New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph by Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.
net/publication/370305837
New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph By

Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous
Preprint · April 2023

DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.7871026
CITATIONS
1 author:
Henry Garrett
464 PUBLICATIONS 14,993 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Number Graphs And Numbers View project
Neutrosophic Graphs View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Henry Garrett on 27 April 2023.
The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 2
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut As Hyper 3
Nebbish On Super Nebulous 4
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · 6
DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA 7
1 ABSTRACT 8
In this scientific research, (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic 9
SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut). Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is 10
a Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut pair S = (V, E). Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet 11
V 0 = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs } and E 0 = {E1 , E2 , . . . , Ez }. Then either V 0 or E 0 is called 12
Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut if the following expression is called 13
Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut criteria holds 14
∀E 0 ∈ C : C is
a SuperHyperCycle and it has
the maximum number of SuperHyperEdges;
Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut if the following expression is called 15
Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut criteria holds 16
∀E 0 ∈ C : C is
and |Ei |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY = |Ej |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY ; Neutrosophic 17
v-SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut if the following expression is called Neutrosophic 18
v-SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut criteria holds 19
∀V 0 ∈ C : C is
Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut if the following expression is called 20
Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut criteria holds 21
∀V 0 ∈ C : C is
and |Vi |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY = |Vj |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY ; Neutrosophic 22
SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut if it’s either of Neutrosophic 23
e-SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut, 24
Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut, and Neutrosophic 25
rv-SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut. ((Neutrosophic) SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut). 26
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). Consider a 27
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) E = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then E is called an 28
Extreme SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut if it’s either of Neutrosophic 29
rv-SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut and C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph 32
N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum Extreme cardinality of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S 33
of high Extreme cardinality of the Extreme SuperHyperEdges in the conseNeighborive 34
Extreme sequence of Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such 35
that they form the Extreme SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut; a Neutrosophic 36
SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut if it’s either of Neutrosophic 37
rv-SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut and C(N SHG) for a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 40
N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic 41
SuperHyperEdges of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high Neutrosophic cardinality 42
conseNeighborive Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 43
such that they form the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut; an Extreme 44
SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of Neutrosophic 45
rv-SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut and C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph 48
N SHG : (V, E) is the Extreme SuperHyperPolynomial contains the Extreme 49
coefficients defined as the Extreme number of the maximum Extreme cardinality of the 50
Extreme SuperHyperEdges of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality 51
conseNeighborive Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such 52
that they form the Extreme SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut; and the Extreme power is 53
corresponded to its Extreme coefficient; a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut 54
SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut, 55
Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut, Neutrosophic 56
v-SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut and 57
C(N SHG) for a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Neutrosophic 58
SuperHyperPolynomial contains the Neutrosophic coefficients defined as the 59
Neutrosophic number of the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic 60
SuperHyperEdges of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high Neutrosophic cardinality 61
conseNeighborive Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic 62
SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Neutrosophic 63
SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut; and the Neutrosophic power is corresponded to its 64
Neutrosophic coefficient; an Extreme V-SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut if it’s either of 65
Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut, Neutrosophic 66
re-SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut, Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut, and 67
Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut and C(N SHG) for an Extreme 68
SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum Extreme cardinality of an Extreme 69
SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality of the Extreme SuperHyperVertices in the 70
conseNeighborive Extreme sequence of Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme 71
SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Extreme SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut; a 72
Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut if it’s either of Neutrosophic 73
N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic 77
SuperHyperVertices of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high Neutrosophic 78
cardinality conseNeighborive Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic 79
SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut; 80
an Extreme V-SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of 81
re-SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut, Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut, and 83
Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut and C(N SHG) for an Extreme 84
SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Extreme SuperHyperPolynomial contains the 85
Extreme coefficients defined as the Extreme number of the maximum Extreme 86
cardinality of the Extreme SuperHyperVertices of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high 87
Extreme cardinality conseNeighborive Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme 88
SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Extreme SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut; 89
and the Extreme power is corresponded to its Extreme coefficient; a Neutrosophic 90
SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of Neutrosophic 91
N SHG : (V, E) is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPolynomial contains the Neutrosophic 95
coefficients defined as the Neutrosophic number of the maximum Neutrosophic 96
cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S 97
of high Neutrosophic cardinality conseNeighborive Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges and 98
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Neutrosophic 99
Neutrosophic coefficient. In this scientific research, new setting is introduced for new 101
SuperHyperNotions, namely, a SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut and Neutrosophic 102
SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut. Two different types of SuperHyperDefinitions are debut 103
for them but the research goes further and the SuperHyperNotion, SuperHyperUniform, 104
and SuperHyperClass based on that are well-defined and well-reviewed. The literature 105
review is implemented in the whole of this research. For shining the elegancy and the 106
significancy of this research, the comparison between this SuperHyperNotion with other 107
SuperHyperNotions and fundamental SuperHyperNumbers are featured. The definitions 108
are followed by the examples and the instances thus the clarifications are driven with 109
different tools. The applications are figured out to make sense about the theoretical 110
aspect of this ongoing research. The “Cancer’s Recognition” are the under research to 111
figure out the challenges make sense about ongoing and upcoming research. The special 112
case is up. The cells are viewed in the deemed ways. There are different types of them. 113
Some of them are individuals and some of them are well-modeled by the group of cells. 114
These types are all officially called “SuperHyperVertex” but the relations amid them all 115
officially called “SuperHyperEdge”. The frameworks “SuperHyperGraph” and 116
“Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” are chosen and elected to research about “Cancer’s 117
Recognition”. Thus these complex and dense SuperHyperModels open up some avenues 118
to research on theoretical segments and “Cancer’s Recognition”. Some avenues are 119
posed to pursue this research. It’s also officially collected in the form of some questions 120
and some problems. Assume a SuperHyperGraph. Assume a SuperHyperGraph. Then 121
δ−SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut is a maximal of SuperHyperVertices with a 122
maximum cardinality such that either of the following expressions hold for the 123
(Neutrosophic) cardinalities of SuperHyperNeighbors of s ∈ S : there are 124
|S ∩ N (s)| > |S ∩ (V \ N (s))| + δ; and |S ∩ N (s)| < |S ∩ (V \ N (s))| + δ. The first 125
Expression, holds if S is an δ−SuperHyperOffensive. And the second Expression, holds 126
if S is an δ−SuperHyperDefensive; a Neutrosophic δ−SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut is a 127
maximal Neutrosophic of SuperHyperVertices with maximum Neutrosophic 128
cardinality such that either of the following expressions hold for the Neutrosophic 129
cardinalities of SuperHyperNeighbors of s ∈ S there are: 130
|S ∩ N (s)|N eutrosophic > |S ∩ (V \ N (s))|N eutrosophic + δ; 131
and |S ∩ N (s)|N eutrosophic < |S ∩ (V \ N (s))|N eutrosophic + δ. The first Expression, 132
holds if S is a Neutrosophic δ−SuperHyperOffensive. And the second Expression, holds 133
if S is a Neutrosophic δ−SuperHyperDefensive It’s useful to define a “Neutrosophic” 134
version of a SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut . Since there’s more ways to get type-results 135
to make a SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut more understandable. For the sake of having 136
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut, there’s a need to “redefine” the notion of a 137
“SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut ”. The SuperHyperVertices and the SuperHyperEdges are 138
assigned by the labels from the letters of the alphabets. In this procedure, there’s the 139
usage of the position of labels to assign to the values. Assume a 140
SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut . It’s redefined a Neutrosophic 141
SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut if the mentioned Table holds, concerning, “The Values of 142
Vertices, SuperVertices, Edges, HyperEdges, and SuperHyperEdges Belong to The 143
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” with the key points, “The Values of The Vertices & 144
The Number of Position in Alphabet”, “The Values of The SuperVertices&The 145
maximum Values of Its Vertices”, “The Values of The Edges&The maximum Values of 146
Its Vertices”, “The Values of The HyperEdges&The maximum Values of Its Vertices”, 147
“The Values of The SuperHyperEdges&The maximum Values of Its Endpoints”. To get 148
structural examples and instances, I’m going to introduce the next SuperHyperClass of 149
SuperHyperGraph based on a SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut . It’s the main. It’ll be 150
disciplinary to have the foundation of previous definition in the kind of 151
SuperHyperClass. If there’s a need to have all SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut until the 152
SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut, then it’s officially called a “SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut” 153
but otherwise, it isn’t a SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut . There are some instances about 154
the clarifications for the main definition titled a “SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut ”. 155
These two examples get more scrutiny and discernment since there are characterized in 156
the disciplinary ways of the SuperHyperClass based on a SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut . 157
For the sake of having a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut, there’s a need to 158
“redefine” the notion of a “Neutrosophic SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut” and a 159
“Neutrosophic SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut ”. The SuperHyperVertices and the 160
SuperHyperEdges are assigned by the labels from the letters of the alphabets. In this 161
procedure, there’s the usage of the position of labels to assign to the values. Assume a 162
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. It’s redefined “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” if the 163
intended Table holds. And a SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut are redefined to a 164
“Neutrosophic SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut” if the intended Table holds. It’s useful to 165
define “Neutrosophic” version of SuperHyperClasses. Since there’s more ways to get 166
Neutrosophic type-results to make a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut more 167
understandable. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. There are some 168
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses if the intended Table holds. Thus SuperHyperPath, 169
SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut, SuperHyperStar, SuperHyperBipartite, 170
SuperHyperMultiPartite, and SuperHyperWheel, are “Neutrosophic 171
SuperHyperPath”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut”, “Neutrosophic 172
SuperHyperStar”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite”, “Neutrosophic 173
SuperHyperMultiPartite”, and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel” if the intended Table 174
holds. A SuperHyperGraph has a “Neutrosophic SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut” where 175
it’s the strongest [the maximum Neutrosophic value from all the 176
SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut amid the maximum value amid all SuperHyperVertices 177
from a SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut .] SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut . A graph is a 178
SuperHyperUniform if it’s a SuperHyperGraph and the number of elements of 179
SuperHyperEdges are the same. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. There are 180
some SuperHyperClasses as follows. It’s SuperHyperPath if it’s only one SuperVertex as 181
intersection amid two given SuperHyperEdges with two exceptions; it’s 182
SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut if it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two given 183
SuperHyperEdges; it’s SuperHyperStar it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid 184
all SuperHyperEdges; it’s SuperHyperBipartite it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection 185
amid two given SuperHyperEdges and these SuperVertices, forming two separate sets, 186
has no SuperHyperEdge in common; it’s SuperHyperMultiPartite it’s only one 187
SuperVertex as intersection amid two given SuperHyperEdges and these SuperVertices, 188
forming multi separate sets, has no SuperHyperEdge in common; it’s a 189
SuperHyperWheel if it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two given 190
SuperHyperEdges and one SuperVertex has one SuperHyperEdge with any common 191
SuperVertex. The SuperHyperModel proposes the specific designs and the specific 192
architectures. The SuperHyperModel is officially called “SuperHyperGraph” and 193
“Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”. In this SuperHyperModel, The “specific” cells and 194
“specific group” of cells are SuperHyperModeled as “SuperHyperVertices” and the 195
common and intended properties between “specific” cells and “specific group” of cells 196
are SuperHyperModeled as “SuperHyperEdges”. Sometimes, it’s useful to have some 197
degrees of determinacy, indeterminacy, and neutrality to have more precise 198
SuperHyperModel which in this case the SuperHyperModel is called “Neutrosophic”. In 199
the future research, the foundation will be based on the “Cancer’s Recognition” and the 200
results and the definitions will be introduced in redeemed ways. The recognition of the 201
cancer in the long-term function. The specific region has been assigned by the model 202
[it’s called SuperHyperGraph] and the long cycle of the move from the cancer is 203
identified by this research. Sometimes the move of the cancer hasn’t be easily identified 204
since there are some determinacy, indeterminacy and neutrality about the moves and 205
the effects of the cancer on that region; this event leads us to choose another model [it’s 206
said to be Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph] to have convenient perception on what’s 207
happened and what’s done. There are some specific models, which are well-known and 208
they’ve got the names, and some SuperHyperGeneral SuperHyperModels. The moves 209
and the traces of the cancer on the complex tracks and between complicated groups of 210
cells could be fantasized by a Neutrosophic 211
SuperHyperPath(-/SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut, SuperHyperStar, 212
SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, SuperHyperWheel). The aim is to find 213
either the longest SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut or the strongest 214
SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut in those Neutrosophic SuperHyperModels. For the 215
longest SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut, called SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut, and the 216
strongest SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut, called Neutrosophic 217
SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut, some general results are introduced. Beyond that in 218
SuperHyperStar, all possible SuperHyperPaths have only two SuperHyperEdges but it’s 219
not enough since it’s essential to have at least three SuperHyperEdges to form any style 220
of a SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut. There isn’t any formation of any 221
SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut but literarily, it’s the deformation of any 222
SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut. It, literarily, deforms and it doesn’t form. A basic 223
familiarity with Neutrosophic SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut theory, SuperHyperGraphs, 224
and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs theory are proposed. 225
Keywords: Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut, 226
Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition 227
AMS Subject Classification: 05C17, 05C22, 05E45 228
2 Applied Notions Under The Scrutiny Of The 229
Motivation Of This Scientific Research 230
In this scientific research, there are some ideas in the featured frameworks of 231
motivations. I try to bring the motivations in the narrative ways. Some cells have been 232
faced with some attacks from the situation which is caused by the cancer’s attacks. In 233
this case, there are some embedded analysis on the ongoing situations which in that, the 234
cells could be labelled as some groups and some groups or individuals have excessive 235
labels which all are raised from the behaviors to overcome the cancer’s attacks. In the 236
embedded situations, the individuals of cells and the groups of cells could be considered 237
as “new groups”. Thus it motivates us to find the proper SuperHyperModels for getting 238
more proper analysis on this messy story. I’ve found the SuperHyperModels which are 239
officially called “SuperHyperGraphs” and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. In this 240
SuperHyperModel, the cells and the groups of cells are defined as “SuperHyperVertices” 241
and the relations between the individuals of cells and the groups of cells are defined as 242
“SuperHyperEdges”. Thus it’s another motivation for us to do research on this 243
SuperHyperModel based on the “Cancer’s Recognition”. Sometimes, the situations get 244
worst. The situation is passed from the certainty and precise style. Thus it’s the beyond 245
them. There are three descriptions, namely, the degrees of determinacy, indeterminacy 246
and neutrality, for any object based on vague forms, namely, incomplete data, imprecise 247
data, and uncertain analysis. The latter model could be considered on the previous 248
SuperHyperModel. It’s SuperHyperModel. It’s SuperHyperGraph but it’s officially 249
called “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. The cancer is the disease but the model is 250
going to figure out what’s going on this phenomenon. The special case of this disease is 251
considered and as the consequences of the model, some parameters are used. The cells 252
are under attack of this disease but the moves of the cancer in the special region are the 253
matter of mind. The recognition of the cancer could help to find some treatments for 254
this disease. The SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph are the 255
SuperHyperModels on the “Cancer’s Recognition” and both bases are the background 256
of this research. Sometimes the cancer has been happened on the region, full of cells, 257
groups of cells and embedded styles. In this segment, the SuperHyperModel proposes 258
some SuperHyperNotions based on the connectivities of the moves of the cancer in the 259
forms of alliances’ styles with the formation of the design and the architecture are 260
formally called “ SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut” in the themes of jargons and buzzwords. 261
The prefix “SuperHyper” refers to the theme of the embedded styles to figure out the 262
background for the SuperHyperNotions. The recognition of the cancer in the long-term 263
function. The specific region has been assigned by the model [it’s called 264
SuperHyperGraph] and the long cycle of the move from the cancer is identified by this 265
research. Sometimes the move of the cancer hasn’t be easily identified since there are 266
some determinacy, indeterminacy and neutrality about the moves and the effects of the 267
cancer on that region; this event leads us to choose another model [it’s said to be 268
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph] to have convenient perception on what’s happened and 269
what’s done. There are some specific models, which are well-known and they’ve got the 270
names, and some general models. The moves and the traces of the cancer on the 271
complex tracks and between complicated groups of cells could be fantasized by a 272
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (-/SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut, SuperHyperStar, 273
SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, SuperHyperWheel). The aim is to find 274
either the optimal SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut or the Neutrosophic 275
SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut in those Neutrosophic SuperHyperModels. Some general 276
results are introduced. Beyond that in SuperHyperStar, all possible Neutrosophic 277
SuperHyperPath s have only two SuperHyperEdges but it’s not enough since it’s 278
essential to have at least three SuperHyperEdges to form any style of a 279
SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut. There isn’t any formation of any 280
SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut but literarily, it’s the deformation of any 281
SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut. It, literarily, deforms and it doesn’t form. 282
Question 2.1. How to define the SuperHyperNotions and to do research on them to 283
find the “ amount of SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut” of either individual of cells or the 284
groups of cells based on the fixed cell or the fixed group of cells, extensively, the “amount 285
of SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut” based on the fixed groups of cells or the fixed groups of 286
group of cells? 287
Question 2.2. What are the best descriptions for the “Cancer’s Recognition” in terms 288
of these messy and dense SuperHyperModels where embedded notions are illustrated? 289
It’s motivation to find notions to use in this dense model is titled 290
“SuperHyperGraphs”. Thus it motivates us to define different types of “ 291
SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut” and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut” on 292
“SuperHyperGraph” and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”. Then the research has 293
taken more motivations to define SuperHyperClasses and to find some connections amid 294
this SuperHyperNotion with other SuperHyperNotions. It motivates us to get some 295
instances and examples to make clarifications about the framework of this research. The 296
general results and some results about some connections are some avenues to make key 297
point of this research, “Cancer’s Recognition”, more understandable and more clear. 298
The framework of this research is as follows. In the beginning, I introduce basic 299
definitions to clarify about preliminaries. In the subsection “Preliminaries”, initial 300
definitions about SuperHyperGraphs and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph are 301
deeply-introduced and in-depth-discussed. The elementary concepts are clarified and 302
illustrated completely and sometimes review literature are applied to make sense about 303
what’s going to figure out about the upcoming sections. The main definitions and their 304
clarifications alongside some results about new notions, SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut 305
and Neutrosophic SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut, are figured out in sections “ 306
SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut” and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut”. In 307
the sense of tackling on getting results and in Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut to make sense about 308
continuing the research, the ideas of SuperHyperUniform and Neutrosophic 309
SuperHyperUniform are introduced and as their consequences, corresponded 310
SuperHyperClasses are figured out to debut what’s done in this section, titled “Results 311
on SuperHyperClasses” and “Results on Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”. As going 312
back to origin of the notions, there are some smart steps toward the common notions to 313
extend the new notions in new frameworks, SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic 314
SuperHyperGraph, in the sections “Results on SuperHyperClasses” and “Results on 315
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”. The starter research about the general 316
SuperHyperRelations and as concluding and closing section of theoretical research are 317
contained in the section “General Results”. Some general SuperHyperRelations are 318
fundamental and they are well-known as fundamental SuperHyperNotions as elicited 319
and discussed in the sections, “General Results”, “ SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut”, 320
“Neutrosophic SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut”, “Results on SuperHyperClasses” and 321
“Results on Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”. There are curious questions about what’s 322
done about the SuperHyperNotions to make sense about excellency of this research and 323
going to figure out the word “best” as the description and adjective for this research as 324
presented in section, “ SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut”. The keyword of this research 325
debut in the section “Applications in Cancer’s Recognition” with two cases and 326
subsections “Case 1: The Initial Steps Toward SuperHyperBipartite as 327
SuperHyperModel” and “Case 2: The Increasing Steps Toward SuperHyperMultipartite 328
as SuperHyperModel”. In the section, “Open Problems”, there are some scrutiny and 329
discernment on what’s done and what’s happened in this research in the terms of 330
“questions” and “problems” to make sense to figure out this research in featured style. 331
The advantages and the limitations of this research alongside about what’s done in this 332
research to make sense and to get sense about what’s figured out are included in the 333
section, “Conclusion and Closing Remarks”. 334
3 Neutrosophic Preliminaries Of This Scientific 335
Research On the Redeemed Ways 336
In this section, the basic material in this scientific research, is referred to [Single Valued 337
Neutrosophic Set](Ref. [189],Definition 2.2,p.2), [Neutrosophic 338
Set](Ref. [189],Definition 2.1,p.1), [Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 339
(NSHG)](Ref. [189],Definition 2.5,p.2), [Characterization of the Neutrosophic 340
SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)](Ref. [189],Definition 2.7,p.3), [t-norm](Ref. [189], 341
Definition 2.7, p.3), and [Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 342
(NSHG)](Ref. [189],Definition 2.7,p.3), [Neutrosophic Strength of the Neutrosophic 343
SuperHyperPaths] (Ref. [189],Definition 5.3,p.7), and [Different Neutrosophic Types of 344
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)] (Ref. [189],Definition 5.4,p.7). Also, the new 345
ideas and their clarifications are addressed to Ref. [189]. 346
In this subsection, the basic material which is used in this scientific research, is 347
presented. Also, the new ideas and their clarifications are elicited. 348
Definition 3.1 (Neutrosophic Set). (Ref. [189],Definition 2.1,p.1). 349
Let X be a Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut of points (objects) with generic elements in X denoted

by x; then the Neutrosophic set A (NS A) is an object having the form
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}

+
where the functions T, I, F : X →]− 0, 1 [ define respectively the a
truth-membership function, an indeterminacy-membership function, and a
falsity-membership function of the element x ∈ X to the set A with the condition
−
0 ≤ TA (x) + IA (x) + FA (x) ≤ 3+ .
The functions TA (x), IA (x) and FA (x) are real standard or nonstandard subsets of 350
+
]− 0, 1 [. 351
Definition 3.2 (Single Valued Neutrosophic Set). (Ref. [189],Definition 2.2,p.2). 352
Let X be a Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut of points (objects) with generic elements in X denoted

by x. A single valued Neutrosophic set A (SVNS A) is characterized by
truth-membership function TA (x), an indeterminacy-membership function IA (x), and a
falsity-membership function FA (x). For each point x in X, TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) ∈ [0, 1].
A SVNS A can be written as
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}.
Definition 3.3. The degree of truth-membership,

indeterminacy-membership and falsity-membership of the subset X ⊂ A of
the single valued Neutrosophic set A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}:
TA (X) = min[TA (vi ), TA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,
IA (X) = min[IA (vi ), IA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,

and FA (X) = min[FA (vi ), FA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X .
Definition 3.4. The support of X ⊂ A of the single valued Neutrosophic set

A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}:
supp(X) = {x ∈ X : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) > 0}.
Definition 3.5 (Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). (Ref. [189],Definition 353
2.5,p.2). 354
Assume V 0 is a given set. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a 355
pair S = (V, E), where 356
(i) V = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vn } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of V 0 ; 357
(ii) V = {(Vi , TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi )) : TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi ) ≥ 0}, (i = 358
1, 2, . . . , n); 359
(iii) E = {E1 , E2 , . . . , En0 } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of 360
V; 361
(iv) E = {(Ei0 , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )) : TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 ) ≥ 0}, (i0 = 362
1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 363
(v) Vi 6= ∅, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 364
(vi) Ei0 6= ∅, (i0 = 1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 365
P
(vii) i supp(Vi ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 366
0 0
P
(viii) i0 supp(Ei ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n );
0 367
(ix) and the following conditions hold:
TV0 (Ei0 ) ≤ min[TV 0 (Vi ), TV 0 (Vj )]Vi ,Vj ∈Ei0 ,
IV0 (Ei0 ) ≤ min[IV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vj )]Vi ,Vj ∈Ei0 ,

and FV0 (Ei0 ) ≤ min[FV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vj )]Vi ,Vj ∈Ei0
where i0 = 1, 2, . . . , n0 . 368
Here the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ej 0 and the Neutrosophic 369
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) Vj are single valued Neutrosophic sets. TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), 370
and FV 0 (Vi ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 371
indeterminacy-membership and the degree of falsity-membership the Neutrosophic 372
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) V. 373
TV0 (Ei0 ), TV0 (Ei0 ), and TV0 (Ei0 ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 374
indeterminacy-membership and the degree of falsity-membership of the Neutrosophic 375
SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) Ei0 to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) E. Thus, 376
the ii0 th element of the incidence matrix of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) 377
are of the form (Vi , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )), the sets V and E are crisp sets. 378
Definition 3.6 (Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). 379
(Ref. [189],Definition 2.7,p.3). 380
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). The 381
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ei0 and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 382
(NSHV) Vi of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S = (V, E) could be 383
characterized as follow-up items. 384
(i) If |Vi | = 1, then Vi is called vertex; 385
(ii) if |Vi | ≥ 1, then Vi is called SuperVertex; 386
(iii) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called edge; 387
(iv) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 388
HyperEdge; 389
(v) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called 390
SuperEdge; 391
(vi) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 392
SuperHyperEdge. 393
If we choose different types of binary operations, then we could get hugely diverse 394
types of general forms of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG). 395
Definition 3.7 (t-norm). (Ref. [189], Definition 2.7, p.3). 396
A binary operation ⊗ : [0, 1] × [0, 1] → [0, 1] is a t-norm if it satisfies the following 397
for x, y, z, w ∈ [0, 1]: 398
(i) 1 ⊗ x = x; 399
(ii) x ⊗ y = y ⊗ x; 400
(iii) x ⊗ (y ⊗ z) = (x ⊗ y) ⊗ z; 401
(iv) If w ≤ x and y ≤ z then w ⊗ y ≤ x ⊗ z. 402
Definition 3.8. The degree of truth-membership, indeterminacy-membership

and falsity-membership of the subset X ⊂ A of the single valued Neutrosophic set
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X} (with respect to t-norm Tnorm ):
TA (X) = Tnorm [TA (vi ), TA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,
IA (X) = Tnorm [IA (vi ), IA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,

and FA (X) = Tnorm [FA (vi ), FA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X .
Definition 3.9. The support of X ⊂ A of the single valued Neutrosophic set
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}:
supp(X) = {x ∈ X : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) > 0}.
Definition 3.10. (General Forms of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). 403
Assume V 0 is a given set. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a 404
pair S = (V, E), where 405
(i) V = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vn } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of V 0 ; 406
(ii) V = {(Vi , TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi )) : TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi ) ≥ 0}, (i = 407
1, 2, . . . , n); 408
(iii) E = {E1 , E2 , . . . , En0 } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of 409
V; 410
(iv) E = {(Ei0 , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )) : TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 ) ≥ 0}, (i0 = 411
1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 412
(v) Vi 6= ∅, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 413
(vi) Ei0 6= ∅, (i0 = 1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 414
P
(vii) i supp(Vi ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 415
0 0
P
(viii) i0 supp(Ei ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n ).
0 416
Here the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ej 0 and the Neutrosophic 417
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) Vj are single valued Neutrosophic sets. TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), 418
and FV 0 (Vi ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 419
indeterminacy-membership and the degree of falsity-membership the Neutrosophic 420
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) V. 421
TV0 (Ei0 ), TV0 (Ei0 ), and TV0 (Ei0 ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 422
indeterminacy-membership and the degree of falsity-membership of the Neutrosophic 423
SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) Ei0 to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) E. Thus, 424
the ii0 th element of the incidence matrix of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) 425
are of the form (Vi , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )), the sets V and E are crisp sets. 426
Definition 3.11 (Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). 427
(Ref. [189],Definition 2.7,p.3). 428
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). The 429
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ei0 and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 430
(NSHV) Vi of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S = (V, E) could be 431
characterized as follow-up items. 432
(i) If |Vi | = 1, then Vi is called vertex; 433
(ii) if |Vi | ≥ 1, then Vi is called SuperVertex; 434
(iii) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called edge; 435
(iv) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 436
HyperEdge; 437
(v) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called 438
SuperEdge; 439
(vi) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 440
SuperHyperEdge. 441
This SuperHyperModel is too messy and too dense. Thus there’s a need to have 442
some restrictions and conditions on SuperHyperGraph. The special case of this 443
SuperHyperGraph makes the patterns and regularities. 444
Definition 3.12. A graph is SuperHyperUniform if it’s SuperHyperGraph and the 445
number of elements of SuperHyperEdges are the same. 446
To get more visions on SuperHyperUniform, the some SuperHyperClasses are 447
introduced. It makes to have SuperHyperUniform more understandable. 448
Definition 3.13. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. There are some 449
SuperHyperClasses as follows. 450
(i). It’s Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath if it’s only one SuperVertex as 451
intersection amid two given SuperHyperEdges with two exceptions; 452
(ii). it’s SuperHyperCycle if it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two 453
given SuperHyperEdges; 454
(iii). it’s SuperHyperStar it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid all 455
SuperHyperEdges; 456
(iv). it’s SuperHyperBipartite it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two 457
given SuperHyperEdges and these SuperVertices, forming two separate sets, has 458
no SuperHyperEdge in common; 459
(v). it’s SuperHyperMultiPartite it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid 460
two given SuperHyperEdges and these SuperVertices, forming multi separate sets, 461
has no SuperHyperEdge in common; 462
(vi). it’s SuperHyperWheel if it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two 463
given SuperHyperEdges and one SuperVertex has one SuperHyperEdge with any 464
common SuperVertex. 465
Definition 3.14. Let a pair S = (V, E) be a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)

S. Then a sequence of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) and Neutrosophic
SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)
V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs
is called a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic 466
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) V1 to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vs if either 467
of following conditions hold: 468
(i) Vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 469
(ii) there’s a vertex vi ∈ Vi such that vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 470
(iii) there’s a SuperVertex Vi0 ∈ Vi such that Vi0 , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 471
(iv) there’s a vertex vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that Vi , vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 472
0 0
(v) there’s a SuperVertex Vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that Vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 473
(vi) there are a vertex vi ∈ Vi and a vertex vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that vi , vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 474
0 0
(vii) there are a vertex vi ∈ Vi and a SuperVertex Vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 475
(viii) there are a SuperVertex Vi0 ∈ Vi and a vertex vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that Vi0 , vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 476
(ix) there are a SuperVertex Vi0 ∈ Vi and a SuperVertex Vi+1

0
∈ Vi+1 such that 477
0 0
Vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 . 478
Definition 3.15. (Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPaths). 479
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). a

Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV)
V1 to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vs is sequence of Neutrosophic
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) and Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)
V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs ,
could be characterized as follow-up items. 480
(i) If for all Vi , Ej 0 , |Vi | = 1, |Ej 0 | = 2, then NSHP is called path; 481
(ii) if for all Ej 0 , |Ej 0 | = 2, and there’s Vi , |Vi | ≥ 1, then NSHP is called SuperPath; 482
(iii) if for all Vi , Ej 0 , |Vi | = 1, |Ej 0 | ≥ 2, then NSHP is called HyperPath; 483
(iv) if there are Vi , Ej 0 , |Vi | ≥ 1, |Ej 0 | ≥ 2, then NSHP is called Neutrosophic 484
SuperHyperPath . 485
Definition 3.16 (Neutrosophic Strength of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPaths). 486
(Ref. [189],Definition 5.3,p.7). 487
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). A

Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV)
V1 to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vs is sequence of Neutrosophic
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) and Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)
V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs ,
have 488
(i) Neutrosophic t-strength (min{T (Vi )}, m, n)si=1 ; 489
(ii) Neutrosophic i-strength (m, min{I(Vi )}, n)si=1 ; 490
(iii) Neutrosophic f-strength (m, n, min{F (Vi )})si=1 ; 491
(iv) Neutrosophic strength (min{T (Vi )}, min{I(Vi )}, min{F (Vi )})si=1 . 492
Definition 3.17 (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges 493
(NSHE)). (Ref. [189],Definition 5.4,p.7). 494
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). Consider 495
a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) E = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then E is called 496
(ix) Neutrosophic t-connective if T (E) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic 497
t-strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 498
(NSHV) Vi to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vj where 1 ≤ i, j ≤ s; 499
(x) Neutrosophic i-connective if I(E) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic 500
i-strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 501
(xi) Neutrosophic f-connective if F (E) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic 503
f-strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 504
(xii) Neutrosophic connective if (T (E), I(E), F (E)) ≥ maximum number of 506
Neutrosophic strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic 507
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vj 508
where 1 ≤ i, j ≤ s. 509
Definition 3.18. (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic 510
SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut). 511
a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs } and E 0 = {E1 , E2 , . . . , Ez }. Then 513
either V 0 or E 0 is called 514
(i) Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut if the following expression is 515
called Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut criteria holds 516
0
∀E ∈ C : C is
(ii) Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut if the following expression is 517
called Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut criteria holds 518
∀E 0 ∈ C : C is
and |Ei |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY = |Ej |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY ; 519
(iii) Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut if the following expression is 520
called Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut criteria holds 521
∀V 0 ∈ C : C is
(iv) Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut if the following expression is 522
called Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut criteria holds 523
∀V 0 ∈ C : C is
and |Vi |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY = |Vj |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY ; 524
(v) Neutrosophic SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut if it’s either of Neutrosophic 525
rv-SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut. 528
Definition 3.19. ((Neutrosophic) SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut). 529
(i) an Extreme SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut if it’s either of Neutrosophic 532
rv-SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut and C(N SHG) for an Extreme 535
SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum Extreme cardinality of an 536
Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality of the Extreme 537
SuperHyperEdges in the conseNeighborive Extreme sequence of Extreme 538
SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 539
Extreme SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut; 540
(ii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut if it’s either of Neutrosophic 541
rv-SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut and C(N SHG) for a Neutrosophic 544
SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of 545
the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high 546
Neutrosophic cardinality conseNeighborive Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges and 547
SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut; 549
(iii) an Extreme SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s 550
either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut, Neutrosophic 551
re-SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut, Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut, 552
and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut and C(N SHG) for an Extreme 553
SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Extreme SuperHyperPolynomial 554
contains the Extreme coefficients defined as the Extreme number of the maximum 555
Extreme cardinality of the Extreme SuperHyperEdges of an Extreme 556
SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality conseNeighborive Extreme 557
Extreme SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut; and the Extreme power is corresponded to 559
its Extreme coefficient; 560
(iv) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut SuperHyperPolynomial if 561
it’s either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut, Neutrosophic 562
and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut and C(N SHG) for a 564
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Neutrosophic 565
Neutrosophic number of the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of the 567
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high 568
Neutrosophic coefficient; 572
(v) an Extreme V-SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut if it’s either of Neutrosophic 573
rv-SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut and C(N SHG) for an Extreme 576
SuperHyperVertices in the conseNeighborive Extreme sequence of Extreme 579
Extreme SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut; 581
(vi) a Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut if it’s either of 582
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum Neutrosophic 586
cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of a Neutrosophic 587
SuperHyperSet S of high Neutrosophic cardinality conseNeighborive Neutrosophic 588
SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 589
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut; 590
(vii) an Extreme V-SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut SuperHyperPolynomial if 591
and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut and C(N SHG) for an Extreme 594
Extreme cardinality of the Extreme SuperHyperVertices of an Extreme 597
Extreme SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut; and the Extreme power is corresponded to 600
its Extreme coefficient; 601
(viii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut SuperHyperPolynomial if 602
Table 1. The Values of Vertices, SuperVertices, Edges, HyperEdges, and SuperHy-

perEdges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph Mentioned in the Definition
(3.23)
The Values of The Vertices The Number of Position in Alphabet
The Values of The SuperVertices The maximum Values of Its Vertices
The Values of The Edges The maximum Values of Its Vertices
The Values of The HyperEdges The maximum Values of Its Vertices
The Values of The SuperHyperEdges The maximum Values of Its Endpoints
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high 609
Neutrosophic coefficient. 613
Definition 3.20. ((Extreme/Neutrosophic)δ−SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut). 614
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). Then 615
(i) an δ−SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut is a Neutrosophic kind of Neutrosophic 616
SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut such that either of the following expressions hold for 617
the Neutrosophic cardinalities of SuperHyperNeighbors of s ∈ S : 618
|S ∩ N (s)| > |S ∩ (V \ N (s))| + δ;

|S ∩ N (s)| < |S ∩ (V \ N (s))| + δ.
The Expression (3.1), holds if S is an δ−SuperHyperOffensive. And the 619
Expression (3.1), holds if S is an δ−SuperHyperDefensive; 620
(ii) a Neutrosophic δ−SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut is a Neutrosophic kind of 621
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut such that either of the following 622
Neutrosophic expressions hold for the Neutrosophic cardinalities of 623
SuperHyperNeighbors of s ∈ S : 624
|S ∩ N (s)|N eutrosophic > |S ∩ (V \ N (s))|N eutrosophic + δ;

|S ∩ N (s)|N eutrosophic < |S ∩ (V \ N (s))|N eutrosophic + δ.
The Expression (3.1), holds if S is a Neutrosophic δ−SuperHyperOffensive. 625
And the Expression (3.1), holds if S is a Neutrosophic 626
δ−SuperHyperDefensive. 627
For the sake of having a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut, there’s a need 628
to “redefine” the notion of “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”. The 629
SuperHyperVertices and the SuperHyperEdges are assigned by the labels from the 630
letters of the alphabets. In this procedure, there’s the usage of the position of labels to 631
assign to the values. 632
Definition 3.21. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair 633
S = (V, E). It’s redefined Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph if the Table (1) holds. 634
It’s useful to define a “Neutrosophic” version of SuperHyperClasses. Since there’s 635
more ways to get Neutrosophic type-results to make a Neutrosophic more 636
understandable. 637

perEdges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, Mentioned in the Definition
(3.22)

perEdges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph Mentioned in the Definition
(3.23)
Definition 3.22. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair 638
S = (V, E). There are some Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses if the Table (2) 639
holds. Thus Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath , SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut, 640
SuperHyperStar, SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultiPartite, and 641
SuperHyperWheel, are Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath, Neutrosophic 642
SuperHyperCycle, Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar, Neutrosophic 643
SuperHyperBipartite, Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultiPartite, and 644
Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel if the Table (2) holds. 645
It’s useful to define a “Neutrosophic” version of a Neutrosophic 646
SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut. Since there’s more ways to get type-results to make a 647
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut more Neutrosophicly understandable. 648
For the sake of having a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut, there’s a need 649
to “redefine” the Neutrosophic notion of “Neutrosophic SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut”. 650
The SuperHyperVertices and the SuperHyperEdges are assigned by the labels from the 651
letters of the alphabets. In this procedure, there’s the usage of the position of labels to 652
assign to the values. 653
Definition 3.23. Assume a SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut. It’s redefined a 654
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut if the Table (3) holds. 655
4 Neutrosophic SuperHyper But As Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut 656
The Extensions Excerpt From Dense And Super 657
Forms 658
Definition 4.1. (Neutrosophic event). 659
S = (V, E) is a probability Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut. Any Neutrosophic k-subset of A of V is 661
called Neutrosophic k-event and if k = 2, then Neutrosophic subset of A of V is 662
called Neutrosophic event. The following expression is called Neutrosophic 663
probability of A. 664
X
E(A) = E(a). (4.1)
a∈A
Definition 4.2. (Neutrosophic Independent). 665
S = (V, E) is a probability Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut. s Neutrosophic k-events Ai , i ∈ I is 667
called Neutrosophic s-independent if the following expression is called 668
Neutrosophic s-independent criteria 669
Y
E(∩i∈I Ai ) = P (Ai ).
i∈I
And if s = 2, then Neutrosophic k-events of A and B is called Neutrosophic 670
independent. The following expression is called Neutrosophic independent 671
criteria 672
E(A ∩ B) = P (A)P (B). (4.2)

Definition 4.3. (Neutrosophic Variable). 673
S = (V, E) is a probability Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut. Any k-function Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut like E 675
is called Neutrosophic k-Variable. If k = 2, then any 2-function Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut 676
like E is called Neutrosophic Variable. 677
The notion of independent on Neutrosophic Variable is likewise. 678
Definition 4.4. (Neutrosophic Expectation). 679
S = (V, E) is a probability Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut. A Neutrosophic k-Variable E has a 681
number is called Neutrosophic Expectation if the following expression is called 682
Neutrosophic Expectation criteria 683
X
Ex(E) = E(α)P (α).
α∈V
Definition 4.5. (Neutrosophic Crossing). 684
S = (V, E) is a probability Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut. A Neutrosophic number is called 686
Neutrosophic Crossing if the following expression is called Neutrosophic 687
Crossing criteria 688
Cr(S) = min{Number of Crossing in a Plane Embedding of S}.

Lemma 4.6. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair 689
S = (V, E). Consider S = (V, E) is a probability Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut. Let m and n propose 690
special Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut. Then with m ≥ 4n, 691
Proof. Consider a planar embedding G of G with cr(G) crossings. Let S be a 692
Neutrosophic random k-subset of V obtained by choosing each SuperHyperVertex of G 693
Neutrosophic independently with probability Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut p := 4n/m, and set 694
H := G[S] and H := G[S]. 695
Define random variables X, Y, Z on V as follows: X is the Neutrosophic number of

SuperHyperVertices, Y the Neutrosophic number of SuperHyperEdges, and Z the
Neutrosophic number of crossings of H. The trivial bound noted above, when applied to
H, yields the inequality Z ≥ cr(H) ≥ Y − 3X. By linearity of Neutrosophic Expectation,
E(Z) ≥ E(Y ) − 3E(X).
Now E(X) = pn, E(Y ) = p2 m (each SuperHyperEdge having some SuperHyperEnds)
and E(Z) = p4 cr(G) (each crossing being defined by some SuperHyperVertices). Hence
p4 cr(G) ≥ p2 m − 3pn.
Dividing both sides by p4 , we have: 696
pm − 3n n 1 3 2
cr(G) ≥ = 3 = 64 m n .
p3 (4n/m)
697
Theorem 4.7. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair 698
S = (V, E). Consider S = (V, E) is a probability Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut. Let P be a 699
SuperHyperSet of n points in the plane, and let l be the Neutrosophic number of 700
SuperHyperLines
√ in the plane passing through at least k + 1 of these points, where 701
1 ≤ k ≤ 2 2n. Then l < 32n2 /k 3 . 702
Proof. Form a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph G with SuperHyperVertex 703
SuperHyperSet P whose SuperHyperEdge are the segments between conseNeighborive 704
points on the SuperHyperLines which pass through at least k + 1 points of P. This 705
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph has at least kl SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic 706
crossing at most l choose two. Thus either kl < 4n, in which case l < 4n/k ≤ 32n2 /k 3 , 707
3
or l2 /2 > l choose 2 ≥ cr(G) ≥ (kl) /64n2 by the Neutrosophic Crossing Lemma, and 708
2 3
again l < 32n /k . 709
S = (V, E). Consider S = (V, E) is a probability Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut. Let P be a 711
SuperHyperSet of n points in the plane, and let k be the number of pairs of points of P 712
at unit SuperHyperDistance. Then k < 5n4/3 . 713
Proof. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). 714
Consider S = (V, E) is a probability Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut. Draw a SuperHyperUnit 715
SuperHyperCircle around each SuperHyperPoint of P. Let ni be the Neutrosophic 716
number of these SuperHyperCircles passing through exactly i points of P. Then 717
i = 0n−1 ni = n and k = 21 i = 0n−1 ini . Now form a Neutrosophic

P P
718
SuperHyperGraph H with SuperHyperVertex SuperHyperSet P whose 719
SuperHyperEdges are the SuperHyperArcs between conseNeighborive SuperHyperPoints 720
on the SuperHyperCircles that pass through at least three SuperHyperPoints of P. Then 721
n−1
X
e(H) = ini = 2k − n1 − 2n2 ≥ 2k − 2n.
i=3
Some SuperHyperPairs of SuperHyperVertices of H might be joined by some parallel 722
SuperHyperEdges. Delete from H one of each SuperHyperPair of parallel 723
SuperHyperEdges, so as to obtain a simple Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph G with 724
e(G) ≥ k − n. Now cr(G) ≤ n(n − 1) because G is formed from at most n 725
SuperHyperCircles, and any two SuperHyperCircles cross at most twice. Thus either 726
3
e(G) < 4n, in which case k < 5n < 5n4/3 , or n2 > n(n − 1) ≥ cr(G) ≥ (k − n) /64n2 727
by the Neutrosophic Crossing Lemma, and k < 4n4/3 + n < 5n4/3 . 728
Proposition 4.9. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair 729
S = (V, E). Consider S = (V, E) is a probability Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut. Let X be a 730
nonnegative Neutrosophic Variable and t a positive real number. Then 731
E(X)
P (X ≥ t) ≤ .
t
Proof.
X X
E(X) = {X(a)P (a) : a ∈ V } ≥ {X(a)P (a) : a ∈ V, X(a) ≥ t}
X X
{tP (a) : a ∈ V, X(a) ≥ t} = t {P (a) : a ∈ V, X(a) ≥ t}
tP (X ≥ t).
Dividing the first and last members by t yields the asserted inequality. 732
Corollary 4.10. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair 733
S = (V, E). Consider S = (V, E) is a probability Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut. Let Xn be a 734
nonnegative integer-valued variable in a probability Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut (Vn , En ), n ≥ 1. If 735
E(Xn ) → 0 as n → ∞, then P (Xn = 0) → 1 as n → ∞. 736
Proof. 737
S = (V, E). Consider S = (V, E) is a probability Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut. A special 739
SuperHyperGraph in Gn,p almost surely has stability number at most d2p−1 log ne. 740
Consider S = (V, E) is a probability Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut. A special SuperHyperGraph in 742
Gn,p is up. Let G ∈ Gn,p and let S be a given SuperHyperSet of k + 1 743
SuperHyperVertices of G, where k ∈ N. The probability that S is a stable 744
SuperHyperSet of G is (1 − p)(k+1)choose2 , this being the probability that none of the 745
(k + 1)choose2 pairs of SuperHyperVertices of S is a SuperHyperEdge of the 746
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph G. 747
Let AS denote the event that S is a stable SuperHyperSet of G, and let XS denote 748
the indicator Neutrosophic Variable for this Neutrosophic Event. By equation, we have 749
E(XS ) = P (XS = 1) = P (AS ) = (1 − p)(k+1)choose2 .
Let X be the number of stable SuperHyperSets of cardinality k + 1 in G. Then 750
X
X= {XS : S ⊆ V, |S| = k + 1}
and so, by those, 751
X
E(X) = {E(XS ) : S ⊆ V, |S| = k + 1} = (n choose k+1)(1 − p)(k+1)choose2 .
We bound the right-hand side by invoking two elementary inequalities: 752
nk+1
(n choose k+1) ≤ and1 − p ≤ e−p .
(k + 1)!
This yields the following upper bound on E(X). 753
nk+1 e−p)(k+1)choose2 ne−pk/2k+1

E(X) ≤ =
(k + 1)! (k + 1)!
Suppose now that k = d2p−1 log ne. Then k ≥ 2p−1 log n, so ne−pk/2 ≤ 1. Because k 754
grows at least as fast as the logarithm of n, implies that E(X) → 0 as n → ∞. Because 755
X is integer-valued and nonnegative, we deduce from Corollary that P (X = 0) → 1 as 756
n → ∞. Consequently, a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph in Gn,p almost surely has 757
stability number at most k. 758
Definition 4.12. (Neutrosophic Variance). 759
S = (V, E) is a probability Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut. A Neutrosophic k-Variable E has a 761
number is called Neutrosophic Variance if the following expression is called 762
Neutrosophic Variance criteria 763
2
V x(E) = Ex((X − Ex(X)) ).
S = (V, E). Consider S = (V, E) is a probability Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut. Let X be a 765
Neutrosophic Variable and let t be a positive real number. Then 766
V (X)
E(|X − Ex(X)| ≥ t) ≤ .
t2
Consider S = (V, E) is a probability Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut. Let X be a Neutrosophic 768
Variable and let t be a positive real number. Then 769
2
2 Ex((X − Ex(X)) ) V (X)
E(|X − Ex(X)| ≥ t) = E((X − Ex(X)) ≥ t2 ) ≤ = .
t2 t2
770
S = (V, E). Consider S = (V, E) is a probability Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut. Let Xn be a 772
Neutrosophic Variable in a probability Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut (Vn , En ), n ≥ 1. If Ex(Xn ) 6= 0 773
and V (Xn ) << E 2 (Xn ), then 774
E(Xn = 0) → 0 as n → ∞
Consider S = (V, E) is a probability Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut. Set X := Xn and t := |Ex(Xn )| 776
in Chebyshev’s Inequality, and observe that 777
E(Xn = 0) ≤ E(|Xn − Ex(Xn )| ≥ |Ex(Xn )|) because |Xn − Ex(Xn )| = |Ex(Xn )| 778
when Xn = 0. 779
S = (V, E). Consider S = (V, E) is a probability Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut. Let G ∈ Gn,1/2 . For 781
0 ≤ k ≤ n, set f (k) := (n choose k)2−(k choose 2) and let k ∗ be the least value of k for 782
which f (k) is less than one. Then almost surely α(G) takes one of the three values 783
k ∗ − 2, k ∗ − 1, k ∗ . 784
Consider S = (V, E) is a probability Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut. As in the proof of related 786
Theorem, the result is straightforward. 787
S = (V, E). Consider S = (V, E) is a probability Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut. Let G ∈ Gn,1/2 and let 789
f and k ∗ be as defined in previous Theorem. Then either: 790
(i). f (k ∗ ) << 1, in which case almost surely α(G) is equal to either k ∗ − 2 or k ∗ − 1, 791
or 792
(ii). f (k ∗ − 1) >> 1, in which case almost surely α(G) is equal to either k ∗ − 1 or k ∗ . 793
Consider S = (V, E) is a probability Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut. The latter is 795
straightforward. 796
Definition 4.17. (Neutrosophic Threshold). 797
S = (V, E) is a probability Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut. Let P be a monotone property of 799
SuperHyperGraphs (one which is preserved when SuperHyperEdges are added). Then a 800
Neutrosophic Threshold for P is a function f (n) such that: 801
(i). if p << f (n), then G ∈ Gn,p almost surely does not have P, 802
(ii). if p >> f (n), then G ∈ Gn,p almost surely has P. 803
Definition 4.18. (Neutrosophic Balanced). 804
S = (V, E) is a probability Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut. Let F be a fixed Neutrosophic 806
SuperHyperGraph. Then there is a threshold function for the property of containing a 807
copy of F as a Neutrosophic SubSuperHyperGraph is called Neutrosophic Balanced. 808
S = (V, E). Consider S = (V, E) is a probability Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut. Let F be a nonempty 810
balanced Neutrosophic SubSuperHyperGraph with k SuperHyperVertices and l 811
SuperHyperEdges. Then n−k/l is a threshold function for the property of containing F 812
as a Neutrosophic SubSuperHyperGraph. 813
Consider S = (V, E) is a probability Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut. The latter is 815
Example 4.20. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair 817
S = (V, E) in the mentioned Neutrosophic Figures in every Neutrosophic items. 818
• On the Figure (1), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 819
SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is 820
Neutrosophicly straightforward. E1 and E3 are some empty Neutrosophic 821
SuperHyperEdges but E2 is a loop Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge and E4 is a 822
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. Thus in the terms of Neutrosophic 823
SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only one Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge, namely, 824
E4 . The Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 is Neutrosophic isolated means that 825
there’s no Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge has it as a Neutrosophic endpoint. Thus 826
the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 , is excluded in every given Neutrosophic 827
SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut. 828
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut

= {E4 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut SuperHyperPolynomial
= z3.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut
= {V1 , V2 , V4 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut SuperHyperPolynomial
= z 5 + 2z 3 .
829
Neutrosophicly straightforward. E1 , E2 and E3 are some empty Neutrosophic 832
SuperHyperEdges but E4 is a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. Thus in the terms 833
of Neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only one Neutrosophic 834
SuperHyperEdge, namely, E4 . The Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 is 835
Neutrosophic isolated means that there’s no Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge has it 836
Figure 1. The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions

of Neutrosophic SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut in the Neutrosophic Example (16.3)
as a Neutrosophic endpoint. Thus the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 , is 837
excluded in every given Neutrosophic SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut. 838

= {E4 }.
= z3.
= {V1 , V2 , V4 }.
= z 5 + z 3 + z.
839
Neutrosophicly straightforward. 842

= {E4 }.
= z3.
= {V1 , V2 , V3 }.
= z8 + z4 + z3.
843




= {E4 , E1 , E5 , E4 }.
= 3z 5 + z 3 .
= {V1 , V2 , {N }, {F }, V3 , {H}, V4 , V1 }.
= 2z 4 + 2z 3 + 3z 2 + 5z.
847

= {E1 }.
= z5.
= {Vi=15 }.
= z 7 + 2z 4 + z 3 + z 2 .
851


= {Ei=110 ,Ei=2332 ,E
12 ,E22 }.

= 22z 2 .
= {Vi ∈ VN SHG }.
X
= z |Vi ∈VN SHG | .
855

= {Ei=110 ,E17 ,E14 ,E13 ,E15 }.
= z 5 + z 4 + 12z 2 .
= {Vi ∈ VN SHG }.
X
859




= {E3 }.
= z5.
= {}.
= 2z 6 + 2z 5 + z 4 .
863

= {Ei=110 ,E23 ,E12 ,E22 }.
= z 11 + 12z 2 .
= {Vi ∈ VN SHG }.
X
867


= {E4 , E7 , E6 }.
= 3z 2 .
= {V12 , V13 , V14 }.
= 2z 5 + z 3 .
871

= {E1 , E6 , E5 , E4 , E7 }.
= z 3 + 4z 2 .
= {Vi ∈ VN SHG }.
X
Figure 10. The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic

Notions of Neutrosophic SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut in the Neutrosophic Example
(16.3)

(16.3)

(16.3)
875

= {E1 }.
= z5.
= {V1 , V2 , V3 , V7 , V8 }.
= z 8 + z 7 + 3z 5 .
879

(16.3)

= {E1 , E10 , E8 , E4 , E2 , E6 }.
= 6z 2 .
= {Vi ∈ VN SHG }.
= 3z 5 + z 4 + 2z 3 .
883

= {E1 }.
= z2.
= {V1 , V3 }.
= 2z 5 .
887

(16.3)

(16.3)

= {E1 }.
= z2.
= {V1 , V5 }.
= 2z 5 .
891

= {E4 }.
= z 10 .
= {Vi=817 }.
X
895

(16.3)

= {E4 }.
= z 10 .
= {Vi=817 }.
X
899

= {E4 }.
= z 10 .
= {Vi=817 }.
X
903

(16.3)

(16.3)

(16.3)

= {Ei=112 }.
X
= z |Ei ∈EN SHG | .
= {|Vi ∈ VN SHG }.
X
907

(16.3)

= {E6 }.
= z |E6 | .
= {VE6 }.
X
= z |VE6 |.
911
(4.4)
912

(16.3)

= {E2 }.
= z |E2 | .
= {VE2 }.
X
= z |VE2 |.
916
(4.6)
917

(16.3)

= {E4 }.
= z |E4 | .
= {VE4 }.
X
= z |VE4 |.
921
(4.8)
922
Proposition 4.21. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 923
ESHG : (V, E). The all interior Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices belong to any 924
Neutrosophic quasi-R-Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut if for any of them, and any of other corresponded 925
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, some interior Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices are 926
mutually Neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbors with no Neutrosophic exception at all 927
minus all Neutrosophic SuperHypeNeighbors to any amount of them. 928
Proposition 4.22. Assume a connected non-obvious Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 929
ESHG : (V, E). There’s only one Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) has 930
only the maximum possibilities of the distinct interior Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 931
inside of any given Neutrosophic quasi-R-Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut minus all Neutrosophic 932
SuperHypeNeighbor to some of them but not all of them. In other words, there’s only an 933
unique Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) has only two distinct 934
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices in an Neutrosophic quasi-R-Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut, minus all 935
Neutrosophic SuperHypeNeighbor to some of them but not all of them. 936
Proposition 4.23. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph

ESHG : (V, E). If a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) has z
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, then the Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic
R-Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut is at least
V \ (V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . . , zE }).
It’s straightforward that the Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic 937
R-Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut is at least the maximum Neutrosophic number of Neutrosophic 938
SuperHyperVertices of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges with the maximum number of 939
the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges. In other words, the maximum number of the 940
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges contains the maximum Neutrosophic number of 941
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices are renamed to Neutrosophic Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut in some 942
cases but the maximum number of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge with the maximum 943
Neutrosophic number of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, has the Neutrosophic 944
SuperHyperVertices are contained in a Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut. 945
Proposition 4.24. Assume a simple Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E).

Then the Neutrosophic number of type-result-R-Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut has, the least
Neutrosophic cardinality, the lower sharp Neutrosophic bound for Neutrosophic
cardinality, is the Neutrosophic cardinality of
V \ V \ {aE , bE 0 , cE 00 , cE 000 }E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .
If there’s a Neutrosophic type-result-R-Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut with the least Neutrosophic 946
cardinality, the lower sharp Neutrosophic bound for cardinality. 947
Proposition 4.25. Assume a connected loopless Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 948
ESHG : (V, E). Then in the worst case, literally, 949
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−Eulerian−T ype−Cycle−Cut

= {V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , E3 , V4 , E4 , V1 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−Eulerian−T ype−Cycle−CutSuperHyperP olynomial = z 4 .
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−Eulerian−T ype−Cycle−Cut = {V1 , V2 , V3 , V4 , V1 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−Eulerian−T ype−Cycle−CutSuperHyperP olynomial = z 5 .
Is a Neutrosophic type-result-Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut. In other words, the least cardinality, the 950
lower sharp bound for the cardinality, of a Neutrosophic type-result-Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut is 951
the cardinality of 952

= {V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , E3 , V4 , E4 , V1 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−Eulerian−T ype−Cycle−CutSuperHyperP olynomial = z 4 .
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−Eulerian−T ype−Cycle−Cut = {V1 , V2 , V3 , V4 , V1 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−Eulerian−T ype−Cycle−CutSuperHyperP olynomial = z 5 .
Proof. Assume a connected loopless Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E).

The SuperHyperSet of the SuperHyperVertices V \ V \ {z} isn’t a
quasi-R-Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut since neither amount of Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges nor
amount of SuperHyperVertices where amount refers to the Neutrosophic number of

SuperHyperVertices(-/SuperHyperEdges) more than one to form any kind of
SuperHyperEdges or any number of SuperHyperEdges. Let us consider the
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet
V \V \{aE , bE , cE , . . . , aE 0 , bE 0 , cE 0 , . . .}E,E 0 ={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .
This Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices has the

eligibilities to propose property such that there’s no Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex of
a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge is common and there’s an Neutrosophic
SuperHyperEdge for all Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices but the maximum
Neutrosophic cardinality indicates that these Neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSets
couldn’t give us the Neutrosophic lower bound in the term of Neutrosophic sharpness.
In other words, the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet
V \V \{aE , bE , cE , . . . , aE 0 , bE 0 , cE 0 , . . .}E,E 0 ={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }}
of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices implies at least on-quasi-triangle style is up but

sometimes the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet
of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices is free-quasi-triangle and it doesn’t make a

contradiction to the supposition on the connected loopless Neutrosophic
SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). Thus the minimum case never happens in the
generality of the connected loopless Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs. Thus if we
assume in the worst case, literally,
V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .
Is a quasi-R-Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut. In other words, the least cardinality, the lower sharp

bound for the cardinality, of a quasi-R-Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut is the cardinality of
Then we’ve lost some connected loopless Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses of the

connected loopless Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs titled free-triangle, on-triangle, and
their quasi-types but the SuperHyperStable is only up in this quasi-R-Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut.
It’s the contradiction to that fact on the generality. There are some counterexamples to
deny this statement. One of them comes from the setting of the graph titled path and
cycle as the counterexamples-classes or reversely direction star as the examples-classes,
are well-known classes in that setting and they could be considered as the
examples-classes and counterexamples-classes for the tight bound of
Let V \ V \ {z} in mind. There’s no necessity on the SuperHyperEdge since we need at 953
least two SuperHyperVertices to form a SuperHyperEdge. It doesn’t withdraw the 954
principles of the main definition since there’s no condition to be satisfied but the 955
condition is on the existence of the SuperHyperEdge instead of acting on the 956
SuperHyperVertices. In other words, if there’s a SuperHyperEdge, then the 957
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet has the necessary condition for the intended definition to 958
be applied. Thus the V \ V \ {z} is withdrawn not by the conditions of the main 959
definition but by the necessity of the pre-condition on the usage of the main definition. 960
The Neutrosophic structure of the Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut decorates the

Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices don’t have received any Neutrosophic connections so
as this Neutrosophic style implies different versions of Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges
with the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality in the terms of Neutrosophic
SuperHyperVertices are spotlight. The lower Neutrosophic bound is to have the
maximum Neutrosophic groups of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices have perfect
Neutrosophic connections inside each of SuperHyperEdges and the outside of this
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet doesn’t matter but regarding the connectedness of the
used Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph arising from its Neutrosophic properties taken
from the fact that it’s simple. If there’s no more than one Neutrosophic
SuperHyperVertex in the targeted Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, then there’s no
Neutrosophic connection. Furthermore, the Neutrosophic existence of one Neutrosophic
SuperHyperVertex has no Neutrosophic effect to talk about the Neutrosophic
R-Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut. Since at least two Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices involve to
make a title in the Neutrosophic background of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph.
The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph is obvious if it has no Neutrosophic
SuperHyperEdge but at least two Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices make the
Neutrosophic version of Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. Thus in the Neutrosophic
setting of non-obvious Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, there are at least one
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. It’s necessary to mention that the word “Simple” is
used as Neutrosophic adjective for the initial Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, induces
there’s no Neutrosophic appearance of the loop Neutrosophic version of the
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge and this Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph is said to be
loopless. The Neutrosophic adjective “loop” on the basic Neutrosophic framework
engages one Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex but it never happens in this Neutrosophic
setting. With these Neutrosophic bases, on a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, there’s
at least one Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge thus there’s at least a Neutrosophic
R-Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut has the Neutrosophic cardinality of a Neutrosophic
SuperHyperEdge. Thus, a Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut has the Neutrosophic
cardinality at least a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. Assume a Neutrosophic
SuperHyperSet V \ V \ {z}. This Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet isn’t a Neutrosophic
R-Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut since either the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph is an obvious
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel thus it never happens since there’s no Neutrosophic
usage of this Neutrosophic framework and even more there’s no Neutrosophic
connection inside or the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph isn’t obvious and as its
consequences, there’s a Neutrosophic contradiction with the term “Neutrosophic
R-Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut” since the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality never happens for
this Neutrosophic style of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet and beyond that there’s no
Neutrosophic connection inside as mentioned in first Neutrosophic case in the forms of
drawback for this selected Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet. Let
Comes up. This Neutrosophic case implies having the Neutrosophic style of
on-quasi-triangle Neutrosophic style on the every Neutrosophic elements of this
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet. Precisely, the Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut is the
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that some
Neutrosophic amount of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices are on-quasi-triangle
Neutrosophic style. The Neutrosophic cardinality of the v SuperHypeSet
Is the maximum in comparison to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet

But the lower Neutrosophic bound is up. Thus the minimum Neutrosophic cardinality
of the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality ends up the Neutrosophic discussion. The
first Neutrosophic term refers to the Neutrosophic setting of the Neutrosophic
SuperHyperGraph but this key point is enough since there’s a Neutrosophic
SuperHyperClass of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph has no on-quasi-triangle
Neutrosophic style amid some amount of its Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. This
Neutrosophic setting of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel proposes a Neutrosophic
SuperHyperSet has only some amount Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices from one
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge such that there’s no Neutrosophic amount of
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges more than one involving these some amount of these
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. The Neutrosophic cardinality of this Neutrosophic
SuperHyperSet is the maximum and the Neutrosophic case is occurred in the minimum
Neutrosophic situation. To sum them up, the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet
Has the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality such that
Contains some Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s

distinct-covers-order-amount Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges for amount of
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices taken from the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet
It means that the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices
Is a Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut for the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph as used 961
Neutrosophic background in the Neutrosophic terms of worst Neutrosophic case and the 962
common theme of the lower Neutrosophic bound occurred in the specific Neutrosophic 963
SuperHyperClasses of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs which are Neutrosophic 964
free-quasi-triangle. 965
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) has z Neutrosophic

number of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. Then every Neutrosophic
SuperHyperVertex has at least no Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge with others in
common. Thus those Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices have the eligibles to be
contained in a Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut. Those Neutrosophic
SuperHyperVertices are potentially included in a Neutrosophic
style-R-Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut. Formally, consider
V \ (V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . . , zE }).
Are the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge

E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) . Thus
Zi ∼ Zj , i 6= j, i, j = 1, 2, . . . , z.
where the ∼ isn’t an equivalence relation but only the symmetric relation on the
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. The formal
definition is as follows.
Zi ∼ Zj , i 6= j, i, j = 1, 2, . . . , z
if and only if Zi and Zj are the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices and there’s only and
only one Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) between the Neutrosophic
SuperHyperVertices Zi and Zj . The other definition for the Neutrosophic
SuperHyperEdge E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) in the terms of Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut is
{aE , bE , cE , . . . , zE } .
This definition coincides with the definition of the Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut

but with slightly differences in the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality amid those
Neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSets of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. Thus the
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices,
max |{Z1 , Z2 , . . . , Zz | Zi ∼ Zj , i 6= j, i, j = 1, 2, . . . , z}|Neutrosophic cardinality ,

z
and
is formalized with mathematical literatures on the Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut.

E
Let Zi ∼ Zj , be defined as Zi and Zj are the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices belong
to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) . Thus,
E
E = {Z1 , Z2 , . . . , Zz | Zi ∼ Zj , i 6= j, i, j = 1, 2, . . . , z}.
Or
{aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .
But with the slightly differences, 966
Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut =
E
{Z1 , Z2 , . . . , Zz | ∀i 6= j, i, j = 1, 2, . . . , z, ∃Ex , Zi ∼x Zj , }.
967
Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut =
Thus E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) is a Neutrosophic quasi-R-Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut where

E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) is fixed that means Ex = E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) . for all Neutrosophic
intended SuperHyperVertices but in a Neutrosophic Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut,
Ex = E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) could be different and it’s not unique. To sum them up, in a
connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). If a Neutrosophic
SuperHyperEdge E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) has z Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, then the
Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut is at least
V \ (V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . . , zE }).
It’s straightforward that the Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic 968
R-Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut is at least the maximum Neutrosophic number of Neutrosophic 969
SuperHyperVertices of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges with the maximum number 970
of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges. In other words, the maximum number of the 971
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges contains the maximum Neutrosophic number of 972
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices are renamed to Neutrosophic Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut in 973
some cases but the maximum number of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge with the 974
maximum Neutrosophic number of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, has the 975
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices are contained in a Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut. 976
The obvious SuperHyperGraph has no Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges. But the 977
non-obvious Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel is up. The quasi-SuperHyperModel 978
addresses some issues about the Neutrosophic optimal SuperHyperObject. It specially 979
delivers some remarks on the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the Neutrosophic 980
SuperHyperVertices such that there’s distinct amount of Neutrosophic 981
SuperHyperEdges for distinct amount of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices up to all 982
taken from that Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 983
but this Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices is either 984
has the maximum Neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality or it doesn’t have maximum 985
Neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality. In a non-obvious SuperHyperModel, there’s at 986
least one Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge containing at least all Neutrosophic 987
SuperHyperVertices. Thus it forms a Neutrosophic quasi-R-Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut where the 988
Neutrosophic completion of the Neutrosophic incidence is up in that. Thus it’s, literarily, 989
a Neutrosophic embedded R-Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut. The SuperHyperNotions of embedded 990
SuperHyperSet and quasi-SuperHyperSet coincide. In the original setting, these types of 991
SuperHyperSets only don’t satisfy on the maximum SuperHyperCardinality. Thus the 992
embedded setting is elected such that those SuperHyperSets have the maximum 993
Neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality and they’re Neutrosophic SuperHyperOptimal. 994
The less than two distinct types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices are included in the 995
minimum Neutrosophic style of the embedded Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut. The 996
interior types of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices are deciders. Since the 997
Neutrosophic number of SuperHyperNeighbors are only affected by the interior 998
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. The common connections, more precise and more 999
formal, the perfect unique connections inside the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet for any 1000
distinct types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices pose the Neutrosophic 1001
R-Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut. Thus Neutrosophic exterior SuperHyperVertices could be used 1002
only in one Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge and in Neutrosophic SuperHyperRelation 1003
with the interior Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices in that Neutrosophic 1004
SuperHyperEdge. In the embedded Neutrosophic Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut, there’s the usage of 1005
exterior Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices since they’ve more connections inside more 1006
than outside. Thus the title “exterior” is more relevant than the title “interior”. One 1007
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex has no connection, inside. Thus, the Neutrosophic 1008
SuperHyperSet of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices with one SuperHyperElement 1009
has been ignored in the exploring to lead on the optimal case implying the Neutrosophic 1010
R-Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut. The Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut with the exclusion of the 1011
exclusion of all Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices in one Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge 1012
and with other terms, the Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut with the inclusion of all 1013
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices in one Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge, is a 1014
Neutrosophic quasi-R-Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut. To sum them up, in a connected non-obvious 1015
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). There’s only one Neutrosophic 1016
SuperHyperEdge E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) has only the maximum possibilities of the distinct 1017
interior Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices inside of any given Neutrosophic 1018
quasi-R-Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut minus all Neutrosophic SuperHypeNeighbor to some of them 1019
but not all of them. In other words, there’s only an unique Neutrosophic 1020
SuperHyperEdge E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) has only two distinct Neutrosophic 1021
SuperHyperVertices in an Neutrosophic quasi-R-Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut, minus all 1022
Neutrosophic SuperHypeNeighbor to some of them but not all of them. 1023
The main definition of the Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut has two titles. a 1024
Neutrosophic quasi-R-Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut and its corresponded quasi-maximum 1025
Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperCardinality are two titles in the terms of quasi-R-styles. For 1026
any Neutrosophic number, there’s a Neutrosophic quasi-R-Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut with that 1027
quasi-maximum Neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality in the terms of the embedded 1028
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. If there’s an embedded Neutrosophic 1029
SuperHyperGraph, then the Neutrosophic quasi-SuperHyperNotions lead us to take the 1030
collection of all the Neutrosophic quasi-R-Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cuts for all Neutrosophic 1031
numbers less than its Neutrosophic corresponded maximum number. The essence of the 1032
Neutrosophic Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut ends up but this essence starts up in the terms of the 1033
Neutrosophic quasi-R-Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut, again and more in the operations of collecting 1034
all the Neutrosophic quasi-R-Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cuts acted on the all possible used 1035
formations of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph to achieve one Neutrosophic number. 1036
This Neutrosophic number is 1037
considered as the equivalence class for all corresponded quasi-R-Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cuts. 1038
Let zNeutrosophic Number , SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet and GNeutrosophic Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut be 1039
a Neutrosophic number, a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet and a Neutrosophic 1040
Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut. Then 1041
[zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class = {SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet |

SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet = GNeutrosophic Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut ,
|SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= zNeutrosophic Number }.
As its consequences, the formal definition of the Neutrosophic Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut is 1042
re-formalized and redefined as follows. 1043
GNeutrosophic Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut ∈ ∪zNeutrosophic Number

[zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class =
∪zNeutrosophic Number
{SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet |
= zNeutrosophic Number }.
To get more precise perceptions, the follow-up expressions propose another formal 1044
technical definition for the Neutrosophic Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut. 1045
GNeutrosophic Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut =
{S ∈ ∪zNeutrosophic Number [zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class =
∪zNeutrosophic Number {SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet |
= zNeutrosophic Number |
= max zNeutrosophic Number }.
[zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class
In more concise and more convenient ways, the modified definition for the Neutrosophic 1046
Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut poses the upcoming expressions. 1047
{S ∈ ∪zNeutrosophic Number [zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class |
To translate the statement to this mathematical literature, the formulae will be revised. 1048
= max zNeutrosophic Number
[zNeutrosophic
Number ]Neutrosophic Class

= max |E| | E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.
And then, 1049

To get more visions in the closer look-up, there’s an overall overlook. 1050
GNeutrosophic Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut ∈ ∪zNeutrosophic Number [zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class =


1051
{S ∈ ∪zNeutrosophic Number [zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class =

1052

1053

Now, the extension of these types of approaches is up. Since the new term, 1054
“Neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood”, could be redefined as the collection of the 1055
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that any amount of its Neutrosophic 1056
SuperHyperVertices are incident to a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. It’s, literarily, 1057
another name for “Neutrosophic Quasi-Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut” but, precisely, it’s the 1058
generalization of “Neutrosophic Quasi-Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut” since “Neutrosophic 1059
Quasi-Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut” happens “Neutrosophic Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut” in a Neutrosophic 1060
SuperHyperGraph as initial framework and background but “Neutrosophic 1061
SuperHyperNeighborhood” may not happens “Neutrosophic Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut” in a 1062
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph as initial framework and preliminarily background 1063
since there are some ambiguities about the Neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality arise 1064
from it. To get orderly keywords, the terms, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood”, 1065
“Neutrosophic Quasi-Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut”, and “Neutrosophic Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut” are up. 1066
Thus, let 1067
zNeutrosophic Number , NNeutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood and 1068
GNeutrosophic Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut be a Neutrosophic number, a Neutrosophic 1069
SuperHyperNeighborhood and a Neutrosophic Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut and the new terms are 1070
up. 1071
GNeutrosophic Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut ∈ ∪zNeutrosophic Number

[zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class =
∪zNeutrosophic Number {NNeutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |
|NNeutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |Neutrosophic Cardinality
1072
{NNeutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood
∈ ∪zNeutrosophic Number [zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class =
|NNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet |Neutrosophic Cardinality
1073
∈ ∪zNeutrosophic Number [zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class |
1074
And with go back to initial structure, 1075
GNeutrosophic Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut ∈ ∪zNeutrosophic Number [zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class =


1076
∈ ∪zNeutrosophic Number [zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class =

1077

1078

Thus, in a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). The all interior 1079
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices belong to any Neutrosophic 1080
quasi-R-Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut if for any of them, and any of other corresponded 1081
To make sense with the precise words in the terms of “R-’, the follow-up illustrations 1085
are coming up. 1086
The following Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices is

the simple Neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut.
The Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices,
Is the simple Neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the Neutrosophic

R-Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut. The Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the Neutrosophic
SuperHyperVertices,
Is an Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut C(ESHG) for an Neutrosophic 1087
SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E) is a Neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet with 1088
the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S 1089
of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s no a Neutrosophic 1090
SuperHyperEdge amid some Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices instead of all given by 1091
Neutrosophic Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut is related to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of

the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices,
There’s not only one Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex inside the intended

Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet. Thus the non-obvious Neutrosophic Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut is
up. The obvious simple Neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet called the Neutrosophic
Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut is a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet includes only one Neutrosophic
SuperHyperVertex. But the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of Neutrosophic

SuperHyperVertices,
doesn’t have less than two SuperHyperVertices inside the intended Neutrosophic
SuperHyperSet since they’ve come from at least so far an SuperHyperEdge. Thus the
non-obvious simple Neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the Neutrosophic
R-Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut is up. To sum them up, the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices,
Is the non-obvious simple Neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the Neutrosophic

R-Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut. Since the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the Neutrosophic
SuperHyperVertices,
(V \ V \ {x, z}) ∪ {xy}
or
(V \ V \ {x, z}) ∪ {zy}
is an Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut C(ESHG) for an Neutrosophic 1092
SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E) is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of 1093
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s no a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge 1094
for some Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices instead of all given by that Neutrosophic 1095
type-SuperHyperSet called the Neutrosophic Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut and it’s an 1096
Neutrosophic Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut. Since it’s 1097
the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S

of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s no a Neutrosophic
SuperHyperEdge for some amount Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices instead of all given
by that Neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet called the Neutrosophic Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut.
There isn’t only less than two Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices inside the intended
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet,
Thus the non-obvious Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut,
is up. The non-obvious simple Neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the Neutrosophic

Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut, not:
Is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, not:
does includes only less than two SuperHyperVertices in a connected Neutrosophic 1098
SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E) but it’s impossible in the case, they’ve corresponded 1099
to an SuperHyperEdge. It’s interesting to mention that the only non-obvious simple 1100
Neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet called the 1101
“Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut” 1102
amid those obvious[non-obvious] simple Neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSets called the 1103
Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut, 1104
is only and only
In a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E) with a illustrated

SuperHyperModeling. It’s also, not only a Neutrosophic free-triangle embedded
SuperHyperModel and a Neutrosophic on-triangle embedded SuperHyperModel but also
it’s a Neutrosophic stable embedded SuperHyperModel. But all only non-obvious simple
Neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSets of the Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut amid those
obvious simple Neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSets of the Neutrosophic
Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut, are
In a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). 1105
To sum them up, assume a connected loopless Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph

ESHG : (V, E). Then in the worst case, literally,
is a Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut. In other words, the least cardinality, the lower

sharp bound for the cardinality, of a Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut is the cardinality
of
To sum them up, in a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). 1106
The all interior Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices belong to any Neutrosophic 1107
quasi-R-Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut if for any of them, and any of other corresponded 1108
Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). Let a 1112
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge ESHE : E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) has some Neutrosophic 1113
SuperHyperVertices r. Consider all Neutrosophic numbers of those Neutrosophic 1114
SuperHyperVertices from that Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge excluding excluding more 1115
than r distinct Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, exclude to any given Neutrosophic 1116
SuperHyperSet of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. Consider there’s a 1117
Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut with the least cardinality, the lower sharp 1118
Neutrosophic bound for Neutrosophic cardinality. Assume a connected Neutrosophic 1119
SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). The Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the 1120
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices VESHE \ {z} is a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of 1121
the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge 1122
to have some Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices uniquely but it isn’t a Neutrosophic 1123
R-Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut. Since it doesn’t have 1124
of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge 1126
to have some SuperHyperVertices uniquely. The Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the 1127
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices VESHE ∪ {z} is the maximum Neutrosophic 1128
cardinality of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices but 1129
it isn’t a Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut. Since it doesn’t do the Neutrosophic 1130
procedure such that such that there’s a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge to have some 1131
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices uniquely [there are at least one Neutrosophic 1132
SuperHyperVertex outside implying there’s, sometimes in the connected Neutrosophic 1133
SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E), a Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, titled its 1134
Neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbor, to that Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex in the 1135
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S so as S doesn’t do “the Neutrosophic procedure”.]. 1136
There’s only one Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex outside the intended Neutrosophic 1137
SuperHyperSet, VESHE ∪ {z}, in the terms of Neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood. 1138
Thus the obvious Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut, VESHE is up. The obvious simple 1139
Neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut, VESHE , is 1140
a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, VESHE , includes only all Neutrosophic 1141
SuperHyperVertices does forms any kind of Neutrosophic pairs are titled 1142
Neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbors in a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 1143
ESHG : (V, E). Since the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the Neutrosophic 1144
SuperHyperVertices VESHE , is the 1145
maximum Neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality of a Neutrosophic 1146
SuperHyperSet S of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s a 1147
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge to have some Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices uniquely. 1148
Thus, in a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). Any 1149
Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut only contains all interior Neutrosophic 1150
SuperHyperVertices and all exterior Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices from the unique 1151
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge where there’s any of them has all possible Neutrosophic 1152
SuperHyperNeighbors in and there’s all Neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhoods in 1153
with no exception minus all Neutrosophic SuperHypeNeighbors to some of them not all 1154
of them but everything is possible about Neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhoods and 1155
Neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbors out. 1156
The SuperHyperNotion, namely, Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut, is up. There’s neither empty 1157
SuperHyperEdge nor loop SuperHyperEdge. The following Neutrosophic 1158
SuperHyperSet of Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges[SuperHyperVertices] is the simple 1159
Neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the Neutrosophic Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut. The 1160
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges[SuperHyperVertices], 1161

|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
b c
= {E2i−1 }i=1 2
.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−Eulerian−T ype−Cycle−CutSuperHyperP olynomial
= 2z b 2 c
.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−Eulerian−T ype−Cycle−Cut = {Vi }si=1 , {Vj }tj=1 .
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−Eulerian−T ype−Cycle−CutSuperHyperP olynomial
= az s + bz t .
is the simple Neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the Neutrosophic Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut . 1162
The Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the Neutrosophic 1163
SuperHyperEdges[SuperHyperVertices], 1164

b c
= {E2i−1 }i=1 2
.
= 2z b 2 c
.
= az s + bz t .
Is an Neutrosophic Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut C(ESHG) for an Neutrosophic 1165
SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E) is a Neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet with 1166
of Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges[SuperHyperVertices] such that there’s no 1168
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge is common and 1169
there’s an Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge for all Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. 1170
There are not only two Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices inside the intended 1171
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet. Thus the non-obvious Neutrosophic Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut is 1172
up. The obvious simple Neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet called the Neutrosophic 1173
Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut is a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet includes only two Neutrosophic 1174
SuperHyperVertices. But the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the Neutrosophic 1175

b c
= {E2i−1 }i=1 2
.
= 2z b 2 c
.
= az s + bz t .
Doesn’t have less than three SuperHyperVertices inside the intended Neutrosophic 1177
SuperHyperSet. Thus the non-obvious simple Neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the 1178
Neutrosophic Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut is up. To sum them up, the Neutrosophic 1179
SuperHyperSet of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges[SuperHyperVertices], 1180

b c
= {E2i−1 }i=1 2
.
= 2z b 2 c
.
= az s + bz t .
Is the non-obvious simple Neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the Neutrosophic 1181
Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut. Since the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the Neutrosophic 1182

b c
= {E2i−1 }i=1 2
.
= 2z b 2 c
.
= az s + bz t .
Is an Neutrosophic Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut C(ESHG) for an Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 1184
ESHG : (V, E) is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of Neutrosophic 1185
SuperHyperVertices such that there’s no a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge for some 1186
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices given by that Neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet 1187
called the Neutrosophic Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut and it’s an Neutrosophic 1188
Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut. Since it’s 1189
of Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges[SuperHyperVertices] such that there’s no 1191
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge is common and 1192
there’s an Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge for all Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. 1193
There aren’t only less than three Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices inside the intended 1194
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, 1195

b c
= {E2i−1 }i=1 2
.
= 2z b 2 c
.
= az s + bz t .
Thus the non-obvious Neutrosophic Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut , 1196

b c
= {E2i−1 }i=1 2
.
= 2z b 2 c
.
= az s + bz t .
Is up. The obvious simple Neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the Neutrosophic 1197
, not:
Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut 1198

b c
= {E2i−1 }i=1 2
.
= 2z b 2 c
.
= az s + bz t .
Is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, not: 1199

b c
= {E2i−1 }i=1 2
.
= 2z b 2 c
.
= az s + bz t .
Does includes only less than three SuperHyperVertices in a connected Neutrosophic 1200
SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). It’s interesting to mention that the only non-obvious 1201
simple Neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet called the 1202
“Neutrosophic Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut ” 1203
amid those obvious[non-obvious] simple Neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSets called the 1204
Neutrosophic Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut , 1205
is only and only 1206

b c
= {E2i−1 }i=1 2
.
= 2z b 2 c
.
= az s + bz t .
In a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). 1207
5 The Neutrosophic Departures on The Theoretical 1208
Results Toward Theoretical Motivations 1209
The previous Neutrosophic approach apply on the upcoming Neutrosophic results on 1210
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses. 1211
Proposition 5.1. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath ESHP : (V, E). 1212
Then 1213

= {Ei }|Ei |=maxEj ∈EN SHG |Ej | .
{Ei }|Ei |=maxE |Ej |
=z j ∈EN SHG

= {V{Ei }|Ei |=maxE |Ej |
}.
j ∈EN SHG

X |{V{Ei }|E |=max }|
i Ej ∈EN SHG |Ej |
= z .
Proof. Let 1214
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
V |EN SHG |
, E |EN SHG |
3 3
1215
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , V2EXT ERN AL ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
E |EN SHG | , V |EN SHG |
3 3
Figure 23. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath Associated to the Notions of Neutrosophic

SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut in the Example (16.5)
be a longest path taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath 1216
ESHP : (V, E). There’s a new way to redefine as 1217
ViEXT ERN AL ∼ VjEXT ERN AL ≡

∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL ∈ Ez ≡
∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , {ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL } ⊆ Ez .
The term “EXTERNAL” implies |N (ViEXT ERN AL )| ≥ |N (Vj )| where Vj is 1218
corresponded to ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut. The 1219
latter is straightforward. 1220
Example 5.2. In the Figure (23), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath 1221
ESHP : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, in the 1222
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (23), is the SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut. 1223
Proposition 5.3. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle ESHC : (V, E). 1224
Then 1225

|E |
= {Ei }i=1N SHG .
X
= z |Ei | .
Ei ∈EN SHG
|V
N SHG |
= {Vi }i=1 .
X
= z |Vi | .
Vi ∈VN SHG
Proof. Let 1226
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
V |EN SHG |
, E |EN SHG |
3 3
1227
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , V2EXT ERN AL ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
E |EN SHG | , V |EN SHG |
3 3
be a longest path taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle 1228
ESHC : (V, E). There’s a new way to redefine as 1229

Example 5.4. In the Figure (24), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle 1233
N SHC : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Neutrosophic 1234
SuperHyperSet, in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (24), is the Neutrosophic 1235
Proposition 5.5. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). 1237
Then 1238

= {Ei }|Ei |=maxEj ∈EN SHG |Ej | .
{Ei }|Ei |=maxE |Ej |
=z j ∈EN SHG

= {V{Ei }|Ei |=maxE |Ej |
}.
j ∈EN SHG

X |{V{Ei }|E |=max }|
i Ej ∈EN SHG |Ej |
= z .
Proof. Let 1239
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
CEN T ER, E2
Figure 24. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions

1240
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , CEN T ER
be a longest path taken a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). 1241
There’s a new way to redefine as 1242

Example 5.6. In the Figure (25), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar 1246
ESHS : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, 1247
by the Algorithm in previous Neutrosophic result, of the Neutrosophic 1248
SuperHyperVertices of the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E), in 1249
the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (25), is the Neutrosophic 1250
Proposition 5.7. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite 1252
Figure 25. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of

Neutrosophic SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut in the Neutrosophic Example (16.9)
ESHB : (V, E). Then 1253

= {Ei , Ej }Ei ∩Ej 6=∅ .
X
=
{Ei ,Ej }Ei ∩Ej 6=∅ z |Ei | .

= {Vi , Vj }Vi ∈PNr SHG ,Vj ∈PNs SHG ,r6=s .
X
= z |Vi | .
{Vi ,Vj }Vi ∈P r ,Vj ∈P s ,r6=s
N SHG N SHG
Proof. Let 1254
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
V|P i |=minP ∈E |Pj | , E|Pi |=minPj ∈EN SHG |Pj | .
j N SHG
1255
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , V2EXT ERN AL ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
E|Pi |=minPj ∈EN SHG |Pj | , V|Pi |=minP ∈E |Pj |
j N SHG
is a longest path taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite 1256
ESHB : (V, E). There’s a new way to redefine as 1257

latter is straightforward. Then there’s no at least one SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut. 1260
Thus the notion of quasi may be up but the SuperHyperNotions based on 1261
SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut could be applied. There are only two SuperHyperParts. 1262
Thus every SuperHyperPart could have one SuperHyperVertex as the representative in 1263
the 1264
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
is a longest SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut taken from a connected Neutrosophic 1265
SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E). Thus only some SuperHyperVertices and only 1266
minimum-Neutrosophic-of-SuperHyperPart SuperHyperEdges are attained in any 1267
solution 1268
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
The latter is straightforward. 1269
Example 5.8. In the Neutrosophic Figure (26), the connected Neutrosophic 1270
SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), is Neutrosophic highlighted and Neutrosophic 1271
featured. The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Neutrosophic Algorithm in 1272
previous Neutrosophic result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected 1273
Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic 1274
SuperHyperModel (26), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut. 1275
Proposition 5.9. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite 1276
ESHM : (V, E). Then 1277

= {Ei , Ej }Ei ∩Ej 6=∅ .
X
=
{Ei ,Ej }Ei ∩Ej 6=∅ z |Ei | .

= {Vi , Vj }Vi ∈PNr SHG ,Vj ∈PNs SHG ,r6=s .
X
= z |Vi | .
{Vi ,Vj }Vi ∈P r ,Vj ∈P s ,r6=s
N SHG N SHG
Figure 26. Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite Neutrosophic Associated to the Neutro-

sophic Notions of Neutrosophic SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut in the Example (16.11)
Proof. Let 1278
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
V|Pi |=minP ∈E |Pj | , E|Pi |=minPj ∈EN SHG |Pj | .
j N SHG
1279
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , V2EXT ERN AL ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
E|Pi |=minPj ∈EN SHG |Pj | , V|Pi |=minP ∈E |Pj |
j N SHG
SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E). There’s a new way to redefine as 1281

latter is straightforward. Then there’s no at least one SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut. 1284
Thus the notion of quasi may be up but the SuperHyperNotions based on 1285
SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut could be applied. There are only z 0 SuperHyperParts. 1286
Thus every SuperHyperPart could have one SuperHyperVertex as the representative in 1287
Figure 27. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite Associated to the Notions of

Neutrosophic SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut in the Example (16.13)
the 1288
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
is a longest path taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite 1289
ESHM : (V, E). Thus only some SuperHyperVertices and only 1290
solution 1292
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
ESHM : (V, E). The latter is straightforward. 1294
Example 5.10. In the Figure (27), the connected Neutrosophic 1295
SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E), is highlighted and Neutrosophic featured. 1296
The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Algorithm in previous Neutrosophic 1297
result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected Neutrosophic 1298
SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (27), 1299
is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut. 1300
Proposition 5.11. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel 1301
ESHW : (V, E ∪ E ∗ ). Then, 1302

|E |
= {Ei }i=1N SHG .
X
= z |Ei | .
Ei ∈EN SHG
|V
N SHG |
= {Vi }i=1 .
X
= z |Vi | .
Vi ∈VN SHG
Proof. Let 1303
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1∗ ,
CEN T ER, E2∗
1304
P :
E1∗ , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2∗ , CEN T ER
SuperHyperWheel ESHW : (V, E). There’s a new way to redefine as 1306

latter is straightforward. Then there’s at least one SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut. Thus 1309
the notion of quasi isn’t up and the SuperHyperNotions based on 1310
SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut could be applied. The unique embedded 1311
SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut proposes some longest SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut 1312
excerpt from some representatives. The latter is straightforward. 1313
SuperHyperWheel N SHW : (V, E), is Neutrosophic highlighted and featured. The 1315
obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Algorithm in previous result, of the 1316
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel 1317
ESHW : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (28), is the Neutrosophic 1318
6 The Surveys of Mathematical Sets On The 1320
Results But As The Initial Motivation 1321
For the SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut, Neutrosophic SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut, and 1322
the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut, some general results are introduced. 1323
Figure 28. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel Neutrosophic Associated to the Neu-

trosophic Notions of Neutrosophic SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut in the Neutrosophic
Example (16.15)
Remark 6.1. Let remind that the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut is 1324
“redefined” on the positions of the alphabets. 1325
Corollary 6.2. Assume Neutrosophic SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut. Then 1326
N eutrosophic SuperHyperEulerian − T ype − Cycle − Cut =

{theSuperHyperEulerian − T ype − Cycle − Cutof theSuperHyperV ertices |
max |SuperHyperOf f ensive
SuperHyperEulerian − T ype − Cycle − Cut
|N eutrosophiccardinalityamidthoseSuperHyperEulerian−T ype−Cycle−Cut. }
plus one Neutrosophic SuperHypeNeighbor to one. Where σi is the unary operation on 1327
the SuperHyperVertices of the SuperHyperGraph to assign the determinacy, the 1328
indeterminacy and the neutrality, for i = 1, 2, 3, respectively. 1329
Corollary 6.3. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph on the same identical letter 1330
of the alphabet. Then the notion of Neutrosophic SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut and 1331
SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut coincide. 1332
of the alphabet. Then a conseNeighborive sequence of the SuperHyperVertices is a 1334
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut if and only if it’s a SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut. 1335
of the alphabet. Then a conseNeighborive sequence of the SuperHyperVertices is a 1337
strongest SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut if and only if it’s a longest 1338
Corollary 6.6. Assume SuperHyperClasses of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph on the 1340
same identical letter of the alphabet. Then its Neutrosophic SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut 1341
is its SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut and reversely. 1342
Corollary 6.7. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath(-/SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut, 1343
SuperHyperStar, SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, SuperHyperWheel) on 1344
the same identical letter of the alphabet. Then its Neutrosophic 1345
SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut is its SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut and reversely. 1346
Corollary 6.8. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. Then its Neutrosophic 1347
SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut isn’t well-defined if and only if its SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut 1348
isn’t well-defined. 1349
Corollary 6.9. Assume SuperHyperClasses of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. Then 1350
its Neutrosophic SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut isn’t well-defined if and only if its 1351
SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut isn’t well-defined. 1352
SuperHyperStar, SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, SuperHyperWheel). 1354
Then its Neutrosophic SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut isn’t well-defined if and only if its 1355
SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut isn’t well-defined. 1356
Corollary 6.11. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. Then its Neutrosophic 1357
SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut is well-defined if and only if its SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut is 1358
well-defined. 1359
Corollary 6.12. Assume SuperHyperClasses of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. 1360
Then its Neutrosophic SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut is well-defined if and only if its 1361
SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut is well-defined. 1362
SuperHyperStar, SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, SuperHyperWheel). 1364
Then its Neutrosophic SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut is well-defined if and only if its 1365
SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut is well-defined. 1366
Proposition 6.14. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. Then V 1367
is 1368
(i) : the dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut; 1369
(ii) : the strong dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut; 1370
(iii) : the connected dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut; 1371
(iv) : the δ-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut; 1372
(v) : the strong δ-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut; 1373
(vi) : the connected δ-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut. 1374
Proposition 6.15. Let N T G : (V, E, σ, µ) be a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. Then 1375
∅ is 1376
(i) : the SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut; 1377
(ii) : the strong SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut; 1378
(iii) : the connected defensive SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut; 1379
(iv) : the δ-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut; 1380
(v) : the strong δ-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut; 1381
(vi) : the connected δ-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut. 1382
Proposition 6.16. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. Then an 1383
independent SuperHyperSet is 1384
(i) : the SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut; 1385
(ii) : the strong SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut; 1386
(iii) : the connected SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut; 1387
(iv) : the δ-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut; 1388
(v) : the strong δ-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut; 1389
(vi) : the connected δ-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut. 1390
Proposition 6.17. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a Neutrosophic SuperHyperUniform 1391
SuperHyperGraph which is a SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut/SuperHyperPath. Then V is a 1392
maximal 1393
(i) : SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut; 1394
(ii) : strong SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut; 1395
(iii) : connected SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut; 1396
(iv) : O(ESHG)-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut; 1397
(v) : strong O(ESHG)-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut; 1398
(vi) : connected O(ESHG)-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut; 1399
Where the exterior SuperHyperVertices and the interior SuperHyperVertices coincide. 1400
Proposition 6.18. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph which is a 1401
SuperHyperUniform SuperHyperWheel. Then V is a maximal 1402
(i) : dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut; 1403
(ii) : strong dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut; 1404
(iii) : connected dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut; 1405
(iv) : O(ESHG)-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut; 1406
(v) : strong O(ESHG)-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut; 1407
(vi) : connected O(ESHG)-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut; 1408
Where the exterior SuperHyperVertices and the interior SuperHyperVertices coincide. 1409
SuperHyperGraph which is a SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut/SuperHyperPath. Then the 1411
number of 1412
(i) : the SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut; 1413
(ii) : the SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut; 1414
(iii) : the connected SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut; 1415
(iv) : the O(ESHG)-SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut; 1416
(v) : the strong O(ESHG)-SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut; 1417
(vi) : the connected O(ESHG)-SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut. 1418
is one and it’s only V. Where the exterior SuperHyperVertices and the interior 1419
SuperHyperVertices coincide. 1420
SuperHyperGraph which is a SuperHyperWheel. Then the number of 1422
(i) : the dual SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut; 1423
(ii) : the dual SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut; 1424
(iii) : the dual connected SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut; 1425
(iv) : the dual O(ESHG)-SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut; 1426
(v) : the strong dual O(ESHG)-SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut; 1427
(vi) : the connected dual O(ESHG)-SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut. 1428
is one and it’s only V. Where the exterior SuperHyperVertices and the interior 1429
SuperHyperGraph which is a SuperHyperStar/SuperHyperComplete 1432
SuperHyperBipartite/SuperHyperComplete SuperHyperMultipartite. Then a 1433
SuperHyperSet contains [the SuperHyperCenter and] the half of multiplying r with the 1434
number of all the SuperHyperEdges plus one of all the SuperHyperVertices is a 1435
O(ESHG)
(iv) : 2 + 1-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut; 1439
O(ESHG)
(v) : strong 2 + 1-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut; 1440
O(ESHG)
(vi) : connected 2 + 1-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut. 1441
SuperHyperBipartite/SuperHyperComplete SuperHyperMultipartite. Then a 1444
SuperHyperSet contains the half of multiplying r with the number of all the 1445
SuperHyperEdges plus one of all the SuperHyperVertices in the biggest SuperHyperPart 1446
is a 1447
(iv) : δ-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut; 1451
(v) : strong δ-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut; 1452
(vi) : connected δ-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut. 1453
SuperHyperBipartite/SuperHyperComplete SuperHyperMultipartite. Then Then the 1456
number of 1457
O(ESHG)
(iv) : 2 + 1-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut; 1461
O(ESHG)
(v) : strong 2 + 1-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut; 1462
O(ESHG)
(vi) : connected 2 + 1-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut. 1463
is one and it’s only S, a SuperHyperSet contains [the SuperHyperCenter and] the half of 1464
multiplying r with the number of all the SuperHyperEdges plus one of all the 1465
SuperHyperVertices. Where the exterior SuperHyperVertices and the interior 1466
Proposition 6.24. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. The 1468
number of connected component is |V − S| if there’s a SuperHyperSet which is a dual 1469
(iv) : SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut; 1473
(v) : strong 1-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut; 1474
(vi) : connected 1-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut. 1475
Proposition 6.25. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. Then the 1476
number is at most O(ESHG) and the Neutrosophic number is at most On (ESHG). 1477
Proposition 6.26. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph which is 1478
SuperHyperComplete. The number is O(ESHG:(V,E)) 2 + 1 and the Neutrosophic number is 1479
min Σv∈{v1 ,v2 ,··· ,vt } O(ESHG:(V,E)) ⊆V σ(v), in the setting of dual 1480
t>
2
(iv) : ( O(ESHG:(V,E))
2 + 1)-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut; 1484
(v) : strong ( O(ESHG:(V,E))

(vi) : connected ( O(ESHG:(V,E))

2 + 1)-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut. 1486
∅. The number is 0 and the Neutrosophic number is 0, for an independent 1488
SuperHyperSet in the setting of dual 1489
(iv) : 0-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut; 1493
(v) : strong 0-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut; 1494
(vi) : connected 0-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut. 1495
SuperHyperComplete. Then there’s no independent SuperHyperSet. 1497
SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut/SuperHyperPath/SuperHyperWheel. The number is 1499
O(ESHG : (V, E)) and the Neutrosophic number is On (ESHG : (V, E)), in the setting 1500
of a dual 1501
(iv) : O(ESHG : (V, E))-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut; 1505
(v) : strong O(ESHG : (V, E))-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut; 1506
(vi) : connected O(ESHG : (V, E))-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut. 1507
SuperHyperStar/complete SuperHyperBipartite/complete SuperHyperMultiPartite. The 1509
number is O(ESHG:(V,E))
2 + 1 and the Neutrosophic number is 1510
min Σv∈{v1 ,v2 ,··· ,vt } O(ESHG:(V,E)) ⊆V σ(v), in the setting of a dual 1511
t>
2
(iv) : ( O(ESHG:(V,E))
(v) : strong ( O(ESHG:(V,E))

(vi) : connected ( O(ESHG:(V,E))

2 + 1)-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut. 1517
Proposition 6.31. Let N SHF : (V, E) be a SuperHyperFamily of the ESHGs : (V, E) 1518
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs which are from one-type SuperHyperClass which the 1519
result is obtained for the individuals. Then the results also hold for the 1520
SuperHyperFamily N SHF : (V, E) of these specific SuperHyperClasses of the 1521
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs. 1522
Proposition 6.32. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a strong Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. If 1523
S is a dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut, then ∀v ∈ V \ S, ∃x ∈ S 1524
such that 1525
(i) v ∈ Ns (x); 1526
(ii) vx ∈ E. 1527
Proposition 6.33. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a strong Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. If 1528
S is a dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut, then 1529
(i) S is SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut set; 1530
(ii) there’s S ⊆ S 0 such that |S 0 | is SuperHyperChromatic number. 1531
Proposition 6.34. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a strong Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. 1532
Then 1533
(i) Γ ≤ O; 1534
(ii) Γs ≤ On . 1535
Proposition 6.35. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a strong Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 1536
which is connected. Then 1537
(i) Γ ≤ O − 1; 1538
(ii) Γs ≤ On − Σ3i=1 σi (x). 1539
Proposition 6.36. Let ESHG : (V, E) be an odd SuperHyperPath. Then 1540
(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {v2 , v4 , · · · , vn−1 } is a dual SuperHyperDefensive 1541
(ii) Γ = b n2 c + 1 and corresponded SuperHyperSet is S = {v2 , v4 , · · · , vn−1 }; 1543
(iii) Γs = min{Σs∈S={v2 ,v4 ,··· ,vn−1 } Σ3i=1 σi (s), Σs∈S={v1 ,v3 ,··· ,vn−1 } Σ3i=1 σi (s)}; 1544
(iv) the SuperHyperSets S1 = {v2 , v4 , · · · , vn−1 } and S2 = {v1 , v3 , · · · , vn−1 } are only 1545
a dual SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut. 1546
Proposition 6.37. Let ESHG : (V, E) be an even SuperHyperPath. Then 1547
(i) the set S = {v2 , v4 , · · · .vn } is a dual SuperHyperDefensive 1548
(ii) Γ = b n2 c and corresponded SuperHyperSets are {v2 , v4 , · · · .vn } and 1550
{v1 , v3 , · · · .vn−1 }; 1551
(iii) Γs = min{Σs∈S={v2 ,v4 ,··· ,vn } Σ3i=1 σi (s), Σs∈S={v1 ,v3 ,··· .vn−1 } Σ3i=1 σi (s)}; 1552
(iv) the SuperHyperSets S1 = {v2 , v4 , · · · .vn } and S2 = {v1 , v3 , · · · .vn−1 } are only 1553
dual SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut. 1554
Proposition 6.38. Let ESHG : (V, E) be an even SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut. Then 1555
(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {v2 , v4 , · · · , vn } is a dual SuperHyperDefensive 1556
(ii) Γ = b n2 c and corresponded SuperHyperSets are {v2 , v4 , · · · , vn } and 1558
{v1 , v3 , · · · , vn−1 }; 1559
(iii) Γs = min{Σs∈S={v2 ,v4 ,··· ,vn } σ(s), Σs∈S={v1 ,v3 ,··· ,vn−1 } σ(s)}; 1560
(iv) the SuperHyperSets S1 = {v2 , v4 , · · · , vn } and S2 = {v1 , v3 , · · · , vn−1 } are only 1561
Proposition 6.39. Let ESHG : (V, E) be an odd SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut. Then 1563
(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {v2 , v4 , · · · , vn−1 } is a dual SuperHyperDefensive 1564
(ii) Γ = b n2 c + 1 and corresponded SuperHyperSet is S = {v2 , v4 , · · · , vn−1 }; 1566
(iii) Γs = min{Σs∈S={v2 ,v4 ,··· .vn−1 } Σ3i=1 σi (s), Σs∈S={v1 ,v3 ,··· .vn−1 } Σ3i=1 σi (s)}; 1567
(iv) the SuperHyperSets S1 = {v2 , v4 , · · · .vn−1 } and S2 = {v1 , v3 , · · · .vn−1 } are only 1568
Proposition 6.40. Let ESHG : (V, E) be SuperHyperStar. Then 1570
(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {c} is a dual maximal SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut; 1571
(ii) Γ = 1; 1572
(iii) Γs = Σ3i=1 σi (c); 1573
(iv) the SuperHyperSets S = {c} and S ⊂ S 0 are only dual SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut. 1574
Proposition 6.41. Let ESHG : (V, E) be SuperHyperWheel. Then 1575
6+3(i−1)≤n
(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {v1 , v3 } ∪ {v6 , v9 · · · , vi+6 , · · · , vn }i=1 is a dual 1576
maximal SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut; 1577
6+3(i−1)≤n
(ii) Γ = |{v1 , v3 } ∪ {v6 , v9 · · · , vi+6 , · · · , vn }i=1 |; 1578
(iii) Γs = Σ{v1 ,v3 }∪{v6 ,v9 ··· ,vi+6 ,··· ,vn }6+3(i−1)≤n Σ3i=1 σi (s); 1579
i=1
6+3(i−1)≤n
(iv) the SuperHyperSet {v1 , v3 } ∪ {v6 , v9 · · · , vi+6 , · · · , vn }i=1 is only a dual 1580
maximal SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut. 1581
Proposition 6.42. Let ESHG : (V, E) be an odd SuperHyperComplete. Then 1582
b n c+1
(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {vi }i=1 2
is a dual SuperHyperDefensive 1583
(ii) Γ = b n2 c + 1; 1585
(iii) Γs = min{Σs∈S Σ3i=1 σi (s)} 2

b n c+1 ; 1586
S={vi }i=1
b n c+1
(iv) the SuperHyperSet S = {vi }i=1 2
is only a dual SuperHyperDefensive 1587
Proposition 6.43. Let ESHG : (V, E) be an even SuperHyperComplete. Then 1589
bn
2c
(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {vi }i=1 is a dual SuperHyperDefensive 1590
(ii) Γ = b n2 c; 1592

bnc ; 1593
S={vi }i=1
bnc
(iv) the SuperHyperSet S = {vi }i=1 2
is only a dual maximal SuperHyperDefensive 1594
Proposition 6.44. Let N SHF : (V, E) be a m-SuperHyperFamily of Neutrosophic 1596
SuperHyperStars with common Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex SuperHyperSet. Then 1597
(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {c1 , c2 , · · · , cm } is a dual SuperHyperDefensive 1598
SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut for N SHF; 1599
(ii) Γ = m for N SHF : (V, E); 1600
(iii) Γs = Σm 3
i=1 Σj=1 σj (ci ) for N SHF : (V, E); 1601
(iv) the SuperHyperSets S = {c1 , c2 , · · · , cm } and S ⊂ S 0 are only dual 1602
SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut for N SHF : (V, E). 1603
Proposition 6.45. Let N SHF : (V, E) be an m-SuperHyperFamily of odd 1604
SuperHyperComplete SuperHyperGraphs with common Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 1605
SuperHyperSet. Then 1606
b n c+1
(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {vi }i=1 2
is a dual maximal SuperHyperDefensive 1607
SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut for N SHF; 1608
(ii) Γ = b n2 c + 1 for N SHF : (V, E); 1609

b n c+1 for N SHF : (V, E); 1610
S={vi }i=1
b n c+1
(iv) the SuperHyperSets S = {vi }i=1 2
are only a dual maximal 1611
SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut for N SHF : (V, E). 1612
Proposition 6.46. Let N SHF : (V, E) be a m-SuperHyperFamily of even 1613
SuperHyperComplete SuperHyperGraphs with common Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 1614
SuperHyperSet. Then 1615
bn
2c
(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {vi }i=1 is a dual SuperHyperDefensive 1616
SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut for N SHF : (V, E); 1617
(ii) Γ = b n2 c for N SHF : (V, E); 1618

bnc for N SHF : (V, E); 1619
S={vi }i=1
bnc
(iv) the SuperHyperSets S = {vi }i=1
2
are only dual maximal SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut 1620
for N SHF : (V, E). 1621
Then following statements hold; 1623
(i) if s ≥ t and a SuperHyperSet S of SuperHyperVertices is an 1624
t-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut, then S is an 1625
s-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut; 1626
(ii) if s ≤ t and a SuperHyperSet S of SuperHyperVertices is a dual 1627
t-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut, then S is a dual 1628
s-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut. 1629
Then following statements hold; 1631
(i) if s ≥ t + 2 and a SuperHyperSet S of SuperHyperVertices is an 1632
t-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut, then S is an 1633
s-SuperHyperPowerful SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut; 1634
(ii) if s ≤ t and a SuperHyperSet S of SuperHyperVertices is a dual 1635
t-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut, then S is a dual 1636
s-SuperHyperPowerful SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut. 1637
Proposition 6.49. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a[an] 1638
[V-]SuperHyperUniform-strong-Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. Then following 1639
statements hold; 1640
(i) if ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| < b 2r c + 1, then ESHG : (V, E) is an 1641
2-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut; 1642
(ii) if ∀a ∈ V \ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| > b 2r c + 1, then ESHG : (V, E) is a dual 1643
(iii) if ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ V \ S| = 0, then ESHG : (V, E) is an V-SuperHyperDefensive 1645
(iv) if ∀a ∈ V \ S, |Ns (a) ∩ V \ S| = 0, then ESHG : (V, E) is a dual 1647
V-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut. 1648
Proposition 6.50. Let ESHG : (V, E) is a[an] 1649
[V-]SuperHyperUniform-strong-Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. Then following 1650
statements hold; 1651
(i) ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| < b 2r c + 1 if ESHG : (V, E) is an 2-SuperHyperDefensive 1652
(ii) ∀a ∈ V \ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| > b 2r c + 1 if ESHG : (V, E) is a dual 1654
(iii) ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ V \ S| = 0 if ESHG : (V, E) is an V-SuperHyperDefensive 1656
(iv) ∀a ∈ V \ S, |Ns (a) ∩ V \ S| = 0 if ESHG : (V, E) is a dual 1658
V-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut. 1659
[V-]SuperHyperUniform-strong-Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph which is a 1661
SuperHyperComplete. Then following statements hold; 1662
(i) ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| < b O−1 2 c + 1 if ESHG : (V, E) is an 2-SuperHyperDefensive 1663
(ii) ∀a ∈ V \ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| > b O−1

2 c + 1 if ESHG : (V, E) is a dual 1665
(iii) ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ V \ S| = 0 if ESHG : (V, E) is an (O − 1)-SuperHyperDefensive 1667
(O − 1)-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut. 1670
[V-]SuperHyperUniform-strong-Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph which is a 1672
SuperHyperComplete. Then following statements hold; 1673
(i) if ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| < b O−1

2 c + 1, then ESHG : (V, E) is an 1674
(ii) if ∀a ∈ V \ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| > b O−1

2 c + 1, then ESHG : (V, E) is a dual 1676
(iii) if ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ V \ S| = 0, then ESHG : (V, E) is 1678
(O − 1)-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut; 1679
(O − 1)-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut. 1681
[V-]SuperHyperUniform-strong-Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph which is 1683
SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut. Then following statements hold; 1684
(i) ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| < 2 if ESHG : (V, E)) is an 2-SuperHyperDefensive 1685
(ii) ∀a ∈ V \ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| > 2 if ESHG : (V, E) is a dual 2-SuperHyperDefensive 1687
(iii) ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ V \ S| = 0 if ESHG : (V, E) is an 2-SuperHyperDefensive 1689
2-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut. 1692
[V-]SuperHyperUniform-strong-Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph which is 1694
SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut. Then following statements hold; 1695
(i) if ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| < 2, then ESHG : (V, E) is an 2-SuperHyperDefensive 1696
(ii) if ∀a ∈ V \ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| > 2, then ESHG : (V, E) is a dual 1698
(iii) if ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ V \ S| = 0, then ESHG : (V, E) is an 2-SuperHyperDefensive 1700
2-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut. 1703
7 Neutrosophic Applications in Cancer’s 1704
Neutrosophic Recognition 1705
The cancer is the Neutrosophic disease but the Neutrosophic model is going to figure 1706
out what’s going on this Neutrosophic phenomenon. The special Neutrosophic case of 1707
this Neutrosophic disease is considered and as the consequences of the model, some 1708
parameters are used. The cells are under attack of this disease but the moves of the 1709
cancer in the special region are the matter of mind. The Neutrosophic recognition of the 1710
cancer could help to find some Neutrosophic treatments for this Neutrosophic disease. 1711
In the following, some Neutrosophic steps are Neutrosophic devised on this disease. 1712
Step 1. (Neutrosophic Definition) The Neutrosophic recognition of the cancer in 1713
the long-term Neutrosophic function. 1714
Step 2. (Neutrosophic Issue) The specific region has been assigned by the 1715
Neutrosophic model [it’s called Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph] and the long 1716
Neutrosophic cycle of the move from the cancer is identified by this research. 1717
Sometimes the move of the cancer hasn’t be easily identified since there are some 1718
determinacy, indeterminacy and neutrality about the moves and the effects of the 1719
cancer on that region; this event leads us to choose another model [it’s said to be 1720
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph] to have convenient perception on what’s 1721
happened and what’s done. 1722
Figure 29. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite Associated to the Notions of Neutro-

sophic SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut
Step 3. (Neutrosophic Model) There are some specific Neutrosophic models, 1723
which are well-known and they’ve got the names, and some general Neutrosophic 1724
models. The moves and the Neutrosophic traces of the cancer on the complex 1725
tracks and between complicated groups of cells could be fantasized by a 1726
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath(-/SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut, SuperHyperStar, 1727
SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, SuperHyperWheel). The aim is to 1728
find either the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut or the Neutrosophic 1729
SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut in those Neutrosophic Neutrosophic 1730
SuperHyperModels. 1731
8 Case 1: The Initial Neutrosophic Steps 1732
Toward Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite as 1733
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel 1734
Step 4. (Neutrosophic Solution) In the Neutrosophic Figure (29), the 1735
Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite is Neutrosophic highlighted and Neutrosophic 1736
featured. 1737
By using the Neutrosophic Figure (29) and the Table (4), the Neutrosophic 1738
SuperHyperBipartite is obtained. 1739
The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Neutrosophic Algorithm in 1740
previous Neutrosophic result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the 1741
connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic 1742
Table 4. The Values of Vertices, SuperVertices, Edges, HyperEdges, and SuperHyper-

Edges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite
Figure 30. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite Associated to the Notions of

Neutrosophic SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut
9 Case 2: The Increasing Neutrosophic Steps 1744
Toward Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite as 1745
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel 1746
Step 4. (Neutrosophic Solution) In the Neutrosophic Figure (30), the 1747
Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite is Neutrosophic highlighted and 1748
Neutrosophic featured. 1749
By using the Neutrosophic Figure (30) and the Table (5), the Neutrosophic 1750
SuperHyperMultipartite is obtained. 1751
The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Neutrosophic Algorithm in 1752
previous result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected 1753
Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic 1754
Table 5. The Values of Vertices, SuperVertices, Edges, HyperEdges, and SuperHyper-

Edges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite
10 Wondering Open Problems But As The 1756
Directions To Forming The Motivations 1757
In what follows, some “problems” and some “questions” are proposed. 1758
The SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut and the Neutrosophic 1759
SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut are defined on a real-world application, titled “Cancer’s 1760
Recognitions”. 1761
Question 10.1. Which the else SuperHyperModels could be defined based on Cancer’s 1762
recognitions? 1763
Question 10.2. Are there some SuperHyperNotions related to 1764
SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut? 1765
Question 10.3. Are there some Algorithms to be defined on the SuperHyperModels to 1766
compute them? 1767
Question 10.4. Which the SuperHyperNotions are related to beyond the 1768
SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut? 1769
Problem 10.5. The SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut and the Neutrosophic 1770
SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut do a SuperHyperModel for the Cancer’s recognitions and 1771
they’re based on SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut, are there else? 1772
Problem 10.6. Which the fundamental SuperHyperNumbers are related to these 1773
SuperHyperNumbers types-results? 1774
Problem 10.7. What’s the independent research based on Cancer’s recognitions 1775
concerning the multiple types of SuperHyperNotions? 1776
11 Conclusion and Closing Remarks 1777
In this section, concluding remarks and closing remarks are represented. The drawbacks 1778
of this research are illustrated. Some benefits and some advantages of this research are 1779
highlighted. 1780
This research uses some approaches to make Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs more 1781
understandable. In this endeavor, two SuperHyperNotions are defined on the 1782
SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut. For that sake in the second definition, the main 1783
definition of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph is redefined on the position of the 1784
alphabets. Based on the new definition for the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, the 1785
new SuperHyperNotion, Neutrosophic SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut, finds the 1786
convenient background to implement some results based on that. Some 1787
SuperHyperClasses and some Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses are the cases of this 1788
research on the modeling of the regions where are under the attacks of the cancer to 1789
recognize this disease as it’s mentioned on the title “Cancer’s Recognitions”. To 1790
formalize the instances on the SuperHyperNotion, SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut, the 1791
new SuperHyperClasses and SuperHyperClasses, are introduced. Some general results 1792
are gathered in the section on the SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut and the Neutrosophic 1793
SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut. The clarifications, instances and literature reviews have 1794
taken the whole way through. In this research, the literature reviews have fulfilled the 1795
lines containing the notions and the results. The SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic 1796
SuperHyperGraph are the SuperHyperModels on the “Cancer’s Recognitions” and both 1797
bases are the background of this research. Sometimes the cancer has been happened on 1798
the region, full of cells, groups of cells and embedded styles. In this segment, the 1799
SuperHyperModel proposes some SuperHyperNotions based on the connectivities of the 1800
moves of the cancer in the longest and strongest styles with the formation of the design 1801
and the architecture are formally called “ SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut” in the themes 1802
of jargons and buzzwords. The prefix “SuperHyper” refers to the theme of the 1803
embedded styles to figure out the background for the SuperHyperNotions. In the Table
Table 6. An Overlook On This Research And Beyond

Advantages Limitations
1. Redefining Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 1. General Results
2. SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut
3. Neutrosophic SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut 2. Other SuperHyperNumbers
4. Modeling of Cancer’s Recognitions
5. SuperHyperClasses 3. SuperHyperFamilies
1804
(6), benefits and avenues for this research are, figured out, pointed out and spoken out. 1805
12 Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality But As The 1806
Extensions Excerpt From Dense And Super 1807
Forms 1808
Definition 12.1. (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality). 1809
(i) Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperDuality if ∀Ei ∈ E 0 , ∃Ej ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ E 0 1813
such that Va ∈ Ei , Ej ; 1814
(ii) Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperDuality if ∀Ei ∈ E 0 , ∃Ej ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ E 0 1815
such that Va ∈ Ei , Ej and 1816
|Ei |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY = |Ej |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY ; 1817
(iii) Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperDuality if ∀Vi ∈ V 0 , ∃Vj ∈ VESHG:(V,E) \ V 0 1818
such that Vi , Vj ∈ Ea ; 1819
(iv) Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperDuality if ∀Vi ∈ V 0 , ∃Vj ∈ VESHG:(V,E) \ V 0 1820
such that Vi , Vj ∈ Ea and 1821
|Vi |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY = |Vj |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY ; 1822
(v) Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality if it’s either of Neutrosophic 1823
e-SuperHyperDuality, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperDuality, Neutrosophic 1824
v-SuperHyperDuality, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperDuality. 1825
Definition 12.2. ((Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDuality). 1826
(i) an Extreme SuperHyperDuality if it’s either of Neutrosophic 1829
v-SuperHyperDuality, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperDuality and C(N SHG) for 1831
an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum Extreme 1832
cardinality of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality of the 1833
Extreme SuperHyperEdges in the conseNeighborive Extreme sequence of Extreme 1834
Extreme SuperHyperDuality; 1836
(ii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality if it’s either of Neutrosophic 1837
a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum Neutrosophic 1840
cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges of a Neutrosophic 1841
Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality; 1844
(iii) an Extreme SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of 1845
Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperDuality, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperDuality, 1846
Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperDuality, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperDuality and 1847
C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Extreme 1848
SuperHyperPolynomial contains the Extreme coefficients defined as the Extreme 1849
number of the maximum Extreme cardinality of the Extreme SuperHyperEdges of 1850
an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality conseNeighborive 1851
Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form 1852
the Extreme SuperHyperDuality; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its 1853
Extreme coefficient; 1854
(iv) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either 1855
of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperDuality, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperDuality, 1856
C(N SHG) for a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the 1858
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPolynomial contains the Neutrosophic coefficients 1859
defined as the Neutrosophic number of the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of 1860
SuperHyperDuality; and the Neutrosophic power is corresponded to its 1864
(v) an Extreme R-SuperHyperDuality if it’s either of Neutrosophic 1866
Extreme SuperHyperVertices in the conseNeighborive Extreme sequence of 1871
the Extreme SuperHyperDuality; 1873
(vi) a Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality if it’s either of Neutrosophic 1874
Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality; 1881
(vii) an Extreme R-SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either 1882
number of the maximum Extreme cardinality of the Extreme SuperHyperVertices 1887
of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality conseNeighborive 1888
the Extreme SuperHyperDuality; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its 1890
(viii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either 1892
the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high 1898
SuperHyperDuality; and the Neutrosophic power is corresponded to its 1901
SuperHyperDuality, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly 1906
straightforward. E1 and E3 are some empty Extreme SuperHyperEdges but E2 is 1907
a loop Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge and E4 is a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. 1908
Thus in the terms of Neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only one 1909
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge, namely, E4 . The Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, 1910
V3 is Neutrosophic isolated means that there’s no Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge 1911
has it as a Neutrosophic endpoint. Thus the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 , 1912
is excluded in every given Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality. 1913
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality = {E4 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality = {V4 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z.
straightforward. E1 , E2 and E3 are some empty Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges 1916
but E4 is a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. Thus in the terms of Neutrosophic 1917
SuperHyperDuality. 1922


C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality = {E4 , E2 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial = 2z 2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality = {V1 , V4 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial = 15z 2 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial = 4z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality = {E3i+13i=0 , E3i+243i=0 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial 6z 8 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality = {V3i+17i=0 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality = {E15 , E16 , E17 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial = z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality = {V3 , V13 , V8 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial =
4 × 5 × 5z 3 .

4 × 5 × 5z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality = {E3i+13i=0 , E23 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality = {V3i+13i=0 , V15 }.

4 × 5 × 5z 3 .

3 × 3z 2 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality = {V1 , Vii610=5,7,8 }.
i=4

3 × 3z 2 .



(2 × 1 × 2) + (2 × 4 × 5)z.

(1 × 1 × 2)z.

(2 × 2 × 2)z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality = {E3i+1i=03 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality = {V2i+1i=05 }.



C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial
= 10 × 9 + 10 × 6 + 12 × 9 + 12 × 6z 2 .
Proposition 12.4. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath 1985
ESHP : (V, E). Then 1986
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality =

= {Ei }i=1 3
.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial
= 3z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality
= {ViEXT ERN AL }i=1 3

.
Y |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= |V EXT ERN AL ESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality z 3 .
Proof. Let 1987
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
E |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality , V EXT ERN AL |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality .
3 3

corresponded to ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of SuperHyperDuality. The latter is 1991
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (23), is the SuperHyperDuality. 1995
Proposition 12.6. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle 1996
ESHC : (V, E). Then 1997
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality =

= {Ei }i=1 3
.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial
= 3z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality

.
Proof. Let 1998
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
3 3

Then 2009
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperDuality = {E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial
= |i | Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E)|Neutrosophic Cardinality |z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperDuality = {CEN T ER ∈ VESHG:(V,E) }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
Proof. Let 2010
P : ViEXT ERN AL , Ei , CEN T ER, VjEXT ERN AL .

the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (25), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality. 2020
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperDuality

= {Ei ∈ EPi ESHG:(V,E) , |Pi ESHG:(V,E) | = min |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈ P ESHG:(V,E) |}.
i
X
=( (min |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈ P ESHG:(V,E) |)choose|Pi ESHG:(V,E) |)
i
i=|P ESHG:(V,E) |
ESHG:(V,E)
∈P ESHG:(V,E) |
z min |Pi
= {ViEXT ERN AL ∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , Vi
EXT ERN AL
∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , i 6= j}.

X X
= =( (|Pi ESHG:(V,E) |choose 2) = z 2 .
EXT ERN AL |
|VESHG:(V,E) i=|P ESHG:(V,E) |
Neutrosophic Cardinality
Proof. Let 2023
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmin i |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1

straightforward. Then there’s at least one SuperHyperDuality. Thus the notion of quasi 2028
isn’t up and the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperDuality could be applied. 2029
There are only two SuperHyperParts. Thus every SuperHyperPart could have one 2030
SuperHyperVertex as the representative in the 2031
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
is a longest SuperHyperDuality taken from a connected Neutrosophic 2032
solution 2035
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
SuperHyperModel (26), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality. 2042

= {Ei ∈ EPi ESHG:(V,E) , |Pi ESHG:(V,E) | = min |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈ P ESHG:(V,E) |}.
i
X
i
i=|P ESHG:(V,E) |
ESHG:(V,E)
∈P ESHG:(V,E) |
z min |Pi
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , Vi
EXT ERN AL
∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , i 6= j}.

X X
EXT ERN AL |
Proof. Let 2045
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
is a longest SuperHyperDuality taken from a connected Neutrosophic 2046

There are only z 0 SuperHyperParts. Thus every SuperHyperPart could have one 2052
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
solution 2057
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality. 2065
ESHW : (V, E). Then, 2067
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperDuality = {E ∗ ∈ EESHG:(V,E)

∗
}.
= |i | Ei∗ ∈ EESHG:(V,E)|
∗
|z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperDuality = {CEN T ER ∈ VESHG:(V,E) }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
Proof. Let 2068
P :
...,
∗ EXT ERN AL
E|E ∗ | , V|E ∗ |Neutrosophic Cardinality +1
ESHG:(V,E) Neutrosophic Cardinality ESHG:(V,E)
is a longest SuperHyperDuality taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel 2069
ESHW : (V, E). There’s a new way to redefine as 2070

∃!Ez∗ ∈ EESHG:(V,E)
∗
, ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL ∈ Ez∗ ≡
∃!Ez∗ ∈ EESHG:(V,E)
∗
, {ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL } ⊆ Ez∗ .
The unique embedded SuperHyperDuality proposes some longest SuperHyperDuality 2075
excerpt from some representatives. The latter is straightforward. 2076
13 Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin But As The 2083
Forms 2085
Definition 13.1. (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin). 2086
(i) Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperJoin if ∀Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ E 0 , ∃Ej ∈ E 0 , such 2090
that Va ∈ Ei , Ej ; and ∀Ei , Ej ∈ E 0 , such that Va 6∈ Ei , Ej ; 2091
(ii) Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperJoin if ∀Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ E 0 , ∃Ej ∈ E 0 , 2092
such that Va ∈ Ei , Ej ; ∀Ei , Ej ∈ E 0 , such that Va 6∈ Ei , Ej ; and 2093
(iii) Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperJoin if ∀Vi ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ V 0 , ∃Vj ∈ V 0 , such 2095
that Vi , Vj 6∈ Ea ; and ∀Vi , Vj ∈ V 0 , such that Vi , Vj 6∈ Ea ; 2096
(iv) Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperJoin if ∀Vi ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ V 0 , ∃Vj ∈ V 0 , such 2097
that Vi , Vj ∈ Ea ; ∀Vi , Vj ∈ V 0 , such that Vi , Vj 6∈ Ea ; and 2098
(v) Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin if it’s either of Neutrosophic 2100
e-SuperHyperJoin, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperJoin, Neutrosophic 2101
v-SuperHyperJoin, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperJoin. 2102
Definition 13.2. ((Neutrosophic) SuperHyperJoin). 2103
(i) an Extreme SuperHyperJoin if it’s either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperJoin, 2106
Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperJoin, Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperJoin, and 2107
Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperJoin and C(N SHG) for an Extreme 2108
Extreme SuperHyperJoin; 2113
(ii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin if it’s either of Neutrosophic 2114
v-SuperHyperJoin, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperJoin and C(N SHG) for a 2116
Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin; 2121
(iii) an Extreme SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of 2122
Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperJoin, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperJoin, Neutrosophic 2123
v-SuperHyperJoin, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperJoin and C(N SHG) for an 2124
Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Extreme 2125
the Extreme SuperHyperJoin; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its 2130
(iv) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of 2132
SuperHyperJoin; and the Neutrosophic power is corresponded to its Neutrosophic 2141
coefficient; 2142
(v) an Extreme R-SuperHyperJoin if it’s either of Neutrosophic 2143
Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum Extreme cardinality 2146
of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality of the Extreme 2147
Extreme SuperHyperJoin; 2150
(vi) a Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin if it’s either of Neutrosophic 2151
Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin; 2158
(vii) an Extreme R-SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of 2159
the Extreme SuperHyperJoin; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its 2167
(viii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of 2169
SuperHyperJoin; and the Neutrosophic power is corresponded to its Neutrosophic 2178
coefficient. 2179
SuperHyperJoin, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly 2183
straightforward. E1 and E3 are some empty Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges but 2184
E2 is a loop Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge and E4 is a Neutrosophic 2185
SuperHyperEdge. Thus in the terms of Neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbor, 2186
there’s only one Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge, namely, E4 . The Neutrosophic 2187
SuperHyperVertex, V3 is Neutrosophic isolated means that there’s no 2188
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge has it as a Neutrosophic endpoint. Thus the 2189
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 , is excluded in every given Neutrosophic 2190
SuperHyperJoin. 2191
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin = {E4 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin = {V1 , V2 , V4 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial = z 3 .


C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin = {E4 , E2 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial = 2z 2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin = {V1 , V4 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial = 15z 2 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial = 4z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin = {V5 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin = {E3i+13i=0 , E3i+243i=0 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial 6z 8 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin = {V3i+17i=0 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin = {E15 , E16 , E17 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial = z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial =
4 × 5 × 5z 3 .

4 × 5 × 5z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin = {E3i+13i=0 , E23 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin = {V3i+13i=0 , V15 }.

4 × 5 × 5z 3 .

3 × 3z 2 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin = {V1 , Vii610=5,7,8 }.
i=4

3 × 3z 2 .



(1 × 5 × 5) + (1 × 2 + 1)z 3 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin = {V27 , V2 , V7 , V17 }.
(1 × 1 × 2 + 1)z 4 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin = {V27 , V2 , V7 , V17 }.
(1 × 1 × 2 + 1)z 4 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin = {E3i+1i=03 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin = {V2i+1i=05 }.


C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial = 10z.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial
= 10 × 6 + 10 × 6 + 12 × 6 + 12 × 6z 2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin =

= {Ei }i=1 3
.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial
= 3z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin

.
Proof. Let 2265
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
3 3

corresponded to ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of SuperHyperJoin. The latter is 2269
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (23), is the SuperHyperJoin. 2273

= {Ei }i=1 3
.
= 3z 3 .

.
Proof. Let 2276
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
3 3

Then 2287
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperJoin = {E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperJoin = {CEN T ER ∈ VESHG:(V,E) }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
Proof. Let 2288

the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (25), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin. 2298
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperJoin

= (PERFECT MATCHING).
{Ei ∈ EPi ESHG:(V,E) ,
∀Pi ESHG:(V,E) , |Pi ESHG:(V,E) | = min |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈ P ESHG:(V,E) |}.
i
= (OTHERWISE).
{},
If ∃Pi ESHG:(V,E) , |Pi ESHG:(V,E) | =
6 min |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈ P ESHG:(V,E) |.
i
X
i
i=|P ESHG:(V,E) |
ESHG:(V,E)
∈P ESHG:(V,E) |
z min |Pi
where ∀Pi ESHG:(V,E) , |Pi ESHG:(V,E) |
= min |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈ P ESHG:(V,E) |}.
i
= (OTHERWISE)0.
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , Vi
EXT ERN AL
∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , i 6= j}.

X X
EXT ERN AL |
Proof. Let 2301
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL

straightforward. Then there’s no at least one SuperHyperJoin. Thus the notion of quasi 2306
may be up but the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperJoin could be applied. 2307
There are only two SuperHyperParts. Thus every SuperHyperPart could have one 2308
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
is a longest SuperHyperJoin taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite 2310
ESHB : (V, E). Thus only some SuperHyperVertices and only 2311
solution 2313
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
SuperHyperModel (26), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin. 2320

i
= (OTHERWISE).
{},
i
X
i
i=|P ESHG:(V,E) |
ESHG:(V,E)
∈P ESHG:(V,E) |
z min |Pi
i
= (OTHERWISE)0.
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , Vi
EXT ERN AL
∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , i 6= j}.

X X
EXT ERN AL |
Proof. Let 2323
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
is a longest SuperHyperJoin taken from a connected Neutrosophic 2324

straightforward. Then there’s no at least one SuperHyperJoin. Thus the notion of quasi 2328
may be up but the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperJoin could be applied. 2329
There are only z 0 SuperHyperParts. Thus every SuperHyperPart could have one 2330
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
solution 2335
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin. 2343

= {Ei }i=1 3
.
= 3z 3 .

.
Proof. Let 2346
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
3 3
is a longest SuperHyperJoin taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel 2347

straightforward. Then there’s at least one SuperHyperJoin. Thus the notion of quasi 2351
isn’t up and the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperJoin could be applied. The 2352
unique embedded SuperHyperJoin proposes some longest SuperHyperJoin excerpt from 2353
some representatives. The latter is straightforward. 2354
14 Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect But As The 2361
Forms 2363
Definition 14.1. (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect). 2364
(i) Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperPerfect if ∀Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ E 0 , ∃!Ej ∈ E 0 , 2368
such that Va ∈ Ei , Ej ; 2369
(ii) Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperPerfect if ∀Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ E 0 , ∃!Ej ∈ E 0 , 2370
such that Va ∈ Ei , Ej ; and 2371
(iii) Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperPerfect if ∀Vi ∈ VESHG:(V,E) \ V 0 , ∃!Vj ∈ V 0 , 2373
such that Vi , Vj ∈ Ea ; 2374
(iv) Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperPerfect if ∀Vi ∈ VESHG:(V,E) \ V 0 , ∃!Vj ∈ V 0 , 2375
such that Vi , Vj ∈ Ea ; and 2376
(v) Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect if it’s either of Neutrosophic 2378
e-SuperHyperPerfect, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperPerfect, Neutrosophic 2379
v-SuperHyperPerfect, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperPerfect. 2380
Definition 14.2. ((Neutrosophic) SuperHyperPerfect). 2381
(i) an Extreme SuperHyperPerfect if it’s either of Neutrosophic 2384
v-SuperHyperPerfect, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperPerfect and C(N SHG) for 2386
Extreme SuperHyperEdges in the conseNeighborive Extreme sequence of Extreme 2389
Extreme SuperHyperPerfect; 2391
(ii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect if it’s either of Neutrosophic 2392
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect; 2399
(iii) an Extreme SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of 2400
Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperPerfect, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperPerfect, 2401
Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperPerfect, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperPerfect and 2402
the Extreme SuperHyperPerfect; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its 2408
(iv) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either 2410
of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperPerfect, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperPerfect, 2411
SuperHyperPerfect; and the Neutrosophic power is corresponded to its 2419
(v) an Extreme R-SuperHyperPerfect if it’s either of Neutrosophic 2421
Extreme SuperHyperVertices in the conseNeighborive Extreme sequence of 2426
the Extreme SuperHyperPerfect; 2428
(vi) a Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect if it’s either of Neutrosophic 2429
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect; 2436
(vii) an Extreme R-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either 2437
the Extreme SuperHyperPerfect; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its 2445
(viii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either 2447
the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high 2453
SuperHyperPerfect; and the Neutrosophic power is corresponded to its 2456
SuperHyperPerfect, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly 2461
SuperHyperPerfect. 2469
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect = {E4 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect = {V4 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z.


C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect = {E4 , E2 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = 2z 2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect = {V1 , V4 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = 15z 2 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = 4z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect = {E3i+13i=0 , E3i+243i=0 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial 6z 8 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect = {V3i+17i=0 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect = {E15 , E16 , E17 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect = {V3 , V6 , V8 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial =
3 × 4 × 4z 3 .

3 × 4 × 4z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect = {E3i+13i=0 , E23 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z 5 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect = {V3i+13i=0 , V15 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z 5 .

3 × 4 × 4z 3 .

3 × 2z 2 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect = {V1 , Vii610=5,7,8 }.
i=4

3 × 3z 2 .



C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect = {V2 , V7 , V17 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial =
(1 × 5 × 5) + (1 × 2 + 1)z 3 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect = {V27 , V2 , V7 , V17 }.
(1 × 1 × 2 + 1)z 4 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect = {V27 , V2 , V7 , V17 }.
(1 × 1 × 2 + 1)z 4 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect = {E3i+1i=03 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect = {V2i+1i=05 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = 2z 6 .



C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect = {V3 , V6 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial
= 10 × 6 + 10 × 6 + 12 × 6 + 12 × 6z 2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect =

= {Ei }i=1 3
.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial
= 3z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect

.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial
Proof. Let 2543
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
3 3

corresponded to ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of SuperHyperPerfect. The latter is 2547
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (23), is the SuperHyperPerfect. 2551
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect =

= {Ei }i=1 3
.
= 3z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect

.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial
Proof. Let 2554
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
3 3

Then 2565
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect = {E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect = {CEN T ER ∈ VESHG:(V,E) }.
Proof. Let 2566

the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (25), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect. 2576
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect

i
= (OTHERWISE).
{},
i
X
i
i=|P ESHG:(V,E) |
ESHG:(V,E)
∈P ESHG:(V,E) |
z min |Pi
i
= (OTHERWISE)0.
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , Vi
EXT ERN AL
∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , i 6= j}.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial

X X
EXT ERN AL |
Proof. Let 2579
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL

straightforward. Then there’s no at least one SuperHyperPerfect. Thus the notion of 2584
quasi may be up but the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperPerfect could be 2585
applied. There are only two SuperHyperParts. Thus every SuperHyperPart could have 2586
one SuperHyperVertex as the representative in the 2587
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
is a longest SuperHyperPerfect taken from a connected Neutrosophic 2588
solution 2591
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
SuperHyperModel (26), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect. 2598

i
= (OTHERWISE).
{},
i
X
i
i=|P ESHG:(V,E) |
ESHG:(V,E)
∈P ESHG:(V,E) |
z min |Pi
i
= (OTHERWISE)0.
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , Vi
EXT ERN AL
∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , i 6= j}.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial

X X
EXT ERN AL |
Proof. Let 2601
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
is a longest SuperHyperPerfect taken from a connected Neutrosophic 2602

straightforward. Then there’s no at least one SuperHyperPerfect. Thus the notion of 2606
quasi may be up but the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperPerfect could be 2607
applied. There are only z 0 SuperHyperParts. Thus every SuperHyperPart could have 2608
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
solution 2613
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect. 2621
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect = {E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect = {CEN T ER ∈ VESHG:(V,E) }.
Proof. Let 2624

is a longest SuperHyperPerfect taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel 2625

straightforward. Then there’s at least one SuperHyperPerfect. Thus the notion of quasi 2629
isn’t up and the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperPerfect could be applied. The 2630
unique embedded SuperHyperPerfect proposes some longest SuperHyperPerfect excerpt 2631
from some representatives. The latter is straightforward. 2632
15 Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal But As The 2639
Forms 2641
Definition 15.1. (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal). 2642
(i) Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperTotal if ∀Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , ∃!Ej ∈ E 0 , such 2646
that Va ∈ Ei , Ej ; 2647
(ii) Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperTotal if ∀Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , ∃!Ej ∈ E 0 , such 2648
that Va ∈ Ei , Ej ; and 2649
(iii) Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperTotal if ∀Vi ∈ VESHG:(V,E) , ∃!Vj ∈ V 0 , such 2651
that Vi , Vj ∈ Ea ; 2652
(iv) Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperTotal if ∀Vi ∈ VESHG:(V,E) , ∃!Vj ∈ V 0 , such 2653
that Vi , Vj ∈ Ea ; and 2654
(v) Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal if it’s either of Neutrosophic 2656
e-SuperHyperTotal, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperTotal, Neutrosophic 2657
v-SuperHyperTotal, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperTotal. 2658
Definition 15.2. ((Neutrosophic) SuperHyperTotal). 2659
(i) an Extreme SuperHyperTotal if it’s either of Neutrosophic 2662
v-SuperHyperTotal, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperTotal and C(N SHG) for an 2664
Extreme SuperHyperTotal; 2669
(ii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal if it’s either of Neutrosophic 2670
v-SuperHyperTotal, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperTotal and C(N SHG) for a 2672
Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal; 2677
(iii) an Extreme SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of 2678
Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperTotal, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperTotal, Neutrosophic 2679
the Extreme SuperHyperTotal; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its 2686
(iv) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of 2688
SuperHyperTotal; and the Neutrosophic power is corresponded to its 2697
(v) an Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal if it’s either of Neutrosophic 2699
Extreme SuperHyperTotal; 2706
(vi) a Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperTotal if it’s either of Neutrosophic 2707
Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal; 2714
(vii) an Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of 2715
the Extreme SuperHyperTotal; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its 2723
(viii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of 2725
SuperHyperTotal; and the Neutrosophic power is corresponded to its 2734
SuperHyperTotal, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly 2739
SuperHyperTotal. 2747
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperTotal = {E4 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperTotal = {V4 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z.


C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi- = {E4 , E2 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = 2z 2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperTotal = {V1 , V4 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = 15z 2 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = 4z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal = {Ei+19i=0 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial 20z 10 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperTotal = {Vi+19i=0 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = 20z 10 .
C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperTotal = {E12 , E13 , E14 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = z 3 .
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal = {V12 , V13 , V14 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = z 3 .
C(N SHG)Extreme Quasi-SuperHyperTotal = {E4 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme Quasi-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial =
3 × 4 × 4z 3 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial 10z 10 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperTotal = {Vi+19i=0 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme Quasi-SuperHyperTotal = {E5 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme Quasi-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
3 × 4 × 4z 3 .
C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperTotal = {E1 , E6 , E7 , E8 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = 2z 4 .
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal = {V1 , V5 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z 2 .
C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperTotal = {E1 , E2 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal = {V1 , Vii68=4,5,6 }.
i=1




4 × 3z 3 .

C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal = {V1 , V2 , V6 , V17 }.
4 × 3z 4 .

C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal = {V1 , V2 , V6 , V17 }.
2 × 4 × 3z 4 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = 11z 10 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperTotal = {Vi+2i=011 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = 11z 10 .

C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal = {V1 , V }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial
= |(|V | − 1)z 2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal = {E1 , E2 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = 2z 2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperTotal = {V1 , V2 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme R-Quasi-SuperHyperTotal = {V3 , V10 , V6 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-Quasi-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial
= 3 × 6z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal =

|E | −2
= {Ei }i=1ESHG:(V,E) Neutrosophic Cardinality .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial
= z |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality −2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperTotal
|E | −2
= {ViEXT ERN AL }i=1ESHG:(V,E) Neutrosophic Cardinality .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial
Y
= |V EXT ERN AL ESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality z |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality −2
Proof. Let 2821
P :
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
V3EXT ERN AL , E3 ,
...

corresponded to ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of SuperHyperTotal. The latter is 2825
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (23), is the SuperHyperTotal. 2829
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal =

|E | −2
= {Ei }i=1ESHG:(V,E) Neutrosophic Cardinality .
= (|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality − 1)
z |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality −2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperTotal
|E | −2
= {ViEXT ERN AL }i=1ESHG:(V,E) Neutrosophic Cardinality .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial
Y
= |V EXT ERN AL ESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality z |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality −2
Proof. Let 2832
P :
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
V3EXT ERN AL , E3 ,
...,
E |E|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality −1 .
, V EXT ERN AL |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality −1

Then 2843
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal = {Ei , Ej ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.

= |i(i − 1) | Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E)|Neutrosophic Cardinality |z 2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperTotal = {CEN T ER, Vj ∈ VESHG:(V,E) }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial =
(|VESHG:(V,E)|Neutrosophic Cardinality |) choose (|VESHG:(V,E)|Neutrosophic Cardinality | − 1)
z2.
Proof. Let 2844
P : ViEXT ERN AL , Ei , CEN T ER, Ej .

the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (25), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal. 2854
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal

= {Ea ∈ EPi ESHG:(V,E) ,
i
ESHG:(V,E)
∈P ESHG:(V,E) |
= z min |Pi
i
= {VaEXT ERN AL ∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , Vb
EXT ERN AL
∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , i 6= j}.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial

X X
EXT ERN AL |
Proof. Let 2857
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2

straightforward. Then there’s no at least one SuperHyperTotal. Thus the notion of 2862
quasi may be up but the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperTotal could be 2863
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
is a longest SuperHyperTotal taken from a connected Neutrosophic 2866
solution 2869
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
SuperHyperModel (26), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal. 2876

i
ESHG:(V,E)
∈P ESHG:(V,E) |
= z min |Pi
i
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , Vb
EXT ERN AL
∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , i 6= j}.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial

X X
EXT ERN AL |
Proof. Let 2879
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
is a longest SuperHyperTotal taken from a connected Neutrosophic 2880

straightforward. Then there’s no at least one SuperHyperTotal. Thus the notion of 2884
quasi may be up but the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperTotal could be 2885
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
solution 2891
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal. 2899
∗
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal = {Ei , Ej ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.
∗
= |i(i − 1) | Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E)|Neutrosophic Cardinality
|z 2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperTotal = {CEN T ER, Vj ∈ VESHG:(V,E) }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial =
(|VESHG:(V,E)|Neutrosophic Cardinality |) choose (|VESHG:(V,E)|Neutrosophic Cardinality | − 1)
z2.
Proof. Let 2902
P : ViEXT ERN AL , Ei∗ , CEN T ER, Ej .

is a longest SuperHyperTotal taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel 2903

straightforward. Then there’s at least one SuperHyperTotal. Thus the notion of quasi 2907
isn’t up and the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperTotal could be applied. The 2908
unique embedded SuperHyperTotal proposes some longest SuperHyperTotal excerpt 2909
from some representatives. The latter is straightforward. 2910
16 Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected But As 2917
The Extensions Excerpt From Dense And Super 2918
Forms 2919
Definition 16.1. (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic 2920
SuperHyperConnected). 2921
(i) Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperConnected if 2925
∀Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ E 0 , ∃Ej ∈ E 0 , such that Va ∈ Ei , Ej ; and ∀Ei , Ej ∈ E 0 , such 2926
that Va 6∈ Ei , Ej ; 2927
(ii) Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperConnected if 2928
∀Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ E 0 , ∃Ej ∈ E 0 , such that Va ∈ Ei , Ej ; ∀Ei , Ej ∈ E 0 , such 2929
that Va 6∈ Ei , Ej ; and 2930
(iii) Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperConnected if 2932
∀Vi ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ V 0 , ∃Vj ∈ V 0 , such that Vi , Vj 6∈ Ea ; and ∀Vi , Vj ∈ V 0 , such 2933
that Vi , Vj 6∈ Ea ; 2934
(iv) Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperConnected if 2935
∀Vi ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ V 0 , ∃Vj ∈ V 0 , such that Vi , Vj ∈ Ea ; ∀Vi , Vj ∈ V 0 , such that 2936
Vi , Vj 6∈ Ea ; and 2937
(v) Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected if it’s either of Neutrosophic 2939
e-SuperHyperConnected, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperConnected, Neutrosophic 2940
v-SuperHyperConnected, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperConnected. 2941
Definition 16.2. ((Neutrosophic) SuperHyperConnected). 2942
(i) an Extreme SuperHyperConnected if it’s either of Neutrosophic 2945
v-SuperHyperConnected, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperConnected and 2947
C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum 2948
Extreme cardinality of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality 2949
of the Extreme SuperHyperEdges in the conseNeighborive Extreme sequence of 2950
the Extreme SuperHyperConnected; 2952
(ii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected if it’s either of Neutrosophic 2953
C(N SHG) for a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum 2956
Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges of a Neutrosophic 2957
Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected; 2960
(iii) an Extreme SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either 2961
of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperConnected, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperConnected, 2962
Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperConnected, and Neutrosophic 2963
rv-SuperHyperConnected and C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph 2964
N SHG : (V, E) is the Extreme SuperHyperPolynomial contains the Extreme 2965
coefficients defined as the Extreme number of the maximum Extreme cardinality 2966
of the Extreme SuperHyperEdges of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high 2967
Extreme cardinality conseNeighborive Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme 2968
SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Extreme SuperHyperConnected; and 2969
the Extreme power is corresponded to its Extreme coefficient; 2970
(iv) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s 2971
either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperConnected, Neutrosophic 2972
re-SuperHyperConnected, Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperConnected, and 2973
Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperConnected and C(N SHG) for a Neutrosophic 2974
SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPolynomial 2975
contains the Neutrosophic coefficients defined as the Neutrosophic number of the 2976
maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges of a 2977
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high Neutrosophic cardinality conseNeighborive 2978
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that 2979
they form the Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected; and the Neutrosophic power is 2980
corresponded to its Neutrosophic coefficient; 2981
(v) an Extreme R-SuperHyperConnected if it’s either of Neutrosophic 2982
C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum 2985
Extreme cardinality of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality 2986
of the Extreme SuperHyperVertices in the conseNeighborive Extreme sequence of 2987
the Extreme SuperHyperConnected; 2989
(vi) a Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnected if it’s either of Neutrosophic 2990
C(N SHG) for a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum 2993
Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of a 2994
they form the Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected; 2997
(vii) an Extreme R-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s 2998
Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperConnected and C(N SHG) for an Extreme 3001
Extreme cardinality of the Extreme SuperHyperVertices of an Extreme 3004
Extreme SuperHyperConnected; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its 3007
(viii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s 3009
Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperConnected and C(N SHG) for a Neutrosophic 3012
SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPolynomial 3013
contains the Neutrosophic coefficients defined as the Neutrosophic number of the 3014
maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of a 3015
they form the Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected; and the Neutrosophic power is 3018
corresponded to its Neutrosophic coefficient. 3019
SuperHyperConnected, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly 3023
SuperHyperConnected. 3031
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected = {E4 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnected = {V4 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z.


C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected = {E1 , E2 , E4 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {V1 , V4 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = 15z 2 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = 4z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {Ei+19i=0 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial 20z 10 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {Vi+19i=0 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperConnected = {E12 , E13 , E14 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z 3 .
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperConnected = {V12 , V13 , V14 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z 3 .
C(N SHG)Extreme Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {E4 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial =
3 × 4 × 4z 3 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial 10z 10 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnected = {Vi+119
i=11
, V22 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = 20z 10 .
C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperConnected = {E5 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
3 × 4 × 4z 3 .
C(N SHG)Extreme Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {E1 , E6 , E7 , E8 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = 2z 4 .
C(N SHG)Extreme R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {V1 , V5 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z 2 .
C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperConnected = {E1 , E2 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = 5z 2 .
C(N SHG)Extreme R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {V1 , Vii68=4,5,6 }.
i=1
C(N SHG)Extreme R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z 5 .
C(N SHG)Extreme Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {E3 , E9 , E6 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z 3 .
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperConnected = {V1 , V5 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z 2 .

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperConnected = {V1 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z.

C(N SHG)Extreme Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z 3 .
C(N SHG)Extreme R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {V2 , V3 , V4 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z 3 .
C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperConnected = {E2 , E3 , E4 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z 3 .
4 × 3z 3 .

C(N SHG)Extreme R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {V1 , V2 , V6 , V17 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial =
4 × 3z 4 .

C(N SHG)Extreme R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {V1 , V2 , V6 , V17 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial =
2 × 4 × 3z 4 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = 11z 10 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {Vi+2i=011 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = 10z.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperConnected = {V1 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z.

C(N SHG)Extreme Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {E3 , E4 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {V3 , V10 , V6 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial
= 3 × 6z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperConnected =

−2
= {Ei }i=1 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic −2
=z Cardinality .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected
= {ViEXT ERN AL }i=1 Cardinality
.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial
|E | −2
Y
= |V EXT ERN AL ESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality z ESHG:(V,E) Neutrosophic Cardinality
Proof. Let 3105
P :
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
V3EXT ERN AL , E3 ,
...,
E|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality −1 , V EXT ERN AL |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality −1 .

corresponded to ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of SuperHyperConnected. The latter is 3109
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (23), is the SuperHyperConnected. 3113
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperConnected =

−2
= {Ei }i=1 .
= (|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality − 1)
z Cardinality .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected
= {ViEXT ERN AL }i=1 Cardinality
.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial
|E | −2
Y
= |V EXT ERN AL ESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality z ESHG:(V,E) Neutrosophic Cardinality
Proof. Let 3116
P :
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
V3EXT ERN AL , E3 ,
...,
E|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality −1 , V EXT ERN AL |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality −1 .

Then 3127
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected = {Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial
= |i | Ei ∈ |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnected = {CEN T ER ∈ VESHG:(V,E) }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
Proof. Let 3128
P : ViEXT ERN AL , Ei , CEN T ER, Ej .

the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (25), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected. 3138
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperConnected

i
ESHG:(V,E)
∈P ESHG:(V,E) |
= z min |Pi
i
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperConnected
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , Vb
EXT ERN AL
∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , i 6= j}.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial

X X
EXT ERN AL |
Proof. Let 3141
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2

straightforward. Then there’s no at least one SuperHyperConnected. Thus the notion of 3146
quasi may be up but the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperConnected could be 3147
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
is a longest SuperHyperConnected taken from a connected Neutrosophic 3150
solution 3153
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
SuperHyperModel (26), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected. 3160
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperConnected

i
ESHG:(V,E)
∈P ESHG:(V,E) |
= z min |Pi
i
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperConnected
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , Vb
EXT ERN AL
∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , i 6= j}.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial

X X
EXT ERN AL |
Proof. Let 3163
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2

straightforward. Then there’s no at least one SuperHyperConnected. Thus the notion of 3168
quasi may be up but the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperConnected could be 3169
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
solution 3175
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected. 3183
∗
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected = {Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial
= |i | Ei ∈ |E ∗ ESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality |z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperConnected = {CEN T ER ∈ VESHG:(V,E) }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
Proof. Let 3186
P : V EXT ERN AL i , E ∗ i , CEN T ER, Ej .
SuperHyperWheel ESHW : (V, E). There’s a new way to redefine as 3188

straightforward. Then there’s at least one SuperHyperConnected. Thus the notion of 3191
quasi isn’t up and the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperConnected could be 3192
applied. The unique embedded SuperHyperConnected proposes some longest 3193
SuperHyperConnected excerpt from some representatives. The latter is 3194
17 Background 3202
There are some scientific researches covering the topic of this research. In what follows, 3203
there are some discussion and literature reviews about them. 3204
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “Super Hyper Dominating 3205
and Super Hyper Resolving on Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs and Their Directions 3206
in Game Theory and Neutrosophic Super Hyper Classes” in Ref. [1] by Henry Garrett 3207
(2022). In this research article, a novel approach is implemented on SuperHyperGraph 3208
and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on fundamental SuperHyperNumber and 3209
using neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses of neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. It’s 3210
published in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled “Journal of Mathematical 3211
Techniques and Computational Mathematics(JMTCM)” with ISO abbreviation “J Math 3212
Techniques Comput Math” in volume 1 and issue 3 with pages 242-263. The research 3213
article studies deeply with choosing directly neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph and 3214
SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough toward independent results based on initial 3215
background and fundamental SuperHyperNumbers. 3216
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “Some Super Hyper Degrees 3217
and Co-Super Hyper Degrees on Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs And Super Hyper 3218
Graphs Alongside Applications in Cancer’s Treatments” in Ref. [2] by Henry Garrett 3219
(2023). In this research article, a novel approach is implemented on SuperHyperGraph 3220
and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on fundamental notions and using vital tools 3221
in Cancer’s Treatments. It’s published in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled 3222
“Journal of Mathematical Techniques and Computational Mathematics(JMTCM)” with 3223
ISO abbreviation “J Math Techniques Comput Math” in volume 2 and issue 1 with 3224
pages 35-47. The research article studies deeply with choosing directly neutrosophic 3225
SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough toward independent 3226
results based on initial background and fundamental SuperHyperNumbers. 3227
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “A Research on Cancer’s 3228
Recognition and Neutrosophic Super Hypergraph by Eulerian Super Hyper Cycles and 3229
Hamiltonian Sets as Hyper Covering Versus Super separations” in Ref. [3] by Henry 3230
Garrett (2023). In this research article, a novel approach is implemented on 3231
SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on fundamental notions 3232
and using vital tools in Cancer’s Recognition. It’s published in prestigious and fancy 3233
journal is entitled “Journal of Mathematical Techniques and Computational 3234
Mathematics(JMTCM)” with ISO abbreviation “J Math Techniques Comput Math” in 3235
volume 2 and issue 3 with pages 136-148. The research article studies deeply with 3236
choosing directly neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph. It’s the 3237
breakthrough toward independent results based on initial background and fundamental 3238
SuperHyperNumbers. 3239
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “neutrosophic co-degree and 3240
neutrosophic degree alongside chromatic numbers in the setting of some classes related 3241
to neutrosophic hypergraphs” in Ref. [4] by Henry Garrett (2023). In this research 3242
article, a novel approach is implemented on SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic 3243
SuperHyperGraph based on general forms without using neutrosophic classes of 3244
neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. It’s published in prestigious and fancy journal is 3245
entitled “Journal of Current Trends in Computer Science Research (JCTCSR)” with 3246
ISO abbreviation “J Curr Trends Comp Sci Res” in volume 2 and issue 1 with pages 3247
16-24. The research article studies deeply with choosing neutrosophic hypergraphs 3248
instead of neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough toward independent 3249
results based on initial background. In some articles are titled “0039 — Closing 3250
Numbers and Super-Closing Numbers as (Dual)Resolving and (Dual)Coloring alongside 3251
(Dual)Dominating in (Neutrosophic)n-SuperHyperGraph” in Ref. [5] by Henry Garrett 3252
(2022), “0049 — (Failed)1-Zero-Forcing Number in Neutrosophic Graphs” in Ref. [6] by 3253
Henry Garrett (2022), “Extreme SuperHyperClique as the Firm Scheme of 3254
Confrontation under Cancer’s Recognition as the Model in The Setting of 3255
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [7] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Uncertainty 3256
On The Act And Effect Of Cancer Alongside The Foggy Positions Of Cells Toward 3257
Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique inside Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Titled 3258
Cancer’s Recognition” in Ref. [8] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic Version Of 3259
Separates Groups Of Cells In Cancer’s Recognition On Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” 3260
in Ref. [9] by Henry Garrett (2022), “The Shift Paradigm To Classify Separately The 3261
Cells and Affected Cells Toward The Totality Under Cancer’s Recognition By New 3262
Multiple Definitions On the Sets Polynomials Alongside Numbers In The (Neutrosophic) 3263
SuperHyperMatching Theory Based on SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic 3264
SuperHyperGraph” in Ref. [10] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Breaking the Continuity and 3265
Uniformity of Cancer In The Worst Case of Full Connections With Extreme Failed 3266
SuperHyperClique In Cancer’s Recognition Applied in (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” 3267
in Ref. [11] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable as the 3268
Survivors on the Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition Based on Uncertainty to All Modes 3269
in Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [12] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Extremism 3270
of the Attacked Body Under the Cancer’s Circumstances Where Cancer’s Recognition 3271
Titled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [13] by Henry Garrett (2022), 3272
“(Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in Cancer’s Recognitions And 3273
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [14] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic 3274
Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on 3275
Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In Special ViewPoints” in Ref. [15] by Henry 3276
Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in the SuperHyperFunction 3277
To Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition And 3278
Beyond ” in Ref. [16] by Henry Garrett (2022), “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperStable on 3279
Cancer’s Recognition by Well- SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs ” 3280
in Ref. [17] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To 3281
Form Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In 3282
Special ViewPoints” in Ref. [13] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Basic Notions on 3283
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperForcing And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling in Cancer’s 3284
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [18] by Henry Garrett 3285
(2022), “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form Neutrosophic 3286
SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In Special ViewPoints” 3287
in Ref. [19] by Henry Garrett (2022),“(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s 3288
Recognitions Featuring (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances” in 3289
Ref. [20] by Henry Garrett (2022), “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperAlliances With 3290
SuperHyperDefensive and SuperHyperOffensive Type-SuperHyperSet On (Neutrosophic) 3291
SuperHyperGraph With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions 3292
And Related (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClasses” in Ref. [21] by Henry Garrett (2022), 3293
“SuperHyperGirth on SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph With 3294
SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions” in Ref. [22] by Henry Garrett (2022), 3295
“Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on Neutrosophic 3296
SuperHyperGraphs and SuperHyperGraphs Alongside Applications in Cancer’s 3297
Treatments” in Ref. [23] by Henry Garrett (2022), “SuperHyperDominating and 3298
SuperHyperResolving on Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs And Their Directions in 3299
Game Theory and Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses” in Ref. [24] by Henry Garrett 3300
(2022), “SuperHyperMatching By (R-)Definitions And Polynomials To Monitor 3301
Cancer’s Recognition In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [159] by Henry 3302
Garrett (2023), “The Focus on The Partitions Obtained By Parallel Moves In The 3303
Cancer’s Extreme Recognition With Different Types of Extreme SuperHyperMatching Set 3304
and Polynomial on (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [160] by Henry Garrett 3305
(2023), “Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique Decides the Failures on the Cancer’s 3306
Recognition in the Perfect Connections of Cancer’s Attacks By SuperHyperModels 3307
Named (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [161] by Henry Garrett (2023), 3308
“Indeterminacy On The All Possible Connections of Cells In Front of Cancer’s Attacks 3309
In The Terms of Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique on Cancer’s Recognition called 3310
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [162] by Henry Garrett (2023), “Perfect 3311
Directions Toward Idealism in Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition Forwarding 3312
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClique on Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [165] by 3313
Henry Garrett (2023), “Demonstrating Complete Connections in Every Embedded 3314
Regions and Sub-Regions in the Terms of Cancer’s Recognition and (Neutrosophic) 3315
SuperHyperGraphs With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClique” in Ref. [166] by Henry 3316
Garrett (2023), “Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic Regions titled 3317
neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable in Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition modeled in 3318
the Form of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [169] by Henry Garrett (2023), 3319
“Using the Tool As (Neutrosophic) Failed SuperHyperStable To SuperHyperModel 3320
Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [172] by Henry 3321
Garrett (2023), “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form Neutrosophic 3322
SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In Special ViewPoints” 3323
in Ref. [173] by Henry Garrett (2023), “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperStable on Cancer’s 3324
Recognition by Well-SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in 3325
Ref. [174] by Henry Garrett (2023), “Neutrosophic 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in the 3326
SuperHyperFunction To Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs on Cancer’s Neutrosophic 3327
Recognition And Beyond ” in Ref. [175] by Henry Garrett (2022), “(Neutrosophic) 3328
1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in Cancer’s Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) 3329
SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [176] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Basic Notions on 3330
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperForcing And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling in Cancer’s 3331
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [177] by Henry Garrett 3332
(2022), “Basic Neutrosophic Notions Concerning SuperHyperDominating and 3333
Neutrosophic SuperHyperResolving in SuperHyperGraph” in Ref. [188] by Henry 3334
Garrett (2022), “Initial Material of Neutrosophic Preliminaries to Study Some 3335
Neutrosophic Notions Based on Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) in Neutrosophic 3336
SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)” in Ref. [189] by Henry Garrett (2022), and [4–189], there 3337
are some endeavors to formalize the basic SuperHyperNotions about neutrosophic 3338
SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph alongside scientific research books 3339
at [190–297]. Two popular scientific research books in Scribd in the terms of high 3340
readers, 4190 and 5189 respectively, on neutrosophic science is on [298, 299]. 3341
Some scientific studies and scientific researches about neutrosophic graphs, are 3342
proposed as book in Ref. [286] by Henry Garrett (2023) which is indexed by Google 3343
Scholar and has more than 4331 readers in Scribd. It’s titled “Beyond Neutrosophic 3344
Graphs” and published by Dr. Henry Garrett. This research book covers different types 3345
of notions and settings in neutrosophic graph theory and neutrosophic 3346
SuperHyperGraph theory. 3347
Also, some scientific studies and scientific researches about neutrosophic graphs, are 3348
proposed as book in Ref. [287] by Henry Garrett (2023) which is indexed by Google 3349
Scholar and has more than 5327 readers in Scribd. It’s titled “Neutrosophic Duality” 3350
and published by Dr. Henry Garrett. This research book presents different types of 3351
notions SuperHyperResolving and SuperHyperDominating in the setting of duality in 3352
neutrosophic graph theory and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph theory. This research 3353
book has scrutiny on the complement of the intended set and the intended set, 3354
simultaneously. It’s smart to consider a set but acting on its complement that what’s 3355
done in this research book which is popular in the terms of high readers in Scribd. 3356
See the seminal scientific researches [1–3]. The formalization of the notions on the 3357
framework of notions in SuperHyperGraphs, Neutrosophic notions in 3358
SuperHyperGraphs theory, and (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs theory at [4–189] 3359
alongside scientific research books at [190–297]. Two popular scientific research books 3360
in Scribd in the terms of high readers, 4331 and 5327 respectively, on neutrosophic 3361
science is on [298, 299]. 3362
References 3363
1. Henry Garrett, “Super Hyper Dominating and Super Hyper Resolving on 3364
Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs and Their Directions in Game Theory and 3365
Neutrosophic Super Hyper Classes”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 1(3) 3366
(2022) 242-263. (doi: 10.33140/JMTCM.01.03.09) 3367
2. Henry Garrett, “Some Super Hyper Degrees and Co-Super Hyper Degrees on 3368
Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs And Super Hyper Graphs Alongside 3369
Applications in Cancer’s Treatments”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 2(1) 3370
(2023) 35-47. (https://www.opastpublishers.com/open-access-articles/some- 3371
super-hyper-degrees-and-cosuper-hyper-degrees-on-neutrosophic-super-hyper- 3372
graphs-and-super-hyper-graphs-alongside-a.pdf) 3373
3. Henry Garrett, “A Research on Cancer’s Recognition and Neutrosophic Super 3374
Hypergraph by Eulerian Super Hyper Cycles and Hamiltonian Sets as Hyper 3375
Covering Versus Super separations”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 2(3) 3376
(2023) 136-148. (https://www.opastpublishers.com/open-access-articles/a- 3377
research-on-cancers-recognition-and-neutrosophic-super-hypergraph-by- 3378
eulerian-super-hyper-cycles-and-hamiltonian-sets-.pdf) 3379
4. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Co-degree and Neutrosophic Degree alongside 3380
Chromatic Numbers in the Setting of Some Classes Related to Neutrosophic 3381
Hypergraphs”, J Curr Trends Comp Sci Res 2(1) (2023) 16-24. 3382
(https://www.opastpublishers.com/open-access-articles/neutrosophic-codegree- 3383
and-neutrosophic-degree-alongside-chromatic-numbers-in-the-setting-of-some- 3384
classes-related-to-neut.pdf) 3385
5. Garrett, Henry. “0039 — Closing Numbers and Super-Closing Numbers as 3386
(Dual)Resolving and (Dual)Coloring alongside (Dual)Dominating in 3387
(Neutrosophic)n-SuperHyperGraph.” CERN European Organization for Nuclear 3388
Research - Zenodo, Nov. 2022. CERN European Organization for Nuclear 3389
Research, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6319942. 3390
https://oa.mg/work/10.5281/zenodo.6319942 3391
6. Garrett, Henry. “0049 — (Failed)1-Zero-Forcing Number in Neutrosophic 3392
Graphs.” CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research - Zenodo, Feb. 3393
2022. CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research, 3394
https://doi.org/10.13140/rg.2.2.35241.26724. 3395
https://oa.mg/work/10.13140/rg.2.2.35241.26724 3396
7. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperClique as the Firm Scheme of 3397
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010308 (doi: 3399
10.20944/preprints202301.0308.v1). 3400
8. Henry Garrett, “Uncertainty On The Act And Effect Of Cancer Alongside The 3401
Foggy Positions Of Cells Toward Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique inside 3402
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Titled Cancer’s Recognition”, Preprints 2023, 3403
2023010282 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0282.v1). 3404
9. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Version Of Separates Groups Of Cells In 3405
Cancer’s Recognition On Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 3406
2023010267 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0267.v1). 3407
10. Henry Garrett, “The Shift Paradigm To Classify Separately The Cells and 3408
Affected Cells Toward The Totality Under Cancer’s Recognition By New 3409
Multiple Definitions On the Sets Polynomials Alongside Numbers In The 3410
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperMatching Theory Based on SuperHyperGraph and 3411
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”, Preprints 2023, 2023010265 (doi: 3412
10.20944/preprints202301.0265.v1). 3413
11. Henry Garrett, “Breaking the Continuity and Uniformity of Cancer In The 3414
Worst Case of Full Connections With Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique In 3415
Cancer’s Recognition Applied in (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 3416
2023, 2023010262,(doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0262.v1). 3417
12. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable as the Survivors on the 3418
Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition Based on Uncertainty to All Modes in 3419
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010240 (doi: 3420
10.20944/preprints202301.0240.v1). 3421
13. Henry Garrett, “Extremism of the Attacked Body Under the Cancer’s 3422
Circumstances Where Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) 3423
SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010224, (doi: 3424
10.20944/preprints202301.0224.v1). 3425
14. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in Cancer’s 3426
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 3427
2023010105 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 3428
15. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form 3429
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions 3430
In Special ViewPoints”, Preprints 2023, 2023010088 (doi: 3431
10.20944/preprints202301.0088.v1). 3432
16. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in the 3433
SuperHyperFunction To Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs on Cancer’s 3434
Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond ”, Preprints 2023, 2023010044 3435
17. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperStable on Cancer’s Recognition by 3436
Well- SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 3437
2023010043 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0043.v1). 3438
18. Henry Garrett, “Basic Notions on (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperForcing And 3439
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling in Cancer’s Recognitions And 3440
10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 3442
10.20944/preprints202301.0088.v1). 3446
20. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions 3447
Featuring (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances”, Preprints 3448
2022, 2022120549 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0549.v1). 3449
21. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperAlliances With SuperHyperDefensive 3450
and SuperHyperOffensive Type-SuperHyperSet On (Neutrosophic) 3451
SuperHyperGraph With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s 3452
Recognitions And Related (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClasses”, Preprints 2022, 3453
2022120540 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0540.v1). 3454
22. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperGirth on SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic 3455
SuperHyperGraph With SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions”, 3456
Preprints 2022, 2022120500 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0500.v1). 3457
23. Henry Garrett, “Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on 3458
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs and SuperHyperGraphs Alongside Applications 3459
in Cancer’s Treatments”, Preprints 2022, 2022120324 (doi: 3460
10.20944/preprints202212.0324.v1). 3461
24. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDominating and SuperHyperResolving on 3462
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs And Their Directions in Game Theory and 3463
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”, Preprints 2022, 2022110576 (doi: 3464
10.20944/preprints202211.0576.v1). 3465
25. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 3466
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Cycle-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super 3467
Nebulous”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7857856). 3468
26. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nebulous By Hyper Nebbish Of 3469
Eulerian-Cycle-Neighbor In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 3470
SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7857841). 3471
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Cycle-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On 3473
Super Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7855661). 3474
28. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Decompensation By Hyper Decompress Of 3475
Eulerian-Cycle-Decomposition In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 3476
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Cycle-Cut As Hyper Eulogy On Super EULA”, 3479
Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7853867). 3480
30. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super EULA By Hyper Eulogy Of 3481
Eulerian-Cycle-Cut In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 3482
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Path-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super 3485
Eulerian-Type-Path-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 3488
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Path-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress 3491
On Super Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7839333). 3492
Eulerian-Type-Path-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 3494
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Path-Cut As Hyper Eulogy On Super 3497
EULA”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7834229). 3498
Eulerian-Type-Path-Cut In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 3500
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Path-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super 3503
Eulerian-Path-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 3506
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Path-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On 3509
Eulerian-Path-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 3512
SuperHyperGraph As Hyper Tool On Super Toot”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 3515
10.5281/zenodo.7812236). 3516
SuperHyperGraph By initial Eulerian-Path-Cut As Hyper initial Eulogy On 3518
Super initial EULA”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7809365). 3519
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Path-Cut As Hyper Eulogy-Path-Cut On Super 3521
EULA-Path-Cut”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7809358). 3522
Eulerian-Path-Cut In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 3524
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Path-Cut As Hyper Eulogy On Super EULA”, 3527
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On 3530
Super Nebulous”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7806767). 3531
Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 3533
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition As Hyper 3536
Decompress On Super Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 3537
10.5281/zenodo.7804238). 3538
Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With 3540
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7804228). 3541
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut As Hyper Hamper On Super 3543
Hammy”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7799902). 3544
51. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Hammy By Hyper Hamper Of 3545
Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 3546
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Cycle-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super 3549
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Cycle-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress 3552
On Super Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7793372). 3553
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Cycle-Cut As Hyper Hamper On Super 3555
Hammy”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7791952). 3556
Hamiltonian-Cycle-Cut In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 3558
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super 3561
Hamiltonian-Neighbor In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 3564
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On 3567
Hamiltonian-Decomposition In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 3570
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Cut As Hyper Hamper On Super Hammy”, 3573
Hamiltonian-Cut In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 3576
SuperHyperGraph By Trace-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 3579
Trace-Neighbor In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 3582
64. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3584
SuperHyperGraph By Trace-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On Super 3585
Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7771831). 3586
Trace-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 3588
SuperHyperGraph By Trace-Cut As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 3591
ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.20913.25446). 3592
67. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Tract By Hyper Track Of Trace-Cut In 3593
Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 2023, 3594
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7764916). 3595
SuperHyperGraph By Edge-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 3597
Edge-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, 3600
SuperHyperGraph By Edge-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On Super 3603
Decompensation”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.22545.10089). 3604
Edge-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 3606
SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.29544.34564). 3607
SuperHyperGraph By Edge-Cut As Hyper Edify On Super Eddy”, ResearchGate 3609
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.11377.76644). 3610
73. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Eddy By Hyper Edify Of Edge-Cut In 3611
Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 3612
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.23750.96329). 3613
SuperHyperGraph By Vertex-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 3615
Vertex-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 3618
SuperHyperGraph By Vertex-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On Super 3621
Decompensation”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.30212.81289). 3622
Vertex-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 3624
SuperHyperGraph By Vertex-Cut As Hyper Vertu On Super Vertigo”, 3627
79. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Vertigo By Hyper Vertu Of Vertex-Cut In 3629
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.32467.25124). 3631
SuperHyperGraph By Stable-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 3633
81. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nebulizer By Hyper Nub Of 3635
Stable-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 3636
SuperHyperGraph By Stable-Decompositions As Hyper Stain On Super Stagy”, 3639
83. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Stale By Hyper Stalk Of 3641
Stable-Decompositions In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 3642
SuperHyperGraph By Stable-Cut As Hyper Stain On Super Stagy”, 3645
85. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Stale By Hyper Stalk Of Stable-Cut In 3647
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.20170.24000). 3649
SuperHyperGraph By Clique-Neighbors As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 3651
87. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nebulizer By Hyper Nub Of 3653
Clique-Neighbors In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 3654
SuperHyperGraph By Clique-Decompositions As Hyper Decompile On Super 3657
Decommission”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.18780.87683). 3658
Clique- Decompositions In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 3660
SuperHyperGraph By Clique-Cut As Hyper Click On Super Cliche”, 3663
91. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Cliff By Hyper Cling Of Clique-Cut In 3665
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.27392.30721). 3667
SuperHyperGraph By Space As Hyper Spin On Super Spacy”, ResearchGate 3669
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.33028.40321). 3670
SuperHyperGraph By List- Coloring As Hyper List On Super Lisle”, 3672
94. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Lith By Hyper Lite Of List-Coloring In 3674
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.16356.04489). 3676
SuperHyperGraph By Space As Hyper Sparse On Super Spark ”, ResearchGate 3678
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.21756.21129). 3679
96. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Solidarity By Hyper Soul Of Space In 3680
Cancer’s Recognition With (Extreme) SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023, 3681
(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.30983.68009). 3682
SuperHyperGraph By Edge-Connectivity As Hyper Disclosure On Super 3684
Closure”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.28552.29445). 3685
98. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Uniform By Hyper Deformation Of 3686
Edge-Connectivity In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 3687
SuperHyperGraph By Vertex-Connectivity As Hyper Leak On Super Structure”, 3690
100. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super System By Hyper Explosions Of 3692
Vertex-Connectivity In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 3693
SuperHyperGraph By Tree-Decomposition As Hyper Forward On Super Returns”, 3696
102. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nodes By Hyper Moves Of 3698
Tree-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 3699
SuperHyperGraph By Chord As Hyper Excellence On Super Excess”, 3702
104. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Gap By Hyper Navigations Of Chord In 3704
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.11172.14720). 3706
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyper(i,j)-Domination As Hyper Controller On 3708
Super Waves”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.22011.80165). 3709
106. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Coincidence By Hyper Routes Of 3710
SuperHyper(i,j)-Domination In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 3711
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperEdge-Domination As Hyper Reversion On 3714
Super Indirection”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.10493.84962). 3715
108. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Obstacles By Hyper Model Of 3716
SuperHyperEdge-Domination In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 3717
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperK-Domination As Hyper k-Actions On Super 3720
Patterns”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.19944.14086). 3721
110. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Harmony By Hyper k-Function Of 3722
SuperHyperK-Domination In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 3723
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperK-Number As Hyper k-Partition On Super 3726
Layers”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.33103.76968). 3727
112. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Gradient By Hyper k-Class Of 3728
SuperHyperK-Number In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 3729
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperOrder As Hyper Enumerations On Super 3732
Landmarks”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.35646.56641). 3733
114. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Analogous By Hyper Visions Of 3734
SuperHyperOrder In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 3735
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperColoring As Hyper Categories On Super 3738
Neighbors”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.13973.81121). 3739
116. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Relations By Hyper Identifications Of 3740
SuperHyperColoring In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 3741
117. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Contradiction By Hyper Detection of 3743
SuperHyperDefensive In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic 3744
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperDimension As Hyper Distinguishing On Super 3747
Distances”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.31956.88961). 3748
119. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Locations By Hyper Differing Of 3749
SuperHyperDimension In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 3750
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperDominating As Hyper Closing On Super 3753
Messy”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.21510.45125). 3754
121. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Missing By Hyper Searching Of 3755
SuperHyperDominating In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 3756
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperConnected As Hyper Group On Super Surge”, 3759
123. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Outbreak By Hyper Collections Of 3761
SuperHyperConnected In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 3762
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperTotal As Hyper Covering On Super Infections”, 3765
125. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Extremism By Hyper Treatments Of 3767
SuperHyperTotal In Cancer’s Recognition with (Neutrosophic) 3768
126. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Isolation By Hyper Perfectness Of 3770
SuperHyperPerfect In Cancer’s Recognition with (Neutrosophic) 3771
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperPerfect As Hyper Idealism On Super Vacancy”, 3774
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperJoin As Hyper Separations On Super Sorts”, 3777
129. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super connections By Hyper disconnections Of 3779
SuperHyperJoin In Cancer’s Recognition with (Neutrosophic) 3780
130. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Mixed-Devastations By Hyper Decisions 3782
Of SuperHyperDuality In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic 3783
131. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition As (Neutrosophic) 3785
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperDuality As Hyper Imaginations On Super 3786
Mixed-Illustrations”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.33275.80161). 3787
132. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition As (Neutrosophic) 3788
SuperHyperGraph By Path SuperHyperColoring As Hyper Correction On Super 3789
Faults”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.30182.50241). 3790
133. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Reflections By Hyper Rotations Of Path 3791
SuperHyperColoring In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic 3792
134. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas As Hyper Deformations On Super Chains In 3794
Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph By 3795
SuperHyperDensity”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.13444.60806). 3796
135. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas As Hyper Ignorance By SuperHyperDensity On 3797
Super Resistances In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic 3798
SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.16800.05123). 3799
136. Henry Garrett, “New Research On Cancer’s Recognition and Neutrosophic 3800
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian SuperHyperCycles and Hamiltonian Sets As 3801
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-VI ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 3802
10.13140/RG.2.2.29913.80482). 3803
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-V ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 3806
10.13140/RG.2.2.33269.24809). 3807
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-IV ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 3810
10.13140/RG.2.2.34946.96960). 3811
139. Henry Garrett, “A Research On Cancer’s Recognition and Neutrosophic 3812
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-III ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 3814
10.13140/RG.2.2.14814.31040). 3815
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-II ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 3818
10.13140/RG.2.2.15653.17125). 3819
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-I ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 3822
10.13140/RG.2.2.25719.50089). 3823
142. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Disruptions In Cancer’s Extreme 3824
Recognition As Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph By Hyper Plans Called 3825
SuperHyperConnectivities”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 3826
10.13140/RG.2.2.29441.94562). 3827
143. Henry Garrett, “Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition As Neutrosophic 3828
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperConnectivities As Hyper Diagnosis On Super 3829
Mechanism”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.17252.24968). 3830
144. Henry Garrett,“Cancer’s Recognition and (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph By 3831
the Criteria of Eulerian and Hamiltonian Type-Sets As Hyper Modified Cycles 3832
On Super Mess”, ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.16652.59525). 3833
145. Henry Garrett,“Eulerian and Hamiltonian In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition 3834
and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph On Super Interactions By Hyper Extensions 3835
of Cycles”, ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.34583.24485). 3836
146. Henry Garrett,“SuperHyperGirth Type-Results on extreme SuperHyperGirth 3837
theory and (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs Toward Cancer’s extreme 3838
Recognition”, Preprints 2023, 2023010396 (doi: 3839
10.20944/preprints202301.0396.v1). 3840
147. Henry Garrett,“Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Warns Hyper Landmark of 3841
neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth In Super Type-Versions of Cancer’s neutrosophic 3842
Recognition”, Preprints 2023, 2023010395 (doi: 3843
10.20944/preprints202301.0395.v1). 3844
148. Henry Garrett,“The Constructions of (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs on the 3845
Cancer’s Recognition in The Confrontation With Super Attacks In Hyper 3846
Situations By Implementing (Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in The 3847
Technical Approaches to Neutralize SuperHyperViews”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 3848
10.13140/RG.2.2.26240.51204). 3849
149. Henry Garrett,“(Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing As the 3850
Entrepreneurs on Cancer’s Recognitions To Fail Forcing Style As the Super 3851
Classes With Hyper Effects In The Background of the Framework is So-Called 3852
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 3853
10.13140/RG.2.2.12818.73925). 3854
150. Henry Garrett,“Super Actions On The Types of Hyper Levels In The Sensible 3855
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth On Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and 3856
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 3857
10.13140/RG.2.2.26836.88960). 3858
151. Henry Garrett,“SuperHyperGirth Approaches on the Super Challenges on the 3859
Cancer’s Recognition In the Hyper Model of (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, 3860
ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.36745.93289). 3861
152. Henry Garrett,“Extreme SuperHyperClique as the Firm Scheme of 3862
10.20944/preprints202301.0308.v1). 3865
153. Henry Garrett,“Uncertainty On The Act And Effect Of Cancer Alongside The 3866
Foggy Positions Of Cells Toward Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique inside 3867
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Titled Cancer’s Recognition”, Preprints 2023, 3868
2023010282 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0282.v1). 3869
154. Henry Garrett,“Neutrosophic Version Of Separates Groups Of Cells In Cancer’s 3870
Recognition On Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010267 3871
(doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0267.v1).). 3872
155. Henry Garrett, “The Shift Paradigm To Classify Separately The Cells and 3873
Affected Cells Toward The Totality Under Cancer’s Recognition By New 3874
Multiple Definitions On the Sets Polynomials Alongside Numbers In The 3875
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperMatching Theory Based on SuperHyperGraph and 3876
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”, Preprints 2023, 2023010265 (doi: 3877
10.20944/preprints202301.0265.v1). 3878
156. Henry Garrett,“Breaking the Continuity and Uniformity of Cancer In The 3879
Worst Case of Full Connections With Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique In 3880
Cancer’s Recognition Applied in (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 3881
2023, 2023010262,(doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0262.v1). 3882
157. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable as the Survivors on the 3883
Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition Based on Uncertainty to All Modes in 3884
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010240 (doi: 3885
10.20944/preprints202301.0240.v1). 3886
158. Henry Garrett, “Extremism of the Attacked Body Under the Cancer’s 3887
Circumstances Where Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) 3888
SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010224, (doi: 3889
10.20944/preprints202301.0224.v1). 3890
159. Henry Garrett,“SuperHyperMatching By (R-)Definitions And Polynomials To 3891
Monitor Cancer’s Recognition In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, 3892
ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.35061.65767). 3893
160. Henry Garrett,“The Focus on The Partitions Obtained By Parallel Moves In 3894
The Cancer’s Extreme Recognition With Different Types of Extreme 3895
SuperHyperMatching Set and Polynomial on (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, 3896
161. Henry Garrett,“Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique Decides the Failures on the 3898
Cancer’s Recognition in the Perfect Connections of Cancer’s Attacks By 3899
SuperHyperModels Named (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 3900
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.32530.73922). 3901
162. Henry Garrett,“Indeterminacy On The All Possible Connections of Cells In 3902
Front of Cancer’s Attacks In The Terms of Neutrosophic Failed 3903
SuperHyperClique on Cancer’s Recognition called Neutrosophic 3904
SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.15897.70243). 3905
163. Henry Garrett,“Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique Decides the Failures on the 3906
Cancer’s Recognition in the Perfect Connections of Cancer’s Attacks By 3907
SuperHyperModels Named (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 3908
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.32530.73922). 3909
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 3911
2023010105 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 3912
165. Henry Garrett,“Perfect Directions Toward Idealism in Cancer’s Neutrosophic 3913
Recognition Forwarding Neutrosophic SuperHyperClique on Neutrosophic 3914
166. Henry Garrett,“Demonstrating Complete Connections in Every Embedded 3916
Regions and Sub-Regions in the Terms of Cancer’s Recognition and 3917
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClique”, 3918
10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 3923
10.20944/preprints202301.0088.v1). 3927
169. Henry Garrett,“Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic Regions titled 3928
neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable in Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition 3929
modeled in the Form of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2023, 3930
(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.17385.36968). 3931
Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond ”, Preprints 2023, 2023010044 3934
Well- SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 3936
2023010043 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0043.v1). 3937
172. Henry Garrett, “Using the Tool As (Neutrosophic) Failed SuperHyperStable To 3938
SuperHyperModel Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) 3939
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In 3942
Special ViewPoints”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.11447.80803). 3943
Well-SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 3945
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.35774.77123). 3946
Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond ”, ResearchGate 2022, (doi: 3949
10.13140/RG.2.2.36141.77287). 3950
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2022, (doi: 3952
10.13140/RG.2.2.29430.88642). 3953
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2022, (doi: 3956
10.13140/RG.2.2.11369.16487). 3957
Featuring (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances”, Preprints 3959
2022, 2022120549 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0549.v1). 3960
Featuring (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances”, 3962
Recognitions And Related (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClasses”, Preprints 2022, 3967
2022120540 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0540.v1). 3968
Recognitions And Related (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClasses”, ResearchGate 3972
2022, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.14426.41923). 3973
Preprints 2022, 2022120500 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0500.v1). 3976
ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.20993.12640). 3979
184. Henry Garrett,“Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on 3980
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs and SuperHyperGraphs Alongside Applications 3981
in Cancer’s Treatments”, Preprints 2022, 2022120324 (doi: 3982
10.20944/preprints202212.0324.v1). 3983
185. Henry Garrett, “Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on 3984
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs And SuperHyperGraphs Alongside Applications 3985
in Cancer’s Treatments”, ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 3986
10.13140/RG.2.2.23123.04641). 3987
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”, Preprints 2022, 2022110576 (doi: 3990
10.20944/preprints202211.0576.v1). 3991
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”, ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 3994
10.13140/RG.2.2.23324.56966). 3995
188. Henry Garrett, “Basic Neutrosophic Notions Concerning SuperHyperDominating 3996
and Neutrosophic SuperHyperResolving in SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 3997
2022 (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.29173.86244). 3998
189. Henry Garrett, “Initial Material of Neutrosophic Preliminaries to Study Some 3999
Neutrosophic Notions Based on Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) in 4000
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)”, ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 4001
10.13140/RG.2.2.25385.88160). 4002
190. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Cycle-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 4003
Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7857906). 4004
191. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Cycle-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 4005
Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7856329). 4006
192. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Cycle-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 4007
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7854561). 4008
193. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Path-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 4009
194. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Path-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 4011
195. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Path-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 4013
196. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Path-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 4015
197. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Path-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 4017
198. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Path-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 4019
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7812750). 4020
199. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 4021
200. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. 4023
Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7810394). 4024
201. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 4025
202. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Cycle-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 4027
203. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Cycle-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 4029
204. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Cycle-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 4031
205. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 4033
206. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 4035
207. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 4037
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7783791). 4038
208. Henry Garrett, “Trace-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 4039
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7780123). 4040
209. Henry Garrett, “Trace-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 4041
210. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDuality”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4043
10.5281/zenodo.7637762). 4044
211. Henry Garrett, “Trace-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 4045
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7766174). 4046
212. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 4047
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7762232). 4048
213. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 4049
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7758601). 4050
214. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4051
10.5281/zenodo.7754661). 4052
215. Henry Garrett, “Vertex-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 4053
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7750995) . 4054
216. Henry Garrett, “Vertex-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 4055
217. Henry Garrett, “Vertex-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 4057
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7747236). 4058
218. Henry Garrett, “Stable-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 4059
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7742587). 4060
219. Henry Garrett, “Stable-Decompositions In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 4061
220. Henry Garrett, “Stable-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 4063
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7734719). 4064
221. Henry Garrett, “Clique-Neighbors In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 4065
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7730484). 4066
222. Henry Garrett, “Clique-Decompositions In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 4067
223. Henry Garrett, “Clique-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 4069
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7722865). 4070
224. Henry Garrett, “Space In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4071
10.5281/zenodo.7713563). 4072
225. Henry Garrett, “Space In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4073
10.5281/zenodo.7709116). 4074
226. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Connectivity In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 4075
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7706415). 4076
227. Henry Garrett, “Vertex-Connectivity In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 4077
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7706063). 4078
228. Henry Garrett, “Tree-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 4079
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7701906). 4080
229. Henry Garrett, “Chord In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4081
10.5281/zenodo.7700205). 4082
230. Henry Garrett, “(i,j)-Domination In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 4083
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7694876). 4084
231. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Domination In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 4085
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7679410). 4086
232. Henry Garrett, “K-Domination In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 4087
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7675982). 4088
233. Henry Garrett, “K-Number In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 4089
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7672388). 4090
234. Henry Garrett, “Order In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4091
10.5281/zenodo.7668648). 4092
235. Henry Garrett, “Coloring In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4093
10.5281/zenodo.7662810). 4094
236. Henry Garrett, “Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 4095
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7659162). 4096
237. Henry Garrett, “Cancer In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4097
10.5281/zenodo.7653233). 4098
238. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperWheel ”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4099
10.5281/zenodo.7653204). 4100
239. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperMultipartite”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4101
10.5281/zenodo.7653142). 4102
240. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperBipartite”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4103
10.5281/zenodo.7653117). 4104
241. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperStar ”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4105
10.5281/zenodo.7653089). 4106
242. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4107
10.5281/zenodo.7651687). 4108
243. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperPath”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4109
10.5281/zenodo.7651619). 4110
244. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDomination”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4111
10.5281/zenodo.7651439). 4112
245. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDominating”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4113
10.5281/zenodo.7650729). 4114
246. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperConnected ”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4115
10.5281/zenodo.7647868). 4116
247. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperTotal ”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4117
10.5281/zenodo.7647017). 4118
248. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperPerfect”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4119
10.5281/zenodo.7644894). 4120
249. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperJoin”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4121
10.5281/zenodo.7641880). 4122
250. Henry Garrett, “Path SuperHyperColoring”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4123
10.5281/zenodo.7632923). 4124
251. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDensity”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4125
10.5281/zenodo.7623459). 4126
252. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 4127
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7606416). 4128
253. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperConnectivities”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 4129
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7606416). 4130
254. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperConnectivities”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4131
10.5281/zenodo.7606404). 4132
255. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4133
10.5281/zenodo.7580018). 4134
256. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4135
10.5281/zenodo.7580018). 4136
257. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4137
10.5281/zenodo.7580018). 4138
258. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4139
10.5281/zenodo.7579929). 4140
259. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4141
10.5281/zenodo.7563170). 4142
260. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4143
10.5281/zenodo.7563164). 4144
261. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4145
10.5281/zenodo.7563160). 4146
262. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4147
10.5281/zenodo.7563160). 4148
263. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4149
10.5281/zenodo.7563160). 4150
264. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 4151
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7557063). 4152
265. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperMatching”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4153
10.5281/zenodo.7557009). 4154
266. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperMatching”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 4155
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7539484). 4156
267. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 4157
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7523390). 4158
268. Henry Garrett, “Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 4159
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7523390). 4160
269. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On Failed SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 4161
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7523390). 4162
270. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4163
10.5281/zenodo.7574952). 4164
271. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4165
10.5281/zenodo.7574992). 4166
272. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4167
10.5281/zenodo.7523357). 4168
273. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4169
10.5281/zenodo.7523357). 4170
274. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 4171
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7504782). 4172
275. Henry Garrett, “Extreme Failed SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 4173
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7504782). 4174
276. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On Failed SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 4175
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7504782). 4176
277. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4177
10.5281/zenodo.7499395). 4178
278. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4179
10.5281/zenodo.7499395). 4180
279. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4181
10.5281/zenodo.7499395). 4182
280. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 4183
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7497450). 4184
281. Henry Garrett, “Extreme Failed SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 4185
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7497450). 4186
282. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 4187
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7494862). 4188
283. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4189
10.5281/zenodo.7494862). 4190
284. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 4191
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7494862). 4192
285. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperAlliances”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 4193
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7493845). 4194
286. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperAlliances”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4195
10.5281/zenodo.7493845). 4196
287. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperAlliances”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 4197
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7493845). 4198
288. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperMatching”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4199
10.5281/zenodo.7539484). 4200
289. Henry Garrett, “Failed SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4201
10.5281/zenodo.7523390). 4202
290. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4203
10.5281/zenodo.7523357). 4204
291. Henry Garrett, “Failed SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4205
10.5281/zenodo.7504782). 4206
292. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4207
10.5281/zenodo.7499395). 4208
293. Henry Garrett, “Failed SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4209
10.5281/zenodo.7497450). 4210
294. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4211
10.5281/zenodo.7494862). 4212
295. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperAlliances”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4213
10.5281/zenodo.7493845). 4214
296. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4215
10.5281/zenodo.7480110). 4216
297. Henry Garrett, “Neut. SuperHyperEdges”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4217
10.5281/zenodo.7378758). 4218
298. Henry Garrett, “Beyond Neutrosophic Graphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4219
10.5281/zenodo.6320305). 4220
299. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Duality”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4221
10.5281/zenodo.6677173). 4222
View publication stats

New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph by Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph by Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph By

Preprint · April 2023

464 PUBLICATIONS 14,993 CITATIONS

Number Graphs And Numbers View project

Neutrosophic Graphs View project

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 2

SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut As Hyper 3

Nebbish On Super Nebulous 4

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · 6

DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA 7

In this scientific research, (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic 9

SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut). Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is 10

a Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut pair S = (V, E). Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet 11

V 0 = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs } and E 0 = {E1 , E2 , . . . , Ez }. Then either V 0 or E 0 is called 12

Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut if the following expression is called 13

Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut criteria holds 14

Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut if the following expression is called 15

Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut criteria holds 16

and |Ei |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY = |Ej |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY ; Neutrosophic 17

v-SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut if the following expression is called Neutrosophic 18

v-SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut criteria holds 19

Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut if the following expression is called 20

Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut criteria holds 21

and |Vi |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY = |Vj |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY ; Neutrosophic 22

SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut if it’s either of Neutrosophic 23

e-SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut, 24

Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut, and Neutrosophic 25

rv-SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut. ((Neutrosophic) SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut). 26

Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). Consider a 27

Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) E = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then E is called an 28

Extreme SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut if it’s either of Neutrosophic 29

e-SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut, 30

Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut, and Neutrosophic 31

rv-SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut and C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph 32

N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum Extreme cardinality of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S 33

of high Extreme cardinality of the Extreme SuperHyperEdges in the conseNeighborive 34

Extreme sequence of Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such 35

that they form the Extreme SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut; a Neutrosophic 36

SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut if it’s either of Neutrosophic 37

e-SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut, 38

Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut, and Neutrosophic 39

rv-SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut and C(N SHG) for a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 40

N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic 41

SuperHyperEdges of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high Neutrosophic cardinality 42

conseNeighborive Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 43

such that they form the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut; an Extreme 44

SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of Neutrosophic 45

e-SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut, 46

Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut, and Neutrosophic 47

rv-SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut and C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph 48

N SHG : (V, E) is the Extreme SuperHyperPolynomial contains the Extreme 49

Extreme SuperHyperEdges of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality 51

conseNeighborive Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such 52

corresponded to its Extreme coefficient; a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut 54

SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut, 55

Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut, Neutrosophic 56

v-SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperEulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut and 57

C(N SHG) for a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Neutrosophic 58

SuperHyperPolynomial contains the Neutrosophic coefficients defined as the 59

Neutrosophic number of the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic 60

SuperHyperEdges of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high Neutrosophic cardinality 61