Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A Physical Argument Against The Use of Small Syringes For Hyaluronic Acid Filler Injections 2020
A Physical Argument Against The Use of Small Syringes For Hyaluronic Acid Filler Injections 2020
Figure 2. Representative case (dynamic forehead). There was no significant difference in clinical efficacy between the 2
sides. (A) Before treatment, (B) 4 weeks after PraBoNT-A injection.
reconstituted form, similar to other BoNT-A products. 5. Alam M, Yoo SS, Wrone DA, White LE, et al. Sterility assessment of
multiple use botulinum A exotoxin vials: a prospective simulation. J Am
However, this study was limited by the small sample Acad Dermatol 2006;55:272–5.
A Physical Argument Against the Use of Small Syringes for Hyaluronic Acid Filler Injections
A growing number of dermatologists claim to inject is a physical law that describes laminar flow of an
soft-tissue filler by backloading smaller 0.3- or 0.5-mL incompressible Newtonian fluid through a hollow
syringes that have built-in 6- or 8-mm 31 G needles cylindrical pipe with a constant circular cross-section
(e.g., BD UltraFine; Becton, Dickinson and Company, substantially longer than its diameter, for example, a
Franklin Lakes, NJ). Irrespective of the risk of bacte- hypodermic needle:
rial contamination, we feel that this technique may
potentially be unsafe, simply on the basis of syringe 8hLQ DPpr4
physics and fluid dynamics. DP 5 or Q 5 ;
pr 4 8hL
Currently available hyaluronic acid filler formulations where DP = hydrostatic pressure gradient between
are gel-like materials that exhibit Newtonian fluid opposing ends of needle; h = dynamic viscosity; L =
behavior during flow out of a syringe, where shear and needle length; Q = volumetric flow rate = volume/time;
viscous stresses are low, maintaining a constant vis- and r = needle radius.
cosity.1 These fillers are considered incompressible
Newtonian fluids, whose density does not change with A decrease in volumetric flow rate effectively decreases
variations in pressure. The Hagen–Poiseuille equation the pressure gradient across the needle. Backloading a
© 2019 by the American Society for Dermatologic Surgery, Inc. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
LETTERS AND COMMUNICATIONS
smaller (0.3 or 0.5 mL) syringe with a high silicone face is more likely to overcome the resistance of
lubricant content could thereby actually enhance distal arterial branches, potentially leading to more
control over flow rate by lowering plunger resistance distal retrograde embolization of filler material.2
and, in turn, limit flow rate and injection pressure.
Given the potential for greater injection pressures with
However, when constant force is applied to the piston the use of these smaller syringes in inexperienced
of a syringe containing an incompressible Newtonian hands, we recommend that they be used with utmost
fluid, injection pressure is inversely proportional to the caution.
square of the piston radius. This is described in the
following equation:
References
1. Ilyin SO, Kulichikhin VG, Malkin AY. The rheological characterisation
F F
P5 5 ; of typical injection implants based on hyaluronic acid for contour
A pr2 correction. Rheol Acta 2016;55:223–33.
© 2019 by the American Society for Dermatologic Surgery, Inc. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.