Professional Documents
Culture Documents
New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph by Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut As Hyper Hamper On Super Hammy
New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph by Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut As Hyper Hamper On Super Hammy
net/publication/369787658
CITATIONS
1 author:
Henry Garrett
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Henry Garrett on 04 April 2023.
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut As 3
1 ABSTRACT 8
∀Ea ∈ C : C is
a SuperHyperCycle and it has
the maximum number of SuperHyperVertices;
∀Ea ∈ C : C is
a SuperHyperCycle and it has
the maximum number of SuperHyperVertices;
∀Va ∈ C : C is
a SuperHyperCycle and it has
the maximum number of SuperHyperVertices;
∀Va ∈ C : C is
a SuperHyperCycle and it has
the maximum number of SuperHyperVertices;
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
coefficients defined as the Extreme number of the maximum Extreme cardinality of the 51
that they form the Extreme SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut; and the Extreme power is 54
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
coefficients defined as the Extreme number of the maximum Extreme cardinality of the 89
SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 102
corresponded to its Neutrosophic coefficient. In this scientific research, new setting is 104
SuperHyperDefinitions are debut for them but the research goes further and the 107
well-defined and well-reviewed. The literature review is implemented in the whole of 109
this research. For shining the elegancy and the significancy of this research, the 110
fundamental SuperHyperNumbers are featured. The definitions are followed by the 112
examples and the instances thus the clarifications are driven with different tools. The 113
applications are figured out to make sense about the theoretical aspect of this ongoing 114
research. The “Cancer’s Recognition” are the under research to figure out the 115
challenges make sense about ongoing and upcoming research. The special case is up. 116
The cells are viewed in the deemed ways. There are different types of them. Some of 117
them are individuals and some of them are well-modeled by the group of cells. These 118
types are all officially called “SuperHyperVertex” but the relations amid them all 119
“Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” are chosen and elected to research about “Cancer’s 121
Recognition”. Thus these complex and dense SuperHyperModels open up some avenues 122
to research on theoretical segments and “Cancer’s Recognition”. Some avenues are 123
posed to pursue this research. It’s also officially collected in the form of some questions 124
maximum cardinality such that either of the following expressions hold for the 127
|S ∩ N (s)| > |S ∩ (V \ N (s))| + δ; and |S ∩ N (s)| < |S ∩ (V \ N (s))| + δ. The first 129
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
cardinality such that either of the following expressions hold for the Neutrosophic 133
and |S ∩ N (s)|N eutrosophic < |S ∩ (V \ N (s))|N eutrosophic + δ. The first Expression, 136
and the SuperHyperEdges are assigned by the labels from the letters of the alphabets. 143
In this procedure, there’s the usage of the position of labels to assign to the values. 144
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” with the key points, “The Values of The Vertices & 148
maximum Values of Its Vertices”, “The Values of The Edges&The maximum Values of 150
Its Vertices”, “The Values of The HyperEdges&The maximum Values of Its Vertices”, 151
“The Values of The SuperHyperEdges&The maximum Values of Its Endpoints”. To get 152
structural examples and instances, I’m going to introduce the next SuperHyperClass of 153
SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut . There are some instances about the clarifications for 159
the main definition titled a “SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut ”. These two examples get 160
more scrutiny and discernment since there are characterized in the disciplinary ways of 161
are assigned by the labels from the letters of the alphabets. In this procedure, there’s 166
the usage of the position of labels to assign to the values. Assume a Neutrosophic 167
where it’s the strongest [the maximum Neutrosophic value from all the 181
SuperHyperEdges are the same. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. There are 185
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
some SuperHyperClasses as follows. It’s SuperHyperPath if it’s only one SuperVertex as 186
intersection amid two given SuperHyperEdges with two exceptions; it’s 187
given SuperHyperEdges; it’s SuperHyperStar it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection 189
amid all SuperHyperEdges; it’s SuperHyperBipartite it’s only one SuperVertex as 190
intersection amid two given SuperHyperEdges and these SuperVertices, forming two 191
only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two given SuperHyperEdges and these 193
SuperVertices, forming multi separate sets, has no SuperHyperEdge in common; it’s a 194
SuperHyperWheel if it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two given 195
SuperHyperEdges and one SuperVertex has one SuperHyperEdge with any common 196
SuperVertex. The SuperHyperModel proposes the specific designs and the specific 197
common and intended properties between “specific” cells and “specific group” of cells 201
the future research, the foundation will be based on the “Cancer’s Recognition” and the 205
results and the definitions will be introduced in redeemed ways. The recognition of the 206
cancer in the long-term function. The specific region has been assigned by the model 207
[it’s called SuperHyperGraph] and the long cycle of the move from the cancer is 208
identified by this research. Sometimes the move of the cancer hasn’t be easily identified 209
since there are some determinacy, indeterminacy and neutrality about the moves and 210
the effects of the cancer on that region; this event leads us to choose another model [it’s 211
happened and what’s done. There are some specific models, which are well-known and 213
they’ve got the names, and some SuperHyperGeneral SuperHyperModels. The moves 214
and the traces of the cancer on the complex tracks and between complicated groups of 215
SuperHyperStar, all possible SuperHyperPaths have only two SuperHyperEdges but it’s 224
not enough since it’s essential to have at least three SuperHyperEdges to form any style 225
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
In this scientific research, there are some ideas in the featured frameworks of 236
motivations. I try to bring the motivations in the narrative ways. Some cells have been 237
faced with some attacks from the situation which is caused by the cancer’s attacks. In 238
this case, there are some embedded analysis on the ongoing situations which in that, the 239
cells could be labelled as some groups and some groups or individuals have excessive 240
labels which all are raised from the behaviors to overcome the cancer’s attacks. In the 241
embedded situations, the individuals of cells and the groups of cells could be considered 242
as “new groups”. Thus it motivates us to find the proper SuperHyperModels for getting 243
more proper analysis on this messy story. I’ve found the SuperHyperModels which are 244
SuperHyperModel, the cells and the groups of cells are defined as “SuperHyperVertices” 246
and the relations between the individuals of cells and the groups of cells are defined as 247
SuperHyperModel based on the “Cancer’s Recognition”. Sometimes, the situations get 249
worst. The situation is passed from the certainty and precise style. Thus it’s the beyond 250
them. There are three descriptions, namely, the degrees of determinacy, indeterminacy 251
and neutrality, for any object based on vague forms, namely, incomplete data, imprecise 252
data, and uncertain analysis. The latter model could be considered on the previous 253
called “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. The cancer is the disease but the model is 255
going to figure out what’s going on this phenomenon. The special case of this disease is 256
considered and as the consequences of the model, some parameters are used. The cells 257
are under attack of this disease but the moves of the cancer in the special region are the 258
matter of mind. The recognition of the cancer could help to find some treatments for 259
this disease. The SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph are the 260
SuperHyperModels on the “Cancer’s Recognition” and both bases are the background 261
of this research. Sometimes the cancer has been happened on the region, full of cells, 262
groups of cells and embedded styles. In this segment, the SuperHyperModel proposes 263
some SuperHyperNotions based on the connectivities of the moves of the cancer in the 264
forms of alliances’ styles with the formation of the design and the architecture are 265
buzzwords. The prefix “SuperHyper” refers to the theme of the embedded styles to 267
figure out the background for the SuperHyperNotions. The recognition of the cancer in 268
the long-term function. The specific region has been assigned by the model [it’s called 269
SuperHyperGraph] and the long cycle of the move from the cancer is identified by this 270
research. Sometimes the move of the cancer hasn’t be easily identified since there are 271
some determinacy, indeterminacy and neutrality about the moves and the effects of the 272
cancer on that region; this event leads us to choose another model [it’s said to be 273
what’s done. There are some specific models, which are well-known and they’ve got the 275
names, and some general models. The moves and the traces of the cancer on the 276
complex tracks and between complicated groups of cells could be fantasized by a 277
general results are introduced. Beyond that in SuperHyperStar, all possible 282
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath s have only two SuperHyperEdges but it’s not enough 283
since it’s essential to have at least three SuperHyperEdges to form any style of a 284
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Question 2.1. How to define the SuperHyperNotions and to do research on them to 288
groups of cells based on the fixed cell or the fixed group of cells, extensively, the “amount 290
of SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut” based on the fixed groups of cells or the fixed groups of 291
Question 2.2. What are the best descriptions for the “Cancer’s Recognition” in terms 293
of these messy and dense SuperHyperModels where embedded notions are illustrated? 294
It’s motivation to find notions to use in this dense model is titled 295
taken more motivations to define SuperHyperClasses and to find some connections amid 299
instances and examples to make clarifications about the framework of this research. The 301
general results and some results about some connections are some avenues to make key 302
point of this research, “Cancer’s Recognition”, more understandable and more clear. 303
The framework of this research is as follows. In the beginning, I introduce basic 304
deeply-introduced and in-depth-discussed. The elementary concepts are clarified and 307
illustrated completely and sometimes review literature are applied to make sense about 308
what’s going to figure out about the upcoming sections. The main definitions and their 309
In the sense of tackling on getting results and in Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut to make sense 313
about continuing the research, the ideas of SuperHyperUniform and Neutrosophic 314
SuperHyperClasses are figured out to debut what’s done in this section, titled “Results 316
back to origin of the notions, there are some smart steps toward the common notions to 318
extend the new notions in new frameworks, SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic 319
SuperHyperRelations and as concluding and closing section of theoretical research are 322
contained in the section “General Results”. Some general SuperHyperRelations are 323
“Results on Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”. There are curious questions about what’s 327
done about the SuperHyperNotions to make sense about excellency of this research and 328
going to figure out the word “best” as the description and adjective for this research as 329
debut in the section “Applications in Cancer’s Recognition” with two cases and 331
as SuperHyperModel”. In the section, “Open Problems”, there are some scrutiny and 334
discernment on what’s done and what’s happened in this research in the terms of 335
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
“questions” and “problems” to make sense to figure out this research in featured style. 336
The advantages and the limitations of this research alongside about what’s done in this 337
research to make sense and to get sense about what’s figured out are included in the 338
In this section, the basic material in this scientific research, is referred to [Single Valued 342
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)] (Ref. [162],Definition 5.4,p.7). Also, the new 350
In this subsection, the basic material which is used in this scientific research, is 352
presented. Also, the new ideas and their clarifications are elicited. 353
The functions TA (x), IA (x) and FA (x) are real standard or nonstandard subsets of 355
+
]− 0, 1 [. 356
Definition 3.2 (Single Valued Neutrosophic Set). (Ref. [162],Definition 2.2,p.2). 357
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
2.5,p.2). 359
(i) V = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vn } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of V 0 ; 362
(ii) V = {(Vi , TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi )) : TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi ) ≥ 0}, (i = 363
1, 2, . . . , n); 364
(iii) E = {E1 , E2 , . . . , En0 } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of 365
V; 366
(iv) E = {(Ei0 , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )) : TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 ) ≥ 0}, (i0 = 367
1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 368
P
(vii) i supp(Vi ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 371
0 0
P
(viii) i0 supp(Ei ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n );
0 372
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) Vj are single valued Neutrosophic sets. TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), 375
TV0 (Ei0 ), TV0 (Ei0 ), and TV0 (Ei0 ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 379
the ii0 th element of the incidence matrix of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) 382
are of the form (Vi , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )), the sets V and E are crisp sets. 383
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
(iii) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called edge; 392
(iv) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 393
HyperEdge; 394
(v) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called 395
SuperEdge; 396
(vi) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 397
SuperHyperEdge. 398
If we choose different types of binary operations, then we could get hugely diverse 399
A binary operation ⊗ : [0, 1] × [0, 1] → [0, 1] is a t-norm if it satisfies the following 402
(i) 1 ⊗ x = x; 404
(ii) x ⊗ y = y ⊗ x; 405
(iii) x ⊗ (y ⊗ z) = (x ⊗ y) ⊗ z; 406
(i) V = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vn } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of V 0 ; 411
(ii) V = {(Vi , TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi )) : TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi ) ≥ 0}, (i = 412
1, 2, . . . , n); 413
(iii) E = {E1 , E2 , . . . , En0 } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of 414
V; 415
(iv) E = {(Ei0 , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )) : TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 ) ≥ 0}, (i0 = 416
1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 417
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
P
(vii) i supp(Vi ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 420
supp(Ei0 ) = V, (i0 = 1, 2, . . . , n0 ).
P
(viii) i0 421
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) Vj are single valued Neutrosophic sets. TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), 423
TV0 (Ei0 ), TV0 (Ei0 ), and TV0 (Ei0 ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 427
the ii0 th element of the incidence matrix of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) 430
are of the form (Vi , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )), the sets V and E are crisp sets. 431
(iii) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called edge; 440
(iv) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 441
HyperEdge; 442
(v) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called 443
SuperEdge; 444
(vi) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 445
SuperHyperEdge. 446
This SuperHyperModel is too messy and too dense. Thus there’s a need to have 447
some restrictions and conditions on SuperHyperGraph. The special case of this 448
(ii). it’s SuperHyperCycle if it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two 458
(iii). it’s SuperHyperStar it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid all 460
SuperHyperEdges; 461
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
(iv). it’s SuperHyperBipartite it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two 462
given SuperHyperEdges and these SuperVertices, forming two separate sets, has 463
(v). it’s SuperHyperMultiPartite it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid 465
two given SuperHyperEdges and these SuperVertices, forming multi separate sets, 466
(vi). it’s SuperHyperWheel if it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two 468
given SuperHyperEdges and one SuperVertex has one SuperHyperEdge with any 469
V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs
(iii) there’s a SuperVertex Vi0 ∈ Vi such that Vi0 , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 476
(iv) there’s a vertex vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that Vi , vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 477
0 0
(v) there’s a SuperVertex Vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that Vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 478
(vi) there are a vertex vi ∈ Vi and a vertex vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that vi , vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 479
0 0
(vii) there are a vertex vi ∈ Vi and a SuperVertex Vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 480
(viii) there are a SuperVertex Vi0 ∈ Vi and a vertex vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that Vi0 , vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 481
V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs ,
(i) If for all Vi , Ej 0 , |Vi | = 1, |Ej 0 | = 2, then NSHP is called path; 486
(ii) if for all Ej 0 , |Ej 0 | = 2, and there’s Vi , |Vi | ≥ 1, then NSHP is called SuperPath; 487
(iii) if for all Vi , Ej 0 , |Vi | = 1, |Ej 0 | ≥ 2, then NSHP is called HyperPath; 488
(iv) if there are Vi , Ej 0 , |Vi | ≥ 1, |Ej 0 | ≥ 2, then NSHP is called Neutrosophic 489
SuperHyperPath . 490
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs ,
have 493
(iv) Neutrosophic strength (min{T (Vi )}, min{I(Vi )}, min{F (Vi )})si=1 . 497
where 1 ≤ i, j ≤ s. 514
SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut). 516
∀Ea ∈ C : C is
a SuperHyperCycle and it has
the maximum number of SuperHyperVertices;
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
∀Ea ∈ C : C is
a SuperHyperCycle and it has
the maximum number of SuperHyperVertices;
∀Va ∈ C : C is
a SuperHyperCycle and it has
the maximum number of SuperHyperVertices;
∀Va ∈ C : C is
a SuperHyperCycle and it has
the maximum number of SuperHyperVertices;
and |Vi |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY = |Vj |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY ; 531
rv-SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut. 536
SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 548
SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut; 559
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
contains the Extreme coefficients defined as the Extreme number of the maximum 566
SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 569
contains the Neutrosophic coefficients defined as the Neutrosophic number of the 579
SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 593
SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut; 604
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
contains the Extreme coefficients defined as the Extreme number of the maximum 611
SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 614
contains the Neutrosophic coefficients defined as the Neutrosophic number of the 624
SuperHyperNeighbors of s ∈ S : 640
δ−SuperHyperDefensive. 643
SuperHyperVertices and the SuperHyperEdges are assigned by the labels from the 646
letters of the alphabets. In this procedure, there’s the usage of the position of labels to 647
S = (V, E). It’s redefined Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph if the Table (1) holds. 650
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
understandable. 653
S = (V, E). There are some Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses if the Table (2) 655
are assigned by the labels from the letters of the alphabets. In this procedure, there’s 668
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Forms 674
probability of A. 680
X
E(A) = E(a). (4.1)
a∈A
Y
E(∩i∈I Ai ) = P (Ai ).
i∈I
criteria 688
X
Ex(E) = E(α)P (α).
α∈V
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
p4 cr(G) ≥ p2 m − 3pn.
pm − 3n n 1 3 2
cr(G) ≥ = 3 = 64 m n .
p3 (4n/m)
713
SuperHyperSet of n points in the plane, and let l be the Neutrosophic number of 716
SuperHyperLines
√ in the plane passing through at least k + 1 of these points, where 717
points on the SuperHyperLines which pass through at least k + 1 points of P. This 721
crossing at most l choose two. Thus either kl < 4n, in which case l < 4n/k ≤ 32n2 /k 3 , 723
3
or l2 /2 > l choose 2 ≥ cr(G) ≥ (kl) /64n2 by the Neutrosophic Crossing Lemma, and 724
SuperHyperSet of n points in the plane, and let k be the number of pairs of points of P 728
on the SuperHyperCircles that pass through at least three SuperHyperPoints of P. Then 737
n−1
X
e(H) = ini = 2k − n1 − 2n2 ≥ 2k − 2n.
i=3
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
SuperHyperCircles, and any two SuperHyperCircles cross at most twice. Thus either 742
3
e(G) < 4n, in which case k < 5n < 5n4/3 , or n2 > n(n − 1) ≥ cr(G) ≥ (k − n) /64n2 743
4/3 4/3
by the Neutrosophic Crossing Lemma, and k < 4n + n < 5n . 744
E(X)
P (X ≥ t) ≤ .
t
Proof.
X X
E(X) = {X(a)P (a) : a ∈ V } ≥ {X(a)P (a) : a ∈ V, X(a) ≥ t}
X X
{tP (a) : a ∈ V, X(a) ≥ t} = t {P (a) : a ∈ V, X(a) ≥ t}
tP (X ≥ t).
Dividing the first and last members by t yields the asserted inequality. 748
Proof. 753
SuperHyperGraph in Gn,p almost surely has stability number at most d2p−1 log ne. 756
SuperHyperSet of G is (1 − p)(k+1)choose2 , this being the probability that none of the 761
Let AS denote the event that S is a stable SuperHyperSet of G, and let XS denote 764
the indicator Neutrosophic Variable for this Neutrosophic Event. By equation, we have 765
X
X= {XS : S ⊆ V, |S| = k + 1}
X
E(X) = {E(XS ) : S ⊆ V, |S| = k + 1} = (n choose k+1)(1 − p)(k+1)choose2 .
nk+1
(n choose k+1) ≤ and1 − p ≤ e−p .
(k + 1)!
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Suppose now that k = d2p−1 log ne. Then k ≥ 2p−1 log n, so ne−pk/2 ≤ 1. Because k 770
grows at least as fast as the logarithm of n, implies that E(X) → 0 as n → ∞. Because 771
2
V x(E) = Ex((X − Ex(X)) ).
V (X)
E(|X − Ex(X)| ≥ t) ≤ .
t2
Proof. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). 783
2
2 Ex((X − Ex(X)) ) V (X)
E(|X − Ex(X)| ≥ t) = E((X − Ex(X)) ≥ t2 ) ≤ = .
t2 t2
786
E(Xn = 0) → 0 as n → ∞
E(Xn = 0) ≤ E(|Xn − Ex(Xn )| ≥ |Ex(Xn )|) because |Xn − Ex(Xn )| = |Ex(Xn )| 794
when Xn = 0. 795
S = (V, E). Consider S = (V, E) is a probability Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut. Let G ∈ Gn,1/2 . For 797
0 ≤ k ≤ n, set f (k) := (n choose k)2−(k choose 2) and let k ∗ be the least value of k for 798
which f (k) is less than one. Then almost surely α(G) takes one of the three values 799
k ∗ − 2, k ∗ − 1, k ∗ . 800
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
S = (V, E). Consider S = (V, E) is a probability Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut. Let G ∈ Gn,1/2 and 805
(i). f (k ∗ ) << 1, in which case almost surely α(G) is equal to either k ∗ − 2 or k ∗ − 1, 807
or 808
(ii). f (k ∗ − 1) >> 1, in which case almost surely α(G) is equal to either k ∗ − 1 or k ∗ . 809
straightforward. 812
SuperHyperGraphs (one which is preserved when SuperHyperEdges are added). Then a 816
(i). if p << f (n), then G ∈ Gn,p almost surely does not have P, 818
SuperHyperGraph. Then there is a threshold function for the property of containing a 823
SuperHyperEdges. Then n−k/l is a threshold function for the property of containing F 828
straightforward. 832
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut. 844
845
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
855
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
863
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
867
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
875
879
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
883
887
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
891
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
895
899
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
903
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
915
919
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
931
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
935
ESHG : (V, E). The all interior Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices belong to any 937
ESHG : (V, E). There’s only one Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) has 944
only the maximum possibilities of the distinct interior Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 945
SuperHypeNeighbor to some of them but not all of them. In other words, there’s only an 947
all Neutrosophic SuperHypeNeighbor to some of them but not all of them. 950
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
V \ (V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . . , zE }).
the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges. In other words, the maximum number of the 954
some cases but the maximum number of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge with the 957
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Let V \ V \ {z} in mind. There’s no necessity on the SuperHyperEdge since we need at 967
principles of the main definition since there’s no condition to be satisfied but the 969
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet has the necessary condition for the intended definition to 972
be applied. Thus the V \ V \ {z} is withdrawn not by the conditions of the main 973
definition but by the necessity of the pre-condition on the usage of the main definition. 974
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
this Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet doesn’t matter but regarding the connectedness of the
used Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph arising from its Neutrosophic properties taken
from the fact that it’s simple. If there’s no more than one Neutrosophic
SuperHyperVertex in the targeted Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, then there’s no
Neutrosophic connection. Furthermore, the Neutrosophic existence of one Neutrosophic
SuperHyperVertex has no Neutrosophic effect to talk about the Neutrosophic
R-Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut. Since at least two Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices involve to
make a title in the Neutrosophic background of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph.
The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph is obvious if it has no Neutrosophic
SuperHyperEdge but at least two Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices make the
Neutrosophic version of Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. Thus in the Neutrosophic
setting of non-obvious Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, there are at least one
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. It’s necessary to mention that the word “Simple” is
used as Neutrosophic adjective for the initial Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, induces
there’s no Neutrosophic appearance of the loop Neutrosophic version of the
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge and this Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph is said to be
loopless. The Neutrosophic adjective “loop” on the basic Neutrosophic framework
engages one Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex but it never happens in this Neutrosophic
setting. With these Neutrosophic bases, on a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, there’s
at least one Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge thus there’s at least a Neutrosophic
R-Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut has the Neutrosophic cardinality of a Neutrosophic
SuperHyperEdge. Thus, a Neutrosophic R-Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut has the Neutrosophic
cardinality at least a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. Assume a Neutrosophic
SuperHyperSet V \ V \ {z}. This Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet isn’t a Neutrosophic
R-Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut since either the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph is an obvious
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel thus it never happens since there’s no Neutrosophic
usage of this Neutrosophic framework and even more there’s no Neutrosophic
connection inside or the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph isn’t obvious and as its
consequences, there’s a Neutrosophic contradiction with the term “Neutrosophic
R-Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut” since the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality never happens for
this Neutrosophic style of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet and beyond that there’s no
Neutrosophic connection inside as mentioned in first Neutrosophic case in the forms of
drawback for this selected Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet. Let
Comes up. This Neutrosophic case implies having the Neutrosophic style of
on-quasi-triangle Neutrosophic style on the every Neutrosophic elements of this
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet. Precisely, the Neutrosophic R-Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut is the
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that some
Neutrosophic amount of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices are on-quasi-triangle
Neutrosophic style. The Neutrosophic cardinality of the v SuperHypeSet
But the lower Neutrosophic bound is up. Thus the minimum Neutrosophic cardinality
of the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality ends up the Neutrosophic discussion. The
first Neutrosophic term refers to the Neutrosophic setting of the Neutrosophic
SuperHyperGraph but this key point is enough since there’s a Neutrosophic
SuperHyperClass of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph has no on-quasi-triangle
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
used Neutrosophic background in the Neutrosophic terms of worst Neutrosophic case 976
and the common theme of the lower Neutrosophic bound occurred in the specific 977
V \ (V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . . , zE }).
Zi ∼ Zj , i 6= j, i, j = 1, 2, . . . , z.
where the ∼ isn’t an equivalence relation but only the symmetric relation on the
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. The formal
definition is as follows.
Zi ∼ Zj , i 6= j, i, j = 1, 2, . . . , z
if and only if Zi and Zj are the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices and there’s only and
only one Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) between the Neutrosophic
SuperHyperVertices Zi and Zj . The other definition for the Neutrosophic
SuperHyperEdge E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) in the terms of Neutrosophic R-Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut
is
{aE , bE , cE , . . . , zE } .
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
and
Or
{aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .
Neutrosophic R-Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut =
E
{Z1 , Z2 , . . . , Zz | ∀i 6= j, i, j = 1, 2, . . . , z, ∃Ex , Zi ∼x Zj , }.
981
Neutrosophic R-Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut =
V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .
V \ (V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . . , zE }).
of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges. In other words, the maximum number of the 985
some cases but the maximum number of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge with the 988
R-Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut. 991
addresses some issues about the Neutrosophic optimal SuperHyperObject. It specially 994
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
the Neutrosophic completion of the Neutrosophic incidence is up in that. Thus it’s, 1004
SuperHyperCardinality. Thus the embedded setting is elected such that those 1008
Neutrosophic SuperHyperOptimal. The less than two distinct types of Neutrosophic 1010
SuperHyperVertices are included in the minimum Neutrosophic style of the embedded 1011
SuperHyperVertices. The common connections, more precise and more formal, the 1015
perfect unique connections inside the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet for any distinct 1016
of exterior Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices since they’ve more connections inside more 1022
than outside. Thus the title “exterior” is more relevant than the title “interior”. One 1023
has been ignored in the exploring to lead on the optimal case implying the Neutrosophic 1026
SuperHyperEdge and with other terms, the Neutrosophic R-Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut with 1029
connected non-obvious Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). There’s only 1032
possibilities of the distinct interior Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices inside of any given 1034
to some of them but not all of them. In other words, there’s only an unique 1036
The main definition of the Neutrosophic R-Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut has two titles. a 1040
Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperCardinality are two titles in the terms of quasi-R-styles. For 1042
numbers less than its Neutrosophic corresponded maximum number. The essence of the 1048
Neutrosophic Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut ends up but this essence starts up in the terms of the 1049
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
collecting all the Neutrosophic quasi-R-Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cuts acted on the all possible 1051
GNeutrosophic Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut =
{S ∈ ∪zNeutrosophic Number [zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class =
∪zNeutrosophic Number {SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet |
SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet = GNeutrosophic Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut ,
|SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= zNeutrosophic Number |
|SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= max zNeutrosophic Number }.
[zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class
In more concise and more convenient ways, the modified definition for the Neutrosophic 1062
GNeutrosophic Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut =
{S ∈ ∪zNeutrosophic Number [zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class |
|SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= max zNeutrosophic Number }.
[zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class
To translate the statement to this mathematical literature, the formulae will be revised. 1064
GNeutrosophic Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut =
{S ∈ ∪zNeutrosophic Number [zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class |
|SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= max zNeutrosophic Number
[zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class
= max |E| | E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
GNeutrosophic Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut =
{S ∈ ∪zNeutrosophic Number [zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class |
|SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= max |E| | E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.
To get more visions in the closer look-up, there’s an overall overlook. 1066
GNeutrosophic Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut =
{S ∈ ∪zNeutrosophic Number [zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class =
∪zNeutrosophic Number {SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet |
SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet = GNeutrosophic Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut ,
|SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= zNeutrosophic Number |
|SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= max |E| | E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.
1068
GNeutrosophic Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut =
{S ∈ ∪zNeutrosophic Number [zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class |
|SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= max zNeutrosophic Number
[zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class
= max |E| | E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.
1069
GNeutrosophic Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut =
{S ∈ ∪zNeutrosophic Number [zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class |
|SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= max |E| | E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.
Now, the extension of these types of approaches is up. Since the new term, 1070
another name for “Neutrosophic Quasi-Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut” but, precisely, it’s the 1074
preliminarily background since there are some ambiguities about the Neutrosophic 1080
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
SuperHyperCardinality arise from it. To get orderly keywords, the terms, 1081
1088
GNeutrosophic Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut =
{NNeutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood
∈ ∪zNeutrosophic Number [zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class =
∪zNeutrosophic Number {NNeutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |
|NNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= zNeutrosophic Number |
|NNeutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= max zNeutrosophic Number }.
[zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class
1089
GNeutrosophic Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut =
{NNeutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood
∈ ∪zNeutrosophic Number [zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class |
|NNeutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= max zNeutrosophic Number }.
[zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class
1090
GNeutrosophic Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut =
{NNeutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood
∈ ∪zNeutrosophic Number [zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class |
|NNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= max zNeutrosophic Number }.
[zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
1092
GNeutrosophic Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut =
{NNeutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood
∈ ∪zNeutrosophic Number [zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class =
∪zNeutrosophic Number {NNeutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |
|NNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= zNeutrosophic Number |
|NNeutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= max |E| | E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.
1093
GNeutrosophic Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut =
{NNeutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood
∈ ∪zNeutrosophic Number [zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class |
|NNeutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= max zNeutrosophic Number
[zNeutrosophic
Number ]Neutrosophic Class
= max |E| | E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.
1094
GNeutrosophic Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut =
{NNeutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood
∈ ∪zNeutrosophic Number [zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class |
|NNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= max |E| | E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.
Thus, in a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). The all interior 1095
To make sense with the precise words in the terms of “R-’, the follow-up illustrations 1101
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
doesn’t have less than two SuperHyperVertices inside the intended Neutrosophic
SuperHyperSet since they’ve come from at least so far an SuperHyperEdge. Thus the
non-obvious simple Neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the Neutrosophic
R-Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut is up. To sum them up, the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices,
for some Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices instead of all given by that Neutrosophic 1108
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
does includes only less than two SuperHyperVertices in a connected Neutrosophic 1111
SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E) but it’s impossible in the case, they’ve corresponded 1112
to an SuperHyperEdge. It’s interesting to mention that the only non-obvious simple 1113
To sum them up, in a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). 1119
Neutrosophic R-Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut with the least cardinality, the lower sharp 1131
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
procedure such that such that there’s a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge to have some 1144
There’s only one Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex outside the intended Neutrosophic 1150
Thus the obvious Neutrosophic R-Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut, VESHE is up. The obvious 1152
SuperHyperVertices does forms any kind of Neutrosophic pairs are titled 1155
ESHG : (V, E). Since the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the Neutrosophic 1157
SuperHyperVertices and all exterior Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices from the unique 1164
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge where there’s any of them has all possible Neutrosophic 1165
with no exception minus all Neutrosophic SuperHypeNeighbors to some of them not all 1167
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
SuperHyperEdges[SuperHyperVertices], 1177
There are not only two Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices inside the intended 1184
is up. The obvious simple Neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet called the Neutrosophic 1186
SuperHyperEdges[SuperHyperVertices], 1189
Doesn’t have less than three SuperHyperVertices inside the intended Neutrosophic 1190
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
SuperHyperEdges[SuperHyperVertices], 1196
There aren’t only less than three Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices inside the intended 1207
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Does includes only less than three SuperHyperVertices in a connected Neutrosophic 1213
SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). It’s interesting to mention that the only non-obvious 1214
The previous Neutrosophic approach apply on the upcoming Neutrosophic results on 1223
Proposition 5.1. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath ESHP : (V, E). 1225
Then 1226
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
V |EN SHG |
, E |EN SHG |
3 3
1228
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , V2EXT ERN AL ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
E |EN SHG | , V |EN SHG |
3 3
Example 5.2. In the Figure (23), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath 1234
ESHP : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, in the 1235
Proposition 5.3. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle ESHC : (V, E). 1237
Then 1238
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
V |EN SHG |
, E |EN SHG |
3 3
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
1241
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , V2EXT ERN AL ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
E |EN SHG | , V |EN SHG |
3 3
Example 5.4. In the Figure (24), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle 1247
N SHC : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Neutrosophic 1248
SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut. 1250
Proposition 5.5. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). 1251
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Then 1252
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
CEN T ER, E2
1254
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , CEN T ER
be a longest path taken a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). 1255
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Example 5.6. In the Figure (25), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar 1260
ESHS : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, 1261
SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut. 1265
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
V|P i |=minP ∈E |Pj | , E|Pi |=minPj ∈EN SHG |Pj | .
j N SHG
1269
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , V2EXT ERN AL ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
E|Pi |=minPj ∈EN SHG |Pj | , V|Pi |=minP ∈E |Pj |
j N SHG
are only two SuperHyperParts. Thus every SuperHyperPart could have one 1277
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E). Thus only some SuperHyperVertices and only 1280
solution 1282
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
Example 5.8. In the Neutrosophic Figure (26), the connected Neutrosophic 1284
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
V|Pi |=minP ∈E |Pj | , E|Pi |=minPj ∈EN SHG |Pj | .
j N SHG
1293
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , V2EXT ERN AL ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
E|Pi |=minPj ∈EN SHG |Pj | , V|P i |=minP ∈E |Pj |
j N SHG
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
are only z 0 SuperHyperParts. Thus every SuperHyperPart could have one 1301
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
ESHM : (V, E). Thus only some SuperHyperVertices and only 1304
solution 1306
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1∗ ,
CEN T ER, E2∗
1318
P :
E1∗ , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2∗ , CEN T ER
Thus the notion of quasi isn’t up and the SuperHyperNotions based on 1324
Example 5.12. In the Neutrosophic Figure (28), the connected Neutrosophic 1328
SuperHyperWheel N SHW : (V, E), is Neutrosophic highlighted and featured. The 1329
ESHW : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (28), is the Neutrosophic 1332
SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut. 1333
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
plus one Neutrosophic SuperHypeNeighbor to one. Where σi is the unary operation on 1341
Corollary 6.3. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph on the same identical letter 1344
Corollary 6.4. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph on the same identical letter 1347
SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut. 1350
Corollary 6.5. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph on the same identical letter 1351
SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut. 1354
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
is 1386
∅ is 1394
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
a maximal 1411
Where the exterior SuperHyperVertices and the interior SuperHyperVertices coincide. 1418
Where the exterior SuperHyperVertices and the interior SuperHyperVertices coincide. 1427
number of 1430
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
is one and it’s only V. Where the exterior SuperHyperVertices and the interior 1437
is one and it’s only V. Where the exterior SuperHyperVertices and the interior 1447
SuperHyperSet contains [the SuperHyperCenter and] the half of multiplying r with the 1452
number of all the SuperHyperEdges plus one of all the SuperHyperVertices is a 1453
O(ESHG)
(iv) : 2 + 1-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut; 1457
O(ESHG)
(v) : strong 2 + 1-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut; 1458
O(ESHG)
(vi) : connected 2 + 1-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut. 1459
SuperHyperSet contains the half of multiplying r with the number of all the 1463
SuperHyperEdges plus one of all the SuperHyperVertices in the biggest SuperHyperPart 1464
is a 1465
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
number of 1475
O(ESHG)
(iv) : 2 + 1-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut; 1479
O(ESHG)
(v) : strong 2 + 1-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut; 1480
O(ESHG)
(vi) : connected 2 + 1-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut. 1481
is one and it’s only S, a SuperHyperSet contains [the SuperHyperCenter and] the half of 1482
multiplying r with the number of all the SuperHyperEdges plus one of all the 1483
Proposition 6.25. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. Then the 1494
number is at most O(ESHG) and the Neutrosophic number is at most On (ESHG). 1495
min Σv∈{v1 ,v2 ,··· ,vt } O(ESHG:(V,E)) ⊆V σ(v), in the setting of dual 1498
t>
2
(iv) : ( O(ESHG:(V,E))
2 + 1)-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut; 1502
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
O(ESHG : (V, E)) and the Neutrosophic number is On (ESHG : (V, E)), in the setting 1518
of a dual 1519
number is O(ESHG:(V,E))
2 + 1 and the Neutrosophic number is 1528
min Σv∈{v1 ,v2 ,··· ,vt } O(ESHG:(V,E)) ⊆V σ(v), in the setting of a dual 1529
t>
2
(iv) : ( O(ESHG:(V,E))
2 + 1)-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut; 1533
Proposition 6.31. Let N SHF : (V, E) be a SuperHyperFamily of the ESHGs : (V, E) 1536
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs which are from one-type SuperHyperClass which the 1537
result is obtained for the individuals. Then the results also hold for the 1538
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
(ii) vx ∈ E. 1545
Then 1551
(i) Γ ≤ O; 1552
(ii) Γs ≤ On . 1553
(i) Γ ≤ O − 1; 1556
SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut; 1560
(iii) Γs = min{Σs∈S={v2 ,v4 ,··· ,vn−1 } Σ3i=1 σi (s), Σs∈S={v1 ,v3 ,··· ,vn−1 } Σ3i=1 σi (s)}; 1562
(iv) the SuperHyperSets S1 = {v2 , v4 , · · · , vn−1 } and S2 = {v1 , v3 , · · · , vn−1 } are only 1563
SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut; 1567
(iii) Γs = min{Σs∈S={v2 ,v4 ,··· ,vn } Σ3i=1 σi (s), Σs∈S={v1 ,v3 ,··· .vn−1 } Σ3i=1 σi (s)}; 1570
(iv) the SuperHyperSets S1 = {v2 , v4 , · · · .vn } and S2 = {v1 , v3 , · · · .vn−1 } are only 1571
SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut; 1575
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
(iii) Γs = min{Σs∈S={v2 ,v4 ,··· ,vn } σ(s), Σs∈S={v1 ,v3 ,··· ,vn−1 } σ(s)}; 1578
(iv) the SuperHyperSets S1 = {v2 , v4 , · · · , vn } and S2 = {v1 , v3 , · · · , vn−1 } are only 1579
SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut; 1583
(iii) Γs = min{Σs∈S={v2 ,v4 ,··· .vn−1 } Σ3i=1 σi (s), Σs∈S={v1 ,v3 ,··· .vn−1 } Σ3i=1 σi (s)}; 1585
(iv) the SuperHyperSets S1 = {v2 , v4 , · · · .vn−1 } and S2 = {v1 , v3 , · · · .vn−1 } are only 1586
(ii) Γ = 1; 1590
SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut. 1593
6+3(i−1)≤n
(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {v1 , v3 } ∪ {v6 , v9 · · · , vi+6 , · · · , vn }i=1 is a dual 1595
6+3(i−1)≤n
(ii) Γ = |{v1 , v3 } ∪ {v6 , v9 · · · , vi+6 , · · · , vn }i=1 |; 1597
(iii) Γs = Σ{v1 ,v3 }∪{v6 ,v9 ··· ,vi+6 ,··· ,vn }6+3(i−1)≤n Σ3i=1 σi (s); 1598
i=1
6+3(i−1)≤n
(iv) the SuperHyperSet {v1 , v3 } ∪ {v6 , v9 · · · , vi+6 , · · · , vn }i=1 is only a dual 1599
bn
2 c+1
(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {vi }i=1 is a dual SuperHyperDefensive 1602
SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut; 1603
(ii) Γ = b n2 c + 1; 1604
b n c+1
(iv) the SuperHyperSet S = {vi }i=1 2
is only a dual SuperHyperDefensive 1606
SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut. 1607
bn
2c
(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {vi }i=1 is a dual SuperHyperDefensive 1609
SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut; 1610
(ii) Γ = b n2 c; 1611
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
bnc
(iv) the SuperHyperSet S = {vi }i=1 2
is only a dual maximal SuperHyperDefensive 1613
SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut. 1614
(iii) Γs = Σm 3
i=1 Σj=1 σj (ci ) for N SHF : (V, E); 1620
b n c+1
(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {vi }i=1 2
is a dual maximal SuperHyperDefensive 1626
b n c+1
(iv) the SuperHyperSets S = {vi }i=1 2
are only a dual maximal 1630
bn
2c
(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {vi }i=1 is a dual SuperHyperDefensive 1635
bnc
(iv) the SuperHyperSets S = {vi }i=1 2
are only dual maximal 1639
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut; 1665
SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut; 1672
SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut; 1676
SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut; 1683
SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut; 1687
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut; 1705
SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut; 1707
SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut; 1709
SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut; 1716
SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut; 1720
The cancer is the Neutrosophic disease but the Neutrosophic model is going to figure out 1725
what’s going on this Neutrosophic phenomenon. The special Neutrosophic case of this 1726
Neutrosophic disease is considered and as the consequences of the model, some 1727
parameters are used. The cells are under attack of this disease but the moves of the 1728
cancer in the special region are the matter of mind. The Neutrosophic recognition of the 1729
cancer could help to find some Neutrosophic treatments for this Neutrosophic disease. 1730
In the following, some Neutrosophic steps are Neutrosophic devised on this disease. 1731
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Step 2. (Neutrosophic Issue) The specific region has been assigned by the 1734
Neutrosophic model [it’s called Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph] and the long 1735
Neutrosophic cycle of the move from the cancer is identified by this research. 1736
Sometimes the move of the cancer hasn’t be easily identified since there are some 1737
determinacy, indeterminacy and neutrality about the moves and the effects of the 1738
cancer on that region; this event leads us to choose another model [it’s said to be 1739
Step 3. (Neutrosophic Model) There are some specific Neutrosophic models, which 1742
are well-known and they’ve got the names, and some general Neutrosophic models. 1743
The moves and the Neutrosophic traces of the cancer on the complex tracks and 1744
SuperHyperModels. 1750
featured. 1756
By using the Neutrosophic Figure (29) and the Table (4), the Neutrosophic 1757
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
featured. 1768
By using the Neutrosophic Figure (30) and the Table (5), the Neutrosophic 1769
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
In what follows, some “problems” and some “questions” are proposed. 1777
Question 10.1. Which the else SuperHyperModels could be defined based on Cancer’s 1780
recognitions? 1781
Question 10.3. Are there some Algorithms to be defined on the SuperHyperModels to 1784
Question 10.4. Which the SuperHyperNotions are related to beyond the 1786
Problem 10.6. Which the fundamental SuperHyperNumbers are related to these 1791
Problem 10.7. What’s the independent research based on Cancer’s recognitions 1793
In this section, concluding remarks and closing remarks are represented. The drawbacks 1796
of this research are illustrated. Some benefits and some advantages of this research are 1797
highlighted. 1798
This research uses some approaches to make Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs more 1799
SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut. For that sake in the second definition, the main definition 1801
Based on the new definition for the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, the new 1803
background to implement some results based on that. Some SuperHyperClasses and some 1805
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses are the cases of this research on the modeling of the 1806
regions where are under the attacks of the cancer to recognize this disease as it’s 1807
mentioned on the title “Cancer’s Recognitions”. To formalize the instances on the 1808
SuperHyperClasses, are introduced. Some general results are gathered in the section on 1810
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
The clarifications, instances and literature reviews have taken the whole way through. In 1812
this research, the literature reviews have fulfilled the lines containing the notions and the 1813
SuperHyperModels on the “Cancer’s Recognitions” and both bases are the background of 1815
this research. Sometimes the cancer has been happened on the region, full of cells, groups 1816
of cells and embedded styles. In this segment, the SuperHyperModel proposes some 1817
SuperHyperNotions based on the connectivities of the moves of the cancer in the longest 1818
and strongest styles with the formation of the design and the architecture are formally 1819
prefix “SuperHyper” refers to the theme of the embedded styles to figure out the 1821
background for the SuperHyperNotions. In the Table (6), benefits and avenues for this
2. SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut
5. SuperHyperClasses 3. SuperHyperFamilies
1822
research are, figured out, pointed out and spoken out. 1823
Forms 1826
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 1853
SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 1861
C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Extreme 1866
Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form 1870
the Extreme SuperHyperDuality; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its 1871
Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form 1890
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 1898
C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Extreme 1903
Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form 1907
the Extreme SuperHyperDuality; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its 1908
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
SuperHyperDuality. 1940
straightforward. 1943
straightforward. 1946
straightforward. 1949
straightforward. 1952
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
straightforward. 1955
straightforward. 1958
straightforward. 1961
straightforward. 1964
straightforward. 1967
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
straightforward. 1970
straightforward. 1973
straightforward. 1976
straightforward. 1979
straightforward. 1982
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
straightforward. 1985
straightforward. 1988
straightforward. 1991
straightforward. 1994
straightforward. 1997
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
straightforward. 2000
The previous Neutrosophic approach apply on the upcoming Neutrosophic results on 2001
= {Ei }i=1 3
.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= 3z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality
|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
E |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality , V EXT ERN AL |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality .
3 3
straightforward. 2010
Example 12.5. In the Figure (23), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath 2011
ESHP : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, in the 2012
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
= {Ei }i=1 3
.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= 3z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality
|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
E |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality , V EXT ERN AL |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality .
3 3
straightforward. 2021
Example 12.7. In the Figure (24), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle 2022
N SHC : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Neutrosophic 2023
SuperHyperDuality. 2025
Proposition 12.8. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). 2026
Then 2027
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
be a longest path taken a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). 2029
straightforward. 2033
Example 12.9. In the Figure (25), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar 2034
ESHS : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, 2035
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmin i |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
straightforward. Then there’s at least one SuperHyperDuality. Thus the notion of quasi 2046
There are only two SuperHyperParts. Thus every SuperHyperPart could have one 2048
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmin i |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1
SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E). Thus only some SuperHyperVertices and only 2051
solution 2053
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmin i |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1
Example 12.11. In the Neutrosophic Figure (26), the connected Neutrosophic 2055
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmin i |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1
straightforward. Then there’s at least one SuperHyperDuality. Thus the notion of quasi 2068
There are only z 0 SuperHyperParts. Thus every SuperHyperPart could have one 2070
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmin i |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1
ESHM : (V, E). Thus only some SuperHyperVertices and only 2073
solution 2075
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmin i |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1∗ ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2∗ ,
...,
∗ EXT ERN AL
E|E ∗ | , V|E ∗ |Neutrosophic Cardinality +1
ESHG:(V,E) Neutrosophic Cardinality ESHG:(V,E)
straightforward. Then there’s at least one SuperHyperDuality. Thus the notion of quasi 2091
Example 12.15. In the Neutrosophic Figure (28), the connected Neutrosophic 2095
SuperHyperWheel N SHW : (V, E), is Neutrosophic highlighted and featured. The 2096
ESHW : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (28), is the Neutrosophic 2099
SuperHyperDuality. 2100
Forms 2103
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 2130
SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 2138
Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form 2147
the Extreme SuperHyperJoin; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its 2148
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
coefficient; 2160
SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 2167
SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 2175
Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form 2184
the Extreme SuperHyperJoin; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its 2185
coefficient. 2197
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
SuperHyperJoin. 2209
SuperHyperJoin. 2218
straightforward. 2221
straightforward. 2224
straightforward. 2227
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
straightforward. 2230
straightforward. 2233
straightforward. 2236
straightforward. 2239
straightforward. 2242
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
straightforward. 2245
straightforward. 2248
straightforward. 2251
straightforward. 2254
straightforward. 2257
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
straightforward. 2260
straightforward. 2263
straightforward. 2266
straightforward. 2269
straightforward. 2272
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
straightforward. 2275
straightforward. 2278
The previous Neutrosophic approach apply on the upcoming Neutrosophic results on 2279
= {Ei }i=1 3
.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= 3z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin
|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
E |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality , V EXT ERN AL |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality .
3 3
straightforward. 2288
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Example 13.5. In the Figure (23), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath 2289
ESHP : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, in the 2290
= {Ei }i=1 3
.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= 3z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin
|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
E |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality , V EXT ERN AL |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality .
3 3
straightforward. 2299
Example 13.7. In the Figure (24), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle 2300
N SHC : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Neutrosophic 2301
SuperHyperJoin. 2303
Proposition 13.8. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). 2304
Then 2305
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
be a longest path taken a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). 2307
straightforward. 2311
Example 13.9. In the Figure (25), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar 2312
ESHS : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, 2313
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmin i |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1
straightforward. Then there’s no at least one SuperHyperJoin. Thus the notion of quasi 2324
There are only two SuperHyperParts. Thus every SuperHyperPart could have one 2326
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmin i |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1
ESHB : (V, E). Thus only some SuperHyperVertices and only 2329
solution 2331
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmin i |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1
Example 13.11. In the Neutrosophic Figure (26), the connected Neutrosophic 2333
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmin i |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1
straightforward. Then there’s no at least one SuperHyperJoin. Thus the notion of quasi 2346
There are only z 0 SuperHyperParts. Thus every SuperHyperPart could have one 2348
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmin i |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1
ESHM : (V, E). Thus only some SuperHyperVertices and only 2351
solution 2353
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmin i |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1
= {Ei }i=1 3
.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= 3z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin
|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
E |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality , V EXT ERN AL |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality .
3 3
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
straightforward. Then there’s at least one SuperHyperJoin. Thus the notion of quasi 2369
isn’t up and the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperJoin could be applied. The 2370
unique embedded SuperHyperJoin proposes some longest SuperHyperJoin excerpt from 2371
Example 13.15. In the Neutrosophic Figure (28), the connected Neutrosophic 2373
SuperHyperWheel N SHW : (V, E), is Neutrosophic highlighted and featured. The 2374
ESHW : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (28), is the Neutrosophic 2377
SuperHyperJoin. 2378
Forms 2381
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 2408
SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 2416
C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Extreme 2421
Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form 2425
the Extreme SuperHyperPerfect; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its 2426
Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form 2445
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 2453
C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Extreme 2458
Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form 2462
the Extreme SuperHyperPerfect; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its 2463
SuperHyperPerfect. 2487
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
SuperHyperPerfect. 2496
straightforward. 2499
straightforward. 2502
straightforward. 2505
straightforward. 2508
straightforward. 2511
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
straightforward. 2514
straightforward. 2517
straightforward. 2520
straightforward. 2523
straightforward. 2526
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
straightforward. 2529
straightforward. 2532
straightforward. 2535
straightforward. 2538
straightforward. 2541
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
straightforward. 2544
straightforward. 2547
straightforward. 2550
straightforward. 2553
straightforward. 2556
The previous Neutrosophic approach apply on the upcoming Neutrosophic results on 2557
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
= {Ei }i=1 3
.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= 3z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect
|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
E |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality , V EXT ERN AL |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality .
3 3
straightforward. 2566
Example 14.5. In the Figure (23), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath 2567
ESHP : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, in the 2568
= {Ei }i=1 3
.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= 3z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect
|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
E |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality , V EXT ERN AL |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality .
3 3
straightforward. 2577
Example 14.7. In the Figure (24), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle 2578
N SHC : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Neutrosophic 2579
SuperHyperPerfect. 2581
Proposition 14.8. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). 2582
Then 2583
be a longest path taken a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). 2585
straightforward. 2589
Example 14.9. In the Figure (25), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar 2590
ESHS : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, 2591
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmin i |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1
straightforward. Then there’s no at least one SuperHyperPerfect. Thus the notion of 2602
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
applied. There are only two SuperHyperParts. Thus every SuperHyperPart could have 2604
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmin i |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1
SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E). Thus only some SuperHyperVertices and only 2607
solution 2609
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmin i |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1
Example 14.11. In the Neutrosophic Figure (26), the connected Neutrosophic 2611
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmin i |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1
straightforward. Then there’s no at least one SuperHyperPerfect. Thus the notion of 2624
applied. There are only z 0 SuperHyperParts. Thus every SuperHyperPart could have 2626
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmin i |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1
ESHM : (V, E). Thus only some SuperHyperVertices and only 2629
solution 2631
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmin i |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1
straightforward. Then there’s at least one SuperHyperPerfect. Thus the notion of quasi 2647
isn’t up and the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperPerfect could be applied. The 2648
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Example 14.15. In the Neutrosophic Figure (28), the connected Neutrosophic 2651
SuperHyperWheel N SHW : (V, E), is Neutrosophic highlighted and featured. The 2652
ESHW : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (28), is the Neutrosophic 2655
SuperHyperPerfect. 2656
Forms 2659
that Va ∈ Ei , Ej ; 2665
that Vi , Vj ∈ Ea ; 2670
SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 2686
SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 2694
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form 2703
the Extreme SuperHyperTotal; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its 2704
SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 2723
SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 2731
Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form 2740
the Extreme SuperHyperTotal; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its 2741
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
SuperHyperTotal. 2765
SuperHyperTotal. 2774
straightforward. 2777
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
straightforward. 2780
straightforward. 2783
straightforward. 2786
straightforward. 2789
straightforward. 2792
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
straightforward. 2795
straightforward. 2798
straightforward. 2801
straightforward. 2804
straightforward. 2807
straightforward. 2810
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
straightforward. 2813
straightforward. 2816
straightforward. 2819
straightforward. 2822
straightforward. 2825
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
straightforward. 2828
straightforward. 2831
straightforward. 2834
The previous Neutrosophic approach apply on the upcoming Neutrosophic results on 2835
P :
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
V3EXT ERN AL , E3 ,
...
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
straightforward. 2844
Example 15.5. In the Figure (23), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath 2845
ESHP : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, in the 2846
P :
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
V3EXT ERN AL , E3 ,
...,
E |E|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality −1 .
, V EXT ERN AL |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality −1
straightforward. 2855
Example 15.7. In the Figure (24), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle 2856
N SHC : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Neutrosophic 2857
SuperHyperTotal. 2859
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Proposition 15.8. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). 2860
Then 2861
be a longest path taken a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). 2863
straightforward. 2867
Example 15.9. In the Figure (25), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar 2868
ESHS : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, 2869
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
straightforward. Then there’s no at least one SuperHyperTotal. Thus the notion of 2880
applied. There are only two SuperHyperParts. Thus every SuperHyperPart could have 2882
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E). Thus only some SuperHyperVertices and only 2885
solution 2887
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
Example 15.11. In the Neutrosophic Figure (26), the connected Neutrosophic 2889
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
is a longest SuperHyperTotal taken from a connected Neutrosophic 2898
straightforward. Then there’s no at least one SuperHyperTotal. Thus the notion of 2902
applied. There are only z 0 SuperHyperParts. Thus every SuperHyperPart could have 2904
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
is a longest path taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite 2906
ESHM : (V, E). Thus only some SuperHyperVertices and only 2907
solution 2909
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
is a longest path taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite 2910
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
∗
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal = {Ei , Ej ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial
∗
= |i(i − 1) | Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E)|Neutrosophic Cardinality
|z 2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperTotal = {CEN T ER, Vj ∈ VESHG:(V,E) }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial =
(|VESHG:(V,E)|Neutrosophic Cardinality |) choose (|VESHG:(V,E)|Neutrosophic Cardinality | − 1)
z2.
Proof. Let 2920
straightforward. Then there’s at least one SuperHyperTotal. Thus the notion of quasi 2925
isn’t up and the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperTotal could be applied. The 2926
Example 15.15. In the Neutrosophic Figure (28), the connected Neutrosophic 2929
SuperHyperWheel N SHW : (V, E), is Neutrosophic highlighted and featured. The 2930
ESHW : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (28), is the Neutrosophic 2933
SuperHyperTotal. 2934
Forms 2937
SuperHyperConnected). 2939
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
that Va 6∈ Ei , Ej ; 2945
that Vi , Vj 6∈ Ea ; 2952
Vi , Vj 6∈ Ea ; and 2955
C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum 2966
Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form 2969
C(N SHG) for a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum 2974
SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 2977
coefficients defined as the Extreme number of the maximum Extreme cardinality 2984
SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Extreme SuperHyperConnected; and 2987
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
contains the Neutrosophic coefficients defined as the Neutrosophic number of the 2994
they form the Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected; and the Neutrosophic power is 2998
C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum 3003
Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form 3006
C(N SHG) for a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum 3011
contains the Extreme coefficients defined as the Extreme number of the maximum 3021
SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 3024
contains the Neutrosophic coefficients defined as the Neutrosophic number of the 3032
they form the Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected; and the Neutrosophic power is 3036
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
SuperHyperConnected. 3049
SuperHyperConnected. 3058
straightforward. 3061
straightforward. 3064
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
straightforward. 3067
straightforward. 3070
straightforward. 3073
straightforward. 3076
straightforward. 3079
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
straightforward. 3082
straightforward. 3085
straightforward. 3088
straightforward. 3091
straightforward. 3094
straightforward. 3097
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
straightforward. 3100
straightforward. 3103
straightforward. 3106
straightforward. 3109
straightforward. 3112
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
straightforward. 3115
straightforward. 3118
The previous Neutrosophic approach apply on the upcoming Neutrosophic results on 3119
P :
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
V3EXT ERN AL , E3 ,
...,
E|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality −1 , V EXT ERN AL |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality −1 .
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
straightforward. 3128
Example 16.5. In the Figure (23), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath 3129
ESHP : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, in the 3130
P :
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
V3EXT ERN AL , E3 ,
...,
E|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality −1 , V EXT ERN AL |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality −1 .
straightforward. 3139
Example 16.7. In the Figure (24), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle 3140
N SHC : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Neutrosophic 3141
SuperHyperConnected. 3143
Proposition 16.8. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). 3144
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Then 3145
be a longest path taken a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). 3147
straightforward. 3151
Example 16.9. In the Figure (25), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar 3152
ESHS : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, 3153
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
straightforward. Then there’s no at least one SuperHyperConnected. Thus the notion of 3164
applied. There are only two SuperHyperParts. Thus every SuperHyperPart could have 3166
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
is a longest SuperHyperConnected taken from a connected Neutrosophic 3168
SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E). Thus only some SuperHyperVertices and only 3169
solution 3171
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
The latter is straightforward. 3172
Example 16.11. In the Neutrosophic Figure (26), the connected Neutrosophic 3173
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
straightforward. Then there’s no at least one SuperHyperConnected. Thus the notion of 3186
applied. There are only z 0 SuperHyperParts. Thus every SuperHyperPart could have 3188
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
ESHM : (V, E). Thus only some SuperHyperVertices and only 3191
solution 3193
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
∗
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected = {Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial
= |i | Ei ∈ |E ∗ ESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality |z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperConnected = {CEN T ER ∈ VESHG:(V,E) }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
straightforward. Then there’s at least one SuperHyperConnected. Thus the notion of 3209
straightforward. 3213
Example 16.15. In the Neutrosophic Figure (28), the connected Neutrosophic 3214
SuperHyperWheel N SHW : (V, E), is Neutrosophic highlighted and featured. The 3215
ESHW : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (28), is the Neutrosophic 3218
SuperHyperConnected. 3219
17 Background 3220
There are some scientific researches covering the topic of this research. In what follows, 3221
there are some discussion and literature reviews about them. 3222
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “neutrosophic co-degree and 3223
neutrosophic degree alongside chromatic numbers in the setting of some classes related 3224
to neutrosophic hypergraphs” in Ref. [1] by Henry Garrett (2022). In this research 3225
entitled “Journal of Current Trends in Computer Science Research (JCTCSR)” with 3229
ISO abbreviation “J Curr Trends Comp Sci Res” in volume 1 and issue 1 with pages 3230
06-14. The research article studies deeply with choosing neutrosophic hypergraphs 3231
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “Super Hyper Dominating and 3234
Super Hyper Resolving on Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs and Their Directions in 3235
Game Theory and Neutrosophic Super Hyper Classes” in Ref. [2] by Henry Garrett 3236
prestigious and fancy journal is entitled “Journal of Mathematical Techniques and 3240
Comput Math” in volume 1 and issue 3 with pages 242-263. The research article studies 3242
deeply with choosing directly neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph. It’s 3243
the breakthrough toward independent results based on initial background and fundamental 3244
SuperHyperNumbers. 3245
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “Some Super Hyper Degrees 3246
and Co-Super Hyper Degrees on Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs And Super Hyper 3247
Graphs Alongside Applications in Cancer’s Treatments” in Ref. [3] by Henry Garrett 3248
and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on fundamental notions and using vital tools 3250
in Cancer’s Treatments. It’s published in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled 3251
ISO abbreviation “J Math Techniques Comput Math” in volume 2 and issue 1 with 3253
pages 35-47. The research article studies deeply with choosing directly neutrosophic 3254
In some articles are titled “0039 — Closing Numbers and Super-Closing Numbers as 3257
in Ref. [7] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Uncertainty On The Act And Effect Of Cancer 3263
Alongside The Foggy Positions Of Cells Toward Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique 3264
Henry Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic Version Of Separates Groups Of Cells In Cancer’s 3266
“The Shift Paradigm To Classify Separately The Cells and Affected Cells Toward The 3268
Totality Under Cancer’s Recognition By New Multiple Definitions On the Sets 3269
Garrett (2022), “Breaking the Continuity and Uniformity of Cancer In The Worst Case 3272
Ref. [12] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Extremism of the Attacked Body Under the 3277
Special ViewPoints” in Ref. [15] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic 1-Failed 3283
on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond” in Ref. [16] by Henry Garrett 3285
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Game Theory and Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses” in Ref. [24] by Henry Garrett 3307
Garrett (2023), “The Focus on The Partitions Obtained By Parallel Moves In The 3310
Cancer’s Extreme Recognition With Different Types of Extreme SuperHyperMatching Set 3311
(2023), “Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique Decides the Failures on the Cancer’s 3313
“Indeterminacy On The All Possible Connections of Cells In Front of Cancer’s Attacks 3316
Regions and Sub-Regions in the Terms of Cancer’s Recognition and (Neutrosophic) 3322
the Form of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [142] by Henry Garrett (2023), 3326
Ref. [147] by Henry Garrett (2023), “Neutrosophic 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in the 3333
Recognition And Beyond” in Ref. [148] by Henry Garrett (2022), “(Neutrosophic) 3335
SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)” in Ref. [162] by Henry Garrett (2022), and [4–162], there 3344
are some endeavors to formalize the basic SuperHyperNotions about neutrosophic 3345
Two popular scientific research books in Scribd in the terms of high readers, 4190 and 3347
Some scientific studies and scientific researches about neutrosophic graphs, are 3349
proposed as book in Ref. [246] by Henry Garrett (2023) which is indexed by Google 3350
Scholar and has more than 4190 readers in Scribd. It’s titled “Beyond Neutrosophic 3351
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Graphs” and published by Dr. Henry Garrett. This research book covers different types 3352
of notions and settings in neutrosophic graph theory and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 3353
theory. 3354
Also, some scientific studies and scientific researches about neutrosophic graphs, are 3355
proposed as book in Ref. [247] by Henry Garrett (2023) which is indexed by Google 3356
Scholar and has more than 5189 readers in Scribd. It’s titled “Neutrosophic Duality” 3357
and published by Dr. Henry Garrett. This research book presents different types of 3358
neutrosophic graph theory and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph theory. This research 3360
book has scrutiny on the complement of the intended set and the intended set, 3361
simultaneously. It’s smart to consider a set but acting on its complement that what’s 3362
done in this research book which is popular in the terms of high readers in Scribd. 3363
See the seminal scientific researches [1–3]. The formalization of the notions on the 3364
research books at [163–257]. Two popular scientific research books in Scribd in the terms 3367
of high readers, 4190 and 5189 respectively, on neutrosophic science is on [258, 259]. 3368
References 3369
Hypergraphs”, J Curr Trends Comp Sci Res 1(1) (2022) 06-14. 3372
2. Henry Garrett, “Super Hyper Dominating and Super Hyper Resolving on 3373
Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs and Their Directions in Game Theory and 3374
Neutrosophic Super Hyper Classes”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 1(3) 3375
3. Henry Garrett, “Some Super Hyper Degrees and Co-Super Hyper Degrees on 3377
Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs And Super Hyper Graphs Alongside 3378
super-hyper-degrees-and-cosuper-hyper-degrees-on-neutrosophic-super-hyper- 3381
graphs-and-super-hyper-graphs-alongside-a.pdf) 3382
Hypergraph by Eulerian Super Hyper Cycles and Hamiltonian Sets as Hyper 3384
Covering Versus Super separations”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 2(3) 3385
research-on-cancers-recognition-and-neutrosophic-super-hypergraph-by-eulerian- 3387
super-hyper-cycles-and-hamiltonian-sets-.pdf) 3388
Research - Zenodo, Nov. 2022. CERN European Organization for Nuclear 3392
https://oa.mg/work/10.5281/zenodo.6319942 3394
Graphs.” CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research - Zenodo, Feb. 3396
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
https://doi.org/10.13140/rg.2.2.35241.26724. 3398
https://oa.mg/work/10.13140/rg.2.2.35241.26724 3399
10.20944/preprints202301.0308.v1). 3403
8. Henry Garrett, “Uncertainty On The Act And Effect Of Cancer Alongside The 3404
10. Henry Garrett, “The Shift Paradigm To Classify Separately The Cells and 3411
Affected Cells Toward The Totality Under Cancer’s Recognition By New 3412
10.20944/preprints202301.0265.v1). 3416
11. Henry Garrett, “Breaking the Continuity and Uniformity of Cancer In The 3417
12. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable as the Survivors on the 3421
10.20944/preprints202301.0240.v1). 3424
13. Henry Garrett, “Extremism of the Attacked Body Under the Cancer’s 3425
10.20944/preprints202301.0224.v1). 3428
10.20944/preprints202301.0088.v1). 3435
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 3445
10.20944/preprints202301.0088.v1). 3449
10.20944/preprints202212.0324.v1). 3464
10.20944/preprints202211.0576.v1). 3468
25. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 3469
26. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 3472
27. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 3475
28. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Hammy By Hyper Hamper Of 3478
29. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 3481
30. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nebulous By Hyper Nebbish Of 3484
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
31. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 3487
32. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Decompensation By Hyper Decompress Of 3490
33. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 3493
34. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Hammy By Hyper Hamper Of 3496
35. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 3499
36. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nebulous By Hyper Nebbish Of 3502
37. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3505
38. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Decompensation By Hyper Decompress Of 3508
39. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3511
40. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Tract By Hyper Track Of Trace-Cut In 3514
41. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3517
42. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nebulous By Hyper Nebbish Of 3520
43. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3523
44. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Decompensation By Hyper Decompress Of 3526
45. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3529
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
46. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Eddy By Hyper Edify Of Edge-Cut In 3532
47. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3535
48. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nebulous By Hyper Nebbish Of 3538
49. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3541
50. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Decompensation By Hyper Decompress Of 3544
51. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3547
52. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Vertigo By Hyper Vertu Of Vertex-Cut In 3550
53. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3553
54. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nebulizer By Hyper Nub Of 3556
55. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3559
56. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Stale By Hyper Stalk Of 3562
57. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3565
58. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Stale By Hyper Stalk Of Stable-Cut In 3568
59. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3571
60. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nebulizer By Hyper Nub Of 3574
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
61. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3577
62. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Decompensation By Hyper Decompress Of 3580
63. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3583
64. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Cliff By Hyper Cling Of Clique-Cut In 3586
65. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3589
66. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3592
67. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Lith By Hyper Lite Of List-Coloring In 3595
68. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3598
69. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Solidarity By Hyper Soul Of Space In 3601
70. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3604
71. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Uniform By Hyper Deformation Of 3607
72. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3610
73. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super System By Hyper Explosions Of 3613
74. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3616
75. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nodes By Hyper Moves Of 3619
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
76. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3622
77. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Gap By Hyper Navigations Of Chord In 3625
78. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3628
79. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Coincidence By Hyper Routes Of 3631
80. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3634
81. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Obstacles By Hyper Model Of 3637
82. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3640
83. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Harmony By Hyper k-Function Of 3643
84. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3646
85. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Gradient By Hyper k-Class Of 3649
86. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3652
87. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Analogous By Hyper Visions Of 3655
88. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3658
89. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Relations By Hyper Identifications Of 3661
90. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Contradiction By Hyper Detection of 3664
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
91. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3667
92. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Locations By Hyper Differing Of 3670
93. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3673
94. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Missing By Hyper Searching Of 3676
95. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3679
96. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Outbreak By Hyper Collections Of 3682
97. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3685
98. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Extremism By Hyper Treatments Of 3688
99. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Isolation By Hyper Perfectness Of 3691
100. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3694
101. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3697
102. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super connections By Hyper disconnections Of 3700
103. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Mixed-Devastations By Hyper Decisions 3703
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
106. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Reflections By Hyper Rotations Of Path 3712
107. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas As Hyper Deformations On Super Chains In 3715
109. Henry Garrett, “New Research On Cancer’s Recognition and Neutrosophic 3721
10.13140/RG.2.2.29913.80482). 3724
110. Henry Garrett, “New Research On Cancer’s Recognition and Neutrosophic 3725
10.13140/RG.2.2.33269.24809). 3728
111. Henry Garrett, “New Research On Cancer’s Recognition and Neutrosophic 3729
10.13140/RG.2.2.34946.96960). 3732
10.13140/RG.2.2.14814.31040). 3736
10.13140/RG.2.2.15653.17125). 3740
10.13140/RG.2.2.25719.50089). 3744
115. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Disruptions In Cancer’s Extreme 3745
10.13140/RG.2.2.29441.94562). 3748
the Criteria of Eulerian and Hamiltonian Type-Sets As Hyper Modified Cycles 3753
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
10.20944/preprints202301.0396.v1). 3761
10.20944/preprints202301.0395.v1). 3765
10.13140/RG.2.2.26240.51204). 3770
Classes With Hyper Effects In The Background of the Framework is So-Called 3773
10.13140/RG.2.2.12818.73925). 3775
123. Henry Garrett,“Super Actions On The Types of Hyper Levels In The Sensible 3776
10.13140/RG.2.2.26836.88960). 3779
10.20944/preprints202301.0308.v1). 3786
126. Henry Garrett,“Uncertainty On The Act And Effect Of Cancer Alongside The 3787
128. Henry Garrett, “The Shift Paradigm To Classify Separately The Cells and 3794
Affected Cells Toward The Totality Under Cancer’s Recognition By New 3795
10.20944/preprints202301.0265.v1). 3799
129. Henry Garrett,“Breaking the Continuity and Uniformity of Cancer In The 3800
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
130. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable as the Survivors on the 3804
10.20944/preprints202301.0240.v1). 3807
131. Henry Garrett, “Extremism of the Attacked Body Under the Cancer’s 3808
10.20944/preprints202301.0224.v1). 3811
133. Henry Garrett,“The Focus on The Partitions Obtained By Parallel Moves In 3815
134. Henry Garrett,“Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique Decides the Failures on the 3819
136. Henry Garrett,“Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique Decides the Failures on the 3827
10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 3844
10.20944/preprints202301.0088.v1). 3848
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
145. Henry Garrett, “Using the Tool As (Neutrosophic) Failed SuperHyperStable To 3859
10.13140/RG.2.2.11447.80803). 3865
10.13140/RG.2.2.36141.77287). 3872
10.13140/RG.2.2.29430.88642). 3875
10.13140/RG.2.2.11369.16487). 3879
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
10.20944/preprints202212.0324.v1). 3905
10.13140/RG.2.2.23123.04641). 3909
10.20944/preprints202211.0576.v1). 3913
10.13140/RG.2.2.23324.56966). 3917
162. Henry Garrett, “Initial Material of Neutrosophic Preliminaries to Study Some 3921
10.13140/RG.2.2.25385.88160). 3924
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
170. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDuality”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3939
10.5281/zenodo.7637762). 3940
171. Henry Garrett, “Trace-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 3941
174. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 3947
177. Henry Garrett, “Vertex-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 3953
180. Henry Garrett, “Stable-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 3959
183. Henry Garrett, “Clique-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 3965
184. Henry Garrett, “Space In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3967
10.5281/zenodo.7713563). 3968
185. Henry Garrett, “Space In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3969
10.5281/zenodo.7709116). 3970
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
189. Henry Garrett, “Chord In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3977
10.5281/zenodo.7700205). 3978
193. Henry Garrett, “K-Number In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 3985
194. Henry Garrett, “Order In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3987
10.5281/zenodo.7668648). 3988
195. Henry Garrett, “Coloring In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3989
10.5281/zenodo.7662810). 3990
196. Henry Garrett, “Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 3991
197. Henry Garrett, “Cancer In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3993
10.5281/zenodo.7653233). 3994
198. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperWheel”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3995
10.5281/zenodo.7653204). 3996
199. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperMultipartite”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3997
10.5281/zenodo.7653142). 3998
200. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperBipartite”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3999
10.5281/zenodo.7653117). 4000
201. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperStar”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4001
10.5281/zenodo.7653089). 4002
202. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4003
10.5281/zenodo.7651687). 4004
203. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperPath”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4005
10.5281/zenodo.7651619). 4006
204. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDomination”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4007
10.5281/zenodo.7651439). 4008
205. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDominating”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4009
10.5281/zenodo.7650729). 4010
206. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperConnected”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4011
10.5281/zenodo.7647868). 4012
207. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperTotal”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4013
10.5281/zenodo.7647017). 4014
208. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperPerfect”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4015
10.5281/zenodo.7644894). 4016
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
209. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperJoin”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4017
10.5281/zenodo.7641880). 4018
210. Henry Garrett, “Path SuperHyperColoring”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4019
10.5281/zenodo.7632923). 4020
211. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDensity”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4021
10.5281/zenodo.7623459). 4022
213. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperConnectivities”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 4025
214. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperConnectivities”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4027
10.5281/zenodo.7606404). 4028
215. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4029
10.5281/zenodo.7580018). 4030
216. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4031
10.5281/zenodo.7580018). 4032
217. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4033
10.5281/zenodo.7580018). 4034
218. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4035
10.5281/zenodo.7579929). 4036
219. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4037
10.5281/zenodo.7563170). 4038
220. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4039
10.5281/zenodo.7563164). 4040
221. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4041
10.5281/zenodo.7563160). 4042
222. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4043
10.5281/zenodo.7563160). 4044
223. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4045
10.5281/zenodo.7563160). 4046
224. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 4047
225. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperMatching”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4049
10.5281/zenodo.7557009). 4050
226. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperMatching”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 4051
227. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 4053
228. Henry Garrett, “Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 4055
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
229. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On Failed SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 4057
230. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4059
10.5281/zenodo.7574952). 4060
231. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 4061
232. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4063
10.5281/zenodo.7523357). 4064
233. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4065
10.5281/zenodo.7523357). 4066
234. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 4067
235. Henry Garrett, “Extreme Failed SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 4069
236. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On Failed SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 4071
237. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4073
10.5281/zenodo.7499395). 4074
238. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4075
10.5281/zenodo.7499395). 4076
239. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4077
10.5281/zenodo.7499395). 4078
240. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 4079
241. Henry Garrett, “Extreme Failed SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 4081
242. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 4083
243. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4085
10.5281/zenodo.7494862). 4086
244. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 4087
245. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperAlliances”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 4089
246. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperAlliances”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4091
10.5281/zenodo.7493845). 4092
247. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperAlliances”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 4093
248. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperMatching”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4095
10.5281/zenodo.7539484). 4096
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
249. Henry Garrett, “Failed SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4097
10.5281/zenodo.7523390). 4098
250. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4099
10.5281/zenodo.7523357). 4100
251. Henry Garrett, “Failed SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4101
10.5281/zenodo.7504782). 4102
252. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4103
10.5281/zenodo.7499395). 4104
253. Henry Garrett, “Failed SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4105
10.5281/zenodo.7497450). 4106
254. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4107
10.5281/zenodo.7494862). 4108
255. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperAlliances”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4109
10.5281/zenodo.7493845). 4110
256. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4111
10.5281/zenodo.7480110). 4112
257. Henry Garrett, “Neut. SuperHyperEdges”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4113
10.5281/zenodo.7378758). 4114
258. Henry Garrett, “Beyond Neutrosophic Graphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4115
10.5281/zenodo.6320305). 4116
259. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Duality”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4117
10.5281/zenodo.6677173). 4118
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA