Professional Documents
Culture Documents
This officially announces the release of the report “GRD Gap Analysis” to GRD Corporation.
This report was written with the intent to improve GRD Corporations project management
processes and through recommendations, resolve the issues of exceeding budgets and late
delivery. This report was authorized by GRD Corporation and is presented by JAPS for their
perusal.
As Business Analysist who have worked with various corporations throughout the years, we
were able to effectively evaluate the issues being experienced by GRD and provide practical
At this time, we would like to thank GRD Corporation for the opportunity to provide assistance
in improving their organizational output. If there are any further questions or a need for
clarification, please let us know as we would be happy to provide assistance. You can contact us
at (780) 257- 3298 or by email at japs@gmail.com. Thank you in advance for your time and
attention.
Regards,
JAPS Consulting
1
GRD GAP ANALYSIS REPORT
JAPS Consulting
GRD GAP ANALYSIS REPORT
GRD Corporation
JAPS Consulting
Our organization, JAPS Consulting, has been hired by GRD Corporation to identify gaps in their
project management methodology. GRD Corporation employs over one hundred project managers
who work on a wide variety of projects including Construction, Event Planning, Retail Operations,
and Consulting. However, GRD has noticed some issues with past projects. Namely that twenty-
two percent of projects were behind schedule and twenty-two percent were overbudget. In order
to ascertain the reasons for this, JAPS consulting created a survey that was focused on areas such
as Position Profile, Human Resources, Project Planning, Team Management, and Project
Execution and Planning. Out of the one hundred project managers working at GRD Corporation,
we surveyed thirty-nine and tabulated the results. Through our Key Findings we have identified
the following issues. Not all GRD project managers are certified, and some have even stated that
they are not compensated enough. There is also a lack of project management standards and
communication- not only between GRD and their clients, but also among GRD employees who
are working on the project. We have also identified that there are sometimes no project charters
and no form of planning which includes plans such as budget plans and scheduling. It was also
noted through the survey that some project managers stated that they did not have the right staff
as well as the necessary tools to perform their tasks effectively. Although we have identified all
these issues, they can be consolidated into two categories: a lack of planning and a lack of
communication.
With these issues in mind, JAPS Consulting has prepared a few recommendations in order to
eliminate or reduce the issues and hence alleviate the risks. In terms of planning, we recommend
that GRD Corporation establishes a systematic approach in which all project managers will have
to follow. This means that once projects are given the green light, project managers need to develop
1
and use project charters, responsibility matrix, have a work breakdown structure, and a checklist.
There needs to be a budget plan, change management plan, risk management plan, scope
management plan, quality management plan, procurement plan, scheduling plan, human resources
plan, communication plan, and contingency plan. It also should be mandatory that all project
managers use the same approach and follow the same guidelines and policies and project managers
For communication, we recommend meeting at least once per week with clients and team members
to ensure that the client's needs are being met and any dissatisfaction or changes can be identified
early so that the project is not delayed and that there are no budget overruns. Agendas need to be
created as well as meeting minutes. Meetings with clients can be face to face or through Microsoft
Team, Zoom, Skype or other methods for communication that involve video conferencing. This
meeting should be scheduled at a specific day and time and any project changes and execution to
be discussed and expectations clarified. Where applicable, there needs to be a project manager on
site every day to ensure that the project deliverables are being executed according to plan and
Survey Results 2
Q8: What is your highest level of education? (Please select only one answer) 4
Summary 4
Q1: How often do you receive a performance assessment? Please check only ONE answer. 6
Q6: Do you believe your salary and benefits are in accordance with your workload? 7
Summary 7
Q3: Does your company have any specific Project Management standards to follow? 8
Q4: If you answered yes to Question 3, can you please describe the standards? 9
Q5: What plans did you develop for your current project? 10
Q9: What Project Management tools are used to plan your project? 12
3
Summary 15
Q3: How often does your project team receive progress reports? 18
Q6: If you answered YES to Question 5, how are team members evaluated? 20
Q7: What are the most difficult challenges working with your project team? 21
Summary 21
Q1: What challenges do you face in executing the project? Please select all that apply. 22
Q2: What Project Management tools are used to monitor your project? Please select all that
apply. 24
Q4: If yes, what software are you using? Please select all that apply. 25
Q5: What plans do you use to monitor your project? Please select all that apply. 26
Summary 29
Key Findings 30
Recommendations 35
References 40
4
Introduction
JAPS Consulting specializes in evaluating and teaching project management skills to businesses
and communities. We have been hired by GRD Corporation, who is currently experiencing
issues regarding project results. With twenty-two percent of their projects being late and
overbudget, it is our job at JAPS to find out why this has been happening. To ascertain why GRD
is currently experiencing gaps in their project management methodology, we will provide an in-
GRD employs over one hundred project managers and as such, it was not possible to survey
assess where GRD is currently, and where they want to be in the future. We tabulated the all the
survey results which can be seen in Appendix A. From these results, we were able to generate
our key findings. We chose questions from each section that highlighted some of the issues we
discovered and created graphs to show comparisons. Through a systematic evaluation of our key
findings, we were able to identify some of the root causes of GRD’s issues. We have identified
two main reasons for the problems GRD is currently facing: lack of planning and lack of
oriented, realistic and time oriented. These recommendations are designed to improve GRD’s
project management processes and make GRD more efficient and profitable.
5
Survey Results
According to Jeffrey Pinto, the first stage in project team development is to conduct a realistic
assessment of the types of skills needed to perform their project duties as effectively as possible
(Pinto, 2019, p. 227). Section one discusses the qualifications of project managers at GRD. This
includes their education and certifications, as well as how long they have been working in project
management environments. Out of this section, there were three questions that concerned our
team. Below are the results of these questions as well as why these questions are concerning.
We asked the project managers of GRD if they had a valid Project Management Certificate. In
this, we have discovered that fifty-nine percent of the project managers have not received a
Project Management Certificate. This can cause a divide in the level of knowledge between
project managers. In the pie chart below, you can see that only forty-one percent of the
Yes
41%
59% No
6
Q6: Do you have your PMP?
Respondents were asked if they have their Project Management Professional Certification. Only
twenty-one percent of the project managers from GRD have this certificate. The remaining
seventy-nine percent have not completed their Project Management Professional Certification.
Although this certification may not be required for the job, GRD should be implementing a
program to promote this certification to enhance project management knowledge. The bar graph
below shows these results. This is also located on page twenty-nine of Appendix A.
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Yes No
7
Q8: What is your highest level of education? (Please select only one answer)
Project Managers at GRD were asked to provide their highest level of education. This includes
education unrelated to their position. The majority of the project managers at GRD have their
bachelors (46%), while only three percent of the project manager stated they only had up to
grade ten education. In addition, there were twenty-eight percent that have completed their
masters. GRD should consider hiring project managers with a strong education as it can reduce
the risk of error in project planning. Below is a pie chart visualizing the percentages of each
category.
3% 8%
15%
28%
46%
Summary
After reviewing these questions regarding profile position, we can see that there is an extreme
difference in certifications. The project managers that have not received their Project
Management Certificate as well as their Project Management Professional Certification may not
have the knowledge needed to complete projects efficiently. It is also concerning that the amount
8
of project managers that have not received these certifications is greater than the amount that
have them. This gap can cause a miscommunication of guidelines between certain project
managers. On the other hand, the variety of education levels seems to be a safe amount. Out of
thirty-nine project managers, there is only one that has not completed their high school diploma.
GRD has hired numerous project managers with masters, which is very beneficial regarding
professionalism and knowledge. Section two will discuss project planning in GRD and questions
The availability of human resources is the most common type of project constraint. Without
sufficient human resources, project teams suffer through numerous assignments, long hours, and
insufficient training (Pinto, 2020, Project Management, p. 444). Ensuring that project teams are
satisfied with their workload and are rewarded for their efforts are key for a successful project.
This section discusses concerns regarding human resources in GRD Corporations project
management.
9
Q1: How often do you receive a performance assessment? Please check only ONE
answer.
Project managers were asked how often they receive a performance assessment. Thirty-one
percent claimed they receive a performance assessment once per year, while eighteen percent
stated they never receive a performance assessment. Twenty-three percent also said that they
receive a performance assessment three or more times per year. Seeing as there may be more
than one project per year, GRD project managers that do not receive a performance assessment
may not know they are consistently going over budget and schedule.
31%
28%
23%
18%
Only once per year Only twice per year Three or more times per Never
year
10
Q6: Do you believe your salary and benefits are in accordance with your workload?
Project managers were asked if they believe their salary and benefits are in accordance with their
workload. While sixty-seven percent of project managers said yes, thirty-three percent said no.
Project managers that feel like they are not being rewards for their work can lack motivation to
complete their projects efficiently, ending in them being over budget and schedule.
No
33%
Yes
67%
Yes No
Summary
While there were not many issues regarding GRD Corporations human resources, having
minimal performance assessments can increase the risk of underqualified project managers. In
addition, these project managers that are not being assessed may not know they are causing
issues regarding budgets and schedules. The thirty-three percent of project managers that feel
that their salary and benefits are not in accordance with their workload could be purposely
causing their projects to go over budget and over schedule as an act of spite. Ensuring that all
project managers at GRD feel as if their work is being acknowledged can prevent a lack of
motivation to complete their projects within the given budget and timeframe. Section three will
11
According to the Project Management textbook, project planning identifies what needs to be
done, who needs to do it and the time it needs to be completed. (Pinto, 2020, p. 158). For any
section of the survey, GRD project managers were asked questions as it relates to execution of
the project and what tools were used to monitor the project from start to finish. This section
focuses on the project management standards, the plans that were used to develop the project, the
use of a project charter, the potential constraints associated with the project as well as how
involved the stakeholders are and how GRD communicated with them.
Q3: Does your company have any specific Project Management standards to follow?
The respondents were asked whether there were any specific Project Management standards that
were being followed. A majority of respondents, fifty-six percent, stated that they did not follow
any Project Management standards; forty-four percent stated that they do in face have specific
standards. Project Management standards highlight a set of guidelines that project managers need
44%
56%
Yes No
Q4: If you answered yes to Question 3, can you please describe the standards?
12
The next question that was asked was if GRD project managers followed specific Project
Management Standards, to describe them. Twenty-six percent of respondent stated that they
followed the PMI Standard, while three percent stated that they either followed the standards
based on the government or their client. The other five percent stated that they followed the
standards based on the company. It appears that government standards were only followed when
the government was involved. Following multiple specific standards can cause confusion and
error.
25%
20%
15%
10%
5%
0%
Response Percentage
13
Q5: What plans did you develop for your current project?
Another important question was what plans were developed for their current projects. Seventy-
seven percent stated that they were using a budget plan while thirteen percent stated that they
were using some other sort of planning such as Execution Plan, Stakeholder Management Plan,
or smaller projects. Of note is the sixty-nine percent that stated that they were using a scheduling
plan. All of these plans are important to a successful project and should be implemented.
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Responses
14
Q7: Did you develop a Project Charter for your Project?
Respondents were asked if they developed a Project Charter. While forty-nine percent said yes,
fifty-one percent said no. A Project Charter is a document that “formally sanctions” the projects
and gives the project team authorization to use company resources. Without one, a lack of
80%
60% 51%
49%
40%
20%
0%
Yes No
15
Q9: What Project Management tools are used to plan your project?
The project managers at GRD were also asked what tools they used to plan their projects.
Seventy-seven percent of respondents stated that they used a checklist, while only fifteen percent
of respondents used other tools such as Monday.com, Microsoft Project, Raid Logs, and Cost
Control Sheets. Of note, was the use of a Responsibility Matrix and Gantt Charts by forty-six
percent of respondents. All these tools are key to a successful project. Without them, projects can
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
16
Q11: What are the potential constraints on your project?
Project constraints identify what factors will have a limiting effect on the execution of the
project. Ninety-five percent of respondents stated that the biggest constraint that they
experienced was time, while thirty-one percent stated that other factors such as external and
internal were also a constraint. Surprisingly, only fifty-nine percent stated that the budget was the
largest constraint.
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Responses
17
Q13: How involved are your stakeholders in the planning process?
Another important question is the involvement of stakeholders in the actual planning of the
project. The responses were rated on a scale of one to five, with one being the lowest and five
being the highest. Thirty-eight percent stated that they rated stakeholder involvement as a four,
while five percent claimed they rate involvement as a one. Twenty-six percent rated stakeholder
involvement as a three. Stakeholders are the decision makers of projects; they should be involved
35%
30%
25%
20%
15%
10%
5%
0%
1 2 3 4 5
Scale of 1-5
18
Q14: For your current project, how are you planning to communicate with your
stakeholders?
GRD project managers were asked how they communicated with stakeholders. Ninety-two
percent stated that that they communicated with stakeholders through meetings, while three
percent stated that they used a stakeholder’s portal or letters. The Client Portal is a great idea to
stay in contact compared to letters, as letters would take longer to receive. The second highest
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
Responses
Summary
The Project Planning section evaluated how GRD project managers planned, executed, and
communicated with stakeholders. Based on the survey results, not all project managers at GRD
follow specific Project Management standards. If they do, they are unsure of which standards to
follow. They also use a wide variety of project planning methods for project development,
19
however, not everyone uses a project charter. In addition, the tools used for project planning are
of a wide range and includes Checklists, Gantt Charts, Responsibility Matrix, and others. It was
also discovered that stakeholders are not always involved in the planning process. Next we will
be reviewing Team Management which assesses team selection and how communication
appraisals. According to the Project Management textbook (2020), meeting with your team is
members, developing a sense of unity, and keeping everyone up to date concerning the project
status (Pinto, p. 148-149). To add, evaluation of team performance and techniques of project
management lay the groundwork for successful future projects (p. 537). Teams that do not meet
frequently and do not receive reliable evaluations cannot learn from their mistakes and further
their project management strategies. This section will briefly discuss GRD Corporations team
20
Q2: How often does your project team meet?
Project managers were asked how often they meet with their teams. While fifty-one percent
stated they meet weekly, zero percent claimed they meet quarterly or any other time period. It is
also noted that thirteen percent of project managers at GRD Corporation meet twice a week.
Having frequent meetings with team members can reduce the risk of miscommunication and
confusion throughout the project. The teams that are only meeting monthly may be missing key
information over the past month if they are not carefully taking notes of achievements and
concerns.
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
51%
20%
26%
10%
13% 10%
0% 0% 0%
Daily Weekly Twice a week Monthly Quarterly Other
21
Q3: How often does your project team receive progress reports?
The survey also asked project managers how often their team receives progress reports. Forty-
eight percent of project managers claimed that they receive weekly reports, and twenty-six
percent claimed to have monthly progress reports. On the contrary, three percent stated that they
only meet twice a year. This drastic difference between how often teams receive progress reports
can affect the unity of GRD Corporation as a whole. In addition, only relying on monthly
progress reports can cause information to be forgotten, furthering the risk of projects being over
schedule.
3% 10%
10%
26%
48%
3%
22
Q5: Are team members evaluated at the end of the project?
GRD Project managers were asked if team members were evaluated at the end of the project.
While sixty-four percent stated they do, thirty-six percent stated they do not. Team members that
are not evaluated at the end of the project are not able to discuss what they could improve on.
This could cause team members to continue utilizing poor management strategies in future
projects.
64%
36%
Yes No
23
Q6: If you answered YES to Question 5, how are team members evaluated?
Project managers that were evaluated at the end of their project were also asked how they were
evaluated. Forty percent of project managers claimed that they were evaluated based on their
productivity. Only six percent claimed they are evaluated based on their results. To add, only ten
percent of project managers were evaluated based on their budget goals. GRD Corporations
projects could be going over budget simply because project managers are more concerned about
30%
40%
6%
14% 10%
24
Q7: What are the most difficult challenges working with your project team?
GRD project managers were asked what the most difficult challenge was while working with
their project team. Forty-six percent stated that communication was the most difficult challenge,
while only eight percent stated that the scope and project timeline were the most difficult
challenge. There was also forty-four percent that claimed scheduling conflicts were the most
difficult challenge. Difficulty with communication and scheduling can cause projects to be over
Summary
There are quite a few issues regarding team management. Managers that are only meeting once a
month with their team to discuss the project may be missing information or important deadlines
due to human error. This can push back projects and make them more costly. In addition, not
having enough progress reports throughout a project can lead to poor management habits that can
end in projects being overdue. With that not enough project managers are being evaluated at the
25
end of each project, furthering the chances of poor management habits. The project managers
that are being evaluated may have the wrong priorities in mind. Although it is important to be
productive and efficient, the budget should be a larger factor in the evaluations if GRD wants to
decrease the number of projects that are going over budget. Lastly, most of the project managers
claimed that communication and scheduling conflicts were the most difficult challenges. Lack of
communication and waiting for certain team members to contribute to the project can lead to
projects going over schedule. This can also result in said projects becoming over budget. Overall,
some improvements must be made regarding team management to reduce the risk of projects
going over budget and schedule. Section five will discuss project execution and monitoring
Project execution and monitoring involves the completion of procedures and workload
management that is required to achieve the project goals. This section is about finding suitable
ways of execution during a project and minimizing losses by implementing strategies to reduce
risk and ensure a smooth execution of the project. According to the Project Management textbook,
execution risk is a broad category that seeks to assess any unique circumstances or uncertainties
that could have a negative impact on the execution of a plan. (Pinto, 2020, p.247). We asked project
managers how they executed different tasks and certain challenges that they faced in said process.
In addition, they were asked how they monitored risks and what tools and software they used to
26
Q1: What challenges do you face in executing the project? Please select all that
apply.
Project managers were asked what some of their main challenges were in executing their
projects. Fifty-nine percent found budgets and costs to be more challenging, while only three
percent selected other types of challenges which consisted of conflicting priorities. Only fifteen
27
Q2: What Project Management tools are used to monitor your project? Please select
Management tools have proved to be an effective way of monitoring projects. Project managers
were asked what tools are used to monitor their projects. Seventy-seven percent of managers
preferred using checklists, while thirteen percent had other tools such as Jira, Monday, Pivot
Chart, and Excel. We learned that forty-four percent of managers use a responsibility matrix. It is
important for all managers to know when sections of the project are to be completed, and who is
responsible.
28
Q4: If yes, what software are you using? Please select all that apply.
Respondents were asked what software they use to monitor the project’s budget. Sixty-nine
percent of them used Excel software and only three percent used Primavera. We also figured that
thirty-five percent selected Microsoft Project. Given the complexity of software, it is important
29
Q5: What plans do you use to monitor your project? Please select all that apply.
GRD project managers were asked what plans they use to monitor their projects. Although
seventy-four percent of respondents claimed they use a budget plan, only five percent stated that
they use an execution plan and/or tracking. To add, thirty percent of project managers used
contingency plans. There should be numerous plans in place to reduce the risk of
30
Q8: How often does your client receive progress reports?
We asked respondents how often their clients receive progress reports. Thirty-three percent of
them stated they provide monthly progress reports while only five percent stated they provide
daily progress reports. In addition, just fifteen percent provide weekly reports. Progress reports
are a way for project managers and clients to ensure their project is to be completed on time and
on budget.
31
Q11: How do you monitor risk during your project?
We asked project managers at GRD how they monitor risk during the project. We found that
thirty-nine percent of project managers develop responses and ten percent create audits or
meetings. We also learned that thirty-one percent of managers double check when monitoring.
Project managers should double check throughout the project to reduce risk.
32
Q15: How do you know your projects have been successful? Please explain.
Project managers were asked how they know their projects have been successful. We found that
forty-four percent of GRD project managers know through senior management satisfaction and
eight percent know through project sponsors. We also learned that thirteen percent of them look
at profits. Senior management should be looking at all factors, including efficiency and budget
Summary
This section exposed how GRD project managers behave and communicate with their clients.
Although communication with clients is not directly linked with the execution, if poorly done, it
causes the project to miss the objectives intended by clients. The challenge that most managers
faced was budgeting and cost. Since most changes in the projects involve costs, it is crucial for
GRD project managers to find a way to stabilize their budget to improve the overall execution of
the project. As far as risk monitoring, most managers were on the same page as to what software
33
Key Findings
We have discovered that project managers at GRD do not have enough education to complete
projects efficiently. Based on Section One of Appendix A, only forty-one percent of project
managers have a valid Project Management Certificate. In addition, only twenty-one percent of
project managers have their Project Management Professional Certification. Although these are
not mandatory to become a project manager, it is an asset. GRD needs to have project managers
that are educated in their field to make sure projects are completed efficiently. Project managers
that do not have their certifications may not have the skills needed to stay on budget and on time.
This issue could also stem from their hiring process. It was discovered that three percent of
project managers only have grade ten education and eight percent only have a certificate. GRD
should make education a priority while hiring to ensure that candidates have the knowledge and
emotional intelligence needed to stay within the budget and time frame.
To add, they also stated that they do not feel like they are being compensated for their workload.
It was noted in Section Two of Appendix A that thirty-one percent of project managers feel as if
their salary and benefits are not in accordance with their workload. This can cause project
managers to the lose motivation to complete their projects to the best of their ability.
Another finding was the lack of project management standards. Found in Section Three of
Appendix A, fifty-six percent of project managers stated that they do not follow any specific
standards. Having poorly defined project team roles and interdependencies are just one of the
reasons why teams fail. Inconsistencies regarding standards can not only confuse teams running
projects, but it also enhances the opportunity for failure. Project managers need standards to
follow to ensure the team is unified and knows their roles within the organization. Since most of
34
the project managers have no standards to follow, they do not know what is expected of them,
It is also noted that there is a lack of plans being developed for each project. Section Three of
Appendix A shows that there are minimal plans in place during GRDs projects. Although the fact
that seventy-seven percent use a budget plan is promising, the remaining twenty-three percent
that do not have one in place could be the cause of projects going over budget. In addition, only
forty-four percent of project managers implement a risk management plan, and only forty-six
percent implement a scope management plan. Without these plans, GRD put themselves in
greater financial and execution risk. Lack of scope management through conceptual development
could be the cause of projects going over schedule. It was also shocking to see only forty-four
percent of project managers at GRD use a communication plan. Having a communication plan
not only with clients, but with the team as well is crucial to ensure everyone is on the right track
and knows what to do. With that, there should always be a contingency plan in place when
dealing with clients. Having a plan in case clients decide to change their expectations, or when
someone cannot complete the job accordingly, will reduce the odds of going over schedule.
Although all plans should be in place, it is time consuming to create and implement these plans.
However, not putting in the time to create these plans can be costly in the end.
In addition to project plans, only fifty-one percent of project managers create a project charter.
Project charters provide a shared understanding of the project, its goals, and the stakeholders
involved. Without this, there can be a lack of unity and understanding of what needs to be done
The issues regarding budgets and schedules should be reflected in team members evaluations. As
of right now, only thirteen percent of team members are evaluated by the budget and thirty-eight
35
percent are evaluated on efficiency. Evaluations show team members where they can improve in
future projects. Focusing on if they made the budget and if they worked efficiently enough to be
on time will show team members the importance of these subjects. Not evaluating team members
on these criteria could be a factor in projects being over budget and over schedule.
Section Four of Appendix A also discusses challenges regarding communication and scheduling.
Forty-six percent of project managers claimed that communication was the most difficult
challenge, while forty-four percent claimed that scheduling conflicts was the most difficult. Lack
of communication can cause errors and delays in projects that can prolong the timeline, causing
these projects to go over their time budget. In addition, having to wait for certain team members
to be available due to their schedule can also cause project to run over their time budget. This
can be the main cause of GRD projects running over time. Projects that go over their time budget
can also mean extra costs through resources, such as wages. Although the project must wait for
certain team members to be available, someone may have to be always observing the project.
We have also discovered that there are not enough management tools in place to control a
use a checklist to monitor their project. This is a great way to visualize everything that needs to
get done; however, there should be other tools in place to reduce confusion and further express
what needs to be done, in what time frame, and order. Forty-four percent claimed that they
implement a responsibility matrix as well. This is a great way of showing who needs to complete
which sections of the project, and who they can ask for assistance when needed. Having no
responsibility matrix can cause confusion regarding roles on the project. This combined with
their lack of communication can be the cause of projects being over budget and time. In addition,
36
only thirty-three percent of project managers use a Gantt chart. Every project manager that
creates a responsibility matrix should be making a Gantt chart as well to visualize when sections
of the project need to be completed. This adds certainty and reduces risk throughout a project.
GRDs issue of projects being over schedule could be caused my lack of management tools to
control them.
Another factor that could be influencing GRDs issues could be the numerous software in place to
monitor projects schedules and budgets. Fifty-four percent of project managers use Excel and
thirty-five percent use Microsoft Project to monitor project schedules. Sixty-nine percent use
excel and only thirteen percent use Microsoft Project to monitor project budget. Although these
are great resources for monitoring projects, having various software for projects can increases the
GRD also has sixteen percent of their project managers not implementing a budget plan for their
projects. This is one of our main concerns. Without a budget plan, project managers do not have
an idea of how much they should be spending and how much they have left to spend. This can be
a large factor in twenty-two percent of their projects being over budget. To add, only fifty-six
percent of their project managers utilize a scheduling plan. With this, it is shocking that only
twenty-two percent of project are going over schedule. Not having a scheduling plan can cause
certain sections of a project to run over the time available, pushing other sections behind.
provide progress report to their clients monthly. Seeing as one of their challenges was clients
changing their ideas on projects, only providing them with monthly updates can cause clients to
ask for numerous changes all at once. Scope changes can further push back a project, making it
over schedule. On that note, fifteen percent of managers claimed they provided clients with
37
weekly progress reports. This would reduce the amount of change requested by a client;
however, there are more project managers providing monthly or quarterly progress reports.
Scope change due to a lack of information to the client can be the cause of projects being over
GRD is also not monitoring risk during their project effectively. Only thirty-one percent of project
managers are double checking their work, and only thirty-nine percent develop responses to risks
found in projects. That means that sixty-nine percent of project managers are not double checking
their work to reduce the risk of error. In addition, sixty-one percent of project managers are not
developing responses to the risks found in projects. This lack of risk management can cause major
scope changes that effect the budgets and timelines of projects. To conclude, this can be a major
reason why projects are being completed over budget and over schedule.
After reviewing all the survey results, one of the main themes present is the lack of planning. The
main concern is the lack of budget and schedule planning; however, a change management plan,
communication plan, scope management plan, contingency plan, and a risk management plan are
keys for successful project execution. Another key theme was an issue with communication. This
includes a gap in education levels between project managers, how often they communicate, and
how they communicate. This also includes how often they communicate with their clients. GRD
Corporation should be hiring project managers with roughly the same education levels so there is
a common knowledge regarding best practices. They should know the importance of planning the
projects before execution. Project managers should also be communicating with everyone involved
as much as possible to reduce the risk of errors and major scope changes from clients. These two
38
Recommendations
The first recommendation we have is to create clear and specific project management standards.
This should include the mandatory implementation of a project charter, responsibility matrix,
work breakdown structure, checklist, budget plan, risk management plan, scope management
plan, communication plan, contingency plan, and scheduling plan. This will be measured by
ensuring project managers that they will be evaluated on how many plans are created to reduce
any risk. Senior management will create a Specific Project Management Standards Guide that
states what needs to be completed before a project begins. This will be more time-consuming,
however in the long run GRD projects should be more efficient and organized. This can be
completed within a six-month time frame. This will include the time it takes to meet with all
senior management, look at what plans and tools they would like to implement, and create a
guide for all project managers. This will ensure project managers at GRD know what they need
to complete. The second recommendation is to schedule more frequent meetings with team
members and clients. This includes mandatory weekly meetings with clients as well as team
members. This will be measured through meeting agendas and meeting minutes. These
project managers will be evaluated on how many meetings were conducted. In addition, this can
be added to GRD Corporations Specific Project Management Standards Guide to ensure project
managers know that these documents are mandatory. This will also be quite time-consuming but
ensures everyone knows what their tasks are, and any necessary changes made by the client are
documented. This recommendation can be added to the six-month period given to the creation of
the Specific Project Management Standards Guide, as it should be included in the guide.
39
Our third recommendation is that GRD Corporation implement a certification program. Through
a course provided by GRD, project managers can complete their Project Management
Professional Certification and Project Management Certification for free. The objective is to aid
project managers to further their knowledge and increase their capabilities. GRD Corporation
will measure the success of this program through participation and successful certification rates.
This will be costly and time consuming as this program will be company funded; however,
having unified abilities throughout the company and making sure all project managers have
amplified skill sets will promote successful projects. Each project manager will have six months
to complete both programs and must be completed out of business hours. GRD Corporation has
full discretion on where they should direct their project managers to complete their certification.
This program will take one year for GRD to implement. They will have to find the necessary
funding, where they want to find the courses, and someone to run the program. In addition, they
will also have to promote and advertise these programs to their project managers. The goal of
this program is to have all of GRD Corporation’s project managers complete at least one
certification.
As a consulting firm, we take a profound interest in helping our clients to restore and reach their
maximum potential. With the application of these recommendations, we are confident that the
GRD corporation will benefit from them in the future and find satisfaction in their endeavors.
Recommendations are suggestions for future action(s). What should GRD do to reduce or eliminate the
problems your team has discovered in your analysis? To help you develop your recommendations, think
40
about them as mini projects. What’s the scope? Objectives? Deliverables? Risks? Milestones? Who needs
to do what?
41
References
42
APPENDIX
43
A. If you answered NO, how do you monitor your project’s schedule?
No 6/39 15%
B. If yes, what software are you using? Please select all that apply.
PROFILE
position?
44
1 to 5 years 22/39 56%
6 to 10 years 3/39 8%
management experience
current position?
No 13/39 33%
3. If answered yes to
PM experience do you
have?
45
4. How did you get into
project management?
Number of Resp
Education 11/39
Promotion 3/39
Other 5/39
(Opportunity
(Run own busin
(Had to appl
(Worked with fri
Management
Certificate?
Number of Responses
Yes 16/39
No 23/39
Number of Responses
Yes 8/39
No 31/39
46
7. Is there a promotional
of a higher level?
Number of Responses
Yes 27/39
No 11/39
level of education?
answer)
Number of Respon
Certificate 3/39
Diploma 6/39
Bachelors 18/39
Masters 11/39
Other 1/39
(Grade 10)
SECTION 2: HUMAN
RESOURCES
47
1. How often do you
receive a performance
assessment? Please
Number of
Never 7/
for training
opportunities?
Number of Responses
Yes 34/39
No 2/39
further studies to
increase your
opportunities for
advancement?
Number of Responses
Yes 23/39
48
No 16/39
number 3 is “yes”,
when?
5 years 0/39 0%
package?
Number of Responses
Yes 30/39
No 8/39
49
6. Do you believe your
workload?
Number of Responses
Yes 25/39
No 12/39
positions in other
organizations?
Number of Responses
Yes 29/39
No 6/39
range? (optional)
50
Number of Resp
SECTION 3: PROJECT
PLANNING
Num
Commercial/Industrial Construction
Residential Construction
Government
Information Technology
Engineering
Human Resources
Operations
Event Planning
Consulting
Other
51
(Clinic
(Busi
Digit
(Civ
(Intern
and stud
(Po
(T
(
(Oi
(Re
(Banq
involved in a current
Number of Respo
52
3. Does your company have
Management standards
to follow?
Number of Responses
Yes 17/39
No 22/39
Prince, other?
Number of R
PMI 10/3
Company 2/3
Client 1/3
Provincial Government 1/3
53
project? Please select all
that apply.
Numb
Budget Plan
Procurement Plan
Scheduling Plan
Communication Plan
Contingency Plan
Other
(Ex
(Stakeho
(Sm
(Did
(Was no
project?
Number of Responses
Yes 21/39
No 18/39
54
7. Did you develop a
project?
Number of Responses
Yes 19/39
No 20/39
project?
Number of Responses
Yes 29/39
No 10/39
9. What Project
that apply.
Number of Resp
Checklists 30/39
55
Responsibility Matrix 18/39
WBS 14/39
Flowcharts 17/39
Other 6/39
(Did not speci
(Monday.com
(Raid Logs
(Cost Control sprea
(MS Project
that apply.
Number of Resp
Excel 30/39
Access 2/39
None 1/39
MS Project 15/39
Primavera 3/39
Other 10/39
(Industry spec
application-i.e. Paso
56
(Microsoft Wo
(PowerPoin
(Monday.com
(PowerBI)
(Apple Page
(Tableau, Figm
(Pason EDR
(Jonas Club Manag
(Custom)
(Phone, Daytim
(Sage 100)
constraints on your
that apply.
Number of R
Time 37/3
Scope 18/3
Environmental 13/3
57
12. How are risks identified
Brainstorming 30/39 7
Other 9/39 2
(Third Party Validation)
(No risk)
(Risk analysis)
(At launch)
(Operational Constraints)
(Manager/Team Meeting)
(Time and Quality Control)
stakeholders in the
planning process?
Number of Resp
1 2/39
2 3/39
3 10/39
4 15/39
58
5 9/39
planning to
stakeholders? For
or texting?
Number of R
Email 29/3
Phone 3/3
Meetings 36/3
Letter 1/3
SECTION 4: TEAM
MANAGEMENT
59
1. Did you select the people
team?
Number of Responses
Yes 30/39
No 9/39
A. If you answered
YES to Question
determine who
was going to be
on your team?
Number of
Interviewing 22/3
Experience 8/3
Recommendations 5/3
Skills sets 16/3
B. If you answered
NO to Question 1,
a. Who
selected
60
your
team?
Number
PMO
Management/Supervisor
Functional managers
Project Manager
Project Sponsor
Other
b. How did
they select
the team?
Number of R
Experience 5/3
Work availability 4/3
Expertise 2/3
Number of Respons
Daily 10/39
Weekly 20/39
61
Twice a month 5/39
Monthly 4/39
Quarterly 0/39
Other 0/39
progress reports?
Number of Respons
Daily 4/39
Weekly 19/39
Monthly 10/39
Quarterly 4/39
Other 1/39
(Twice a year)
assignments broken
down?
Number of Respon
Expertise 20/39
62
By time 2/39
Other 1/39
(Capacity to tackle
problem)
of the project?
Number of Responses
Yes 25/39
No 14/39
to Question 5, how
evaluated? Please
explain.
Productivity 20/39 5
Budget 5/39 1
Progress 7/39 1
Results 3/39 8
63
Efficiency 15/39 3
difficult challenges
Number o
Team cohesiveness 11
Communication 18
Personalities 11
Scheduling conflicts 17
Other 3
(Scope and p
SECTION 5: PROJECT
EXECUTION AND
MONITORING
64
2. What challenges do you
that apply.
Number of
Environment 11/
Scheduling 20/
Communication 6/3
Other 1/3
(Conflicting
65
3. What Project
that apply.
Number of Resp
Checklists 30/39
WBS 11/39
Flowcharts 11/39
Other 5/39
(Jira)
(Excel)
(Pivot chart
(Monday)
schedule?
Number of Responses
Yes 31/39
No 8/39
66
B. If yes, what
software are
you using?
Please select
Number of Resp
Excel 21/39
Access 3/39
MS Project 14/39
Primavera 1/39
Other 2/39
(Monday)
Primavera 1/39 3%
67
Number of Responses Response Percentage
Maintenance 3/39 8%
Notebook 1/39 3%
5. What plans do you use to monitor your project? Please select all that apply.
Other 2/39 5%
(Execution plan)
(Tracking)
68
6. How often do you meet with your client?
Daily 2/39 5%
Daily 2/39 5%
Weekly 3/39 8%
Other 2/39 5%
(Biweekly)
(Never)
69
8. How often does your client receive progress reports?
Daily 2/39 5%
Daily 1/39 3%
Other 2/39 5%
(Never)
70
10. How do you handle changes to your project scope?
RFI 2/39 5%
No 8/39 21%
71
13. What does your company do with the assessment? Please select all that apply.
Other 1/39 3%
(Reviewed with project
team)
72
Management approval 17/39 44%
15. How do you know your projects have been successful? Please explain.
73