognition and Neutrosophic 3052
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian SuperHyperCycles and Hamiltonian Sets As 3053
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-VI”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 3054
10.13140/RG.2.2.29913.80482). 3055
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-V”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 3058
10.13140/RG.2.2.33269.24809). 3059
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-IV”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 3062
10.13140/RG.2.2.34946.96960). 3063
45. Henry Garrett, “A Research On Cancer’s Recognition and Neutrosophic 3064
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-III”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 3066
10.13140/RG.2.2.14814.31040). 3067
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-II”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 3070
10.13140/RG.2.2.15653.17125). 3071
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-I”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 3074
10.13140/RG.2.2.25719.50089). 3075
48. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Disruptions In Cancer’s Extreme 3076
Recognition As Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph By Hyper Plans Called 3077
SuperHyperConnectivities”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 3078
10.13140/RG.2.2.29441.94562). 3079
49. Henry Garrett, “Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition As Neutrosophic 3080
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperConnectivities As Hyper Diagnosis On Super 3081
Mechanism”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.17252.24968). 3082
50. Henry Garrett,“Cancer’s Recognition and (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph By 3083
the Criteria of Eulerian and Hamiltonian Type-Sets As Hyper Modified Cycles 3084
On Super Mess”, ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.16652.59525). 3085
51. Henry Garrett,“Eulerian and Hamiltonian In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition 3086
and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph On Super Interactions By Hyper 3087
Extensions of Cycles”, ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.34583.24485). 3088
52. Henry Garrett, “Some Super Hyper Degrees and Co-Super Hyper Degrees on 3089
Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs And Super Hyper Graphs Alongside 3090
Applications in Cancer’s Treatments”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 2(1) 3091
(2023) 35-47. 3092
53. Henry Garrett,“SuperHyperGirth Type-Results on extreme SuperHyperGirth 3093
theory and (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs Toward Cancer’s extreme 3094
Recognition”, Preprints 2023, 2023010396 (doi: 3095
10.20944/preprints202301.0396.v1). 3096
54. Henry Garrett,“Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Warns Hyper Landmark of 3097
neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth In Super Type-Versions of Cancer’s neutrosophic 3098
Recognition”, Preprints 2023, 2023010395 (doi: 3099
10.20944/preprints202301.0395.v1). 3100
55. Henry Garrett,“The Constructions of (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs on the 3101
Cancer’s Recognition in The Confrontation With Super Attacks In Hyper 3102
Situations By Implementing (Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in The 3103
Technical Approaches to Neutralize SuperHyperViews”, ResearchGate 2023, 3104
(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.26240.51204). 3105
56. Henry Garrett,“(Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing As the 3106
Entrepreneurs on Cancer’s Recognitions To Fail Forcing Style As the Super 3107
Classes With Hyper Effects In The Background of the Framework is So-Called 3108
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 3109
10.13140/RG.2.2.12818.73925). 3110
57. Henry Garrett,“Super Actions On The Types of Hyper Levels In The Sensible 3111
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth On Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and 3112
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 3113
10.13140/RG.2.2.26836.88960). 3114
58. Henry Garrett,“SuperHyperGirth Approaches on the Super Challenges on the 3115
Cancer’s Recognition In the Hyper Model of (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, 3116
ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.36745.93289). 3117
59. Henry Garrett,“Extreme SuperHyperClique as the Firm Scheme of 3118
Confrontation under Cancer’s Recognition as the Model in The Setting of 3119
10.20944/preprints202301.0308.v1). 3121
60. Henry Garrett,“Uncertainty On The Act And Effect Of Cancer Alongside The 3122
Foggy Positions Of Cells Toward Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique inside 3123
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Titled Cancer’s Recognition”, Preprints 2023, 3124
2023010282 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0282.v1). 3125
61. Henry Garrett,“Neutrosophic Version Of Separates Groups Of Cells In Cancer’s 3126
Recognition On Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010267 3127
(doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0267.v1).). 3128
62. Henry Garrett, “The Shift Paradigm To Classify Separately The Cells and 3129
Affected Cells Toward The Totality Under Cancer’s Recognition By New 3130
Multiple Definitions On the Sets Polynomials Alongside Numbers In The 3131
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperMatching Theory Based on SuperHyperGraph and 3132
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”, Preprints 2023, 2023010265 (doi: 3133
10.20944/preprints202301.0265.v1). 3134
63. Henry Garrett,“Breaking the Continuity and Uniformity of Cancer In The 3135
Worst Case of Full Connections With Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique In 3136
Cancer’s Recognition Applied in (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 3137
2023, 2023010262,(doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0262.v1). 3138
64. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable as the Survivors on the 3139
Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition Based on Uncertainty to All Modes in 3140
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010240 (doi: 3141
10.20944/preprints202301.0240.v1). 3142
65. Henry Garrett, “Extremism of the Attacked Body Under the Cancer’s 3143
Circumstances Where Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) 3144
SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010224, (doi: 3145
10.20944/preprints202301.0224.v1). 3146
66. Henry Garrett,“SuperHyperMatching By (R-)Definitions And Polynomials To 3147
Monitor Cancer’s Recognition In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, 3148
ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.35061.65767). 3149
67. Henry Garrett,“The Focus on The Partitions Obtained By Parallel Moves In 3150
The Cancer’s Extreme Recognition With Different Types of Extreme 3151
SuperHyperMatching Set and Polynomial on (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, 3152
68. Henry Garrett,“Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique Decides the Failures on the 3154
SuperHyperModels Named (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 3156
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.32530.73922). 3157
69. Henry Garrett,“Indeterminacy On The All Possible Connections of Cells In 3158
Front of Cancer’s Attacks In The Terms of Neutrosophic Failed 3159
SuperHyperClique on Cancer’s Recognition called Neutrosophic 3160
SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.15897.70243). 3161
70. Henry Garrett,“Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique Decides the Failures on the 3162
SuperHyperModels Named (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 3164
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.32530.73922). 3165
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 3167
2023010105 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 3168
72. Henry Garrett,“Perfect Directions Toward Idealism in Cancer’s Neutrosophic 3169
Recognition Forwarding Neutrosophic SuperHyperClique on Neutrosophic 3170
73. Henry Garrett,“Demonstrating Complete Connections in Every Embedded 3172
Regions and Sub-Regions in the Terms of Cancer’s Recognition and 3173
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClique”, 3174
10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 3179
10.20944/preprints202301.0088.v1). 3183
76. Henry Garrett,“Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic Regions titled 3184
neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable in Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition 3185
modeled in the Form of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2023, 3186
(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.17385.36968). 3187
Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond”, Preprints 2023, 2023010044 3190
Well- SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 3192
2023010043 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0043.v1). 3193
79. Henry Garrett, “Using the Tool As (Neutrosophic) Failed SuperHyperStable To 3194
SuperHyperModel Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) 3195
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In 3198
Special ViewPoints”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.11447.80803). 3199
Well-SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 3201
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.35774.77123). 3202
Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond ”, ResearchGate 2022, (doi: 3205
10.13140/RG.2.2.36141.77287). 3206
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2022, (doi: 3208
10.13140/RG.2.2.29430.88642). 3209
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2022, (doi: 3212
10.13140/RG.2.2.11369.16487). 3213
Featuring (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances”, Preprints 3215
2022, 2022120549 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0549.v1). 3216
Featuring (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances”, 3218
87. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperAlliances With 3220
Cancer’s Recognitions And Related (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClasses”, 3223
88. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperAlliances With 3225
Cancer’s Recognitions And Related (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClasses”, 3228
ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.20993.12640). 3235
91. Henry Garrett,“Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on 3236
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs and SuperHyperGraphs Alongside 3237
Applications in Cancer’s Treatments”, Preprints 2022, 2022120324 (doi: 3238
10.20944/preprints202212.0324.v1). 3239
92. Henry Garrett, “Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on 3240
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs And SuperHyperGraphs Alongside 3241
Applications in Cancer’s Treatments”, ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 3242
10.13140/RG.2.2.23123.04641). 3243
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”, Preprints 2022, 2022110576 (doi: 3246
10.20944/preprints202211.0576.v1). 3247
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”, ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 3250
10.13140/RG.2.2.23324.56966). 3251
95. Henry Garrett, “Basic Neutrosophic Notions Concerning SuperHyperDominating 3252
and Neutrosophic SuperHyperResolving in SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 3253
2022 (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.29173.86244). 3254
96. Henry Garrett, “Initial Material of Neutrosophic Preliminaries to Study Some 3255
Neutrosophic Notions Based on Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) in 3256
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)”, ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 3257
10.13140/RG.2.2.25385.88160). 3258
97. Henry Garrett, (2022). “Beyond Neutrosophic Graphs”, Ohio: E-publishing: 3259
Educational Publisher 1091 West 1st Ave Grandview Heights, Ohio 43212 3260
United States. ISBN: 979-1-59973-725-6 3261
(http://fs.unm.edu/BeyondNeutrosophicGraphs.pdf). 3262
98. Henry Garrett, (2022). “Neutrosophic Duality”, Florida: GLOBAL 3263
KNOWLEDGE - Publishing House 848 Brickell Ave Ste 950 Miami, Florida 3264
33131 United States. ISBN: 978-1-59973-743-0 3265
(http://fs.unm.edu/NeutrosophicDuality.pdf). 3266
View publication stats

New Ideas in Cancer's Recognition and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph by SuperHyperColoring As Hyper Categories On Super Neighbors

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

New Ideas in Cancer's Recognition and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph by SuperHyperColoring As Hyper Categories On Super Neighbors

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

New Ideas In Cancer's Recognition And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph By

Preprint · February 2023

326 PUBLICATIONS 4,091 CITATIONS

On Algebraic Structures and Algebraic Hyperstructures View project

Featured Articles View project

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 2

SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperColoring As Hyper 3

Categories On Super Neighbors 4

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · 6

DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA 7

In this scientific research, (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic 9

SuperHyperColoring). Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an 10

ordered pair S = (V, E). Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs } 11

and E 0 = {E1 , E2 , . . . , Ez }. Then either V 0 or E 0 is called Neutrosophic 12

e-SuperHyperColoring if Vc ∈ Ea , Eb ∈ E 0 such that d(Ea ) 6= d(Eb ); Neutrosophic 13

re-SuperHyperColoring if Vc ∈ Ea , Eb ∈ E 0 such that d(Ea ) 6= d(Eb ); and 14

|Ei |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY = |Ej |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY ; Neutrosophic 15

v-SuperHyperColoring if Va , Vb ∈ V 0 , Va , Vb ∈ Ec such that d(Va ) 6= V (Eb ); 16

Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperColoring if Va , Vb ∈ V 0 , Va , Vb ∈ Ec such that 17

d(Va ) 6= V (Eb ); and |Vi |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY = |Vj |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY ; 18

Neutrosophic SuperHyperColoring if it’s either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperColoring, 19

Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperColoring, Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperColoring, and 20

Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperColoring. ((Neutrosophic) SuperHyperColoring). Assume a 21

Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an ordered pair S = (V, E). Consider a 22

Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) E = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then E is called an 23

Extreme SuperHyperColoring if it’s either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperColoring, 24

Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperColoring, Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperColoring, and 25

Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperColoring and C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph 26

N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum Extreme cardinality of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S 27

of high Extreme cardinality of the Extreme SuperHyperEdges in the consecutive 28

Extreme sequence of Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such 29

that they form the Extreme SuperHyperColoring; a Neutrosophic SuperHyperColoring 30

if it’s either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperColoring, Neutrosophic 31

re-SuperHyperColoring, Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperColoring, and Neutrosophic 32

rv-SuperHyperColoring and C(N SHG) for a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 33

N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic 34

SuperHyperEdges of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high Neutrosophic cardinality 35

consecutive Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such 36

that they form the Neutrosophic SuperHyperColoring; an Extreme SuperHyperColoring 37

SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperColoring, 38

Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperColoring, Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperColoring, and 39

Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperColoring and C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph 40

N SHG : (V, E) is the Extreme SuperHyperPolynomial contains the Extreme 41

Extreme SuperHyperEdges of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality 43

consecutive Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they 44

Extreme coefficient; a Neutrosophic SuperHyperColoring SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s 46

either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperColoring, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperColoring, 47

Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperColoring, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperColoring and 48

C(N SHG) for a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Neutrosophic 49

SuperHyperPolynomial contains the Neutrosophic coefficients defined as the 50

Neutrosophic number of the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic 51

SuperHyperEdges of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high Neutrosophic cardinality 52

consecutive Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such 53

corresponded to its Neutrosophic coefficient; an Extreme V-SuperHyperColoring if it’s 55

either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperColoring, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperColoring, 56

Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperColoring, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperColoring and 57

cardinality of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality of the Extreme 59

SuperHyperVertices in the consecutive Extreme sequence of Extreme SuperHyperEdges 60

and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Extreme 61

SuperHyperColoring; a Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperColoring if it’s either of 62

Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperColoring, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperColoring, 63