New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel by Dominating Sequence As Hyper Decoration On Super Density

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.
net/publication/376477572
New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph With

Star and Wheel By Dominating Sequence As Hyper Decoration On Super Density
Preprint · December 2023

DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.10371529
CITATIONS
1 author:
Henry Garrett
553 PUBLICATIONS 28,580 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Henry Garrett on 13 December 2023.
The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 2
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By Dominating 3
Sequence As Hyper Decoration On Super Density 4
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · 6
DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA 7
1 ABSTRACT 8
In this scientific research, (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic 9
SuperHyperDominating Sequence). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S be a 10
pair S = (V, E). Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then 11
V 0 is called Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating Sequence if the following expressions, terms 12
and statements is called Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating Sequence criteria holds. 13
X X X
|( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 Vi ∈V 0 Vi ∈V 0
X X X
= min |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) | ∀Vi ∈ V 00 , ∃Vj ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 :
V 00 ⊆VN SHG 00 00 00
Vi ∈V Vi ∈V Vi ∈V
TV0 (Vi , Vj ∈ Ei0 ) = min[TV (Vi0 ), TV (Vj0 )]Vi0 ,Vj0 ∈EN SHG ,
IV0 (Vi , Vj ∈ Ei0 ) = min[IV (Vi0 ), IV (Vj0 )]Vi0 ,Vj0 ∈EN SHG ,
and FV0 (Ei0 )(Vi , Vj ∈ Ei0 ) = min[FV (Vi0 ), FV (Vj0 )]Vi0 ,Vj0 ∈EN SHG ,
then Vj ∈ V 00 , until V 00 = VN SHG }
In this scientific research, new configurations are introduced for the new 14
SuperHyperNotions, namely a Dominating Sequence and a Neutrosophic Dominating 15
Sequence. Two different SuperHyperDefinitions were started for them, but research has 16
progressed and SuperHyperNotion, SuperHyperUniform, and SuperHyperClass are 17
well-defined and well-reviewed based on them. Literature review is implemented 18
throughout this research. To shine the light and importance of this research, a 19
comparison between this SuperHyperNotion with other SuperHyperNotions and basic 20
SuperHyperNumbers is presented. Definitions are followed by examples and examples, 21
so clarifications are guided by various tools. Applications are designed to understand 22
the theoretical aspect of this ongoing research. “Cancer diagnosis” are the things that 23
are being researched to explore the challenges that make sense in ongoing research and 24
future research. It is a special case. Cells are viewed in the intended manner. There are 25
different types of them. Some are individual and some are well modeled by groups of 26
cells. All these types are officially called “SuperHyperVertex”, but the relationships 27
between them all are officially called “SuperHyperEdge”. “SuperHyperGraph” and 28
“Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” frameworks are selected and selected for research on 29
“Cancer Diagnosis”. Thus, these complex and dense super-hypermodels open avenues for 30
research on theoretical aspects and “cancer diagnosis”. Ways to pursue this scientific 31
research have been considered. It has also been formally collected in the form of several 32
questions and problems. It is useful to define a “neutrosophic” version of Dominating 33
Sequence. Since there are more ways to get type results a Dominating Sequence 34
becomes more understandable. In order to master the Neutrosophic Dominating 35
Sequence, there is a need to “re-define” the concept of “Dominating Sequence mastery”. 36
SuperHyperVertices and SuperHyperEdges are assigned by alphabetical labels. In this 37
method, the position of tags is used to assign values. Suppose a Dominating Sequence. 38
If the specified table contains “values of vertices, supervertices, edges, hyperedges, and 39
hyperedges belonging to Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” with key points, it is 40
redefined. ”values of vertices & number of positions in alphabet”, ”Values of 41
SuperVertices&maximum values of its vertices”, ”values of edges&maximum values of 42
its vertices”, ”super edge values&max values of its vertices”, “super edge values” and 43
maximum values of its endpoints”. To get examples and structural examples, I would 44
like to introduce the next SuperHyperClass SuperHyperGraph based on Dominating 45
Sequence. This is the original. Having the foundation of the previous definition in the 46
SuperHyperClass type would be disciplined. If there is a need to have all Dominating 47
Sequence until Dominating Sequence, then it is officially called “Dominating Sequence”, 48
but otherwise, it is not Dominating Sequence. There is some explanation for the 49
original definition titled “Dominating Sequence”. These two examples are further 50
explored and distinguished because they are characterized in the SuperHyperClass 51
disciplinary methods based on a dominant Dominating Sequence. Because of having 52
Dominating Sequence, there is a need to “re-define” the concept of “neutrosophic 53
Dominating Sequence” and “neutrosophic Dominating Sequence”. SuperHyperVertices 54
and SuperHyperEdges are assigned by alphabetical labels. In this method, the position 55
of tags is used to assign values. Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. 56
“Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” is redefined if the desired table exists. And if the 57
desired table exists, a Dominating Sequence is redefined to a “Neutrosophic Dominating 58
Sequence”. It is useful to define a “Neutrosophic” version of SuperHyperClasses. Since 59
there are more ways to obtain Neutrosophic type results, a SuperHyper- Neutrosophic 60
Dominating Sequence becomes more understandable. Consider a Neutrosophic 61
SuperHyperGraph. If the desired table exists, there are a number of Neutrosophic 62
SuperHyperClasses. So are SuperHyperPath, SuperHyperCycle, SuperHyperStar, 63
SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultiPartite and SuperHyperWheel. ”Neutrosophic 64
SuperHyperPath”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar”, 65
“Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultiPartite” and 66
“Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel”. A graph is SuperHyperUniform if it is a 67
SuperHyperGraph and the number of SuperHyperEdges elements is the same. Consider 68
a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. There are a number of SuperHyperClasses as follows. 69
It is a SuperHyperPath if there is only one SuperVertex as an intersection between two 70
given SuperHyperEdges with two exceptions. If only one SuperVertex is given as an 71
intersection between two SuperHyperEdges, it is SuperHyperCycle. It is 72
SuperHyperStar and only one SuperVertex as intersection among all SuperHyperEdges. 73
It is SuperHyperBipartite, and only one SuperVertex is given as the intersection between 74
two SuperHyperEdges, and these SuperVertices, which form two distinct sets, have no 75
SuperHyperEdge in common. This is SuperHyperMultiPartite. Only one SuperVertex is 76
given as an intersection between two SuperHyperEdges, and these SuperVertices, which 77
form separate multisets, have no SuperHyperEdge in common. If only one 78
SuperHyperEdge among the given two SuperHyperEdges is a SuperHyperWheel and a 79
SuperVertex has a SuperHyperEdge with any regular SuperVertex. SuperHyperModel 80
suggests specific designs and specific architectures. SuperHyperModel is officially called 81
“SuperHyperGraph” and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”. In this SuperHyperModel, 82
the “special” cells and the “special group” of cells are SuperHyperModeled as 83
“SuperHyperVertices” and the common and desired properties between the “special” 84
cells and the “special group” of cells. SuperHyperModeled as “SuperHyperEdges”. 85
Sometimes, to have a more accurate SuperHyperModel, it is useful to have some degree 86
of determinism, uncertainty, and neutrality, in this case the SuperHyperModel is called 87
“Neutrosophic”. In future scientific research, the foundation will be based on “diagnosis 88
of cancer” and the results and definitions will be introduced in redeemed methods. 89
Cancer diagnosis in long-term practice. The specific region is assigned by the model 90
(called SuperHyperGraph) and the long cycle of movement of the cancer is determined 91
by this scientific research. Sometimes the movement of cancer is not easy to detect, 92
because there is certainty, uncertainty and neutrality about the movements and effects 93
of cancer on that area. This event leads us to choose another model [which is said to be 94
the Neutrosophic superhypergraph] in order to have a proper understanding of what 95
happened and was done. There are some specific models, which are well known and 96
have names, and some SuperHyperGeneral SuperHyperModels. The movements and 97
effects of cancer in complex pathways and between complex groups of cells can be 98
visualized with a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (-/SuperHyperCycle, SuperHyperStar, 99
SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, SuperHyperWheel). The goal is to find 100
the longest Dominating Sequence or the strongest Dominating Sequence in those 101
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModels. Some general results are presented for the longest 102
Dominating Sequence called Dominating Sequence and the strongest Dominating 103
Sequence called Neutrosophic Dominating Sequence. Beyond that in SuperHyperStar, 104
all possible SuperHyperPaths have only two SuperHyperEdges, but it is not enough as 105
having at least three SuperHyperEdges is necessary to form any style of cycle. There is 106
no form of any cycle, but literally, it is the transformation of any cycle. It literally 107
transforms and does not form. A basic introduction to the theory of Dominating 108
Sequence Neutrosophic, SuperHyperGraphs and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs is 109
suggested. 110
Keywords: Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, SuperHyperDominating Sequence, Cancer’s 111
Neutrosophic Recognition 112
AMS Subject Classification: 05C17, 05C22, 05E45 113
2 Applied Notions Under The Scrutiny Of The 114
Motivation Of This Scientific Research 115
In this scientific research, there are ideas in the prominent frameworks of motivations. I 116
try to bring motivations in narrative ways. Some Cells have faced attacks from the 117
established situation with cancer attacks in this case, there is some analysis embedded 118
in the case current situations where cells can be labeled as some groups and some 119
groups or individuals are overlabeled, all from behaviors to overcome cancer attacks. In 120
embedded situations, cell individuals and cell groups can be considered as “new groups”. 121
So it encourages us to find suitable SuperHyperModels for more appropriate analysis 122
about this dirty story. I found SuperHyperModels, officially called “SuperHyperGraphs” 123
and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. In this SuperHyperModel, cells and groups of 124
cells are defined as “SuperHyperVertices” and relationships between individual cells and 125
groups of cells are defined as “SuperHyperEdges”. So this is another motivation for us 126
to do research on this SuperHyperModel based on “cancer diagnosis”. Sometimes, 127
things get worse. The situation has passed certainty and precise style. So it is beyond 128
them. There are three descriptions, i.e., degrees of determination, uncertainty, and 129
neutrality, for any object based on ambiguous forms, i.e., incomplete data, imprecise 130
data, and uncertain analysis. The second model can be considered in the previous 131
SuperHyperModel. This is SuperHyperModel. This is SuperHyperGraph but officially 132
called “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. Cancer is a disease, but the model is 133
supposed to understand what happens in this phenomenon. The special case of this 134
disease is considered and some parameters are used as consequences of the model. Cells 135
are attacked by the disease, but the movement of cancer is in a specific area. Knowing 136
the mind of cancer can help to find some cures for this disease. SuperHyperGraph and 137
Neutrosophic Super-HyperGraph are super-hypermodels used in “cancer diagnosis” and 138
both are the foundation of the background of this scientific research. Sometimes cancer 139
has occurred in an area full of cells, cell groups, and embedded styles. In this section, 140
SuperHyperModel proposes based on the links of cancer movements in the form of unity 141
styles with the formation of design and architecture officially called “Dominating 142
Sequence”, in the themes of specialized terms and common words. Particle for direct 143
object. Applied concepts under the investigation of the motivation of this scientific 144
research. The “SuperHyper” prefix refers to the theme of embedded styles for 145
background discovery for SuperHyperNotions. Cancer diagnosis in long-term practice. 146
The specific region is assigned by the model (called SuperHyperGraph) and the long 147
cycle of movement of the cancer is determined by this scientific research. Sometimes the 148
movement of Cancer is not easy to identify because there is certainty, uncertainty and 149
neutrality about the movements and effects of Cancer in that region. This event leads 150
us to choose another model [said to be Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph]. Easy 151
understanding of what happened and what was done. There are some specific models 152
that are well known and named and some general models. The movements and effects 153
of cancer in complex pathways and between complex groups of cells can be visualized by 154
a neurosophic superhyperpath (-/SuperHyperCycle, SuperHyperStar, 155
SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, SuperHyperWheel). The goal is to find 156
Dominating Sequence or Neutrosophic Dominating Sequence for SuperHyperModels in 157
it. Some general results are presented. Beyond that in SuperHyperStar, all possible 158
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPaths have only two SuperHyperEdges, but it is not enough 159
as having at least three SuperHyperEdges is necessary to form any style of cycle. There 160
is no form of cycle, but it is literally a form of any cycle. It literally transforms and does 161
not form. 162
Question 2.1. How to define “SuperHyperNotions and to do research” to find the 163
“Dominating Sequence Rate” of any cell or groups of cells based on fixed cell or fixed 164
group of cells broadly, “Dominating Sequence Rate” based on fixed groups or fixed cells. 165
Groups of groups of cells? 166
Question 2.2. What are the best descriptions for “diagnosing cancer” in terms of 167
these chaotic and dense super-hypermodels in which embedded concepts are depicted? 168
This motivation to find concepts to use in this dense model is called 169
“SuperHyperGraphs”. So it motivates us to define different types of “Dominating 170
Sequence” and “neutrosophic Dominating Sequence” over “superhypergraph” and 171
“neutrosophic superhypergraph”. Then this scientific research has taken more 172
motivations to define SuperHyperClasses and find some connections among this 173
SuperHyperNotion with other SuperHyperNotions. It motivates us to obtain examples 174
and examples to clarify the framework of this scientific research. The general results 175
and some of the results about some of the connections are the ways that the key point 176
of this scientific research, “diagnosis of cancer” is more understandable and clear. 177
The framework of this research is as follows. First, I will introduce the basic 178
definitions to clarify the basics. In the “Introductions” subsection, basic definitions 179
about SuperHyperGraphs and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph are introduced and 180
discussed in depth. Basic concepts are thoroughly explained and illustrated, and 181
sometimes a literature review is used to make sense of what is to come in the coming 182
sections. The main definitions and their explanations, along with some results on the 183
new concepts, Dominating Sequence and Neutrosophic Dominating Sequence, are 184
specified in the sections “Dominating Sequence” and “Neutrosophic Dominating 185
Sequence”. In the concept of dealing with results and in Dominating Sequence to create 186
logic about the continuation of the scientific research, the ideas of SuperHyperUniform 187
and Neutrosophic SuperHyperUniform are introduced and as their consequences, the 188
corresponding SuperHyperClasses are specified to summarize the work done in this 189
section, as “Results on SuperHyperClasses” and “Results on Neutrosophic 190
SuperHyperClasses”. Going back to the core concepts, clever steps towards common 191
concepts to extend new concepts in new frameworks, SuperHyperGraph and 192
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, in “Results on SuperHyperClasses” and “Results on 193
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses” sections. There is the initial scientific research on 194
supergeneral relations and as the final and final part of the theoretical scientific research 195
is available in the section “General results”. Some general SuperHyperRelations are 196
fundamental and are known as fundamental SuperHyperNotions, as in “General results” 197
were extracted and discussed. “Dominating Sequence”, “Neutrosophic Dominating 198
Sequence”, “Results on SuperHyperClasses” and “Results on Neutrosophic 199
SuperHyperClasses”. There are curious questions about what has been done about 200
SuperHyperNotions to make sense of the superiority of this scientific research and to 201
discover the word “best” as a description and adjective of this scientific research as 202
presented in the “Dominating Sequence” section. The keyword of this scientific research 203
was presented in the section “Applications in cancer diagnosis” with two cases and 204
sub-sections “Case 1: Initial steps towards SuperHyperBipartite as SuperHyperModel” 205
and “Case 2: Incremental steps towards SuperHyperMultiperdel as SuperHyper. In the 206
“open issues” section, there is a detailed examination and recognition of what was done 207
in this scientific research and what happened in this scientific research in the form of 208
“questions” and “issues” in order to understand this scientific research in an outstanding 209
style, the advantages and limitations of this scientific research in addition to What has 210
been done in this scientific research is stated in the “conclusion and final remarks” 211
section. 212
3 Neutrosophic Preliminaries Of This Scientific 213
Research On the Redeemed Ways 214
In this section, the basic material in this scientific research, is referred to [Single Valued 215
Neutrosophic Set](Ref. [1],Definition 2.2,p.2), [Neutrosophic Set](Ref. [1],Definition 216
2.1,p.1), [Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)](Ref. [1],Definition 2.5,p.2), 217
[Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)](Ref. [1],Definition 218
2.7,p.3), [t-norm](Ref. [1], Definition 2.7, p.3), and [Characterization of the 219
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)](Ref. [1],Definition 2.7,p.3), [Neutrosophic 220
Strength of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPaths] (Ref. [1],Definition 5.3,p.7), and 221
[Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)] 222
(Ref. [1],Definition 5.4,p.7). Also, the new ideas and their clarifications are addressed 223
to Ref. [1]. 224
In this subsection, the basic material which is used in this scientific research, is 225
presented. Also, the new ideas and their clarifications are elicited. 226
Definition 3.1 (Neutrosophic Set). (Ref. [1],Definition 2.1,p.1). 227
Let X be a Eulerian-Path-Cut of points (objects) with generic elements in X denoted by

x; then the Neutrosophic set A (NS A) is an object having the form
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}

+
where the functions T, I, F : X →]− 0, 1 [ define respectively the a
truth-membership function, an indeterminacy-membership function, and a
falsity-membership function of the element x ∈ X to the set A with the condition
−
0 ≤ TA (x) + IA (x) + FA (x) ≤ 3+ .
The functions TA (x), IA (x) and FA (x) are real standard or nonstandard subsets of 228
+
]− 0, 1 [. 229
Definition 3.2 (Single Valued Neutrosophic Set). (Ref. [1],Definition 2.2,p.2). 230
Let X be a Eulerian-Path-Cut of points (objects) with generic elements in X denoted by

x. A single valued Neutrosophic set A (SVNS A) is characterized by
truth-membership function TA (x), an indeterminacy-membership function IA (x), and a
falsity-membership function FA (x). For each point x in X, TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) ∈ [0, 1].
A SVNS A can be written as
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}.
Definition 3.3. The degree of truth-membership,

indeterminacy-membership and falsity-membership of the subset X ⊂ A of
the single valued Neutrosophic set A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}:
TA (X) = min[TA (vi ), TA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,
IA (X) = min[IA (vi ), IA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,

and FA (X) = min[FA (vi ), FA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X .
Definition 3.4. The support of X ⊂ A of the single valued Neutrosophic set
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}:
supp(X) = {x ∈ X : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) > 0}.
Definition 3.5 (Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). (Ref. [1],Definition 231
2.5,p.2). 232
Assume V 0 is a given set. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a 233
pair S = (V, E), where 234
(i) V = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vn } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of V 0 ; 235
(ii) V = {(Vi , TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi )) : TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi ) ≥ 0}, (i = 236
1, 2, . . . , n); 237
(iii) E = {E1 , E2 , . . . , En0 } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of 238
V; 239
(iv) E = {(Ei0 , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )) : TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 ) ≥ 0}, (i0 = 240
1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 241
(v) Vi 6= ∅, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 242
(vi) Ei0 6= ∅, (i0 = 1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 243
P
(vii) i supp(Vi ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 244
0 0
P
(viii) i0 supp(Ei ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n );
0 245
(ix) and the following conditions hold:
TV0 (Ei0 ) ≤ min[TV 0 (Vi ), TV 0 (Vj )]Vi ,Vj ∈Ei0 ,
IV0 (Ei0 ) ≤ min[IV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vj )]Vi ,Vj ∈Ei0 ,

and FV0 (Ei0 ) ≤ min[FV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vj )]Vi ,Vj ∈Ei0
where i0 = 1, 2, . . . , n0 . 246
Figure 1. The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a illustrated SuperHyperModeling

on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Here the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ej 0 and the Neutrosophic 247
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) Vj are single valued Neutrosophic sets. TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), 248
and FV 0 (Vi ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 249
indeterminacy-membership and the degree of falsity-membership the Neutrosophic 250
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) V. 251
TV0 (Ei0 ), TV0 (Ei0 ), and TV0 (Ei0 ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 252
indeterminacy-membership and the degree of falsity-membership of the Neutrosophic 253
SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) Ei0 to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) E. Thus, 254
the ii0 th element of the incidence matrix of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) 255
are of the form (Vi , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )), the sets V and E are crisp sets. 256
Example 3.6. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair 257
S = (V, E) in the mentioned Neutrosophic Figures in every Neutrosophic items. 258
• On the Figure (1), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 259
notion, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. E1 260
and E3 are some empty Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges but E2 is a loop 261
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge and E4 is a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. Thus 262
in the terms of Neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only one Neutrosophic 263
SuperHyperEdge, namely, E4 . The Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 is 264
Neutrosophic isolated means that there’s no Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge has it 265
as a Neutrosophic endpoint. 266
notion, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 268
E1 , E2 and E3 are some empty Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges but E4 is a 269
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. Thus in the terms of Neutrosophic 270
SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only one Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge, namely, 271
E4 . The Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 is Neutrosophic isolated means that 272
there’s no Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge has it as a Neutrosophic endpoint. 273
• On the Figure (3), the SuperHyperNotion, namely, SuperHyperGirth, is up. 274
E1 , E2 and E3 are some empty SuperHyperEdges but E4 is a SuperHyperEdge. 275
Thus in the terms of SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only one SuperHyperEdge, 276
namely, E4 . 277
Figure 2. TThe Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a illustrated SuperHyperModel-

ing on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 3. The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a illustrated SuperHyperModeling

on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 4. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a illustrated Super-

HyperModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
• On the Figure (4), there’s no empty SuperHyperEdge but E3 are a loop 278
SuperHyperEdge on {F } and there are some SuperHyperEdges, namely, E1 on 279
{H, V1 , V3 }, alongside E2 on {O, H, V4 , V3 } and E4 , E5 on {N, V1 , V2 , V3 , F }. 280
• On the Figure (5),there’s neither empty SuperHyperEdge nor loop 281
SuperHyperEdge. 282
• On the Figure (6), there’s neither empty SuperHyperEdge nor loop 283
SuperHyperEdge. 284
SuperHyperEdge. 286
SuperHyperEdge. 288
SuperHyperEdge. 290
SuperHyperEdge. 292
SuperHyperEdge. 294
SuperHyperEdge. 296
SuperHyperEdge. 298
SuperHyperEdge. 300
SuperHyperEdge. 302
Figure 5. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs mentioned as the SuperHy-

perModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 6. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a illustrated Super-

HyperModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 7. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs depicted SuperHyperMod-

eling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 8. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with dense SuperHyper-

Modeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 9. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a messy SuperHyper-

Modeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 10. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with highly-embedding-

connected SuperHyperModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example
(3.6)
Figure 11. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a SuperHyperModel-

Figure 12. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with highly-multiple-

connected-style SuperHyperModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic
Example (3.6)


Figure 15. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with Linearly-Connected

SuperHyperModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)

Figure 17. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a Linearly-over-

packed SuperHyperModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example
(3.6)
SuperHyperEdge. 304
SuperHyperEdge. 306
SuperHyperEdge. 308
SuperHyperEdge. 310
SuperHyperEdge. 312
SuperHyperEdge. 314
SuperHyperEdge. 316
Definition 3.7 (Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). 317
(Ref. [1],Definition 2.7,p.3). 318
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). The 319
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ei0 and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 320
(NSHV) Vi of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S = (V, E) could be 321
characterized as follow-up items. 322
(i) If |Vi | = 1, then Vi is called vertex; 323
(ii) if |Vi | ≥ 1, then Vi is called SuperVertex; 324





(iii) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called edge; 325
(iv) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 326
HyperEdge; 327
(v) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called 328
SuperEdge; 329
(vi) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 330
SuperHyperEdge. 331
If we choose different types of binary operations, then we could get hugely diverse 332
types of general forms of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG). 333
Definition 3.8 (t-norm). (Ref. [1], Definition 2.7, p.3). 334
A binary operation ⊗ : [0, 1] × [0, 1] → [0, 1] is a t-norm if it satisfies the following 335
for x, y, z, w ∈ [0, 1]: 336
(i) 1 ⊗ x = x; 337
(ii) x ⊗ y = y ⊗ x; 338
(iii) x ⊗ (y ⊗ z) = (x ⊗ y) ⊗ z; 339
(iv) If w ≤ x and y ≤ z then w ⊗ y ≤ x ⊗ z. 340
Definition 3.9. The degree of truth-membership, indeterminacy-membership

and falsity-membership of the subset X ⊂ A of the single valued Neutrosophic set
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X} (with respect to t-norm Tnorm ):
TA (X) = Tnorm [TA (vi ), TA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,
IA (X) = Tnorm [IA (vi ), IA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,

and FA (X) = Tnorm [FA (vi ), FA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X .
Definition 3.10. The support of X ⊂ A of the single valued Neutrosophic set

A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}:
supp(X) = {x ∈ X : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) > 0}.
Definition 3.11. (General Forms of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). 341
Assume V 0 is a given set. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a 342
pair S = (V, E), where 343
(i) V = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vn } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of V 0 ; 344
(ii) V = {(Vi , TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi )) : TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi ) ≥ 0}, (i = 345
1, 2, . . . , n); 346
(iii) E = {E1 , E2 , . . . , En0 } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of 347
V; 348
(iv) E = {(Ei0 , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )) : TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 ) ≥ 0}, (i0 = 349
1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 350
(v) Vi 6= ∅, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 351
(vi) Ei0 6= ∅, (i0 = 1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 352
P
(vii) i supp(Vi ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 353
0 0
P
(viii) i0 supp(Ei ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n ).
0 354
Here the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ej 0 and the Neutrosophic 355
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) Vj are single valued Neutrosophic sets. TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), 356
and FV 0 (Vi ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 357
indeterminacy-membership and the degree of falsity-membership the Neutrosophic 358
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) V. 359
TV0 (Ei0 ), TV0 (Ei0 ), and TV0 (Ei0 ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 360
indeterminacy-membership and the degree of falsity-membership of the Neutrosophic 361
SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) Ei0 to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) E. Thus, 362
the ii0 th element of the incidence matrix of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) 363
are of the form (Vi , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )), the sets V and E are crisp sets. 364
Definition 3.12 (Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). 365
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). The 367
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ei0 and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 368
(NSHV) Vi of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S = (V, E) could be 369
characterized as follow-up items. 370
(i) If |Vi | = 1, then Vi is called vertex; 371
(ii) if |Vi | ≥ 1, then Vi is called SuperVertex; 372
(iii) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called edge; 373
(iv) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 374
HyperEdge; 375
(v) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called 376
SuperEdge; 377
(vi) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 378
SuperHyperEdge. 379
This SuperHyperModel is too messy and too dense. Thus there’s a need to have 380
some restrictions and conditions on SuperHyperGraph. The special case of this 381
SuperHyperGraph makes the patterns and regularities. 382
Definition 3.13. A graph is SuperHyperUniform if it’s SuperHyperGraph and the 383
number of elements of SuperHyperEdges are the same. 384
To get more visions on SuperHyperUniform, the some SuperHyperClasses are 385
introduced. It makes to have SuperHyperUniform more understandable. 386
Definition 3.14. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. There are some 387
SuperHyperClasses as follows. 388
(i). It’s Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath if it’s only one SuperVertex as 389
intersection amid two given SuperHyperEdges with two exceptions; 390
(ii). it’s SuperHyperCycle if it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two 391
given SuperHyperEdges; 392
(iii). it’s SuperHyperStar it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid all 393
SuperHyperEdges; 394
(iv). it’s SuperHyperBipartite it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two 395
given SuperHyperEdges and these SuperVertices, forming two separate sets, has 396
no SuperHyperEdge in common; 397
(v). it’s SuperHyperMultiPartite it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid 398
two given SuperHyperEdges and these SuperVertices, forming multi separate sets, 399
has no SuperHyperEdge in common; 400
(vi). it’s SuperHyperWheel if it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two 401
given SuperHyperEdges and one SuperVertex has one SuperHyperEdge with any 402
common SuperVertex. 403
Example 3.15. In the Figure (23), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath 404
ESHP : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, in the 405
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (23), is the notion. 406
Example 3.16. In the Figure (24), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle 407
N SHC : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Neutrosophic 408
SuperHyperSet, in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (24), is up. 409
Example 3.17. In the Figure (25), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar 410
ESHS : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, 411
by the Algorithm in previous Neutrosophic result, of the Neutrosophic 412
SuperHyperVertices of the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E), in 413
the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (25), is up. 414
Example 3.18. In the Neutrosophic Figure (26), the connected Neutrosophic 415
SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), is Neutrosophic highlighted and Neutrosophic 416
featured. The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Neutrosophic Algorithm in 417
previous Neutrosophic result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected 418
Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic 419
SuperHyperModel (26), is up. 420
Figure 23. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath Associated to the Notions in the Example

(3.15)
Figure 24. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions

in the Neutrosophic Example (3.16)
Figure 25. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions in

the Neutrosophic Example (3.17)
Figure 26. Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite Neutrosophic Associated to the Neutro-

sophic Notions in the Example (3.18)
Figure 27. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite Associated to the Notions in the

Example (3.19)
Figure 28. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel Neutrosophic Associated to the Neutro-

sophic Notions in the Neutrosophic Example (3.20)
Example 3.19. In the Figure (27), the connected Neutrosophic 421
SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E), is highlighted and Neutrosophic featured. 422
The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Algorithm in previous Neutrosophic 423
result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected Neutrosophic 424
SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (27), 425
is up. 426
Example 3.20. In the Neutrosophic Figure (28), the connected Neutrosophic 427
SuperHyperWheel N SHW : (V, E), is Neutrosophic highlighted and featured. The 428
obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Algorithm in previous result, of the 429
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel 430
ESHW : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (28), is up. 431
Definition 3.21. Let a pair S = (V, E) be a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)

S. Then a sequence of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) and Neutrosophic
SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)
V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs
is called a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic 432
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) V1 to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vs if either 433
of following conditions hold: 434
(i) Vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 435
(ii) there’s a vertex vi ∈ Vi such that vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 436
(iii) there’s a SuperVertex Vi0 ∈ Vi such that Vi0 , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 437
(iv) there’s a vertex vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that Vi , vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 438
0 0
(v) there’s a SuperVertex Vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that Vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 439
(vi) there are a vertex vi ∈ Vi and a vertex vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that vi , vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 440
0 0
(vii) there are a vertex vi ∈ Vi and a SuperVertex Vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 441
(viii) there are a SuperVertex Vi0 ∈ Vi and a vertex vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that Vi0 , vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 442
(ix) there are a SuperVertex Vi0 ∈ Vi and a SuperVertex Vi+1

0
∈ Vi+1 such that 443
0 0
Vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 . 444
Definition 3.22. (Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPaths). 445
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). a

Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV)
V1 to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vs is sequence of Neutrosophic
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) and Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)
V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs ,
could be characterized as follow-up items. 446
(i) If for all Vi , Ej 0 , |Vi | = 1, |Ej 0 | = 2, then NSHP is called path; 447
(ii) if for all Ej 0 , |Ej 0 | = 2, and there’s Vi , |Vi | ≥ 1, then NSHP is called SuperPath; 448
(iii) if for all Vi , Ej 0 , |Vi | = 1, |Ej 0 | ≥ 2, then NSHP is called HyperPath; 449
(iv) if there are Vi , Ej 0 , |Vi | ≥ 1, |Ej 0 | ≥ 2, then NSHP is called Neutrosophic 450
SuperHyperPath . 451
Definition 3.23 (Neutrosophic Strength of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPaths). 452
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). A

Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV)
V1 to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vs is sequence of Neutrosophic
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) and Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)
V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs ,
have 454
(i) Neutrosophic t-strength (min{T (Vi )}, m, n)si=1 ; 455
(ii) Neutrosophic i-strength (m, min{I(Vi )}, n)si=1 ; 456
Table 1. The Values of Vertices, SuperVertices, Edges, HyperEdges, and SuperHy-

perEdges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph Mentioned in the Definition
(3.27)
The Values of The Vertices The Number of Position in Alphabet
The Values of The SuperVertices The maximum Values of Its Vertices
The Values of The Edges The maximum Values of Its Vertices
The Values of The HyperEdges The maximum Values of Its Vertices
The Values of The SuperHyperEdges The maximum Values of Its Endpoints
(iii) Neutrosophic f-strength (m, n, min{F (Vi )})si=1 ; 457
(iv) Neutrosophic strength (min{T (Vi )}, min{I(Vi )}, min{F (Vi )})si=1 . 458
Definition 3.24 (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges 459
(NSHE)). (Ref. [1],Definition 5.4,p.7). 460
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). Consider 461
a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) E = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then E is called 462
(ix) Neutrosophic t-connective if T (E) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic 463
t-strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 464
(NSHV) Vi to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vj where 1 ≤ i, j ≤ s; 465
(x) Neutrosophic i-connective if I(E) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic 466
i-strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 467
(xi) Neutrosophic f-connective if F (E) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic 469
f-strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 470
(xii) Neutrosophic connective if (T (E), I(E), F (E)) ≥ maximum number of 472
Neutrosophic strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic 473
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vj 474
where 1 ≤ i, j ≤ s. 475
For the sake of having a Neutrosophic notion, there’s a need to “redefine” the 476
notion of “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”. The SuperHyperVertices and the 477
SuperHyperEdges are assigned by the labels from the letters of the alphabets. In this 478
procedure, there’s the usage of the position of labels to assign to the values. 479
Definition 3.25. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (SHG) S is a pair 480
S = (V, E). It’s redefined Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph if the Table (1) holds. 481
It’s useful to define a “Neutrosophic” version of SuperHyperClasses. Since there’s 482
more ways to get Neutrosophic type-results to make a Neutrosophic more 483
understandable. 484
Definition 3.26. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (SHG) S is a pair 485
S = (V, E). There are some Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses if the Table (2) 486
holds. Thus Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath , notion, SuperHyperStar, 487
SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultiPartite, and SuperHyperWheel, are 488
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath, Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle, 489
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar, Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite, 490
Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultiPartite, and Neutrosophic 491
SuperHyperWheel if the Table (2) holds. 492

perEdges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, Mentioned in the Definition
(3.26)

perEdges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph Mentioned in the Definition
(3.27)
It’s useful to define a “Neutrosophic” version of a Neutrosophic notion. Since there’s 493
more ways to get type-results to make a Neutrosophic notion more Neutrosophicly 494
understandable. 495
For the sake of having a Neutrosophic notion, there’s a need to “redefine” the 496
Neutrosophic notion of “Neutrosophic notion”. The SuperHyperVertices and the 497
SuperHyperEdges are assigned by the labels from the letters of the alphabets. In this 498
procedure, there’s the usage of the position of labels to assign to the values. 499
Definition 3.27. Assume a notion. It’s redefined a Neutrosophic notion if the 500
Table (3) holds. 501
Example 3.28. Referred to the Example (3.6), assume a Neutrosophic 502
SuperHyperGraph (SHG) S is a pair S = (V, E) in the mentioned Neutrosophic Figures 503
in every Neutrosophic items. 504
SuperHyperGraph (SHG), is up in the illustration of the Table (4). 506
Table 4. The Values of Vertices, SuperVertices, Edges, HyperEdges, and SuperHyper-

Edges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph
Vi (TVi , IVi , FVi ) Ei (TEi , IEi , FEi )
V1 (0.13, 0.13, 0.13) E1 (0, 0, 0)
V2 (0.13, 0.13, 0.13) E2 (0.13, 0.13, 0.13)
V3 (0.15, 0.15, 0.15) E3 (0, 0, 0)
V4 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14) E4 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14)

V1 (0.13, 0.13, 0.13) E1 (0, 0, 0)
V2 (0.03, 0.03, 0.03) E2 (0, 0, 0)
V3 (0.15, 0.15, 0.15) E3 (0, 0, 0)
V4 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14) E4 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14)

V1 (0.13, 0.13, 0.13) E1 (0, 0, 0)
V2 (0.11, 0.11, 0.11) E2 (0, 0, 0)
V3 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14) E3 (0, 0, 0)
- - E4 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14)

V1 (0.13, 0.13, 0.13) E1 (0.08, 0.08, 0.08)
V2 (0.11, 0.11, 0.11) E2 (0.15, 0.15, 0.15)
V3 (0.05, 0.05, 0.05) E3 (0, 0, 0)
V4 (0.12, 0.12, 0.12) E4 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14)
{F } (0.06, 0.06, 0.06) E5 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14)
{H} (0.08, 0.08, 0.08) - -
{N } (0.14, 0.14, 0.14) - -
{O} (0.15, 0.15, 0.15) - -

4 Main Resultant 513
Definition 4.1. (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating 514
Sequence). 515
Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Consider a 516
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then V 0 is called Neutrosophic 517
SuperHyperDominating Sequence if the following expressions, terms and statements is called 518
Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating Sequence criteria holds. 519
X X X
|( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 Vi ∈V 0 Vi ∈V 0
X X X
= min
00 ⊆V
|{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) | ∀Vi ∈ V 00 , ∃Vj ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 :
V N SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
TV0 (Vi , Vj ∈ Ei0 ) = min[TV (Vi0 ), TV (Vj0 )]Vi0 ,Vj0 ∈EN SHG ,
IV0 (Vi , Vj ∈ Ei0 ) = min[IV (Vi0 ), IV (Vj0 )]Vi0 ,Vj0 ∈EN SHG ,
and FV0 (Ei0 )(Vi , Vj ∈ Ei0 ) = min[FV (Vi0 ), FV (Vj0 )]Vi0 ,Vj0 ∈EN SHG ,
then Vj ∈ V 00 , until V 00 = VN SHG }
Example 4.2. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel (SHG) S is a pair S = (V, E) 520
in the mentioned Neutrosophic Figures in every Neutrosophic items. 521
SuperHyperWheel (SHG), is up in the illustration of the Table (8). 523
Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Consider a 524
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {Vi=1 }. Then V 0 is called Neutrosophic 525
SuperHyperDominating Sequence since the following expressions, terms and statements 526


Figure 32. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar Neutrosophic Associated to the Neutro-











Edges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
is called Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating Sequence criteria holds. 527
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1 }
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1 }
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={V
i=1 }
= (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) =
X X X
= 00
max |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VSHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
Vi=1 ∈ V 00 = {V1 }, ∃Vj=2,6,7 ∈ VN SHG \ V 00

:
TV0 (Vi , Vj ∈ Ei0 ) = 0.26 = min[TV (Vi0 ), TV (Vj0 )]Vi0 ,Vj0 ∈EN SHG ,
IV0 (Vi , Vj ∈ Ei0 ) = 0.26 = min[IV (Vi0 ), IV (Vj0 )]Vi0 ,Vj0 ∈EN SHG ,
and FV0 (Ei0 )(Vi , Vj ∈ Ei0 ) = 0.26 = min[FV (Vi0 ), FV (Vj0 )]Vi0 ,Vj0 ∈EN SHG ,
then Vj=2,6,7 ∈ V 00 , but V 00 6= VN SHG
Vi=2 ∈ V 00 = {V1,2,6,7 }, ∃Vj=3,4 ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 :
then Vj=1−4,6−7 ∈ V 00 , but V 00 6= VN SHG
Vi=7 ∈ V 00 = {V1−4,6−7 }, ∃Vj=5 ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 :
then Vj=1−7 ∈ V 00 , then V 00 = VN SHG }
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {Vi=1−3,6 }. Then V 0 is called Neutrosophic 531
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−3,6 }

V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
V3 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E3 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V4 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V5 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V6 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.19, 0.19, 0.19) E2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
V3 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E3 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V4 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V5 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V6 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−3,6 }
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−3,6 }
= (0.97, 0.97, 0.97) =
X X X
= 00
max |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VSHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
Vi=1 ∈ V 00 = {Vi=1−3,6 }, ∃Vj=7 ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 :

then Vi=1−3,6−7 ∈ V 00 , but V 00 6= VN SHG
Vi=6 ∈ V 00 = {Vi=1−3,6−7 }, ∃Vj=3,4 ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 :
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {Vi=1−3,6 }. Then V 0 is called Neutrosophic 537
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−3,6 }
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.19, 0.19, 0.19) E2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
V3 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E3 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V4 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V5 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V6 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V7 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−3,6 }
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−3,6 }
= (0.93, 0.93, 0.93) =
X X X
= max |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V 00 ⊆VSHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
Vi=1 ∈ V 00 = {Vi=1−3,6 }, ∃Vj=7 ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 :

Vi=6 ∈ V 00 = {Vi=1−3,6−7 }, ∃Vj=3,4 ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 :
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {Vi=1−3,6−7 }. Then V 0 is called Neutrosophic 543
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−3,6−7 }
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−3,6−7 }
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−3,6−7 }
= (1.16, 1.16, 1.16) =
X X X
= max
00 ⊆V
|{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.19, 0.19, 0.19) E2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
V3 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E3 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
V4 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V5 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V6 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V7 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
Vi=1 ∈ V 00 = {Vi=1−3,6 }, ∃Vj=7 ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 :

Vi=6 ∈ V 00 = {Vi=1−3,6−7 }, ∃Vj=3,4 ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 :
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {Vi=1−4,6−7 }. Then V 0 is called Neutrosophic 549
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−4,6−7 }
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={V
i=1−4,6−7 }
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−4,6−7 }
= (1.4, 1.4, 1.4) =
X X X
= max
00 ⊆V
|{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
Vi=1 ∈ V 00 = {Vi=1−3,6 }, ∃Vj=7 ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 :

Vi=4 ∈ V 00 = {Vi=1−4,6−7 }, ∃Vj=5 ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 :
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.19, 0.19, 0.19) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V6 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V7 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
Edges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {Vi=1−7 }. Then V 0 is called Neutrosophic 555
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−7 }
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−7 }
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−7 }
= (1.43, 1.43, 1.43) =
X X X
= 00
max |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VSHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00 00
then Vj=1−7 ∈ V , then V = VN SHG }
Example 4.3. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar (SHG) S is a pair S = (V, E) 558
in the mentioned Neutrosophic Figures in every Neutrosophic items. 559
SuperHyperStar (SHG), is up in the illustration of the Table (14). 561
Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Consider a 562
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {Vi=2 }. Then V 0 is called Neutrosophic 563
V1 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=2 }
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=2 }
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=2 }
= (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) =
X X X
= max |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V 00 ⊆VSHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
Vi=2 ∈ V 00 = {Vi=2 }, ∃Vj=1,3−7 ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 :

then Vj=1,3−7 ∈ V 00 , then V 00 = VN SHG }
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {Vi=1,2 }. Then V 0 is called Neutrosophic 569
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1,2 }
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1,2 }
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1,2 }
= (0.49, 0.49, 0.49) =
X X X
= 00
max |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VSHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
Vi=2 ∈ V 00 = {Vi=1,2 }, ∃Vj=3−7 ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 :

V1 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−3 }
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−3 }
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−3 }
= (0.72, 0.72, 0.72) =
X X X
= max
00 ⊆V
|{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
Vi=2 ∈ V 00 = {Vi=1−3 }, ∃Vj=4−7 ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 :

X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−4 }
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={V
i=1−4 }
V1 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V1 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V5 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−4 }
= (0.95, 0.95, 0.95) =
X X X
= max
00 ⊆V
|{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
Vi=2 ∈ V 00 = {Vi=1−4 }, ∃Vj=5−7 ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 :

X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−5 }
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−5 }
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−5 }
= (1.18, 1.18, 1.18) =
X X X
= max
00 ⊆V
|{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
V1 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V5 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V6 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
Vi=2 ∈ V 00 = {Vi=1−5 }, ∃Vj=6−7 ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 :

X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−6 }
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−6 }
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−6 }
= (1.41, 1.41, 1.41) =
X X X
= max
00 ⊆V
|{ ( T (Vi ), F (Vi )) |
I(Vi ),
V SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
Vi ∈V 00
Vi=2 ∈ V 00 = {Vi=1−6 }, ∃Vj=7 ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 :

then Vj=7 ∈ V 00 , then V 00 = VN SHG }
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−7 }
V1 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V5 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V6 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V7 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−7 }
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={V
i=1−7 }
= (1.64, 1.64, 1.64) =
X X X
= 00
max |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VSHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
then Vj = ∅ ∈ V , then V 00 = VN SHG }

00
5 Main Result 602
Theorem 5.1. (Main Result and Main Theorem). 603
Assume every Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar has the letter z. The notion on the 604
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar and Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel coincides. 605
Proof. 606
(i). Let 607
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
CEN T ER, E2
608
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , CEN T ER
be a longest path taken a connected Extreme SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). There’s 609
a new way to redefine as 610
ViEXT ERN AL ∼ VjEXT ERN AL ≡

∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL ∈ Ez ≡
∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , {ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL } ⊆ Ez .
The term “EXTERNAL” implies |N (ViEXT ERN AL )| ≥ |N (Vj )| where Vj is 611
corresponded to ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating 612
Sequence. The latter is straightforward. 613
(ii). Let 614
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1∗ ,

CEN T ER, E2∗
615
P :
E1∗ , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2∗ , CEN T ER
is a longest SuperHyperDominating Sequence taken from a connected Extreme 616
SuperHyperWheel ESHW : (V, E). There’s a new way to redefine as 617

Sequence. The latter is straightforward. Then there’s at least one Neutrosophic 620
SuperHyperDominating Sequence. Thus the notion of quasi isn’t up and the 621
SuperHyperNotions based on Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating Sequence could be applied. 622
The unique embedded Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating Sequence proposes some longest 623
Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating Sequence excerpt from some representatives. The latter 624
is straightforward. 625
Proposition 5.2. Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E).

Assume every Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex has the letter z. The Neutrosophic
SuperHyperDominating Sequence set is as follows.
{CEN T ER}.
Proof. Let 626
P :
CEN T ER, E2∗
627
P :
E2∗ , CEN T ER


SuperHyperDominating Sequence number is as follows.
0.26.
Proof. Let 638
P :
CEN T ER, E2∗
639
P :
E2∗ , CEN T ER

Proposition 5.4. Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E).

SuperHyperDominating Sequence set is as follows.
{CEN T ER}.
Proof. Let 650
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
CEN T ER, E2
651
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , CEN T ER

Proposition 5.5. Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E).

SuperHyperDominating Sequence number is as follows.
0.26.
Proof. Let 657
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
CEN T ER, E2
658
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , CEN T ER

Definition 5.6. (Uniform Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar and Uniform Neutrosophic 664
SuperHyperStar). 665
(i). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Every pair of 666
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices has the same maximum letter, i.e., 667
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices mutually has the same maximum letter. A 668
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E) is called Uniform 669
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar. 670
(ii). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Every pair 671
of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices has the same maximum letter, i.e., 672
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices mutually has the same maximum letter. A 673
Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E) is called Uniform 674
Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel. 675
Proposition 5.7. Let an Uniform Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel (SHG) S be a pair

S = (V, E). The Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating Sequence set is as follows.
{CEN T ER}.
Proof. Let 676
P :
CEN T ER, E2∗
677
P :
E2∗ , CEN T ER


The Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating Sequence number is lower than as follows.
0.26.
Proof. Let 688
P :
CEN T ER, E2∗
689
P :
E2∗ , CEN T ER

. The latter is straightforward. Then there’s at least one Neutrosophic

Sequence 694
Proposition 5.9. Let an Uniform Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar (SHG) S be a pair

S = (V, E). The Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating Sequence set is as follows.
{CEN T ER}.
Proof. Let 700
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
CEN T ER, E2
701
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , CEN T ER

Proposition 5.10. Let an Uniform Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar (SHG) S be a pair

S = (V, E). The Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating Sequence number is lower than as follows.
0.26.
Proof. Let 707
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
CEN T ER, E2
708
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , CEN T ER

Proposition 5.11. (Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar and Neutrosophic 714
SuperHyperWheel). 715
(i). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Assume every 716
Neutrosophic CENTER has the letter maximum letter. Then the Neutrosophic 717
SuperHyperVertices don’t have the same maximum letter, are in every 718
Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating Sequence set. 719
(ii). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Assume 720
every Neutrosophic CENTER has the letter maximum letter. Then the 721
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices don’t have the same maximum letter, are in 722
every Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating Sequence set. 723
Proof. 724
(i). Let 725
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
CEN T ER, E2
726
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , CEN T ER

(ii). Let 732
P :
CEN T ER, E2∗
733
P :
E2∗ , CEN T ER

Proposition 5.12. (Embedded Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar and Embedded 744
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar). 745
(i). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Then 746
CENTER is in every Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating Sequence set. 747
(ii). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Then 748
CENTER is in every Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating Sequence set. 749
Proof. 750
(i). Let 751
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
CEN T ER, E2
752
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , CEN T ER

(ii). Let 758
P :
CEN T ER, E2∗
759
P :
E2∗ , CEN T ER

6 Neutrosophic Applications in Cancer’s 770
The cancer is the Neutrosophic disease but the Neutrosophic model is going to figure 772
out what’s going on this Neutrosophic phenomenon. The special Neutrosophic case of 773
this Neutrosophic disease is considered and as the consequences of the model, some 774
parameters are used. The cells are under attack of this disease but the moves of the 775
cancer in the special region are the matter of mind. The Neutrosophic recognition of the 776
cancer could help to find some Neutrosophic treatments for this Neutrosophic disease. 777
In the following, some Neutrosophic steps are Neutrosophic devised on this disease. 778
Step 1. (Neutrosophic Definition) The Neutrosophic recognition of the cancer in 779
the long-term Neutrosophic function. 780
Step 2. (Neutrosophic Issue) The specific region has been assigned by the 781
Neutrosophic model [it’s called Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph] and the long 782
Neutrosophic cycle of the move from the cancer is identified by this research. 783
Sometimes the move of the cancer hasn’t be easily identified since there are some 784
determinacy, indeterminacy and neutrality about the moves and the effects of the 785
cancer on that region; this event leads us to choose another model [it’s said to be 786
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph] to have convenient perception on what’s 787
happened and what’s done. 788
Step 3. (Neutrosophic Model) There are some specific Neutrosophic models, 789
which are well-known and they’ve got the names, and some general Neutrosophic 790
models. The moves and the Neutrosophic traces of the cancer on the complex 791
tracks and between complicated groups of cells could be fantasized by a 792
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath(-/SuperHyperDominating Sequence, SuperHyperStar, 793
SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, SuperHyperWheel). The aim is to 794
find either the Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating Sequence or the Neutrosophic 795
SuperHyperDominating Sequence in those Neutrosophic Neutrosophic 796
SuperHyperModels. 797
Figure 42. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite Associated to the Notions of Neutro-

sophic SuperHyperDominating Sequence
Edges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite
7 Case 1: The Initial Neutrosophic Steps 798
Toward Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite as 799
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel 800
Step 4. (Neutrosophic Solution) In the Neutrosophic Figure (42), the 801
Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite is Neutrosophic highlighted and Neutrosophic 802
featured. 803
By using the Neutrosophic Figure (42) and the Table (21), the Neutrosophic 804
SuperHyperBipartite is obtained. 805
The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Neutrosophic Algorithm in 806
previous Neutrosophic result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the 807
connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic 808
SuperHyperModel (42), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating Sequence. 809
Figure 43. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite Associated to the Notions of

Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating Sequence
Edges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite
8 Case 2: The Increasing Neutrosophic Steps 810
Toward Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite as 811
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel 812
Step 4. (Neutrosophic Solution) In the Neutrosophic Figure (43), the 813
Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite is Neutrosophic highlighted and 814
Neutrosophic featured. 815
By using the Neutrosophic Figure (43) and the Table (22), the Neutrosophic 816
SuperHyperMultipartite is obtained. 817
The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Neutrosophic Algorithm in 818
previous result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected 819
Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic 820
SuperHyperModel (43), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating Sequence. 821
9 Neutrosophic Applications in Cancer’s 822
Cancer is a neutrosophic disease, but the neutrosophic model is supposed to understand 824
what is going on in this neutrosophic phenomenon. The special case of neutrosophic 825
disease is considered and some parameters have been used as consequences of the model. 826
Cells are subject to attack by the disease, but the movements of the cancer in the 827
specific area is a matter of mind. Neutrosophic diagnosis of cancer can help in finding 828
some Neutrosophic cures for this Neutrosophic disease. 829
In the following, several Neutrosophic stages are designed for this disease. 830
Step 1. (Neutrosophic Definition) Neutrosophic diagnosis of cancer in long-term 831
Neutrosophic performance. 832
Step 2. (Neutrosophic Issue) The specific region is assigned by the Neutrosophic 833
model (called Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph) and the long Neutrosophic cycle of 834
movement of cancer is identified by this scientific research. Sometimes the 835
movement of cancer is not easy to detect, because there is certainty, uncertainty 836
and neutrality about the movements and effects of cancer on that area. This event 837
leads us to choose another model [which is said to be the Neutrosophic 838
superhypergraph] in order to have a proper understanding of what happened and 839
was done. 840
Step 3. (Neutrosophic Model) There are some specific Neutrosophic models that 841
are well known and have names and some general Neutrosophic models. Cancer 842
neurtosophic movements and effects in complex pathways and between complex 843
groups of cells can be visualized by a SuperHyperPath (-/SuperHyperCycle, 844
SuperHyperStar, SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, 845
SuperHyperWheel). The goal is to find dominant neutrosophic Dominating 846
Sequence models or dominant sDominating Sequence models. 847
10 Wondering Open Problems But As The 848
Directions To Forming The Motivations 849
In what follows, some “problems” and some “questions” are proposed. 850
The SuperHyperDominating Sequence and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating Sequence 851
are defined on a real-world application, titled “Cancer’s Recognitions”. 852
Question 10.1. Which the else SuperHyperModels could be defined based on Cancer’s 853
recognitions? 854
Question 10.2. Are there some SuperHyperNotions related to SuperHyperDominating Sequence 855
and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating Sequence? 856
Question 10.3. Are there some Algorithms to be defined on the SuperHyperModels to 857
compute them? 858
Question 10.4. Which the SuperHyperNotions are related to beyond the 859
SuperHyperDominating Sequence and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating Sequence? 860
Problem 10.5. The SuperHyperDominating Sequence and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating 861
do a SuperHyperModel for the Cancer’s recognitions and they’re based on

Sequence 862
SuperHyperDominating Sequence, are there else? 863
Problem 10.6. Which the fundamental SuperHyperNumbers are related to these 864
SuperHyperNumbers types-results? 865
Problem 10.7. What’s the independent research based on Cancer’s recognitions 866
concerning the multiple types of SuperHyperNotions? 867
11 Conclusion and Closing Remarks 868
In this section, closing and concluding remarks are presented. The drawbacks of this 869
scientific research are shown. Some advantages and disadvantages of this scientific 870
research are highlighted. 871
This scientific research uses some approaches to further understand the Neutrosophic 872
SuperHyperGraphs. In this effort, two SuperHyperNotions are defined on the 873
Dominating Sequence. For this reason, in the second definition, the original definition of 874
the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph is redefined on the position of the alphabets. Based 875
on the new Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph definition, the new SuperHyperNotion, 876
Neutrosophic Dominating Sequence, finds a suitable background to implement some 877
results on. Some SuperHyperClasses and some Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses are the 878
subjects of this scientific research on modeling areas that are subject to cancer attacks 879
in order to recognize this disease as mentioned under the title “Cancer Diagnosis”. To 880
formalize the SuperHyperNotion, Dominating Sequence, SuperHyperClasses and new 881
SuperHyperClasses instances are introduced. Some general results are summarized in 882
the Dominating Sequence and Neutrosophic Dominating Sequence sections. 883
Clarifications, examples, and literature reviews go all the way. In this scientific research, 884
the literature review has met the lines containing concepts and results. 885
SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph are super-hypermodels in 886
“cancer diagnosis” and both are the foundation of the background of this scientific 887
research. Sometimes cancer has occurred in an area full of cells, cell groups, and 888
embedded styles. In this section, SuperHyperModel proposes SuperHyperNotions, 889
formally called “Dominating Sequence”, based on the connections of Cancer’s 890
movements in the longest and strongest styles with the formation of design and 891
architecture, in terms of terms and whispering words. . The “SuperHyper” prefix refers 892
to the topic of embedded styles to explore the background of SuperHyperNotions. In
Table 23. A look at this scientific research and beyond

Advantages Limitations
1. Redefining the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 1. General Results
2. Dominating Sequence
3. Neutrosophic Dominating Sequence 2. Other SuperHyperNumbers
4. modeling cancer diagnoses
5. SuperHyperClasses 3. SuperHyperFamilies
893
the table (23), the advantages and ways of this scientific research are specified, pointed 894
out and expressed. 895
12 Background 896
There are some scientific researches covering the topic of this scientific research. In what 897
follows, there are some discussion and literature reviews about them. 898
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “New Ideas In Recognition of 899
Cancer And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph As Hyper Tool On Super Toot” in Ref. [1] 900
by Henry Garrett (2023). In this research article, a novel approach is implemented on 901
SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on general forms with 902
introducing used neutrosophic classes of neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. It’s published 903
in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled “Current Trends in Mass Communication 904
(CTMC)” with ISO abbreviation “Curr Trends Mass Comm” in volume 2 and issue 1 905
with pages 32-55. 906
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “Some Super Hyper Degrees 907
and Co-Super Hyper Degrees on Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs And Super Hyper 908
Graphs Alongside Applications in Cancer’s Treatments” in Ref. [2] by Henry Garrett 909
(2023). In this research article, a novel approach is implemented on SuperHyperGraph 910
and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on fundamental notions and using vital tools 911
in Cancer’s Treatments. It’s published in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled 912
“Journal of Mathematical Techniques and Computational Mathematics(JMTCM)” with 913
ISO abbreviation “J Math Techniques Comput Math” in volume 2 and issue 1 with 914
pages 35-47. The research article studies deeply with choosing directly neutrosophic 915
SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough toward independent 916
results based on initial background and fundamental SuperHyperNumbers. 917
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “A Research on Cancer’s 918
Recognition and Neutrosophic Super Hypergraph by Eulerian Super Hyper Cycles and 919
Hamiltonian Sets as Hyper Covering Versus Super separations” in Ref. [3] by Henry 920
Garrett (2023). In this research article, a novel approach is implemented on 921
SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on fundamental notions 922
and using vital tools in Cancer’s Recognition. It’s published in prestigious and fancy 923
journal is entitled “Journal of Mathematical Techniques and Computational 924
Mathematics(JMTCM)” with ISO abbreviation “J Math Techniques Comput Math” in 925
volume 2 and issue 3 with pages 136-148. The research article studies deeply with 926
choosing directly neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph. It’s the 927
breakthrough toward independent results based on initial background and fundamental 928
SuperHyperNumbers. 929
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “Neutrosophic 1-Failed 930
SuperHyperForcing in the SuperHyperFunction to Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs 931
on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Beyond ” in Ref. [4] by Henry Garrett (2023). 932
In this research article, a novel approach is implemented on SuperHyperGraph and 933
neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on fundamental SuperHyperNumber and using 934
neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses of neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. It’s published in 935
prestigious and fancy journal is entitled “Journal of Mathematical Techniques and 936
Computational Mathematics(JMTCM)” with ISO abbreviation “J Math Techniques 937
Comput Math” in volume 2 and issue 6 with pages 221-307. The research article studies 938
deeply with choosing directly neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph. 939
It’s the breakthrough toward independent results based on initial background and 940
fundamental SuperHyperNumbers. The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is 941
titled “New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph by 942
Initial Eulerian-Path-Cut as Hyper Initial Eulogy on Super Initial EULA” in Ref. [5] by 943
Henry Garrett (2023). In this research article, a novel approach is implemented on 944
SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on fundamental 945
SuperHyperNumber and using neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses of neutrosophic 946
SuperHyperGraph. It’s published in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled 947
“International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Research” with ISO 948
abbreviation “IJPAMR” in volume 3 and issue 2 with pages 60-88 and doi: 949
10.51483/IJPAMR.3.2.2023.60-88. The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is 950
titled “New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graph by 951
Eulerian-Path-Cut as Hyper Eulogy-Path-Cut on Super EULA-Path-Cut” in Ref. [6] by 952
SuperHyperGraph. It’s published in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled 956
“International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Research” with ISO 957
abbreviation “IJPAMR” in volume 3 and issue 2 with pages 102-124 and doi: 958
10.51483/IJPAMR.3.2.2023.102-124. The research article studies deeply with choosing 959
directly neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough 960
toward independent results based on initial background and fundamental 961
SuperHyperNumbers. The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “Super 962
Hyper Dominating and Super Hyper Resolving on Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs and 963
Their Directions in Game Theory and Neutrosophic Super Hyper Classes” in Ref. [7] by 964
SuperHyperGraph. It’s published in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled “Journal 968
of Mathematical Techniques and Computational Mathematics(JMTCM)” with ISO 969
abbreviation “J Math Techniques Comput Math” in volume 1 and issue 3 with pages 970
242-263. The research article studies deeply with choosing directly neutrosophic 971
SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough toward independent 972
results based on initial background and fundamental SuperHyperNumbers. The seminal 973
paper and groundbreaking article is titled “neutrosophic co-degree and neutrosophic 974
degree alongside chromatic numbers in the setting of some classes related to neutrosophic 975
hypergraphs” in Ref. [8] by Henry Garrett (2023). In this research article, a novel 976
approach is implemented on SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 977
based on general forms without using neutrosophic classes of neutrosophic 978
SuperHyperGraph. It’s published in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled “Journal 979
of Current Trends in Computer Science Research (JCTCSR)” with ISO abbreviation “J 980
Curr Trends Comp Sci Res” in volume 2 and issue 1 with pages 16-24. The research 981
article studies deeply with choosing neutrosophic hypergraphs instead of neutrosophic 982
SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough toward independent results based on initial 983
background. The research article studies deeply with choosing neutrosophic 984
hypergraphs instead of neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough toward 985
independent results based on initial background. In some articles are titled “0039 — 986
Closing Numbers and Super-Closing Numbers as (Dual)Resolving and (Dual)Coloring 987
alongside (Dual)Dominating in (Neutrosophic)n-SuperHyperGraph” in Ref. [9] by 988
Henry Garrett (2022), “0049 — (Failed)1-Zero-Forcing Number in Neutrosophic Graphs” 989
in Ref. [10] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Extreme SuperHyperClique as the Firm Scheme 990
of Confrontation under Cancer’s Recognition as the Model in The Setting of 991
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [11] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Uncertainty 992
On The Act And Effect Of Cancer Alongside The Foggy Positions Of Cells Toward 993
Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique inside Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Titled 994
Cancer’s Recognition” in Ref. [12] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic Version Of 995
Separates Groups Of Cells In Cancer’s Recognition On Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” 996
in Ref. [13] by Henry Garrett (2022), “The Shift Paradigm To Classify Separately The 997
Cells and Affected Cells Toward The Totality Under Cancer’s Recognition By New 998
Multiple Definitions On the Sets Polynomials Alongside Numbers In The (Neutrosophic) 999
SuperHyperMatching Theory Based on SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic 1000
SuperHyperGraph” in Ref. [14] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Breaking the Continuity and 1001
Uniformity of Cancer In The Worst Case of Full Connections With Extreme Failed 1002
SuperHyperClique In Cancer’s Recognition Applied in (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” 1003
in Ref. [15] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable as the 1004
Survivors on the Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition Based on Uncertainty to All Modes 1005
in Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [16] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Extremism 1006
of the Attacked Body Under the Cancer’s Circumstances Where Cancer’s Recognition 1007
Titled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [17] by Henry Garrett (2022), 1008
“(Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in Cancer’s Recognitions And 1009
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [18] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic 1010
Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on 1011
Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In Special ViewPoints” in Ref. [19] by Henry 1012
Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in the SuperHyperFunction 1013
To Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition And 1014
Beyond ” in Ref. [20] by Henry Garrett (2022), “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperStable on 1015
Cancer’s Recognition by Well- SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs ” 1016
in Ref. [21] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To 1017
Form Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In 1018
Special ViewPoints” in Ref. [17] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Basic Notions on 1019
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperForcing And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling in Cancer’s 1020
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [22] by Henry Garrett 1021
(2022), “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form Neutrosophic 1022
SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In Special ViewPoints” 1023
in Ref. [23] by Henry Garrett (2022),“(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s 1024
Recognitions Featuring (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances” in 1025
Ref. [24] by Henry Garrett (2022), “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperAlliances With 1026
SuperHyperDefensive and SuperHyperOffensive Type-SuperHyperSet On (Neutrosophic) 1027
SuperHyperGraph With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions 1028
And Related (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClasses” in Ref. [25] by Henry Garrett (2022), 1029
“SuperHyperGirth on SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph With 1030
SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions” in Ref. [26] by Henry Garrett (2022), 1031
“Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on Neutrosophic 1032
SuperHyperGraphs and SuperHyperGraphs Alongside Applications in Cancer’s 1033
Treatments” in Ref. [27] by Henry Garrett (2022), “SuperHyperDominating and 1034
SuperHyperResolving on Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs And Their Directions in 1035
Game Theory and Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses” in Ref. [28] by Henry Garrett 1036
(2022), “SuperHyperMatching By (R-)Definitions And Polynomials To Monitor 1037
Cancer’s Recognition In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [222] by Henry 1038
Garrett (2023), “The Focus on The Partitions Obtained By Parallel Moves In The 1039
Cancer’s Extreme Recognition With Different Types of Extreme SuperHyperMatching Set 1040
and Polynomial on (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [223] by Henry Garrett 1041
(2023), “Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique Decides the Failures on the Cancer’s 1042
Recognition in the Perfect Connections of Cancer’s Attacks By SuperHyperModels 1043
Named (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [224] by Henry Garrett (2023), 1044
“Indeterminacy On The All Possible Connections of Cells In Front of Cancer’s Attacks 1045
In The Terms of Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique on Cancer’s Recognition called 1046
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [225] by Henry Garrett (2023), “Perfect 1047
Directions Toward Idealism in Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition Forwarding 1048
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClique on Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [228] by 1049
Henry Garrett (2023), “Demonstrating Complete Connections in Every Embedded 1050
Regions and Sub-Regions in the Terms of Cancer’s Recognition and (Neutrosophic) 1051
SuperHyperGraphs With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClique” in Ref. [229] by Henry 1052
Garrett (2023), “Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic Regions titled 1053
neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable in Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition modeled in 1054
the Form of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [232] by Henry Garrett (2023), 1055
“Using the Tool As (Neutrosophic) Failed SuperHyperStable To SuperHyperModel 1056
Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [235] by Henry 1057
Garrett (2023), “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form Neutrosophic 1058
SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In Special ViewPoints” 1059
in Ref. [236] by Henry Garrett (2023), “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperStable on Cancer’s 1060
Recognition by Well-SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in 1061
Ref. [237] by Henry Garrett (2023), “Neutrosophic 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in the 1062
SuperHyperFunction To Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs on Cancer’s Neutrosophic 1063
Recognition And Beyond ” in Ref. [238] by Henry Garrett (2022), “(Neutrosophic) 1064
1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in Cancer’s Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) 1065
SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [239] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Basic Notions on 1066
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperForcing And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling in Cancer’s 1067
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [240] by Henry Garrett 1068
(2022), “Basic Neutrosophic Notions Concerning SuperHyperDominating and 1069
Neutrosophic SuperHyperResolving in SuperHyperGraph” in Ref. [251] by Henry 1070
Garrett (2022), “Initial Material of Neutrosophic Preliminaries to Study Some 1071
Neutrosophic Notions Based on Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) in Neutrosophic 1072
SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)” in Ref. [252] by Henry Garrett (2022), and [4–252], there 1073
are some endeavors to formalize the basic SuperHyperNotions about neutrosophic 1074
SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph alongside scientific research books 1075
at [253–387]. Two popular scientific research books in Scribd in the terms of high 1076
readers, 5679 and 6667 respectively, on neutrosophic science is on [388, 389]. 1077
Some scientific studies and scientific researches about neutrosophic graphs, are 1078
proposed as book in Ref. [388] by Henry Garrett (2023) which is indexed by Google 1079
Scholar and has more than 5679 readers in Scribd. It’s titled “Beyond Neutrosophic 1080
Graphs” and published by Dr. Henry Garrett. This research book covers different types 1081
of notions and settings in neutrosophic graph theory and neutrosophic 1082
SuperHyperGraph theory. 1083
Also, some scientific studies and scientific researches about neutrosophic graphs, are 1084
proposed as book in Ref. [389] by Henry Garrett (2023) which is indexed by Google 1085
Scholar and has more than 6667 readers in Scribd. It’s titled “Neutrosophic Duality” 1086
and published by Dr. Henry Garrett. This research book presents different types of 1087
notions SuperHyperResolving and SuperHyperDominating in the setting of duality in 1088
neutrosophic graph theory and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph theory. This research 1089
book has scrutiny on the complement of the intended set and the intended set, 1090
simultaneously. It’s smart to consider a set but acting on its complement that what’s 1091
done in this research book which is popular in the terms of high readers in Scribd. 1092
See the seminal scientific researches [1–3]. The formalization of the notions on the 1093
framework of notions in SuperHyperGraphs, Neutrosophic notions in 1094
SuperHyperGraphs theory, and (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs theory at [4–252] 1095
alongside scientific research books at [253–387]. Two popular scientific research books 1096
in Scribd ,in the terms of high readers, 5679 and 6667 respectively, on neutrosophic 1097
science is on [388, 389]. 1098
References 1099
1. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 1100
SuperHyperGraph As Hyper Tool On Super Toot”, Curr Trends Mass Comm 1101
2(1) (2023) 32-55. (doi: 10.33140/CTMC.02.01.03). 1102
2. Henry Garrett, “Some Super Hyper Degrees and Co-Super Hyper Degrees on 1103
Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs And Super Hyper Graphs Alongside 1104
Applications in Cancer’s Treatments”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 2(1) 1105
(2023) 35-47. (https://www.opastpublishers.com/open-access-articles/some- 1106
super-hyper-degrees-and-cosuper-hyper-degrees-on-neutrosophic-super-hyper- 1107
graphs-and-super-hyper-graphs-alongside-a.pdf) 1108
3. Henry Garrett, “A Research on Cancer’s Recognition and Neutrosophic Super 1109
Hypergraph by Eulerian Super Hyper Cycles and Hamiltonian Sets as Hyper 1110
Covering Versus Super separations”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 2(3) 1111
(2023) 136-148. (https://www.opastpublishers.com/open-access-articles/a- 1112
research-on-cancers-recognition-and-neutrosophic-super-hypergraph-by- 1113
eulerian-super-hyper-cycles-and-hamiltonian-sets-.pdf) 1114
4. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in the 1115
SuperHyperFunction to Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs on Cancer’s 1116
Neutrosophic Recognition and Beyond ”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 2(6) 1117
(2023) 221-307. (https://www.opastpublishers.com/open-access- 1118
articles/neutrosophic-1failed-superhyperforcing-in-the-superhyperfunction-to- 1119
use-neutrosophic-superhypergraphs-on-cancers-neutros.pdf) 1120
5. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic 1121
SuperHyperGraph by Initial Eulerian-Path-Cut as Hyper Initial Eulogy on Super 1122
Initial EULA”, International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics 1123
Research 3(2) (2023) 60-88. (doi: 10.51483/IJPAMR.3.2.2023.60-88). 1124
6. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic Super 1125
Hyper Graph by Eulerian-Path-Cut as Hyper Eulogy-Path-Cut on Super 1126
EULA-Path-Cut”, International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics 1127
Research 3(2) (2023) 102-124. (doi: 10.51483/IJPAMR.3.2.2023.102-124). 1128
7. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic Super 1129
Hyper Graph by Eulerian-Path-Cut as Hyper Eulogy-Path-Cut on Super 1130
EULA-Path-Cut”, J Curr Trends Comp Sci Res 2(1) (2023) 16-24. (doi: 1131
10.33140/JCTCSR.02.01.04) 1132
8. Henry Garrett, “Super Hyper Dominating and Super Hyper Resolving on 1133
Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs and Their Directions in Game Theory and 1134
Neutrosophic Super Hyper Classes”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 1(3) 1135
(2022) 242-263. (doi: 10.33140/JMTCM.01.03.09) 1136
9. Garrett, Henry. “0039 — Closing Numbers and Super-Closing Numbers as 1137
(Dual)Resolving and (Dual)Coloring alongside (Dual)Dominating in 1138
(Neutrosophic)n-SuperHyperGraph.” CERN European Organization for Nuclear 1139
Research - Zenodo, Nov. 2022. CERN European Organization for Nuclear 1140
Research, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6319942. 1141
https://oa.mg/work/10.5281/zenodo.6319942 1142
10. Garrett, Henry. “0049 — (Failed)1-Zero-Forcing Number in Neutrosophic 1143
Graphs.” CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research - Zenodo, Feb. 1144
2022. CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research, 1145
https://doi.org/10.13140/rg.2.2.35241.26724. 1146
https://oa.mg/work/10.13140/rg.2.2.35241.26724 1147
11. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperClique as the Firm Scheme of 1148
Confrontation under Cancer’s Recognition as the Model in The Setting of 1149
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010308 (doi: 1150
10.20944/preprints202301.0308.v1). 1151
12. Henry Garrett, “Uncertainty On The Act And Effect Of Cancer Alongside The 1152
Foggy Positions Of Cells Toward Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique inside 1153
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Titled Cancer’s Recognition”, Preprints 2023, 1154
2023010282 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0282.v1). 1155
13. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Version Of Separates Groups Of Cells In 1156
Cancer’s Recognition On Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 1157
2023010267 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0267.v1). 1158
14. Henry Garrett, “The Shift Paradigm To Classify Separately The Cells and 1159
Affected Cells Toward The Totality Under Cancer’s Recognition By New 1160
Multiple Definitions On the Sets Polynomials Alongside Numbers In The 1161
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperMatching Theory Based on SuperHyperGraph and 1162
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”, Preprints 2023, 2023010265 (doi: 1163
10.20944/preprints202301.0265.v1). 1164
15. Henry Garrett, “Breaking the Continuity and Uniformity of Cancer In The 1165
Worst Case of Full Connections With Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique In 1166
Cancer’s Recognition Applied in (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 1167
2023, 2023010262,(doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0262.v1). 1168
16. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable as the Survivors on the 1169
Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition Based on Uncertainty to All Modes in 1170
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010240 (doi: 1171
10.20944/preprints202301.0240.v1). 1172
17. Henry Garrett, “Extremism of the Attacked Body Under the Cancer’s 1173
Circumstances Where Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) 1174
SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010224, (doi: 1175
10.20944/preprints202301.0224.v1). 1176
18. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in Cancer’s 1177
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 1178
2023010105 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 1179
19. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form 1180
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions 1181
In Special ViewPoints”, Preprints 2023, 2023010088 (doi: 1182
10.20944/preprints202301.0088.v1). 1183
SuperHyperFunction To Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs on Cancer’s 1185
Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond ”, Preprints 2023, 2023010044 1186
21. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperStable on Cancer’s Recognition by 1187
Well- SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 1188
2023010043 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0043.v1). 1189
22. Henry Garrett, “Basic Notions on (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperForcing And 1190
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling in Cancer’s Recognitions And 1191
10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 1193
10.20944/preprints202301.0088.v1). 1197
24. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions 1198
Featuring (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances”, Preprints 1199
2022, 2022120549 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0549.v1). 1200
25. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperAlliances With SuperHyperDefensive 1201
and SuperHyperOffensive Type-SuperHyperSet On (Neutrosophic) 1202
SuperHyperGraph With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s 1203
Recognitions And Related (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClasses”, Preprints 2022, 1204
2022120540 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0540.v1). 1205
26. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperGirth on SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic 1206
SuperHyperGraph With SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions”, 1207
Preprints 2022, 2022120500 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0500.v1). 1208
27. Henry Garrett, “Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on 1209
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs and SuperHyperGraphs Alongside Applications 1210
in Cancer’s Treatments”, Preprints 2022, 2022120324 (doi: 1211
10.20944/preprints202212.0324.v1). 1212
28. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDominating and SuperHyperResolving on 1213
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs And Their Directions in Game Theory and 1214
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”, Preprints 2022, 2022110576 (doi: 1215
10.20944/preprints202211.0576.v1). 1216
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By Dominating Sequence As 1218
Hyper Decoration On Super Density”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1219
10.5281/zenodo.10263440). 1220
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By STABLE As Hyper Decoration On 1222
Super Density”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10028600). 1223
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By STABLE As Hyper Decoration 1225
On Super Density”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8310454). 1226
32. Henry Garrett, “Recognition of Cancer With Bipartite and Path as 1227
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph By the Tool Called Stability”, Preprints 2023, 1228
2023081972 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202308.1972.v1). 1229
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By STABLE As Hyper 1231
Decoration On Super Density”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8262182). 1232
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By REVERSE CONNECTIVE 1234
DOMINATION As Hyper Decoration On Super Density”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1235
10.5281/zenodo.8206877). 1236
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By REVERSE CONNECTIVE 1238
10.5281/zenodo.8206834). 1240
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By REVERSE CONNECTIVE 1242
10.5281/zenodo.8206773). 1244
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By EQUAL CONNECTIVE 1246
10.5281/zenodo.8201319). 1248
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By EQUAL CONNECTIVE 1250
10.5281/zenodo.8201255). 1252
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By EQUAL CONNECTIVE 1254
10.5281/zenodo.8201165). 1256
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By CONNECTIVE DOMINATION As 1258
Hyper Decoration On Super Density”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1259
10.5281/zenodo.8196147). 1260
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By CONNECTIVE DOMINATION 1262
As Hyper Decoration On Super Density”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1263
10.5281/zenodo.8196132). 1264
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By CONNECTIVE 1266
10.5281/zenodo.8196099). 1268
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By DOMINATION As Hyper 1270
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By DOMINATION As Hyper 1273
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By DOMINATION As Hyper 1276
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperPerfect Search As Hyper Perf On Super 1279
Perfidy”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8104836). 1280
47. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Perfidy By Hyper Perf Of 1281
SuperHyperPerfect Search In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1282
SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8104857). 1283
SuperHyperGraph By Reverse Strict Dimension Dominating As Hyper Dimple 1285
On Super Dimity”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8092796). 1286
49. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Dimity By Hyper Dimple Of Reverse 1287
Strict Dimension Dominating In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1288
SuperHyperGraph By Unequal Dimension Dominating As Hyper Dimple On 1291
Super Dimity”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8088438). 1292
51. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Dimity By Hyper Dimple Of Unequal 1293
Dimension Dominating In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1294
SuperHyperGraph By Strict Dimension Dominating As Hyper Dimple On Super 1297
Dimity”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8084436). 1298
53. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Dimity By Hyper Dimple Of Strict 1299
SuperHyperGraph By Reverse Strict Connective As Hyper Conceit On Super 1303
Con”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8080100). 1304
55. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Con By Hyper Conceit Of Reverse Strict 1305
Connective In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, 1306
Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8080068). 1307
SuperHyperGraph By Unequal Connective Dominating As Hyper Conceit On 1309
Super Con”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8078445). 1310
57. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Con By Hyper Conceit Of Unequal 1311
Connective Dominating In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1312
SuperHyperGraph By Strict Connective Dominating As Hyper Conceit On 1315
59. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Con By Hyper Conceit Of Strict 1317
SuperHyperGraph By Reverse Dimension Dominating As Hyper Dimple On 1321
Super Dimity”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8072171). 1322
61. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Dimity By Hyper Dimple Of Reverse 1323
SuperHyperGraph By Equal Dimension Dominating As Hyper Dimple On Super 1327
63. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Dimity By Hyper Dimple Of Equal 1329
SuperHyperGraph By Dimension Dominating As Hyper Dimple On Super 1333
65. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Dimity By Hyper Dimple Of Dimension 1335
Dominating In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, 1336
SuperHyperGraph By Reverse Connective Dominating As Hyper Conceit On 1339
67. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Con By Hyper Conceit Of Reverse 1341
SuperHyperGraph By Equal Connective Dominating As Hyper Conceit On 1345
69. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Con By Hyper Conceit Of Equal 1347
SuperHyperGraph By Connective Dominating As Hyper Conceit On Super 1351
Con”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8051346). 1352
71. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Con By Hyper Conceit Of Connective 1353
SuperHyperGraph By United Dominating As Hyper Ultra On Super Units”, 1357
73. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Units By Hyper Ultra Of United 1359
SuperHyperGraph By Zero Forcing As Hyper ford On Super forceps”, Zenodo 1363
2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8017246). 1364
75. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super forceps By Hyper ford Of Zero Forcing In 1365
Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 2023, 1366
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8020128). 1367
SuperHyperGraph By Matrix-Based As Hyper mat On Super matte”, Zenodo 1369
2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7978571). 1370
77. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super mat By Hyper matte Of Matrix-Based In 1371
Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 2023, 1372
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7978857). 1373
SuperHyperGraph By Dominating-Edges As Hyper Dome On Super Eddy”, 1375
79. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Eddy By Hyper Dome Of 1377
Dominating-Edges In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1378
SuperHyperGraph By Edge-Gap As Hyper Gape On Super Gab”, Zenodo 2023, 1381
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7916595). 1382
81. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Gab By Hyper Gape Of Edge-Gap In 1383
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7923632). 1385
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On 1387
Super Nebulous”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7904698). 1388
83. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nebulous By Hyper Nebbish Of 1389
Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1390
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition As Hyper 1393
Decompress On Super Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1394
10.5281/zenodo.7904529). 1395
85. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Decompensation By Hyper Decompress Of 1396
Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With 1397
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1398
10.5281/zenodo.7904401). 1399
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut As Hyper Nebbish On Super 1401
Nebulous”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7871026). 1402
Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1404
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Cycle-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super 1407
Eulerian-Cycle-Neighbor In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1410
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Cycle-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On 1413
Super Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7855661). 1414
Eulerian-Cycle-Decomposition In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1416
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Cycle-Cut As Hyper Eulogy On Super EULA”, 1419
93. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super EULA By Hyper Eulogy Of 1421
Eulerian-Cycle-Cut In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1422
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Path-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super 1425
Eulerian-Type-Path-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1428
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Path-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress 1431
On Super Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7839333). 1432
Eulerian-Type-Path-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1434
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Path-Cut As Hyper Eulogy On Super 1437
EULA”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7834229). 1438
Eulerian-Type-Path-Cut In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1440
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Path-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super 1443
Eulerian-Path-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1446
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Path-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On 1449
Eulerian-Path-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1452
SuperHyperGraph As Hyper Tool On Super Toot”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1455
10.5281/zenodo.7812236). 1456
SuperHyperGraph By initial Eulerian-Path-Cut As Hyper initial Eulogy On 1458
Super initial EULA”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7809365). 1459
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Path-Cut As Hyper Eulogy-Path-Cut On Super 1461
EULA-Path-Cut”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7809358). 1462
Eulerian-Path-Cut In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1464
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Path-Cut As Hyper Eulogy On Super EULA”, 1467
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On 1470
Super Nebulous”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7806767). 1471
Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1473
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition As Hyper 1476
Decompress On Super Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1477
10.5281/zenodo.7804238). 1478
Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With 1480
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7804228). 1481
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut As Hyper Hamper On Super 1483
Hammy”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7799902). 1484
114. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Hammy By Hyper Hamper Of 1485
Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1486
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Cycle-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super 1489
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Cycle-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress 1492
On Super Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7793372). 1493
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Cycle-Cut As Hyper Hamper On Super 1495
Hammy”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7791952). 1496
Hamiltonian-Cycle-Cut In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1498
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super 1501
Hamiltonian-Neighbor In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1504
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On 1507
Hamiltonian-Decomposition In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1510
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Cut As Hyper Hamper On Super Hammy”, 1513
Hamiltonian-Cut In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1516
SuperHyperGraph By Trace-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 1519
Trace-Neighbor In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1522
127. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 1524
SuperHyperGraph By Trace-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On Super 1525
Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7771831). 1526
Trace-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1528
SuperHyperGraph By Trace-Cut As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 1531
ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.20913.25446). 1532
130. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Tract By Hyper Track Of Trace-Cut In 1533
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7764916). 1535
SuperHyperGraph By Edge-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 1537
Edge-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, 1540
SuperHyperGraph By Edge-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On Super 1543
Decompensation”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.22545.10089). 1544
Edge-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1546
SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.29544.34564). 1547
SuperHyperGraph By Edge-Cut As Hyper Edify On Super Eddy”, ResearchGate 1549
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.11377.76644). 1550
136. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Eddy By Hyper Edify Of Edge-Cut In 1551
Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 1552
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.23750.96329). 1553
SuperHyperGraph By Vertex-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 1555
Vertex-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1558
SuperHyperGraph By Vertex-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On Super 1561
Decompensation”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.30212.81289). 1562
Vertex-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1564
SuperHyperGraph By Vertex-Cut As Hyper Vertu On Super Vertigo”, 1567
142. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Vertigo By Hyper Vertu Of Vertex-Cut In 1569
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.32467.25124). 1571
SuperHyperGraph By Stable-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 1573
144. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nebulizer By Hyper Nub Of 1575
Stable-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1576
SuperHyperGraph By Stable-Decompositions As Hyper Stain On Super Stagy”, 1579
146. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Stale By Hyper Stalk Of 1581
Stable-Decompositions In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1582
SuperHyperGraph By Stable-Cut As Hyper Stain On Super Stagy”, 1585
148. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Stale By Hyper Stalk Of Stable-Cut In 1587
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.20170.24000). 1589
SuperHyperGraph By Clique-Neighbors As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 1591
150. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nebulizer By Hyper Nub Of 1593
Clique-Neighbors In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1594
SuperHyperGraph By Clique-Decompositions As Hyper Decompile On Super 1597
Decommission”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.18780.87683). 1598
Clique- Decompositions In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1600
SuperHyperGraph By Clique-Cut As Hyper Click On Super Cliche”, 1603
154. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Cliff By Hyper Cling Of Clique-Cut In 1605
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.27392.30721). 1607
SuperHyperGraph By Space As Hyper Spin On Super Spacy”, ResearchGate 1609
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.33028.40321). 1610
SuperHyperGraph By List- Coloring As Hyper List On Super Lisle”, 1612
157. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Lith By Hyper Lite Of List-Coloring In 1614
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.16356.04489). 1616
SuperHyperGraph By Space As Hyper Sparse On Super Spark ”, ResearchGate 1618
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.21756.21129). 1619
159. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Solidarity By Hyper Soul Of Space In 1620
Cancer’s Recognition With (Extreme) SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023, 1621
(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.30983.68009). 1622
SuperHyperGraph By Edge-Connectivity As Hyper Disclosure On Super 1624
Closure”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.28552.29445). 1625
161. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Uniform By Hyper Deformation Of 1626
Edge-Connectivity In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1627
SuperHyperGraph By Vertex-Connectivity As Hyper Leak On Super Structure”, 1630
163. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super System By Hyper Explosions Of 1632
Vertex-Connectivity In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1633
SuperHyperGraph By Tree-Decomposition As Hyper Forward On Super Returns”, 1636
165. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nodes By Hyper Moves Of 1638
Tree-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1639
SuperHyperGraph By Chord As Hyper Excellence On Super Excess”, 1642
167. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Gap By Hyper Navigations Of Chord In 1644
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.11172.14720). 1646
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyper(i,j)-Domination As Hyper Controller On 1648
Super Waves”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.22011.80165). 1649
169. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Coincidence By Hyper Routes Of 1650
SuperHyper(i,j)-Domination In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1651
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperEdge-Domination As Hyper Reversion On 1654
Super Indirection”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.10493.84962). 1655
171. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Obstacles By Hyper Model Of 1656
SuperHyperEdge-Domination In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1657
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperK-Domination As Hyper k-Actions On Super 1660
Patterns”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.19944.14086). 1661
173. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Harmony By Hyper k-Function Of 1662
SuperHyperK-Domination In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1663
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperK-Number As Hyper k-Partition On Super 1666
Layers”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.33103.76968). 1667
175. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Gradient By Hyper k-Class Of 1668
SuperHyperK-Number In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1669
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperOrder As Hyper Enumerations On Super 1672
Landmarks”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.35646.56641). 1673
177. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Analogous By Hyper Visions Of 1674
SuperHyperOrder In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1675
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperColoring As Hyper Categories On Super 1678
Neighbors”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.13973.81121). 1679
179. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Relations By Hyper Identifications Of 1680
SuperHyperColoring In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1681
180. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Contradiction By Hyper Detection of 1683
SuperHyperDefensive In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic 1684
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperDimension As Hyper Distinguishing On Super 1687
Distances”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.31956.88961). 1688
182. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Locations By Hyper Differing Of 1689
SuperHyperDimension In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1690
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperDominating As Hyper Closing On Super 1693
Messy”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.21510.45125). 1694
184. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Missing By Hyper Searching Of 1695
SuperHyperDominating In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1696
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperConnected As Hyper Group On Super Surge”, 1699
186. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Outbreak By Hyper Collections Of 1701
SuperHyperConnected In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1702
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperTotal As Hyper Covering On Super Infections”, 1705
188. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Extremism By Hyper Treatments Of 1707
SuperHyperTotal In Cancer’s Recognition with (Neutrosophic) 1708
189. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Isolation By Hyper Perfectness Of 1710
SuperHyperPerfect In Cancer’s Recognition with (Neutrosophic) 1711
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperPerfect As Hyper Idealism On Super Vacancy”, 1714
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperJoin As Hyper Separations On Super Sorts”, 1717
192. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super connections By Hyper disconnections Of 1719
SuperHyperJoin In Cancer’s Recognition with (Neutrosophic) 1720
193. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Mixed-Devastations By Hyper Decisions 1722
Of SuperHyperDuality In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic 1723
194. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition As (Neutrosophic) 1725
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperDuality As Hyper Imaginations On Super 1726
Mixed-Illustrations”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.33275.80161). 1727
195. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition As (Neutrosophic) 1728
SuperHyperGraph By Path SuperHyperColoring As Hyper Correction On Super 1729
Faults”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.30182.50241). 1730
196. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Reflections By Hyper Rotations Of Path 1731
SuperHyperColoring In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic 1732
197. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas As Hyper Deformations On Super Chains In 1734
Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph By 1735
SuperHyperDensity”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.13444.60806). 1736
198. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas As Hyper Ignorance By SuperHyperDensity On 1737
Super Resistances In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic 1738
SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.16800.05123). 1739
199. Henry Garrett, “New Research On Cancer’s Recognition and Neutrosophic 1740
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian SuperHyperCycles and Hamiltonian Sets As 1741
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-VI ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1742
10.13140/RG.2.2.29913.80482). 1743
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-V ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1746
10.13140/RG.2.2.33269.24809). 1747
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-IV ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1750
10.13140/RG.2.2.34946.96960). 1751
202. Henry Garrett, “A Research On Cancer’s Recognition and Neutrosophic 1752
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-III ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1754
10.13140/RG.2.2.14814.31040). 1755
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-II ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1758
10.13140/RG.2.2.15653.17125). 1759
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-I ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1762
10.13140/RG.2.2.25719.50089). 1763
205. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Disruptions In Cancer’s Extreme 1764
Recognition As Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph By Hyper Plans Called 1765
SuperHyperConnectivities”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1766
10.13140/RG.2.2.29441.94562). 1767
206. Henry Garrett, “Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition As Neutrosophic 1768
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperConnectivities As Hyper Diagnosis On Super 1769
Mechanism”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.17252.24968). 1770
207. Henry Garrett,“Cancer’s Recognition and (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph By 1771
the Criteria of Eulerian and Hamiltonian Type-Sets As Hyper Modified Cycles 1772
On Super Mess”, ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.16652.59525). 1773
208. Henry Garrett,“Eulerian and Hamiltonian In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition 1774
and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph On Super Interactions By Hyper Extensions 1775
of Cycles”, ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.34583.24485). 1776
209. Henry Garrett,“SuperHyperGirth Type-Results on extreme SuperHyperGirth 1777
theory and (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs Toward Cancer’s extreme 1778
Recognition”, Preprints 2023, 2023010396 (doi: 1779
10.20944/preprints202301.0396.v1). 1780
210. Henry Garrett,“Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Warns Hyper Landmark of 1781
neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth In Super Type-Versions of Cancer’s neutrosophic 1782
Recognition”, Preprints 2023, 2023010395 (doi: 1783
10.20944/preprints202301.0395.v1). 1784
211. Henry Garrett,“The Constructions of (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs on the 1785
Cancer’s Recognition in The Confrontation With Super Attacks In Hyper 1786
Situations By Implementing (Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in The 1787
Technical Approaches to Neutralize SuperHyperViews”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1788
10.13140/RG.2.2.26240.51204). 1789
212. Henry Garrett,“(Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing As the 1790
Entrepreneurs on Cancer’s Recognitions To Fail Forcing Style As the Super 1791
Classes With Hyper Effects In The Background of the Framework is So-Called 1792
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1793
10.13140/RG.2.2.12818.73925). 1794
213. Henry Garrett,“Super Actions On The Types of Hyper Levels In The Sensible 1795
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth On Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and 1796
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 1797
10.13140/RG.2.2.26836.88960). 1798
214. Henry Garrett,“SuperHyperGirth Approaches on the Super Challenges on the 1799
Cancer’s Recognition In the Hyper Model of (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, 1800
ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.36745.93289). 1801
215. Henry Garrett,“Extreme SuperHyperClique as the Firm Scheme of 1802
Confrontation under Cancer’s Recognition as the Model in The Setting of 1803
10.20944/preprints202301.0308.v1). 1805
216. Henry Garrett,“Uncertainty On The Act And Effect Of Cancer Alongside The 1806
Foggy Positions Of Cells Toward Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique inside 1807
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Titled Cancer’s Recognition”, Preprints 2023, 1808
2023010282 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0282.v1). 1809
217. Henry Garrett,“Neutrosophic Version Of Separates Groups Of Cells In Cancer’s 1810
Recognition On Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010267 1811
(doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0267.v1).). 1812
218. Henry Garrett, “The Shift Paradigm To Classify Separately The Cells and 1813
Affected Cells Toward The Totality Under Cancer’s Recognition By New 1814
Multiple Definitions On the Sets Polynomials Alongside Numbers In The 1815
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperMatching Theory Based on SuperHyperGraph and 1816
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”, Preprints 2023, 2023010265 (doi: 1817
10.20944/preprints202301.0265.v1). 1818
219. Henry Garrett,“Breaking the Continuity and Uniformity of Cancer In The 1819
Worst Case of Full Connections With Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique In 1820
Cancer’s Recognition Applied in (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 1821
2023, 2023010262,(doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0262.v1). 1822
220. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable as the Survivors on the 1823
Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition Based on Uncertainty to All Modes in 1824
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010240 (doi: 1825
10.20944/preprints202301.0240.v1). 1826
221. Henry Garrett, “Extremism of the Attacked Body Under the Cancer’s 1827
Circumstances Where Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) 1828
SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010224, (doi: 1829
10.20944/preprints202301.0224.v1). 1830
222. Henry Garrett,“SuperHyperMatching By (R-)Definitions And Polynomials To 1831
Monitor Cancer’s Recognition In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, 1832
ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.35061.65767). 1833
223. Henry Garrett,“The Focus on The Partitions Obtained By Parallel Moves In 1834
The Cancer’s Extreme Recognition With Different Types of Extreme 1835
SuperHyperMatching Set and Polynomial on (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, 1836
224. Henry Garrett,“Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique Decides the Failures on the 1838
Cancer’s Recognition in the Perfect Connections of Cancer’s Attacks By 1839
SuperHyperModels Named (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 1840
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.32530.73922). 1841
225. Henry Garrett,“Indeterminacy On The All Possible Connections of Cells In 1842
Front of Cancer’s Attacks In The Terms of Neutrosophic Failed 1843
SuperHyperClique on Cancer’s Recognition called Neutrosophic 1844
SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.15897.70243). 1845
226. Henry Garrett,“Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique Decides the Failures on the 1846
Cancer’s Recognition in the Perfect Connections of Cancer’s Attacks By 1847
SuperHyperModels Named (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 1848
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.32530.73922). 1849
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 1851
2023010105 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 1852
228. Henry Garrett,“Perfect Directions Toward Idealism in Cancer’s Neutrosophic 1853
Recognition Forwarding Neutrosophic SuperHyperClique on Neutrosophic 1854
229. Henry Garrett,“Demonstrating Complete Connections in Every Embedded 1856
Regions and Sub-Regions in the Terms of Cancer’s Recognition and 1857
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClique”, 1858
10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 1863
10.20944/preprints202301.0088.v1). 1867
232. Henry Garrett,“Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic Regions titled 1868
neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable in Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition 1869
modeled in the Form of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2023, 1870
(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.17385.36968). 1871
Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond ”, Preprints 2023, 2023010044 1874
Well- SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 1876
2023010043 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0043.v1). 1877
235. Henry Garrett, “Using the Tool As (Neutrosophic) Failed SuperHyperStable To 1878
SuperHyperModel Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) 1879
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In 1882
Special ViewPoints”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.11447.80803). 1883
Well-SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 1885
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.35774.77123). 1886
Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond ”, ResearchGate 2022, (doi: 1889
10.13140/RG.2.2.36141.77287). 1890
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2022, (doi: 1892
10.13140/RG.2.2.29430.88642). 1893
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2022, (doi: 1896
10.13140/RG.2.2.11369.16487). 1897
Featuring (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances”, Preprints 1899
2022, 2022120549 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0549.v1). 1900
Featuring (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances”, 1902
Recognitions And Related (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClasses”, Preprints 2022, 1907
2022120540 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0540.v1). 1908
Recognitions And Related (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClasses”, ResearchGate 1912
2022, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.14426.41923). 1913
Preprints 2022, 2022120500 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0500.v1). 1916
ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.20993.12640). 1919
247. Henry Garrett,“Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on 1920
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs and SuperHyperGraphs Alongside Applications 1921
in Cancer’s Treatments”, Preprints 2022, 2022120324 (doi: 1922
10.20944/preprints202212.0324.v1). 1923
248. Henry Garrett, “Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on 1924
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs And SuperHyperGraphs Alongside Applications 1925
in Cancer’s Treatments”, ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 1926
10.13140/RG.2.2.23123.04641). 1927
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”, Preprints 2022, 2022110576 (doi: 1930
10.20944/preprints202211.0576.v1). 1931
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”, ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 1934
10.13140/RG.2.2.23324.56966). 1935
251. Henry Garrett, “Basic Neutrosophic Notions Concerning SuperHyperDominating 1936
and Neutrosophic SuperHyperResolving in SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 1937
2022 (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.29173.86244). 1938
252. Henry Garrett, “Initial Material of Neutrosophic Preliminaries to Study Some 1939
Neutrosophic Notions Based on Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) in 1940
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)”, ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 1941
10.13140/RG.2.2.25385.88160). 1942
253. Henry Garrett, “Stable In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 1943
Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8210033). 1944
254. Henry Garrett, “Reverse Connective Domination In Neutrosophic 1945
SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8206898). 1946
255. Henry Garrett, “Equal Connective Domination In Neutrosophic 1947
SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8201378). 1948
256. Henry Garrett, “Connective Domination In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. 1949
Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8194003). 1950
257. Henry Garrett, “Domination In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 1951
258. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperPerfect Search In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 1953
259. Henry Garrett, “Reverse Strict Dimension Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. 1955
260. Henry Garrett, “Unequal Dimension Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1957
Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8090194). 1958
261. Henry Garrett, “Strict Dimension Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1959
262. Henry Garrett, “Reverse Strict Connective In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 1961
263. Henry Garrett, “Unequal Connective Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1963
264. Henry Garrett, “Strict Connective Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1965
265. Henry Garrett, “Reverse Dimension Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1967
266. Henry Garrett, “Equal Dimension Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1969
267. Henry Garrett, “Dimension Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 1971
268. Henry Garrett, “Reverse Connective Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1973
269. Henry Garrett, “Equal Connective Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1975
270. Henry Garrett, “Connective Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 1977
271. Henry Garrett, “United Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 1979
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8027488). 1980
272. Henry Garrett, “Zero Forcing In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 1981
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8020181). 1982
273. Henry Garrett, “Matrix-Based In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 1983
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7978921). 1984
274. Henry Garrett, “Collections of Math II”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 1985
10.5281/zenodo.7943878). 1986
275. Henry Garrett, “Dominating-Edges In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 1987
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7943871). 1988
276. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Gap In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 1989
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7923786). 1990
277. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1991
278. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. 1993
279. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 1995
280. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Cycle-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 1997
281. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Cycle-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1999
282. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Cycle-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2001
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7854561). 2002
283. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Path-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2003
284. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Path-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2005
285. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Path-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2007
286. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Path-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2009
287. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Path-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2011
288. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Path-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2013
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7812750). 2014
289. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2015
290. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. 2017
291. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2019
292. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Cycle-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2021
293. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Cycle-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2023
294. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Cycle-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2025
295. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2027
296. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2029
297. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2031
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7783791). 2032
298. Henry Garrett, “Trace-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2033
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7780123). 2034
299. Henry Garrett, “Trace-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2035
300. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDuality”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2037
10.5281/zenodo.7637762). 2038
301. Henry Garrett, “Trace-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2039
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7766174). 2040
302. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2041
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7762232). 2042
303. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2043
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7758601). 2044
304. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2045
10.5281/zenodo.7754661). 2046
305. Henry Garrett, “Vertex-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2047
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7750995) . 2048
306. Henry Garrett, “Vertex-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2049
307. Henry Garrett, “Vertex-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2051
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7747236). 2052
308. Henry Garrett, “Stable-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2053
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7742587). 2054
309. Henry Garrett, “Stable-Decompositions In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2055
310. Henry Garrett, “Stable-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2057
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7734719). 2058
311. Henry Garrett, “Clique-Neighbors In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2059
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7730484). 2060
312. Henry Garrett, “Clique-Decompositions In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2061
313. Henry Garrett, “Clique-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2063
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7722865). 2064
314. Henry Garrett, “Space In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2065
10.5281/zenodo.7713563). 2066
315. Henry Garrett, “Space In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2067
10.5281/zenodo.7709116). 2068
316. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Connectivity In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2069
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7706415). 2070
317. Henry Garrett, “Vertex-Connectivity In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2071
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7706063). 2072
318. Henry Garrett, “Tree-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2073
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7701906). 2074
319. Henry Garrett, “Chord In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2075
10.5281/zenodo.7700205). 2076
320. Henry Garrett, “(i,j)-Domination In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2077
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7694876). 2078
321. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Domination In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2079
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7679410). 2080
322. Henry Garrett, “K-Domination In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2081
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7675982). 2082
323. Henry Garrett, “K-Number In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2083
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7672388). 2084
324. Henry Garrett, “Order In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2085
10.5281/zenodo.7668648). 2086
325. Henry Garrett, “Coloring In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2087
10.5281/zenodo.7662810). 2088
326. Henry Garrett, “Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2089
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7659162). 2090
327. Henry Garrett, “Cancer In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2091
10.5281/zenodo.7653233). 2092
328. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperWheel ”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2093
10.5281/zenodo.7653204). 2094
329. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperMultipartite”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2095
10.5281/zenodo.7653142). 2096
330. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperBipartite”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2097
10.5281/zenodo.7653117). 2098
331. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperStar ”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2099
10.5281/zenodo.7653089). 2100
332. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2101
10.5281/zenodo.7651687). 2102
333. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperPath”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2103
10.5281/zenodo.7651619). 2104
334. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDomination”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2105
10.5281/zenodo.7651439). 2106
335. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDominating”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2107
10.5281/zenodo.7650729). 2108
336. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperConnected ”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2109
10.5281/zenodo.7647868). 2110
337. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperTotal ”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2111
10.5281/zenodo.7647017). 2112
338. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperPerfect”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2113
10.5281/zenodo.7644894). 2114
339. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperJoin”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2115
10.5281/zenodo.7641880). 2116
340. Henry Garrett, “Path SuperHyperColoring”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2117
10.5281/zenodo.7632923). 2118
341. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDensity”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2119
10.5281/zenodo.7623459). 2120
342. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2121
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7606416). 2122
343. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperConnectivities”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2123
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7606416). 2124
344. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperConnectivities”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2125
10.5281/zenodo.7606404). 2126
345. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2127
10.5281/zenodo.7580018). 2128
346. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2129
10.5281/zenodo.7580018). 2130
347. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2131
10.5281/zenodo.7580018). 2132
348. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2133
10.5281/zenodo.7579929). 2134
349. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2135
10.5281/zenodo.7563170). 2136
350. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2137
10.5281/zenodo.7563164). 2138
351. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2139
10.5281/zenodo.7563160). 2140
352. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2141
10.5281/zenodo.7563160). 2142
353. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2143
10.5281/zenodo.7563160). 2144
354. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2145
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7557063). 2146
355. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperMatching”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2147
10.5281/zenodo.7557009). 2148
356. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperMatching”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2149
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7539484). 2150
357. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2151
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7523390). 2152
358. Henry Garrett, “Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2153
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7523390). 2154
359. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On Failed SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2155
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7523390). 2156
360. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2157
10.5281/zenodo.7574952). 2158
361. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2159
10.5281/zenodo.7574992). 2160
362. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2161
10.5281/zenodo.7523357). 2162
363. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2163
10.5281/zenodo.7523357). 2164
364. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2165
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7504782). 2166
365. Henry Garrett, “Extreme Failed SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2167
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7504782). 2168
366. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On Failed SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2169
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7504782). 2170
367. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2171
10.5281/zenodo.7499395). 2172
368. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2173
10.5281/zenodo.7499395). 2174
369. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2175
10.5281/zenodo.7499395). 2176
370. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2177
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7497450). 2178
371. Henry Garrett, “Extreme Failed SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2179
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7497450). 2180
372. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2181
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7494862). 2182
373. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2183
10.5281/zenodo.7494862). 2184
374. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2185
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7494862). 2186
375. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperAlliances”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2187
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7493845). 2188
376. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperAlliances”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2189
10.5281/zenodo.7493845). 2190
377. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperAlliances”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2191
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7493845). 2192
378. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperMatching”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2193
10.5281/zenodo.7539484). 2194
379. Henry Garrett, “Failed SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2195
10.5281/zenodo.7523390). 2196
380. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2197
10.5281/zenodo.7523357). 2198
381. Henry Garrett, “Failed SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2199
10.5281/zenodo.7504782). 2200
382. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2201
10.5281/zenodo.7499395). 2202
383. Henry Garrett, “Failed SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2203
10.5281/zenodo.7497450). 2204
384. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2205
10.5281/zenodo.7494862). 2206
385. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperAlliances”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2207
10.5281/zenodo.7493845). 2208
386. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2209
10.5281/zenodo.7480110). 2210
387. Henry Garrett, “Neut. SuperHyperEdges”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2211
10.5281/zenodo.7378758). 2212
388. Henry Garrett, “Beyond Neutrosophic Graphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2213
10.5281/zenodo.6320305). 2214
389. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Duality”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2215
10.5281/zenodo.6677173). 2216
View publication stats

New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel by Dominating Sequence As Hyper Decoration On Super Density

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel by Dominating Sequence As Hyper Decoration On Super Density

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph With

Preprint · December 2023

553 PUBLICATIONS 28,580 CITATIONS

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 2

SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By Dominating 3

Sequence As Hyper Decoration On Super Density 4

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · 6

DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA 7

In this scientific research, (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic 9

SuperHyperDominating Sequence). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S be a 10

pair S = (V, E). Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then 11

V 0 is called Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating Sequence if the following expressions, terms 12

and statements is called Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating Sequence criteria holds. 13

SuperHyperNotions, namely a Dominating Sequence and a Neutrosophic Dominating 15

progressed and SuperHyperNotion, SuperHyperUniform, and SuperHyperClass are 17

well-defined and well-reviewed based on them. Literature review is implemented 18

comparison between this SuperHyperNotion with other SuperHyperNotions and basic 20

SuperHyperNumbers is presented. Definitions are followed by examples and examples, 21

so clarifications are guided by various tools. Applications are designed to understand 22

between them all are officially called “SuperHyperEdge”. “SuperHyperGraph” and 28

“Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” frameworks are selected and selected for research on 29

questions and problems. It is useful to define a “neutrosophic” version of Dominating 33

becomes more understandable. In order to master the Neutrosophic Dominating 35

Sequence, there is a need to “re-define” the concept of “Dominating Sequence mastery”. 36

SuperHyperVertices and SuperHyperEdges are assigned by alphabetical labels. In this 37

hyperedges belonging to Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” with key points, it is 40

redefined. ”values of vertices & number of positions in alphabet”, ”Values of 41

SuperVertices&maximum values of its vertices”, ”values of edges&maximum values of 42

like to introduce the next SuperHyperClass SuperHyperGraph based on Dominating 45

SuperHyperClass type would be disciplined. If there is a need to have all Dominating 47

Sequence until Dominating Sequence, then it is officially called “Dominating Sequence”, 48

explored and distinguished because they are characterized in the SuperHyperClass 51

disciplinary methods based on a dominant Dominating Sequence. Because of having 52

Dominating Sequence, there is a need to “re-define” the concept of “neutrosophic 53

Dominating Sequence” and “neutrosophic Dominating Sequence”. SuperHyperVertices 54

of tags is used to assign values. Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. 56

“Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” is redefined if the desired table exists. And if the 57

desired table exists, a Dominating Sequence is redefined to a “Neutrosophic Dominating 58

Sequence”. It is useful to define a “Neutrosophic” version of SuperHyperClasses. Since 59

Dominating Sequence becomes more understandable. Consider a Neutrosophic 61

SuperHyperGraph. If the desired table exists, there are a number of Neutrosophic 62

SuperHyperClasses. So are SuperHyperPath, SuperHyperCycle, SuperHyperStar, 63

SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultiPartite and SuperHyperWheel. ”Neutrosophic 64

SuperHyperPath”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar”, 65

“Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultiPartite” and 66

“Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel”. A graph is SuperHyperUniform if it is a 67

SuperHyperGraph and the number of SuperHyperEdges elements is the same. Consider 68

a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. There are a number of SuperHyperClasses as follows. 69

It is a SuperHyperPath if there is only one SuperVertex as an intersection between two 70

given SuperHyperEdges with two exceptions. If only one SuperVertex is given as an 71

intersection between two SuperHyperEdges, it is SuperHyperCycle. It is 72

SuperHyperStar and only one SuperVertex as intersection among all SuperHyperEdges. 73

It is SuperHyperBipartite, and only one SuperVertex is given as the intersection between 74

SuperHyperEdge in common. This is SuperHyperMultiPartite. Only one SuperVertex is 76

given as an intersection between two SuperHyperEdges, and these SuperVertices, which 77

form separate multisets, have no SuperHyperEdge in common. If only one 78

SuperHyperEdge among the given two SuperHyperEdges is a SuperHyperWheel and a 79

SuperVertex has a SuperHyperEdge with any regular SuperVertex. SuperHyperModel 80

suggests specific designs and specific architectures. SuperHyperModel is officially called 81

“SuperHyperGraph” and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”. In this SuperHyperModel, 82

cells and the “special group” of cells. SuperHyperModeled as “SuperHyperEdges”. 85