Professional Documents
Culture Documents
New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph by Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous
New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph by Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous
net/publication/369850330
CITATIONS
1 author:
Henry Garrett
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Henry Garrett on 06 April 2023.
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor As 3
1 ABSTRACT 8
∀N (Ea ) ∈ C : C is
a SuperHyperCycle and it has
the maximum number of SuperHyperVertices;
∀N (Ea ) ∈ C : C is
a SuperHyperCycle and it has
the maximum number of SuperHyperVertices;
∀N (Va ) ∈ C : C is
a SuperHyperCycle and it has
the maximum number of SuperHyperVertices;
∀N (Va ) ∈ C : C is
a SuperHyperCycle and it has
the maximum number of SuperHyperVertices;
e-SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor, Neutrosophic 24
re-SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor, Neutrosophic 25
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
rv-SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor. ((Neutrosophic) 27
re-SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor, Neutrosophic 32
SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor; a Neutrosophic 39
e-SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor, Neutrosophic 41
re-SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor, Neutrosophic 42
e-SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor, Neutrosophic 51
re-SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor, Neutrosophic 52
e-SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor, Neutrosophic 63
re-SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor, Neutrosophic 64
e-SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor, Neutrosophic 75
re-SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor, Neutrosophic 76
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor; a Neutrosophic 83
e-SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor, Neutrosophic 85
re-SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor, Neutrosophic 86
e-SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor, Neutrosophic 95
re-SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor, Neutrosophic 96
Extreme coefficients defined as the Extreme number of the maximum Extreme 100
the Neutrosophic coefficients defined as the Neutrosophic number of the maximum 112
SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 115
corresponded to its Neutrosophic coefficient. In this scientific research, new setting is 117
SuperHyperDefinitions are debut for them but the research goes further and the 120
well-defined and well-reviewed. The literature review is implemented in the whole of 122
this research. For shining the elegancy and the significancy of this research, the 123
fundamental SuperHyperNumbers are featured. The definitions are followed by the 125
examples and the instances thus the clarifications are driven with different tools. The 126
applications are figured out to make sense about the theoretical aspect of this ongoing 127
research. The “Cancer’s Recognition” are the under research to figure out the 128
challenges make sense about ongoing and upcoming research. The special case is up. 129
The cells are viewed in the deemed ways. There are different types of them. Some of 130
them are individuals and some of them are well-modeled by the group of cells. These 131
types are all officially called “SuperHyperVertex” but the relations amid them all 132
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
“Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” are chosen and elected to research about “Cancer’s 134
Recognition”. Thus these complex and dense SuperHyperModels open up some avenues 135
to research on theoretical segments and “Cancer’s Recognition”. Some avenues are 136
posed to pursue this research. It’s also officially collected in the form of some questions 137
maximum cardinality such that either of the following expressions hold for the 140
|S ∩ N (s)| > |S ∩ (V \ N (s))| + δ; and |S ∩ N (s)| < |S ∩ (V \ N (s))| + δ. The first 142
SuperHyperVertices with maximum Neutrosophic cardinality such that either of the 146
and |S ∩ N (s)|N eutrosophic < |S ∩ (V \ N (s))|N eutrosophic + δ. The first Expression, 149
SuperHyperVertices and the SuperHyperEdges are assigned by the labels from the 156
letters of the alphabets. In this procedure, there’s the usage of the position of labels to 157
SuperHyperEdges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” with the key points, 161
“The Values of The Vertices & The Number of Position in Alphabet”, “The Values of 162
The SuperVertices&The maximum Values of Its Vertices”, “The Values of The 163
Edges&The maximum Values of Its Vertices”, “The Values of The HyperEdges&The 164
maximum Values of Its Endpoints”. To get structural examples and instances, I’m 166
examples get more scrutiny and discernment since there are characterized in the 175
SuperHyperEdges are assigned by the labels from the letters of the alphabets. In this 181
procedure, there’s the usage of the position of labels to assign to the values. Assume a 182
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
useful to define “Neutrosophic” version of SuperHyperClasses. Since there’s more ways 186
SuperHyperEdges are the same. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. There are 201
some SuperHyperClasses as follows. It’s SuperHyperPath if it’s only one SuperVertex as 202
intersection amid two given SuperHyperEdges with two exceptions; it’s 203
two given SuperHyperEdges; it’s SuperHyperStar it’s only one SuperVertex as 205
intersection amid all SuperHyperEdges; it’s SuperHyperBipartite it’s only one 206
SuperVertex as intersection amid two given SuperHyperEdges and these SuperVertices, 207
SuperHyperMultiPartite it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two given 209
SuperHyperEdges and these SuperVertices, forming multi separate sets, has no 210
intersection amid two given SuperHyperEdges and one SuperVertex has one 212
SuperHyperEdge with any common SuperVertex. The SuperHyperModel proposes the 213
specific designs and the specific architectures. The SuperHyperModel is officially called 214
The “specific” cells and “specific group” of cells are SuperHyperModeled as 216
“SuperHyperVertices” and the common and intended properties between “specific” cells 217
Sometimes, it’s useful to have some degrees of determinacy, indeterminacy, and 219
neutrality to have more precise SuperHyperModel which in this case the 220
SuperHyperModel is called “Neutrosophic”. In the future research, the foundation will 221
be based on the “Cancer’s Recognition” and the results and the definitions will be 222
introduced in redeemed ways. The recognition of the cancer in the long-term function. 223
The specific region has been assigned by the model [it’s called SuperHyperGraph] and 224
the long cycle of the move from the cancer is identified by this research. Sometimes the 225
move of the cancer hasn’t be easily identified since there are some determinacy, 226
indeterminacy and neutrality about the moves and the effects of the cancer on that 227
region; this event leads us to choose another model [it’s said to be Neutrosophic 228
SuperHyperGraph] to have convenient perception on what’s happened and what’s done. 229
There are some specific models, which are well-known and they’ve got the names, and 230
some SuperHyperGeneral SuperHyperModels. The moves and the traces of the cancer 231
on the complex tracks and between complicated groups of cells could be fantasized by a 232
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
in SuperHyperStar, all possible SuperHyperPaths have only two SuperHyperEdges but 240
it’s not enough since it’s essential to have at least three SuperHyperEdges to form any 241
In this scientific research, there are some ideas in the featured frameworks of 252
motivations. I try to bring the motivations in the narrative ways. Some cells have been 253
faced with some attacks from the situation which is caused by the cancer’s attacks. In 254
this case, there are some embedded analysis on the ongoing situations which in that, the 255
cells could be labelled as some groups and some groups or individuals have excessive 256
labels which all are raised from the behaviors to overcome the cancer’s attacks. In the 257
embedded situations, the individuals of cells and the groups of cells could be considered 258
as “new groups”. Thus it motivates us to find the proper SuperHyperModels for getting 259
more proper analysis on this messy story. I’ve found the SuperHyperModels which are 260
SuperHyperModel, the cells and the groups of cells are defined as “SuperHyperVertices” 262
and the relations between the individuals of cells and the groups of cells are defined as 263
SuperHyperModel based on the “Cancer’s Recognition”. Sometimes, the situations get 265
worst. The situation is passed from the certainty and precise style. Thus it’s the beyond 266
them. There are three descriptions, namely, the degrees of determinacy, indeterminacy 267
and neutrality, for any object based on vague forms, namely, incomplete data, imprecise 268
data, and uncertain analysis. The latter model could be considered on the previous 269
called “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. The cancer is the disease but the model is 271
going to figure out what’s going on this phenomenon. The special case of this disease is 272
considered and as the consequences of the model, some parameters are used. The cells 273
are under attack of this disease but the moves of the cancer in the special region are the 274
matter of mind. The recognition of the cancer could help to find some treatments for 275
this disease. The SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph are the 276
SuperHyperModels on the “Cancer’s Recognition” and both bases are the background 277
of this research. Sometimes the cancer has been happened on the region, full of cells, 278
groups of cells and embedded styles. In this segment, the SuperHyperModel proposes 279
some SuperHyperNotions based on the connectivities of the moves of the cancer in the 280
forms of alliances’ styles with the formation of the design and the architecture are 281
buzzwords. The prefix “SuperHyper” refers to the theme of the embedded styles to 283
figure out the background for the SuperHyperNotions. The recognition of the cancer in 284
the long-term function. The specific region has been assigned by the model [it’s called 285
SuperHyperGraph] and the long cycle of the move from the cancer is identified by this 286
research. Sometimes the move of the cancer hasn’t be easily identified since there are 287
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
some determinacy, indeterminacy and neutrality about the moves and the effects of the 288
cancer on that region; this event leads us to choose another model [it’s said to be 289
what’s done. There are some specific models, which are well-known and they’ve got the 291
names, and some general models. The moves and the traces of the cancer on the 292
complex tracks and between complicated groups of cells could be fantasized by a 293
general results are introduced. Beyond that in SuperHyperStar, all possible 298
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath s have only two SuperHyperEdges but it’s not enough 299
since it’s essential to have at least three SuperHyperEdges to form any style of a 300
Question 2.1. How to define the SuperHyperNotions and to do research on them to 304
groups of cells based on the fixed cell or the fixed group of cells, extensively, the “amount 306
of SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor” based on the fixed groups of cells or the fixed groups 307
Question 2.2. What are the best descriptions for the “Cancer’s Recognition” in terms 309
of these messy and dense SuperHyperModels where embedded notions are illustrated? 310
It’s motivation to find notions to use in this dense model is titled 311
SuperHyperGraph”. Then the research has taken more motivations to define 315
SuperHyperClasses and to find some connections amid this SuperHyperNotion with 316
other SuperHyperNotions. It motivates us to get some instances and examples to make 317
clarifications about the framework of this research. The general results and some results 318
about some connections are some avenues to make key point of this research, “Cancer’s 319
The framework of this research is as follows. In the beginning, I introduce basic 321
deeply-introduced and in-depth-discussed. The elementary concepts are clarified and 324
illustrated completely and sometimes review literature are applied to make sense about 325
what’s going to figure out about the upcoming sections. The main definitions and their 326
Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor to make sense about continuing the research, the ideas of 332
consequences, corresponded SuperHyperClasses are figured out to debut what’s done in 334
SuperHyperClasses”. As going back to origin of the notions, there are some smart steps 336
toward the common notions to extend the new notions in new frameworks, 337
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
research about the general SuperHyperRelations and as concluding and closing section 340
of theoretical research are contained in the section “General Results”. Some general 341
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”. There are curious questions about what’s done 346
about the SuperHyperNotions to make sense about excellency of this research and going 347
to figure out the word “best” as the description and adjective for this research as 348
research debut in the section “Applications in Cancer’s Recognition” with two cases and 350
as SuperHyperModel”. In the section, “Open Problems”, there are some scrutiny and 353
discernment on what’s done and what’s happened in this research in the terms of 354
“questions” and “problems” to make sense to figure out this research in featured style. 355
The advantages and the limitations of this research alongside about what’s done in this 356
research to make sense and to get sense about what’s figured out are included in the 357
In this section, the basic material in this scientific research, is referred to [Single Valued 361
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)] (Ref. [166],Definition 5.4,p.7). Also, the new 369
In this subsection, the basic material which is used in this scientific research, is 371
presented. Also, the new ideas and their clarifications are elicited. 372
The functions TA (x), IA (x) and FA (x) are real standard or nonstandard subsets of 374
+
]− 0, 1 [. 375
Definition 3.2 (Single Valued Neutrosophic Set). (Ref. [166],Definition 2.2,p.2). 376
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
2.5,p.2). 378
(i) V = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vn } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of V 0 ; 381
(ii) V = {(Vi , TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi )) : TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi ) ≥ 0}, (i = 382
1, 2, . . . , n); 383
(iii) E = {E1 , E2 , . . . , En0 } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of 384
V; 385
(iv) E = {(Ei0 , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )) : TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 ) ≥ 0}, (i0 = 386
1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 387
P
(vii) i supp(Vi ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 390
0 0
P
(viii) i0 supp(Ei ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n );
0 391
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) Vj are single valued Neutrosophic sets. TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), 394
TV0 (Ei0 ), TV0 (Ei0 ), and TV0 (Ei0 ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 398
the ii0 th element of the incidence matrix of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) 401
are of the form (Vi , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )), the sets V and E are crisp sets. 402
(iii) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called edge; 411
(iv) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 412
HyperEdge; 413
(v) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called 414
SuperEdge; 415
(vi) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 416
SuperHyperEdge. 417
If we choose different types of binary operations, then we could get hugely diverse 418
A binary operation ⊗ : [0, 1] × [0, 1] → [0, 1] is a t-norm if it satisfies the following 421
(i) 1 ⊗ x = x; 423
(ii) x ⊗ y = y ⊗ x; 424
(iii) x ⊗ (y ⊗ z) = (x ⊗ y) ⊗ z; 425
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
(i) V = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vn } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of V 0 ; 430
(ii) V = {(Vi , TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi )) : TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi ) ≥ 0}, (i = 431
1, 2, . . . , n); 432
(iii) E = {E1 , E2 , . . . , En0 } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of 433
V; 434
(iv) E = {(Ei0 , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )) : TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 ) ≥ 0}, (i0 = 435
1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 436
P
(vii) i supp(Vi ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 439
0 0
P
(viii) i0 supp(Ei ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n ).
0 440
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) Vj are single valued Neutrosophic sets. TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), 442
TV0 (Ei0 ), TV0 (Ei0 ), and TV0 (Ei0 ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 446
the ii0 th element of the incidence matrix of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) 449
are of the form (Vi , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )), the sets V and E are crisp sets. 450
(iii) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called edge; 459
(iv) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 460
HyperEdge; 461
(v) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called 462
SuperEdge; 463
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
(vi) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 464
SuperHyperEdge. 465
This SuperHyperModel is too messy and too dense. Thus there’s a need to have 466
some restrictions and conditions on SuperHyperGraph. The special case of this 467
(ii). it’s SuperHyperCycle if it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two 477
(iii). it’s SuperHyperStar it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid all 479
SuperHyperEdges; 480
(iv). it’s SuperHyperBipartite it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two 481
given SuperHyperEdges and these SuperVertices, forming two separate sets, has 482
(v). it’s SuperHyperMultiPartite it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid 484
two given SuperHyperEdges and these SuperVertices, forming multi separate sets, 485
(vi). it’s SuperHyperWheel if it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two 487
given SuperHyperEdges and one SuperVertex has one SuperHyperEdge with any 488
V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs
(iii) there’s a SuperVertex Vi0 ∈ Vi such that Vi0 , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 495
(iv) there’s a vertex vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that Vi , vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 496
0 0
(v) there’s a SuperVertex Vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that Vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 497
(vi) there are a vertex vi ∈ Vi and a vertex vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that vi , vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 498
0 0
(vii) there are a vertex vi ∈ Vi and a SuperVertex Vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 499
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
(viii) there are a SuperVertex Vi0 ∈ Vi and a vertex vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that Vi0 , vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 500
V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs ,
(i) If for all Vi , Ej 0 , |Vi | = 1, |Ej 0 | = 2, then NSHP is called path; 505
(ii) if for all Ej 0 , |Ej 0 | = 2, and there’s Vi , |Vi | ≥ 1, then NSHP is called SuperPath; 506
(iii) if for all Vi , Ej 0 , |Vi | = 1, |Ej 0 | ≥ 2, then NSHP is called HyperPath; 507
(iv) if there are Vi , Ej 0 , |Vi | ≥ 1, |Ej 0 | ≥ 2, then NSHP is called Neutrosophic 508
SuperHyperPath . 509
V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs ,
have 512
(iv) Neutrosophic strength (min{T (Vi )}, min{I(Vi )}, min{F (Vi )})si=1 . 516
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
where 1 ≤ i, j ≤ s. 533
SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor). 535
∀N (Ea ) ∈ C : C is
a SuperHyperCycle and it has
the maximum number of SuperHyperVertices;
∀N (Ea ) ∈ C : C is
a SuperHyperCycle and it has
the maximum number of SuperHyperVertices;
∀N (Va ) ∈ C : C is
a SuperHyperCycle and it has
the maximum number of SuperHyperVertices;
∀N (Va ) ∈ C : C is
a SuperHyperCycle and it has
the maximum number of SuperHyperVertices;
rv-SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor. 557
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 569
SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor; 580
contains the Extreme coefficients defined as the Extreme number of the maximum 588
SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 591
contains the Neutrosophic coefficients defined as the Neutrosophic number of the 601
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 615
SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor; 626
contains the Extreme coefficients defined as the Extreme number of the maximum 634
SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 637
contains the Neutrosophic coefficients defined as the Neutrosophic number of the 647
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
s∈S: 658
SuperHyperNeighbors of s ∈ S : 664
δ−SuperHyperDefensive. 667
SuperHyperVertices and the SuperHyperEdges are assigned by the labels from the 670
letters of the alphabets. In this procedure, there’s the usage of the position of labels to 671
S = (V, E). It’s redefined Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph if the Table (1) holds. 674
understandable. 677
S = (V, E). There are some Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses if the Table (2) 679
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
understandable. 689
SuperHyperEdges are assigned by the labels from the letters of the alphabets. In this 693
procedure, there’s the usage of the position of labels to assign to the values. 694
probability of A. 705
X
E(A) = E(a). (4.1)
a∈A
Y
E(∩i∈I Ai ) = P (Ai ).
i∈I
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
criteria 713
X
Ex(E) = E(α)P (α).
α∈V
p4 cr(G) ≥ p2 m − 3pn.
pm − 3n n 1 3 2
cr(G) ≥ 3
= 3 = m n .
p (4n/m) 64
738
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
SuperHyperSet of n points in the plane, and let l be the Neutrosophic number of 741
SuperHyperLines
√ in the plane passing through at least k + 1 of these points, where 742
points on the SuperHyperLines which pass through at least k + 1 points of P. This 746
crossing at most l choose two. Thus either kl < 4n, in which case l < 4n/k ≤ 32n2 /k 3 , 748
3
or l2 /2 > l choose 2 ≥ cr(G) ≥ (kl) /64n2 by the Neutrosophic Crossing Lemma, and 749
SuperHyperSet of n points in the plane, and let k be the number of pairs of points of P 753
on the SuperHyperCircles that pass through at least three SuperHyperPoints of P. Then 762
n−1
X
e(H) = ini = 2k − n1 − 2n2 ≥ 2k − 2n.
i=3
SuperHyperCircles, and any two SuperHyperCircles cross at most twice. Thus either 767
3
e(G) < 4n, in which case k < 5n < 5n4/3 , or n2 > n(n − 1) ≥ cr(G) ≥ (k − n) /64n2 768
by the Neutrosophic Crossing Lemma, and k < 4n4/3 + n < 5n4/3 . 769
E(X)
P (X ≥ t) ≤ .
t
Proof.
X X
E(X) = {X(a)P (a) : a ∈ V } ≥ {X(a)P (a) : a ∈ V, X(a) ≥ t}
X X
{tP (a) : a ∈ V, X(a) ≥ t} = t {P (a) : a ∈ V, X(a) ≥ t}
tP (X ≥ t).
Dividing the first and last members by t yields the asserted inequality. 773
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Proof. 778
SuperHyperGraph in Gn,p almost surely has stability number at most d2p−1 log ne. 781
SuperHyperGraph in Gn,p is up. Let G ∈ Gn,p and let S be a given SuperHyperSet of 784
SuperHyperSet of G is (1 − p)(k+1)choose2 , this being the probability that none of the 786
Let AS denote the event that S is a stable SuperHyperSet of G, and let XS denote 789
the indicator Neutrosophic Variable for this Neutrosophic Event. By equation, we have 790
X
X= {XS : S ⊆ V, |S| = k + 1}
X
E(X) = {E(XS ) : S ⊆ V, |S| = k + 1} = (n choose k+1)(1 − p)(k+1)choose2 .
nk+1
(n choose k+1) ≤ and1 − p ≤ e−p .
(k + 1)!
Suppose now that k = d2p−1 log ne. Then k ≥ 2p−1 log n, so ne−pk/2 ≤ 1. Because k 795
grows at least as fast as the logarithm of n, implies that E(X) → 0 as n → ∞. Because 796
2
V x(E) = Ex((X − Ex(X)) ).
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
V (X)
E(|X − Ex(X)| ≥ t) ≤ .
t2
Proof. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). 808
2
2 Ex((X − Ex(X)) ) V (X)
E(|X − Ex(X)| ≥ t) = E((X − Ex(X)) ≥ t2 ) ≤ = .
t2 t2
811
E(Xn = 0) → 0 as n → ∞
E(Xn = 0) ≤ E(|Xn − Ex(Xn )| ≥ |Ex(Xn )|) because |Xn − Ex(Xn )| = |Ex(Xn )| 819
when Xn = 0. 820
For 0 ≤ k ≤ n, set f (k) := (n choose k)2−(k choose 2) and let k ∗ be the least value of k 823
for which f (k) is less than one. Then almost surely α(G) takes one of the three values 824
k ∗ − 2, k ∗ − 1, k ∗ . 825
(i). f (k ∗ ) << 1, in which case almost surely α(G) is equal to either k ∗ − 2 or k ∗ − 1, 832
or 833
(ii). f (k ∗ − 1) >> 1, in which case almost surely α(G) is equal to either k ∗ − 1 or k ∗ . 834
straightforward. 837
SuperHyperGraphs (one which is preserved when SuperHyperEdges are added). Then a 841
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
(i). if p << f (n), then G ∈ Gn,p almost surely does not have P, 843
SuperHyperGraph. Then there is a threshold function for the property of containing a 848
SuperHyperEdges. Then n−k/l is a threshold function for the property of containing F 853
straightforward. 857
SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor. 869
870
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
880
884
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
888
892
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
896
900
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
912
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
916
920
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
924
928
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
932
936
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
940
944
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
948
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
952
956
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
960
ESHG : (V, E). The all interior Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices belong to any 962
ESHG : (V, E). There’s only one Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) has 969
only the maximum possibilities of the distinct interior Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 970
SuperHypeNeighbor to some of them but not all of them. In other words, there’s only an 972
minus all Neutrosophic SuperHypeNeighbor to some of them but not all of them. 975
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
V \ (V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . . , zE }).
the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges. In other words, the maximum number of the 979
some cases but the maximum number of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge with the 982
R-Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor. 985
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Let V \ V \ {z} in mind. There’s no necessity on the SuperHyperEdge since we need at 993
principles of the main definition since there’s no condition to be satisfied but the 995
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet has the necessary condition for the intended definition to 998
be applied. Thus the V \ V \ {z} is withdrawn not by the conditions of the main 999
definition but by the necessity of the pre-condition on the usage of the main definition. 1000
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Comes up. This Neutrosophic case implies having the Neutrosophic style of
on-quasi-triangle Neutrosophic style on the every Neutrosophic elements of this
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet. Precisely, the Neutrosophic R-Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor is
the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that
some Neutrosophic amount of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices are
on-quasi-triangle Neutrosophic style. The Neutrosophic cardinality of the v
SuperHypeSet
But the lower Neutrosophic bound is up. Thus the minimum Neutrosophic cardinality
of the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality ends up the Neutrosophic discussion. The
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
used Neutrosophic background in the Neutrosophic terms of worst Neutrosophic case 1002
and the common theme of the lower Neutrosophic bound occurred in the specific 1003
V \ (V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . . , zE }).
Zi ∼ Zj , i 6= j, i, j = 1, 2, . . . , z.
where the ∼ isn’t an equivalence relation but only the symmetric relation on the
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. The formal
definition is as follows.
Zi ∼ Zj , i 6= j, i, j = 1, 2, . . . , z
if and only if Zi and Zj are the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices and there’s only and
only one Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) between the Neutrosophic
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
and
Neutrosophic R-Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor =
E
{Z1 , Z2 , . . . , Zz | ∀i 6= j, i, j = 1, 2, . . . , z, ∃Ex , Zi ∼x Zj , }.
1007
Neutrosophic R-Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor =
V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .
V \ (V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . . , zE }).
Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor in some cases but the maximum number of the Neutrosophic 1014
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
addresses some issues about the Neutrosophic optimal SuperHyperObject. It specially 1020
where the Neutrosophic completion of the Neutrosophic incidence is up in that. Thus 1030
the original setting, these types of SuperHyperSets only don’t satisfy on the maximum 1033
SuperHyperCardinality. Thus the embedded setting is elected such that those 1034
Neutrosophic SuperHyperOptimal. The less than two distinct types of Neutrosophic 1036
SuperHyperVertices are included in the minimum Neutrosophic style of the embedded 1037
SuperHyperVertices. The common connections, more precise and more formal, the 1041
perfect unique connections inside the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet for any distinct types 1042
Thus Neutrosophic exterior SuperHyperVertices could be used only in one Neutrosophic 1044
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices since they’ve more connections inside more than 1048
outside. Thus the title “exterior” is more relevant than the title “interior”. One 1049
has been ignored in the exploring to lead on the optimal case implying the Neutrosophic 1052
only one Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) has only the maximum 1059
possibilities of the distinct interior Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices inside of any given 1060
SuperHypeNeighbor to some of them but not all of them. In other words, there’s only 1062
minus all Neutrosophic SuperHypeNeighbor to some of them but not all of them. 1065
The main definition of the Neutrosophic R-Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor has two titles. a 1066
Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperCardinality are two titles in the terms of quasi-R-styles. For 1068
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
numbers less than its Neutrosophic corresponded maximum number. The essence of the 1074
Neutrosophic Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor ends up but this essence starts up in the terms of 1075
To get more precise perceptions, the follow-up expressions propose another formal 1086
GNeutrosophic Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor =
{S ∈ ∪zNeutrosophic Number [zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class =
∪zNeutrosophic Number {SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet |
SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet = GNeutrosophic Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor ,
|SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= zNeutrosophic Number |
|SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= max zNeutrosophic Number }.
[zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class
In more concise and more convenient ways, the modified definition for the Neutrosophic 1088
GNeutrosophic Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor =
{S ∈ ∪zNeutrosophic Number [zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class |
|SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= max zNeutrosophic Number }.
[zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
To translate the statement to this mathematical literature, the formulae will be revised. 1090
GNeutrosophic Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor =
{S ∈ ∪zNeutrosophic Number [zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class |
|SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= max zNeutrosophic Number
[zNeutrosophic
Number ]Neutrosophic Class
= max |E| | E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.
GNeutrosophic Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor =
{S ∈ ∪zNeutrosophic Number [zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class |
|SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= max |E| | E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.
To get more visions in the closer look-up, there’s an overall overlook. 1092
GNeutrosophic Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor =
{S ∈ ∪zNeutrosophic Number [zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class =
∪zNeutrosophic Number {SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet |
SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet = GNeutrosophic Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor ,
|SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= zNeutrosophic Number |
|SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= max |E| | E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.
1094
GNeutrosophic Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor =
{S ∈ ∪zNeutrosophic Number [zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class |
|SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= max zNeutrosophic Number
[zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class
= max |E| | E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.
1095
GNeutrosophic Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor =
{S ∈ ∪zNeutrosophic Number [zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class |
|SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= max |E| | E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.
Now, the extension of these types of approaches is up. Since the new term, 1096
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
another name for “Neutrosophic Quasi-Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor” but, precisely, it’s the 1100
preliminarily background since there are some ambiguities about the Neutrosophic 1106
SuperHyperCardinality arise from it. To get orderly keywords, the terms, 1107
1114
GNeutrosophic Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor =
{NNeutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood
∈ ∪zNeutrosophic Number [zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class =
∪zNeutrosophic Number {NNeutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |
|NNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= zNeutrosophic Number |
|NNeutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= max zNeutrosophic Number }.
[zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class
1115
GNeutrosophic Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor =
{NNeutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood
∈ ∪zNeutrosophic Number [zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class |
|NNeutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= max zNeutrosophic Number }.
[zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class
1116
GNeutrosophic Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor =
{NNeutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood
∈ ∪zNeutrosophic Number [zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class |
|NNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= max zNeutrosophic Number }.
[zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
GNeutrosophic Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor =
{NNeutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood
∈ ∪zNeutrosophic Number [zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class =
∪zNeutrosophic Number {NNeutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |
|NNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= zNeutrosophic Number |
|NNeutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= max |E| | E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.
1119
GNeutrosophic Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor =
{NNeutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood
∈ ∪zNeutrosophic Number [zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class |
|NNeutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= max zNeutrosophic Number
[zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class
= max |E| | E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.
1120
GNeutrosophic Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor =
{NNeutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood
∈ ∪zNeutrosophic Number [zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class |
|NNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= max |E| | E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.
Thus, in a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). The all interior 1121
To make sense with the precise words in the terms of “R-’, the follow-up illustrations 1127
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
doesn’t have less than two SuperHyperVertices inside the intended Neutrosophic
SuperHyperSet since they’ve come from at least so far an SuperHyperEdge. Thus the
non-obvious simple Neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the Neutrosophic
R-Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor is up. To sum them up, the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices,
for some Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices instead of all given by that Neutrosophic 1134
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
does includes only less than two SuperHyperVertices in a connected Neutrosophic 1137
SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E) but it’s impossible in the case, they’ve corresponded 1138
to an SuperHyperEdge. It’s interesting to mention that the only non-obvious simple 1139
To sum them up, in a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). 1145
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Neutrosophic R-Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor with the least cardinality, the lower sharp 1157
Neutrosophic procedure such that such that there’s a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge to 1170
have some Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices uniquely [there are at least one 1171
There’s only one Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex outside the intended Neutrosophic 1176
Thus the obvious Neutrosophic R-Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor, VESHE is up. The obvious 1178
includes only all Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices does forms any kind of 1181
SuperHyperVertices and all exterior Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices from the unique 1190
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge where there’s any of them has all possible Neutrosophic 1191
with no exception minus all Neutrosophic SuperHypeNeighbors to some of them not all 1193
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
SuperHyperEdges[SuperHyperVertices], 1203
There are not only two Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices inside the intended 1210
Doesn’t have less than three SuperHyperVertices inside the intended Neutrosophic 1216
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
SuperHyperEdges[SuperHyperVertices], 1222
There aren’t only less than three Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices inside the intended 1233
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Does includes only less than three SuperHyperVertices in a connected Neutrosophic 1239
SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). It’s interesting to mention that the only non-obvious 1240
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
The previous Neutrosophic approach apply on the upcoming Neutrosophic results on 1249
Proposition 5.1. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath ESHP : (V, E). 1251
Then 1252
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
V |EN SHG |
, E |EN SHG |
3 3
1254
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , V2EXT ERN AL ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
E |EN SHG | , V |EN SHG |
3 3
Example 5.2. In the Figure (23), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath 1260
ESHP : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, in the 1261
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Proposition 5.3. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle ESHC : (V, E). 1263
Then 1264
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
V |EN SHG |
, E |EN SHG |
3 3
1266
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , V2EXT ERN AL ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
E |EN SHG | , V |EN SHG |
3 3
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Example 5.4. In the Figure (24), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle 1272
N SHC : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Neutrosophic 1273
SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor. 1275
Proposition 5.5. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). 1276
Then 1277
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
CEN T ER, E2
1279
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , CEN T ER
be a longest path taken a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). 1280
Example 5.6. In the Figure (25), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar 1285
ESHS : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, 1286
SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor. 1290
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
V|P i |=minP ∈E |Pj | , E|Pi |=minPj ∈EN SHG |Pj | .
j N SHG
1294
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , V2EXT ERN AL ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
E|Pi |=minPj ∈EN SHG |Pj | , V|Pi |=minP ∈E |Pj |
j N SHG
There are only two SuperHyperParts. Thus every SuperHyperPart could have one 1302
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E). Thus only some SuperHyperVertices and only 1305
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
solution 1307
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
Example 5.8. In the Neutrosophic Figure (26), the connected Neutrosophic 1309
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
V|P i |=minP ∈E |Pj | , E|Pi |=minPj ∈EN SHG |Pj | .
j N SHG
1318
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , V2EXT ERN AL ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
E|Pi |=minPj ∈EN SHG |Pj | , V|Pi |=minP ∈E |Pj |
j N SHG
There are only z 0 SuperHyperParts. Thus every SuperHyperPart could have one 1326
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
ESHM : (V, E). Thus only some SuperHyperVertices and only 1329
solution 1331
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1∗ ,
CEN T ER, E2∗
1343
P :
E1∗ , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2∗ , CEN T ER
is a longest SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor taken from a connected Neutrosophic 1344
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
straightforward. 1353
Example 5.12. In the Neutrosophic Figure (28), the connected Neutrosophic 1354
SuperHyperWheel N SHW : (V, E), is Neutrosophic highlighted and featured. The 1355
ESHW : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (28), is the Neutrosophic 1358
SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor. 1359
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Corollary 6.3. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph on the same identical letter 1371
Corollary 6.4. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph on the same identical letter 1374
SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor. 1377
Corollary 6.5. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph on the same identical letter 1378
SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor. 1381
is 1413
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
∅ is 1421
is a maximal 1438
Where the exterior SuperHyperVertices and the interior SuperHyperVertices coincide. 1445
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Where the exterior SuperHyperVertices and the interior SuperHyperVertices coincide. 1454
is one and it’s only V. Where the exterior SuperHyperVertices and the interior 1464
is one and it’s only V. Where the exterior SuperHyperVertices and the interior 1474
SuperHyperSet contains [the SuperHyperCenter and] the half of multiplying r with the 1479
number of all the SuperHyperEdges plus one of all the SuperHyperVertices is a 1480
O(ESHG)
(iv) : 2 + 1-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor; 1484
O(ESHG)
(v) : strong 2 + 1-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor; 1485
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor. 1487
SuperHyperSet contains the half of multiplying r with the number of all the 1491
SuperHyperEdges plus one of all the SuperHyperVertices in the biggest SuperHyperPart 1492
is a 1493
number of 1503
O(ESHG)
(iv) : 2 + 1-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor; 1507
O(ESHG)
(v) : strong 2 + 1-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor; 1508
SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor. 1510
is one and it’s only S, a SuperHyperSet contains [the SuperHyperCenter and] the half of 1511
multiplying r with the number of all the SuperHyperEdges plus one of all the 1512
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Proposition 6.25. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. Then the 1523
number is at most O(ESHG) and the Neutrosophic number is at most On (ESHG). 1524
min Σv∈{v1 ,v2 ,··· ,vt } O(ESHG:(V,E)) ⊆V σ(v), in the setting of dual 1527
t>
2
(iv) : ( O(ESHG:(V,E))
2 + 1)-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor; 1531
SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor. 1534
O(ESHG : (V, E)) and the Neutrosophic number is On (ESHG : (V, E)), in the setting 1548
of a dual 1549
SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor. 1556
number is O(ESHG:(V,E))
2 + 1 and the Neutrosophic number is 1559
min Σv∈{v1 ,v2 ,··· ,vt } O(ESHG:(V,E)) ⊆V σ(v), in the setting of a dual 1560
t>
2
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
(iv) : ( O(ESHG:(V,E))
2 + 1)-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor; 1564
SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor. 1567
Proposition 6.31. Let N SHF : (V, E) be a SuperHyperFamily of the ESHGs : (V, E) 1568
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs which are from one-type SuperHyperClass which the 1569
result is obtained for the individuals. Then the results also hold for the 1570
(ii) vx ∈ E. 1577
Then 1583
(i) Γ ≤ O; 1584
(ii) Γs ≤ On . 1585
(i) Γ ≤ O − 1; 1588
SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor; 1592
(iii) Γs = min{Σs∈S={v2 ,v4 ,··· ,vn−1 } Σ3i=1 σi (s), Σs∈S={v1 ,v3 ,··· ,vn−1 } Σ3i=1 σi (s)}; 1594
(iv) the SuperHyperSets S1 = {v2 , v4 , · · · , vn−1 } and S2 = {v1 , v3 , · · · , vn−1 } are only 1595
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor; 1599
(iii) Γs = min{Σs∈S={v2 ,v4 ,··· ,vn } Σ3i=1 σi (s), Σs∈S={v1 ,v3 ,··· .vn−1 } Σ3i=1 σi (s)}; 1602
(iv) the SuperHyperSets S1 = {v2 , v4 , · · · .vn } and S2 = {v1 , v3 , · · · .vn−1 } are only 1603
Then 1606
SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor; 1608
(iii) Γs = min{Σs∈S={v2 ,v4 ,··· ,vn } σ(s), Σs∈S={v1 ,v3 ,··· ,vn−1 } σ(s)}; 1611
(iv) the SuperHyperSets S1 = {v2 , v4 , · · · , vn } and S2 = {v1 , v3 , · · · , vn−1 } are only 1612
Then 1615
SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor; 1617
(iii) Γs = min{Σs∈S={v2 ,v4 ,··· .vn−1 } Σ3i=1 σi (s), Σs∈S={v1 ,v3 ,··· .vn−1 } Σ3i=1 σi (s)}; 1619
(iv) the SuperHyperSets S1 = {v2 , v4 , · · · .vn−1 } and S2 = {v1 , v3 , · · · .vn−1 } are only 1620
(ii) Γ = 1; 1624
SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor. 1627
6+3(i−1)≤n
(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {v1 , v3 } ∪ {v6 , v9 · · · , vi+6 , · · · , vn }i=1 is a dual 1629
6+3(i−1)≤n
(ii) Γ = |{v1 , v3 } ∪ {v6 , v9 · · · , vi+6 , · · · , vn }i=1 |; 1631
(iii) Γs = Σ{v1 ,v3 }∪{v6 ,v9 ··· ,vi+6 ,··· ,vn }6+3(i−1)≤n Σ3i=1 σi (s); 1632
i=1
6+3(i−1)≤n
(iv) the SuperHyperSet {v1 , v3 } ∪ {v6 , v9 · · · , vi+6 , · · · , vn }i=1 is only a dual 1633
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
b n c+1
(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {vi }i=1 2
is a dual SuperHyperDefensive 1636
SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor; 1637
(ii) Γ = b n2 c + 1; 1638
b n c+1
(iv) the SuperHyperSet S = {vi }i=1 2
is only a dual SuperHyperDefensive 1640
SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor. 1641
bn
2c
(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {vi }i=1 is a dual SuperHyperDefensive 1643
SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor; 1644
(ii) Γ = b n2 c; 1645
bnc
(iv) the SuperHyperSet S = {vi }i=1 2
is only a dual maximal SuperHyperDefensive 1647
SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor. 1648
(iii) Γs = Σm 3
i=1 Σj=1 σj (ci ) for N SHF : (V, E); 1654
b n c+1
(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {vi }i=1 2
is a dual maximal SuperHyperDefensive 1660
b n c+1
(iv) the SuperHyperSets S = {vi }i=1 2
are only a dual maximal 1664
bn
2c
(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {vi }i=1 is a dual SuperHyperDefensive 1669
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
bnc
(iv) the SuperHyperSets S = {vi }i=1 2
are only dual maximal 1673
SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor; 1699
SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor; 1706
SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor; 1710
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor; 1717
SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor; 1721
SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor; 1739
SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor; 1741
SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor; 1743
SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor; 1750
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor; 1754
The cancer is the Neutrosophic disease but the Neutrosophic model is going to figure 1759
out what’s going on this Neutrosophic phenomenon. The special Neutrosophic case of 1760
this Neutrosophic disease is considered and as the consequences of the model, some 1761
parameters are used. The cells are under attack of this disease but the moves of the 1762
cancer in the special region are the matter of mind. The Neutrosophic recognition of the 1763
cancer could help to find some Neutrosophic treatments for this Neutrosophic disease. 1764
In the following, some Neutrosophic steps are Neutrosophic devised on this disease. 1765
Step 2. (Neutrosophic Issue) The specific region has been assigned by the 1768
Neutrosophic model [it’s called Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph] and the long 1769
Neutrosophic cycle of the move from the cancer is identified by this research. 1770
Sometimes the move of the cancer hasn’t be easily identified since there are some 1771
determinacy, indeterminacy and neutrality about the moves and the effects of the 1772
cancer on that region; this event leads us to choose another model [it’s said to be 1773
Step 3. (Neutrosophic Model) There are some specific Neutrosophic models, which 1776
are well-known and they’ve got the names, and some general Neutrosophic models. 1777
The moves and the Neutrosophic traces of the cancer on the complex tracks and 1778
featured. 1790
By using the Neutrosophic Figure (29) and the Table (4), the Neutrosophic 1791
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
By using the Neutrosophic Figure (30) and the Table (5), the Neutrosophic 1803
In what follows, some “problems” and some “questions” are proposed. 1811
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Question 10.1. Which the else SuperHyperModels could be defined based on Cancer’s 1815
recognitions? 1816
Question 10.3. Are there some Algorithms to be defined on the SuperHyperModels to 1819
Question 10.4. Which the SuperHyperNotions are related to beyond the 1821
Problem 10.6. Which the fundamental SuperHyperNumbers are related to these 1826
Problem 10.7. What’s the independent research based on Cancer’s recognitions 1828
In this section, concluding remarks and closing remarks are represented. The drawbacks 1831
of this research are illustrated. Some benefits and some advantages of this research are 1832
highlighted. 1833
This research uses some approaches to make Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs more 1834
SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor. For that sake in the second definition, the main 1836
alphabets. Based on the new definition for the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, the 1838
SuperHyperClasses and some Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses are the cases of this 1841
research on the modeling of the regions where are under the attacks of the cancer to 1842
recognize this disease as it’s mentioned on the title “Cancer’s Recognitions”. To 1843
the new SuperHyperClasses and SuperHyperClasses, are introduced. Some general 1845
results are gathered in the section on the SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor and the 1846
literature reviews have taken the whole way through. In this research, the literature 1848
reviews have fulfilled the lines containing the notions and the results. The 1849
the “Cancer’s Recognitions” and both bases are the background of this research. 1851
Sometimes the cancer has been happened on the region, full of cells, groups of cells and 1852
SuperHyperNotions based on the connectivities of the moves of the cancer in the longest 1854
and strongest styles with the formation of the design and the architecture are formally 1855
The prefix “SuperHyper” refers to the theme of the embedded styles to figure out the 1857
background for the SuperHyperNotions. In the Table (6), benefits and avenues for this 1858
research are, figured out, pointed out and spoken out. 1859
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
2. SuperHyperHamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor
5. SuperHyperClasses 3. SuperHyperFamilies
Forms 1862
SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 1889
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 1897
C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Extreme 1902
Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form 1906
the Extreme SuperHyperDuality; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its 1907
Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form 1926
SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 1934
C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Extreme 1939
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form 1943
the Extreme SuperHyperDuality; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its 1944
SuperHyperDuality. 1976
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
straightforward. 1979
straightforward. 1982
straightforward. 1985
straightforward. 1988
straightforward. 1991
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
straightforward. 1994
straightforward. 1997
straightforward. 2000
straightforward. 2003
straightforward. 2006
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
straightforward. 2009
straightforward. 2012
straightforward. 2015
straightforward. 2018
straightforward. 2021
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
straightforward. 2024
straightforward. 2027
straightforward. 2030
straightforward. 2033
straightforward. 2036
The previous Neutrosophic approach apply on the upcoming Neutrosophic results on 2037
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
= {Ei }i=1 3
.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= 3z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality
|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
E |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality , V EXT ERN AL |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality .
3 3
straightforward. 2046
Example 12.5. In the Figure (23), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath 2047
ESHP : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, in the 2048
= {Ei }i=1 3
.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= 3z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality
|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
E |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality , V EXT ERN AL |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality .
3 3
straightforward. 2057
Example 12.7. In the Figure (24), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle 2058
N SHC : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Neutrosophic 2059
SuperHyperDuality. 2061
Proposition 12.8. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). 2062
Then 2063
be a longest path taken a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). 2065
straightforward. 2069
Example 12.9. In the Figure (25), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar 2070
ESHS : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, 2071
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmin i |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1
straightforward. Then there’s at least one SuperHyperDuality. Thus the notion of quasi 2082
There are only two SuperHyperParts. Thus every SuperHyperPart could have one 2084
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmin i |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1
SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E). Thus only some SuperHyperVertices and only 2087
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
solution 2089
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmin i |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1
Example 12.11. In the Neutrosophic Figure (26), the connected Neutrosophic 2091
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmin i |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
straightforward. Then there’s at least one SuperHyperDuality. Thus the notion of quasi 2104
There are only z 0 SuperHyperParts. Thus every SuperHyperPart could have one 2106
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmin i |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1
ESHM : (V, E). Thus only some SuperHyperVertices and only 2109
solution 2111
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmin i |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1∗ ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2∗ ,
...,
∗ EXT ERN AL
E|E ∗ | , V|E ∗ |Neutrosophic Cardinality +1
ESHG:(V,E) Neutrosophic Cardinality ESHG:(V,E)
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
straightforward. Then there’s at least one SuperHyperDuality. Thus the notion of quasi 2127
Example 12.15. In the Neutrosophic Figure (28), the connected Neutrosophic 2131
SuperHyperWheel N SHW : (V, E), is Neutrosophic highlighted and featured. The 2132
ESHW : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (28), is the Neutrosophic 2135
SuperHyperDuality. 2136
Forms 2139
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 2166
SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 2174
Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form 2183
the Extreme SuperHyperJoin; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its 2184
coefficient; 2196
SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 2203
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 2211
Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form 2220
the Extreme SuperHyperJoin; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its 2221
coefficient. 2233
SuperHyperJoin. 2245
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
SuperHyperJoin. 2254
straightforward. 2257
straightforward. 2260
straightforward. 2263
straightforward. 2266
straightforward. 2269
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
straightforward. 2272
straightforward. 2275
straightforward. 2278
straightforward. 2281
straightforward. 2284
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
straightforward. 2287
straightforward. 2290
straightforward. 2293
straightforward. 2296
straightforward. 2299
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
straightforward. 2302
straightforward. 2305
straightforward. 2308
straightforward. 2311
straightforward. 2314
The previous Neutrosophic approach apply on the upcoming Neutrosophic results on 2315
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
= {Ei }i=1 3
.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= 3z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin
|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
E |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality , V EXT ERN AL |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality .
3 3
straightforward. 2324
Example 13.5. In the Figure (23), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath 2325
ESHP : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, in the 2326
= {Ei }i=1 3
.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= 3z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin
|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
E |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality , V EXT ERN AL |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality .
3 3
straightforward. 2335
Example 13.7. In the Figure (24), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle 2336
N SHC : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Neutrosophic 2337
SuperHyperJoin. 2339
Proposition 13.8. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). 2340
Then 2341
be a longest path taken a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). 2343
straightforward. 2347
Example 13.9. In the Figure (25), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar 2348
ESHS : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, 2349
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmin i |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1
straightforward. Then there’s no at least one SuperHyperJoin. Thus the notion of quasi 2360
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
There are only two SuperHyperParts. Thus every SuperHyperPart could have one 2362
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmin i |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1
ESHB : (V, E). Thus only some SuperHyperVertices and only 2365
solution 2367
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmin i |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1
Example 13.11. In the Neutrosophic Figure (26), the connected Neutrosophic 2369
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmin i |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1
straightforward. Then there’s no at least one SuperHyperJoin. Thus the notion of quasi 2382
There are only z 0 SuperHyperParts. Thus every SuperHyperPart could have one 2384
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmin i |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1
ESHM : (V, E). Thus only some SuperHyperVertices and only 2387
solution 2389
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmin i |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1
= {Ei }i=1 3
.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= 3z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin
|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
E |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality , V EXT ERN AL |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality .
3 3
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
straightforward. Then there’s at least one SuperHyperJoin. Thus the notion of quasi 2405
isn’t up and the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperJoin could be applied. The 2406
unique embedded SuperHyperJoin proposes some longest SuperHyperJoin excerpt from 2407
Example 13.15. In the Neutrosophic Figure (28), the connected Neutrosophic 2409
SuperHyperWheel N SHW : (V, E), is Neutrosophic highlighted and featured. The 2410
ESHW : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (28), is the Neutrosophic 2413
SuperHyperJoin. 2414
Forms 2417
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 2444
SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 2452
C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Extreme 2457
Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form 2461
the Extreme SuperHyperPerfect; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its 2462
Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form 2481
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 2489
C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Extreme 2494
Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form 2498
the Extreme SuperHyperPerfect; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its 2499
SuperHyperPerfect. 2523
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
SuperHyperPerfect. 2532
straightforward. 2535
straightforward. 2538
straightforward. 2541
straightforward. 2544
straightforward. 2547
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
straightforward. 2550
straightforward. 2553
straightforward. 2556
straightforward. 2559
straightforward. 2562
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
straightforward. 2565
straightforward. 2568
straightforward. 2571
straightforward. 2574
straightforward. 2577
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
straightforward. 2580
straightforward. 2583
straightforward. 2586
straightforward. 2589
straightforward. 2592
The previous Neutrosophic approach apply on the upcoming Neutrosophic results on 2593
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
= {Ei }i=1 3
.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= 3z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect
|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
E |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality , V EXT ERN AL |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality .
3 3
straightforward. 2602
Example 14.5. In the Figure (23), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath 2603
ESHP : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, in the 2604
= {Ei }i=1 3
.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= 3z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect
|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
E |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality , V EXT ERN AL |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality .
3 3
straightforward. 2613
Example 14.7. In the Figure (24), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle 2614
N SHC : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Neutrosophic 2615
SuperHyperPerfect. 2617
Proposition 14.8. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). 2618
Then 2619
be a longest path taken a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). 2621
straightforward. 2625
Example 14.9. In the Figure (25), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar 2626
ESHS : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, 2627
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmin i |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1
straightforward. Then there’s no at least one SuperHyperPerfect. Thus the notion of 2638
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
applied. There are only two SuperHyperParts. Thus every SuperHyperPart could have 2640
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmin i |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1
SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E). Thus only some SuperHyperVertices and only 2643
solution 2645
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmin i |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1
Example 14.11. In the Neutrosophic Figure (26), the connected Neutrosophic 2647
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmin i |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1
straightforward. Then there’s no at least one SuperHyperPerfect. Thus the notion of 2660
applied. There are only z 0 SuperHyperParts. Thus every SuperHyperPart could have 2662
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmin i |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1
ESHM : (V, E). Thus only some SuperHyperVertices and only 2665
solution 2667
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmin i |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1
straightforward. Then there’s at least one SuperHyperPerfect. Thus the notion of quasi 2683
isn’t up and the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperPerfect could be applied. The 2684
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Example 14.15. In the Neutrosophic Figure (28), the connected Neutrosophic 2687
SuperHyperWheel N SHW : (V, E), is Neutrosophic highlighted and featured. The 2688
ESHW : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (28), is the Neutrosophic 2691
SuperHyperPerfect. 2692
Forms 2695
that Va ∈ Ei , Ej ; 2701
that Vi , Vj ∈ Ea ; 2706
SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 2722
SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 2730
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form 2739
the Extreme SuperHyperTotal; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its 2740
SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 2759
SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 2767
Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form 2776
the Extreme SuperHyperTotal; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its 2777
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
SuperHyperTotal. 2801
SuperHyperTotal. 2810
straightforward. 2813
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
straightforward. 2816
straightforward. 2819
straightforward. 2822
straightforward. 2825
straightforward. 2828
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
straightforward. 2831
straightforward. 2834
straightforward. 2837
straightforward. 2840
straightforward. 2843
straightforward. 2846
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
straightforward. 2849
straightforward. 2852
straightforward. 2855
straightforward. 2858
straightforward. 2861
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
straightforward. 2864
straightforward. 2867
straightforward. 2870
The previous Neutrosophic approach apply on the upcoming Neutrosophic results on 2871
P :
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
V3EXT ERN AL , E3 ,
...
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
straightforward. 2880
Example 15.5. In the Figure (23), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath 2881
ESHP : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, in the 2882
P :
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
V3EXT ERN AL , E3 ,
...,
E |E|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality −1 .
, V EXT ERN AL |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality −1
straightforward. 2891
Example 15.7. In the Figure (24), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle 2892
N SHC : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Neutrosophic 2893
SuperHyperTotal. 2895
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Proposition 15.8. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). 2896
Then 2897
be a longest path taken a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). 2899
straightforward. 2903
Example 15.9. In the Figure (25), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar 2904
ESHS : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, 2905
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
straightforward. Then there’s no at least one SuperHyperTotal. Thus the notion of 2916
applied. There are only two SuperHyperParts. Thus every SuperHyperPart could have 2918
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E). Thus only some SuperHyperVertices and only 2921
solution 2923
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
Example 15.11. In the Neutrosophic Figure (26), the connected Neutrosophic 2925
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
is a longest SuperHyperTotal taken from a connected Neutrosophic 2934
straightforward. Then there’s no at least one SuperHyperTotal. Thus the notion of 2938
applied. There are only z 0 SuperHyperParts. Thus every SuperHyperPart could have 2940
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
is a longest path taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite 2942
ESHM : (V, E). Thus only some SuperHyperVertices and only 2943
solution 2945
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
is a longest path taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite 2946
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
∗
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal = {Ei , Ej ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial
∗
= |i(i − 1) | Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E)|Neutrosophic Cardinality
|z 2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperTotal = {CEN T ER, Vj ∈ VESHG:(V,E) }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial =
(|VESHG:(V,E)|Neutrosophic Cardinality |) choose (|VESHG:(V,E)|Neutrosophic Cardinality | − 1)
z2.
Proof. Let 2956
straightforward. Then there’s at least one SuperHyperTotal. Thus the notion of quasi 2961
isn’t up and the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperTotal could be applied. The 2962
Example 15.15. In the Neutrosophic Figure (28), the connected Neutrosophic 2965
SuperHyperWheel N SHW : (V, E), is Neutrosophic highlighted and featured. The 2966
ESHW : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (28), is the Neutrosophic 2969
SuperHyperTotal. 2970
Forms 2973
SuperHyperConnected). 2975
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
that Va 6∈ Ei , Ej ; 2981
that Vi , Vj 6∈ Ea ; 2988
Vi , Vj 6∈ Ea ; and 2991
C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum 3002
Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form 3005
C(N SHG) for a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum 3010
SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 3013
coefficients defined as the Extreme number of the maximum Extreme cardinality 3020
SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Extreme SuperHyperConnected; and 3023
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
contains the Neutrosophic coefficients defined as the Neutrosophic number of the 3030
they form the Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected; and the Neutrosophic power is 3034
C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum 3039
Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form 3042
C(N SHG) for a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum 3047
contains the Extreme coefficients defined as the Extreme number of the maximum 3057
SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 3060
contains the Neutrosophic coefficients defined as the Neutrosophic number of the 3068
they form the Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected; and the Neutrosophic power is 3072
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
SuperHyperConnected. 3085
SuperHyperConnected. 3094
straightforward. 3097
straightforward. 3100
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
straightforward. 3103
straightforward. 3106
straightforward. 3109
straightforward. 3112
straightforward. 3115
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
straightforward. 3118
straightforward. 3121
straightforward. 3124
straightforward. 3127
straightforward. 3130
straightforward. 3133
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
straightforward. 3136
straightforward. 3139
straightforward. 3142
straightforward. 3145
straightforward. 3148
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
straightforward. 3151
straightforward. 3154
The previous Neutrosophic approach apply on the upcoming Neutrosophic results on 3155
P :
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
V3EXT ERN AL , E3 ,
...,
E|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality −1 , V EXT ERN AL |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality −1 .
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
straightforward. 3164
Example 16.5. In the Figure (23), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath 3165
ESHP : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, in the 3166
P :
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
V3EXT ERN AL , E3 ,
...,
E|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality −1 , V EXT ERN AL |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality −1 .
straightforward. 3175
Example 16.7. In the Figure (24), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle 3176
N SHC : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Neutrosophic 3177
SuperHyperConnected. 3179
Proposition 16.8. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). 3180
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Then 3181
be a longest path taken a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). 3183
straightforward. 3187
Example 16.9. In the Figure (25), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar 3188
ESHS : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, 3189
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
straightforward. Then there’s no at least one SuperHyperConnected. Thus the notion of 3200
applied. There are only two SuperHyperParts. Thus every SuperHyperPart could have 3202
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
is a longest SuperHyperConnected taken from a connected Neutrosophic 3204
SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E). Thus only some SuperHyperVertices and only 3205
solution 3207
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
The latter is straightforward. 3208
Example 16.11. In the Neutrosophic Figure (26), the connected Neutrosophic 3209
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
straightforward. Then there’s no at least one SuperHyperConnected. Thus the notion of 3222
applied. There are only z 0 SuperHyperParts. Thus every SuperHyperPart could have 3224
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
ESHM : (V, E). Thus only some SuperHyperVertices and only 3227
solution 3229
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
∗
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected = {Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial
= |i | Ei ∈ |E ∗ ESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality |z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperConnected = {CEN T ER ∈ VESHG:(V,E) }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
straightforward. Then there’s at least one SuperHyperConnected. Thus the notion of 3245
straightforward. 3249
Example 16.15. In the Neutrosophic Figure (28), the connected Neutrosophic 3250
SuperHyperWheel N SHW : (V, E), is Neutrosophic highlighted and featured. The 3251
ESHW : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (28), is the Neutrosophic 3254
SuperHyperConnected. 3255
17 Background 3256
There are some scientific researches covering the topic of this research. In what follows, 3257
there are some discussion and literature reviews about them. 3258
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “neutrosophic co-degree and 3259
neutrosophic degree alongside chromatic numbers in the setting of some classes related 3260
to neutrosophic hypergraphs” in Ref. [1] by Henry Garrett (2022). In this research 3261
entitled “Journal of Current Trends in Computer Science Research (JCTCSR)” with 3265
ISO abbreviation “J Curr Trends Comp Sci Res” in volume 1 and issue 1 with pages 3266
06-14. The research article studies deeply with choosing neutrosophic hypergraphs 3267
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “Super Hyper Dominating 3270
and Super Hyper Resolving on Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs and Their Directions 3271
in Game Theory and Neutrosophic Super Hyper Classes” in Ref. [2] by Henry Garrett 3272
Techniques Comput Math” in volume 1 and issue 3 with pages 242-263. The research 3278
article studies deeply with choosing directly neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph and 3279
SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough toward independent results based on initial 3280
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “Some Super Hyper Degrees 3282
and Co-Super Hyper Degrees on Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs And Super Hyper 3283
Graphs Alongside Applications in Cancer’s Treatments” in Ref. [3] by Henry Garrett 3284
and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on fundamental notions and using vital tools 3286
in Cancer’s Treatments. It’s published in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled 3287
ISO abbreviation “J Math Techniques Comput Math” in volume 2 and issue 1 with 3289
pages 35-47. The research article studies deeply with choosing directly neutrosophic 3290
In some articles are titled “0039 — Closing Numbers and Super-Closing Numbers as 3293
in Ref. [7] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Uncertainty On The Act And Effect Of Cancer 3299
Alongside The Foggy Positions Of Cells Toward Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique 3300
Henry Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic Version Of Separates Groups Of Cells In Cancer’s 3302
“The Shift Paradigm To Classify Separately The Cells and Affected Cells Toward The 3304
Totality Under Cancer’s Recognition By New Multiple Definitions On the Sets 3305
Henry Garrett (2022), “Breaking the Continuity and Uniformity of Cancer In The 3308
Worst Case of Full Connections With Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique In Cancer’s 3309
SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [12] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Extremism of the Attacked 3313
Body Under the Cancer’s Circumstances Where Cancer’s Recognition Titled 3314
Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond” in Ref. [16] by Henry Garrett (2022), 3322
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Game Theory and Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses” in Ref. [24] by Henry Garrett 3344
(2023), “The Focus on The Partitions Obtained By Parallel Moves In The Cancer’s 3347
Extreme Recognition With Different Types of Extreme SuperHyperMatching Set and 3348
(2023), “Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique Decides the Failures on the Cancer’s 3350
“Indeterminacy On The All Possible Connections of Cells In Front of Cancer’s Attacks In 3353
Regions and Sub-Regions in the Terms of Cancer’s Recognition and (Neutrosophic) 3359
the Form of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [146] by Henry Garrett (2023), 3363
Ref. [151] by Henry Garrett (2023), “Neutrosophic 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in the 3370
Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond” in Ref. [152] by Henry Garrett (2022), 3372
in Ref. [154] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Basic Neutrosophic Notions Concerning 3377
in Ref. [165] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Initial Material of Neutrosophic Preliminaries 3379
and [4–166], there are some endeavors to formalize the basic SuperHyperNotions about 3382
books at [167–262]. Two popular scientific research books in Scribd in the terms of high 3384
readers, 4190 and 5189 respectively, on neutrosophic science is on [263, 264]. 3385
Some scientific studies and scientific researches about neutrosophic graphs, are 3386
proposed as book in Ref. [251] by Henry Garrett (2023) which is indexed by Google 3387
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Scholar and has more than 4216 readers in Scribd. It’s titled “Beyond Neutrosophic 3388
Graphs” and published by Dr. Henry Garrett. This research book covers different types 3389
Also, some scientific studies and scientific researches about neutrosophic graphs, are 3392
proposed as book in Ref. [252] by Henry Garrett (2023) which is indexed by Google 3393
Scholar and has more than 5214 readers in Scribd. It’s titled “Neutrosophic Duality” 3394
and published by Dr. Henry Garrett. This research book presents different types of 3395
neutrosophic graph theory and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph theory. This research 3397
book has scrutiny on the complement of the intended set and the intended set, 3398
simultaneously. It’s smart to consider a set but acting on its complement that what’s 3399
done in this research book which is popular in the terms of high readers in Scribd. 3400
See the seminal scientific researches [1–3]. The formalization of the notions on the 3401
alongside scientific research books at [167–262]. Two popular scientific research books 3404
in Scribd in the terms of high readers, 4216 and 5214 respectively, on neutrosophic 3405
References 3407
Hypergraphs”, J Curr Trends Comp Sci Res 1(1) (2022) 06-14. 3410
2. Henry Garrett, “Super Hyper Dominating and Super Hyper Resolving on 3411
Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs and Their Directions in Game Theory and 3412
Neutrosophic Super Hyper Classes”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 1(3) 3413
3. Henry Garrett, “Some Super Hyper Degrees and Co-Super Hyper Degrees on 3415
Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs And Super Hyper Graphs Alongside 3416
super-hyper-degrees-and-cosuper-hyper-degrees-on-neutrosophic-super-hyper- 3419
graphs-and-super-hyper-graphs-alongside-a.pdf) 3420
Hypergraph by Eulerian Super Hyper Cycles and Hamiltonian Sets as Hyper 3422
Covering Versus Super separations”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 2(3) 3423
research-on-cancers-recognition-and-neutrosophic-super-hypergraph-by- 3425
eulerian-super-hyper-cycles-and-hamiltonian-sets-.pdf) 3426
Research - Zenodo, Nov. 2022. CERN European Organization for Nuclear 3430
https://oa.mg/work/10.5281/zenodo.6319942 3432
Graphs.” CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research - Zenodo, Feb. 3434
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
https://doi.org/10.13140/rg.2.2.35241.26724. 3436
https://oa.mg/work/10.13140/rg.2.2.35241.26724 3437
10.20944/preprints202301.0308.v1). 3441
8. Henry Garrett, “Uncertainty On The Act And Effect Of Cancer Alongside The 3442
10. Henry Garrett, “The Shift Paradigm To Classify Separately The Cells and 3449
Affected Cells Toward The Totality Under Cancer’s Recognition By New 3450
10.20944/preprints202301.0265.v1). 3454
11. Henry Garrett, “Breaking the Continuity and Uniformity of Cancer In The 3455
12. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable as the Survivors on the 3459
10.20944/preprints202301.0240.v1). 3462
13. Henry Garrett, “Extremism of the Attacked Body Under the Cancer’s 3463
10.20944/preprints202301.0224.v1). 3466
10.20944/preprints202301.0088.v1). 3473
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 3483
10.20944/preprints202301.0088.v1). 3487
10.20944/preprints202212.0324.v1). 3502
10.20944/preprints202211.0576.v1). 3506
25. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 3507
10.5281/zenodo.7804238). 3510
26. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Decompensation By Hyper Decompress Of 3511
10.5281/zenodo.7804228). 3514
27. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 3515
28. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Hammy By Hyper Hamper Of 3518
29. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 3521
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
30. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 3524
31. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 3527
32. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Hammy By Hyper Hamper Of 3530
33. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 3533
34. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nebulous By Hyper Nebbish Of 3536
35. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 3539
36. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Decompensation By Hyper Decompress Of 3542
37. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 3545
38. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Hammy By Hyper Hamper Of 3548
39. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 3551
40. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nebulous By Hyper Nebbish Of 3554
41. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3557
42. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Decompensation By Hyper Decompress Of 3560
43. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3563
44. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Tract By Hyper Track Of Trace-Cut In 3566
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
45. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3569
46. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nebulous By Hyper Nebbish Of 3572
47. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3575
48. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Decompensation By Hyper Decompress Of 3578
49. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3581
50. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Eddy By Hyper Edify Of Edge-Cut In 3584
51. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3587
52. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nebulous By Hyper Nebbish Of 3590
53. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3593
54. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Decompensation By Hyper Decompress Of 3596
55. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3599
56. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Vertigo By Hyper Vertu Of Vertex-Cut In 3602
57. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3605
58. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nebulizer By Hyper Nub Of 3608
59. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3611
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
60. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Stale By Hyper Stalk Of 3614
61. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3617
62. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Stale By Hyper Stalk Of Stable-Cut In 3620
63. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3623
64. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nebulizer By Hyper Nub Of 3626
65. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3629
66. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Decompensation By Hyper Decompress Of 3632
67. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3635
68. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Cliff By Hyper Cling Of Clique-Cut In 3638
69. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3641
70. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3644
71. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Lith By Hyper Lite Of List-Coloring In 3647
72. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3650
73. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Solidarity By Hyper Soul Of Space In 3653
74. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3656
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
75. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Uniform By Hyper Deformation Of 3659
76. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3662
77. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super System By Hyper Explosions Of 3665
78. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3668
79. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nodes By Hyper Moves Of 3671
80. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3674
81. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Gap By Hyper Navigations Of Chord In 3677
82. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3680
83. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Coincidence By Hyper Routes Of 3683
84. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3686
85. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Obstacles By Hyper Model Of 3689
86. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3692
87. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Harmony By Hyper k-Function Of 3695
88. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3698
89. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Gradient By Hyper k-Class Of 3701
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
90. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3704
91. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Analogous By Hyper Visions Of 3707
92. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3710
93. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Relations By Hyper Identifications Of 3713
94. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Contradiction By Hyper Detection of 3716
95. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3719
96. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Locations By Hyper Differing Of 3722
97. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3725
98. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Missing By Hyper Searching Of 3728
99. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3731
100. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Outbreak By Hyper Collections Of 3734
101. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3737
102. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Extremism By Hyper Treatments Of 3740
103. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Isolation By Hyper Perfectness Of 3743
104. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3746
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
105. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3749
106. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super connections By Hyper disconnections Of 3752
107. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Mixed-Devastations By Hyper Decisions 3755
110. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Reflections By Hyper Rotations Of Path 3764
111. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas As Hyper Deformations On Super Chains In 3767
113. Henry Garrett, “New Research On Cancer’s Recognition and Neutrosophic 3773
10.13140/RG.2.2.29913.80482). 3776
114. Henry Garrett, “New Research On Cancer’s Recognition and Neutrosophic 3777
10.13140/RG.2.2.33269.24809). 3780
115. Henry Garrett, “New Research On Cancer’s Recognition and Neutrosophic 3781
10.13140/RG.2.2.34946.96960). 3784
10.13140/RG.2.2.14814.31040). 3788
10.13140/RG.2.2.15653.17125). 3792
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
10.13140/RG.2.2.25719.50089). 3796
119. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Disruptions In Cancer’s Extreme 3797
10.13140/RG.2.2.29441.94562). 3800
the Criteria of Eulerian and Hamiltonian Type-Sets As Hyper Modified Cycles 3805
10.20944/preprints202301.0396.v1). 3813
10.20944/preprints202301.0395.v1). 3817
Classes With Hyper Effects In The Background of the Framework is So-Called 3825
10.13140/RG.2.2.12818.73925). 3827
127. Henry Garrett,“Super Actions On The Types of Hyper Levels In The Sensible 3828
10.13140/RG.2.2.26836.88960). 3831
10.20944/preprints202301.0308.v1). 3838
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
130. Henry Garrett,“Uncertainty On The Act And Effect Of Cancer Alongside The 3839
132. Henry Garrett, “The Shift Paradigm To Classify Separately The Cells and 3846
Affected Cells Toward The Totality Under Cancer’s Recognition By New 3847
10.20944/preprints202301.0265.v1). 3851
133. Henry Garrett,“Breaking the Continuity and Uniformity of Cancer In The 3852
134. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable as the Survivors on the 3856
10.20944/preprints202301.0240.v1). 3859
135. Henry Garrett, “Extremism of the Attacked Body Under the Cancer’s 3860
10.20944/preprints202301.0224.v1). 3863
137. Henry Garrett,“The Focus on The Partitions Obtained By Parallel Moves In 3867
138. Henry Garrett,“Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique Decides the Failures on the 3871
140. Henry Garrett,“Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique Decides the Failures on the 3879
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 3896
10.20944/preprints202301.0088.v1). 3900
149. Henry Garrett, “Using the Tool As (Neutrosophic) Failed SuperHyperStable To 3911
10.13140/RG.2.2.36141.77287). 3923
10.13140/RG.2.2.29430.88642). 3926
10.13140/RG.2.2.11369.16487). 3930
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
10.20944/preprints202212.0324.v1). 3956
10.13140/RG.2.2.23123.04641). 3960
10.20944/preprints202211.0576.v1). 3964
10.13140/RG.2.2.23324.56966). 3968
166. Henry Garrett, “Initial Material of Neutrosophic Preliminaries to Study Some 3972
10.13140/RG.2.2.25385.88160). 3975
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
175. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDuality”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 3992
10.5281/zenodo.7637762). 3993
176. Henry Garrett, “Trace-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 3994
179. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 4000
182. Henry Garrett, “Vertex-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 4006
185. Henry Garrett, “Stable-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 4012
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
188. Henry Garrett, “Clique-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 4018
189. Henry Garrett, “Space In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4020
10.5281/zenodo.7713563). 4021
190. Henry Garrett, “Space In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4022
10.5281/zenodo.7709116). 4023
194. Henry Garrett, “Chord In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4030
10.5281/zenodo.7700205). 4031
197. Henry Garrett, “K-Domination In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 4036
198. Henry Garrett, “K-Number In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 4038
199. Henry Garrett, “Order In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4040
10.5281/zenodo.7668648). 4041
200. Henry Garrett, “Coloring In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4042
10.5281/zenodo.7662810). 4043
201. Henry Garrett, “Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 4044
202. Henry Garrett, “Cancer In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4046
10.5281/zenodo.7653233). 4047
203. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperWheel”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4048
10.5281/zenodo.7653204). 4049
204. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperMultipartite”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4050
10.5281/zenodo.7653142). 4051
205. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperBipartite”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4052
10.5281/zenodo.7653117). 4053
206. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperStar”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4054
10.5281/zenodo.7653089). 4055
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
207. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4056
10.5281/zenodo.7651687). 4057
208. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperPath”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4058
10.5281/zenodo.7651619). 4059
209. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDomination”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4060
10.5281/zenodo.7651439). 4061
210. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDominating”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4062
10.5281/zenodo.7650729). 4063
211. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperConnected”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4064
10.5281/zenodo.7647868). 4065
212. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperTotal”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4066
10.5281/zenodo.7647017). 4067
213. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperPerfect”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4068
10.5281/zenodo.7644894). 4069
214. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperJoin”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4070
10.5281/zenodo.7641880). 4071
215. Henry Garrett, “Path SuperHyperColoring”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4072
10.5281/zenodo.7632923). 4073
216. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDensity”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4074
10.5281/zenodo.7623459). 4075
218. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperConnectivities”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 4078
219. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperConnectivities”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4080
10.5281/zenodo.7606404). 4081
220. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4082
10.5281/zenodo.7580018). 4083
221. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4084
10.5281/zenodo.7580018). 4085
222. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4086
10.5281/zenodo.7580018). 4087
223. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4088
10.5281/zenodo.7579929). 4089
224. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4090
10.5281/zenodo.7563170). 4091
225. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4092
10.5281/zenodo.7563164). 4093
226. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4094
10.5281/zenodo.7563160). 4095
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
227. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4096
10.5281/zenodo.7563160). 4097
228. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4098
10.5281/zenodo.7563160). 4099
229. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 4100
230. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperMatching”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4102
10.5281/zenodo.7557009). 4103
231. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperMatching”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 4104
232. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 4106
233. Henry Garrett, “Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 4108
234. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On Failed SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 4110
235. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4112
10.5281/zenodo.7574952). 4113
236. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 4114
237. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4116
10.5281/zenodo.7523357). 4117
238. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4118
10.5281/zenodo.7523357). 4119
239. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 4120
240. Henry Garrett, “Extreme Failed SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 4122
241. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On Failed SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 4124
242. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4126
10.5281/zenodo.7499395). 4127
243. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4128
10.5281/zenodo.7499395). 4129
244. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4130
10.5281/zenodo.7499395). 4131
245. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 4132
246. Henry Garrett, “Extreme Failed SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 4134
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
247. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 4136
248. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4138
10.5281/zenodo.7494862). 4139
249. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 4140
250. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperAlliances”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 4142
251. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperAlliances”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4144
10.5281/zenodo.7493845). 4145
252. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperAlliances”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 4146
253. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperMatching”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4148
10.5281/zenodo.7539484). 4149
254. Henry Garrett, “Failed SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4150
10.5281/zenodo.7523390). 4151
255. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4152
10.5281/zenodo.7523357). 4153
256. Henry Garrett, “Failed SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4154
10.5281/zenodo.7504782). 4155
257. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4156
10.5281/zenodo.7499395). 4157
258. Henry Garrett, “Failed SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4158
10.5281/zenodo.7497450). 4159
259. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4160
10.5281/zenodo.7494862). 4161
260. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperAlliances”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4162
10.5281/zenodo.7493845). 4163
261. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4164
10.5281/zenodo.7480110). 4165
262. Henry Garrett, “Neut. SuperHyperEdges”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4166
10.5281/zenodo.7378758). 4167
263. Henry Garrett, “Beyond Neutrosophic Graphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4168
10.5281/zenodo.6320305). 4169
264. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Duality”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 4170
10.5281/zenodo.6677173). 4171
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA