New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle by REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION As Hyper Decoration On Super Density

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.
net/publication/372825320
New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph With

Multipartite and Cycle By REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION As Hyper
Decoration On Super Density
Preprint · August 2023

DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.8206773
CITATIONS
1 author:
Henry Garrett
539 PUBLICATIONS 27,627 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Metric Dimension in fuzzy(neutrosophic) Graphs View project
On Algebraic Structures and Algebraic Hyperstructures View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Henry Garrett on 01 August 2023.
The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 2
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By 3
REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION As Hyper 4
Decoration On Super Density 5
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · 7
DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA 8
1 ABSTRACT 9
In this scientific research, (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic 10
SuperHyperREVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 11
(NSHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet 12
V 0 = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then V 0 is called Neutrosophic SuperHyperREVERSE CONNECTIVE 13
DOMINATION if the following expressions, terms and statements is called Neutrosophic 14
SuperHyperREVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION criteria holds. 15
X X X
|( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 Vi ∈V 0 Vi ∈V 0
X X X
= max
00 ⊆V
|{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) | ∀Vi ∈ VN SHG , ∃Vj ∈ V 00 :
V N SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
0 0 0
TV (Vi , Vj ∈ Ei ) ≤ min[TV (Vi ), TV (Vj )]Vi ,Vj0 ∈P :Vi ,...,Vj ,
0 0
IV0 (Vi , Vj ∈ Ei0 ) ≤ min[IV (Vi0 ), IV (Vj0 )]Vi ,Vj ∈Ei0 Vi0 ,Vj0 ∈P :Vi ,...,Vj ,
and FV0 (Ei0 )(Vi , Vj ∈ Ei0 ) ≤ min[FV (Vi0 ), FV (Vj0 )]Vi ,Vj ∈Ei0 Vi0 ,Vj0 ∈P :Vi ,...,Vj
}
In this scientific research, new configurations are introduced for the new 16
SuperHyperNotions, namely a REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION and a 17
Neutrosophic REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION. Two different 18
SuperHyperDefinitions were started for them, but research has progressed and 19
SuperHyperNotion, SuperHyperUniform, and SuperHyperClass are well-defined and 20
well-reviewed based on them. Literature review is implemented throughout this research. 21
To shine the light and importance of this research, a comparison between this 22
SuperHyperNotion with other SuperHyperNotions and basic SuperHyperNumbers is 23
presented. Definitions are followed by examples and examples, so clarifications are 24
guided by various tools. Applications are designed to understand the theoretical aspect 25
of this ongoing research. “Cancer diagnosis” are the things that are being researched to 26
explore the challenges that make sense in ongoing research and future research. It is a 27
special case. Cells are viewed in the intended manner. There are different types of them. 28
Some are individual and some are well modeled by groups of cells. All these types are 29
officially called “SuperHyperVertex”, but the relationships between them all are 30
officially called “SuperHyperEdge”. “SuperHyperGraph” and “Neutrosophic 31
SuperHyperGraph” frameworks are selected and selected for research on “Cancer 32
Diagnosis”. Thus, these complex and dense super-hypermodels open avenues for 33
research on theoretical aspects and “cancer diagnosis”. Ways to pursue this scientific 34
research have been considered. It has also been formally collected in the form of several 35
questions and problems. It is useful to define a “neutrosophic” version of REVERSE 36
CONNECTIVE DOMINATION. Since there are more ways to get type results a 37
REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION becomes more understandable. In order to 38
master the Neutrosophic REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION, there is a need to 39
“re-define” the concept of “REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION mastery”. 40
SuperHyperVertices and SuperHyperEdges are assigned by alphabetical labels. In this 41
method, the position of tags is used to assign values. Suppose a REVERSE 42
CONNECTIVE DOMINATION. If the specified table contains “values of vertices, 43
supervertices, edges, hyperedges, and hyperedges belonging to Neutrosophic 44
SuperHyperGraph” with key points, it is redefined. ”values of vertices & number of 45
positions in alphabet”, ”Values of SuperVertices&maximum values of its vertices”, 46
”values of edges&maximum values of its vertices”, ”super edge values&max values of its 47
vertices”, “super edge values” and maximum values of its endpoints”. To get examples 48
and structural examples, I would like to introduce the next SuperHyperClass 49
SuperHyperGraph based on REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION. This is the 50
original. Having the foundation of the previous definition in the SuperHyperClass type 51
would be disciplined. If there is a need to have all REVERSE CONNECTIVE 52
DOMINATION until REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION, then it is officially 53
called “REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION”, but otherwise, it is not REVERSE 54
CONNECTIVE DOMINATION. There is some explanation for the original definition 55
titled “REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION”. These two examples are further 56
explored and distinguished because they are characterized in the SuperHyperClass 57
disciplinary methods based on a dominant REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION. 58
Because of having REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION, there is a need to 59
“re-define” the concept of “neutrosophic REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION” 60
and “neutrosophic REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION”. SuperHyperVertices 61
and SuperHyperEdges are assigned by alphabetical labels. In this method, the position 62
of tags is used to assign values. Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. 63
“Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” is redefined if the desired table exists. And if the 64
desired table exists, a REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION is redefined to a 65
“Neutrosophic REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION”. It is useful to define a 66
“Neutrosophic” version of SuperHyperClasses. Since there are more ways to obtain 67
Neutrosophic type results, a SuperHyper- Neutrosophic REVERSE CONNECTIVE 68
DOMINATION becomes more understandable. Consider a Neutrosophic 69
SuperHyperGraph. If the desired table exists, there are a number of Neutrosophic 70
SuperHyperClasses. So are SuperHyperPath, SuperHyperCycle, SuperHyperStar, 71
SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultiPartite and SuperHyperWheel. ”Neutrosophic 72
SuperHyperPath”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar”, 73
“Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultiPartite” and 74
“Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel”. A graph is SuperHyperUniform if it is a 75
SuperHyperGraph and the number of SuperHyperEdges elements is the same. Consider 76
a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. There are a number of SuperHyperClasses as follows. 77
It is a SuperHyperPath if there is only one SuperVertex as an intersection between two 78
given SuperHyperEdges with two exceptions. If only one SuperVertex is given as an 79
intersection between two SuperHyperEdges, it is SuperHyperCycle. It is 80
SuperHyperStar and only one SuperVertex as intersection among all SuperHyperEdges. 81
It is SuperHyperBipartite, and only one SuperVertex is given as the intersection between 82
two SuperHyperEdges, and these SuperVertices, which form two distinct sets, have no 83
SuperHyperEdge in common. This is SuperHyperMultiPartite. Only one SuperVertex is 84
given as an intersection between two SuperHyperEdges, and these SuperVertices, which 85
form separate multisets, have no SuperHyperEdge in common. If only one 86
SuperHyperEdge among the given two SuperHyperEdges is a SuperHyperWheel and a 87
SuperVertex has a SuperHyperEdge with any regular SuperVertex. SuperHyperModel 88
suggests specific designs and specific architectures. SuperHyperModel is officially called 89
“SuperHyperGraph” and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”. In this SuperHyperModel, 90
the “special” cells and the “special group” of cells are SuperHyperModeled as 91
“SuperHyperVertices” and the common and desired properties between the “special” 92
cells and the “special group” of cells. SuperHyperModeled as “SuperHyperEdges”. 93
Sometimes, to have a more accurate SuperHyperModel, it is useful to have some degree 94
of determinism, uncertainty, and neutrality, in this case the SuperHyperModel is called 95
“Neutrosophic”. In future scientific research, the foundation will be based on “diagnosis 96
of cancer” and the results and definitions will be introduced in redeemed methods. 97
Cancer diagnosis in long-term practice. The specific region is assigned by the model 98
(called SuperHyperGraph) and the long cycle of movement of the cancer is determined 99
by this scientific research. Sometimes the movement of cancer is not easy to detect, 100
because there is certainty, uncertainty and neutrality about the movements and effects 101
of cancer on that area. This event leads us to choose another model [which is said to be 102
the Neutrosophic superhypergraph] in order to have a proper understanding of what 103
happened and was done. There are some specific models, which are well known and 104
have names, and some SuperHyperGeneral SuperHyperModels. The movements and 105
effects of cancer in complex pathways and between complex groups of cells can be 106
visualized with a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (-/SuperHyperCycle, SuperHyperStar, 107
SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, SuperHyperWheel). The goal is to find 108
the longest REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION or the strongest REVERSE 109
CONNECTIVE DOMINATION in those Neutrosophic SuperHyperModels. Some 110
general results are presented for the longest REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION 111
called REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION and the strongest REVERSE 112
CONNECTIVE DOMINATION called Neutrosophic REVERSE CONNECTIVE 113
DOMINATION. Beyond that in SuperHyperStar, all possible SuperHyperPaths have 114
only two SuperHyperEdges, but it is not enough as having at least three 115
SuperHyperEdges is necessary to form any style of cycle. There is no form of any cycle, 116
but literally, it is the transformation of any cycle. It literally transforms and does not 117
form. A basic introduction to the theory of REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION 118
Neutrosophic, SuperHyperGraphs and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs is suggested. 119
Keywords: Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, SuperHyperREVERSE CONNECTIVE 120
, Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition

DOMINATION 121
AMS Subject Classification: 05C17, 05C22, 05E45 122
2 Applied Notions Under The Scrutiny Of The 123
Motivation Of This Scientific Research 124
In this scientific research, there are ideas in the prominent frameworks of motivations. I 125
try to bring motivations in narrative ways. Some Cells have faced attacks from the 126
established situation with cancer attacks in this case, there is some analysis embedded 127
in the case current situations where cells can be labeled as some groups and some 128
groups or individuals are overlabeled, all from behaviors to overcome cancer attacks. In 129
embedded situations, cell individuals and cell groups can be considered as “new groups”. 130
So it encourages us to find suitable SuperHyperModels for more appropriate analysis 131
about this dirty story. I found SuperHyperModels, officially called “SuperHyperGraphs” 132
and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. In this SuperHyperModel, cells and groups of 133
cells are defined as “SuperHyperVertices” and relationships between individual cells and 134
groups of cells are defined as “SuperHyperEdges”. So this is another motivation for us 135
to do research on this SuperHyperModel based on “cancer diagnosis”. Sometimes, 136
things get worse. The situation has passed certainty and precise style. So it is beyond 137
them. There are three descriptions, i.e., degrees of determination, uncertainty, and 138
neutrality, for any object based on ambiguous forms, i.e., incomplete data, imprecise 139
data, and uncertain analysis. The second model can be considered in the previous 140
SuperHyperModel. This is SuperHyperModel. This is SuperHyperGraph but officially 141
called “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. Cancer is a disease, but the model is 142
supposed to understand what happens in this phenomenon. The special case of this 143
disease is considered and some parameters are used as consequences of the model. Cells 144
are attacked by the disease, but the movement of cancer is in a specific area. Knowing 145
the mind of cancer can help to find some cures for this disease. SuperHyperGraph and 146
Neutrosophic Super-HyperGraph are super-hypermodels used in “cancer diagnosis” and 147
both are the foundation of the background of this scientific research. Sometimes cancer 148
has occurred in an area full of cells, cell groups, and embedded styles. In this section, 149
SuperHyperModel proposes based on the links of cancer movements in the form of unity 150
styles with the formation of design and architecture officially called “REVERSE 151
CONNECTIVE DOMINATION”, in the themes of specialized terms and common 152
words. Particle for direct object. Applied concepts under the investigation of the 153
motivation of this scientific research. The “SuperHyper” prefix refers to the theme of 154
embedded styles for background discovery for SuperHyperNotions. Cancer diagnosis in 155
long-term practice. The specific region is assigned by the model (called 156
SuperHyperGraph) and the long cycle of movement of the cancer is determined by this 157
scientific research. Sometimes the movement of Cancer is not easy to identify because 158
there is certainty, uncertainty and neutrality about the movements and effects of Cancer 159
in that region. This event leads us to choose another model [said to be Neutrosophic 160
SuperHyperGraph]. Easy understanding of what happened and what was done. There 161
are some specific models that are well known and named and some general models. The 162
movements and effects of cancer in complex pathways and between complex groups of 163
cells can be visualized by a neurosophic superhyperpath (-/SuperHyperCycle, 164
SuperHyperStar, SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, SuperHyperWheel). 165
The goal is to find REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION or Neutrosophic 166
REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION for SuperHyperModels in it. Some general 167
results are presented. Beyond that in SuperHyperStar, all possible Neutrosophic 168
SuperHyperPaths have only two SuperHyperEdges, but it is not enough as having at 169
least three SuperHyperEdges is necessary to form any style of cycle. There is no form of 170
cycle, but it is literally a form of any cycle. It literally transforms and does not form. 171
Question 2.1. How to define “SuperHyperNotions and to do research” to find the 172
“REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION Rate” of any cell or groups of cells based on 173
fixed cell or fixed group of cells broadly, “REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION 174
Rate” based on fixed groups or fixed cells. Groups of groups of cells? 175
Question 2.2. What are the best descriptions for “diagnosing cancer” in terms of 176
these chaotic and dense super-hypermodels in which embedded concepts are depicted? 177
This motivation to find concepts to use in this dense model is called 178
“SuperHyperGraphs”. So it motivates us to define different types of “REVERSE 179
CONNECTIVE DOMINATION” and “neutrosophic REVERSE CONNECTIVE 180
DOMINATION” over “superhypergraph” and “neutrosophic superhypergraph”. Then 181
this scientific research has taken more motivations to define SuperHyperClasses and find 182
some connections among this SuperHyperNotion with other SuperHyperNotions. It 183
motivates us to obtain examples and examples to clarify the framework of this scientific 184
research. The general results and some of the results about some of the connections are 185
the ways that the key point of this scientific research, “diagnosis of cancer” is more 186
understandable and clear. 187
The framework of this research is as follows. First, I will introduce the basic 188
definitions to clarify the basics. In the “Introductions” subsection, basic definitions 189
about SuperHyperGraphs and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph are introduced and 190
discussed in depth. Basic concepts are thoroughly explained and illustrated, and 191
sometimes a literature review is used to make sense of what is to come in the coming 192
sections. The main definitions and their explanations, along with some results on the 193
new concepts, REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION and Neutrosophic 194
REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION, are specified in the sections “REVERSE 195
CONNECTIVE DOMINATION” and “Neutrosophic REVERSE CONNECTIVE 196
DOMINATION”. In the concept of dealing with results and in REVERSE 197
CONNECTIVE DOMINATION to create logic about the continuation of the scientific 198
research, the ideas of SuperHyperUniform and Neutrosophic SuperHyperUniform are 199
introduced and as their consequences, the corresponding SuperHyperClasses are 200
specified to summarize the work done in this section, as “Results on SuperHyperClasses” 201
and “Results on Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”. Going back to the core concepts, 202
clever steps towards common concepts to extend new concepts in new frameworks, 203
SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, in “Results on 204
SuperHyperClasses” and “Results on Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses” sections. There 205
is the initial scientific research on supergeneral relations and as the final and final part 206
of the theoretical scientific research is available in the section “General results”. Some 207
general SuperHyperRelations are fundamental and are known as fundamental 208
SuperHyperNotions, as in “General results” were extracted and discussed. “REVERSE 209
CONNECTIVE DOMINATION”, “Neutrosophic REVERSE CONNECTIVE 210
DOMINATION”, “Results on SuperHyperClasses” and “Results on Neutrosophic 211
SuperHyperClasses”. There are curious questions about what has been done about 212
SuperHyperNotions to make sense of the superiority of this scientific research and to 213
discover the word “best” as a description and adjective of this scientific research as 214
presented in the “REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION” section. The keyword of 215
this scientific research was presented in the section “Applications in cancer diagnosis” 216
with two cases and sub-sections “Case 1: Initial steps towards SuperHyperBipartite as 217
SuperHyperModel” and “Case 2: Incremental steps towards SuperHyperMultiperdel as 218
SuperHyper. In the “open issues” section, there is a detailed examination and 219
recognition of what was done in this scientific research and what happened in this 220
scientific research in the form of “questions” and “issues” in order to understand this 221
scientific research in an outstanding style, the advantages and limitations of this 222
scientific research in addition to What has been done in this scientific research is stated 223
in the “conclusion and final remarks” section. 224
3 Neutrosophic Preliminaries Of This Scientific 225
Research On the Redeemed Ways 226
In this section, the basic material in this scientific research, is referred to [Single Valued 227
Neutrosophic Set](Ref. [1],Definition 2.2,p.2), [Neutrosophic Set](Ref. [1],Definition 228
2.1,p.1), [Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)](Ref. [1],Definition 2.5,p.2), 229
[Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)](Ref. [1],Definition 230
2.7,p.3), [t-norm](Ref. [1], Definition 2.7, p.3), and [Characterization of the 231
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)](Ref. [1],Definition 2.7,p.3), [Neutrosophic 232
Strength of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPaths] (Ref. [1],Definition 5.3,p.7), and 233
[Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)] 234
(Ref. [1],Definition 5.4,p.7). Also, the new ideas and their clarifications are addressed 235
to Ref. [1]. 236
In this subsection, the basic material which is used in this scientific research, is 237
presented. Also, the new ideas and their clarifications are elicited. 238
Definition 3.1 (Neutrosophic Set). (Ref. [1],Definition 2.1,p.1). 239
Let X be a Eulerian-Path-Cut of points (objects) with generic elements in X denoted by

x; then the Neutrosophic set A (NS A) is an object having the form
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}

+
where the functions T, I, F : X →]− 0, 1 [ define respectively the a
truth-membership function, an indeterminacy-membership function, and a
falsity-membership function of the element x ∈ X to the set A with the condition
−
0 ≤ TA (x) + IA (x) + FA (x) ≤ 3+ .
The functions TA (x), IA (x) and FA (x) are real standard or nonstandard subsets of 240
+
]− 0, 1 [. 241
Definition 3.2 (Single Valued Neutrosophic Set). (Ref. [1],Definition 2.2,p.2). 242
Let X be a Eulerian-Path-Cut of points (objects) with generic elements in X denoted by

x. A single valued Neutrosophic set A (SVNS A) is characterized by
truth-membership function TA (x), an indeterminacy-membership function IA (x), and a
falsity-membership function FA (x). For each point x in X, TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) ∈ [0, 1].
A SVNS A can be written as
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}.
Definition 3.3. The degree of truth-membership,

indeterminacy-membership and falsity-membership of the subset X ⊂ A of
the single valued Neutrosophic set A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}:
TA (X) = min[TA (vi ), TA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,
IA (X) = min[IA (vi ), IA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,

and FA (X) = min[FA (vi ), FA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X .
Definition 3.4. The support of X ⊂ A of the single valued Neutrosophic set
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}:
supp(X) = {x ∈ X : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) > 0}.
Definition 3.5 (Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). (Ref. [1],Definition 243
2.5,p.2). 244
Assume V 0 is a given set. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a 245
pair S = (V, E), where 246
(i) V = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vn } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of V 0 ; 247
(ii) V = {(Vi , TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi )) : TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi ) ≥ 0}, (i = 248
1, 2, . . . , n); 249
(iii) E = {E1 , E2 , . . . , En0 } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of 250
V; 251
(iv) E = {(Ei0 , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )) : TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 ) ≥ 0}, (i0 = 252
1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 253
(v) Vi 6= ∅, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 254
(vi) Ei0 6= ∅, (i0 = 1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 255
Figure 1. The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a illustrated SuperHyperModeling

on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
P
(vii) i supp(Vi ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 256
supp(Ei0 ) = V, (i0 = 1, 2, . . . , n0 );
P
(viii) i0 257
(ix) and the following conditions hold:
TV0 (Ei0 ) ≤ min[TV 0 (Vi ), TV 0 (Vj )]Vi ,Vj ∈Ei0 ,
IV0 (Ei0 ) ≤ min[IV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vj )]Vi ,Vj ∈Ei0 ,

and FV0 (Ei0 ) ≤ min[FV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vj )]Vi ,Vj ∈Ei0
where i0 = 1, 2, . . . , n0 . 258
Here the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ej 0 and the Neutrosophic 259
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) Vj are single valued Neutrosophic sets. TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), 260
and FV 0 (Vi ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 261
indeterminacy-membership and the degree of falsity-membership the Neutrosophic 262
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) V. 263
TV0 (Ei0 ), TV0 (Ei0 ), and TV0 (Ei0 ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 264
indeterminacy-membership and the degree of falsity-membership of the Neutrosophic 265
SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) Ei0 to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) E. Thus, 266
the ii0 th element of the incidence matrix of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) 267
are of the form (Vi , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )), the sets V and E are crisp sets. 268
Example 3.6. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair 269
S = (V, E) in the mentioned Neutrosophic Figures in every Neutrosophic items. 270
• On the Figure (1), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 271
notion, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. E1 272
and E3 are some empty Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges but E2 is a loop 273
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge and E4 is a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. Thus 274
in the terms of Neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only one Neutrosophic 275
SuperHyperEdge, namely, E4 . The Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 is 276
Neutrosophic isolated means that there’s no Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge has it 277
as a Neutrosophic endpoint. 278
Figure 2. TThe Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a illustrated SuperHyperModel-

ing on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
notion, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 280
E1 , E2 and E3 are some empty Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges but E4 is a 281
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. Thus in the terms of Neutrosophic 282
SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only one Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge, namely, 283
E4 . The Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 is Neutrosophic isolated means that 284
there’s no Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge has it as a Neutrosophic endpoint. 285
• On the Figure (3), the SuperHyperNotion, namely, SuperHyperGirth, is up. 286
E1 , E2 and E3 are some empty SuperHyperEdges but E4 is a SuperHyperEdge. 287
Thus in the terms of SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only one SuperHyperEdge, 288
namely, E4 . 289
• On the Figure (4), there’s no empty SuperHyperEdge but E3 are a loop 290
SuperHyperEdge on {F } and there are some SuperHyperEdges, namely, E1 on 291
{H, V1 , V3 }, alongside E2 on {O, H, V4 , V3 } and E4 , E5 on {N, V1 , V2 , V3 , F }. 292
• On the Figure (5),there’s neither empty SuperHyperEdge nor loop 293
SuperHyperEdge. 294
• On the Figure (6), there’s neither empty SuperHyperEdge nor loop 295
SuperHyperEdge. 296
SuperHyperEdge. 298
SuperHyperEdge. 300
SuperHyperEdge. 302
SuperHyperEdge. 304
Figure 3. The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a illustrated SuperHyperModeling

on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 4. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a illustrated Super-

HyperModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 5. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs mentioned as the SuperHy-

perModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 6. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a illustrated Super-

HyperModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 7. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs depicted SuperHyperMod-

eling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 8. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with dense SuperHyper-

Modeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 9. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a messy SuperHyper-

Modeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 10. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with highly-embedding-

connected SuperHyperModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example
(3.6)
Figure 11. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a SuperHyperModel-

SuperHyperEdge. 306
SuperHyperEdge. 308
SuperHyperEdge. 310
SuperHyperEdge. 312
SuperHyperEdge. 314
SuperHyperEdge. 316
SuperHyperEdge. 318
SuperHyperEdge. 320
SuperHyperEdge. 322
SuperHyperEdge. 324
SuperHyperEdge. 326
SuperHyperEdge. 328
Figure 12. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with highly-multiple-

connected-style SuperHyperModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic
Example (3.6)


Figure 15. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with Linearly-Connected

SuperHyperModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)

Figure 17. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a Linearly-over-

packed SuperHyperModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example
(3.6)





Definition 3.7 (Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). 329
(Ref. [1],Definition 2.7,p.3). 330
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). The 331
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ei0 and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 332
(NSHV) Vi of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S = (V, E) could be 333
characterized as follow-up items. 334
(i) If |Vi | = 1, then Vi is called vertex; 335
(ii) if |Vi | ≥ 1, then Vi is called SuperVertex; 336
(iii) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called edge; 337
(iv) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 338
HyperEdge; 339
(v) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called 340
SuperEdge; 341
(vi) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 342
SuperHyperEdge. 343
If we choose different types of binary operations, then we could get hugely diverse 344
types of general forms of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG). 345
Definition 3.8 (t-norm). (Ref. [1], Definition 2.7, p.3). 346
A binary operation ⊗ : [0, 1] × [0, 1] → [0, 1] is a t-norm if it satisfies the following 347
for x, y, z, w ∈ [0, 1]: 348
(i) 1 ⊗ x = x; 349
(ii) x ⊗ y = y ⊗ x; 350
(iii) x ⊗ (y ⊗ z) = (x ⊗ y) ⊗ z; 351
(iv) If w ≤ x and y ≤ z then w ⊗ y ≤ x ⊗ z. 352
Definition 3.9. The degree of truth-membership, indeterminacy-membership

and falsity-membership of the subset X ⊂ A of the single valued Neutrosophic set
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X} (with respect to t-norm Tnorm ):
TA (X) = Tnorm [TA (vi ), TA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,
IA (X) = Tnorm [IA (vi ), IA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,

and FA (X) = Tnorm [FA (vi ), FA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X .
Definition 3.10. The support of X ⊂ A of the single valued Neutrosophic set
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}:
supp(X) = {x ∈ X : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) > 0}.
Definition 3.11. (General Forms of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). 353
Assume V 0 is a given set. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a 354
pair S = (V, E), where 355
(i) V = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vn } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of V 0 ; 356
(ii) V = {(Vi , TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi )) : TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi ) ≥ 0}, (i = 357
1, 2, . . . , n); 358
(iii) E = {E1 , E2 , . . . , En0 } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of 359
V; 360
(iv) E = {(Ei0 , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )) : TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 ) ≥ 0}, (i0 = 361
1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 362
(v) Vi 6= ∅, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 363
(vi) Ei0 6= ∅, (i0 = 1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 364
P
(vii) i supp(Vi ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 365
0 0
P
(viii) i0 supp(Ei ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n ).
0 366
Here the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ej 0 and the Neutrosophic 367
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) Vj are single valued Neutrosophic sets. TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), 368
and FV 0 (Vi ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 369
indeterminacy-membership and the degree of falsity-membership the Neutrosophic 370
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) V. 371
TV0 (Ei0 ), TV0 (Ei0 ), and TV0 (Ei0 ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 372
indeterminacy-membership and the degree of falsity-membership of the Neutrosophic 373
SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) Ei0 to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) E. Thus, 374
the ii0 th element of the incidence matrix of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) 375
are of the form (Vi , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )), the sets V and E are crisp sets. 376
Definition 3.12 (Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). 377
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). The 379
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ei0 and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 380
(NSHV) Vi of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S = (V, E) could be 381
characterized as follow-up items. 382
(i) If |Vi | = 1, then Vi is called vertex; 383
(ii) if |Vi | ≥ 1, then Vi is called SuperVertex; 384
(iii) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called edge; 385
(iv) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 386
HyperEdge; 387
(v) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called 388
SuperEdge; 389
(vi) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 390
SuperHyperEdge. 391
This SuperHyperModel is too messy and too dense. Thus there’s a need to have 392
some restrictions and conditions on SuperHyperGraph. The special case of this 393
SuperHyperGraph makes the patterns and regularities. 394
Definition 3.13. A graph is SuperHyperUniform if it’s SuperHyperGraph and the 395
number of elements of SuperHyperEdges are the same. 396
To get more visions on SuperHyperUniform, the some SuperHyperClasses are 397
introduced. It makes to have SuperHyperUniform more understandable. 398
Definition 3.14. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. There are some 399
SuperHyperClasses as follows. 400
(i). It’s Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath if it’s only one SuperVertex as 401
intersection amid two given SuperHyperEdges with two exceptions; 402
(ii). it’s SuperHyperCycle if it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two 403
given SuperHyperEdges; 404
(iii). it’s SuperHyperStar it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid all 405
SuperHyperEdges; 406
(iv). it’s SuperHyperBipartite it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two 407
given SuperHyperEdges and these SuperVertices, forming two separate sets, has 408
no SuperHyperEdge in common; 409
(v). it’s SuperHyperMultiPartite it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid 410
two given SuperHyperEdges and these SuperVertices, forming multi separate sets, 411
has no SuperHyperEdge in common; 412
(vi). it’s SuperHyperWheel if it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two 413
given SuperHyperEdges and one SuperVertex has one SuperHyperEdge with any 414
common SuperVertex. 415
Example 3.15. In the Figure (23), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath 416
ESHP : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, in the 417
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (23), is the notion. 418
Example 3.16. In the Figure (24), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle 419
N SHC : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Neutrosophic 420
SuperHyperSet, in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (24), is up. 421
Example 3.17. In the Figure (25), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar 422
ESHS : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, 423
by the Algorithm in previous Neutrosophic result, of the Neutrosophic 424
SuperHyperVertices of the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E), in 425
the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (25), is up. 426
Figure 23. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath Associated to the Notions in the Example

(3.15)
Figure 24. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions

in the Neutrosophic Example (3.16)
Figure 25. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions in

the Neutrosophic Example (3.17)
Example 3.18. In the Neutrosophic Figure (26), the connected Neutrosophic 427
SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), is Neutrosophic highlighted and Neutrosophic 428
featured. The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Neutrosophic Algorithm in 429
previous Neutrosophic result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected 430
Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic 431
SuperHyperModel (26), is up. 432
Example 3.19. In the Figure (27), the connected Neutrosophic 433
SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E), is highlighted and Neutrosophic featured. 434
The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Algorithm in previous Neutrosophic 435
result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected Neutrosophic 436
SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (27), 437
is up. 438
Example 3.20. In the Neutrosophic Figure (28), the connected Neutrosophic 439
SuperHyperWheel N SHW : (V, E), is Neutrosophic highlighted and featured. The 440
obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Algorithm in previous result, of the 441
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel 442
ESHW : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (28), is up. 443
Definition 3.21. Let a pair S = (V, E) be a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)

S. Then a sequence of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) and Neutrosophic
SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)
V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs
is called a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic 444
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) V1 to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vs if either 445
of following conditions hold: 446
(i) Vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 447
Figure 26. Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite Neutrosophic Associated to the Neutro-

sophic Notions in the Example (3.18)
Figure 27. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite Associated to the Notions in the

Example (3.19)
Figure 28. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel Neutrosophic Associated to the Neutro-

sophic Notions in the Neutrosophic Example (3.20)
(ii) there’s a vertex vi ∈ Vi such that vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 448
(iii) there’s a SuperVertex Vi0 ∈ Vi such that Vi0 , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 449
(iv) there’s a vertex vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that Vi , vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 450
0 0
(v) there’s a SuperVertex Vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that Vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 451
(vi) there are a vertex vi ∈ Vi and a vertex vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that vi , vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 452
0 0
(vii) there are a vertex vi ∈ Vi and a SuperVertex Vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 453
(viii) there are a SuperVertex Vi0 ∈ Vi and a vertex vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that Vi0 , vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 454
(ix) there are a SuperVertex Vi0 ∈ Vi and a SuperVertex Vi+1

0
∈ Vi+1 such that 455
Vi0 , Vi+1
0
∈ Ei0 . 456
Definition 3.22. (Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPaths). 457
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). a

Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV)
V1 to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vs is sequence of Neutrosophic
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) and Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)
V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs ,
could be characterized as follow-up items. 458
(i) If for all Vi , Ej 0 , |Vi | = 1, |Ej 0 | = 2, then NSHP is called path; 459
(ii) if for all Ej 0 , |Ej 0 | = 2, and there’s Vi , |Vi | ≥ 1, then NSHP is called SuperPath; 460
(iii) if for all Vi , Ej 0 , |Vi | = 1, |Ej 0 | ≥ 2, then NSHP is called HyperPath; 461
(iv) if there are Vi , Ej 0 , |Vi | ≥ 1, |Ej 0 | ≥ 2, then NSHP is called Neutrosophic 462
SuperHyperPath . 463
Definition 3.23 (Neutrosophic Strength of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPaths). 464
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). A

Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV)
Table 1. The Values of Vertices, SuperVertices, Edges, HyperEdges, and SuperHy-

perEdges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph Mentioned in the Definition
(3.27)
The Values of The Vertices The Number of Position in Alphabet
The Values of The SuperVertices The maximum Values of Its Vertices
The Values of The Edges The maximum Values of Its Vertices
The Values of The HyperEdges The maximum Values of Its Vertices
The Values of The SuperHyperEdges The maximum Values of Its Endpoints
V1 to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vs is sequence of Neutrosophic

SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) and Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)
V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs ,
have 466
(i) Neutrosophic t-strength (min{T (Vi )}, m, n)si=1 ; 467
(ii) Neutrosophic i-strength (m, min{I(Vi )}, n)si=1 ; 468
(iii) Neutrosophic f-strength (m, n, min{F (Vi )})si=1 ; 469
(iv) Neutrosophic strength (min{T (Vi )}, min{I(Vi )}, min{F (Vi )})si=1 . 470
Definition 3.24 (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges 471
(NSHE)). (Ref. [1],Definition 5.4,p.7). 472
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). Consider 473
a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) E = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then E is called 474
(ix) Neutrosophic t-connective if T (E) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic 475
t-strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 476
(NSHV) Vi to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vj where 1 ≤ i, j ≤ s; 477
(x) Neutrosophic i-connective if I(E) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic 478
i-strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 479
(xi) Neutrosophic f-connective if F (E) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic 481
f-strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 482
(xii) Neutrosophic connective if (T (E), I(E), F (E)) ≥ maximum number of 484
Neutrosophic strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic 485
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vj 486
where 1 ≤ i, j ≤ s. 487
For the sake of having a Neutrosophic notion, there’s a need to “redefine” the 488
notion of “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”. The SuperHyperVertices and the 489
SuperHyperEdges are assigned by the labels from the letters of the alphabets. In this 490
procedure, there’s the usage of the position of labels to assign to the values. 491
Definition 3.25. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (SHG) S is a pair 492
S = (V, E). It’s redefined Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph if the Table (1) holds. 493
It’s useful to define a “Neutrosophic” version of SuperHyperClasses. Since there’s 494
more ways to get Neutrosophic type-results to make a Neutrosophic more 495
understandable. 496

perEdges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, Mentioned in the Definition
(3.26)

perEdges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph Mentioned in the Definition
(3.27)
Definition 3.26. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (SHG) S is a pair 497
S = (V, E). There are some Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses if the Table (2) 498
holds. Thus Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath , notion, SuperHyperStar, 499
SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultiPartite, and SuperHyperWheel, are 500
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath, Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle, 501
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar, Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite, 502
Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultiPartite, and Neutrosophic 503
SuperHyperWheel if the Table (2) holds. 504
It’s useful to define a “Neutrosophic” version of a Neutrosophic notion. Since there’s 505
more ways to get type-results to make a Neutrosophic notion more Neutrosophicly 506
understandable. 507
For the sake of having a Neutrosophic notion, there’s a need to “redefine” the 508
Neutrosophic notion of “Neutrosophic notion”. The SuperHyperVertices and the 509
SuperHyperEdges are assigned by the labels from the letters of the alphabets. In this 510
procedure, there’s the usage of the position of labels to assign to the values. 511
Definition 3.27. Assume a notion. It’s redefined a Neutrosophic notion if the 512
Table (3) holds. 513
Example 3.28. Referred to the Example (3.6), assume a Neutrosophic 514
SuperHyperGraph (SHG) S is a pair S = (V, E) in the mentioned Neutrosophic Figures 515
in every Neutrosophic items. 516
SuperHyperGraph (SHG), is up in the illustration of the Table (4). 518
Table 4. The Values of Vertices, SuperVertices, Edges, HyperEdges, and SuperHyper-

Edges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph
Vi (TVi , IVi , FVi ) Ei (TEi , IEi , FEi )
V1 (0.13, 0.13, 0.13) E1 (0, 0, 0)
V2 (0.13, 0.13, 0.13) E2 (0.13, 0.13, 0.13)
V3 (0.15, 0.15, 0.15) E3 (0, 0, 0)
V4 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14) E4 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14)

V1 (0.13, 0.13, 0.13) E1 (0, 0, 0)
V2 (0.03, 0.03, 0.03) E2 (0, 0, 0)
V3 (0.15, 0.15, 0.15) E3 (0, 0, 0)
V4 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14) E4 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14)

V1 (0.13, 0.13, 0.13) E1 (0, 0, 0)
V2 (0.11, 0.11, 0.11) E2 (0, 0, 0)
V3 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14) E3 (0, 0, 0)
- - E4 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14)
4 Main Resultant 525
Definition 4.1. (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperREVERSE 526
CONNECTIVE DOMINATION). 527
Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Consider a 528
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then V 0 is called Neutrosophic 529
SuperHyperREVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION if the following expressions, terms and 530
statements is called Neutrosophic SuperHyperREVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION criteria 531

V1 (0.13, 0.13, 0.13) E1 (0.08, 0.08, 0.08)
V2 (0.11, 0.11, 0.11) E2 (0.15, 0.15, 0.15)
V3 (0.05, 0.05, 0.05) E3 (0, 0, 0)
V4 (0.12, 0.12, 0.12) E4 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14)
{F } (0.06, 0.06, 0.06) E5 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14)
{H} (0.08, 0.08, 0.08) - -
{N } (0.14, 0.14, 0.14) - -
{O} (0.15, 0.15, 0.15) - -
Figure 29. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite Neutrosophic Associated to the

Neutrosophic Notions in the Neutrosophic Example (4.2)

Edges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
holds. 532
X X X
|( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 Vi ∈V 0 Vi ∈V 0
X X X
= max
00 ⊆V
|{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) | ∀Vi ∈ VN SHG , ∃Vj ∈ V 00 :
V N SHG 00 00 00
Vi ∈V Vi ∈V Vi ∈V
TV0 (Vi , Vj ∈ Ei0 ) ≤ min[TV (Vi0 ), TV (Vj0 )]Vi0 ,Vj0 ∈P :Vi ,...,Vj ,
IV0 (Vi , Vj ∈ Ei0 ) ≤ min[IV (Vi0 ), IV (Vj0 )]Vi ,Vj ∈Ei0 Vi0 ,Vj0 ∈P :Vi ,...,Vj ,
and FV0 (Ei0 )(Vi , Vj ∈ Ei0 ) ≤ min[FV (Vi0 ), FV (Vj0 )]Vi ,Vj ∈Ei0 Vi0 ,Vj0 ∈P :Vi ,...,Vj
}
Example 4.2. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite (SHG) S is a pair 533
S = (V, E) in the mentioned Neutrosophic Figures in every Neutrosophic items. 534
SuperHyperMultipartite (SHG), is up in the illustration of the Table (8). 536






Figure 36. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle Neutrosophic Associated to the Neutro-







Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). 537
Assume SuperHyperPart {Vi }7i=1 and non-SuperHyperPart {Vi }12 i=7 . Consider a 538
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V4 }. Then V 0 is called Neutrosophic 539
SuperHyperREVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION since the following expressions, terms 540
and statements is called Neutrosophic SuperHyperREVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION 541

V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
criteria holds. 542
X X X
|( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={V1 ,V4 } Vi ∈V 0 ={V1 ,V4 } Vi ∈V 0 ={V1 ,V4 }
= (0.52, 0.52, 0.52) =

X X X
= 00max |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) | V5 ∈ VSHG \ V 00 , ∃V1 ∈ V 00 :
V ⊆VSHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
0
TV (E2 ) = 0.26 = min[TV 0 (V5 ), TV 0 (V1 )]V5 ,V1 ∈E2 ,
IV0 (E2 ) = 0.26 = min[IV 0 (V5 ), IV 0 (V1 )]V5 ,V1 ∈E2 ,
and FV0 (E2 ) = 0.26 = min[FV 0 (V5 ), FV 0 (V1 )]V5 ,V1 ∈E2 ,
,
V6 ∈ VSHG \ V 00 , ∃V1 ∈ V 00 :
TV0 (E2 ) = 0.26 = min[TV 0 (V5 ), TV 0 (V1 )]V5 ,V1 ∈E2 ,
,
V7 ∈ VSHG \ V 00 , ∃V1 ∈ V 00 :
,
V2 ∈ VSHG \ V 00 , ∃V4 ∈ V 00 :
,
V3 ∈ VSHG \ V 00 , ∃V4 ∈ V 00 :
}
Assume SuperHyperPart {Vi }7i=1 and non-SuperHyperPart {Vi }12

i=7 . Consider a 546
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V2 , V4 }. Then V 0 is called Neutrosophic 547
criteria holds. 550
X X X
|( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={V1 ,V2 ,V4 } Vi ∈V 0 ={V1 ,V2 ,V4 } Vi ∈V 0 ={V1 ,V2 ,V4 }
= (0.76, 0.76, 0.76) =

X X X
V ⊆VSHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
0
,
V6 ∈ VSHG \ V 00 , ∃V1 ∈ V 00 :
,
V7 ∈ VSHG \ V 00 , ∃V1 ∈ V 00 :
,
V3 ∈ VSHG \ V 00 , ∃V4 ∈ V 00 :
}
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V2 , V3 , V4 }. Then V 0 is called 555
Neutrosophic SuperHyperREVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION since the following 556
expressions, terms and statements is called Neutrosophic SuperHyperREVERSE 557
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
CONNECTIVE DOMINATION criteria holds. 558
X
|(
Vi ∈V 0 ={V1 ,V2 ,V3 ,V4 }
X X
T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={V1 ,V2 ,V3 ,V4 } Vi ∈V 0 ={V1 ,V2 ,V3 ,V4 }
= (1, 1, 1) =
X X X
= max |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) | V5 ∈ VSHG \ V 00 , ∃V1 ∈ V 00 :
V 00 ⊆VSHG 00 00 00
Vi ∈V Vi ∈V Vi ∈V

,
V6 ∈ VSHG \ V 00 , ∃V1 ∈ V 00 :
,
V7 ∈ VSHG \ V 00 , ∃V1 ∈ V 00 :
}
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V2 , V3 , V4 , V5 }. Then V 0 is called 563
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
V6 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)

X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={V1 ,V2 ,V3 ,V4 ,V5 }
X X
I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={V1 ,V2 ,V3 ,V4 ,V5 } Vi ∈V 0 ={V1 ,V2 ,V3 ,V4 ,V5 }
= (1.24, 1.24, 1.24) =

X X X
V ⊆VSHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
0
TV (E2 ) = 0.26 = min[TV (V5 ), TV (V1 )]V5 ,V1 ∈E2 ,
0 0

,
V7 ∈ VSHG \ V 00 , ∃V1 ∈ V 00 :
}
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V2 , V3 , V4 , V5 , V6 }. Then V 0 is called 571

X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={V1 ,V2 ,V3 ,V4 ,V5 ,V6 }
X X
I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={V ,V ,V ,V ,V ,V } Vi ∈V 0 ={V
1 2 3 4 5 6 1 ,V2 ,V3 ,V4 ,V5 ,V6 }
= (1.48, 1.48, 1.48) =

X X X
V ⊆VSHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
0
}
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
V6 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V7 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
V6 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V7 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V2 , V3 , V4 , V5 , V6 , V7 }. Then V 0 is called 579
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={V1 ,V2 ,V3 ,V4 ,V5 ,V6 ,V7 }
X X
I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={V1 ,V2 ,V3 ,V4 ,V5 ,V6 ,V7 } Vi ∈V 0 ={V1 ,V2 ,V3 ,V4 ,V5 ,V6 ,V7 }
= (1.72, 1.72, 1.72).
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {Vi }12

i=1 . Then V 0
is called Neutrosophic 587
criteria holds. 590
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi }12
i=1
X X
I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi }12
i=1 Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi }12
i=1
= (2.88, 2.88, 2.88).
Example 4.3. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle (SHG) S is a pair S = (V, E) 591
in the mentioned Neutrosophic Figures in every Neutrosophic items. 592
Edges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) Eii=37 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
SuperHyperCycle (SHG), is up in the illustration of the Table (15). 594
Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Assume 595
SuperHyperExternal {Vi }7i=1 and non-SuperHyperInternal {Vi }34 i=8 . Consider a 596
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V3 , V5 , V7 }. Then V 0 is called 597
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vii=1,3,5,7 }
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vii=1,3,5,7 }
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={V
ii=1,3,5,7 }
= (1.04, 1.04, 1.04) =

X X X
= 00max |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VSHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00 00
Vii=11,15,19,24,32−34 ∈ VSHG \ V , ∃V1 ∈ V :
TV0 (E1 ) = 0.26 = min[TV 0 (Vii=11,15,19,24,32−34 ), TV 0 (V1 )]Vii=11,15,19,24,32−34 ,V1 ∈E1 ,
IV0 (E1 ) = 0.26 = min[IV 0 (Vii=11,15,19,24,32−34 ), IV 0 (V1 )]Vii=11,15,19,24,32−34 ,V1 ∈E1 ,
and FV0 (E1 ) = 0.26 = min[FV 0 (Vii=11,15,19,24,32−34 ), FV 0 (V1 )]Vii=11,15,19,24,32−34 ,V1 ∈E1 ,
, TV0 (E7 ) = 0.26 = min[TV 0 (Vii=32−34 ), TV 0 (V1 )]Vii=32−34 ,V1 ∈E7 ,
IV0 (E7 ) = 0.26 = min[IV 0 (Vii=32−34 ), IV 0 (V1 )]Vii=32−34 ,V1 ∈E7 ,
and FV0 (E7 ) = 0.26 = min[FV 0 (Vii=32−34 ), FV 0 (V1 )]Vii=32−34 ,V1 ∈E7 ,
,
Vii=2,32,8−10,4,12−14 ∈ VSHG \ V 00 , ∃V3 ∈ V 00 :
TV0 (E2 ) = 0.26 = min[TV 0 (Vii=2,32,8−10 ), TV 0 (V3 )]Vii=2,32,8−10 ,V3 ∈E2 ,
IV0 (E2 ) = 0.26 = min[IV 0 (Vii=12,32,8−10 ), IV 0 (V3 )]Vii=2,32,8−10 ,V3 ∈E2 ,
and FV0 (E2 ) = 0.26 = min[FV 0 (Vii=2,32,8−10 ), FV 0 (V3 )]Vii=2,32,8−10 ,V3 ∈E2 ,
, TV0 (E3 ) = 0.26 = min[TV 0 (Vii=4,12−14 ), TV 0 (V3 )]Vii=4,12−14 ,V3 ∈E3 ,
IV0 (E3 ) = 0.26 = min[IV 0 (Vii=4,12−14 ), IV 0 (V3 )]Vii=4,12−14 ,V3 ∈E3 ,
and FV0 (E3 ) = 0.26 = min[FV 0 (Vii=4,12−14 ), FV 0 (V3 )]Vii=4,12−14 ,V3 ∈E3 ,
,
Vii=16−18,20−23 ∈ VSHG \ V 00 , ∃V5 ∈ V 00 :
TV0 (E4 ) = 0.26 = min[TV 0 (Vii=16−18 ), TV 0 (V5 )]Vii=16−18 ,V5 ∈E4 ,
,
Vii=6,25−30 ∈ VSHG \ V 00 , ∃V7 ∈ V 00 :
TV0 (E6 ) = 0.26 = min[TV 0 (Vii=6,25−30 ), TV 0 (V7 )]Vii=6,25−30 ,V7 ∈E6 ,
}
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) Eii=37 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V3 , V5 , V7 , Vii=2,11,15,19,24,27,32−34 }. Then V 0 605
is called Neutrosophic SuperHyperREVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION since the 606
following expressions, terms and statements is called Neutrosophic 607
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vii=1,3,5,7 ,Vii=2,11,15,19,24,27,32−34 }
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vii=1,3,5,7 ,Vii=2,11,15,19,24,27,32−34 }
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vii=1,3,5,7 ,Vii=2,11,15,19,24,27,32−34 }
= (2.94, 2.94, 2.94) =

X X X
= 00max |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VSHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00 00
Vii=2,32,8−10,4,12−14 ∈ VSHG \ V , ∃V3 ∈ V :
TV0 (E2 ) = 0.26 = min[TV 0 (Vii=2,32,8−10 ), TV 0 (V3 )]Vii=2,32,8−10 ,V3 ∈E2 ,
IV0 (E2 ) = 0.26 = min[IV 0 (Vii=12,32,8−10 ), IV 0 (V3 )]Vii=2,32,8−10 ,V3 ∈E2 ,
and FV0 (E2 ) = 0.26 = min[FV 0 (Vii=2,32,8−10 ), FV 0 (V3 )]Vii=2,32,8−10 ,V3 ∈E2 ,
, TV0 (E3 ) = 0.26 = min[TV 0 (Vii=4,12−14 ), TV 0 (V3 )]Vii=4,12−14 ,V3 ∈E3 ,
,
Vii=16−18,20−23 ∈ VSHG \ V 00 , ∃V5 ∈ V 00 :
,
Vii=6,25−30 ∈ VSHG \ V 00 , ∃V27 ∈ V 00 :
TV0 (E6 ) = 0.26 = min[TV 0 (Vii=6,25−30 ), TV 0 (V27)]Vi ,V27 ∈E6 ,
i=6,25−30

}
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet 613
V 0 = {V1 , V3 , V5 , V7 , Vii=2,11,15,19,24,27,32−34 , Vii=32,8−10,4,12−14 }. Then V 0 is called 614
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) Eii=37 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vii=1,3,5,7 ,Vii=2,11,15,19,24,27,32−34 ,Vii=32,8−10,4,12−14 }
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={V
ii=1,3,5,7 ,Vii=2,11,15,19,24,27,32−34 ,Vii=32,8−10,4,12−14 }
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vii=1,3,5,7 ,Vii=2,11,15,19,24,27,32−34 ,Vii=32,8−10,4,12−14 }
= (4.86, 4.86, 4.86) =

X X X
= 00max |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VSHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00 00
Vii=16−18,20−23 ∈ VSHG \ V , ∃V5 ∈ V :
,
Vii=6,25−30 ∈ VSHG \ V 00 , ∃V27 ∈ V 00 :
i=6,25−30

}
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet 622
V 0 = {V1 , V3 , V5 , V7 , Vii=2,11,15,19,24,27,32−34 , Vii=32,8−10,4,12−14 , Vii=16−18,20−23 }. Then 623
V 0 is called Neutrosophic SuperHyperREVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION since the 624
following expressions, terms and statements is called Neutrosophic 625
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) Eii=37 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V7 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) Eii=37 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V7 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vii=1,3,5,7 ,Vii=2,11,15,19,24,27,32−34 ,Vii=32,8−10,4,12−14 ,Vii=16−18,20−23 }
X
I(Vi ),
X
F (Vi ))|
= (6.54, 6.54, 6.54) =

X X X
= 00max |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VSHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00 00
Vii=6,25−30 ∈ VSHG \ V , ∃V27 ∈ V :
i=6,25−30

}
SuperHyperExternal {Vi }7i=1 and non-SuperHyperInternal {Vi }34

Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = VSHG . Then V 0 is called Neutrosophic 631
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) Eii=37 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V5 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
V6 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V7 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) Eii=37 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V5 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
V6 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V7 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
criteria holds. 634
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 =VSHG
X X
I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 =VSHG Vi ∈V 0 =VSHG
= (8.24, 8.24, 8.24).
}

criteria holds. 642
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 =VSHG
X X
I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
= (8.26, 8.26, 8.26).
}

criteria holds. 650
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 =VSHG
X X
I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
= (8.28, 8.28, 8.28).
}
5 Main Result 651
Theorem 5.1. (Main Result and Main Theorem). 652
Assume every Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite has the letter z. The notion on 653
the Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite and Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle don’t 654
coincide. 655
Proof. 656
(i). Let 657
P :
V1Pi , E1 ,
P
V1 j , E2
658
P :
V1Pi , E1 ,
P
V1 j , E2
be a longest path taken a connected Extreme SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E). 659
There’s a new way to redefine as 660
ViEXT ERN AL ∼ VjEXT ERN AL ≡

∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL ∈ Ez ≡
∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , {ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL } ⊆ Ez .
The term “EXTERNAL” implies |N (ViEXT ERN AL )| ≥ |N (Vj )| where Vj is 661
corresponded to ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of Neutrosophic SuperHyperREVERSE 662
CONNECTIVE DOMINATION. The latter is straightforward. 663
(ii). Let 664
P :
ViEXT ERN AL , Ei∗ ,
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1
665
P :
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1
is a longest SuperHyperREVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION taken from a connected Extreme 666
SuperHyperCycle ESHC : (V, E). There’s a new way to redefine as 667

CONNECTIVE DOMINATION. The latter is straightforward. Then there’s at least one 670
Neutrosophic SuperHyperREVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION. Thus the notion of quasi isn’t 671
up and the SuperHyperNotions based on Neutrosophic SuperHyperREVERSE CONNECTIVE 672
DOMINATION could be applied. The unique embedded Neutrosophic SuperHyperREVERSE 673
CONNECTIVE DOMINATION proposes some longest Neutrosophic SuperHyperREVERSE 674
CONNECTIVE DOMINATION excerpt from some representatives. The latter is 675
straightforward. 676
Proposition 5.2. Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM be a pair

S = (V, E). Assume every Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex has the letter z. The
Neutrosophic SuperHyperREVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION set is as follows.
P
{V1Pi , V1 j }.
Proof. Let 677
P :
V1Pi , E1 ,
P
V1 j , E2
678
P :
V1Pi , E1 ,
P
V1 j , E2

Proposition 5.3. Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM be a pair

Neutrosophic SuperHyperREVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION number is as follows.
2 × 0.26.
Proof. Let 684
P :
V1Pi , E1 ,
P
V1 j , E2
685
P :
V1Pi , E1 ,
P
V1 j , E2

Proposition 5.4. Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle (ESHC) S be a pair 691
S = (V, E). Assume every Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex has the letter z. The 692
Neutrosophic SuperHyperREVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION set is as follows. 693
{
ViEXT ERN AL ,
EXT ERN AL
Vi+2 ,...
}
Proof. Let 694
P :
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1
695
P :
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1

Proposition 5.5. Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle (ESHC) S be a pair

Neutrosophic SuperHyperREVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION number is as follows.
|V |
× 0.26.
2
Proof. Let 707
P :
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1
708
P :
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1

Definition 5.6. (Uniform Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite and Uniform 720
Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle). 721
(i). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Every 722
pair of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices has the same maximum letter, i.e., 723
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices mutually has the same maximum letter. A 724
Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E) is called 725
Uniform Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite. 726
(ii). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Every pair of 727
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices has the same maximum letter, i.e., 728
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices mutually has the same maximum letter. A 729
Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E) is called Uniform 730
Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle. 731
Proposition 5.7. Let an Uniform Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM be a

pair S = (V, E). The Neutrosophic SuperHyperREVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION set is as
follows.
P
{V1Pi , V1 j }.
Proof. Let 732
P :
V1Pi , E1 ,
P
V1 j , E2
733
P :
V1Pi , E1 ,
P
V1 j , E2

Proposition 5.8. Let an Uniform Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM be a

pair S = (V, E). The Neutrosophic SuperHyperREVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION number is as
follows.
2 × 0.26.
Proof. Let 739
P :
V1Pi , E1 ,
P
V1 j , E2
740
P :
V1Pi , E1 ,
P
V1 j , E2

Proposition 5.9. Let an Uniform Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle (ESHC) S be a pair 746
S = (V, E). The Neutrosophic SuperHyperREVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION set is as follows. 747
{
ViEXT ERN AL ,
EXT ERN AL
Vi+2 ,...
}
Proof. Let 748
P :
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1
749
P :
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1

Proposition 5.10. Let an Uniform Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle (ESHC) S be a

pair S = (V, E). The Neutrosophic SuperHyperREVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION number is as
follows.
|V |
× 0.26.
2
Proof. Let 761
P :
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1
762
P :
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1

Proposition 5.11. (Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite and Neutrosophic 774
SuperHyperCycle). 775
(i). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). 776
Assume two Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, from different SuperHyperParts, 777
have the maximum letter. Then the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices don’t have 778
the same maximum letter, are in every Neutrosophic SuperHyperREVERSE CONNECTIVE 779
DOMINATION set. 780
(ii). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Assume every 781
Neutrosophic EXTERNAL SuperHyperVertices with distance two have the 782
maximum letter. Then the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices don’t have the same 783
maximum letter, are in every Neutrosophic SuperHyperREVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION 784
set. 785
Proof. 786
(i). Let 787
P :
V1Pi , E1 ,
P
V1 j , E2
788
P :
V1Pi , E1 ,
P
V1 j , E2

(ii). Let 794
P :
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1
795
P :
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1

Proposition 5.12. (Embedded Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar and Embedded 807
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar). 808
(i). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Then 809
two Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, from different SuperHyperParts, is in every 810
Neutrosophic SuperHyperREVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION set. 811
(ii). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Then every 812
Neutrosophic EXTERNAL SuperHyperVertices with distance two is in every 813
Neutrosophic SuperHyperREVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION set. 814
Proof. 815
(i). Let 816
P :
V1Pi , E1 ,
P
V1 j , E2
817
P :
V1Pi , E1 ,
P
V1 j , E2

(ii). Let 823
P :
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1
824
P :
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1

6 Neutrosophic Applications in Cancer’s 836
Neutrosophic Recognition 837
The cancer is the Neutrosophic disease but the Neutrosophic model is going to figure 838
out what’s going on this Neutrosophic phenomenon. The special Neutrosophic case of 839
this Neutrosophic disease is considered and as the consequences of the model, some 840
parameters are used. The cells are under attack of this disease but the moves of the 841
cancer in the special region are the matter of mind. The Neutrosophic recognition of the 842
cancer could help to find some Neutrosophic treatments for this Neutrosophic disease. 843
In the following, some Neutrosophic steps are Neutrosophic devised on this disease. 844
Step 1. (Neutrosophic Definition) The Neutrosophic recognition of the cancer in 845
the long-term Neutrosophic function. 846
Figure 43. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite Associated to the Notions of Neutro-

sophic SuperHyperREVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION
Step 2. (Neutrosophic Issue) The specific region has been assigned by the 847
Neutrosophic model [it’s called Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph] and the long 848
Neutrosophic cycle of the move from the cancer is identified by this research. 849
Sometimes the move of the cancer hasn’t be easily identified since there are some 850
determinacy, indeterminacy and neutrality about the moves and the effects of the 851
cancer on that region; this event leads us to choose another model [it’s said to be 852
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph] to have convenient perception on what’s 853
happened and what’s done. 854
Step 3. (Neutrosophic Model) There are some specific Neutrosophic models, 855
which are well-known and they’ve got the names, and some general Neutrosophic 856
models. The moves and the Neutrosophic traces of the cancer on the complex 857
tracks and between complicated groups of cells could be fantasized by a 858
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath(-/SuperHyperREVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION, 859
SuperHyperStar, SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, 860
SuperHyperWheel). The aim is to find either the Neutrosophic 861
SuperHyperREVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION or the Neutrosophic SuperHyperREVERSE 862
CONNECTIVE DOMINATION in those Neutrosophic Neutrosophic SuperHyperModels. 863
7 Case 1: The Initial Neutrosophic Steps 864
Toward Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite as 865
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel 866
Step 4. (Neutrosophic Solution) In the Neutrosophic Figure (43), the 867
Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite is Neutrosophic highlighted and Neutrosophic 868
featured. 869
By using the Neutrosophic Figure (43) and the Table (22), the Neutrosophic 870
SuperHyperBipartite is obtained. 871
Edges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite
Figure 44. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite Associated to the Notions of

Neutrosophic SuperHyperREVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION
The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Neutrosophic Algorithm in 872
previous Neutrosophic result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the 873
connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), in the 874
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (43), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperREVERSE 875
CONNECTIVE DOMINATION. 876
8 Case 2: The Increasing Neutrosophic Steps 877
Toward Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite as 878
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel 879
Step 4. (Neutrosophic Solution) In the Neutrosophic Figure (44), the 880
Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite is Neutrosophic highlighted and 881
Neutrosophic featured. 882
By using the Neutrosophic Figure (44) and the Table (23), the Neutrosophic 883
SuperHyperMultipartite is obtained. 884
The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Neutrosophic Algorithm in 885
previous result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected 886
Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic 887
SuperHyperModel (44), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperREVERSE CONNECTIVE 888
DOMINATION. 889
Edges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite
9 Wondering Open Problems But As The 890
Directions To Forming The Motivations 891
In what follows, some “problems” and some “questions” are proposed. 892
The SuperHyperREVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION and the Neutrosophic 893
SuperHyperREVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION are defined on a real-world application, titled 894
“Cancer’s Recognitions”. 895
Question 9.1. Which the else SuperHyperModels could be defined based on Cancer’s 896
recognitions? 897
Question 9.2. Are there some SuperHyperNotions related to SuperHyperREVERSE 898
and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperREVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION?

CONNECTIVE DOMINATION 899
Question 9.3. Are there some Algorithms to be defined on the SuperHyperModels to 900
compute them? 901
Question 9.4. Which the SuperHyperNotions are related to beyond the 902
SuperHyperREVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperREVERSE CONNECTIVE 903
DOMINATION? 904
Problem 9.5. The SuperHyperREVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION and the Neutrosophic 905
SuperHyperREVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION do a SuperHyperModel for the Cancer’s 906
recognitions and they’re based on SuperHyperREVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION, are there else? 907
Problem 9.6. Which the fundamental SuperHyperNumbers are related to these 908
SuperHyperNumbers types-results? 909
Problem 9.7. What’s the independent research based on Cancer’s recognitions 910
concerning the multiple types of SuperHyperNotions? 911
10 Conclusion and Closing Remarks 912
In this section, closing and concluding remarks are presented. The drawbacks of this 913
scientific research are shown. Some advantages and disadvantages of this scientific 914
research are highlighted. 915
This scientific research uses some approaches to further understand the Neutrosophic 916
SuperHyperGraphs. In this effort, two SuperHyperNotions are defined on the 917
REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION. For this reason, in the second definition, 918
the original definition of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph is redefined on the 919
position of the alphabets. Based on the new Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph definition, 920
the new SuperHyperNotion, Neutrosophic REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION, 921
finds a suitable background to implement some results on. Some SuperHyperClasses 922
and some Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses are the subjects of this scientific research on 923
modeling areas that are subject to cancer attacks in order to recognize this disease as 924
mentioned under the title “Cancer Diagnosis”. To formalize the SuperHyperNotion, 925
REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION, SuperHyperClasses and new 926
SuperHyperClasses instances are introduced. Some general results are summarized in 927
the REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION and Neutrosophic REVERSE 928
CONNECTIVE DOMINATION sections. Clarifications, examples, and literature 929
reviews go all the way. In this scientific research, the literature review has met the lines 930
containing concepts and results. SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 931
are super-hypermodels in “cancer diagnosis” and both are the foundation of the 932
background of this scientific research. Sometimes cancer has occurred in an area full of 933
cells, cell groups, and embedded styles. In this section, SuperHyperModel proposes 934
SuperHyperNotions, formally called “REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION”, 935
based on the connections of Cancer’s movements in the longest and strongest styles with 936
the formation of design and architecture, in terms of terms and whispering words. . The 937
“SuperHyper” prefix refers to the topic of embedded styles to explore the background of 938
SuperHyperNotions. In the table (24), the advantages and ways of this scientific
Table 24. A look at this scientific research and beyond

Advantages Limitations
1. Redefining the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 1. General Results
2. REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION
3. Neutrosophic REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION 2. Other SuperHyperNumb
4. modeling cancer diagnoses
5. SuperHyperClasses 3. SuperHyperFamilies
939
research are specified, pointed out and expressed. 940
11 Background 941
There are some scientific researches covering the topic of this scientific research. In what 942
follows, there are some discussion and literature reviews about them. 943
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “New Ideas In Recognition of 944
Cancer And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph As Hyper Tool On Super Toot” in Ref. [1] 945
by Henry Garrett (2023). In this research article, a novel approach is implemented on 946
SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on general forms with 947
introducing used neutrosophic classes of neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. It’s published 948
in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled “Current Trends in Mass Communication 949
(CTMC)” with ISO abbreviation “Curr Trends Mass Comm” in volume 2 and issue 1 950
with pages 32-55. 951
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “Some Super Hyper Degrees 952
and Co-Super Hyper Degrees on Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs And Super Hyper 953
Graphs Alongside Applications in Cancer’s Treatments” in Ref. [2] by Henry Garrett 954
(2023). In this research article, a novel approach is implemented on SuperHyperGraph 955
and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on fundamental notions and using vital tools 956
in Cancer’s Treatments. It’s published in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled 957
“Journal of Mathematical Techniques and Computational Mathematics(JMTCM)” with 958
ISO abbreviation “J Math Techniques Comput Math” in volume 2 and issue 1 with 959
pages 35-47. The research article studies deeply with choosing directly neutrosophic 960
SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough toward independent 961
results based on initial background and fundamental SuperHyperNumbers. 962
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “A Research on Cancer’s 963
Recognition and Neutrosophic Super Hypergraph by Eulerian Super Hyper Cycles and 964
Hamiltonian Sets as Hyper Covering Versus Super separations” in Ref. [3] by Henry 965
Garrett (2023). In this research article, a novel approach is implemented on 966
SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on fundamental notions 967
and using vital tools in Cancer’s Recognition. It’s published in prestigious and fancy 968
journal is entitled “Journal of Mathematical Techniques and Computational 969
Mathematics(JMTCM)” with ISO abbreviation “J Math Techniques Comput Math” in 970
volume 2 and issue 3 with pages 136-148. The research article studies deeply with 971
choosing directly neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph. It’s the 972
breakthrough toward independent results based on initial background and fundamental 973
SuperHyperNumbers. 974
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “Neutrosophic 1-Failed 975
SuperHyperForcing in the SuperHyperFunction to Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs 976
on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Beyond ” in Ref. [4] by Henry Garrett (2023). 977
In this research article, a novel approach is implemented on SuperHyperGraph and 978
neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on fundamental SuperHyperNumber and using 979
neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses of neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. It’s published in 980
prestigious and fancy journal is entitled “Journal of Mathematical Techniques and 981
Computational Mathematics(JMTCM)” with ISO abbreviation “J Math Techniques 982
Comput Math” in volume 2 and issue 6 with pages 221-307. The research article studies 983
deeply with choosing directly neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph. 984
It’s the breakthrough toward independent results based on initial background and 985
fundamental SuperHyperNumbers. The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is 986
titled “Super Hyper Dominating and Super Hyper Resolving on Neutrosophic Super 987
Hyper Graphs and Their Directions in Game Theory and Neutrosophic Super Hyper 988
Classes” in Ref. [5] by Henry Garrett (2022). In this research article, a novel approach 989
is implemented on SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on 990
fundamental SuperHyperNumber and using neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses of 991
neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. It’s published in prestigious and fancy journal is 992
entitled “Journal of Mathematical Techniques and Computational 993
Mathematics(JMTCM)” with ISO abbreviation “J Math Techniques Comput Math” in 994
choosing directly neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph. It’s the 996
breakthrough toward independent results based on initial background and fundamental 997
SuperHyperNumbers. The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled 998
“neutrosophic co-degree and neutrosophic degree alongside chromatic numbers in the 999
setting of some classes related to neutrosophic hypergraphs” in Ref. [6] by Henry 1000
Garrett (2023). In this research article, a novel approach is implemented on 1001
SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on general forms without 1002
using neutrosophic classes of neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. It’s published in 1003
prestigious and fancy journal is entitled “Journal of Current Trends in Computer 1004
Science Research (JCTCSR)” with ISO abbreviation “J Curr Trends Comp Sci Res” in 1005
choosing neutrosophic hypergraphs instead of neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. It’s the 1007
breakthrough toward independent results based on initial background. The research 1008
article studies deeply with choosing neutrosophic hypergraphs instead of neutrosophic 1009
SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough toward independent results based on initial 1010
background. In some articles are titled “0039 — Closing Numbers and Super-Closing 1011
Numbers as (Dual)Resolving and (Dual)Coloring alongside (Dual)Dominating in 1012
(Neutrosophic)n-SuperHyperGraph” in Ref. [7] by Henry Garrett (2022), “0049 — 1013
(Failed)1-Zero-Forcing Number in Neutrosophic Graphs” in Ref. [8] by Henry Garrett 1014
(2022), “Extreme SuperHyperClique as the Firm Scheme of Confrontation under 1015
Cancer’s Recognition as the Model in The Setting of (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” 1016
in Ref. [9] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Uncertainty On The Act And Effect Of Cancer 1017
Alongside The Foggy Positions Of Cells Toward Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique 1018
inside Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Titled Cancer’s Recognition” in Ref. [10] by 1019
Henry Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic Version Of Separates Groups Of Cells In Cancer’s 1020
Recognition On Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [11] by Henry Garrett (2022), 1021
“The Shift Paradigm To Classify Separately The Cells and Affected Cells Toward The 1022
Totality Under Cancer’s Recognition By New Multiple Definitions On the Sets 1023
Polynomials Alongside Numbers In The (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperMatching Theory 1024
Based on SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” in Ref. [12] by Henry 1025
Garrett (2022), “Breaking the Continuity and Uniformity of Cancer In The Worst Case 1026
of Full Connections With Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique In Cancer’s Recognition 1027
Applied in (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [13] by Henry Garrett (2022), 1028
“Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable as the Survivors on the Cancer’s Neutrosophic 1029
Recognition Based on Uncertainty to All Modes in Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in 1030
Ref. [14] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Extremism of the Attacked Body Under the 1031
Cancer’s Circumstances Where Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) 1032
SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [15] by Henry Garrett (2022), “(Neutrosophic) 1-Failed 1033
SuperHyperForcing in Cancer’s Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in 1034
Ref. [16] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To 1035
Form Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In 1036
Special ViewPoints” in Ref. [17] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic 1-Failed 1037
SuperHyperForcing in the SuperHyperFunction To Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs 1038
on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond ” in Ref. [18] by Henry Garrett 1039
(2022), “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperStable on Cancer’s Recognition by Well- 1040
SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs ” in Ref. [19] by Henry Garrett 1041
(2022), “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form Neutrosophic 1042
SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In Special ViewPoints” 1043
in Ref. [15] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Basic Notions on (Neutrosophic) 1044
SuperHyperForcing And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling in Cancer’s Recognitions 1045
And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [20] by Henry Garrett (2022), 1046
“Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable 1047
To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In Special ViewPoints” in Ref. [21] by 1048
Henry Garrett (2022),“(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions 1049
Featuring (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances” in Ref. [22] by 1050
Henry Garrett (2022), “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperAlliances With SuperHyperDefensive 1051
and SuperHyperOffensive Type-SuperHyperSet On (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph 1052
With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions And Related 1053
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClasses” in Ref. [23] by Henry Garrett (2022), 1054
“SuperHyperGirth on SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph With 1055
SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions” in Ref. [24] by Henry Garrett (2022), 1056
“Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on Neutrosophic 1057
SuperHyperGraphs and SuperHyperGraphs Alongside Applications in Cancer’s 1058
Treatments” in Ref. [25] by Henry Garrett (2022), “SuperHyperDominating and 1059
SuperHyperResolving on Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs And Their Directions in 1060
Game Theory and Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses” in Ref. [26] by Henry Garrett 1061
(2022), “SuperHyperMatching By (R-)Definitions And Polynomials To Monitor 1062
Cancer’s Recognition In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [212] by Henry 1063
Garrett (2023), “The Focus on The Partitions Obtained By Parallel Moves In The 1064
Cancer’s Extreme Recognition With Different Types of Extreme SuperHyperMatching Set 1065
and Polynomial on (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [213] by Henry Garrett 1066
(2023), “Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique Decides the Failures on the Cancer’s 1067
Recognition in the Perfect Connections of Cancer’s Attacks By SuperHyperModels 1068
Named (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [214] by Henry Garrett (2023), 1069
“Indeterminacy On The All Possible Connections of Cells In Front of Cancer’s Attacks 1070
In The Terms of Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique on Cancer’s Recognition called 1071
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [215] by Henry Garrett (2023), “Perfect 1072
Directions Toward Idealism in Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition Forwarding 1073
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClique on Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [218] by 1074
Henry Garrett (2023), “Demonstrating Complete Connections in Every Embedded 1075
Regions and Sub-Regions in the Terms of Cancer’s Recognition and (Neutrosophic) 1076
SuperHyperGraphs With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClique” in Ref. [219] by Henry 1077
Garrett (2023), “Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic Regions titled 1078
neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable in Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition modeled in 1079
the Form of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [222] by Henry Garrett (2023), 1080
“Using the Tool As (Neutrosophic) Failed SuperHyperStable To SuperHyperModel 1081
Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [225] by Henry 1082
Garrett (2023), “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form Neutrosophic 1083
SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In Special ViewPoints” 1084
in Ref. [226] by Henry Garrett (2023), “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperStable on Cancer’s 1085
Recognition by Well-SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in 1086
Ref. [227] by Henry Garrett (2023), “Neutrosophic 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in the 1087
SuperHyperFunction To Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs on Cancer’s Neutrosophic 1088
Recognition And Beyond ” in Ref. [228] by Henry Garrett (2022), “(Neutrosophic) 1089
1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in Cancer’s Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) 1090
SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [229] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Basic Notions on 1091
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperForcing And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling in Cancer’s 1092
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [230] by Henry Garrett 1093
(2022), “Basic Neutrosophic Notions Concerning SuperHyperDominating and 1094
Neutrosophic SuperHyperResolving in SuperHyperGraph” in Ref. [241] by Henry 1095
Garrett (2022), “Initial Material of Neutrosophic Preliminaries to Study Some 1096
Neutrosophic Notions Based on Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) in Neutrosophic 1097
SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)” in Ref. [242] by Henry Garrett (2022), and [4–26, 30–242], 1098
there are some endeavors to formalize the basic SuperHyperNotions about neutrosophic 1099
SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph alongside scientific research books 1100
at [243–375]. Two popular scientific research books in Scribd in the terms of high 1101
readers, 4728 and 5721 respectively, on neutrosophic science is on [376, 377]. 1102
Some scientific studies and scientific researches about neutrosophic graphs, are 1103
proposed as book in Ref. [376] by Henry Garrett (2023) which is indexed by Google 1104
Scholar and has more than 4728 readers in Scribd. It’s titled “Beyond Neutrosophic 1105
Graphs” and published by Dr. Henry Garrett. This research book covers different types 1106
of notions and settings in neutrosophic graph theory and neutrosophic 1107
SuperHyperGraph theory. 1108
Also, some scientific studies and scientific researches about neutrosophic graphs, are 1109
proposed as book in Ref. [377] by Henry Garrett (2023) which is indexed by Google 1110
Scholar and has more than 5721 readers in Scribd. It’s titled “Neutrosophic Duality” 1111
and published by Dr. Henry Garrett. This research book presents different types of 1112
notions SuperHyperResolving and SuperHyperDominating in the setting of duality in 1113
neutrosophic graph theory and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph theory. This research 1114
book has scrutiny on the complement of the intended set and the intended set, 1115
simultaneously. It’s smart to consider a set but acting on its complement that what’s 1116
done in this research book which is popular in the terms of high readers in Scribd. 1117
See the seminal scientific researches [1–3]. The formalization of the notions on the 1118
framework of notions in SuperHyperGraphs, Neutrosophic notions in 1119
SuperHyperGraphs theory, and (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs theory at [4–242] 1120
alongside scientific research books at [243–375]. Two popular scientific research books 1121
in Scribd ,in the terms of high readers, 4728 and 5721 respectively, on neutrosophic 1122
science is on [376, 377]. 1123
References 1124
1. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 1125
SuperHyperGraph As Hyper Tool On Super Toot”, Curr Trends Mass Comm 1126
2(1) (2023) 32-55. (https://www.opastpublishers.com/open-access-articles/new- 1127
ideas-in-recognition-of-cancer-and-neutrosophic-super-hypergraph-as-hyper- 1128
tool-on-super-toot.pdf) 1129
2. Henry Garrett, “Some Super Hyper Degrees and Co-Super Hyper Degrees on 1130
Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs And Super Hyper Graphs Alongside 1131
Applications in Cancer’s Treatments”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 2(1) 1132
(2023) 35-47. (https://www.opastpublishers.com/open-access-articles/some- 1133
super-hyper-degrees-and-cosuper-hyper-degrees-on-neutrosophic-super-hyper- 1134
graphs-and-super-hyper-graphs-alongside-a.pdf) 1135
3. Henry Garrett, “A Research on Cancer’s Recognition and Neutrosophic Super 1136
Hypergraph by Eulerian Super Hyper Cycles and Hamiltonian Sets as Hyper 1137
Covering Versus Super separations”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 2(3) 1138
(2023) 136-148. (https://www.opastpublishers.com/open-access-articles/a- 1139
research-on-cancers-recognition-and-neutrosophic-super-hypergraph-by- 1140
eulerian-super-hyper-cycles-and-hamiltonian-sets-.pdf) 1141
4. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in the 1142
SuperHyperFunction to Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs on Cancer’s 1143
Neutrosophic Recognition and Beyond ”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 2(6) 1144
(2023) 221-307. (https://www.opastpublishers.com/open-access- 1145
articles/neutrosophic-1failed-superhyperforcing-in-the-superhyperfunction-to- 1146
use-neutrosophic-superhypergraphs-on-cancers-neutros.pdf) 1147
5. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Co-degree and Neutrosophic Degree alongside 1148
Chromatic Numbers in the Setting of Some Classes Related to Neutrosophic 1149
Hypergraphs”, J Curr Trends Comp Sci Res 2(1) (2023) 16-24. (doi: 1150
10.33140/JCTCSR.02.01.04) 1151
6. Henry Garrett, “Super Hyper Dominating and Super Hyper Resolving on 1152
Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs and Their Directions in Game Theory and 1153
Neutrosophic Super Hyper Classes”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 1(3) 1154
(2022) 242-263. (doi: 10.33140/JMTCM.01.03.09) 1155
7. Garrett, Henry. “0039 — Closing Numbers and Super-Closing Numbers as 1156
(Dual)Resolving and (Dual)Coloring alongside (Dual)Dominating in 1157
(Neutrosophic)n-SuperHyperGraph.” CERN European Organization for Nuclear 1158
Research - Zenodo, Nov. 2022. CERN European Organization for Nuclear 1159
Research, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6319942. 1160
https://oa.mg/work/10.5281/zenodo.6319942 1161
8. Garrett, Henry. “0049 — (Failed)1-Zero-Forcing Number in Neutrosophic 1162
Graphs.” CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research - Zenodo, Feb. 1163
2022. CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research, 1164
https://doi.org/10.13140/rg.2.2.35241.26724. 1165
https://oa.mg/work/10.13140/rg.2.2.35241.26724 1166
9. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperClique as the Firm Scheme of 1167
Confrontation under Cancer’s Recognition as the Model in The Setting of 1168
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010308 (doi: 1169
10.20944/preprints202301.0308.v1). 1170
10. Henry Garrett, “Uncertainty On The Act And Effect Of Cancer Alongside The 1171
Foggy Positions Of Cells Toward Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique inside 1172
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Titled Cancer’s Recognition”, Preprints 2023, 1173
2023010282 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0282.v1). 1174
11. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Version Of Separates Groups Of Cells In 1175
Cancer’s Recognition On Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 1176
2023010267 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0267.v1). 1177
12. Henry Garrett, “The Shift Paradigm To Classify Separately The Cells and 1178
Affected Cells Toward The Totality Under Cancer’s Recognition By New 1179
Multiple Definitions On the Sets Polynomials Alongside Numbers In The 1180
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperMatching Theory Based on SuperHyperGraph and 1181
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”, Preprints 2023, 2023010265 (doi: 1182
10.20944/preprints202301.0265.v1). 1183
13. Henry Garrett, “Breaking the Continuity and Uniformity of Cancer In The 1184
Worst Case of Full Connections With Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique In 1185
Cancer’s Recognition Applied in (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 1186
2023, 2023010262,(doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0262.v1). 1187
14. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable as the Survivors on the 1188
Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition Based on Uncertainty to All Modes in 1189
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010240 (doi: 1190
10.20944/preprints202301.0240.v1). 1191
15. Henry Garrett, “Extremism of the Attacked Body Under the Cancer’s 1192
Circumstances Where Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) 1193
SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010224, (doi: 1194
10.20944/preprints202301.0224.v1). 1195
16. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in Cancer’s 1196
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 1197
2023010105 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 1198
17. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form 1199
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions 1200
In Special ViewPoints”, Preprints 2023, 2023010088 (doi: 1201
10.20944/preprints202301.0088.v1). 1202
SuperHyperFunction To Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs on Cancer’s 1204
Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond ”, Preprints 2023, 2023010044 1205
19. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperStable on Cancer’s Recognition by 1206
Well- SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 1207
2023010043 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0043.v1). 1208
20. Henry Garrett, “Basic Notions on (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperForcing And 1209
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling in Cancer’s Recognitions And 1210
10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 1212
10.20944/preprints202301.0088.v1). 1216
22. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions 1217
Featuring (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances”, Preprints 1218
2022, 2022120549 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0549.v1). 1219
23. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperAlliances With SuperHyperDefensive 1220
and SuperHyperOffensive Type-SuperHyperSet On (Neutrosophic) 1221
SuperHyperGraph With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s 1222
Recognitions And Related (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClasses”, Preprints 2022, 1223
2022120540 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0540.v1). 1224
24. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperGirth on SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic 1225
SuperHyperGraph With SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions”, 1226
Preprints 2022, 2022120500 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0500.v1). 1227
25. Henry Garrett, “Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on 1228
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs and SuperHyperGraphs Alongside Applications 1229
in Cancer’s Treatments”, Preprints 2022, 2022120324 (doi: 1230
10.20944/preprints202212.0324.v1). 1231
26. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDominating and SuperHyperResolving on 1232
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs And Their Directions in Game Theory and 1233
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”, Preprints 2022, 2022110576 (doi: 1234
10.20944/preprints202211.0576.v1). 1235
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By EQUAL CONNECTIVE 1237
DOMINATION As Hyper Decoration On Super Density”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1238
10.5281/zenodo.8201319). 1239
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By EQUAL CONNECTIVE 1241
10.5281/zenodo.8201255). 1243
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By EQUAL CONNECTIVE 1245
10.5281/zenodo.8201165). 1247
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By CONNECTIVE DOMINATION As 1249
Hyper Decoration On Super Density”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1250
10.5281/zenodo.8196147). 1251
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By CONNECTIVE DOMINATION 1253
As Hyper Decoration On Super Density”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1254
10.5281/zenodo.8196132). 1255
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By CONNECTIVE 1257
10.5281/zenodo.8196099). 1259
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By DOMINATION As Hyper 1261
Decoration On Super Density”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8187955). 1262
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By DOMINATION As Hyper 1264
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By DOMINATION As Hyper 1267
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperPerfect Search As Hyper Perf On Super 1270
Perfidy”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8104836). 1271
37. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Perfidy By Hyper Perf Of 1272
SuperHyperPerfect Search In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1273
SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8104857). 1274
SuperHyperGraph By Reverse Strict Dimension Dominating As Hyper Dimple 1276
On Super Dimity”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8092796). 1277
39. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Dimity By Hyper Dimple Of Reverse 1278
Strict Dimension Dominating In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1279
SuperHyperGraph By Unequal Dimension Dominating As Hyper Dimple On 1282
Super Dimity”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8088438). 1283
41. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Dimity By Hyper Dimple Of Unequal 1284
Dimension Dominating In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1285
SuperHyperGraph By Strict Dimension Dominating As Hyper Dimple On Super 1288
Dimity”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8084436). 1289
43. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Dimity By Hyper Dimple Of Strict 1290
SuperHyperGraph By Reverse Strict Connective As Hyper Conceit On Super 1294
Con”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8080100). 1295
45. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Con By Hyper Conceit Of Reverse Strict 1296
Connective In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, 1297
Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8080068). 1298
SuperHyperGraph By Unequal Connective Dominating As Hyper Conceit On 1300
Super Con”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8078445). 1301
47. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Con By Hyper Conceit Of Unequal 1302
Connective Dominating In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1303
SuperHyperGraph By Strict Connective Dominating As Hyper Conceit On 1306
49. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Con By Hyper Conceit Of Strict 1308
SuperHyperGraph By Reverse Dimension Dominating As Hyper Dimple On 1312
Super Dimity”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8072171). 1313
51. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Dimity By Hyper Dimple Of Reverse 1314
SuperHyperGraph By Equal Dimension Dominating As Hyper Dimple On Super 1318
53. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Dimity By Hyper Dimple Of Equal 1320
SuperHyperGraph By Dimension Dominating As Hyper Dimple On Super 1324
55. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Dimity By Hyper Dimple Of Dimension 1326
Dominating In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, 1327
SuperHyperGraph By Reverse Connective Dominating As Hyper Conceit On 1330
57. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Con By Hyper Conceit Of Reverse 1332
SuperHyperGraph By Equal Connective Dominating As Hyper Conceit On 1336
59. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Con By Hyper Conceit Of Equal 1338
SuperHyperGraph By Connective Dominating As Hyper Conceit On Super 1342
Con”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8051346). 1343
61. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Con By Hyper Conceit Of Connective 1344
SuperHyperGraph By United Dominating As Hyper Ultra On Super Units”, 1348
63. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Units By Hyper Ultra Of United 1350
SuperHyperGraph By Zero Forcing As Hyper ford On Super forceps”, Zenodo 1354
2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8017246). 1355
65. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super forceps By Hyper ford Of Zero Forcing In 1356
Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 2023, 1357
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8020128). 1358
SuperHyperGraph By Matrix-Based As Hyper mat On Super matte”, Zenodo 1360
2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7978571). 1361
67. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super mat By Hyper matte Of Matrix-Based In 1362
Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 2023, 1363
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7978857). 1364
SuperHyperGraph By Dominating-Edges As Hyper Dome On Super Eddy”, 1366
69. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Eddy By Hyper Dome Of 1368
Dominating-Edges In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1369
SuperHyperGraph By Edge-Gap As Hyper Gape On Super Gab”, Zenodo 2023, 1372
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7916595). 1373
71. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Gab By Hyper Gape Of Edge-Gap In 1374
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7923632). 1376
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On 1378
Super Nebulous”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7904698). 1379
73. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nebulous By Hyper Nebbish Of 1380
Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1381
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition As Hyper 1384
Decompress On Super Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1385
10.5281/zenodo.7904529). 1386
75. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Decompensation By Hyper Decompress Of 1387
Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With 1388
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1389
10.5281/zenodo.7904401). 1390
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut As Hyper Nebbish On Super 1392
Nebulous”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7871026). 1393
Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1395
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Cycle-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super 1398
Eulerian-Cycle-Neighbor In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1401
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Cycle-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On 1404
Super Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7855661). 1405
Eulerian-Cycle-Decomposition In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1407
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Cycle-Cut As Hyper Eulogy On Super EULA”, 1410
83. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super EULA By Hyper Eulogy Of 1412
Eulerian-Cycle-Cut In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1413
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Path-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super 1416
Eulerian-Type-Path-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1419
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Path-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress 1422
On Super Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7839333). 1423
Eulerian-Type-Path-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1425
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Path-Cut As Hyper Eulogy On Super 1428
EULA”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7834229). 1429
Eulerian-Type-Path-Cut In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1431
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Path-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super 1434
Eulerian-Path-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1437
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Path-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On 1440
Eulerian-Path-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1443
SuperHyperGraph As Hyper Tool On Super Toot”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1446
10.5281/zenodo.7812236). 1447
SuperHyperGraph By initial Eulerian-Path-Cut As Hyper initial Eulogy On 1449
Super initial EULA”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7809365). 1450
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Path-Cut As Hyper Eulogy-Path-Cut On Super 1452
EULA-Path-Cut”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7809358). 1453
Eulerian-Path-Cut In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1455
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Path-Cut As Hyper Eulogy On Super EULA”, 1458
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On 1461
Super Nebulous”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7806767). 1462
Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1464
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition As Hyper 1467
Decompress On Super Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1468
10.5281/zenodo.7804238). 1469
Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With 1471
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7804228). 1472
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut As Hyper Hamper On Super 1474
Hammy”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7799902). 1475
104. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Hammy By Hyper Hamper Of 1476
Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1477
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Cycle-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super 1480
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Cycle-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress 1483
On Super Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7793372). 1484
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Cycle-Cut As Hyper Hamper On Super 1486
Hammy”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7791952). 1487
Hamiltonian-Cycle-Cut In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1489
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super 1492
Hamiltonian-Neighbor In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1495
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On 1498
Hamiltonian-Decomposition In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1501
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Cut As Hyper Hamper On Super Hammy”, 1504
Hamiltonian-Cut In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1507
SuperHyperGraph By Trace-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 1510
Trace-Neighbor In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1513
117. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 1515
SuperHyperGraph By Trace-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On Super 1516
Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7771831). 1517
Trace-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1519
SuperHyperGraph By Trace-Cut As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 1522
ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.20913.25446). 1523
120. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Tract By Hyper Track Of Trace-Cut In 1524
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7764916). 1526
SuperHyperGraph By Edge-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 1528
Edge-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, 1531
SuperHyperGraph By Edge-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On Super 1534
Decompensation”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.22545.10089). 1535
Edge-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1537
SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.29544.34564). 1538
SuperHyperGraph By Edge-Cut As Hyper Edify On Super Eddy”, ResearchGate 1540
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.11377.76644). 1541
126. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Eddy By Hyper Edify Of Edge-Cut In 1542
Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 1543
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.23750.96329). 1544
SuperHyperGraph By Vertex-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 1546
Vertex-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1549
SuperHyperGraph By Vertex-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On Super 1552
Decompensation”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.30212.81289). 1553
Vertex-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1555
SuperHyperGraph By Vertex-Cut As Hyper Vertu On Super Vertigo”, 1558
132. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Vertigo By Hyper Vertu Of Vertex-Cut In 1560
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.32467.25124). 1562
SuperHyperGraph By Stable-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 1564
134. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nebulizer By Hyper Nub Of 1566
Stable-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1567
SuperHyperGraph By Stable-Decompositions As Hyper Stain On Super Stagy”, 1570
136. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Stale By Hyper Stalk Of 1572
Stable-Decompositions In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1573
SuperHyperGraph By Stable-Cut As Hyper Stain On Super Stagy”, 1576
138. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Stale By Hyper Stalk Of Stable-Cut In 1578
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.20170.24000). 1580
SuperHyperGraph By Clique-Neighbors As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 1582
140. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nebulizer By Hyper Nub Of 1584
Clique-Neighbors In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1585
SuperHyperGraph By Clique-Decompositions As Hyper Decompile On Super 1588
Decommission”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.18780.87683). 1589
Clique- Decompositions In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1591
SuperHyperGraph By Clique-Cut As Hyper Click On Super Cliche”, 1594
144. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Cliff By Hyper Cling Of Clique-Cut In 1596
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.27392.30721). 1598
SuperHyperGraph By Space As Hyper Spin On Super Spacy”, ResearchGate 1600
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.33028.40321). 1601
SuperHyperGraph By List- Coloring As Hyper List On Super Lisle”, 1603
147. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Lith By Hyper Lite Of List-Coloring In 1605
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.16356.04489). 1607
SuperHyperGraph By Space As Hyper Sparse On Super Spark ”, ResearchGate 1609
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.21756.21129). 1610
149. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Solidarity By Hyper Soul Of Space In 1611
Cancer’s Recognition With (Extreme) SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023, 1612
(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.30983.68009). 1613
SuperHyperGraph By Edge-Connectivity As Hyper Disclosure On Super 1615
Closure”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.28552.29445). 1616
151. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Uniform By Hyper Deformation Of 1617
Edge-Connectivity In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1618
SuperHyperGraph By Vertex-Connectivity As Hyper Leak On Super Structure”, 1621
153. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super System By Hyper Explosions Of 1623
Vertex-Connectivity In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1624
SuperHyperGraph By Tree-Decomposition As Hyper Forward On Super Returns”, 1627
155. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nodes By Hyper Moves Of 1629
Tree-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1630
SuperHyperGraph By Chord As Hyper Excellence On Super Excess”, 1633
157. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Gap By Hyper Navigations Of Chord In 1635
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.11172.14720). 1637
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyper(i,j)-Domination As Hyper Controller On 1639
Super Waves”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.22011.80165). 1640
159. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Coincidence By Hyper Routes Of 1641
SuperHyper(i,j)-Domination In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1642
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperEdge-Domination As Hyper Reversion On 1645
Super Indirection”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.10493.84962). 1646
161. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Obstacles By Hyper Model Of 1647
SuperHyperEdge-Domination In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1648
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperK-Domination As Hyper k-Actions On Super 1651
Patterns”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.19944.14086). 1652
163. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Harmony By Hyper k-Function Of 1653
SuperHyperK-Domination In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1654
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperK-Number As Hyper k-Partition On Super 1657
Layers”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.33103.76968). 1658
165. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Gradient By Hyper k-Class Of 1659
SuperHyperK-Number In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1660
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperOrder As Hyper Enumerations On Super 1663
Landmarks”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.35646.56641). 1664
167. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Analogous By Hyper Visions Of 1665
SuperHyperOrder In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1666
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperColoring As Hyper Categories On Super 1669
Neighbors”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.13973.81121). 1670
169. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Relations By Hyper Identifications Of 1671
SuperHyperColoring In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1672
170. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Contradiction By Hyper Detection of 1674
SuperHyperDefensive In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic 1675
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperDimension As Hyper Distinguishing On Super 1678
Distances”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.31956.88961). 1679
172. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Locations By Hyper Differing Of 1680
SuperHyperDimension In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1681
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperDominating As Hyper Closing On Super 1684
Messy”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.21510.45125). 1685
174. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Missing By Hyper Searching Of 1686
SuperHyperDominating In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1687
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperConnected As Hyper Group On Super Surge”, 1690
176. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Outbreak By Hyper Collections Of 1692
SuperHyperConnected In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1693
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperTotal As Hyper Covering On Super Infections”, 1696
178. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Extremism By Hyper Treatments Of 1698
SuperHyperTotal In Cancer’s Recognition with (Neutrosophic) 1699
179. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Isolation By Hyper Perfectness Of 1701
SuperHyperPerfect In Cancer’s Recognition with (Neutrosophic) 1702
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperPerfect As Hyper Idealism On Super Vacancy”, 1705
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperJoin As Hyper Separations On Super Sorts”, 1708
182. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super connections By Hyper disconnections Of 1710
SuperHyperJoin In Cancer’s Recognition with (Neutrosophic) 1711
183. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Mixed-Devastations By Hyper Decisions 1713
Of SuperHyperDuality In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic 1714
184. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition As (Neutrosophic) 1716
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperDuality As Hyper Imaginations On Super 1717
Mixed-Illustrations”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.33275.80161). 1718
185. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition As (Neutrosophic) 1719
SuperHyperGraph By Path SuperHyperColoring As Hyper Correction On Super 1720
Faults”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.30182.50241). 1721
186. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Reflections By Hyper Rotations Of Path 1722
SuperHyperColoring In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic 1723
187. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas As Hyper Deformations On Super Chains In 1725
Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph By 1726
SuperHyperDensity”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.13444.60806). 1727
188. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas As Hyper Ignorance By SuperHyperDensity On 1728
Super Resistances In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic 1729
SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.16800.05123). 1730
189. Henry Garrett, “New Research On Cancer’s Recognition and Neutrosophic 1731
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian SuperHyperCycles and Hamiltonian Sets As 1732
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-VI ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1733
10.13140/RG.2.2.29913.80482). 1734
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-V ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1737
10.13140/RG.2.2.33269.24809). 1738
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-IV ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1741
10.13140/RG.2.2.34946.96960). 1742
192. Henry Garrett, “A Research On Cancer’s Recognition and Neutrosophic 1743
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-III ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1745
10.13140/RG.2.2.14814.31040). 1746
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-II ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1749
10.13140/RG.2.2.15653.17125). 1750
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-I ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1753
10.13140/RG.2.2.25719.50089). 1754
195. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Disruptions In Cancer’s Extreme 1755
Recognition As Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph By Hyper Plans Called 1756
SuperHyperConnectivities”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1757
10.13140/RG.2.2.29441.94562). 1758
196. Henry Garrett, “Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition As Neutrosophic 1759
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperConnectivities As Hyper Diagnosis On Super 1760
Mechanism”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.17252.24968). 1761
197. Henry Garrett,“Cancer’s Recognition and (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph By 1762
the Criteria of Eulerian and Hamiltonian Type-Sets As Hyper Modified Cycles 1763
On Super Mess”, ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.16652.59525). 1764
198. Henry Garrett,“Eulerian and Hamiltonian In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition 1765
and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph On Super Interactions By Hyper Extensions 1766
of Cycles”, ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.34583.24485). 1767
199. Henry Garrett,“SuperHyperGirth Type-Results on extreme SuperHyperGirth 1768
theory and (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs Toward Cancer’s extreme 1769
Recognition”, Preprints 2023, 2023010396 (doi: 1770
10.20944/preprints202301.0396.v1). 1771
200. Henry Garrett,“Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Warns Hyper Landmark of 1772
neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth In Super Type-Versions of Cancer’s neutrosophic 1773
Recognition”, Preprints 2023, 2023010395 (doi: 1774
10.20944/preprints202301.0395.v1). 1775
201. Henry Garrett,“The Constructions of (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs on the 1776
Cancer’s Recognition in The Confrontation With Super Attacks In Hyper 1777
Situations By Implementing (Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in The 1778
Technical Approaches to Neutralize SuperHyperViews”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1779
10.13140/RG.2.2.26240.51204). 1780
202. Henry Garrett,“(Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing As the 1781
Entrepreneurs on Cancer’s Recognitions To Fail Forcing Style As the Super 1782
Classes With Hyper Effects In The Background of the Framework is So-Called 1783
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1784
10.13140/RG.2.2.12818.73925). 1785
203. Henry Garrett,“Super Actions On The Types of Hyper Levels In The Sensible 1786
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth On Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and 1787
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 1788
10.13140/RG.2.2.26836.88960). 1789
204. Henry Garrett,“SuperHyperGirth Approaches on the Super Challenges on the 1790
Cancer’s Recognition In the Hyper Model of (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, 1791
ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.36745.93289). 1792
205. Henry Garrett,“Extreme SuperHyperClique as the Firm Scheme of 1793
Confrontation under Cancer’s Recognition as the Model in The Setting of 1794
10.20944/preprints202301.0308.v1). 1796
206. Henry Garrett,“Uncertainty On The Act And Effect Of Cancer Alongside The 1797
Foggy Positions Of Cells Toward Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique inside 1798
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Titled Cancer’s Recognition”, Preprints 2023, 1799
2023010282 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0282.v1). 1800
207. Henry Garrett,“Neutrosophic Version Of Separates Groups Of Cells In Cancer’s 1801
Recognition On Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010267 1802
(doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0267.v1).). 1803
208. Henry Garrett, “The Shift Paradigm To Classify Separately The Cells and 1804
Affected Cells Toward The Totality Under Cancer’s Recognition By New 1805
Multiple Definitions On the Sets Polynomials Alongside Numbers In The 1806
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperMatching Theory Based on SuperHyperGraph and 1807
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”, Preprints 2023, 2023010265 (doi: 1808
10.20944/preprints202301.0265.v1). 1809
209. Henry Garrett,“Breaking the Continuity and Uniformity of Cancer In The 1810
Worst Case of Full Connections With Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique In 1811
Cancer’s Recognition Applied in (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 1812
2023, 2023010262,(doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0262.v1). 1813
210. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable as the Survivors on the 1814
Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition Based on Uncertainty to All Modes in 1815
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010240 (doi: 1816
10.20944/preprints202301.0240.v1). 1817
211. Henry Garrett, “Extremism of the Attacked Body Under the Cancer’s 1818
Circumstances Where Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) 1819
SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010224, (doi: 1820
10.20944/preprints202301.0224.v1). 1821
212. Henry Garrett,“SuperHyperMatching By (R-)Definitions And Polynomials To 1822
Monitor Cancer’s Recognition In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, 1823
ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.35061.65767). 1824
213. Henry Garrett,“The Focus on The Partitions Obtained By Parallel Moves In 1825
The Cancer’s Extreme Recognition With Different Types of Extreme 1826
SuperHyperMatching Set and Polynomial on (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, 1827
214. Henry Garrett,“Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique Decides the Failures on the 1829
Cancer’s Recognition in the Perfect Connections of Cancer’s Attacks By 1830
SuperHyperModels Named (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 1831
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.32530.73922). 1832
215. Henry Garrett,“Indeterminacy On The All Possible Connections of Cells In 1833
Front of Cancer’s Attacks In The Terms of Neutrosophic Failed 1834
SuperHyperClique on Cancer’s Recognition called Neutrosophic 1835
SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.15897.70243). 1836
216. Henry Garrett,“Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique Decides the Failures on the 1837
Cancer’s Recognition in the Perfect Connections of Cancer’s Attacks By 1838
SuperHyperModels Named (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 1839
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.32530.73922). 1840
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 1842
2023010105 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 1843
218. Henry Garrett,“Perfect Directions Toward Idealism in Cancer’s Neutrosophic 1844
Recognition Forwarding Neutrosophic SuperHyperClique on Neutrosophic 1845
219. Henry Garrett,“Demonstrating Complete Connections in Every Embedded 1847
Regions and Sub-Regions in the Terms of Cancer’s Recognition and 1848
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClique”, 1849
10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 1854
10.20944/preprints202301.0088.v1). 1858
222. Henry Garrett,“Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic Regions titled 1859
neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable in Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition 1860
modeled in the Form of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2023, 1861
(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.17385.36968). 1862
Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond ”, Preprints 2023, 2023010044 1865
Well- SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 1867
2023010043 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0043.v1). 1868
225. Henry Garrett, “Using the Tool As (Neutrosophic) Failed SuperHyperStable To 1869
SuperHyperModel Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) 1870
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In 1873
Special ViewPoints”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.11447.80803). 1874
Well-SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 1876
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.35774.77123). 1877
Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond ”, ResearchGate 2022, (doi: 1880
10.13140/RG.2.2.36141.77287). 1881
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2022, (doi: 1883
10.13140/RG.2.2.29430.88642). 1884
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2022, (doi: 1887
10.13140/RG.2.2.11369.16487). 1888
Featuring (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances”, Preprints 1890
2022, 2022120549 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0549.v1). 1891
Featuring (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances”, 1893
Recognitions And Related (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClasses”, Preprints 2022, 1898
2022120540 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0540.v1). 1899
Recognitions And Related (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClasses”, ResearchGate 1903
2022, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.14426.41923). 1904
Preprints 2022, 2022120500 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0500.v1). 1907
ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.20993.12640). 1910
237. Henry Garrett,“Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on 1911
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs and SuperHyperGraphs Alongside Applications 1912
in Cancer’s Treatments”, Preprints 2022, 2022120324 (doi: 1913
10.20944/preprints202212.0324.v1). 1914
238. Henry Garrett, “Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on 1915
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs And SuperHyperGraphs Alongside Applications 1916
in Cancer’s Treatments”, ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 1917
10.13140/RG.2.2.23123.04641). 1918
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”, Preprints 2022, 2022110576 (doi: 1921
10.20944/preprints202211.0576.v1). 1922
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”, ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 1925
10.13140/RG.2.2.23324.56966). 1926
241. Henry Garrett, “Basic Neutrosophic Notions Concerning SuperHyperDominating 1927
and Neutrosophic SuperHyperResolving in SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 1928
2022 (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.29173.86244). 1929
242. Henry Garrett, “Initial Material of Neutrosophic Preliminaries to Study Some 1930
Neutrosophic Notions Based on Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) in 1931
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)”, ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 1932
10.13140/RG.2.2.25385.88160). 1933
243. Henry Garrett, “Equal Connective Domination In Neutrosophic 1934
SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8201378). 1935
244. Henry Garrett, “Connective Domination In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. 1936
Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8194003). 1937
245. Henry Garrett, “Domination In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 1938
Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8113416). 1939
246. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperPerfect Search In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 1940
247. Henry Garrett, “Reverse Strict Dimension Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. 1942
248. Henry Garrett, “Unequal Dimension Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1944
Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8090194). 1945
249. Henry Garrett, “Strict Dimension Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1946
250. Henry Garrett, “Reverse Strict Connective In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 1948
251. Henry Garrett, “Unequal Connective Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1950
252. Henry Garrett, “Strict Connective Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1952
253. Henry Garrett, “Reverse Dimension Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1954
254. Henry Garrett, “Equal Dimension Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1956
255. Henry Garrett, “Dimension Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 1958
256. Henry Garrett, “Reverse Connective Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1960
257. Henry Garrett, “Equal Connective Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1962
258. Henry Garrett, “Connective Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 1964
259. Henry Garrett, “United Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 1966
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8027488). 1967
260. Henry Garrett, “Zero Forcing In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 1968
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8020181). 1969
261. Henry Garrett, “Matrix-Based In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 1970
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7978921). 1971
262. Henry Garrett, “Collections of Math II”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 1972
10.5281/zenodo.7943878). 1973
263. Henry Garrett, “Dominating-Edges In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 1974
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7943871). 1975
264. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Gap In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 1976
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7923786). 1977
265. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1978
266. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. 1980
267. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 1982
268. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Cycle-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 1984
269. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Cycle-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1986
270. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Cycle-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 1988
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7854561). 1989
271. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Path-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1990
272. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Path-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1992
273. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Path-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 1994
274. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Path-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 1996
275. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Path-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1998
276. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Path-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2000
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7812750). 2001
277. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2002
278. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. 2004
279. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2006
280. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Cycle-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2008
281. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Cycle-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2010
282. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Cycle-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2012
283. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2014
284. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2016
285. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2018
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7783791). 2019
286. Henry Garrett, “Trace-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2020
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7780123). 2021
287. Henry Garrett, “Trace-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2022
288. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDuality”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2024
10.5281/zenodo.7637762). 2025
289. Henry Garrett, “Trace-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2026
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7766174). 2027
290. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2028
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7762232). 2029
291. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2030
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7758601). 2031
292. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2032
10.5281/zenodo.7754661). 2033
293. Henry Garrett, “Vertex-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2034
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7750995) . 2035
294. Henry Garrett, “Vertex-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2036
295. Henry Garrett, “Vertex-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2038
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7747236). 2039
296. Henry Garrett, “Stable-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2040
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7742587). 2041
297. Henry Garrett, “Stable-Decompositions In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2042
298. Henry Garrett, “Stable-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2044
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7734719). 2045
299. Henry Garrett, “Clique-Neighbors In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2046
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7730484). 2047
300. Henry Garrett, “Clique-Decompositions In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2048
301. Henry Garrett, “Clique-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2050
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7722865). 2051
302. Henry Garrett, “Space In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2052
10.5281/zenodo.7713563). 2053
303. Henry Garrett, “Space In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2054
10.5281/zenodo.7709116). 2055
304. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Connectivity In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2056
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7706415). 2057
305. Henry Garrett, “Vertex-Connectivity In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2058
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7706063). 2059
306. Henry Garrett, “Tree-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2060
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7701906). 2061
307. Henry Garrett, “Chord In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2062
10.5281/zenodo.7700205). 2063
308. Henry Garrett, “(i,j)-Domination In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2064
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7694876). 2065
309. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Domination In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2066
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7679410). 2067
310. Henry Garrett, “K-Domination In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2068
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7675982). 2069
311. Henry Garrett, “K-Number In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2070
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7672388). 2071
312. Henry Garrett, “Order In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2072
10.5281/zenodo.7668648). 2073
313. Henry Garrett, “Coloring In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2074
10.5281/zenodo.7662810). 2075
314. Henry Garrett, “Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2076
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7659162). 2077
315. Henry Garrett, “Cancer In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2078
10.5281/zenodo.7653233). 2079
316. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperWheel ”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2080
10.5281/zenodo.7653204). 2081
317. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperMultipartite”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2082
10.5281/zenodo.7653142). 2083
318. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperBipartite”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2084
10.5281/zenodo.7653117). 2085
319. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperStar ”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2086
10.5281/zenodo.7653089). 2087
320. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2088
10.5281/zenodo.7651687). 2089
321. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperPath”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2090
10.5281/zenodo.7651619). 2091
322. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDomination”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2092
10.5281/zenodo.7651439). 2093
323. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDominating”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2094
10.5281/zenodo.7650729). 2095
324. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperConnected ”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2096
10.5281/zenodo.7647868). 2097
325. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperTotal ”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2098
10.5281/zenodo.7647017). 2099
326. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperPerfect”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2100
10.5281/zenodo.7644894). 2101
327. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperJoin”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2102
10.5281/zenodo.7641880). 2103
328. Henry Garrett, “Path SuperHyperColoring”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2104
10.5281/zenodo.7632923). 2105
329. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDensity”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2106
10.5281/zenodo.7623459). 2107
330. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2108
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7606416). 2109
331. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperConnectivities”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2110
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7606416). 2111
332. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperConnectivities”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2112
10.5281/zenodo.7606404). 2113
333. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2114
10.5281/zenodo.7580018). 2115
334. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2116
10.5281/zenodo.7580018). 2117
335. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2118
10.5281/zenodo.7580018). 2119
336. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2120
10.5281/zenodo.7579929). 2121
337. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2122
10.5281/zenodo.7563170). 2123
338. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2124
10.5281/zenodo.7563164). 2125
339. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2126
10.5281/zenodo.7563160). 2127
340. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2128
10.5281/zenodo.7563160). 2129
341. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2130
10.5281/zenodo.7563160). 2131
342. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2132
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7557063). 2133
343. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperMatching”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2134
10.5281/zenodo.7557009). 2135
344. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperMatching”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2136
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7539484). 2137
345. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2138
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7523390). 2139
346. Henry Garrett, “Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2140
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7523390). 2141
347. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On Failed SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2142
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7523390). 2143
348. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2144
10.5281/zenodo.7574952). 2145
349. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2146
10.5281/zenodo.7574992). 2147
350. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2148
10.5281/zenodo.7523357). 2149
351. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2150
10.5281/zenodo.7523357). 2151
352. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2152
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7504782). 2153
353. Henry Garrett, “Extreme Failed SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2154
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7504782). 2155
354. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On Failed SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2156
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7504782). 2157
355. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2158
10.5281/zenodo.7499395). 2159
356. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2160
10.5281/zenodo.7499395). 2161
357. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2162
10.5281/zenodo.7499395). 2163
358. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2164
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7497450). 2165
359. Henry Garrett, “Extreme Failed SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2166
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7497450). 2167
360. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2168
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7494862). 2169
361. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2170
10.5281/zenodo.7494862). 2171
362. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2172
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7494862). 2173
363. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperAlliances”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2174
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7493845). 2175
364. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperAlliances”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2176
10.5281/zenodo.7493845). 2177
365. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperAlliances”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2178
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7493845). 2179
366. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperMatching”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2180
10.5281/zenodo.7539484). 2181
367. Henry Garrett, “Failed SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2182
10.5281/zenodo.7523390). 2183
368. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2184
10.5281/zenodo.7523357). 2185
369. Henry Garrett, “Failed SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2186
10.5281/zenodo.7504782). 2187
370. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2188
10.5281/zenodo.7499395). 2189
371. Henry Garrett, “Failed SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2190
10.5281/zenodo.7497450). 2191
372. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2192
10.5281/zenodo.7494862). 2193
373. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperAlliances”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2194
10.5281/zenodo.7493845). 2195
374. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2196
10.5281/zenodo.7480110). 2197
375. Henry Garrett, “Neut. SuperHyperEdges”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2198
10.5281/zenodo.7378758). 2199
376. Henry Garrett, “Beyond Neutrosophic Graphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2200
10.5281/zenodo.6320305). 2201
377. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Duality”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2202
10.5281/zenodo.6677173). 2203
View publication stats

New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle by REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION As Hyper Decoration On Super Density

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle by REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION As Hyper Decoration On Super Density

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph With

Preprint · August 2023

539 PUBLICATIONS 27,627 CITATIONS

Metric Dimension in fuzzy(neutrosophic) Graphs View project

On Algebraic Structures and Algebraic Hyperstructures View project

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 2

SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By 3

REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION As Hyper 4

Decoration On Super Density 5

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · 7

DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA 8

In this scientific research, (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic 10

SuperHyperREVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 11

(NSHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet 12

V 0 = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then V 0 is called Neutrosophic SuperHyperREVERSE CONNECTIVE 13

DOMINATION if the following expressions, terms and statements is called Neutrosophic 14

SuperHyperREVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION criteria holds. 15

SuperHyperNotions, namely a REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION and a 17

Neutrosophic REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION. Two different 18

SuperHyperNotion, SuperHyperUniform, and SuperHyperClass are well-defined and 20

well-reviewed based on them. Literature review is implemented throughout this research. 21

SuperHyperNotion with other SuperHyperNotions and basic SuperHyperNumbers is 23

presented. Definitions are followed by examples and examples, so clarifications are 24

officially called “SuperHyperEdge”. “SuperHyperGraph” and “Neutrosophic 31

SuperHyperGraph” frameworks are selected and selected for research on “Cancer 32

questions and problems. It is useful to define a “neutrosophic” version of REVERSE 36

REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION becomes more understandable. In order to 38

master the Neutrosophic REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION, there is a need to 39

“re-define” the concept of “REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION mastery”. 40

SuperHyperVertices and SuperHyperEdges are assigned by alphabetical labels. In this 41

method, the position of tags is used to assign values. Suppose a REVERSE 42

CONNECTIVE DOMINATION. If the specified table contains “values of vertices, 43

supervertices, edges, hyperedges, and hyperedges belonging to Neutrosophic 44

SuperHyperGraph” with key points, it is redefined. ”values of vertices & number of 45

positions in alphabet”, ”Values of SuperVertices&maximum values of its vertices”, 46

and structural examples, I would like to introduce the next SuperHyperClass 49

SuperHyperGraph based on REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION. This is the 50

would be disciplined. If there is a need to have all REVERSE CONNECTIVE 52

DOMINATION until REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION, then it is officially 53

called “REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION”, but otherwise, it is not REVERSE 54

CONNECTIVE DOMINATION. There is some explanation for the original definition 55

titled “REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION”. These two examples are further 56

explored and distinguished because they are characterized in the SuperHyperClass 57

disciplinary methods based on a dominant REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION. 58

Because of having REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION, there is a need to 59

“re-define” the concept of “neutrosophic REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION” 60

and “neutrosophic REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION”. SuperHyperVertices 61

of tags is used to assign values. Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. 63

“Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” is redefined if the desired table exists. And if the 64

desired table exists, a REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION is redefined to a 65

“Neutrosophic REVERSE CONNECTIVE DOMINATION”. It is useful to define a 66

“Neutrosophic” version of SuperHyperClasses. Since there are more ways to obtain 67

Neutrosophic type results, a SuperHyper- Neutrosophic REVERSE CONNECTIVE 68

DOMINATION becomes more understandable. Consider a Neutrosophic 69

SuperHyperGraph. If the desired table exists, there are a number of Neutrosophic 70

SuperHyperClasses. So are SuperHyperPath, SuperHyperCycle, SuperHyperStar, 71

SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultiPartite and SuperHyperWheel. ”Neutrosophic 72

SuperHyperPath”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar”, 73

“Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultiPartite” and 74

“Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel”. A graph is SuperHyperUniform if it is a 75

SuperHyperGraph and the number of SuperHyperEdges elements is the same. Consider 76