You are on page 1of 6

J. Ind. Eng. Chem., Vol. 13, No.

2, (2007) 231-236

Silver-Mediated Electrochemical Oxidation: Production of Silver (II)


in Nitric Acid Medium and in situ Destruction of Phenol in Semi-batch
Process

Manickam Matheswaran, Subramanian Balaji, Sang Joon Chung, and Il Shik Moon

Department of Chemical Engineering, Sunchon National University, Chonnam 540-742, Korea

Received August 14, 2006; Accepted November 30, 2006

Abstract: The mediated electrochemical oxidation was studied with Ag (II) as the mediator ion in nitric acid
medium. The oxidation of Ag (I) was performed in an electrochemical cell under various conditions, including
varying the temperature and the concentrations of nitric acid and mediator ions in a batch-type electrochemical
reactor in recirculation mode. The formation of Ag (II) increased upon increasing the concentration of nitric
acid, but it decreased at higher temperatures. The percentage of conversion decreased upon increaseing the
concentration of Ag (I). The destruction of phenol was performed in batch and continuous organic feeding
modes. A maximum destruction efficiency of 88.8 % (based on CO2) was achieved in the batch process. The
destruction efficiency during the continuous organic feeding increased upon increasing the temperature and in-
itial concentration of Ag (I) up to 0.5 M. The destruction was also tested in the long run for 2 h; the steady
state destruction efficiency was 75 %, based on CO2 production.

Keywords: mediated electrochemical oxidation, silver (I), destruction efficiency, phenol, organic destruction,
carbon dioxide

Introduction In the electrochemical cell,


1) Red ⇔ Ox + ne
The mediated electrochemical oxidation (MEO) process
is an emerging new technology for the destruction of or- In the reactor during the organic destruction,
ganic waste materials. In this process, the hazardous or Ox + S ⇔ P + Red
mixed organic waste streams can be destructed at am-
bient temperatures (less than 100 oC) and atmospheric where ‘Red’ represents the mediator in the reduced state,
pressure. In the MEO process, the mediator oxidant is re- ‘Ox’ represents the mediators in the oxidized state, ‘S’
generated continuously by an electrochemical cell to represents the reactants, and ‘P’ is the product of the re-
minimize the production of secondary wastes [1-3]. Steel action [4].
and coworkers [4] reported that mediated electro- Commonly used mediator redox pairs in MEO proc-
chemical oxidation might provide a new alternative for esses are Ag2+/Ag+, Mn3+/Mn2+, Co3+/Co2+, and Ce4+/
the safe disposal of chemical wastes. Mediated electro- Ce3+. Among these systems, silver is the most powerful
chemical oxidation is a cyclic process involving the elec- oxidizing agent in acid media owing to its high redox po-
trochemical regeneration of mediator ions in the electro- tential (1.98 V). It may react directly with the organic
chemical cell and subsequent destruction of organic ma- material to be destroyed or it may first react with water to
terials by the produced metal ion oxidant. The general re- form hydroxyl radicals that in turn oxidize the organic
actions in the cell and in the reactor for organic destruc- compounds.
tion can be represented as follows: Sulfuric acid, nitric acid, or perchloric acid is generally
employed as the electrolyte for the electrogeneration of
† silver [5-13]. Sulfuric acid possesses low solubility to-
To whom all correspondence should be addressed.
ward metal ions, perchloric acid is explosive, and hydro-
(e-mail: ismoon@sunchon.ac.kr)
232 Manickam Matheswaran, Subramanian Balaji, Sang Joon Chung, and Il Shik Moon

Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the MEO system.

-
chloric acid is unstable due to the oxidation of Cl to Cl2 ervoirs, respectively. The electrolyte solution was con-
[14]. Considering these working difficulties, nitric acid tinuously circulated through the anolyte and catholyte
can be considered as the best choice in terms of its high compartments of the reactor at a constant flow rate. A
solubilizing capacity, stability, and low viscosity. The constant potential was applied between the electrodes
potential of the Ag (II)/Ag (I) couple in a nitric acid me- during the oxidation reaction. In both the anolyte and
dium lies between 1.91 and 1.98 V versus a standard hy- catholyte reservoirs, the temperature was maintained
drogen electrode. Some researchers have studied the ki- constant throughout the reaction using thermostated
netics of the oxidation of Ag (I) in nitric acid media. mantles. During the experiment, Ag (I) was oxidized to
Fleishmann and coworkers [15] reported the oxidation Ag (II) at the anode and nitric acid was reduced into ni-
kinetics of Ag (I) in 3 M nitric acid with a platinum trous acid at the cathode. In the catholyte reservoir, NO
electrode. However, a systematic study of the kinetics of produced during the reduction of nitric acid was reoxi-
Ag (I) oxidation at various nitric acid concentrations and dized with continuous passage of atmospheric oxygen in-
its instantaneous usage towards phenol destruction has to NO2, and dissolved in water to reform nitric acid.
not been reported so far. During the electrochemical oxidation, the concentration
The objectives of the present study were to investigate of Ag (II) in solution was determined rapidly and con-
the generation of Ag (II) in a batch-type electrochemical veniently using a method reported previously [16]. The
reactor in recirculation mode with various operating pa- procedure involved the quantitative oxidation of cerium
rameters, including the temperature and the concen- (III) to cerium (IV) by Ag (II), followed by the photo-
trations of the mediator and nitric acid, under the con- metric determination of the cerium (IV) concentration at
stant potential mode, and to destruct phenol in batch and a fixed nitric acid concentration. The anodic and cathodic
continuous feeding modes under the optimum conditions reactions can be represented as follows [6]:
of Ag (II) production.
At anode:
+ 2+ -
Experimental Section Ag → Ag + e
2+ - +
Figure 1 shows a schematic diagram of the mediated Ag + NO3 → AgNO3
electrochemical oxidation process. The electrochemical
reactor of flow type consisted of two compartments sepa- At cathode:
- + -
rated by a Nafion 324 membrane. The membrane is capa- NO3 + 3H + 2e → HNO2 + H2O
ble of allowing protons to move from the anodic to
cathodic compartment to maintain the current flow. IrO2- After oxidation, Ag (II) is present as a dark-brown nitrate
+
Coated titanium and titanium mesh-type DSA electrodes, complex, AgNO3 , in the solution.
having an area of 4 cm2 (2 cm × 2 cm × 0.5 cm), were After finding suitable and optimal operating conditions
used as the anode and cathode, respectively. A 50-mL for silver oxidation, the destruction of phenol was
solution of Ag (I) in nitric acid (0.5 M in 8 M) and nitric investigated. The destruction was studied either in batch
acid (12 M) were placed in the anolyte and catholyte res- or in continuous feeding mode. In the case of continuous
Silver-Mediated Electrochemical Oxidation: Production of Silver (II) in Nitric Acid Medium and in situ Destruction of Phenol in Semi-batch Process 233

Figure 2. Effect of temperature on the formation of Ag (II). Figure 3. Effect of nitric acid concentration on Ag (II)
(Experimental conditions: [AgNO3], 0.1 M; [HNO3], 8 M; generation. (Experimental conditions: [AgNO3], 0.1 M; Temp.,
o o
Temp., 25 C; Cell Voltage, 2.5 V; q, 100 mL/min). 25 C; Cell Voltage, 2.5 V; q, 100 mL/min).

organic feeding, phenol was added into the anolyte after peratures. As the temperature increased, the formation of
the concentration of Ag (II) attained its steady state. The Ag (II) decreased due to the increased reactivity of Ag
phenol solution (10,000 ppm) was constantly fed at a rate (II) with water and corresponding decrease in the stabil-
of 0.05 mL/min up to 30 or 120 min using a syringe ity of Ag (II). Upon increasing the temperature, the ni-
pump. The phenol was oxidized into carbon dioxide and trous acid production increased in the anolyte and, as a
water and the mediator ion was reduced. result, the acid concentration decreased in the anolyte.
This reduced nitric acid concentration lowered the stabil-
+
C6H5OH + 28Ag(II) + 11H2O → 6CO2 + 28Ag(I) + 28H ity of the silver (II) complex and, hence, the silver (II)
concentration also decreased. A similar trend was also
The reduced mediator ions were continuously oxidized observed by Sequeira and coworkers [1]. The reduction
in the cell. The CO2 formed during the organic destruc- of Ag (II) by water is represented by
tion reaction was removed by passing a carrier gas
+ +
stream (500 mL/min of N2) into the reservoir. The con- 4AgNO3 + 2H2O → Ag + O2 + 4HNO3
centrations of CO2 and CO produced were measured con-
tinuously (ppm) by using an Infrared CO2 analyzer Effect of Nitric Acid
(Anagas CD 98, Environmental Instruments) and con- The oxidation of Ag (I) was studied under different ni-
o
verted into volume at 25 C. From the accumulated CO2 tric acid concentrations at a fixed concentration of Ag (I)
and CO volumes, the destruction efficiency was cal- (0.1 M) at 25 oC. Figure 3 shows the concentration of Ag
culated. (II) produced with respect to the reaction time at different
nitric acid concentrations. From the figure, we observe
Destruction Efficiency (% of CO2) that the formation of Ag (II) increased upon increasing
= (Expt. volume/Theo. Volume) × 100 the nitric acid concentration, due to the higher stability of
the [Ag(NO3)]+ complex at higher acid concentrations
[17]. The highest conversion, 45 % Ag (II), was obtained
Results and Discussion at 8 M nitric acid. From Figure 3 we also observe that the
concentration of Ag (II) increased initially and attained a
Silver Oxidation steady state near 30 min for a lower acid concentration (6
M); the same effect was observed at ca. 60 min at a high
Effect of Temperature acid concentration (10 M nitric acid).
The effect of temperature on the electrochemical oxida-
tion of Ag (I) was studied in the temperature range 25∼ Effect of Initial Ag (I) Concentration
o
60 C at fixed Ag (I) and nitric acid concentrations. The oxidation of silver was studied under different ini-
Figure 2 shows the concentration of Ag (II) generated tial concentrations of Ag (I) at a fixed concentration of
o
with respect to the reaction time at different tem- nitric acid of 8 M at 25 C. Figure 4 shows the increase
234 Manickam Matheswaran, Subramanian Balaji, Sang Joon Chung, and Il Shik Moon

Figure 4. Effect of initial Ag (I) concentration on the formation Figure 6. Effect of concentration of Ag (I) on the destruction
of Ag (II). (Experimental conditions: [HNO3], 8 M; Temp., 25 efficiency of phenol in the continuous mode (Exper-imental
o o
C; Cell Voltage, 2.5 V; q, 100 mL/min). conditions: Temp., 60 C; [HNO3], 8 M; Cell Voltage, 2.5 V;
feed time, 30 min).

Destruction of Phenol during Continuous Organic


Feeding

Short-term Feeding
Effect of Temperature
The destruction of phenol was undertaken at different
temperatures with fixed concentrations of 0.1 M Ag (I)
and 8 M nitric acid. The Ag (I) was oxidized into Ag (II).
Initially, the Ag (II) concentration increased with in-
creasing time and reached a steady state after 30 min.
The steady state Ag (II) concentration was established
when the rates of Ag (II) generation and loss were
equivalent. At this point, the only loss of Ag (II) was due
to the reduction by water. After the steady state was
reached, the organic solution was continuously fed into
the anolyte for 30 min. The organic fed to the anolyte
Figure 5. Effect of temperature on the destruction efficiency of was completely oxidized into carbon dioxide and water.
phenol in the continuous feeding mode (Experimental con- Also, a minor quantity of carbon monoxide was detected
ditions: [AgNO3], 0.1 M; [HNO3], 8 M; Cell Voltage, 2.5 V; during the destruction reaction. Figure 5 shows the de-
feed time, 30 min). struction efficiency for various temperatures in the con-
tinuous feeding mode. The destruction efficiency was
in the Ag (II) concentration with time at different initial calculated based on the volume of CO2 produced up to
concentrations of Ag (I). The percentage conversion of the end point of organic feeding (30 min). The destruc-
Ag (II) formation decreased upon increasing the concen- tion efficiency increased upon increasing the temperature
tration of Ag (I). At 0.1 M Ag (I), 45 % of Ag (II) was (Figure 5).
obtained at the steady state. In this case, the steady state
concentration of Ag (II) was attained at ca. 30 min for al- Effect of Silver (I) Concentration
most all concentrations of silver (I), except for 1 M Ag The effect of the silver (I) concentration on phenol de-
o
(I). struction was studied at a fixed temperature of 60 C with
a fixed nitric acid concentration of 8 M. After reaching
the steady state concentration of Ag (II), the destruction
of phenol was performed in continuous mode. Figure 6
Silver-Mediated Electrochemical Oxidation: Production of Silver (II) in Nitric Acid Medium and in situ Destruction of Phenol in Semi-batch Process 235

Figure 7. (a) Phenol conversion to CO2 and moles of CO2. (b) Figure 8. Phenol conversion to CO2 plotted against time in
Phenol conversion to CO and moles of CO produced during terms of (a) percentage and concentration and (b) concentration
phenol destruction in continuous feeding mode (Experimental of CO in batch mode of organic addition (Experimental con-
conditions: [AgNO3], 0.1 M; Temp., 60 oC; [HNO3], 8 M, Cell ditions: [AgNO3], 0.1 M; Temp., 60 oC; [HNO3], 8 M; Cell
Voltage, 2.5 V; [Phenol], 10000 ppm). Voltage, 2.5 V; [Phenol], 10000 ppm).

shows the destruction efficiency plotted against the ini- V was applied between the electrodes throughout the ex-
o
tial concentration of Ag (I). The destruction efficiency periment at 60 C. Figure 8a shows the percentage con-
increased upon increasing the concentration of Ag (I). version of CO2 and the amount of CO2 formed during the
However, the increase in the destruction efficiency was reaction time. The destruction efficiency of the process
not significant over 0.5 M Ag (I). An increase in the Ag was observed to be 88 % based on CO2 produced. Figure
(II) concentration beyond 0.5 M did not result in in- 8b shows the concentration of CO formed during the
creased destruction efficiencies. This finding coincides reaction. A maximum destruction of 80 % was obtained
with the results reported by many authors for silver MEO at ca. 30 min and then the extent of further destruction
systems [1,6,8,18], in which 0.5 M Ag (I) has been used slowed down. At 60 min, the CO2 production had almost
for organic destruction to obtain maximum destruction ceased, and the increase in the destruction efficiency af-
efficiency. ter 30 min was observed to be only 8 %. This typical pat-
tern of an initial fast destruction and then slow kinetics is
Long-Term Feeding the inherent nature of MEO systems featuring the for-
Figure 7a shows the percentage conversion of CO2 and mation of slowly degrading intermediates [19,20]. It was
moles of CO2 produced during continuous feeding of reported by Balazs and coworkers [19,20] that in the sil-
phenol for 120 min at a constant flow rate of 0.05 ver MEO process, the coulombic efficiency [21] was ca.
o
mL/min at 60 C. The steady state of CO2 evolution was 80 % to obtain 95 % organic destruction, whereas to ob-
reached after 20 min. The steady state destruction effi- tain 99 % destruction, the coulombic efficiency was ob-
ciency of the process was 80 % based on CO2 formation. served to be only 40 %, indicating the slow destruction
The accumulated concentration of CO2 increased linearly of remaining organics and the greater amount of energy
with respect to the reaction time. During the destruction required to achieve complete destruction.
of phenol, a small amount of CO was also observed.
Figure 7b shows the percentage of CO produced and the
moles of CO produced over time during phenol Conclusions
destruction.
The electrochemical oxidation of Ag (I) was studied
Destruction of Phenol in Batch-Type Organic Feeding with respect to various parameters, including the temper-
In this case, both the phenol and silver solutions [with ature and the concentrations of nitric acid and mediator
fixed concentrations of silver (I) and nitric acid] were in an electrochemical cell. The concentration of Ag (II)
mixed to obtain the desired concentrations of phenol increased upon increasing the concentration of nitric acid
(10,000 ppm) and silver (I) (0.1 M); this solution was and decreased upon increasing the temperature. The con-
then fed into the anolyte tank. A constant potential of 2.5 version ratio also decreased upon increasing the initial
236 Manickam Matheswaran, Subramanian Balaji, Sang Joon Chung, and Il Shik Moon

concentration of Ag (I). The destruction of phenol was Schimider, J. Appl. Electochem., 25, 846 (1995).
studied in batch and continuous feeding modes under the 7. V. Devadoss, M. Noel, K. Jayaraman, and C. Ahmed
optimum oxidation conditons for Ag (II) production by Basha, J. Appl. Electrochem., 33, 319 (2003).
the cell. The destruction efficiency in the batch mode 8. J. C. Farmer, F. T. Wang, R. A. Hawley Fedder, P.
was ca. 88 % (based on CO2 evolution) and in the con- R. Lewis, L. J. Summers, and L. Follies, J.
tinuous mode it was 80 %. Long-term organic feeding Electrochem. Soc., 139, 654 (1992).
experiments showed that the efficiency of the process, 9. J. J. Jow and T. C. Chou, J. Appl. Electrochem., 18,
with large amounts of organic destruction and consistent 298 (1988).
Ag (II) production by the cell. 10. A. T. Kuhn and T. H. Randle, J. Chem. Soc.
Faraday Trans., 1, 403 (1985).
11. T. H. Randle and A. T. Kuhn, Electrochim. Acta.,
Acknowledgments 31, 739 (1986).
12. M. P. Sah, J. Indian Chem. Soc., 72, 173 (1995).
This study was supported by the Ministry of Commerce, 13. T. Vijayabarathi, D. Velayutham, and M. Noel, J.
Industry, and Energy (MOCIE), Republic of Korea, Appl. Electrochem., 31, 976 (2001).
through the project of the Regional Invocation Center 14. Y. Liu, X. Xia, and H. Liu, J. Power Sources, 130,
(RIC). 299 (2004).
15. M. Fleischmann, D. Pletcher, and A. Rafinski, J.
References Appl. Electrochem., 1, 1 (1971).
16. J. B. Kirwin, F. B. Peat, P. J. Proll, and L. H.
1. C. A. C. Sequeira, D. M. F. Santos, and P. S. D. Sutcliffe, J. Phys. Chem., 67, 1617 (1963).
Brito, Appl. Surf. Sci., 252, 6093 (2006). 17. A. A. Noyes, D. De Vault, C. D. Coryell, and T. J.
2. (a) I. S. Kim, S. W. Choi, C. D. Heo, and S. C. Park, Deahl, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 59, 1326 (1937).
J. Korean Ind. Eng. Chem., 13, 33 (2002). (b) C. W. 18. Z. Chiba, B. Schumacher, P. Lewis, and L. Murguia,
Lee, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 12, 967 (2006). WM95 Symposia, Tucson, AZ, March 1 (1995).
3. S. C. Park and I. S. Kim, J. Korean Ind. Eng. Chem., 19. S. Balaji, S. J. Chung, T. Ramesh, and I. S. Moon,
16, 206 (2002). Chem. Eng. J., 126, 51 (2007).
4. D. F. Steele, D. Richardson, J. D. Campbell, D. R. 20. S. J. Chung, S. Balaji, M. Matheswaran, T. Ramesh,
Craig, and J. D. Quinn, Trans. IChemE., 68, 115 and I. S. Moon, Water Sci. Technol., 55, 261 (2007).
(1990). 21. B. Balazs, Z. Chiba, P. Lewis, L. Murguia, and M.
5. R. M. Spotnitz, R. P. Kreh, J. T. Lundquist, and P. J. Adamson, Sixth International Confernece on
Press, J. Appl. Electrochem., 20, 209 (1990). Radioactive Waste Management & Environmental
6. J. Bringmann, K. Ebert, U. Galla, and H. J. Remediation, Singapore, October 12-16 (1997).

You might also like