New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel by Strongly Resolving Sequence As Hyper Decoration On Super Density

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.
net/publication/377326386
New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph With

Star and Wheel By Strongly Resolving Sequence As Hyper Decoration On Super
Density
Preprint · January 2024

DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.17389.97769
CITATIONS
1 author:
Henry Garrett
557 PUBLICATIONS 28,726 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Henry Garrett on 11 January 2024.
The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 2
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By Strongly 3
Resolving Sequence As Hyper Decoration On Super Density 4
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · 6
DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA 7
1 ABSTRACT 8
In this scientific research, (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic 9
SuperHyperStrongly Resolving Sequence). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S be 10
a pair S = (V, E). Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then 11
V 0 is called Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Resolving Sequence if the following expressions, 12
terms and statements is called Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Resolving Sequence criteria 13
holds. 14
X X X
|( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 Vi ∈V 0 Vi ∈V 0
X X X
= min
00 ⊆V
|{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V N SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
∀Vb , Vc ∈ VN SHG \ V , ∃Va ∈ V 00 :

00
d(TV (Va , Vb )) 6= d(TV (Va , Vc )),

d(IV (Va , Vb )) 6= d(IV (Va , Vc )),
and d(FV (Va , Vb )) 6= d(FV (Va , Vc )),
then Vb , Vc ∈ V 00 , until V 00 = VN SHG }
In this scientific research, new configurations are introduced for the new 15
SuperHyperNotions, namely a Strongly Resolving Sequence and a Neutrosophic 16
Strongly Resolving Sequence. Two different SuperHyperDefinitions were started for 17
them, but research has progressed and SuperHyperNotion, SuperHyperUniform, and 18
SuperHyperClass are well-defined and well-reviewed based on them. Literature review is 19
implemented throughout this research. To shine the light and importance of this 20
research, a comparison between this SuperHyperNotion with other SuperHyperNotions 21
and basic SuperHyperNumbers is presented. Definitions are followed by examples and 22
examples, so clarifications are guided by various tools. Applications are designed to 23
understand the theoretical aspect of this ongoing research. “Cancer diagnosis” are the 24
things that are being researched to explore the challenges that make sense in ongoing 25
research and future research. It is a special case. Cells are viewed in the intended 26
manner. There are different types of them. Some are individual and some are well 27
modeled by groups of cells. All these types are officially called “SuperHyperVertex”, but 28
the relationships between them all are officially called “SuperHyperEdge”. 29
“SuperHyperGraph” and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” frameworks are selected and 30
selected for research on “Cancer Diagnosis”. Thus, these complex and dense 31
super-hypermodels open avenues for research on theoretical aspects and “cancer 32
diagnosis”. Ways to pursue this scientific research have been considered. It has also 33
been formally collected in the form of several questions and problems. It is useful to 34
define a “neutrosophic” version of Strongly Resolving Sequence. Since there are more 35
ways to get type results a Strongly Resolving Sequence becomes more understandable. 36
In order to master the Neutrosophic Strongly Resolving Sequence, there is a need to 37
“re-define” the concept of “Strongly Resolving Sequence mastery”. SuperHyperVertices 38
and SuperHyperEdges are assigned by alphabetical labels. In this method, the position 39
of tags is used to assign values. Suppose a Strongly Resolving Sequence. If the specified 40
table contains “values of vertices, supervertices, edges, hyperedges, and hyperedges 41
belonging to Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” with key points, it is redefined. ”values 42
of vertices & number of positions in alphabet”, ”Values of SuperVertices&maximum 43
values of its vertices”, ”values of edges&maximum values of its vertices”, ”super edge 44
values&max values of its vertices”, “super edge values” and maximum values of its 45
endpoints”. To get examples and structural examples, I would like to introduce the next 46
SuperHyperClass SuperHyperGraph based on Strongly Resolving Sequence. This is the 47
original. Having the foundation of the previous definition in the SuperHyperClass type 48
would be disciplined. If there is a need to have all Strongly Resolving Sequence until 49
Strongly Resolving Sequence, then it is officially called “Strongly Resolving Sequence”, 50
but otherwise, it is not Strongly Resolving Sequence. There is some explanation for the 51
original definition titled “Strongly Resolving Sequence”. These two examples are further 52
explored and distinguished because they are characterized in the SuperHyperClass 53
disciplinary methods based on a dominant Strongly Resolving Sequence. Because of 54
having Strongly Resolving Sequence, there is a need to “re-define” the concept of 55
“neutrosophic Strongly Resolving Sequence” and “neutrosophic Strongly Resolving 56
Sequence”. SuperHyperVertices and SuperHyperEdges are assigned by alphabetical 57
labels. In this method, the position of tags is used to assign values. Consider a 58
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” is redefined if the 59
desired table exists. And if the desired table exists, a Strongly Resolving Sequence is 60
redefined to a “Neutrosophic Strongly Resolving Sequence”. It is useful to define a 61
“Neutrosophic” version of SuperHyperClasses. Since there are more ways to obtain 62
Neutrosophic type results, a SuperHyper- Neutrosophic Strongly Resolving Sequence 63
becomes more understandable. Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. If the 64
desired table exists, there are a number of Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses. So are 65
SuperHyperPath, SuperHyperCycle, SuperHyperStar, SuperHyperBipartite, 66
SuperHyperMultiPartite and SuperHyperWheel. ”Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath”, 67
“Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar”, “Neutrosophic 68
SuperHyperBipartite”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultiPartite” and “Neutrosophic 69
SuperHyperWheel”. A graph is SuperHyperUniform if it is a SuperHyperGraph and the 70
number of SuperHyperEdges elements is the same. Consider a Neutrosophic 71
SuperHyperGraph. There are a number of SuperHyperClasses as follows. It is a 72
SuperHyperPath if there is only one SuperVertex as an intersection between two given 73
SuperHyperEdges with two exceptions. If only one SuperVertex is given as an 74
intersection between two SuperHyperEdges, it is SuperHyperCycle. It is 75
SuperHyperStar and only one SuperVertex as intersection among all SuperHyperEdges. 76
It is SuperHyperBipartite, and only one SuperVertex is given as the intersection between 77
two SuperHyperEdges, and these SuperVertices, which form two distinct sets, have no 78
SuperHyperEdge in common. This is SuperHyperMultiPartite. Only one SuperVertex is 79
given as an intersection between two SuperHyperEdges, and these SuperVertices, which 80
form separate multisets, have no SuperHyperEdge in common. If only one 81
SuperHyperEdge among the given two SuperHyperEdges is a SuperHyperWheel and a 82
SuperVertex has a SuperHyperEdge with any regular SuperVertex. SuperHyperModel 83
suggests specific designs and specific architectures. SuperHyperModel is officially called 84
“SuperHyperGraph” and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”. In this SuperHyperModel, 85
the “special” cells and the “special group” of cells are SuperHyperModeled as 86
“SuperHyperVertices” and the common and desired properties between the “special” 87
cells and the “special group” of cells. SuperHyperModeled as “SuperHyperEdges”. 88
Sometimes, to have a more accurate SuperHyperModel, it is useful to have some degree 89
of determinism, uncertainty, and neutrality, in this case the SuperHyperModel is called 90
“Neutrosophic”. In future scientific research, the foundation will be based on “diagnosis 91
of cancer” and the results and definitions will be introduced in redeemed methods. 92
Cancer diagnosis in long-term practice. The specific region is assigned by the model 93
(called SuperHyperGraph) and the long cycle of movement of the cancer is determined 94
by this scientific research. Sometimes the movement of cancer is not easy to detect, 95
because there is certainty, uncertainty and neutrality about the movements and effects 96
of cancer on that area. This event leads us to choose another model [which is said to be 97
the Neutrosophic superhypergraph] in order to have a proper understanding of what 98
happened and was done. There are some specific models, which are well known and 99
have names, and some SuperHyperGeneral SuperHyperModels. The movements and 100
effects of cancer in complex pathways and between complex groups of cells can be 101
visualized with a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (-/SuperHyperCycle, SuperHyperStar, 102
SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, SuperHyperWheel). The goal is to find 103
the longest Strongly Resolving Sequence or the strongest Strongly Resolving Sequence 104
in those Neutrosophic SuperHyperModels. Some general results are presented for the 105
longest Strongly Resolving Sequence called Strongly Resolving Sequence and the 106
strongest Strongly Resolving Sequence called Neutrosophic Strongly Resolving Sequence. 107
Beyond that in SuperHyperStar, all possible SuperHyperPaths have only two 108
SuperHyperEdges, but it is not enough as having at least three SuperHyperEdges is 109
necessary to form any style of cycle. There is no form of any cycle, but literally, it is the 110
transformation of any cycle. It literally transforms and does not form. A basic 111
introduction to the theory of Strongly Resolving Sequence Neutrosophic, 112
SuperHyperGraphs and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs is suggested. 113
Keywords: Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, SuperHyperStrongly Resolving Sequence, 114
Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition 115
AMS Subject Classification: 05C17, 05C22, 05E45 116
2 Applied Notions Under The Scrutiny Of The 117
Motivation Of This Scientific Research 118
In this scientific research, there are ideas in the prominent frameworks of motivations. I 119
try to bring motivations in narrative ways. Some Cells have faced attacks from the 120
established situation with cancer attacks in this case, there is some analysis embedded 121
in the case current situations where cells can be labeled as some groups and some 122
groups or individuals are overlabeled, all from behaviors to overcome cancer attacks. In 123
embedded situations, cell individuals and cell groups can be considered as “new groups”. 124
So it encourages us to find suitable SuperHyperModels for more appropriate analysis 125
about this dirty story. I found SuperHyperModels, officially called “SuperHyperGraphs” 126
and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. In this SuperHyperModel, cells and groups of 127
cells are defined as “SuperHyperVertices” and relationships between individual cells and 128
groups of cells are defined as “SuperHyperEdges”. So this is another motivation for us 129
to do research on this SuperHyperModel based on “cancer diagnosis”. Sometimes, 130
things get worse. The situation has passed certainty and precise style. So it is beyond 131
them. There are three descriptions, i.e., degrees of determination, uncertainty, and 132
neutrality, for any object based on ambiguous forms, i.e., incomplete data, imprecise 133
data, and uncertain analysis. The second model can be considered in the previous 134
SuperHyperModel. This is SuperHyperModel. This is SuperHyperGraph but officially 135
called “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. Cancer is a disease, but the model is 136
supposed to understand what happens in this phenomenon. The special case of this 137
disease is considered and some parameters are used as consequences of the model. Cells 138
are attacked by the disease, but the movement of cancer is in a specific area. Knowing 139
the mind of cancer can help to find some cures for this disease. SuperHyperGraph and 140
Neutrosophic Super-HyperGraph are super-hypermodels used in “cancer diagnosis” and 141
both are the foundation of the background of this scientific research. Sometimes cancer 142
has occurred in an area full of cells, cell groups, and embedded styles. In this section, 143
SuperHyperModel proposes based on the links of cancer movements in the form of unity 144
styles with the formation of design and architecture officially called “Strongly Resolving 145
Sequence”, in the themes of specialized terms and common words. Particle for direct 146
object. Applied concepts under the investigation of the motivation of this scientific 147
research. The “SuperHyper” prefix refers to the theme of embedded styles for 148
background discovery for SuperHyperNotions. Cancer diagnosis in long-term practice. 149
The specific region is assigned by the model (called SuperHyperGraph) and the long 150
cycle of movement of the cancer is determined by this scientific research. Sometimes the 151
movement of Cancer is not easy to identify because there is certainty, uncertainty and 152
neutrality about the movements and effects of Cancer in that region. This event leads 153
us to choose another model [said to be Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph]. Easy 154
understanding of what happened and what was done. There are some specific models 155
that are well known and named and some general models. The movements and effects 156
of cancer in complex pathways and between complex groups of cells can be visualized by 157
a neurosophic superhyperpath (-/SuperHyperCycle, SuperHyperStar, 158
SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, SuperHyperWheel). The goal is to find 159
Strongly Resolving Sequence or Neutrosophic Strongly Resolving Sequence for 160
SuperHyperModels in it. Some general results are presented. Beyond that in 161
SuperHyperStar, all possible Neutrosophic SuperHyperPaths have only two 162
SuperHyperEdges, but it is not enough as having at least three SuperHyperEdges is 163
necessary to form any style of cycle. There is no form of cycle, but it is literally a form 164
of any cycle. It literally transforms and does not form. 165
Question 2.1. How to define “SuperHyperNotions and to do research” to find the 166
“Strongly Resolving Sequence Rate” of any cell or groups of cells based on fixed cell or 167
fixed group of cells broadly, “Strongly Resolving Sequence Rate” based on fixed groups or 168
fixed cells. Groups of groups of cells? 169
Question 2.2. What are the best descriptions for “diagnosing cancer” in terms of 170
these chaotic and dense super-hypermodels in which embedded concepts are depicted? 171
This motivation to find concepts to use in this dense model is called 172
“SuperHyperGraphs”. So it motivates us to define different types of “Strongly Resolving 173
Sequence” and “neutrosophic Strongly Resolving Sequence” over “superhypergraph” 174
and “neutrosophic superhypergraph”. Then this scientific research has taken more 175
motivations to define SuperHyperClasses and find some connections among this 176
SuperHyperNotion with other SuperHyperNotions. It motivates us to obtain examples 177
and examples to clarify the framework of this scientific research. The general results 178
and some of the results about some of the connections are the ways that the key point 179
of this scientific research, “diagnosis of cancer” is more understandable and clear. 180
The framework of this research is as follows. First, I will introduce the basic 181
definitions to clarify the basics. In the “Introductions” subsection, basic definitions 182
about SuperHyperGraphs and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph are introduced and 183
discussed in depth. Basic concepts are thoroughly explained and illustrated, and 184
sometimes a literature review is used to make sense of what is to come in the coming 185
sections. The main definitions and their explanations, along with some results on the 186
new concepts, Strongly Resolving Sequence and Neutrosophic Strongly Resolving 187
Sequence, are specified in the sections “Strongly Resolving Sequence” and 188
“Neutrosophic Strongly Resolving Sequence”. In the concept of dealing with results and 189
in Strongly Resolving Sequence to create logic about the continuation of the scientific 190
research, the ideas of SuperHyperUniform and Neutrosophic SuperHyperUniform are 191
introduced and as their consequences, the corresponding SuperHyperClasses are 192
specified to summarize the work done in this section, as “Results on SuperHyperClasses” 193
and “Results on Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”. Going back to the core concepts, 194
clever steps towards common concepts to extend new concepts in new frameworks, 195
SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, in “Results on 196
SuperHyperClasses” and “Results on Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses” sections. There 197
is the initial scientific research on supergeneral relations and as the final and final part 198
of the theoretical scientific research is available in the section “General results”. Some 199
general SuperHyperRelations are fundamental and are known as fundamental 200
SuperHyperNotions, as in “General results” were extracted and discussed. “Strongly 201
Resolving Sequence”, “Neutrosophic Strongly Resolving Sequence”, “Results on 202
SuperHyperClasses” and “Results on Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”. There are 203
curious questions about what has been done about SuperHyperNotions to make sense of 204
the superiority of this scientific research and to discover the word “best” as a description 205
and adjective of this scientific research as presented in the “Strongly Resolving 206
Sequence” section. The keyword of this scientific research was presented in the section 207
“Applications in cancer diagnosis” with two cases and sub-sections “Case 1: Initial steps 208
towards SuperHyperBipartite as SuperHyperModel” and “Case 2: Incremental steps 209
towards SuperHyperMultiperdel as SuperHyper. In the “open issues” section, there is a 210
detailed examination and recognition of what was done in this scientific research and 211
what happened in this scientific research in the form of “questions” and “issues” in 212
order to understand this scientific research in an outstanding style, the advantages and 213
limitations of this scientific research in addition to What has been done in this scientific 214
research is stated in the “conclusion and final remarks” section. 215
3 Neutrosophic Preliminaries Of This Scientific 216
Research On the Redeemed Ways 217
In this section, the basic material in this scientific research, is referred to [Single Valued 218
Neutrosophic Set](Ref. [1],Definition 2.2,p.2), [Neutrosophic Set](Ref. [1],Definition 219
2.1,p.1), [Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)](Ref. [1],Definition 2.5,p.2), 220
[Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)](Ref. [1],Definition 221
2.7,p.3), [t-norm](Ref. [1], Definition 2.7, p.3), and [Characterization of the 222
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)](Ref. [1],Definition 2.7,p.3), [Neutrosophic 223
Strength of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPaths] (Ref. [1],Definition 5.3,p.7), and 224
[Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)] 225
(Ref. [1],Definition 5.4,p.7). Also, the new ideas and their clarifications are addressed 226
to Ref. [1]. 227
In this subsection, the basic material which is used in this scientific research, is 228
presented. Also, the new ideas and their clarifications are elicited. 229
Definition 3.1 (Neutrosophic Set). (Ref. [1],Definition 2.1,p.1). 230
Let X be a Eulerian-Path-Cut of points (objects) with generic elements in X denoted by

x; then the Neutrosophic set A (NS A) is an object having the form
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}

+
where the functions T, I, F : X →]− 0, 1 [ define respectively the a
truth-membership function, an indeterminacy-membership function, and a
falsity-membership function of the element x ∈ X to the set A with the condition

−
0 ≤ TA (x) + IA (x) + FA (x) ≤ 3+ .
The functions TA (x), IA (x) and FA (x) are real standard or nonstandard subsets of 231
+
]− 0, 1 [. 232
Definition 3.2 (Single Valued Neutrosophic Set). (Ref. [1],Definition 2.2,p.2). 233
Let X be a Eulerian-Path-Cut of points (objects) with generic elements in X denoted by

x. A single valued Neutrosophic set A (SVNS A) is characterized by
truth-membership function TA (x), an indeterminacy-membership function IA (x), and a
falsity-membership function FA (x). For each point x in X, TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) ∈ [0, 1].
A SVNS A can be written as
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}.
Definition 3.3. The degree of truth-membership,
indeterminacy-membership and falsity-membership of the subset X ⊂ A of
the single valued Neutrosophic set A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}:
TA (X) = min[TA (vi ), TA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,
IA (X) = min[IA (vi ), IA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,
and FA (X) = min[FA (vi ), FA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X .
Definition 3.4. The support of X ⊂ A of the single valued Neutrosophic set
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}:
supp(X) = {x ∈ X : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) > 0}.
Definition 3.5 (Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). (Ref. [1],Definition 234
2.5,p.2). 235
Assume V 0 is a given set. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a 236
pair S = (V, E), where 237
(i) V = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vn } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of V 0 ; 238
(ii) V = {(Vi , TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi )) : TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi ) ≥ 0}, (i = 239
1, 2, . . . , n); 240
(iii) E = {E1 , E2 , . . . , En0 } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of 241
V; 242
(iv) E = {(Ei0 , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )) : TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 ) ≥ 0}, (i0 = 243
1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 244
(v) Vi 6= ∅, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 245
0 0
(vi) Ei0 6= ∅, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n ); 246
P
(vii) i supp(Vi ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 247
0 0
P
(viii) i0 supp(Ei ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n );
0 248
(ix) and the following conditions hold:

TV0 (Ei0 ) ≤ min[TV 0 (Vi ), TV 0 (Vj )]Vi ,Vj ∈Ei0 ,
IV0 (Ei0 ) ≤ min[IV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vj )]Vi ,Vj ∈Ei0 ,
and FV0 (Ei0 ) ≤ min[FV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vj )]Vi ,Vj ∈Ei0
where i0 = 1, 2, . . . , n0 . 249
Figure 1. The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a illustrated SuperHyperModeling

on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Here the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ej 0 and the Neutrosophic 250
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) Vj are single valued Neutrosophic sets. TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), 251
and FV 0 (Vi ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 252
indeterminacy-membership and the degree of falsity-membership the Neutrosophic 253
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) V. 254
TV0 (Ei0 ), TV0 (Ei0 ), and TV0 (Ei0 ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 255
indeterminacy-membership and the degree of falsity-membership of the Neutrosophic 256
SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) Ei0 to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) E. Thus, 257
the ii0 th element of the incidence matrix of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) 258
are of the form (Vi , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )), the sets V and E are crisp sets. 259
Example 3.6. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair 260
S = (V, E) in the mentioned Neutrosophic Figures in every Neutrosophic items. 261
• On the Figure (1), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 262
notion, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. E1 263
and E3 are some empty Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges but E2 is a loop 264
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge and E4 is a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. Thus 265
in the terms of Neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only one Neutrosophic 266
SuperHyperEdge, namely, E4 . The Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 is 267
Neutrosophic isolated means that there’s no Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge has it 268
as a Neutrosophic endpoint. 269
notion, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 271
E1 , E2 and E3 are some empty Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges but E4 is a 272
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. Thus in the terms of Neutrosophic 273
SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only one Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge, namely, 274
E4 . The Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 is Neutrosophic isolated means that 275
there’s no Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge has it as a Neutrosophic endpoint. 276
• On the Figure (3), the SuperHyperNotion, namely, SuperHyperGirth, is up. 277
E1 , E2 and E3 are some empty SuperHyperEdges but E4 is a SuperHyperEdge. 278
Thus in the terms of SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only one SuperHyperEdge, 279
namely, E4 . 280
Figure 2. TThe Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a illustrated SuperHyperModel-

ing on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 3. The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a illustrated SuperHyperModeling

on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 4. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a illustrated Super-

HyperModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
• On the Figure (4), there’s no empty SuperHyperEdge but E3 are a loop 281
SuperHyperEdge on {F } and there are some SuperHyperEdges, namely, E1 on 282
{H, V1 , V3 }, alongside E2 on {O, H, V4 , V3 } and E4 , E5 on {N, V1 , V2 , V3 , F }. 283
• On the Figure (5),there’s neither empty SuperHyperEdge nor loop 284
SuperHyperEdge. 285
• On the Figure (6), there’s neither empty SuperHyperEdge nor loop 286
SuperHyperEdge. 287
SuperHyperEdge. 289
SuperHyperEdge. 291
SuperHyperEdge. 293
SuperHyperEdge. 295
SuperHyperEdge. 297
SuperHyperEdge. 299
SuperHyperEdge. 301
SuperHyperEdge. 303
SuperHyperEdge. 305
Figure 5. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs mentioned as the SuperHy-

perModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 6. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a illustrated Super-

HyperModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 7. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs depicted SuperHyperMod-

eling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 8. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with dense SuperHyper-

Modeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 9. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a messy SuperHyper-

Modeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 10. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with highly-embedding-

connected SuperHyperModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example
(3.6)
Figure 11. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a SuperHyperModel-

Figure 12. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with highly-multiple-

connected-style SuperHyperModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic
Example (3.6)


Figure 15. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with Linearly-Connected

SuperHyperModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)

Figure 17. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a Linearly-over-

packed SuperHyperModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example
(3.6)
SuperHyperEdge. 307
SuperHyperEdge. 309
SuperHyperEdge. 311
SuperHyperEdge. 313
SuperHyperEdge. 315
SuperHyperEdge. 317
SuperHyperEdge. 319
Definition 3.7 (Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). 320
(Ref. [1],Definition 2.7,p.3). 321
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). The 322
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ei0 and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 323
(NSHV) Vi of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S = (V, E) could be 324
characterized as follow-up items. 325
(i) If |Vi | = 1, then Vi is called vertex; 326
(ii) if |Vi | ≥ 1, then Vi is called SuperVertex; 327





(iii) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called edge; 328
(iv) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 329
HyperEdge; 330
(v) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called 331
SuperEdge; 332
(vi) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 333
SuperHyperEdge. 334
If we choose different types of binary operations, then we could get hugely diverse 335
types of general forms of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG). 336
Definition 3.8 (t-norm). (Ref. [1], Definition 2.7, p.3). 337
A binary operation ⊗ : [0, 1] × [0, 1] → [0, 1] is a t-norm if it satisfies the following 338
for x, y, z, w ∈ [0, 1]: 339
(i) 1 ⊗ x = x; 340
(ii) x ⊗ y = y ⊗ x; 341
(iii) x ⊗ (y ⊗ z) = (x ⊗ y) ⊗ z; 342
(iv) If w ≤ x and y ≤ z then w ⊗ y ≤ x ⊗ z. 343
Definition 3.9. The degree of truth-membership, indeterminacy-membership

and falsity-membership of the subset X ⊂ A of the single valued Neutrosophic set
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X} (with respect to t-norm Tnorm ):
TA (X) = Tnorm [TA (vi ), TA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,
IA (X) = Tnorm [IA (vi ), IA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,

and FA (X) = Tnorm [FA (vi ), FA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X .
Definition 3.10. The support of X ⊂ A of the single valued Neutrosophic set

A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}:
supp(X) = {x ∈ X : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) > 0}.
Definition 3.11. (General Forms of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). 344
Assume V 0 is a given set. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a 345
pair S = (V, E), where 346
(i) V = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vn } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of V 0 ; 347
(ii) V = {(Vi , TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi )) : TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi ) ≥ 0}, (i = 348
1, 2, . . . , n); 349
(iii) E = {E1 , E2 , . . . , En0 } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of 350
V; 351
(iv) E = {(Ei0 , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )) : TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 ) ≥ 0}, (i0 = 352
1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 353
(v) Vi 6= ∅, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 354
(vi) Ei0 6= ∅, (i0 = 1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 355
P
(vii) i supp(Vi ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 356
0 0
P
(viii) i0 supp(Ei ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n ).
0 357
Here the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ej 0 and the Neutrosophic 358
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) Vj are single valued Neutrosophic sets. TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), 359
and FV 0 (Vi ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 360
indeterminacy-membership and the degree of falsity-membership the Neutrosophic 361
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) V. 362
TV0 (Ei0 ), TV0 (Ei0 ), and TV0 (Ei0 ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 363
indeterminacy-membership and the degree of falsity-membership of the Neutrosophic 364
SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) Ei0 to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) E. Thus, 365
the ii0 th element of the incidence matrix of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) 366
are of the form (Vi , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )), the sets V and E are crisp sets. 367
Definition 3.12 (Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). 368
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). The 370
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ei0 and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 371
(NSHV) Vi of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S = (V, E) could be 372
characterized as follow-up items. 373
(i) If |Vi | = 1, then Vi is called vertex; 374
(ii) if |Vi | ≥ 1, then Vi is called SuperVertex; 375
(iii) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called edge; 376
(iv) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 377
HyperEdge; 378
(v) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called 379
SuperEdge; 380
(vi) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 381
SuperHyperEdge. 382
This SuperHyperModel is too messy and too dense. Thus there’s a need to have 383
some restrictions and conditions on SuperHyperGraph. The special case of this 384
SuperHyperGraph makes the patterns and regularities. 385
Definition 3.13. A graph is SuperHyperUniform if it’s SuperHyperGraph and the 386
number of elements of SuperHyperEdges are the same. 387
To get more visions on SuperHyperUniform, the some SuperHyperClasses are 388
introduced. It makes to have SuperHyperUniform more understandable. 389
Definition 3.14. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. There are some 390
SuperHyperClasses as follows. 391
(i). It’s Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath if it’s only one SuperVertex as 392
intersection amid two given SuperHyperEdges with two exceptions; 393
(ii). it’s SuperHyperCycle if it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two 394
given SuperHyperEdges; 395
(iii). it’s SuperHyperStar it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid all 396
SuperHyperEdges; 397
(iv). it’s SuperHyperBipartite it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two 398
given SuperHyperEdges and these SuperVertices, forming two separate sets, has 399
no SuperHyperEdge in common; 400
(v). it’s SuperHyperMultiPartite it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid 401
two given SuperHyperEdges and these SuperVertices, forming multi separate sets, 402
has no SuperHyperEdge in common; 403
(vi). it’s SuperHyperWheel if it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two 404
given SuperHyperEdges and one SuperVertex has one SuperHyperEdge with any 405
common SuperVertex. 406
Example 3.15. In the Figure (23), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath 407
ESHP : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, in the 408
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (23), is the notion. 409
Example 3.16. In the Figure (24), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle 410
N SHC : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Neutrosophic 411
SuperHyperSet, in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (24), is up. 412
Example 3.17. In the Figure (25), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar 413
ESHS : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, 414
by the Algorithm in previous Neutrosophic result, of the Neutrosophic 415
SuperHyperVertices of the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E), in 416
the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (25), is up. 417
Example 3.18. In the Neutrosophic Figure (26), the connected Neutrosophic 418
SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), is Neutrosophic highlighted and Neutrosophic 419
featured. The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Neutrosophic Algorithm in 420
previous Neutrosophic result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected 421
Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic 422
SuperHyperModel (26), is up. 423
Figure 23. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath Associated to the Notions in the Example

(3.15)
Figure 24. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions

in the Neutrosophic Example (3.16)
Figure 25. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions in

the Neutrosophic Example (3.17)
Figure 26. Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite Neutrosophic Associated to the Neutro-

sophic Notions in the Example (3.18)
Figure 27. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite Associated to the Notions in the

Example (3.19)
Figure 28. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel Neutrosophic Associated to the Neutro-

sophic Notions in the Neutrosophic Example (3.20)
Example 3.19. In the Figure (27), the connected Neutrosophic 424
SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E), is highlighted and Neutrosophic featured. 425
The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Algorithm in previous Neutrosophic 426
result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected Neutrosophic 427
SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (27), 428
is up. 429
Example 3.20. In the Neutrosophic Figure (28), the connected Neutrosophic 430
SuperHyperWheel N SHW : (V, E), is Neutrosophic highlighted and featured. The 431
obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Algorithm in previous result, of the 432
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel 433
ESHW : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (28), is up. 434
Definition 3.21. Let a pair S = (V, E) be a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)

S. Then a sequence of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) and Neutrosophic
SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)
V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs
is called a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic 435
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) V1 to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vs if either 436
of following conditions hold: 437
(i) Vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 438
(ii) there’s a vertex vi ∈ Vi such that vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 439
(iii) there’s a SuperVertex Vi0 ∈ Vi such that Vi0 , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 440
(iv) there’s a vertex vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that Vi , vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 441
0 0
(v) there’s a SuperVertex Vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that Vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 442
(vi) there are a vertex vi ∈ Vi and a vertex vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that vi , vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 443
0 0
(vii) there are a vertex vi ∈ Vi and a SuperVertex Vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 444
(viii) there are a SuperVertex Vi0 ∈ Vi and a vertex vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that Vi0 , vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 445
(ix) there are a SuperVertex Vi0 ∈ Vi and a SuperVertex Vi+1

0
∈ Vi+1 such that 446
0 0
Vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 . 447
Definition 3.22. (Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPaths). 448
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). a

Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV)
V1 to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vs is sequence of Neutrosophic
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) and Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)
V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs ,
could be characterized as follow-up items. 449
(i) If for all Vi , Ej 0 , |Vi | = 1, |Ej 0 | = 2, then NSHP is called path; 450
(ii) if for all Ej 0 , |Ej 0 | = 2, and there’s Vi , |Vi | ≥ 1, then NSHP is called SuperPath; 451
(iii) if for all Vi , Ej 0 , |Vi | = 1, |Ej 0 | ≥ 2, then NSHP is called HyperPath; 452
(iv) if there are Vi , Ej 0 , |Vi | ≥ 1, |Ej 0 | ≥ 2, then NSHP is called Neutrosophic 453
SuperHyperPath . 454
Definition 3.23 (Neutrosophic Strength of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPaths). 455
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). A

Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV)
V1 to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vs is sequence of Neutrosophic
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) and Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)
V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs ,
have 457
(i) Neutrosophic t-strength (min{T (Vi )}, m, n)si=1 ; 458
(ii) Neutrosophic i-strength (m, min{I(Vi )}, n)si=1 ; 459
Table 1. The Values of Vertices, SuperVertices, Edges, HyperEdges, and SuperHy-

perEdges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph Mentioned in the Definition
(3.27)
The Values of The Vertices The Number of Position in Alphabet
The Values of The SuperVertices The maximum Values of Its Vertices
The Values of The Edges The maximum Values of Its Vertices
The Values of The HyperEdges The maximum Values of Its Vertices
The Values of The SuperHyperEdges The maximum Values of Its Endpoints
(iii) Neutrosophic f-strength (m, n, min{F (Vi )})si=1 ; 460
(iv) Neutrosophic strength (min{T (Vi )}, min{I(Vi )}, min{F (Vi )})si=1 . 461
Definition 3.24 (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges 462
(NSHE)). (Ref. [1],Definition 5.4,p.7). 463
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). Consider 464
a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) E = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then E is called 465
(ix) Neutrosophic t-connective if T (E) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic 466
t-strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 467
(NSHV) Vi to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vj where 1 ≤ i, j ≤ s; 468
(x) Neutrosophic i-connective if I(E) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic 469
i-strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 470
(xi) Neutrosophic f-connective if F (E) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic 472
f-strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 473
(xii) Neutrosophic connective if (T (E), I(E), F (E)) ≥ maximum number of 475
Neutrosophic strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic 476
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vj 477
where 1 ≤ i, j ≤ s. 478
For the sake of having a Neutrosophic notion, there’s a need to “redefine” the 479
notion of “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”. The SuperHyperVertices and the 480
SuperHyperEdges are assigned by the labels from the letters of the alphabets. In this 481
procedure, there’s the usage of the position of labels to assign to the values. 482
Definition 3.25. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (SHG) S is a pair 483
S = (V, E). It’s redefined Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph if the Table (1) holds. 484
It’s useful to define a “Neutrosophic” version of SuperHyperClasses. Since there’s 485
more ways to get Neutrosophic type-results to make a Neutrosophic more 486
understandable. 487
Definition 3.26. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (SHG) S is a pair 488
S = (V, E). There are some Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses if the Table (2) 489
holds. Thus Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath , notion, SuperHyperStar, 490
SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultiPartite, and SuperHyperWheel, are 491
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath, Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle, 492
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar, Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite, 493
Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultiPartite, and Neutrosophic 494
SuperHyperWheel if the Table (2) holds. 495

perEdges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, Mentioned in the Definition
(3.26)

perEdges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph Mentioned in the Definition
(3.27)
It’s useful to define a “Neutrosophic” version of a Neutrosophic notion. Since there’s 496
more ways to get type-results to make a Neutrosophic notion more Neutrosophicly 497
understandable. 498
For the sake of having a Neutrosophic notion, there’s a need to “redefine” the 499
Neutrosophic notion of “Neutrosophic notion”. The SuperHyperVertices and the 500
SuperHyperEdges are assigned by the labels from the letters of the alphabets. In this 501
procedure, there’s the usage of the position of labels to assign to the values. 502
Definition 3.27. Assume a notion. It’s redefined a Neutrosophic notion if the 503
Table (3) holds. 504
Example 3.28. Referred to the Example (3.6), assume a Neutrosophic 505
SuperHyperGraph (SHG) S is a pair S = (V, E) in the mentioned Neutrosophic Figures 506
in every Neutrosophic items. 507
SuperHyperGraph (SHG), is up in the illustration of the Table (4). 509
Table 4. The Values of Vertices, SuperVertices, Edges, HyperEdges, and SuperHyper-

Edges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph
Vi (TVi , IVi , FVi ) Ei (TEi , IEi , FEi )
V1 (0.13, 0.13, 0.13) E1 (0, 0, 0)
V2 (0.13, 0.13, 0.13) E2 (0.13, 0.13, 0.13)
V3 (0.15, 0.15, 0.15) E3 (0, 0, 0)
V4 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14) E4 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14)

V1 (0.13, 0.13, 0.13) E1 (0, 0, 0)
V2 (0.03, 0.03, 0.03) E2 (0, 0, 0)
V3 (0.15, 0.15, 0.15) E3 (0, 0, 0)
V4 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14) E4 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14)

V1 (0.13, 0.13, 0.13) E1 (0, 0, 0)
V2 (0.11, 0.11, 0.11) E2 (0, 0, 0)
V3 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14) E3 (0, 0, 0)
- - E4 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14)

V1 (0.13, 0.13, 0.13) E1 (0.08, 0.08, 0.08)
V2 (0.11, 0.11, 0.11) E2 (0.15, 0.15, 0.15)
V3 (0.05, 0.05, 0.05) E3 (0, 0, 0)
V4 (0.12, 0.12, 0.12) E4 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14)
{F } (0.06, 0.06, 0.06) E5 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14)
{H} (0.08, 0.08, 0.08) - -
{N } (0.14, 0.14, 0.14) - -
{O} (0.15, 0.15, 0.15) - -

4 Main Resultant 516
Definition 4.1. (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly 517
Resolving Sequence). 518
Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Consider a 519
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then V 0 is called Neutrosophic 520
SuperHyperStrongly Resolving Sequence if the following expressions, terms and statements is 521
called Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Resolving Sequence criteria holds. 522
X X X
|( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 Vi ∈V 0 Vi ∈V 0
X X X
= min
00 ⊆V
|{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V N SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
∀Vb , Vc ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 , ∃Va ∈ V 00 :

d(TV (Va , Vb )) 6= d(TV (Va , Vc )),
d(IV (Va , Vb )) 6= d(IV (Va , Vc )),
and d(FV (Va , Vb )) 6= d(FV (Va , Vc )),
then Vb , Vc ∈ V 00 , until V 00 = VN SHG }
Example 4.2. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel (SHG) S is a pair S = (V, E) 523
in the mentioned Neutrosophic Figures in every Neutrosophic items. 524
SuperHyperWheel (SHG), is up in the illustration of the Table (8). 526
Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Consider a 527
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {Vi=1 }. Then V 0 is called Neutrosophic 528
SuperHyperStrongly Resolving Sequence since the following expressions, terms and 529


Figure 32. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar Neutrosophic Associated to the Neutro-











Edges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
statements is called Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Resolving Sequence criteria holds. 530
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1 }
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1 }
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1 }
= (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) =
X X X
= 00
max |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VSHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
Vi=1 ∈ V 00 = {V1 }, ∃Vj,j 0 =2,4,j6=j 0 ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 :

d(TV (Vi , Vj )) = 1(2) 6= 2(1) = d(TV (Vi , Vj 0 )),
d(IV (Vi , Vj )) = 1(2) 6= 2(1) = d(IV (Vi , Vj 0 )),
and d(FV (Vi , Vj )) = 1(2) 6= 2(1) = d(FV (Vi , Vj 0 )),
then Vj=2,4 ∈ V 00 , but V 00 6= VN SHG
Vi=2 ∈ V 00 = {VI=1−2,4 }, ∃Vj,j 0 =3,5,j6=j 0 ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 :
d(TV (Vi , Vj )) = 1(2) 6= 2(1) = d(TV (Vi , Vj 0 )),
d(IV (Vi , Vj )) = 1(2) 6= 2(1) = d(IV (Vi , Vj 0 )),
Vi=4 ∈ V 00 = {VI=1−5 }, ∃Vj,j 0 =6,7,j6=j 0 ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 :
d(TV (Vi , Vj )) = 1(2) 6= 2(1) = d(TV (Vi , Vj 0 )),
d(IV (Vi , Vj )) = 1(2) 6= 2(1) = d(IV (Vi , Vj 0 )),
then Vj=6,7 ∈ V 00 , then V 00 = VN SHG .}
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=17 }

V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
V3 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E3 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V4 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V5 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V6 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.19, 0.19, 0.19) E2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
V3 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E3 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V4 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V5 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V6 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=17 }
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=17 }
= (1.69, 1.69, 1.69) =
X X X
= max
00 ⊆V
|{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
then V 00 = VN SHG .}
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=17 }
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=17 }
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=17 }
= (1.64, 1.64, 1.64) =
X X X
= max
00 ⊆V
|{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.19, 0.19, 0.19) E2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
V3 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E3 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V4 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V5 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V6 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V7 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.19, 0.19, 0.19) E2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
V3 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E3 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
V4 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V5 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V6 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V7 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=17 }
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=17 }
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=17 }
= (1.61, 1.61, 1.61) =
X X X
= 00
max |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VSHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=17 }
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=17 }
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=17 }
= (1.62, 1.62, 1.62) =
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.19, 0.19, 0.19) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V6 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V7 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
Edges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
X X X
= 00
max |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VSHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=17 }
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=17 }
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=17 }
= (1.62, 1.62, 1.62) =
X X X
= max
00 ⊆V
|{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
Example 4.3. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar (SHG) S is a pair S = (V, E) 561
in the mentioned Neutrosophic Figures in every Neutrosophic items. 562
SuperHyperStar (SHG), is up in the illustration of the Table (14). 564
Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Consider a 565
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {Vi=1,6,7 }. Then V 0 is called Neutrosophic 566
V1 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1,6,7 }
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1,6,7 }
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1,6,7 }
= (0.78, 0.78, 0.78) =
X X X
= max
00 ⊆V
|{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
Vi=1 ∈ V 00 = {Vi=1,6,7 }, ∃Vj,j 0 =2,3,j6=j 0 ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 :

d(TV (Vi , Vj )) = 1(2) 6= 2(1) = d(TV (Vi , Vj 0 )),
d(IV (Vi , Vj )) = 1(2) 6= 2(1) = d(IV (Vi , Vj 0 )),
Vi=3 ∈ V 00 = {VI=1−3,6,7 }, ∃Vj,j 0 =4,5,j6=j 0 ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 :
d(TV (Vi , Vj )) = 1(2) 6= 2(1) = d(TV (Vi , Vj 0 )),
d(IV (Vi , Vj )) = 1(2) 6= 2(1) = d(IV (Vi , Vj 0 )),
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {Vi=1,6,7 }. Then V 0 is called Neutrosophic 572
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1,6,7 }
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1,6,7 }
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1,6,7 }
= (0.75, 0.75, 0.75) =
V1 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
X X X
= 00
max |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VSHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00

d(TV (Vi , Vj )) = 1(2) 6= 2(1) = d(TV (Vi , Vj 0 )),
d(IV (Vi , Vj )) = 1(2) 6= 2(1) = d(IV (Vi , Vj 0 )),
d(TV (Vi , Vj )) = 1(2) 6= 2(1) = d(TV (Vi , Vj 0 )),
d(IV (Vi , Vj )) = 1(2) 6= 2(1) = d(IV (Vi , Vj 0 )),
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {Vi=1−4,6,7 }. Then V 0 is called Neutrosophic 578
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−4,6,7 }
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−4,6,7 }
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−4,6,7 }
= (1.21, 1.21, 1.21) =
X X X
= max |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V 00 ⊆VSHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00

d(TV (Vi , Vj )) = 1(2) 6= 2(1) = d(TV (Vi , Vj 0 )),
d(IV (Vi , Vj )) = 1(2) 6= 2(1) = d(IV (Vi , Vj 0 )),
V1 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
d(TV (Vi , Vj )) = 1(2) 6= 2(1) = d(TV (Vi , Vj 0 )),

d(IV (Vi , Vj )) = 1(2) 6= 2(1) = d(IV (Vi , Vj 0 )),
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−3,6,7 }
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−3,6,7 }
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−3,6,7 }
= (1.24, 1.24, 1.24) =
X X X
= max
00 ⊆V
|{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00

d(TV (Vi , Vj )) = 1(2) 6= 2(1) = d(TV (Vi , Vj 0 )),
d(IV (Vi , Vj )) = 1(2) 6= 2(1) = d(IV (Vi , Vj 0 )),
then Vj=2,4,5 ∈ V 00 , then V 00 = VN SHG .}
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−4,6,7 }
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={V
i=1−4,6,7 }
V1 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V5 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V1 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V5 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V6 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−4,6,7 }
= (1.21, 1.21, 1.21) =
X X X
= 00
max |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VSHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
Vi=3 ∈ V 00 = {VI=1−4,6,7 },
then Vj=5 ∈ V 00 , then V 00 = VN SHG .}
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−4,6,7 }
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−4,6,7 }
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−4,6,7 }
= (1.18, 1.18, 1.18) =
X X X
= max
00 ⊆V
|{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
V 00 = {VI=1−4,6,7 },
V1 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V5 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V6 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V7 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−4,6,7 }
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−4,6,7 }
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−4,6,7 }
= (1.15, 1.15, 1.15) =
X X X
= max
00 ⊆V
|{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
V 00 = {VI=1−4,6,7 },
5 Main Result 605
Theorem 5.1. (Main Result and Main Theorem). 606
Assume every Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar has the letter z. The notion on the 607
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar and Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel coincides. 608
Proof. 609
(i). Let 610
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
CEN T ER, E2
611
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , CEN T ER
be a longest path taken a connected Extreme SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). There’s 612
a new way to redefine as 613
ViEXT ERN AL ∼ VjEXT ERN AL ≡
∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL ∈ Ez ≡

∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , {ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL } ⊆ Ez .
The term “EXTERNAL” implies |N (ViEXT ERN AL )| ≥ |N (Vj )| where Vj is 614
corresponded to ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly 615
Resolving Sequence. The latter is straightforward. 616
(ii). Let 617
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1∗ ,
CEN T ER, E2∗
618
P :
E1∗ , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2∗ , CEN T ER
is a longest SuperHyperStrongly Resolving Sequence taken from a connected Extreme 619
SuperHyperWheel ESHW : (V, E). There’s a new way to redefine as 620

Resolving Sequence. The latter is straightforward. Then there’s at least one Neutrosophic 623
SuperHyperStrongly Resolving Sequence. Thus the notion of quasi isn’t up and the 624
SuperHyperNotions based on Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Resolving Sequence could be 625
applied. The unique embedded Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Resolving Sequence proposes 626
some longest Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Resolving Sequence excerpt from some 627
representatives. The latter is straightforward. 628
Proposition 5.2. Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E).

Assume every Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex has the letter z. The Neutrosophic
SuperHyperStrongly Resolving Sequence set is as follows.
{CEN T ER}.
Proof. Let 629
P :
CEN T ER, E2∗
630
P :
E2∗ , CEN T ER


SuperHyperStrongly Resolving Sequence number is as follows.
0.26.
Proof. Let 641
P :
CEN T ER, E2∗
642
P :
E2∗ , CEN T ER

Proposition 5.4. Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E).

SuperHyperStrongly Resolving Sequence set is as follows.
{CEN T ER}.
Proof. Let 653
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
CEN T ER, E2
654
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , CEN T ER

Proposition 5.5. Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E).

SuperHyperStrongly Resolving Sequence number is as follows.
0.26.
Proof. Let 660
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
CEN T ER, E2
661
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , CEN T ER

Definition 5.6. (Uniform Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar and Uniform Neutrosophic 667
SuperHyperStar). 668
(i). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Every pair of 669
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices has the same maximum letter, i.e., 670
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices mutually has the same maximum letter. A 671
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E) is called Uniform 672
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar. 673
(ii). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Every pair 674
of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices has the same maximum letter, i.e., 675
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices mutually has the same maximum letter. A 676
Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E) is called Uniform 677
Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel. 678
Proposition 5.7. Let an Uniform Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel (SHG) S be a pair

S = (V, E). The Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Resolving Sequence set is as follows.
{CEN T ER}.
Proof. Let 679
P :
CEN T ER, E2∗
680
P :
E2∗ , CEN T ER


The Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Resolving Sequence number is lower than as follows.
0.26.
Proof. Let 691
P :
CEN T ER, E2∗
692
P :
E2∗ , CEN T ER

Proposition 5.9. Let an Uniform Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar (SHG) S be a pair

S = (V, E). The Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Resolving Sequence set is as follows.
{CEN T ER}.
Proof. Let 703
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
CEN T ER, E2
704
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , CEN T ER

Proposition 5.10. Let an Uniform Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar (SHG) S be a pair

S = (V, E). The Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Resolving Sequence number is lower than as
follows.
0.26.
Proof. Let 710
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
CEN T ER, E2
711
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , CEN T ER

Proposition 5.11. (Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar and Neutrosophic 717
SuperHyperWheel). 718
(i). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Assume every 719
Neutrosophic CENTER has the letter maximum letter. Then the Neutrosophic 720
SuperHyperVertices don’t have the same maximum letter, are in every 721
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Resolving Sequence set. 722
(ii). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Assume 723
every Neutrosophic CENTER has the letter maximum letter. Then the 724
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices don’t have the same maximum letter, are in 725
every Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Resolving Sequence set. 726
Proof. 727
(i). Let 728
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
CEN T ER, E2
729
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , CEN T ER

(ii). Let 735
P :
CEN T ER, E2∗
736
P :
E2∗ , CEN T ER

Proposition 5.12. (Embedded Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar and Embedded 747
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar). 748
(i). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Then 749
CENTER is in every Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Resolving Sequence set. 750
(ii). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Then 751
CENTER is in every Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Resolving Sequence set. 752
Proof. 753
(i). Let 754
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
CEN T ER, E2
755
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , CEN T ER


(ii). Let 761
P :
CEN T ER, E2∗
762
P :
E2∗ , CEN T ER

6 Neutrosophic Applications in Cancer’s 773
Neutrosophic Recognition 774
The cancer is the Neutrosophic disease but the Neutrosophic model is going to figure 775
out what’s going on this Neutrosophic phenomenon. The special Neutrosophic case of 776
this Neutrosophic disease is considered and as the consequences of the model, some 777
parameters are used. The cells are under attack of this disease but the moves of the 778
cancer in the special region are the matter of mind. The Neutrosophic recognition of the 779
cancer could help to find some Neutrosophic treatments for this Neutrosophic disease. 780
In the following, some Neutrosophic steps are Neutrosophic devised on this disease. 781
Step 1. (Neutrosophic Definition) The Neutrosophic recognition of the cancer in 782
the long-term Neutrosophic function. 783
Step 2. (Neutrosophic Issue) The specific region has been assigned by the 784
Neutrosophic model [it’s called Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph] and the long 785
Neutrosophic cycle of the move from the cancer is identified by this research. 786
Sometimes the move of the cancer hasn’t be easily identified since there are some 787
determinacy, indeterminacy and neutrality about the moves and the effects of the 788
cancer on that region; this event leads us to choose another model [it’s said to be 789
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph] to have convenient perception on what’s 790
happened and what’s done. 791
Figure 42. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite Associated to the Notions of Neutro-

sophic SuperHyperStrongly Resolving Sequence
Step 3. (Neutrosophic Model) There are some specific Neutrosophic models, 792
which are well-known and they’ve got the names, and some general Neutrosophic 793
models. The moves and the Neutrosophic traces of the cancer on the complex 794
tracks and between complicated groups of cells could be fantasized by a 795
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath(-/SuperHyperStrongly Resolving Sequence, 796
SuperHyperStar, SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, 797
SuperHyperWheel). The aim is to find either the Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly 798
Resolving Sequence or the Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Resolving Sequence in those 799
Neutrosophic Neutrosophic SuperHyperModels. 800
7 Case 1: The Initial Neutrosophic Steps 801
Toward Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite as 802
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel 803
Step 4. (Neutrosophic Solution) In the Neutrosophic Figure (42), the 804
Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite is Neutrosophic highlighted and Neutrosophic 805
featured. 806
By using the Neutrosophic Figure (42) and the Table (21), the Neutrosophic 807
SuperHyperBipartite is obtained. 808
The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Neutrosophic Algorithm in 809
previous Neutrosophic result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the 810
connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic 811
SuperHyperModel (42), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Resolving Sequence. 812
Edges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite
Figure 43. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite Associated to the Notions of

Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Resolving Sequence
8 Case 2: The Increasing Neutrosophic Steps 813
Toward Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite as 814
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel 815
Step 4. (Neutrosophic Solution) In the Neutrosophic Figure (43), the 816
Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite is Neutrosophic highlighted and 817
Neutrosophic featured. 818
By using the Neutrosophic Figure (43) and the Table (22), the Neutrosophic 819
SuperHyperMultipartite is obtained. 820
The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Neutrosophic Algorithm in 821
previous result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected 822
Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic 823
SuperHyperModel (43), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Resolving Sequence. 824
Edges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite
9 Neutrosophic Applications in Cancer’s 825
Neutrosophic Recognition 826
Cancer is a neutrosophic disease, but the neutrosophic model is supposed to understand 827
what is going on in this neutrosophic phenomenon. The special case of neutrosophic 828
disease is considered and some parameters have been used as consequences of the model. 829
Cells are subject to attack by the disease, but the movements of the cancer in the 830
specific area is a matter of mind. Neutrosophic diagnosis of cancer can help in finding 831
some Neutrosophic cures for this Neutrosophic disease. 832
In the following, several Neutrosophic stages are designed for this disease. 833
Step 1. (Neutrosophic Definition) Neutrosophic diagnosis of cancer in long-term 834
Neutrosophic performance. 835
Step 2. (Neutrosophic Issue) The specific region is assigned by the Neutrosophic 836
model (called Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph) and the long Neutrosophic cycle of 837
movement of cancer is identified by this scientific research. Sometimes the 838
movement of cancer is not easy to detect, because there is certainty, uncertainty 839
and neutrality about the movements and effects of cancer on that area. This event 840
leads us to choose another model [which is said to be the Neutrosophic 841
superhypergraph] in order to have a proper understanding of what happened and 842
was done. 843
Step 3. (Neutrosophic Model) There are some specific Neutrosophic models that 844
are well known and have names and some general Neutrosophic models. Cancer 845
neurtosophic movements and effects in complex pathways and between complex 846
groups of cells can be visualized by a SuperHyperPath (-/SuperHyperCycle, 847
SuperHyperStar, SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, 848
SuperHyperWheel). The goal is to find dominant neutrosophic Strongly Resolving 849
Sequence models or dominant sStrongly Resolving Sequence models. 850
10 Wondering Open Problems But As The 851
Directions To Forming The Motivations 852
In what follows, some “problems” and some “questions” are proposed. 853
The SuperHyperStrongly Resolving Sequence and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Resolving 854
Sequence are defined on a real-world application, titled “Cancer’s Recognitions”. 855
Question 10.1. Which the else SuperHyperModels could be defined based on Cancer’s 856
recognitions? 857
Question 10.2. Are there some SuperHyperNotions related to SuperHyperStrongly Resolving 858
and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Resolving Sequence?

Sequence 859
Question 10.3. Are there some Algorithms to be defined on the SuperHyperModels to 860
compute them? 861
Question 10.4. Which the SuperHyperNotions are related to beyond the 862
SuperHyperStrongly Resolving Sequence and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Resolving Sequence? 863
Problem 10.5. The SuperHyperStrongly Resolving Sequence and the Neutrosophic 864
SuperHyperStrongly Resolving Sequence do a SuperHyperModel for the Cancer’s recognitions and 865
they’re based on SuperHyperStrongly Resolving Sequence, are there else? 866
Problem 10.6. Which the fundamental SuperHyperNumbers are related to these 867
SuperHyperNumbers types-results? 868
Problem 10.7. What’s the independent research based on Cancer’s recognitions 869
concerning the multiple types of SuperHyperNotions? 870
11 Conclusion and Closing Remarks 871
In this section, closing and concluding remarks are presented. The drawbacks of this 872
scientific research are shown. Some advantages and disadvantages of this scientific 873
research are highlighted. 874
This scientific research uses some approaches to further understand the Neutrosophic 875
SuperHyperGraphs. In this effort, two SuperHyperNotions are defined on the Strongly 876
Resolving Sequence. For this reason, in the second definition, the original definition of 877
the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph is redefined on the position of the alphabets. Based 878
on the new Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph definition, the new SuperHyperNotion, 879
Neutrosophic Strongly Resolving Sequence, finds a suitable background to implement 880
some results on. Some SuperHyperClasses and some Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses 881
are the subjects of this scientific research on modeling areas that are subject to cancer 882
attacks in order to recognize this disease as mentioned under the title “Cancer 883
Diagnosis”. To formalize the SuperHyperNotion, Strongly Resolving Sequence, 884
SuperHyperClasses and new SuperHyperClasses instances are introduced. Some general 885
results are summarized in the Strongly Resolving Sequence and Neutrosophic Strongly 886
Resolving Sequence sections. Clarifications, examples, and literature reviews go all the 887
way. In this scientific research, the literature review has met the lines containing 888
concepts and results. SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph are 889
super-hypermodels in “cancer diagnosis” and both are the foundation of the background 890
of this scientific research. Sometimes cancer has occurred in an area full of cells, cell 891
groups, and embedded styles. In this section, SuperHyperModel proposes 892
SuperHyperNotions, formally called “Strongly Resolving Sequence”, based on the 893
connections of Cancer’s movements in the longest and strongest styles with the 894
formation of design and architecture, in terms of terms and whispering words. . The 895
“SuperHyper” prefix refers to the topic of embedded styles to explore the background of 896
SuperHyperNotions. In the table (23), the advantages and ways of this scientific
Table 23. A look at this scientific research and beyond

Advantages Limitations
1. Redefining the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 1. General Results
2. Strongly Resolving Sequence
3. Neutrosophic Strongly Resolving Sequence 2. Other SuperHyperNumbers
4. modeling cancer diagnoses
5. SuperHyperClasses 3. SuperHyperFamilies
897
research are specified, pointed out and expressed. 898
12 Background 899
There are some scientific researches covering the topic of this scientific research. In what 900
follows, there are some discussion and literature reviews about them. 901
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “New Ideas In Recognition of 902
Cancer And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph As Hyper Tool On Super Toot” in Ref. [1] 903
by Henry Garrett (2023). In this research article, a novel approach is implemented on 904
SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on general forms with 905
introducing used neutrosophic classes of neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. It’s published 906
in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled “Current Trends in Mass Communication 907
(CTMC)” with ISO abbreviation “Curr Trends Mass Comm” in volume 2 and issue 1 908
with pages 32-55. 909
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “Some Super Hyper Degrees 910
and Co-Super Hyper Degrees on Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs And Super Hyper 911
Graphs Alongside Applications in Cancer’s Treatments” in Ref. [2] by Henry Garrett 912
(2023). In this research article, a novel approach is implemented on SuperHyperGraph 913
and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on fundamental notions and using vital tools 914
in Cancer’s Treatments. It’s published in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled 915
“Journal of Mathematical Techniques and Computational Mathematics(JMTCM)” with 916
ISO abbreviation “J Math Techniques Comput Math” in volume 2 and issue 1 with 917
pages 35-47. The research article studies deeply with choosing directly neutrosophic 918
SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough toward independent 919
results based on initial background and fundamental SuperHyperNumbers. 920
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “A Research on Cancer’s 921
Recognition and Neutrosophic Super Hypergraph by Eulerian Super Hyper Cycles and 922
Hamiltonian Sets as Hyper Covering Versus Super separations” in Ref. [3] by Henry 923
Garrett (2023). In this research article, a novel approach is implemented on 924
SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on fundamental notions 925
and using vital tools in Cancer’s Recognition. It’s published in prestigious and fancy 926
journal is entitled “Journal of Mathematical Techniques and Computational 927
Mathematics(JMTCM)” with ISO abbreviation “J Math Techniques Comput Math” in 928
volume 2 and issue 3 with pages 136-148. The research article studies deeply with 929
choosing directly neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph. It’s the 930
breakthrough toward independent results based on initial background and fundamental 931
SuperHyperNumbers. 932
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “Neutrosophic 1-Failed 933
SuperHyperForcing in the SuperHyperFunction to Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs 934
on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Beyond ” in Ref. [4] by Henry Garrett (2023). 935
In this research article, a novel approach is implemented on SuperHyperGraph and 936
neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on fundamental SuperHyperNumber and using 937
neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses of neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. It’s published in 938
prestigious and fancy journal is entitled “Journal of Mathematical Techniques and 939
Computational Mathematics(JMTCM)” with ISO abbreviation “J Math Techniques 940
Comput Math” in volume 2 and issue 6 with pages 221-307. The research article studies 941
deeply with choosing directly neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph. 942
It’s the breakthrough toward independent results based on initial background and 943
fundamental SuperHyperNumbers. The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is 944
titled “New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph by 945
Initial Eulerian-Path-Cut as Hyper Initial Eulogy on Super Initial EULA” in Ref. [5] by 946
Henry Garrett (2023). In this research article, a novel approach is implemented on 947
SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on fundamental 948
SuperHyperNumber and using neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses of neutrosophic 949
SuperHyperGraph. It’s published in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled 950
“International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Research” with ISO 951
abbreviation “IJPAMR” in volume 3 and issue 2 with pages 60-88 and doi: 952
10.51483/IJPAMR.3.2.2023.60-88. The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is 953
titled “New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graph by 954
Eulerian-Path-Cut as Hyper Eulogy-Path-Cut on Super EULA-Path-Cut” in Ref. [6] by 955
SuperHyperGraph. It’s published in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled 959
“International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Research” with ISO 960
abbreviation “IJPAMR” in volume 3 and issue 2 with pages 102-124 and doi: 961
10.51483/IJPAMR.3.2.2023.102-124. The research article studies deeply with choosing 962
directly neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough 963
toward independent results based on initial background and fundamental 964
SuperHyperNumbers. The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “Super 965
Hyper Dominating and Super Hyper Resolving on Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs and 966
Their Directions in Game Theory and Neutrosophic Super Hyper Classes” in Ref. [7] by 967
SuperHyperGraph. It’s published in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled “Journal 971
of Mathematical Techniques and Computational Mathematics(JMTCM)” with ISO 972
abbreviation “J Math Techniques Comput Math” in volume 1 and issue 3 with pages 973
242-263. The research article studies deeply with choosing directly neutrosophic 974
SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough toward independent 975
results based on initial background and fundamental SuperHyperNumbers. The seminal 976
paper and groundbreaking article is titled “neutrosophic co-degree and neutrosophic 977
degree alongside chromatic numbers in the setting of some classes related to neutrosophic 978
hypergraphs” in Ref. [8] by Henry Garrett (2023). In this research article, a novel 979
approach is implemented on SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 980
based on general forms without using neutrosophic classes of neutrosophic 981
SuperHyperGraph. It’s published in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled “Journal 982
of Current Trends in Computer Science Research (JCTCSR)” with ISO abbreviation “J 983
Curr Trends Comp Sci Res” in volume 2 and issue 1 with pages 16-24. The research 984
article studies deeply with choosing neutrosophic hypergraphs instead of neutrosophic 985
SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough toward independent results based on initial 986
background. The research article studies deeply with choosing neutrosophic 987
hypergraphs instead of neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough toward 988
independent results based on initial background. In some articles are titled “0039 — 989
Closing Numbers and Super-Closing Numbers as (Dual)Resolving and (Dual)Coloring 990
alongside (Dual)Dominating in (Neutrosophic)n-SuperHyperGraph” in Ref. [9] by 991
Henry Garrett (2022), “0049 — (Failed)1-Zero-Forcing Number in Neutrosophic Graphs” 992
in Ref. [10] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Extreme SuperHyperClique as the Firm Scheme 993
of Confrontation under Cancer’s Recognition as the Model in The Setting of 994
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [11] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Uncertainty 995
On The Act And Effect Of Cancer Alongside The Foggy Positions Of Cells Toward 996
Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique inside Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Titled 997
Cancer’s Recognition” in Ref. [12] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic Version Of 998
Separates Groups Of Cells In Cancer’s Recognition On Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” 999
in Ref. [13] by Henry Garrett (2022), “The Shift Paradigm To Classify Separately The 1000
Cells and Affected Cells Toward The Totality Under Cancer’s Recognition By New 1001
Multiple Definitions On the Sets Polynomials Alongside Numbers In The (Neutrosophic) 1002
SuperHyperMatching Theory Based on SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic 1003
SuperHyperGraph” in Ref. [14] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Breaking the Continuity and 1004
Uniformity of Cancer In The Worst Case of Full Connections With Extreme Failed 1005
SuperHyperClique In Cancer’s Recognition Applied in (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” 1006
in Ref. [15] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable as the 1007
Survivors on the Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition Based on Uncertainty to All Modes 1008
in Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [16] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Extremism 1009
of the Attacked Body Under the Cancer’s Circumstances Where Cancer’s Recognition 1010
Titled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [17] by Henry Garrett (2022), 1011
“(Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in Cancer’s Recognitions And 1012
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [18] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic 1013
Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on 1014
Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In Special ViewPoints” in Ref. [19] by Henry 1015
Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in the SuperHyperFunction 1016
To Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition And 1017
Beyond ” in Ref. [20] by Henry Garrett (2022), “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperStable on 1018
Cancer’s Recognition by Well- SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs ” 1019
in Ref. [21] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To 1020
Form Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In 1021
Special ViewPoints” in Ref. [17] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Basic Notions on 1022
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperForcing And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling in Cancer’s 1023
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [22] by Henry Garrett 1024
(2022), “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form Neutrosophic 1025
SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In Special ViewPoints” 1026
in Ref. [23] by Henry Garrett (2022),“(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s 1027
Recognitions Featuring (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances” in 1028
Ref. [24] by Henry Garrett (2022), “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperAlliances With 1029
SuperHyperDefensive and SuperHyperOffensive Type-SuperHyperSet On (Neutrosophic) 1030
SuperHyperGraph With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions 1031
And Related (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClasses” in Ref. [25] by Henry Garrett (2022), 1032
“SuperHyperGirth on SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph With 1033
SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions” in Ref. [26] by Henry Garrett (2022), 1034
“Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on Neutrosophic 1035
SuperHyperGraphs and SuperHyperGraphs Alongside Applications in Cancer’s 1036
Treatments” in Ref. [27] by Henry Garrett (2022), “SuperHyperDominating and 1037
SuperHyperResolving on Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs And Their Directions in 1038
Game Theory and Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses” in Ref. [28] by Henry Garrett 1039
(2022), “SuperHyperMatching By (R-)Definitions And Polynomials To Monitor 1040
Cancer’s Recognition In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [224] by Henry 1041
Garrett (2023), “The Focus on The Partitions Obtained By Parallel Moves In The 1042
Cancer’s Extreme Recognition With Different Types of Extreme SuperHyperMatching Set 1043
and Polynomial on (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [225] by Henry Garrett 1044
(2023), “Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique Decides the Failures on the Cancer’s 1045
Recognition in the Perfect Connections of Cancer’s Attacks By SuperHyperModels 1046
Named (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [226] by Henry Garrett (2023), 1047
“Indeterminacy On The All Possible Connections of Cells In Front of Cancer’s Attacks 1048
In The Terms of Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique on Cancer’s Recognition called 1049
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [227] by Henry Garrett (2023), “Perfect 1050
Directions Toward Idealism in Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition Forwarding 1051
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClique on Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [230] by 1052
Henry Garrett (2023), “Demonstrating Complete Connections in Every Embedded 1053
Regions and Sub-Regions in the Terms of Cancer’s Recognition and (Neutrosophic) 1054
SuperHyperGraphs With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClique” in Ref. [231] by Henry 1055
Garrett (2023), “Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic Regions titled 1056
neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable in Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition modeled in 1057
the Form of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [234] by Henry Garrett (2023), 1058
“Using the Tool As (Neutrosophic) Failed SuperHyperStable To SuperHyperModel 1059
Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [237] by Henry 1060
Garrett (2023), “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form Neutrosophic 1061
SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In Special ViewPoints” 1062
in Ref. [238] by Henry Garrett (2023), “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperStable on Cancer’s 1063
Recognition by Well-SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in 1064
Ref. [239] by Henry Garrett (2023), “Neutrosophic 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in the 1065
SuperHyperFunction To Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs on Cancer’s Neutrosophic 1066
Recognition And Beyond ” in Ref. [240] by Henry Garrett (2022), “(Neutrosophic) 1067
1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in Cancer’s Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) 1068
SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [241] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Basic Notions on 1069
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperForcing And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling in Cancer’s 1070
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [242] by Henry Garrett 1071
(2022), “Basic Neutrosophic Notions Concerning SuperHyperDominating and 1072
Neutrosophic SuperHyperResolving in SuperHyperGraph” in Ref. [253] by Henry 1073
Garrett (2022), “Initial Material of Neutrosophic Preliminaries to Study Some 1074
Neutrosophic Notions Based on Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) in Neutrosophic 1075
SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)” in Ref. [254] by Henry Garrett (2022), and [4–254], there 1076
are some endeavors to formalize the basic SuperHyperNotions about neutrosophic 1077
SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph alongside scientific research books 1078
at [255–390]. Two popular scientific research books in Scribd in the terms of high 1079
readers, 5679 and 6667 respectively, on neutrosophic science is on [391, 392]. 1080
Some scientific studies and scientific researches about neutrosophic graphs, are 1081
proposed as book in Ref. [391] by Henry Garrett (2023) which is indexed by Google 1082
Scholar and has more than 5679 readers in Scribd. It’s titled “Beyond Neutrosophic 1083
Graphs” and published by Dr. Henry Garrett. This research book covers different types 1084
of notions and settings in neutrosophic graph theory and neutrosophic 1085
SuperHyperGraph theory. 1086
Also, some scientific studies and scientific researches about neutrosophic graphs, are 1087
proposed as book in Ref. [392] by Henry Garrett (2023) which is indexed by Google 1088
Scholar and has more than 6667 readers in Scribd. It’s titled “Neutrosophic Duality” 1089
and published by Dr. Henry Garrett. This research book presents different types of 1090
notions SuperHyperResolving and SuperHyperDominating in the setting of duality in 1091
neutrosophic graph theory and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph theory. This research 1092
book has scrutiny on the complement of the intended set and the intended set, 1093
simultaneously. It’s smart to consider a set but acting on its complement that what’s 1094
done in this research book which is popular in the terms of high readers in Scribd. 1095
See the seminal scientific researches [1–3]. The formalization of the notions on the 1096
framework of notions in SuperHyperGraphs, Neutrosophic notions in 1097
SuperHyperGraphs theory, and (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs theory at [4–254] 1098
alongside scientific research books at [255–390]. Two popular scientific research books 1099
in Scribd ,in the terms of high readers, 5679 and 6667 respectively, on neutrosophic 1100
science is on [391, 392]. 1101
References 1102
1. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 1103
SuperHyperGraph As Hyper Tool On Super Toot”, Curr Trends Mass Comm 1104
2(1) (2023) 32-55. (doi: 10.33140/CTMC.02.01.03). 1105
2. Henry Garrett, “Some Super Hyper Degrees and Co-Super Hyper Degrees on 1106
Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs And Super Hyper Graphs Alongside 1107
Applications in Cancer’s Treatments”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 2(1) 1108
(2023) 35-47. (doi: 10.33140/JMTCM.02.01.05 ) 1109
3. Henry Garrett, “A Research on Cancer’s Recognition and Neutrosophic Super 1110
Hypergraph by Eulerian Super Hyper Cycles and Hamiltonian Sets as Hyper 1111
Covering Versus Super separations”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 2(3) 1112
(2023) 136-148. (https://www.opastpublishers.com/open-access-articles/a- 1113
research-on-cancers-recognition-and-neutrosophic-super-hypergraph-by- 1114
eulerian-super-hyper-cycles-and-hamiltonian-sets-.pdf) 1115
4. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in the 1116
SuperHyperFunction to Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs on Cancer’s 1117
Neutrosophic Recognition and Beyond ”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 2(6) 1118
(2023) 221-307. (https://www.opastpublishers.com/open-access- 1119
articles/neutrosophic-1failed-superhyperforcing-in-the-superhyperfunction-to- 1120
use-neutrosophic-superhypergraphs-on-cancers-neutros.pdf) 1121
5. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic 1122
SuperHyperGraph by Initial Eulerian-Path-Cut as Hyper Initial Eulogy on Super 1123
Initial EULA”, International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics 1124
Research 3(2) (2023) 60-88. (doi: 10.51483/IJPAMR.3.2.2023.60-88). 1125
6. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic Super 1126
Hyper Graph by Eulerian-Path-Cut as Hyper Eulogy-Path-Cut on Super 1127
EULA-Path-Cut”, International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics 1128
Research 3(2) (2023) 102-124. (doi: 10.51483/IJPAMR.3.2.2023.102-124). 1129
7. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic Super 1130
Hyper Graph by Eulerian-Path-Cut as Hyper Eulogy-Path-Cut on Super 1131
EULA-Path-Cut”, J Curr Trends Comp Sci Res 2(1) (2023) 16-24. (doi: 1132
10.33140/JCTCSR.02.01.04) 1133
8. Henry Garrett, “Super Hyper Dominating and Super Hyper Resolving on 1134
Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs and Their Directions in Game Theory and 1135
Neutrosophic Super Hyper Classes”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 1(3) 1136
(2022) 242-263. (doi: 10.33140/JMTCM.01.03.09) 1137
9. Garrett, Henry. “0039 — Closing Numbers and Super-Closing Numbers as 1138
(Dual)Resolving and (Dual)Coloring alongside (Dual)Dominating in 1139
(Neutrosophic)n-SuperHyperGraph.” CERN European Organization for Nuclear 1140
Research - Zenodo, Nov. 2022. CERN European Organization for Nuclear 1141
Research, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6319942. 1142
https://oa.mg/work/10.5281/zenodo.6319942 1143
10. Garrett, Henry. “0049 — (Failed)1-Zero-Forcing Number in Neutrosophic 1144
Graphs.” CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research - Zenodo, Feb. 1145
2022. CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research, 1146
https://doi.org/10.13140/rg.2.2.35241.26724. 1147
https://oa.mg/work/10.13140/rg.2.2.35241.26724 1148
11. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperClique as the Firm Scheme of 1149
Confrontation under Cancer’s Recognition as the Model in The Setting of 1150
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010308 (doi: 1151
10.20944/preprints202301.0308.v1). 1152
12. Henry Garrett, “Uncertainty On The Act And Effect Of Cancer Alongside The 1153
Foggy Positions Of Cells Toward Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique inside 1154
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Titled Cancer’s Recognition”, Preprints 2023, 1155
2023010282 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0282.v1). 1156
13. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Version Of Separates Groups Of Cells In 1157
Cancer’s Recognition On Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 1158
2023010267 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0267.v1). 1159
14. Henry Garrett, “The Shift Paradigm To Classify Separately The Cells and 1160
Affected Cells Toward The Totality Under Cancer’s Recognition By New 1161
Multiple Definitions On the Sets Polynomials Alongside Numbers In The 1162
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperMatching Theory Based on SuperHyperGraph and 1163
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”, Preprints 2023, 2023010265 (doi: 1164
10.20944/preprints202301.0265.v1). 1165
15. Henry Garrett, “Breaking the Continuity and Uniformity of Cancer In The 1166
Worst Case of Full Connections With Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique In 1167
Cancer’s Recognition Applied in (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 1168
2023, 2023010262,(doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0262.v1). 1169
16. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable as the Survivors on the 1170
Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition Based on Uncertainty to All Modes in 1171
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010240 (doi: 1172
10.20944/preprints202301.0240.v1). 1173
17. Henry Garrett, “Extremism of the Attacked Body Under the Cancer’s 1174
Circumstances Where Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) 1175
SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010224, (doi: 1176
10.20944/preprints202301.0224.v1). 1177
18. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in Cancer’s 1178
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 1179
2023010105 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 1180
19. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form 1181
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions 1182
In Special ViewPoints”, Preprints 2023, 2023010088 (doi: 1183
10.20944/preprints202301.0088.v1). 1184
SuperHyperFunction To Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs on Cancer’s 1186
Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond ”, Preprints 2023, 2023010044 1187
21. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperStable on Cancer’s Recognition by 1188
Well- SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 1189
2023010043 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0043.v1). 1190
22. Henry Garrett, “Basic Notions on (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperForcing And 1191
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling in Cancer’s Recognitions And 1192
10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 1194
10.20944/preprints202301.0088.v1). 1198
24. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions 1199
Featuring (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances”, Preprints 1200
2022, 2022120549 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0549.v1). 1201
25. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperAlliances With SuperHyperDefensive 1202
and SuperHyperOffensive Type-SuperHyperSet On (Neutrosophic) 1203
SuperHyperGraph With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s 1204
Recognitions And Related (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClasses”, Preprints 2022, 1205
2022120540 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0540.v1). 1206
26. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperGirth on SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic 1207
SuperHyperGraph With SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions”, 1208
Preprints 2022, 2022120500 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0500.v1). 1209
27. Henry Garrett, “Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on 1210
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs and SuperHyperGraphs Alongside Applications 1211
in Cancer’s Treatments”, Preprints 2022, 2022120324 (doi: 1212
10.20944/preprints202212.0324.v1). 1213
28. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDominating and SuperHyperResolving on 1214
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs And Their Directions in Game Theory and 1215
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”, Preprints 2022, 2022110576 (doi: 1216
10.20944/preprints202211.0576.v1). 1217
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By Dominating Sequence As Hyper 1219
Decoration On Super Density”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10371529). 1220
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By Dominating Sequence As Hyper 1222
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By Dominating Sequence As 1225
Hyper Decoration On Super Density”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1226
10.5281/zenodo.10263440). 1227
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By STABLE As Hyper Decoration On 1229
Super Density”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10028600). 1230
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By STABLE As Hyper Decoration 1232
On Super Density”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8310454). 1233
34. Henry Garrett, “Recognition of Cancer With Bipartite and Path as 1234
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph By the Tool Called Stability”, Preprints 2023, 1235
2023081972 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202308.1972.v1). 1236
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By STABLE As Hyper 1238
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By REVERSE CONNECTIVE 1241
DOMINATION As Hyper Decoration On Super Density”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1242
10.5281/zenodo.8206877). 1243
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By REVERSE CONNECTIVE 1245
10.5281/zenodo.8206834). 1247
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By REVERSE CONNECTIVE 1249
10.5281/zenodo.8206773). 1251
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By EQUAL CONNECTIVE 1253
10.5281/zenodo.8201319). 1255
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By EQUAL CONNECTIVE 1257
10.5281/zenodo.8201255). 1259
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By EQUAL CONNECTIVE 1261
10.5281/zenodo.8201165). 1263
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By CONNECTIVE DOMINATION As 1265
Hyper Decoration On Super Density”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1266
10.5281/zenodo.8196147). 1267
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By CONNECTIVE DOMINATION 1269
As Hyper Decoration On Super Density”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1270
10.5281/zenodo.8196132). 1271
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By CONNECTIVE 1273
10.5281/zenodo.8196099). 1275
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By DOMINATION As Hyper 1277
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By DOMINATION As Hyper 1280
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By DOMINATION As Hyper 1283
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperPerfect Search As Hyper Perf On Super 1286
Perfidy”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8104836). 1287
49. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Perfidy By Hyper Perf Of 1288
SuperHyperPerfect Search In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1289
SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8104857). 1290
SuperHyperGraph By Reverse Strict Dimension Dominating As Hyper Dimple 1292
On Super Dimity”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8092796). 1293
51. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Dimity By Hyper Dimple Of Reverse 1294
Strict Dimension Dominating In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1295
SuperHyperGraph By Unequal Dimension Dominating As Hyper Dimple On 1298
Super Dimity”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8088438). 1299
53. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Dimity By Hyper Dimple Of Unequal 1300
Dimension Dominating In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1301
SuperHyperGraph By Strict Dimension Dominating As Hyper Dimple On Super 1304
Dimity”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8084436). 1305
55. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Dimity By Hyper Dimple Of Strict 1306
SuperHyperGraph By Reverse Strict Connective As Hyper Conceit On Super 1310
Con”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8080100). 1311
57. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Con By Hyper Conceit Of Reverse Strict 1312
Connective In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, 1313
Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8080068). 1314
SuperHyperGraph By Unequal Connective Dominating As Hyper Conceit On 1316
Super Con”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8078445). 1317
59. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Con By Hyper Conceit Of Unequal 1318
Connective Dominating In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1319
SuperHyperGraph By Strict Connective Dominating As Hyper Conceit On 1322
61. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Con By Hyper Conceit Of Strict 1324
SuperHyperGraph By Reverse Dimension Dominating As Hyper Dimple On 1328
Super Dimity”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8072171). 1329
63. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Dimity By Hyper Dimple Of Reverse 1330
SuperHyperGraph By Equal Dimension Dominating As Hyper Dimple On Super 1334
65. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Dimity By Hyper Dimple Of Equal 1336
SuperHyperGraph By Dimension Dominating As Hyper Dimple On Super 1340
67. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Dimity By Hyper Dimple Of Dimension 1342
Dominating In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, 1343
SuperHyperGraph By Reverse Connective Dominating As Hyper Conceit On 1346
69. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Con By Hyper Conceit Of Reverse 1348
SuperHyperGraph By Equal Connective Dominating As Hyper Conceit On 1352
71. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Con By Hyper Conceit Of Equal 1354
SuperHyperGraph By Connective Dominating As Hyper Conceit On Super 1358
Con”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8051346). 1359
73. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Con By Hyper Conceit Of Connective 1360
SuperHyperGraph By United Dominating As Hyper Ultra On Super Units”, 1364
75. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Units By Hyper Ultra Of United 1366
SuperHyperGraph By Zero Forcing As Hyper ford On Super forceps”, Zenodo 1370
2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8017246). 1371
77. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super forceps By Hyper ford Of Zero Forcing In 1372
Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 2023, 1373
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8020128). 1374
SuperHyperGraph By Matrix-Based As Hyper mat On Super matte”, Zenodo 1376
2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7978571). 1377
79. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super mat By Hyper matte Of Matrix-Based In 1378
Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 2023, 1379
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7978857). 1380
SuperHyperGraph By Dominating-Edges As Hyper Dome On Super Eddy”, 1382
81. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Eddy By Hyper Dome Of 1384
Dominating-Edges In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1385
SuperHyperGraph By Edge-Gap As Hyper Gape On Super Gab”, Zenodo 2023, 1388
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7916595). 1389
83. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Gab By Hyper Gape Of Edge-Gap In 1390
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7923632). 1392
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On 1394
Super Nebulous”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7904698). 1395
85. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nebulous By Hyper Nebbish Of 1396
Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1397
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition As Hyper 1400
Decompress On Super Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1401
10.5281/zenodo.7904529). 1402
87. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Decompensation By Hyper Decompress Of 1403
Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With 1404
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1405
10.5281/zenodo.7904401). 1406
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut As Hyper Nebbish On Super 1408
Nebulous”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7871026). 1409
Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1411
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Cycle-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super 1414
Eulerian-Cycle-Neighbor In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1417
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Cycle-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On 1420
Super Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7855661). 1421
Eulerian-Cycle-Decomposition In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1423
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Cycle-Cut As Hyper Eulogy On Super EULA”, 1426
95. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super EULA By Hyper Eulogy Of 1428
Eulerian-Cycle-Cut In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1429
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Path-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super 1432
Eulerian-Type-Path-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1435
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Path-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress 1438
On Super Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7839333). 1439
Eulerian-Type-Path-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1441
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Path-Cut As Hyper Eulogy On Super 1444
EULA”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7834229). 1445
Eulerian-Type-Path-Cut In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1447
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Path-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super 1450
Eulerian-Path-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1453
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Path-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On 1456
Eulerian-Path-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1459
SuperHyperGraph As Hyper Tool On Super Toot”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1462
10.5281/zenodo.7812236). 1463
SuperHyperGraph By initial Eulerian-Path-Cut As Hyper initial Eulogy On 1465
Super initial EULA”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7809365). 1466
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Path-Cut As Hyper Eulogy-Path-Cut On Super 1468
EULA-Path-Cut”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7809358). 1469
Eulerian-Path-Cut In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1471
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Path-Cut As Hyper Eulogy On Super EULA”, 1474
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On 1477
Super Nebulous”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7806767). 1478
Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1480
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition As Hyper 1483
Decompress On Super Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1484
10.5281/zenodo.7804238). 1485
Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With 1487
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7804228). 1488
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut As Hyper Hamper On Super 1490
Hammy”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7799902). 1491
116. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Hammy By Hyper Hamper Of 1492
Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1493
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Cycle-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super 1496
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Cycle-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress 1499
On Super Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7793372). 1500
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Cycle-Cut As Hyper Hamper On Super 1502
Hammy”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7791952). 1503
Hamiltonian-Cycle-Cut In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1505
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super 1508
Hamiltonian-Neighbor In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1511
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On 1514
Hamiltonian-Decomposition In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1517
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Cut As Hyper Hamper On Super Hammy”, 1520
Hamiltonian-Cut In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1523
SuperHyperGraph By Trace-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 1526
Trace-Neighbor In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1529
129. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 1531
SuperHyperGraph By Trace-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On Super 1532
Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7771831). 1533
Trace-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1535
SuperHyperGraph By Trace-Cut As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 1538
ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.20913.25446). 1539
132. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Tract By Hyper Track Of Trace-Cut In 1540
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7764916). 1542
SuperHyperGraph By Edge-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 1544
Edge-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, 1547
SuperHyperGraph By Edge-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On Super 1550
Decompensation”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.22545.10089). 1551
Edge-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1553
SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.29544.34564). 1554
SuperHyperGraph By Edge-Cut As Hyper Edify On Super Eddy”, ResearchGate 1556
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.11377.76644). 1557
138. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Eddy By Hyper Edify Of Edge-Cut In 1558
Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 1559
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.23750.96329). 1560
SuperHyperGraph By Vertex-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 1562
Vertex-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1565
SuperHyperGraph By Vertex-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On Super 1568
Decompensation”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.30212.81289). 1569
Vertex-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1571
SuperHyperGraph By Vertex-Cut As Hyper Vertu On Super Vertigo”, 1574
144. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Vertigo By Hyper Vertu Of Vertex-Cut In 1576
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.32467.25124). 1578
SuperHyperGraph By Stable-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 1580
146. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nebulizer By Hyper Nub Of 1582
Stable-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1583
SuperHyperGraph By Stable-Decompositions As Hyper Stain On Super Stagy”, 1586
148. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Stale By Hyper Stalk Of 1588
Stable-Decompositions In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1589
SuperHyperGraph By Stable-Cut As Hyper Stain On Super Stagy”, 1592
150. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Stale By Hyper Stalk Of Stable-Cut In 1594
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.20170.24000). 1596
SuperHyperGraph By Clique-Neighbors As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 1598
152. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nebulizer By Hyper Nub Of 1600
Clique-Neighbors In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1601
SuperHyperGraph By Clique-Decompositions As Hyper Decompile On Super 1604
Decommission”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.18780.87683). 1605
Clique- Decompositions In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1607
SuperHyperGraph By Clique-Cut As Hyper Click On Super Cliche”, 1610
156. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Cliff By Hyper Cling Of Clique-Cut In 1612
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.27392.30721). 1614
SuperHyperGraph By Space As Hyper Spin On Super Spacy”, ResearchGate 1616
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.33028.40321). 1617
SuperHyperGraph By List- Coloring As Hyper List On Super Lisle”, 1619
159. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Lith By Hyper Lite Of List-Coloring In 1621
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.16356.04489). 1623
SuperHyperGraph By Space As Hyper Sparse On Super Spark ”, ResearchGate 1625
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.21756.21129). 1626
161. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Solidarity By Hyper Soul Of Space In 1627
Cancer’s Recognition With (Extreme) SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023, 1628
(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.30983.68009). 1629
SuperHyperGraph By Edge-Connectivity As Hyper Disclosure On Super 1631
Closure”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.28552.29445). 1632
163. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Uniform By Hyper Deformation Of 1633
Edge-Connectivity In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1634
SuperHyperGraph By Vertex-Connectivity As Hyper Leak On Super Structure”, 1637
165. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super System By Hyper Explosions Of 1639
Vertex-Connectivity In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1640
SuperHyperGraph By Tree-Decomposition As Hyper Forward On Super Returns”, 1643
167. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nodes By Hyper Moves Of 1645
Tree-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1646
SuperHyperGraph By Chord As Hyper Excellence On Super Excess”, 1649
169. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Gap By Hyper Navigations Of Chord In 1651
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.11172.14720). 1653
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyper(i,j)-Domination As Hyper Controller On 1655
Super Waves”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.22011.80165). 1656
171. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Coincidence By Hyper Routes Of 1657
SuperHyper(i,j)-Domination In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1658
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperEdge-Domination As Hyper Reversion On 1661
Super Indirection”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.10493.84962). 1662
173. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Obstacles By Hyper Model Of 1663
SuperHyperEdge-Domination In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1664
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperK-Domination As Hyper k-Actions On Super 1667
Patterns”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.19944.14086). 1668
175. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Harmony By Hyper k-Function Of 1669
SuperHyperK-Domination In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1670
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperK-Number As Hyper k-Partition On Super 1673
Layers”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.33103.76968). 1674
177. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Gradient By Hyper k-Class Of 1675
SuperHyperK-Number In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1676
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperOrder As Hyper Enumerations On Super 1679
Landmarks”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.35646.56641). 1680
179. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Analogous By Hyper Visions Of 1681
SuperHyperOrder In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1682
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperColoring As Hyper Categories On Super 1685
Neighbors”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.13973.81121). 1686
181. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Relations By Hyper Identifications Of 1687
SuperHyperColoring In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1688
182. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Contradiction By Hyper Detection of 1690
SuperHyperDefensive In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic 1691
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperDimension As Hyper Distinguishing On Super 1694
Distances”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.31956.88961). 1695
184. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Locations By Hyper Differing Of 1696
SuperHyperDimension In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1697
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperDominating As Hyper Closing On Super 1700
Messy”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.21510.45125). 1701
186. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Missing By Hyper Searching Of 1702
SuperHyperDominating In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1703
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperConnected As Hyper Group On Super Surge”, 1706
188. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Outbreak By Hyper Collections Of 1708
SuperHyperConnected In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1709
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperTotal As Hyper Covering On Super Infections”, 1712
190. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Extremism By Hyper Treatments Of 1714
SuperHyperTotal In Cancer’s Recognition with (Neutrosophic) 1715
191. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Isolation By Hyper Perfectness Of 1717
SuperHyperPerfect In Cancer’s Recognition with (Neutrosophic) 1718
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperPerfect As Hyper Idealism On Super Vacancy”, 1721
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperJoin As Hyper Separations On Super Sorts”, 1724
194. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super connections By Hyper disconnections Of 1726
SuperHyperJoin In Cancer’s Recognition with (Neutrosophic) 1727
195. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Mixed-Devastations By Hyper Decisions 1729
Of SuperHyperDuality In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic 1730
196. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition As (Neutrosophic) 1732
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperDuality As Hyper Imaginations On Super 1733
Mixed-Illustrations”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.33275.80161). 1734
197. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition As (Neutrosophic) 1735
SuperHyperGraph By Path SuperHyperColoring As Hyper Correction On Super 1736
Faults”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.30182.50241). 1737
198. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Reflections By Hyper Rotations Of Path 1738
SuperHyperColoring In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic 1739
199. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas As Hyper Deformations On Super Chains In 1741
Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph By 1742
SuperHyperDensity”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.13444.60806). 1743
200. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas As Hyper Ignorance By SuperHyperDensity On 1744
Super Resistances In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic 1745
SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.16800.05123). 1746
201. Henry Garrett, “New Research On Cancer’s Recognition and Neutrosophic 1747
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian SuperHyperCycles and Hamiltonian Sets As 1748
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-VI ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1749
10.13140/RG.2.2.29913.80482). 1750
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-V ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1753
10.13140/RG.2.2.33269.24809). 1754
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-IV ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1757
10.13140/RG.2.2.34946.96960). 1758
204. Henry Garrett, “A Research On Cancer’s Recognition and Neutrosophic 1759
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-III ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1761
10.13140/RG.2.2.14814.31040). 1762
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-II ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1765
10.13140/RG.2.2.15653.17125). 1766
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-I ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1769
10.13140/RG.2.2.25719.50089). 1770
207. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Disruptions In Cancer’s Extreme 1771
Recognition As Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph By Hyper Plans Called 1772
SuperHyperConnectivities”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1773
10.13140/RG.2.2.29441.94562). 1774
208. Henry Garrett, “Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition As Neutrosophic 1775
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperConnectivities As Hyper Diagnosis On Super 1776
Mechanism”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.17252.24968). 1777
209. Henry Garrett,“Cancer’s Recognition and (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph By 1778
the Criteria of Eulerian and Hamiltonian Type-Sets As Hyper Modified Cycles 1779
On Super Mess”, ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.16652.59525). 1780
210. Henry Garrett,“Eulerian and Hamiltonian In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition 1781
and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph On Super Interactions By Hyper Extensions 1782
of Cycles”, ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.34583.24485). 1783
211. Henry Garrett,“SuperHyperGirth Type-Results on extreme SuperHyperGirth 1784
theory and (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs Toward Cancer’s extreme 1785
Recognition”, Preprints 2023, 2023010396 (doi: 1786
10.20944/preprints202301.0396.v1). 1787
212. Henry Garrett,“Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Warns Hyper Landmark of 1788
neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth In Super Type-Versions of Cancer’s neutrosophic 1789
Recognition”, Preprints 2023, 2023010395 (doi: 1790
10.20944/preprints202301.0395.v1). 1791
213. Henry Garrett,“The Constructions of (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs on the 1792
Cancer’s Recognition in The Confrontation With Super Attacks In Hyper 1793
Situations By Implementing (Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in The 1794
Technical Approaches to Neutralize SuperHyperViews”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1795
10.13140/RG.2.2.26240.51204). 1796
214. Henry Garrett,“(Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing As the 1797
Entrepreneurs on Cancer’s Recognitions To Fail Forcing Style As the Super 1798
Classes With Hyper Effects In The Background of the Framework is So-Called 1799
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1800
10.13140/RG.2.2.12818.73925). 1801
215. Henry Garrett,“Super Actions On The Types of Hyper Levels In The Sensible 1802
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth On Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and 1803
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 1804
10.13140/RG.2.2.26836.88960). 1805
216. Henry Garrett,“SuperHyperGirth Approaches on the Super Challenges on the 1806
Cancer’s Recognition In the Hyper Model of (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, 1807
ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.36745.93289). 1808
217. Henry Garrett,“Extreme SuperHyperClique as the Firm Scheme of 1809
Confrontation under Cancer’s Recognition as the Model in The Setting of 1810
10.20944/preprints202301.0308.v1). 1812
218. Henry Garrett,“Uncertainty On The Act And Effect Of Cancer Alongside The 1813
Foggy Positions Of Cells Toward Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique inside 1814
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Titled Cancer’s Recognition”, Preprints 2023, 1815
2023010282 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0282.v1). 1816
219. Henry Garrett,“Neutrosophic Version Of Separates Groups Of Cells In Cancer’s 1817
Recognition On Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010267 1818
(doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0267.v1).). 1819
220. Henry Garrett, “The Shift Paradigm To Classify Separately The Cells and 1820
Affected Cells Toward The Totality Under Cancer’s Recognition By New 1821
Multiple Definitions On the Sets Polynomials Alongside Numbers In The 1822
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperMatching Theory Based on SuperHyperGraph and 1823
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”, Preprints 2023, 2023010265 (doi: 1824
10.20944/preprints202301.0265.v1). 1825
221. Henry Garrett,“Breaking the Continuity and Uniformity of Cancer In The 1826
Worst Case of Full Connections With Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique In 1827
Cancer’s Recognition Applied in (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 1828
2023, 2023010262,(doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0262.v1). 1829
222. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable as the Survivors on the 1830
Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition Based on Uncertainty to All Modes in 1831
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010240 (doi: 1832
10.20944/preprints202301.0240.v1). 1833
223. Henry Garrett, “Extremism of the Attacked Body Under the Cancer’s 1834
Circumstances Where Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) 1835
SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010224, (doi: 1836
10.20944/preprints202301.0224.v1). 1837
224. Henry Garrett,“SuperHyperMatching By (R-)Definitions And Polynomials To 1838
Monitor Cancer’s Recognition In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, 1839
ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.35061.65767). 1840
225. Henry Garrett,“The Focus on The Partitions Obtained By Parallel Moves In 1841
The Cancer’s Extreme Recognition With Different Types of Extreme 1842
SuperHyperMatching Set and Polynomial on (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, 1843
226. Henry Garrett,“Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique Decides the Failures on the 1845
Cancer’s Recognition in the Perfect Connections of Cancer’s Attacks By 1846
SuperHyperModels Named (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 1847
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.32530.73922). 1848
227. Henry Garrett,“Indeterminacy On The All Possible Connections of Cells In 1849
Front of Cancer’s Attacks In The Terms of Neutrosophic Failed 1850
SuperHyperClique on Cancer’s Recognition called Neutrosophic 1851
SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.15897.70243). 1852
228. Henry Garrett,“Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique Decides the Failures on the 1853
Cancer’s Recognition in the Perfect Connections of Cancer’s Attacks By 1854
SuperHyperModels Named (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 1855
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.32530.73922). 1856
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 1858
2023010105 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 1859
230. Henry Garrett,“Perfect Directions Toward Idealism in Cancer’s Neutrosophic 1860
Recognition Forwarding Neutrosophic SuperHyperClique on Neutrosophic 1861
231. Henry Garrett,“Demonstrating Complete Connections in Every Embedded 1863
Regions and Sub-Regions in the Terms of Cancer’s Recognition and 1864
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClique”, 1865
10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 1870
10.20944/preprints202301.0088.v1). 1874
234. Henry Garrett,“Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic Regions titled 1875
neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable in Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition 1876
modeled in the Form of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2023, 1877
(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.17385.36968). 1878
Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond ”, Preprints 2023, 2023010044 1881
Well- SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 1883
2023010043 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0043.v1). 1884
237. Henry Garrett, “Using the Tool As (Neutrosophic) Failed SuperHyperStable To 1885
SuperHyperModel Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) 1886
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In 1889
Special ViewPoints”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.11447.80803). 1890
Well-SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 1892
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.35774.77123). 1893
Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond ”, ResearchGate 2022, (doi: 1896
10.13140/RG.2.2.36141.77287). 1897
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2022, (doi: 1899
10.13140/RG.2.2.29430.88642). 1900
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2022, (doi: 1903
10.13140/RG.2.2.11369.16487). 1904
Featuring (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances”, Preprints 1906
2022, 2022120549 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0549.v1). 1907
Featuring (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances”, 1909
Recognitions And Related (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClasses”, Preprints 2022, 1914
2022120540 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0540.v1). 1915
Recognitions And Related (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClasses”, ResearchGate 1919
2022, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.14426.41923). 1920
Preprints 2022, 2022120500 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0500.v1). 1923
ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.20993.12640). 1926
249. Henry Garrett,“Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on 1927
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs and SuperHyperGraphs Alongside Applications 1928
in Cancer’s Treatments”, Preprints 2022, 2022120324 (doi: 1929
10.20944/preprints202212.0324.v1). 1930
250. Henry Garrett, “Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on 1931
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs And SuperHyperGraphs Alongside Applications 1932
in Cancer’s Treatments”, ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 1933
10.13140/RG.2.2.23123.04641). 1934
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”, Preprints 2022, 2022110576 (doi: 1937
10.20944/preprints202211.0576.v1). 1938
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”, ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 1941
10.13140/RG.2.2.23324.56966). 1942
253. Henry Garrett, “Basic Neutrosophic Notions Concerning SuperHyperDominating 1943
and Neutrosophic SuperHyperResolving in SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 1944
2022 (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.29173.86244). 1945
254. Henry Garrett, “Initial Material of Neutrosophic Preliminaries to Study Some 1946
Neutrosophic Notions Based on Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) in 1947
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)”, ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 1948
10.13140/RG.2.2.25385.88160). 1949
255. Henry Garrett, “Dominating Sequence In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1950
Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10042973). 1951
256. Henry Garrett, “Stable In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 1952
Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8210033). 1953
257. Henry Garrett, “Reverse Connective Domination In Neutrosophic 1954
SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8206898). 1955
258. Henry Garrett, “Equal Connective Domination In Neutrosophic 1956
SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8201378). 1957
259. Henry Garrett, “Connective Domination In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. 1958
Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8194003). 1959
260. Henry Garrett, “Domination In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 1960
261. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperPerfect Search In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 1962
262. Henry Garrett, “Reverse Strict Dimension Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. 1964
263. Henry Garrett, “Unequal Dimension Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1966
264. Henry Garrett, “Strict Dimension Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1968
265. Henry Garrett, “Reverse Strict Connective In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 1970
266. Henry Garrett, “Unequal Connective Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1972
267. Henry Garrett, “Strict Connective Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1974
268. Henry Garrett, “Reverse Dimension Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1976
269. Henry Garrett, “Equal Dimension Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1978
270. Henry Garrett, “Dimension Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 1980
271. Henry Garrett, “Reverse Connective Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1982
272. Henry Garrett, “Equal Connective Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1984
273. Henry Garrett, “Connective Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 1986
274. Henry Garrett, “United Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 1988
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8027488). 1989
275. Henry Garrett, “Zero Forcing In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 1990
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8020181). 1991
276. Henry Garrett, “Matrix-Based In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 1992
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7978921). 1993
277. Henry Garrett, “Collections of Math II”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 1994
10.5281/zenodo.7943878). 1995
278. Henry Garrett, “Dominating-Edges In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 1996
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7943871). 1997
279. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Gap In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 1998
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7923786). 1999
280. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2000
281. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. 2002
282. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2004
283. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Cycle-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2006
284. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Cycle-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2008
285. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Cycle-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2010
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7854561). 2011
286. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Path-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2012
287. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Path-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2014
288. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Path-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2016
289. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Path-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2018
290. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Path-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2020
291. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Path-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2022
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7812750). 2023
292. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2024
293. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. 2026
294. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2028
295. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Cycle-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2030
296. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Cycle-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2032
297. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Cycle-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2034
298. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2036
299. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2038
300. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2040
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7783791). 2041
301. Henry Garrett, “Trace-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2042
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7780123). 2043
302. Henry Garrett, “Trace-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2044
303. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDuality”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2046
10.5281/zenodo.7637762). 2047
304. Henry Garrett, “Trace-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2048
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7766174). 2049
305. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2050
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7762232). 2051
306. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2052
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7758601). 2053
307. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2054
10.5281/zenodo.7754661). 2055
308. Henry Garrett, “Vertex-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2056
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7750995) . 2057
309. Henry Garrett, “Vertex-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2058
310. Henry Garrett, “Vertex-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2060
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7747236). 2061
311. Henry Garrett, “Stable-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2062
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7742587). 2063
312. Henry Garrett, “Stable-Decompositions In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2064
313. Henry Garrett, “Stable-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2066
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7734719). 2067
314. Henry Garrett, “Clique-Neighbors In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2068
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7730484). 2069
315. Henry Garrett, “Clique-Decompositions In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2070
316. Henry Garrett, “Clique-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2072
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7722865). 2073
317. Henry Garrett, “Space In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2074
10.5281/zenodo.7713563). 2075
318. Henry Garrett, “Space In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2076
10.5281/zenodo.7709116). 2077
319. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Connectivity In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2078
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7706415). 2079
320. Henry Garrett, “Vertex-Connectivity In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2080
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7706063). 2081
321. Henry Garrett, “Tree-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2082
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7701906). 2083
322. Henry Garrett, “Chord In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2084
10.5281/zenodo.7700205). 2085
323. Henry Garrett, “(i,j)-Domination In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2086
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7694876). 2087
324. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Domination In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2088
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7679410). 2089
325. Henry Garrett, “K-Domination In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2090
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7675982). 2091
326. Henry Garrett, “K-Number In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2092
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7672388). 2093
327. Henry Garrett, “Order In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2094
10.5281/zenodo.7668648). 2095
328. Henry Garrett, “Coloring In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2096
10.5281/zenodo.7662810). 2097
329. Henry Garrett, “Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2098
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7659162). 2099
330. Henry Garrett, “Cancer In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2100
10.5281/zenodo.7653233). 2101
331. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperWheel ”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2102
10.5281/zenodo.7653204). 2103
332. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperMultipartite”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2104
10.5281/zenodo.7653142). 2105
333. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperBipartite”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2106
10.5281/zenodo.7653117). 2107
334. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperStar ”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2108
10.5281/zenodo.7653089). 2109
335. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2110
10.5281/zenodo.7651687). 2111
336. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperPath”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2112
10.5281/zenodo.7651619). 2113
337. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDomination”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2114
10.5281/zenodo.7651439). 2115
338. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDominating”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2116
10.5281/zenodo.7650729). 2117
339. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperConnected ”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2118
10.5281/zenodo.7647868). 2119
340. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperTotal ”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2120
10.5281/zenodo.7647017). 2121
341. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperPerfect”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2122
10.5281/zenodo.7644894). 2123
342. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperJoin”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2124
10.5281/zenodo.7641880). 2125
343. Henry Garrett, “Path SuperHyperColoring”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2126
10.5281/zenodo.7632923). 2127
344. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDensity”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2128
10.5281/zenodo.7623459). 2129
345. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2130
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7606416). 2131
346. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperConnectivities”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2132
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7606416). 2133
347. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperConnectivities”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2134
10.5281/zenodo.7606404). 2135
348. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2136
10.5281/zenodo.7580018). 2137
349. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2138
10.5281/zenodo.7580018). 2139
350. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2140
10.5281/zenodo.7580018). 2141
351. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2142
10.5281/zenodo.7579929). 2143
352. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2144
10.5281/zenodo.7563170). 2145
353. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2146
10.5281/zenodo.7563164). 2147
354. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2148
10.5281/zenodo.7563160). 2149
355. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2150
10.5281/zenodo.7563160). 2151
356. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2152
10.5281/zenodo.7563160). 2153
357. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2154
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7557063). 2155
358. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperMatching”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2156
10.5281/zenodo.7557009). 2157
359. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperMatching”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2158
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7539484). 2159
360. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2160
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7523390). 2161
361. Henry Garrett, “Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2162
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7523390). 2163
362. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On Failed SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2164
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7523390). 2165
363. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2166
10.5281/zenodo.7574952). 2167
364. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2168
10.5281/zenodo.7574992). 2169
365. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2170
10.5281/zenodo.7523357). 2171
366. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2172
10.5281/zenodo.7523357). 2173
367. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2174
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7504782). 2175
368. Henry Garrett, “Extreme Failed SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2176
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7504782). 2177
369. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On Failed SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2178
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7504782). 2179
370. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2180
10.5281/zenodo.7499395). 2181
371. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2182
10.5281/zenodo.7499395). 2183
372. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2184
10.5281/zenodo.7499395). 2185
373. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2186
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7497450). 2187
374. Henry Garrett, “Extreme Failed SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2188
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7497450). 2189
375. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2190
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7494862). 2191
376. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2192
10.5281/zenodo.7494862). 2193
377. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2194
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7494862). 2195
378. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperAlliances”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2196
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7493845). 2197
379. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperAlliances”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2198
10.5281/zenodo.7493845). 2199
380. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperAlliances”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2200
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7493845). 2201
381. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperMatching”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2202
10.5281/zenodo.7539484). 2203
382. Henry Garrett, “Failed SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2204
10.5281/zenodo.7523390). 2205
383. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2206
10.5281/zenodo.7523357). 2207
384. Henry Garrett, “Failed SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2208
10.5281/zenodo.7504782). 2209
385. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2210
10.5281/zenodo.7499395). 2211
386. Henry Garrett, “Failed SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2212
10.5281/zenodo.7497450). 2213
387. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2214
10.5281/zenodo.7494862). 2215
388. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperAlliances”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2216
10.5281/zenodo.7493845). 2217
389. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2218
10.5281/zenodo.7480110). 2219
390. Henry Garrett, “Neut. SuperHyperEdges”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2220
10.5281/zenodo.7378758). 2221
391. Henry Garrett, “Beyond Neutrosophic Graphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2222
10.5281/zenodo.6320305). 2223
392. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Duality”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2224
10.5281/zenodo.6677173). 2225
View publication stats

New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel by Strongly Resolving Sequence As Hyper Decoration On Super Density

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel by Strongly Resolving Sequence As Hyper Decoration On Super Density

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph With

Preprint · January 2024

557 PUBLICATIONS 28,726 CITATIONS

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 2

SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By Strongly 3

Resolving Sequence As Hyper Decoration On Super Density 4

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · 6

DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA 7

In this scientific research, (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic 9

SuperHyperStrongly Resolving Sequence). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S be 10

a pair S = (V, E). Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then 11

V 0 is called Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Resolving Sequence if the following expressions, 12

terms and statements is called Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Resolving Sequence criteria 13

∀Vb , Vc ∈ VN SHG \ V , ∃Va ∈ V 00 :

d(TV (Va , Vb )) 6= d(TV (Va , Vc )),

SuperHyperNotions, namely a Strongly Resolving Sequence and a Neutrosophic 16

Strongly Resolving Sequence. Two different SuperHyperDefinitions were started for 17

them, but research has progressed and SuperHyperNotion, SuperHyperUniform, and 18

SuperHyperClass are well-defined and well-reviewed based on them. Literature review is 19

research, a comparison between this SuperHyperNotion with other SuperHyperNotions 21

and basic SuperHyperNumbers is presented. Definitions are followed by examples and 22

examples, so clarifications are guided by various tools. Applications are designed to 23

the relationships between them all are officially called “SuperHyperEdge”. 29

“SuperHyperGraph” and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” frameworks are selected and 30

super-hypermodels open avenues for research on theoretical aspects and “cancer 32

In order to master the Neutrosophic Strongly Resolving Sequence, there is a need to 37

“re-define” the concept of “Strongly Resolving Sequence mastery”. SuperHyperVertices 38

table contains “values of vertices, supervertices, edges, hyperedges, and hyperedges 41

belonging to Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” with key points, it is redefined. ”values 42

of vertices & number of positions in alphabet”, ”Values of SuperVertices&maximum 43

SuperHyperClass SuperHyperGraph based on Strongly Resolving Sequence. This is the 47

Strongly Resolving Sequence, then it is officially called “Strongly Resolving Sequence”, 50

explored and distinguished because they are characterized in the SuperHyperClass 53

disciplinary methods based on a dominant Strongly Resolving Sequence. Because of 54

having Strongly Resolving Sequence, there is a need to “re-define” the concept of 55

“neutrosophic Strongly Resolving Sequence” and “neutrosophic Strongly Resolving 56

Sequence”. SuperHyperVertices and SuperHyperEdges are assigned by alphabetical 57

Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” is redefined if the 59

redefined to a “Neutrosophic Strongly Resolving Sequence”. It is useful to define a 61

“Neutrosophic” version of SuperHyperClasses. Since there are more ways to obtain 62

Neutrosophic type results, a SuperHyper- Neutrosophic Strongly Resolving Sequence 63

becomes more understandable. Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. If the 64

desired table exists, there are a number of Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses. So are 65

SuperHyperPath, SuperHyperCycle, SuperHyperStar, SuperHyperBipartite, 66

SuperHyperMultiPartite and SuperHyperWheel. ”Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath”, 67

“Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar”, “Neutrosophic 68

SuperHyperBipartite”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultiPartite” and “Neutrosophic 69

SuperHyperWheel”. A graph is SuperHyperUniform if it is a SuperHyperGraph and the 70

number of SuperHyperEdges elements is the same. Consider a Neutrosophic 71

SuperHyperGraph. There are a number of SuperHyperClasses as follows. It is a 72

SuperHyperPath if there is only one SuperVertex as an intersection between two given 73

SuperHyperEdges with two exceptions. If only one SuperVertex is given as an 74

intersection between two SuperHyperEdges, it is SuperHyperCycle. It is 75

SuperHyperStar and only one SuperVertex as intersection among all SuperHyperEdges. 76

It is SuperHyperBipartite, and only one SuperVertex is given as the intersection between 77

SuperHyperEdge in common. This is SuperHyperMultiPartite. Only one SuperVertex is 79

given as an intersection between two SuperHyperEdges, and these SuperVertices, which 80

form separate multisets, have no SuperHyperEdge in common. If only one 81

SuperHyperEdge among the given two SuperHyperEdges is a SuperHyperWheel and a 82

SuperVertex has a SuperHyperEdge with any regular SuperVertex. SuperHyperModel 83

suggests specific designs and specific architectures. SuperHyperModel is officially called 84