Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Warns Hyper Landmark of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth in Super Type-Versions of Cancer's Neutrosophic Recognition

Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 23 January 2023 doi:10.20944/preprints202301.0395.
v1
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions, and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and
contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting
from any ideas, methods, instructions, or products referred to in the content.
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Warns Hyper Landmark of 2
neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth In Super Type-Versions of 3
Cancer’s neutrosophic Recognition 4
Henry Garrett 6
DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com 7
Twitter’s ID: @DrHenryGarrett | DrHenryGarrett.wordpress.com

c 8
ABSTRACT 9
In this research, the neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, neutrosophic 10
SuperHyperGirth, is up. E1 and E3 are some empty neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges 11
but E2 is a loop neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge and E4 is an neutrosophic 12
SuperHyperEdge. Thus in the terms of neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only 13
one neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge, namely, E4 . The neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, 14
V3 is neutrosophic isolated means that there’s no neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge has it 15
as an neutrosophic endpoint. Thus the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 , is excluded 16
in every given neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth. 17
C(N SHG) = {Ei } is an neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth. C(N SHG) = 18
jz i is an neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth SuperHyperPolynomial. C(N SHG) = 19
{Vi } is an neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth. C(N SHG) = 20
jz I is an neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth SuperHyperPolynomial. The following 21
neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges[SuperHyperVertices] is 22
the neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth. The 23
neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges[SuperHyperVertices], is 24
the neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth. The 25
neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges[SuperHyperVertices], 26
is an neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth C(ESHG) for an neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 27
ESHG : (V, E) is an neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet with the maximum 28
neutrosophic cardinality of an neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neutrosophic 29
SuperHyperEdges[SuperHyperVertices] such that there’s only one neutrosophic 30
consecutive sequence of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices and the neutrosophic 31
SuperHyperEdges form only one neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle. There are not only 32
four neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices inside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet. 33
Thus the non-obvious neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth isn’t up. The obvious simple 34
neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet called the neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth is an 35
neutrosophic SuperHyperSet includes only less than four neutrosophic 36
SuperHyperVertices. But the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic 37
SuperHyperEdges[SuperHyperVertices], doesn’t have less than four SuperHyperVertices 38
inside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet. Thus the non-obvious simple 39
neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth isn’t up. To 40
sum them up, the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic 41
SuperHyperEdges[SuperHyperVertices], isn’t the non-obvious simple neutrosophic 42
type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth. Since the neutrosophic 43
SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges[SuperHyperVertices], is an 44
1/147
© 2023 by the author(s). Distributed under a Creative Commons CC BY license.

Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 23 January 2023 doi:10.20944/preprints202301.0395.v1
neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth C(ESHG) for an neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 45
ESHG : (V, E) is the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neutrosophic 46
SuperHyperVertices[SuperHyperEdges] such that there’s only one neutrosophic 47
consecutive neutrosophic sequence of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices and neutrosophic 48
SuperHyperEdges form only one neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle given by that 49
neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet called the neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth and it’s an 50
neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth . Since it ’s the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of an 51
neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges[SuperHyperVertices] 52
such that there’s only one neutrosophic consecutive neutrosophic sequence of 53
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices and neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges form only one 54
neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle. There are only less than four neutrosophic 55
SuperHyperVertices inside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, thus the obvious 56
neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth, is up. The obvious simple neutrosophic 57
type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth, is: ,is the neutrosophic 58
SuperHyperSet, is: does includes only less than four SuperHyperVertices in a connected 59
neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). It’s interesting to mention that the 60
only simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet called the neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth 61
amid those obvious[non-obvious] simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSets called the 62
neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth , is only and only. A basic familiarity with neutrosophic 63
SuperHyperGirth theory, SuperHyperGraphs, and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs 64
theory are proposed. 65
Keywords: neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, (neutrosophic) SuperHyperGirth, 66
Cancer’s neutrosophic Recognition 67
AMS Subject Classification: 05C17, 05C22, 05E45 68
1 Background 69
Fuzzy set in Ref. [63] by Zadeh (1965), intuitionistic fuzzy sets in Ref. [50] by 70
Atanassov (1986), a first step to a theory of the intuitionistic fuzzy graphs in Ref. [60] 71
by Shannon and Atanassov (1994), a unifying field in logics neutrosophy: neutrosophic 72
probability, set and logic, rehoboth in Ref. [61] by Smarandache (1998), single-valued 73
neutrosophic sets in Ref. [62] by Wang et al. (2010), single-valued neutrosophic graphs 74
in Ref. [54] by Broumi et al. (2016), operations on single-valued neutrosophic graphs in 75
Ref. [46] by Akram and Shahzadi (2017), neutrosophic soft graphs in Ref. [59] by Shah 76
and Hussain (2016), bounds on the average and minimum attendance in 77
preference-based activity scheduling in Ref. [48] by Aronshtam and Ilani (2022), 78
investigating the recoverable robust single machine scheduling problem under interval 79
uncertainty in Ref. [53] by Bold and Goerigk (2022), polyhedra associated with 80
locating-dominating, open locating-dominating and locating total-dominating sets in 81
graphs in Ref. [47] by G. Argiroffo et al. (2022), a Vizing-type result for semi-total 82
domination in Ref. [49] by J. Asplund et al. (2020), total domination cover rubbling in 83
Ref. [51] by R.A. Beeler et al. (2020), on the global total k-domination number of 84
graphs in Ref. [52] by S. Bermudo et al. (2019), maker–breaker total domination game 85
in Ref. [55] by V. Gledel et al. (2020), a new upper bound on the total domination 86
number in graphs with minimum degree six in Ref. [56] by M.A. Henning, and A. Yeo 87
(2021), effect of predomination and vertex removal on the game total domination 88
number of a graph in Ref. [57] by V. Irsic (2019), hardness results of global total 89
k-domination problem in graphs in Ref. [58] by B.S. Panda, and P. Goyal (2021), are 90
studied. 91
Look at [41–45] for further researches on this topic. See the seminal researches [1–3]. 92
The formalization of the notions on the framework of neutrosophic Failed 93
2/147
SuperHyperClique theory, Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique theory, and 94
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs theory at [4–38]. Two popular research books in 95
Scribd in the terms of high readers, 2638 and 3363 respectively, on neutrosophic science 96
is on [39, 40]. 97
2 General neutrosophic Results 98
For the SuperHyperGirth, neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth, and the neutrosophic 99
SuperHyperGirth, some general results are introduced. 100
Remark 2.1. Let remind that the neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth is “redefined” on the 101
positions of the alphabets. 102
Corollary 2.2. Assume neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth. Then 103
N eutrosophic SuperHyperGirth =
{theSuperHyperGirthof theSuperHyperV ertices |
max |SuperHyperOf f ensiveSuperHyper
Clique|neutrosophiccardinalityamidthoseSuperHyperGirth. }
plus one neutrosophic SuperHypeNeighbor to one. Where σi is the unary operation on 104
the SuperHyperVertices of the SuperHyperGraph to assign the determinacy, the 105
indeterminacy and the neutrality, for i = 1, 2, 3, respectively. 106
Corollary 2.3. Assume a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph on the same identical letter 107
of the alphabet. Then the notion of neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth and SuperHyperGirth 108
coincide. 109
of the alphabet. Then a consecutive sequence of the SuperHyperVertices is a 111
neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth if and only if it’s a SuperHyperGirth. 112
of the alphabet. Then a consecutive sequence of the SuperHyperVertices is a strongest 114
SuperHyperCycle if and only if it’s a longest SuperHyperCycle. 115
Corollary 2.6. Assume SuperHyperClasses of a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph on the 116
same identical letter of the alphabet. Then its neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth is its 117
SuperHyperGirth and reversely. 118
Corollary 2.7. Assume a neutrosophic SuperHyperPath(-/SuperHyperCycle, 119
SuperHyperStar, SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, SuperHyperWheel) on 120
the same identical letter of the alphabet. Then its neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth is its 121
SuperHyperGirth and reversely. 122
Corollary 2.8. Assume a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. Then its neutrosophic 123
SuperHyperGirth isn’t well-defined if and only if its SuperHyperGirth isn’t well-defined. 124
Corollary 2.9. Assume SuperHyperClasses of a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. Then 125
its neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth isn’t well-defined if and only if its SuperHyperGirth 126
isn’t well-defined. 127
SuperHyperStar, SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, SuperHyperWheel). 129
Then its neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth isn’t well-defined if and only if its 130
SuperHyperGirth isn’t well-defined. 131
3/147
Corollary 2.11. Assume a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. Then its neutrosophic 132
SuperHyperGirth is well-defined if and only if its SuperHyperGirth is well-defined. 133
Corollary 2.12. Assume SuperHyperClasses of a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. 134
Then its neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth is well-defined if and only if its SuperHyperGirth 135
is well-defined. 136
SuperHyperStar, SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, SuperHyperWheel). 138
Then its neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth is well-defined if and only if its SuperHyperGirth 139
is well-defined. 140
Proposition 2.14. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. Then V 141
is 142
(i) : the dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperGirth; 143
(ii) : the strong dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperGirth; 144
(iii) : the connected dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperGirth; 145
(iv) : the δ-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperGirth; 146
(v) : the strong δ-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperGirth; 147
(vi) : the connected δ-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperGirth. 148
Proposition 2.15. Let N T G : (V, E, σ, µ) be a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. Then 149
∅ is 150
(i) : the SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperGirth; 151
(ii) : the strong SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperGirth; 152
(iii) : the connected defensive SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperGirth; 153
(iv) : the δ-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperGirth; 154
(v) : the strong δ-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperGirth; 155
(vi) : the connected δ-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperGirth. 156
Proposition 2.16. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. Then an 157
independent SuperHyperSet is 158
(i) : the SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperGirth; 159
(ii) : the strong SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperGirth; 160
(iii) : the connected SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperGirth; 161
(iv) : the δ-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperGirth; 162
(v) : the strong δ-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperGirth; 163
(vi) : the connected δ-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperGirth. 164
Proposition 2.17. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a neutrosophic SuperHyperUniform 165
SuperHyperGraph which is a SuperHyperCycle/SuperHyperPath. Then V is a maximal 166
(i) : SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperGirth; 167
4/147
(ii) : strong SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperGirth; 168
(iii) : connected SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperGirth; 169
(iv) : O(ESHG)-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperGirth; 170
(v) : strong O(ESHG)-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperGirth; 171
(vi) : connected O(ESHG)-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperGirth; 172
Where the exterior SuperHyperVertices and the interior SuperHyperVertices coincide. 173
Proposition 2.18. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph which is a 174
SuperHyperUniform SuperHyperWheel. Then V is a maximal 175
(i) : dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperGirth; 176
(ii) : strong dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperGirth; 177
(iii) : connected dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperGirth; 178
(iv) : O(ESHG)-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperGirth; 179
(v) : strong O(ESHG)-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperGirth; 180
(vi) : connected O(ESHG)-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperGirth; 181
Where the exterior SuperHyperVertices and the interior SuperHyperVertices coincide. 182
SuperHyperGraph which is a SuperHyperCycle/SuperHyperPath. Then the number of 184
(i) : the SuperHyperGirth; 185
(ii) : the SuperHyperGirth; 186
(iii) : the connected SuperHyperGirth; 187
(iv) : the O(ESHG)-SuperHyperGirth; 188
(v) : the strong O(ESHG)-SuperHyperGirth; 189
(vi) : the connected O(ESHG)-SuperHyperGirth. 190
is one and it’s only V. Where the exterior SuperHyperVertices and the interior 191
SuperHyperVertices coincide. 192
SuperHyperGraph which is a SuperHyperWheel. Then the number of 194
(i) : the dual SuperHyperGirth; 195
(ii) : the dual SuperHyperGirth; 196
(iii) : the dual connected SuperHyperGirth; 197
(iv) : the dual O(ESHG)-SuperHyperGirth; 198
(v) : the strong dual O(ESHG)-SuperHyperGirth; 199
(vi) : the connected dual O(ESHG)-SuperHyperGirth. 200
5/147
is one and it’s only V. Where the exterior SuperHyperVertices and the interior 201
SuperHyperGraph which is a SuperHyperStar/SuperHyperComplete 204
SuperHyperBipartite/SuperHyperComplete SuperHyperMultipartite. Then a 205
SuperHyperSet contains [the SuperHyperCenter and] the half of multiplying r with the 206
number of all the SuperHyperEdges plus one of all the SuperHyperVertices is a 207
O(ESHG)
(iv) : 2 + 1-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperGirth; 211
O(ESHG)
(v) : strong 2 + 1-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperGirth; 212
O(ESHG)
(vi) : connected 2 + 1-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperGirth. 213
SuperHyperBipartite/SuperHyperComplete SuperHyperMultipartite. Then a 216
SuperHyperSet contains the half of multiplying r with the number of all the 217
SuperHyperEdges plus one of all the SuperHyperVertices in the biggest SuperHyperPart 218
is a 219
(iv) : δ-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperGirth; 223
(v) : strong δ-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperGirth; 224
(vi) : connected δ-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperGirth. 225
SuperHyperBipartite/SuperHyperComplete SuperHyperMultipartite. Then Then the 228
number of 229
O(ESHG)
(iv) : 2 + 1-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperGirth; 233
O(ESHG)
(v) : strong 2 + 1-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperGirth; 234
O(ESHG)
(vi) : connected 2 + 1-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperGirth. 235
is one and it’s only S, a SuperHyperSet contains [the SuperHyperCenter and] the half of 236
multiplying r with the number of all the SuperHyperEdges plus one of all the 237
SuperHyperVertices. Where the exterior SuperHyperVertices and the interior 238
6/147
Proposition 2.24. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. The 240
number of connected component is |V − S| if there’s a SuperHyperSet which is a dual 241
(iv) : SuperHyperGirth; 245
(v) : strong 1-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperGirth; 246
(vi) : connected 1-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperGirth. 247
Proposition 2.25. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. Then the 248
number is at most O(ESHG) and the neutrosophic number is at most On (ESHG). 249
Proposition 2.26. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph which is 250
SuperHyperComplete. The number is O(ESHG:(V,E)) 2 + 1 and the neutrosophic number is 251
min Σv∈{v1 ,v2 ,··· ,vt } O(ESHG:(V,E)) ⊆V σ(v), in the setting of dual 252
t>
2
(iv) : ( O(ESHG:(V,E))
2 + 1)-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperGirth; 256
(v) : strong ( O(ESHG:(V,E))

(vi) : connected ( O(ESHG:(V,E))

2 + 1)-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperGirth. 258
Proposition 2.27. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph which is ∅. 259
The number is 0 and the neutrosophic number is 0, for an independent SuperHyperSet in 260
the setting of dual 261
(iv) : 0-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperGirth; 265
(v) : strong 0-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperGirth; 266
(vi) : connected 0-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperGirth. 267
SuperHyperComplete. Then there’s no independent SuperHyperSet. 269
SuperHyperCycle/SuperHyperPath/SuperHyperWheel. The number is O(ESHG : (V, E)) 271
and the neutrosophic number is On (ESHG : (V, E)), in the setting of a dual 272
7/147
(iv) : O(ESHG : (V, E))-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperGirth; 276
(v) : strong O(ESHG : (V, E))-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperGirth; 277
(vi) : connected O(ESHG : (V, E))-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperGirth. 278
SuperHyperStar/complete SuperHyperBipartite/complete SuperHyperMultiPartite. The 280
number is O(ESHG:(V,E))
2 + 1 and the neutrosophic number is 281
min Σv∈{v1 ,v2 ,··· ,vt } O(ESHG:(V,E)) ⊆V σ(v), in the setting of a dual 282
t>
2
(iv) : ( O(ESHG:(V,E))
(v) : strong ( O(ESHG:(V,E))

(vi) : connected ( O(ESHG:(V,E))

2 + 1)-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperGirth. 288
Proposition 2.31. Let N SHF : (V, E) be a SuperHyperFamily of the ESHGs : (V, E) 289
neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs which are from one-type SuperHyperClass which the 290
result is obtained for the individuals. Then the results also hold for the 291
SuperHyperFamily N SHF : (V, E) of these specific SuperHyperClasses of the 292
neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs. 293
Proposition 2.32. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a strong neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. If 294
S is a dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperGirth, then ∀v ∈ V \ S, ∃x ∈ S such that 295
(i) v ∈ Ns (x); 296
(ii) vx ∈ E. 297
Proposition 2.33. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a strong neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. If 298
S is a dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperGirth, then 299
(i) S is SuperHyperDominating set; 300
(ii) there’s S ⊆ S 0 such that |S 0 | is SuperHyperChromatic number. 301
Proposition 2.34. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a strong neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. 302
Then 303
(i) Γ ≤ O; 304
(ii) Γs ≤ On . 305
Proposition 2.35. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a strong neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 306
which is connected. Then 307
(i) Γ ≤ O − 1; 308
(ii) Γs ≤ On − Σ3i=1 σi (x). 309
Proposition 2.36. Let ESHG : (V, E) be an odd SuperHyperPath. Then 310
8/147
(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {v2 , v4 , · · · , vn−1 } is a dual SuperHyperDefensive 311
SuperHyperGirth; 312
(ii) Γ = b n2 c + 1 and corresponded SuperHyperSet is S = {v2 , v4 , · · · , vn−1 }; 313
(iii) Γs = min{Σs∈S={v2 ,v4 ,··· ,vn−1 } Σ3i=1 σi (s), Σs∈S={v1 ,v3 ,··· ,vn−1 } Σ3i=1 σi (s)}; 314
(iv) the SuperHyperSets S1 = {v2 , v4 , · · · , vn−1 } and S2 = {v1 , v3 , · · · , vn−1 } are only 315
a dual SuperHyperGirth. 316
Proposition 2.37. Let ESHG : (V, E) be an even SuperHyperPath. Then 317
(i) the set S = {v2 , v4 , · · · .vn } is a dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperGirth; 318
(ii) Γ = b n2 c and corresponded SuperHyperSets are {v2 , v4 , · · · .vn } and 319
{v1 , v3 , · · · .vn−1 }; 320
(iii) Γs = min{Σs∈S={v2 ,v4 ,··· ,vn } Σ3i=1 σi (s), Σs∈S={v1 ,v3 ,··· .vn−1 } Σ3i=1 σi (s)}; 321
(iv) the SuperHyperSets S1 = {v2 , v4 , · · · .vn } and S2 = {v1 , v3 , · · · .vn−1 } are only 322
dual SuperHyperGirth. 323
Proposition 2.38. Let ESHG : (V, E) be an even SuperHyperCycle. Then 324
(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {v2 , v4 , · · · , vn } is a dual SuperHyperDefensive 325
(ii) Γ = b n2 c and corresponded SuperHyperSets are {v2 , v4 , · · · , vn } and 327
{v1 , v3 , · · · , vn−1 }; 328
(iii) Γs = min{Σs∈S={v2 ,v4 ,··· ,vn } σ(s), Σs∈S={v1 ,v3 ,··· ,vn−1 } σ(s)}; 329
(iv) the SuperHyperSets S1 = {v2 , v4 , · · · , vn } and S2 = {v1 , v3 , · · · , vn−1 } are only 330
Proposition 2.39. Let ESHG : (V, E) be an odd SuperHyperCycle. Then 332
(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {v2 , v4 , · · · , vn−1 } is a dual SuperHyperDefensive 333
(ii) Γ = b n2 c + 1 and corresponded SuperHyperSet is S = {v2 , v4 , · · · , vn−1 }; 335
(iii) Γs = min{Σs∈S={v2 ,v4 ,··· .vn−1 } Σ3i=1 σi (s), Σs∈S={v1 ,v3 ,··· .vn−1 } Σ3i=1 σi (s)}; 336
(iv) the SuperHyperSets S1 = {v2 , v4 , · · · .vn−1 } and S2 = {v1 , v3 , · · · .vn−1 } are only 337
Proposition 2.40. Let ESHG : (V, E) be SuperHyperStar. Then 339
(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {c} is a dual maximal SuperHyperGirth; 340
(ii) Γ = 1; 341
(iii) Γs = Σ3i=1 σi (c); 342
(iv) the SuperHyperSets S = {c} and S ⊂ S 0 are only dual SuperHyperGirth. 343
Proposition 2.41. Let ESHG : (V, E) be SuperHyperWheel. Then 344
6+3(i−1)≤n
(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {v1 , v3 } ∪ {v6 , v9 · · · , vi+6 , · · · , vn }i=1 is a dual 345
maximal SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperGirth; 346
9/147
6+3(i−1)≤n
(ii) Γ = |{v1 , v3 } ∪ {v6 , v9 · · · , vi+6 , · · · , vn }i=1 |; 347
(iii) Γs = Σ{v1 ,v3 }∪{v6 ,v9 ··· ,vi+6 ,··· ,vn }6+3(i−1)≤n Σ3i=1 σi (s); 348
i=1
6+3(i−1)≤n
(iv) the SuperHyperSet {v1 , v3 } ∪ {v6 , v9 · · · , vi+6 , · · · , vn }i=1 is only a dual 349
maximal SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperGirth. 350
Proposition 2.42. Let ESHG : (V, E) be an odd SuperHyperComplete. Then 351
bn
2 c+1
(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {vi }i=1 is a dual SuperHyperDefensive 352
(ii) Γ = b n2 c + 1; 354
(iii) Γs = min{Σs∈S Σ3i=1 σi (s)} 2

b n c+1 ; 355
S={vi }i=1
b n c+1
(iv) the SuperHyperSet S = {vi }i=1
2
is only a dual SuperHyperDefensive 356
SuperHyperGirth. 357
Proposition 2.43. Let ESHG : (V, E) be an even SuperHyperComplete. Then 358
bnc
(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {vi }i=1
2
is a dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperGirth; 359
(ii) Γ = b n2 c; 360

bnc ; 361
S={vi }i=1
bnc
(iv) the SuperHyperSet S = {vi }i=1
2
is only a dual maximal SuperHyperDefensive 362
Proposition 2.44. Let N SHF : (V, E) be a m-SuperHyperFamily of neutrosophic 364
SuperHyperStars with common neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex SuperHyperSet. Then 365
(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {c1 , c2 , · · · , cm } is a dual SuperHyperDefensive 366
SuperHyperGirth for N SHF; 367
(ii) Γ = m for N SHF : (V, E); 368
(iii) Γs = Σm 3
i=1 Σj=1 σj (ci ) for N SHF : (V, E); 369
(iv) the SuperHyperSets S = {c1 , c2 , · · · , cm } and S ⊂ S 0 are only dual 370
SuperHyperGirth for N SHF : (V, E). 371
Proposition 2.45. Let N SHF : (V, E) be an m-SuperHyperFamily of odd 372
SuperHyperComplete SuperHyperGraphs with common neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 373
SuperHyperSet. Then 374
bn
2 c+1
(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {vi }i=1 is a dual maximal SuperHyperDefensive 375
SuperHyperGirth for N SHF; 376
(ii) Γ = b n2 c + 1 for N SHF : (V, E); 377

b n c+1 for N SHF : (V, E); 378
S={vi }i=1
b n c+1
(iv) the SuperHyperSets S = {vi }i=1
2
are only a dual maximal SuperHyperGirth for 379
N SHF : (V, E). 380
10/147
Proposition 2.46. Let N SHF : (V, E) be a m-SuperHyperFamily of even 381
SuperHyperComplete SuperHyperGraphs with common neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 382
SuperHyperSet. Then 383
bnc
(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {vi }i=1
2
is a dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperGirth 384
for N SHF : (V, E); 385
(ii) Γ = b n2 c for N SHF : (V, E); 386

bnc for N SHF : (V, E); 387
S={vi }i=1
bnc
(iv) the SuperHyperSets S = {vi }i=1
2
are only dual maximal SuperHyperGirth for 388
N SHF : (V, E). 389
Then following statements hold; 391
(i) if s ≥ t and a SuperHyperSet S of SuperHyperVertices is an 392
t-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperGirth, then S is an s-SuperHyperDefensive 393
(ii) if s ≤ t and a SuperHyperSet S of SuperHyperVertices is a dual 395
t-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperGirth, then S is a dual s-SuperHyperDefensive 396
(i) if s ≥ t + 2 and a SuperHyperSet S of SuperHyperVertices is an 400
t-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperGirth, then S is an s-SuperHyperPowerful 401
(ii) if s ≤ t and a SuperHyperSet S of SuperHyperVertices is a dual 403
t-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperGirth, then S is a dual s-SuperHyperPowerful 404
Proposition 2.49. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a[an] 406
[r-]SuperHyperUniform-strong-neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. Then following 407
statements hold; 408
(i) if ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| < b 2r c + 1, then ESHG : (V, E) is an 409
2-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperGirth; 410
(ii) if ∀a ∈ V \ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| > b 2r c + 1, then ESHG : (V, E) is a dual 411
(iii) if ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ V \ S| = 0, then ESHG : (V, E) is an r-SuperHyperDefensive 413
(iv) if ∀a ∈ V \ S, |Ns (a) ∩ V \ S| = 0, then ESHG : (V, E) is a dual 415
r-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperGirth. 416
Proposition 2.50. Let ESHG : (V, E) is a[an] 417
[r-]SuperHyperUniform-strong-neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. Then following 418
statements hold; 419
(i) ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| < b 2r c + 1 if ESHG : (V, E) is an 2-SuperHyperDefensive 420
11/147
(ii) ∀a ∈ V \ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| > b 2r c + 1 if ESHG : (V, E) is a dual 422
(iii) ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ V \ S| = 0 if ESHG : (V, E) is an r-SuperHyperDefensive 424
(iv) ∀a ∈ V \ S, |Ns (a) ∩ V \ S| = 0 if ESHG : (V, E) is a dual 426
r-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperGirth. 427
[r-]SuperHyperUniform-strong-neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph which is a 429
SuperHyperComplete. Then following statements hold; 430
(i) ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| < b O−1

2 c + 1 if ESHG : (V, E) is an 2-SuperHyperDefensive 431
(ii) ∀a ∈ V \ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| > b O−1

2 c
+ 1 if ESHG : (V, E) is a dual 433
(iii) ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ V \ S| = 0 if ESHG : (V, E) is an (O − 1)-SuperHyperDefensive 435
(O − 1)-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperGirth. 438
[r-]SuperHyperUniform-strong-neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph which is a 440
SuperHyperComplete. Then following statements hold; 441
(i) if ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| < b O−1

2 c + 1, then ESHG : (V, E) is an 442
(ii) if ∀a ∈ V \ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| >b O−1

2 c
+ 1, then ESHG : (V, E) is a dual 444
(iii) if ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ V \ S| = 0, then ESHG : (V, E) is 446
(O − 1)-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperGirth; 447
(O − 1)-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperGirth. 449
[r-]SuperHyperUniform-strong-neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph which is SuperHyperCycle. 451
(i) ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| < 2 if ESHG : (V, E)) is an 2-SuperHyperDefensive 453
(ii) ∀a ∈ V \ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| > 2 if ESHG : (V, E) is a dual 2-SuperHyperDefensive 455
(iii) ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ V \ S| = 0 if ESHG : (V, E) is an 2-SuperHyperDefensive 457
2-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperGirth. 460
[r-]SuperHyperUniform-strong-neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph which is SuperHyperCycle. 462
12/147
(i) if ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| < 2, then ESHG : (V, E) is an 2-SuperHyperDefensive 464
(ii) if ∀a ∈ V \ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| > 2, then ESHG : (V, E) is a dual 466
(iii) if ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ V \ S| = 0, then ESHG : (V, E) is an 2-SuperHyperDefensive 468
2-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperGirth. 471
3 Motivation and Contributions 472
In this research, there are some ideas in the featured frameworks of motivations. I try 473
to bring the motivations in the narrative ways. 474
Question 3.1. How to define the SuperHyperNotions and to do research on them to 475
find the “ amount of SuperHyperGirth” of either individual of cells or the groups of cells 476
based on the fixed cell or the fixed group of cells, extensively, the “amount of 477
SuperHyperGirth” based on the fixed groups of cells or the fixed groups of group of cells? 478
Question 3.2. What are the best descriptions for the “Cancer’s Recognition” in terms 479
of these messy and dense SuperHyperModels where embedded notions are illustrated? 480
It’s motivation to find notions to use in this dense model is titled 481
“SuperHyperGraphs”. Thus it motivates us to define different types of “ 482
SuperHyperGirth” and “neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth” on “SuperHyperGraph” and 483
“neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”. Then the research has taken more motivations to 484
define SuperHyperClasses and to find some connections amid this SuperHyperNotion 485
with other SuperHyperNotions. It motivates us to get some instances and examples to 486
make clarifications about the framework of this research. The general results and some 487
results about some connections are some avenues to make key point of this research, 488
“Cancer’s Recognition”, more understandable and more clear. 489
Definition 3.3. ((neutrosophic) SuperHyperGirth). 490
Assume a SuperHyperGraph. Then 491
(i) an neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth C(N SHG) for an neutrosophic 492
SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of an 493
neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high neutrosophic cardinality of the 494
neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges in the consecutive neutrosophic sequence of 495
neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges and neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that 496
they form the neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle; 497
(ii) a neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth C(N SHG) for a neutrosophic 498
SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of 499
the neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges of a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high 500
neutrosophic cardinality consecutive neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges and 501
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that they form the neutrosophic 502
SuperHyperCycle; 503
(iii) an neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth SuperHyperPolynomial C(N SHG) 504
for an neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the neutrosophic 505
SuperHyperPolynomial contains the neutrosophic coefficients defined as the 506
neutrosophic number of the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of the neutrosophic 507
13/147
SuperHyperEdges of an neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high neutrosophic 508
cardinality consecutive neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges and neutrosophic 509
SuperHyperVertices such that they form the neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle and 510
the neutrosophic power is corresponded to its neutrosophic coefficient; 511
(iv) a neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth SuperHyperPolynomial C(N SHG) for 512
an neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the neutrosophic 513
SuperHyperEdges of a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high neutrosophic 516
(v) an neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth C(N SHG) for an neutrosophic 520
SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of an 521
neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high neutrosophic cardinality of the 522
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices in the consecutive neutrosophic sequence of 523
neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges and neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that 524
they form the neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle; 525
(vi) a neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth C(N SHG) for a neutrosophic 526
SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of 527
the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high 528
neutrosophic cardinality consecutive neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges and 529
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that they form the neutrosophic 530
SuperHyperCycle; 531
(vii) an neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth SuperHyperPolynomial C(N SHG) 532
for an neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the neutrosophic 533
SuperHyperVertices of an neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high neutrosophic 536
(viii) a neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth SuperHyperPolynomial C(N SHG) for 540
an neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the neutrosophic 541
SuperHyperVertices of a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high neutrosophic 544
the neutrosophic power is corresponded to its neutrosophic coefficient. 547
Definition 3.4. ((neutrosophic/neutrosophic)δ−SuperHyperGirth). 548
Assume a SuperHyperGraph. Then 549
(i) an δ−SuperHyperGirth is an neutrosophic kind of neutrosophic 550
SuperHyperGirth such that either of the following expressions hold for the 551
neutrosophic cardinalities of SuperHyperNeighbors of s ∈ S : 552
|S ∩ N (s)| > |S ∩ (V \ N (s))| + δ;

|S ∩ N (s)| < |S ∩ (V \ N (s))| + δ.
14/147
Table 1. The Values of Vertices, SuperVertices, Edges, HyperEdges, and SuperHy-

perEdges Belong to The neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph Mentioned in the Definition
(3.7)
The Values of The Vertices The Number of Position in Alphabet
The Values of The SuperVertices The maximum Values of Its Vertices
The Values of The Edges The maximum Values of Its Vertices
The Values of The HyperEdges The maximum Values of Its Vertices
The Values of The SuperHyperEdges The maximum Values of Its Endpoints

perEdges Belong to The neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, Mentioned in the Definition
(3.6)
The Expression (3.1), holds if S is an δ−SuperHyperOffensive. And the 553
Expression (3.1), holds if S is an δ−SuperHyperDefensive; 554
(ii) an neutrosophic δ−SuperHyperGirth is a neutrosophic kind of neutrosophic 555
SuperHyperGirth such that either of the following neutrosophic expressions hold 556
for the neutrosophic cardinalities of SuperHyperNeighbors of s ∈ S : 557
|S ∩ N (s)|neutrosophic > |S ∩ (V \ N (s))|neutrosophic + δ;

|S ∩ N (s)|neutrosophic < |S ∩ (V \ N (s))|neutrosophic + δ.
The Expression (3.1), holds if S is an neutrosophic δ−SuperHyperOffensive. 558
And the Expression (3.1), holds if S is an neutrosophic 559
δ−SuperHyperDefensive. 560
For the sake of having an neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth, there’s a need to 561
“redefine” the notion of “neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”. The SuperHyperVertices 562
and the SuperHyperEdges are assigned by the labels from the letters of the alphabets. 563
In this procedure, there’s the usage of the position of labels to assign to the values. 564
Definition 3.5. Assume an neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. It’s redefined 565
neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph if the Table (1) holds. 566
It’s useful to define a “neutrosophic” version of SuperHyperClasses. Since there’s 567
more ways to get neutrosophic type-results to make a neutrosophic more 568
understandable. 569
Definition 3.6. Assume an neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. There are some 570
neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses if the Table (2) holds. Thus neutrosophic 571
SuperHyperPath , SuperHyperCycle, SuperHyperStar, SuperHyperBipartite, 572
SuperHyperMultiPartite, and SuperHyperWheel, are neutrosophic 573
SuperHyperPath , neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle, neutrosophic 574
SuperHyperStar, neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite, neutrosophic 575
SuperHyperMultiPartite, and neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel if the Table (2) 576
holds. 577
15/147

perEdges Belong to The neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph Mentioned in the Definition
(3.7)
It’s useful to define a “neutrosophic” version of a neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth. 578
Since there’s more ways to get type-results to make a neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth 579
more neutrosophicly understandable. 580
For the sake of having a neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth, there’s a need to “redefine” 581
the neutrosophic notion of “neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth”. The SuperHyperVertices 582
and the SuperHyperEdges are assigned by the labels from the letters of the alphabets. 583
In this procedure, there’s the usage of the position of labels to assign to the values. 584
Definition 3.7. Assume a SuperHyperGirth. It’s redefined an neutrosophic 585
SuperHyperGirth if the Table (3) holds. 586
4 Results on neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses 587
The previous neutrosophic approaches apply on the upcoming neutrosophic results on 588
neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses. 589
Proposition 4.1. Assume a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperPath ESHP : (V, E). 590
Then an neutrosophic quasi-R-SuperHyperGirth-style with the maximum neutrosophic 591
SuperHyperCardinality is an neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the interior neutrosophic 592
SuperHyperVertices. 593
Proposition 4.2. Assume a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperPath ESHP : (V, E). 594
Then an neutrosophic quasi-R-SuperHyperGirth is an neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the 595
interior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices with only no neutrosophic exceptions in the 596
form of interior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices from the unique neutrosophic 597
SuperHyperEdges not excluding only any interior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices from 598
the neutrosophic unique SuperHyperEdges. an neutrosophic quasi-R-SuperHyperGirth 599
has the neutrosophic number of all the interior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. Also, 600
C(N SHG)neutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth
|EESHG:(V,E) |neutrosophic Cardinality
b c
= {E2i−1 }i=1 2
.
C(N SHG)neutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirthSuperHyperP olynomial
= 2z b 2 c
.
C(N SHG)neutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperGirth = {Vi }si=1 , {Vj }tj=1 .
C(N SHG)neutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperGirthSuperHyperP olynomial = az s + bz t .
Example 4.3. In the Figure (2), the connected neutrosophic SuperHyperPath 601
ESHP : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, in the 602
neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (2), is the SuperHyperGirth. 603
Proposition 4.4. Assume a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle ESHC : (V, E). 604
16/147
Figure 1. an neutrosophic SuperHyperPath Associated to the Notions of neutrosophic

SuperHyperGirth in the Example (4.5)
interior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices with only no neutrosophic exceptions on the 606
form of interior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices from the same neutrosophic 607
SuperHyperNeighborhoods not excluding any neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex. an 608
neutrosophic quasi-R-SuperHyperGirth has the neutrosophic half number of all the 609
neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges in the terms of the maximum neutrosophic cardinality. 610
Also, 611
b c
= {E2i−1 }i=1 2
.
= 2z b 2 c
.
Example 4.5. In the Figure (2), the connected neutrosophic SuperHyperPath 612
ESHP : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, in the 613
neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (2), is the SuperHyperGirth. 614
Proposition 4.6. Assume a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle ESHC : (V, E). 615
interior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices with only no neutrosophic exceptions on the 617
form of interior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices from the same neutrosophic 618
SuperHyperNeighborhoods not excluding any neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex. an 619
neutrosophic quasi-R-SuperHyperGirth has the neutrosophic half number of all the 620
neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges in the terms of the maximum neutrosophic cardinality. 621
17/147
Figure 2. an neutrosophic SuperHyperPath Associated to the Notions of neutrosophic

SuperHyperGirth in the Example (4.5)
Also, 622
b c
= {E2i−1 }i=1 2
.
= 2z b 2 c
.
Example 4.7. In the Figure (3), the connected neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle 623
N SHC : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, 624
in the neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (3), is the neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth. 625
Proposition 4.8. Assume a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). 626
interior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, corresponded to an neutrosophic 628
SuperHyperEdge. an neutrosophic quasi-R-SuperHyperGirth has the neutrosophic 629
number of the neutrosophic cardinality of the one neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. Also, 630
= {E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.
X
= z |E|neutrosophic Cardinality | E:∈EESHG:(V,E) .
C(N SHG)neutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperGirth = {Vi }si=1 , {Vj }tj=1 , . . . .

C(N SHG)neutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperGirthSuperHyperP olynomial = z s + z t +, . . . .
18/147
Figure 3. an neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle Associated to the neutrosophic Notions of

neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth in the neutrosophic Example (4.7)
Example 4.9. In the Figure (5), the connected neutrosophic SuperHyperStar 631
ESHS : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, 632
by the Algorithm in previous neutrosophic result, of the neutrosophic 633
SuperHyperVertices of the connected neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E), in 634
the neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (5), is the neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth. 635
Proposition 4.10. Assume a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite 636
ESHB : (V, E). Then an neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth is an neutrosophic 637
SuperHyperSet of the interior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices with no neutrosophic 638
exceptions in the form of interior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices titled neutrosophic 639
SuperHyperNeighbors. an neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth has the neutrosophic 640
maximum number of on neutrosophic cardinality of the minimum SuperHyperPart minus 641
those have common neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbors and not unique neutrosophic 642
SuperHyperNeighbors. Also, 643
min |PESHG:(V,E) |neutrosophic Cardinality
= {E2i−1 }i=1 .
= z min |PESHG:(V,E) |neutrosophic Cardinality .
C(N SHG)neutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperGirth = {Vi }si=1 .
C(N SHG)neutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperGirthSuperHyperP olynomial = az s .
Example 4.11. In the Figure (5), the connected neutrosophic SuperHyperStar 644
ESHS : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, 645
by the Algorithm in previous neutrosophic result, of the neutrosophic 646
SuperHyperVertices of the connected neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E), in 647
the neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (5), is the neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth. 648
Proposition 4.12. Assume a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite 649
ESHB : (V, E). Then an neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth is an neutrosophic 650
19/147
Figure 4. an neutrosophic SuperHyperStar Associated to the neutrosophic Notions of

Figure 5. an neutrosophic SuperHyperStar Associated to the neutrosophic Notions of

20/147
Figure 6. an neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite neutrosophic Associated to the neutro-

sophic Notions of neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth in the Example (4.13)
SuperHyperSet of the interior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices with no neutrosophic 651
exceptions in the form of interior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices titled neutrosophic 652
SuperHyperNeighbors. an neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth has the neutrosophic 653
maximum number of on neutrosophic cardinality of the minimum SuperHyperPart minus 654
those have common neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbors and not unique neutrosophic 655
SuperHyperNeighbors. Also, 656
= {E2i−1 }i=1 .
Example 4.13. In the neutrosophic Figure (6), the connected neutrosophic 657
SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), is neutrosophic highlighted and neutrosophic 658
featured. The obtained neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the neutrosophic Algorithm in 659
previous neutrosophic result, of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected 660
neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), in the neutrosophic 661
SuperHyperModel (6), is the neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth. 662
Proposition 4.14. Assume a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite 663
ESHM : (V, E). Then an neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth is an neutrosophic 664
SuperHyperSet of the interior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices with only no 665
neutrosophic exception in the neutrosophic form of interior neutrosophic 666
SuperHyperVertices from an neutrosophic SuperHyperPart and only no exception in the 667
form of interior SuperHyperVertices from another SuperHyperPart titled 668
“SuperHyperNeighbors” with neglecting and ignoring more than some of them aren’t 669
SuperHyperNeighbors to all. an neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth has the neutrosophic 670
maximum number on all the neutrosophic summation on the neutrosophic cardinality of 671
21/147
Figure 7. an neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite Associated to the Notions of

neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth in the Example (4.15)
the all neutrosophic SuperHyperParts form some SuperHyperEdges minus those make 672
neutrosophic SuperHypeNeighbors to some not all or not unique. Also, 673
= {E2i−1 }i=1 .
Example 4.15. In the Figure (7), the connected neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite 674
ESHM : (V, E), is highlighted and neutrosophic featured. The obtained neutrosophic 675
SuperHyperSet, by the Algorithm in previous neutrosophic result, of the neutrosophic 676
SuperHyperVertices of the connected neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite 677
ESHM : (V, E), in the neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (7), is the neutrosophic 678
Proposition 4.16. Assume a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel 680
ESHW : (V, E). Then an neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth is an neutrosophic 681
SuperHyperSet of the interior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, excluding the 682
neutrosophic SuperHyperCenter, with only no exception in the form of interior 683
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices from same neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge with the 684
exclusion on neutrosophic SuperHypeNeighbors to some of them and not all. an 685
neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth has the neutrosophic maximum number on all the 686
neutrosophic number of all the neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges don’t have common 687
22/147
Figure 8. an neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel neutrosophic Associated to the neutro-

sophic Notions of neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth in the neutrosophic Example (4.17)
neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbors. Also, 688
b c
= {E2i−1 }i=1 2
.
= 2z b 2 c
.
Example 4.17. In the neutrosophic Figure (8), the connected neutrosophic 689
SuperHyperWheel N SHW : (V, E), is neutrosophic highlighted and featured. The 690
obtained neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Algorithm in previous result, of the 691
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel 692
ESHW : (V, E), in the neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (8), is the neutrosophic 693
5 neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth 695
The neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth, is up. 696
Thus the non-obvious neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth, S is up. The obvious simple 697
neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth, not: S is an 698
neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, not: S does includes only less than four neutrosophic 699
SuperHyperVertices in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). It’s 700
interesting to mention that the only non-obvious simple neutrosophic 701
type-SuperHyperSet called the 702
“neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth” 703
neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth, 705
is only and only S in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E) with 706
a illustrated SuperHyperModeling. But all only non-obvious simple neutrosophic 707
23/147
type-SuperHyperSets of the neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth amid those 708
obvious[non-obvious] simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSets, are S. A connected 709
neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E) as a linearly-over-packed 710
SuperHyperModel is featured on the Figures. 711
Example 5.1. Assume the SuperHyperGraphs in the Figures (9), (10), (11), (12), (13), 712
(14), (15), (16), (17), (18), (19), (20), (21), (22), (23), (24), (25), (26), (27), and (28). 713
• On the Figure (9), the neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, neutrosophic 714
SuperHyperGirth, is up. E1 and E3 are some empty neutrosophic 715
SuperHyperEdges but E2 is a loop neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge and E4 is an 716
neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. Thus in the terms of neutrosophic 717
SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only one neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge, namely, E4 . 718
The neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 is neutrosophic isolated means that 719
there’s no neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge has it as an neutrosophic endpoint. 720
Thus the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 , is excluded in every given 721
neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth. 722
C(N SHG) = {E2 } is an neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth.

C(N SHG) = z is an neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth SuperHyperPolynomial.
C(N SHG) = {V1 } is an neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth.
C(N SHG) = z is an neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth SuperHyperPolynomial.
The following neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic 723
SuperHyperEdges[SuperHyperVertices] is the neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of 724
the neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth. The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of 725
neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges[SuperHyperVertices], 726

Is the neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth. 727
The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic 728
SuperHyperEdges[SuperHyperVertices], 729

Is an neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth C(ESHG) for an neutrosophic 730
SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E) is an neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet with 731
the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of an neutrosophic SuperHyperSet 732
S of neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges[SuperHyperVertices] such that there’s only 733
one neutrosophic consecutive sequence of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 734
and the neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges form only one neutrosophic 735
SuperHyperCycle. There are not only four neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 736
inside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet. Thus the non-obvious 737
neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth isn’t up. The obvious simple neutrosophic 738
type-SuperHyperSet called the neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth is an neutrosophic 739
SuperHyperSet includes only less than four neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. 740
24/147
But the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic 741

Doesn’t have less than four SuperHyperVertices inside the intended neutrosophic 743
SuperHyperSet. Thus the non-obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of 744
the neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth isn’t up. To sum them up, the neutrosophic 745
SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges[SuperHyperVertices], 746

Isn’t the non-obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the 747
neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth. Since the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the 748

SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E) is the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of 751
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices[SuperHyperEdges] such that there’s only one 752
neutrosophic consecutive neutrosophic sequence of neutrosophic 753
SuperHyperVertices and neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges form only one 754
neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle given by that neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet 755
called the neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth and it’s an neutrosophic 756
SuperHyperGirth. Since it’s the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of 757
an neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neutrosophic 758
consecutive neutrosophic sequence of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices and 760
neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges form only one neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle. 761
There are only less than four neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices inside the 762
intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, 763

Thus the obvious neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth, 764

25/147
Is up. The obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic 765
SuperHyperGirth, is: 766

Is the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, is: 767

Does includes only less than four SuperHyperVertices in a connected neutrosophic 768
SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). It’s interesting to mention that the only 769
simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet called the 770
amid those obvious[non-obvious] simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSets called 772
the 773
is only and only 775

• On the Figure (10), the SuperHyperNotion, namely, SuperHyperGirth, is up. 776
E1 , E2 and E3 are some empty SuperHyperEdges but E2 isn’t a loop 777
SuperHyperEdge and E4 is a SuperHyperEdge. Thus in the terms of 778
SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only one SuperHyperEdge, namely, E4 . The 779
SuperHyperVertex, V3 is isolated means that there’s no SuperHyperEdge has it as 780
an endpoint. Thus the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 , is excluded in every 781
given neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth. 782

C(N SHG) = 3z is an neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth SuperHyperPolynomial.

26/147




27/147




the 833

28/147
E1 , E2 and E3 are some empty SuperHyperEdges but E4 is a SuperHyperEdge. 837
Thus in the terms of SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only one SuperHyperEdge, 838
namely, E4 . 839

C(N SHG) = {V1 , V2 , V4 } is an neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth.
C(N SHG) = z 3 is an neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth SuperHyperPolynomial.



29/147





30/147

the 890

• On the Figure (12), the SuperHyperNotion, namely, a SuperHyperGirth, is up. 893
There’s no empty SuperHyperEdge but E3 are a loop SuperHyperEdge on {F }, 894
and there are some SuperHyperEdges, namely, E1 on {H, V1 , V3 }, alongside E2 on 895
{O, H, V4 , V3 } and E4 , E5 on {N, V1 , V2 , V3 , F }. 896
C(N SHG) = {F, E3 , V2 , E4 , F } is an neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth.

C(N SHG) = 4z 2 is an neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth SuperHyperPolynomial.
C(N SHG) = {V2 , F } is an neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth.
C(N SHG) = 4z 2 is an neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth SuperHyperPolynomial.


31/147



32/147




the 947

There’s neither empty SuperHyperEdge nor loop SuperHyperEdge. The following 951
33/147
neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices is the simple 952
neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth. 953
C(N SHG)neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperGirth = {}.

C(N SHG)neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperGirth SuperHyperPolynomial = 0.
C(N SHG)neutrosophic Quasi-R-SuperHyperGirth = {}.
C(N SHG)neutrosophic Quasi-R-SuperHyperGirth SuperHyperPolynomial = 0.



34/147





35/147

the 1004

In a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E) is mentioned as 1007
the SuperHyperModel ESHG : (V, E) in the Figure (13). 1008
There’s neither empty SuperHyperEdge nor loop SuperHyperEdge. 1010
C(N SHG)neutrosophicSuperHyperGirth =
{Vi , Ei , V6 , E17 , V16 }5i=2 ∪ {Vi , Ei+12 , E12 , V1 }15
i=11 .
C(N SHG)neutrosophicSuperHyperGirthSuperHyperP olynomial = 22z 12 .
C(N SHG)neutrosophicR−SuperHyperGirth = {Vi , V6 , V16 }5i=2 ∪ {Vi , V1 }15
i=11 .
C(N SHG)neutrosophicR−SuperHyperGirthSuperHyperP olynomial = 22z 12 .
{Vi , Ei , V6 , E17 , V16 }5i=2 ∪ {Vi , Ei+12 , E12 , V1 }15
i=11 .
i=11 .
36/147
{Vi , Ei , V6 , E17 , V16 }5i=2 ∪ {Vi , Ei+12 , E12 , V1 }15
i=11 .
i=11 .
{Vi , Ei , V6 , E17 , V16 }5i=2 ∪ {Vi , Ei+12 , E12 , V1 }15
i=11 .
i=11 .
the neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth is up. To sum them up, the neutrosophic 1033
{Vi , Ei , V6 , E17 , V16 }5i=2 ∪ {Vi , Ei+12 , E12 , V1 }15
i=11 .
i=11 .
Is the non-obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic 1035
SuperHyperGirth. Since the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic 1036
{Vi , Ei , V6 , E17 , V16 }5i=2 ∪ {Vi , Ei+12 , E12 , V1 }15
i=11 .
i=11 .
37/147
There are not only less than four neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices inside the 1050
{Vi , Ei , V6 , E17 , V16 }5i=2 ∪ {Vi , Ei+12 , E12 , V1 }15
i=11 .
i=11 .
Thus the non-obvious neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth, 1052
{Vi , Ei , V6 , E17 , V16 }5i=2 ∪ {Vi , Ei+12 , E12 , V1 }15
i=11 .
i=11 .
SuperHyperGirth, is not: 1054
{Vi , Ei , V6 , E17 , V16 }5i=2 ∪ {Vi , Ei+12 , E12 , V1 }15
i=11 .
i=11 .
Is the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, is not: 1055
{Vi , Ei , V6 , E17 , V16 }5i=2 ∪ {Vi , Ei+12 , E12 , V1 }15
i=11 .
i=11 .
the 1061
38/147
{Vi , Ei , V6 , E17 , V16 }5i=2 ∪ {Vi , Ei+12 , E12 , V1 }15
i=11 .
i=11 .
• On the Figure (15), the SuperHyperNotion, namely, SuperHyperGirth, is up. The 1064
following neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic 1065
SuperHyperEdges[SuperHyperVertices] is the simple neutrosophic 1066
type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth. The neutrosophic 1067
SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges[SuperHyperVertices], 1068
{V8 , E17 , V14 , E12 , V12 , E15 , V3 , E3 , V4 , E16 , V7 , E7 , V8 }
C(N SHG)neutrosophicR−SuperHyperGirth =
{V8 , V14 , V12 , V3 , V4 , V7 , V8 }
{V8 , E17 , V14 , E12 , V12 , E15 , V3 , E3 , V4 , E16 , V7 , E7 , V8 }
{V8 , V14 , V12 , V3 , V4 , V7 , V8 }
{V8 , E17 , V14 , E12 , V12 , E15 , V3 , E3 , V4 , E16 , V7 , E7 , V8 }
{V8 , V14 , V12 , V3 , V4 , V7 , V8 }
39/147
{V8 , E17 , V14 , E12 , V12 , E15 , V3 , E3 , V4 , E16 , V7 , E7 , V8 }
{V8 , V14 , V12 , V3 , V4 , V7 , V8 }
{V8 , E17 , V14 , E12 , V12 , E15 , V3 , E3 , V4 , E16 , V7 , E7 , V8 }
{V8 , V14 , V12 , V3 , V4 , V7 , V8 }
{V8 , E17 , V14 , E12 , V12 , E15 , V3 , E3 , V4 , E16 , V7 , E7 , V8 }
{V8 , V14 , V12 , V3 , V4 , V7 , V8 }
40/147
{V8 , E17 , V14 , E12 , V12 , E15 , V3 , E3 , V4 , E16 , V7 , E7 , V8 }
{V8 , V14 , V12 , V3 , V4 , V7 , V8 }

{V8 , E17 , V14 , E12 , V12 , E15 , V3 , E3 , V4 , E16 , V7 , E7 , V8 }
{V8 , V14 , V12 , V3 , V4 , V7 , V8 }

{V8 , E17 , V14 , E12 , V12 , E15 , V3 , E3 , V4 , E16 , V7 , E7 , V8 }
{V8 , V14 , V12 , V3 , V4 , V7 , V8 }

{V8 , E17 , V14 , E12 , V12 , E15 , V3 , E3 , V4 , E16 , V7 , E7 , V8 }
{V8 , V14 , V12 , V3 , V4 , V7 , V8 }
41/147
the 1119
{V8 , E17 , V14 , E12 , V12 , E15 , V3 , E3 , V4 , E16 , V7 , E7 , V8 }
{V8 , V14 , V12 , V3 , V4 , V7 , V8 }
neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic 1124
type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth. The following 1126
C(N SHG)neutrosophicSuperHyperGirth = {}
C(N SHG)neutrosophicSuperHyperGirthSuperHyperP olynomial = 0.
C(N SHG)neutrosophicR−SuperHyperGirth = {}
C(N SHG)neutrosophicR−SuperHyperGirthSuperHyperP olynomial = 0.
42/147
43/147




the 1177

In a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E) of dense 1180
SuperHyperModel as the Figure (16). 1181
44/147
neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices is the simple 1184
neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth. 1185
{Vi , Ei , V6 , E17 , V16 , d1 , V1 }5i=2 C(N SHG)neutrosophicSuperHyperGirthSuperHyperP olynom
C(N SHG)neutrosophicR−SuperHyperGirth = {V1 , Vi , V16 , V1 }6i=2 .
45/147
46/147
the 1236
In a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E) of 1239
highly-embedding-connected SuperHyperModel as the Figure (17). 1240
{V14 , E4 , V12 , E6 , V13 , E7 , V14 }
{V14 V12 , V13 , V14 }
47/147
{V14 , E4 , V12 , E6 , V13 , E7 , V14 }
{V14 V12 , V13 , V14 }
{V14 , E4 , V12 , E6 , V13 , E7 , V14 }
{V14 V12 , V13 , V14 }
{V14 , E4 , V12 , E6 , V13 , E7 , V14 }
{V14 V12 , V13 , V14 }
Does has less than four SuperHyperVertices inside the intended neutrosophic 1267
48/147
{V14 , E4 , V12 , E6 , V13 , E7 , V14 }
{V14 V12 , V13 , V14 }
{V14 , E4 , V12 , E6 , V13 , E7 , V14 }
{V14 V12 , V13 , V14 }
{V14 , E4 , V12 , E6 , V13 , E7 , V14 }
{V14 V12 , V13 , V14 }
49/147
{V14 , E4 , V12 , E6 , V13 , E7 , V14 }
{V14 V12 , V13 , V14 }

{V14 , E4 , V12 , E6 , V13 , E7 , V14 }
{V14 V12 , V13 , V14 }

{V14 , E4 , V12 , E6 , V13 , E7 , V14 }
{V14 V12 , V13 , V14 }

the 1297
{V14 , E4 , V12 , E6 , V13 , E7 , V14 }
{V14 V12 , V13 , V14 }
50/147
In a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E) of dense 1300
SuperHyperModel as the Figure (18). 1301
There’s neither empty SuperHyperEdge nor loop SuperHyperEdge. The 1303
{V1 , E6 , V5 , E5 , V6 , E4 , V4 , E7 , V2 , E1 , V1 }
{V1 , V5 , V6 , V4 , V2 , V1 }
{V1 , E6 , V5 , E5 , V6 , E4 , V4 , E7 , V2 , E1 , V1 }
{V1 , V5 , V6 , V4 , V2 , V1 }
{V1 , E6 , V5 , E5 , V6 , E4 , V4 , E7 , V2 , E1 , V1 }
{V1 , V5 , V6 , V4 , V2 , V1 }
51/147
{V1 , E6 , V5 , E5 , V6 , E4 , V4 , E7 , V2 , E1 , V1 }
{V1 , V5 , V6 , V4 , V2 , V1 }
{V1 , E6 , V5 , E5 , V6 , E4 , V4 , E7 , V2 , E1 , V1 }
{V1 , V5 , V6 , V4 , V2 , V1 }
{V1 , E6 , V5 , E5 , V6 , E4 , V4 , E7 , V2 , E1 , V1 }
{V1 , V5 , V6 , V4 , V2 , V1 }
52/147
{V1 , E6 , V5 , E5 , V6 , E4 , V4 , E7 , V2 , E1 , V1 }
{V1 , V5 , V6 , V4 , V2 , V1 }
{V1 , E6 , V5 , E5 , V6 , E4 , V4 , E7 , V2 , E1 , V1 }
{V1 , V5 , V6 , V4 , V2 , V1 }
{V1 , E6 , V5 , E5 , V6 , E4 , V4 , E7 , V2 , E1 , V1 }
{V1 , V5 , V6 , V4 , V2 , V1 }
{V1 , E6 , V5 , E5 , V6 , E4 , V4 , E7 , V2 , E1 , V1 }
{V1 , V5 , V6 , V4 , V2 , V1 }
the 1356
53/147
{V1 , E6 , V5 , E5 , V6 , E4 , V4 , E7 , V2 , E1 , V1 }
{V1 , V5 , V6 , V4 , V2 , V1 }
In a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). 1359
type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth. There’s only one 1364
neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges between any given neutrosophic amount of 1365
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. Thus there isn’t any neutrosophic 1366
SuperHyperGirth at all. The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic 1367
54/147
55/147
the 1419
{V1 , E1 , V2 , E10 , V3 , E8 , V6 , E4 , V4 , E2 , V5 , E6 , V1 }.
C(N SHG)neutrosophicSuperHyperGirthSuperHyperP olynomial = z 6 .
C(N SHG)neutrosophicR−SuperHyperGirth = {Vi }6i=1 .
C(N SHG)neutrosophicR−SuperHyperGirthSuperHyperP olynomial = z 6 .
56/147
is the simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic 1429
SuperHyperGirth. The following neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic 1430
{V1 , E1 , V2 , E10 , V3 , E8 , V6 , E4 , V4 , E2 , V5 , E6 , V1 }.
{V1 , E1 , V2 , E10 , V3 , E8 , V6 , E4 , V4 , E2 , V5 , E6 , V1 }.
{V1 , E1 , V2 , E10 , V3 , E8 , V6 , E4 , V4 , E2 , V5 , E6 , V1 }.
{V1 , E1 , V2 , E10 , V3 , E8 , V6 , E4 , V4 , E2 , V5 , E6 , V1 }.
57/147
{V1 , E1 , V2 , E10 , V3 , E8 , V6 , E4 , V4 , E2 , V5 , E6 , V1 }.
{V1 , E1 , V2 , E10 , V3 , E8 , V6 , E4 , V4 , E2 , V5 , E6 , V1 }.
{V1 , E1 , V2 , E10 , V3 , E8 , V6 , E4 , V4 , E2 , V5 , E6 , V1 }.
{V1 , E1 , V2 , E10 , V3 , E8 , V6 , E4 , V4 , E2 , V5 , E6 , V1 }.
58/147
{V1 , E1 , V2 , E10 , V3 , E8 , V6 , E4 , V4 , E2 , V5 , E6 , V1 }.
the 1480
{V1 , E1 , V2 , E10 , V3 , E8 , V6 , E4 , V4 , E2 , V5 , E6 , V1 }.
C(N SHG)neutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {}.

C(N SHG)neutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirthSuperHyperP olynomial = 0.
C(N SHG)neutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperGirth = {}.
C(N SHG)neutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperGirthSuperHyperP olynomial = 0

C(N SHG)neutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperGirthSuperHyperP olynomial = 0.
59/147




60/147




the 1541

61/147
In a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). It’s noted that 1544
this neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E) is an neutrosophic graph 1545
G : (V, E) thus the notions in both settings are coincided. 1546

C(N SHG)neutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperGirthSuperHyperP olynomial = 0



62/147





63/147

the 1604

In a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). It’s noted that 1607
this neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E) is an neutrosophic graph 1608
G : (V, E) thus the notions in both settings are coincided. In a connected 1609
neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E) as Linearly-Connected 1610
SuperHyperModel On the Figure (23). 1611
C(N SHG)neutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V8 , E3 , V9 , E4 , V8 }.

64/147
1618

1619

1620

C(N SHG)neutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirthSuperHyperP olynomial = 28z 2 .
C(N SHG)neutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V8 , V9 , V8 }.
1621

C(N SHG)neutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V15 V17 , V15 }.
C(N SHG)neutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperGirthSuperHyperP olynomial = 14z 3 .
65/147

1627

1628

1629

66/147
1630


1634

1635

67/147
1636

1637


68/147
1651

1652

1653

1654

69/147

1659

1660

1661

70/147
1662


1666

1667

71/147
1668

1669


72/147
1684

1685

1686

1687

73/147

1689

1690

1691

74/147
1692


1695

1696

75/147
1697

1698

the 1704

76/147
1707

1708

1709

1710

77/147

1718

1719

1720

78/147
1721


1727

1728

79/147
1729

1730


1734

80/147
1735

1736

1737

81/147

1751

1752

1753

82/147
1754


1759

1760

83/147
1761

1762


1766

84/147
1767

1768

1769

85/147

1784

1785

1786

86/147
1787


1789

1790

87/147
1791

1792


1795

88/147
1796

1797

1798

the 1804
89/147

1807

1808

1809

90/147
1810


1818

1819

91/147

C(N SHG)neutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirthSuperHyperP olynomial = 322 .
1820


92/147
1826

1827

1828

93/147
1829


1833

1834

94/147
1835

1836

95/147

1850

1851

1852

96/147
1853


1858

1859

97/147
1860

1861


98/147
1865

1866

1867

99/147
1868

erHyperGirth C(ESHG) for an neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E) is 1869
the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neutrosophic 1870
neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges form only one neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle 1873
given by that neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet called the neutrosophic 1874
SuperHyperGirth and it’s an neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth. Since it’s 1875
one neutrosophic consecutive neutrosophic sequence of neutrosophic 1878
SuperHyperVertices inside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, 1881

1882

100/147
1883

1884

1885

101/147

1887

1888

1889

102/147
1890


1893

1894

103/147
1895

1896

the 1902
104/147

1905

1906

1907

105/147
1908




106/147



SuperHyperGirth C(ESHG) for an neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 1944
ESHG : (V, E) is the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neutrosophic 1945
neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges form only one neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle 1948
given by that neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet called the neutrosophic 1949
SuperHyperGirth and it’s an neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth. Since it’s 1950
one neutrosophic consecutive neutrosophic sequence of neutrosophic 1953
SuperHyperVertices inside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, 1956

107/147


the 1965

Proposition 5.2. Assume a connected loopless neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 1970
ESHG : (V, E). Then in the worst case, literally, 1971
C(N SHG)neutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , E3 , V4 , E4 , V1 }.

C(N SHG)neutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirthSuperHyperP olynomial = z 4 .
C(N SHG)neutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V1 , V2 , V3 , V4 , V1 }.
C(N SHG)neutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperGirthSuperHyperP olynomial = z 5 .
Is an neutrosophic type-result-SuperHyperGirth. In other words, the least cardinality, 1972
the lower sharp bound for the cardinality, of an neutrosophic 1973
type-result-SuperHyperGirth is the cardinality of 1974

108/147
Figure 9. The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperGirth in

the Example (5.1)

the Example (5.1)
109/147

the Example (5.1)

the Example (5.1)
110/147

the Example (5.1)

the Example (5.1)
111/147

the Example (5.1)

the Example (5.1)
112/147

the Example (5.1)

the Example (5.1)
113/147

the Example (5.1)

the Example (5.1)
114/147

the Example (5.1)

the Example (5.1)
115/147

the Example (5.1)

the Example (5.1)
116/147

the Example (5.1)

the Example (5.1)
117/147

the Example (5.1)

the Example (5.1)
118/147
Proof. Assume a connected loopless neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). 1975
The SuperHyperSet of the SuperHyperVertices V \ V \ {V1 , V2 , V3 , V4 , V1 } isn’t an 1976
neutrosophic quasi-type-result-SuperHyperGirth since neither neutrosophic amount of 1977
neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges nor neutrosophic amount of neutrosophic 1978
SuperHyperVertices where neutrosophic amount refers to the neutrosophic number of 1979
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices(-/SuperHyperEdges) more than one to form any 1980
neutrosophic kind of neutrosophic consecutive consequence as the neutrosophic icon and 1981
neutrosophic generator of the neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle in the terms of the 1982
neutrosophic longest form. Let us consider the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet 1983

This neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices has the 1984
eligibilities to propose property such that there’s only one neutrosophic consecutive 1985
neutrosophic sequence of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices and neutrosophic 1986
SuperHyperEdges form only one neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle given by that 1987
neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet called the neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth but the 1988
maximum neutrosophic cardinality indicates that these neutrosophic 1989
type-SuperHyperSets couldn’t give us the neutrosophic lower bound in the term of 1990
neutrosophic sharpness. In other words, the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet 1991

Of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices implies at least on-quasi-triangle style is up 1992
but sometimes the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet 1993

Of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices is free-quasi-triangle and it doesn’t make a

contradiction to the supposition on the connected loopless neutrosophic
SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). Thus the minimum case never happens in the
generality of the connected loopless neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs. Thus if we
assume in the worst case, literally,
V \ V \ {V1 , V2 , V3 , V4 , V1 }
Is an neutrosophic quasi-type-result-SuperHyperGirth. In other words, the least

cardinality, the lower sharp bound for the neutrosophic cardinality, of an neutrosophic
neutrosophic quasi-type-result-SuperHyperGirth is the cardinality of
V \ V \ {V1 , V2 , V3 , V4 , V1 }.
Then we’ve lost some connected loopless neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses of the

connected loopless neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs titled free-triangle, on-triangle, and
119/147
their quasi-types but the neutrosophic quasi-type-result-SuperHyperGirth is only up in

this neutrosophic quasi-type-result-SuperHyperGirth. It’s the contradiction to that fact
on the neutrosophic generality. There are some counterexamples to deny this statement.
One of them comes from the setting of the graph titled path and star as the
counterexamples-classes or reversely direction cycle as the examples-classes, are
well-known classes in that setting and they could be considered as the examples-classes
and counterexamples-classes for the tight bound of
V \ V \ {V1 , V2 , V3 , V4 , V1 }.
Let V \ V \ {z, z 0 } in mind. There’s no neutrosophic necessity on the neutrosophic 1994
SuperHyperEdge since we need at least three neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices to form 1995
an neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. It doesn’t withdraw the neutrosophic principles of 1996
the main neutrosophic definition since there’s no neutrosophic condition to be satisfied 1997
but the neutrosophic condition is on the neutrosophic existence of the neutrosophic 1998
SuperHyperEdge instead of acting on the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. In other 1999
words, if there are three neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges, then the neutrosophic 2000
SuperHyperSet has the necessary condition for the intended neutrosophic definition to 2001
be neutrosophicly applied. Thus the V \ V \ {z, z 0 } is withdrawn not by the 2002
neutrosophic conditions of the main neutrosophic definition but by the neutrosophic 2003
necessity of the neutrosophic pre-condition on the neutrosophic usage of the main 2004
neutrosophic definition. 2005
To make sense with the precise neutrosophic words in the terms of “R-’, the 2006
follow-up neutrosophic illustrations are neutrosophicly coming up. 2007
The following neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices is

the simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth.
V \ V \ {aE , bE 0 , cE 00 , cE 000 }E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .
The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices,
Is the simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth.

The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices,
Is an neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth C(ESHG) for an neutrosophic

SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E) is an neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet with
the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of an neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s only one neutrosophic consecutive
neutrosophic sequence of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices and neutrosophic
SuperHyperEdges form only one neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle given by that
neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet called the neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth, instead of
all given by neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth is related to the neutrosophic
SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices,
There are not only four neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices inside the intended
neutrosophic SuperHyperSet. Thus the non-obvious neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth is
up. The obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet called the neutrosophic
SuperHyperGirth is an neutrosophic SuperHyperSet includes only four neutrosophic
120/147
SuperHyperVertices. But the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic

SuperHyperVertices,
Doesn’t have less than four SuperHyperVertices inside the intended neutrosophic
SuperHyperSet since they’ve come from at least so far four neutrosophic
SuperHyperEdges. Thus the non-obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of
the neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth isn’t up. To sum them up, the neutrosophic
SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices,
Isn’t the non-obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic 2008
R-SuperHyperGirth. Since the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic 2009

SuperHyperGirth C(ESHG) for an neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E) is 2011
the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neutrosophic 2012
neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges form only one neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle given by 2015
that neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet called the neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth and 2016
it’s an neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth. Since it’s 2017
the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of an neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of 2018
neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges[SuperHyperVertices] such that there’s only one 2019
neutrosophic consecutive neutrosophic sequence of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 2020
and neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges form only one neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle. 2021
There are not only less than four neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices inside the intended 2022
neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, 2023



121/147
SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). It’s interesting to mention that the only simple 2028
neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet called the 2029

In a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E) with a illustrated

SuperHyperModeling. It’s also, not only an neutrosophic free-triangle embedded
SuperHyperModel and an neutrosophic on-triangle embedded SuperHyperModel but
also it’s an neutrosophic girth embedded SuperHyperModel. But all only non-obvious
simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSets of the neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth amid
those obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSets of the neutrosophic
SuperHyperGirth, are
To sum them up, assume a connected loopless neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 2035
ESHG : (V, E). Then in the worst case, literally, 2036

Is an neutrosophic type-result-SuperHyperGirth. In other words, the least cardinality, 2037
the lower sharp bound for the cardinality, of an neutrosophic 2038
type-result-SuperHyperGirth is the cardinality of 2039

2040
Proposition 5.3. Assume a simple neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E).

Then the neutrosophic number of type-result-R-SuperHyperGirth has, the least
neutrosophic cardinality, the lower sharp neutrosophic bound for neutrosophic
cardinality, is the neutrosophic cardinality of
If there’s an neutrosophic type-result-R-SuperHyperGirth with the least neutrosophic 2041
cardinality, the lower sharp neutrosophic bound for cardinality. 2042
122/147
Proof. The neutrosophic structure of the neutrosophic type-result-R-SuperHyperGirth

decorates the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices don’t have received any neutrosophic
connections so as this neutrosophic style implies different versions of neutrosophic
SuperHyperEdges with the maximum neutrosophic cardinality in the terms of
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices are spotlight. The lower neutrosophic bound is to
have the maximum neutrosophic groups of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices have
perfect neutrosophic connections inside each of SuperHyperEdges and the outside of
this neutrosophic SuperHyperSet doesn’t matter but regarding the connectedness of the
used neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph arising from its neutrosophic properties taken from
the fact that it’s simple. If there’s no more than one neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex in
the targeted neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, then there’s no neutrosophic connection.
Furthermore, the neutrosophic existence of one neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex has no
neutrosophic effect to talk about the neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth. Since at least
two neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices involve to make a title in the neutrosophic
background of the neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. The neutrosophic
SuperHyperGraph is obvious if it has no neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge but at least two
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices make the neutrosophic version of neutrosophic
SuperHyperEdge. Thus in the neutrosophic setting of non-obvious neutrosophic
SuperHyperGraph, there are at least one neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. It’s necessary
to mention that the word “Simple” is used as neutrosophic adjective for the initial
neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, induces there’s no neutrosophic appearance of the loop
neutrosophic version of the neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge and this neutrosophic
SuperHyperGraph is said to be loopless. The neutrosophic adjective “loop” on the basic
neutrosophic framework engages one neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex but it never
happens in this neutrosophic setting. With these neutrosophic bases, on an
neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, there’s at least one neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge thus
there’s at least an neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth has the neutrosophic cardinality of
an neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. Thus, an neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth has the
neutrosophic cardinality at least an neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. Assume an
neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V \ V \ {z}. This neutrosophic SuperHyperSet isn’t an
neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth since either the neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph is an
obvious neutrosophic SuperHyperModel thus it never happens since there’s no
neutrosophic usage of this neutrosophic framework and even more there’s no
neutrosophic connection inside or the neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph isn’t obvious and
as its consequences, there’s an neutrosophic contradiction with the term “neutrosophic
R-SuperHyperGirth” since the maximum neutrosophic cardinality never happens for
this neutrosophic style of the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet and beyond that there’s no
neutrosophic connection inside as mentioned in first neutrosophic case in the forms of
drawback for this selected neutrosophic SuperHyperSet. Let
V \V \{aE , bE , cE , . . . , aE 0 , bE 0 , cE 0 , . . .}E,E 0 ={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }}
Comes up. This neutrosophic case implies having the neutrosophic style of
on-quasi-triangle neutrosophic style on the every neutrosophic elements of this
neutrosophic SuperHyperSet. Precisely, the neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth is the
neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that some
neutrosophic amount of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices are on-quasi-triangle
neutrosophic style. The neutrosophic cardinality of the v SuperHypeSet
V \V \{aE , bE , cE , . . . , aE 0 , bE 0 , cE 0 , . . .}E,E 0 ={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }}
Is the maximum in comparison to the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet
V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .
123/147
But the lower neutrosophic bound is up. Thus the minimum neutrosophic cardinality of
the maximum neutrosophic cardinality ends up the neutrosophic discussion. The first
neutrosophic term refers to the neutrosophic setting of the neutrosophic
SuperHyperGraph but this key point is enough since there’s an neutrosophic
SuperHyperClass of an neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph has no on-quasi-triangle
neutrosophic style amid some amount of its neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. This
neutrosophic setting of the neutrosophic SuperHyperModel proposes an neutrosophic
SuperHyperSet has only some amount neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices from one
neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge such that there’s no neutrosophic amount of
neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges more than one involving these some amount of these
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. The neutrosophic cardinality of this neutrosophic
SuperHyperSet is the maximum and the neutrosophic case is occurred in the minimum
neutrosophic situation. To sum them up, the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet
Has the maximum neutrosophic cardinality such that
Contains some neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s

distinct-covers-order-amount neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges for amount of neutrosophic
SuperHyperVertices taken from the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet
It means that the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices
Is an neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth for the neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph as used 2043
neutrosophic background in the neutrosophic terms of worst neutrosophic case and the 2044
common theme of the lower neutrosophic bound occurred in the specific neutrosophic 2045
SuperHyperClasses of the neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs which are neutrosophic 2046
free-quasi-triangle. 2047
To make sense with the precise words in the terms of “R-’, the follow-up illustrations 2048
are coming up. 2049



124/147
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s no an neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge

amid some neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices instead of all given by
neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth is related to the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of
the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices,
There’s not only one neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex inside the intended neutrosophic
SuperHyperSet. Thus the non-obvious neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth is up. The
obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet called the neutrosophic
SuperHyperGirth is an neutrosophic SuperHyperSet includes only one neutrosophic
SuperHyperVertex. But the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic
SuperHyperVertices,
doesn’t have less than two SuperHyperVertices inside the intended neutrosophic
SuperHyperSet since they’ve come from at least so far an SuperHyperEdge. Thus the
non-obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic
R-SuperHyperGirth is up. To sum them up, the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices,
Is the non-obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic

R-SuperHyperGirth. Since the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic
SuperHyperVertices,
(V \ V \ {x, z}) ∪ {xy}
or
(V \ V \ {x, z}) ∪ {zy}
is an neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth C(ESHG) for an neutrosophic
SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E) is the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neutrosophic
SuperHyperVertices such that there’s no an neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge for some
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices instead of all given by that neutrosophic
type-SuperHyperSet called the neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth and it’s an neutrosophic
SuperHyperGirth. Since it’s the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of an
neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s no
an neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge for some amount neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices
instead of all given by that neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet called the neutrosophic
SuperHyperGirth. There isn’t only less than two neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices
inside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet,
Thus the non-obvious neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth,
is up. The non-obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic

SuperHyperGirth, not:
125/147
Is the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, not:
does includes only less than two SuperHyperVertices in a connected neutrosophic 2050
SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E) but it’s impossible in the case, they’ve corresponded 2051
to an SuperHyperEdge. It’s interesting to mention that the only non-obvious simple 2052
“neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth” 2054
neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth, 2056
is only and only

also it’s an neutrosophic stable embedded SuperHyperModel. But all only non-obvious
To sum them up, assume a simple neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E).
Then the neutrosophic number of R-SuperHyperGirth has, the least cardinality, the
lower sharp bound for cardinality, is the neutrosophic cardinality of
If there’s a R-SuperHyperGirth with the least cardinality, the lower sharp bound for 2058
cardinality. 2059
Proposition 5.4. Assume a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E).

If an neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) has z neutrosophic
SuperHyperVertices, then the neutrosophic cardinality of the neutrosophic
R-SuperHyperGirth is at least
V \ (V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . . , zE }).
It’s straightforward that the neutrosophic cardinality of the neutrosophic 2060
R-SuperHyperGirth is at least the maximum neutrosophic number of neutrosophic 2061
SuperHyperVertices of the neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges with the maximum number of 2062
the neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges. In other words, the maximum number of the 2063
neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges contains the maximum neutrosophic number of 2064
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices are renamed to neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth in some 2065
cases but the maximum number of the neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge with the maximum 2066
neutrosophic number of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, has the neutrosophic 2067
SuperHyperVertices are contained in an neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth. 2068
126/147
Proof. Assume an neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) has z neutrosophic

number of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. Then every neutrosophic
SuperHyperVertex has at least no neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge with others in common.
Thus those neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices have the eligibles to be contained in an
neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth. Those neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices are
potentially included in an neutrosophic style-R-SuperHyperGirth. Formally, consider
V \ (V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . . , zE }).
Are the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of an neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge

E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) . Thus
Zi ∼ Zj , i 6= j, i, j = 1, 2, . . . , z.
where the ∼ isn’t an equivalence relation but only the symmetric relation on the
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. The formal
definition is as follows.
Zi ∼ Zj , i 6= j, i, j = 1, 2, . . . , z
if and only if Zi and Zj are the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices and there’s only and
only one neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) between the neutrosophic
SuperHyperVertices Zi and Zj . The other definition for the neutrosophic
SuperHyperEdge E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) in the terms of neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth is
{aE , bE , cE , . . . , zE } .
This definition coincides with the definition of the neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth but
with slightly differences in the maximum neutrosophic cardinality amid those
neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSets of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. Thus the
neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices,
max |{Z1 , Z2 , . . . , Zz | Zi ∼ Zj , i 6= j, i, j = 1, 2, . . . , z}|neutrosophic cardinality ,

z
and
is formalized with mathematical literatures on the neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth.

E
Let Zi ∼ Zj , be defined as Zi and Zj are the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices belong
to the neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) . Thus,
E
E = {Z1 , Z2 , . . . , Zz | Zi ∼ Zj , i 6= j, i, j = 1, 2, . . . , z}.
Or
{aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .
But with the slightly differences, 2069
neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth =
E
{Z1 , Z2 , . . . , Zz | ∀i 6= j, i, j = 1, 2, . . . , z, ∃Ex , Zi ∼x Zj , }.
2070
neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth =
127/147
Thus E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) is an neutrosophic quasi-R-SuperHyperGirth where

E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) is fixed that means Ex = E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) . for all neutrosophic
intended SuperHyperVertices but in an neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth,
Ex = E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) could be different and it’s not unique. To sum them up, in a
connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). If an neutrosophic
SuperHyperEdge E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) has z neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, then the
neutrosophic cardinality of the neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth is at least
V \ (V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . . , zE }).
SuperHyperVertices of the neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges with the maximum number 2073
of the neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges. In other words, the maximum number of the 2074
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices are renamed to neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth in 2076
some cases but the maximum number of the neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge with the 2077
maximum neutrosophic number of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, has the 2078
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices are contained in an neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth. 2079
are coming up. 2081



SuperHyperVertices,
128/147


SuperHyperVertices,
(V \ V \ {x, z}) ∪ {xy}
or
(V \ V \ {x, z}) ∪ {zy}

is only and only

129/147

To sum them up, assume a connected loopless neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph

ESHG : (V, E). Then in the worst case, literally,
is an neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth. In other words, the least cardinality, the lower

sharp bound for the cardinality, of an neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth is the
cardinality of
To sum them up, in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). If

an neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) has z neutrosophic
SuperHyperVertices, then the neutrosophic cardinality of the neutrosophic
R-SuperHyperGirth is at least
V \ (V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . . , zE }).
SuperHyperVertices of the neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges with the maximum number 2092
of the neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges. In other words, the maximum number of the 2093
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices are renamed to neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth in 2095
some cases but the maximum number of the neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge with the 2096
maximum neutrosophic number of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, has the 2097
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices are contained in an neutrosophic 2098
R-SuperHyperGirth. 2099
Proposition 5.5. Assume a connected non-obvious neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 2100
ESHG : (V, E). There’s only one neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) has 2101
only the maximum possibilities of the distinct interior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 2102
inside of any given neutrosophic quasi-R-SuperHyperGirth minus all neutrosophic 2103
SuperHypeNeighbor to some of them but not all of them. In other words, there’s only an 2104
unique neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) has only two distinct 2105
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices in an neutrosophic quasi-R-SuperHyperGirth, minus 2106
all neutrosophic SuperHypeNeighbor to some of them but not all of them. 2107
Proof. The obvious SuperHyperGraph has no neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges. But the 2108
non-obvious neutrosophic SuperHyperModel is up. The quasi-SuperHyperModel 2109
addresses some issues about the neutrosophic optimal SuperHyperObject. It specially 2110
delivers some remarks on the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic 2111
SuperHyperVertices such that there’s distinct amount of neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges 2112
for distinct amount of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices up to all taken from that 2113
neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices but this 2114
neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices is either has the 2115
130/147
maximum neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality or it doesn’t have maximum 2116
neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality. In a non-obvious SuperHyperModel, there’s at 2117
least one neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge containing at least all neutrosophic 2118
SuperHyperVertices. Thus it forms an neutrosophic quasi-R-SuperHyperGirth where the 2119
neutrosophic completion of the neutrosophic incidence is up in that. Thus it’s, literarily, 2120
an neutrosophic embedded R-SuperHyperGirth. The SuperHyperNotions of embedded 2121
SuperHyperSet and quasi-SuperHyperSet coincide. In the original setting, these types of 2122
SuperHyperSets only don’t satisfy on the maximum SuperHyperCardinality. Thus the 2123
embedded setting is elected such that those SuperHyperSets have the maximum 2124
neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality and they’re neutrosophic SuperHyperOptimal. 2125
The less than two distinct types of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices are included in the 2126
minimum neutrosophic style of the embedded neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth. The 2127
interior types of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices are deciders. Since the 2128
neutrosophic number of SuperHyperNeighbors are only affected by the interior 2129
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. The common connections, more precise and more 2130
formal, the perfect unique connections inside the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet for any 2131
distinct types of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices pose the neutrosophic 2132
R-SuperHyperGirth. Thus neutrosophic exterior SuperHyperVertices could be used only 2133
in one neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge and in neutrosophic SuperHyperRelation with the 2134
interior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices in that neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. In the 2135
embedded neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth, there’s the usage of exterior neutrosophic 2136
SuperHyperVertices since they’ve more connections inside more than outside. Thus the 2137
title “exterior” is more relevant than the title “interior”. One neutrosophic 2138
SuperHyperVertex has no connection, inside. Thus, the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of 2139
the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices with one SuperHyperElement has been ignored in 2140
the exploring to lead on the optimal case implying the neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth. 2141
The neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth with the exclusion of the exclusion of all 2142
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices in one neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge and with other 2143
terms, the neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth with the inclusion of all neutrosophic 2144
SuperHyperVertices in one neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge, is an neutrosophic 2145
quasi-R-SuperHyperGirth. To sum them up, in a connected non-obvious neutrosophic 2146
SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). There’s only one neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge 2147
E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) has only the maximum possibilities of the distinct interior 2148
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices inside of any given neutrosophic 2149
quasi-R-SuperHyperGirth minus all neutrosophic SuperHypeNeighbor to some of them 2150
but not all of them. In other words, there’s only an unique neutrosophic 2151
SuperHyperEdge E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) has only two distinct neutrosophic 2152
SuperHyperVertices in an neutrosophic quasi-R-SuperHyperGirth, minus all 2153
neutrosophic SuperHypeNeighbor to some of them but not all of them. 2154
are coming up. 2156


131/147

SuperHyperVertices,

SuperHyperVertices,
(V \ V \ {x, z}) ∪ {xy}
or
(V \ V \ {x, z}) ∪ {zy}


132/147
is only and only



cardinality of
To sum them up, in a connected non-obvious neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 2165
ESHG : (V, E). There’s only one neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) has 2166
only the maximum possibilities of the distinct interior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 2167
inside of any given neutrosophic quasi-R-SuperHyperGirth minus all neutrosophic 2168
SuperHypeNeighbor to some of them but not all of them. In other words, there’s only 2169
an unique neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) has only two distinct 2170
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices in an neutrosophic quasi-R-SuperHyperGirth, minus 2171
all neutrosophic SuperHypeNeighbor to some of them but not all of them. 2172
Proposition 5.6. Assume a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). 2173
The all interior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices belong to any neutrosophic 2174
quasi-R-SuperHyperGirth if for any of them, and any of other corresponded neutrosophic 2175
SuperHyperVertex, some interior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices are mutually 2176
neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbors with no neutrosophic exception at all minus all 2177
neutrosophic SuperHypeNeighbors to any amount of them. 2178
133/147
Proof. The main definition of the neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth has two titles. an 2179
neutrosophic quasi-R-SuperHyperGirth and its corresponded quasi-maximum 2180
neutrosophic R-SuperHyperCardinality are two titles in the terms of quasi-R-styles. For 2181
any neutrosophic number, there’s an neutrosophic quasi-R-SuperHyperGirth with that 2182
quasi-maximum neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality in the terms of the embedded 2183
neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. If there’s an embedded neutrosophic 2184
SuperHyperGraph, then the neutrosophic quasi-SuperHyperNotions lead us to take the 2185
collection of all the neutrosophic quasi-R-SuperHyperGirths for all neutrosophic 2186
numbers less than its neutrosophic corresponded maximum number. The essence of the 2187
neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth ends up but this essence starts up in the terms of the 2188
neutrosophic quasi-R-SuperHyperGirth, again and more in the operations of collecting 2189
all the neutrosophic quasi-R-SuperHyperGirths acted on the all possible used 2190
formations of the neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph to achieve one neutrosophic number. 2191
This neutrosophic number is 2192
considered as the equivalence class for all corresponded quasi-R-SuperHyperGirths. 2193
Let zneutrosophic Number , Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet and Gneutrosophic SuperHyperGirth be an 2194
neutrosophic number, an neutrosophic SuperHyperSet and an neutrosophic 2195
SuperHyperGirth. Then 2196
[zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class = {Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |

Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet = Gneutrosophic SuperHyperGirth ,
|Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality
= zneutrosophic Number }.
As its consequences, the formal definition of the neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth is 2197
re-formalized and redefined as follows. 2198
Gneutrosophic SuperHyperGirth ∈ ∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class =

∪zneutrosophic Number {Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |
= zneutrosophic Number }.
To get more precise perceptions, the follow-up expressions propose another formal 2199
technical definition for the neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth. 2200
Gneutrosophic SuperHyperGirth =
{S ∈ ∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class =
= zneutrosophic Number |
= max zneutrosophic Number }.
[zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class
In more concise and more convenient ways, the modified definition for the neutrosophic 2201
SuperHyperGirth poses the upcoming expressions. 2202
{S ∈ ∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class |
134/147
To translate the statement to this mathematical literature, the formulae will be revised. 2203
= max zneutrosophic Number
[zneutrosophic
Number ]neutrosophic Class

= max |E| | E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.
And then, 2204

To get more visions in the closer look-up, there’s an overall overlook. 2205


2206
{S ∈ ∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class =

2207

2208

Now, the extension of these types of approaches is up. Since the new term, 2209
“neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood”, could be redefined as the collection of the 2210
135/147
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that any amount of its neutrosophic 2211
SuperHyperVertices are incident to an neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. It’s, literarily, 2212
another name for “neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperGirth” but, precisely, it’s the 2213
generalization of “neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperGirth” since “neutrosophic 2214
Quasi-SuperHyperGirth” happens “neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth” in an neutrosophic 2215
SuperHyperGraph as initial framework and background but “neutrosophic 2216
SuperHyperNeighborhood” may not happens “neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth” in an 2217
neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph as initial framework and preliminarily background since 2218
there are some ambiguities about the neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality arise from it. 2219
To get orderly keywords, the terms, “neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood”, 2220
“neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperGirth”, and “neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth” are up. 2221
Thus, let zneutrosophic Number , Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood and 2222
Gneutrosophic SuperHyperGirth be an neutrosophic number, an neutrosophic 2223
SuperHyperNeighborhood and an neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth and the new terms are 2224
up. 2225

∪zneutrosophic Number {Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |
|Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |neutrosophic Cardinality
2226
{Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood ∈ ∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class
|Nneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality
2227
2228
|Nneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality = max zneutrosophic
And with go back to initial structure, 2229


136/147
2230

2231

2232

Thus, in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). The all interior 2233
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices belong to any neutrosophic quasi-R-SuperHyperGirth 2234
if for any of them, and any of other corresponded neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, some 2235
interior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices are mutually neutrosophic 2236
SuperHyperNeighbors with no neutrosophic exception at all minus all neutrosophic 2237
SuperHypeNeighbors to any amount of them. 2238
are coming up. 2240



137/147

SuperHyperVertices,

SuperHyperVertices,
(V \ V \ {x, z}) ∪ {xy}
or
(V \ V \ {x, z}) ∪ {zy}

138/147
is only and only



cardinality of
To sum them up, in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). 2249
The all interior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices belong to any neutrosophic 2250
quasi-R-SuperHyperGirth if for any of them, and any of other corresponded 2251
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, some interior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices are 2252
mutually neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbors with no neutrosophic exception at all 2253
minus all neutrosophic SuperHypeNeighbors to any amount of them. 2254
Any neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth only contains all interior neutrosophic 2256
SuperHyperVertices and all exterior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices from the unique 2257
neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge where there’s any of them has all possible neutrosophic 2258
SuperHyperNeighbors in and there’s all neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhoods in with 2259
no exception minus all neutrosophic SuperHypeNeighbors to some of them not all of 2260
them but everything is possible about neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhoods and 2261
neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbors out. 2262
Proof. Assume a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). Let an 2263
neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge ESHE : E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) has some neutrosophic 2264
SuperHyperVertices r. Consider all neutrosophic numbers of those neutrosophic 2265
139/147
SuperHyperVertices from that neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge excluding excluding more 2266
than r distinct neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, exclude to any given neutrosophic 2267
SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. Consider there’s an 2268
neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth with the least cardinality, the lower sharp 2269
neutrosophic bound for neutrosophic cardinality. Assume a connected neutrosophic 2270
SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the 2271
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices VESHE \ {z} is an neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of 2272
the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s an neutrosophic 2273
SuperHyperEdge to have some neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices uniquely but it isn’t 2274
an neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth. Since it doesn’t have 2275
the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of an neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of 2276
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s an neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge to 2277
have some SuperHyperVertices uniquely. The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the 2278
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices VESHE ∪ {z} is the maximum neutrosophic 2279
cardinality of an neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 2280
but it isn’t an neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth. Since it doesn’t do the neutrosophic 2281
procedure such that such that there’s an neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge to have some 2282
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices uniquely [there are at least one neutrosophic 2283
SuperHyperVertex outside implying there’s, sometimes in the connected neutrosophic 2284
SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E), an neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, titled its 2285
neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbor, to that neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex in the 2286
neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S so as S doesn’t do “the neutrosophic procedure”.]. 2287
There’s only one neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex outside the intended neutrosophic 2288
SuperHyperSet, VESHE ∪ {z}, in the terms of neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood. 2289
Thus the obvious neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth, VESHE is up. The obvious simple 2290
neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth, VESHE , is 2291
an neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, VESHE , includes only all neutrosophic 2292
SuperHyperVertices does forms any kind of neutrosophic pairs are titled 2293
neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbors in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 2294
ESHG : (V, E). Since the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic 2295
SuperHyperVertices VESHE , is the 2296
maximum neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality of an neutrosophic 2297
SuperHyperSet S of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s an 2298
neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge to have some neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices uniquely. 2299
Thus, in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). Any neutrosophic 2300
R-SuperHyperGirth only contains all interior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices and all 2301
exterior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices from the unique neutrosophic 2302
SuperHyperEdge where there’s any of them has all possible neutrosophic 2303
SuperHyperNeighbors in and there’s all neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhoods in with 2304
no exception minus all neutrosophic SuperHypeNeighbors to some of them not all of 2305
them but everything is possible about neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhoods and 2306
neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbors out. 2307
are coming up. 2309

140/147

SuperHyperVertices,

SuperHyperVertices,
(V \ V \ {x, z}) ∪ {xy}
or
(V \ V \ {x, z}) ∪ {zy}
141/147

is only and only



cardinality of
To sum them up, assume a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 2318
ESHG : (V, E). Any neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth only contains all interior 2319
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices and all exterior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 2320
from the unique neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge where there’s any of them has all 2321
possible neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbors in and there’s all neutrosophic 2322
SuperHyperNeighborhoods in with no exception minus all neutrosophic 2323
SuperHypeNeighbors to some of them not all of them but everything is possible about 2324
neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhoods and neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbors 2325
out. 2326
142/147
Remark 5.8. The words “ neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth” and “neutrosophic 2327
SuperHyperDominating” both refer to the maximum neutrosophic type-style. In other 2328
words, they refer to the maximum neutrosophic SuperHyperNumber and the 2329
neutrosophic SuperHyperSet with the maximum neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality. 2330
Consider an neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating. Then an neutrosophic 2332
SuperHyperGirth has the members poses only one neutrosophic representative in an 2333
neutrosophic quasi-SuperHyperDominating. 2334
Proof. Assume a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). Consider 2335
an neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating. By applying the Proposition (5.7), the 2336
neutrosophic results are up. Thus on a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 2337
ESHG : (V, E). Consider an neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating. Then an 2338
neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth has the members poses only one neutrosophic 2339
representative in an neutrosophic quasi-SuperHyperDominating. 2340
References 2341
1. Henry Garrett, “Properties of SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic 2342
SuperHyperGraph”, Neutrosophic Sets and Systems 49 (2022) 531-561 (doi: 2343
10.5281/zenodo.6456413). 2344
(http://fs.unm.edu/NSS/NeutrosophicSuperHyperGraph34.pdf). 2345
(https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nss journal/vol49/iss1/34). 2346
2. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Co-degree and Neutrosophic Degree alongside 2347
Chromatic Numbers in the Setting of Some Classes Related to Neutrosophic 2348
Hypergraphs”, J Curr Trends Comp Sci Res 1(1) (2022) 06-14. 2349
3. Henry Garrett, “Super Hyper Dominating and Super Hyper Resolving on 2350
Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs and Their Directions in Game Theory and 2351
Neutrosophic Super Hyper Classes”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 1(3) 2352
(2022) 242-263. 2353
4. Garrett, Henry. “0039 — Closing Numbers and Super-Closing Numbers as 2354
(Dual)Resolving and (Dual)Coloring alongside (Dual)Dominating in 2355
(Neutrosophic)n-SuperHyperGraph.” CERN European Organization for Nuclear 2356
Research - Zenodo, Nov. 2022. CERN European Organization for Nuclear 2357
Research, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6319942. 2358
https://oa.mg/work/10.5281/zenodo.6319942 2359
5. Garrett, Henry. “0049 — (Failed)1-Zero-Forcing Number in Neutrosophic 2360
Graphs.” CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research - Zenodo, Feb. 2361
2022. CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research, 2362
https://doi.org/10.13140/rg.2.2.35241.26724. 2363
https://oa.mg/work/10.13140/rg.2.2.35241.26724 2364
6. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperClique as the Firm Scheme of 2365
Confrontation under Cancer’s Recognition as the Model in The Setting of 2366
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010308 (doi: 2367
10.20944/preprints202301.0308.v1). 2368
7. Henry Garrett, “Uncertainty On The Act And Effect Of Cancer Alongside The 2369
Foggy Positions Of Cells Toward Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique inside 2370
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Titled Cancer’s Recognition”, Preprints 2023, 2371
2023010282 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0282.v1). 2372
143/147
8. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Version Of Separates Groups Of Cells In 2373
Cancer’s Recognition On Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2374
2023010267 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0267.v1). 2375
9. Henry Garrett, “The Shift Paradigm To Classify Separately The Cells and 2376
Affected Cells Toward The Totality Under Cancer’s Recognition By New 2377
Multiple Definitions On the Sets Polynomials Alongside Numbers In The 2378
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperMatching Theory Based on SuperHyperGraph and 2379
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”, Preprints 2023, 2023010265 (doi: 2380
10.20944/preprints202301.0265.v1). 2381
10. Henry Garrett, “Breaking the Continuity and Uniformity of Cancer In The 2382
Worst Case of Full Connections With Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique In 2383
Cancer’s Recognition Applied in (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2384
2023, 2023010262,(doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0262.v1). 2385
11. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable as the Survivors on the 2386
Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition Based on Uncertainty to All Modes in 2387
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010240 (doi: 2388
10.20944/preprints202301.0240.v1). 2389
12. Henry Garrett, “Extremism of the Attacked Body Under the Cancer’s 2390
Circumstances Where Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) 2391
SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010224, (doi: 2392
10.20944/preprints202301.0224.v1). 2393
13. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in Cancer’s 2394
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2395
2023010105 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 2396
14. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form 2397
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions 2398
In Special ViewPoints”, Preprints 2023, 2023010088 (doi: 2399
10.20944/preprints202301.0088.v1). 2400
15. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in the 2401
SuperHyperFunction To Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs on Cancer’s 2402
Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond ”, Preprints 2023, 2023010044 2403
16. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperStable on Cancer’s Recognition by 2404
Well- SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2405
2023010043 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0043.v1). 2406
17. Henry Garrett, “Basic Notions on (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperForcing And 2407
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling in Cancer’s Recognitions And 2408
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010105 (doi: 2409
10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 2410
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions 2412
In Special ViewPoints”, Preprints 2023, 2023010088 (doi: 2413
10.20944/preprints202301.0088.v1). 2414
19. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions 2415
Featuring (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances”, Preprints 2416
2022, 2022120549 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0549.v1). 2417
144/147
20. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperAlliances With SuperHyperDefensive 2418
and SuperHyperOffensive Type-SuperHyperSet On (Neutrosophic) 2419
SuperHyperGraph With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s 2420
Recognitions And Related (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClasses”, Preprints 2022, 2421
2022120540 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0540.v1). 2422
21. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperGirth on SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic 2423
SuperHyperGraph With SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions”, 2424
Preprints 2022, 2022120500 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0500.v1). 2425
22. Henry Garrett, “Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on 2426
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs and SuperHyperGraphs Alongside Applications 2427
in Cancer’s Treatments”, Preprints 2022, 2022120324 (doi: 2428
10.20944/preprints202212.0324.v1). 2429
23. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDominating and SuperHyperResolving on 2430
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs And Their Directions in Game Theory and 2431
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”, Preprints 2022, 2022110576 (doi: 2432
10.20944/preprints202211.0576.v1). 2433
24. Henry Garrett,“SuperHyperMatching By (R-)Definitions And Polynomials To 2434
Monitor Cancer’s Recognition In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, 2435
ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.35061.65767). 2436
25. Henry Garrett,“The Focus on The Partitions Obtained By Parallel Moves In 2437
The Cancer’s Extreme Recognition With Different Types of Extreme 2438
SuperHyperMatching Set and Polynomial on (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, 2439
ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.18494.15680). 2440
26. Henry Garrett,“Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique Decides the Failures on the 2441
Cancer’s Recognition in the Perfect Connections of Cancer’s Attacks By 2442
SuperHyperModels Named (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2443
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.32530.73922). 2444
27. Henry Garrett,“Indeterminacy On The All Possible Connections of Cells In 2445
Front of Cancer’s Attacks In The Terms of Neutrosophic Failed 2446
SuperHyperClique on Cancer’s Recognition called Neutrosophic 2447
SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.15897.70243). 2448
28. Henry Garrett,“Perfect Directions Toward Idealism in Cancer’s Neutrosophic 2449
Recognition Forwarding Neutrosophic SuperHyperClique on Neutrosophic 2450
29. Henry Garrett,“Demonstrating Complete Connections in Every Embedded 2452
Regions and Sub-Regions in the Terms of Cancer’s Recognition and 2453
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClique”, 2454
ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.23172.19849). 2455
30. Henry Garrett,“Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic Regions titled 2456
neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable in Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition 2457
modeled in the Form of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2023, 2458
(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.17385.36968). 2459
31. Henry Garrett, “Using the Tool As (Neutrosophic) Failed SuperHyperStable To 2460
SuperHyperModel Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) 2461
145/147
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In 2464
Special ViewPoints”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.11447.80803). 2465
33. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperStable on Cancer’s Recognition by 2466
Well-SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2467
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.35774.77123). 2468
34. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in the 2469
SuperHyperFunction To Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs on Cancer’s 2470
Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond ”, ResearchGate 2022, (doi: 2471
10.13140/RG.2.2.36141.77287). 2472
35. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in Cancer’s 2473
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2022, (doi: 2474
10.13140/RG.2.2.29430.88642). 2475
36. Henry Garrett, “Basic Notions on (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperForcing And 2476
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling in Cancer’s Recognitions And 2477
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2022, (doi: 2478
10.13140/RG.2.2.11369.16487). 2479
37. Henry Garrett, “Basic Neutrosophic Notions Concerning SuperHyperDominating 2480
and Neutrosophic SuperHyperResolving in SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2481
2022 (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.29173.86244). 2482
38. Henry Garrett, “Initial Material of Neutrosophic Preliminaries to Study Some 2483
Neutrosophic Notions Based on Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) in 2484
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)”, ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 2485
10.13140/RG.2.2.25385.88160). 2486
39. Henry Garrett, (2022). “Beyond Neutrosophic Graphs”, Ohio: E-publishing: 2487
Educational Publisher 1091 West 1st Ave Grandview Heights, Ohio 43212 2488
United States. ISBN: 979-1-59973-725-6 2489
(http://fs.unm.edu/BeyondNeutrosophicGraphs.pdf). 2490
40. Henry Garrett, (2022). “Neutrosophic Duality”, Florida: GLOBAL 2491
KNOWLEDGE - Publishing House 848 Brickell Ave Ste 950 Miami, Florida 2492
33131 United States. ISBN: 978-1-59973-743-0 2493
(http://fs.unm.edu/NeutrosophicDuality.pdf). 2494
41. F. Smarandache, “Extension of HyperGraph to n-SuperHyperGraph and to 2495
Plithogenic n-SuperHyperGraph, and Extension of HyperAlgebra to n-ary 2496
(Classical-/Neutro-/Anti-) HyperAlgebra”, Neutrosophic Sets and Systems 33 2497
(2020) 290-296. (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.3783103). 2498
42. M. Akram et al., “Single-valued neutrosophic Hypergraphs”, TWMS J. App. 2499
Eng. Math. 8 (1) (2018) 122-135. 2500
43. S. Broumi et al., “Single-valued neutrosophic graphs”, Journal of New Theory 10 2501
(2016) 86-101. 2502
44. H. Wang et al., “Single-valued neutrosophic sets”, Multispace and 2503
Multistructure 4 (2010) 410-413. 2504
45. H.T. Nguyen and E.A. Walker, “A First course in fuzzy logic”, CRC Press, 2006. 2505
146/147
46. M. Akram, and G. Shahzadi, “Operations on Single-Valued Neutrosophic 2506
Graphs”, Journal of uncertain systems 11 (1) (2017) 1-26. 2507
47. G. Argiroffo et al., “Polyhedra associated with locating-dominating, open 2508
locating-dominating and locating total-dominating sets in graphs”, Discrete 2509
Applied Mathematics (2022). (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dam.2022.06.025.) 2510
48. L. Aronshtam, and H. Ilani, “Bounds on the average and minimum attendance 2511
in preference-based activity scheduling”, Discrete Applied Mathematics 306 2512
(2022) 114-119. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dam.2021.09.024.) 2513
49. J. Asplund et al., “A Vizing-type result for semi-total domination”, Discrete 2514
Applied Mathematics 258 (2019) 8-12. 2515
(https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dam.2018.11.023.) 2516
50. K. Atanassov, “Intuitionistic fuzzy sets”, Fuzzy Sets Syst. 20 (1986) 87-96. 2517
51. R.A. Beeler et al., “Total domination cover rubbling”, Discrete Applied 2518
Mathematics 283 (2020) 133-141. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dam.2019.12.020.) 2519
52. S. Bermudo et al., “On the global total k-domination number of graphs”, 2520
Discrete Applied Mathematics 263 (2019) 42-50. 2521
53. M. Bold, and M. Goerigk, “Investigating the recoverable robust single machine 2523
scheduling problem under interval uncertainty”, Discrete Applied Mathematics 2524
313 (2022) 99-114. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dam.2022.02.005.) 2525
54. S. Broumi et al., “Single-valued neutrosophic graphs”, Journal of New Theory 10 2526
(2016) 86-101. 2527
55. V. Gledel et al., “Maker–Breaker total domination game”, Discrete Applied 2528
Mathematics 282 (2020) 96-107. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dam.2019.11.004.) 2529
56. M.A. Henning, and A. Yeo, “A new upper bound on the total domination 2530
number in graphs with minimum degree six ”, Discrete Applied Mathematics 302 2531
(2021) 1-7. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dam.2021.05.033.) 2532
57. V. Irsic, “Effect of predomination and vertex removal on the game total 2533
domination number of a graph”, Discrete Applied Mathematics 257 (2019) 2534
216-225. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dam.2018.09.011.) 2535
58. B.S. Panda, and P. Goyal, “Hardness results of global total k-domination 2536
problem in graphs”, Discrete Applied Mathematics (2021). 2537
59. N. Shah, and A. Hussain, “Neutrosophic soft graphs”, Neutrosophic Set and 2539
Systems 11 (2016) 31-44. 2540
60. A. Shannon and K.T. Atanassov, “A first step to a theory of the intuitionistic 2541
fuzzy graphs”, Proceeding of FUBEST (Lakov, D., Ed.) Sofia (1994) 59-61. 2542
61. F. Smarandache, “A Unifying field in logics neutrosophy: Neutrosophic 2543
probability, set and logic, Rehoboth: ” American Research Press (1998). 2544
62. H. Wang et al., “Single-valued neutrosophic sets”, Multispace and 2545
Multistructure 4 (2010) 410-413. 2546
63. L. A. Zadeh, “Fuzzy sets”, Information and Control 8 (1965) 338-354. 2547
147/147

Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Warns Hyper Landmark of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth in Super Type-Versions of Cancer's Neutrosophic Recognition

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Warns Hyper Landmark of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth in Super Type-Versions of Cancer's Neutrosophic Recognition

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 23 January 2023 doi:10.20944/preprints202301.0395.

Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Warns Hyper Landmark of 2

neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth In Super Type-Versions of 3

Cancer’s neutrosophic Recognition 4

Twitter’s ID: @DrHenryGarrett | DrHenryGarrett.wordpress.com

In this research, the neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, neutrosophic 10

SuperHyperGirth, is up. E1 and E3 are some empty neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges 11

but E2 is a loop neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge and E4 is an neutrosophic 12

SuperHyperEdge. Thus in the terms of neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only 13

one neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge, namely, E4 . The neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, 14

V3 is neutrosophic isolated means that there’s no neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge has it 15

as an neutrosophic endpoint. Thus the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 , is excluded 16

in every given neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth. 17

C(N SHG) = {Ei } is an neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth. C(N SHG) = 18

jz i is an neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth SuperHyperPolynomial. C(N SHG) = 19

{Vi } is an neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth. C(N SHG) = 20

jz I is an neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth SuperHyperPolynomial. The following 21

neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges[SuperHyperVertices] is 22

the neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth. The 23

neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges[SuperHyperVertices], is 24

the neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth. The 25

neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges[SuperHyperVertices], 26

is an neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth C(ESHG) for an neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 27

ESHG : (V, E) is an neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet with the maximum 28

neutrosophic cardinality of an neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neutrosophic 29

SuperHyperEdges[SuperHyperVertices] such that there’s only one neutrosophic 30

consecutive sequence of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices and the neutrosophic 31

four neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices inside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet. 33

neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet called the neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth is an 35

neutrosophic SuperHyperSet includes only less than four neutrosophic 36

SuperHyperVertices. But the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic 37

SuperHyperEdges[SuperHyperVertices], doesn’t have less than four SuperHyperVertices 38

inside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet. Thus the non-obvious simple 39

neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth isn’t up. To 40

sum them up, the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic 41

SuperHyperEdges[SuperHyperVertices], isn’t the non-obvious simple neutrosophic 42

type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth. Since the neutrosophic 43

SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges[SuperHyperVertices], is an 44

© 2023 by the author(s). Distributed under a Creative Commons CC BY license.

neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth C(ESHG) for an neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 45

ESHG : (V, E) is the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neutrosophic 46

SuperHyperVertices[SuperHyperEdges] such that there’s only one neutrosophic 47

consecutive neutrosophic sequence of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices and neutrosophic 48

SuperHyperEdges form only one neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle given by that 49

neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet called the neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth and it’s an 50

neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth . Since it ’s the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of an 51

neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges[SuperHyperVertices] 52

such that there’s only one neutrosophic consecutive neutrosophic sequence of 53

neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices and neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges form only one 54

neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle. There are only less than four neutrosophic 55

SuperHyperVertices inside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, thus the obvious 56

neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth, is up. The obvious simple neutrosophic 57

type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth, is: ,is the neutrosophic 58

only simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet called the neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth 61

amid those obvious[non-obvious] simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSets called the 62

neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth , is only and only. A basic familiarity with neutrosophic 63

SuperHyperGirth theory, SuperHyperGraphs, and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs 64

theory are proposed. 65

Keywords: neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, (neutrosophic) SuperHyperGirth, 66

Cancer’s neutrosophic Recognition 67

AMS Subject Classification: 05C17, 05C22, 05E45 68

by Shannon and Atanassov (1994), a unifying field in logics neutrosophy: neutrosophic 72

in Ref. [54] by Broumi et al. (2016), operations on single-valued neutrosophic graphs in 75