Professional Documents
Culture Documents
New Ideas On Super Hammy by Hyper Hamper of Hamiltonian-Cut in Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph
New Ideas On Super Hammy by Hyper Hamper of Hamiltonian-Cut in Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph
net/publication/369619224
CITATIONS
1 author:
Henry Garrett
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Henry Garrett on 29 March 2023.
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph 4
1 ABSTRACT 8
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Neutrosophic coefficient. In this scientific research, new setting is introduced for new 101
for them but the research goes further and the SuperHyperNotion, SuperHyperUniform, 104
and SuperHyperClass based on that are well-defined and well-reviewed. The literature 105
review is implemented in the whole of this research. For shining the elegancy and the 106
significancy of this research, the comparison between this SuperHyperNotion with other 107
are followed by the examples and the instances thus the clarifications are driven with 109
different tools. The applications are figured out to make sense about the theoretical 110
aspect of this ongoing research. The “Cancer’s Recognition” are the under research to 111
figure out the challenges make sense about ongoing and upcoming research. The special 112
case is up. The cells are viewed in the deemed ways. There are different types of them. 113
Some of them are individuals and some of them are well-modeled by the group of cells. 114
These types are all officially called “SuperHyperVertex” but the relations amid them all 115
“Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” are chosen and elected to research about “Cancer’s 117
Recognition”. Thus these complex and dense SuperHyperModels open up some avenues 118
to research on theoretical segments and “Cancer’s Recognition”. Some avenues are 119
posed to pursue this research. It’s also officially collected in the form of some questions 120
cardinality such that either of the following expressions hold for the (Neutrosophic) 123
|S ∩ N (s)| > |S ∩ (V \ N (s))| + δ; and |S ∩ N (s)| < |S ∩ (V \ N (s))| + δ. The first 125
cardinality such that either of the following expressions hold for the Neutrosophic 129
and |S ∩ N (s)|N eutrosophic < |S ∩ (V \ N (s))|N eutrosophic + δ. The first Expression, 132
assigned by the labels from the letters of the alphabets. In this procedure, there’s the 139
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” with the key points, “The Values of The Vertices & 144
maximum Values of Its Vertices”, “The Values of The Edges&The maximum Values of 146
Its Vertices”, “The Values of The HyperEdges&The maximum Values of Its Vertices”, 147
“The Values of The SuperHyperEdges&The maximum Values of Its Endpoints”. To get 148
structural examples and instances, I’m going to introduce the next SuperHyperClass of 149
but otherwise, it isn’t a SuperHyperHamiltonian-Cut . There are some instances about 154
the clarifications for the main definition titled a “SuperHyperHamiltonian-Cut ”. These 155
two examples get more scrutiny and discernment since there are characterized in the 156
SuperHyperEdges are assigned by the labels from the letters of the alphabets. In this 161
procedure, there’s the usage of the position of labels to assign to the values. Assume a 162
define “Neutrosophic” version of SuperHyperClasses. Since there’s more ways to get 166
it’s the strongest [the maximum Neutrosophic value from all the 176
SuperHyperEdges are the same. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. There are 180
some SuperHyperClasses as follows. It’s SuperHyperPath if it’s only one SuperVertex as 181
intersection amid two given SuperHyperEdges with two exceptions; it’s 182
SuperHyperHamiltonian-Cut if it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two given 183
SuperHyperEdges; it’s SuperHyperStar it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid 184
all SuperHyperEdges; it’s SuperHyperBipartite it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection 185
amid two given SuperHyperEdges and these SuperVertices, forming two separate sets, 186
SuperVertex as intersection amid two given SuperHyperEdges and these SuperVertices, 188
SuperHyperWheel if it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two given 190
SuperHyperEdges and one SuperVertex has one SuperHyperEdge with any common 191
SuperVertex. The SuperHyperModel proposes the specific designs and the specific 192
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
common and intended properties between “specific” cells and “specific group” of cells 196
the future research, the foundation will be based on the “Cancer’s Recognition” and the 200
results and the definitions will be introduced in redeemed ways. The recognition of the 201
cancer in the long-term function. The specific region has been assigned by the model 202
[it’s called SuperHyperGraph] and the long cycle of the move from the cancer is 203
identified by this research. Sometimes the move of the cancer hasn’t be easily identified 204
since there are some determinacy, indeterminacy and neutrality about the moves and 205
the effects of the cancer on that region; this event leads us to choose another model [it’s 206
happened and what’s done. There are some specific models, which are well-known and 208
they’ve got the names, and some SuperHyperGeneral SuperHyperModels. The moves 209
and the traces of the cancer on the complex tracks and between complicated groups of 210
SuperHyperStar, all possible SuperHyperPaths have only two SuperHyperEdges but it’s 219
not enough since it’s essential to have at least three SuperHyperEdges to form any style 220
In this scientific research, there are some ideas in the featured frameworks of 231
motivations. I try to bring the motivations in the narrative ways. Some cells have been 232
faced with some attacks from the situation which is caused by the cancer’s attacks. In 233
this case, there are some embedded analysis on the ongoing situations which in that, the 234
cells could be labelled as some groups and some groups or individuals have excessive 235
labels which all are raised from the behaviors to overcome the cancer’s attacks. In the 236
embedded situations, the individuals of cells and the groups of cells could be considered 237
as “new groups”. Thus it motivates us to find the proper SuperHyperModels for getting 238
more proper analysis on this messy story. I’ve found the SuperHyperModels which are 239
SuperHyperModel, the cells and the groups of cells are defined as “SuperHyperVertices” 241
and the relations between the individuals of cells and the groups of cells are defined as 242
SuperHyperModel based on the “Cancer’s Recognition”. Sometimes, the situations get 244
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
worst. The situation is passed from the certainty and precise style. Thus it’s the beyond 245
them. There are three descriptions, namely, the degrees of determinacy, indeterminacy 246
and neutrality, for any object based on vague forms, namely, incomplete data, imprecise 247
data, and uncertain analysis. The latter model could be considered on the previous 248
called “Extreme SuperHyperGraphs”. The cancer is the disease but the model is going 250
to figure out what’s going on this phenomenon. The special case of this disease is 251
considered and as the consequences of the model, some parameters are used. The cells 252
are under attack of this disease but the moves of the cancer in the special region are the 253
matter of mind. The recognition of the cancer could help to find some treatments for 254
this disease. The SuperHyperGraph and Extreme SuperHyperGraph are the 255
SuperHyperModels on the “Cancer’s Recognition” and both bases are the background 256
of this research. Sometimes the cancer has been happened on the region, full of cells, 257
groups of cells and embedded styles. In this segment, the SuperHyperModel proposes 258
some SuperHyperNotions based on the connectivities of the moves of the cancer in the 259
forms of alliances’ styles with the formation of the design and the architecture are 260
The prefix “SuperHyper” refers to the theme of the embedded styles to figure out the 262
background for the SuperHyperNotions. The recognition of the cancer in the long-term 263
function. The specific region has been assigned by the model [it’s called 264
SuperHyperGraph] and the long cycle of the move from the cancer is identified by this 265
research. Sometimes the move of the cancer hasn’t be easily identified since there are 266
some determinacy, indeterminacy and neutrality about the moves and the effects of the 267
cancer on that region; this event leads us to choose another model [it’s said to be 268
what’s done. There are some specific models, which are well-known and they’ve got the 270
names, and some general models. The moves and the traces of the cancer on the 271
complex tracks and between complicated groups of cells could be fantasized by an 272
are introduced. Beyond that in SuperHyperStar, all possible Extreme SuperHyperPath 277
s have only two SuperHyperEdges but it’s not enough since it’s essential to have at least 278
any formation of any SuperHyperHamiltonian-Cut but literarily, it’s the deformation of 280
Question 2.1. How to define the SuperHyperNotions and to do research on them to 282
groups of cells based on the fixed cell or the fixed group of cells, extensively, the “amount 284
of SuperHyperHamiltonian-Cut” based on the fixed groups of cells or the fixed groups of 285
Question 2.2. What are the best descriptions for the “Cancer’s Recognition” in terms 287
of these messy and dense SuperHyperModels where embedded notions are illustrated? 288
It’s motivation to find notions to use in this dense model is titled 289
“SuperHyperGraph” and “Extreme SuperHyperGraph”. Then the research has taken 292
more motivations to define SuperHyperClasses and to find some connections amid this 293
instances and examples to make clarifications about the framework of this research. The 295
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
general results and some results about some connections are some avenues to make key 296
point of this research, “Cancer’s Recognition”, more understandable and more clear. 297
The framework of this research is as follows. In the beginning, I introduce basic 298
deeply-introduced and in-depth-discussed. The elementary concepts are clarified and 301
illustrated completely and sometimes review literature are applied to make sense about 302
what’s going to figure out about the upcoming sections. The main definitions and their 303
sense of tackling on getting results and in Hamiltonian-Cut to make sense about 307
SuperHyperClasses are figured out to debut what’s done in this section, titled “Results 310
to origin of the notions, there are some smart steps toward the common notions to 312
extend the new notions in new frameworks, SuperHyperGraph and Extreme 313
SuperHyperRelations and as concluding and closing section of theoretical research are 316
contained in the section “General Results”. Some general SuperHyperRelations are 317
on Extreme SuperHyperClasses”. There are curious questions about what’s done about 321
the SuperHyperNotions to make sense about excellency of this research and going to 322
figure out the word “best” as the description and adjective for this research as presented 323
section “Applications in Cancer’s Recognition” with two cases and subsections “Case 1: 325
The Initial Steps Toward SuperHyperBipartite as SuperHyperModel” and “Case 2: The 326
“Open Problems”, there are some scrutiny and discernment on what’s done and what’s 328
happened in this research in the terms of “questions” and “problems” to make sense to 329
figure out this research in featured style. The advantages and the limitations of this 330
research alongside about what’s done in this research to make sense and to get sense 331
about what’s figured out are included in the section, “Conclusion and Closing Remarks”. 332
In this section, the basic material in this scientific research, is referred to [Single Valued 335
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)] (Ref. [153],Definition 5.4,p.7). Also, the new 343
In this subsection, the basic material which is used in this scientific research, is 345
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
presented. Also, the new ideas and their clarifications are elicited. 346
The functions TA (x), IA (x) and FA (x) are real standard or nonstandard subsets of 348
+
]− 0, 1 [. 349
Definition 3.2 (Single Valued Neutrosophic Set). (Ref. [153],Definition 2.2,p.2). 350
2.5,p.2). 352
(i) V = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vn } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of V 0 ; 355
(ii) V = {(Vi , TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi )) : TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi ) ≥ 0}, (i = 356
1, 2, . . . , n); 357
(iii) E = {E1 , E2 , . . . , En0 } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of 358
V; 359
(iv) E = {(Ei0 , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )) : TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 ) ≥ 0}, (i0 = 360
1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 361
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
P
(vii) i supp(Vi ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 364
0 0
P
(viii) i0 supp(Ei0 ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n ); 365
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) Vj are single valued Neutrosophic sets. TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), 368
TV0 (Ei0 ), TV0 (Ei0 ), and TV0 (Ei0 ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 372
the ii0 th element of the incidence matrix of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) 375
are of the form (Vi , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )), the sets V and E are crisp sets. 376
(iii) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called edge; 385
(iv) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 386
HyperEdge; 387
(v) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called 388
SuperEdge; 389
(vi) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 390
SuperHyperEdge. 391
If we choose different types of binary operations, then we could get hugely diverse 392
A binary operation ⊗ : [0, 1] × [0, 1] → [0, 1] is a t-norm if it satisfies the following 395
(i) 1 ⊗ x = x; 397
(ii) x ⊗ y = y ⊗ x; 398
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
(iii) x ⊗ (y ⊗ z) = (x ⊗ y) ⊗ z; 399
(i) V = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vn } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of V 0 ; 404
(ii) V = {(Vi , TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi )) : TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi ) ≥ 0}, (i = 405
1, 2, . . . , n); 406
(iii) E = {E1 , E2 , . . . , En0 } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of 407
V; 408
(iv) E = {(Ei0 , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )) : TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 ) ≥ 0}, (i0 = 409
1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 410
P
(vii) i supp(Vi ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 413
0 0
P
(viii) i0 supp(Ei ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n ).
0 414
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) Vj are single valued Neutrosophic sets. TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), 416
TV0 (Ei0 ), TV0 (Ei0 ), and TV0 (Ei0 ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 420
the ii0 th element of the incidence matrix of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) 423
are of the form (Vi , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )), the sets V and E are crisp sets. 424
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
(iii) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called edge; 433
(iv) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 434
HyperEdge; 435
(v) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called 436
SuperEdge; 437
(vi) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 438
SuperHyperEdge. 439
This SuperHyperModel is too messy and too dense. Thus there’s a need to have 440
some restrictions and conditions on SuperHyperGraph. The special case of this 441
(ii). it’s SuperHyperCycle if it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two 451
(iii). it’s SuperHyperStar it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid all 453
SuperHyperEdges; 454
(iv). it’s SuperHyperBipartite it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two 455
given SuperHyperEdges and these SuperVertices, forming two separate sets, has 456
(v). it’s SuperHyperMultiPartite it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid 458
two given SuperHyperEdges and these SuperVertices, forming multi separate sets, 459
(vi). it’s SuperHyperWheel if it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two 461
given SuperHyperEdges and one SuperVertex has one SuperHyperEdge with any 462
V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
(iii) there’s a SuperVertex Vi0 ∈ Vi such that Vi0 , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 469
(iv) there’s a vertex vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that Vi , vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 470
0 0
(v) there’s a SuperVertex Vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that Vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 471
(vi) there are a vertex vi ∈ Vi and a vertex vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that vi , vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 472
0 0
(vii) there are a vertex vi ∈ Vi and a SuperVertex Vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 473
(viii) there are a SuperVertex Vi0 ∈ Vi and a vertex vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that Vi0 , vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 474
V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs ,
(i) If for all Vi , Ej 0 , |Vi | = 1, |Ej 0 | = 2, then NSHP is called path; 479
(ii) if for all Ej 0 , |Ej 0 | = 2, and there’s Vi , |Vi | ≥ 1, then NSHP is called SuperPath; 480
(iii) if for all Vi , Ej 0 , |Vi | = 1, |Ej 0 | ≥ 2, then NSHP is called HyperPath; 481
(iv) if there are Vi , Ej 0 , |Vi | ≥ 1, |Ej 0 | ≥ 2, then NSHP is called Neutrosophic 482
SuperHyperPath . 483
V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs ,
have 486
(iv) Neutrosophic strength (min{T (Vi )}, min{I(Vi )}, min{F (Vi )})si=1 . 490
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
where 1 ≤ i, j ≤ s. 507
SuperHyperHamiltonian-Cut). 509
rv-SuperHyperHamiltonian-Cut. 526
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
SuperHyperHamiltonian-Cut; 538
SuperHyperHamiltonian-Cut; 547
contains the Extreme coefficients defined as the Extreme number of the maximum 553
SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 556
contains the Neutrosophic coefficients defined as the Neutrosophic number of the 564
SuperHyperHamiltonian-Cut; 578
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 586
contains the Extreme coefficients defined as the Extreme number of the maximum 593
SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 596
contains the Neutrosophic coefficients defined as the Neutrosophic number of the 604
SuperHyperHamiltonian-Cut such that either of the following expressions hold for 613
SuperHyperNeighbors of s ∈ S : 620
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
δ−SuperHyperDefensive. 623
and the SuperHyperEdges are assigned by the labels from the letters of the alphabets. 626
In this procedure, there’s the usage of the position of labels to assign to the values. 627
S = (V, E). It’s redefined Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph if the Table (1) holds. 629
understandable. 632
S = (V, E). There are some Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses if the Table (2) 634
The SuperHyperVertices and the SuperHyperEdges are assigned by the labels from the 646
letters of the alphabets. In this procedure, there’s the usage of the position of labels to 647
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Forms 653
X
E(A) = E(a). (4.1)
a∈A
Y
E(∩i∈I Ai ) = P (Ai ).
i∈I
X
Ex(E) = E(α)P (α).
α∈V
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Lemma 4.6. Assume an Extreme SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). 681
Proof. Consider a planar embedding G of G with cr(G) crossings. Let S be an Extreme 684
independently with probability Hamiltonian-Cut p := 4n/m, and set H := G[S] and 686
H := G[S]. 687
p4 cr(G) ≥ p2 m − 3pn.
pm − 3n n 1 3 2
cr(G) ≥ = 3 = 64 m n .
p3 (4n/m)
689
Theorem 4.7. Assume an Extreme SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). 690
passing through at least k + 1 of these points, where 1 ≤ k ≤ 2 2n. Then l < 32n2 /k 3 . 693
P whose SuperHyperEdge are the segments between conseNeighborive points on the 695
choose two. Thus either kl < 4n, in which case l < 4n/k ≤ 32n2 /k 3 , or 698
3
l2 /2 > l choose 2 ≥ cr(G) ≥ (kl) /64n2 by the Extreme Crossing Lemma, and again 699
2 3
l < 32n /k . 700
Theorem 4.8. Assume an Extreme SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). 701
points in the plane, and let k be the number of pairs of points of P at unit 703
Proof. Assume an Extreme SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). Consider 705
i = 0n−1 ni = n
P
these SuperHyperCircles passing through exactly i points of P. Then 708
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
n−1
X
e(H) = ini = 2k − n1 − 2n2 ≥ 2k − 2n.
i=3
SuperHyperCircles, and any two SuperHyperCircles cross at most twice. Thus either 717
3
e(G) < 4n, in which case k < 5n < 5n4/3 , or n2 > n(n − 1) ≥ cr(G) ≥ (k − n) /64n2 718
4/3 4/3
by the Extreme Crossing Lemma, and k < 4n + n < 5n . 719
E(X)
P (X ≥ t) ≤ .
t
Proof.
X X
E(X) = {X(a)P (a) : a ∈ V } ≥ {X(a)P (a) : a ∈ V, X(a) ≥ t}
X X
{tP (a) : a ∈ V, X(a) ≥ t} = t {P (a) : a ∈ V, X(a) ≥ t}
tP (X ≥ t).
Dividing the first and last members by t yields the asserted inequality. 723
Proof. 728
SuperHyperGraph in Gn,p almost surely has stability number at most d2p−1 log ne. 731
Proof. Assume an Extreme SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). Consider 732
(1 − p)(k+1)choose2 , this being the probability that none of the (k + 1)choose2 pairs of 736
Let AS denote the event that S is a stable SuperHyperSet of G, and let XS denote 738
the indicator Extreme Variable for this Extreme Event. By equation, we have 739
X
X= {XS : S ⊆ V, |S| = k + 1}
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
X
E(X) = {E(XS ) : S ⊆ V, |S| = k + 1} = (n choose k+1)(1 − p)(k+1)choose2 .
nk+1
(n choose k+1) ≤ and1 − p ≤ e−p .
(k + 1)!
Suppose now that k = d2p−1 log ne. Then k ≥ 2p−1 log n, so ne−pk/2 ≤ 1. Because k 744
grows at least as fast as the logarithm of n, implies that E(X) → 0 as n → ∞. Because 745
called Extreme Variance if the following expression is called Extreme Variance 752
criteria 753
2
V x(E) = Ex((X − Ex(X)) ).
V (X)
E(|X − Ex(X)| ≥ t) ≤ .
t2
Proof. Assume an Extreme SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). Consider 757
2
2 Ex((X − Ex(X)) ) V (X)
E(|X − Ex(X)| ≥ t) = E((X − Ex(X)) ≥ t2 ) ≤ = .
t2 t2
760
E(Xn = 0) → 0 as n → ∞
Proof. Assume an Extreme SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). Consider 765
Chebyshev’s Inequality, and observe that E(Xn = 0) ≤ E(|Xn − Ex(Xn )| ≥ |Ex(Xn )|) 767
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Theorem 4.15. Assume an Extreme SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). 769
set f (k) := (n choose k)2−(k choose 2) and let k ∗ be the least value of k for which f (k) is 771
less than one. Then almost surely α(G) takes one of the three values k ∗ − 2, k ∗ − 1, k ∗ . 772
Proof. Assume an Extreme SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). Consider 773
S = (V, E). Consider S = (V, E) is a probability Hamiltonian-Cut. Let G ∈ Gn,1/2 and 777
(i). f (k ∗ ) << 1, in which case almost surely α(G) is equal to either k ∗ − 2 or k ∗ − 1, 779
or 780
(ii). f (k ∗ − 1) >> 1, in which case almost surely α(G) is equal to either k ∗ − 1 or k ∗ . 781
Proof. Assume an Extreme SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). Consider 782
SuperHyperGraphs (one which is preserved when SuperHyperEdges are added). Then a 787
(i). if p << f (n), then G ∈ Gn,p almost surely does not have P, 789
SuperHyperGraph. Then there is a threshold function for the property of containing a 794
SuperHyperEdges. Then n−k/l is a threshold function for the property of containing F 799
Proof. Assume an Extreme SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). Consider 801
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
SuperHyperHamiltonian-Cut. 823
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
824
straightforward. 827
straightforward. 831
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
832
straightforward. 835
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
836
straightforward. 839
straightforward. 843
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
844
straightforward. 847
straightforward. 851
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
852
straightforward. 855
straightforward. 859
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
860
straightforward. 863
864
straightforward. 867
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
868
straightforward. 871
872
straightforward. 875
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
876
straightforward. 879
880
straightforward. 883
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
884
straightforward. 887
888
straightforward. 891
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
892
straightforward. 895
straightforward. 899
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
900
straightforward. 903
904
Proposition 4.21. Assume a connected Extreme SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). 905
quasi-R-Hamiltonian-Cut if for any of them, and any of other corresponded Extreme 907
ESHG : (V, E). There’s only one Extreme SuperHyperEdge E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) has only 912
the maximum possibilities of the distinct interior Extreme SuperHyperVertices inside of 913
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
some of them but not all of them. In other words, there’s only an unique Extreme 915
V \ (V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . . , zE }).
It’s straightforward that the Extreme cardinality of the Extreme R-Hamiltonian-Cut is at 919
least the maximum Extreme number of Extreme SuperHyperVertices of the Extreme 920
SuperHyperEdges with the maximum number of the Extreme SuperHyperEdges. In other 921
words, the maximum number of the Extreme SuperHyperEdges contains the maximum 922
Hamiltonian-Cut in some cases but the maximum number of the Extreme 924
Proposition 4.24. Assume a simple Extreme SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). Then
the Extreme number of type-result-R-Hamiltonian-Cut has, the least Extreme cardinality,
the lower sharp Extreme bound for Extreme cardinality, is the Extreme cardinality of
lower sharp bound for the cardinality, of an Extreme type-result-Hamiltonian-Cut is the 932
cardinality of 933
Proof. Assume a connected loopless Extreme SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). The
SuperHyperSet of the SuperHyperVertices V \ V \ {z} isn’t a quasi-R-Hamiltonian-Cut
since neither amount of Extreme SuperHyperEdges nor amount of SuperHyperVertices
where amount refers to the Extreme number of SuperHyperVertices(-/SuperHyperEdges)
more than one to form any kind of SuperHyperEdges or any number of
SuperHyperEdges. Let us consider the Extreme SuperHyperSet
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Then we’ve lost some connected loopless Extreme SuperHyperClasses of the connected
loopless Extreme SuperHyperGraphs titled free-triangle, on-triangle, and their
quasi-types but the SuperHyperStable is only up in this quasi-R-Hamiltonian-Cut. It’s
the contradiction to that fact on the generality. There are some counterexamples to
deny this statement. One of them comes from the setting of the graph titled path and
cycle as the counterexamples-classes or reversely direction star as the examples-classes,
are well-known classes in that setting and they could be considered as the
examples-classes and counterexamples-classes for the tight bound of
Let V \ V \ {z} in mind. There’s no necessity on the SuperHyperEdge since we need at 934
principles of the main definition since there’s no condition to be satisfied but the 936
SuperHyperSet has the necessary condition for the intended definition to be applied. 939
Thus the V \ V \ {z} is withdrawn not by the conditions of the main definition but by 940
the necessity of the pre-condition on the usage of the main definition. 941
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
properties taken from the fact that it’s simple. If there’s no more than one Extreme
SuperHyperVertex in the targeted Extreme SuperHyperSet, then there’s no Extreme
connection. Furthermore, the Extreme existence of one Extreme SuperHyperVertex has
no Extreme effect to talk about the Extreme R-Hamiltonian-Cut. Since at least two
Extreme SuperHyperVertices involve to make a title in the Extreme background of the
Extreme SuperHyperGraph. The Extreme SuperHyperGraph is obvious if it has no
Extreme SuperHyperEdge but at least two Extreme SuperHyperVertices make the
Extreme version of Extreme SuperHyperEdge. Thus in the Extreme setting of
non-obvious Extreme SuperHyperGraph, there are at least one Extreme
SuperHyperEdge. It’s necessary to mention that the word “Simple” is used as Extreme
adjective for the initial Extreme SuperHyperGraph, induces there’s no Extreme
appearance of the loop Extreme version of the Extreme SuperHyperEdge and this
Extreme SuperHyperGraph is said to be loopless. The Extreme adjective “loop” on the
basic Extreme framework engages one Extreme SuperHyperVertex but it never happens
in this Extreme setting. With these Extreme bases, on an Extreme SuperHyperGraph,
there’s at least one Extreme SuperHyperEdge thus there’s at least an Extreme
R-Hamiltonian-Cut has the Extreme cardinality of an Extreme SuperHyperEdge. Thus,
an Extreme R-Hamiltonian-Cut has the Extreme cardinality at least an Extreme
SuperHyperEdge. Assume an Extreme SuperHyperSet V \ V \ {z}. This Extreme
SuperHyperSet isn’t an Extreme R-Hamiltonian-Cut since either the Extreme
SuperHyperGraph is an obvious Extreme SuperHyperModel thus it never happens since
there’s no Extreme usage of this Extreme framework and even more there’s no Extreme
connection inside or the Extreme SuperHyperGraph isn’t obvious and as its
consequences, there’s an Extreme contradiction with the term “Extreme
R-Hamiltonian-Cut” since the maximum Extreme cardinality never happens for this
Extreme style of the Extreme SuperHyperSet and beyond that there’s no Extreme
connection inside as mentioned in first Extreme case in the forms of drawback for this
selected Extreme SuperHyperSet. Let
Comes up. This Extreme case implies having the Extreme style of on-quasi-triangle
Extreme style on the every Extreme elements of this Extreme SuperHyperSet. Precisely,
the Extreme R-Hamiltonian-Cut is the Extreme SuperHyperSet of the Extreme
SuperHyperVertices such that some Extreme amount of the Extreme
SuperHyperVertices are on-quasi-triangle Extreme style. The Extreme cardinality of the
v SuperHypeSet
But the lower Extreme bound is up. Thus the minimum Extreme cardinality of the
maximum Extreme cardinality ends up the Extreme discussion. The first Extreme term
refers to the Extreme setting of the Extreme SuperHyperGraph but this key point is
enough since there’s an Extreme SuperHyperClass of an Extreme SuperHyperGraph has
no on-quasi-triangle Extreme style amid some amount of its Extreme
SuperHyperVertices. This Extreme setting of the Extreme SuperHyperModel proposes
an Extreme SuperHyperSet has only some amount Extreme SuperHyperVertices from
one Extreme SuperHyperEdge such that there’s no Extreme amount of Extreme
SuperHyperEdges more than one involving these some amount of these Extreme
SuperHyperVertices. The Extreme cardinality of this Extreme SuperHyperSet is the
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
maximum and the Extreme case is occurred in the minimum Extreme situation. To sum
them up, the Extreme SuperHyperSet
background in the Extreme terms of worst Extreme case and the common theme of the 943
lower Extreme bound occurred in the specific Extreme SuperHyperClasses of the 944
V \ (V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . . , zE }).
Zi ∼ Zj , i 6= j, i, j = 1, 2, . . . , z.
where the ∼ isn’t an equivalence relation but only the symmetric relation on the
Extreme SuperHyperVertices of the Extreme SuperHyperGraph. The formal definition
is as follows.
Zi ∼ Zj , i 6= j, i, j = 1, 2, . . . , z
if and only if Zi and Zj are the Extreme SuperHyperVertices and there’s only and only
one Extreme SuperHyperEdge E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) between the Extreme
SuperHyperVertices Zi and Zj . The other definition for the Extreme SuperHyperEdge
E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) in the terms of Extreme R-Hamiltonian-Cut is
{aE , bE , cE , . . . , zE } .
This definition coincides with the definition of the Extreme R-Hamiltonian-Cut but
with slightly differences in the maximum Extreme cardinality amid those Extreme
type-SuperHyperSets of the Extreme SuperHyperVertices. Thus the Extreme
SuperHyperSet of the Extreme SuperHyperVertices,
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
and
E
E = {Z1 , Z2 , . . . , Zz | Zi ∼ Zj , i 6= j, i, j = 1, 2, . . . , z}.
Or
{aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .
Extreme R-Hamiltonian-Cut =
E
{Z1 , Z2 , . . . , Zz | ∀i 6= j, i, j = 1, 2, . . . , z, ∃Ex , Zi ∼x Zj , }.
947
Extreme R-Hamiltonian-Cut =
V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .
V \ (V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . . , zE }).
It’s straightforward that the Extreme cardinality of the Extreme R-Hamiltonian-Cut is 948
at least the maximum Extreme number of Extreme SuperHyperVertices of the Extreme 949
other words, the maximum number of the Extreme SuperHyperEdges contains the 951
Hamiltonian-Cut in some cases but the maximum number of the Extreme 953
some issues about the Extreme optimal SuperHyperObject. It specially delivers some 958
remarks on the Extreme SuperHyperSet of the Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that 959
there’s distinct amount of Extreme SuperHyperEdges for distinct amount of Extreme 960
SuperHyperVertices up to all taken from that Extreme SuperHyperSet of the Extreme 961
SuperHyperModel, there’s at least one Extreme SuperHyperEdge containing at least all 965
where the Extreme completion of the Extreme incidence is up in that. Thus it’s, 967
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
SuperHyperCardinality. Thus the embedded setting is elected such that those 971
Extreme SuperHyperOptimal. The less than two distinct types of Extreme 973
SuperHyperVertices are included in the minimum Extreme style of the embedded 974
Extreme R-Hamiltonian-Cut. The interior types of the Extreme SuperHyperVertices are 975
deciders. Since the Extreme number of SuperHyperNeighbors are only affected by the 976
interior Extreme SuperHyperVertices. The common connections, more precise and more 977
formal, the perfect unique connections inside the Extreme SuperHyperSet for any 978
Thus Extreme exterior SuperHyperVertices could be used only in one Extreme 980
they’ve more connections inside more than outside. Thus the title “exterior” is more 984
relevant than the title “interior”. One Extreme SuperHyperVertex has no connection, 985
inside. Thus, the Extreme SuperHyperSet of the Extreme SuperHyperVertices with one 986
SuperHyperElement has been ignored in the exploring to lead on the optimal case 987
implying the Extreme R-Hamiltonian-Cut. The Extreme R-Hamiltonian-Cut with the 988
SuperHyperEdge and with other terms, the Extreme R-Hamiltonian-Cut with the 990
Extreme SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). There’s only one Extreme SuperHyperEdge 993
E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) has only the maximum possibilities of the distinct interior Extreme 994
Extreme SuperHypeNeighbor to some of them but not all of them. In other words, 996
there’s only an unique Extreme SuperHyperEdge E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) has only two 997
all Extreme SuperHypeNeighbor to some of them but not all of them. 999
The main definition of the Extreme R-Hamiltonian-Cut has two titles. an Extreme 1000
R-SuperHyperCardinality are two titles in the terms of quasi-R-styles. For any Extreme 1002
Extreme quasi-SuperHyperNotions lead us to take the collection of all the Extreme 1006
quasi-R-Hamiltonian-Cuts for all Extreme numbers less than its Extreme corresponded 1007
maximum number. The essence of the Extreme Hamiltonian-Cut ends up but this 1008
essence starts up in the terms of the Extreme quasi-R-Hamiltonian-Cut, again and more 1009
in the operations of collecting all the Extreme quasi-R-Hamiltonian-Cuts acted on the 1010
all possible used formations of the Extreme SuperHyperGraph to achieve one Extreme 1011
Let zExtreme Number , SExtreme SuperHyperSet and GExtreme Hamiltonian-Cut be an Extreme 1014
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
GExtreme Hamiltonian-Cut =
{S ∈ ∪zExtreme Number [zExtreme Number ]Extreme Class =
∪zExtreme Number {SExtreme SuperHyperSet |
SExtreme SuperHyperSet = GExtreme Hamiltonian-Cut ,
|SExtreme SuperHyperSet |Extreme Cardinality
= zExtreme Number |
|SExtreme SuperHyperSet |Extreme Cardinality
= max zExtreme Number }.
[zExtreme Number ]Extreme Class
In more concise and more convenient ways, the modified definition for the Extreme 1020
GExtreme Hamiltonian-Cut =
{S ∈ ∪zExtreme Number [zExtreme Number ]Extreme Class |
|SExtreme SuperHyperSet |Extreme Cardinality
= max zExtreme Number }.
[zExtreme Number ]Extreme Class
To translate the statement to this mathematical literature, the formulae will be revised. 1022
GExtreme Hamiltonian-Cut =
{S ∈ ∪zExtreme Number [zExtreme Number ]Extreme Class |
|SExtreme SuperHyperSet |Extreme Cardinality
= max zExtreme Number
[zExtreme
Number ]Extreme Class
= max |E| | E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.
And then, 1023
GExtreme Hamiltonian-Cut =
{S ∈ ∪zExtreme Number [zExtreme Number ]Extreme Class |
|SExtreme SuperHyperSet |Extreme Cardinality
= max |E| | E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.
To get more visions in the closer look-up, there’s an overall overlook. 1024
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
1025
GExtreme Hamiltonian-Cut =
{S ∈ ∪zExtreme Number [zExtreme Number ]Extreme Class =
∪zExtreme Number {SExtreme SuperHyperSet |
SExtreme SuperHyperSet = GExtreme Hamiltonian-Cut ,
|SExtreme SuperHyperSet |Extreme Cardinality
= zExtreme Number |
|SExtreme SuperHyperSet |Extreme Cardinality
= max |E| | E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.
1026
GExtreme Hamiltonian-Cut =
{S ∈ ∪zExtreme Number [zExtreme Number ]Extreme Class |
|SExtreme SuperHyperSet |Extreme Cardinality
= max zExtreme Number
[zExtreme Number ]Extreme Class
= max |E| | E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.
1027
GExtreme Hamiltonian-Cut =
{S ∈ ∪zExtreme Number [zExtreme Number ]Extreme Class |
|SExtreme SuperHyperSet |Extreme Cardinality
= max |E| | E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.
Now, the extension of these types of approaches is up. Since the new term, “Extreme 1028
SuperHyperVertices such that any amount of its Extreme SuperHyperVertices are 1030
incident to an Extreme SuperHyperEdge. It’s, literarily, another name for “Extreme 1031
preliminarily background since there are some ambiguities about the Extreme 1037
SuperHyperCardinality arise from it. To get orderly keywords, the terms, “Extreme 1038
Thus, let zExtreme Number , NExtreme SuperHyperNeighborhood and GExtreme Hamiltonian-Cut 1041
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
1044
GExtreme Hamiltonian-Cut =
{NExtreme SuperHyperNeighborhood
∈ ∪zExtreme Number [zExtreme Number ]Extreme Class =
∪zExtreme Number {NExtreme SuperHyperNeighborhood |
|NExtreme SuperHyperSet |Extreme Cardinality
= zExtreme Number |
|NExtreme SuperHyperNeighborhood |Extreme Cardinality
= max zExtreme Number }.
[zExtreme Number ]Extreme Class
1045
GExtreme Hamiltonian-Cut =
{NExtreme SuperHyperNeighborhood
∈ ∪zExtreme Number [zExtreme Number ]Extreme Class |
|NExtreme SuperHyperNeighborhood |Extreme Cardinality
= max zExtreme Number }.
[zExtreme Number ]Extreme Class
1046
GExtreme Hamiltonian-Cut =
{NExtreme SuperHyperNeighborhood
∈ ∪zExtreme Number [zExtreme Number ]Extreme Class |
|NExtreme SuperHyperSet |Extreme Cardinality
= max zExtreme Number }.
[zExtreme Number ]Extreme Class
GExtreme Hamiltonian-Cut =
{NExtreme SuperHyperNeighborhood
∈ ∪zExtreme Number [zExtreme Number ]Extreme Class =
∪zExtreme Number {NExtreme SuperHyperNeighborhood |
|NExtreme SuperHyperSet |Extreme Cardinality
= zExtreme Number |
|NExtreme SuperHyperNeighborhood |Extreme Cardinality
= max |E| | E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.
1049
GExtreme Hamiltonian-Cut =
{NExtreme SuperHyperNeighborhood
∈ ∪zExtreme Number [zExtreme Number ]Extreme Class |
|NExtreme SuperHyperNeighborhood |Extreme Cardinality
= max zExtreme Number
[zExtreme Number ]Extreme Class
= max |E| | E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
1050
GExtreme Hamiltonian-Cut =
{NExtreme SuperHyperNeighborhood
∈ ∪zExtreme Number [zExtreme Number ]Extreme Class |
|NExtreme SuperHyperSet |Extreme Cardinality
= max |E| | E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.
Thus, in a connected Extreme SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). The all interior 1051
of them, and any of other corresponded Extreme SuperHyperVertex, some interior 1053
Extreme exception at all minus all Extreme SuperHypeNeighbors to any amount of 1055
them. 1056
To make sense with the precise words in the terms of “R-’, the follow-up illustrations 1057
There’s not only one Extreme SuperHyperVertex inside the intended Extreme
SuperHyperSet. Thus the non-obvious Extreme Hamiltonian-Cut is up. The obvious
simple Extreme type-SuperHyperSet called the Extreme Hamiltonian-Cut is an Extreme
SuperHyperSet includes only one Extreme SuperHyperVertex. But the Extreme
SuperHyperSet of Extreme SuperHyperVertices,
doesn’t have less than two SuperHyperVertices inside the intended Extreme
SuperHyperSet since they’ve come from at least so far an SuperHyperEdge. Thus the
non-obvious simple Extreme type-SuperHyperSet of the Extreme R-Hamiltonian-Cut is
up. To sum them up, the Extreme SuperHyperSet of Extreme SuperHyperVertices,
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
instead of all given by that Extreme type-SuperHyperSet called the Extreme 1064
does includes only less than two SuperHyperVertices in a connected Extreme 1066
SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E) but it’s impossible in the case, they’ve corresponded 1067
to an SuperHyperEdge. It’s interesting to mention that the only non-obvious simple 1068
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
is an Extreme R-Hamiltonian-Cut. In other words, the least cardinality, the lower sharp
bound for the cardinality, of an Extreme R-Hamiltonian-Cut is the cardinality of
V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .
To sum them up, in a connected Extreme SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). The 1074
quasi-R-Hamiltonian-Cut if for any of them, and any of other corresponded Extreme 1076
Assume a connected Extreme SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). Let an Extreme 1080
Consider all Extreme numbers of those Extreme SuperHyperVertices from that Extreme 1082
cardinality, the lower sharp Extreme bound for Extreme cardinality. Assume a 1086
connected Extreme SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). The Extreme SuperHyperSet of 1087
R-Hamiltonian-Cut. Since it doesn’t do the Extreme procedure such that such that 1097
uniquely [there are at least one Extreme SuperHyperVertex outside implying there’s, 1099
sometimes in the connected Extreme SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E), an Extreme 1100
procedure”.]. There’s only one Extreme SuperHyperVertex outside the intended 1103
Extreme SuperHyperVertices does forms any kind of Extreme pairs are titled 1108
ESHG : (V, E). Since the Extreme SuperHyperSet of the Extreme SuperHyperVertices 1110
R-Hamiltonian-Cut only contains all interior Extreme SuperHyperVertices and all 1115
exterior Extreme SuperHyperVertices from the unique Extreme SuperHyperEdge where 1116
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
there’s any of them has all possible Extreme SuperHyperNeighbors in and there’s all 1117
SuperHypeNeighbors to some of them not all of them but everything is possible about 1119
C(N SHG)ExtremeQuasi−Hamiltonian−Cut
|EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality
b c
= {E2i−1 }i=1 2
.
C(N SHG)ExtremeQuasi−Hamiltonian−CutSuperHyperP olynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality
= 2z b 2 c
.
C(N SHG)ExtremeR−Quasi−Hamiltonian−Cut = {Vi }si=1 , {Vj }tj=1 .
C(N SHG)ExtremeR−Quasi−Hamiltonian−CutSuperHyperP olynomial = az s + bz t .
is the simple Extreme type-SuperHyperSet of the Extreme Hamiltonian-Cut. The 1126
C(N SHG)ExtremeQuasi−Hamiltonian−Cut
|EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality
b c
= {E2i−1 }i=1 2
.
C(N SHG)ExtremeQuasi−Hamiltonian−CutSuperHyperP olynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality
= 2z b 2 c
.
C(N SHG)ExtremeR−Quasi−Hamiltonian−Cut = {Vi }si=1 , {Vj }tj=1 .
C(N SHG)ExtremeR−Quasi−Hamiltonian−CutSuperHyperP olynomial = az s + bz t .
Is an Extreme Hamiltonian-Cut C(ESHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph 1128
SuperHyperEdge for all Extreme SuperHyperVertices. There are not only two Extreme 1133
includes only two Extreme SuperHyperVertices. But the Extreme SuperHyperSet of 1137
C(N SHG)ExtremeQuasi−Hamiltonian−Cut
|EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality
b c
= {E2i−1 }i=1 2
.
C(N SHG)ExtremeQuasi−Hamiltonian−CutSuperHyperP olynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality
= 2z b 2 c
.
C(N SHG)ExtremeR−Quasi−Hamiltonian−Cut = {Vi }si=1 , {Vj }tj=1 .
C(N SHG)ExtremeR−Quasi−Hamiltonian−CutSuperHyperP olynomial = az s + bz t .
Doesn’t have less than three SuperHyperVertices inside the intended Extreme 1139
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Extreme Hamiltonian-Cut is up. To sum them up, the Extreme SuperHyperSet of the 1141
C(N SHG)ExtremeQuasi−Hamiltonian−Cut
|EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality
b c
= {E2i−1 }i=1 2
.
C(N SHG)ExtremeQuasi−Hamiltonian−CutSuperHyperP olynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality
= 2z b 2 c
.
C(N SHG)ExtremeR−Quasi−Hamiltonian−Cut = {Vi }si=1 , {Vj }tj=1 .
C(N SHG)ExtremeR−Quasi−Hamiltonian−CutSuperHyperP olynomial = az s + bz t .
Is the non-obvious simple Extreme type-SuperHyperSet of the Extreme 1143
SuperHyperEdges[SuperHyperVertices], 1145
C(N SHG)ExtremeQuasi−Hamiltonian−Cut
|EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality
b c
= {E2i−1 }i=1 2
.
C(N SHG)ExtremeQuasi−Hamiltonian−CutSuperHyperP olynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality
= 2z b 2 c
.
C(N SHG)ExtremeR−Quasi−Hamiltonian−Cut = {Vi }si=1 , {Vj }tj=1 .
C(N SHG)ExtremeR−Quasi−Hamiltonian−CutSuperHyperP olynomial = az s + bz t .
Is an Extreme Hamiltonian-Cut C(ESHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph 1146
given by that Extreme type-SuperHyperSet called the Extreme Hamiltonian-Cut and 1149
SuperHyperEdge for all Extreme SuperHyperVertices. There aren’t only less than three 1154
C(N SHG)ExtremeQuasi−Hamiltonian−Cut
|EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality
b c
= {E2i−1 }i=1 2
.
C(N SHG)ExtremeQuasi−Hamiltonian−CutSuperHyperP olynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality
= 2z b 2 c
.
C(N SHG)ExtremeR−Quasi−Hamiltonian−Cut = {Vi }si=1 , {Vj }tj=1 .
C(N SHG)ExtremeR−Quasi−Hamiltonian−CutSuperHyperP olynomial = az s + bz t .
Thus the non-obvious Extreme Hamiltonian-Cut, 1156
C(N SHG)ExtremeQuasi−Hamiltonian−Cut
|EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality
b c
= {E2i−1 }i=1 2
.
C(N SHG)ExtremeQuasi−Hamiltonian−CutSuperHyperP olynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality
= 2z b 2 c
.
C(N SHG)ExtremeR−Quasi−Hamiltonian−Cut = {Vi }si=1 , {Vj }tj=1 .
C(N SHG)ExtremeR−Quasi−Hamiltonian−CutSuperHyperP olynomial = az s + bz t .
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
C(N SHG)ExtremeQuasi−Hamiltonian−Cut
|EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality
b c
= {E2i−1 }i=1 2
.
C(N SHG)ExtremeQuasi−Hamiltonian−CutSuperHyperP olynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality
= 2z b 2 c
.
C(N SHG)ExtremeR−Quasi−Hamiltonian−Cut = {Vi }si=1 , {Vj }tj=1 .
C(N SHG)ExtremeR−Quasi−Hamiltonian−CutSuperHyperP olynomial = az s + bz t .
C(N SHG)ExtremeQuasi−Hamiltonian−Cut
|EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality
b c
= {E2i−1 }i=1 2
.
C(N SHG)ExtremeQuasi−Hamiltonian−CutSuperHyperP olynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality
= 2z b 2 c
.
C(N SHG)ExtremeR−Quasi−Hamiltonian−Cut = {Vi }si=1 , {Vj }tj=1 .
C(N SHG)ExtremeR−Quasi−Hamiltonian−CutSuperHyperP olynomial = az s + bz t .
Does includes only less than three SuperHyperVertices in a connected Extreme 1160
SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). It’s interesting to mention that the only non-obvious 1161
C(N SHG)ExtremeQuasi−Hamiltonian−Cut
|EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality
b c
= {E2i−1 }i=1 2
.
C(N SHG)ExtremeQuasi−Hamiltonian−CutSuperHyperP olynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality
= 2z b 2 c
.
C(N SHG)ExtremeR−Quasi−Hamiltonian−Cut = {Vi }si=1 , {Vj }tj=1 .
C(N SHG)ExtremeR−Quasi−Hamiltonian−CutSuperHyperP olynomial = az s + bz t .
The previous Extreme approach apply on the upcoming Extreme results on Extreme 1170
SuperHyperClasses. 1171
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Proposition 5.1. Assume a connected Extreme SuperHyperPath ESHP : (V, E). Then 1172
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
V |EN SHG |
, E |EN SHG |
3 3
1174
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , V2EXT ERN AL ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
E |EN SHG | , V |EN SHG |
3 3
be a longest path taken from a connected Extreme SuperHyperPath ESHP : (V, E). 1175
Example 5.2. In the Figure (23), the connected Extreme SuperHyperPath 1180
ESHP : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The Extreme SuperHyperSet, in the 1181
Proposition 5.3. Assume a connected Extreme SuperHyperCycle ESHC : (V, E). 1183
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Then 1184
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
V |EN SHG |
, E |EN SHG |
3 3
1186
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , V2EXT ERN AL ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
E |EN SHG | , V |EN SHG |
3 3
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
be a longest path taken from a connected Extreme SuperHyperCycle ESHC : (V, E). 1187
Example 5.4. In the Figure (24), the connected Extreme SuperHyperCycle 1192
N SHC : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Extreme SuperHyperSet, in 1193
Proposition 5.5. Assume a connected Extreme SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). Then 1195
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
CEN T ER, E2
1197
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , CEN T ER
be a longest path taken a connected Extreme SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). There’s 1198
Example 5.6. In the Figure (25), the connected Extreme SuperHyperStar 1203
ESHS : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Extreme SuperHyperSet, by 1204
the Algorithm in previous Extreme result, of the Extreme SuperHyperVertices of the 1205
connected Extreme SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E), in the Extreme SuperHyperModel 1206
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Proposition 5.7. Assume a connected Extreme SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E). 1208
Then 1209
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
V|P i |=minP ∈E |Pj | , E|Pi |=minPj ∈EN SHG |Pj | .
j N SHG
1211
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , V2EXT ERN AL ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
E|Pi |=minPj ∈EN SHG |Pj | , V|Pi |=minP ∈E |Pj |
j N SHG
is a longest path taken from a connected Extreme SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E). 1212
Thus the notion of quasi may be up but the SuperHyperNotions based on 1217
Thus every SuperHyperPart could have one SuperHyperVertex as the representative in 1219
the 1220
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E). Thus only some SuperHyperVertices and only 1222
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
Example 5.8. In the Extreme Figure (26), the connected Extreme 1225
SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), is Extreme highlighted and Extreme featured. 1226
The obtained Extreme SuperHyperSet, by the Extreme Algorithm in previous Extreme 1227
SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), in the Extreme SuperHyperModel (26), is the 1229
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
V|P i |=minP ∈E |Pj | , E|Pi |=minPj ∈EN SHG |Pj | .
j N SHG
1234
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , V2EXT ERN AL ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
E|Pi |=minPj ∈EN SHG |Pj | , V|Pi |=minP ∈E |Pj |
j N SHG
Thus the notion of quasi may be up but the SuperHyperNotions based on 1240
Thus every SuperHyperPart could have one SuperHyperVertex as the representative in 1242
the 1243
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
ESHM : (V, E). Thus only some SuperHyperVertices and only 1245
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
Example 5.10. In the Figure (27), the connected Extreme SuperHyperMultipartite 1249
ESHM : (V, E), is highlighted and Extreme featured. The obtained Extreme 1250
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Proposition 5.11. Assume a connected Extreme SuperHyperWheel ESHW : (V, E). 1254
Then, 1255
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1∗ ,
CEN T ER, E2∗
1257
P :
E1∗ , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2∗ , CEN T ER
is a longest SuperHyperHamiltonian-Cut taken from a connected Extreme 1258
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Example 5.12. In the Extreme Figure (28), the connected Extreme SuperHyperWheel 1267
N SHW : (V, E), is Extreme highlighted and featured. The obtained Extreme 1268
Remark 6.1. Let remind that the Extreme SuperHyperHamiltonian-Cut is “redefined” 1276
plus one Extreme SuperHypeNeighbor to one. Where σi is the unary operation on the 1279
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Corollary 6.3. Assume an Extreme SuperHyperGraph on the same identical letter of 1282
Corollary 6.4. Assume an Extreme SuperHyperGraph on the same identical letter of 1285
Corollary 6.5. Assume an Extreme SuperHyperGraph on the same identical letter of 1288
same identical letter of the alphabet. Then its Extreme SuperHyperHamiltonian-Cut is 1292
the same identical letter of the alphabet. Then its Extreme SuperHyperHamiltonian-Cut 1296
Then its Extreme SuperHyperHamiltonian-Cut isn’t well-defined if and only if its 1306
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
a maximal 1342
Where the exterior SuperHyperVertices and the interior SuperHyperVertices coincide. 1349
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Where the exterior SuperHyperVertices and the interior SuperHyperVertices coincide. 1358
number of 1361
is one and it’s only V. Where the exterior SuperHyperVertices and the interior 1368
is one and it’s only V. Where the exterior SuperHyperVertices and the interior 1378
SuperHyperSet contains [the SuperHyperCenter and] the half of multiplying r with the 1383
number of all the SuperHyperEdges plus one of all the SuperHyperVertices is a 1384
O(ESHG)
(iv) : 2 + 1-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperHamiltonian-Cut; 1388
O(ESHG)
(v) : strong 2 + 1-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperHamiltonian-Cut; 1389
O(ESHG)
(vi) : connected 2 + 1-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperHamiltonian-Cut. 1390
SuperHyperSet contains the half of multiplying r with the number of all the 1394
SuperHyperEdges plus one of all the SuperHyperVertices in the biggest SuperHyperPart 1395
is a 1396
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
number of 1406
O(ESHG)
(iv) : 2 + 1-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperHamiltonian-Cut; 1410
O(ESHG)
(v) : strong 2 + 1-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperHamiltonian-Cut; 1411
O(ESHG)
(vi) : connected 2 + 1-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperHamiltonian-Cut. 1412
is one and it’s only S, a SuperHyperSet contains [the SuperHyperCenter and] the half of 1413
multiplying r with the number of all the SuperHyperEdges plus one of all the 1414
Proposition 6.24. Let ESHG : (V, E) be an Extreme SuperHyperGraph. The number 1417
Proposition 6.25. Let ESHG : (V, E) be an Extreme SuperHyperGraph. Then the 1425
number is at most O(ESHG) and the Extreme number is at most On (ESHG). 1426
min Σv∈{v1 ,v2 ,··· ,vt } O(ESHG:(V,E)) ⊆V σ(v), in the setting of dual 1429
t>
2
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
(iv) : ( O(ESHG:(V,E))
2 + 1)-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperHamiltonian-Cut; 1433
The number is 0 and the Extreme number is 0, for an independent SuperHyperSet in the 1437
O(ESHG : (V, E)) and the Extreme number is On (ESHG : (V, E)), in the setting of a 1449
dual 1450
number is O(ESHG:(V,E))
2 + 1 and the Extreme number is 1459
min Σv∈{v1 ,v2 ,··· ,vt } O(ESHG:(V,E)) ⊆V σ(v), in the setting of a dual 1460
t>
2
(iv) : ( O(ESHG:(V,E))
2 + 1)-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperHamiltonian-Cut; 1464
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Proposition 6.31. Let N SHF : (V, E) be a SuperHyperFamily of the ESHGs : (V, E) 1467
Extreme SuperHyperGraphs which are from one-type SuperHyperClass which the result is 1468
obtained for the individuals. Then the results also hold for the SuperHyperFamily 1469
that 1473
(ii) vx ∈ E. 1475
Proposition 6.34. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a strong Extreme SuperHyperGraph. Then 1480
(i) Γ ≤ O; 1481
(ii) Γs ≤ On . 1482
Proposition 6.35. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a strong Extreme SuperHyperGraph which is 1483
(i) Γ ≤ O − 1; 1485
SuperHyperHamiltonian-Cut; 1489
(iii) Γs = min{Σs∈S={v2 ,v4 ,··· ,vn−1 } Σ3i=1 σi (s), Σs∈S={v1 ,v3 ,··· ,vn−1 } Σ3i=1 σi (s)}; 1491
(iv) the SuperHyperSets S1 = {v2 , v4 , · · · , vn−1 } and S2 = {v1 , v3 , · · · , vn−1 } are only 1492
SuperHyperHamiltonian-Cut; 1496
(iii) Γs = min{Σs∈S={v2 ,v4 ,··· ,vn } Σ3i=1 σi (s), Σs∈S={v1 ,v3 ,··· .vn−1 } Σ3i=1 σi (s)}; 1499
(iv) the SuperHyperSets S1 = {v2 , v4 , · · · .vn } and S2 = {v1 , v3 , · · · .vn−1 } are only 1500
SuperHyperHamiltonian-Cut; 1504
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
(iii) Γs = min{Σs∈S={v2 ,v4 ,··· ,vn } σ(s), Σs∈S={v1 ,v3 ,··· ,vn−1 } σ(s)}; 1507
(iv) the SuperHyperSets S1 = {v2 , v4 , · · · , vn } and S2 = {v1 , v3 , · · · , vn−1 } are only 1508
SuperHyperHamiltonian-Cut; 1512
(iii) Γs = min{Σs∈S={v2 ,v4 ,··· .vn−1 } Σ3i=1 σi (s), Σs∈S={v1 ,v3 ,··· .vn−1 } Σ3i=1 σi (s)}; 1514
(iv) the SuperHyperSets S1 = {v2 , v4 , · · · .vn−1 } and S2 = {v1 , v3 , · · · .vn−1 } are only 1515
(ii) Γ = 1; 1519
SuperHyperHamiltonian-Cut. 1522
6+3(i−1)≤n
(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {v1 , v3 } ∪ {v6 , v9 · · · , vi+6 , · · · , vn }i=1 is a dual 1524
6+3(i−1)≤n
(ii) Γ = |{v1 , v3 } ∪ {v6 , v9 · · · , vi+6 , · · · , vn }i=1 |; 1526
(iii) Γs = Σ{v1 ,v3 }∪{v6 ,v9 ··· ,vi+6 ,··· ,vn }6+3(i−1)≤n Σ3i=1 σi (s); 1527
i=1
6+3(i−1)≤n
(iv) the SuperHyperSet {v1 , v3 } ∪ {v6 , v9 · · · , vi+6 , · · · , vn }i=1 is only a dual 1528
b n c+1
(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {vi }i=1
2
is a dual SuperHyperDefensive 1531
SuperHyperHamiltonian-Cut; 1532
(ii) Γ = b n2 c + 1; 1533
b n c+1
(iv) the SuperHyperSet S = {vi }i=1
2
is only a dual SuperHyperDefensive 1535
SuperHyperHamiltonian-Cut. 1536
bn
2c
(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {vi }i=1 is a dual SuperHyperDefensive 1538
SuperHyperHamiltonian-Cut; 1539
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
(ii) Γ = b n2 c; 1540
bnc
(iv) the SuperHyperSet S = {vi }i=1
2
is only a dual maximal SuperHyperDefensive 1542
SuperHyperHamiltonian-Cut. 1543
(iii) Γs = Σm 3
i=1 Σj=1 σj (ci ) for N SHF : (V, E); 1549
b n c+1
(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {vi }i=1
2
is a dual maximal SuperHyperDefensive 1555
b n c+1
(iv) the SuperHyperSets S = {vi }i=1
2
are only a dual maximal 1559
bnc
(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {vi }i=1
2
is a dual SuperHyperDefensive 1564
bnc
(iv) the SuperHyperSets S = {vi }i=1
2
are only dual maximal 1568
Proposition 6.47. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a strong Extreme SuperHyperGraph. Then 1570
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Proposition 6.48. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a strong Extreme SuperHyperGraph. Then 1578
hold; 1588
SuperHyperHamiltonian-Cut; 1594
hold; 1599
SuperHyperHamiltonian-Cut; 1601
SuperHyperHamiltonian-Cut; 1605
SuperHyperHamiltonian-Cut; 1612
SuperHyperHamiltonian-Cut; 1616
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
SuperHyperHamiltonian-Cut; 1634
SuperHyperHamiltonian-Cut; 1636
SuperHyperHamiltonian-Cut; 1638
SuperHyperHamiltonian-Cut; 1645
SuperHyperHamiltonian-Cut; 1649
Recognition 1653
The cancer is the Extreme disease but the Extreme model is going to figure out what’s 1654
going on this Extreme phenomenon. The special Extreme case of this Extreme disease 1655
is considered and as the consequences of the model, some parameters are used. The cells 1656
are under attack of this disease but the moves of the cancer in the special region are the 1657
matter of mind. The Extreme recognition of the cancer could help to find some 1658
In the following, some Extreme steps are Extreme devised on this disease. 1660
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Step 1. (Extreme Definition) The Extreme recognition of the cancer in the 1661
Step 2. (Extreme Issue) The specific region has been assigned by the Extreme 1663
model [it’s called Extreme SuperHyperGraph] and the long Extreme cycle of the 1664
move from the cancer is identified by this research. Sometimes the move of the 1665
cancer hasn’t be easily identified since there are some determinacy, indeterminacy 1666
and neutrality about the moves and the effects of the cancer on that region; this 1667
event leads us to choose another model [it’s said to be Extreme SuperHyperGraph] 1668
Step 3. (Extreme Model) There are some specific Extreme models, which are 1670
well-known and they’ve got the names, and some general Extreme models. The 1671
moves and the Extreme traces of the cancer on the complex tracks and between 1672
SuperHyperModel 1680
Step 4. (Extreme Solution) In the Extreme Figure (29), the Extreme 1681
By using the Extreme Figure (29) and the Table (4), the Extreme 1683
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
SuperHyperModel 1691
Step 4. (Extreme Solution) In the Extreme Figure (30), the Extreme 1692
By using the Extreme Figure (30) and the Table (5), the Extreme 1694
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
In what follows, some “problems” and some “questions” are proposed. 1702
Question 10.1. Which the else SuperHyperModels could be defined based on Cancer’s 1705
recognitions? 1706
Question 10.3. Are there some Algorithms to be defined on the SuperHyperModels to 1709
Question 10.4. Which the SuperHyperNotions are related to beyond the 1711
Problem 10.6. Which the fundamental SuperHyperNumbers are related to these 1716
Problem 10.7. What’s the independent research based on Cancer’s recognitions 1718
In this section, concluding remarks and closing remarks are represented. The drawbacks 1721
of this research are illustrated. Some benefits and some advantages of this research are 1722
highlighted. 1723
This research uses some approaches to make Extreme SuperHyperGraphs more 1724
SuperHyperHamiltonian-Cut. For that sake in the second definition, the main definition 1726
of the Extreme SuperHyperGraph is redefined on the position of the alphabets. Based 1727
on the new definition for the Extreme SuperHyperGraph, the new SuperHyperNotion, 1728
some results based on that. Some SuperHyperClasses and some Extreme 1730
SuperHyperClasses are the cases of this research on the modeling of the regions where 1731
are under the attacks of the cancer to recognize this disease as it’s mentioned on the 1732
introduced. Some general results are gathered in the section on the 1735
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
clarifications, instances and literature reviews have taken the whole way through. In 1737
this research, the literature reviews have fulfilled the lines containing the notions and 1738
the results. The SuperHyperGraph and Extreme SuperHyperGraph are the 1739
SuperHyperModels on the “Cancer’s Recognitions” and both bases are the background 1740
of this research. Sometimes the cancer has been happened on the region, full of cells, 1741
groups of cells and embedded styles. In this segment, the SuperHyperModel proposes 1742
some SuperHyperNotions based on the connectivities of the moves of the cancer in the 1743
longest and strongest styles with the formation of the design and the architecture are 1744
The prefix “SuperHyper” refers to the theme of the embedded styles to figure out the 1746
background for the SuperHyperNotions. In the Table (6), benefits and avenues for this
2. SuperHyperHamiltonian-Cut
5. SuperHyperClasses 3. SuperHyperFamilies
1747
research are, figured out, pointed out and spoken out. 1748
Forms 1751
V 0 or E 0 is called 1755
that Va ∈ Ei , Ej ; 1757
that Vi , Vj ∈ Ea ; 1762
rv-SuperHyperDuality. 1768
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 1778
Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form 1794
the Extreme SuperHyperDuality; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its 1795
Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form 1804
the Extreme SuperHyperDuality; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its 1805
SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 1813
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form 1829
the Extreme SuperHyperDuality; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its 1830
Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form 1839
the Extreme SuperHyperDuality; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its 1840
E1 and E3 are some empty Extreme SuperHyperEdges but E2 is a loop Extreme 1846
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
The previous Extreme approach apply on the upcoming Extreme results on Extreme 1900
SuperHyperClasses. 1901
Proposition 12.4. Assume a connected Extreme SuperHyperPath ESHP : (V, E). 1902
Then 1903
= {Ei }i=1 3
.
C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality
= 3z 3 .
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperDuality
|EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
E |EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality , V EXT ERN AL |EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality .
3 3
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
be a longest path taken from a connected Extreme SuperHyperPath ESHP : (V, E). 1905
straightforward. 1909
Example 12.5. In the Figure (23), the connected Extreme SuperHyperPath 1910
ESHP : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The Extreme SuperHyperSet, in the 1911
Proposition 12.6. Assume a connected Extreme SuperHyperCycle ESHC : (V, E). 1913
Then 1914
= {Ei }i=1 3
.
C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality
= 3z 3 .
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperDuality
|EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
E |EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality , V EXT ERN AL |EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality .
3 3
be a longest path taken from a connected Extreme SuperHyperCycle ESHC : (V, E). 1916
straightforward. 1920
Example 12.7. In the Figure (24), the connected Extreme SuperHyperCycle 1921
N SHC : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Extreme SuperHyperSet, in 1922
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Proposition 12.8. Assume a connected Extreme SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). 1924
Then 1925
straightforward. 1931
Example 12.9. In the Figure (25), the connected Extreme SuperHyperStar 1932
ESHS : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Extreme SuperHyperSet, by 1933
the Algorithm in previous Extreme result, of the Extreme SuperHyperVertices of the 1934
connected Extreme SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E), in the Extreme SuperHyperModel 1935
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmin i |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
is a longest path taken from a connected Extreme SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E). 1940
straightforward. Then there’s at least one SuperHyperDuality. Thus the notion of quasi 1944
There are only two SuperHyperParts. Thus every SuperHyperPart could have one 1946
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmin i |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1
ESHB : (V, E). Thus only some SuperHyperVertices and only 1949
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmin i |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1
Example 12.11. In the Extreme Figure (26), the connected Extreme 1952
SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), is Extreme highlighted and Extreme featured. 1953
The obtained Extreme SuperHyperSet, by the Extreme Algorithm in previous Extreme 1954
SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), in the Extreme SuperHyperModel (26), is the 1956
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmin i |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1
straightforward. Then there’s at least one SuperHyperDuality. Thus the notion of quasi 1965
There are only z 0 SuperHyperParts. Thus every SuperHyperPart could have one 1967
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmin i |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1
ESHM : (V, E). Thus only some SuperHyperVertices and only 1970
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmin i |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1
Example 12.13. In the Figure (27), the connected Extreme SuperHyperMultipartite 1974
ESHM : (V, E), is highlighted and Extreme featured. The obtained Extreme 1975
Proposition 12.14. Assume a connected Extreme SuperHyperWheel ESHW : (V, E). 1979
Then, 1980
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1∗ ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2∗ ,
...,
∗ EXT ERN AL
E|E ∗ | , V|E ∗ |Extreme Cardinality +1
ESHG:(V,E) Extreme Cardinality ESHG:(V,E)
straightforward. Then there’s at least one SuperHyperDuality. Thus the notion of quasi 1986
Example 12.15. In the Extreme Figure (28), the connected Extreme 1990
SuperHyperWheel N SHW : (V, E), is Extreme highlighted and featured. The obtained 1991
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Forms 1997
V 0 or E 0 is called 2001
0 0
(i) Extreme e-SuperHyperJoin if ∀Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ E , ∃Ej ∈ E , such that 2002
Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Extreme SuperHyperJoin; 2023
Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form 2038
the Extreme SuperHyperJoin; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its 2039
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form 2048
the Extreme SuperHyperJoin; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its 2049
Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Extreme SuperHyperJoin; 2057
Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form 2072
the Extreme SuperHyperJoin; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its 2073
Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form 2082
the Extreme SuperHyperJoin; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its 2083
and E3 are some empty Extreme SuperHyperEdges but E2 is a loop Extreme 2089
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
The previous Extreme approach apply on the upcoming Extreme results on Extreme 2143
SuperHyperClasses. 2144
Proposition 13.4. Assume a connected Extreme SuperHyperPath ESHP : (V, E). 2145
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Then 2146
= {Ei }i=1 3
.
C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality
= 3z 3 .
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperJoin
|EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
E |EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality , V EXT ERN AL |EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality .
3 3
be a longest path taken from a connected Extreme SuperHyperPath ESHP : (V, E). 2148
straightforward. 2152
Example 13.5. In the Figure (23), the connected Extreme SuperHyperPath 2153
ESHP : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The Extreme SuperHyperSet, in the 2154
Proposition 13.6. Assume a connected Extreme SuperHyperCycle ESHC : (V, E). 2156
Then 2157
= {Ei }i=1 3
.
C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality
= 3z 3 .
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperJoin
|EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
E |EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality , V EXT ERN AL |EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality .
3 3
be a longest path taken from a connected Extreme SuperHyperCycle ESHC : (V, E). 2159
straightforward. 2163
Example 13.7. In the Figure (24), the connected Extreme SuperHyperCycle 2164
N SHC : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Extreme SuperHyperSet, in 2165
Proposition 13.8. Assume a connected Extreme SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). 2167
Then 2168
be a longest path taken a connected Extreme SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). There’s 2170
straightforward. 2174
Example 13.9. In the Figure (25), the connected Extreme SuperHyperStar 2175
ESHS : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Extreme SuperHyperSet, by 2176
the Algorithm in previous Extreme result, of the Extreme SuperHyperVertices of the 2177
connected Extreme SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E), in the Extreme SuperHyperModel 2178
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmin i |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1
is a longest path taken from a connected Extreme SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E). 2183
straightforward. Then there’s no at least one SuperHyperJoin. Thus the notion of quasi 2187
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
There are only two SuperHyperParts. Thus every SuperHyperPart could have one 2189
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmin i |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1
ESHB : (V, E). Thus only some SuperHyperVertices and only 2192
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmin i |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1
Example 13.11. In the Extreme Figure (26), the connected Extreme 2195
SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), is Extreme highlighted and Extreme featured. 2196
The obtained Extreme SuperHyperSet, by the Extreme Algorithm in previous Extreme 2197
SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), in the Extreme SuperHyperModel (26), is the 2199
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmin i |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1
straightforward. Then there’s no at least one SuperHyperJoin. Thus the notion of quasi 2208
There are only z 0 SuperHyperParts. Thus every SuperHyperPart could have one 2210
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmin i |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1
ESHM : (V, E). Thus only some SuperHyperVertices and only 2213
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmin i |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1
Example 13.13. In the Figure (27), the connected Extreme SuperHyperMultipartite 2217
ESHM : (V, E), is highlighted and Extreme featured. The obtained Extreme 2218
Proposition 13.14. Assume a connected Extreme SuperHyperWheel ESHW : (V, E). 2222
Then, 2223
= {Ei }i=1 3
.
C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality
= 3z 3 .
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperJoin
|EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
E |EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality , V EXT ERN AL |EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality .
3 3
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
straightforward. Then there’s at least one SuperHyperJoin. Thus the notion of quasi 2229
isn’t up and the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperJoin could be applied. The 2230
unique embedded SuperHyperJoin proposes some longest SuperHyperJoin excerpt from 2231
Example 13.15. In the Extreme Figure (28), the connected Extreme 2233
SuperHyperWheel N SHW : (V, E), is Extreme highlighted and featured. The obtained 2234
Forms 2240
V 0 or E 0 is called 2244
that Va ∈ Ei , Ej ; 2246
that Vi , Vj ∈ Ea ; 2251
rv-SuperHyperPerfect. 2257
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
SuperHyperPerfect; 2268
Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form 2283
the Extreme SuperHyperPerfect; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its 2284
Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form 2293
the Extreme SuperHyperPerfect; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its 2294
SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 2302
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form 2318
the Extreme SuperHyperPerfect; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its 2319
Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form 2328
the Extreme SuperHyperPerfect; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its 2329
E1 and E3 are some empty Extreme SuperHyperEdges but E2 is a loop Extreme 2335
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
The previous Extreme approach apply on the upcoming Extreme results on Extreme 2389
SuperHyperClasses. 2390
Proposition 14.4. Assume a connected Extreme SuperHyperPath ESHP : (V, E). 2391
Then 2392
= {Ei }i=1 3
.
C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality
= 3z 3 .
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperPerfect
|EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
E |EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality , V EXT ERN AL |EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality .
3 3
be a longest path taken from a connected Extreme SuperHyperPath ESHP : (V, E). 2394
straightforward. 2398
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Example 14.5. In the Figure (23), the connected Extreme SuperHyperPath 2399
ESHP : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The Extreme SuperHyperSet, in the 2400
Proposition 14.6. Assume a connected Extreme SuperHyperCycle ESHC : (V, E). 2402
Then 2403
= {Ei }i=1 3
.
C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality
= 3z 3 .
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperPerfect
|EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
E |EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality , V EXT ERN AL |EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality .
3 3
be a longest path taken from a connected Extreme SuperHyperCycle ESHC : (V, E). 2405
straightforward. 2409
Example 14.7. In the Figure (24), the connected Extreme SuperHyperCycle 2410
N SHC : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Extreme SuperHyperSet, in 2411
Proposition 14.8. Assume a connected Extreme SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). 2413
Then 2414
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
be a longest path taken a connected Extreme SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). There’s 2416
straightforward. 2420
Example 14.9. In the Figure (25), the connected Extreme SuperHyperStar 2421
ESHS : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Extreme SuperHyperSet, by 2422
the Algorithm in previous Extreme result, of the Extreme SuperHyperVertices of the 2423
connected Extreme SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E), in the Extreme SuperHyperModel 2424
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmin i |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1
is a longest path taken from a connected Extreme SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E). 2429
straightforward. Then there’s no at least one SuperHyperPerfect. Thus the notion of 2433
applied. There are only two SuperHyperParts. Thus every SuperHyperPart could have 2435
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmin i |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1
ESHB : (V, E). Thus only some SuperHyperVertices and only 2438
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmin i |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1
Example 14.11. In the Extreme Figure (26), the connected Extreme 2441
SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), is Extreme highlighted and Extreme featured. 2442
The obtained Extreme SuperHyperSet, by the Extreme Algorithm in previous Extreme 2443
SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), in the Extreme SuperHyperModel (26), is the 2445
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmin i |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1
straightforward. Then there’s no at least one SuperHyperPerfect. Thus the notion of 2454
applied. There are only z 0 SuperHyperParts. Thus every SuperHyperPart could have 2456
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmin i |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1
ESHM : (V, E). Thus only some SuperHyperVertices and only 2459
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmin i |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1
Example 14.13. In the Figure (27), the connected Extreme SuperHyperMultipartite 2463
ESHM : (V, E), is highlighted and Extreme featured. The obtained Extreme 2464
Proposition 14.14. Assume a connected Extreme SuperHyperWheel ESHW : (V, E). 2468
Then, 2469
straightforward. Then there’s at least one SuperHyperPerfect. Thus the notion of quasi 2475
isn’t up and the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperPerfect could be applied. The 2476
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Example 14.15. In the Extreme Figure (28), the connected Extreme 2479
SuperHyperWheel N SHW : (V, E), is Extreme highlighted and featured. The obtained 2480
Forms 2486
V 0 or E 0 is called 2490
Va ∈ Ei , Ej ; 2492
Va ∈ Ei , Ej ; and 2494
Vi , Vj ∈ Ea ; 2497
Vi , Vj ∈ Ea ; and 2499
rv-SuperHyperTotal. 2503
Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Extreme SuperHyperTotal; 2513
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form 2528
the Extreme SuperHyperTotal; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its 2529
Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form 2538
the Extreme SuperHyperTotal; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its 2539
Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Extreme SuperHyperTotal; 2547
Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form 2562
the Extreme SuperHyperTotal; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its 2563
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form 2572
the Extreme SuperHyperTotal; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its 2573
E1 and E3 are some empty Extreme SuperHyperEdges but E2 is a loop Extreme 2579
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
The previous Extreme approach apply on the upcoming Extreme results on Extreme 2633
SuperHyperClasses. 2634
Proposition 15.4. Assume a connected Extreme SuperHyperPath ESHP : (V, E). 2635
Then 2636
P :
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
V3EXT ERN AL , E3 ,
...
be a longest path taken from a connected Extreme SuperHyperPath ESHP : (V, E). 2638
straightforward. 2642
Example 15.5. In the Figure (23), the connected Extreme SuperHyperPath 2643
ESHP : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The Extreme SuperHyperSet, in the 2644
Proposition 15.6. Assume a connected Extreme SuperHyperCycle ESHC : (V, E). 2646
Then 2647
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
P :
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
V3EXT ERN AL , E3 ,
...,
E |E|EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality −1 .
, V EXT ERN AL |EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality −1
be a longest path taken from a connected Extreme SuperHyperCycle ESHC : (V, E). 2649
straightforward. 2653
Example 15.7. In the Figure (24), the connected Extreme SuperHyperCycle 2654
N SHC : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Extreme SuperHyperSet, in 2655
Proposition 15.8. Assume a connected Extreme SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). 2657
Then 2658
straightforward. 2664
Example 15.9. In the Figure (25), the connected Extreme SuperHyperStar 2665
ESHS : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Extreme SuperHyperSet, by 2666
the Algorithm in previous Extreme result, of the Extreme SuperHyperVertices of the 2667
connected Extreme SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E), in the Extreme SuperHyperModel 2668
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
is a longest path taken from a connected Extreme SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E). 2673
straightforward. Then there’s no at least one SuperHyperTotal. Thus the notion of 2677
applied. There are only two SuperHyperParts. Thus every SuperHyperPart could have 2679
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
is a longest SuperHyperTotal taken from a connected Extreme SuperHyperBipartite 2681
ESHB : (V, E). Thus only some SuperHyperVertices and only 2682
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
The latter is straightforward. 2684
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Example 15.11. In the Extreme Figure (26), the connected Extreme 2685
SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), is Extreme highlighted and Extreme featured. 2686
The obtained Extreme SuperHyperSet, by the Extreme Algorithm in previous Extreme 2687
SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), in the Extreme SuperHyperModel (26), is the 2689
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
straightforward. Then there’s no at least one SuperHyperTotal. Thus the notion of 2698
applied. There are only z 0 SuperHyperParts. Thus every SuperHyperPart could have 2700
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
ESHM : (V, E). Thus only some SuperHyperVertices and only 2703
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
Example 15.13. In the Figure (27), the connected Extreme SuperHyperMultipartite 2707
ESHM : (V, E), is highlighted and Extreme featured. The obtained Extreme 2708
Proposition 15.14. Assume a connected Extreme SuperHyperWheel ESHW : (V, E). 2712
Then, 2713
∗
C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperTotal = {Ei , Ej ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.
C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial
∗
= |i(i − 1) | Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E)|Extreme Cardinality
|z 2 .
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal = {CEN T ER, Vj ∈ VESHG:(V,E) }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial =
(|VESHG:(V,E)|Extreme Cardinality |) choose (|VESHG:(V,E)|Extreme Cardinality | − 1)
z2.
straightforward. Then there’s at least one SuperHyperTotal. Thus the notion of quasi 2719
isn’t up and the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperTotal could be applied. The 2720
Example 15.15. In the Extreme Figure (28), the connected Extreme 2723
SuperHyperWheel N SHW : (V, E), is Extreme highlighted and featured. The obtained 2724
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Forms 2730
V 0 or E 0 is called 2734
SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 2757
SuperHyperConnected; 2766
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form 2774
the Extreme SuperHyperConnected; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its 2775
Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form 2784
the Extreme SuperHyperConnected; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its 2785
Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form 2793
SuperHyperConnected; 2802
C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Extreme 2806
Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form 2810
the Extreme SuperHyperConnected; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its 2811
Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form 2820
the Extreme SuperHyperConnected; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its 2821
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
straightforward. 2844
straightforward. 2847
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
straightforward. 2850
straightforward. 2853
straightforward. 2856
straightforward. 2859
straightforward. 2862
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
straightforward. 2865
straightforward. 2868
straightforward. 2871
straightforward. 2874
straightforward. 2877
straightforward. 2880
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
straightforward. 2883
straightforward. 2886
straightforward. 2889
straightforward. 2892
straightforward. 2895
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
straightforward. 2898
straightforward. 2901
The previous Extreme approach apply on the upcoming Extreme results on Extreme 2902
SuperHyperClasses. 2903
Proposition 16.4. Assume a connected Extreme SuperHyperPath ESHP : (V, E). 2904
Then 2905
P :
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
V3EXT ERN AL , E3 ,
...,
E|EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality −1 , V EXT ERN AL |EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality −1 .
be a longest path taken from a connected Extreme SuperHyperPath ESHP : (V, E). 2907
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
straightforward. 2911
Example 16.5. In the Figure (23), the connected Extreme SuperHyperPath 2912
ESHP : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The Extreme SuperHyperSet, in the 2913
Proposition 16.6. Assume a connected Extreme SuperHyperCycle ESHC : (V, E). 2915
Then 2916
P :
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
V3EXT ERN AL , E3 ,
...,
E|EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality −1 , V EXT ERN AL |EESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality −1 .
be a longest path taken from a connected Extreme SuperHyperCycle ESHC : (V, E). 2918
straightforward. 2922
Example 16.7. In the Figure (24), the connected Extreme SuperHyperCycle 2923
N SHC : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Extreme SuperHyperSet, in 2924
Proposition 16.8. Assume a connected Extreme SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). 2926
Then 2927
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
be a longest path taken a connected Extreme SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). There’s 2929
straightforward. 2933
Example 16.9. In the Figure (25), the connected Extreme SuperHyperStar 2934
ESHS : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Extreme SuperHyperSet, by 2935
the Algorithm in previous Extreme result, of the Extreme SuperHyperVertices of the 2936
connected Extreme SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E), in the Extreme SuperHyperModel 2937
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
is a longest path taken from a connected Extreme SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E). 2942
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
straightforward. Then there’s no at least one SuperHyperConnected. Thus the notion of 2946
applied. There are only two SuperHyperParts. Thus every SuperHyperPart could have 2948
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E). Thus only some SuperHyperVertices and only 2951
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
Example 16.11. In the Extreme Figure (26), the connected Extreme 2954
SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), is Extreme highlighted and Extreme featured. 2955
The obtained Extreme SuperHyperSet, by the Extreme Algorithm in previous Extreme 2956
SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), in the Extreme SuperHyperModel (26), is the 2958
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
straightforward. Then there’s no at least one SuperHyperConnected. Thus the notion of 2967
applied. There are only z 0 SuperHyperParts. Thus every SuperHyperPart could have 2969
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
is a longest path taken from a connected Extreme SuperHyperMultipartite 2971
ESHM : (V, E). Thus only some SuperHyperVertices and only 2972
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
is a longest path taken from a connected Extreme SuperHyperMultipartite 2974
Example 16.13. In the Figure (27), the connected Extreme SuperHyperMultipartite 2976
ESHM : (V, E), is highlighted and Extreme featured. The obtained Extreme 2977
Proposition 16.14. Assume a connected Extreme SuperHyperWheel ESHW : (V, E). 2981
Then, 2982
∗
C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperConnected = {Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.
C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial
= |i | Ei ∈ |E ∗ ESHG:(V,E) |Extreme Cardinality |z.
C(N SHG)Extreme V-SuperHyperConnected = {CEN T ER ∈ VESHG:(V,E) }.
C(N SHG)Extreme V-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
Proof. Let 2983
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
straightforward. Then there’s at least one SuperHyperConnected. Thus the notion of 2988
straightforward. 2992
Example 16.15. In the Extreme Figure (28), the connected Extreme 2993
SuperHyperWheel N SHW : (V, E), is Extreme highlighted and featured. The obtained 2994
17 Background 2998
There are some scientific researches covering the topic of this research. In what follows, 2999
there are some discussion and literature reviews about them. 3000
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “neutrosophic co-degree and 3001
neutrosophic degree alongside chromatic numbers in the setting of some classes related 3002
to neutrosophic hypergraphs” in Ref. [1] by Henry Garrett (2022). In this research 3003
entitled “Journal of Current Trends in Computer Science Research (JCTCSR)” with 3007
ISO abbreviation “J Curr Trends Comp Sci Res” in volume 1 and issue 1 with pages 3008
06-14. The research article studies deeply with choosing neutrosophic hypergraphs 3009
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “Super Hyper Dominating 3012
and Super Hyper Resolving on Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs and Their Directions 3013
in Game Theory and Neutrosophic Super Hyper Classes” in Ref. [2] by Henry Garrett 3014
Techniques Comput Math” in volume 1 and issue 3 with pages 242-263. The research 3020
article studies deeply with choosing directly neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph and 3021
SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough toward independent results based on initial 3022
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “Some Super Hyper Degrees 3024
and Co-Super Hyper Degrees on Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs And Super Hyper 3025
Graphs Alongside Applications in Cancer’s Treatments” in Ref. [3] by Henry Garrett 3026
and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on fundamental notions and using vital tools 3028
in Cancer’s Treatments. It’s published in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled 3029
ISO abbreviation “J Math Techniques Comput Math” in volume 2 and issue 1 with 3031
pages 35-47. The research article studies deeply with choosing directly neutrosophic 3032
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
In some articles are titled “0039 — Closing Numbers and Super-Closing Numbers as 3035
in Ref. [7] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Uncertainty On The Act And Effect Of Cancer 3041
Alongside The Foggy Positions Of Cells Toward Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique 3042
Henry Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic Version Of Separates Groups Of Cells In Cancer’s 3044
“The Shift Paradigm To Classify Separately The Cells and Affected Cells Toward The 3046
Totality Under Cancer’s Recognition By New Multiple Definitions On the Sets 3047
Henry Garrett (2022), “Breaking the Continuity and Uniformity of Cancer In The 3050
Worst Case of Full Connections With Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique In Cancer’s 3051
SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [12] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Extremism of the Attacked 3055
Body Under the Cancer’s Circumstances Where Cancer’s Recognition Titled 3056
Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond” in Ref. [16] by Henry Garrett (2022), 3064
Game Theory and Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses” in Ref. [24] by Henry Garrett 3086
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
(2023), “The Focus on The Partitions Obtained By Parallel Moves In The Cancer’s 3089
Extreme Recognition With Different Types of Extreme SuperHyperMatching Set and 3090
(2023), “Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique Decides the Failures on the Cancer’s 3092
“Indeterminacy On The All Possible Connections of Cells In Front of Cancer’s Attacks In 3095
Regions and Sub-Regions in the Terms of Cancer’s Recognition and (Neutrosophic) 3101
the Form of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [133] by Henry Garrett (2023), 3105
Ref. [138] by Henry Garrett (2023), “Neutrosophic 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in the 3112
Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond” in Ref. [139] by Henry Garrett (2022), 3114
in Ref. [141] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Basic Neutrosophic Notions Concerning 3119
in Ref. [152] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Initial Material of Neutrosophic Preliminaries 3121
and [4–153], there are some endeavors to formalize the basic SuperHyperNotions about 3124
books at [154–243]. Two popular scientific research books in Scribd in the terms of high 3126
readers, 4087 and 5084 respectively, on neutrosophic science is on [244, 245]. 3127
Some scientific studies and scientific researches about neutrosophic graphs, are 3128
proposed as book in Ref. [232] by Henry Garrett (2023) which is indexed by Google 3129
Scholar and has more than 4093 readers in Scribd. It’s titled “Beyond Neutrosophic 3130
Graphs” and published by Dr. Henry Garrett. This research book covers different types 3131
Also, some scientific studies and scientific researches about neutrosophic graphs, are 3134
proposed as book in Ref. [233] by Henry Garrett (2023) which is indexed by Google 3135
Scholar and has more than 5090 readers in Scribd. It’s titled “Neutrosophic Duality” 3136
and published by Dr. Henry Garrett. This research book presents different types of 3137
neutrosophic graph theory and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph theory. This research 3139
book has scrutiny on the complement of the intended set and the intended set, 3140
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
simultaneously. It’s smart to consider a set but acting on its complement that what’s 3141
done in this research book which is popular in the terms of high readers in Scribd. 3142
See the seminal scientific researches [1–3]. The formalization of the notions on the 3143
alongside scientific research books at [154–243]. Two popular scientific research books 3146
in Scribd in the terms of high readers, 4093 and 5090 respectively, on neutrosophic 3147
References 3149
Hypergraphs”, J Curr Trends Comp Sci Res 1(1) (2022) 06-14. 3152
2. Henry Garrett, “Super Hyper Dominating and Super Hyper Resolving on 3153
Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs and Their Directions in Game Theory and 3154
Neutrosophic Super Hyper Classes”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 1(3) 3155
3. Henry Garrett, “Some Super Hyper Degrees and Co-Super Hyper Degrees on 3157
Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs And Super Hyper Graphs Alongside 3158
super-hyper-degrees-and-cosuper-hyper-degrees-on-neutrosophic-super-hyper- 3161
graphs-and-super-hyper-graphs-alongside-a.pdf) 3162
Hypergraph by Eulerian Super Hyper Cycles and Hamiltonian Sets as Hyper 3164
Covering Versus Super separations”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 2(3) 3165
research-on-cancers-recognition-and-neutrosophic-super-hypergraph-by- 3167
eulerian-super-hyper-cycles-and-hamiltonian-sets-.pdf) 3168
Research - Zenodo, Nov. 2022. CERN European Organization for Nuclear 3172
https://oa.mg/work/10.5281/zenodo.6319942 3174
Graphs.” CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research - Zenodo, Feb. 3176
https://doi.org/10.13140/rg.2.2.35241.26724. 3178
https://oa.mg/work/10.13140/rg.2.2.35241.26724 3179
10.20944/preprints202301.0308.v1). 3183
8. Henry Garrett, “Uncertainty On The Act And Effect Of Cancer Alongside The 3184
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
10. Henry Garrett, “The Shift Paradigm To Classify Separately The Cells and 3191
Affected Cells Toward The Totality Under Cancer’s Recognition By New 3192
10.20944/preprints202301.0265.v1). 3196
11. Henry Garrett, “Breaking the Continuity and Uniformity of Cancer In The 3197
12. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable as the Survivors on the 3201
10.20944/preprints202301.0240.v1). 3204
13. Henry Garrett, “Extremism of the Attacked Body Under the Cancer’s 3205
10.20944/preprints202301.0224.v1). 3208
10.20944/preprints202301.0088.v1). 3215
10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 3225
10.20944/preprints202301.0088.v1). 3229
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
10.20944/preprints202212.0324.v1). 3244
10.20944/preprints202211.0576.v1). 3248
25. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 3249
26. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 3252
27. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nebulous By Hyper Nebbish Of 3255
28. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3258
29. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Decompensation By Hyper Decompress Of 3261
30. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3264
31. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Tract By Hyper Track Of Trace-Cut In 3267
32. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3270
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
33. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nebulous By Hyper Nebbish Of 3273
34. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3276
35. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Decompensation By Hyper Decompress Of 3279
36. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3282
37. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Eddy By Hyper Edify Of Edge-Cut In 3285
38. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3288
39. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nebulous By Hyper Nebbish Of 3291
40. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3294
41. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Decompensation By Hyper Decompress Of 3297
42. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3300
43. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Vertigo By Hyper Vertu Of Vertex-Cut In 3303
44. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3306
45. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nebulizer By Hyper Nub Of 3309
46. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3312
47. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Stale By Hyper Stalk Of 3315
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
48. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3318
49. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Stale By Hyper Stalk Of Stable-Cut In 3321
50. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3324
51. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nebulizer By Hyper Nub Of 3327
52. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3330
53. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Decompensation By Hyper Decompress Of 3333
54. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3336
55. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Cliff By Hyper Cling Of Clique-Cut In 3339
56. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3342
57. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3345
58. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Lith By Hyper Lite Of List-Coloring In 3348
59. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3351
60. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Solidarity By Hyper Soul Of Space In 3354
61. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3357
62. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Uniform By Hyper Deformation Of 3360
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
63. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3363
64. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super System By Hyper Explosions Of 3366
65. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3369
66. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nodes By Hyper Moves Of 3372
67. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3375
68. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Gap By Hyper Navigations Of Chord In 3378
69. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3381
70. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Coincidence By Hyper Routes Of 3384
71. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3387
72. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Obstacles By Hyper Model Of 3390
73. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3393
74. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Harmony By Hyper k-Function Of 3396
75. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3399
76. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Gradient By Hyper k-Class Of 3402
77. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3405
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
78. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Analogous By Hyper Visions Of 3408
79. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3411
80. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Relations By Hyper Identifications Of 3414
81. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Contradiction By Hyper Detection of 3417
82. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3420
83. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Locations By Hyper Differing Of 3423
84. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3426
85. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Missing By Hyper Searching Of 3429
86. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3432
87. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Outbreak By Hyper Collections Of 3435
88. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3438
89. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Extremism By Hyper Treatments Of 3441
90. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Isolation By Hyper Perfectness Of 3444
91. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3447
92. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3450
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
93. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super connections By Hyper disconnections Of 3453
94. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Mixed-Devastations By Hyper Decisions 3456
97. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Reflections By Hyper Rotations Of Path 3465
98. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas As Hyper Deformations On Super Chains In 3468
100. Henry Garrett, “New Research On Cancer’s Recognition and Neutrosophic 3474
10.13140/RG.2.2.29913.80482). 3477
101. Henry Garrett, “New Research On Cancer’s Recognition and Neutrosophic 3478
10.13140/RG.2.2.33269.24809). 3481
102. Henry Garrett, “New Research On Cancer’s Recognition and Neutrosophic 3482
10.13140/RG.2.2.34946.96960). 3485
10.13140/RG.2.2.14814.31040). 3489
10.13140/RG.2.2.15653.17125). 3493
10.13140/RG.2.2.25719.50089). 3497
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
106. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Disruptions In Cancer’s Extreme 3498
10.13140/RG.2.2.29441.94562). 3501
the Criteria of Eulerian and Hamiltonian Type-Sets As Hyper Modified Cycles 3506
10.20944/preprints202301.0396.v1). 3514
10.20944/preprints202301.0395.v1). 3518
Classes With Hyper Effects In The Background of the Framework is So-Called 3526
10.13140/RG.2.2.12818.73925). 3528
114. Henry Garrett,“Super Actions On The Types of Hyper Levels In The Sensible 3529
10.13140/RG.2.2.26836.88960). 3532
10.20944/preprints202301.0308.v1). 3539
117. Henry Garrett,“Uncertainty On The Act And Effect Of Cancer Alongside The 3540
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
119. Henry Garrett, “The Shift Paradigm To Classify Separately The Cells and 3547
Affected Cells Toward The Totality Under Cancer’s Recognition By New 3548
10.20944/preprints202301.0265.v1). 3552
120. Henry Garrett,“Breaking the Continuity and Uniformity of Cancer In The 3553
121. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable as the Survivors on the 3557
10.20944/preprints202301.0240.v1). 3560
122. Henry Garrett, “Extremism of the Attacked Body Under the Cancer’s 3561
10.20944/preprints202301.0224.v1). 3564
124. Henry Garrett,“The Focus on The Partitions Obtained By Parallel Moves In 3568
125. Henry Garrett,“Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique Decides the Failures on the 3572
127. Henry Garrett,“Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique Decides the Failures on the 3580
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 3597
10.20944/preprints202301.0088.v1). 3601
136. Henry Garrett, “Using the Tool As (Neutrosophic) Failed SuperHyperStable To 3612
10.13140/RG.2.2.36141.77287). 3624
10.13140/RG.2.2.29430.88642). 3627
10.13140/RG.2.2.11369.16487). 3631
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
10.20944/preprints202212.0324.v1). 3657
10.13140/RG.2.2.23123.04641). 3661
10.20944/preprints202211.0576.v1). 3665
10.13140/RG.2.2.23324.56966). 3669
153. Henry Garrett, “Initial Material of Neutrosophic Preliminaries to Study Some 3673
10.13140/RG.2.2.25385.88160). 3676
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
156. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDuality”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3681
10.5281/zenodo.7637762). 3682
157. Henry Garrett, “Trace-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 3683
160. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 3689
163. Henry Garrett, “Vertex-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 3695
166. Henry Garrett, “Stable-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 3701
169. Henry Garrett, “Clique-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 3707
170. Henry Garrett, “Space In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3709
10.5281/zenodo.7713563). 3710
171. Henry Garrett, “Space In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3711
10.5281/zenodo.7709116). 3712
175. Henry Garrett, “Chord In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3719
10.5281/zenodo.7700205). 3720
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
178. Henry Garrett, “K-Domination In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 3725
179. Henry Garrett, “K-Number In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 3727
180. Henry Garrett, “Order In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3729
10.5281/zenodo.7668648). 3730
181. Henry Garrett, “Coloring In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3731
10.5281/zenodo.7662810). 3732
182. Henry Garrett, “Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 3733
183. Henry Garrett, “Cancer In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3735
10.5281/zenodo.7653233). 3736
184. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperWheel”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3737
10.5281/zenodo.7653204). 3738
185. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperMultipartite”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3739
10.5281/zenodo.7653142). 3740
186. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperBipartite”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3741
10.5281/zenodo.7653117). 3742
187. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperStar”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3743
10.5281/zenodo.7653089). 3744
188. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3745
10.5281/zenodo.7651687). 3746
189. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperPath”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3747
10.5281/zenodo.7651619). 3748
190. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDomination”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3749
10.5281/zenodo.7651439). 3750
191. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDominating”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3751
10.5281/zenodo.7650729). 3752
192. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperConnected”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3753
10.5281/zenodo.7647868). 3754
193. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperTotal”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3755
10.5281/zenodo.7647017). 3756
194. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperPerfect”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3757
10.5281/zenodo.7644894). 3758
195. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperJoin”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3759
10.5281/zenodo.7641880). 3760
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
196. Henry Garrett, “Path SuperHyperColoring”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3761
10.5281/zenodo.7632923). 3762
197. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDensity”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3763
10.5281/zenodo.7623459). 3764
199. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperConnectivities”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 3767
200. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperConnectivities”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3769
10.5281/zenodo.7606404). 3770
201. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3771
10.5281/zenodo.7580018). 3772
202. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3773
10.5281/zenodo.7580018). 3774
203. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3775
10.5281/zenodo.7580018). 3776
204. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3777
10.5281/zenodo.7579929). 3778
205. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3779
10.5281/zenodo.7563170). 3780
206. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3781
10.5281/zenodo.7563164). 3782
207. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3783
10.5281/zenodo.7563160). 3784
208. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3785
10.5281/zenodo.7563160). 3786
209. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3787
10.5281/zenodo.7563160). 3788
210. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 3789
211. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperMatching”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3791
10.5281/zenodo.7557009). 3792
212. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperMatching”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 3793
213. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 3795
214. Henry Garrett, “Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 3797
215. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On Failed SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 3799
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
216. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3801
10.5281/zenodo.7574952). 3802
217. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 3803
218. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3805
10.5281/zenodo.7523357). 3806
219. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3807
10.5281/zenodo.7523357). 3808
220. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 3809
221. Henry Garrett, “Extreme Failed SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 3811
222. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On Failed SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 3813
223. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3815
10.5281/zenodo.7499395). 3816
224. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3817
10.5281/zenodo.7499395). 3818
225. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3819
10.5281/zenodo.7499395). 3820
226. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 3821
227. Henry Garrett, “Extreme Failed SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 3823
228. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 3825
229. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3827
10.5281/zenodo.7494862). 3828
230. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 3829
231. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperAlliances”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 3831
232. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperAlliances”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3833
10.5281/zenodo.7493845). 3834
233. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperAlliances”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 3835
234. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperMatching”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3837
10.5281/zenodo.7539484). 3838
235. Henry Garrett, “Failed SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3839
10.5281/zenodo.7523390). 3840
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
236. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3841
10.5281/zenodo.7523357). 3842
237. Henry Garrett, “Failed SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3843
10.5281/zenodo.7504782). 3844
238. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3845
10.5281/zenodo.7499395). 3846
239. Henry Garrett, “Failed SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3847
10.5281/zenodo.7497450). 3848
240. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3849
10.5281/zenodo.7494862). 3850
241. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperAlliances”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3851
10.5281/zenodo.7493845). 3852
242. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3853
10.5281/zenodo.7480110). 3854
243. Henry Garrett, “Neut. SuperHyperEdges”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3855
10.5281/zenodo.7378758). 3856
244. Henry Garrett, “Beyond Neutrosophic Graphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3857
10.5281/zenodo.6320305). 3858
245. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Duality”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3859
10.5281/zenodo.6677173). 3860
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA