New Research On Cancer's Recognition and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph by Eulerian SuperHyperCycles and Hamiltonian Sets As Hyper Covering Versus Super Separations-V

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.
net/publication/368291539
New Research On Cancer's Recognition and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph By

Eulerian SuperHyperCycles and Hamiltonian Sets As Hyper Covering Versus
Super separations-V
Preprint · February 2023

DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.33269.24809
CITATIONS
1 author:
Henry Garrett
288 PUBLICATIONS 2,891 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Metric Dimension in fuzzy(neutrosophic) Graphs View project
Neutrosophic Graphs View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Henry Garrett on 06 February 2023.
The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
New Research On Cancer’s Recognition and Neutrosophic 2
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian SuperHyperCycles and 3
Hamiltonian Sets As Hyper Covering Versus Super 4
separations-V 5
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · 7
DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA 8
ABSTRACT 9
In this research, assume a SuperHyperGraph. Then some notions on Extreme 10
SuperHyperCycle based on the backgrounds of Eulerian and Hamiltonian styles are 11
proposed. Some results are directed in the way that, the starting definitions make sense 12
on the motivation and the continuous approaches for this research. [Neutrosophic 13
Strength of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPaths] Assume a Neutrosophic 14
SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an ordered pair S = (V, E). A Neutrosophic 15
SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) V1 to 16
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vs is sequence of Neutrosophic 17
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) and Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges 18
(NSHE) V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs , have Neutrosophic t-strength 19
(min{T (Vi )}, m, n)si=1 ; Neutrosophic i-strength (m, min{I(Vi )}, n)si=1 ; Neutrosophic 20
f-strength (m, n, min{F (Vi )})si=1 ; Neutrosophic strength 21
(min{T (Vi )}, min{I(Vi )}, min{F (Vi )})si=1 . [Different Neutrosophic Types of 22
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)] Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 23
(NSHG) S is an ordered pair S = (V, E). Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge 24
(NSHE) E = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then E is called Neutrosophic t-connective if T (E) ≥ 25
maximum number of Neutrosophic t-strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from 26
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 27
(NSHV) Vj where 1 ≤ i, j ≤ s; Neutrosophic i-connective if I(E) ≥ maximum number of 28
Neutrosophic i-strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic 29
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vj where 30
1 ≤ i, j ≤ s; Neutrosophic f-connective if F (E) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic 31
f-strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) 32
Vi to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vj where 1 ≤ i, j ≤ s; Neutrosophic 33
connective if (T (E), I(E), F (E)) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic strength of 34
SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi to 35
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vj where 1 ≤ i, j ≤ s. ((Neutrosophic) 36
SuperHyperConnectivities). Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an 37
ordered pair S = (V, E). Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) 38
E = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then E is called an Extreme SuperHyperConnectivities if it’s 39
either of Neutrosophic t-connective, Neutrosophic i-connective, Neutrosophic 40
f-connective, and Neutrosophic connective and C(N SHG) for an Extreme 41
SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum Extreme cardinality of an Extreme 42
SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality of the Extreme SuperHyperEdges in the 43
consecutive Extreme sequence of Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme 44
SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Extreme SuperHyperConnectivities; a 45
Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities if it’s either of Neutrosophic t-connective, 46
Neutrosophic i-connective, Neutrosophic f-connective, and Neutrosophic connective and 47
C(N SHG) for a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum 48
Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges of a Neutrosophic 49
SuperHyperSet S of high Neutrosophic cardinality consecutive Neutrosophic 50
SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 51
Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities; an Extreme SuperHyperConnectivities 52
SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of Neutrosophic t-connective, Neutrosophic 53
i-connective, Neutrosophic f-connective, and Neutrosophic connective and C(N SHG) for 54
an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Extreme SuperHyperPolynomial 55
contains the Extreme coefficients defined as the Extreme number of the maximum 56
Extreme cardinality of the Extreme SuperHyperEdges of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S 57
of high Extreme cardinality consecutive Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme 58
SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Extreme SuperHyperConnectivities; and 59
the Extreme power is corresponded to its Extreme coefficient; a Neutrosophic 60
SuperHyperConnectivities SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of Neutrosophic 61
t-connective, Neutrosophic i-connective, Neutrosophic f-connective, and Neutrosophic 62
connective and C(N SHG) for a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the 63
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPolynomial contains the Neutrosophic coefficients defined as 64
the Neutrosophic number of the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic 65
SuperHyperEdges of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high Neutrosophic cardinality 66
consecutive Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such 67
that they form the Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities; and the Neutrosophic power 68
is corresponded to its Neutrosophic coefficient; an Extreme R-SuperHyperConnectivities 69
if it’s either of Neutrosophic t-connective, Neutrosophic i-connective, Neutrosophic 70
SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum Extreme cardinality of an Extreme 72
SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality of the Extreme SuperHyperVertices in the 73
consecutive Extreme sequence of Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme 74
SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Extreme SuperHyperConnectivities; a 75
Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnectivities if it’s either of Neutrosophic t-connective, 76
Neutrosophic i-connective, Neutrosophic f-connective, and Neutrosophic connective and 77
C(N SHG) for a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum 78
Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of a Neutrosophic 79
SuperHyperSet S of high Neutrosophic cardinality consecutive Neutrosophic 80
SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 81
Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities; an Extreme R-SuperHyperConnectivities 82
SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of Neutrosophic t-connective, Neutrosophic 83
i-connective, Neutrosophic f-connective, and Neutrosophic connective and C(N SHG) for 84
an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Extreme SuperHyperPolynomial 85
Extreme cardinality of the Extreme SuperHyperVertices of an Extreme SuperHyperSet 87
S of high Extreme cardinality consecutive Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme 88
SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Extreme SuperHyperConnectivities; and 89
the Extreme power is corresponded to its Extreme coefficient; a Neutrosophic 90
SuperHyperConnectivities SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of Neutrosophic 91
t-connective, Neutrosophic i-connective, Neutrosophic f-connective, and Neutrosophic 92
connective and C(N SHG) for a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the 93
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPolynomial contains the Neutrosophic coefficients defined as 94
the Neutrosophic number of the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic 95
SuperHyperVertices of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high Neutrosophic 96
cardinality consecutive Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic 97
SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities; 98
and the Neutrosophic power is corresponded to its Neutrosophic coefficient. A basic 99
familiarity with neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle theory, SuperHyperGraphs, and 100
neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs theory are proposed. 101
Keywords: neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, (neutrosophic) SuperHyperCycle, 102
Cancer’s neutrosophic Recognition 103
AMS Subject Classification: 05C17, 05C22, 05E45 104
1 Wondering open Problems But As The Directions 105
To Forming The Motivations 106
Problem 1.1. Does neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle do Neutrosophicly a neutrosophic 107
SuperHyperModel for the Cancer’s neutrosophic recognition based Neutrosophicly on 108
neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle? 109
Problem 1.2. Is the independent research based on Cancer’s neutrosophic recognition 110
based Neutrosophicly on neutrosophic SuperHyperNotions? 111
2 The Surveys of Mathematical Sets On The 112
Results But As The Initial Motivation 113
Definition 2.1 (Neutrosophic Strength of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPaths). 114
(Ref. [38],Definition 5.3,p.7). 115
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an ordered pair S = (V, E).

A Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex
(NSHV) V1 to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vs is sequence of Neutrosophic
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) and Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)
V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs ,
have 116
(i) Neutrosophic t-strength (min{T (Vi )}, m, n)si=1 ; 117
(ii) Neutrosophic i-strength (m, min{I(Vi )}, n)si=1 ; 118
(iii) Neutrosophic f-strength (m, n, min{F (Vi )})si=1 ; 119
(iv) Neutrosophic strength (min{T (Vi )}, min{I(Vi )}, min{F (Vi )})si=1 . 120
Definition 2.2 (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges 121
(NSHE)). (Ref. [38],Definition 5.4,p.7). 122
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an ordered pair S = (V, E). 123
Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) E = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then E is 124
called 125
(ix) Neutrosophic t-connective if T (E) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic 126
t-strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 127
(NSHV) Vi to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vj where 1 ≤ i, j ≤ s; 128
(x) Neutrosophic i-connective if I(E) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic 129
i-strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 130
(xi) Neutrosophic f-connective if F (E) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic 132
f-strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 133
(xii) Neutrosophic connective if (T (E), I(E), F (E)) ≥ maximum number of 135
Neutrosophic strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic 136
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vj 137
where 1 ≤ i, j ≤ s. 138
Definition 2.3. ((Neutrosophic) SuperHyperConnectivities). 139
called 142
(i) an Extreme SuperHyperConnectivities if it’s either of Neutrosophic 143
t-connective, Neutrosophic i-connective, Neutrosophic f-connective, and 144
Neutrosophic connective and C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph 145
N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum Extreme cardinality of an Extreme 146
SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality of the Extreme SuperHyperEdges in 147
the consecutive Extreme sequence of Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme 148
SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Extreme SuperHyperConnectivities; 149
(ii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities if it’s either of Neutrosophic 150
Neutrosophic connective and C(N SHG) for a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 152
N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic 153
SuperHyperEdges of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high Neutrosophic 154
SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Neutrosophic 156
SuperHyperConnectivities; 157
(iii) an Extreme SuperHyperConnectivities SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s 158
SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Extreme SuperHyperPolynomial 161
Extreme cardinality of the Extreme SuperHyperEdges of an Extreme 163
SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality consecutive Extreme 164
SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 165
Extreme SuperHyperConnectivities; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its 166
Extreme coefficient; 167
(iv) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities SuperHyperPolynomial if 168
it’s either of Neutrosophic t-connective, Neutrosophic i-connective, Neutrosophic 169
f-connective, and Neutrosophic connective and C(N SHG) for a Neutrosophic 170
SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPolynomial 171
contains the Neutrosophic coefficients defined as the Neutrosophic number of the 172
maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges of a 173
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high Neutrosophic cardinality consecutive 174
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that 175
they form the Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities; and the Neutrosophic 176
power is corresponded to its Neutrosophic coefficient; 177
(v) an Extreme R-SuperHyperConnectivities if it’s either of Neutrosophic 178
Neutrosophic connective and C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph 180
N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum Extreme cardinality of an Extreme 181
SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality of the Extreme SuperHyperVertices 182
in the consecutive Extreme sequence of Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme 183
SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Extreme SuperHyperConnectivities; 184
(vi) a Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnectivities if it’s either of Neutrosophic 185
Neutrosophic connective and C(N SHG) for a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 187
N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic 188
SuperHyperVertices of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high Neutrosophic 189
SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Neutrosophic 191
SuperHyperConnectivities; 192
(vii) an Extreme R-SuperHyperConnectivities SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s 193
SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Extreme SuperHyperPolynomial 196
Extreme cardinality of the Extreme SuperHyperVertices of an Extreme 198
SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality consecutive Extreme 199
SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 200
Extreme SuperHyperConnectivities; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its 201
Extreme coefficient; 202
(viii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities SuperHyperPolynomial if 203
it’s either of Neutrosophic t-connective, Neutrosophic i-connective, Neutrosophic 204
f-connective, and Neutrosophic connective and C(N SHG) for a Neutrosophic 205
SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPolynomial 206
contains the Neutrosophic coefficients defined as the Neutrosophic number of the 207
maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of a 208
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high Neutrosophic cardinality consecutive 209
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that 210
they form the Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities; and the Neutrosophic 211
power is corresponded to its Neutrosophic coefficient. 212
Example 2.4. • On the Figure (1), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, 213
Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities, is up. E1 and E3 are some empty 214
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges but E2 is a loop Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge 215
and E4 is a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. Thus in the terms of Neutrosophic 216
SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only one Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge, namely, 217
E4 . The Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 is Neutrosophic isolated means that 218
there’s no Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge has it as a Neutrosophic endpoint. Thus 219
the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 , is excluded in every given Neutrosophic 220
SuperHyperConnectivities. 221
C(N SHG) = {E4 } is a Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities.

C(N SHG) = z is a Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities SuperHyperPolynomial.
C(N SHG) = {Vi }i6=3 is a Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnectivities.
C(N SHG) = 3z is a Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnectivities SuperHyperPolynomial.
222
Figure 1. The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions

of Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities in the Neutrosophic Example (??)
• On the Figure (2), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 223
SuperHyperConnectivities, is up. E1 , E2 and E3 are some empty Neutrosophic 224
SuperHyperEdges but E4 is a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. Thus in the terms 225
of Neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only one Neutrosophic 226
SuperHyperEdge, namely, E4 . The Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 is 227
Neutrosophic isolated means that there’s no Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge has it 228
as a Neutrosophic endpoint. Thus the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 , is 229
excluded in every given Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities. 230
C(N SHG) = {E4 } is a Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities.

C(N SHG) = z is a Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities SuperHyperPolynomial.
C(N SHG) = {Vi }i6=3 is a Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnectivities.
C(N SHG) = 3z is a Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnectivities SuperHyperPolynomial.
231
3 Applied Notions Under The Scrutiny Of The 232
Motivation Of This Research 233
In this research, there are some ideas in the featured frameworks of motivations. I try 234
to bring the motivations in the narrative ways. 235
Question 3.1. How to define the SuperHyperNotions to do research to find the “ 236
amount of SuperHyperCycle” of either individual of cells or the groups of cells based on 237
the fixed cell or the fixed group of cells, extensively, the “amount of SuperHyperCycle” 238
based on the fixed groups of cells or the fixed groups of group of cells? 239
Question 3.2. What are the best descriptions for the “Cancer’s Recognition” in terms 240
of these messy and dense SuperHyperModels where embedded notions are illustrated? 241
It’s motivation to find notions to use in this dense model is titled 242
“SuperHyperGraphs”. Thus it motivates us to define different types of “ 243
SuperHyperCycle” and “neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle” on “SuperHyperGraph” and 244
“neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”. 245
Figure 2. The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions

of Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities in the Neutrosophic Example (??)
4 Preliminaries Of This Research On the Redeemed 246
Ways 247
In this section, the basic material in this research, is referred to [Single Valued 248
Neutrosophic Set](Ref. [38],Definition 2.2,p.2), [Neutrosophic Set](Ref. [38],Definition 249
2.1,p.1), [Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)](Ref. [38],Definition 2.5,p.2), 250
[Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)](Ref. [38],Definition 251
2.7,p.3), [t-norm](Ref. [38], Definition 2.7, p.3), and [Characterization of the 252
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)](Ref. [38],Definition 2.7,p.3), [Neutrosophic 253
Strength of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPaths] (Ref. [38],Definition 5.3,p.7), and 254
[Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)] 255
(Ref. [38],Definition 5.4,p.7). Also, the new ideas and their clarifications are addressed 256
to Ref. [38]. 257
In this subsection, the basic material which is used in this research, is presented. 258
Also, the new ideas and their clarifications are elicited. 259
Definition 4.1 (Neutrosophic Set). (Ref. [38],Definition 2.1,p.1). 260
Let X be a space of points (objects) with generic elements in X denoted by x; then

the Neutrosophic set A (NS A) is an object having the form
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}

+
where the functions T, I, F : X →]− 0, 1 [ define respectively the a
truth-membership function, an indeterminacy-membership function, and a
falsity-membership function of the element x ∈ X to the set A with the condition
−
0 ≤ TA (x) + IA (x) + FA (x) ≤ 3+ .
The functions TA (x), IA (x) and FA (x) are real standard or nonstandard subsets of 261
+
]− 0, 1 [. 262
Definition 4.2 (Single Valued Neutrosophic Set). (Ref. [38],Definition 2.2,p.2). 263
Let X be a space of points (objects) with generic elements in X denoted by x. A

single valued Neutrosophic set A (SVNS A) is characterized by truth-membership
function TA (x), an indeterminacy-membership function IA (x), and a falsity-membership
function FA (x). For each point x in X, TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) ∈ [0, 1]. A SVNS A can be
written as
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}.
Definition 4.3. The degree of truth-membership,
indeterminacy-membership and falsity-membership of the subset X ⊂ A of
the single valued Neutrosophic set A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}:
TA (X) = min[TA (vi ), TA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,
IA (X) = min[IA (vi ), IA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,

and FA (X) = min[FA (vi ), FA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X .
Definition 4.4. The support of X ⊂ A of the single valued Neutrosophic set
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}:
supp(X) = {x ∈ X : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) > 0}.
Definition 4.5 (Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). (Ref. [38],Definition 264
2.5,p.2). 265
Assume V 0 is a given set. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an 266
ordered pair S = (V, E), where 267
(i) V = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vn } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of V 0 ; 268
(ii) V = {(Vi , TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi )) : TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi ) ≥ 0}, (i = 269
1, 2, . . . , n); 270
(iii) E = {E1 , E2 , . . . , En0 } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of 271
V; 272
(iv) E = {(Ei0 , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )) : TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 ) ≥ 0}, (i0 = 273
1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 274
(v) Vi 6= ∅, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 275
(vi) Ei0 6= ∅, (i0 = 1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 276
P
(vii) i supp(Vi ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 277
0 0
P
(viii) i0 supp(Ei ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n );
0 278
(ix) and the following conditions hold:
TV0 (Ei0 ) ≤ min[TV 0 (Vi ), TV 0 (Vj )]Vi ,Vj ∈Ei0 ,
IV0 (Ei0 ) ≤ min[IV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vj )]Vi ,Vj ∈Ei0 ,

and FV0 (Ei0 ) ≤ min[FV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vj )]Vi ,Vj ∈Ei0
where i0 = 1, 2, . . . , n0 . 279
Here the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ej 0 and the Neutrosophic 280
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) Vj are single valued Neutrosophic sets. TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), 281
and FV 0 (Vi ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 282
indeterminacy-membership and the degree of falsity-membership the Neutrosophic 283
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) V. 284
TV0 (Ei0 ), TV0 (Ei0 ), and TV0 (Ei0 ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 285
indeterminacy-membership and the degree of falsity-membership of the Neutrosophic 286
SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) Ei0 to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) E. Thus, 287
the ii0 th element of the incidence matrix of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) 288
are of the form (Vi , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )), the sets V and E are crisp sets. 289
Definition 4.6 (Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). 290
The Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ei0 and the Neutrosophic 293
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) Vi of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S = (V, E) 294
could be characterized as follow-up items. 295
(i) If |Vi | = 1, then Vi is called vertex; 296
(ii) if |Vi | ≥ 1, then Vi is called SuperVertex; 297
(iii) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called edge; 298
(iv) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 299
HyperEdge; 300
(v) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called 301
SuperEdge; 302
(vi) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 303
SuperHyperEdge. 304
If we choose different types of binary operations, then we could get hugely diverse 305
types of general forms of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG). 306
Definition 4.7 (t-norm). (Ref. [38], Definition 2.7, p.3). 307
A binary operation ⊗ : [0, 1] × [0, 1] → [0, 1] is a t-norm if it satisfies the following 308
for x, y, z, w ∈ [0, 1]: 309
(i) 1 ⊗ x = x; 310
(ii) x ⊗ y = y ⊗ x; 311
(iii) x ⊗ (y ⊗ z) = (x ⊗ y) ⊗ z; 312
(iv) If w ≤ x and y ≤ z then w ⊗ y ≤ x ⊗ z. 313
Definition 4.8. The degree of truth-membership, indeterminacy-membership

and falsity-membership of the subset X ⊂ A of the single valued Neutrosophic set
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X} (with respect to t-norm Tnorm ):
TA (X) = Tnorm [TA (vi ), TA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,
IA (X) = Tnorm [IA (vi ), IA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,

and FA (X) = Tnorm [FA (vi ), FA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X .
Definition 4.9. The support of X ⊂ A of the single valued Neutrosophic set

A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}:
supp(X) = {x ∈ X : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) > 0}.
Definition 4.10. (General Forms of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). 314
Assume V 0 is a given set. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an 315
ordered pair S = (V, E), where 316
(i) V = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vn } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of V 0 ; 317
(ii) V = {(Vi , TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi )) : TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi ) ≥ 0}, (i = 318
1, 2, . . . , n); 319
(iii) E = {E1 , E2 , . . . , En0 } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of 320
V; 321
(iv) E = {(Ei0 , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )) : TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 ) ≥ 0}, (i0 = 322
1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 323
(v) Vi 6= ∅, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 324
(vi) Ei0 6= ∅, (i0 = 1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 325
P
(vii) i supp(Vi ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 326
0 0
P
(viii) i0 supp(Ei ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n ).
0 327
Here the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ej 0 and the Neutrosophic 328
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) Vj are single valued Neutrosophic sets. TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), 329
and FV 0 (Vi ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 330
indeterminacy-membership and the degree of falsity-membership the Neutrosophic 331
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) V. 332
TV0 (Ei0 ), TV0 (Ei0 ), and TV0 (Ei0 ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 333
indeterminacy-membership and the degree of falsity-membership of the Neutrosophic 334
SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) Ei0 to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) E. Thus, 335
the ii0 th element of the incidence matrix of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) 336
are of the form (Vi , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )), the sets V and E are crisp sets. 337
Definition 4.11 (Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). 338
The Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ei0 and the Neutrosophic 341
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) Vi of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S = (V, E) 342
(i) If |Vi | = 1, then Vi is called vertex; 344
(ii) if |Vi | ≥ 1, then Vi is called SuperVertex; 345
(iii) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called edge; 346
(iv) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 347
HyperEdge; 348
(v) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called 349
SuperEdge; 350
(vi) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 351
SuperHyperEdge. 352
This SuperHyperModel is too messy and too dense. Thus there’s a need to have 353
some restrictions and conditions on SuperHyperGraph. The special case of this 354
SuperHyperGraph makes the patterns and regularities. 355
Definition 4.12. A graph is SuperHyperUniform if it’s SuperHyperGraph and the 356
number of elements of SuperHyperEdges are the same. 357
To get more visions on SuperHyperUniform, the some SuperHyperClasses are 358
introduced. It makes to have SuperHyperUniform more understandable. 359
Definition 4.13. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. There are some 360
SuperHyperClasses as follows. 361
(i). It’s Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath if it’s only one SuperVertex as 362
intersection amid two given SuperHyperEdges with two exceptions; 363
(ii). it’s SuperHyperCycle if it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two 364
given SuperHyperEdges; 365
(iii). it’s SuperHyperStar it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid all 366
SuperHyperEdges; 367
(iv). it’s SuperHyperBipartite it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two 368
given SuperHyperEdges and these SuperVertices, forming two separate sets, has 369
no SuperHyperEdge in common; 370
(v). it’s SuperHyperMultiPartite it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid 371
two given SuperHyperEdges and these SuperVertices, forming multi separate sets, 372
has no SuperHyperEdge in common; 373
(vi). it’s SuperHyperWheel if it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two 374
given SuperHyperEdges and one SuperVertex has one SuperHyperEdge with any 375
common SuperVertex. 376
Definition 4.14. Let an ordered pair S = (V, E) be a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph

(NSHG) S. Then a sequence of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) and
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)
V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs
is called a Neutrosophic Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from 377
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) V1 to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 378
(NSHV) Vs if either of following conditions hold: 379
(i) Vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 380
(ii) there’s a vertex vi ∈ Vi such that vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 381
(iii) there’s a SuperVertex Vi0 ∈ Vi such that Vi0 , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 382
(iv) there’s a vertex vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that Vi , vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 383
0 0
(v) there’s a SuperVertex Vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that Vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 384
(vi) there are a vertex vi ∈ Vi and a vertex vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that vi , vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 385
0 0
(vii) there are a vertex vi ∈ Vi and a SuperVertex Vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 386
(viii) there are a SuperVertex Vi0 ∈ Vi and a vertex vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that Vi0 , vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 387
(ix) there are a SuperVertex Vi0 ∈ Vi and a SuperVertex Vi+1

0
∈ Vi+1 such that 388
0 0
Vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 . 389
Definition 4.15. (Characterization of the Neutrosophic Neutrosophic 390
SuperHyperPaths). 391

a Neutrosophic Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) V1 to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vs is
sequence of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) and Neutrosophic
SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)
V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs ,
(i) If for all Vi , Ej 0 , |Vi | = 1, |Ej 0 | = 2, then NSHP is called path; 393
(ii) if for all Ej 0 , |Ej 0 | = 2, and there’s Vi , |Vi | ≥ 1, then NSHP is called SuperPath; 394
(iii) if for all Vi , Ej 0 , |Vi | = 1, |Ej 0 | ≥ 2, then NSHP is called HyperPath; 395
(iv) if there are Vi , Ej 0 , |Vi | ≥ 1, |Ej 0 | ≥ 2, then NSHP is called Neutrosophic 396
SuperHyperPath . 397
Definition 4.16 (Neutrosophic Strength of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPaths). 398

A Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex
(NSHV) V1 to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vs is sequence of Neutrosophic
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) and Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)
V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs ,
have 400
(i) Neutrosophic t-strength (min{T (Vi )}, m, n)si=1 ; 401
(ii) Neutrosophic i-strength (m, min{I(Vi )}, n)si=1 ; 402
(iii) Neutrosophic f-strength (m, n, min{F (Vi )})si=1 ; 403
(iv) Neutrosophic strength (min{T (Vi )}, min{I(Vi )}, min{F (Vi )})si=1 . 404
Definition 4.17 (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges 405
(NSHE)). (Ref. [38],Definition 5.4,p.7). 406
called 409
(ix) Neutrosophic t-connective if T (E) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic 410
t-strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 411
(x) Neutrosophic i-connective if I(E) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic 413
i-strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 414
(xi) Neutrosophic f-connective if F (E) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic 416
f-strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 417
(xii) Neutrosophic connective if (T (E), I(E), F (E)) ≥ maximum number of 419
Neutrosophic strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic 420
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vj 421
where 1 ≤ i, j ≤ s. 422
Definition 4.18. ((neutrosophic) SuperHyperCycle). 423
Assume a SuperHyperGraph. Then 424
(i) an Extreme SuperHyperCycle C(N SHG) for an extreme SuperHyperGraph 425
N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum extreme cardinality of an extreme 426
SuperHyperSet S of high extreme cardinality of the extreme SuperHyperEdges in 427
the consecutive extreme sequence of extreme SuperHyperEdges and extreme 428
SuperHyperVertices such that they form the extreme SuperHyperCycle and either 429
all extreme SuperHyperVertices or all extreme SuperHyperEdges; 430
(ii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle C(N SHG) for a neutrosophic 431
SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of 432
the neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges of a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high 433
neutrosophic cardinality consecutive neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges and 434
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that they form the neutrosophic 435
SuperHyperCycle and either all neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices or all 436
neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges; 437
(iii) an Extreme SuperHyperCycle SuperHyperPolynomial C(N SHG) for an 438
extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the extreme SuperHyperPolynomial 439
contains the extreme coefficients defined as the extreme number of the maximum 440
extreme cardinality of the extreme SuperHyperEdges of an extreme 441
SuperHyperSet S of high extreme cardinality consecutive extreme 442
SuperHyperEdges and extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 443
extreme SuperHyperCycle and either all extreme SuperHyperVertices or all 444
extreme SuperHyperEdges; and the extreme power is corresponded to its extreme 445
coefficient; 446
(iv) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle SuperHyperPolynomial C(N SHG) for 447
a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the neutrosophic 448
SuperHyperPolynomial contains the neutrosophic coefficients defined as the 449
neutrosophic number of the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of the neutrosophic 450
SuperHyperEdges of a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high neutrosophic 451
cardinality consecutive neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges and neutrosophic 452
SuperHyperVertices such that they form the neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle and 453
either all neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices or all neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges; 454
and the neutrosophic power is corresponded to its neutrosophic coefficient; 455
(v) an Extreme R-SuperHyperCycle C(N SHG) for an extreme 456
SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum extreme cardinality of an 457
extreme SuperHyperSet S of high extreme cardinality of the extreme 458
SuperHyperVertices in the consecutive extreme sequence of extreme 459
extreme SuperHyperEdges; 462
(vi) a Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperCycle C(N SHG) for a neutrosophic 463
SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of 464
the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high 465
neutrosophic cardinality consecutive neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges and 466
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that they form the neutrosophic 467
SuperHyperCycle and either all neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices or all 468
neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges;; 469
(vii) an Extreme R-SuperHyperCycle SuperHyperPolynomial C(N SHG) for 470
an extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the extreme 471
SuperHyperPolynomial contains the extreme coefficients defined as the extreme 472
number of the maximum extreme cardinality of the extreme SuperHyperVertices 473
of an extreme SuperHyperSet S of high extreme cardinality consecutive extreme 474
extreme SuperHyperEdges; and the extreme power is corresponded to its extreme 477
coefficient; 478
(viii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle SuperHyperPolynomial C(N SHG) for 479
a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the neutrosophic 480
SuperHyperPolynomial contains the neutrosophic coefficients defined as the 481
neutrosophic number of the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of the neutrosophic 482
SuperHyperVertices of a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high neutrosophic 483
cardinality consecutive neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges and neutrosophic 484
SuperHyperVertices such that they form the neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle and 485
either all neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices or all neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges; 486
and the neutrosophic power is corresponded to its neutrosophic coefficient. 487
Definition 4.19. ((neutrosophic/neutrosophic)δ−SuperHyperCycle). 488
Assume a SuperHyperGraph. Then 489
(i) an δ−SuperHyperCycle is a neutrosophic kind of neutrosophic 490
SuperHyperCycle such that either of the following expressions hold for the 491
neutrosophic cardinalities of SuperHyperNeighbors of s ∈ S : 492
|S ∩ N (s)| > |S ∩ (V \ N (s))| + δ;

|S ∩ N (s)| < |S ∩ (V \ N (s))| + δ.
The Expression (4.1), holds if S is an δ−SuperHyperOffensive. And the 493
Expression (4.1), holds if S is an δ−SuperHyperDefensive; 494
(ii) a Neutrosophic δ−SuperHyperCycle is a neutrosophic kind of neutrosophic 495
SuperHyperCycle such that either of the following neutrosophic expressions hold 496
for the neutrosophic cardinalities of SuperHyperNeighbors of s ∈ S : 497
|S ∩ N (s)|N eutrosophic > |S ∩ (V \ N (s))|N eutrosophic + δ;

|S ∩ N (s)|N eutrosophic < |S ∩ (V \ N (s))|N eutrosophic + δ.
The Expression (4.1), holds if S is a Neutrosophic δ−SuperHyperOffensive. 498
And the Expression (4.1), holds if S is a Neutrosophic 499
δ−SuperHyperDefensive. 500
For the sake of having a neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle, there’s a need to “redefine” 501
the notion of “neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”. The SuperHyperVertices and the 502
SuperHyperEdges are assigned by the labels from the letters of the alphabets. In this 503
procedure, there’s the usage of the position of labels to assign to the values. 504
Table 1. The Values of Vertices, SuperVertices, Edges, HyperEdges, and SuperHy-

perEdges Belong to The neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph Mentioned in the Definition
(4.22)
The Values of The Vertices The Number of Position in Alphabet
The Values of The SuperVertices The maximum Values of Its Vertices
The Values of The Edges The maximum Values of Its Vertices
The Values of The HyperEdges The maximum Values of Its Vertices
The Values of The SuperHyperEdges The maximum Values of Its Endpoints

perEdges Belong to The neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, Mentioned in the Definition
(4.21)
Definition 4.20. Assume a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. It’s redefined 505
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph if the Table (1) holds. 506
It’s useful to define a “neutrosophic” version of SuperHyperClasses. Since there’s 507
more ways to get neutrosophic type-results to make a neutrosophic more 508
understandable. 509
Definition 4.21. Assume a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. There are some 510
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses if the Table (2) holds. Thus neutrosophic 511
SuperHyperPath , SuperHyperCycle, SuperHyperStar, SuperHyperBipartite, 512
SuperHyperMultiPartite, and SuperHyperWheel, are Neutrosophic 513
SuperHyperPath , Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle, Neutrosophic 514
SuperHyperStar, Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite, Neutrosophic 515
SuperHyperMultiPartite, and Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel if the Table 516
(2) holds. 517
It’s useful to define a “neutrosophic” version of a neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle. 518
Since there’s more ways to get type-results to make a neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle 519
more neutrosophicly understandable. 520
For the sake of having a neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle, there’s a need to “redefine” 521
the neutrosophic notion of “neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle”. The SuperHyperVertices 522
and the SuperHyperEdges are assigned by the labels from the letters of the alphabets. 523
In this procedure, there’s the usage of the position of labels to assign to the values. 524
Definition 4.22. Assume a SuperHyperCycle. It’s redefined a Neutrosophic 525
SuperHyperCycle if the Table (3) holds. 526
5 Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle But As The 527
Extensions Except From Eulerian And 528
Hamiltonian Forms 529
The extreme SuperHyperNotion, namely, extreme SuperHyperCycle, is up. Thus the 530
non-obvious extreme SuperHyperCycle, S is up. The extreme type-SuperHyperSet of 531
the extreme SuperHyperCycle, is: S is a extreme SuperHyperSet, is: S does includes 532

perEdges Belong to The neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph Mentioned in the Definition
(4.22)
only more than four extreme SuperHyperVertices in a connected neutrosophic 533
SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). It’s interesting to mention that the extreme 534
type-SuperHyperSet called the 535
“extreme SuperHyperCycle” 536
amid those obvious[non-obvious] simple[non-simple] extreme type-SuperHyperSets 537
called the 538
SuperHyperCycle, 539
is only and only S in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E) with 540
a illustrated SuperHyperModeling. But all only obvious[non-obvious] simple[non-simple] 541
extreme type-SuperHyperSets of the obvious[non-obvious] simple[non-simple] extreme 542
SuperHyperCycle amid those type-SuperHyperSets, are S. A connected neutrosophic 543
SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E) as a linearly-over-packed SuperHyperModel is 544
featured on the Figures. 545
Example 5.1. Assume the SuperHyperGraphs in the Figures (3) and (4). 546
• On the Figure (3), the SuperHyperNotion, namely, SuperHyperCycle, is up. 547
E1 , E2 and E3 are some empty SuperHyperEdges but E4 is a SuperHyperEdge. 548
Thus in the terms of SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only one SuperHyperEdge, 549
namely, E4 . E2 is an isolated SuperHyperEdge. 550
With the exception of E2 , the concept could be applied. With keeping E2 in the 551
mind, the story is coming up. 552
C(N SHG) = {E4 } is a neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle.

C(N SHG) = z is an neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle SuperHyperPolynomial.
C(N SHG) = {V1 , V2 , V3 } is a neutrosophic R-SuperHyperCycle.
C(N SHG) = z is a neutrosophic R-SuperHyperCycle SuperHyperPolynomial.
553
• On the Figure (4), the SuperHyperNotion, namely, a SuperHyperCycle, is up. 554
There’s no empty SuperHyperEdge but E3 are a loop SuperHyperEdge on {F }, 555
and there are some SuperHyperEdges, namely, E1 on {H, V1 , V3 }, alongside E2 on 556
{O, H, V4 , V3 } and E4 , E5 on {N, V1 , V2 , V3 , F }. 557
C(N SHG) = {V3 , E1 , V4 , E2 , H, E1 , V3 } is a neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle.

C(N SHG) = 4z 3 is a neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle SuperHyperPolynomial.
C(N SHG) = {V3 , V4 , H, V3 } is a neutrosophic R-SuperHyperCycle.
C(N SHG) = 4z 4 is a neutrosophic R-SuperHyperCycle SuperHyperPolynomial.
558
Figure 3. The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperCycle in

the Example (5.1)
Figure 4. The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperCycle in

the Example (5.1)
Figure 5. a neutrosophic SuperHyperPath Associated to the Notions of neutrosophic

SuperHyperCycle in the Example (6.2)
6 The Departures on The Theoretical Results 559
Toward Theoretical Motivations 560
The previous neutrosophic approaches apply on the upcoming neutrosophic results on 561
neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses. 562
Proposition 6.1. Assume a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperPath ESHP : (V, E). 563
Then 564
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperCycle

|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
b c
= {E2i−1 }i=1 2
.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperCycleSuperHyperP olynomial
= 2z b 2 c
.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperCycle = {Vi }si=1 , {Vj }tj=1 .
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperCycleSuperHyperP olynomial = az s + bz t .
Proof. Let P : V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , . . . , Vz is a longest path taken from a connected 565
neutrosophic SuperHyperPath ESHP : (V, E). Then there’s no cycle. Thus the notion 566
of quasi is up. The latter is straightforward. 567
Example 6.2. In the Figure (5), the connected neutrosophic SuperHyperPath 568
ESHP : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, in the 569
neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (5), is the SuperHyperCycle. 570
Proposition 6.3. Assume a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle ESHC : (V, E). 571
Figure 6. a neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle Associated to the neutrosophic Notions of

neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle in the neutrosophic Example (6.4)
Then 572

b c
= {E2i−1 }i=1 2
.
= 2z b 2 c
.
Proof. Let C : V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , . . . , Vz is a longest cycle taken from a connected 573
neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle ESHC : (V, E). Then there’s at least one cycle. Thus 574
the notion of quasi isn’t up and the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperCycle 575
could be applied. The latter is straightforward. 576
Example 6.4. In the Figure (6), the connected neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle 577
N SHC : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, 578
in the neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (6), is the neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle. 579
Proposition 6.5. Assume a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). 580
Then 581

= {E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.
X
= z |E|Neutrosophic Cardinality | E:∈EESHG:(V,E) .
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperCycle = {Vi }si=1 , {Vj }tj=1 , . . . .

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperCycleSuperHyperP olynomial = z s + z t +, . . . .
Figure 7. a neutrosophic SuperHyperStar Associated to the neutrosophic Notions of

neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle in the neutrosophic Example (6.6)
Proof. Let P : V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , . . . , Vz is a longest path taken from a connected 582
neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). Then there’s no cycle. Thus the notion of 583
quasi is up. The latter is straightforward. 584
Example 6.6. In the Figure (7), the connected neutrosophic SuperHyperStar 585
ESHS : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, 586
by the Algorithm in previous neutrosophic result, of the neutrosophic 587
SuperHyperVertices of the connected neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E), in 588
the neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (7), is the neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle. 589
Proposition 6.7. Assume a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite 590
ESHB : (V, E). Then 591

min |PESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= {E2i−1 }i=1 .
= z min |PESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality .
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperCycle = {Vi }si=1 .
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperCycleSuperHyperP olynomial = az s .
neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E). Then there’s at least one cycle. 593
Thus the notion of quasi isn’t up and the SuperHyperNotions based on 594
SuperHyperCycle could be applied. There are only two SuperHyperParts. Thus every 595
SuperHyperPart could have one SuperHyperVertex as the representative in the 596
C : V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , . . . , Vz is a longest cycle taken from a connected neutrosophic 597
SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E). Thus only four SuperHyperVertices and only four 598
SuperHyperEdges are attained in any solution C : V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , . . . , Vz . The latter is 599
straightforward. 600
Figure 8. a neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite neutrosophic Associated to the neutro-

sophic Notions of neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle in the Example (6.8)
Example 6.8. In the neutrosophic Figure (8), the connected neutrosophic 601
SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), is neutrosophic highlighted and neutrosophic 602
featured. The obtained neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the neutrosophic Algorithm in 603
previous neutrosophic result, of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected 604
neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), in the neutrosophic 605
SuperHyperModel (8), is the neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle. 606
Proposition 6.9. Assume a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite 607
ESHM : (V, E). Then 608

min |PESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= {E2i−1 }i=1 .
= z min |PESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality .
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperCycle = {Vi }si=1 .
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperCycleSuperHyperP olynomial = az s .
neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E). Then there’s at least one cycle. 610
Thus the notion of quasi isn’t up and the SuperHyperNotions based on 611
SuperHyperCycle could be applied. There are only z 0 SuperHyperParts. Thus every 612
SuperHyperPart could have one SuperHyperVertex as the representative in the 613
C : V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , . . . , Vz is a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite 614
ESHM : (V, E). Thus only z 0 SuperHyperVertices and only z 0 SuperHyperEdges are 615
attained in any solution C : V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , . . . , Vz . The latter is straightforward. 616
Example 6.10. In the Figure (9), the connected neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite 617
ESHM : (V, E), is highlighted and neutrosophic featured. The obtained neutrosophic 618
SuperHyperSet, by the Algorithm in previous neutrosophic result, of the neutrosophic 619
SuperHyperVertices of the connected neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite 620
Figure 9. a neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite Associated to the Notions of neutro-

sophic SuperHyperCycle in the Example (6.10)
ESHM : (V, E), in the neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (9), is the neutrosophic 621
SuperHyperCycle. 622
Proposition 6.11. Assume a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel 623
ESHW : (V, E). Then, 624

b c
= {E2i−1 }i=1 2
.
= 2z b 2 c
.
neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel ESHW : (V, E). Then there’s at least one cycle. Thus 626
the notion of quasi isn’t up and the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperCycle 627
could be applied. The unique embedded SuperHyperCycle proposes some longest cycles 628
excerpt from some representatives. The latter is straightforward. 629
Example 6.12. In the neutrosophic Figure (10), the connected neutrosophic 630
SuperHyperWheel N SHW : (V, E), is neutrosophic highlighted and featured. The 631
obtained neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Algorithm in previous result, of the 632
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel 633
ESHW : (V, E), in the neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (10), is the neutrosophic 634
SuperHyperCycle. 635
7 Background 636
There are some researches covering the topic of this research. In what follows, there are 637
some discussion and literature reviews about them. 638
Figure 10. a neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel neutrosophic Associated to the neutro-

sophic Notions of neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle in the neutrosophic Example (6.12)
First article is titled “properties of SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic 639
SuperHyperGraph” in Ref. [1] by Henry Garrett (2022). It’s first step toward the 640
research on neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs. This research article is published on the 641
journal “Neutrosophic Sets and Systems” in issue 49 and the pages 531-561. In this 642
research article, different types of notions like dominating, resolving, coloring, 643
Eulerian(Hamiltonian) neutrosophic path, n-Eulerian(Hamiltonian) neutrosophic path, 644
zero forcing number, zero forcing neutrosophic- number, independent number, 645
independent neutrosophic-number, clique number, clique neutrosophic-number, 646
matching number, matching neutrosophic-number, girth, neutrosophic girth, 647
1-zero-forcing number, 1-zero- forcing neutrosophic-number, failed 1-zero-forcing 648
number, failed 1-zero-forcing neutrosophic-number, global- offensive alliance, t-offensive 649
alliance, t-defensive alliance, t-powerful alliance, and global-powerful alliance are defined 650
in SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. Some Classes of 651
SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph are cases of research. Some 652
results are applied in family of SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. 653
Thus this research article has concentrated on the vast notions and introducing the 654
majority of notions. 655
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “neutrosophic co-degree and 656
neutrosophic degree alongside chromatic numbers in the setting of some classes related 657
to neutrosophic hypergraphs” in Ref. [2] by Henry Garrett (2022). In this research 658
article, a novel approach is implemented on SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic 659
SuperHyperGraph based on general forms without using neutrosophic classes of 660
neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. It’s published in prestigious and fancy journal is 661
entitled “Journal of Current Trends in Computer Science Research (JCTCSR)” with 662
abbreviation “J Curr Trends Comp Sci Res” in volume 1 and issue 1 with pages 06-14. 663
The research article studies deeply with choosing neutrosophic hypergraphs instead of 664
neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough toward independent results 665
based on initial background. 666
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “Super Hyper Dominating 667
and Super Hyper Resolving on Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs and Their Directions 668
in Game Theory and Neutrosophic Super Hyper Classes” in Ref. [3] by Henry Garrett 669
(2022). In this research article, a novel approach is implemented on SuperHyperGraph 670
and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on fundamental SuperHyperNumber and 671
using neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses of neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. It’s 672
published in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled “Journal of Mathematical 673
Techniques and Computational Mathematics(JMTCM)” with abbreviation “J Math 674
Techniques Comput Math” in volume 1 and issue 3 with pages 242-263. The research 675
article studies deeply with choosing directly neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph and 676
SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough toward independent results based on initial 677
background and fundamental SuperHyperNumbers. 678
In some articles are titled “0039 — Closing Numbers and Super-Closing Numbers as 679
(Dual)Resolving and (Dual)Coloring alongside (Dual)Dominating in 680
(Neutrosophic)n-SuperHyperGraph” in Ref. [4] by Henry Garrett (2022), “0049 — 681
(Failed)1-Zero-Forcing Number in Neutrosophic Graphs” in Ref. [5] by Henry Garrett 682
(2022), “Extreme SuperHyperClique as the Firm Scheme of Confrontation under 683
Cancer’s Recognition as the Model in The Setting of (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” 684
in Ref. [6] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Uncertainty On The Act And Effect Of Cancer 685
Alongside The Foggy Positions Of Cells Toward Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique 686
inside Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Titled Cancer’s Recognition” in Ref. [7] by 687
Henry Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic Version Of Separates Groups Of Cells In Cancer’s 688
Recognition On Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [8] by Henry Garrett (2022), 689
“The Shift Paradigm To Classify Separately The Cells and Affected Cells Toward The 690
Totality Under Cancer’s Recognition By New Multiple Definitions On the Sets 691
Polynomials Alongside Numbers In The (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperMatching Theory 692
Based on SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” in Ref. [9] by Henry 693
Garrett (2022), “Breaking the Continuity and Uniformity of Cancer In The Worst Case 694
of Full Connections With Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique In Cancer’s Recognition 695
Applied in (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [10] by Henry Garrett (2022), 696
“Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable as the Survivors on the Cancer’s Neutrosophic 697
Recognition Based on Uncertainty to All Modes in Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in 698
Ref. [11] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Extremism of the Attacked Body Under the 699
Cancer’s Circumstances Where Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) 700
SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [12] by Henry Garrett (2022), “(Neutrosophic) 1-Failed 701
SuperHyperForcing in Cancer’s Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” 702
in Ref. [13] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs 703
To Form Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic 704
Recognitions In Special ViewPoints” in Ref. [14] by Henry Garrett (2022), 705
“Neutrosophic 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in the SuperHyperFunction To Use 706
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond” 707
in Ref. [15] by Henry Garrett (2022), “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperStable on Cancer’s 708
Recognition by Well- SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs ” in 709
Ref. [16] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To 710
Form Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In 711
Special ViewPoints” in Ref. [12] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Basic Notions on 712
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperForcing And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling in 713
Cancer’s Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [17] by Henry 714
Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form Neutrosophic 715
SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In Special ViewPoints” 716
in Ref. [18] by Henry Garrett (2022),“(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s 717
Recognitions Featuring (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances” in 718
Ref. [19] by Henry Garrett (2022), “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperAlliances With 719
SuperHyperDefensive and SuperHyperOffensive Type-SuperHyperSet On 720
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of 721
Cancer’s Recognitions And Related (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClasses” in Ref. [20] by 722
Henry Garrett (2022), “SuperHyperGirth on SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic 723
SuperHyperGraph With SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions” in Ref. [21] by 724
Henry Garrett (2022), “Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on 725
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs and SuperHyperGraphs Alongside Applications in 726
Cancer’s Treatments” in Ref. [22] by Henry Garrett (2022), “SuperHyperDominating 727
and SuperHyperResolving on Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs And Their Directions in 728
Game Theory and Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses” in Ref. [23] by Henry Garrett 729
(2022), “SuperHyperMatching By (R-)Definitions And Polynomials To Monitor 730
Cancer’s Recognition In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [24] by Henry 731
Garrett (2023), “The Focus on The Partitions Obtained By Parallel Moves In The 732
Cancer’s Extreme Recognition With Different Types of Extreme SuperHyperMatching 733
Set and Polynomial on (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [25] by Henry 734
Garrett (2023), “Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique Decides the Failures on the 735
Cancer’s Recognition in the Perfect Connections of Cancer’s Attacks By 736
SuperHyperModels Named (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [26] by Henry 737
Garrett (2023), “Indeterminacy On The All Possible Connections of Cells In Front of 738
Cancer’s Attacks In The Terms of Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique on Cancer’s 739
Recognition called Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [27] by Henry Garrett 740
(2023), “Perfect Directions Toward Idealism in Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition 741
Forwarding Neutrosophic SuperHyperClique on Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in 742
Ref. [28] by Henry Garrett (2023), “Demonstrating Complete Connections in Every 743
Embedded Regions and Sub-Regions in the Terms of Cancer’s Recognition and 744
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClique” in 745
Ref. [29] by Henry Garrett (2023), “Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic 746
Regions titled neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable in Cancer’s Neutrosophic 747
Recognition modeled in the Form of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [30] by 748
Henry Garrett (2023), “Using the Tool As (Neutrosophic) Failed SuperHyperStable To 749
SuperHyperModel Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in 750
Ref. [31] by Henry Garrett (2023), “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To 751
Form Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In 752
Special ViewPoints” in Ref. [32] by Henry Garrett (2023), “(Neutrosophic) 753
SuperHyperStable on Cancer’s Recognition by Well-SuperHyperModelled 754
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [33] by Henry Garrett (2023), 755
“Neutrosophic 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in the SuperHyperFunction To Use 756
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond” 757
in Ref. [34] by Henry Garrett (2022), “(Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in 758
Cancer’s Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [35] by Henry 759
Garrett (2022), “Basic Notions on (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperForcing And 760
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling in Cancer’s Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) 761
SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [36] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Basic Neutrosophic Notions 762
Concerning SuperHyperDominating and Neutrosophic SuperHyperResolving in 763
SuperHyperGraph” in Ref. [37] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Initial Material of 764
Neutrosophic Preliminaries to Study Some Neutrosophic Notions Based on 765
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) in Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)” in 766
Ref. [38] by Henry Garrett (2022), there are some endeavors to formalize the basic 767
SuperHyperNotions about neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph. 768
Some studies and researches about neutrosophic graphs, are proposed as book in 769
Ref. [39] by Henry Garrett (2022) which is indexed by Google Scholar and has more 770
than 2732 readers in Scribd. It’s titled “Beyond Neutrosophic Graphs” and published 771
by Ohio: E-publishing: Educational Publisher 1091 West 1st Ave Grandview Heights, 772
Ohio 43212 United State. This research book covers different types of notions and 773
settings in neutrosophic graph theory and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph theory. 774
Also, some studies and researches about neutrosophic graphs, are proposed as book 775
in Ref. [40] by Henry Garrett (2022) which is indexed by Google Scholar and has more 776
than 3504 readers in Scribd. It’s titled “Neutrosophic Duality” and published by 777
Florida: GLOBAL KNOWLEDGE - Publishing House 848 Brickell Ave Ste 950 Miami, 778
Florida 33131 United States. This research book presents different types of notions 779
SuperHyperResolving and SuperHyperDominating in the setting of duality in 780
neutrosophic graph theory and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph theory. This research 781
book has scrutiny on the complement of the intended set and the intended set, 782
simultaneously. It’s smart to consider a set but acting on its complement that what’s 783
done in this research book which is popular in the terms of high readers in Scribd. 784
See the seminal researches [1–3]. The formalization of the notions on the framework 785
of Extreme SuperHyperCycle theory, Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle theory, and 786
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs theory at [4–38]. Two popular research books in 787
Scribd in the terms of high readers, 2638 and 3363 respectively, on neutrosophic science 788
is on [39, 40]. 789
References 790
1. Henry Garrett, “Properties of SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic 791
SuperHyperGraph”, Neutrosophic Sets and Systems 49 (2022) 531-561 (doi: 792
10.5281/zenodo.6456413). 793
(http://fs.unm.edu/NSS/NeutrosophicSuperHyperGraph34.pdf). 794
(https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nss journal/vol49/iss1/34). 795
2. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Co-degree and Neutrosophic Degree alongside 796
Chromatic Numbers in the Setting of Some Classes Related to Neutrosophic 797
Hypergraphs”, J Curr Trends Comp Sci Res 1(1) (2022) 06-14. 798
3. Henry Garrett, “Super Hyper Dominating and Super Hyper Resolving on 799
Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs and Their Directions in Game Theory and 800
Neutrosophic Super Hyper Classes”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 1(3) 801
(2022) 242-263. 802
4. Garrett, Henry. “0039 — Closing Numbers and Super-Closing Numbers as 803
(Dual)Resolving and (Dual)Coloring alongside (Dual)Dominating in 804
(Neutrosophic)n-SuperHyperGraph.” CERN European Organization for Nuclear 805
Research - Zenodo, Nov. 2022. CERN European Organization for Nuclear 806
Research, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6319942. 807
https://oa.mg/work/10.5281/zenodo.6319942 808
5. Garrett, Henry. “0049 — (Failed)1-Zero-Forcing Number in Neutrosophic 809
Graphs.” CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research - Zenodo, Feb. 810
2022. CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research, 811
https://doi.org/10.13140/rg.2.2.35241.26724. 812
https://oa.mg/work/10.13140/rg.2.2.35241.26724 813
6. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperClique as the Firm Scheme of 814
Confrontation under Cancer’s Recognition as the Model in The Setting of 815
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010308 (doi: 816
10.20944/preprints202301.0308.v1). 817
7. Henry Garrett, “Uncertainty On The Act And Effect Of Cancer Alongside The 818
Foggy Positions Of Cells Toward Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique inside 819
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Titled Cancer’s Recognition”, Preprints 2023, 820
2023010282 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0282.v1). 821
8. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Version Of Separates Groups Of Cells In 822
Cancer’s Recognition On Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 823
2023010267 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0267.v1). 824
9. Henry Garrett, “The Shift Paradigm To Classify Separately The Cells and 825
Affected Cells Toward The Totality Under Cancer’s Recognition By New 826
Multiple Definitions On the Sets Polynomials Alongside Numbers In The 827
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperMatching Theory Based on SuperHyperGraph and 828
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”, Preprints 2023, 2023010265 (doi: 829
10.20944/preprints202301.0265.v1). 830
10. Henry Garrett, “Breaking the Continuity and Uniformity of Cancer In The 831
Worst Case of Full Connections With Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique In 832
Cancer’s Recognition Applied in (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 833
2023, 2023010262,(doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0262.v1). 834
11. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable as the Survivors on the 835
Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition Based on Uncertainty to All Modes in 836
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010240 (doi: 837
10.20944/preprints202301.0240.v1). 838
12. Henry Garrett, “Extremism of the Attacked Body Under the Cancer’s 839
Circumstances Where Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) 840
SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010224, (doi: 841
10.20944/preprints202301.0224.v1). 842
13. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in Cancer’s 843
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 844
2023010105 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 845
14. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form 846
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions 847
In Special ViewPoints”, Preprints 2023, 2023010088 (doi: 848
10.20944/preprints202301.0088.v1). 849
15. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in the 850
SuperHyperFunction To Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs on Cancer’s 851
Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond ”, Preprints 2023, 2023010044 852
16. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperStable on Cancer’s Recognition by 853
Well- SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 854
2023010043 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0043.v1). 855
17. Henry Garrett, “Basic Notions on (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperForcing And 856
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling in Cancer’s Recognitions And 857
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010105 (doi: 858
10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 859
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions 861
In Special ViewPoints”, Preprints 2023, 2023010088 (doi: 862
10.20944/preprints202301.0088.v1). 863
19. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions 864
Featuring (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances”, Preprints 865
2022, 2022120549 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0549.v1). 866
20. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperAlliances With SuperHyperDefensive 867
and SuperHyperOffensive Type-SuperHyperSet On (Neutrosophic) 868
SuperHyperGraph With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s 869
Recognitions And Related (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClasses”, Preprints 2022, 870
2022120540 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0540.v1). 871
21. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperGirth on SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic 872
SuperHyperGraph With SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions”, 873
Preprints 2022, 2022120500 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0500.v1). 874
22. Henry Garrett, “Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on 875
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs and SuperHyperGraphs Alongside Applications 876
in Cancer’s Treatments”, Preprints 2022, 2022120324 (doi: 877
10.20944/preprints202212.0324.v1). 878
23. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDominating and SuperHyperResolving on 879
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs And Their Directions in Game Theory and 880
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”, Preprints 2022, 2022110576 (doi: 881
10.20944/preprints202211.0576.v1). 882
24. Henry Garrett,“SuperHyperMatching By (R-)Definitions And Polynomials To 883
Monitor Cancer’s Recognition In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, 884
ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.35061.65767). 885
25. Henry Garrett,“The Focus on The Partitions Obtained By Parallel Moves In 886
The Cancer’s Extreme Recognition With Different Types of Extreme 887
SuperHyperMatching Set and Polynomial on (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, 888
ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.18494.15680). 889
26. Henry Garrett,“Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique Decides the Failures on the 890
Cancer’s Recognition in the Perfect Connections of Cancer’s Attacks By 891
SuperHyperModels Named (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 892
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.32530.73922). 893
27. Henry Garrett,“Indeterminacy On The All Possible Connections of Cells In 894
Front of Cancer’s Attacks In The Terms of Neutrosophic Failed 895
SuperHyperClique on Cancer’s Recognition called Neutrosophic 896
SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.15897.70243). 897
28. Henry Garrett,“Perfect Directions Toward Idealism in Cancer’s Neutrosophic 898
Recognition Forwarding Neutrosophic SuperHyperClique on Neutrosophic 899
29. Henry Garrett,“Demonstrating Complete Connections in Every Embedded 901
Regions and Sub-Regions in the Terms of Cancer’s Recognition and 902
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClique”, 903
ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.23172.19849). 904
30. Henry Garrett,“Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic Regions titled 905
neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable in Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition 906
modeled in the Form of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2023, 907
(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.17385.36968). 908
31. Henry Garrett, “Using the Tool As (Neutrosophic) Failed SuperHyperStable To 909
SuperHyperModel Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) 910
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In 913
Special ViewPoints”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.11447.80803). 914
33. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperStable on Cancer’s Recognition by 915
Well-SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 916
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.35774.77123). 917
34. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in the 918
SuperHyperFunction To Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs on Cancer’s 919
Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond ”, ResearchGate 2022, (doi: 920
10.13140/RG.2.2.36141.77287). 921
35. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in Cancer’s 922
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2022, (doi: 923
10.13140/RG.2.2.29430.88642). 924
36. Henry Garrett, “Basic Notions on (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperForcing And 925
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling in Cancer’s Recognitions And 926
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2022, (doi: 927
10.13140/RG.2.2.11369.16487). 928
37. Henry Garrett, “Basic Neutrosophic Notions Concerning SuperHyperDominating 929
and Neutrosophic SuperHyperResolving in SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 930
2022 (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.29173.86244). 931
38. Henry Garrett, “Initial Material of Neutrosophic Preliminaries to Study Some 932
Neutrosophic Notions Based on Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) in 933
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)”, ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 934
10.13140/RG.2.2.25385.88160). 935
39. Henry Garrett, (2022). “Beyond Neutrosophic Graphs”, Ohio: E-publishing: 936
Educational Publisher 1091 West 1st Ave Grandview Heights, Ohio 43212 937
United States. ISBN: 979-1-59973-725-6 938
(http://fs.unm.edu/BeyondNeutrosophicGraphs.pdf). 939
40. Henry Garrett, (2022). “Neutrosophic Duality”, Florida: GLOBAL 940
KNOWLEDGE - Publishing House 848 Brickell Ave Ste 950 Miami, Florida 941
33131 United States. ISBN: 978-1-59973-743-0 942
(http://fs.unm.edu/NeutrosophicDuality.pdf). 943
View publication stats

New Research On Cancer's Recognition and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph by Eulerian SuperHyperCycles and Hamiltonian Sets As Hyper Covering Versus Super Separations-V

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

New Research On Cancer's Recognition and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph by Eulerian SuperHyperCycles and Hamiltonian Sets As Hyper Covering Versus Super Separations-V

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

New Research On Cancer's Recognition and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph By

Preprint · February 2023

288 PUBLICATIONS 2,891 CITATIONS

Metric Dimension in fuzzy(neutrosophic) Graphs View project

Neutrosophic Graphs View project

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

New Research On Cancer’s Recognition and Neutrosophic 2

SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian SuperHyperCycles and 3

Hamiltonian Sets As Hyper Covering Versus Super 4

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · 7

DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA 8

In this research, assume a SuperHyperGraph. Then some notions on Extreme 10

SuperHyperCycle based on the backgrounds of Eulerian and Hamiltonian styles are 11

Strength of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPaths] Assume a Neutrosophic 14

SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an ordered pair S = (V, E). A Neutrosophic 15

SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) V1 to 16

Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vs is sequence of Neutrosophic 17

SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) and Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges 18

(NSHE) V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs , have Neutrosophic t-strength 19

f-strength (m, n, min{F (Vi )})si=1 ; Neutrosophic strength 21

Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)] Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 23

(NSHG) S is an ordered pair S = (V, E). Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge 24

(NSHE) E = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then E is called Neutrosophic t-connective if T (E) ≥ 25

maximum number of Neutrosophic t-strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from 26

Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 27

(NSHV) Vj where 1 ≤ i, j ≤ s; Neutrosophic i-connective if I(E) ≥ maximum number of 28

Neutrosophic i-strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic 29

SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vj where 30

1 ≤ i, j ≤ s; Neutrosophic f-connective if F (E) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic 31

f-strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) 32

Vi to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vj where 1 ≤ i, j ≤ s; Neutrosophic 33

connective if (T (E), I(E), F (E)) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic strength of 34

SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi to 35

Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vj where 1 ≤ i, j ≤ s. ((Neutrosophic) 36

SuperHyperConnectivities). Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an 37

ordered pair S = (V, E). Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) 38

E = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then E is called an Extreme SuperHyperConnectivities if it’s 39

either of Neutrosophic t-connective, Neutrosophic i-connective, Neutrosophic 40

f-connective, and Neutrosophic connective and C(N SHG) for an Extreme 41

SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum Extreme cardinality of an Extreme 42

SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality of the Extreme SuperHyperEdges in the 43

consecutive Extreme sequence of Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme 44

SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Extreme SuperHyperConnectivities; a 45

Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities if it’s either of Neutrosophic t-connective, 46

Neutrosophic i-connective, Neutrosophic f-connective, and Neutrosophic connective and 47

C(N SHG) for a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum 48

Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges of a Neutrosophic 49

SuperHyperSet S of high Neutrosophic cardinality consecutive Neutrosophic 50

SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 51

Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities; an Extreme SuperHyperConnectivities 52

SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of Neutrosophic t-connective, Neutrosophic 53

an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Extreme SuperHyperPolynomial 55

Extreme cardinality of the Extreme SuperHyperEdges of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S 57

of high Extreme cardinality consecutive Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme 58

SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Extreme SuperHyperConnectivities; and 59

the Extreme power is corresponded to its Extreme coefficient; a Neutrosophic 60

SuperHyperConnectivities SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of Neutrosophic 61

t-connective, Neutrosophic i-connective, Neutrosophic f-connective, and Neutrosophic 62

Neutrosophic SuperHyperPolynomial contains the Neutrosophic coefficients defined as 64

the Neutrosophic number of the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic 65

SuperHyperEdges of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high Neutrosophic cardinality 66

consecutive Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such 67